Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| x | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012
OR
| ¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number: 1-15449
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| LOUISIANA | 72-0693290 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1333 South Clearview Parkway Jefferson, Louisiana | 70121 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (504) 729-1400
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Title of each Class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| Class A Common Stock, No Par Value | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||
| Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company.) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ | |||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of April 30, 2012 was approximately $471,000,000.
The number of shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock, no par value per share, and Class B common stock, no par value per share, outstanding as of November 30, 2012, was 81,234,091 and 3,555,020, respectively.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the proxy statement in connection with the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated in Part III of this Report.
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
2
Table of Contents
Cautionary Note
This annual report contains forward-looking statements that are generally identifiable through the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “will” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements rely on assumptions, estimates and predictions that could be inaccurate and that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. Important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements include those described in “Risk Factors” Item 1A. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise such statements to reflect new circumstances or unanticipated events as they occur.
Operations
Founded in 1910, Stewart Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) is the second largest provider of funeral and cemetery products and services in the death care industry in the United States. Through our subsidiaries, we provide a complete range of funeral and cremation merchandise and services, along with cemetery property, merchandise and services, both at the time of need and on a preneed basis. As of October 31, 2012, our operations included 217 funeral homes and 141 cemeteries in 24 states within the United States and in Puerto Rico.
General. We believe that we operate one or more of the premier death care facilities in each of our principal markets, which are primarily in larger metropolitan areas in the Southern, Western, Mid-Atlantic and Mid-Western states. In our view, a “premier” facility is one that is among the most highly regarded facilities in its market area in terms of a number of factors such as tradition, heritage, reputation, physical size, volume of business, available inventory, name recognition, aesthetics and/or potential for development or expansion. While funeral homes and cemeteries in the United States perform an average of approximately 130 funerals and 140 burials per year, our facilities perform an average of approximately 250 funerals and 320 burials per year. In addition, approximately 42 percent of our properties are located in California, Florida and Texas, which are three of the four states with the highest populations over age 65, an age group that represents a large portion of our target market.
We operate most of our funeral homes and cemeteries in “clusters.” Clusters are groups of funeral homes and cemeteries located close enough to one another that their operations can be integrated to achieve economies of scale. For example, clustered facilities can share vehicles, embalming services, crematories, inventories of merchandise and, most significantly, personnel, including preparation and prearrangement sales personnel; thus, we are able to reduce our costs and expand our sales and marketing effectiveness at each location. By virtue of their proximity to one another, clustered facilities also create opportunities for more integrated and sophisticated management.
Funeral operations. Our funeral homes offer a complete range of funeral and cremation services and products both at the time of need and on a preneed basis. Our services and products include family consultation, removal and preparation of remains, the use of funeral home facilities for visitation, worship and funeral services, transportation services, flowers and caskets. Most of our funeral homes have a non-denominational chapel on the premises, which allows family visitation and religious services to take place at the same location. We also earn commissions on the sale of insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts that will be funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third party insurers when we act as an agent on the sale of the policies. Funeral operations accounted for 55 percent of our revenues for fiscal year 2012.
Cemetery operations. Our cemetery operations sell cemetery property and related merchandise, including lots, lawn crypts, family and community mausoleums, monuments, markers and burial vaults, and also provide burial site openings and closings and inscriptions. We also provide cremation memorialization options including columbariums, cremation niches and cremation gardens. Cemetery property and merchandise sales are made both at the time of need and on a preneed basis. We also maintain cemetery grounds under cemetery perpetual care
3
Table of Contents
contracts and local laws. Cemetery operations accounted for approximately 45 percent of our revenues for fiscal year 2012, which is a significantly larger percentage than either of our two largest competitors. We believe this is a competitive advantage because families generally return to the same cemetery for multiple generations to bury family members, and the barriers to entry for cemeteries are significant. Cemetery property often becomes an important part of a family’s heritage, and family members who relocate are often returned to their home cemetery to be buried. We build on our relationships with our cemetery customers by offering additional cemetery property to family members and by offering related products and services such as cemetery merchandise and funeral services at one of our funeral homes located either on the cemetery grounds or nearby. Approximately 38 percent of our total cemetery acreage is available for future development.
Combination funeral home and cemetery operations. Approximately 48 percent of our cemeteries have a funeral home onsite that is operated in conjunction with the cemetery, which we refer to as a combination operation. We believe combination operations represent a competitive advantage because they offer families the convenience of complete death care services at a single location. A family that is planning a burial in one of our cemeteries often perceives our onsite funeral home to be a more desirable location for funeral services than an unaffiliated offsite funeral home nearby. Thus, the call volume of the funeral home is enhanced by the heritage of the cemetery, and, over time, the volume of cemetery events increases as well. In addition, combination operations enhance our purchasing power, enable us to employ more sophisticated management systems and allow us to share facilities, equipment and personnel, including a preneed sales force, resulting in lower average operating costs and expanded marketing and sales opportunities. As a result, our combination operations usually generate higher operating margins compared to our stand-alone funeral homes and cemeteries. In addition to our combination operations, approximately 36 percent of our non-combination cemeteries are located within the same market as, and operated in conjunction with, one or more of our nearby funeral homes.
Third-party affiliations.We have entered into various agreements with faith-based organizations, other non-profit entities and municipalities and are continuing to pursue more of these types of affiliations. In 1987, we entered into an agreement with the Catholic Archdiocese of New Orleans pursuant to which we constructed and own a mausoleum on one of our cemeteries, and the Archdiocese of New Orleans assists in the promotion of the sale of crypts in the mausoleum to its parishioners. The Company pays the Archdiocese of New Orleans a percentage of the revenue from the sale of all crypts in the mausoleum. Additionally, in fiscal year 1994, we constructed a funeral home and mausoleum on the grounds of the New Orleans Cemetery of the Firemen’s Charitable and Benevolent Association, a non-profit organization. We own and operate the funeral home and mausoleum.
In 1997, we entered into lease agreements with the Archdiocese of Los Angeles pursuant to which we constructed and now operate six funeral homes on the sites of cemeteries owned and operated by the Archdiocese. The leases, which we account for as operating leases, expire in 2039, and we do not have an option to renew. In October 2007, we further expanded our relationship with the Archdiocese of Los Angeles and entered into a contract to manage the preneed sales at eleven of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles cemeteries.
During fiscal year 2009, we entered into a third-party agreement and a 30 year lease, with no option to renew, with a municipality in Texas where we constructed and operate a funeral home on the municipally-owned cemetery. This agreement and the other third-party agreements provide us with many of the benefits of a combination operation without the capital outlay and business risks associated with purchasing or developing a new cemetery.
We have a mausoleum construction and sales business, Acme Mausoleum Corporation (“ACME”), which constructs community mausoleums on third-party cemetery property and assists in the selling efforts for these crypts, primarily in Louisiana and Texas. In return for these services, ACME receives construction revenue and a sales commission for the crypts sold. Over the last 50 years, ACME has developed relationships with the Catholic Church in approximately 70 dioceses across 39 states.
Preneed arrangements. We believe that we are distinguished from many of our competitors by our strong emphasis on, and more than 60-year history of experience with, preneed sales. Preneed plans enable families to specify in advance and prepay for cemetery property and funeral and cemetery products and services. Some of these preneed sales are funded by insurance arrangements and some by trust and escrow accounts. We market our preneed properties, products and services through a full-time staff of approximately 900 family service and preneed
4
Table of Contents
specialists. We estimate that as of October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, the future value of our preneed backlog of funeral and cemetery products and services represented approximately $1.8 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively, of revenue to be recognized in the future as these prepaid products and services are delivered. Our methods for calculating the future value of our preneed backlog are discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7.
In April 2012, after a comprehensive evaluation of our approach to sales, we announced a restructuring of our preneed sales force, with goals of providing more effective sales management and better opportunities for our sales counselors, and reducing turnover. By accomplishing these goals, we believe the customer experience will improve and lead to improving sales volume. We eliminated layers of sales management and redefined our sales roles. We created the position of vice president of sales effectiveness, and promoted one of our experienced sales executives to work with our managers to improve sales strategies, mentoring, training and recruiting. In December 2012, we will complete the restructuring by instituting a new compensation structure for our customer-facing sales force. The combined effect of this restructuring has been projected to reduce costs by approximately $5 million on an annual basis.
Our expertise in preneed sales has historically developed out of, and now complements, our strong cemetery operations. This is because cemetery property, such as a burial plot, is usually the first purchase a family will make when considering preneed arrangements. We build on our relationships with our preneed cemetery property customers by offering them additional preneed products and services such as cemetery merchandise and funeral services. Our focus on preneed cemetery property sales is also important because these sales generate current revenues and higher current cash flows than other types of preneed sales.
Trusts and escrow accounts. Because preneed services or merchandise will be provided in the future, most states require that all or a portion of the customer payments under preneed contracts be placed into trust accounts. Generally, the earnings on and principal of the amounts placed in trust are not withdrawn until the underlying service or merchandise is delivered. In addition, pursuant to cemetery perpetual care contracts and laws, a portion, generally between 10 percent and 15 percent, of the proceeds from cemetery property sales (interment rights) is deposited into perpetual care trusts. The income from these trusts is used to defray the cost of maintenance of those cemeteries, but principal, including in some jurisdictions net realized capital gains, must generally be held in perpetuity. Accordingly, we maintain three types of trusts and escrow accounts: (1) preneed funeral merchandise and services, (2) preneed cemetery merchandise and services and (3) cemetery perpetual care. Differing state laws govern preneed sales, including matters such as required deposits, permitted withdrawals and customers’ rights regarding contract cancellation, and generally require prudent investment of trust assets. Because of our focus on preneed sales and related trusting activities that accompany selling preneed, our business is impacted by changes in financial markets. For a discussion of the impact of financial market conditions on our trusts and related financial results, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A. In addition, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7 and Notes 4, 5 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
We believe that the balances in our trusts and escrow accounts, along with expected future earnings on the balances, insurance proceeds and installment payments under contracts will be sufficient to cover our estimated cost of providing the related preneed services and merchandise in the future. For additional information, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7.
Generally, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Investors Trust, Inc. (“ITI”), a Texas corporation with trust powers, serves as investment advisor for our preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trust and escrow accounts (“preneed trusts”) and our cemetery perpetual care trusts and escrow accounts. ITI provides investment advisory services for a fee based on the market value of the assets in the trust. Under state trust laws, we are allowed to charge the trusts a fee for managing the investment of the trust assets. We have elected to perform these services in-house, and the fees are recognized as income as the services are provided. For additional information, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. ITI is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. As of October 31, 2012, ITI managed assets with a market value of approximately $854.1 million. Lawrence B. Hawkins, one of our executive officers and a professional investment manager, serves as President of ITI. The Investment Committee of our Board of Directors has adopted an investment policy statement that provides guidance on asset allocation and
5
Table of Contents
investment quality requirements, emphasizes diversification and balances long-term growth objectives with the need for current income. The long-term objectives are to preserve principal while seeking appropriate levels of current income and capital appreciation in order to provide returns that match inflation plus a reasonable return. For additional information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7.
Personalization. Our market research indicates that consumer preferences are shifting towards more personalized memorial services and merchandise for traditional burials as well as cremations. In response to these changing preferences, we trained our employees interacting with preneed and at-need customers company-wide to be more proficient in their ability to offer our customers a broad range of options, stressing our ability to design a personalized service that reflects the special interests and accomplishments of the deceased. We also changed the way our product offerings are displayed at our locations, making it easier for our customers to appreciate the many options available to them. We implemented a custom funeral planning program in all of our funeral homes and refresh the process periodically in order to keep our professionals up-to-date on our wider selection of merchandise and services. We hope through this program to provide greater value to our families, leading to higher revenue per event and improved customer satisfaction.
Enhanced cremation offerings. A significant trend in the United States is an increasing preference of consumers for cremation. In fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010, 43 percent, 43 percent and 42 percent, respectively, of the funeral services we performed in our operations were cremations. According to industry estimates, 41 percent of funeral services in the United States during 2010 resulted in cremations, and cremations are expected to represent 57 percent of funeral services in the United States by the year 2025. All of our funeral homes offer cremation products and services. While the average revenue for a cremation service is generally lower than that of a traditional full-service funeral, we have found that these revenues can be substantially enhanced by our emphasis on customization and memorialization. For example, in addition to a personalized memorial service to celebrate the life of the deceased, an enhanced cremation may include a casket, an urn and a niche in a mausoleum or columbarium in which to place the remains, or a memorial in one of our cremation gardens.
Beginning in fiscal year 2010, we intensified our efforts to offer services, merchandise and memorialization options specifically tailored to the cremation consumer. We hired a senior vice president of cremation with extensive industry and cremation experience. We standardized and sourced a core line of cremation merchandise offerings, such as urns and cremation containers, and trained our employees to anticipate and address the needs of cremation consumers. During this process, we recognized that many of our cremation families desired a more attractive permanent place for their loved ones’ cremated remains, and unique and lasting memorialization. In response, we began implementing a plan to augment substantially the cremation memorialization choices we offer in our cemeteries. Our goal was to develop a destination specifically for the cremation consumer by creating tranquil cremation gardens in our cemeteries that include beautiful landscaping and winding pathways. The gardens also include flowing water features, lighting, music and committal shelters for reflection and celebration, and specially designed spaces that capture the local passions of the people that live in those communities. Families can choose to create a permanent cremation memorial (with or without the cremated remains) in a variety of ways, some of which include unique columbaria, cremation benches, granite monuments, hand-carved pedestals and family estates, among other options. We also expanded and augmented the cremation memorialization alternatives in our mausoleums, including constructing new marble interiors and installing new lighting, statues and glass-front niches. In San Francisco and Orlando, we built new free standing state-of-the-art columbarium buildings with glass-front niches, stained glass features and bronze sculptures that are designated exclusively for cremation consumers. As of October 31, 2012, we had completed 31 cremation gardens and other cremation memorialization projects, had 4 projects under construction, and more than 20 additional projects under feasibility review. In addition, during fiscal year 2012, we began a program to upgrade and modernize our crematories. We intend to be the premier provider of products and services to the cremation consumer.
We have 23 alternative service firms, generally located on the West Coast, that serve primarily cremation customers. These firms are generally located in leased premises and have lower overhead than traditional funeral homes. These firms primarily offer direct cremations with limited additional products and services. Although death care arrangements at these locations are typically less expensive than services at a traditional funeral home, it is not our goal to be the low-price leader in these markets.
6
Table of Contents
Management. We have an experienced management team. Many of our regional managers owned and operated their own funeral homes and cemeteries and joined us when we acquired their business. In addition, we have a senior management team with experience both in the industry and outside of the industry, which we believe allows us to introduce innovations effectively and improve the efficiencies of our existing businesses. In 2012, we realigned our regional management to better integrate operations and sales, such that there is now one regional vice president responsible for funeral and cemetery operations and sales in each region. We believe that this approach will lead to more effective management of our rooftop locations, improve our ability to serve families, increase our profitability and enhance the customer experience.
Centralized support services. Our shared services center, which we opened in 1997, was developed for the standardization and centralization of many of our facilities’ administrative and support processes such as accounting, management reporting, payroll, trust administration, contract processing, accounts payable processing, accounts receivable collection and other services. It allows us to decrease our costs without diminishing service by creating significant savings on items such as trust administration fees, travel expenses, office supplies, overnight delivery and long distance telephone services.
Continuous improvement. For many years, we have focused on streamlining, standardizing and automating our processes and improving our technologies, with goals of achieving cost efficiencies, improving productivity and enhancing our customer’s experience. In 2008, we established a Continuous Improvement department to focus solely on these efforts. Among other things, we have standardized our contracts and contract processing systems, which has resulted in a reduction in the time and expense involved in accurately recording preneed contracts. Our efforts over the last several years have enabled a reduction in our administrative headcount. In addition, in April 2012, there was a reduction in workforce of approximately 60 employees, primarily in corporate support services. In addition, in April 2012 we announced a restructuring of our organization to better integrate operations and sales. We are also in the process of implementing technologies that will enable us to interface more effectively with customers. As we look for opportunities for growth, we expect to leverage the efficiencies that we have gained.
Financial information about industry and geographic segments. For financial information about our industry segments for fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010, see Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Business Strategy
Our business strategy aims to improve our revenues, profitability and cash flow by implementing our long-term strategic plan, which has three components: our Growth initiative, our Continuous Improvement initiative and our Cash Flow Deployment initiative.
Improve revenues and profitability through our Growth initiative. This initiative is designed to grow revenue and profitability through organic growth and growth through acquisitions. In order to grow organically, we are focused on increasing funeral service revenue and calls, expanding our cremation initiative, improving preneed sales and our trust performance and developing new third-party relationships. We are also concentrating on capturing appropriate acquisition opportunities.
Increase at-need funeral service revenue and call volume. In order to grow our at-need funeral service revenue and call volume, and gain market share, we have enhanced training for customer-facing employees and emphasized our goal of providing exceptional customer service. We have continued to refine our packages and developed technology to assist in the arrangement process to show all options to every family with the ultimate goal of improving the customer experience. We have expanded our engagement with and visibility in our communities, including by being active in community organizations and offering community seminars.
Increase cremation revenue. We are focused on growing our cremation revenue in both our funeral and cemetery business. Currently, 43 percent of our funeral events are cremations, while only 19 percent of our cemetery events are cremations. We view this as a significant opportunity and are developing and offering expanded memorialization options in our cemeteries. For a discussion of our recent efforts to increase our cremation revenue, see “Operations - Enhanced cremation offerings.”
7
Table of Contents
Improve preneed sales and trust performance. Another of our strategic priorities is to increase our preneed cemetery property and funeral sales volume. In April 2012, we announced a comprehensive organizational restructuring involving the integration of our management of operations and sales, and complete restructuring of our sales force. We realigned our geographic regions and appointed one regional vice president who is now responsible for funeral and cemetery operations and sales in each region. Formerly, we had different managers responsible for operations and sales. We believe that this new approach will lead to more effective management of our rooftop locations, improve our ability to serve families, increase our profitability and enhance the customer experience.
In addition, we engaged in a complete redesign of our sales organization. We eliminated layers of sales management and redefined our sales roles. We created the position of vice president of sales effectiveness, promoting one of our experienced sales executives to work with our managers to improve sales strategies, mentoring, training and recruiting. We believe that our new sales organization will result in more effective sales management, provide better opportunities for our sales personnel and lower sales force turnover. By accomplishing these goals, we believe the customer experience will improve and lead to improving sales volume. We also implemented Customer Relationship Manager software to better manage all contacts, appointments, presentations and sales, and implemented a new automated contract system, allowing personnel to spend more time interacting with families and less time manually completing contracts. We implemented these new measures after a careful planning process, working with an independent sales management consulting firm with expertise in sales force design, and were able to capitalize on many of the administrative and technological efficiencies gained through our continuous improvement initiative. Ultimately, we believe these changes will improve our customers’ experience and lead to increased preneed sales.
We are focused on achieving more consistent trust performance by better diversifying our trust portfolio. Currently, 25 percent of our portfolio is invested in asset classes that were not represented in our trusts just three years ago, such as real estate investment trusts, high yield mutual funds and master limited partnerships, among others. We have been investing in proportionately more exchange traded/index funds and fewer individual equities. We continuously evaluate our investment strategies to maintain an asset allocation that provides consistent returns with appropriate risk. The long-term objectives are to preserve principal while seeking appropriate levels of current income and capital appreciation in order to provide returns that match inflation plus a reasonable return.
Establish third-party relationships; expand through acquisitions. We also continue our efforts to develop strategic partnerships with third-party and faith-based organizations, and continue to seek to grow through acquisitions. Our third-party relationships take a significant amount of time and effort to establish, but can result in substantial, long-term profitable relationships once established. In addition, we actively seek out acquisition opportunities and evaluate opportunities presented to us. We target larger businesses that are typically combination operations or businesses that will benefit from our existing infrastructure. We have maintained our pricing discipline, and have closed on four acquisitions totaling approximately $15.3 million during fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
Increase efficiencies and profit margins through our Continuous Improvement initiative. Our Continuous Improvement initiative aims to eliminate waste and inefficiency, produce more timely and accurate information for management and improve productivity over time. This includes embracing technology, standardized training and cost reduction initiatives. For additional information, see “Operations-Continuous improvement.”
Augment shareholder returns through our Cash Flow Deployment initiative.We continuously analyze optimal ways to deploy our cash flow to improve shareholder returns. During the last five fiscal years, we have generated more than $60 million each year in cash flow from operations. As an indication of our board’s confidence in the strength of our balance sheet and ability to continue to generate cash flow, our board increased our annual cash dividend by 14 percent to $.16 per share in March 2012; our annual dividend rate has increased from $.10 per share in 2009 to $.16 per share currently. Twice during fiscal year 2011, our board increased the availability under our current stock repurchase program, for a total increase of $50 million. We repurchased 4.0 million shares of our Class A common stock under our stock repurchase program for approximately $27.4 million during fiscal year 2012. For the last three fiscal years, our stock repurchases totaled approximately $60.0 million and reduced the number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding by 10 percent. During fiscal years 2009 and 2010, we repurchased $118.5 million principal amount of our outstanding senior convertible notes at $26.5 million less than face value, producing $3.8 million of annual cash interest savings. In fiscal year 2012, we completed the acquisitions of two
8
Table of Contents
businesses for $6.2 million, and in the past two fiscal years, acquisitions have totaled $15.3 million. We will continue to evaluate the use of our cash to make acquisitions, pay dividends, repurchase debt and stock, invest in our strategic initiatives and construct funeral homes on cemeteries of unaffiliated third parties or on our own strategic locations, with a view towards choosing the best opportunities to enhance long-term shareholder value.
The Death Care Industry
Industry consolidation. Death care businesses in the United States have traditionally been relatively small, family-owned enterprises that have passed through successive generations. The decade of the 1990s witnessed a trend of family-owned firms consolidating with larger organizations, but this trend slowed dramatically in 1999. As the number of consolidators participating in the acquisition market declined, those that remained generally applied significantly tighter pricing criteria, and many potential sellers withdrew their businesses from the market rather than pursuing transactions at lower prices. Our industry continues to be characterized by a large number of locally-owned, independent operations, with approximately 80 percent of industry revenue being generated by independently-owned operations. We estimate that our industry, which consists of approximately 20,000 funeral homes and 10,500 cemeteries in the United States, collectively generates approximately $15 billion in annual revenue.
Large public death care companies have also experienced consolidation. Equity Corporation International, previously the fourth largest public death care company, merged with Service Corporation International (“SCI”) in 1999. Also in 1999, The Loewen Group, Inc., at the time the second largest death care company, entered into bankruptcy proceedings. Loewen emerged from bankruptcy as Alderwoods Group, Inc. in 2002 and was subsequently acquired by SCI in November 2006. In March 2010, SCI acquired Keystone North America, Inc., the fifth largest death care company in North America.
During the 1990s, we grew rapidly primarily through acquisitions of funeral homes and cemeteries both domestically and abroad, financed by new equity and debt. We ceased our acquisition activity in 1999 and developed strategies for improving our cash flow and reducing/restructuring debt. During fiscal years 2000 through 2003, we completed our transitional strategies of improving our cash flow, restructuring and reducing our debt and selling our foreign assets. During fiscal years 2004 through 2007, we sold underperforming assets, refinanced and further reduced our debt and implemented new strategies to improve operations. During fiscal years 2008 through 2012, we focused on our new long-term strategic plan and on implementing new business systems to further improve operations. We believe, at the appropriate pricing, that growing our organization through acquisitions remains an important business strategy, as it will enable us to enjoy the synergies and economies of scale from our existing infrastructure.
Importance of tradition; barriers to entry. We believe it is difficult for new competitors to enter existing markets successfully by opening new cemeteries. The barriers to entry are lower in the funeral business. Entry into the cemetery market can be difficult due to several factors. Because families tend to return to the same cemetery for multiple generations to bury family members, it is difficult for new cemeteries to attract families. Additionally, mature markets, including many of the metropolitan areas where our cemeteries are located, are often served by an adequate number of existing cemeteries with sufficient land for additional plots, whereas land for new cemetery development is often scarce and expensive. Regulatory complexities and zoning restrictions also make entry into the cemetery market difficult. Finally, development of a new cemetery usually requires a significant capital investment that takes several years to produce a return.
Continuing need for products and services; increasing number of deaths. There is an inevitable need for our products and services. Although the number of deaths in the United States will reflect short-term fluctuations, deaths in the United States are expected to increase at a steady, moderate pace over the long-term. According to the United States Bureau of the Census, the number of deaths in the United States is expected to increase by approximately 1 percent per year, from 2.5 million in 2010 to 3.1 million in 2025. Furthermore, the average age of the population in the United States is increasing. According to the United States Bureau of the Census, the United States population over 50 years of age is expected to increase by approximately 1.6 percent per year, from 98.6 million in 2010 to 125.0 million in 2025. In addition, the United States population over 65 years of age is expected to increase by approximately 3.1 percent per year, from 40.2 million in 2010 to 63.5 million in 2025. We believe the aging of the population is particularly important because it expands our target market for preneed sales, as persons over the age of 50 are the most likely group to make preneed funeral and cemetery arrangements.
9
Table of Contents
Growing demand for cremation. A significant trend in the United States is an increasing preference of consumers for cremations. The trend toward cremations has historically been a significant concern for traditional funeral home and cemetery operators because cremations have typically included few, if any, additional products or services other than the cremation itself. We are, however, focused intently on improving our revenues from cremations. We have hired new management devoted solely to this effort and intend to continue to devote significant resources to it. For additional information, including information about our strategies to address this trend, see “Operations-Enhanced cremation offerings” above.
Competition
Our funeral home and cemetery operations generally face intense competition in local markets that typically are served by numerous funeral home and cemetery firms. We also compete with monument dealers, casket retailers, low-cost funeral providers and crematories, and other non-traditional providers of services or products. Discount retailers have begun marketing caskets at prices that are sometimes substantially lower than what we offer. Consumers can also now buy caskets in funeral supply stores or other general retail establishments and directly from manufacturers, as well as over the Internet. Market share for funeral services and cemetery property is largely a function of goodwill, family heritage and tradition, although competitive pricing, professional service and attractive, well-maintained and conveniently located facilities are also important. Market share for funeral and cemetery merchandise is largely a function of price. Extensive marketing through media advertising, direct mailings and personal sales calls has increased in recent years, especially with respect to the sale of preneed funeral services.
Regulation
Our funeral home operations are regulated by the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) under the FTC’s Trade Regulation Rule on Funeral Industry Practices, 16 CFR Part 453 (the “Funeral Rule”), which went into effect on April 30, 1984, and was revised effective July 19, 1994. The Funeral Rule defines certain acts or practices as unfair or deceptive and contains certain requirements to prevent these acts or practices. The preventive measures require a funeral provider to give consumers accurate, itemized price information and various other disclosures about funeral goods and services and prohibit a funeral provider from: (1) misrepresenting legal, crematory and cemetery requirements; (2) embalming for a fee without permission; (3) requiring the purchase of a casket for direct cremation; and (4) requiring consumers to buy certain funeral goods or services as a condition for furnishing other funeral goods or services.
On March 3, 2011, Representative Bobby L. Rush (D.-Ill.) and eleven co-sponsors introduced H.R. 900, The Bereaved Consumers’ Bill of Rights of 2011 to direct the FTC to draft regulations to extend the Funeral Rule to cemeteries, crematories and sellers of caskets and other funeral merchandise and to require certain disclosures with respect to preneed sales of funeral services or funeral goods. The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade on March 11, 2011 and no further action has been taken. We cannot accurately predict the effect this legislation might have on us if passed.
Our operations are also subject to extensive regulation, supervision and licensing under numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations. For example, state laws impose licensing requirements for funeral homes and funeral directors and regulate preneed sales including our preneed trust activities. Our embalming and cremation facilities are subject to stringent environmental and health regulations. We have a department that monitors compliance, and we believe that we are in substantial compliance with the Funeral Rule and all such laws and regulations. Federal, state and local legislative bodies and regulatory agencies frequently propose new laws and regulations, some of which could have a material effect on our operations and on the death care industry in general. We cannot accurately predict the outcome of any proposed legislation or regulation or the effect that any such legislation or regulation might have on us.
10
Table of Contents
Employees
As of October 31, 2012, we employed approximately 4,800 persons (including approximately 3,700 full-time employees), and we believe that we maintain a good relationship with our employees. Approximately 140 of our employees are represented by labor unions or collective bargaining units.
Additional Information
Our business was incorporated as a Louisiana corporation in 1970. Our principal executive offices are located at 1333 South Clearview Parkway, Jefferson, Louisiana 70121, and our telephone number is 504-729-1400. Our website address is www.stewartenterprises.com, where all of our public filings are available free of charge on the same day they are filed with the SEC. Information on our website is not part of this report. The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website address is www.sec.gov.
Cautionary Statements
Our business is subject to significant risks. We caution readers that the following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected, and in the future, could affect, our actual consolidated results and could cause our actual consolidated results in the future to differ materially from the goals and expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements in this report and in any other forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf.
Risks Related to our Business
Our earnings from our trusts can be reduced by declines in stock and bond prices and interest and dividend rates, which can have a significant adverse effect on our gross profit, net earnings and cash flows.
Because of our preneed sales activities and the related state trusting requirements that accompany preneed sales, our business is impacted by changes in financial markets. We maintain three types of trusts: (1) preneed funeral merchandise and services, (2) preneed cemetery merchandise and services (together with the preneed funeral merchandise and services trusts, “preneed trusts”) and (3) cemetery perpetual care. Our trust assets are generally invested in a mix of equity and fixed-income securities, and dividend and interest rates and investment gains and losses are affected by financial market conditions that are not necessarily within our control. Generally, declines in market performance reduce the earnings in our trusts and reduce our earnings and cash flow. In addition, any significant or sustained investment losses could result in there being insufficient funds in the trusts to cover the cost of delivering services and merchandise in the future and result in there being less funds available to defray the costs of cemetery maintenance. Any such deficiency would have to be covered by operating cash flow, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. In addition, our subsidiary, ITI, earns trust management fees based on the fair market value of the trusts managed; therefore, declines in the fair market value of the assets in the trusts decrease the amount of fees we collect and earn for trust management.
In fiscal years 2008 through 2012 cemetery perpetual care trust earnings, preneed trust earnings and ITI trust management fees comprised 7 percent, 6 percent, 6 percent, 6 percent and 7 percent of our revenue, respectively, and 36 percent, 31 percent, 30 percent, 31 percent and 30 percent of our gross profit, respectively. During fiscal year 2008 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, we experienced significant declines in the market value of our trust portfolio, consistent with overall market declines during that time period. During fiscal years 2008 through 2012, our preneed trusts experienced a total return (loss) of (29.5) percent, 15.4 percent, 14.2 percent, 4.4 percent and 11.4 percent, respectively, and our cemetery perpetual care trusts experienced a total return (loss) of (25.9) percent, 19.9 percent, 15.1 percent, 4.9 percent and 13.2 percent, respectively.
Declines in our perpetual care trust earnings and in revenue for fees we earn for managing our trusts impact current revenue, while realized earnings and losses on preneed trust investments are allocated to the underlying contracts and recognized as revenue as the underlying products or services are delivered. During fiscal years 2008 through 2012, we recognized $38.1 million, $29.3 million, $30.7 million, $32.9 million and $34.5 million in revenue
11
Table of Contents
from trust-related activities, respectively. As discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7, during fiscal year 2008, we realized aggregate net losses in our trusts, and during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, we recorded impairment charges in our trusts, which will negatively impact our revenues and gross profit in future years. If market conditions further deteriorate or we experience additional realized losses, trust-related revenue would further decrease, and the decrease could be material. We believe that our trust investments will appreciate in value over the long-term. However, whether they will appreciate and over what time period cannot be predicted with any certainty.
Additional information regarding our trusts and related risks are described in the risk factors that follow.
Earnings in preneed trusts may be reduced by declines in stock and bond prices and will be reduced by declines in interest and dividend rates, resulting in lower future revenues, earnings and cash flows.
Declines in earnings in our preneed trusts can cause a decline in our reported future revenues, earnings and cash flows. With respect to these trusts, we defer recognition and generally withdrawal of dividends, interest income and realized gains until the underlying product or service is delivered. Realized gains and losses generally have no immediate impact on our revenues, margins, earnings or cash flow, except to the extent there are tax consequences as described later in these risk factors. Dividends, interest income and realized gains and losses are allocated to the underlying contracts and will affect the amount of future revenue recognized, and cash withdrawn, at the time the specific contract is performed. In our preneed trusts, at October 31, 2012, the fair market value of the investments in the trusts of $593.5 million was $68.5 million lower than our cost basis of $662.0 million. In most of our trusts, unrealized gains and losses are not allocated to individual contracts, in accordance with our trust agreements; however, as gains and losses are realized, they are allocated to the underlying contracts and will affect the amount of earnings we recognize and cash we withdraw at the time the contracts are ultimately performed. Thus, significant unrealized losses in these trusts, if they do not recover over time, can limit future earnings available to us. Although we have significant unrealized and unallocated losses in our trust portfolio, as of October 31, 2012, we also had $187.1 million in earnings that have been previously realized and allocated to contracts that we will recognize in the future as the underlying contracts are performed. For fiscal years 2008 through 2012, funeral trust earnings included in our reported revenue amounted to $13.2 million, $11.3 million, $11.3 million, $11.4 million and $9.9 million, respectively, and cemetery merchandise and service trust earnings amounted to $4.2 million, $3.2 million, $2.6 million, $2.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively.
If the fair market value of these trusts were to decline below the estimated costs to deliver the underlying products and services, we would record a charge to earnings to record a liability for the expected losses on the delivery of the associated contract. No such charge has ever been recorded. For additional information, see Note 2(m) to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Realized capital losses in preneed trusts for which we are the grantor, if we have insufficient offsetting gains, can cause increases in our current period effective tax rate, a reduction of our current period reported net earnings and a reduction in operating cash flows in future periods.
Approximately 60 percent of the October 31, 2012 fair market value of our preneed trusts are trusts for which the Company is the grantor. For these trusts (unlike the remaining trusts for which the customers are the grantors), we retain the income tax characteristics of all earnings as realized in the trust. For example, capital gains and losses in the trusts are capital gains and losses on our tax returns. For fiscal years 2008 through 2012, the trusts for which we are the grantor incurred net gains (losses) subject to valuation allowance analysis of ($23.5) million, ($5.1) million, ($1.0) million, $10.0 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
Realized capital losses in the trusts for which we are the grantor, if we have insufficient offsetting gains, may require us to record a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset, which increases our current period effective tax rate and reduces our current period reported net earnings. During fiscal year 2008, we recorded a tax valuation allowance of $7.4 million related to capital losses realized in our preneed trusts for which we are the grantor for tax purposes. We recorded an additional $0.4 million tax valuation allowance in fiscal year 2009 and were able to subsequently reduce this allowance by $1.8 million in fiscal year 2010, $1.0 million in fiscal year 2011 and $2.1 million in fiscal year 2012. Essentially, the current period valuation allowance reflects the fact that, if we cannot generate capital gains in the future to offset the capital loss during the carry forward period (which is limited
12
Table of Contents
to five years), when we perform the contract, we will pay higher taxes. This tax relationship does not occur with respect to trusts for which the customer is the grantor, because all earnings in customer grantor trusts are ordinary income to us, and we do not recognize the revenue for either tax or book purposes until the underlying contract is performed.
As of October 31, 2012, we had approximately $55.7 million remaining in unrealized losses for tax purposes in trusts for which we are the grantor; hypothetically, if all of these losses were realized at once, this would have resulted in an additional valuation allowance of approximately $22.8 million, assuming a projected tax rate of 41 percent. We currently have only a limited amount of embedded gains in our trusts. Also, we have utilized all previous capital gains recorded in tax year 2008 and prior tax years to offset prior capital losses. Accordingly, if we experience additional realized losses in these trusts and do not have or expect to have future capital gains available (within or outside the trusts) to offset these losses, we would record an additional valuation allowance and related reduction of net income.
Earnings in cemetery perpetual care trusts may be reduced by declines in stock and bond prices and will be reduced by declines in interest and dividend rates, resulting in lower current and potentially future revenues, earnings and cash flows. In addition, we may be required to fund realized net capital losses in these trusts, which would have a negative effect on our earnings and cash flow.
Pursuant to cemetery perpetual care contracts and laws, a portion, generally 10 percent to 15 percent, of the proceeds from cemetery property sales is deposited into perpetual care trusts. The income from these trusts, which have been established in most jurisdictions in which we operate cemeteries, is used for maintenance of those cemeteries, but the corpus must generally be held by the trust in perpetuity. The statutory provisions that create and regulate these trusts differ from state to state, as do the regulatory interpretations of the provisions. The trusts are reviewed regularly by the respective state regulatory authorities.
We recognize currently all dividend and interest income earned and, in states where it is permitted, realized net capital gains generated by cemetery perpetual care trusts. The cash withdrawn is used to defray the costs of cemetery maintenance. Therefore, declines in these eligible distributable earnings in cemetery perpetual care trusts would cause a decline in current earnings and cash flows. Likewise, sustained declines in these earnings would reduce future revenues and cash flows and would require cash flow from other sources to continue to maintain our cemeteries at the level necessary to satisfy our customers. For fiscal years 2008 through 2012, earnings in these trusts contributed $10.7 million, $6.8 million, $7.4 million, $8.6 million and $9.6 million, respectively, to cemetery revenue.
In our cemetery perpetual care trusts, at October 31, 2012, the fair market value of our investments of $262.7 million was $14.6 million lower than our cost basis of $277.3 million. If we realize losses in our cemetery perpetual care trusts and the fair market value of the trust assets is less than the aggregate amounts required to be contributed to the trust, some states may require us to make cash deposits to the trust to cover the net realized loss or may require us to stop withdrawing earnings until future earnings cover the net realized loss.
In those states where we have withdrawn realized net capital gains in the past, regulators may seek replenishment of the realized net capital losses either by requiring a cash deposit to the trust or by prohibiting or restricting withdrawals of future earnings until they cover the loss. As of October 31, 2012, $12.0 million was recorded for the estimated probable funding obligation. We are currently utilizing some of the amounts that could be withdrawn from the trusts to satisfy our funding obligation resulting from previously realized capital losses. As of October 31, 2012, we had net unrealized losses of $16.6 million in the trusts in these states that could be subject to a future funding obligation. Because some of these trusts currently have assets with a fair market value less than the aggregate amounts required to be contributed to the trust, any additional realized net capital losses in these trusts may result in a corresponding funding liability and increase in cemetery costs.
In those states where realized net capital gains have not been withdrawn, due to the different laws and our trust agreements in those states, we do not believe that we will be required to replenish the realized net capital loss, and have not recorded a funding obligation; however, it is possible that regulators may disagree with our conclusion, and future funding obligations may exist. As of October 31, 2012, the realized net capital loss in these trusts was $2.0 million, and the unrealized gain was $2.0 million.
13
Table of Contents
Our distributions from cemetery perpetual care trusts include net realized capital gains on investment sales in states where permitted. If regulations in these states are changed to no longer permit withdrawal of realized capital gains, our cemetery perpetual care trust eligible distributable earnings may be reduced in the future, which would reduce our earnings and cash flows.
In states where permitted, we withdraw and recognize as revenue net realized capital gains on investment sales in cemetery perpetual care trusts. Currently, our portfolio mix in these states is more heavily weighted to investments that potentially generate capital gains, such as equities. In states where we do not withdraw capital gains, our portfolio mix is more heavily weighted to fixed income type securities. If states where capital gains are currently permitted to be withdrawn make changes in legislation or regulations to not allow capital gains to be withdrawn, our future revenues and cash flow may be reduced from historical levels until we are able to replace some or all of the investments that potentially generate capital gains with ones that generate more ordinary income such as fixed income securities. Given current economic conditions and market values, we may not be able to make that shift quickly without triggering capital losses that could require additional funding obligations.
Reduced market values of preneed trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts will also reduce our trust management fees.
The fees that our subsidiary, ITI, earns for managing the trusts are based on the fair market value of the trusts as determined by quoted market prices. Thus as market values decline, the earnings ITI generates and the cash we withdraw for managing the trusts is also reduced. During fiscal years 2008 through 2012, ITI trust management fees collected were approximately $10.0 million, $8.0 million, $9.4 million, $10.0 million and $11.7 million, respectively.
Our trust portfolio has a significant concentration in the financial services sector, which may be more susceptible to additional adverse impact from the current economic environment.
As of October 31, 2012, approximately 11 percent of our preneed trust portfolios and 18 percent of our cemetery perpetual care trust portfolios were invested in issuer specific investments in the financial services sector. We may have other investments in this sector through our mutual fund holdings. For the issuer specific financial services sector concentration in the preneed trust portfolio, approximately 60 percent was invested in preferred stock, 16 percent in fixed-income securities and 24 percent in common stock investments. Unrealized losses in the financial services sector represented 3 percent of the total unrealized losses of $84.2 million in our preneed trust portfolio. For the issuer specific financial services sector concentration in the cemetery perpetual care trust portfolio, approximately 66 percent was invested in preferred stock, 21 percent in fixed-income securities and 13 percent in common stock investments. Unrealized losses in the financial services sector represented 5 percent of the total unrealized losses of $24.0 million in our cemetery perpetual care trust portfolios.
The current economic environment may result in greater declines to the fair market value of our investments in this and other sectors as compared to the performance of our overall trust portfolio and/or market benchmarks, including the S&P 500 Index. Each sector has particular risks associated with it, and depending on our asset allocation, sector mix, company-specific information and future economic events, our portfolio could be at risk for further decline. For additional information, see the section titled “Preneed-Backlog, Trust Portfolio and Cash Impact of Sales” included in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7.
A reduction in corporate federal tax rates could result in a significant non-cash charge to earnings.
As of October 31, 2012, we had approximately $87.9 million of net deferred tax assets. If corporate federal tax rates are reduced by Congress, we could incur a significant non-cash charge to earnings.
14
Table of Contents
A weakened economy could decrease preneed sales. A reduction in discretionary spending could also decrease amounts at-need customers are willing to pay, and could cause third-party insurance providers that fund our insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts to experience financial difficulties.
A weakened economy that causes customers to reduce discretionary spending could cause, and we believe has caused, declines in preneed sales, and could also decrease the amounts at-need customers are willing to pay. Declines in preneed cemetery property sales and average revenue per at-need event would reduce current revenue. Declines in preneed funeral and cemetery service and merchandise sales would reduce our backlog and could reduce our future revenues and market share. A weakened economy could also impact our customers’ ability to pay, causing increased delinquencies, increased bad debt and decreased finance charge revenue which would reduce future earnings and cash flow. A weakened economy could also increase costs related to sales force turnover.
Some of the preneed funeral contracts we sell are funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third-party insurers. The net amount of these contracts that have not been fulfilled as of October 31, 2012 was $600.9 million. These contracts are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheet, but we include them when we discuss our anticipated “backlog” or anticipated future revenue from preneed funeral sales. Approximately 73 percent of these contracts have been funded by Forethought Life Insurance Company (“Forethought”). If Forethought or any other insurance companies that have issued policies to our customers experience financial difficulties, our potential future revenue associated with these contracts, and commissions we would receive from selling these types of contracts in the future, could be at risk. For a discussion of our revenue recognition policies for insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts, see Note 2(i) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
The organizational restructuring designed to better integrate operations and sales and to redesign our sales organization, implemented during the latter part of fiscal year 2012 and the beginning of fiscal year 2013, may not achieve our projected cost savings or may result in reduced sales.
As discussed in “Business-Business Strategy,” in April 2012, we announced an organizational restructuring. The organizational changes include a restructure of the sales organization and realignment of our geographic regions and regional management to better integrate operations and sales. The changes implemented during fiscal year 2012 primarily impacted sales management. During the beginning of fiscal year 2013, we are implementing changes that primarily impact our customer-facing sales force, including changing our compensation structure. The combined effect of this restructuring has been projected to reduce costs by approximately $5 million on an annual basis. We also intend for it to produce a more effective sales force, increase our sales and enhance the customer experience. However, the restructuring may not have the outcomes that we anticipate.
Continued economic weakness and financial and stock market declines could reduce future potential earnings and cash flows and could result in future goodwill impairments.
As of October 31, 2012, goodwill amounted to $249.6 million, consisting of $200.9 million in the funeral segment and $48.7 million in the cemetery segment. Our cemetery segment tends to be more sensitive to goodwill impairments because it has a heavier reliance on preneed sales that are impacted by changes in consumer sentiment and customer discretionary income. If current economic conditions worsen causing decreased revenues and increased costs or if the current economic conditions result in additional companies in which the trust portfolio is invested in filing for bankruptcy, we may have a triggering event which could result in further goodwill impairments.
Servicing our debt will require a significant amount of cash and our ability to generate sufficient cash depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our debt depends on our ability to generate cash flow. We have a senior secured revolving credit facility due in 2016, on which no amounts were drawn as of October 31, 2012, and $331.5 million in fixed-rate long-term debt becoming due in 2014 through 2019. We believe that our current level of cash on hand, projected cash flows from operations and available capacity under our senior secured revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our debt service and other cash requirements for the foreseeable future, although we will need to refinance the senior secured revolving credit facility and other long-term debt as they become due. Our ability to generate cash, to a significant extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors some of which are beyond our control. In addition, our ability to borrow funds in the future to make payments on our debt will depend on our meeting the financial covenants in our debt agreements. Our business may not generate cash flow from operations, and future borrowings may not be
15
Table of Contents
available to us under our senior secured revolving credit facility or otherwise in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our debt or to fund other liquidity needs. As a result, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity. We may not be able to refinance any of our debt on favorable terms, or at all. Any inability to generate sufficient cash flow or refinance our debt on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Our same-store funeral call volumes have not increased for a number of years due to many factors, such as the number of deaths and competition in our markets, our ability to identify changing consumer preferences and various other factors, some of which are beyond our control.
Our same-store funeral call volumes decreased for three of the last five years due to many factors described elsewhere in this report, including the number of deaths and intense competition in our markets, and our ability to identify changing consumer preferences. From fiscal years 2008 through 2012, we experienced same-store funeral call volume changes of 0 percent, (5.9) percent, (2.1) percent, 0.6 percent and (0.9) percent, respectively. We can give no assurance that we will be able to increase same-store funeral call volumes over the long term. Declines in same-store funeral calls can adversely affect revenues and profits if not offset by increases in average revenue per call or alternative sources of revenue.
Price competition could reduce market share or cause us to reduce prices to retain or recapture market share, either of which could reduce revenues and margins.
Our funeral home and cemetery operations generally face intense competition in local markets that typically are served by numerous funeral homes and cemetery firms. We have historically experienced price competition primarily from independent funeral home and cemetery operators, and from monument dealers, casket retailers, low-cost funeral providers and other non-traditional providers of services or products including, in recent years, internet providers. From time to time, this price competition has caused us to lose market share in some markets. In other markets, we have had to reduce prices, thereby reducing profit margins in order to retain or recapture market share. Increased price competition in the future could further reduce revenues, profit margins and backlog and potentially impact our annual goodwill impairment analysis.
Discount retailers sell caskets at prices substantially lower than prices we offer. Consumers can also buy caskets in funeral supply stores, other general retailers and directly from manufacturers, as well as over the Internet. Competition from these sources could reduce our casket sales, which could adversely affect funeral revenues and margins.
Increased advertising and better marketing by competitors, as well as increased offering of products or services over the Internet, could cause us to lose market share and revenues or cause us to incur increased costs or to decrease prices in order to retain or recapture market share.
In recent years, the marketing of preneed funeral services through television, radio and print advertising, direct mailings and personal sales calls has increased. Extensive advertising or effective marketing by competitors in local markets could cause us to lose market share and revenues or cause us to incur increased marketing costs. In addition, competitors may change the types or mix of products or services offered. These changes may attract customers, causing us to lose market share and revenue or to incur costs necessary to respond to competition by varying the types or mix of products or services offered by us. Also, increased use of the Internet by customers to research and/or purchase products and services could cause us to lose market share to competitors offering to sell products or services over the Internet.
If we are not able to respond effectively to changing consumer preferences, our market share, revenues and profitability could decrease.
Future market share, revenues and profits will depend in part on our ability to anticipate, identify and respond to changing consumer preferences. We may not correctly anticipate or identify trends in consumer preferences, or we may identify them later than our competitors do. In addition, any strategies we may implement to address these trends may prove incorrect or ineffective.
16
Table of Contents
Increased preneed sales may have a negative impact on current cash flow and earnings.
Preneed sales of cemetery property and funeral and cemetery products and services, which are generally paid on an installment basis, are generally cash flow negative initially, primarily due to the costs to acquire the sale and the fact that a portion of the sales proceeds is required to be placed into trusts or escrow accounts. We will continue to invest a significant portion of cash flow in preneed acquisition costs, which reduces cash flow available for other activities, and, to the extent preneed activities are increased, cash flow would be further reduced, and our ability to service debt could be adversely affected.
Increased costs, including potential increased health care costs, may have a negative impact on earnings and cash flows.
We may not be successful in maintaining our margins and may incur additional costs. For example, in the past, we have experienced increased property and casualty insurance costs primarily as a result of hurricanes and natural disasters. On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act became law, and one week later, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 became effective, together enacting comprehensive health care reform in the United States. The legislation is likely to increase our health care costs. Many provisions of the law that could impact our business will not become effective until 2014, or later, and require implementation through regulations that have not yet been promulgated. Accordingly, the costs and other effects of the legislation, which may include the cost of compliance and potentially increased costs of providing for medical insurance for our employees, cannot be determined with certainty at this time. We did experience increased healthcare costs in fiscal year 2011 and a slight increase in 2012. We also incurred additional costs in fiscal year 2011 in conjunction with improving our business systems and implementing new growth initiatives. Some of the costs impacting our business are largely beyond our control. To the extent that we are unable to pass these cost increases on to our customers, they will have a negative impact on our earnings and cash flows.
Our business is subject to the risk of losses due to hurricanes and other natural disasters.
Our Company is headquartered in the New Orleans metropolitan area, and approximately 110 of our funeral homes and 73 of our cemeteries, along with our mausoleum construction and sales business, ACME Mausoleum, are located near the Gulf Coast in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida, along the East Coast in Florida, Georgia, North and South Carolina and in Puerto Rico. These areas are periodically threatened by hurricanes, which can damage our properties, interrupt our business and disrupt the lives of our customers and employees. We are also at risk for tornadoes at our locations in the midwestern United States and for earthquakes at our locations along the west coast of the United States. In fiscal year 2005, our business was adversely affected by Hurricanes Katrina, Wilma and Rita. In fiscal year 2008, Hurricane Ike impacted our Houston operations. In 2012, Hurricane Isaac affected our business in Southeast Louisiana. Our insurance may not protect us from all material losses or expenses incurred in connection with a natural disaster.
We have an estimate included in our deferred revenue liability primarily related to certain unidentified contracts sold prior to the time we acquired certain businesses, and we may become aware of new information that would require us to increase that estimated liability.
From time to time, contracts are presented to us primarily relating to contracts sold prior to the time we acquired certain businesses for which we were previously unaware. In addition, from time to time, we have identified in our backlog, certain contracts in which services or merchandise have already been delivered but the revenue was not yet recognized. Using historical trends and statistical analyses, we have recorded an estimated net debit for these items of approximately $0.3 million as of October 31, 2012. To the extent we are made aware of contracts that exceed the estimated liability recorded, or cause us to conclude that we should increase the estimated liability recorded, we would have to record a charge to earnings for the estimated cost to deliver the products and services.
17
Table of Contents
Our Chairman may have a significant and disproportionate influence on the outcome of election of directors and other matters presented for a vote of shareholders and this control may be exercised in a manner that may conflict with the interests of other shareholders.
As of October 31, 2012, our Chairman, Frank B. Stewart, Jr., held 7,115,748 shares (or approximately 8.7 percent) of our outstanding Class A common stock and all of the 3,555,020 outstanding shares of our Class B common stock. There is no established public trading market for our Class B common stock. Because each share of Class B common stock is entitled to 10 votes on all matters presented for a vote by our shareholders, Mr. Stewart controls approximately 36 percent of our total voting power, while holding approximately 13 percent of our outstanding equity. Accordingly, Mr. Stewart may have a significant and disproportionate influence over the election of directors and other matters requiring the affirmative vote of our shareholders and this control may be exercised in a manner that may conflict with the interest of other shareholders. Additionally, because Louisiana law and our articles of incorporation require the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the voting power present to approve certain major transactions such as mergers and any amendments to our articles of incorporation, Mr. Stewart may have the ability to prevent the consummation of such actions, even if they are recommended by our Board of Directors and favored by a substantial majority of our shareholders.
We may be unable to repurchase our senior convertible notes and 6.50 percent senior notes when required by the holders, or to pay the cash portion of the conversion value upon conversion of our senior convertible notes. In addition, we are subject to counterparty risk on the call options relating to our senior convertible notes.
Upon a change of control of our company as defined in the relevant indenture, holders of our 6.50 percent senior notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or any part of their notes for cash at a price equal to 101 percent of the principal amount of the notes repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, upon fundamental change events specified in the relevant indenture, holders of our senior convertible notes may require us to purchase for cash all or a portion of their notes at a price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest. Also, upon conversion of our senior convertible notes, we will be required to deliver to the holders a cash payment equal to the lesser of the principal amount of the notes being converted or the conversion value of the notes. As a result, we may be required to pay significant amounts of cash to holders of the senior convertible notes upon conversion. We cannot assure you that we will have sufficient financial resources to make these payments when due. Any inability to make these payments would constitute an event of default under the indentures governing these notes and would also cause cross-defaults under the terms of our other debt agreements.
Concurrently with the sale of our senior convertible notes, we purchased call options with respect to our Class A common stock from Bank of America/Merrill Lynch International and sold warrants to Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Financial Markets, Inc. The counterparties’ obligations to us under the call options and warrants are guaranteed by Bank of America/Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. By simultaneously purchasing the call options and selling the warrants, we have effectively increased the conversion premium on the senior convertible notes to 55-65 percent above the market price of the Class A common stock at the time of the offering. The call options are expected to offset our exposure to dilution from conversion of the senior convertible notes because any shares we would be obligated to deliver to holders upon conversion would be delivered to us by the counterparty to the call options. This obligation is dependent upon the financial viability of the counterparty and guarantor. With the uncertainty in the United States financial markets, there are risks that the counterparty and guarantor may not remain financially viable or may seek bankruptcy protection. If the counterparty and guarantor are relieved of or cannot perform this obligation, then at the time of conversion, we may be required to issue additional shares based upon the initial conversion price of the notes and cause further dilution to our shareholders.
The call options we purchased and the warrants we sold contemporaneously with the sale of our senior convertible notes may affect the trading price of our Class A common stock and the value of the senior convertible notes.
The counterparties to the call options we purchased and the warrants we sold may engage in hedging activities and modify their hedge positions from time to time prior to the conversion or maturity of our senior convertible notes, and particularly around the time of any conversion of the notes. These hedging activities may include purchasing and selling shares of our Class A common stock, or other of our securities, or other instruments, including over-the-counter derivative instruments. The effect, if any, of these activities on the trading price of our Class A common stock or the senior convertible notes will depend in part on market conditions at the time and cannot be reasonably predicted at this time. Any of these activities could adversely affect the trading price of our
18
Table of Contents
Class A common stock and the value of the senior convertible notes. For additional information about the call options we purchased and the warrants we sold, see Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Exercise of the outstanding warrants could dilute the ownership interests of our existing stockholders.
Concurrently with the sale of our senior convertible notes, we sold warrants expiring in 2014 to purchase approximately 11.3 million shares of Class A common stock at $12.93 per share and warrants expiring in 2016 to purchase approximately 11.3 million shares of Class A common stock at $13.76 per share. The warrants expiring in 2014 may not be exercised prior to the maturity of the senior convertible notes due in 2014, and the warrants expiring in 2016 may not be exercised prior to the maturity of the senior convertible notes due in 2016. The warrants may be settled in cash at our election. Exercise of the warrants could dilute the ownership interests of our existing stockholders. In connection with the fiscal year 2009 and 2010 repurchases of our senior convertible notes, the number of shares of Class A common stock subject to the warrants was reduced to 7.0 million related to the senior convertible notes due in 2014 and 3.6 million related to the senior convertible notes due in 2016. For additional information, see Notes 14 and 16 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Increases in interest rates would increase interest costs on any variable-rate long-term debt and could have a material adverse effect on our net income and earnings per share.
We have no variable-rate long-term debt agreements besides our senior secured revolving credit facility. Although we have no amounts currently drawn under the credit facility, any amounts borrowed in the future are subject to variable interest rates. Any significant increase in interest rates could increase our interest costs on our variable-rate long-term debt or indebtedness incurred in the future, which could decrease our net income and earnings per share materially.
Our ability to maintain compliance with our covenants under our senior secured revolving credit facility and 6.50 percent senior notes is dependent upon many factors. Covenant restrictions may also limit our ability to operate our business.
Our senior secured revolving credit facility and the indenture governing the 6.50 percent senior notes contain, among other things, covenants that restrict our and our subsidiaries’ activities. Our senior secured revolving credit facility limits, among other things, our and the guarantors’ ability to: borrow money; pay dividends or distributions; purchase or redeem stock; make investments; engage in transactions with affiliates; engage in sale and leaseback transactions; consummate specified asset sales; effect a consolidation or merger or sell, transfer, lease, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and create liens on our assets. In addition, our senior secured revolving credit facility contains specific limits on capital expenditures. Furthermore, our senior secured revolving credit facility requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy periodic financial condition tests. The indenture governing the 6.50 percent senior notes restricts our and the guarantors’ ability to create liens on assets, enter into sale and leaseback transactions and merge or consolidate with other companies. Our and our subsidiaries’ future indebtedness may contain similar or even more restrictive covenants. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for additional information on our debt covenants.
These covenants may require that we take action to reduce our debt or to act in a manner contrary to our business objectives. In addition, events beyond our control, including changes in general economic and business conditions, may affect our ability to satisfy these covenants. We might not meet those covenants, and the lenders might not waive any failure to meet those covenants. A breach of any of those covenants could result in a default under such indebtedness. If an event of default under our senior secured credit facility occurs, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. Any such declaration would also result in an event of default under the indenture governing the 6.50 percent senior notes. For additional information, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” included in Item 7.
19
Table of Contents
The payment of dividends on our common stock in the future is subject to uncertainties.
The declaration of dividends on our common stock in the future is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors after its review of our financial performance. Our ability to pay dividends is restricted under our senior secured revolving credit facility. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
We may not be able to consummate significant acquisitions of death care businesses successfully.
Although we have not made any significant acquisitions in recent years, we may in the future. Any such acquisitions have risks. We may fail to identify suitable candidates, and even if we do, we may not be able to successfully complete the transaction or integrate the new business into our existing business. We may not be able to find businesses for sale at prices we are willing to pay. Acquisition activity, if any, will also depend on our ability to enter new markets. Due in part to the presence of competitors who have been in certain markets longer than we have, such acquisitions may be more difficult or expensive than we anticipate.
The application of generally accepted accounting principles to our business is complex, and we have had significant changes in the application of generally accepted accounting principles to our business. No assurances can be given that we will not face similar issues in the future.
Our industry is unusual because we often sell products and services many years prior to the time they are required to be delivered, and we are required by varying state laws to hold customer funds related to these sales in trust until the products and services are ultimately delivered. The accounting for these unusual features is complex, and in prior years there have been periodic changes in the application of generally accepted accounting principles to our business. Some of these changes have made it difficult to compare results from one period to the next when these changes are not applied retrospectively. Such changes have also increased our administrative costs. We can give no assurances that we will not face similar issues in the future.
Risks Related to the Death Care Industry
Declines in the number of deaths in our markets can cause a decrease in revenues. Changes in the number of deaths are not predictable from market to market or over the short term, and reliable statistics on deaths in particular markets can be difficult to obtain.
Declines in the number of deaths could cause at-need sales of funeral and cemetery services, property and merchandise to decline and could cause a decline in the number of preneed sales being delivered, both of which could decrease revenues. Although the United States Bureau of the Census estimates that the number of deaths in the United States will increase by approximately 1 percent per year from 2010 to 2025, longer life spans could reduce the rate of deaths. Changes in the number of deaths can vary among local markets and from quarter to quarter, and variations in the number of deaths in our markets or from quarter to quarter are not predictable. However, generally the number of deaths fluctuates with the seasons with more deaths occurring during the winter months primarily resulting from pneumonia and influenza. These variations can cause revenues to fluctuate.
Our comparisons of the change in the number of families served to the change in the number of deaths reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) from time to time may not necessarily be meaningful. The CDC receives weekly mortality reports from 122 cities and metropolitan areas in the United States within two to three weeks from the date of death and reports the total number of deaths occurring in these areas each week based on the reports received from state health departments. The comparability of our funeral calls to the CDC data is limited, as reports from the state health departments are often delayed, and the 122 cities reporting to the CDC are not necessarily comparable with the markets in which we operate.
We have experienced an increase in the proportion of lower-priced, non-traditional funeral services and direct cremations, which we believe is part of the continuing national trend toward increased cremation.
Our traditional cemetery and funeral service operations face competition from the increasing number of cremations in the United States. Industry studies indicate that the percentage of cremations has steadily increased and that cremations could represent approximately 57 percent of deaths in the United States by the year 2025, compared to 41 percent in 2010. In fiscal years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, 40 percent, 41 percent, 42 percent, 43 percent and 43 percent, respectively, of the funeral services we performed in our operations were
20
Table of Contents
cremations, and the percentage of those that were direct cremations has increased. A full service cremation, which includes a funeral service, merchandise and memorialization of the remains in a mausoleum or columbarium niche or a burial of the remains, can result in funeral and cemetery revenue and profit margins similar to those of traditional funeral services and burials. In contrast, a basic or direct cremation, with no funeral service or casket and no memorialization of the remains, produces no revenues for cemetery operations and lower revenues and profit margins for funeral operations when delivered through a traditional funeral home. In addition, the increasing trend towards cremations in the United States could cause us to lose market share to firms specializing in cremations. During fiscal years 2008 through 2012, we experienced a reduction in the proportion of full service traditional funeral services and cremations and an increase in the proportion of lower-priced, non-traditional funeral services and direct cremations. A continuation of this trend would adversely affect the revenues and gross profits of our funeral and cemetery businesses. To address this trend, we have been intensifying our efforts to market full service cremations and have begun a program of enhancing our cremation memorialization offerings in our cemeteries.
Because the funeral and cemetery businesses are high fixed-cost businesses, positive or negative changes in revenue can have a disproportionately large effect on cash flow and profits.
Funeral homes and cemetery businesses must incur many of the costs of operating and maintaining facilities, land and equipment regardless of the level of sales in any given period. For example, we must pay salaries, utilities, property taxes and maintenance costs on funeral homes and maintain the grounds of cemeteries regardless of the number of funeral services or cemetery interments performed. Because we cannot decrease these costs significantly or rapidly when we experience declines in sales, declines in sales can cause margins, profits and cash flow to decline at a greater rate than the decline in revenues.
Changes or increases in, or failure to comply with, regulations applicable to our business could increase costs or decrease cash flows.
The death care industry is subject to extensive regulation and licensing requirements under federal, state and local laws. For example, the funeral home industry is regulated by the FTC, which requires funeral homes to take actions designed to protect consumers. State laws impose licensing requirements and regulate preneed sales including our preneed trust activities. Embalming and cremation facilities are subject to stringent environmental and health regulations. Compliance with these regulations is burdensome, and we are always at risk of not complying with the regulations.
In addition, from time to time, governments and agencies propose to amend or add regulations, which could increase costs or decrease cash flows. For example, federal, state, Puerto Rican and other regulatory agencies have considered and may enact additional legislation or regulations that could affect the death care industry. Several jurisdictions and regulatory agencies have considered or are considering regulations that could require more liberal refund and cancellation policies for preneed sales of products and services, limit or eliminate our ability to use surety bonding, impose or increase trust requirements and prohibit the common ownership of funeral homes and cemeteries in the same market. If adopted by the regulatory authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate, these and other possible proposals could have a material adverse effect on us, our financial condition, our results of operations, our cash flows and our future prospects. On March 3, 2011, Representative Bobby L. Rush (D.-Ill.) and eleven co-sponsors introduced H.R. 900, The Bereaved Consumers’ Bill of Rights of 2011 to direct the FTC to draft regulations to extend the Funeral Rule to cemeteries, crematories and sellers of caskets and other funeral merchandise and to require certain disclosures with respect to preneed sales of funeral services or funeral goods. The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade on March 11, 2011 and no further action has been taken. We cannot accurately predict the effect this legislation might have on us if passed.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
21
Table of Contents
The following table shows the number of funeral homes and cemeteries we operated in each of our operating segments as of October 31, 2012:
Operating Segment | Number of Locations | Geographic Areas | ||||
Funeral | 217 | Alabama (8), Arkansas (5), California (46), Florida (38), Georgia (2), Illinois (4), Kansas (3), Louisiana (3), Maryland (5), Mississippi (2), Missouri (9), Nebraska (2), North Carolina (9), Oregon (6), Pennsylvania (2), South Carolina (9), Tennessee (8), Texas (26), Virginia (4), Washington (2), West Virginia (11) and Puerto Rico (13) | ||||
Cemetery | 141 | Alabama (5), Arkansas (3), California (7), Florida (19), Georgia (5), Kansas (4), Kentucky (1), Louisiana (5), Maryland (9), Mississippi (2), Missouri (6), Nebraska (2), North Carolina (10), Ohio (2), Oregon (1), Pennsylvania (3), South Carolina (6), Tennessee (7), Texas (13), Virginia (13), Washington (1), West Virginia (6), Wisconsin (3) and Puerto Rico (8) | ||||
|
| |||||
| 358 | ||||||
|
| |||||
As of October 31, 2012, approximately 77 percent of our 217 funeral home locations were owned by our subsidiaries, and approximately 23 percent were held under operating leases. The leases have terms ranging from one to ten years, except for one lease that expires in 2032 and seven leases that expire in 2039 (six of which are with the Archdiocese of Los Angeles). An aggregate of $0.1 million of our term notes are secured by mortgages on some of our funeral homes; these notes were either assumed by us upon our acquisition of the property or represent seller financing for the acquired property.
As of October 31, 2012, we owned 141 cemeteries covering a total of approximately 10,000 acres. Although approximately 38 percent of the total acreage is available for future development, life spans of our cemeteries can be extended by different types of cemetery development such as the construction of mausoleums, columbariums, niche spaces and cremation gardens.
We own a 98,200 square-foot building in suburban New Orleans that we use for our corporate headquarters, shared services center, human resources, communications, internal audit and information systems departments.
We and certain of our subsidiaries are parties to a number of other legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect these matters to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
We carry insurance with coverages and coverage limits that we believe to be adequate. Although there can be no assurance that such insurance is sufficient to protect us against all contingencies, we believe that our insurance protection is reasonable in view of the nature and scope of our operations.
22
Table of Contents
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers. Each of the following has served in the capacity indicated for more than five years, except as indicated below.
Name | Age | Position | ||
Thomas M. Kitchen | 65 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(1) | ||
Lewis J. Derbes, Jr. | 41 | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(2) | ||
Kenneth G. Myers, Jr. | 55 | Executive Vice President of Operations and Sales(3) | ||
Lawrence B. Hawkins | 64 | Executive Vice President and President—Investors Trust, Inc. | ||
Martin R. de Laurèal | 61 | Senior Vice President of Corporate Development and Investor Relations(4) | ||
Christine Hunsaker | 46 | Senior Vice President of Cremation(5) | ||
G. Kenneth Stephens, Jr. | 51 | Senior Vice President – Eastern Division(6) | ||
Michael H. Miller | 42 | Senior Vice President – Western Division(7) | ||
Lisa T. Winningkoff | 45 | Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary, Senior Administrative Officer(8) | ||
Angela M. Lacour | 40 | Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer(9) | ||
Larry L. Merington | 58 | Senior Vice President of Strategic Market Development(10) | ||
Kent J. Alphonso | 56 | Vice President and Chief Information Officer(11) | ||
Philip G. Sprick | 56 | Vice President of Marketing(12) | ||
Kelly K. Millberger | 52 | Vice President of Sales Effectiveness(13) |
| (1) | On January 24, 2011, Mr. Kitchen was appointed to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer effective April 7, 2011. Mr. Kitchen previously served as Senior Executive Vice President since March 31, 2007 and as Chief Financial Officer since December 2, 2004. He has also served as a director since February 18, 2004. From June 30, 2006 through March 31, 2007, Mr. Kitchen served as acting Chief Executive Officer. From July 2003 until he became our Chief Financial Officer, he served as an investment management consultant with Equitas Capital Advisors, LLC. From 1987 to 1999, he was Chief Financial Officer of Avondale Industries, Inc., a publicly-traded company engaged in the design, construction, system integration and repair of large, complex ships for commercial and government customers. He served as President of Avondale from 1999 to 2002, after Avondale’s acquisition by Litton Industries, which was subsequently acquired by Northrop Grumman Corporation. |
| (2) | On January 24, 2011, Mr. Derbes was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective April 7, 2011 and continued his position as Treasurer. Previously Mr. Derbes held the position of Senior Vice President of Finance, Secretary and Treasurer since July 2008. He served as Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company from May 2005 through July 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Derbes served as Chief Financial Officer of Conrad Industries, a publicly-traded company engaged in the construction and repair of government and commercial marine vessels, from 2002 through 2004 and as Operations Manager of Kirschman’s LLC, a furniture retailer, from late 2004 until joining the Company. |
23
Table of Contents
| (3) | On August 10, 2011, Mr. Myers was appointed to the position of Executive Vice President of Operations and Sales. Prior to that time, he served as Senior Vice President of Operations since June 2008. He served as Senior Vice President of Finance of the Company from February 2006 through June 2008. He has also served as a consultant to the Company from February 2005 to February 2006. From July 2004 through February 2006, he provided consulting services specializing in Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. From 2001 to 2004, he was the Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Conrad Industries, a publicly-traded company engaged in the construction and repair of government and commercial marine vessels. From 1992 to 2001, he served as Vice President of Avondale Industries, Inc., a publicly-traded company engaged in the design, construction, system integration and repair of large, complex ships for commercial and government customers, which was subsequently acquired by Northrop Grumman Corporation. |
| (4) | On November 1, 2007, Mr. de Laurèal was appointed Senior Vice President of Corporate Development and Investor Relations. He joined the Company in 1977 and has held numerous management positions. Mr. de Laurèal has also served as President of Acme Mausoleum Corporation since January 2007. From December 1995 to December 2003, he was Vice President of Investor Relations, and from December 2003 to November 2007, he was Senior Vice President of Investor and Corporate Relations. |
| (5) | On December 1, 2009, Ms. Hunsaker was appointed Senior Vice President of Cremation. From March 2009 through November 2009, she was a consultant to the Company in evaluating its cremation business and helping to identify targets for growth. From 2004 to the present, she owns and operates Paws, Whiskers & Wags, Your Pet Crematory, a pet cremation company in Atlanta helping over 3,000 clients annually. She worked for Service Corporation International twice in the past in various senior management positions addressing cremation revenue and growth. During her last assignment at SCI from 2002 to 2004, she was President of Cremation Services/Cremation Operations, North America, and led the expansion of National Cremation Society, SCI’s largest cremation brand. Prior to her employment at SCI, Ms. Hunsaker worked for the Batesville Casket Company and was part of the team that launched Options, Batesville’s cremation company. |
| (6) | On August 10, 2011, Mr. Stephens was appointed Senior Vice President – Eastern Division. Prior to that time, he served as Senior Vice President of Sales since March 2009. He served as Executive Vice President and President of our former Western Division from July 2005 through March 2009. From January 2000 to July 2005, he served as Senior Vice President and President of our former Eastern Division. |
| (7) | On August 10, 2011, Mr. Miller was appointed Senior Vice President – Western Division. He previously served as the Regional Vice President for the Company’s Western Region. He joined the Company in 1988 and became a member of the management team at Laurel Land Funeral Home in Dallas. In 2000, Mr. Miller was named Director of Operations for Southern California, and was named Regional Vice President of Southern California in 2005 when the Catholic Mortuaries were added to his area of responsibility. |
| (8) | On July 7, 2011, Ms. Winningkoff was appointed Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary while continuing to serve as the Company’s Senior Administrative Officer. Prior to that time, she served as Vice President and Senior Administrative Officer since December 2005. From December 2004 to December 2005, she served as the Company’s Compensation and Benefits Director. From July 2002 through December 2004, she served as the Director of Compliance. She joined the Company in June 1991 and held several financial and accounting positions, including Assistant Treasurer and Director of Financial Reporting. |
| (9) | On July 7, 2011, Ms. Lacour was appointed Senior Vice President of Finance while continuing to serve as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to that time, she served as Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since July 2006. She joined the Company in February 1997 and has served in a variety of financial and accounting positions including Director of Financial Reporting and Assistant Corporate Controller. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Lacour was an auditor with KPMG LLP for four years. |
| (10) | On August 11, 2012, Mr. Merington was appointed Senior Vice President of Strategic Market Development. From August 2010 through August 2012, Mr. Merington served as Vice President of Strategic Market Development. From March 2009 through August 2010, he was Senior Vice President of Marketing. Prior to that time, he served as Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing since September 2007. From 2005 to 2007, he was the Chief Operating Officer of Ace Bayou, a furniture and pet products corporation in Kenner, |
24
Table of Contents
| Louisiana. From 2003 to 2005, Mr. Merington was the Vice President of Business Development at New York Environmental Services, a medical waste company. After the terrorist attack on the United States on September 11, 2001, he was called to active duty for one year as a commander in the United States Air Force in Afghanistan. From 1996 through 2001, he served various senior management roles at Browning-Ferris Industries before becoming President of its Gas Services Division. |
| (11) | On June 20, 1998, Mr. Alphonso was appointed Vice President and Chief Information Officer. Mr. Alphonso joined the Company in 1985 and has served in a number of key roles, including Information Systems Manager and Director of Information Systems. Prior to becoming Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Mr. Alphonso held the position of Vice President of Information Systems since 1992. |
| (12) | On March 12, 2011, Mr. Sprick was appointed to the position of Vice President of Marketing. Mr. Sprick joined the Company in 1999 and has served in a number of key roles, including Vice President of Human Resources, Senior Administrative Officer, Director of Employee Development and Performance Catalyst Coach. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Sprick served as an accountant with Price Waterhouse and Company from 1978 to 1980, as a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 1980 to 1985 and as Senior Vice President and Human Resources Manager with First Commerce Corporation, a Louisiana-based bank holding company, from 1985 to 1998. He served as Regional Human Resources Manager with Banc One Corporation, a multi-bank holding Company, from 1998 (when Banc One acquired First Commerce) until joining the Company. |
| (13) | On May 5, 2012, Ms. Millberger was appointed to the position of Vice President of Sales Effectiveness. She joined the Company in 1999 and has served in a number of key sales and marketing roles, including Senior Sales Executive, Regional Marketing Director, Area Sales Executive and Personnel Development Manager. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Milberger served as Vice President and Marketing Director with Victoria Bank & Trust from 1984 to 1991, and as National Market Regional Sales Consultant with The Forethought Group, an insurance subsidiary of Hillenbrand Industries, from 1993 until joining the Company. |
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
25
Table of Contents
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our Class A common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol STEI. On November 30, 2012, the closing sale price as reported by the NASDAQ Stock Market was $7.64. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low sale prices, as reported by the NASDAQ Stock Market. As of November 30, 2012, there were 805 record holders of our Class A common stock. Record holders include persons holding Class A common stock on behalf of one or more beneficial owners who are not holders of record.
| High | Low | |||||||
Fiscal Year 2012 | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter | $ | 8.65 | $ | 6.50 | ||||
Third Quarter | 7.78 | 5.87 | ||||||
Second Quarter | 6.71 | 4.92 | ||||||
First Quarter | 6.58 | 5.11 | ||||||
Fiscal Year 2011 | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter | $ | 7.03 | $ | 5.14 | ||||
Third Quarter | 8.21 | 6.51 | ||||||
Second Quarter | 8.39 | 6.32 | ||||||
First Quarter | 6.94 | 5.35 | ||||||
There is no established public trading market for our Class B common stock. As of October 31, 2012, our Chairman, Frank B. Stewart, Jr., was the record holder of all of our shares of Class B common stock. Our Class A and Class B common stock are substantially identical, except that holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share, and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share. Each share of Class B common stock is automatically converted into one share of Class A common stock upon transfer to persons other than certain affiliates of Frank B. Stewart, Jr. As of October 31, 2012, by virtue of his beneficial ownership of outstanding Class A and Class B common shares, Mr. Stewart controlled approximately 36 percent of our total voting power and held approximately 13 percent of our outstanding equity.
Dividends
The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of two and one-half cents per share for its Class A and Class B common stock from April 2005 through June 2009. In September 2009, June 2011 and March 2012, the quarterly cash dividend was increased by one half cent per share. Effective March 2012, the quarterly dividend rate is four cents per share of Class A and B common stock. Although we intend to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the foreseeable future, the declaration and payment of future dividends are discretionary and will be subject to determination by the Board of Directors after its review of our financial performance. Our ability to pay dividends is subject to restrictions contained in our senior secured revolving credit facility. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Equity Plan Information
For information regarding compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance, see Part III, Item 12.
26
Table of Contents
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The table below shows purchases made by or on behalf of us, or of any “affiliated purchaser” as defined in SEC rules, of our equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period | Total number of shares purchased | Average price paid per share | Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs(1) | Maximum approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs(1) | ||||||||||||
August 1, 2012 through August 31, 2012 | 465,499 | $ | 6.92 | 465,499 | $ | 21,543,319 | ||||||||||
September 1, 2012 through September 30, 2012 | — | $ | — | — | $ | 21,543,319 | ||||||||||
October 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012 | 617,470 | $ | 8.26 | 617,470 | $ | 16,444,994 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total | 1,082,969 | $ | 7.68 | 1,082,969 | $ | 16,444,994 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| (1) | We announced a $25.0 million stock repurchase program on September 19, 2007, which was increased by $25.0 million in December 2007, June 2008, June 2011 and September 2011, resulting in a $125.0 million program. As of October 31, 2012, we had repurchased 15.9 million shares for $108.6 million at an average price of $6.82 per share and have $16.4 million remaining under this program. |
27
Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The tables below contain selected consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended October 31, 2008 through October 31, 2012. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8 and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7.
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| Year Ended October 31,(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012(2) | 2011(3) | 2010(4) | 2009(5) | 2008(6) | ||||||||||||||||
Statement of Earnings Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 516,097 | $ | 512,664 | $ | 499,907 | $ | 486,379 | $ | 526,246 | ||||||||||
Total gross profit | $ | 109,682 | $ | 100,417 | $ | 96,739 | $ | 87,619 | $ | 100,607 | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 37,480 | $ | 39,317 | $ | 30,733 | $ | 23,191 | $ | (7,468 | ) | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | (1,584 | ) | (762 | ) | 245 | 75 | 134 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 35,896 | $ | 38,555 | $ | 30,978 | $ | 23,266 | $ | (7,334 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Per Share Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | $ | .43 | $ | .44 | $ | .33 | $ | .25 | $ | (.08 | ) | |||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | (.02 | ) | (.01 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | .41 | $ | .43 | $ | .33 | $ | .25 | $ | (.08 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | $ | .43 | $ | .43 | $ | .33 | $ | .25 | $ | (.08 | ) | |||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | (.02 | ) | (.01 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | .41 | $ | .42 | $ | .33 | $ | .25 | $ | (.08 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | .195 | $ | .13 | $ | .12 | $ | .105 | $ | .10 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | $ | 2,221,685 | $ | 2,157,098 | $ | 2,142,866 | $ | 2,099,004 | $ | 2,087,306 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 321,887 | 317,821 | 314,027 | 339,721 | 402,291 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ equity | 424,321 | 427,676 | 425,484 | 408,657 | 396,232 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Consolidated Operating Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Funeral homes in operation at end of period | 217 | 218 | 217 | 218 | 221 | |||||||||||||||
At-need funerals performed | 33,987 | 34,330 | 34,652 | 35,581 | 37,589 | |||||||||||||||
Prearranged funerals performed | 20,322 | 20,373 | 19,795 | 19,984 | 21,436 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total funerals performed | 54,309 | 54,703 | 54,447 | 55,565 | 59,025 | |||||||||||||||
Prearranged funerals sold | 26,208 | 26,235 | 26,656 | 26,966 | 28,390 | |||||||||||||||
Backlog of prearranged funerals at end of period | 338,803 | (7) | 332,865 | 331,374 | 331,041 | 329,085 | ||||||||||||||
Cemeteries in operation at end of period | 141 | 141 | 140 | 140 | 139 | |||||||||||||||
28
Table of Contents
| (1) | Effective November 1, 2009, we adopted FASB issued guidance regarding the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion. This guidance applies to our senior convertible notes, which were originally issued in 2007, and was required to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. For additional information, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. |
Effective November 1, 2009, we adopted FASB issued guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. This guidance was required to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
All businesses that met the criteria for discontinued operations under applicable accounting guidance have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The operating data presented represents activity related to our total operations for the respective year.
| (2) | During fiscal year 2012, we recorded the following items: |
| • | $3.3 million in restructuring and other costs related to our reorganization and workforce reduction (see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements). |
| • | $0.9 million in net losses on dispositions recorded in discontinued operations (see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements). |
| (3) | During fiscal year 2011, we recorded the following items: |
| • | $12.4 million in hurricane related insurance proceeds (see Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements). |
| • | $1.9 million charge for the loss on early extinguishment of debt as a result of the refinancing of our senior secured revolving credit facility and senior notes (see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements). |
| (4) | During fiscal year 2010, we recorded the following items: |
| • | $0.6 million in net gains on dispositions recorded in discontinued operations (see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements). |
| • | $1.0 million charge for the loss on early extinguishment of debt due to open market purchases of our senior convertible notes (see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements). |
| (5) | During fiscal year 2009, we recorded the following items: |
| • | $6.2 million in gains on early extinguishment of debt due to open market purchases of our senior convertible notes. |
| • | $3.4 million in charges related to our estimated probable obligation to fund the cemetery perpetual care trust investment losses. |
| • | $0.4 million in net hurricane related expenses primarily related to the lawsuit we filed against our insurance carriers related to our Hurricane Katrina claim. |
| • | $0.3 million in separation charges related to the separation pay of a former executive officer and costs related to the reorganization of our operating structure. |
| (6) | During fiscal year 2008, we recorded the following items: |
| • | $26.0 million charge for goodwill impairment. |
| • | $13.3 million in charges related to our estimated probable obligation to fund the cemetery perpetual care trust investment losses and a $7.4 million tax valuation allowance as a result of realized trust investment losses. |
| • | $2.3 million in net hurricane related expenses related to Hurricanes Ike and Katrina. |
| (7) | Our backlog of preneed funerals is comprised of trust-funded contracts and insurance-funded contracts. As described in Note 2(i) to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, preneed funeral contracts funded by third-party insurance are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. As of October 31, 2012, 54 percent of our preneed funeral backlog is comprised of trust-funded contracts and 46 percent is insurance-funded contracts. |
29
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
We are the second largest provider of funeral and cemetery products and services in the death care industry in the United States. As of October 31, 2012, we owned and operated 217 funeral homes and 141 cemeteries in 24 states within the United States and Puerto Rico. We sell cemetery property and funeral and cemetery products and services both at the time of need and on a preneed basis. Our revenues in each period are derived primarily from at-need sales, preneed sales delivered out of our backlog during the period (including the accumulated trust earnings or build-up in the face value of insurance contracts related to these preneed deliveries), preneed cemetery property sales and other items such as perpetual care trust earnings, finance charges on installment sale contracts for cemetery property and trust management fees. We also earn commissions on the sale of insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts that will be funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third-party insurers when we act as an agent on the sale.
General
For fiscal year 2012, we generated $516.1 million in revenue and $109.7 million in gross profit, our highest revenue and gross profit in four years. We increased cemetery gross profit by 19.5 percent and funeral gross profit by 4.1 percent while expanding cemetery gross profit margin by 250 basis points and funeral gross profit margin by 100 basis points. We produced the highest annual cemetery property and preneed funeral production in five years. Earnings from continuing operations for fiscal year 2012 were $37.5 million, compared to $39.3 million for fiscal year 2011. Fiscal year 2011 results included an after-tax benefit of $7.5 million from our successful settlement of our Hurricane Katrina litigation. Earnings from continuing operations per diluted share were $.43 for fiscal years 2012 and 2011. Our fiscal year 2012 results reflect an increase in cemetery revenue and a reduction in operating expenses associated with our continuous improvement initiative, including successfully integrating our operations and sales organizational structures.
We generated $76.5 million in operating cash flow during fiscal year 2012 and maintained our strong balance sheet with $78.7 million of cash and marketable securities on-hand and no amounts borrowed on our $150.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility at fiscal year end. During fiscal year 2012, we repurchased 4.0 million shares of our outstanding Class A common stock for $27.4 million. These purchases of common stock under our share repurchase program have resulted in a 3.5 percent decrease in total shares outstanding in the last twelve months. Also, during fiscal year 2012 we announced a 14 percent increase in our annual dividend to $.16 per share and returned $13.3 million to our shareholders through the payment of dividends, or $.155 per share.
In fiscal year 2010, we began a program of developing cremation gardens and other cremation projects in our cemeteries. We have successfully completed 31 cremation projects, and we currently have 4 projects under construction and approximately 20 additional projects currently under feasibility review. We spent $8.2 million in fiscal year 2012 on these projects, compared to $4.1 million in fiscal year 2011 and plan to spend approximately $10 to $15 million in fiscal year 2013. Cemetery cremation sales improved 15 percent in fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011, highlighting the positive returns on our ongoing cremation initiative. Additional information about our business and strategies can be found in Item 1 “Business.”
In the second quarter, we announced an organizational restructuring and workforce reduction. The organizational changes involve a restructure of the sales organization and realignment of our geographic regions and regional management to better integrate operations and sales. The restructure of our sales organization focuses on providing more efficient and effective sales strategy, management, mentoring, training and recruiting with the ultimate goals of improving customer service and increasing sales. The new organization reduces the layers of sales management and is designed to provide increased opportunities for sales employees. During the beginning of fiscal year 2013, we will finalize our sales force restructuring by implementing changes that primarily impact our customer-facing sales force, including changing our compensation structure. Separate from the changes related to the sales organization, we also announced in the second quarter a reduction of our workforce by approximately 60 employees, primarily within our corporate support services. The combined effect of our organizational restructuring and workforce reduction is expected to produce annual savings of approximately $10 million.
30
Table of Contents
Our trust earnings continue to be impacted by the volatility in the financial markets. The adverse financial market conditions throughout the latter part of fiscal year 2008 and the early part of fiscal year 2009 caused a decrease in our revenue from trust activities. From fiscal years 2008 through 2012, we recognized $38.1 million, $29.3 million, $30.7 million, $32.9 million and $34.5 million, respectively, in revenue from trust-related activities. During fiscal years 2008 through 2012, our trust portfolios had total returns of (29.5) percent, 15.4 percent, 14.2 percent, 4.4 percent and 11.4 percent, respectively, in our preneed trusts and (25.9) percent, 19.9 percent, 15.1 percent, 4.9 percent and 13.2 percent, respectively, in our cemetery perpetual care trusts.
Financial Summary for Fiscal Year 2012
For fiscal year 2012, we reported net earnings of $35.9 million, earnings from continuing operations of $37.5 million, or $.43 per diluted share, total revenue of $516.1 million and total gross profit of $109.7 million. Our net earnings for fiscal year 2012 included a $3.3 million ($2.1 million after-tax) charge due to the organizational restructuring and a separate reduction in workforce occurring primarily in the second quarter of the fiscal year. In addition, during fiscal year 2012 we sold one of our e-commerce businesses resulting in a net loss from discontinued operations of $1.6 million. For fiscal year 2011, we reported net earnings of $38.6 million, earnings from continuing operations of $39.3 million, or $.43 per diluted share, total revenue of $512.7 million and total gross profit of $100.4 million. Our net earnings for fiscal year 2011 included a $12.4 million ($7.5 million after-tax) insurance settlement related to the successful resolution of our litigation related to Hurricane Katrina damages and a $1.9 million ($1.2 million after-tax) charge for the early extinguishment of debt as a result of the refinancing of our senior notes and revolving credit facility in April 2011.
Cemetery revenue improved $4.1 million, or 1.8 percent, to $233.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. Cemetery property sales improved $2.4 million, or 2.3 percent, compared to fiscal year 2011. In addition, revenue related to trust activities increased by $2.4 million and merchandise delivered and services performed increased by $1.3 million. These improvements were partially offset by a $2.1 million decline in finance charges as a result of reduced interest rates in this low interest rate environment and a $1.6 million decrease in revenue recognized for cemetery property sales for which the property was not yet constructed or the down payment required for revenue recognition was not yet received. We generated $283.0 million in funeral revenue during fiscal year 2012, a $0.7 million decline from fiscal year 2011. The decrease is primarily due to a 0.9 percent decline in same-store funeral services performed, which we believe is consistent with industry-wide data in our markets. The decline in funeral services was partially offset by a 0.3 percent improvement in same-store average revenue per funeral service. Our net preneed funeral sales increased 10.0 percent during fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011. Preneed funeral sales are deferred until a future period and have no impact on current revenue.
Cemetery gross profit increased $6.6 million, or 19.5 percent, to $40.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The increase in gross profit is primarily due to the improvement in revenue, as previously noted, as well as a reduction in operating expenses associated with our continuous improvement initiative, including successfully integrating our operations and sales organizational structures earlier this year.Cemetery gross profit margin improved 250 basis points to 17.3 percent for fiscal year 2012 from 14.8 percent for fiscal year 2011. Funeral gross profit increased $2.7 million, or 4.1 percent, to $69.3 million for fiscal year 2012. The improvement in gross profit is primarily due to a reduction in operating expenses associated with our continuous improvement initiative, including successfully integrating our operations and sales organizational structures earlier this year, as well as an improvement in our insurance claims experience. Funeral gross profit margin improved 100 basis points to 24.5 percent for fiscal year 2012 from 23.5 percent for fiscal year 2011.
During fiscal year 2012, we announced a 14 percent increase in our annual dividend to $.16 per share from $.14 per share. We paid $13.3 million in dividends to our shareholders in fiscal year 2012, compared to $11.8 million in fiscal year 2011. Throughout fiscal year 2012, we repurchased 4.0 million shares of our outstanding Class A common stock for $27.4 million. As of October 31, 2012 we had $16.4 million remaining under our $125.0 million stock repurchase program. Our weighted average diluted shares outstanding decreased to 86.3 million shares for fiscal year 2012 compared to 90.5 million shares for fiscal year 2011. This decrease is primarily a result of our stock repurchase program, which yielded a positive impact on our earnings per share. Purchases of Class A common stock under our share repurchase program have resulted in a 3.5 percent decrease in total shares outstanding in the last twelve months.
31
Table of Contents
Cash flow provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2012 was $76.5 million compared to $86.8 million for fiscal year 2011. The decline in cash flow is primarily due to $11.3 million of the Hurricane Katrina settlement received during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011.
During the third quarter of 2012, our Board of Directors appointed Dr. John B. Elstrott, Jr. to the newly created position of lead independent director. Among his primary responsibilities as lead independent director, Dr. Elstrott will act as the principal liaison between the independent directors and the CEO, assist the CEO and the Chairman of the Board with developing Board agendas and preside at Board meetings and executive sessions of the independent directors.
Preneed-Backlog, Trust Portfolio and Cash Impact of Sales
Overview
We believe that preneed funeral and cemetery property sales are two of the primary drivers of sustainable long-term growth in the number of families served by our funeral homes and cemeteries. Our preneed funeral service and merchandise sales and preneed cemetery service and merchandise sales are deferred into our backlog while our preneed cemetery property sales are recognized currently in accordance with the retail land sale provisions of ASC 360-Property, Plant and Equipment. For a detailed discussion of our revenue recognition policies and how we account for our at-need sales, preneed sales and trust earnings, see Notes 2(i), 2(j), 2(k), and Notes 4 through 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Backlog
We estimate that as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 the future value of our preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services backlog represented approximately $1.8 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively, of revenue to be recognized in the future as these prepaid products and services are ultimately delivered. This is made up of approximately $1.2 billion from trust and $0.6 billion from insurance as of October 31, 2012 and approximately $1.1 billion from trust and $0.6 billion from insurance as of October 31, 2011. This represents the face value of the backlog taking into account unrealized earnings and losses on the funds held in trust and realized earnings and losses (including impairments) on the funds held in trust not yet recognized as revenue plus the earnings that are projected on the funds held in trust and the current face value of insurance contracts. It assumes no future preneed sales and assumes maturities each year consistent with our historical experience, with the majority of existing contracts expected to mature over the next 15 years. In addition, in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, the analysis assumes a weighted average annual return of approximately 5 percent and 4 percent, respectively, projected from our trusts over the expected life of the contracts and zero percent for increasing death benefits on insurance contracts. Actual results could differ materially from our assumptions used in the calculation. Proceeds of these insurance policies may be used by customers for other purposes and are portable to other funeral service providers or for completely separate purposes.
Supplemental Trust Portfolio Information
We maintain three types of trusts and escrow accounts: (1) preneed funeral merchandise and services, (2) preneed cemetery merchandise and services (together with the preneed funeral merchandise and services trust, “preneed trusts”) and (3) cemetery perpetual care. The size of the trusts depends primarily upon the level of preneed sales and maturities, the amount of dividend and interest income and investment gains or losses and funds added through acquisitions, if any.
As of October 31, 2012, approximately 7 percent of our trust portfolio was invested in cash, 43 percent in equities, 34 percent in fixed-income securities, 9 percent in preferred stock, 2 percent in each of real estate index funds, commodity index funds and master limited partnership index funds and 1 percent in other investments. Our trust portfolios and trust earnings continue to be impacted by volatility in the financial markets and contain a substantial proportion of equity securities. The equity securities have generally experienced increases and decreases in value commensurate with the overall financial markets.
32
Table of Contents
During fiscal year 2008, we realized aggregate net losses of $35.1 million in our preneed trusts and recorded a $7.4 million tax valuation allowance. In addition, we realized aggregate net losses of $9.7 million in our cemetery perpetual care trusts. We recorded a related charge for the estimated probable funding obligation to restore the net realized losses of $13.3 million in certain of our cemetery perpetual care trusts. At their lowest quarter-end point, our trust portfolios reached a net unrealized loss position of $370.6 million as of January 31, 2009. As of October 31, 2011, we recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $44.7 million in our preneed trusts and $11.0 million in our perpetual care trusts, and reduced the cost basis of the related securities to fair market value. These losses and impairments had no impact on our balance sheet, as the securities and corresponding liabilities are already recorded at fair market value on our balance sheet. However, the losses and impairments in our preneed trusts were allocated to the underlying contracts and will be recognized as the services and merchandise are performed and delivered in the future, reducing the revenues and gross profits we would otherwise have realized related to those contracts. After these losses and impairments and an overall improvement in the market, our net unrealized loss position was $83.1 million as of October 31, 2012.
During late fiscal 2008, we reviewed alternative asset allocation models and selected new asset allocation goals that emphasize diversification and reduce volatility. We have taken advantage of the improvement in the overall markets to adjust our asset allocation towards these goals. Currently, 25 percent of our portfolio is invested in asset classes that were not represented in our trusts just three years ago, including real estate investment trusts, high yield mutual funds and master limited partnerships, among others. We have been investing in proportionately more exchange traded/index funds and fewer individual equities. We continuously evaluate our investment strategies to maintain an asset allocation that provides consistent returns with appropriate risk. The long-term objectives are to preserve principal while seeking appropriate levels of current income and capital appreciation in order to provide returns that match inflation plus a reasonable return.
The following table presents the annual realized return in our trusts for fiscal years 2002 through 2012. The returns represent interest, dividends and realized capital gains or losses, but not unrealized capital gains or losses.
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3% | 4.8 | % | 2.6 | % | 4.3 | % | 5.1 | % | 4.8 | % | (3.3 | )% | (.4 | )% | 1.7 | % | 4.4 | % | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents the annual total returns in our trusts for fiscal years 2002 through 2012 including realized and unrealized gains and losses:
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6.4)% | 16.1 | % | 4.1 | % | 6.0 | % | 12.2 | % | 7.7 | % | (28.5 | )% | 16.6 | % | 14.4 | % | 4.6 | % | 11.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents the total returns of our preneed trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts including realized and unrealized gains and losses for the periods indicated:
| Preneed Trusts | Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts | |||||||
For the year ended October 31, 2012 | 11.4 | % | 13.2 | % | ||||
For three years ended October 31, 2012 | 9.9 | % | 11.0 | % | ||||
For five years ended October 31, 2012 | 1.6 | % | 4.0 | % | ||||
For ten years ended October 31, 2012 | 5.5 | % | 6.1 | % | ||||
During fiscal years 2012 and 2011, we experienced positive trends in the overall market and in our preneed and perpetual care trusts. For the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, our preneed trusts experienced a total return, including both realized and unrealized losses, of 11.4 percent and 4.4 percent, respectively, and our cemetery perpetual care trusts experienced a total return, including both realized and unrealized losses, of 13.2 percent and 4.9 percent, respectively.
In our preneed trusts, the fair market value of the investments in the trusts were $68.5 million and $101.1 million lower than our cost basis as of October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, respectively. In our cemetery perpetual care trusts, the fair market value of our investments were $14.6 million and $30.7 million lower than our cost basis as of October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, respectively. For additional information see Notes 4, 5 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8. The cost basis of our trust assets reflect the price we originally paid for the securities, reduced for other-than-temporary impairments we have recorded pursuant to GAAP.
33
Table of Contents
We believe that the trust investments will appreciate in value over the long-term. We continue to monitor our investment portfolio closely. Although we have significant unrealized and unallocated losses in our trust portfolio, as of October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, we had $187.1 million and $179.0 million, respectively, in trust earnings, net of losses, that have been realized and allocated to contracts that will be recognized in the future as the underlying contracts are performed.
Securities with unrealized losses totaling $103.3 million at October 31, 2012 were also in a loss position at October 31, 2011, down from $135.2 million at the end of the last fiscal year. For additional information see Notes 4, 5 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
We perform a separate analysis to determine whether our preneed contracts are in a loss position and whether a charge to earnings to record a liability for any expected losses is required. No charge has ever been required. For additional information, see Note 2(m) to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 and “Overview of Critical Accounting Policies.”
We generate revenue related to the trusts from investment management fees earned by our subsidiary, ITI. During fiscal years 2008 through 2012, these fees amounted to $10.0 million, $8.0 million, $9.4 million, $10.0 million and $11.7 million, respectively. These fees are based on the fair market value of the investments in the preneed trust portfolio and the cemetery perpetual care trusts. Significant changes in the fair market value of the portfolio impact the fees earned by the Company.
The following table presents the significant sectors in which our trust portfolio is invested and the percentage of each sector to the total trust portfolio as of October 31, 2012 (in millions).
| Preneed Trusts | Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts | |||||||||||||||
Sector | Fair Market Value | Percentage of Portfolio | Fair Market Value | Percentage of Portfolio | ||||||||||||
Cash and mutual funds | $ | 259.5 | 44 | % | $ | 122.0 | 46 | % | ||||||||
Financial Services | $ | 68.0 | 11 | % | $ | 47.5 | 18 | % | ||||||||
Information Technology | $ | 50.3 | 8 | % | $ | 12.3 | 5 | % | ||||||||
Healthcare Services | $ | 47.0 | 8 | % | $ | 19.1 | 7 | % | ||||||||
Issuer specific investments in the financial services sector represented $68.0 million of the fair market value of our preneed trust portfolio as of October 31, 2012, of which 60 percent related to preferred stock, 24 percent related to investments in common stock and 16 percent related to fixed-income securities. Issuer specific investments in the financial services sector represented $47.5 million of the fair market value of our cemetery perpetual care trust portfolio as of October 31, 2012, of which 66 percent related to preferred stock, 21 percent related to fixed-income securities and 13 percent related to investments in common stock.
Issuer specific investments in the information technology sector represented $50.3 million of the fair market value of our preneed trust portfolio as of October 31, 2012, of which 97 percent related to investments in common stock and 3 percent related to fixed-income securities. Issuer specific investments in the information technology sector represented $12.3 million of the fair market value of our cemetery perpetual care trust portfolio as of October 31, 2012, of which 93 percent related to investments in common stock and 7 percent related to fixed-income securities.
Issuer specific investments in the healthcare services sector represented $47.0 million of the fair market value of our preneed trust portfolio as of October 31, 2012, of which 97 percent related to investments in common stock and 3 percent related to fixed-income securities. Issuer specific investments in the healthcare services sector represented $19.1 million of the fair market value of our cemetery perpetual care trust portfolio as of October 31, 2012, of which 90 percent related to investments in common stock and 10 percent related to fixed-income securities.
34
Table of Contents
The following table presents the significant sectors in which our trust portfolio currently has unrealized losses and the percentage of each sector to the total unrealized losses as of October 31, 2012 (in millions). We may have other investments in these sectors through our mutual fund holdings.
| Preneed Trusts | Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts | |||||||||||||||
Sector | Unrealized Losses | Percentage of Total Unrealized Losses | Unrealized Losses | Percentage of Total Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||
Financial Services | $ | 2.1 | 3 | % | $ | 1.1 | 5 | % | ||||||||
Information Technology | $ | 32.1 | 38 | % | $ | 8.5 | 35 | % | ||||||||
Healthcare Services | $ | 5.8 | 7 | % | $ | 1.5 | 6 | % | ||||||||
Risks associated with the financial services sector include risk of failure of various large financial institutions, changing government regulation, interest rates, cost of capital funds, credit losses and volatility in financial markets. The information technology sector risks include overall economic conditions, short product cycles, rapid obsolescence of products, competition and government regulation. The healthcares services sector risks include the failure of research and development products, class-action litigation related to adverse side-effects, changes in the level of U.S. Government funding for Medicare and Medicaid, the loss of patent protection on existing pharmaceutical drugs and the impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Impact of Preneed Sales on Near-Term Cash
The impact of preneed sales on near-term cash flow depends primarily on the commissions paid on the sale, the timing of the tax payments on the sale, whether the sale is funded by trust or insurance, the portion of the sale required to be placed into trust and the terms of the particular contracts such as the size of the down payment required and the length of the contract. We are required to place a portion of each cash installment paid by the customer into trust; therefore, we may be required to use our own cash to cover a portion of the commission due on the installment from the customer. Accordingly, preneed trust sales are generally cash flow negative initially, but may become cash flow positive at varying times over the life of the contract, depending upon the trusting requirements and the terms of the particular contract. Generally preneed insurance sales are slightly cash flow positive as commissions received generally exceed the commissions paid to sales counselors. Commissions related to preneed funeral and preneed cemetery services and merchandise sales are expensed as incurred.
Cash flows related to earnings in our trusts, deposits and withdrawals and related matters and our cemetery perpetual care funding obligations are described in Notes 4, 5 and 6 of the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Overview of Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require us to make estimates and assumptions. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgment. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Deferred Revenue and Revenue Recognition
Funeral revenue is recognized when funeral services are ultimately performed. Our funeral receivables included in current receivables primarily consist of amounts due for funeral services already performed. We sell price-guaranteed prearranged funeral contracts through various programs providing for future funeral services at prices prevailing when the agreements are signed. Revenues associated with sales of prearranged funeral contracts, which include accumulated trust earnings, are deferred until such time that the funeral services are ultimately performed. See Note 2(i) to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
35
Table of Contents
Revenue associated with cemetery merchandise and services is recognized when the service is ultimately performed or merchandise is actually delivered. Revenue associated with preneed cemetery property interment rights is recognized in accordance with the retail land sales provision of ASC 360—Property, Plant and Equipment. Under this guidance, revenue from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until 10 percent of the sales price has been collected. Revenue related to the preneed sale of cemetery property prior to completion of its construction is recognized on a percentage of completion method of accounting. See Note 2(j) to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
We defer all dividends and interest earned and net capital gains and losses realized by our preneed trusts including impairments until the underlying service or the merchandise is delivered. Unrealized capital gains and losses are not allocated to specific contracts.
From time to time, unidentified contracts are presented to us primarily relating to contracts sold prior to the time we acquired certain businesses. In addition, from time to time, we have identified in our backlog, certain contracts in which services or merchandise have already been delivered. Using historical trends and statistical analysis, we have recorded an estimated net debit for these items.
Perpetual Care Funding Obligation
Certain states allow us to withdraw realized capital gains from cemetery perpetual care trusts, while other states prohibit these withdrawals. These earnings and related funds are intended to defray cemetery maintenance costs and are recorded as revenue. In the event that we have been allowed to withdraw realized gains from the trust and then realize net losses in the trust, we may determine we have a funding obligation to restore the net realized losses of the trust. A charge is recorded in the statement of earnings at the time it is considered probable that we will be required to restore the realized losses.
Loss Contract Analysis
Each quarter we perform an analysis to determine whether our preneed contracts are in a loss position, which would necessitate a charge to earnings. For this analysis, we add the sales prices of the underlying contracts and realized earnings, then subtract realized losses to derive the net amount of proceeds for contracts as of that particular balance sheet date. We then consider unrealized gains and losses based on current market prices quoted for the investments, but we do not include future expected returns on the investments in our analysis. We compare the amount of adjusted proceeds after considering net unrealized gains and losses to the estimated direct costs to deliver the contracts, which consist primarily of funeral and cemetery merchandise costs and salaries, supplies and equipment related to the delivery of a preneed contract. If a deficiency were to exist, we would record a charge to earnings and a corresponding liability for the expected loss on the delivery of those contracts from our deferred revenue. Due to the positive margins of our preneed contracts and the trust portfolio returns we have experienced in prior years, there is currently sufficient capacity for additional market depreciation before a contract loss would occur. No such charges have ever been recorded.
Variable Interest Entities
We consolidate our preneed trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts. For a more detailed discussion of our related accounting policies, see Notes 2(k) and 4 through 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts are not recorded on our balance sheet, as described in Note 2(i) to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Determination of Whether Securities Held in Trusts are Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired
We have significant unrealized losses in certain securities held in our trust portfolios. Determining whether these losses are temporary or other-than-temporary is inherently subjective. To determine whether an unrealized loss is other-than-temporary, we analyze the securities on an individual trust account basis as well as a security-by-security basis. The evaluation first considers whether we have sufficient liquidity within each individual trust account to hold the investments in an unrealized loss position for an extended period of time. The liquidity assessment of the individual trust accounts includes estimates of annual trust income, historical deposits and
36
Table of Contents
withdrawals, cash balances, upcoming debt investment maturities and other liquidity alternatives. We also evaluate consensus analyst recommendations, concerns specific to the issuer, overall market performance and annual returns required to recover the loss. We also evaluate whether we have the intent to hold the security until it recovers in value.
If we determine that an unrealized loss is other-than-temporary, we must write down the cost basis of the impaired security to fair value at that time, which would generally be the current trading price. Any subsequent recovery in fair value cannot be recognized until the security is sold.
Any losses realized from other-than-temporary impairments of securities held in our trusts generally would have no immediate impact on our balance sheet, because our trust portfolio securities are already carried at fair market value on our balance sheet.
In our preneed trusts, losses from other-than-temporary impaired securities generally would have no immediate impact on our revenues, margins, earnings or cash flow. However, such losses would be allocated to the underlying contracts and would have an adverse impact on the amount of future revenue recognized from the trusts at the time the specific contract is ultimately performed. Accordingly, a determination that any significant losses in these trust portfolios are other-than-temporary could have a material adverse effect on our future trust earnings.
In our cemetery perpetual care trusts, such losses generally would have no immediate impact on our revenues, margins, earnings or cash flow, unless the losses caused us to realize a probable funding obligation as described in Item 1A “Risk Factors” and “Overview of Critical Accounting Policies-Perpetual Care Funding Obligation.”
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales Cancellations
Management must make estimates of the collectibility of our accounts receivable. We establish a reserve for uncollectible installment contracts and trade accounts based on a range of percentages applied to accounts receivable aging categories. These percentages are based on an analysis of our historical collection and write-off experience. In addition, we establish a reserve for sales cancellations for cemetery property sales based on historical cancellations and recent write-off activity. This reserve is recorded as a reduction in cemetery revenue. We also establish an allowance for cancellations of insurance and third-party commissions based on historical experience for cancellations of insurance contracts within the period of refundability. These estimates are impacted by a number of factors, including changes in the economy and demographic or competitive changes in our areas of operation. If circumstances change, our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to us could change by a material amount.
Depreciation of Long-Lived Assets
Buildings and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, primarily using the straight-line method. Buildings and building improvement items are generally depreciated over a period ranging from 10 to 40 years. Equipment is generally depreciated over the following ranges: light equipment, 5 to 10 years; heavy equipment, 10 years; computer equipment and software, 3 to 6 years; and crematory equipment, 5 to 20 years. Vehicles are generally depreciated over 5 to 7 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the term of the lease or the life of the asset. These estimates of the useful lives may be affected by such factors as changes in regulatory requirements or changing market conditions.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. This review is based on our projections of anticipated undiscounted future cash flows and compares the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by those assets to the carrying amount of those assets. The net carrying value of any assets not fully recoverable would be reduced to fair value. While we believe that our estimates of undiscounted future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows and comparable sales values could materially affect our evaluations.
37
Table of Contents
Valuation of Goodwill
In our determination of reporting units for goodwill impairment testing purposes, both qualitative and quantitative characteristics are evaluated. Gross margins are analyzed for purposes of determining whether or not our operating regions are considered economically similar. Qualitative factors include the nature of our products and services, consistency of products and services and the delivery of those products and services in our funeral homes and cemeteries, the similarity of class of customers across all locations and regulations in different jurisdictions. Based on our evaluation, we have eleven reporting units. Because goodwill impairment tests are applied at the reporting unit level, a change in a reporting unit can have a material effect on the outcome of the test. See Note 2(g) to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for additional information.
Goodwill of a reporting unit must be tested for impairment on at least an annual basis. We conduct our annual goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. In addition to an annual review, we assess the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may be greater than its fair value. Factors we consider important that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of our assets or the strategy for our overall business and significant negative industry or economic trends.
Goodwill was allocated to these reporting units based on the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill determined in a business combination. That is, we allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. We calculate the fair value, or enterprise value, for each of the reporting units based on a discounted cash flow analysis, as supplemented by comparing them to the trading multiples of companies in our industry and supplier industries calculated as enterprise value divided by EBITDA. We also review multiples paid in recent acquisition transactions within the deathcare industry.
In fiscal year 2011, we adopted guidance that simplified the testing for goodwill impairment. The guidance permits an entity to first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining if performing the two-step goodwill impairment test is necessary. In April 2012, we announced an organizational restructuring and a separate workforce reduction. The organizational changes involved a restructure of the sales organization and realignment of our geographic regions and regional management. Due to the realignment of certain regions, we evaluated the economic similarity of our regions and determined that two of our funeral reporting units were impacted by this change. Our former Southeastern region was split in two, with the Northern part of the region forming the new Southeastern region and the Southern part of the region combining with the former Puerto Rico region to form the new South Florida/Puerto Rico region. For these two funeral reporting units, which have a combined goodwill balance of $58.6 million, we proceeded directly to step one of the impairment test and performed a quantitative analysis, which was performed due to the fact these are two new regions and a previous analysis was not available. This reorganization required a reallocation of goodwill.
From a qualitative perspective, in evaluating whether it is more likely than not (i.e., a probability of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, relevant events and circumstances were taken into account, with greater weight assigned to events and circumstances that most affect a reporting unit’s fair value or the carrying amounts of its assets. Items that were considered include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) macroeconomic conditions; (2) industry and market conditions; (3) costs of merchandise or labor; (4) overall financial performance; (5) other entity specific events, such as changes in management or key personnel; (6) events affecting a reporting unit, such as a change in the composition of net assets or an expected disposition; and (7) a change in our share price. In addition, we also considered recent fair value calculations for each reporting unit and determined that there was a significant difference between fair value and the carrying amount. After assessing these and other factors, we determined that is was more likely than not that the fair value of all of our reporting units was greater than the carrying amounts.
38
Table of Contents
For the two reporting units for which we performed a quantitative analysis, we determined that goodwill was not impaired. The goodwill impairment test involves estimates and management judgment. We determined the fair value of the reporting units based on present value techniques including discounted cash flows. The discounted cash flow valuation uses projections of future cash flows and includes assumptions concerning future operating performance and economic conditions that may differ from actual future cash flows. In projecting our cash flows, we used growth rates generally ranging from one to five percent in revenues and costs, and also considered additional cremation gardens and other mausoleum projects that are currently under construction. For the discount rate, we used 7.5 percent, which reflected our weighted average cost of capital determined based on our industry, suppliers and capital structure as adjusted for equity risk premiums and size risk premiums based on our market capitalization. Fair value is calculated as the sum of the projected discounted cash flows of the reporting unit over the next five years and terminal value at the end of those five years. The terminal value is calculated as the projected EBITDA at the end of the five year period divided by the discount rate minus terminal growth rates ranging from 2 to 3 percent. We prepared a sensitivity analysis of the terminal values and used the midpoint enterprise value as our best estimate.
Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of certain items, such as deferred revenue, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. The following items are reviewed to determine if a valuation allowance is required: net operating losses (federal, state and United States possessions), capital loss carry forwards and deferred tax assets (federal, state and United States possessions). To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change in this allowance in a period, we include an expense or benefit within the tax provision in the statement of earnings.
Approximately 60 percent of the October 31, 2012 fair market value of our preneed trusts are in trusts for which the Company is the grantor. For these trusts (unlike the remaining trusts for which the customers are the grantors), we retain the income tax characteristics of all earnings as realized in the trust. For example, capital gains and losses in the trusts are capital gains and losses on our tax returns. In addition, we must recognize these earnings currently for tax purposes, while for book purposes they are deferred.
Realized capital losses in the trusts for which we are the grantor, if we have or expect insufficient offsetting capital gains, may require us to record a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset (capital loss carryforward), which increases our current period effective tax rate and reduces our current period reported net earnings. Essentially, the current period valuation allowance reflects the fact that, if we cannot generate sufficient capital gains in the future against which to use the tax benefit of the capital loss (which is limited to five years), when we perform the contract, we will pay higher taxes. This tax relationship does not occur with respect to trusts for which the customer is the grantor, because all of their earnings are service revenue and thus ordinary income to us, and we do not recognize the revenue for either tax or book purposes until the underlying contract is performed.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, we adopted the guidance on uncertain tax positions in ASC 740—Income Taxes. This guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We have reviewed our income tax positions and identified certain tax deductions or revenue deferrals that are not certain.
With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for fiscal years before 2008. To the extent tax, interest and penalties are not assessed with respect to uncertain tax positions in the future, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of tax expense, interest expense or “other” expense.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to change our allowance, which could materially impact our financial condition and results of operations.
39
Table of Contents
Estimated Insurance Loss Liabilities
We purchase comprehensive general liability, automobile liability and workers compensation insurance coverages structured within a large deductible/self-insured retention premium rating program. This program results in the Company being primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs and losses covered by these policies but below our deductible. With respect to health insurance, we purchase individual and aggregate stop loss coverage with a large deductible. This program results in the Company being primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs up to the amount of the deductible, with claims in excess of the deductible amount being covered by insurance. We also have insurance coverage related to property damage, incremental costs and property operating expenses we incur due to damage caused by hurricanes and other natural disasters. Our policy is to record such amounts when recovery is probable, which generally means we have reached an agreement with the insurance company. For additional information, see Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Results of Operations
The following discussion segregates the financial results of our continuing operations into our three segments: funeral, cemetery and corporate trust management. For a discussion of our segments, see Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Comparison of Fiscal Year 2012 to Fiscal Year 2011
Year Ended October 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended October 31, 2011 – Continuing Operations
Funeral Operations
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||
| (In millions) | ||||||||||||
Funeral Revenue: | ||||||||||||
Funeral Home Locations | $ | 267.7 | $ | 267.6 | $ | .1 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | 15.3 | 16.1 | (.8 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Funeral Revenue | $ | 283.0 | $ | 283.7 | $ | (.7 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Funeral Costs: | ||||||||||||
Funeral Home Locations | $ | 212.7 | $ | 216.2 | $ | (3.5 | ) | |||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | 1.0 | .9 | .1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Funeral Costs | $ | 213.7 | $ | 217.1 | $ | (3.4 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Funeral Gross Profit: | ||||||||||||
Funeral Home Locations | $ | 55.0 | $ | 51.4 | $ | 3.6 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | 14.3 | 15.2 | (.9 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Funeral Gross Profit | $ | 69.3 | $ | 66.6 | $ | 2.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Same-Store Analysis for the Years Ended October 31, 2012 and 2011
| Change in Average Revenue | Change in Same-Store | Same-Store Cremation Rate | ||||||||||
Per Funeral Service | Funeral Services | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
0.3%(1) | (0.9 | )% | 43.1 | % | 42.5 | % | ||||||
| (1) | Corporate trust management consists of trust management fees and funeral merchandise and service trust earnings recognized with respect to preneed contracts delivered during the period. Trust management fees are established by the Company at rates consistent with industry norms based on the fair market value of assets |
40
Table of Contents
| managed and are paid by the trusts to our subsidiary, Investors Trust, Inc. The trust earnings represent the amount of distributable earnings as stipulated by our respective trust agreements that are generated by the trusts over the life of the preneed contracts and allocated to those products and services delivered during the relevant periods. See Notes 4 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for information regarding the cost basis and market value of the trust assets and current performance of the trusts (i.e., current realized gains and losses, interest income and dividends). Trust management fees included in funeral revenue for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 were $5.4 million and $4.7 million, respectively. Funeral trust earnings recognized in funeral revenue for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 with respect to preneed contracts delivered were $9.9 and $11.4 million, respectively. |
Funeral revenue declined $0.7 million, or 0.2 percent, to $283.0 million for fiscal year 2012. This decline is primarily due to a 0.9 percent decrease in same-store funeral services, which we believe is consistent with industry-wide data in our markets. This decrease was partially offset by a 0.3 percent improvement in same-store average revenue per funeral service. The cremation rate for our same-store operations was 43.1 percent for the year ended October 31, 2012 compared to 42.5 percent for the year ended October 31, 2011.
Funeral gross profit increased $2.7 million, or 4.1 percent, to $69.3 million for fiscal year 2012 compared to $66.6 million for fiscal year 2011. The improvement in gross profit is primarily due to a reduction in operating expenses associated with our continuous improvement initiative, including successfully integrating our operations and sales organizational structures, as well as an improvement in our insurance claims experience. Funeral gross profit margin improved 100 basis points to 24.5 percent for fiscal year 2012 from 23.5 percent for fiscal year 2011.
Cemetery Operations
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||
| (In millions) | ||||||||||||
Cemetery Revenue: | ||||||||||||
Cemetery Locations | $ | 223.5 | $ | 220.8 | $ | 2.7 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | 9.6 | 8.2 | 1.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Cemetery Revenue | $ | 233.1 | $ | 229.0 | $ | 4.1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cemetery Costs: | ||||||||||||
Cemetery Locations | $ | 191.8 | $ | 194.4 | $ | (2.6 | ) | |||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | .9 | .8 | .1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Cemetery Costs | $ | 192.7 | $ | 195.2 | $ | (2.5 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cemetery Gross Profit: | ||||||||||||
Cemetery Locations | $ | 31.7 | $ | 26.4 | $ | 5.3 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | 8.7 | 7.4 | 1.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Cemetery Gross Profit | $ | 40.4 | $ | 33.8 | $ | 6.6 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| (1) | Corporate trust management consists of trust management fees and cemetery merchandise and service trust earnings recognized with respect to preneed contracts delivered during the period. Trust management fees are established by the Company at rates consistent with industry norms based on the fair market value of assets managed and are paid by the trusts to our subsidiary, Investors Trust, Inc. The trust earnings represent the amount of distributable earnings as stipulated by our respective trust agreements that are generated by the trusts over the life of the preneed contracts and allocated to those products and services delivered during the relevant periods. See Notes 5 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for information regarding the cost basis and market value of the trust assets and current performance of the trusts (i.e., current realized gains and losses, interest income and dividends). Trust management fees included in cemetery revenue for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 were $6.3 million and $5.3 million, respectively, and cemetery trust earnings included in cemetery revenue for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 recognized with respect to preneed contracts delivered were $3.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Perpetual care trust earnings of $9.6 million and $8.6 million for fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively, are included in the revenues and gross profit of the cemetery segment and are reflected in cemetery locations. See Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for information regarding the cemetery perpetual care trusts. |
41
Table of Contents
Cemetery revenue increased $4.1 million, or 1.8 percent, to $233.1 million for fiscal year 2012. Cemetery property sales improved $2.4 million, or 2.3 percent, compared to fiscal year 2011. In addition, revenue related to trust activities increased by $2.4 million and merchandise delivered and services performed increased by $1.3 million. These improvements were partially offset by a $2.1 million decline in finance charges as a result of reduced interest rates in this low interest rate environment and a $1.6 million decrease in revenue recognized for cemetery property sales for which the property was not yet constructed or the down payment required for revenue recognition was not yet received.
Cemetery gross profit increased $6.6 million, or 19.5 percent, to $40.4 million for fiscal year 2012. The increase in gross profit is primarily due to the improvement in revenue, as previously noted, as well as a reduction in operating expenses associated with our continuous improvement initiative, including successfully integrating our operations and sales organizational structures. Cemetery gross profit margin improved 250 basis points to 17.3 percent for fiscal year 2012 from 14.8 percent for fiscal year 2011.
Acquisitions
During the year ended October 31, 2012, we acquired two funeral businesses. These acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method, and the acquired assets and liabilities were valued at their estimated fair values. The results of operations for these businesses, which are considered immaterial, have been included in consolidated results since the acquisition date. For additional information, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Discontinued Operations
During fiscal year 2012, we sold one of our e-commerce businesses with the results of its operations and the related impairment reported within discontinued operations. For additional information, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Other
Corporate general and administrative expenses increased $1.7 million to $28.5 million for fiscal year 2012, compared to $26.8 million for fiscal year 2011. During fiscal year 2012, we increased spending on marketing and consumer research, as well as professional and consulting fees associated with the operations and sales integration, which we believe will provide benefits in the future. In addition, we experienced an increase in health care expenses.
Results for fiscal year 2011 include $12.4 million related to the settlement of Hurricane Katrina insurance litigation. The settlement increased fiscal year 2011 pre-tax earnings by $12.4 million and net earnings by $7.5 million.
We recorded $3.3 million in restructuring and other charges during fiscal year 2012. This charge was primarily related to separation pay, termination benefits and a non-cash asset impairment due to the restructuring of the operations and sales organizational structure, as well as a separate reduction in workforce associated with our continuous improvement initiative announced in April 2012. For the year ended October 31, 2012, the decline in costs associated with the restructuring of our operations and sales organizational structure, as well as our reduction in force, are consistent with the previously announced expectations of approximately $10 million on an annual basis, realized in part in fiscal year 2012, and expected to be realized in full in fiscal year 2013. For additional information, see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
As a result of the refinancing of our senior notes and revolving credit facility in April 2011, we recorded a $1.9 million charge for the early extinguishment of debt during fiscal year 2011.
42
Table of Contents
The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the year ended October 31, 2012 was 33.3 percent compared to 37.7 percent for fiscal year 2011. For the year ended October 31, 2012, we benefited from a $2.1 million reduction in the valuation allowance for capital losses, associated with the positive performance of our trust portfolio during fiscal year 2012. During the year ended October 31, 2011, we recorded a $2.9 million one-time, non-cash charge to income tax expense as a result of the revaluation of our deferred tax asset due to a change in Puerto Rican tax legislation. This charge to tax expense was offset primarily by a reduction in the valuation allowance related to our capital loss carryforward, due in part to the positive performance of our trust portfolio during fiscal year 2011.
During fiscal year 2012, we repurchased 4.0 million shares of our Class A common stock for $27.4 million under our stock repurchase program. As of October 31, 2012, we had $16.4 million remaining under our $125.0 million stock repurchase program.
Our weighted average diluted shares outstanding decreased to 86.3 million shares for the year ended October 31, 2012 compared to 90.5 million shares for fiscal year 2011. The decrease is a direct result of our stock repurchase program, which has yielded a positive impact on our earnings per share.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $2.5 million from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2012 primarily due to cash provided by operations, offset by $27.4 million in purchases made under our stock repurchase program, $20.8 million in additions to property, plant and equipment, $13.3 million of dividends paid and a $9.8 million net increase in marketable securities. Current and long-term receivables increased $3.3 million and $4.6 million, respectively, from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2012 primarily due to an increase in sales. Goodwill increased $2.5 million from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2012 primarily due to an acquisition made in the second quarter of 2012. Cemetery property increased $5.7 million from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2012 primarily due to the continued investments in numerous construction inventory development projects. Long-term deferred taxes decreased $17.7 million from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2012 resulting primarily from the tax accounting change approved in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012. Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments, cemetery perpetual care trust investments, deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust and perpetual care trusts’ corpus were all positively impacted by the improvement in the market value of our trust assets during the year ended October 31, 2012. For additional information, see Notes 4, 5 and 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Accrued payroll increased $1.8 million from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2012 primarily due to the timing of compensation payments. Other current liabilities increased $4.7 million from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2012 primarily due to a $3.4 million increase in dividends payable. The Board accelerated the regular quarterly cash dividend, typically paid in January, to be payable on December 26, 2012 to holders of record of Class A and Class B common stock as of the close of business on December 12, 2012.
Preneed Sales into the Backlog
Net preneed funeral sales increased 10.0 percent during the year ended October 31, 2012 compared to the corresponding period in 2011.
The revenues from our preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service sales are deferred into our backlog and are not included in our previously noted operating results presented above. We had $158.8 million in net preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service sales (including $81.4 million related to third-party insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts) during the year ended October 31, 2012 to be recognized in the future as these prepaid products and services are delivered, compared to net sales of $148.1 million (including $78.9 million related to third-party insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts) for the year ended October 31, 2011. Insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts which will be funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third-party insurers are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets.
43
Table of Contents
Comparison of Fiscal Year 2011 to Fiscal Year 2010
Year Ended October 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended October 31, 2010 – Continuing Operations
Funeral Operations
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | Increase | ||||||||||
| (In millions) | ||||||||||||
Funeral Revenue: | ||||||||||||
Funeral Home Locations | $ | 267.6 | $ | 260.1 | $ | 7.5 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | 16.1 | 15.8 | .3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Funeral Revenue | $ | 283.7 | $ | 275.9 | $ | 7.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Funeral Costs: | ||||||||||||
Funeral Home Locations | $ | 216.2 | $ | 209.4 | $ | 6.8 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | .9 | .9 | — | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Funeral Costs | $ | 217.1 | $ | 210.3 | $ | 6.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Funeral Gross Profit: | ||||||||||||
Funeral Home Locations | $ | 51.4 | $ | 50.7 | $ | .7 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | 15.2 | 14.9 | .3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Funeral Gross Profit | $ | 66.6 | $ | 65.6 | $ | 1.0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Same-Store Analysis for the Years Ended October 31, 2011 and 2010
| Change in Average Revenue | Change in Same-Store | Same-Store Cremation Rate | ||||||||||
Per Funeral Service | Funeral Services | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
1.2%(1) | 0.6 | % | 42.5 | % | 41.9 | % | ||||||
| (1) | Corporate trust management consists of trust management fees and funeral merchandise and service trust earnings recognized with respect to preneed contracts delivered during the period. Trust management fees are established by the Company at rates consistent with industry norms based on the fair market value of assets managed and are paid by the trusts to our subsidiary, Investors Trust, Inc. The trust earnings represent the amount of distributable earnings as stipulated by our respective trust agreements that are generated by the trusts over the life of the preneed contracts and allocated to those products and services delivered during the relevant periods. See Notes 4 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for information regarding the cost basis and market value of the trust assets and current performance of the trusts (i.e., current realized gains and losses, interest income and dividends). Trust management fees included in funeral revenue for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were $4.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively. Funeral trust earnings recognized in funeral revenue for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 with respect to preneed contracts delivered were $11.4 and $11.3 million, respectively. |
Funeral revenue increased $7.8 million, or 2.8 percent, to $283.7 million in fiscal year 2011 from $275.9 million in fiscal year 2010. Our same-store funeral operations generated a 1.6 percent increase in average revenue per traditional funeral service and a 3.3 percent increase in average revenue per cremation service. These increases were partially offset by a shift in mix to lower-priced cremation services resulting in an overall increase of 1.2 percent in same-store average revenue per funeral service. Same-store funeral services increased 0.6 percent, or 302 events. The cremation rate for our same-store operations was 42.5 percent for fiscal year 2011 compared to 41.9 percent for fiscal year 2010.
Funeral gross profit increased $1.0 million, or 1.5 percent, to $66.6 million for fiscal year 2011 compared to $65.6 million for fiscal year 2010. The improvement in funeral gross profit is primarily due to the increase in funeral revenue, as previously noted, partially offset by an increase in funeral expenses. This increase in expenses is primarily due to changes made in our compensation package to incentivize improvements in operational performance, as well as an increase in health and general liability insurance, funeral bad debt and energy costs.
44
Table of Contents
Net preneed funeral sales increased 1.8 percent during fiscal year 2011 compared to fiscal year 2010. Preneed funeral sales are deferred until the underlying contracts are performed and have no impact on current revenue.
Cemetery Operations
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||
| (In millions) | ||||||||||||
Cemetery Revenue: | ||||||||||||
Cemetery Locations | $ | 220.8 | $ | 216.5 | $ | 4.3 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | 8.2 | 7.5 | .7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Cemetery Revenue | $ | 229.0 | $ | 224.0 | $ | 5.0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cemetery Costs: | ||||||||||||
Cemetery Locations | $ | 194.4 | $ | 192.0 | $ | 2.4 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | .8 | .9 | (.1 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Cemetery Costs | $ | 195.2 | $ | 192.9 | $ | 2.3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cemetery Gross Profit: | ||||||||||||
Cemetery Locations | $ | 26.4 | $ | 24.5 | $ | 1.9 | ||||||
Corporate Trust Management(1) | 7.4 | 6.6 | .8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Cemetery Gross Profit | $ | 33.8 | $ | 31.1 | $ | 2.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| (1) | Corporate trust management consists of trust management fees and cemetery merchandise and service trust earnings recognized with respect to preneed contracts delivered during the period. Trust management fees are established by the Company at rates consistent with industry norms based on the fair market value of assets managed and are paid by the trusts to our subsidiary, Investors Trust, Inc. The trust earnings represent the amount of distributable earnings as stipulated by our respective trust agreements that are generated by the trusts over the life of the preneed contracts and allocated to those products and services delivered during the relevant periods. See Notes 5 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for information regarding the cost basis and market value of the trust assets and current performance of the trusts (i.e., current realized gains and losses, interest income and dividends). Trust management fees included in cemetery revenue for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were $5.3 million and $4.9 million, respectively, and cemetery trust earnings included in cemetery revenue for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 recognized with respect to preneed contracts delivered were $2.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively. Perpetual care trust earnings of $8.6 million and $7.4 million for fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively, are included in the revenues and gross profit of the cemetery segment and are reflected in cemetery locations. See Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 for information regarding the cemetery perpetual care trusts. |
Cemetery revenue increased $5.0 million, or 2.2 percent, to $229.0 million in fiscal year 2011 primarily due to a $7.3 million, or 7.6 percent, increase in cemetery property sales, coupled with a $1.9 million improvement in revenue related to trust activities of which $1.2 million of the increase relates to cemetery perpetual care trust earnings. These increases were partially offset by a $1.2 million reduction in finance charges as a result of reduced interest rates in this low interest rate environment and a $0.9 million decrease in merchandise delivered.
Cemetery gross profit increased $2.7 million, or 8.7 percent, to $33.8 million for fiscal year 2011, even after considering a $1.1 million positive impact in fiscal year 2010 of perpetual care withdrawals related to prior cancellations which we used to offset our perpetual care expenses. The improvement in cemetery gross profit is primarily due to the $5.0 million increase in revenue, as previously noted above.
45
Table of Contents
Acquisitions
During the year ended October 31, 2011, we acquired two funeral home/cemetery combinations for approximately $9.1 million. The acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method, and the acquired assets and liabilities were valued at their estimated fair values. The results of operations for these businesses, which are considered immaterial, have been included in consolidated results since the acquisition date. For additional information, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
In addition, we completed the construction of one additional stand-alone funeral home and one funeral home that is part of a combination operation and purchased a funeral home building that we previously leased.
Discontinued Operations
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, we sold one business for a gain of $0.4 million, net of taxes, which is included in discontinued operations. For additional information, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Other
Corporate general and administrative expenses decreased $1.2 million to $26.8 million for fiscal year 2011, compared to $28.0 million for the same period of 2010. During fiscal year 2010, we experienced increased litigation costs primarily related to the settlement of litigation. During fiscal year 2011, we realized cost savings from our continuous improvement initiatives.
In August 2011, we successfully settled litigation related to Hurricane Katrina damages for $12.4 million, including $1.1 million that was advanced to the Company in fiscal year 2007.
Interest expense decreased $1.7 million to $22.7 million during fiscal year 2011 primarily due to the significant repurchases of our senior convertible notes in the open market that occurred through fiscal year 2010.
The effective tax rate for fiscal year 2011 was 37.7 percent compared to 31.4 percent for fiscal year 2010. The increased rate in fiscal year 2011 is primarily due to a $2.9 million charge to income tax expense in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 as a result of the revaluation of our deferred tax asset due to a change in Puerto Rican tax legislation. This charge to tax expense was offset primarily by a reduction in the valuation allowance related to our capital loss carry forward, due in part to the performance of our trust portfolio during fiscal year 2011. In fiscal year 2010, the effective tax rate was positively impacted by a $1.8 million tax benefit caused by the reduced valuation allowance on the capital loss carry forward and a $1.5 million tax benefit attributable to the utilization of state net operating loss carryovers realized from our state tax planning strategies.
During fiscal year 2011, we completed refinancing transactions that significantly extended our debt maturity profile at favorable terms. We issued $200.0 million of 6.50 percent senior notes due 2019 and repurchased $194.2 million of our $200.0 million outstanding 6.25 percent senior notes due 2013. We redeemed the remaining $5.8 million of our 6.25 percent senior notes outstanding in May 2011 at par. We also amended our $95.0 million revolving credit facility, which was undrawn and scheduled to mature in June 2012, to increase its size to $150.0 million and extend its maturity to April 2016. As a result of these transactions, we recorded a charge for the early extinguishment of debt of $1.9 million during fiscal year 2011. During fiscal year 2010, we purchased $35.9 million aggregate principal amount of our senior convertible notes in the open market at $4.5 million less than the face value of the notes. In connection with the purchases, we recorded a net loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1.0 million for fiscal year 2010.
During fiscal year 2011, we repurchased 4.5 million shares of our Class A common stock for $28.7 million under our stock repurchase program.
Preneed Sales into the Backlog
Net preneed funeral sales increased 1.8 percent during the year ended October 31, 2011 compared to the corresponding period in 2010.
46
Table of Contents
The revenues from our preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service sales are deferred into our backlog and are not included in our previously noted operating results. We had $148.1 million in net preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service sales (including $78.9 million related to third-party insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts) during the year ended October 31, 2011 to be recognized in the future as these prepaid products and services are delivered, compared to net sales of $144.4 million (including $77.3 million related to third-party insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts) for the corresponding period in 2010. Insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts which will be funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third-party insurers are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
We generate cash in our operations primarily from at-need sales, preneed sales that turn at-need, funds we are able to withdraw from our trusts and escrow accounts when preneed sales turn at-need, monies collected on preneed sales that are not required to be placed in trust and items such as cemetery perpetual care trust earnings and finance charges. Over the last five years, we have generated more than $60 million annually in cash flow from operations. We have historically satisfied our working capital requirements with cash flows from operations. We believe that our current level of cash on hand, projected cash flows from operations and available capacity under the $150 million senior secured revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the foreseeable future.
As of October 31, 2012, we had no amounts drawn on the revolving credit facility, which matures in 2016, and our availability under the facility, after giving consideration to $0.8 million outstanding letters of credit and the $23.5 million Florida bond, was $125.7 million. See Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information about the Florida bond. We also have outstanding $131.5 million principal amount in senior convertible notes as of October 31, 2012, of which $86.4 million is scheduled to mature in 2014 and $45.1 million is scheduled to mature in 2016. We have outstanding $200.0 million principal amount in senior notes set to mature in 2019. See the table below under “Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments” for further information on our long-term debt obligations.
Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, we increased our quarterly cash dividend on our Class A and B common stock from three and one half cents per share to four cents per share resulting in a 14 percent increase in our annual dividend rate to $0.16 per share. Dividends amounted to $13.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2012 compared to $11.8 million during fiscal year 2011. The declaration and payment of future dividends are discretionary and will be subject to determination by the Board of Directors after its review of our financial performance. In June 2011 and September 2011, we increased our stock repurchase program by $25.0 million resulting in a $125.0 million program. Under the program, we purchased 4.0 million shares of our Class A common stock for approximately $27.4 million during the year ended October 31, 2012. In November 2012, we purchased an additional 0.2 million shares of our Class A common stock for approximately $1.1 million and as of November 30, 2012, had $15.3 million remaining available under the program. Repurchases under the program are limited to our Class A common stock, and are made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at such times and in such amounts as management deems appropriate, depending upon market conditions and other factors.
We plan to continue to evaluate our options for deployment of cash flow as opportunities arise. We believe that the use of our cash to make acquisitions of death care businesses, pay dividends, repurchase debt and stock, invest in our strategic initiatives and construct funeral homes on cemeteries of unaffiliated third parties or on our own strategic locations are all attractive options. We are continuing to invest in further improving our business processes, and continue to look at ways to improve our organization and cost structure.
In fiscal year 2010, we began a program of developing cremation gardens and other cremation projects in our cemeteries. We have successfully completed 31 cremation projects, and we currently have 4 projects either under construction or expected to begin construction and approximately 20 additional projects under feasibility review. For the year ended October 31, 2012, we spent $8.2 million on these projects, compared to $4.1 million in fiscal year 2011, and we plan to spend approximately $10 million to $15 million in fiscal year 2013. As of October 31, 2012, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.
47
Table of Contents
We believe that growing our organization through acquisitions remains a good business strategy, as it will enable us to enjoy the important synergies and economies of scale from our existing infrastructure. We regularly review acquisition and other strategic opportunities, which may require us to draw on our senior secured revolving credit facility or pursue additional debt or equity financing. During the year ended October 31, 2012, we invested $6.2 million of available cash for the acquisition of two funeral businesses, and during the year ended October 31, 2011, we invested $9.1 million of available cash for the acquisition of two funeral home/cemetery combinations.
We received Internal Revenue Service approval in fiscal year 2010 on five requests for changes in tax accounting methods, which resulted in the deferral of approximately $84.0 million of taxable income. These changes increased the amounts available to offset taxable income beginning in 2010 to approximately $105.0 million. These changes primarily relate to our tax accounting methods for preneed cemetery services and preneed funeral merchandise. These changes permit us to defer the recognition of income for tax purposes (and payment of taxes) with respect to those amounts until the time the service is provided or the merchandise is actually delivered. We will eventually pay taxes with respect to the $84.0 million as the related preneed contracts are performed in the future.
In fiscal year 2012, we received approval from the Internal Revenue Service for a change in tax accounting method resulting in the deferral of approximately $52.0 million in revenue until the service is performed or merchandise is delivered, thereby increasing the amount available to reduce taxable income. This increase resulted or will result in approximately $21.0 million of reduced tax payments. We will eventually pay taxes with respect to the $52.0 million when the related preneed contracts are performed in the future.
As a result of the tax accounting changes that took place in fiscal years 2010 through 2012 described above, we had approximately $157.0 million available to offset taxable income as of 2010. We were able to utilize approximately $42.0 million in fiscal year 2012, $46.0 million in fiscal year 2011 and approximately $26.0 million in fiscal year 2010, which reduced federal income taxes paid by approximately $14.7 million, $16.1 million and $9.1 million, respectively.
We are continuing to review all of our tax accounting methods to determine opportunities to further improve our current tax position. Several possible changes are being considered that could result in potential reductions in future tax payments. At this time, we cannot predict with certainty what, if any, reductions in future tax payments we will obtain. However, we currently do not expect that these potential reductions in future tax payments, if obtained, will be as substantial as those obtained in fiscal years 2009 through 2012, which resulted in a combination of refunds and reductions of federal income tax payments totaling in excess of $100 million. Based on the currently approved changes, we expect to have federal net operating losses available in fiscal year 2013 to offset a portion of federal income taxes. For fiscal years 2013 and 2014, we expect our federal cash tax payments to be approximately $5 million to $10 million above fiscal year 2012 amounts.
Cash Flow
Comparison of Fiscal Year 2012 to Fiscal Year 2011
Cash flow provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2012 was $76.5 million compared to $86.8 million for fiscal year 2011. The decline in cash flow is primarily due to $11.3 million of the Hurricane Katrina settlement received during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Our investing activities resulted in a net cash outflow of $36.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to a net cash outflow of $32.5 million for fiscal year 2011. The change is primarily due to a $12.8 million net change related to purchases and sales of certificates of deposits, marketable securities and restricted cash equivalents offset by declines in capital expenditures and acquisition spending. For the year ended October 31, 2012, capital expenditures amounted to $20.8 million, which included $15.1 million for maintenance capital expenditures, $2.2 million for the construction of new funeral homes, $1.7 million related to the implementation of new business systems and $1.8 million related to the purchase of land and a new building for an existing business. For the year ended October 31, 2011, capital expenditures were $27.0 million, which included $17.6 million for maintenance capital expenditures, $3.5 million for the construction of new funeral homes, $1.3 million related to the
48
Table of Contents
implementation of new business systems and $4.6 million related to the purchase of a funeral home building that we previously leased. We also purchased two funeral businesses in fiscal year 2012 resulting in a net cash outflow of $6.2 million, compared to purchasing two funeral/cemetery combinations in fiscal year 2011 for $9.1 million.
Our financing activities resulted in a net cash outflow of $37.9 million for the year ended October 31, 2012, compared to a net cash outflow of $44.7 million for fiscal year 2011. During fiscal year 2012, we repurchased $27.4 million of our common stock compared to $28.8 million in fiscal year 2011. During fiscal year 2011, we issued $200.0 million of 6.50 percent senior notes due 2019 and repurchased and redeemed $200.0 million of 6.25 percent senior notes due 2013. We also paid $5.9 million in debt refinancing costs during fiscal year 2011 related to the senior notes transactions and refinancing of the senior secured revolving credit facility. Dividends paid increased from $11.8 million in fiscal year 2011 to $13.3 million in fiscal year 2012.
Comparison of Fiscal Year 2011 to Fiscal Year 2010
Cash flow provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2011 was $86.8 million compared to $63.4 million for fiscal year 2010. The increase in operating cash flow is primarily due to the receipt of $11.3 million of the Hurricane Katrina settlement during the fourth quarter of 2011. In addition, we experienced a change in working capital during fiscal year 2011, primarily driven by the timing of trust withdrawals and deposits, partially offset by an increase in inventory and receivables. These increases are due in part to the improved cemetery property sales, which are typically financed.
Our investing activities resulted in a net cash outflow of $32.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2011, compared to a net cash outflow of $24.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2010. The change is primarily due to a $13.1 million net change related to purchases and sales of certificates of deposits, marketable securities and restricted cash equivalents. In fiscal year 2011, we replaced a letter of credit by posting cash to satisfy collateral requirements with insurance carriers and invested the cash collateral in a money market fund. Both methods of posting collateral are available to us in the future at any time. We also purchased two funeral/cemetery combinations in fiscal year 2011 resulting in a net cash outflow of $9.1 million. For the year ended October 31, 2011, capital expenditures amounted to $27.0 million, which included $17.6 million for maintenance capital expenditures, $3.5 million for the construction of two new funeral homes, $1.3 million related to the implementation of new business systems and $4.6 million related to the purchase of a funeral home building that we previously leased. For the year ended October 31, 2010, capital expenditures were $16.5 million, which included $12.7 million for maintenance capital expenditures, $3.0 million for the construction of new funeral homes and $0.8 million related to the implementation of new business systems. The increase in maintenance capital expenditures is primarily due to several large building improvement projects undertaken in fiscal year 2011 as well as increased vehicle and equipment purchases as we assess lease versus purchase decisions for our fleet.
Our financing activities resulted in a net cash outflow of $44.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2011, compared to a net cash outflow of $45.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2010. During fiscal year 2011, we repurchased $28.8 million of our common stock compared to $4.1 million in fiscal year 2010. During fiscal year 2010, we had $31.5 million in repayments of long-term debt primarily due to purchases of our senior convertible notes. During fiscal year 2011, we issued $200.0 million of 6.50 percent senior notes due 2019 and repurchased and redeemed $200.0 million of 6.25 percent senior notes due 2013. We also paid $5.9 million in debt refinancing costs during fiscal year 2011 related to the senior notes transactions and refinancing of the senior secured revolving credit facility. Dividends paid increased from $11.2 million in fiscal year 2010 to $11.8 million in fiscal year 2011.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
We have contractual obligations requiring future cash payments under existing contractual arrangements. The following table details our known future cash payments (in millions) related to various contractual obligations as of October 31, 2012.
49
Table of Contents
| Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations(1) | $ | 331.6 | $ | — | $ | 86.4 | $ | 45.1 | $ | 200.1 | ||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt(2) | 102.5 | 17.2 | 31.8 | 27.5 | 26.0 | |||||||||||||||
Operating and capital lease agreements(3) | 35.6 | 5.9 | 9.2 | 6.5 | 14.0 | |||||||||||||||
Non-competition and other agreements(4) | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations(5) | 4.4 | 4.4 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total | $ | 475.6 | $ | 28.0 | $ | 127.9 | $ | 79.5 | $ | 240.2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| (1) | As of October 31, 2012, our outstanding long-term debt obligations amounted to $331.6 million, consisting of $86.4 million of 3.125 percent senior convertible notes due 2014, $45.1 million of 3.375 percent senior convertible notes due 2016, $200.0 million of 6.50 percent senior notes due 2019 and $0.1 million of other debt. There were no amounts drawn on the senior secured revolving credit facility. |
| (2) | Includes contractual interest payments for our senior convertible notes, senior notes and third-party debt. |
| (3) | Our noncancellable operating leases are primarily for land and buildings and expire over the next one to 10 years, except for eight leases that expire between 2032 and 2039. These amounts also include leases under our vehicle fleet leasing program. Our future minimum lease payments for all leases as of October 31, 2012 were $5.9 million, $5.0 million, $4.2 million, $3.5 million, $3.0 million and $14.0 million for the years ending October 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and later years, respectively. |
| (4) | This category includes payments pursuant to non-competition agreements with prior owners and key employees of acquired businesses. |
| (5) | This category represents a construction contract for a funeral home currently under construction. This category also represents a purchase obligation related to an agreement we entered into to purchase the land and building of an existing business that we currently lease. |
The following table details our known potential or possible future cash payments related to the specified contingent obligations specified below (in millions) as of October 31, 2012.
| Expiration by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contingent Obligations | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||
Cemetery perpetual care trust funding obligations(1) | $ | 12.0 | $ | 12.0 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Long-term obligations related to uncertain tax positions(2) | 1.5 | — | — | — | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| $ | 13.5 | $ | 12.0 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1.5 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| (1) | In those states where we have withdrawn realized net capital gains in the past from our cemetery perpetual care trusts, regulators may seek replenishment of subsequent realized net capital losses either by requiring a cash deposit to the trust or by prohibiting or restricting withdrawals of future earnings until they restore the initial corpus. The estimated probable funding obligation in the cemetery perpetual care trusts in these states was $12.0 million as of October 31, 2012. As of October 31, 2012, we had net unrealized losses of $16.6 million in the trusts in these states that could be subject to a future funding obligation. Because some of these trusts currently have assets with a fair market value less than the aggregate amounts required to be contributed to the trust, any additional realized net capital losses in these trusts may result in a corresponding funding liability and increase in cemetery costs. In those states where realized net capital gains have not been withdrawn, we believe it is reasonably possible but not probable that additional funding obligations may exist with an estimated amount of approximately $2.0 million; no charge has been recorded for these amounts as of October 31, 2012. |
| (2) | As discussed in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, we adopted the required accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions on November 1, 2007. In accordance with this guidance, |
50
Table of Contents
| as of October 31, 2012, we recorded $1.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties. Due to the uncertainty regarding the timing and completion of audits and possible outcomes, it is not possible to estimate the range of increase and decrease and the timing thereof of any potential cash payments. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our off-balance sheet arrangements as of October 31, 2012 consist of the following two items:
| (1) | the $23.5 million bond we are required to maintain to guarantee our obligations relating to funds we withdrew in fiscal year 2001 from our preneed funeral trusts in Florida, which is discussed in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8; and |
| (2) | the insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts, which will be funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third-party insurers, which are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets, and are discussed in Note 2(i) to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. |
Effect of Recent Accounting Standards
For additional information on changes in accounting principles and new accounting principles, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Inflation
Inflation has not had a significant impact on our operations over the past three years, nor is it expected to have a significant impact in the foreseeable future.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The market risk inherent in our market risk sensitive instruments and positions is the potential change arising from increases or decreases in the prices of investments in our preneed trusts and perpetual care trusts and interest rates associated with our long-term debt. Generally, our market risk sensitive instruments and positions are characterized as “other than trading.” Our exposure to market risk as discussed below includes forward-looking statements and represents an estimate of possible changes in fair value or future earnings that would occur assuming hypothetical future movements in equity markets or interest rates. Our views on market risk are not necessarily indicative of actual results that may occur, and do not represent the maximum possible gains and losses that may occur. Actual gains and losses, fluctuations in equity markets, interest rates and the timing of transactions, may differ from those estimated.
Trust Investments
As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, our marketable equity securities subject to market risk consisted principally of issuer specific common stock and preferred stock investments held by our preneed trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts and had fair values of $391.0 million and $363.4 million, respectively, which were determined using final sale prices quoted on stock exchanges. Each 10 percent change in the average market prices of the equity securities held in our preneed trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts would result in a change of approximately $39.1 million and $36.3 million, respectively, in the fair value of such accounts.
As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, our mutual funds subject to market risk consisted principally of investments held in our preneed trusts and in our cemetery perpetual care trusts and had fair values of $343.3 million and $301.1 million, respectively. Each 10 percent change in the average market prices of the mutual fund securities held in our preneed trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts would result in a change of approximately $34.3 million and $30.1 million, respectively, in the fair value of such accounts.
As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, our fixed-income securities subject to market risk consisted principally of investments in our preneed trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts and had aggregate quoted market values of $58.5 million and $64.5 million, respectively. Each 10 percent change in interest rates on these fixed-income securities would result in changes of approximately $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, in the fair values of such securities based on discounted expected future cash flows. If these securities are held to maturity, no change in fair value will be realized.
51
Table of Contents
As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, our money market and other short-term investments subject to market risk, including amounts held in preneed trusts, and in our cemetery perpetual care trusts, had carrying values approximating their fair values of $75.0 million and $77.3 million, respectively. A change in the average interest rate earned by our preneed trusts would not result in a change in our current pre-tax earnings. As such, as of October 31, 2012 and 2011, only $28.4 million and $22.6 million, respectively, of these short-term investments, which consists of amounts in the cemetery perpetual care trusts and other short-term investments not held in trust, were subject to changes in interest rates. Each 10 percent change in average interest rates applicable to such investments, 10 basis points for fiscal years 2012 and 2011, would result in changes of less than $0.1 million for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 in our pre-tax earnings.
Our preneed trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts are further discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 and in Notes 4, 5 and 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. Our marketable equity securities are principally held by our preneed trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts, and are managed by ITI. ITI operates pursuant to a formal investment policy approved by the Investment Committee of our Board of Directors as discussed in “Operations” included in Item 1.
Long-term Debt
We have entered into various fixed- and variable-rate debt obligations, which are detailed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
As of October 31, 2012, our long-term fixed-rate debt consisted of $200.0 million of our 6.50 percent senior notes due 2019, $86.4 million of our 3.125 percent senior convertible notes due 2014, $45.1 million of our 3.375 percent senior convertible notes due 2016 and $0.1 million of third-party debt. Our variable-rate debt obligations consist of our $150.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility for which there was nothing drawn. As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, the carrying values of our long-term fixed-rate debt, including accrued interest, were approximately $323.7 million and $319.6 million, respectively, compared to fair values of $351.1 million and $326.3 million, respectively. Fair values were determined using quoted market prices. Each approximate 10 percent change in the average interest rates applicable to determine the fair value of such debt, 40 basis points for fiscal year 2012 and 60 basis points for fiscal year 2011, would result in changes of approximately $5.8 million and $7.8 million, respectively, in the fair values of these instruments.
We monitor our mix of fixed- and variable-rate debt obligations in light of changing market conditions and from time to time may alter that mix by, for example, entering into interest rate swap agreements or refinancing balances outstanding among our variable-rate senior secured revolving credit facility and fixed-rate debt.
52
Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
53
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Stewart Enterprises, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at October 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
December 17, 2012
54
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 282,984 | $ | 283,657 | $ | 275,898 | ||||||
Cemetery | 233,113 | 229,007 | 224,009 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 516,097 | 512,664 | 499,907 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||
Funeral | 213,670 | 217,009 | 210,277 | |||||||||
Cemetery | 192,745 | 195,238 | 192,891 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 406,415 | 412,247 | 403,168 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Gross profit | 109,682 | 100,417 | 96,739 | |||||||||
Corporate general and administrative expenses | (28,521 | ) | (26,775 | ) | (28,044 | ) | ||||||
Restructuring and other charges | (3,291 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Hurricane related recoveries (charges), net | (55 | ) | 12,232 | (66 | ) | |||||||
Net gain (loss) on dispositions | 403 | (389 | ) | — | ||||||||
Other operating income, net | 1,211 | 1,625 | 1,424 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Operating earnings | 79,429 | 87,110 | 70,053 | |||||||||
Interest expense | (23,401 | ) | (22,747 | ) | (24,392 | ) | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — | (1,884 | ) | (1,035 | ) | |||||||
Investment and other income, net | 174 | 672 | 156 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 56,202 | 63,151 | 44,782 | |||||||||
Income taxes | 18,722 | 23,834 | 14,049 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 37,480 | 39,317 | 30,733 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes | (2,314 | ) | (1,245 | ) | 385 | |||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (730 | ) | (483 | ) | 140 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | (1,584 | ) | (762 | ) | 245 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net earnings | $ | 35,896 | $ | 38,555 | $ | 30,978 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Basic earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | .43 | $ | .44 | $ | .33 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | (.02 | ) | (.01 | ) | — | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net earnings | $ | .41 | $ | .43 | $ | .33 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Diluted earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | .43 | $ | .43 | $ | .33 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | (.02 | ) | (.01 | ) | — | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net earnings | $ | .41 | $ | .42 | $ | .33 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands): | ||||||||||||
Basic | 85,879 | 90,001 | 92,119 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Diluted | 86,278 | 90,486 | 92,394 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | .195 | $ | .13 | $ | .12 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
55
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 68,187 | $ | 65,688 | ||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 6,250 | 6,250 | ||||||
Marketable securities | 10,514 | 662 | ||||||
Receivables, net of allowances | 52,441 | 49,146 | ||||||
Inventories | 36,495 | 35,859 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 4,923 | 5,055 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 30,671 | 29,768 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current assets | 209,481 | 192,428 | ||||||
Receivables due beyond one year, net of allowances | 72,620 | 67,979 | ||||||
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments | 432,422 | 409,296 | ||||||
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments | 225,048 | 216,582 | ||||||
Goodwill | 249,584 | 247,038 | ||||||
Cemetery property, at cost | 401,670 | 396,014 | ||||||
Property and equipment, at cost: | ||||||||
Land | 49,085 | 46,538 | ||||||
Buildings | 360,852 | 353,688 | ||||||
Equipment and other | 204,971 | 197,766 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| 614,908 | 597,992 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 323,648 | 305,708 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net property and equipment | 291,260 | 292,284 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 62,125 | 79,793 | ||||||
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments | 263,663 | 240,392 | ||||||
Other assets | 13,812 | 15,292 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total assets | $ | 2,221,685 | $ | 2,157,098 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
(continued)
56
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 6 | $ | 5 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 25,214 | 24,547 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and other benefits | 19,964 | 18,181 | ||||||
Accrued insurance | 22,152 | 22,398 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 2,161 | 2,129 | ||||||
Estimated obligation to fund cemetery perpetual care trust | 11,965 | 12,017 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 14,723 | 10,013 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 1,004 | 1,173 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current liabilities | 97,189 | 90,463 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 321,887 | 317,821 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 4,931 | 5,104 | ||||||
Deferred preneed funeral revenue | 240,415 | 240,286 | ||||||
Deferred preneed cemetery revenue | 265,347 | 259,237 | ||||||
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust | 585,164 | 558,194 | ||||||
Perpetual care trusts’ corpus | 261,883 | 238,980 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 20,548 | 19,337 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liabilities | 1,797,364 | 1,729,422 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $1.00 stated value: | ||||||||
Class A authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 81,359,536 and 84,421,416 shares at October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively | 81,360 | 84,421 | ||||||
Class B authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 3,555,020 shares at October 31, 2012 and 2011; 10 votes per share convertible into an equal number of Class A shares | 3,555 | 3,555 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 479,060 | 515,274 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (139,696 | ) | (175,592 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income : | ||||||||
Unrealized appreciation of investments | 42 | 18 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive income | 42 | 18 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 424,321 | 427,676 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 2,221,685 | $ | 2,157,098 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
57
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| Common Stock(1) | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Investments | Total Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Balance October 31, 2009, as adjusted | $ | 92,684 | $ | 561,063 | $ | (245,125 | ) | $ | 35 | $ | 408,657 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings | — | — | 30,978 | — | 30,978 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation of investments, net of deferred tax benefit of $9 | — | — | — | (17 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss | — | — | — | (17 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | 30,978 | (17 | ) | 30,961 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity | 115 | 549 | — | — | 664 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 156 | 566 | — | — | 722 | |||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 82 | 304 | — | — | 386 | |||||||||||||||
Stock option expense | — | 1,054 | — | — | 1,054 | |||||||||||||||
Tax expense associated with stock activity | — | (120 | ) | — | — | (120 | ) | |||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock | (743 | ) | (3,313 | ) | — | — | (4,056 | ) | ||||||||||||
Retirement of call options, net of tax expense of $1,247 | — | 2,315 | — | — | 2,315 | |||||||||||||||
Retirement of common stock warrants | — | (3,143 | ) | — | — | (3,143 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repurchase of convertible notes, net of tax benefit of $442 | — | (786 | ) | — | — | (786 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends ($.12 per share) | — | (11,170 | ) | — | — | (11,170 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance October 31, 2010 | $ | 92,294 | $ | 547,319 | $ | (214,147 | ) | $ | 18 | $ | 425,484 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
(continued)
58
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| Common Stock(1) | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Unrealized Appreciation of Investments | Total Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Balance October 31, 2010 | $ | 92,294 | $ | 547,319 | $ | (214,147 | ) | $ | 18 | $ | 425,484 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings | — | — | 38,555 | — | 38,555 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | — | 38,555 | — | 38,555 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity | (195 | ) | 1,109 | — | — | 914 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 138 | 644 | — | — | 782 | |||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 264 | 905 | — | — | 1,169 | |||||||||||||||
Stock option expense | — | 1,111 | — | — | 1,111 | |||||||||||||||
Tax benefit associated with stock activity | — | 261 | — | — | 261 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock | (4,525 | ) | (24,313 | ) | — | — | (28,838 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends ($.13 per share) | — | (11,762 | ) | — | — | (11,762 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance October 31, 2011 | $ | 87,976 | $ | 515,274 | $ | (175,592 | ) | $ | 18 | $ | 427,676 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| Common Stock(1) | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Unrealized Appreciation of Investments | Total Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Balance October 31, 2011 | $ | 87,976 | $ | 515,274 | $ | (175,592 | ) | $ | 18 | $ | 427,676 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings | — | — | 35,896 | — | 35,896 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation of investments, net of deferred tax expense of ($5) | — | — | — | 24 | 24 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income | — | — | — | 24 | 24 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | — | 35,896 | 24 | 35,920 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity | 302 | 388 | — | — | 690 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 118 | 600 | — | — | 718 | |||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 545 | 2,084 | — | — | 2,629 | |||||||||||||||
Stock option expense | — | 1,428 | — | — | 1,428 | |||||||||||||||
Tax expense associated with stock activity | — | (577 | ) | — | — | (577 | ) | |||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock | (4,026 | ) | (23,402 | ) | — | — | (27,428 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends ($.195 per share) | — | (16,735 | ) | — | — | (16,735 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance October 31, 2012 | $ | 84,915 | $ | 479,060 | $ | (139,696 | ) | $ | 42 | $ | 424,321 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| (1) | Amount includes shares of Class A common stock with a stated value of $1 per share, and includes 3,555 shares (in thousands) of Class B common stock. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
59
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 35,896 | $ | 38,555 | $ | 30,978 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||
Net (gains) losses on dispositions | 468 | 389 | (645 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — | 1,884 | 1,035 | |||||||||
Non-cash restructuring charge | 1,236 | — | — | |||||||||
Premiums paid on early extinguishment of debt | — | (850 | ) | — | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 26,412 | 27,052 | 26,367 | |||||||||
Non-cash interest and amortization of discount on senior convertible notes | 5,531 | 5,305 | 5,901 | |||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | 4,256 | 4,879 | 4,758 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation | 3,404 | 2,952 | 2,457 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | — | (351 | ) | (121 | ) | |||||||
Provision for deferred income taxes | 16,000 | 20,141 | 10,922 | |||||||||
Estimated obligation to fund cemetery perpetual care trust | 619 | 72 | 31 | |||||||||
Other | 159 | (184 | ) | (649 | ) | |||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Increase in receivables | (12,158 | ) | (7,503 | ) | (1,980 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in prepaid expenses | 124 | 424 | 1,249 | |||||||||
(Increase) decrease in inventories and cemetery property | (6,778 | ) | (4,105 | ) | 301 | |||||||
Federal income tax refunds | 76 | 1,698 | 1,600 | |||||||||
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses | (546 | ) | (858 | ) | (4,502 | ) | ||||||
Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities: | ||||||||||||
Decrease in preneed funeral receivables and trust investments | 1,280 | 35,532 | 11,424 | |||||||||
Decrease in deferred preneed funeral revenue | (4 | ) | (4,356 | ) | (4,143 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust | (4,803 | ) | (32,787 | ) | (14,043 | ) | ||||||
Net effect of preneed cemetery production and deliveries: | ||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments | (135 | ) | 3,872 | 905 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in deferred preneed cemetery revenue | 6,110 | (2,354 | ) | (8,919 | ) | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust | (859 | ) | (1,194 | ) | 178 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in other | 249 | (1,383 | ) | 250 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 76,537 | 86,830 | 63,354 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales/maturities of certificates of deposit and marketable securities and release of restricted funds | 2,869 | 10,000 | 5,901 | |||||||||
Deposits of restricted funds and purchases of restricted cash equivalents, certificates of deposit and marketable securities | (12,630 | ) | (6,912 | ) | (15,875 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | 755 | 332 | 1,681 | |||||||||
Purchase of subsidiaries and other investments, net of cash acquired | (6,442 | ) | (9,110 | ) | — | |||||||
Additions to property and equipment | (20,846 | ) | (26,958 | ) | (16,450 | ) | ||||||
Other | 148 | 149 | 176 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (36,146 | ) | (32,499 | ) | (24,567 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds of long-term debt | — | 200,000 | — | |||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt | (5 | ) | (200,005 | ) | (31,505 | ) | ||||||
Debt refinancing costs | (34 | ) | (5,944 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||
Retirement of common stock warrants | — | — | (3,143 | ) | ||||||||
Retirement of call options | — | — | 3,562 | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 2,910 | 1,495 | 694 | |||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock | (27,428 | ) | (28,838 | ) | (4,056 | ) | ||||||
Dividends | (13,335 | ) | (11,762 | ) | (11,170 | ) | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | — | 351 | 121 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (37,892 | ) | (44,703 | ) | (45,535 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | 2,499 | 9,628 | (6,748 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 65,688 | 56,060 | 62,808 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 68,187 | $ | 65,688 | $ | 56,060 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the year for: | ||||||||||||
Income taxes, net | $ | 2,798 | $ | 3,298 | $ | (309 | ) | |||||
Interest | $ | 18,237 | $ | 20,203 | $ | 19,311 | ||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock to directors | $ | 437 | $ | 456 | $ | 414 | ||||||
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures | $ | 690 | $ | 914 | $ | 664 | ||||||
Dividends declared but not paid | $ | 3,400 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
60
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(1) The Company
Stewart Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) is a provider of funeral and cemetery products and services in the death care industry in the United States. Through its subsidiaries, the Company offers a complete line of funeral and cremation merchandise and services, along with cemetery property, merchandise and services, both at the time of need and on a preneed basis. As of October 31, 2012, the Company owned and operated 217 funeral homes and 141 cemeteries in 24 states within the United States and Puerto Rico. The Company has three operating and reportable segments consisting of a funeral segment, cemetery segment and corporate trust management segment.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. A discussion of discontinued operations can be found in Note 12.
(b) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and these differences could be material.
(c) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and the valuation methodologies described below. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and current receivables approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amount of receivables due beyond one year approximates fair value because they bear interest at rates currently offered by the Company for receivables with similar terms and maturities.
The carrying amounts of securities included in preneed funeral trust investments, preneed cemetery trust investments and cemetery perpetual care trust investments are stated at fair value, as described in Note 2(k).
The Company records debt at amortized cost, but determines the fair value for disclosure purposes. The fair value of the Company’s long-term variable-rate and fixed-rate debt is estimated using quoted market prices, where applicable, or future cash flows discounted at rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements as discussed in Note 14.
61
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
The call options purchased and warrants sold contemporaneously with the sale of the senior convertible notes issued in fiscal year 2007 are equity contracts that meet the scope exception of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-Derivatives and Hedging and hence do not need to be marked-to-market through earnings. In addition, since the call option and warrant transactions are accounted for as equity transactions, the payment associated with the purchase of the call options and the proceeds received from the issuance of the warrants were recorded in additional paid-in capital in stockholders’ equity as separate equity transactions.
(d) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (average cost and first-in, first-out methods) or net realizable value. The portion of developed cemetery property that management estimates will be used in the next twelve months is included in inventories. Such estimates are based on the Company’s projected results. Included in inventory are various cemetery construction projects. The Company allocates costs of these construction projects to the number of units in the respective project.
(e) Buildings and Equipment
Buildings and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, primarily using the straight-line method. Building and building improvement items are generally depreciated over a period ranging from 10 to 40 years. Equipment is generally depreciated over the following ranges: light equipment, 5 to 10 years; heavy equipment, 10 years; computer equipment and software, 3 to 6 years; and crematory equipment, 5 to 20 years. Vehicles are depreciated over 5 to 7 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the term of the lease or the life of the asset. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense whereas renewals and major replacements that extend the assets’ useful lives are capitalized. For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, depreciation expense totaled $25,639, $26,259 and $25,622, respectively.
The Company reviews for continued appropriateness the carrying value of its long-lived assets whenever events and circumstances indicate a potential impairment. This review is based on its projections of anticipated undiscounted future cash flows. If indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by those assets compared to the carrying amount of those assets. The net carrying value of assets not recoverable is reduced to fair value. While the Company believes that its estimates of undiscounted future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows and comparable sales values could materially affect its evaluations.
(f) Preneed Selling Costs
Preneed selling costs related to the acquisition of new prearranged funeral and cemetery service and merchandise sales are charged to expense as incurred. Preneed selling costs related to the acquisition of new prearranged cemetery property sales are deferred until the related revenue is recognized.
(g)Goodwill
The Company’s evaluation of the goodwill of its operations consists of eleven reporting units. Those reporting units are: the funeral operating segment comprised of five reporting units (Southern, Southwestern and Midwestern regions aggregated; Northern, Central and Mid-Atlantic regions aggregated; Western and Los Angeles/Pacific Northwest region; South Florida/Puerto Rico region; and Southeastern region); the cemetery operating segment comprised of six reporting units (Southwestern region; Southern and Midwestern regions aggregated; South Florida/Puerto Rico region; Northern, Central and Mid-Atlantic regions aggregated; Southeastern region; and Western and Los Angeles/Pacific Northwest region).
62
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
Goodwill of a reporting unit must be tested for impairment on at least an annual basis. The Company conducts its annual goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. In addition to an annual review, the Company assesses the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be greater than fair value. Factors the Company considers important that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the Company’s assets or the strategy for its overall business and significant negative industry or economic trends.
Goodwill was allocated to these reporting units based on the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill determined in a business combination. That is, the Company allocates the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. The Company calculated the fair value, or enterprise value, for each of the reporting units based on a discounted cash flow analysis, as supplemented by comparing them to the trading multiples of companies in this industry and supplier industries calculated as enterprise value divided by EBITDA. The Company also reviewed multiples paid in recent acquisition transactions within the deathcare industry.
In fiscal year 2011, the Company adopted guidance which simplified how entities test for goodwill impairment. The amendment permits an entity to first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining if performing the two-step goodwill impairment test is necessary. In April 2012, the Company announced an organizational restructuring and separate workforce reduction, as discussed in Note 17. The organizational changes involved a restructure of the sales organization and realignment of the Company’s geographic regions and regional management. Due to the realignment of certain regions, the Company evaluated the economic similarity of its regions and determined that two of its funeral reporting units were impacted by this change. The Company’s former Southeastern region was split in two, with the Northern part of the region forming the new Southeastern region and the Southern part of the region combining with the former Puerto Rico region to form the new South Florida/Puerto Rico region. For these two funeral reporting units, which have a combined goodwill balance of $58.6 million, the Company proceeded directly to step one of the impairment test and performed a quantitative analysis, which was performed due to the fact these are two new regions and a previous analysis was not available. This reorganization required a reallocation of goodwill.
From a qualitative perspective, in evaluating whether it is more likely than not (i.e., a probability of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, relevant events and circumstances were taken into account, with greater weight assigned to events and circumstances that most affect a reporting unit’s fair value or the carrying amounts of its assets. Items that were considered include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) macroeconomic conditions; (2) industry and market conditions; (3) costs of merchandise or labor; (4) overall financial performance; (5) other entity specific events, such as changes in management or key personnel; (6) events affecting a reporting unit, such as a change in the composition of net assets or an expected disposition; and (7) a change in the Company’s share price. In addition, we also considered recent fair value calculations for each reporting unit and determined that there was a significant difference between fair value and the carrying amount. After assessing these and other factors, the Company determined that is was more likely than not that the fair value of these reporting units were greater than the carrying amounts.
For the two reporting units in which the Company performed a quantitative analysis, the goodwill impairment test involves estimates and management judgment. The Company determined the fair value of the reporting units based on present value techniques including discounted cash flows. The discounted cash flow valuation uses projections of future cash flows and includes assumptions concerning future operating performance and economic conditions and may differ from actual future cash flows. In projecting the Company’s cash flows, it
63
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
used growth rates generally ranging from one to five percent in revenues and costs, and in addition, considered the additional cremation gardens and other mausoleum projects that are currently under construction. For the discount rate, the Company used 7.5 percent, which reflected its weighted average cost of capital determined based on its industry, suppliers and capital structure as adjusted for equity risk premiums and size risk premiums based on its market capitalization. Fair value is calculated as the sum of the projected discounted cash flows of the reporting unit over the next five years and terminal value at the end of those five years. The terminal value is calculated as the projected EBITDA at the end of the five year period divided by the discount rate minus terminal growth rates ranging from 2 to 3 percent. The Company prepared a sensitivity analysis of the terminal values and used the midpoint enterprise value as its best estimate. Based on the analysis performed, the Company determined that no goodwill impairment charge was required for fiscal year 2012.
(h)Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s stock-based compensation cost for each period is the expense related to all share-based compensation arrangements vesting in the period based on the estimated grant date fair value. See Note 19 for additional information.
(i)Funeral Revenue
The Company sells price-guaranteed prearranged funeral services and merchandise under contracts that provide for delivery of the services and merchandise at the time of death. Prearranged funeral services are recorded as funeral revenue in the period the funeral service is actually performed. Prearranged funeral merchandise is recognized as revenue upon delivery. When a contract turns at-need or the merchandise is delivered, the contract face value along with related trust dividends, interest income and gains and losses net of fees allocated to individual contracts as per the applicable trust agreement are included in revenue. Prior to performing the funeral or delivering of the merchandise, such sales and related trust earnings are deferred. Funeral services and merchandise sold at the time of need are recorded as funeral revenue in the period the funeral is performed or the merchandise is delivered. The Company records cash advance items such as public transportation arranged on behalf of a customer on a net basis. Discounts are also recorded on a net basis in revenue. The Company presents all taxes assessed by governmental authorities on its revenue-producing transactions (i.e., sales taxes) as well as the recoveries from its customers from these taxes on a net basis in its consolidated financial statements.
Because preneed services or merchandise will not be provided until the future, most states require that all or a portion of the customer payments under these contracts be protected for the benefit of the customers pursuant to applicable law. Some or all of the funds may be required to be placed into trust accounts (“trust-funded preneed funeral contracts”). Alternatively, where allowed, customers may purchase a life insurance or annuity policy from third-party insurance companies to fund their preneed funeral contracts (“insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts”). The funeral goods and services selected at the time of contract origination will be funded by the insurance policy proceeds, which include increasing insurance benefits. Under either customer funding option, the Company enters into a preneed funeral contract with the customer to provide funeral services in the future. See discussion of insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts below.
When a trust-funded preneed funeral contract is sold, the Company records an asset (included in preneed funeral receivables and trust investments) and a corresponding liability (included in deferred preneed funeral revenues) for the contract price. Principal amounts deposited in the trust or escrow accounts generally range from 70 percent to 90 percent of each installment received. As the customer makes payments on the contract prior to performance by the Company, the Company deposits into the related trust the required portion of the payment based on applicable state law and reclassifies the corresponding amount from deferred preneed funeral revenues into deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust.
64
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
The Company’s policy for recognizing trust income follows the allocation of trust earnings to individual contracts as stipulated in the Company’s respective trust agreements. In substantially all of the Company’s trusts, trust earnings, which include dividends and interest earned and net capital gains and losses (including losses from other-than-temporary impairments of securities) realized by preneed funeral trust or escrow accounts net of fees, are allocated to individual contracts as earned or realized. In these trusts, unrealized gains and losses are not allocated to contracts. The trust earnings allocated to individual contracts are recognized as components of revenue along with the original contract sales price when the underlying service or merchandise is actually performed or delivered. Principal and earnings are withdrawn only as the merchandise or services are delivered or contracts are cancelled, except in jurisdictions that permit trust earnings to be withdrawn currently.
Deferred preneed funeral revenue represents future funeral contract revenues. In addition to amounts receivable from customers and amounts received from customers that are not required to be trusted, this includes distributed and distributable trust investment earnings associated with unperformed trust-funded preneed funeral contracts where the related cash or investments are not held in trust accounts (generally because the Company was permitted to withdraw the cash from the trust before performance of the service or delivery of the merchandise). Future funeral contract revenues that were trusted and non-distributable net trust investment earnings where the related cash or investments are held in trust accounts are included in deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust.
Upon cancellation of a trust-funded preneed funeral contract, a customer is generally entitled to receive a refund. In many jurisdictions, the Company may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust including investment income at the time of cancellation. If the fair market value of the trusts were to decline below the estimated costs to deliver the underlying products and services, the Company would record a charge to earnings to record a liability for the expected loss on the delivery of contracts in the Company’s backlog. Based upon the analysis described in Note 2(m), no loss amounts have been required to be recognized for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. See Note 2(m) below.
Insurance-funded price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts that will be funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third-party insurers are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. The net amount of these contracts that have not been fulfilled as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 was $600,951 and $557,348, respectively. With insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts, the Company earns a commission because it acts as an agent on the sale of the policies on behalf of the third-party insurer. Customers send payments of premiums on the insurance policies directly to the insurance company, and the insurance premium receivables and related customer payments are not recorded on the Company’s financial statements. Insurance commissions are recognized as revenue as earned, net of an allowance for cancellations. This allowance amounted to $3,889 and $3,842 for October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The costs related to the commissions paid to the Company’s sales counselors are expensed as incurred. Proceeds of these policies may be used by customers for other purposes and are portable to other funeral service providers or for completely separate purposes. As a result, no additional amounts are recorded until the contracted service or merchandise is delivered, and these contracts are not included in deferred revenue. At that time, the face amount of the contract including any build-up (i.e., the policy proceeds) is recorded as funeral revenue, as well as the related costs to deliver the contract, and a receivable from the insurance company for the policy proceeds is recorded as a funeral receivable.
(j)Cemetery Revenue
The Company sells price-guaranteed preneed cemetery merchandise and services under contracts that provide for delivery of the merchandise and services at the time of need. Preneed cemetery merchandise and service sales are recorded as cemetery revenue in the period the merchandise is delivered or service is performed. Prior to that time, such sales are deferred. Cemetery merchandise and services sold at the time of need are recorded as cemetery revenue in the period the service is performed or the merchandise is delivered. Discounts are recorded on a net basis in revenue. The Company presents all taxes assessed by governmental authorities on its revenue-producing transactions (i.e., sales taxes) as well as the recoveries from its customers from these taxes on a net basis in its consolidated financial statements.
65
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
Some or all of the funds received under preneed cemetery contracts for merchandise or services may be required to be placed into trust accounts, pursuant to applicable state law. With respect to the preneed sale of cemetery merchandise, the Company is generally required to place in trust 30 percent to 50 percent of each installment received. With respect to the preneed sale of cemetery services, the Company is generally required to place in trust 70 percent to 90 percent of each installment received. When a trust-funded preneed cemetery contract is entered into, the Company records an asset (included in preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments) and a corresponding liability (included in deferred preneed cemetery revenues) for the contract price. As the customer makes payments on the contract prior to performance by the Company, the Company deposits into the related trust the required portion of the payment based on applicable state law and reclassifies the corresponding amount from deferred preneed cemetery revenues into deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust.
Deferred preneed cemetery revenue represents future preneed cemetery revenues to be recognized upon delivery of merchandise or performance of services. In addition to the amounts receivable from customers and amounts received but not required to be trusted, this includes distributed and distributable trust investment earnings associated with unperformed preneed cemetery services or undelivered preneed cemetery merchandise where the related cash or investments are not held in trust accounts (generally because the Company was permitted to withdraw the cash from the trust in advance of performance of the service or delivery of the merchandise). Future contract revenues that were trusted and non-distributable net trust investment earnings where the related cash or investments are held in trust accounts are included in deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust.
The Company’s policy for recognizing trust income follows the allocation of trust earnings to individual contracts as stipulated in the Company’s respective trust agreements. In substantially all of the Company’s trusts, trust earnings, which include dividends and interest earned and net capital gains and losses (including losses from other-than-temporary impairments of securities) realized by preneed cemetery trust or escrow accounts net of fees, are allocated to individual contracts when earned or realized. In these trusts, unrealized gains and losses are not allocated to contracts. The trust earnings allocated to individual contracts are recognized as components of revenue along with the original contract sales price when the underlying service or merchandise is actually performed or delivered. Principal and earnings are withdrawn only as the merchandise or services are delivered or contracts are cancelled, except in jurisdictions that permit trust earnings to be withdrawn currently.
The Company sells price-guaranteed cemetery contracts providing for property interment rights. For preneed sales of interment rights (cemetery property), the associated revenue and all costs to acquire the sale are recognized in accordance with the retail land sales provisions of ASC 360-Property, Plant and Equipment. Based on this guidance, recognition of revenue and costs must be deferred until 10 percent of the property sale price has been collected. Until the 10 percent has been collected, the Company records all payments received as deposits, does not record receivables and continues to report the inventory in its financial statements. As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, the amount of inventory included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets on which the 10 percent collection requirement has not been met was $525 and $651, respectively. Revenue related to the preneed sale of cemetery property prior to the completion of its construction is recognized on a percentage of completion method of accounting as construction occurs. The Company measures the percentage of completion by taking the costs incurred to date and dividing that number by the total projected cost of the project.
Pursuant to cemetery perpetual care contracts and laws, a portion, generally between 10 percent and 15 percent, of the proceeds from cemetery property sales is deposited into perpetual care trusts. As payments are received, the Company generally funds the perpetual care trust based on applicable state law in the same proportion as the payment bears to the contract amount. For example, if the Company receives 20 percent of the contract price, it places in trust 20 percent of the total amount it is required to place in the cemetery perpetual care trust for that contract. The income from these trusts, which have been established in most jurisdictions in which the Company
66
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
operates cemeteries, is used for maintenance of those cemeteries, but principal, including in some jurisdictions net realized capital gains, must generally be held in perpetuity. The Company currently recognizes and withdraws all dividend and interest income earned net of fees and, where permitted, net capital gains realized by cemetery perpetual care funds subject to a maximum of the maintenance costs incurred by the Company during the period.
If the Company realizes net losses in those states that allowed it to previously withdraw capital gains, these states may require the Company to make cash deposits to the trust to cover the net loss, or may require the Company to stop withdrawing earnings until future earnings cover the net losses. The Company is currently utilizing some of the cash that could be withdrawn from the trusts to satisfy its funding obligation resulting from the net realized capital losses previously recorded.
Some of the Company’s sales of cemetery property and merchandise are made under installment contracts bearing interest at prevailing rates. Interest rates on cemetery property and merchandise contracts range from 2.9 percent to 12.9 percent and have a weighted average interest rate of 5.7 percent. Finance charges are recognized as cemetery revenue under the effective interest method over the terms of the related installment receivables that are 90 days outstanding or less.
(k) Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Merchandise and Services Trusts (“Preneed Trusts”) and Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts
As of April 30, 2004, the Company implemented the FASB’s applicable guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities. This resulted in the consolidation of the Company’s preneed trusts and the Company’s cemetery perpetual care trusts. The implementation affected certain line items in the consolidated balance sheet and statement of earnings as described below, but had no impact on net earnings. Also, the implementation did not result in any net changes to the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows, but does require disclosure of certain financing and investing activities. See Notes 4, 5 and 6.
Although this guidance required consolidation of the preneed trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts, it did not change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company and its customers. In the case of preneed trusts, the customers are the legal beneficiaries. In the case of cemetery perpetual care trusts, the Company does not have a legal right to the cemetery perpetual care trust assets. For these reasons, upon consolidation of the trusts, the Company recognized these third-party interests in the trusts in its financial statements. The Company classifies deposits to the preneed trusts as “deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust” and classifies deposits to the cemetery perpetual care trusts as “perpetual care trusts’ corpus,” both within the liabilities section of the balance sheet.
All of these trusts hold investments in cash and marketable equity and debt securities, which are classified as available for sale and reported at fair value, with the related realized and unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and initially reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. These earnings are then reclassified to deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Distributable income according to the regulatory requirements, which are primarily dividends, interest income and gains and losses allocated to individual accounts as per the applicable trust agreement net of fees, are included in the determination of revenue in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy.
Each quarter, the Company assesses its portfolio for other than temporary impairments. In the case of preneed trusts, if a loss is realized from the sale of a security, or an unrealized loss is deemed other-than-temporary, the loss is included as a component of future revenue recorded as contracts turn at need. To determine whether an unrealized loss is other-than-temporary, the Company analyzes the securities on an individual trust account basis as well as a security-by-security basis. The evaluation first considers whether the Company has sufficient liquidity within each individual trust account to hold the investments for an extended period of time. The liquidity
67
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
assessment of the individual trust accounts includes estimates of annual trust income, historical deposits and withdrawals, cash balances, upcoming debt investment maturities and other liquidity alternatives. The Company evaluates whether it has the ability and intent to hold the security until it recovers in value. The Company also evaluates consensus analyst recommendations, concerns specific to the issuer, overall market performance and annual returns required to recover the loss. Based on the analysis performed, as discussed in Notes 4, 5 and 6, the Company has recorded other-than-temporary impairments on certain securities. The Company does not consider any of its other equity or debt security investments in its preneed trusts to be other-than- temporarily impaired as of October 31, 2012. The Company believes it has the intent and the ability to hold temporarily impaired securities in an unrealized loss position until they recover in value.
In the case of cemetery perpetual care trusts, the Company recognizes investment earnings in cemetery revenues when such earnings are realized and permitted to be legally withdrawn by the Company (with a corresponding debit to perpetual care trusts’ corpus). Certain states allow the Company to withdraw net realized capital gains, and other states prohibit these withdrawals. These earnings and related funds are intended to defray cemetery maintenance costs and are recorded as revenue. In the event that the Company has been allowed to withdraw net realized gains and there are subsequent realized losses in the trust, the Company may determine it has a funding obligation to restore the initial corpus of the trust. A charge is recorded in the statement of earnings at the time it is considered probable that the Company will be required to restore the net realized losses.
See Notes 4, 5 and 6 for fair market value information for the Company’s preneed funeral trust investments, preneed cemetery trust investments and cemetery perpetual care trust investments.
Cash flows from preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services contracts and cemetery perpetual care contracts are presented as operating cash flows in the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows, with related unrealized gains and losses excluded and reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
(l) Trust Fee Revenue
Trust management fees related to the preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts are earned by the Company based on the fair market value of the investments in the trusts. These fees are established by the Company at rates consistent with industry norms and are paid by the trusts to the Company’s subsidiary, ITI.
(m)Loss Contract Impairment Analysis
Each quarter, the Company performs an analysis to determine whether its preneed contracts are in a loss position, which would necessitate a charge to earnings. For this analysis, the Company adds the sales prices of the underlying contracts and realized earnings, then subtracts realized losses to derive the net amount of proceeds for contracts as of that particular balance sheet date. The Company then considers unrealized gains and losses based on current market prices quoted for the investments and does not include future expected returns on the investments in its analysis. The Company compares the amount of adjusted proceeds after considering net unrealized gains and losses to the estimated direct costs to deliver the contracts, which consist primarily of funeral and cemetery merchandise costs and salaries, supplies and equipment related to the delivery of a preneed contract. If a deficiency were to exist, the Company would record a charge to earnings and a corresponding liability for the expected loss on the delivery of those contracts from its deferred revenue. No such amounts were recognized during fiscal years 2012, 2011 or 2010.
68
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
(n) Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales Cancellations
The Company establishes an allowance for uncollectible installment contracts and trade accounts based on a range of percentages applied to accounts receivable aging categories. These percentages are based on an analysis of the Company’s historical collection and write-off experience. At-need funeral and other receivables are considered past due after 30 days. The Company records an allowance on its interest accruals similar to the corresponding principal aging categories. For accounts that are more than 90 days past due, interest continues to be accrued, however, an allowance is established to fully reserve for the interest. Interest income on these receivables is recognized only to the extent the account becomes less than 90 days past due and then only on the non-reserved portion. Accounts are restored to normal accrual status only when interest and principal payments are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
The Company establishes allowances for preneed trust receivables. These allowances are recorded as reductions in preneed receivables and preneed deferred revenue, and changes in these allowances have no effect on the consolidated statement of earnings. The Company establishes a reserve for cancellations for cemetery property sales based on historical cancellations and recent write-off activity. This reserve is recorded as a reduction of cemetery revenue. The Company also establishes an allowance for cancellations for insurance and third-party commissions based on historical experience for cancellations of insurance contracts within the period of refundability.
(o) Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method under which deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of “temporary differences” by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The effect on deferred taxes for a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Management records a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset for amounts which are not considered more likely than not to be realized. For additional information see Note 18.
For the purpose of calculating income taxes for discontinued operations, earnings from discontinued operations is segregated into two categories: operating results and gain or loss on dispositions. Operating results are tax affected in the ordinary manner (i.e., income tax expense on net operating income, income tax benefit on net operating loss).
(p)Business Combinations
Tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are recorded at fair value, and goodwill is recognized for any difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the acquired tangible and intangible assets.
(q) Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during each period as discussed in Note 16.
For purposes of calculating the effect of the Company’s senior convertible notes on diluted earnings per share, any shares issuable upon conversion are accounted for under the net share settlement method. The effect of the net share settlement method is that the shares potentially issuable upon conversion of the senior convertible notes are only included in the calculation of earnings per share to the extent the conversion value of the senior convertible notes exceeds their principal amount. In this case, the Company would include in diluted shares the number of
69
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
shares of Class A common stock necessary to settle the conversion if it occurred at that time. The warrants are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share to the extent the effect is dilutive using the treasury stock method. The call options are not considered in the diluted earnings per share calculation.
(r)Purchase and Retirement of Common Stock
Share repurchases are recorded at stated value with the amount in excess of stated value recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. Share repurchases reduce the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.
In September 2007, the Company announced a stock repurchase program, authorizing the investment of up to $25,000 in the repurchase of the Company’s common stock. The program was increased by $25,000 in December 2007, June 2008, June 2011 and September 2011, resulting in a $125,000 program. Repurchases under the program are limited to the Company’s Class A common stock, and can be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at such times and in such amounts as management deems appropriate, depending upon market conditions and other factors. During fiscal year 2012, the Company repurchased 4,025,809 shares of its Class A common stock for $27,314 at an average price of $6.78 per share. As of October 31, 2012, the Company has repurchased 15,927,732 shares of its Class A common stock since the start of the program for $108,555 at an average price of $6.82 per share and has $16,445 remaining available under this program.
(s) Derivatives
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments under ASC 815 – Derivatives and Hedging. The Company’s only derivatives are its covered calls in its trust portfolios. A discussion of covered calls can be found in Notes 4, 5 and 6.
(t)Estimated Insurance Loss Liabilities
The Company purchases comprehensive general liability, automobile liability and workers compensation insurance coverages structured within a large deductible/self-insured retention premium rating program. This program results in the Company being primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs and losses covered by these policies but below the deductible. Historical insurance industry experience indicates some degree of inherent variability in assessing the ultimate amount of losses associated with the types of claims covered by the program. This is especially true as a result of the extended period of time that transpires between when the claim might occur and the full settlement of such claim, often many years. The Company continually evaluates the receivables due from its insurance carriers as well as loss estimates associated with claims and losses related to these insurance coverages with information obtained from its primary insurer.
With respect to health insurance, the Company purchases individual and aggregate stop loss coverage with a large deductible. This program results in the Company being primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs up to the amount of the deductible, with claims in excess of the deductible amount being covered by insurance. Expected claims are based on actuarial estimates; actual claims may differ from those estimates. The Company continually evaluates its claims experience related to this coverage with information obtained from its insurer.
Assumptions used in preparing these estimates are based on factors such as claim settlement patterns, claim development trends, claim frequency and severity patterns, inflationary trends and data reasonableness. Together these factors will generally affect the analysis and determination of the “best estimate” of the projected ultimate claim losses. The results of these evaluations are used to assess the reasonableness of the Company’s insurance loss liability.
70
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued)
The estimated liability on the uninsured litigation and employment-related claims are established by management based upon the recommendations of professionals who perform a review of both reported claims and estimate a liability for incurred but not reported claims. These liabilities include estimated settlement costs. Although management believes estimated liabilities related to uninsured claims are adequately recorded, it is possible that actual results could significantly differ from the recorded liabilities.
The Company also has insurance coverage related to property damage, incremental costs and property operating expenses it incurs due to damage caused by hurricanes and other natural disasters. The Company’s policy is to record such amounts when recovery is probable, which generally means it has reached an agreement with the insurance company.
The Company accrues for legal costs related to loss contingencies as the services are provided. If a settlement is determined to be probable, then an estimate is recorded for the settlement at that time.
(u)Dividends
In March 2005, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved the initiation of a quarterly cash dividend of two and one-half cents per share of Class A and B common stock. In September 2009, June 2011 and March 2012, the Company announced that it had increased the quarterly dividend rate by one half cent per share. Effective March 2012, the quarterly dividend rate is four cents per share of Class A and B common stock. Although the Company intends to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the foreseeable future, the declaration and payment of future dividends are discretionary and will be subject to determination by the Board of Directors after its review of the Company’s financial performance. On October 29, 2012, the Board of Directors approved its regular quarterly cash dividend of four cents per share payable on December 26, 2012 to holders of record of Class A and B common stock as of December 12, 2012. This dividend, which amounted to approximately $3,400, was recorded in “other current liabilities” and “additional paid-in capital��� in the Company’s October 31, 2012 consolidated balance sheet. For the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company paid $13,335, $11,762 and $11,170, respectively, in dividends.
(v)Leases
The Company has noncancellable operating leases, primarily for land and buildings, that expire over the next one to 10 years, with the exception of eight leases that expire between 2032 and 2039. As of October 31, 2012, approximately 77 percent of the Company’s 217 funeral locations were owned by the Company’s subsidiaries and approximately 23 percent were held under operating leases. The Company records operating lease expense for leases with escalating rents on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease, including reasonably assured lease renewals. The Company amortizes leasehold improvements in an operating lease over the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term, including reasonably assured lease renewals. The Company also has operating leases under its vehicle fleet program.
(w) Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2011 and 2010 consolidated financial statements in order for these periods to be comparable.
(3) Change in Accounting Principles and New Accounting Principles
In May 2008, the FASB issued guidance regarding the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion. The guidance states that issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion should account separately for the liability and equity components of the instruments in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible borrowing rate as the related interest cost is recognized in
71
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(3) Change in Accounting Principles and New Accounting Principles—(Continued)
subsequent periods. The entity must determine the carrying amount of the liability component of any outstanding debt instrument by estimating the fair value of a similar liability without the conversion option. The amount of the equity component is then calculated by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the principal amount of the debt instrument. The value of the debt instrument is adjusted through a discount to the face value of the debt, which is amortized as non-cash interest expense over the expected life of the debt. This guidance applies to the Company’s 3.125 percent senior convertible notes due 2014 and 3.375 percent senior convertible notes due 2016 which were originally issued in 2007, and was required to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company adopted this guidance effective November 1, 2009. See Note 14 for additional information.
In June 2008, the FASB issued guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. This guidance states whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities. Dividends are currently paid by the Company on all shares of nonvested restricted stock at the same rate as dividends on normal shares of the Company’s stock. In addition, restricted stockholders are not required to return the dividends to the Company if their shares of nonvested restricted stock do not ultimately vest. Therefore, under this guidance, the Company must include nonvested restricted stock in the basic earnings per share calculation and allocate earnings to common stock and the participating securities according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. This was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings and selected financial data). The Company adopted this guidance effective November 1, 2009. The impact of adopting this guidance was not material.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, which requires additional fair value disclosures. This guidance requires reporting entities to disclose transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and requires gross presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the Level 3 reconciliation of the three-tier fair value hierarchy. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements related to Level 3 activity. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The guidance on transfers between Levels 1 and 2 was adopted by the Company as of its second fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010. The guidance on Level 3 activity was adopted by the Company in the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2011. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which amends the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities. It requires additional disclosures about involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. This guidance is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, which corresponds to the Company’s fiscal year beginning November 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, which requires new disclosures on finance receivables and allowance for credit losses. The new disclosures are required for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010, although the disclosures of reporting period activity are required for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-01, which delayed the effective date of ASU No. 2010-20 for public companies with regard to the disclosures on troubled debt restructurings. In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, which clarifies the guidance for identifying restructuring of receivables that constitute a troubled debt restructuring for a creditor. This guidance is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption, which corresponded to the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter beginning
72
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(3) Change in Accounting Principles and New Accounting Principles—(Continued)
August 1, 2011. The guidance was adopted by the Company as of its first fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2011. The disclosures of reporting period activity were effective for the Company’s second fiscal quarter beginning February 1, 2011. The adoption of this guidance by the Company had no impact on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 9 for the required disclosures.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28 regarding the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. The guidance clarifies the steps to be performed to determine whether goodwill has been impaired and addresses the steps for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. This guidance was effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within such years) beginning after December 15, 2010, which corresponds to the Company’s first fiscal quarter beginning November 1, 2011. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 regarding fair value measurements and disclosures. This new guidance clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement guidance and revises certain measurement and disclosure requirements to achieve convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards. This guidance is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2011, which corresponded to the Company’s second fiscal quarter beginning February 1, 2012. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05 regarding the presentation of comprehensive income. This guidance amends the previous application of comprehensive income and the requirements regarding presentation in the financial statements. It requires the disclosure of the components of comprehensive income, which the Company currently discloses in other sections of its filings, to be presented as part of one statement of comprehensive income, or as a separate statement of comprehensive income following the statement of earnings. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12 which temporarily defers those changes in ASU No. 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This guidance is effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within such years) beginning after December 15, 2011, which corresponds to the Company’s first fiscal quarter beginning November 1, 2012. This guidance will have no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations, and the required information will be included in the Company’s quarterly and annual filings beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2013.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08 regarding the testing of goodwill impairment. This new guidance amends ASC 350-20 to allow an initial assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the first step of the two step goodwill impairment test. This guidance is effective for the first annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, which corresponds to first fiscal quarter beginning November 1, 2012. The Company early adopted this guidance effective for its annual goodwill impairment testing performed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011. For further information, see Note 2(g).
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 regarding disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. This new guidance requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods, which corresponds to the Company’s first fiscal quarter beginning November 1, 2013. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02 regarding subsequent measurement guidance for long lived intangibles. This guidance is meant to reduce the cost and complexity of performing an impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets. This guidance is effective for annual and interim tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, which corresponds to the Company’s fiscal year beginning November 1, 2012.
73
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(3) Change in Accounting Principles and New Accounting Principles—(Continued)
The Company believes that the adoption of this guidance in fiscal year 2013 will have no impact on its consolidated financial statements.
(4) Preneed Funeral Activities
Preneed Funeral Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments represent trust assets and customer receivables related to unperformed, price-guaranteed trust-funded preneed funeral contracts. The components of preneed funeral receivables and trust investments in the consolidated balance sheets as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
| October 31, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | |||||||
Trust assets | $ | 397,875 | $ | 377,198 | ||||
Receivables from customers | 44,959 | 43,457 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| 442,834 | 420,655 | |||||||
Allowances for cancellations | (10,412 | ) | (11,359 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments | $ | 432,422 | $ | 409,296 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
The cost basis and market values associated with preneed funeral merchandise and services trust assets as of October 31, 2012 detailed below.
| October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Hierarchy Level | Cost Basis | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses | Market | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, money market and other short- term investments | 1 | $ | 24,501 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 24,501 | |||||||||||||||
Long term certificate of deposit investments | 1 | 6,775 | — | — | 6,775 | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, agencies and municipalities | 2 | 1,657 | 79 | — | 1,736 | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 2 | 18,946 | 1,580 | — | 20,526 | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | 2 | 34,939 | 1,099 | (688 | ) | 35,350 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 1 | 196,745 | 4,598 | (42,568 | ) | 158,775 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 1 | 18,471 | 1,007 | (1,494 | ) | 17,984 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 1 | 96,021 | 3,271 | (570 | ) | 98,722 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity | 1 | 13,412 | — | (2,864 | ) | 10,548 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 1 | 8,737 | 564 | (9 | ) | 9,292 | ||||||||||||||||||
Master limited partnerships | 1 | 6,867 | 1 | (26 | ) | 6,842 | ||||||||||||||||||
Insurance contracts and other | 3 | 5,372 | 168 | — | 5,540 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Trust investments | $ | 432,443 | $ | 12,367 | $ | (48,219 | ) | $ | 396,591 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Market value as a percentage of cost | 91.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued investment income | 1,284 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust assets | $ | 397,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
The estimated maturities and market values of debt securities included above are as follows:
| October 31, 2012 | ||||
Due in one year or less | $ | 6,144 | ||
Due in one to five years | 12,722 | |||
Due in five to ten years | 2,877 | |||
Thereafter | 519 | |||
|
| |||
| $ | 22,262 | |||
|
| |||
74
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(4) Preneed Funeral Activities—(Continued)
The cost and market values associated with preneed funeral merchandise and services trust assets as of October 31, 2011 are detailed below.
| October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Hierarchy Level | Cost Basis | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses | Market | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, money market and other short- term investments | 1 | $ | 30,714 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 30,714 | |||||||||||||||
Long term certificate of deposit investments | 1 | 7,464 | 10 | — | 7,474 | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, agencies and municipalities | 2 | 2,094 | 60 | (2 | ) | 2,152 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 2 | 21,856 | 1,079 | (8 | ) | 22,927 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | 2 | 36,565 | 362 | (3,358 | ) | 33,569 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 1 | 202,451 | 791 | (55,830 | ) | 147,412 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 1 | 23,591 | 980 | (2,018 | ) | 22,553 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 1 | 78,509 | 902 | (1,417 | ) | 77,994 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity | 1 | 11,844 | 8 | (1,450 | ) | 10,402 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 1 | 15,075 | 37 | (338 | ) | 14,774 | ||||||||||||||||||
Master limited partnerships | 1 | 136 | 4 | — | 140 | |||||||||||||||||||
Insurance contracts and other | 3 | 5,839 | 29 | — | 5,868 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Trust investments | $ | 436,138 | $ | 4,262 | $ | (64,421 | ) | $ | 375,979 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Market value as a percentage of cost | 86.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued investment income | 1,219 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust assets | $ | 377,198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
The Company manages a covered call program on its equity securities within the preneed funeral merchandise and services trust in order to reduce the exposure and volatility of equity securities as well as provide an opportunity for additional income. As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had outstanding covered calls with a market value of $379 and $0, respectively. These covered calls are included at market value in the balance sheet line “preneed funeral receivables and trust investments.” For fiscal years October 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company realized trust earnings (losses) of approximately $116, ($248) and ($270), respectively, related to the covered call program. These trust earnings and losses are accounted for in the same manner as for other funeral merchandise and services trust earnings and flow through funeral revenue in the statement of earnings as the underlying contracts are delivered. Although the Company realized losses associated with the covered call program during fiscal years 2011 and 2010, it continues to hold the underlying securities against which these covered calls were issued; these underlying securities appreciated in value by $1,153 and $3,877, respectively, during the period that the covered calls were outstanding.
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, investments held by the trusts are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation hierarchy. The Company’s Level 1 investments include cash, money market and other short-term investments, common stock and mutual funds.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. These investments are primarily U. S. Government, agencies and municipalities, corporate bonds, convertible bonds and preferred stocks, all of which are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
The Company’s Level 3 investments include insurance contracts and partnership investments purchased within the trusts. The valuation of insurance contracts and partnership investments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted prices, inherent lack of liquidity and the long-term nature of such assets. The fair market value of the insurance contracts is based upon the current face value of the contracts according to the respective insurance companies which is deemed to approximate fair market value. The fair market value of the partnership investments was determined by using their most recent audited financial statements and assessing the market value of the underlying securities within the partnership.
75
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(4) Preneed Funeral Activities—(Continued)
The change in the Company’s preneed funeral merchandise and services trust investments with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows:
| Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||
| October 31, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | October 31, 2010 | ||||||||||
Fair market value, beginning balance | $ | 5,868 | $ | 6,784 | $ | 8,649 | ||||||
Total unrealized gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income(1) | 10 | (689 | ) | (1,762 | ) | |||||||
Distributions and other, net | (338 | ) | (227 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Fair market value, ending balance | $ | 5,540 | $ | 5,868 | $ | 6,784 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| (1) | All gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income for funeral trust investments are attributable to the Company’s preneed customers and are offset by a corresponding increase (decrease) in deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust. |
Activity related to preneed funeral trust investments is as follows:
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Purchases | $ | 77,330 | $ | 166,763 | $ | 41,441 | ||||||
Sales | 74,978 | 181,740 | 45,995 | |||||||||
Realized gains from sales of investments | 6,925 | 9,439 | 2,222 | |||||||||
Realized losses from sales of investments and other | (4,953 | )(1) | (34,508 | )(2) | (5,959 | )(3) | ||||||
Interest income, dividend and other ordinary income | 14,010 | 13,255 | 10,685 | |||||||||
Deposits(4) | 25,005 | 21,807 | 26,018 | |||||||||
Withdrawals(4) | 38,577 | 41,263 | 44,009 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||
Reduction in net unrealized losses | 24,307 | 29,188 | 36,989 | |||||||||
Reclassification to deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust | (24,307 | ) | (29,188 | ) | (36,989 | ) | ||||||
| (1) | Includes $4,741 in losses from the sale of investments and $212 in losses related to certain investments that the Company determined it no longer had the intent to hold until they recover in value. |
| (2) | Includes $3,306 in losses from the sale of investments and $31,202 in losses related to certain investments that the Company determined it no longer had the ability, or in some cases the intent, to hold until they recover in value. As a result of the Company’s review, it concluded that a number of equity securities in its preneed funeral trust portfolios are other-than-temporarily impaired and wrote the cost basis of these securities down to their fair market value as of October 31, 2011. |
| (3) | Includes $4,722 in losses from the sale of investments and $1,416 in losses related to certain investments that the Company determined it no longer had the intent to hold until they recover in value. |
| (4) | The Company historically sold a significant portion of its preneed funeral sales through trust-funded price-guaranteed contracts. Over time, the mix has shifted to a more significant portion being sold using insurance, particularly in states where the trusting requirements are high. |
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the preneed funeral merchandise and services trust investments with unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of October 31, 2012 and 2011.
76
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(4) Preneed Funeral Activities—(Continued)
| October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | $ | 5,707 | $ | (170 | ) | $ | 6,923 | $ | (518 | ) | $ | 12,630 | $ | (688 | ) | |||||||||
Common stocks | 34,686 | (2,241 | ) | 76,621 | (40,327 | ) | 111,307 | (42,568 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 2,467 | (24 | ) | 3,363 | (1,470 | ) | 5,830 | (1,494 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 7,054 | (11 | ) | 3,684 | (559 | ) | 10,738 | (570 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Commodity | — | — | 10,547 | (2,864 | ) | 10,547 | (2,864 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 2,005 | (9 | ) | — | — | 2,005 | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Master limited partnerships | 5,281 | (26 | ) | — | — | 5,281 | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 57,200 | $ | (2,481 | ) | $ | 101,138 | $ | (45,738 | ) | $ | 158,338 | $ | (48,219 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, agencies and municipalities | $ | 498 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 498 | $ | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 6,398 | (8 | ) | — | — | 6,398 | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | 548 | (2 | ) | 19,065 | (3,356 | ) | 19,613 | (3,358 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 5,564 | (58 | ) | 128,478 | (55,772 | ) | 134,042 | (55,830 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 3 | (1 | ) | 8,481 | (2,017 | ) | 8,484 | (2,018 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 43,688 | (707 | ) | 5,015 | (710 | ) | 48,703 | (1,417 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Commodity | 10,175 | (1,450 | ) | — | — | 10,175 | (1,450 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 12,941 | (338 | ) | — | — | 12,941 | (338 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 79,815 | $ | (2,566 | ) | $ | 161,039 | $ | (61,855 | ) | $ | 240,854 | $ | (64,421 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
The unrealized losses in the preneed funeral merchandise and services trust portfolio are not considered to be other than temporary. For a discussion of the Company’s policies for determining whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired, see Note 2(k). Of the total unrealized losses at October 31, 2012, 88 percent, or $42,568, were generated by common stock investments. Most of the common stock investments are part of the S&P 500 Index. The Company generally expects its portfolio performance to improve if the performance of the overall financial market improves, but would also expect its performance to deteriorate if the overall financial market declines. The Company believes it has the intent and ability to hold these investments until they recover in value.
(5) Preneed Cemetery Merchandise and Service Activities
Preneed Cemetery Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments represent trust assets and customer receivables for contracts sold in advance of when the merchandise or services are needed. The receivables related to the sale of preneed property interment rights are included in the Company’s current and long-term receivables discussed in Note 9. The components of preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments in the consolidated balance sheets as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
77
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(5) Preneed Cemetery Merchandise and Service Activities—(Continued)
| October 31, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | |||||||
Trust assets | $ | 197,544 | $ | 189,678 | ||||
Receivables from customers | 29,594 | 30,270 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| 227,138 | 219,948 | |||||||
Allowance for cancellations | (2,090 | ) | (3,366 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments | $ | 225,048 | $ | 216,582 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
The cost basis and market values associated with the preneed cemetery merchandise and services trust assets as of October 31, 2012 are detailed below.
| October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Hierarchy Level | Cost Basis | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses | Market | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, money market and other short- term investments | 1 | $ | 9,099 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9,099 | |||||||||||||||
Long term certificate of deposit investments | 1 | 487 | — | — | 487 | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, agencies and municipalities | 2 | 1,568 | 115 | — | 1,683 | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 2 | 1,981 | 156 | — | 2,137 | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | 2 | 12,790 | 142 | — | 12,932 | |||||||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 1 | 104,170 | 1,931 | (27,687 | ) | 78,414 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 1 | 23,818 | 201 | (6,253 | ) | 17,766 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 1 | 53,572 | 857 | (16 | ) | 54,413 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity | 1 | 8,693 | — | (1,991 | ) | 6,702 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 1 | 3,021 | — | (14 | ) | 3,007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Master limited partnerships | 1 | 10,303 | — | (67 | ) | 10,236 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Trust investments | $ | 229,502 | $ | 3,402 | $ | (36,028 | ) | $ | 196,876 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Market value as a percentage of cost | 85.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued investment income | 668 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust assets | $ | 197,544 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
The estimated maturities and market values of debt securities included above are as follows:
| October 31, 2012 | ||||
Due in one year or less | $ | 197 | ||
Due in one to five years | 2,125 | |||
Due in five to ten years | 1,122 | |||
Thereafter | 376 | |||
|
| |||
| $ | 3,820 | |||
|
| |||
78
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(5) Preneed Cemetery Merchandise and Service Activities—(Continued)
The cost basis and market values associated with the preneed cemetery merchandise and services trust assets as of October 31, 2011 are detailed below.
| October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Hierarchy Level | Cost Basis | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses | Market | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, money market and other short- term investments | 1 | $ | 9,844 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9,844 | |||||||||||||||
Long term certificate of deposit investments | 1 | 477 | — | — | 477 | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, agencies and municipalities | 2 | 2,052 | 90 | (2 | ) | 2,140 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 2 | 2,596 | 131 | (3 | ) | 2,724 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | 2 | 12,637 | 66 | (1,662 | ) | 11,041 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 1 | 112,010 | 920 | (32,761 | ) | 80,169 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 1 | 25,374 | 348 | (6,791 | ) | 18,931 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 1 | 46,258 | 305 | (586 | ) | 45,977 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity | 1 | 8,780 | — | (892 | ) | 7,888 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 1 | 9,866 | 74 | (193 | ) | 9,747 | ||||||||||||||||||
Master limited partnerships | 1 | 97 | — | (2 | ) | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Trust investments | $ | 229,991 | $ | 1,934 | $ | (42,892 | ) | $ | 189,033 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Market value as a percentage of cost | 82.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued investment income | 645 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust assets | $ | 189,678 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
The Company manages a covered call program on its equity securities within the cemetery merchandise and services trust in order to reduce the exposure and volatility of equity securities as well as provide an opportunity for additional income. As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had outstanding covered calls with a market value of $171 and $0, respectively. These covered calls are included at market value in the balance sheet line “preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments.” For fiscal years October 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company realized trust earnings (losses) of approximately $145, ($105) and ($220), respectively, related to the covered call program. These trust earnings and losses are accounted for in the same manner as for other cemetery merchandise and services trust earnings and flow through cemetery revenue in the statement of earnings as the underlying contracts are delivered. Although the Company realized losses associated with the covered call program during fiscal years 2011 and 2010, it continues to hold the underlying securities against which these covered calls were issued; these underlying securities appreciated in value by $133 and $3,014 during the period that the covered calls were outstanding.
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, investments held by the trusts are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation hierarchy. The Company’s Level 1 investments include cash, money market and other short-term investments, common stock and mutual funds.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. These investments are U. S. Government, agencies and municipalities, corporate bonds, convertible bonds and preferred stocks, all of which are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
There are no Level 3 investments in the preneed cemetery merchandise and services trust investment portfolio.
Activity related to preneed cemetery merchandise and services trust investments is as follows:
79
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(5) Preneed Cemetery Merchandise and Service Activities—(Continued)
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Purchases | $ | 46,754 | $ | 131,952 | $ | 31,721 | ||||||
Sales | 48,810 | 127,232 | 27,364 | |||||||||
Realized gains from sales of investments | 4,288 | 7,314 | 1,708 | |||||||||
Realized losses from sales of investments and other | (1,622 | )(1) | (14,076 | )(2) | (2,153 | )(3) | ||||||
Interest income, dividend and other ordinary income | 7,915 | 7,194 | 5,322 | |||||||||
Deposits | 16,756 | 16,842 | 17,963 | |||||||||
Withdrawals | 24,849 | 19,040 | 18,536 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||
Reduction in net unrealized losses | 8,332 | 8,357 | 17,238 | |||||||||
Reclassification to deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust | (8,332 | ) | (8,357 | ) | (17,238 | ) | ||||||
| (1) | Includes $1,721 in losses from the sale of investments. |
| (2) | Includes $1,068 in losses from the sale of investments and $13,008 in losses related to certain investments that the Company determined it did not have the ability, or in some cases the intent, to hold until they recover in value. As a result of the Company’s review, it concluded that a number of equity securities in its preneed cemetery trust portfolios are other-than-temporarily impaired and wrote the cost basis of these securities down to their fair market value as of October 31, 2011. |
| (3) | Includes $2,164 in losses from the sale of investments and $195 in losses related to certain investments that were rendered worthless or practically worthless and to certain investments that the Company determined it did not have the intent to hold until they recover in value. |
80
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(5) Preneed Cemetery Merchandise and Service Activities—(Continued)
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the preneed cemetery merchandise and services trust investments aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of October 31, 2012 and 2011.
| October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Common stocks | $ | 18,856 | $ | (1,271 | ) | $ | 37,775 | $ | (26,416 | ) | $ | 56,631 | $ | (27,687 | ) | |||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 1,868 | (14 | ) | 11,756 | (6,239 | ) | 13,624 | (6,253 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 11,014 | (16 | ) | — | — | 11,014 | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commodity | — | — | 6,703 | (1,991 | ) | 6,703 | (1,991 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 3,007 | (14 | ) | — | — | 3,007 | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Master limited partnerships | 10,236 | (67 | ) | — | — | 10,236 | (67 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 44,981 | $ | (1,382 | ) | $ | 56,234 | $ | (34,646 | ) | $ | 101,215 | $ | (36,028 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, agencies and municipalities | $ | 313 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 313 | $ | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 117 | (3 | ) | — | — | 117 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | — | — | 7,609 | (1,662 | ) | 7,609 | (1,662 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 5,385 | (707 | ) | 59,506 | (32,054 | ) | 64,891 | (32,761 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | — | — | 14,376 | (6,791 | ) | 14,376 | (6,791 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 34,325 | (586 | ) | — | — | 34,325 | (586 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commodity | 7,887 | (892 | ) | — | — | 7,887 | (892 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 5,775 | (193 | ) | — | — | 5,775 | (193 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Master limited partnerships | — | — | 95 | (2 | ) | 95 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 53,802 | $ | (2,383 | ) | $ | 81,586 | $ | (40,509 | ) | $ | 135,388 | $ | (42,892 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
The unrealized losses in the preneed cemetery merchandise and services trust portfolio are not considered to be other than temporary. For a discussion of the Company’s policies for determining whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired, see Note 2(k). Of the total unrealized losses at October 31, 2012, 94 percent, or $33,940 were generated by common stock investments and mutual fund – equity investments. Most of the common stock investments are part of the S&P 500 Index, and the mutual fund – equity investments are invested in small-cap, mid-cap and international mutual funds that are highly diversified. The Company generally expects its portfolio performance to improve if the performance of the overall financial market improves, but would also expect its performance to deteriorate if the overall financial market declines. The Company believes it has the intent and ability to hold these investments until they recover in value.
(6) Cemetery Interment Rights and Perpetual Care Trusts
Earnings from cemetery perpetual care trust investments that the Company is legally permitted to withdraw are recognized in current cemetery revenues and are used to defray cemetery maintenance costs which are expensed as incurred. Recognized earnings related to these cemetery perpetual care trust investments were $9,552, $8,555 and $7,376 for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The cost basis and market values of the trust investments held by the cemetery perpetual care trusts as of October 31, 2012 are detailed below.
81
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(6) Cemetery Interment Rights and Perpetual Care Trusts—(Continued)
| October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Hierarchy Level | Cost Basis | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses | Market | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, money market and other short- term investments | 1 | $ | 16,856 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 16,856 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, agencies and municipalities | 2 | 5,089 | 250 | — | 5,339 | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 2 | 26,479 | 1,409 | (828 | ) | 27,060 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | 2 | 33,476 | 552 | (2,069 | ) | 31,959 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 1 | 90,085 | 3,017 | (19,440 | ) | 73,662 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 1 | 17,204 | 1,164 | (521 | ) | 17,847 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 1 | 74,762 | 2,400 | (713 | ) | 76,449 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity | 1 | 4,591 | 6 | (463 | ) | 4,134 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 1 | 8,792 | 614 | (15 | ) | 9,391 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3 | 47 | — | — | 47 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Trust investments | $ | 277,381 | $ | 9,412 | $ | (24,049 | ) | $ | 262,744 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Market value as a percentage of cost | 94.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued investment income | 919 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust assets | $ | 263,663 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
The estimated maturities and market values of debt securities included above are as follows:
| October 31, 2012 | ||||
Due in one year or less | $ | 4,229 | ||
Due in one to five years | 15,557 | |||
Due in five to ten years | 7,863 | |||
Thereafter | 4,750 | |||
|
| |||
| $ | 32,399 | |||
|
| |||
82
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(6) Cemetery Interment Rights and Perpetual Care Trusts—(Continued)
The cost basis and market values of the trust investments held by the cemetery perpetual care trusts as of October 31, 2011 are detailed below.
| October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Hierarchy Level | Cost Basis | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses | Market | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, money market and other short- term investments | 1 | $ | 20,654 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 20,654 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, agencies and municipalities | 2 | 6,928 | 375 | (57 | ) | 7,246 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 2 | 27,166 | 1,044 | (876 | ) | 27,334 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | 2 | 38,428 | 155 | (6,927 | ) | 31,656 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 1 | 82,750 | 1,751 | (24,410 | ) | 60,091 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 1 | 13,478 | 601 | (807 | ) | 13,272 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 1 | 61,740 | 706 | (1,990 | ) | 60,456 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity | 1 | 6 | 5 | — | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 1 | 8,834 | 6 | (210 | ) | 8,630 | ||||||||||||||||||
Master limited partnerships | 1 | 10,248 | 16 | (61 | ) | 10,203 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3 | 60 | — | (12 | ) | 48 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Trust investments | $ | 270,292 | $ | 4,659 | $ | (35,350 | ) | $ | 239,601 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Market value as a percentage of cost | 88.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued investment income | 791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust assets | $ | 240,392 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
The Company manages a covered call program on its equity securities within the cemetery perpetual care trust in order to reduce the exposure and volatility of equity securities as well as provide an opportunity for additional income. As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had outstanding covered calls with a market value of $131 and $0, respectively. These covered calls are included at market value in the balance sheet line “cemetery perpetual care trust investments.” For fiscal years October 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company realized trust earnings (losses) of approximately $94, ($141) and ($187), respectively, related to the covered call program. These trust earnings and losses are accounted for in the same manner as for other cemetery perpetual care trust earnings and flow through cemetery revenue in the statement of earnings. Although the Company realized losses associated with the covered call programs during fiscal years 2011 and 2010, it continues to hold the underlying securities against which these covered calls were issued; these underlying securities appreciated in value by $380 and $2,005 during the period that the covered calls were outstanding.
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, investments held by the trusts are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation hierarchy. The Company’s Level 1 investments include cash, money market and other short-term investments, common stock and mutual funds.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. These investments are primarily U. S. Government, agencies and municipalities, corporate bonds, convertible bonds and preferred stocks, all of which are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
The Company’s Level 3 investments include an investment in a partnership. The valuation of partnership investments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted prices, inherent lack of liquidity and the long-term nature of such assets. The fair market value of the partnership investments was determined by using its most recent audited financial statements and assessing the market value of the underlying securities within the partnership.
83
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(6) Cemetery Interment Rights and Perpetual Care Trusts—(Continued)
The change in the Company’s cemetery perpetual care trust investments with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows:
| Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||
| October 31, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | October 31, 2010 | ||||||||||
Fair market value, beginning balance | $ | 48 | $ | 88 | $ | 201 | ||||||
Total unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income(1) | (1 | ) | (40 | ) | �� | (113 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Fair market value, ending balance | $ | 47 | $ | 48 | $ | 88 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| (1) | All gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income for cemetery perpetual care trust investments are attributable to the Company’s customers and are offset by a corresponding increase (decrease) in perpetual care trusts’ corpus. |
In states where the Company withdraws and recognizes capital gains in its cemetery perpetual care trusts, if it realizes subsequent net capital losses (i.e., losses in excess of capital gains in the trust) and the fair market value of the trust assets is less than the aggregate amounts required to be contributed to the trust, some states may require the Company to make cash deposits to the trusts or may require the Company to stop withdrawing earnings until future earnings restore the initial corpus. As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had a liability recorded for the estimated probable funding obligation to restore the net realized losses of $11,965 and $12,017, respectively. The Company recorded $619 and $72 for the estimated probable funding obligation to restore the net realized losses in the cemetery perpetual care trust for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The additional funding obligation in fiscal year 2012 is related to the bankruptcy of Eastman Kodak. The Company had earnings of $671 and $1,308 within the trusts that it did not withdraw from the trusts in order to satisfy a portion of its estimated probable funding obligation for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In those states where realized net capital gains have not been withdrawn, the Company believes it is reasonably possible but not probable that additional funding obligations may exist with an estimated amount of $1,990; no charge has been recorded for these amounts as of October 31, 2012.
84
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(6) Cemetery Interment Rights and Perpetual Care Trusts—(Continued)
Activity related to preneed cemetery perpetual care trust investments is as follows:
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Purchases | $ | 112,000 | $ | 160,534 | $ | 106,857 | ||||||
Sales | 102,596 | 141,944 | 116,361 | |||||||||
Realized gains from sales of investments | 6,390 | 3,457 | 6,031 | |||||||||
Realized losses from sales of investments and other | (3,263 | )(1) | (11,871 | )(2) | (1,328 | )(3) | ||||||
Interest income, dividend and other ordinary income | 10,652 | 10,066 | 8,769 | |||||||||
Deposits | 8,828 | 7,751 | 7,293 | |||||||||
Withdrawals | 9,930 | 7,392 | 7,213 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||
Reduction in net unrealized losses | 16,054 | 10,347 | 15,621 | |||||||||
Reclassification to perpetual care trusts’ corpus | (16,054 | ) | (10,347 | ) | (15,621 | ) | ||||||
| (1) | Includes $2,644 in losses from the sale of investments and $619 in additional realized losses related to securities that had been previously impaired. |
| (2) | Includes $816 in losses from the sale of investments, $72 in realized losses related to securities that had been previously rendered worthless or practically worthless and $10,983 in losses related to certain investments that the Company determined it did not have the ability, or in some cases the intent, to hold until they recover in value. As a result of the Company’s review, it concluded that a number of equity securities in its cemetery perpetual care trust portfolios are other-than-temporarily impaired and wrote the cost basis of these securities down to their fair market value as of October 31, 2011. |
| (3) | Includes $1,297 in losses from the sale of investments and $31 in losses related to certain investments that were rendered worthless or practically worthless. |
During the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, cemetery revenues were $233,113, $229,007 and $224,009, respectively, of which $8,539, $9,068 and $8,288, respectively, were required to be placed into perpetual care trusts and were recorded as revenues and expenses.
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the cemetery perpetual care trust investments with unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of October 31, 2012 and 2011.
85
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(6) Cemetery Interment Rights and Perpetual Care Trusts—(Continued)
| October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | $ | 4,736 | $ | (80 | ) | $ | 276 | $ | (748 | ) | $ | 5,012 | $ | (828 | ) | |||||||||
Preferred stocks | 4,076 | (54 | ) | 6,492 | (2,015 | ) | 10,568 | (2,069 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 19,623 | (704 | ) | 32,424 | (18,736 | ) | 52,047 | (19,440 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 3,405 | (40 | ) | 1,169 | (481 | ) | 4,574 | (521 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 7,267 | (12 | ) | 14,517 | (701 | ) | 21,784 | (713 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Commodity | 2,559 | (234 | ) | 1,539 | (229 | ) | 4,098 | (463 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 2,106 | (15 | ) | — | — | 2,106 | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 43,772 | $ | (1,139 | ) | $ | 56,417 | $ | (22,910 | ) | $ | 100,189 | $ | (24,049 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | Market Value | Unrealized Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, agencies and municipalities | $ | 213 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 71 | $ | (56 | ) | $ | 284 | $ | (57 | ) | |||||||||
Corporate bonds | 5,959 | (150 | ) | 1,341 | (726 | ) | 7,300 | (876 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stocks | 3,611 | (91 | ) | 20,921 | (6,836 | ) | 24,532 | (6,927 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Common stocks | 1,027 | (108 | ) | 50,539 | (24,302 | ) | 51,566 | (24,410 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 106 | (113 | ) | 1,967 | (694 | ) | 2,073 | (807 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Fixed income | 39,397 | (1,742 | ) | 1,606 | (248 | ) | 41,003 | (1,990 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Real estate investment trusts | 7,659 | (210 | ) | — | — | 7,659 | (210 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Master limited partnerships | 7,936 | (61 | ) | — | — | 7,936 | (61 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other | — | — | 48 | (12 | ) | 48 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 65,908 | $ | (2,476 | ) | $ | 76,493 | $ | (32,874 | ) | $ | 142,401 | $ | (35,350 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
The unrealized losses in the cemetery perpetual care trust portfolio are not considered to be other than temporary. For a discussion of the Company’s policies for determining whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired, see Note 2(k). Of the total unrealized losses at October 31, 2012, 89 percent, or $21,509, were generated by common stock and preferred stock investments. Most of the common stock investments are part of the S&P 500 Index, and all preferred stock investments had a rating of investment grade at the time of purchase. The Company generally expects its portfolio performance to improve if the performance of the overall financial market improves, but would also expect its performance to deteriorate if the overall financial market declines. The Company believes it has the intent and ability to hold these investments until they recover in value.
(7) Deferred Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Receipts Held in Trust and Perpetual Care Trusts’ Corpus
The components of deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust in the consolidated balance sheet at October 31, 2012 are as follows:
86
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(7) Deferred Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Receipts Held in Trust and Perpetual Care Trusts’ Corpus—(Continued)
| Deferred Receipts Held in Trust | ||||||||||||
| Preneed Funeral | Preneed Cemetery | Total | ||||||||||
Trust assets at market value | $ | 397,875 | $ | 197,544 | $ | 595,419 | ||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||
Pending withdrawals | (7,870 | ) | (6,345 | ) | (14,215 | ) | ||||||
Pending deposits | 2,333 | 1,627 | 3,960 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Deferred receipts held in trust | $ | 392,338 | $ | 192,826 | $ | 585,164 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
The components of perpetual care trusts’ corpus in the consolidated balance sheet at October 31, 2012 are as follows:
| Perpetual Care Trusts’ Corpus | ||||
Trust assets at market value | $ | 263,663 | ||
Less: | ||||
Pending withdrawals | (1,905 | ) | ||
Pending deposits | 125 | |||
|
| |||
Perpetual care trusts’ corpus | $ | 261,883 | ||
|
| |||
The components of deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust in the consolidated balance sheet at October 31, 2011 are as follows:
| Deferred Receipts Held in Trust | ||||||||||||
| Preneed Funeral | Preneed Cemetery | Total | ||||||||||
Trust assets at market value | $ | 377,198 | $ | 189,678 | $ | 566,876 | ||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||
Pending withdrawals | (6,373 | ) | (5,454 | ) | (11,827 | ) | ||||||
Pending deposits | 2,015 | 1,130 | 3,145 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Deferred receipts held in trust | $ | 372,840 | $ | 185,354 | $ | 558,194 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
The components of perpetual care trusts’ corpus in the consolidated balance sheet at October 31, 2011 are as follows:
| Perpetual Care Trusts’ Corpus | ||||
Trust assets at market value | $ | 240,392 | ||
Less: | ||||
Pending withdrawals | (1,896 | ) | ||
Pending deposits | 484 | |||
|
| |||
Perpetual care trusts’ corpus | $ | 238,980 | ||
|
| |||
87
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(7) Deferred Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Receipts Held in Trust and Perpetual Care Trusts’ Corpus—(Continued)
Investment and other income, net
The components of investment and other income, net in the consolidated statement of earnings for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are detailed below.
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Realized gains from sales of investments | $ | 17,603 | $ | 20,210 | $ | 9,961 | ||||||
Realized losses from sales of investments and other(1) | (9,838 | ) | (60,455 | ) | (9,440 | ) | ||||||
Interest income, dividends and other ordinary income | 32,577 | 30,515 | 24,776 | |||||||||
Trust expenses and income taxes | (11,850 | ) | (10,523 | ) | (9,983 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net trust investment income (loss) | 28,492 | (20,253 | ) | 15,314 | ||||||||
Reclassification to deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trusts | (18,858 | ) | 18,229 | (5,384 | ) | |||||||
Reclassification to perpetual care trusts’ corpus | (9,634 | ) | 2,024 | (9,930 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust and perpetual care trusts’ corpus | — | — | — | |||||||||
Investment and other income, net(2) | 174 | 672 | 156 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total investment and other income, net | $ | 174 | $ | 672 | $ | 156 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| (1) | This category includes impairments recorded related to certain securities in the trusts. See Notes 4, 5 and 6 for additional information. |
| (2) | Investment and other income, net consists of interest income primarily on the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities not held in trust. For the year ended October 31, 2011, the balance includes approximately $579 of interest income related to the resolution of an audit by the Internal Revenue Service. |
(8) Marketable Securities and Restricted Investments
The market value of marketable securities as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 was $11,514 and $1,662, respectively, which included gross unrealized gains of $66 and $33 for fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively, and gross unrealized losses of $0 and $5 for fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively. Of the total marketable securities balance as of October 31, 2012 and 2011, $1,000 is classified as a long-term asset in “other assets” in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company is required by Texas statutes to maintain a minimal capital level of $1,000, of which at least 40 percent must be in readily marketable investments.
In connection with its workers’ compensation and automobile liability program with its insurance carrier, the Company is required to maintain collateral in the amount of $6,250. In the past, the Company has posted letters of credit to meet the collateral requirement. In fiscal year 2011, in order to reduce the letter of credit fees, the Company posted cash to satisfy the collateral requirement by investing $6,250 in a money market fund comprised of short-term U.S. treasury securities. This amount is classified in the “restricted cash and cash equivalents” line in the current assets section of the consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 2012 and 2011. Both methods of posting collateral are available to the Company in the future at any time.
88
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(9) Receivables
As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s receivables were as follows:
| Receivables as of October 31, 2012 | Receivables as of October 31, 2011 | |||||||
| Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment | Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment | |||||||
Current receivables – at-need funeral | $ | 8,120 | $ | 8,317 | ||||
Current receivables – other | 48,380 | 45,455 | ||||||
Receivables, due beyond one year – other | 77,873 | 75,097 | ||||||
Preneed funeral receivables | 44,959 | 43,457 | ||||||
Preneed cemetery receivables | 29,594 | 30,270 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 208,926 | $ | 202,596 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current receivables | 56,500 | 53,772 | ||||||
Total noncurrent receivables | 152,426 | 148,824 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 208,926 | $ | 202,596 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Below is a breakdown by type of current receivables and receivables due beyond one year.
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Current receivables are summarized as follows: | ||||||||
Installment contracts due within one year | $ | 36,500 | $ | 34,107 | ||||
Income tax receivables | 1,772 | 1,004 | ||||||
Trade and other receivables | 13,544 | 13,489 | ||||||
Funeral receivables | 8,120 | 8,317 | ||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (4,059 | ) | (4,626 | ) | ||||
Amounts to be collected for cemetery perpetual care trusts | (3,436 | ) | (3,145 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net current receivables | $ | 52,441 | $ | 49,146 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Receivables due beyond one year are summarized as follows: | ||||||||
Installment contracts due beyond one year | $ | 85,966 | $ | 82,724 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (5,253 | ) | (7,118 | ) | ||||
Amounts to be collected for cemetery perpetual care trusts | (8,093 | ) | (7,627 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net receivables due beyond one year | $ | 72,620 | $ | 67,979 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Installment contracts due within one year and due beyond one year include receivables in the Company’s preneed cemetery property sales only. Receivables for preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services sales are included in preneed funeral receivables and trust investments and preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments as discussed in Notes 4 and 5.
89
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(9) Receivables—(continued)
The Company’s receivables as of October 31, 2012 are expected to be collected as follows:
Years ending October 31, | ||||
2013 | $ | 52,441 | ||
2014 | 23,529 | |||
2015 | 18,210 | |||
2016 | 13,491 | |||
2017 | 8,220 | |||
Thereafter | 9,170 | |||
|
| |||
| $ | 125,061 | |||
|
|
As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts and cancellations were as follows:
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Cancellations as of October 31, 2012 | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Cancellations as of October 31, 2011 | |||||||
| Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment | Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment | |||||||
Current receivables – at-need funeral and other | $ | (4,059 | ) | $ | (4,626 | ) | ||
Receivables, due beyond one year – other | (5,253 | ) | (7,118 | ) | ||||
Preneed funeral receivables | (10,412 | ) | (11,359 | ) | ||||
Preneed cemetery receivables | (2,090 | ) | (3,366 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | (21,814 | ) | $ | (26,469 | ) | ||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current receivables | (4,059 | ) | (4,626 | ) | ||||
Total noncurrent receivables | (17,755 | ) | (21,843 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | (21,814 | ) | $ | (26,469 | ) | ||
|
|
|
| |||||
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Cancellations Rollforward | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance – October 31, 2011 | Charged to costs and expenses | Write-offs | Balance – October 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||
Current receivables – at-need funeral and other | $ | 4,626 | 1,855 | (2,422 | ) | $ | 4,059 | |||||||||
Receivables, due beyond one year – other | $ | 7,118 | 2,401 | (4,266 | ) | $ | 5,253 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| $ | 11,744 | 4,256 | (6,688 | ) | $ | 9,312 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Cancellations Rollforward | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance – October 31, 2010 | Charged to costs and expenses | Write-offs | Balance – October 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Current receivables – at-need funeral and other | $ | 5,738 | 1,922 | (3,034 | ) | $ | 4,626 | |||||||||
Receivables, due beyond one year – other | $ | 8,324 | 2,957 | (4,163 | ) | $ | 7,118 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| $ | 14,062 | 4,879 | (7,197 | ) | $ | 11,744 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
The Company has established allowances for preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trust receivables. Changes in these allowances have no effect on the consolidated statement of earnings but are recorded as reductions in preneed receivables and preneed deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheet. The following summarizes the Company’s receivables aging analysis:
90
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(9) Receivables—(continued)
| Receivables Aging Analysis as of October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 90 Days | Greater than 90 Days | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Receivables – at-need funeral | $ | 4,392 | $ | 1,274 | $ | 509 | $ | 1,945 | $ | 8,120 | ||||||||||
Receivables – other | 107,602 | 4,239 | 2,491 | 11,921 | 126,253 | |||||||||||||||
Preneed funeral receivables | 33,034 | 825 | 406 | 10,694 | 44,959 | |||||||||||||||
Preneed cemetery receivables | 25,472 | 1,012 | 584 | 2,526 | 29,594 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| $ | 170,500 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 3,990 | $ | 27,086 | $ | 208,926 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
(10) Inventories and Cemetery Property
Inventories are comprised of the following:
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Developed cemetery property | $ | 13,195 | $ | 11,661 | ||||
Merchandise and supplies | 23,300 | 24,198 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| $ | 36,495 | $ | 35,859 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cemetery property is comprised of the following:
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Developed cemetery property | $ | 127,484 | $ | 120,486 | ||||
Undeveloped cemetery property | 274,186 | 275,528 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| $ | 401,670 | $ | 396,014 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
The portion of developed cemetery property that management estimates will be used in the next twelve months is included in inventories. Included in the non-current developed portion of cemetery property are $20,032 and $16,845 related to cemetery property under development as of October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
91
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(11) Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of Guarantors of Senior Notes and Senior Convertible Notes
The following tables present the condensed consolidating historical financial statements as of October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 and for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, for the direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries of the Company that serve as guarantors of the Company’s 6.50 percent senior notes and its 3.125 percent and 3.375 percent senior convertible notes, and the financial results of the Company’s subsidiaries that do not serve as guarantors. Non-guarantor subsidiaries of the 6.50 percent senior notes and senior convertible notes include the Puerto Rican subsidiaries, Investors Trust, Inc. and certain immaterial domestic subsidiaries, which are not 100 percent owned, or are prohibited by law from guaranteeing the 6.50 percent senior notes and senior convertible notes. The guarantor subsidiaries of the 6.50 percent senior notes and senior convertible notes are 100 percent-owned directly or indirectly by the Company. The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. In the condensed consolidating statements of earnings and other comprehensive income, corporate general and administrative expenses and interest expense of the parent are presented net of amounts charged to the guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Earnings and Other Comprehensive Income
| Year Ended October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Funeral | $ | — | $ | 263,156 | $ | 19,828 | $ | — | $ | 282,984 | ||||||||||
Cemetery | — | 209,692 | 23,421 | — | 233,113 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| — | 472,848 | 43,249 | — | 516,097 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Funeral | — | 200,073 | 13,597 | — | 213,670 | |||||||||||||||
Cemetery | — | 175,546 | 17,199 | — | 192,745 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| — | 375,619 | 30,796 | — | 406,415 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Gross profit | — | 97,229 | 12,453 | — | 109,682 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate general and administrative expenses | (28,521 | ) | — | — | — | (28,521 | ) | |||||||||||||
Restructuring and other charges | (2,055 | ) | (1,071 | ) | (165 | ) | — | (3,291 | ) | |||||||||||
Hurricane related charges, net | — | (55 | ) | — | — | (55 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net gain on dispositions | — | 403 | — | — | 403 | |||||||||||||||
Other operating income, net | 106 | 802 | 303 | — | 1,211 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Operating earnings (loss) | (30,470 | ) | 97,308 | 12,591 | — | 79,429 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (7,554 | ) | (14,245 | ) | (1,602 | ) | — | (23,401 | ) | |||||||||||
Investment and other income, net | 174 | — | — | — | 174 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in subsidiaries | 59,744 | 1,090 | — | (60,834 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 21,894 | 84,153 | 10,989 | (60,834 | ) | 56,202 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (14,002 | ) | 29,035 | 3,689 | — | 18,722 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 35,896 | 55,118 | 7,300 | (60,834 | ) | 37,480 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes | — | (2,314 | ) | — | — | (2,314 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income tax benefit | — | (730 | ) | — | — | (730 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | — | (1,584 | ) | — | — | (1,584 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net earnings | 35,896 | 53,534 | 7,300 | (60,834 | ) | 35,896 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net | 24 | — | 23 | (23 | ) | 24 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 35,920 | $ | 53,534 | $ | 7,323 | $ | (60,857 | ) | $ | 35,920 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
92
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| (11) | Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of Guarantors of Senior Notes and Senior Convertible Notes—(Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Earnings and Other Comprehensive Income
| Year Ended October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Funeral | $ | — | $ | 263,776 | $ | 19,881 | $ | — | $ | 283,657 | ||||||||||
Cemetery | — | 205,004 | 24,003 | — | 229,007 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| — | 468,780 | 43,884 | — | 512,664 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Funeral | — | 203,884 | 13,125 | — | 217,009 | |||||||||||||||
Cemetery | — | 176,766 | 18,472 | — | 195,238 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| — | 380,650 | 31,597 | — | 412,247 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Gross profit | — | 88,130 | 12,287 | — | 100,417 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate general and administrative expenses | (26,775 | ) | — | — | — | (26,775 | ) | |||||||||||||
Hurricane related recoveries, net | 4,057 | 6,683 | 1,492 | — | 12,232 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss on dispositions | — | (389 | ) | — | — | (389 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other operating income, net | 158 | 1,237 | 230 | — | 1,625 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Operating earnings (loss) | (22,560 | ) | 95,661 | 14,009 | — | 87,110 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (3,890 | ) | (17,019 | ) | (1,838 | ) | — | (22,747 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (1,884 | ) | — | — | — | (1,884 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investment and other income, net | 672 | — | — | — | 672 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in subsidiaries | 50,344 | 1,092 | — | (51,436 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 22,682 | 79,734 | 12,171 | (51,436 | ) | 63,151 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (15,873 | ) | 33,201 | 6,506 | — | 23,834 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 38,555 | 46,533 | 5,665 | (51,436 | ) | 39,317 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes | — | (1,245 | ) | — | — | (1,245 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income tax benefit | — | (483 | ) | — | — | (483 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | — | (762 | ) | — | — | (762 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net earnings | 38,555 | 45,771 | 5,665 | (51,436 | ) | 38,555 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 38,555 | $ | 45,771 | $ | 5,665 | $ | (51,436 | ) | $ | 38,555 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
93
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| (11) | Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of Guarantors of Senior Notes and Senior Convertible Notes—(Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Earnings and Other Comprehensive Income
| Year Ended October 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Funeral | $ | — | $ | 256,423 | $ | 19,475 | $ | — | $ | 275,898 | ||||||||||
Cemetery | — | 200,524 | 23,485 | — | 224,009 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| — | 456,947 | 42,960 | — | 499,907 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Funeral | — | 196,667 | 13,610 | — | 210,277 | |||||||||||||||
Cemetery | — | 174,340 | 18,551 | — | 192,891 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| — | 371,007 | 32,161 | — | 403,168 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Gross profit | — | 85,940 | 10,799 | — | 96,739 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate general and administrative expenses | (28,044 | ) | — | — | — | (28,044 | ) | |||||||||||||
Hurricane related recoveries (charges), net | (121 | ) | — | 55 | — | (66 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other operating income, net | 69 | 1,048 | 307 | — | 1,424 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Operating earnings (loss) | (28,096 | ) | 86,988 | 11,161 | — | 70,053 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (1,400 | ) | (20,436 | ) | (2,556 | ) | — | (24,392 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (1,035 | ) | — | — | — | (1,035 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investment and other income, net | 154 | 2 | — | — | 156 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in subsidiaries | 46,589 | 767 | — | (47,356 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 16,212 | 67,321 | 8,605 | (47,356 | ) | 44,782 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (14,766 | ) | 25,017 | 3,798 | — | 14,049 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 30,978 | 42,304 | 4,807 | (47,356 | ) | 30,733 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings from discontinued operations before income taxes | — | 385 | — | — | 385 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes | — | 140 | — | — | 140 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Earnings from discontinued operations | — | 245 | — | — | 245 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net earnings | 30,978 | 42,549 | 4,807 | (47,356 | ) | 30,978 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net | (17 | ) | — | (17 | ) | 17 | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 30,961 | $ | 42,549 | $ | 4,790 | $ | (47,339 | ) | $ | 30,961 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
94
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| (11) | Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of Guarantors of Senior Notes and Senior Convertible Notes—(Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
| October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 65,722 | $ | 1,033 | $ | 1,432 | $ | — | $ | 68,187 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 6,250 | — | — | — | 6,250 | |||||||||||||||
Marketable securities | 10,046 | — | 468 | — | 10,514 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables, net of allowances | 2,682 | 43,453 | 6,306 | — | 52,441 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories | 193 | 33,929 | 2,373 | — | 36,495 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,373 | 2,128 | 1,422 | — | 4,923 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 16,701 | 13,154 | 816 | — | 30,671 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables | 1,247 | — | — | (1,247 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total current assets | 104,214 | 93,697 | 12,817 | (1,247 | ) | 209,481 | ||||||||||||||
Receivables due beyond one year, net of allowances | — | 61,025 | 11,595 | — | 72,620 | |||||||||||||||
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments | — | 422,753 | 9,669 | — | 432,422 | |||||||||||||||
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments | — | 218,018 | 7,030 | — | 225,048 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill | — | 229,749 | 19,835 | — | 249,584 | |||||||||||||||
Cemetery property, at cost | — | 365,901 | 35,769 | — | 401,670 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, at cost | 63,328 | 506,957 | 44,623 | — | 614,908 | |||||||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 50,732 | 252,124 | 20,792 | — | 323,648 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net property and equipment | 12,596 | 254,833 | 23,831 | — | 291,260 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 2,967 | 52,379 | 6,779 | — | 62,125 | |||||||||||||||
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments | — | 249,608 | 14,055 | — | 263,663 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets | 8,281 | 4,279 | 1,252 | — | 13,812 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables | 601,223 | — | — | (601,223 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Equity in subsidiaries | 55,287 | 11,070 | — | (66,357 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 784,568 | $ | 1,963,312 | $ | 142,632 | $ | (668,827 | ) | $ | 2,221,685 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 6 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 19,263 | 73,119 | 4,801 | — | 97,183 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables | — | — | 1,247 | (1,247 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 19,269 | 73,119 | 6,048 | (1,247 | ) | 97,189 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 321,887 | — | — | — | 321,887 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | — | 4,350 | 581 | — | 4,931 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables | — | 591,381 | 9,842 | (601,223 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Deferred preneed funeral revenue | — | 193,860 | 46,555 | — | 240,415 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred preneed cemetery revenue | — | 236,249 | 29,098 | — | 265,347 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust | — | 577,013 | 8,151 | — | 585,164 | |||||||||||||||
Perpetual care trusts’ corpus | — | 247,845 | 14,038 | — | 261,883 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 19,091 | 1,457 | — | — | 20,548 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total liabilities | 360,247 | 1,925,274 | 114,313 | (602,470 | ) | 1,797,364 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Common stock | 84,915 | 102 | 376 | (478 | ) | 84,915 | ||||||||||||||
Other | 339,364 | 37,936 | 27,934 | (65,870 | ) | 339,364 | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 42 | — | 9 | (9 | ) | 42 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 424,321 | 38,038 | 28,319 | (66,357 | ) | 424,321 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 784,568 | $ | 1,963,312 | $ | 142,632 | $ | (668,827 | ) | $ | 2,221,685 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
95
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| (11) | Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of Guarantors of Senior Notes and Senior Convertible Notes—(Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
| October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 62,388 | $ | 1,937 | $ | 1,363 | $ | — | $ | 65,688 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 6,250 | — | — | — | 6,250 | |||||||||||||||
Marketable securities | — | — | 662 | — | 662 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables, net of allowances | 2,040 | 40,405 | 6,701 | — | 49,146 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories | 318 | 32,926 | 2,615 | — | 35,859 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,214 | 2,289 | 1,552 | — | 5,055 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 14,815 | 13,696 | 1,257 | — | 29,768 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables | 1,762 | — | — | (1,762 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total current assets | 88,787 | 91,253 | 14,150 | (1,762 | ) | 192,428 | ||||||||||||||
Receivables due beyond one year, net of allowances | — | 55,847 | 12,132 | — | 67,979 | |||||||||||||||
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments | — | 399,731 | 9,565 | — | 409,296 | |||||||||||||||
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments | — | 209,284 | 7,298 | — | 216,582 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill | — | 227,203 | 19,835 | — | 247,038 | |||||||||||||||
Cemetery property, at cost | — | 359,678 | 36,336 | — | 396,014 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, at cost | 59,688 | 495,089 | 43,215 | — | 597,992 | |||||||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 45,705 | 240,906 | 19,097 | — | 305,708 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net property and equipment | 13,983 | 254,183 | 24,118 | — | 292,284 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 4,947 | 68,939 | 5,907 | — | 79,793 | |||||||||||||||
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments | — | 227,428 | 12,964 | — | 240,392 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets | 9,539 | 4,728 | 1,025 | — | 15,292 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables | 660,246 | — | — | (660,246 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Equity in subsidiaries | 15,812 | 9,980 | — | (25,792 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 793,314 | $ | 1,908,254 | $ | 143,330 | $ | (687,800 | ) | $ | 2,157,098 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 5 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 14,320 | 71,505 | 4,633 | — | 90,458 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables | — | — | 1,762 | (1,762 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 14,325 | 71,505 | 6,395 | (1,762 | ) | 90,463 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 317,821 | — | — | — | 317,821 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | — | 4,521 | 583 | — | 5,104 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables | — | 646,588 | 13,658 | (660,246 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Deferred preneed funeral revenue | — | 193,452 | 46,834 | — | 240,286 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred preneed cemetery revenue | — | 230,291 | 28,946 | — | 259,237 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust | — | 550,010 | 8,184 | — | 558,194 | |||||||||||||||
Perpetual care trusts’ corpus | — | 226,042 | 12,938 | — | 238,980 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 17,996 | 1,341 | — | — | 19,337 | |||||||||||||||
Negative equity in subsidiaries | 15,496 | — | — | (15,496 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total liabilities | 365,638 | 1,923,750 | 117,538 | (677,504 | ) | 1,729,422 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Common stock | 87,976 | 102 | 376 | (478 | ) | 87,976 | ||||||||||||||
Other | 339,682 | (15,598 | ) | 25,398 | (9,800 | ) | 339,682 | |||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 18 | — | 18 | (18 | ) | 18 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 427,676 | (15,496 | ) | 25,792 | (10,296 | ) | 427,676 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 793,314 | $ | 1,908,254 | $ | 143,330 | $ | (687,800 | ) | $ | 2,157,098 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
96
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| (11) | Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of Guarantors of Senior Notes and Senior Convertible Notes—(Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
| Year Ended October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 9,305 | $ | 56,953 | $ | 10,279 | $ | — | $ | 76,537 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales/maturities of marketable securities and release of restricted funds | 1,756 | — | 1,113 | — | 2,869 | |||||||||||||||
Deposits of restricted funds and purchases of marketable securities | (11,750 | ) | — | (880 | ) | — | (12,630 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | — | 755 | — | — | 755 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of subsidiaries and other investments, net of cash acquired | (200 | ) | (6,242 | ) | — | — | (6,442 | ) | ||||||||||||
Additions to property and equipment | (3,281 | ) | (16,217 | ) | (1,348 | ) | — | (20,846 | ) | |||||||||||
Other | — | 148 | — | — | 148 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (13,475 | ) | (21,556 | ) | (1,115 | ) | — | (36,146 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt | (5 | ) | — | — | — | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables (payables) | 45,396 | (36,301 | ) | (9,095 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Debt refinancing costs | (34 | ) | — | — | — | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 2,910 | — | — | — | 2,910 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock | (27,428 | ) | — | — | — | (27,428 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends | (13,335 | ) | — | — | — | (13,335 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 7,504 | (36,301 | ) | (9,095 | ) | — | (37,892 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | 3,334 | (904 | ) | 69 | — | 2,499 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 62,388 | 1,937 | 1,363 | — | 65,688 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 65,722 | $ | 1,033 | $ | 1,432 | $ | — | $ | 68,187 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
97
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| (11) | Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of Guarantors of Senior Notes and Senior Convertible Notes—(Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
| Year Ended October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 4,915 | $ | 72,927 | $ | 8,988 | $ | — | $ | 86,830 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales/maturities of certificates of deposit | 10,000 | — | — | — | 10,000 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of restricted cash equivalents and marketable securities | (6,250 | ) | — | (662 | ) | — | (6,912 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | — | 332 | — | — | 332 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of subsidiaries and other investments, net of cash acquired | — | (9,110 | ) | — | — | (9,110 | ) | |||||||||||||
Additions to property and equipment | (3,082 | ) | (22,393 | ) | (1,483 | ) | — | (26,958 | ) | |||||||||||
Other | — | 149 | — | — | 149 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 668 | (31,022 | ) | (2,145 | ) | — | (32,499 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt | 200,000 | — | — | — | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt | (200,005 | ) | — | — | — | (200,005 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables (payables) | 53,238 | (46,023 | ) | (7,215 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Debt refinancing costs | (5,944 | ) | — | — | — | (5,944 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 1,495 | — | — | — | 1,495 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock | (28,838 | ) | — | — | — | (28,838 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends | (11,762 | ) | — | — | — | (11,762 | ) | |||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | 351 | — | — | — | 351 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 8,535 | (46,023 | ) | (7,215 | ) | — | (44,703 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | 14,118 | (4,118 | ) | (372 | ) | — | 9,628 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 48,270 | 6,055 | 1,735 | — | 56,060 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 62,388 | $ | 1,937 | $ | 1,363 | $ | — | $ | 65,688 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
98
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| (11) | Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of Guarantors of Senior Notes and Senior Convertible Notes—(Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
| Year Ended October 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Parent | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (780 | ) | $ | 56,234 | $ | 7,900 | $ | — | $ | 63,354 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales/maturities of certificates of deposit and marketable securities | 5,000 | — | 901 | — | 5,901 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of certificates of deposit and marketable securities | (15,000 | ) | — | (875 | ) | — | (15,875 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | — | 1,681 | — | — | 1,681 | |||||||||||||||
Additions to property and equipment | (2,792 | ) | (12,430 | ) | (1,228 | ) | — | (16,450 | ) | |||||||||||
Other | — | 176 | — | — | 176 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (12,792 | ) | (10,573 | ) | (1,202 | ) | — | (24,567 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt | (31,505 | ) | — | — | — | (31,505 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables (payables) | 50,643 | (44,702 | ) | (5,941 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Debt refinancing costs | (38 | ) | — | — | — | (38 | ) | |||||||||||||
Retirement of common stock warrants | (3,143 | ) | — | — | — | (3,143 | ) | |||||||||||||
Retirement of call options | 3,562 | — | — | — | 3,562 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 694 | — | — | — | 694 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock | (4,056 | ) | — | — | — | (4,056 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends | (11,170 | ) | — | — | — | (11,170 | ) | |||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | 121 | — | — | — | 121 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 5,108 | (44,702 | ) | (5,941 | ) | — | (45,535 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | (8,464 | ) | 959 | 757 | — | (6,748 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 56,734 | 5,096 | 978 | — | 62,808 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 48,270 | $ | 6,055 | $ | 1,735 | $ | — | $ | 56,060 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
99
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(12) Acquisitions and Dispositions
Acquisitions
During the year ended October 31, 2012, the Company acquired two funeral businesses for approximately $6,242 in cash. These acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method, and the acquired assets and liabilities (primarily goodwill of approximately $2,564, and property, plant and equipment of approximately $3,873) were valued at their estimated fair values. The results of operations for these businesses, which are considered immaterial, have been included in consolidated results since the acquisition date. Pro forma presentation of results is also considered immaterial.
During the year ended October 31, 2011, the Company acquired two funeral home/cemetery combinations for approximately $9,110 in cash. The acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method, and the acquired assets and liabilities (primarily cemetery property of approximately $6,006, deferred revenue of approximately $4,705 and property, plant and equipment of approximately $2,885) were valued at their estimated fair values. The results of operations for these businesses, which are considered immaterial, have been included in consolidated results since the acquisition date. Pro forma presentation of results is also considered immaterial.
Dispositions
During the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded net gains (losses) on dispositions of $403 and ($389), respectively, in continuing operations.
During the year ended October 31, 2012, the Company sold a business, recorded impairment charges related to the business and classified its operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The Company recorded net (losses) gains on dispositions of ($871) and $645 in discontinued operations during the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2010, respectively. The earnings (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were ($2,314), ($1,245), and $385, respectively.
100
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(13) Goodwill
Goodwill in excess of net assets of companies acquired totaled $249,584 and $247,038 as of October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company has approximately $8,510 of tax deductible goodwill which is being amortized for tax purposes. There were no goodwill impairment charges for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. See Note 2(g) for a discussion of the Company’s reporting units and its annual goodwill impairment evaluation methodology.
Goodwill and changes to goodwill by operating segment for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 is presented below:
| October 31, 2011 | Changes | October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 198,317 | $ | 2,546 | (1) | $ | 200,863 | |||||
Cemetery | 48,721 | — | 48,721 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 247,038 | $ | 2,546 | $ | 249,584 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| (1) | The change is due to the purchase of a funeral business and the sale of a funeral home during the year ended October 31, 2012. |
| October 31, 2010 | Changes | October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 198,317 | $ | — | $ | 198,317 | ||||||
Cemetery | 48,721 | — | 48,721 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 247,038 | $ | — | $ | 247,038 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
(14) Long-term Debt
| October 31, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | |||||||
Long-term debt: | ||||||||
3.125% senior convertible notes due 2014, net of unamortized discount of $4,757 and $7,611 as of October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, respectively | $ | 81,659 | $ | 78,805 | ||||
3.375% senior convertible notes due 2016, net of unamortized discount of $4,965 and $6,183 as of October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, respectively | 40,154 | 38,936 | ||||||
Senior secured revolving credit facility | — | — | ||||||
6.50% senior notes due 2019 | 200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||
Other, principally seller financing of acquired operations or assumption upon acquisition, weighted average interest rate of 8.0% as of October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, partially secured by assets of subsidiaries, with maturities through 2022 | 80 | 85 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total long-term debt | 321,893 | 317,826 | ||||||
Less current maturities | 6 | 5 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| $ | 321,887 | $ | 317,821 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Fair Value
As of October 31, 2012, the carrying values of the Company’s 3.125 percent senior convertible notes due 2014 (the “2014 Notes”) and 3.375 percent senior convertible notes due 2016 (the “2016 Notes”), including accrued interest, were $82,455 and $40,602, respectively, compared to fair values of $88,988 and $46,247, respectively. As of October 31, 2011, the carrying values of the 2014 Notes and 2016 Notes, including accrued interest, were $79,600 and $39,385, respectively, compared to fair values of $85,753 and $44,411, respectively.
101
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(14) Long-term Debt—(Continued)
As of October 31, 2012, the carrying value of the Company’s 6.50 percent senior notes, including accrued interest, was $200,542, compared to a fair value of $215,809. As of October 31, 2011, the carrying value of the Company’s 6.50 percent senior notes, including accrued interest, was $200,542 compared to a fair value of $196,043.
Fair values were determined using quoted market prices for these securities and are classified within Level 1 of the three-level valuation hierarchy.
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
On April 20, 2011, the Company amended its $95,000 senior secured revolving credit facility which was set to mature in June 2012. The amended senior secured revolving credit facility matures on April 20, 2016 and was increased to $150,000 and includes a $30,000 sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a $10,000 sublimit for swingline loans. The Company may also request the addition of a new tranche of term loans, an increase in the commitments to the amended senior secured revolving credit facility or a combination thereof not to exceed $50,000. During the year ended October 31, 2011, the Company recorded a charge for the loss on early extinguishment of debt of $88 to write-off a portion of the unamortized fees on the prior agreement. The remaining fees related to the prior agreement and the fees incurred for the amended agreement were $2,373 (of which $1,571 was paid in cash as of October 31, 2011) and are being amortized over the term of the new credit facility. As of October 31, 2012, there were no amounts drawn on the senior secured revolving credit facility, and the Company’s availability for future borrowings under the facility, after giving consideration to its $842 of outstanding letters of credit and $23,456 reserve for its Florida bond, was $125,702.
The interest rate on the amended senior secured revolving credit facility ranges from LIBOR plus 225 to 275 basis points and was LIBOR plus 225 basis points at October 31, 2012. The Company pays a quarterly commitment fee ranging from 40 to 50 basis points annually based on the undrawn portion of the commitments.
The amended senior secured revolving credit facility is governed by the following financial covenants:
| • | Maintenance on a rolling four quarter basis of a maximum consolidated adjusted leverage ratio (total funded debt (net of eligible securities and readily marketable securities, but in no event greater than $30,000) divided by EBITDA (as defined) – of not more than 4.75 to 1.00; |
| • | Maintenance on a rolling four quarter basis of a maximum consolidated senior secured leverage ratio (total funded senior secured debt divided by EBITDA (as defined)) – of not more than 2.00 to 1.00; and |
| • | Maintenance on a rolling four quarter basis of a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio (EBITDAR (as defined) divided by interest expense paid in cash plus rent expense less certain transaction costs to the extent such constitutes cash interest expense) – of not less than 2.60 to 1.00. |
The covenants include limitations on (i) liens, (ii) mergers, consolidations and asset sales, (iii) the incurrence of debt, (iv) dividends, stock redemptions and the redemption and/or prepayment of other debt, (v) capital expenditures, (vi) investments and acquisitions, (vii) transactions with affiliates and (viii) a change of control. If there is no default or event of default, the Company may pay cash dividends and repurchase its stock, provided that the aggregate amount of the dividends and stock repurchased plus other types of restricted payments in any fiscal year does not exceed $30,000 plus any positive amounts available in the discretionary basket. As of October 31, 2012, the amount available to pay dividends or repurchase stock was $245,394. The agreement also limits capital expenditures in any fiscal year to $45,000, with a provision for the carryover of permitted but unused amounts. As of October 31, 2012, there is $46,592 that can be carried over from previous years. The lenders under the senior secured revolving credit facility can accelerate all obligations under the facility and terminate the revolving credit commitments if an event of default occurs and is continuing.
102
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(14) Long-term Debt—(Continued)
Obligations under the amended senior secured revolving credit facility are guaranteed by substantially all existing and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries of the Company formed under the laws of any one of the states or the District of Columbia of the United States of America (“SEI Guarantors”).
The lenders under the amended senior secured revolving credit facility have a first priority perfected security interest in (1) all of the capital stock or other equity interests of each of the domestic subsidiaries of the Company whether now existing or hereafter created or acquired other than certain excluded immaterial subsidiaries and 65 percent of the voting capital stock of all direct foreign subsidiaries whether now existing or hereafter acquired and (2) all other present and future assets and properties of the Company and the SEI Guarantors except (a) real property, (b) vehicles, (c) assets to which applicable law or regulation prohibits a security interest therein or requires the consent of a third party, (d) contract rights in which a security interest without the approval of the other party to the contract would constitute a default thereunder, (e) any assets with respect to which a security interest cannot be perfected and (f) a certain securities account to be maintained for the benefit of one of the Company’s umbrella insurance policies.
Senior Notes
On April 4, 2011, the Company commenced a cash tender offer for any and all of its outstanding $200,000 aggregate principal amount 6.25 percent senior notes due 2013 (the “6.25 percent notes”) and a solicitation of consents to amend the indenture governing the 6.25 percent notes (the “Indenture”). On April 15, 2011, the Company announced that it had received the requisite consents to amend the Indenture and accordingly entered into a supplemental indenture, dated April 15, 2011 (the “Supplemental Indenture”), to the Indenture with U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the 6.25 percent notes. On April 18, 2011, the Company purchased a total of $194,188 in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 6.25 percent notes in the offer for an aggregate purchase price (including consent payments) of $194,673 plus $2,124 in accrued and unpaid interest. The Company redeemed the remaining $5,812 of the 6.25 percent senior notes in May 2011 at the redemption price of 100 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. During the year ended October 31, 2011, the Company recorded a charge for the loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1,796 representing $850 for related fees and expenses and $946 for the write-off of the remaining unamortized fees on the 6.25 percent senior notes.
The Company funded the tender offer for the 6.25 percent senior notes with a portion of its available cash and the net proceeds of the issuance of $200,000 6.50 percent senior notes due 2019 (the “6.50 percent notes”), which were issued April 18, 2011. Fees incurred for the new 6.50 percent senior notes amounted to $4,397 (of which $4,373 was paid in cash as of October 31, 2011) and are being amortized over the term of the 6.50 percent notes.
The 6.50 percent notes are governed by an indenture dated April 18, 2011. The Company pays interest on the 6.50 percent notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning October 15, 2011. The 6.50 percent notes will mature on April 15, 2019. The indenture governing the 6.50 percent notes contains affirmative and negative covenants that will, among other things, limit the Company’s and the SEI Guarantors’ ability to engage in sale and leaseback transactions, effect a consolidation or merger or sell, transfer, lease, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all assets, and create liens on assets. Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the indenture), each holder of the 6.50 percent notes will have the right to require the Company to purchase that holder’s 6.50 percent notes for a cash price equal to 101 percent of their principal amount. The 6.50 percent notes are redeemable on or after April 15, 2014 at redemption prices specified in the indenture, and prior to April 15, 2014 at a “make-whole” premium described in the indenture. Upon the occurrence of certain events of default (as defined in the indenture), the trustee or the holders of the 6.50 percent notes may declare all outstanding 6.50 percent notes to be due and payable immediately.
103
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(14) Long-term Debt—(Continued)
The 6.50 percent notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, by the SEI Guarantors, and are the Company’s, and the guarantees of the 6.50 percent notes are the SEI Guarantors’, general unsecured and unsubordinated obligations, and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company’s, in the case of the 6.50 percent notes, and the SEI Guarantors’, in the case of their guarantees of the 6.50 percent notes, existing and future unsubordinated indebtedness.
In connection with the issuance of the 6.50 percent notes, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement dated as of April 18, 2011 whereby the Company agreed to offer to exchange the 6.50 percent notes for a new issue of substantially identical notes registered under the Securities Act. The Company filed the required exchange offer registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in June 2011 and completed the exchange offer in July 2011.
Senior Convertible Notes
On June 27, 2007, the Company issued in a private placement $125,000 aggregate principal amount of 3.125 percent senior convertible notes due 2014 (the “2014 Notes”) and $125,000 aggregate principal amount of 3.375 percent senior convertible notes due 2016 (the “2016 Notes” and together with the 2014 Notes, the “senior convertible notes”). In connection with the sale of the senior convertible notes, the Company also sold common stock warrants for approximately $43,850, as described below. Total proceeds from the issuance of the senior convertible notes and sale of the common stock warrants was approximately $293,850. The Company used approximately $163,978 of the proceeds to prepay the remaining balance of the Company’s Term Loan B at par value, including accrued interest, and used $60,000 for the purchase of call options as described below. The Company also used approximately $64,201 of the proceeds to repurchase 7,698,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock in negotiated transactions. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of approximately $6,217 for investment bank fees, legal fees and other costs related to the transaction. Debt issuance costs were capitalized and are being amortized over the terms of the senior convertible notes or until they become convertible. The aggregate principal amount of the 2014 Notes and 2016 Notes outstanding at October 31, 2012 was $86,416 and $45,119, respectively.
The 2014 Notes and 2016 Notes are governed by separate indentures dated as of June 27, 2007, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and the trustee. The 2014 Notes mature July 15, 2014, and the 2016 Notes mature July 15, 2016. The 2014 Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.125 percent per annum, and the 2016 Notes bear interest at a rate of 3.375 percent per annum. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, which commenced January 15, 2008.
Holders may convert their senior convertible notes based on a 2012 conversion rate of 91.4833 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock per $1,000 principal amount of senior convertible notes subject to adjustment: (1) during any fiscal quarter beginning after October 31, 2007, if the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock for a specified period in the prior quarter is more than 130 percent of the conversion price per share, (2) for a specified period after five trading days in which the trading price of the notes for each trading day was less than 95 percent of the product of the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock and the then applicable conversion rate, (3) if specified distributions to holders of the Company’s Class A common stock occur, (4) if a fundamental change occurs or (5) during the last month prior to the maturity date of the notes. None of these conditions had been met during fiscal years 2012, 2011 or 2010.
Upon conversion, in lieu of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, for each $1,000 principal amount of senior convertible notes converted, a holder will receive an amount in cash equal to the lesser of (1) $1,000 or (2) the conversion value, determined in the manner set forth in the indentures, of the number of shares of
104
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(14) Long-term Debt—(Continued)
the Company’s Class A common stock equal to the conversion rate. If the conversion value exceeds $1,000, the Company will also deliver, at the Company’s election, cash or Class A common stock or a combination of cash and Class A common stock with respect to such excess amount, subject to the limitations in the indentures. If a holder elects to convert its senior convertible notes in connection with certain fundamental change transactions, the Company will pay, to the extent described in the indentures, a make whole premium by increasing the conversion rate applicable to such senior convertible notes.
Upon specified fundamental change events, holders will have the option to require the Company to purchase for cash all or any portion of their senior convertible notes at a price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount of the senior convertible notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the fundamental change purchase date.
The senior convertible notes are the Company’s senior unsecured obligations. The senior convertible notes are guaranteed, fully and unconditionally, jointly and severally, on an unsecured senior basis, by all of the Company’s subsidiaries that are guarantors of the Company’s 6.50 percent senior notes. The indentures contain events of default which, if they occur, entitle the holders of the senior convertible notes to declare the senior convertible notes immediately due and payable.
Also, in connection with the sale of the senior convertible notes in 2007, the Company purchased call options with respect to its Class A common stock from Bank of America/Merrill Lynch International. The call options covered, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, 11,311,700 shares of Class A common stock for each series of senior convertible notes, at strike prices that corresponded to the initial conversion price of the notes. The call options are expected to offset the Company’s exposure to dilution from conversion of the senior convertible notes because any shares the Company would be obligated to deliver to holders upon conversion of the senior convertible notes would be delivered to the Company by the counterparty to the call options. The Company paid approximately $60,000 for the call options. In connection with the purchases of the Company’s senior convertible notes during fiscal years 2009 and 2010, the number of shares covered by the call options was reduced to 7,905,619 related to the 2014 Notes and 4,127,634 related to the 2016 Notes.
The Company also entered into warrant transactions in 2007 whereby it sold to Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Financial Markets warrants expiring in 2014 and 2016 to acquire, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, 11,311,700 and 11,311,700 shares of Class A common stock, respectively. The strike prices of the sold warrants expiring in 2014 and 2016 are $12.93 per share of Class A common stock and $13.76 per share of Class A common stock, respectively. The warrants expiring in 2014 and 2016 may not be exercised prior to the maturity of the 2014 Notes and 2016 Notes, respectively. The Company can elect to settle the warrants in cash or Class A common stock, subject to certain conditions. The Company received approximately $43,850 for the warrants. In connection with purchases of the Company’s senior convertible notes during fiscal years 2009 and 2010, the number of shares subject to the warrants was reduced to 6,988,887 related to the 2014 Notes and 3,648,995 related to the 2016 Notes.
The price of the call options is treated for tax purposes as interest expense, which amortizes over the lives of the notes. Accordingly, the Company will have a tax benefit of approximately $21,000 over the lives of the senior convertible notes. The sale of the warrants is not expected to have any tax consequences to the Company.
By selling the warrants, the Company used the proceeds to offset much of the cost of the call options. By simultaneously purchasing the call options and selling the warrants, the Company has effectively increased the conversion premium on the senior convertible notes to 55-65 percent above the market price of the Class A common stock at the time of the offering.
During fiscal years 2010 and 2009, the Company purchased $38,584 aggregate principal amount of its 3.125 percent senior convertible notes due 2014 in the open market, and $79,881 aggregate principal amount of its 3.375 percent senior convertible notes due 2016 in the open market, at discounts to their face value totaling $26,501,
105
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(14) Long-term Debt—(Continued)
generating annual cash interest savings of $3,777. In connection with these debt purchases, corresponding call options and common stock warrants were also terminated. As a result of the debt purchases, the Company recorded $1,035 in pre-tax losses on early extinguishment of debt during fiscal year 2010. There were no debt purchases in fiscal years 2011 or 2012.
Adoption of Convertible Debt Guidance – Senior Convertible Notes
In May 2008, the FASB issued guidance regarding the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion. The guidance states that issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion should account separately for the liability and equity components of the instruments in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate as the related interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. The entity must determine the carrying amount of the liability component of any outstanding debt instrument by estimating the fair value of a similar liability without the conversion option. The Company used the market valuations of its then 6.25 percent senior notes due 2013 as the basis for estimating fair value. The amount of the equity component is then calculated by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the principal amount of the debt instrument. The value of the debt instrument is adjusted through a discount to the face value of the debt, which is amortized as non-cash interest expense over the expected life of the debt.
This guidance applies to the Company’s senior convertible notes which as described above were originally issued in 2007, and was required to be applied retrospectively to all periods since inception. The Company adopted this guidance effective November 1, 2009. See Note 3 for additional information on the effects of the adoption of this guidance.
The remaining periods over which the discount on the 2014 Notes and 2016 Notes will be amortized is approximately 1.75 years and 3.75 years, respectively. The carrying value of the equity component of the 2014 Notes as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 was $15,995. The carrying value of the equity component of the 2016 Notes as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 was $18,219. The amount of interest expense recorded for the senior convertible notes related both to the contractual interest coupon and amortization of the discount on the liability component was $8,295, $8,023 and $9,212 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the coupon and amortization of the discount yielded an effective interest rate of 6.96 percent on the 2014 Notes and 2016 Notes.
Other
As of October 31, 2012, the Company’s subsidiaries had approximately $80 of long-term debt that represents notes the subsidiaries issued as part of the purchase price of acquired businesses or debt the subsidiaries assumed in connection with acquisitions. All of this debt is secured by liens on the stock or assets of the related subsidiaries.
Scheduled principal payments of the Company’s long-term debt for the fiscal years ending October 31, 2013 through October 31, 2017, are approximately $6 in 2013, $86,422 in 2014, $7 in 2015, $45,126 in 2016 and $8 in 2017. Scheduled principal payments thereafter are $200,046.
As of October 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in its debt agreements.
106
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(15) Guarantees
The Company’s obligations under its senior secured revolving credit facility, 6.50 percent senior notes and its 3.125 percent and 3.375 percent senior convertible notes are guaranteed by all of its existing and future direct and indirect subsidiaries formed under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, except for specified excluded subsidiaries. For additional information regarding the senior secured revolving credit facility, senior convertible notes and senior notes, see Note 14.
All obligations under the senior secured revolving credit facility, including the guarantees and any interest rate protection and other hedging agreements with any lender or its affiliates, are secured by a first priority perfected security interest as described in Note 14.
As discussed in Note 2(i), the Company sells insurance-funded price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts that will be funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third-party insurers which are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. The net amount of these contracts that have not been fulfilled as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 was $600,951 and $557,348, respectively.
Louisiana law gives Louisiana corporations broad powers to indemnify their present and former directors and officers and those of affiliated corporations against expenses incurred in the defense of any lawsuit to which they are made parties by reason of their positions. The Company’s by-laws make mandatory the indemnification of directors and officers permitted by Louisiana law. The Company has in effect a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy that provides for indemnification of its officers and directors against losses arising from claims asserted against them in their capacities as officers and directors, subject to limitations and conditions set forth in such policy. The Company has also entered into indemnity agreements with each director pursuant to which the Company has agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to purchase and maintain directors’ liability insurance. The agreements also provide that the Company will indemnify each director against any costs and expenses, judgments, settlements and fines incurred in connection with any claim involving him or her by reason of his or her position as director, provided that the director meets certain standards of conduct.
(16) Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Per Share Data
| Earnings (Numerator) | Shares (Denominator) | Per Share Data | ||||||||||
Year Ended October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 37,480 | ||||||||||
Allocation of earnings to nonvested restricted stock | $ | (236 | ) | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations available to common shareholders | $ | 37,244 | 85,879 | $ | .43 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||
Stock options assumed exercised | 399 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations available to common shareholders plus stock options assumed exercised | $ | 37,244 | 86,278 | $ | .43 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
107
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(16) Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Per Share Data—(Continued)
| Earnings (Numerator) | Shares (Denominator) | Per Share Data | ||||||||||
Year Ended October 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 39,317 | ||||||||||
Allocation of earnings to nonvested restricted stock | $ | (219 | ) | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations available to common shareholders | $ | 39,098 | 90,001 | $ | .44 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||
Stock options assumed exercised | 485 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations available to common shareholders plus stock options assumed exercised | $ | 39,098 | 90,486 | $ | .43 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Earnings (Numerator) | Shares (Denominator) | Per Share Data | ||||||||||
Year Ended October 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 30,733 | ||||||||||
Allocation of earnings to nonvested restricted stock | $ | (268 | ) | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations available to common shareholders | $ | 30,465 | 92,119 | $ | .33 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||
Stock options assumed exercised | 275 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations available to common shareholders plus stock options assumed exercised | $ | 30,465 | 92,394 | $ | .33 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
During the year ended October 31, 2012, options to purchase 467,609 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $6.83 to $8.47 per share were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common shares for those periods. Additionally, weighted-average shares outstanding as of October 31, 2012 exclude the effect of approximately 1,006,731 options because such options were not dilutive. These options expire between May 5, 2013 and August 13, 2018.
During the year ended October 31, 2011, options to purchase 794,697 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $6.88 to $8.47 per share were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common shares for those periods.
During the year ended October 31, 2010, options to purchase 1,260,619 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $5.84 to $8.47 per share were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of the options were greater than the average market price of the common shares for those periods. Additionally, weighted-average shares outstanding as of October 31, 2010 exclude the effect of approximately 2,750 options because such options were not dilutive.
108
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(16) Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Per Share Data—(Continued)
As of October 31, 2012, all of the outstanding 94,500 market based stock options were dilutive as the respective market conditions had been achieved. As of October 31, 2011 and 2010, all of the outstanding 214,500 market based stock options were dilutive as the respective market conditions had been achieved.
For the year ended October 31, 2012, a maximum of 13,153,500 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock related to the senior convertible notes and a maximum of 10,637,882 shares of Class A common stock under the common stock warrants associated with the June 2007 senior convertible debt transaction were not dilutive, as the average price of the Company’s stock for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012 was less than the conversion price of the senior convertible notes and strike price of the warrants. For the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, a maximum of 13,153,500 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock related to the senior convertible notes and a maximum of 10,522,798 shares of Class A common stock under the associated common stock warrants were also not dilutive. During fiscal year 2010, the Company purchased $35,866, of its senior convertible notes in the open market which resulted in associated common stock warrants being terminated. There were no debt repurchases in fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
The Company includes Class A and Class B common stock in its diluted shares calculation. As of October 31, 2012, the Company’s Chairman, Frank B. Stewart, Jr., was the record holder of all of the Company’s shares of Class B common stock. The Company’s Class A and B common stock are substantially identical, except that holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share, and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share. Each share of Class B common stock is automatically converted into one share of Class A common stock upon transfer to persons other than certain affiliates of Frank B. Stewart, Jr.
(17) Restructuring and Other Charges
In April 2012, the Company announced an organizational restructuring as well as a separate workforce reduction. The organizational restructuring involved the integration of management of operations and sales, and a complete restructuring of the Company’s sales force. The Company realigned its geographic regions and appointed one regional vice president who is responsible for funeral and cemetery operations and sales in each region. Formerly, the Company had different managers responsible for operations and sales. In addition, the Company engaged in an across-the-board redesign of its sales organization. The Company eliminated layers of sales management, redefined sales roles, and in the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, expects to complete the restructuring with the implementation of a new compensation structure for its customer-facing sales force. Separately, the Company reduced its workforce by approximately 60 employees, primarily in corporate support services. Total expenses related to the organizational restructuring and workforce reduction consist primarily of separation pay and termination benefits and other non-cash asset impairments associated with the sales restructuring. The Company recorded $3,291 in charges related to the restructuring and workforce reduction during the year ended October 31, 2012. These charges are in the “restructuring and other charges” line in the consolidated statement of earnings. As of October 31, 2012, the Company does not expect to incur any material additional costs related to the restructuring. The following table summarizes the activity related to the restructuring liability as of October 31, 2012:
109
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(17) Restructuring and Other Charges—(Continued)
| Employee Termination Costs | Non-cash Asset Impairment and Other Costs | Total | ||||||||||
Costs incurred | $ | 990 | $ | 2,301 | $ | 3,291 | ||||||
Cash payments | (990 | ) | (859 | ) | (1,849 | ) | ||||||
Non-cash items | — | (1,236 | ) | (1,236 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Restructuring liability as of October 31, 2012 | $ | — | $ | 206 | $ | 206 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
(18) Income Taxes
Income tax expense is comprised of the following components:
| Continuing Operations | ||||||||||||
| U.S. and Possessions | State | Totals | ||||||||||
Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
2012: | ||||||||||||
Current tax expense | $ | 1,010 | $ | 982 | $ | 1,992 | ||||||
Deferred tax expense | 14,215 | 2,515 | 16,730 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| $ | 15,225 | $ | 3,497 | $ | 18,722 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
2011: | ||||||||||||
Current tax expense | $ | 1,469 | $ | 1,741 | $ | 3,210 | ||||||
Deferred tax expense | 17,574 | 3,050 | 20,624 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| $ | 19,043 | $ | 4,791 | $ | 23,834 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
2010: | ||||||||||||
Current tax expense | $ | 1,490 | $ | 1,527 | $ | 3,017 | ||||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit) | 11,649 | (617 | ) | 11,032 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| $ | 13,139 | $ | 910 | $ | 14,049 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Discontinued Operations | ||||||||||||
| U.S. and Possessions | State | Totals | ||||||||||
Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
2012: | ||||||||||||
Current tax expense (benefit) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit) | (853 | ) | 123 | (730 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| $ | (853 | ) | $ | 123 | $ | (730 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
2011: | ||||||||||||
Current tax expense (benefit) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Deferred tax benefit | (407 | ) | (76 | ) | (483 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| $ | (407 | ) | $ | (76 | ) | $ | (483 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
2010: | ||||||||||||
Current tax expense | $ | 231 | $ | 19 | $ | 250 | ||||||
Deferred tax benefit | (88 | ) | (22 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| $ | 143 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 140 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
110
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(18) Income Taxes—(Continued)
The reconciliation of the statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate is as follows for continuing operations:
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Statutory tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
Increases (reductions) in tax rate resulting from: | ||||||||||||
State income tax | 3.9 | 4.7 | 1.2 | |||||||||
U.S. possession income tax | .2 | 3.8 | .8 | |||||||||
Nondeductible expenses and other | — | (.1 | ) | 1.0 | ||||||||
Dividend exclusion | (2.6 | ) | (2.7 | ) | (3.0 | ) | ||||||
Capital loss valuation allowance | (3.2 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (3.6 | ) | ||||||
Basis adjustment on charitable contribution | — | (.7 | ) | — | ||||||||
Basis adjustment on sale of business | — | (.6 | ) | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Effective tax rate | 33.3 | % | 37.7 | % | 31.4 | % | ||||||
|
| �� |
|
|
| |||||||
111
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(18) Income Taxes—(Continued)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:
| October 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
Accrued expenses | $ | 10,922 | $ | 10,511 | ||||
Allowance for sales cancellations and doubtful accounts | 3,948 | 5,027 | ||||||
Capital loss carryover | 6,445 | 7,591 | ||||||
Deferred compensation | 6,364 | 5,826 | ||||||
Deferred preneed sales and expenses | 173,211 | 193,316 | ||||||
Inventory writedown | 1,113 | 1,123 | ||||||
Lease obligations | 779 | 779 | ||||||
Net operating loss carryover - federal | 14,435 | 12,382 | ||||||
Net operating loss carryover - state | 14,170 | 13,570 | ||||||
Federal alternative minimum tax credit | 1,105 | 882 | ||||||
Federal work opportunity tax credit | 2,185 | 2,095 | ||||||
U.S. possession alternative minimum tax credit | 1,100 | 907 | ||||||
State enterprise zone tax credit | 147 | 287 | ||||||
Original issue discount on purchased call options | 4,049 | 5,656 | ||||||
Other | 1,846 | 1,175 | ||||||
Share-based compensation | 1,952 | 2,441 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| 243,771 | 263,568 | |||||||
Valuation allowance-federal capital loss carryover | (2,900 | ) | (4,975 | ) | ||||
Valuation allowance-state net operating loss carryover | (2,750 | ) | (2,499 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| 238,121 | 256,094 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
Cemetery property | 70,198 | 70,896 | ||||||
Debt discount amortization | 3,770 | 5,005 | ||||||
Deferral of gain on early extinguishment of debt | 5,731 | 5,732 | ||||||
Depreciation | 21,271 | 23,528 | ||||||
Goodwill amortization | 45,793 | 44,016 | ||||||
Non-compete amortization | 776 | 573 | ||||||
Prepaid expense | 866 | — | ||||||
Partnership interest | 1,851 | 1,887 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| 150,256 | 151,637 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| $ | 87,865 | $ | 104,457 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Current net deferred asset | $ | 30,671 | $ | 29,768 | ||||
Long-term net deferred asset | 62,125 | 79,793 | ||||||
Long-term net deferred liability | (4,931 | ) | (5,104 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| $ | 87,865 | $ | 104,457 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
The federal net operating loss of $43,234 originated in fiscal 2009 and 2012. $35,376 of the net operating loss is scheduled to expire in 2029. The remaining amount expires in 2032. The state net operating loss is $338,649 (deferred tax asset of $14,170 as of October 31, 2012) which includes $185,637 attributable to the state of Florida and $153,012 which is widespread among several states. The Florida carryover period is 20 years and the earliest year of expiration is 2022 when $17,430 is scheduled to expire. The remaining balance of state net operating loss has carryover periods averaging from 10 to 20 years and there is no significant balance subject to expiration in the near future.
112
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(18) Income Taxes—(Continued)
In January 2011, the government of Puerto Rico signed into law corporate tax rate changes that decreased the top tax rate for businesses from 39 percent to 30 percent. The Company will benefit from this reduced rate when paying taxes in the future. However, as a result of this change, the Company was required to revalue its previously recorded Puerto Rican-related deferred tax asset using the 30 percent current top tax rate. During fiscal 2011, the Company recorded a one-time, non-cash charge of $2,860 ($4,400 charge less a federal tax benefit of $1,540) in order to decrease the Puerto Rican deferred tax asset balance. The Puerto Rican deferred tax asset balance decreased from approximately $19,100 at the previously required 39 percent tax rate to approximately $14,700 at the newly-enacted 30 percent tax rate.
In fiscal year 2011, approximately $2,000 of the federal work opportunity tax credit was reclassified from long-term receivables to long-term deferred tax assets as a result of federal tax legislation that was not extended for tax years beginning in 2010 which eliminated the utilization of these tax credits against alternative minimum tax.
As a result of the tax accounting changes that took place in fiscal years 2010 through 2012 described below, the Company had approximately $157,000 available to offset taxable income as of 2010. The Company was able to utilize approximately $42,000 in fiscal year 2012, $46,000 in fiscal year 2011 and approximately $26,000 in fiscal year 2010, which reduced federal income taxes paid by approximately $14,700, $16,100 and $9,100, respectively. The Company expects to have federal net operating losses available in fiscal year 2013 to offset a portion of federal income taxes.
In fiscal year 2012, the Company received approval from the Internal Revenue Service for a change in tax accounting method resulting in the deferral of approximately $52,000 in revenue until the service is performed or the merchandise is delivered, thereby increasing the amount available to reduce taxable income. This increase resulted or will result in approximately $21,000 of reduced tax payments. The Company will eventually pay taxes with respect to the $52,000 when the related preneed contacts are performed in the future.
The Company received IRS approval in fiscal year 2010 on five requests for changes in tax accounting methods, which resulted in the deferral of approximately $84,000 of taxable income. These changes increased the amounts available to offset taxable income beginning in 2010 to approximately $105,000. These changes primarily relate to the Company’s tax accounting methods for preneed cemetery services and preneed funeral merchandise. These changes permit the Company to defer the recognition of income for tax purposes (and pay taxes) with respect to those amounts until the time the service is provided or the merchandise is actually delivered. The Company will eventually pay taxes with respect to the $84,000 when the related preneed contracts are performed in the future.
On November 1, 2007, the Company adopted the uncertain tax position guidance in ASC 740-Income Taxes. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
113
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(18) Income Taxes—(Continued)
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Gross unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period | $ | 1,411 | $ | 1,744 | $ | 2,767 | ||||||
Additions for tax for prior years positions | 126 | 32 | 131 | |||||||||
Reductions for tax for prior years positions | — | — | (1,133 | ) | ||||||||
Reduction in tax as a result of a lapse of applicable statute of limitations | — | (365 | ) | (21 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Gross unrecognized tax benefits, end of period | $ | 1,537 | $ | 1,411 | $ | 1,744 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
As of October 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $0, $0 and $366, respectively. The Company’s policy with respect to potential penalties and interest is to record them as “other” expense and interest expense, respectively. For the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company had accrued interest and penalties related to the unrecognized tax benefits of $0, $0 and $487, respectively. During fiscal year 2012, no additional interest was accrued for uncertain tax positions due to the Company’s current net operating loss position. No interest and penalties were reduced in fiscal year 2012 due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations. During fiscal year 2011, an additional $2 of interest was accrued for uncertain tax positions and $490 of interest and penalties was reduced due to payments and lapse of applicable statute of limitations. During fiscal year 2010, an additional $281 of interest was accrued for uncertain tax positions and $528 of interest and penalties was reduced due to payments and lapse of applicable statute of limitations.
With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for fiscal years before 2008.
(19) Benefit Plans
Stewart Enterprises Employees’ Retirement Trust
The Company has a defined contribution retirement plan, the “Stewart Enterprises Employees’ Retirement Trust (A Profit-Sharing Plan)” (“SEERT”). All regular employees are eligible to participate in this plan. New employees are automatically enrolled in the plan at a three percent contribution rate after 60 days of employment, unless they elect not to participate. Contributions are made to the plan at the discretion of the Company. Additionally, employees who participate may contribute 100 percent of their earnings, up to the limit set by the Internal Revenue Code. Effective March 1, 2010, employee contributions of up to six percent of earnings are eligible for Company matching contributions at the rate of $0.25 for each $1.00 contributed. Previously, the Company matching contribution rate was $0.50 for each $1.00 contributed. The Company’s expense, including the Company’s matching contributions, for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $1,489, $1,617 and $2,027, respectively.
Stewart Enterprises Puerto Rico Employees’ Retirement Trust
On January 1, 2003, the Stewart Enterprises Puerto Rico Employees’ Retirement Trust, a defined contribution retirement plan, became effective when the Company adopted the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Master Defined Contribution Retirement Plan. Employees in Puerto Rico who were formerly participating in the Stewart Enterprises Employees’ Retirement Trust had their account balances transferred to this plan in February 2003. Individuals employed in Puerto Rico by the Company or certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates are eligible to participate in this plan. Contributions are made to the plan at the discretion of the Company. Eligible employees may contribute up to 100 percent of their earnings, up to a maximum annual contribution of $8. Effective August 1,
114
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(19) Benefit Plans—(Continued)
2010, employee contributions of up to six percent of earnings are eligible for Company matching contributions at the rate of $0.25 for each $1.00 contributed. Previously, the Company matching contribution rate was $0.50 for each $1.00 contributed. Additional contributions may also be made to this plan at the discretion of the Company. The Company’s expense, including the Company’s matching contributions, for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $36, $38 and $69, respectively.
Non-Qualified Supplemental Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a non-qualified key employee defined contribution supplemental retirement plan, which provides certain highly compensated employees the opportunity to accumulate deferred compensation which cannot be accumulated under the SEERT due to certain limitations. Contributions are made to the plan at the discretion of the Company. Additionally, employees who participate may contribute up to 15 percent of their earnings up to the limit set by the Internal Revenue Code. Participants’ account balances are credited with interest at the rate of the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. Effective March 1, 2010, employee contributions of up to six percent are eligible for Company matching contributions at the rate of $0.25 for each $1.00 contributed. Previously, the Company matching contribution rate was $.50 for each $1.00 contributed. The Company’s expense, including the Company’s matching contributions, for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $218, $298 and $237, respectively.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
On April 1, 2002, the Company adopted an unfunded, non-qualified retirement plan, the “Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan” (“SERP”), to provide for the payment of pension benefits to a select group of highly-compensated management employees as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The retirement plan is non-contributory and provides retirement benefits based on final average compensation, position and the participant’s age, years of service or years of participation in the SERP. The Company’s expense for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $1,480, $1,611 and $2,136, respectively. The Company’s liability as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 was $15,307 and $14,825, respectively, and is presented in other current liabilities and other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.
Compensation Plans
In April 2012, the Company’s shareholders approved the Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”) at its annual shareholders’ meeting. The Stock Plan, first approved by the Company’s shareholders in 2010, was amended and restated to, among other things, increase the number of issuable shares of Class A common stock by 4 million shares and extend the duration of the stock plan by approximately two years. A total of 9 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock are authorized to be issued under the Stock Plan, and no incentives may be granted under the Stock Plan after April 19, 2022. The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors administers the Stock Plan and has the authority to make awards under the Stock Plan including setting the terms of the awards. Officers, directors, key employees and consultants will be eligible to receive incentives under the Stock Plan when designated as a Stock Plan participant by the Committee. As of October 31, 2012, there are 5,903,985 shares remaining under the Stock Plan.
In April 2012, the Company’s shareholders approved the Company’s Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) at its annual shareholders’ meeting. The Incentive Plan was presented to the shareholders for approval in order to qualify the quantitative portion of the annual incentive award as fully deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and applies for a five-year period through October 31, 2017, unless terminated earlier by the Compensation Committee. Any executive officer may be designated by the Compensation Committee as a participant in the Incentive Plan for any year. No
115
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(19) Benefit Plans—(Continued)
participant may be paid a bonus under the Incentive Plan of more than $1,500 for any fiscal year. The Compensation Committee may determine to pay bonuses under the Incentive Plan in whole or in part in cash or stock. Any such stock will be issued through the Company’s stock-based incentive plans.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On July 1, 1992, the Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. This plan was terminated and replaced by the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Employee Stock Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its 2003 annual meeting. The Company authorized 1,000,000 shares for issuance under the Employee Stock Plan. The Employee Stock Plan provides to eligible employees the opportunity to purchase the Company’s Class A common stock on a quarterly basis. The purchase price is established at a 15 percent discount from fair market value, as defined in the Employee Stock Plan. Since the inception of the Employee Stock Plan through October 31, 2012, 650,557 shares had been acquired and 349,443 shares remain available under the Employee Stock Plan.
Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation is comprised of stock option expense, restricted stock expense and equity grants to the Company’s independent directors as described below.
Stock Options
The Company has granted stock options under its stock incentive plans. The stock options generally vest in equal portions over four years and expire in either seven or ten years. For the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, stock option expenses amounted to $1,428, $1,111 and $1,054, respectively, which are included in corporate general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings. As of October 31, 2012, there was $2,933 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock options that are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.57 years. The following table is a summary of the Company’s stock options outstanding as of October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, and the changes that occurred during fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010.
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares Underlying Options | Weighted Average Exercise Prices | Number of Shares Underlying Options | Weighted Average Exercise Prices | Number of Shares Underlying Options | Weighted Average Exercise Prices | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 3,765,633 | $ | 5.67 | 3,130,610 | $ | 5.31 | 2,864,562 | $ | 5.78 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | 1,215,000 | $ | 6.26 | 1,356,000 | $ | 6.24 | 960,750 | $ | 5.08 | |||||||||||||||
Exercised | (544,426 | ) | $ | 4.83 | (263,602 | ) | $ | 4.43 | (81,714 | ) | $ | 4.73 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited | (675,701 | ) | $ | 6.70 | (457,375 | ) | $ | 5.59 | (612,988 | ) | $ | 7.20 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at end of year | 3,760,506 | $ | 5.80 | 3,765,633 | $ | 5.67 | 3,130,610 | $ | 5.31 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at end of year | 1,388,996 | $ | 5.71 | 1,652,611 | $ | 6.02 | 1,366,738 | $ | 6.24 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted | $ | 1.90 | $ | 1.98 | $ | 1.53 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended October 31, 2012 | ||||
| Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||
Options outstanding as of October 31, 2012 | $ | 7,541 | ||
Options exercisable as of October 31, 2012 | $ | 2,991 | ||
Options exercised during 2012 | $ | 1,388 | ||
116
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(19) Benefit Plans—(Continued)
| Year Ended October 31, 2011 | ||||
| Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||
Options outstanding as of October 31, 2011 | $ | 3,846 | ||
Options exercisable as of October 31, 2011 | $ | 1,522 | ||
Options exercised during 2011 | $ | 730 | ||
| Year Ended October 31, 2010 | ||||
| Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||
Options outstanding as of October 31, 2010 | $ | 2,720 | ||
Options exercisable as of October 31, 2010 | $ | 593 | ||
Options exercised during 2010 | $ | 112 | ||
The following table further describes the Company’s stock options outstanding as of October 31, 2012.
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Number Outstanding at 10/31/2012 | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number Exercisable at 10/31/2012 | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | Weighted Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2.65 | 241,442 | 3.13 years | $ | 2.65 | 141,120 | 3.13 years | $ | 2.65 | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 3.09 | 240,000 | 3.18 years | $ | 3.09 | 180,000 | 3.18 years | $ | 3.09 | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 5.04-5.84 | 636,064 | 4.11 years | $ | 5.10 | 280,376 | 4.03 years | $ | 5.11 | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 6.22-6.88 | 2,295,750 | 6.65 years | $ | 6.26 | 450,000 | 3.08 years | $ | 6.32 | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 7.37-7.75 | 77,500 | 2.28 years | $ | 7.43 | 67,750 | 1.81 years | $ | 7.40 | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 8.24-8.47 | 269,750 | 2.10 years | $ | 8.27 | 269,750 | 2.10 years | $ | 8.27 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| $ | 2.65 to 8.47 | 3,760,506 | 5.36 years | $ | 5.80 | 1,388,996 | 3.04 years | $ | 5.71 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended October 31, 2012 | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested options as of November 1, 2011 | 2,113,022 | $ | 1.65 | |||||
Granted | 1,215,000 | $ | 1.90 | |||||
Vested | (708,136 | ) | $ | 1.56 | ||||
Forfeited | (248,376 | ) | $ | 1.76 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Nonvested options as of October 31, 2012 | 2,371,510 | $ | 1.79 | |||||
|
| |||||||
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of its service based stock options. This pricing model uses assumptions related to dividend yield, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rates and expected term. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s annual dividend payout at grant date. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock for a period approximating the expected term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. treasury yield in effect at the time of grant over the expected term. The expected term of service based options is calculated using the simplified method which is the average of the vesting term and contractual term. The following are the weighted average assumptions for fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010:
117
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(19) Benefit Plans—(Continued)
Assumptions | Fiscal Year 2012 | Fiscal Year 2011 | Fiscal Year 2010 | |||||||||
Dividend yield | 2.4% | 2.3% | 2.4% | |||||||||
Expected volatility | 38.7% | 38.9% | 37.7% | |||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.8% | 2.1% | 2.8% | |||||||||
Expected term | 5.1 years | 4.7 years | 4.7 years | |||||||||
Likewise, the fair value of shares acquired through the Employee Stock Plan is estimated quarterly using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010:
Assumptions | Fiscal Year 2012 | Fiscal Year 2011 | Fiscal Year 2010 | |||||||||
Dividend yield | 2.7% | 2.4% | 2.6% | |||||||||
Expected volatility | 16.3% | 37.8% | 39.8% | |||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.05% | 0.1% | 0.1% | |||||||||
Expected term | 0.3 years | 0.3 years | 0.3 years | |||||||||
Restricted Stock
The Company has granted restricted stock to certain employees under its stock incentive plans, which generally vest in equal portions over three years based on achieving certain market conditions. The fair value of market based restricted stock is determined using a Monte Carlo lattice model approach. For the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, restricted stock expenses amounted to $1,539, $1,385 and $989, respectively, which are included in corporate general and administrative expenses in the statement of earnings. As of October 31, 2012, there was $889 of remaining future restricted stock expense to be recognized. Once granted, the restricted stock is included in total shares outstanding but is not included in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in each period used to calculate basic earnings per common share until the shares vest. The table below is a summary of the Company’s restricted stock activity for fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010.
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares(1) | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | Number of Shares(2) | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | Number of Shares(3) | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Nonvested restricted stock at beginning of year | 361,979 | $ | 3.94 | 720,819 | $ | 3.76 | 729,665 | $ | 3.96 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | 449,500 | $ | 3.98 | 520,500 | $ | 4.20 | 332,000 | $ | 3.23 | |||||||||||||||
Vested | (361,166 | ) | $ | 3.87 | (236,507 | ) | $ | 3.88 | (181,514 | ) | $ | 4.69 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited | (36,831 | ) | $ | 3.95 | (642,833 | ) | $ | 3.97 | (159,332 | ) | $ | 2.55 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Nonvested restricted stock at end of year | 413,482 | $ | 4.05 | 361,979 | $ | 3.94 | 720,819 | $ | 3.76 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | In fiscal year 2012, the Company granted restricted stock with market conditions based on achieving certain target stock prices in fiscal years 2012, 2013 and 2014. The market condition related to fiscal year 2012 was achieved. |
| (2) | In fiscal year 2011, the Company granted restricted stock with market conditions based on achieving certain target stock prices in fiscal years 2011, 2012 and 2013. The market conditions related to fiscal years 2011 and 2012 were achieved. |
118
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(19) Benefit Plans—(Continued)
| (3) | In fiscal year 2010, the Company granted restricted stock with market conditions based on achieving certain target stock prices in fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012. Also in fiscal year 2010, the Company granted restricted stock which vest in equal one-third portions over three years. The market conditions discussed above related to fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012 were achieved. |
Other
During the year ended October 31, 2012, the Company issued 67,853 shares of Class A common stock and paid approximately $133 in cash to the independent directors of the Company. The expense related to this stock grant amounted to $437 and was recorded in corporate general and administrative expenses. Each of the shares received has a restriction requiring each independent director to hold the respective shares until completion of service as a member of the Board of Directors.
During the year ended October 31, 2011, the Company issued 82,160 shares of Class A common stock and paid approximately $114 in cash to the independent directors of the Company. The expense related to this stock grant amounted to $456 and was recorded in corporate general and administrative expenses. Each of the shares received has a restriction requiring each independent director to hold the respective shares until completion of service as a member of the Board of Directors.
During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Company issued 90,000 shares of Class A common stock and paid approximately $96 in cash to the independent directors of the Company. The expense related to this stock grant amounted to $414 and was recorded in corporate general and administrative expenses. Each of the shares received has a restriction requiring each independent director to hold the respective shares until completion of service as a member of the Board of Directors.
(20) Commitments, Contingencies and Related Party Transactions
Litigation
The Company settled litigation with its insurance carriers related to damages from Hurricane Katrina in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, as described in Note 23.
The Company is a defendant in a variety of other litigation matters that have arisen in the ordinary course of business, which are covered by insurance or otherwise not considered to be material. The Company carries insurance with coverages and coverage limits that it believes to be adequate.
Leases
The Company has noncancellable operating leases, primarily for land and buildings that expire over the next 1 to 10 years, except for eight leases that expire between 2032 and 2039. The Company also has operating leases under its vehicle fleet program. Rent payments under these leases were $5,729, $5,652 and $5,078 for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company’s future minimum lease payments as of October 31, 2012 are $5,849, $5,023, $4,171, $3,541, $2,967 and $14,046 for the years ending October 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and later years, respectively.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
In those states where the Company has withdrawn realized net capital gains in the past from its cemetery perpetual care trusts, regulators may seek replenishment of subsequent realized net capital losses either by requiring a cash deposit to the trust or by prohibiting or restricting withdrawals of future earnings until they restore the initial
119
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(20) Commitments, Contingencies and Related Party Transactions—(Continued)
corpus. As of October 31, 2012, the Company had $11,965 recorded as a liability for the estimated probable funding obligation. As of October 31, 2012, the Company had unrealized losses of approximately $16,560 in cemetery perpetual care trusts in these states that could be subject to a future funding obligation. Because some of these trusts currently have assets with a fair market value less than the aggregate amounts required to be contributed to the trust, any additional realized net capital losses in these trusts may result in an additional corresponding funding liability and increase in cemetery costs.
From time to time, contracts are presented to the Company relating to contracts sold prior to the time the Company acquired certain businesses for which the Company was previously unaware. In addition, from time to time, the Company has identified in its backlog, certain contracts in which services or merchandise have previously been delivered but the revenue was not yet recognized. Using historical trends and statistical analysis, the Company has recorded an estimated net debit (credit) for these items of approximately $0.3 million and ($2) million as of October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company has entered into non-compete agreements with prior owners and key employees of acquired subsidiaries that expire through 2018. Non-compete agreements are included in the “other assets” line in the consolidated balance sheet and amounted to $4,903 and $4,939 as of October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company’s future non-compete payments as of October 31, 2012 are $260, $235, $235, $235, $156 and $100 for the years ending October 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and thereafter, respectively.
The Company is required to maintain a bond ($23,456 as of October 31, 2012) to guarantee its obligations relating to funds the Company withdrew in fiscal year 2001 from its preneed funeral trusts in Florida. This amount would become senior secured debt if the Company was required to borrow funds under the senior secured revolving credit facility and return to the trusts the amounts it previously withdrew that relate to the remaining undelivered preneed contracts in lieu of this bond.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase within a year the land and building of an existing business that it currently leases for $2,800.
Related Party Transactions
In January 1998, the Company discontinued an insurance policy on the life of Mr. Frank B. Stewart, Jr., Chairman of the Company. In order to purchase a replacement policy, The Stewart Family Special Trust borrowed $685 from the Company pursuant to a promissory note due 180 days after the death of Mr. Stewart. Interest on the note accrues annually at a rate equal to the Company’s cost of borrowing under its senior secured revolving credit facility and is payable when the principal becomes due. The amount of the loan was equal to the cash value received by the Company upon the discontinuance of the prior insurance policy. The loan proceeds were used by the trust to purchase a single premium policy on the life of Mr. Stewart. Certain of the beneficiaries of The Stewart Family Special Trust are members of Mr. Stewart’s family. The loan was approved by all of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors. The outstanding balance of the loan at October 31, 2012, including accrued interest, was approximately $1,476.
(21) Segment Data
The Company has determined that managements’ approach to operating the business indicates that there are three operating and reportable segments: a funeral segment, a cemetery segment and a corporate trust management segment. The Company does not aggregate its operating segments. Therefore, its operating and reportable segments are the same. As of October 31, 2012, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer meet regularly with the Executive Vice President of Operations and Sales to discuss operational performance and with the Executive Vice President and President of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Investor’s Trust, Inc. (“ITI”), to discuss ITI’s performance. The Company’s Executive Vice President of Operations
120
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(21) Segment Data—(Continued)
and Sales acts as the segment manager for the funeral and cemetery businesses and the Executive Vice President and President of ITI acts as segment manager for corporate trust. The Company has determined that its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are the chief operating decision makers (“CODM”) as they make decisions about the Company’s overall resource allocation and assessment of performance.
The corporate trust management segment includes (1) the funeral and cemetery service and merchandise trust earnings recognized for GAAP purposes, which are further described below, and (2) fee income related to the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, ITI. Trust assets and the earnings on those assets are associated exclusively with preneed sales. Because preneed services and merchandise will not be provided until an unknown future date, most states require that all or a portion of the customer payments under preneed contracts be placed in trust or escrow accounts for the benefit of the customers.
ITI serves as investment advisor to the Company’s trust funds. ITI provides investment advisory services to the trusts for a fee consistent with industry norms based on the fair market value of assets managed. The Company has elected to perform these services in-house, and the fees are recognized as income as earned.
The corporate trust management segment revenues reflect (1) investment management fees earned and (2) the realized earnings related to preneed contracts delivered, which are the earnings realized over the life of the contracts delivered during the relevant period. Earnings recognition in this segment is unrelated to investment results in the current period. Current investment gains/losses of the funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trusts are deferred until the underlying products and services are delivered and are not reflected in the statement of earnings but are disclosed in Notes 4, 5 and 7 along with the cost and market value of the trust assets. The Company’s fee income related to management of its trust assets, the investment income recognized on preneed contracts delivered and the trust assets are referred to as “corporate trust management” for the benefit of the segments.
Perpetual care trust earnings are reported in the cemetery segment, as these revenues are recognized currently and are used to maintain the cemeteries. Perpetual care trust earnings and the cost and market values of the perpetual care trust assets are presented in Note 6.
The accounting policies of the Company’s segments are the same as those described in Note 2. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them using a variety of profitability metrics. The most comprehensive of these measures is gross profit.
The Company also measures its preneed sales growth year-over-year. Preneed sales and the accounting for these sales are discussed in Notes 2(i), 2(j) and 2(k). Although the Company does not consider its preneed selling activities to be a separate segment, the Company is providing additional disclosure of preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service sales in its segment footnote as preneed sales are reviewed regularly by the Company’s CODM to assess performance and allocate resources. Preneed sales are strategically significant to the Company as those sales are one of the primary drivers of market share protection and growth. As such, the CODM reviews the preneed sales data in addition to revenue and gross profit. Information on segment assets is not disclosed as it is not reviewed by the CODM.
The Company’s operations are product-based. As such, the Company’s primary reportable segments presented in the following table are based on products and services.
The Company’s funeral homes offer a complete range of funeral services and products both at the time of need and on a preneed basis. The Company’s services and products include family consultation, removal and preparation of remains, the use of funeral home facilities for visitation, worship and funeral services, transportation services, flowers and caskets. In addition to traditional funeral services, all of the Company’s funeral homes offer cremation products and services. The Company’s cemetery operations involve the sale of cemetery property and
121
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(21) Segment Data—(Continued)
related merchandise, including lots, lawn crypts, family and community mausoleums, columbariums, cremation niches, cremation gardens, monuments, memorials and burial vaults, along with the sale of burial site openings and closings and inscriptions. Cemetery property and merchandise sales are made both at the time of need and on a preneed basis.
The Company incurs certain costs that benefit all of the funeral homes and cemeteries, such as management compensation, headquarters overhead, insurance costs and legal and professional fees. These costs are allocated to the facilities using various methods including their proportionate share of sales (which can include preneed sales) or payroll. These costs are included in funeral and cemetery costs.
The Company incurs certain other costs at its shared services center that benefit all of the funeral homes and cemeteries, such as the costs to process contracts, make collections, pay vendors, deliver information system services and deliver human resource services. These costs are allocated using various methods including their proportionate share of sales (which can include preneed sales) and the number of employees. These costs are included in funeral and cemetery costs.
For a discussion of discontinued operations, see Note 12. The table below presents information about reported segments for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 for the Company’s continuing operations only.
122
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(21) Segment Data—(Continued)
| Total Revenue | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 267,678 | $ | 267,522 | $ | 260,087 | ||||||
Cemetery(1) | 223,492 | 220,814 | 216,504 | |||||||||
Corporate Trust Management(2) | 24,927 | 24,328 | 23,316 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 516,097 | $ | 512,664 | $ | 499,907 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Total Gross Profit | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 54,938 | $ | 51,359 | $ | 50,686 | ||||||
Cemetery(1) | 31,653 | 26,383 | 24,464 | |||||||||
Corporate Trust Management(2) | 23,091 | 22,675 | 21,589 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 109,682 | $ | 100,417 | $ | 96,739 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Depreciation and Amortization Total | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 14,299 | $ | 15,515 | $ | 15,203 | ||||||
Cemetery | 8,494 | 8,111 | 7,928 | |||||||||
Reconciling Items(3) | 9,150 | 8,731 | 9,137 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 31,943 | $ | 32,357 | $ | 32,268 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Additions to Long-Lived Assets Total(4) | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 14,182 | $ | 16,510 | $ | 6,735 | ||||||
Cemetery | 28,124 | 24,031 | 16,773 | |||||||||
Reconciling Items(3) | 4,960 | 4,045 | 3,084 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 47,266 | $ | 44,586 | $ | 26,592 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Total Goodwill | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Funeral | $ | 200,863 | $ | 198,317 | ||||
Cemetery | 48,721 | 48,721 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 249,584 | $ | 247,038 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| (1) | Perpetual care trust earnings are included in the revenue and gross profit data of the cemetery segment and amounted to $9,552, $8,555 and $7,376 for fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
| (2) | Corporate trust management consists of the trust management fees and funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trust earnings recognized with respect to preneed contracts delivered during the period. Trust management fees are established by the Company at rates consistent with industry norms based on the fair market value of the assets managed and are paid by the trusts to the Company’s subsidiary, Investors Trust, Inc. The trust earnings represent the amount of distributable earnings as stipulated by the Company’s respective trust agreements that are generated by the trusts over the life of the preneed contracts and allocated to those products and services delivered during the relevant periods. Trust management fees included in funeral revenue for 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $5,372, $4,741 and $4,517, respectively, and funeral trust earnings recognized with respect to preneed contracts delivered included in funeral revenue for 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $9,933, |
123
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(21) Segment Data—(Continued)
| $11,393 and $11,294, respectively. Trust management fees included in cemetery revenue for 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $6,262, $5,284 and $4,873, respectively, and cemetery trust earnings recognized with respect to preneed contracts delivered included in cemetery revenue for 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $3,360, $2,910 and $2,632, respectively. |
| (3) | Reconciling items consist of unallocated corporate assets, depreciation and amortization on unallocated corporate assets, amortization of deferred financing costs, amortization of the discount on the Company’s senior convertible notes and additions to corporate long-lived assets. |
| (4) | Long-lived assets include cemetery property and net property and equipment. |
A reconciliation of total segment gross profit to total earnings from continuing operations before income taxes for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, is as follows:
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Gross profit for reportable segments | $ | 109,682 | $ | 100,417 | $ | 96,739 | ||||||
Corporate general and administrative expenses | (28,521 | ) | (26,775 | ) | (28,044 | ) | ||||||
Restructuring and other charges | (3,291 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Hurricane related recoveries (charges), net | (55 | ) | 12,232 | (66 | ) | |||||||
Net gain (loss) on dispositions | 403 | (389 | ) | — | ||||||||
Other operating income, net | 1,211 | 1,625 | 1,424 | |||||||||
Interest expense | (23,401 | ) | (22,747 | ) | (24,392 | ) | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — | (1,884 | ) | (1,035 | ) | |||||||
Investment and other income, net | 174 | 672 | 156 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 56,202 | $ | 63,151 | $ | 44,782 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
The table below presents total net preneed merchandise and services sales for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
| Total Net Preneed Merchandise and Service Sales(1) | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 107,635 | $ | 97,815 | $ | 96,114 | ||||||
Cemetery | 51,129 | 50,272 | 48,290 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 158,764 | $ | 148,087 | $ | 144,404 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| (1) | Preneed sales amounts represent total preneed funeral trust and insurance sales and cemetery service and merchandise trust sales generated in the applicable period, net of cancellations. Preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service sales are deferred until a future period and have no impact on current revenues. |
124
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(22) Supplementary Information
The detail of certain income statement accounts is as follows for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
| Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Service revenue | ||||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 194,654 | $ | 192,451 | $ | 180,419 | ||||||
Cemetery | 61,684 | 60,682 | 59,693 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 256,338 | 253,133 | 240,112 | ||||||||||
Merchandise revenue | ||||||||||||
Funeral | 80,728 | 83,742 | 88,686 | |||||||||
Cemetery | 158,637 | 154,612 | 149,161 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 239,365 | 238,354 | 237,847 | ||||||||||
Other revenue | ||||||||||||
Funeral | 7,602 | 7,464 | 6,793 | |||||||||
Cemetery | 12,792 | 13,713 | 15,155 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 20,394 | 21,177 | 21,948 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total revenue | $ | 516,097 | $ | 512,664 | $ | 499,907 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Service costs | ||||||||||||
Funeral | $ | 66,472 | $ | 65,242 | $ | 60,556 | ||||||
Cemetery | 43,182 | 43,343 | 42,067 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 109,654 | 108,585 | 102,623 | ||||||||||
Merchandise costs | ||||||||||||
Funeral | 54,483 | 55,155 | 55,472 | |||||||||
Cemetery | 93,398 | 95,589 | 94,143 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 147,881 | 150,744 | 149,615 | ||||||||||
Facility expenses | ||||||||||||
Funeral | 92,715 | 96,612 | 94,249 | |||||||||
Cemetery | 56,165 | 56,306 | 56,681 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 148,880 | 152,918 | 150,930 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total costs | $ | 406,415 | $ | 412,247 | $ | 403,168 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Service revenue includes funeral service revenue, funeral trust earnings, insurance commission revenue, burial site openings and closings and perpetual care trust earnings. Merchandise revenue includes funeral merchandise revenue, flower sales, cemetery property sales revenue, cemetery merchandise delivery revenue and merchandise trust earnings. Other revenue consists of finance charge revenue and trust management fees. Service costs include the direct costs associated with service revenue and preneed selling costs associated with preneed service sales. Merchandise costs include the direct costs associated with merchandise revenue, preneed selling costs associated with preneed merchandise sales and the Company’s estimated obligation to fund the cemetery perpetual care trusts.
(23) Hurricane Related Recoveries (Charges)
The Company has insurance coverage related to property damage, incremental costs and property operating expenses. The insurance policies also provide coverage for interruption to the business, including lost profits, and reimbursement for other expenses and costs incurred relating to the damages and losses suffered. In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina struck the Company’s South Louisiana operations. In September 2008, Hurricane Ike struck the Texas Gulf Coast and the Company’s facilities in the area.
125
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(23) Hurricane Related Recoveries (Charges)—(Continued)
The Company had been unable to finalize its negotiations with its insurance carrier related to damages from Hurricane Katrina, and as a result filed suit against the carrier in August 2007. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, the insurance litigation was settled, and the Company received $11,325 in additional insurance proceeds. The Company recorded net hurricane related recoveries (charges) of ($55), $12,232 and ($66) for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Hurricane Katrina charges incurred in fiscal years 2010 and 2011 primarily related to legal costs associated with litigation settled in fiscal year 2011 as described above. The Company does not anticipate any further hurricane related charges associated with past hurricanes.
(24) Significant Risks and Uncertainties
Concentrations of Investments
The Company’s preneed trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts are invested in various industry sectors, including the financial services sector, information technology sector and the healthcare sector. The market values of the trusts experienced significant declines during late fiscal year 2008 and early fiscal year 2009. As of October 31, 2012, the Company has a concentration of issuer specific investments in these sectors in its preneed trust portfolio which comprise the following percentages of the portfolio’s fair market value: 11 percent in the financial services sector, eight percent in the information technology sector and eight percent in the healthcare sector. As of October 31, 2012, the Company has a concentration of issuer specific investments in these sectors in its cemetery perpetual care trust portfolio which comprise the following percentages of the portfolio’s fair market value: 18 percent in the financial services sector, five percent in the information technology sector and seven percent in the healthcare sector. The Company may have other investments in these sectors through its mutual fund holdings.
Risks associated with the financial services sector include risk of failure of various large financial institutions, changing government regulation, interest rates, cost of capital funds, credit losses and volatility in financial markets. Risks associated with the information technology sector include overall economic conditions, short product cycles, rapid obsolescence of products, competition and government regulation. Risks associated with the healthcares services sector risks include the failure of research and development products, class-action litigation related to adverse side-effects, changes in the level of U.S. government funding for Medicare and Medicaid, the loss of patent protection on existing pharmaceutical drugs and the impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. See Notes 2(i), 2(j) and 2(k) for the Company’s policy outlining how realized losses could impact future revenue and additional potential funding obligations for cemetery perpetual care trusts.
Customer Installment Receivables
The Company has gross installment contract receivables of $122,466 relating to cemetery property sales as of October 31, 2012. A continued economic downturn could impact the ability of customers to meet payment obligations.
Deferred Tax Assets
In addition to the potential additional realized losses described above in the Company’s trust investment portfolios, further realized capital losses in the trusts for which the Company is the grantor, to the extent there are insufficient offsetting capital gains, may result in additional valuation allowances against the related deferred tax asset (capital loss carryforward).
(25) Subsequent Events
As of November 30, 2012, the fair market value of the Company’s preneed trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts increased 0.2 percent, or approximately $1,591, from October 31, 2012.
126
Table of Contents
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(25) Subsequent Events—(Continued)
In November 2012, the Company issued 17,116 shares of Class A common stock and paid approximately $437 in cash to the independent directors of the Company. Each independent director must hold all of the shares received until completion of service as a member of the Board of Directors.
Subsequent to October 31, 2012 through November 30, 2012, the Company repurchased an additional 150,686 shares of its Class A common stock for $1,118 at an average price of $7.42 per share and has $15,327 remaining available under its current stock repurchase program.
(26) Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarterly financial data for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 is presented below:
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||
Year Ended October 31, 2012(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 124,824 | $ | 132,598 | $ | 129,239 | $ | 129,436 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 25,396 | 29,138 | 26,986 | 28,162 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings | 8,545 | 8,736 | 9,638 | 8,977 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | .10 | .10 | .11 | .11 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | .10 | .10 | .11 | .11 | ||||||||||||
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||
Year Ended October 31, 2011(2) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 129,264 | $ | 129,665 | $ | 124,357 | $ | 129,378 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 28,355 | 25,641 | 21,752 | 24,669 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings | 8,044 | 9,998 | 11,986 | 8,527 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | .09 | .11 | .13 | .10 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | .09 | .11 | .13 | .10 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | First quarter of fiscal year 2012 includes a $642 charge related to the Company’s estimated probable funding obligation to fund the cemetery perpetual care trusts. Second quarter of fiscal year 2012 includes a $2,547 charge related to the Company’s second quarter 2012 restructuring and a $850 loss from discontinued operations. Third quarter of fiscal year 2012 includes a $305 charge related to the Company’s second quarter 2012 restructuring. Fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012 includes a $439 charge related to the Company’s second quarter 2012 restructuring. |
| (2) | Second quarter of fiscal year 2011 includes a $1,811 loss on the early extinguishment of debt and a $400 charge for net losses on dispositions. Third quarter of fiscal year 2011 includes net hurricane related recoveries of $12,349. |
Changes in the number of deaths can vary among local markets and from quarter to quarter, and variations in the number of deaths in the Company’s markets or from quarter to quarter are not predictable. However, generally the number of deaths fluctuates with the seasons with more deaths occurring during the winter months primarily resulting from pneumonia and influenza. These variations can cause revenues to fluctuate.
127
Table of Contents
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Disclosure Committee and management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria described inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended October 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
128
Table of Contents
On December 13, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to Section 3.1 of the Company’s by-laws increasing the mandatory retirement age for members of the Board of Directors from 70 to 75.
Our Board of Directors has set the date of our 2013 annual shareholder’s meeting on April 18, 2013.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information regarding executive officers required by Item 10 may be found in Part I of this report.
We have adopted the Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “code”), a code of ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller. The code is available at the Company website where all of its public filings are available free of charge on the same day they are filed with the SEC. Any substantive amendments to the code, or any waivers granted for any directors or executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or Corporate Controller, will be disclosed on the Company’s website. The Company’s website address is www.stewartenterprises.com.
The remaining information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 annual meeting of shareholders, which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the last fiscal year.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 annual meeting of shareholders, which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the last fiscal year.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued under equity compensation plans as of October 31, 2012:
Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column)(1) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3,760,506 | $ | 5.80 | 6,253,428 | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | 3,760,506 | $ | 5.80 | 6,253,428 | ||||||||
| (1) | Includes 5,903,985 shares of our common stock under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, which are issuable as stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares or stock awards. This also includes 349,443 shares remaining to be granted under the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
The remaining information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 annual meeting of shareholders, which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the last fiscal year.
129
Table of Contents
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 annual meeting of shareholders, which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the last fiscal year.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 annual meeting of shareholders, which proxy statement will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the last fiscal year.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
| (a) | Documents filed as part of this report: |
(1) Financial Statements
The Company’s consolidated financial statements listed below have been filed as part of this report:
| Page | ||||
| 54 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Years Ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 | 55 | |||
| 56 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 | 58 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 | 60 | |||
| 61 | ||||
(2) Financial Statement Schedule for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 | ||||
| 131 | ||||
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or the information appears in the financial statements or notes thereto.
130
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTSSTEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
COLUMN A | COLUMN B | COLUMN C | COLUMN D | COLUMN E | COLUMN F | |||||||||||||||
Description | Balance at beginning of period | Charged to costs and expenses | Other changes | Write-offs | Balance at end of period | |||||||||||||||
Current—Allowance for doubtful accounts: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ | 4,626 | 1,855 | — | (2,422 | ) | $ | 4,059 | ||||||||||||
2011 | $ | 5,738 | 1,922 | — | (3,034 | ) | $ | 4,626 | ||||||||||||
2010 | $ | 7,390 | 1,942 | — | (3,594 | ) | $ | 5,738 | ||||||||||||
Due after one year—Allowance for doubtful accounts: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ | 7,118 | 2,401 | — | (4,266 | ) | $ | 5,253 | ||||||||||||
2011 | $ | 8,324 | 2,957 | — | (4,163 | ) | $ | 7,118 | ||||||||||||
2010 | $ | 9,778 | 2,816 | — | (4,270 | ) | $ | 8,324 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ | 7,474 | (1,779 | ) | — | (45 | ) | $ | 5,650 | |||||||||||
2011 | $ | 8,616 | (986 | ) | — | (156 | )(1) | $ | 7,474 | |||||||||||
2010 | $ | 10,194 | (1,578 | ) | — | — | $ | 8,616 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | This is related to the write-off of both the deferred tax asset and related valuation allowance for an expired net operating loss as a result of a change in state tax legislation. |
Item 15(a)(3) Exhibits
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended and restated as of April 3, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008) | |
| 3.2 | By-laws of the Company, as amended and restated as of December 13, 2012 | |
| 4.1 | See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions of the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and By-laws, as amended, defining the rights of holders of Class A and Class B common stock | |
| 4.2 | Specimen of Class A common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the Commission on June 21, 2007) | |
| 4.3 | Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 20, 2011 by and among the Company, Empresas Stewart-Cementerios and Empresas Stewart-Funerarias, as Borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and The Other Lenders party hereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 21, 2011) | |
| 4.4 | Indenture dated as of April 18, 2011 by and among Stewart Enterprises, Inc., the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to the 6.50 percent Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 19, 2011) | |
131
Table of Contents
| 4.5 | Form of 6.50 percent Senior Note due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 19, 2011) | |
| 4.6 | Indenture dated June 27, 2007 by and among Stewart Enterprises, Inc., the guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to 3.125 percent Senior Convertible Notes due 2014 (including Form of 3.125 percent Senior Convertible Notes due 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2007) | |
| 4.7 | Indenture dated June 27, 2007 by and among Stewart Enterprises, Inc., the guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to 3.375 percent Senior Convertible Notes due 2016 (including Form of 3.375 percent Senior Convertible Notes due 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2007) | |
The Company hereby agrees to furnish to the Commission, upon request, a copy of the instruments which define the rights of holders of the Company’s long-term debt. None of such instruments (other than those included as exhibits herein) represent long-term debt in excess of 10 percent of the Company’s consolidated total assets.
Management Contracts and Compensatory Plans or Arrangements
| 10.1 | Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Company and its Directors and Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2004, filed January 11, 2005) (the “Original 2004 Form 10-K”); Form of First Amendment to Indemnity Agreements between Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and its Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008) | |
| 10.2 | Employment Agreement between the Company and Thomas M. Kitchen dated February 24, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011) | |
| 10.3 | Form of Stock Option Agreement between the Company and its Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Original 2004 Form 10-K, Commission File No. 1-15449) | |
| 10.4 | Amended and Restated 1995 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1996, Commission File No. 1-15449) | |
| 10.5 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan between the Company and its Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2007) | |
| 10.6 | Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan between the Company and its Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2007) | |
| 10.7 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan between the Company and its Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011) | |
| 10.8 | Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan between the Company and its Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011) | |
132
Table of Contents
| 10.9 | Amended and Restated Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 23, 2012) | |
| 10.10 | Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the year ended October 31, 2006) | |
| 10.11 | Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 23, 2012) | |
| 10.12 | Amended and Restated 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009) | |
| 10.13 | Amended and Restated Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Retention Plan and Summary Plan Description effective June 11, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2012) | |
| 10.14 | Amended and Restated Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Supplemental Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan effective January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008); Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Supplemental Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan effective December 17, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009); Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Supplemental Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan effective June 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2012) | |
| 10.15 | Amended and Restated Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008); Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective January 26, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009); Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective June 20, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2012) | |
| 10.16 | Confirmation of OTC Convertible Note Hedge dated as of June 21, 2007 by and between Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and Merrill Lynch International (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2007) | |
| 10.17 | Confirmation of OTC Convertible Note Hedge dated as of June 21, 2007 by and between Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and Merrill Lynch International (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2007) | |
| 10.18 | Confirmation of OTC Warrant Transaction dated as of June 21, 2007 by and between Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Financial Markets (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2007) | |
| 10.19 | Confirmation of OTC Warrant Transaction dated as of June 21, 2007 by and between Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Financial Markets (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 27, 2007) | |
133
Table of Contents
| 21 | Subsidiaries of the Company | |
| 23 | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | |
| 31.1 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Thomas M. Kitchen, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| 31.2 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Lewis J. Derbes, Jr., Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
| 32.1 | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Thomas M. Kitchen, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Lewis J. Derbes, Jr., Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
| 101 | The following materials from Stewart Enterprises, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2012 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | |
134
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on December 17, 2012.
| STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC. | ||
| By: | /s/THOMAS M. KITCHEN | |
| Thomas M. Kitchen | ||
President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/S/THOMAS M. KITCHEN Thomas M. Kitchen (Principal Executive Officer) | President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director | December 17, 2012 | ||
/S/LEWIS J. DERBES, JR. Lewis J. Derbes, Jr. (Principal Financial Officer) | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | December 17, 2012 | ||
/S/ANGELA M. LACOUR Angela M. Lacour (Principal Accounting Officer) | Senior Vice President of Finance, and Chief Accounting Officer | December 17, 2012 | ||
/S/FRANK B. STEWART, JR. Frank B. Stewart, Jr. | Chairman of the Board | December 17, 2012 | ||
/S/JOHN B. ELSTROTT John B. Elstrott | Director | December 17, 2012 | ||
/S/ALDEN J. MCDONALD, JR. Alden J. McDonald, Jr. | Director | December 17, 2012 | ||
/S/RONALD H. PATRON Ronald H. Patron | Director | December 17, 2012 | ||
/S/ASHTON J. RYAN, JR. Ashton J. Ryan, Jr. | Director | December 17, 2012 | ||
/S/JOHN K. SAER, JR. John K. Saer, Jr. | Director | December 17, 2012 | ||
135
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
| 3.2 | By-laws of the Company, as amended and restated as of December 13, 2012 | |
| 21 | Subsidiaries of the Company | |
| 23 | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | |
| 31.1 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Thomas M. Kitchen, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| 31.2 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Lewis J. Derbes, Jr., Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
| 32.1 | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Thomas M. Kitchen, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Lewis J. Derbes, Jr., Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
| 101 | The following materials from Stewart Enterprises, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2012 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | |
136