The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared by the Company and are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at June 30, 2006 and for all periods presented, have been made.
XL FINANCIAL ASSURANCE LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s December 31, 2005 financial statements and notes thereto. The December 31, 2005 condensed balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
The preparation of condensed financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Any such adjustments are reflected in income in the period in which the adjustments are made. The financial statement estimates subject to most uncertainty are estimates for loss reserves and calculation of the fair value of credit default swap derivative instruments.
New Accounting Pronouncements and Developments
In April 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 46(R)-6, Determining the Variability to be Considered in Applying FIN 46(R), which states that the variability to be considered when applying FIN 46(R) should be based on an analysis of the design of an entity which entails analyzing the nature of the risks in the entity and determining the purpose for which the entity was created and determining the variability the entity is designed to create and pass along to its interest holders. Typically, assets and operations of the entity create the variability (and thus are not variable interests), while liabilities and equity interests absorb that variability (and thus, are variable interests). The role of a contract or arrangement in the design of the entity, regardless of its legal form or accounting classification, shall dictate whether that interest should be treated as creating or absorbing variability for the entity. The guidance in this FSP must be applied as of July 1, 2006 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations but will form an important part of the Company’s evaluation of any relevant structures prospectively.
In June 2005, at the request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FASB added a project to their agenda to review and provide guidance for the accounting for financial guaranty insurance contracts under which it will consider claims liability recognition, premium recognition, and the related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs. The Company will continue to apply its current accounting policies as described in its 2005 year-end financial statements until further guidance is provided by the FASB.
4. Derivative Instruments
Credit default swaps reinsured by the Company meet the definition of a derivative under FAS 133. The Company has recorded these products at fair value, modeled on prevailing market conditions and certain other factors relating to the structure and credit quality of the transaction. The Company considers credit default swaps to be, in substance, financial guarantee contracts, as the Company intends to hold them to maturity.
XL FINANCIAL ASSURANCE LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Credit default swaps generally cover a portfolio of securities. In order to effectively price and market the transaction, different tranches are modeled for the purpose of assigning credit ratings based upon the level of subordination. Generally, a primary layer of first loss protection is created with the Company participating in the senior or higher quality-rated tranches of the transaction.
The Company’s exposure is fair valued taking into account changes in credit spreads, current market conditions, as well as the overall credit quality of the underlying collateral.
The Company’s credit default swap portfolio generally requires the Company to meet payment obligations for referenced credits within the portfolio in the event of specific credit events after exhaustion of various first loss protection levels. These credit events are contract specific, but generally cover bankruptcy, failure to pay and repudiation. The credit default swap portfolio consists of structured pools of obligations backed by corporate obligations that were awarded investment-grade ratings at the deals’ inception. The net notional exposure of the credit derivatives portfolio as of June 30, 2006 was $12.9 billion. Approximately 99% and 1% of the portfolio is rated AAA and BBB, respectively. The weighted average term of the contracts in force was 13.69 years. Changes in the fair value of credit default swaps attributable to earnings from premiums received by the Company from the issuance of such contracts are recorded in the line item caption entitled “premium” in the accompanying combined statement of operations. In addition, changes in the fair value of credit default swaps attributable to losses from actual and expected payments to counterparties under such contracts are recorded in the line item caption entitled “net losses and loss adjustment expenses” in the accompanying combined statement of operations, and the remaining components of the change in fair value of credit defaults swaps, which are attributable to the market and other factors discussed above, are recorded in the line item caption entitled “net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on credit derivatives” in the accompanying combined statement of operations. This presentation is applicable only to credit default swaps issued by the Company that it has the intent and ability to hold to maturity and is consistent with practices in the financial guaranty insurance industry for reporting the results of such instruments.
In terms of the 2006 and 2005 condensed financial statements, the impact of credit default swaps is outlined as follows:
| Unaudited | | | Unaudited |
| Three months ended June 30, | | | Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
| |
|
| 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Income Statement | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net earned premiums | 4,924 | | | 7,642 | | | 9,780 | | | 11,535 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net losses and loss expenses | 1,231 | | | 1,911 | | | 2,445 | | | 2,885 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on credit default swaps | (769 | ) | | (853 | ) | | (3,042 | ) | | 2,001 |
XL FINANCIAL ASSURANCE LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | (Unaudited) | |
| | As at | |
| |
| |
| | June 30, | | December 31, | |
Balance Sheet | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| |
| |
| |
Assets | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Derivative assets – credit default swaps | | $ | 10,789 | | $ | 13,482 | |
| | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Derivative liabilities – credit default swaps | | | 350 | | | — | |
In addition to the credit derivatives, the Company reinsures interest rate swaps indirectly as part of financial guarantee reinsurance of XLCA. The swap portion of these insurance contracts is required to be measured and recorded at fair value. The valuation methodology comprises of a mark to model approach that measures the change in expected loss. The expected loss is driven by the valuation of the underlying derivative, the default probability of the underlying obligor and the expected recovery rate on the underlying asset class. These amounts are included in “Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments”. During the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 the Company recorded an unrealized gain on these interest rate swaps of $1,571 and an unrealized loss of $2,773, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 the Company recorded an unrealized gain on $1,182 and an unrealized loss of $2,773, respectively on these interest rate swaps.
The Company is also party to a put option agreement and an asset trust expense reimbursement agreement with Twin Reefs Asset Trust (the “Asset Trust”). The put option agreement provides The Company with the irrevocable right to require the Asset Trust at any time and from time to time to purchase the Company’s non-cumulative perpetual Series B Preferred Shares with an aggregate liquidation preference of up to $200 million. The Company is obligated to reimburse the Asset Trust for certain fees and ordinary expenses. To the extent that any Series B Preferred Shares are put to the Asset Trust and remain outstanding, a corresponding portion of such fees and ordinary expenses will be payable by the Company pursuant to the asset trust expense reimbursement agreement. The put option agreement is perpetual but would terminate on delivery of notice by the Company on or after December 10, 2009, or under certain defined circumstances, such as the failure of the Company to pay the put option premium when due or bankruptcy. The put option is recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in “Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments”. For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 the fair value adjustment was $3 and $17 increase to income. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 the fair value adjustment was a $4 decrease and a $2 increase to income. Put option premiums for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $626 and $465, respectively. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 put option premiums were $1,201 and $1,069 respectively.
5. Reinsurance
The effect of reinsurance on premiums written and earned for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is shown below:
| | Assumed | | Ceded | | Net |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2006 | | | | | | | | | |
Premium written | | $ | 96,636 | | $ | (5,373 | ) | $ | 91,263 |
Premium earned | | | 58,835 | | | (9,176 | ) | | 49,659 |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses | | | 2,734 | | | (264 | ) | | 2,470 |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 | | | | | | | | | |
Premium written | | $ | 75,958 | | $ | (7,366 | ) | $ | 68,592 |
Premium earned | | | 36,416 | | | (6,729 | ) | | 29,687 |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses | | | 20,928 | | | (10,146 | ) | | 10,782 |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 | | | | | | | | | |
Premium written | | $ | 170,456 | | $ | (11,953 | ) | $ | 158,503 |
Premium earned | | | 101,597 | | | (16,484 | ) | | 85,113 |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses | | | 6,964 | | | (810 | ) | | 6,154 |
XL FINANCIAL ASSURANCE LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Six months ended June 30, 2005 | | | | | | | | | | |
Premium written | | $ | 119,011 | | $ | (16,948 | ) | | $ | 102,063 |
Premium earned | | | 70,303 | | | (12,156 | ) | | | 58,147 |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses | | | 23,882 | | | (12,534 | ) | | | 11,348 |
6. Unpaid losses and loss expenses
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
| | As at and for the | | As at and for the | |
(U.S. dollars in thousands) | | Six Months Ended | | Twelve Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Case | | Unallocated | | | | | Case | | Unallocated | | | | |
| | reserves | | reserves | | Total | | reserves | | reserves | | | Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Unpaid losses and loss expenses at beginning of year | | $ | 64,746 | | $ | 69,298 | | $ | 134,044 | | $ | 50,810 | | $ | 58,341 | | $ | 109,151 | |
Unpaid losses and loss expenses recoverable | | | (52,316 | ) | | (14,078 | ) | | (66,394 | ) | | (42,151 | ) | | (13,290 | ) | | (55,441 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net unpaid losses and loss expenses at beginning of year | | | 12,430 | | | 55,220 | | | 67,650 | | | 8,659 | | | 45,051 | | | 53,710 | |
Increase (decrease) in net losses and loss expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
incurred in respect of losses occurring in: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current year | | | - | | | 4,295 | | | 4,295 | | | - | | | 10,169 | | | 10,169 | |
Prior years | | | 1,859 | | | - | | | 1,859 | | | 6,683 | | | - | | | 6,683 | |
Less net losses and loss expenses paid | | | (1,390 | ) | | | | | (1,390 | ) | | (2,912 | ) | | | | | (2,912 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net unpaid losses and loss expenses at end of period | | | 12,899 | | | 59,515 | | | 72,414 | | | 12,430 | | | 55,220 | | | 67,650 | |
Unpaid losses and loss expenses recoverable | | | 52,345 | | | 14,858 | | | 67,203 | | | 52,316 | | | 14,078 | | | 66,394 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Unpaid losses and loss expenses at end of period | | $ | 65,244 | | $ | 74,373 | | $ | 139,617 | | $ | 64,746 | | $ | 69,298 | | $ | 134,044 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| a. | During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a provision for losses of approximately $42.1 million representing the present value of losses expected to be incurred in the future with respect to an insured project financing, which the Company reinsured under its facultative quota share reinsurance treaty with XLCA (see Note 2) As this loss represented a full limit loss to the subordinated tranche of the insured transaction, the remaining unearned premium pertaining to such tranche, which aggregated approximately $23.3 million, was fully earned resulting in a net loss, before reinsurance, of approximately $18.8 million. The portion of the insured exposure to which this loss relates was fully reinsured on a first loss basis by an affiliate of the Company and, accordingly, there was no net impact on the Company’s results of operations from this loss provision. |
|
| | During 2005, the Company recorded an additional provision for loss relating to this transaction of $13.5 million ($5.6 million after reinsurance to affiliates), on a net present value basis to reflect certain adverse developments. There has been no further development in such loss reserve through June 30, 2006. The total remaining par insured by the Company in connection with this transaction, which amortizes over the next 12 years, aggregated approximately $203.5 million ($121.7 million net of reinsurance to affiliates) at June 30, 2006. The estimate of loss was necessarily based on assumptions and estimates extending over many years into the future. There is currently no payment default with respect to this transaction. Management continues to monitor the exposure and will revise its loss estimate if necessary, as new information becomes available. Pursuant to the assumptions upon which the estimate was based, under its existing reinsurance arrangements, approximately 59.8% of any additional loss provision in excess of the amount currently provided will be retained by the Company. |
|
XL FINANCIAL ASSURANCE LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| b. | In 2005, the Company recorded funds withheld of $15.9 million pursuant to its Treaty with XLCA in respect of notes (the “Insured Notes”) issued pursuant to a structured financing of loans to medical providers, which were insured in 2001, and which defaulted upon their maturity. In December 2005, XLCA received a claim notice from the trustee on behalf of the holders of such insured notes in the amount of $20.2 million, representing the outstanding principal of the Insured Notes plus accrued interest thereon at the date of default (the “Claim Amount”). Pursuant to the terms of the insurance arrangement, XLCA had the option of satisfying the claim by either paying, in cash, the Claim Amount to the holders of the Insured Notes or purchasing the Insured Notes from such holders for an amount, in cash, equal to the Claim Amount. XLCA elected to purchase the Insured Notes in satisfaction of the claim. The purchase of the Insured Notes was recorded as an investment on XLCA’s balance sheet at an estimated fair value of $19.5 million. The difference between the estimated fair value and the consideration paid to acquire the Insured Notes was recorded as a net paid loss of $0.1 million. Pursuant to the Treaty, XLCA’s purchase of the Insured Notes was in furtherance of defending or compromising a claim and, accordingly, XLCA billed the Company for its share of the cost of purchasing the notes and received consideration from the Company in satisfaction thereof of $17.6 million. Subsequent to the purchase of the Insured Notes, a principal payment was received by XLCA thereon in the amount of $1.7 million, which reduced the funds withheld balance to $15.9 million. The Company was also billed $0.6 million for its share of the initial loss which is reflected in “Net losses and loss adjustment expenses”. |
|
| | The estimate of fair value of the Insured Notes was based on XLCA’s estimate of the fair value of the underlying collateral which, as previously discussed, consisted of loans to medical providers. Certain of these loans were made to Intrepid USA Inc. and certain of its affiliates (“Intrepid”), a national provider of home nursing services to patients with acute illnesses. Intrepid declared bankruptcy in 2004. On February 3, 2006, Intrepid emerged from bankruptcy and in connection therewith, XLCA accepted preferred stock of Intrepid in exchange for the cancellation of a portion of the Insured Notes. This preferred stock is in-substance common stock, as defined in EITF 02- 14,Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other Than Common Stock, and represented a 49% ownership interest in Intrepid. In connection with, and critical to, Intrepid’s emergence from bankruptcy was certain exit financing obtained by Intrepid. Pursuant to the terms of the related credit agreement, Intrepid must achieve certain financial targets over certain periods of time. In certain cases, if such targets are not met, the provider of such financing may foreclose on all ownership interest in Intrepid. If the provider of the financing foreclosed on all ownership interest in Intrepid, XLCA expects that it would be required to completely write-off the carrying value of this investment and, accordingly, XLFA would incur a loss equal to its proportionate share thereof under its reinsurance arrangement with XLCA. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, XLCA received a return of principal of $0.5 million and recognized an other than temporary impairment charge on its investment in Intrepid and the remaining Insured Notes which aggregated $4.9 million. Of these amounts, XLFA received $0.4 million of the funds withheld and reinsured $4.5 million of the loss which is reflected as an other than temporary impairment charge and included in net realized losses on investments in the accompanying condensed statement of income. As a result of the impairment charge the funds held balance referred to above was reduced to $4.9 million at March 31, 2006. |
|
| | In June 2006, in recognition of the challenges facing Intrepid in achieving the aforementioned financial targets for the period ended June 30, 2006, XLCA and other equity holder’s and creditors in Intrepid, negotiated an agreement in principle to effect a restructuring of Intrepid’s capitalization. |
|
XL FINANCIAL ASSURANCE LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(UNAUDITED)
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | Pursuant to the restructuring, XLCA’s ownership interest in Intrepid will be reduced from 49% to 12.4% . In addition, at June 30, 2006, XLCA recognized an impairment charge of approximately $9.0 million ($0.9 million, net of reinsurance to XLFA) on its investment in Intrepid reflecting management’s best estimate of the value of such investment at that date, which considered the aforementioned restructuring and an updated forecast of Intrepid’s expected future operating performance, as well as a valuation of XLCA’s investment in Intrepid by an outside valuation consulting firm. At June 30, 2006, XLCA’s carrying value of the Insured Notes and preference shares in Intrepid were $1.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of which the Company bears 90% of the risks and rewards of ownership. |
| | |
| c. | During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recorded a provision for loss of $4.3 million ($2.5 million after reinsurance) representing the present value loss expected to be incurred in the future with respect to an insured residential mortgage securitization insured by XLCA. There has been no development in such loss reserve since its initial establishment through June 30, 2006. The total remaining par reinsured by the Company in connection with this transaction aggregated approximately $176.6 million ($104.3 million net of reinsurance) at June 30, 2006. The underlying insured par amortizes over many years into the future. Accordingly, the estimate of loss was necessarily based on assumptions and estimates extending over many years into the future.There is currently no payment default with respect to this transaction. Management continues to monitor the exposure and will revise its loss estimate as n ecessary, as new information becomes available. |
| | |
7. Insured Exposure in Geographic Area Impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
As at June 30, 2006, the Company’s had reinsured principal exposure of $298.9 million for the credits located in the Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas counties designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for “Individual and Public Assistance” (excluding counties designated to receive only Category A: Debris Removal and Category B: Emergency Protective Measures) as at June 30, 2006 as a result of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Such exposure consists solely of guaranteed public finance exposures. The Company has no direct exposure to the City of New Orleans or to any other issuer located in such City. The Company’s asset-backed transactions are backed by pools of geographically diverse assets with minimal concentration in the areas affected. As at June 30, 2006, the Company has not been notified of any claims associated with Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane Rita. In addition, based on the Company’s assessment of its exposures in the affected areas and all related available information, it has not established any reserves at such date. As additional information becomes available, the Company will assess the need for reserves and make provision therefore as considered necessary.