Product sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010, increased 43.6% to $659,000 compared to $459,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Product sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, increased 44.4% to $2,169,000 compared to $1,502,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increases in both periods were primarily due to higher sales of laser printer supplies based on increased demand for these products from one of our customers.
Gross profit from our POPSign program revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010, increased 6.5% to $4,258,000 compared to $3,999,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Gross profit from our POPSign program revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, increased 11.4% to $11,039,000 compared to $9,910,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increases in both 2010 periods were primarily due to increased sales which were partially offset by increased retailer expenses. Gross profit as a percentage of POPSign program revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010, increased to 54.2% compared to 53.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in the 2010 period was primarily due to increased sales partially offset by increased retailer expense. Gross profit as a percentage of POPSign program revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, decreased to 53.7%, compared to 53.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of POPSign program revenues in the 2010 period was primarily due to the effect of increased retailer expenses.
Gross profit from our product sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010, increased 63.2% to $217,000 compared to $133,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Gross profit from our product sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, increased 51.3% to $711,000 compared to $470,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increases in gross profit in both 2010 periods were primarily due to increased sales combined with fixed costs. Gross profit as a percentage of product sales increased to 32.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 29.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Gross profit as a percentage of product sales increased to 32.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 31.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increases in gross profit as a percentage of products sales in the 2010 periods were primarily due to increased sales and the effect of fixed costs.
Table of Contents
Selling expenses as a percentage of total net sales increased to 23.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 22.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Selling expenses as a percentage of total net sales decreased to 23.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 24.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The changes in the selling expenses as a percentage of total net sales in the 2010 periods were due to the effect of the increased costs discussed above in combination with the effect of increased sales.
Marketing.Marketing expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010, increased 9.7% to $429,000 compared to $391,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, increased 9.8% to $1,235,000 compared to $1,125,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Increased expenses in the 2010 periods were primarily the result of increased data acquisition expenses and increased staffing related expenses.
Marketing expenses as a percentage of total net sales increased to 5.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 4.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in marketing expense as a percentage of total net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010, was the result of the increased expenses discussed above in relation to increased sales. Marketing expenses as a percentage of total net sales decreased to 5.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 5.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in marketing expenses as a percentage of total net sales for the nine months ending September 30, 2010, was the result of the increased expenses discussed above in relation to increased sales.
General and administrative.General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010, increased 17.8% to $1,146,000 compared to $973,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased 16.2% to $4,001,000 compared to $3,442,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increases in the 2010 periods were primarily due to increased staffing levels and increased legal expense.
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total net sales increased to 13.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 12.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total net sales increased to 17.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 17.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increases in the 2010 periods were primarily due to the increased costs discussed above in relation to increased sales.
Legal fees for the three months ended September 30, 2010, were $288,000 compared to $250,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Legal fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, were $1,377,000 compared to $1,309,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The legal fees and expenses in each period were incurred primarily in connection with the News America lawsuit described in Note 2 to the financial statements. We currently expect the amount of additional legal fees and expenses that will be incurred in connection with the ongoing lawsuit to be significant throughout the remainder of 2010, and into 2011 as trial preparation continues and the trial is conducted. A negative outcome of this litigation could affect long-term competitive aspects of the Company’s business.
Insurance settlement proceeds.The Company received a payment of $1,387,000 in the first quarter of 2009 from an insurer as part of a settlement of the Company’s claim that the insurer owed the Company defense costs for claims asserted against the Company and one of its officers in the News America litigation.
Other Income.Interest income was offset by interest expense resulting in the Company reporting no other income for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to other income of $20,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, was $16,000 compared to $69,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Lower other income in the 2010 periods was primarily due to decreased interest income in the 2010 periods as a result of lower interest rates which more than offset the higher cash, cash equivalent and short-term investment balances in the 2010 periods.
13
Table of Contents
Income Taxes.The Company carried a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset at both September 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009. The Company did not record income tax expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, due to the combination of the full valuation allowance and the lack of taxable income for the period. The Company recorded income tax expense of $26,000 and $62,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, related to alternative minimum tax liability. The valuation allowance has been established due to uncertainties regarding the realization of deferred tax assets. The Company updates its deferred tax asset and valuation allowance analysis quarterly to confirm the appropriateness of its valuation allowance.
Net Income. Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2010, was $932,000 compared to $986,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, was $1,151,000 compared to $2,413,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has financed its operations with proceeds from public and private stock sales and sales of its services and products. At September 30, 2010, working capital was $12,345,000 compared to $10,716,000 at December 31, 2009. During the first nine months of 2010, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased by $640,000 to $12,557,000 at September 30, 2010, as compared to $13,197,000 at December 31, 2009. The decrease in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments was primarily the result of timing of accounts receivable collections.
Net cash used in operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, was $516,000. Net income of $1,151,000 plus non-cash expense of $806,000 totaling $1,957,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, were more than offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $2,473,000. The non-cash expense of $806,000 consisted of stock-based compensation expense and depreciation expense. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased $883,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of amounts due to our strategic partner. Accounts receivable increased $2,541,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the timing of accounts receivable collections, and higher POPSign billings in the last month of the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the last month of the fourth quarter of 2009. Deferred revenue decreased $501,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to the advanced billing to a customer in June 2009 for an eleven month POPSign program in addition to other advanced billings. The Company expects accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred revenue to fluctuate during 2010 depending on the level of quarterly POPSign revenues and related business activity as well as billing arrangements with customers.
Net cash of $1,532,000 was provided by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, due to short-term investment activity which was partially offset by the purchase of property and equipment. Purchases of short-term investments of $3,800,000 and proceeds of $5,700,000 during the nine months consisted entirely of purchases and redemptions of twenty-six week certificates of deposit. Purchases of property and equipment totaled $368,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Net cash of $244,000 was provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Net proceeds of $713,000 resulting from the issuance of common stock from the employee stock purchase plan and the employee stock option plan were partially offset by the repurchase of common stock of $469,000 pursuant to a plan adopted on February 23, 2010. The stock repurchase plan allows for the repurchase of up to $2,000,000 of the Company’s common stock on or before January 31, 2011.
14
Table of Contents
The Company believes that based upon current business conditions, its existing cash balance and future cash from operations will be sufficient for its cash requirements in the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurances that this will occur or that the Company will be able to secure additional financing from public or private stock sales or from other financing agreements if needed.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the annual financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2010. We believe our most critical accounting policies and estimates include the following:
| | |
| • | revenue recognition; |
| • | allowance for doubtful accounts; |
| • | accounting for deferred income taxes; and |
| • | stock-based compensation. |
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Statements made in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, in the Company’s other SEC filings, in press releases and in oral statements to shareholders and securities analysts, which are not statements of historical or current facts, are “forward-looking statements.” Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results or performance of the Company to be materially different from the results or performance expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “seeks” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. These statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and updated in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
| |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Not applicable.
| |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in these reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Office and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosures.
15
Table of Contents
(b) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
On September 23, 2004, the Company brought suit against News America Marketing In-Store, Inc. (News America) and Albertson’s Inc. (Albertson’s) in Federal District Court in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for violations of federal and state antitrust and false advertising laws, alleging that News America has acquired and maintained monopoly power through various wrongful acts designed to harm the Company in the in-store advertising and promotion products and services market. The suit seeks injunctive relief sufficient to prevent further antitrust injury and an award of treble damages to be determined at trial for the harm caused to the Company. On September 20, 2006, the State of Minnesota through its Attorney General intervened as a co-plaintiff in the business disparagement portion of the case. In December 2006, News America filed counterclaims in the case that included claims of alleged interference with contracts and alleged libel and slander against Insignia and one of its officers. On February 4, 2008, the Court approved a consent decree entered into by News America and the State of Minnesota under which News America agreed to not violate Minnesota’s statutes prohibiting commercial disparagement. On July 29, 2008, the Company and Albertson’s entered into a settlement agreement and mutual release, in which they each agreed to release all claims against the other, and the Company agreed to dismiss its lawsuit against Albertson’s.
On September 30, 2009, the Court ruled on motions by both the Company and News America for Summary Judgment. The Court awarded Summary Judgment to the Company and one of its executive officers on all of News America’s counterclaims and third-party claims. The Court also denied News America’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Company’s claims against News America other than granting News America’s uncontested motion on one claim in the Amended Complaint related to retailers. The Court’s rulings set the stage for a trial on the Company’s antitrust and unfair-competition claims against News America. The Company received a revised scheduling order on October 22, 2010, which sets January 3, 2011, as the starting date for the trial.
The Company filed claims in December 2006 and January 2007 with its director’s and officer’s liability and general liability insurers related to the defense costs and insurance coverage for claims asserted against the Company and one of its officers in News America’s counterclaims. On August 9, 2007, the Company filed a complaint against the insurers in Hennepin County District Court, State of Minnesota requesting a declaratory judgment that the insurers owed the Company and its officer such defense costs and insurance coverage. In December 2007, the Company settled its claim against one of the insurers. In March 2009, the Company settled with the other insurer and received a payment of $1,387,000 as part of the settlement. The Company recorded the payment in general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and the litigation with the insurers is finished.
16
Table of Contents
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company incurred legal fees of $1,188,000 related to the News America litigation. Management currently expects the amount of legal fees and expenses that will be incurred in connection with the ongoing lawsuit against News America to be significant throughout the remainder of 2010 and into 2011 as trial preparation continues and the trial is conducted. A negative outcome of this litigation could affect long-term competitive aspects of the Company’s business. Legal fees and expenses are expensed as incurred and are included in general and administrative expenses in the statements of operations.
The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings in the normal course of business. Management believes the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Set forth below is an update to one of the Risk Factors contained in our report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009:
We Are Dependent On Our Contracts With Retailers And Our Ability To Renew Those Contracts When Their Terms Expire
On an ongoing basis, we negotiate renewals of various retailer contracts. Some of our retailer contracts require us to guarantee minimum payments to our retailers. If we are unable to offer guarantees at the required levels in the new contracts, and the contracts are not renewed because of that or because of other reasons, it could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.
Our POPS business and results of operations could be adversely affected if the number of retailer partners decreases significantly or if the retailer partners fail to continue to provide good service including performing their duties in placing and maintaining POPSigns at the shelf-edge in their stores and providing product movement data to us.
Our current contract with The Kroger Co. will expire on December 31, 2010, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
17
Table of Contents
| |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
On February 23, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $2,000,000 of the Company’s common stock on or before January 31, 2011. The plan does not obligate the Company to repurchase any particular number of shares, and may be suspended at any time at the Company’s discretion.
Our share repurchase program activity for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Number Of Shares Repurchased | | Average Price Paid Per Share | | Total Number Of Shares Purchased As Part Of Publicly Announced Plans Or Programs | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under The Plans Or Programs | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 1-31, 2010 | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | $ | 1,535,000 | |
August 1-31, 2010 | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | $ | 1,535,000 | |
September 1-30, 2010 | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | $ | 1,535,000 | |
| |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
| |
None. | |
| |
Item 4. | Removed and Reserved |
| |
None. | |
| |
Item 5. | Other Information |
| |
None. | |
| |
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The following exhibits are included herewith:
| | |
| 31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
| | |
| 31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
| | |
| 32 | Section 1350 Certification |
18
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| |
Dated: November 5, 2010 | Insignia Systems, Inc. |
| (Registrant) |
| |
| /s/ Scott F. Drill |
| Scott F. Drill |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (principal executive officer) |
| |
| /s/ Justin W. Shireman |
| Justin W. Shireman |
| Vice President, Finance and |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| (principal financial officer) |
19
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | |
| 31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
| | |
| 31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
| | |
| 32 | Section 1350 Certification |
20