Federated Fixed Income Securities N-CSR Certified annual shareholder report (management investment company)

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form N-CSR

Certified Shareholder Report of Registered Management Investment Companies

811-6447

(Investment Company Act File Number)

Federated Fixed Income Securities, Inc.

_______________________________________________________________

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

Federated Investors Funds

4000 Ericsson Drive

Warrendale, Pennsylvania 15086-7561

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(412) 288-1900

(Registrant's Telephone Number)

Peter J. Germain, Esquire

Federated Investors Tower

1001 Liberty Avenue

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-3779

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

(Notices should be sent to the Agent for Service)

Date of Fiscal Year End: 09/30/18

Date of Reporting Period: 09/30/18

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders

Annual Shareholder Report

September 30, 2018

Share Class | Ticker A | FMUUX Institutional | FMUSX

Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund

Fund Established 2000

A Portfolio of Federated Fixed Income Securities, Inc.

Dear Valued Shareholder,

I am pleased to present the Annual Shareholder Report for your fund covering the period from October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018. This report includes Management's Discussion of Fund Performance, a complete listing of your fund's holdings, performance information and financial statements along with other important fund information.

In addition, our website, FederatedInvestors.com, offers easy access to Federated resources that include timely fund updates, economic and market insights from our investment strategists, and financial planning tools.

Thank you for investing with Federated. I hope you find this information useful and look forward to keeping you informed.

Sincerely,

J. Christopher Donahue, President

Not FDIC Insured ■ May Lose Value ■ No Bank Guarantee

CONTENTS

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance	1
Portfolio of Investments Summary Table	9
Portfolio of Investments	10
Financial Highlights	28
Statement of Assets and Liabilities	30
Statement of Operations	31
Statement of Changes in Net Assets	32
Notes to Financial Statements	33
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	41
Shareholder Expense Example	43
In Memoriam	45
Board of Directors and Corporation Officers	45
Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract–May 2018	52
Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities	59
Quarterly Portfolio Schedule	59

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance (unaudited)

The total return of Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund (the “Fund”), based on net asset value for the 12-month reporting period ended September 30, 2018, was 0.65% for the Class A Shares and 1.11% for the Institutional Shares. The 1.11% total return for the Institutional Shares for the reporting period consisted of 1.41% of tax-exempt dividend income and price depreciation of -0.30% in the net asset value of the shares.^1,2 The total return of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-Year U.S. Municipal Bond Index (B1MB),³ the Fund's broad-based securities market index, was 0.57% and the total return of the Lipper Short Municipal Debt Funds Average (LSMDFA),⁴ a peer group average of funds with durations of less than three years, was 0.27% during the same period. The total return of a 50/50 blend (Blended Index)⁵ of the B1MB and the Lipper Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds Average, which would approximate a 0.75 year average duration, was 0.70% during the same period. The Fund's and the LSMDFA's total returns for the most recently completed fiscal year reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs and other expenses that were not reflected in the total return of the B1MB.

During the reporting period, the Fund's investment strategy focused on: (a) the effective duration⁶ of its portfolio (which indicates the portfolio's price sensitivity to interest rates); (b) the selection of securities with different maturities (expressed by a yield curve showing the relative yield of securities with different maturities); (c) the allocation of the portfolio among securities of similar issuers (referred to as “sectors”); and (d) the credit quality⁷ and ratings of the portfolio securities (which indicates the risk that securities may default). These were the most significant factors affecting the Fund's performance relative to the B1MB during the reporting period.

The following discussion will focus on the performance of the Fund's Institutional Shares.

MARKET OVERVIEW

During the reporting period, 10-year U.S. Treasury yields increased from a low of 2.27% in early October 2017 to a high of 3.11% in May 2018, and ended the period at 3.06% and averaged 2.75%. Economic activity in the U.S. continued to expand at a moderate, but accelerating pace.

Accommodative financial conditions, the recently enacted U.S. tax legislation and an improved global economic outlook supported economic growth over the reporting period. Inflation showed signs of picking up during the reporting period; however, it continued to run below the 2% target inflation rate of the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”). This partly reflected declines in energy prices and impacts of the dollar's strength on non-energy imports. The Fed's decision to raise the federal funds' target rate (FFTR) range four times by 0.25% each time

Annual Shareholder Report

1

during the reporting period was mostly anticipated by the markets. In determining the size and timing of changes in the FFTR, changes in the Federal Open Market Committee's indicators of maximum employment and a 2% inflation target were essential.

The Fed reaffirmed that adjustments to the policy path would depend on assessments of how the economic outlook and risks to the outlook were evolving. The labor market continued to strengthen during the reporting period as economic activity expanded at a moderate pace. Job gains remained strong, and the unemployment rate stayed low during the reporting period. Measures of consumer and business sentiment also improved during the reporting period. Considerable uncertainty remained regarding the prospects for changes in government policies as well as the timing and magnitude of the net effect of such changes on economic activity. Health care reform, tax reform, changes in financial regulations and trade & tariff negotiations were among the important policy decisions that had significant impacts on the financial markets during the reporting period.

The U.S. dollar strengthened against the currencies of most advanced economies during the reporting period amid concerns about growth in those countries as well as announcements by several central banks regarding monetary policy actions. The European and Japanese Central Banks were anticipated to make changes to their asset purchase programs during the reporting period.

Major U.S. tax reform occurred during the reporting period through the passage of Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2018 (“Tax Reform Act”), which reduced both corporate and individual tax rates. The top tax rate for individuals declined from 39.6% to 37%. The legislation either eliminated, modified or limited numerous deductions. The municipal bond market was spared many of the potentially negative tax law changes that were proposed, such as the limitation on the tax exemption for municipal bond interest. As a result, the impact of the Tax Reform Act's implementation on the municipal bond market has not been significant. The supply of municipal debt has been to some degree reduced during the reporting period as a result of the elimination of advanced refundings by municipal issuers. Also, the significant reduction in the corporate tax rate is expected over time to reduce corporations' demand for holding municipal debt.

State and local government payrolls increased somewhat during the reporting period while nominal construction spending by these governments declined, reflecting a reticence to take on additional debt. Most state and local governments' finances improved over the reporting period as the pickup in housing, consumer spending and hiring boosted sales tax and income tax collection and real estate valuations. The spread between “AAA”- and “BBB”-rated general obligation debt narrowed at different maturities along the yield curve during the period. Credit quality continued to be generally stable. However, fiscal deficits and pension underfunding continued to be a focal point for states such as Connecticut, New Jersey and Illinois during the reporting period. The municipal bond market's technical (supply and demand) position

Annual Shareholder Report

2

was mostly favorable over the reporting period. The issuance of municipal debt increased near the end of 2017 in anticipation of the impacts of federal tax reform on the market and the issuers of municipal debt. The issuance declined significantly beginning in 2018 compared to previous periods, as the ability to advance refund existing debt became disallowed and issuers were hesitant to add additional leverage. Flows from investors into municipal bond funds were mostly positive and broad-based for a significant portion of the reporting period. The intermittent flight-to-quality by investors as a result of the unstable global political and economic environment also favored municipal bonds, as they were viewed as a safer alternative investment.

Over the reporting period, the municipal yield curve flattened as yields on shorter maturities (five years and shorter) rose more than long maturity yields (10 to 30 years). Despite this flattening bias, the B1MB outperformed all indices inside of 10 years with the only positive return for the reporting period.

DURATION

The Fund is an ultrashort tax-exempt municipal bond fund and pursues a low price volatility strategy. As such, the Fund's typical dollar-weighted average duration is constrained by its prospectus to one year or less with the typical operating range from four months to one year. As determined at the end of the reporting period, the Fund's dollar-weighted average duration was 0.37 years. The duration of the B1MB (which contains only bonds with maturities from one to two years) was 1.37 years at the end of the reporting period.

Short-term municipal yields increased over the period as the Fed tightened the FFTR range four times. The seven-day SIFMA rate, a proxy for weekly municipal variable-rate demand note (MVRDN) yields and the base coupon index for many municipal floating-rate notes (MFRNs) held in the Fund, ended the reporting period at 1.56%, up from a low of 0.91% in October 2017, and averaged 1.27% over the period. The 1-month ICE Libor Index, a base index for some of the MFRNs in the Fund, moved from 1.23% at the beginning to 2.26% at the end of the reporting period. One-year and two-year “AAA”-rated municipal bond fixed-rate yields increased over the period by 1.00% and 0.96%, ending the period at 1.93% and 1.98%, respectively.

With short-term interest rates increasing, the shorter duration of 0.37 years and high floating/variable-rate structure (70-75%) of the Fund helped the Fund's relative performance versus the B1MB. For instance, as the upper bound of the FFTR range increased from 1.25% to 2.25% over the period, the performance of MFRNs, an overweight position in the Fund with 7-day or 1-month coupon rate resets, helped Fund performance as their coupon income increased and prices improved in contrast to price declines in comparable maturity fixed-rate coupon bonds. For example, MFRNs comprised about 50% of the Fund during the reporting period and had their average coupon income

Annual Shareholder Report

3

improve from a relatively high start level of 1.60% at the start of the reporting period to 2.20% at the end, an increase of 0.60%. This coupon improvement of MFRNs combined with improved prices added to the total return of the Fund as compared to the B1MB over the reporting period.

Maturity/Yield Curve

During the reporting period, the municipal yield curve flattened significantly as yields on intermediate and long maturity bonds (five years and longer) increased less than yields on bonds with shorter maturities. Outside of MFRNs, the best performing portions of the broad municipal market were bonds with maturities from one to two years, as well as very short-term maturity instruments inside of three months that matured or rolled or reset with the higher yield environment since they experienced no price erosion due to higher rates.

Because the Fund pursues an ultrashort duration strategy to seek to provide income exempt from federal regular income tax, the Fund was managed during the reporting period with an intention of maintaining a barbell structure consisting of: 70% to 80% weighting in very short-term maturity securities such as tax-exempt weekly reset MVRDNs; weekly and monthly reset MFRNs and 90-day or less municipal commercial paper; and a 20% to 25% weighting in tax-exempt fixed-rate municipal notes and bonds with durations generally from three months to four years.

The B1MB contains only bonds with maturities greater than one year but less than two years, and does not contain any bonds with less than one year remaining to maturity, nor does it include MVRDNs and many MFRNs. The Fund's portfolio of 50% in MFRNs and 20-25% in MVRDNs positively impacted Fund performance relative to the B1MB during the reporting period, as the Fund's total returns in these notes outperformed the B1MB.

SECTOR ALLOCATION

During the reporting period, the Fund received a positive contribution to excess return from sector allocation. The Fund maintained a higher portfolio allocation, relative to the B1MB, to securities issued by hospitals, transportation, industrial development and pollution control revenue entities (corporate obligors and investor-owned electric and gas utilities). These allocations helped the Fund's performance due to the outperformance of these sectors relative to the B1MB.

The Fund was significantly underweight, compared to the B1MB, in state and local general obligation bonds and pre-refunded bonds (which are bonds for which the principal and interest payments are secured or guaranteed by cash or U.S. Treasury securities held in an escrow account), and since these sectors were underperformers within the B1MB, these decisions positively affected Fund performance relative to the B1MB during the reporting period. The Fund's holdings in these sectors also significantly outperformed those in the B1MB due to security selection.

Annual Shareholder Report

4

Overall, security selection decisions had a significant and positive impact to the Fund's performance relative to the B1MB during the reporting period. The Fund's holdings of New Jersey state related debt, New Jersey Turnpike Authority revenue debt, Connecticut state general obligation debt, British Petroleum PLC guaranteed debt, Lancaster, Ohio pre-paid gas revenue bonds, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center bonds all significantly outperformed in return relative to the B1MB as their credit spreads tightened and contributed to performance. The Fund's holdings of Hartford, Connecticut Tax Anticipation Notes also added to price performance as the notes matured and payment was received as the city received significant state assistance amid budget deficit concerns during the period. The Fund had no exposure to Puerto Rico or its authorities over the reporting period.

CREDIT QUALITY

During the reporting period, investor appetite for yield in the low interest rate environment remained strong along with municipal bond fund inflows, and resulted in outperformance of bonds rated “A” and “BBB” (or unrated bonds of comparable quality) relative to bonds rated in the higher rating categories (or unrated bonds of comparable quality). Bonds in the noninvestment-grade category, below “BBB,” also outperformed the higher rating categories.

The Fund's overweight position, relative to the B1MB, in “A”, “BBB” and “MIG-2/SP-2” (or unrated comparable quality) debt during the reporting period had a significant and positive impact on the Fund's performance. The Fund's underweight position in bonds rated “AAA” and “AA” (or unrated comparable quality) also made a positive contribution to performance as bonds in these ratings categories underperformed within the B1MB. The Fund's small exposure to noninvestment-grade (“B” or “BB) debt also added positive excess return relative to the B1MB.

1	Bond prices are sensitive to changes in interest rates, and a rise in interest rates can cause a decline in their prices. The Fund is not a “money market” mutual fund. Some money market mutual funds attempt to maintain a stable net asset value through compliance with relevant Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. The Fund is not governed by those rules, and its shares will fluctuate in value.
2	Income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax, as well as state and local taxes.
3	Please see the footnotes to the line graphs under “Fund Performance and Growth of a $10,000 Investment” below for the definition of, and more information about, the B1MB.
4	Please see the footnotes to the line graphs under “Fund Performance and Growth of a $10,000 Investment” below for the definition of, and more information about, the LSMDFA.
5	Please see the footnotes to the line graphs under “Fund Performance and Growth of a $10,000 Investment” below for the definition of, and more information about, the Blended Index.
6	Duration is a measure of a security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Securities with longer durations are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations. For purposes of this Management's Discussion of Fund Performance, duration is determined using a third-party analytical system.
7	Investment-grade securities and noninvestment-grade securities may either be: (a) rated by a nationally recognized statistical ratings organization or rating agency; or (b) unrated securities that the Fund's investment adviser (“Adviser”) believes are of comparable quality. The rating agencies that provided the ratings for rated securities include Standard & Poor's, Moody's Investor Services, Inc. and Fitch Rating

Annual Shareholder Report

5

Service. When ratings vary, the highest rating is used. Credit ratings of “AA” or better are considered to be high credit quality; credit ratings of “A” are considered high or medium/good quality; and credit ratings of “BBB” are considered to be medium/good credit quality, and the lowest category of investment-grade securities; credit ratings of “BB” and below are lower-rated, noninvestment-grade securities or junk bonds; and credit ratings of “CCC” or below are noninvestment-grade securities that have high default risk. Any credit quality breakdown does not give effect to the impact of any credit derivative investments made by the Fund. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher rated securities and increased possibilities of default.

Annual Shareholder Report

6

FUND PERFORMANCE AND GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000¹ in the Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund (the “Fund”) from September 30, 2008 to September 30, 2018, compared to the Bloomberg Barclays 1-Year U.S. Municipal Bond Index (B1MB),² the Lipper Short Municipal Debt Funds Average (LSMDFA)³ and a 50/50 blended index (Blended Index) of the B1MB and Lipper Tax-Exempt Money Market Funds Average.^2,3 The Average Annual Total Return table below shows returns for each class averaged over the stated periods.

Growth of a $10,000 Investment

Growth of $10,000 as of September 30, 2018

Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund -	Institutional Shares	Class A Shares	NA	B1MB	LSMDFA	Blended Index
	F	F	NA	I	I	I
9/30/2008	10,000	9,800		10,000	10,000	10,000
9/30/2009	10,367	10,115		10,471	10,522	10,264
9/30/2010	10,498	10,197		10,656	10,771	10,355
9/30/2011	10,656	10,305		10,799	10,932	10,425
9/30/2012	10,768	10,365		10,901	11,134	10,474
9/30/2013	10,819	10,367		10,978	11,124	10,511
9/30/2014	10,928	10,426		11,060	11,250	10,551
9/30/2015	10,939	10,389		11,136	11,279	10,588
9/30/2016	11,011	10,411		11,184	11,366	10,615
9/30/2017	11,142	10,488		11,311	11,442	10,695
9/30/2018	11,266	10,556		11,376	11,481	10,770

41 graphic description end -->

■  Total returns shown for Class A include the maximum sales charge of 2.00% ($10,000 investment minus $200 sales charge = $9,800).

The Fund offers multiple share classes whose performance may be greater than or less than its other share class(es) due to differences in sales charges and expenses.

Average Annual Total Returns for the Period Ended 9/30/2018

(returns reflect all applicable sales charges as specified below in footnote #1)

	1 Year	5 Years	10 Years
Class A Shares	-1.32%	-0.04%	0.54%
Institutional Shares	1.11%	0.81%	1.20%
B1MB	0.57%	0.71%	1.30%
LSMDFA	0.27%	0.78%	1.37%
Blended Index	0.70%	0.49%	0.74%

Annual Shareholder Report

7

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured.

1	Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund after deducting applicable sales charge. For Class A Shares, the maximum sales charge of 2.00% ($10,000 investment minus $200 sales charge = $9,800). The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The B1MB, the LSMDFA and the Blended Index have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the index and the average.
2	The B1MB is the one-year (1-2) component of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Municipal Bond Index. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Municipal Bond Index covers the USD-denominated long-term tax-exempt bond market. The index has four main sectors: state and local general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, insured bonds and prerefunded bonds. The B1MB is not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses or other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance. The Fund is not a money market fund and is not subject to the special regulatory requirements (including maturity and credit quality constraints) designed to enable money market funds to maintain a stable share price. The B1MB is unmanaged, and unlike the Fund, is not affected by cash flows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
3	Lipper figures represent the average of the total returns reported by all funds designated by Lipper, Inc., as falling into the respective category and is not adjusted to reflect any sales charges. The Lipper figures in the Growth of $10,000 line graph are based on historical return information published by Lipper and reflect the return of the funds comprising the category in the year of publication. Because the funds designated by Lipper as falling into the category can change over time, the Lipper figures in the line graph may not match the Lipper figures in the Average Annual Total Returns table, which reflect the return of the funds that currently comprise the category.

Annual Shareholder Report

8

Portfolio of Investments Summary Table (unaudited)

At September 30, 2018, the Fund's sector composition¹ was as follows:

Sector Composition	Percentage of Total Net Assets
Industrial Development Bond/Pollution Control Revenue	18.1%
Hospital	16.1%
Toll Road	8.0%
Prepaid Gas Utility	7.7%
General Obligation—Local	5.8%
Electric & Gas	5.6%
Water & Sewer	4.7%
General Obligation—State	4.0%
Airport	3.3%
Education	3.2%
Other2	23.4%
Other Assets and Liabilities—Net3	0.1%
TOTAL	100.0%

1	Sector classifications, and the assignment of holdings to such sectors, are based upon the economic sector and/or revenue source of the underlying obligor, as determined by the Fund's Adviser. For securities that have been enhanced by a third-party guarantor, such as bond insurers and banks, sector classifications are based upon the economic sector and/or revenue source of the underlying obligor, as determined by the Fund's Adviser.
2	For purposes of this table, sector classifications constitute 76.5% of the Fund's total net assets. Remaining sectors have been aggregated under the designation “Other.”
3	Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

Annual Shareholder Report

9

Portfolio of Investments

September 30, 2018

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—72.9%
		Alabama—4.2%
$22,500,000	1	Black Belt Energy Gas District, AL, Gas Prepay Revenue Bonds Project No. 3 (Series 2018B-1) FRNs (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GTD), 2.31%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.900%), 12/1/2023	$22,500,000
15,500,000		Black Belt Energy Gas District, AL, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2016A), 4.00% TOBs, (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), Mandatory Tender 6/1/2021	16,074,895
30,325,000		Health Care Authority for Baptist Health, AL, Affiliate of UAB Health (Montgomery) (Series B) ARS (Assured Guaranty Corp. INS), 1.90%, 10/5/2018	30,325,000
30,000,000	1	Southeast Alabama Gas Supply District, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds Project No.2 (Series 2018B) FRNs (Morgan Stanley GTD), 2.26%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.850%), 6/1/2024	29,851,800
		TOTAL	98,751,695
		Alaska—1.0%
24,175,000		Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority (Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corp.), Loan Anticipation Revenue Notes (Series 2017), 3.50%, 12/1/2020	24,397,168
		Arizona—2.1%
7,000,000	1	Arizona Health Facilities Authority (Phoenix Children's Hospital), Variable Rate Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2013A-1) FRNs, 3.41% (SIFMA 7-day +1.850%), Mandatory Tender 2/5/2020	7,077,560
7,000,000		Coconino County, AZ Pollution Control Corp. (Nevada Power Co.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2017A), 1.80% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 5/21/2020	6,922,930
1,100,000		Coconino County, AZ Pollution Control Corp. (Nevada Power Co.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2017B), 1.60% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 5/21/2020	1,086,129
25,700,000		Phoenix, AZ IDA (Republic Services, Inc.), (Series 2013), 1.85% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 11/1/2018	25,695,374
5,000,000		Tempe, AZ IDA (Mirabella at ASU), Revenue Bonds (Series 2017B), 4.00%, 10/1/2023	5,017,150
4,000,000	2	Yavapai County, AZ IDA Solid Waste Disposal (Waste Management, Inc.), Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 2.80% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2021	4,014,240
		TOTAL	49,813,383
		California—7.5%
9,350,000	1	Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge Revenue Bonds (Index Rate Bonds Series 2017D) FRNs, 2.186%(3-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.550%), 4/1/2021	9,403,482

Annual Shareholder Report

10

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		California—continued
$15,000,000	1	Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge Revenue Bonds (SIFMA Index Rate Bonds Series 2007A-1) FRNs, 2.26%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.70%), Mandatory Tender 10/1/2019	$15,038,550
10,000,000	1	California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank (California Academy of Sciences), Revenue Bonds (Series 2018B) FRNs, 1.941%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.380%), 8/1/2021	10,002,500
15,000,000	1	California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank (J Paul Getty Trust), Variable Rate Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2011A-1) FRNs, 1.673%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.200%), 4/1/2021	14,992,800
10,000,000	1	California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank (J Paul Getty Trust), Variable Rate Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2011A-3) FRNs, 1.995%, (3-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.370%), 4/1/2020	10,018,700
50,000,000	1	California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank (Los Angeles County Museum of Art), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017B) FRNs, 2.22%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.650%), 2/1/2021	50,100,000
8,000,000		California PCFA (Republic Services, Inc.), (Series A-1), 1.85% TOBs, Mandatory Tender, 10/15/2018	7,999,280
7,500,000	1	California State, UT GO Bonds (Index Floating Rate Bonds Series 2013D) FRNs, 1.85%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.290%) 12/1/2020	7,511,625
25,000,000	1	California State, UT GO Bonds (Series 2013B) FRNs, 1.94%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.380%) 12/1/2022	25,061,500
8,000,000	1	Contra Costa, CA Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A) FRNs, 1.702%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.250%), 9/21/2021	7,984,240
2,500,000		Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, Toll Road Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2013B-2), 5.00% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 1/15/2020	2,555,175
10,750,000	1	Riverside, CA Water Revenue, (Series 2011A) FRNs, 2.19%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.630%), 1/15/2020	10,750,645
7,250,000		Southern California Public Power Authority (Power Projects) (Magnolia Power Project A), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017-1), 2.00% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2020	7,228,902
		TOTAL	178,647,399
		Colorado—1.5%
6,000,000	1	Colorado School of Mines Board of Trustees (Colorado School of Mines, CO), Institutional Enterprise Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A) FRNs, 1.91%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.500%), 2/1/2023	5,987,160
9,640,000	1	Denver (City & County), CO (Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority), Airport System Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016B) Index Rate Notes FRNs, 2.333%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.860%), 11/15/2019	9,656,195
5,000,000	1	E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, Senior Revenue Bonds (LIBOR Index Series 2017A) FRNs, 2.402%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.900%), 9/1/2019	5,010,550

Annual Shareholder Report

11

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		Colorado—continued
$6,000,000	1	E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, Senior Revenue Bonds (LIBOR Index Series 2017B) FRNs, 2.544% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +1.050%), 9/1/2021	$6,050,520
8,500,000		University of Colorado Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2017 C-1), 4.00% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 9/1/2019	8,636,000
		TOTAL	35,340,425
		Connecticut—1.9%
15,000,000	1	Connecticut State HEFA (Yale-New Haven Hospital), Revenue Bonds (Series 2014B Floating Rate Note) FRNs, 1.96% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.550%), Mandatory Tender 7/1/2019	15,000,750
6,355,000	1	Connecticut State, UT GO SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013A) FRNs, 2.21% (SIFMA 7-day +0.650%), 3/1/2020	6,373,303
4,000,000	1	Connecticut State, UT GO SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013A) FRNs, 2.31% (SIFMA 7-day +0.750%), 3/1/2021	4,021,640
3,065,000	1	Connecticut State, UT GO SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013A) FRNs, 2.41% (SIFMA 7-day +0.850%), 3/1/2022	3,092,033
1,500,000	1	Connecticut State, UT GO SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013A) FRNs, 2.46% (SIFMA 7-day +0.900%), 3/1/2023	1,516,170
15,000,000	1	Connecticut State, UT GO SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013D) FRNs, 2.44% (SIFMA 7-day +0.880%), 8/15/2019	15,095,400
		TOTAL	45,099,296
		Florida—0.8%
4,500,000		Miami-Dade County, FL IDA (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2006), 1.50%, 10/1/2018	4,500,000
5,000,000		Orlando, FL Utilities Commission, Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017A), 3.00% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2020	5,082,650
10,000,000		Orlando, FL Utilities Commission, Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017A), 5.00% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2020	10,554,200
		TOTAL	20,136,850
		Georgia—3.3%
1,250,000		Atlanta, GA (Atlantic Station Project), Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (Series 2017), 5.00%, 12/1/2018	1,255,938
1,100,000		Atlanta, GA (Atlantic Station Project), Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (Series 2017), 5.00%, 12/1/2019	1,134,650
1,000,000		Atlanta, GA (Atlantic Station Project), Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (Series 2017), 5.00%, 12/1/2020	1,053,610
1,125,000		Atlanta, GA (Atlantic Station Project), Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (Series 2017), 5.00%, 12/1/2021	1,209,656
4,100,000		Bartow County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power Co.), Bowen Project PCRBs (First Series 1997), 2.05% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 11/19/2021	3,993,974

Annual Shareholder Report

12

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		Georgia—continued
$20,000,000		Burke County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power Co.), Vogtle Project Revenue Refunding Bonds, 1.85% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 8/22/2019	$19,846,200
22,500,000	1	Gainesville & Hall County, GA Hospital Authority (Northeast Georgia Health System, Inc.), Revenue Anticipation Certificates (Series 2014B) FRNs, 2.51% (SIFMA 7-day +0.950%), 2/18/2020	22,582,800
22,000,000	1	Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2018) FRNs (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 2.16%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.750%), Mandatory Tender 9/1/2023	21,872,620
2,500,000		Monroe County, GA Development Authority Pollution Control (Georgia Power Co.), Scherer Project PCRBs (First Series 2009), 2.05% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 11/19/2021	2,435,350
3,750,000		Monroe County, GA Development Authority Pollution Control (Gulf Power Co.), PCRBs (Plant Scherer First Series 2010), 1.40% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 9/19/2019	3,702,862
		TOTAL	79,087,660
		Hawaii—0.9%
6,500,000	1	Honolulu, HI City & County, Honolulu Rail Transit Project GO Bonds (Series 2017H) FRNs, 1.88%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.320%), 9/1/2020	6,497,725
8,000,000	1	Honolulu, HI City & County, Honolulu Rail Transit Project GO Bonds (Series 2017H) FRNs, 1.88%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.320%), 9/1/2020	7,997,200
7,500,000	1	Honolulu, HI City & County, Honolulu Rail Transit Project GO Bonds (Series 2017H) FRNs, 1.88%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.320%), 9/1/2020	7,497,375
		TOTAL	21,992,300
		Illinois—1.7%
2,000,000		Chicago, IL Water Revenue, Second Lien Water Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004), 5.00%, 11/1/2018	2,004,760
3,250,000		Chicago, IL Water Revenue, Second Lien Water Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004), 5.00%, 11/1/2019	3,343,048
4,000,000		Chicago, IL Water Revenue, Second Lien Water Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004), 5.00%, 11/1/2020	4,206,440
4,000,000		Chicago, IL Water Revenue, Second Lien Water Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004), 5.00%, 11/1/2021	4,283,560
1,375,000		Illinois Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017), 5.00%, 5/15/2020	1,399,750
1,705,000		Illinois Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017), 5.00%, 5/15/2021	1,747,778
10,000,000		Illinois State, GO Bonds (Series 2017D), 5.00%, 11/1/2020	10,390,000
5,000,000		Illinois State, GO Bonds (Series 2017D), 5.00%, 11/1/2021	5,217,100
3,000,000		Illinois State, GO Bonds (Series 2017D), 5.00%, 11/1/2022	3,148,680
2,000,000		Illinois State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 5.00%, 10/1/2021	2,085,240

Annual Shareholder Report

13

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		Illinois—continued
$3,000,000		Illinois State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 5.00%, 10/1/2022	$3,145,950
		TOTAL	40,972,306
		Indiana—3.8%
7,340,000		Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority (Ascension Health Alliance Subordinate Credit Group), Revenue Bonds (Series 2005 A-3), 1.35%TOBs, Mandatory Tender 8/4/2020	7,208,614
1,845,000		Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority (Ascension Health Alliance Subordinate Credit Group), Revenue Bonds (Series 2005 A-5), 1.35%TOBs, Mandatory Tender 8/4/2020	1,811,974
5,000,000		Indiana State EDA (Republic Services, Inc.), (Series 2012), 1.90%TOBs, Mandatory Tender 12/3/2018	4,998,300
5,000,000		Indiana State EDA (Republic Services, Inc.), (Series A), 1.90% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 12/3/2018	4,998,300
70,000,000	1	Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities (BP PLC), Environmental Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2014) FRNs, 2.31% (SIFMA 7-day +0.750%), 12/2/2019	70,137,900
		TOTAL	89,155,088
		Iowa—0.2%
4,000,000	1	lowa Finance Authority, Single Family Mortgage Bonds (Series 2018B) FRNs, 1.86%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.300%), 5/3/2021	4,006,760
		Kansas—0.3%
6,000,000	1	Kansas State Department of Transportation, Highway Revenue Refunding Index Bonds (Series 2014B-5) FRNs, 1.81% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.400%), 9/1/2019	6,009,480
		Kentucky—1.5%
8,000,000		Carroll County, KY (Kentucky Utilities Company), PCR Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016A), 1.05% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 9/1/2019	7,913,600
5,000,000		Kentucky EDFA (Republic Services, Inc.), (Series A), 1.90% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 12/3/2018	4,998,300
7,855,000		Kentucky State Rural Water Finance Corp., Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 4.00%, 2/1/2019	7,907,000
6,500,000		Louisville & Jefferson County, KY Metropolitan Government (Louisville Gas & Electric Co.), Environmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017A), 1.25% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 6/3/2019	6,457,880
8,000,000		Public Energy Authority of Kentucky, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2018B), 4.00% TOBs, (BP PLC GTD), Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024	8,438,320
		TOTAL	35,715,100
		Maryland—0.2%
6,000,000		Rockville, MD Mayor & City Council Econ Dev Revenue (King Farm Presbyterian Retirement Community, Inc.), Paydown Securities TEMPS-45 (Series 2017C-3), 2.50%, 11/1/2024	5,883,420

Annual Shareholder Report

14

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		Massachusetts—1.7%
$11,000,000	1	Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Partners Healthcare Systems), Index Floating Rate Bonds (Series 2017S) FRNs, 1.98%(SIFMA 7-day +0.420%), 1/27/2022	$11,004,180
12,000,000	1	Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Partners Healthcare Systems), Index Floating Rate Bonds (Series 2017S) FRNs, 2.06%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.500%), 1/26/2023	12,055,800
7,650,000	1	Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Partners Healthcare Systems), Revenue Bonds (Series 2015O-3) FRNs, 2.04% (SIFMA 7-day +0.480%), 1/29/2020	7,657,574
5,700,000		Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Partners Healthcare Systems), Revenue Bonds (Series 2017 S-4), 5.00% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 1/25/2024	6,398,706
4,000,000	1	Massachusetts State HFA (Massachusetts State HFA SFH Revenue), Single Family Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 196) FRNs, 1.823%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.350%), 6/1/2021	4,000,200
		TOTAL	41,116,460
		Michigan—2.4%
20,000,000	1	Michigan State Finance Authority (Trinity Healthcare Credit Group), Hospital Revenue Bonds, (Series 2015MI) FRNs, 2.034% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.540%), 12/1/2020	20,057,600
10,000,000		Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority (Ascension Health Alliance Senior Credit Group), Refunding and Project Revenue Bonds (Series 2010F-2), 1.90% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 4/1/2021	9,874,700
14,000,000	1	Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority (McLaren Health Care Corp.), Hospital Revenue Refunding Floating Rate Bonds (Series 2015D-1) FRNs, 1.916%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.68 +0.400%), 10/15/2021	13,980,820
12,285,000	1	Michigan State Housing Development Authority, Rental Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2016E) FRNs, 2.616% (3-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +1.000%), 10/1/2021	12,425,418
		TOTAL	56,338,538
		Minnesota—0.9%
7,000,000		Kanabec Co., MN Healthcare (FirstLight Health System), Healthcare Revenue BANs (Series 2018), 2.75%, 12/1/2019	6,984,740
6,500,000		Minnesota Rural Water Finance Authority, Public Project Construction Notes (Series 2017), 1.05%, 3/1/2019	6,460,480
7,000,000	1	Minnesota State HFA, Residential Housing Finance Bonds (Series 2018D) FRNs, 1.99%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.430%), 7/3/2023	7,000,000
		TOTAL	20,445,220
		Mississippi—1.2%
7,325,000	1	Mississippi State, UT GO Bonds (Series 2017B) FRNs, 1.74%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.330%), 9/1/2020	7,333,277
15,000,000		South Central Regional Medical Center, MS Hospital Revenue, Facilities Improvement and Refinancing Hospital Revenue Notes (Series 2017), 1.70%, 3/1/2020	14,803,350

Annual Shareholder Report

15

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		Mississippi—continued
$5,765,000		Southwest Mississippi Regional Medical Center, Hospital Revenue Notes (Series 2018A), 2.10%, 6/1/2019	$5,740,384
		TOTAL	27,877,011
		Montana—0.7%
13,000,000	1	Montana Facility Finance Authority (Billings Clinic Obligated Group), Variable Rate Revenue Bonds (Series 2018C) FRNs, 2.04%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.550%), 8/15/2023	13,000,000
3,500,000	1	Montana State University (The Board of Regents of), Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2018F) FRNs, 1.93%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.450%), 9/1/2023	3,500,000
		TOTAL	16,500,000
		Multi State—1.0%
1,094,420	1	BB&T Muni Trust, Tax-Exempt Pool Certificates (Series 2014 Class D) FRNs (Cooperatieve Rabobank UA LOC), 2.36% (SIFMA 7-day +0.800%), 11/15/2019	1,094,431
13,384,228	1	BB&T Muni Trust, Tax-Exempt Pool Certificates (Series 2016 Class C) FRNs (Cooperatieve Rabobank UA LOC), 2.61% (SIFMA 7-day +1.050%), 12/31/2019	13,384,362
7,935,000	1	BB&T Muni Trust, Tax-Exempt Pool Certificates (Series 2016 Class D) FRNs (Cooperatieve Rabobank UA LOC), 2.81% (SIFMA 7-day +1.250%), 12/31/2021	7,935,000
1,900,000	1	Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Institutional MuniFund Term Preferred Shares (Series 2019) FRNs, 2.61% (SIFMA 7-day +1.050%), 7/1/2019	1,899,867
		TOTAL	24,313,660
		Nevada—1.4%
27,000,000		Clark County, NV Airport System, Airport System Junior Subordinate Lien Revenue Notes (Series 2017C), 5.00%, 7/1/2021	28,877,040
5,000,000		Washoe County, NV Gas Facilities Revenue (Sierra Pacific Power Co.), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016A), 1.50% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 6/3/2019	4,968,600
		TOTAL	33,845,640
		New Hampshire—0.4%
10,000,000	1	National Finance Authority, NH (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2018A) FRNs, 2.31%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.750%), 10/1/2021	10,000,000
		New Jersey—6.5%
19,023,000		Asbury Park, NJ, 2.50% BANs, 1/25/2019	19,040,311
7,000,000		Jersey City, NJ, 2.50% BANs, 12/7/2018	7,010,220
10,000,000		New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Facilities Construction Refunding Bonds (Series 2015 XX), 5.00%, 6/15/2019	10,186,800

Annual Shareholder Report

16

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		New Jersey—continued
$25,000,000	1	New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority (New Jersey State), Transportation Program Notes (SIFMA Index Multimodal Notes) (Series 2014BB) FRNs, 2.56% (SIFMA 7-day +1.000%), 12/15/2019	$25,041,750
7,000,000	1	New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017 C-2) FRNs, 1.953%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.480%), 1/1/2022	7,013,930
30,000,000	1	New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017 C-5) FRNs, 1.933%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.460%), 1/1/2021	30,075,900
20,000,000	1	New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017 C-6) FRNs, 2.223%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.750%), 1/1/2023	20,171,000
10,582,031		Newark, NJ, (Series 2018A), 3.00% BANs, 7/31/2019	10,636,529
6,264,000		Orange Township, NJ, 2.50% BANs, 12/7/2018	6,270,264
3,095,535		Sea Bright, NJ, 2.50% BANs, 12/7/2018	3,098,166
3,500,000		Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NJ, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 5.00%, 6/1/2019	3,567,865
3,000,000		Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NJ, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 5.00%, 6/1/2020	3,136,410
3,500,000		Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NJ, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 5.00%, 6/1/2021	3,739,925
2,000,000		Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NJ, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 5.00%, 6/1/2022	2,176,140
3,405,000		Upper Township, NJ, 2.50% BANs, 1/25/2019	3,410,039
		TOTAL	154,575,249
		New Mexico—1.0%
5,000,000		Farmington, NM (Public Service Co., NM), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2016B), 1.875% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2021	4,883,400
19,350,000	1	New Mexico Municipal Energy Acquisition Authority, Gas Supply Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2014B) FRNs (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 2.16% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.750%), Mandatory Tender 8/1/2019	19,365,674
		TOTAL	24,249,074
		New York—5.2%
12,000,000	1	Long Island Power Authority, NY, Electric System General Revenue Bonds (Series 2014C) (LIBOR Floating Rate Tender Notes) FRNs, 2.31% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.650%), 10/1/2023	11,988,720
3,000,000	1	Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Dedicated Tax Fund), Dedicated Tax Fund Refunding Bonds (Series 2008B-3c) (Floating Rate Tender Notes) FRNs, 2.01% (SIFMA 7-day +0.450%), 11/1/2019	3,003,480
3,525,000	1	Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Dedicated Tax Fund), Dedicated Tax Fund Variable Rate Bonds (Series 2008A-2A) FRNs, 2.01% (SIFMA 7-day +0.450%), 6/1/2022	3,523,026

Annual Shareholder Report

17

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		New York—continued
$14,000,000	1	Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Dedicated Tax Fund), Dedicated Tax Fund Variable Rate Bonds (Subseries 2002B-3b) FRNs, 2.46% (SIFMA 7-day +0.900%), 11/1/2018	$14,007,000
15,000,000	1	Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Dedicated Tax Fund), Dedicated Tax Fund Variable Rate Bonds (Subseries 2002B-3c) FRNs, 2.51% (SIFMA 7-day +0.950%), 11/1/2019	15,111,900
7,000,000	1	Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Transportation Revenue), Transportation Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bonds (Series 2002D-2A) FRNs (AGM INS), 2.022% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.69 +0.570%), 4/6/2020	7,022,750
9,000,000	1	Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Transportation Revenue), Transportation Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bonds (Series 2002D-A2) FRNs (AGM INS), 2.132% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.69 +0.680%), 4/6/2021	9,053,730
10,000,000	1	Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Transportation Revenue), Transportation Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bonds (Series 2002G-3) FRNs, 2.11% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.700%), 2/1/2020	10,038,200
28,000,000	1	Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Transportation Revenue), Transportation Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bonds (Series 2011B) FRNs, 1.96% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.550%), 11/1/2022	27,858,600
2,250,000		Rockland County, NY, LT GO Bonds (Series 2014A), 5.00% (AGM INS), 3/1/2019	2,278,575
6,000,000	1	Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, NY, General Revenue Variable Rate Bonds (Series 2001B) FRNs, 1.716%, (SOFR x 0.67 +0.430%), 9/26/2019	6,000,000
9,905,000	1	Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, NY, Subordinate Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bond (Series 2016 4A) FRNs, 2.11%(1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.700%), 12/1/2021	9,983,745
4,000,000	1	Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, NY, Subordinate Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bonds (Series 2000ABCD-5) FRNs (AGM INS), 2.00% (SIFMA 7-day +0.440%), 1/1/2019	4,002,680
		TOTAL	123,872,406
		North Carolina—1.2%
6,250,000		North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency (Republic Services, Inc.), (Series 2013), 1.95% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 12/17/2018	6,248,063
13,000,000		North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency (Republic Services, Inc.), (Series B), 1.95% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 12/3/2018	12,996,620
10,000,000	1	University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, General Revenue Bonds (Series 2012B) FRNs, 1.81%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.400%), 11/9/2022	10,005,900
		TOTAL	29,250,583

Annual Shareholder Report

18

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		Ohio—2.8%
$6,205,000	1	Allen County, OH (Mercy Health), Adjustable Rate Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2015B) FRNs, 2.31% (SIFMA 7-day +0.750%), 5/1/2020	$6,206,489
2,750,000		Independence, OH, (Series 2), 2.00% BANs, 12/5/2018	2,750,770
40,000,000	1	Lancaster, OH Port Authority, Gas Supply Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2014) FRNs (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 2.13% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.720%), Mandatory Tender 8/1/2019	40,025,200
17,130,000	1	Ohio State Water Development Authority Pollution Control Facilities (Ohio State Water Development Authority), Water Pollution Control Loan Fund Revenue Notes (Series 2017B) FRNs, 1.78%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.220%), 12/1/2020	17,112,870
		TOTAL	66,095,329
		Oregon—0.1%
1,265,000		Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon, Payroll Tax & Grant Receipt Revenue Bonds (Series 2013), 5.00%, 11/1/2018	1,266,910
		Pennsylvania—5.6%
8,145,000	1	Bethlehem, PA Area School District Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2018) FRNs, 1.906%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.480%), 11/1/2021	8,130,746
10,000,000	1	Bethlehem, PA Area School District Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A) FRNs, 1.899%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.480%), 11/1/2021	9,982,500
5,450,000		Lehigh County, PA IDA (PPL Electric Utilities Corp.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2016B), 1.80% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 8/15/2022	5,251,402
1,250,000	1	Manheim Township, PA School District, GO LIBOR Notes (Series 2017A) FRNs, 1.651% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.68 +0.220%), 5/1/2019	1,250,213
1,320,000	1	Manheim Township, PA School District, GO LIBOR Notes (Series 2017A) FRNs, 1.701% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.68 +0.270%), 5/1/2020	1,323,010
1,500,000	1	Manheim Township, PA School District, GO LIBOR Notes (Series 2017A) FRNs, 1.751% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.68 +0.320%), 5/3/2021	1,505,280
1,850,000	1	Manheim Township, PA School District, GO LIBOR Notes (Series 2017A) FRNs, 1.851% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.68 +0.420%), 11/1/2021	1,860,230
3,400,000	1	Manheim Township, PA School District, GO LIBOR Notes (Series 2017A) FRNs, 1.90% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.68 +0.470%), 11/1/2021	3,420,094
5,000,000	1	Montgomery County, PA Higher Education & Health Authority Hospital (Thomas Jefferson University), Revenue Bonds (Series 2018C) FRNs, 2.28%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.720%), 9/1/2023	4,997,950
4,000,000		Montgomery County, PA IDA (Exelon Generation Co. LLC), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2002A), 2.55% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2020	3,990,240

Annual Shareholder Report

19

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		Pennsylvania—continued
$700,000	1	North Penn, PA Water Authority, Variable Rate Water Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2014) FRNs, 1.76% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.350%), 11/1/2018	$699,895
1,000,000	1	North Penn, PA Water Authority, Variable Rate Water Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2014) FRNs, 1.82% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.410%), 11/1/2019	999,070
4,000,000	1	North Penn, PA Water Authority, Variable Rate Water Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2014) FRNs, 1.91% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.500%), 11/1/2019	4,000,480
8,000,000	1	Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (St. Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem), Variable Rate Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2013B) FRNs, 2.96% (SIFMA 7-day +1.400%), 8/15/2020	8,082,960
4,000,000	1	Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (St. Luke's University Health Network), Variable Rate Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2018B) FRNs, 2.513%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +1.040%), 8/15/2024	4,005,880
10,150,000		Pennsylvania EDFA (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2017A), 1.70% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 8/3/2020	9,987,092
6,000,000	1	Pennsylvania HFA, SFM Revenue Bonds (Series 2018-127C) FRNs, 2.119%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.570%), 10/1/2023	5,997,240
4,000,000	1	Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Variable Rate Turnpike Revenue Bonds (SIFMA Index Bonds)(Series 2014B) FRNs, 2.44%(SIFMA 7-day +0.880%), 12/1/2020	4,034,880
10,000,000	1	Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Variable Rate Turnpike Revenue Bonds (SIFMA Index Bonds)(Series 2018A-1) FRNs, 2.16%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.600%), 12/1/2023	10,000,000
40,000,000	1	Pittsburgh, PA Water & Sewer Authority, First Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2018C) FRNs (AGM INS), 2.113%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.640%), 12/1/2020	40,031,600
4,400,000	1	Scranton, PA School District, GO Notes (Series 2014) (LIBOR Floating Rate Tender Notes) FRNs (State Aid Withholding GTD), 2.281% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.68 +1.000%), 4/1/2021	4,409,108
		TOTAL	133,959,870
		South Carolina—1.5%
25,000,000	1	Patriots Energy Group Financing Agency, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2018B) FRNs (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 2.27%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.860%), 2/1/2024	24,963,000
7,000,000		South Carolina Jobs-EDA (East Point Academy), Revenue Notes (Series 2017A), 2.25%, 5/1/2019	6,967,940
4,500,000	2	South Carolina Jobs-EDA (Royal Live Oaks Academy), Economic Development Revenue Notes (Series 2018A), 3.00%, 8/1/2020	4,492,710
		TOTAL	36,423,650
		Tennessee—0.2%
5,000,000		Monroe County, TN, UT GO BANs, 1.20%, 6/15/2019	4,980,400

Annual Shareholder Report

20

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		Texas—4.5%
$5,000,000		Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Senior Lien Revenue & Refunding Bonds (Series 2015B), 5.00% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 1/6/2021	$5,229,750
10,000,000	1	Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Memorial Hermann Health System), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2014B) FRNs, 2.14% (SIFMA 7-day +0.580%), Mandatory Tender 12/1/2019	10,018,900
2,250,000	1	Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Memorial Hermann Health System), Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2013B) FRNs, 2.26% (SIFMA 7-day +0.700%), 6/1/2019	2,256,998
2,000,000	1	Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Memorial Hermann Health System), Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2013B) FRNs, 2.31% (SIFMA 7-day +0.750%), 6/1/2020	2,015,820
3,710,000	1	Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Memorial Hermann Health System), Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2013B) FRNs, 2.39% (SIFMA 7-day +0.830%), 6/1/2021	3,756,449
8,000,000	1	Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Texas Children's Hospital), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2015-3) FRNs, 2.375% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.68 +0.850%), 6/1/2020	8,056,720
5,000,000	1	Houston, TX Combined Utility System, First Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2012A) FRNs, 2.46% (SIFMA 7-day +0.900%), 5/1/2020	5,032,600
5,000,000	1	Houston, TX Combined Utility System, First Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2018C) FRNs, 1.844%, (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.360%), 8/1/2021	4,991,150
5,000,000	1	Katy, TX ISD, Variable Rate UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2015C) FRNs (PSFG GTD), 1.996% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.550%), 8/15/2019	5,004,200
5,500,000		Mansfield, TX ISD, UT GO School Building Bonds (Series 2012), 2.50%TOBs (PSFG GTD), Mandatory Tender 8/1/2021	5,532,890
7,000,000		Matagorda County, TX Navigation District No. 1 (AEP Texas, Inc.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 1996), 1.75% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 9/1/2020	6,874,140
10,000,000	1	North Texas Tollway Authority, System First Tier Variable Rate Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2011A SIFMA Index Floating Rate) FRNs, 2.36% (SIFMA 7-day +0.800%), Mandatory Tender 1/1/2019	10,001,100
31,665,000	1	North Texas Tollway Authority, System First Tier Variable Rate Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2014C) (SIFMA Index Floating Rate Bonds) FRNs, 2.23% (SIFMA 7-day +0.670%), 1/1/2020	31,690,965
5,000,000		Texas State Transportation Commission—Central Texas Turnpike System, First Tier Revenue Refunding Put Bonds (Series 2015-A), 5.00% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 4/1/2020	5,201,300
		TOTAL	105,662,982
		Vermont—0.7%
16,000,000		Vermont EDA (B.C. Campus Holdings LLC), Bennington College Real Estate Project (Series 2017), 2.00% BANs, 7/1/2020	15,600,480

Annual Shareholder Report

21

Principal Amount			Value
		MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
		Virginia—0.2%
$5,000,000		Louisa, VA IDA (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2008C), 1.85% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 5/16/2019	$4,989,500
		Washington—1.7%
7,060,000	1	Everett, WA, LT Tax GO Refunding Bonds (SIFMA Index Floating) (Series 2014) FRNs, 1.96% (SIFMA 7-day +0.400%), 12/1/2019	7,066,636
5,000,000		Grant County, WA Public Utilities District NO. 2: Electric System, Electric System Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017N), 2.00%TOBs, 9/1/2020	4,966,300
5,725,000		Grays Harbor County, WA Public Hospital District No.1 (Summit Pacific Medical Center), Hospital Revenue BANs (Series 2017), 3.00%, 8/1/2019	5,706,222
5,000,000	1	Seattle, WA Municipal Light & Power, Refunding Revenue Bonds—SIFMA Index (Series 2018C) FRNs, 1.97%, (SIFMA 7-day +0.490%), 11/1/2023	5,000,000
10,000,000	1	Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center), Variable Rate LIBOR Index Revenue Bonds (Series 2017B) FRNs, 2.594% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +1.100%), 7/1/2022	10,105,200
7,000,000	1	Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center), Variable Rate SIMFA Index Revenue Bonds (Series 2017C) FRNs, 2.61% (SIFMA 7-day +1.050%), 7/3/2023	7,129,570
		TOTAL	39,973,928
		West Virginia—0.7%
9,000,000		Mason County, WV (Appalachian Power Co.), PCRBs, 1.625% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2018	9,000,000
7,000,000	1	West Virginia University Board of Governors (West Virginia University), Variable Rate Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2014C) FRNs, 2.09% (SIFMA 7-day +0.530%), 10/1/2019	7,004,200
		TOTAL	16,004,200
		Wisconsin—0.4%
4,000,000		Public Finance Authority, WI Revenue (Lake Oconee Academy Foundation, Inc.), LANs (Series 2017), 2.30%, 10/1/2019	3,973,960
4,500,000		Wisconsin State HEFA (Tomah Memorial Hospital, Inc.), Revenue and BANs (Series 2017A), 2.65%, 11/1/2020	4,464,810
		TOTAL	8,438,770
		TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (IDENTIFIED COST $1,732,819,194)	1,730,788,190
	1	SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—27.0%
		Alabama—0.5%
250,000		Bessemer, AL IDB (Hardwick Co., Inc.), (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 2.00%, 10/4/2018	250,000

Annual Shareholder Report

22

Principal Amount			Value
	1	SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—continued
		Alabama—continued
$12,300,000		Chelsea Park, AL Cooperative District, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 1.94%, 10/4/2018	$12,300,000
		TOTAL	12,550,000
		California—2.7%
2,500,000		California State Municipal Finance Authority (LAX Integrated Express Solutions LLC), (Series 2018-XF2615) Weekly VRDNs (Barclays Bank PLC LIQ)/(Barclays Bank PLC LOC), 1.76%, 10/4/2018	2,500,000
60,000,000		Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, (Series A) Daily VRDNs, 1.86%, 10/1/2018	60,000,000
		TOTAL	62,500,000
		Georgia—3.5%
5,440,000		Bartow County, GA Development Authority (Somerset Cove Apartments, LP), (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 2.19%, 10/4/2018	5,440,000
32,900,000		Burke County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power Co.), (1st Series 2009) Daily VRDNs, 1.93%, 10/1/2018	32,900,000
4,050,000		Burke County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power Co.), (Second Series 1995) Daily VRDNs, 1.94%, 10/1/2018	4,050,000
40,400,000		Gainesville & Hall County, GA Hospital Authority (Northeast Georgia Health System, Inc.), R-Float (Series 2017C) Weekly VRENs, 1.80%, 10/4/2018	40,400,000
		TOTAL	82,790,000
		Illinois—2.2%
18,725,000		Chicago, IL Board of Education, (Series 2017-XG0108) Weekly VRDNs (Barclays Bank PLC LIQ)/(Barclays Bank PLC LOC), 1.74%, 10/4/2018	18,725,000
19,505,000		Illinois Housing Development Authority, TOB Trust Certificates (2016-XG0093) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Deutsche Bank AG GTD)/(Deutsche Bank AG LIQ), 1.86%, 10/4/2018	19,505,000
14,775,000		Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL, TOB Trust Certificates (2015-XF1045) Weekly VRDNs (Deutsche Bank AG GTD)/(Deutsche Bank AG LIQ), 1.89%, 10/4/2018	14,775,000
		TOTAL	53,005,000
		Indiana—0.8%
19,325,000		Indiana State Finance Authority Environmental (Mittal Steel USA, Inc.), (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA LOC), 1.74%, 10/3/2018	19,325,000
		Louisiana—1.1%
10,300,000		St. James Parish, LA (Nucor Steel Louisiana LLC), (Series 2010A-1) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp. GTD), 1.70%, 10/3/2018	10,300,000
16,425,000		St. James Parish, LA (Nucor Steel Louisiana LLC), (Series 2010B-1) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp. GTD), 1.70%, 10/3/2018	16,425,000
		TOTAL	26,725,000

Annual Shareholder Report

23

Principal Amount			Value
	1	SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—continued
		Michigan—0.3%
$7,575,000		Detroit, MI City School District, TOB Trust Receipts (2015-XF0241) Weekly VRDNs (AGM GTD)/(TD Bank, N.A. LIQ), 1.81%, 10/4/2018	$7,575,000
		Nebraska—0.2%
800,000		Stanton County, NE (Nucor Corp.), (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs, 1.75%, 10/3/2018	800,000
2,525,000		Stanton County, NE (Nucor Corp.), (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs, 1.75%, 10/3/2018	2,525,000
		TOTAL	3,325,000
		New Jersey—1.6%
11,765,000		New Jersey EDA (Jewish Community Center on the Palisades), (Series 2016) Weekly VRDNs (Valley National Bank, Passaic, NJ LOC), 1.86%, 10/5/2018	11,765,000
6,835,000		New Jersey EDA (Jewish Home at Rockleigh), (Series 1998A) Weekly VRDNs (Valley National Bank, Passaic, NJ LOC), 1.86%, 10/5/2018	6,835,000
6,835,000		New Jersey EDA (Jewish Home at Rockleigh), (Series 1998B) Weekly VRDNs (Valley National Bank, Passaic, NJ LOC), 1.86%, 10/5/2018	6,835,000
12,385,000		New Jersey State EDA (New Jersey State), TOB Trust Certificates (2015-XF1048) Weekly VRDNs (Deutsche Bank AG GTD)/(Deutsche Bank AG LIQ), 1.76%, 10/4/2018	12,385,000
		TOTAL	37,820,000
		New York—1.6%
5,500,000		New York City, NY TFA, New York City Recovery Bonds (2003 Subseries 2-E) Weekly VRDNs (Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 1.70%, 10/3/2018	5,500,000
31,500,000		Nuveen New York AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, 800 (Series A) Munifund Preferred Shares Daily VRDPs, 1.86%, 10/1/2018	31,500,000
		TOTAL	37,000,000
		North Carolina—0.4%
1,000,000		Hertford County, NC Industrial Facilities & PCFA (Nucor Corp.), (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs, 1.74%, 10/3/2018	1,000,000
7,725,000		North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, TOB Trust Certificates (Series 2017-XG0135) Weekly VRDNs (Deutsche Bank AG LIQ), 1.76%, 10/4/2018	7,725,000
		TOTAL	8,725,000
		Ohio—0.2%
5,000,000		Ohio State Higher Educational Facility Commission, (University Hospitals Health System, Inc.), (Series 2015-B) Weekly VRENs, 1.81%, 10/4/2018	5,000,000
500,000		Ohio State Hospital Revenue (University Hospitals Health System, Inc.), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2014B) Daily VRENs, 1.81%, 10/1/2018	500,000
		TOTAL	5,500,000

Annual Shareholder Report

24

Principal Amount			Value
	1	SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—continued
		Pennsylvania—1.9%
$41,495,000		Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority (Thomas Jefferson University), VRMOs (Series 2015B) Weekly VRENs, 1.81%, 10/4/2018	$41,495,000
4,000,000		Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, TOB Trust Certificates (Series 2017-XF1060) Weekly VRDNs (Deutsche Bank AG LIQ), 1.71%, 10/4/2018	4,000,000
		TOTAL	45,495,000
		Tennessee—0.0%
300,000		Jackson, TN IDB (Bobrick Washroom Equipment), (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 2.00%, 10/4/2018	300,000
		Texas—8.4%
13,650,000		Port of Corpus Christi Authority of Nueces County, TX (Flint Hills Resources LLC), (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Flint Hills Resources LLC GTD), 1.68%, 10/3/2018	13,650,000
25,000,000		Port of Corpus Christi Authority of Nueces County, TX (Flint Hills Resources LLC), (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Flint Hills Resources LLC GTD), 1.74%, 10/3/2018	25,000,000
11,250,000		Port of Corpus Christi Authority of Nueces County, TX (Flint Hills Resources LLC), (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Flint Hills Resources LLC GTD), 1.74%, 10/3/2018	11,250,000
69,200,000		Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX (Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs, 1.95%, 10/3/2018	69,200,000
12,310,000		Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX (Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2010A) Daily VRDNs, 1.80%, 10/1/2018	12,310,000
2,215,000		Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX (Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2010B) Daily VRDNs, 1.80%, 10/1/2018	2,215,000
18,650,000		Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX (Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2010C) Daily VRDNs, 1.85%, 10/1/2018	18,650,000
12,325,000		Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX (Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2010D) Weekly VRDNs, 1.80%, 10/3/2018	12,325,000
35,000,000		Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX (Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2010E) Weekly VRDNs, 1.81%, 10/3/2018	35,000,000
		TOTAL	199,600,000
		Wisconsin—1.6%
38,035,000		Public Finance Authority, WI Special Facilities (Austin FBO LLC), Golden Blue 3a7 (Series 2018-015) Weekly VRENs (Barclays Bank PLC LIQ)/(Barclays Bank PLC LOC), 2.06%, 10/4/2018	38,035,000
		TOTAL SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS (IDENTIFIED COST $640,270,000)	640,270,000
		TOTAL INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES—99.9% (IDENTIFIED COST $2,373,089,194)3	2,371,058,190
		OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET—0.1%4	1,982,546
		TOTAL NET ASSETS—100%	$2,373,040,736

Annual Shareholder Report

25

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 18.1% of the Fund's portfolio as calculated based upon total market value. (Unaudited)

1	Current rate and current maturity or next reset date shown for floating rate notes and variable rate notes/demand instruments. Certain variable rate securities are not based on a published reference rate and spread but are determined by the issuer or agent and are based on current market conditions. These securities do not indicate a reference rate and spread in their description above.
2	Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or availing of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At September 30, 2018, these restricted securities amounted to $8,506,950, which represented 0.4% of total net assets.
3	The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $2,373,052,661.
4	Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at September 30, 2018.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.

Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). Also includes securities valued at amortized cost.

Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).

The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

As of September 30, 2018, all investments of the Fund utilized Level 2 inputs in valuing the Fund's assets carried at fair value.

Annual Shareholder Report

26

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AGM	—Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMT	—Alternative Minimum Tax
ARS	—Auction Rate Securities
BANs	—Bond Anticipation Notes
COL	—Collateralized
EDA	—Economic Development Authority
EDFA	—Economic Development Finance Authority
FRNs	—Floating Rate Notes
GNMA	—Government National Mortgage Association
GO	—General Obligation
GTD	—Guaranteed
HEFA	—Health and Education Facilities Authority
HFA	—Housing Finance Authority
IDA	—Industrial Development Authority
IDB	—Industrial Development Bond
INS	—Insured
ISD	—Independent School District
LANs	—Loan Anticipation Notes
LIBOR	—London Interbank Offered Rate
LIQ	—Liquidity Agreement
LOC	—Letter of Credit
LT	—Limited Tax
PCFA	—Pollution Control Finance Authority
PCR	—Pollution Control Revenue
PCRBs	—Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
PSFG	—Public School Fund Guarantee
SFH	—Single Family Housing
SFM	—Single Family Mortgage
SIFMA	—Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
SOFR	—Secured Overnight Financing Rate
TEMPS	—Tax Exempt Mandatory Paydown Securities
TFA	—Transitional Finance Authority
TOBs	—Tender Option Bonds
UT	—Unlimited Tax
VRDNs	—Variable Rate Demand Notes
VRDPs	—Variable Rate Demand Preferreds
VRENs	—Variable Rate Extendible Notes
VRMOs	—Variable Rate Remarketed Obligations

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Annual Shareholder Report

27

Financial Highlights–Class A Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended September 30	2018	2017	2016	2015	2014
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period	$10.01	$9.99	$10.00	$10.05	$10.02
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income	0.10	0.05	0.03	0.01	0.03
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)	(0.03)	0.02	(0.01)	(0.05)	0.03
TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS	0.07	0.07	0.02	(0.04)	0.06
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income	(0.10)	(0.05)	(0.03)	(0.01)	(0.03)
Net Asset Value, End of Period	$9.98	$10.01	$9.99	$10.00	$10.05
Total Return1	0.65%	0.74%	0.21%	(0.35)%	0.56%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
Net expenses	0.81%2	0.81%2	0.81%	0.80%	0.80%2
Net investment income	0.94%	0.54%	0.30%	0.14%	0.26%
Expense waiver/reimbursement3	0.17%	0.17%	0.21%	0.23%	0.22%
Supplemental Data:
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)	$661,860	$799,292	$785,216	$1,021,204	$1,362,615
Portfolio turnover	87%	88%	29%	46%	62%

1	Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable.
2	The net expense ratio is calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratio is 0.81%, 0.81% and 0.80% for the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2014, respectively, after taking into account this expense reduction.
3	This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Annual Shareholder Report

28

Financial Highlights–Institutional Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended September 30	2018	2017	2016	2015	2014
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period	$10.01	$9.99	$10.00	$10.05	$10.02
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income	0.14	0.10	0.08	0.06	0.07
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)	(0.03)	0.02	(0.01)	(0.05)	0.03
TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS	0.11	0.12	0.07	0.01	0.10
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income	(0.14)	(0.10)	(0.08)	(0.06)	(0.07)
Net Asset Value, End of Period	$9.98	$10.01	$9.99	$10.00	$10.05
Total Return1	1.11%	1.19%	0.66%	0.10%	1.01%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
Net expenses	0.36%2	0.36%2	0.35%	0.35%	0.35%2
Net investment income	1.39%	0.99%	0.75%	0.59%	0.71%
Expense waiver/reimbursement3	0.12%	0.12%	0.16%	0.18%	0.17%
Supplemental Data:
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)	$1,711,181	$1,864,456	$1,518,382	$1,912,653	$2,198,711
Portfolio turnover	87%	88%	29%	46%	62%

1	Based on net asset value.
2	The net expense ratio is calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratio is 0.36%, 0.36% and 0.35% for the years ended September 30, 2018, 2017 and 2014, respectively, after taking into account this expense reduction.
3	This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Annual Shareholder Report

29

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

September 30, 2018

Assets:
Investment in securities, at value (identified cost $2,373,089,194)		$2,371,058,190
Cash		48,387
Receivable for shares sold		28,297,175
Income receivable		8,304,298
Receivable for investments sold		421,036
TOTAL ASSETS		2,408,129,086
Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased	$23,000,000
Payable for shares redeemed	10,628,060
Income distribution payable	730,429
Payable for other service fees (Notes 2 and 5)	173,767
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)	111,155
Payable for investment adviser fee (Note 5)	40,847
Payable for administrative fee (Note 5)	15,504
Accrued expenses (Note 5)	388,588
TOTAL LIABILITIES		35,088,350
Net assets for 237,671,811 shares outstanding		$2,373,040,736
Net Assets Consists of:
Paid-in capital		$2,376,695,815
Net unrealized depreciation		(2,031,004)
Accumulated net realized loss		(1,647,572)
Undistributed net investment income		23,497
TOTAL NET ASSETS		$2,373,040,736
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
Class A Shares:
Net asset value per share ($661,859,669 ÷ 66,287,088 shares outstanding) $0.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized		$9.98
Offering price per share (100/98.00 of $9.98)		$10.18
Redemption proceeds per share		$9.98
Institutional Shares:
Net asset value per share ($1,711,181,067 ÷ 171,384,723 shares outstanding) $0.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized		$9.98
Offering price per share		$9.98
Redemption proceeds per share		$9.98

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Annual Shareholder Report

30

Statement of Operations

Year Ended September 30, 2018

Investment Income:
Interest			$44,542,405
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)		$8,577,708
Administrative fee (Note 5)		2,035,720
Custodian fees		88,142
Transfer agent fees		993,580
Directors'/Trustees' fees (Note 5)		24,754
Auditing fees		33,990
Legal fees		9,579
Distribution services fee (Note 5)		1,870,670
Other service fees (Notes 2 and 5)		1,869,767
Portfolio accounting fees		277,864
Share registration costs		108,982
Printing and postage		28,990
Taxes		150
Miscellaneous (Note 5)		39,461
TOTAL EXPENSES		15,959,357
Waivers and Reduction:
Waiver of investment adviser fee (Note 5)	$(3,005,145)
Waiver of other operating expenses (Note 5)	(373,231)
Reduction of custodian fees (Note 6)	(5,199)
TOTAL WAIVERS AND REDUCTION		(3,383,575)
Net expenses			12,575,782
Net investment income			31,966,623
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments:
Net realized loss on investments			(1,615,624)
Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments			(3,940,292)
Net realized and unrealized loss on investments			(5,555,916)
Change in net assets resulting from operations			$26,410,707

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Annual Shareholder Report

31

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended September 30	2018	2017
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income	$31,966,623	$21,390,855
Net realized gain (loss)	(1,615,624)	1,284,474
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation	(3,940,292)	3,706,967
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS	26,410,707	26,382,296
Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Class A Shares	(7,043,660)	(4,232,792)
Institutional Shares	(24,972,072)	(17,130,015)
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS	(32,015,732)	(21,362,807)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares	1,634,848,545	1,765,355,092
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared	24,908,702	17,272,214
Cost of shares redeemed	(1,944,859,203)	(1,427,497,119)
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS	(285,101,956)	355,130,187
Change in net assets	(290,706,981)	360,149,676
Net Assets:
Beginning of period	2,663,747,717	2,303,598,041
End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $23,497 and $71,321, respectively)	$2,373,040,736	$2,663,747,717

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Annual Shareholder Report

32

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2018

1. ORGANIZATION

Federated Fixed Income Securities, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Corporation consists of two portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund (the “Fund”), a diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolio are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. Each portfolio pays its own expenses. The Fund offers two classes of shares: Class A Shares and Institutional Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal regular income tax. Interest income from the Fund's investments may be subject to the federal AMT for individuals and state and local taxes.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

Investment Valuation

In calculating its net asset value (NAV), the Fund generally values investments as follows:

■	Fixed-income securities are fair valued using price evaluations provided by a pricing service approved by the Fund's Board of Directors (the “Directors”).
■	Shares of other mutual funds or non-exchange-traded investment companies are valued based upon their reported NAVs.
■	Derivative contracts listed on exchanges are valued at their reported settlement or closing price, except that options are valued at the mean of closing bid and asked quotations.
■	Over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts are fair valued using price evaluations provided by a pricing service approved by the Directors.
■	For securities that are fair valued in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Directors, certain factors may be considered such as: the last traded or purchase price of the security, information obtained by contacting the issuer or dealers, analysis of the issuer's financial statements or other available documents, fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, the movement of the market in which the security is normally traded, public trading in similar securities or derivative contracts of the issuer or comparable issuers, movement of a relevant index, or other factors including but not limited to industry changes and relevant government actions.

If any price, quotation, price evaluation or other pricing source is not readily available when the NAV is calculated, if the Fund cannot obtain price evaluations from a pricing service or from more than one dealer for an investment within a reasonable period of time as set forth in the Fund's valuation policies and procedures, or if information furnished by a pricing service, in the opinion of the valuation committee (“Valuation Committee”), is deemed not representative of the fair value of such security, the Fund uses the fair value of the investment determined in accordance with the procedures described below. There can be no assurance that the Fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it sold the investment at approximately the time at which the Fund determines its NAV per share.

Annual Shareholder Report

33

Fair Valuation Procedures

The Directors have ultimate responsibility for determining the fair value of investments for which market quotations are not readily available. The Directors have appointed a Valuation Committee comprised of officers of the Fund, Federated Investment Management Company (the “Adviser”) and certain of the Adviser's affiliated companies to assist in determining fair value and in overseeing the calculation of the NAV. The Directors have also authorized the use of pricing services recommended by the Valuation Committee to provide fair value evaluations of the current value of certain investments for purposes of calculating the NAV. The Valuation Committee employs various methods for reviewing third-party pricing-service evaluations including periodic reviews of third-party pricing services' policies, procedures and valuation methods (including key inputs, methods, models and assumptions), transactional back-testing, comparisons of evaluations of different pricing services and review of price challenges by the Adviser based on recent market activity. In the event that market quotations and price evaluations are not available for an investment, the Valuation Committee determines the fair value of the investment in accordance with procedures adopted by the Directors. The Directors periodically review and approve the fair valuations made by the Valuation Committee and any changes made to the procedures.

Factors considered by pricing services in evaluating an investment include the yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, call rights and other potential prepayments, terms and type, reported transactions, indications as to values from dealers and general market conditions. Some pricing services provide a single price evaluation reflecting the bid-side of the market for an investment (a “bid” evaluation). Other pricing services offer both bid evaluations and price evaluations indicative of a price between the prices bid and asked for the investment (a “mid” evaluation). The Fund normally uses bid evaluations for any U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. The Fund normally uses mid evaluations for any other types of fixed-income securities and any OTC derivative contracts. In the event that market quotations and price evaluations are not available for an investment, the fair value of the investment is determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Directors.

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses and Distributions

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified-cost basis. Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Dividend income and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Amortization/accretion of premium and discount is included in investment income. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that select classes will bear certain expenses unique to those classes. The detail of the total fund expense waivers and reduction of $3,383,575 is disclosed in various locations in Note 5 and Note 6.

Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Annual Shareholder Report

34

Other Service Fees

The Fund may pay other service fees up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares to unaffiliated financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for other service fees. For the year ended September 30, 2018, other service fees for the Fund were as follows:

	Other Service Fees Incurred
Class A Shares	$1,869,767

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary. As of and during the year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund did not have a liability for any uncertain tax positions. The Fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to tax liabilities as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. As of September 30, 2018, tax years 2015 through 2018 remain subject to examination by the Fund's major tax jurisdictions, which include the United States of America, the state of Maryland and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

When-Issued and Delayed-Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed-delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

The Fund may purchase securities which are considered restricted. Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Directors. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Fund's restricted securities, like other securities, are priced in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Directors.

Annual Shareholder Report

35

Additional information on restricted securities held at September 30, 2018, is as follows:

Security	Acquisition Date	Cost	Market Value
South Carolina Jobs-EDA (Royal Live Oaks Academy), Economic Development Revenue Notes (Series 2018A), 3.00%, 8/1/2020	5/18/2018	$4,500,000	$4,492,710
Yavapai County, AZ IDA Solid Waste Disposal (Waste Management, Inc.), Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 2.80% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2021	6/1/2018	$4,000,000	$4,014,240

Other

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated. The Fund applies investment company accounting and reporting guidance.

3. CAPITAL STOCK

The following tables summarize capital stock activity:

Year Ended September 30	2018		2017
Class A Shares:	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount
Shares sold	29,264,339	$292,486,310	41,271,606	$412,464,518
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared	679,917	6,793,030	409,646	4,094,569
Shares redeemed	(43,544,068)	(435,136,632)	(40,426,480)	(403,967,253)
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS A SHARE TRANSACTIONS	(13,599,812)	$(135,857,292)	1,254,772	$12,591,834

Year Ended September 30	2018		2017
Institutional Shares:	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount
Shares sold	134,312,460	$1,342,362,235	135,396,879	$1,352,890,574
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared	1,813,165	18,115,672	1,318,353	13,177,645
Shares redeemed	(151,082,136)	(1,509,722,571)	(102,419,510)	(1,023,529,866)
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS	(14,956,511)	$(149,244,664)	34,295,722	$342,538,353
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TOTAL FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS	(28,556,323)	$(285,101,956)	35,550,494	$355,130,187

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The timing and character of income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These differences are due to differing treatments for defaulted securities, discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities and expiration of capital loss carryforwards.

Annual Shareholder Report

36

For the year ended September 30, 2018, permanent differences identified and reclassified among the components of net assets were as follows:

Increase (Decrease)
Paid in Capital	Undistributed Net Investment Income (Loss)	Accumulated Net Realized Gain (Loss)
$(1,242,780)	$1,285	$1,241,495

Net investment income (loss), net realized gains (losses) and net assets were not affected by the reclassification.

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, was as follows:

	2018	2017
Tax-exempt income	$32,015,732	$21,362,807

As of September 30, 2018, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income	$23,497
Net unrealized depreciation	$(1,994,471)
Capital loss carryforwards	$(1,684,105)

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

At September 30, 2018, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $2,373,052,661. The net unrealized depreciation of investments for federal tax purposes was $1,994,471. This consists of net unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $2,934,821 and net unrealized depreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of cost over value of $4,929,292.

At September 30, 2018, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $1,684,105 which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code, thereby reducing the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income tax. Pursuant to the Code, a net capital loss incurred in taxable years beginning on or before December 22, 2010, is characterized as short-term and may be carried forward for a maximum of eight tax years (“Carryforward Limit”), whereas a net capital loss incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010, retains its character as either short-term or long-term, does not expire and is required to be utilized prior to the losses which have a Carryforward Limit.

Annual Shareholder Report

37

The following schedule summarizes the Fund's capital loss carryforwards and expiration years:

Expiration Year	Short-Term	Long-Term	Total
No Expiration	$956,261	$721,102	$1,677,363
2019	$6,742	NA	$6,742

Capital loss carryforwards of $1,242,780 expired during the year ended September 30, 2018.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

The advisory agreement between the Fund and the Adviser provides for an annual fee equal to 0.30% of the Fund's average daily net assets. Prior to June 28, 2018, the Adviser fee was 0.35% of the Fund's average daily net assets. Subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, the Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. For the year ended September 30, 2018, the Adviser voluntarily waived $3,005,145 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. For purposes of determining the appropriate rate breakpoint, “Investment Complex” is defined as all of the Federated Funds subject to a fee under the Administrative Services Agreement. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average daily net assets of the Investment Complex as specified below:

Administrative Fee	Average Daily Net Assets of the Investment Complex
0.100%	on assets up to $50 billion
0.075%	on assets over $50 billion

Subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. During year ended September 30, 2018, the annualized fee paid to FAS was 0.080% of average daily net assets of the Fund.

Prior to September 1, 2017, the breakpoints of the Administrative Fee paid to FAS, described above, were:

Administrative Fee	Average Daily Net Assets of the Investment Complex
0.150%	on the first $5 billion
0.125%	on the next $5 billion
0.100%	on the next $10 billion
0.075%	on assets in excess of $20 billion

In addition, FAS may charge certain out-of-pocket expenses to the Fund.

Annual Shareholder Report

38

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses at 0.25% of average daily net assets annually to compensate FSC.

Subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. For the year ended September 30, 2018, distribution services fees for the Fund were as follows:

	Distribution Services Fees Incurred	Distribution Services Fees Waived
Class A Shares	$1,870,670	$(373,231)

For the year ended September 30, 2018, FSC retained $750,302 of fees paid by the Fund. When FSC receives fees, it may pay some or all of them to financial intermediaries whose customers purchase shares.

Sales Charges

Front-end sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges do not represent expenses of the Fund. They are deducted from the proceeds of sales of Fund shares prior to investment or from redemption proceeds prior to remittance, as applicable. For the year ended September 30, 2018, FSC did not retain any sales charges from the sale of Class A Shares.

Other Service Fees

For the year ended September 30, 2018, FSSC received $951 of the other service fees disclosed in Note 2.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $353,535,000 and $581,090,000, respectively.

Expense Limitation

The Adviser and certain of its affiliates (which may include FSC, FAS and FSSC) on their own initiative have agreed to waive certain amounts of their respective fees and/or reimburse expenses. Total annual fund operating expenses (as shown in the financial highlights, excluding interest expense, extraordinary expenses and proxy-related expenses, paid by the Fund, if any) paid by the Fund's Class A Shares and Institutional Shares (after the voluntary waivers and reimbursements) will not exceed 0.81% and 0.36% (the “Fee Limit”), respectively, up to but not including the later of (the “Termination Date”): (a) December 1, 2019; or (b) the date of the Fund's next effective Prospectus. While the Adviser and its applicable affiliates currently do not anticipate terminating or increasing these arrangements prior to the Termination Date, these arrangements may only be terminated or the Fee Limit increased prior to the Termination Date with the agreement of the Directors.

Annual Shareholder Report

39

Directors'/Trustees' and Miscellaneous Fees

Certain Officers and Directors of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of certain of the above companies. To efficiently facilitate payment, Directors'/Trustees' fees and certain expenses related to conducting meetings of the Directors/Trustees and other miscellaneous expenses are paid by an affiliate of the Adviser which in due course are reimbursed by the Fund. These expenses related to conducting meetings of the Directors/Trustees and other miscellaneous expenses may be included in Accrued and Miscellaneous Expenses on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Operations, respectively.

6. EXPENSE REDUCTION

Through arrangements with the Fund's custodian, net credits realized as a result of uninvested cash balances were used to reduce custody expenses. For the year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund's expenses were reduced by $5,199 under these arrangements.

7. Investment TRANSACTIONS

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations, for the year ended September 30, 2018, were as follows:

Purchases	$593,980,233
Sales	$849,308,349

8. LINE OF CREDIT

The Fund participates with certain other Federated Funds, on a several basis, in an up to $500,000,000 unsecured, 364-day, committed, revolving line of credit (LOC) agreement. The LOC was made available to finance temporarily the repurchase or redemption of shares of the Fund, failed trades, payment of dividends, settlement of trades and for other short-term, temporary or emergency general business purposes. The Fund cannot borrow under the LOC if an inter-fund loan is outstanding. The Fund's ability to borrow under the LOC also is subject to the limitations of the Act and various conditions precedent that must be satisfied before the Fund can borrow. Loans under the LOC are charged interest at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest, on any day, of (a) (i) the federal funds effective rate, (ii) the one month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), and (iii) 0.0%, plus (b) a margin. The LOC also requires the Fund to pay, quarterly in arrears and at maturity, its pro rata share of a commitment fee based on the amount of the lenders' commitment that has not been utilized. As of September 30, 2018, the Fund had no outstanding loans. During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Fund did not utilize the LOC.

9. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Fund, along with other funds advised by subsidiaries of Federated Investors, Inc., may participate in an interfund lending program. This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the Fund to borrow from other participating affiliated funds. As of September 30, 2018, there were no outstanding loans. During the year ended September 30, 2018, the program was not utilized.

10. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, 100% of distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

Annual Shareholder Report

40

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Federated Fixed Income Securities, Inc. and Shareolders of Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund:

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of the Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund (the “Fund”), a portfolio of Federated Fixed Income Securities, Inc., as of September 30, 2018, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the “financial statements”) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of September 30, 2018, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2018, by correspondence with custodians and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Annual Shareholder Report

41

We have served as the auditor of one or more of Federated Investors' investment companies since 2006.

Boston, Massachusetts
November 20, 2018

Annual Shareholder Report

42

Shareholder Expense Example (unaudited)

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees and to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or other service fees and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from April 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Annual Shareholder Report

43

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

	Beginning Account Value 4/1/2018	Ending Account Value 9/30/2018	Expenses Paid During Period1
Actual:
Class A Shares	$1,000.00	$1,004.50	$4.07
Institutional Shares	$1,000.00	$1,006.80	$1.81
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):
Class A Shares	$1,000.00	$1,021.01	$4.10
Institutional Shares	$1,000.00	$1,023.26	$1.83

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratios, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half-year period). The annualized net expense ratios are as follows:

Class A Shares	0.81%
Institutional Shares	0.36%

Annual Shareholder Report

44

In Memoriam

With profound sadness, Federated announces the passing of Richard B. (“Dick”) Fisher. He will be greatly missed.

RICHARD B. FISHER

(Former Officer of the Federated Funds, Chairman of Federated Securities Corp., and Vice Chairman of Federated Investors, Inc.)

Dick Fisher, along with John F. (“Jack”) Donahue and Thomas J. Donnelly, Esq., co-founded Federated in 1955 and served as a leader, particularly for Federated's sales division, and an officer of the Federated Funds. Mr. Fisher was a family man of deep faith, with exemplary character, prodigious generosity, immeasurable devotion, undeniable charm and a good sense of humor. He served his religion, family, community, and the Federated Funds and Federated, as well as their shareholders, officers and employees, with distinction. His integrity, intelligence, and keen sense of duty to shareholders, coupled with his faith and devotion to family, allowed him to become the consummate gentleman and salesman par excellence who will be greatly missed. Among his many achievements, Mr. Fisher led the sales strategy and execution for Federated's Fund for U.S. Government Securities, the first fund to invest exclusively in government bonds, and spearheaded the campaign for sales of Federated's Government Income Securities Fund, the first of what would become Federated's Fortress family of funds. Federated expresses deep gratitude to Mr. Fisher for his inspiring leadership, distinguished service and contributions as a husband, father, co-founder, officer, colleague and friend.

Board of Directors and Corporation Officers

The Board of Directors is responsible for managing the Corporation business affairs and for exercising all the Corporation powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Director and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Directors who are “interested persons” of the Fund (i.e., “Interested” Directors) and those who are not (i.e., “Independent” Directors). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222. The address of all Independent Directors listed is 4000 Ericsson Drive, Warrendale, PA 15086-7561; Attention: Mutual Fund Board. As of December 31, 2017, the Corporation comprised two portfolio(s), and the Federated Fund Family consisted of 40 investment companies (comprising 108 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Director oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Family and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Corporation Directors and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

Annual Shareholder Report

45

Interested DIRECTORS Background

Name Birth Date Positions Held with Corporation Date Service Began	Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
J. Christopher Donahue* Birth Date: April 11, 1949 President and Director Indefinite Term Began serving: January 2000	Principal Occupations: Principal Executive Officer and President of certain of the Funds in the Federated Fund Family; Director or Trustee of the Funds in the Federated Fund Family; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania; Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company. Previous Positions: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd.
John B. Fisher* Birth Date: May 16, 1956 Director Indefinite Term Began serving: May 2016	Principal Occupations: Principal Executive Officer and President of certain of the Funds in the Federated Fund Family; Director or Trustee of certain of the Funds in the Federated Fund Family; Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc.; President, Director/Trustee and CEO, Federated Advisory Services Company, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Investment Counseling, Federated Investment Management Company; President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex and Director, Federated Investors Trust Company. Previous Positions: President and Director of the Institutional Sales Division of Federated Securities Corp.; President and Director of Federated Investment Counseling; President and CEO of Passport Research, Ltd.; Director, Edgewood Securities Corp.; Director, Federated Services Company; Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Director, Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc. and President, Technology, Federated Services Company.

* Reasons for “interested” status: J. Christopher Donahue and John B. Fisher are interested due to their beneficial ownership of shares of Federated Investors, Inc. and due to positions they hold with Federated and its subsidiaries.

Annual Shareholder Report

46

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS Background

Name Birth Date Positions Held with Corporation Date Service Began	Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held, Previous Position(s) and Qualifications
John T. Collins Birth Date: January 24, 1947 Director Indefinite Term Began serving: October 2013	Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Family; formerly, Chairman and CEO, The Collins Group, Inc. (a private equity firm) (Retired). Other Directorships Held: Director, Current Chair of the Compensation Committee, KLX Corp. Qualifications: Mr. Collins has served in several business and financial management roles and directorship positions throughout his career. Mr. Collins previously served as Chairman and CEO, The Collins Group, Inc. (a private equity firm). Mr. Collins serves as Chairman Emeriti, Bentley University. Mr. Collins previously served as Director and Audit Committee Member, Bank of America Corp.; Director, FleetBoston Financial Corp.; and Director, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Harvard University Affiliate Hospital).
G. Thomas Hough Birth Date: February 28, 1955 Director Indefinite Term Began serving: August 2015	Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Family; formerly, Vice Chair, Ernst & Young LLP (public accounting firm) (Retired). Other Directorships Held: Director, Chair of the Audit Committee, Governance Committee, Publix Super Markets, Inc.; Director, Member of the Audit Committee and Technology Committee of Equifax, Inc. Qualifications: Mr. Hough has served in accounting, business management and directorship positions throughout his career. Mr. Hough most recently held the position of Americas Vice Chair of Assurance with Ernst & Young LLP (public accounting firm). Mr. Hough is an Executive Committee member of the United States Golf Association, he serves on the President's Cabinet and Business School Board of Visitors for the University of Alabama and is on the Business School Board of Visitors for Wake Forest University.

Annual Shareholder Report

47

Name Birth Date Positions Held with Corporation Date Service Began	Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held, Previous Position(s) and Qualifications
Maureen Lally-Green Birth Date: July 5, 1949 Director Indefinite Term Began serving: May 2009	Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Family; Dean of the Duquesne University School of Law; Professor and Adjunct Professor of Law, Duquesne University School of Law; formerly, Interim Dean of the Duquesne University School of Law; formerly, Associate General Secretary and Director, Office of Church Relations, Diocese of Pittsburgh. Other Directorships Held: Director, CNX Resources Corporation (formerly known as CONSOL Energy Inc.). Qualifications: Judge Lally-Green has served in various legal and business roles and directorship positions throughout her career. Judge Lally-Green previously served as a member of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and as a Professor of Law, Duquesne University School of Law. Judge Lally-Green also currently holds the positions on not for profit or for profit boards of directors as follows: Director and Chair, UPMC Mercy Hospital; Director and Vice Chair, Our Campaign for the Church Alive!, Inc.; Director, Saint Vincent College; Member, Pennsylvania State Board of Education (public); and Director CNX Resources Corporation (formerly known as CONSOL Energy Inc.). Judge Lally-Green has held the positions of: Director, Auberle; Director, Epilepsy Foundation of Western and Central Pennsylvania; Director, Ireland Institute of Pittsburgh; Director, Saint Thomas More Society; Director and Chair, Catholic High Schools of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, Inc.; Director, Pennsylvania Bar Institute; Regent, St. Vincent Seminary; and Director and Chair, North Catholic High School, Inc.
Charles F. Mansfield, Jr. Birth Date: April 10, 1945 Director Indefinite Term Began serving: January 1999	Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Family; Management Consultant. Other Directorships Held: None. Qualifications: Mr. Mansfield has served as a Marine Corps officer and in several banking, business management, educational roles and directorship positions throughout his long career. He remains active as a Management Consultant.

Annual Shareholder Report

48

Name Birth Date Positions Held with Corporation Date Service Began	Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held, Previous Position(s) and Qualifications
Thomas M. O'Neill Birth Date: June 14, 1951 Director Indefinite Term Began serving: October 2006	Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee, Chair of the Audit Committee of the Federated Fund Family; Sole Proprietor, Navigator Management Company (investment and strategic consulting). Other Directorships Held: None. Qualifications: Mr. O'Neill has served in several business, mutual fund and financial management roles and directorship positions throughout his career. Mr. O'Neill serves as Director, Medicines for Humanity and Director, The Golisano Children's Museum of Naples, Florida. Mr. O'Neill previously served as Chief Executive Officer and President, Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer, Fleet Investment Advisors; President and Chief Executive Officer, Aeltus Investment Management, Inc.; General Partner, Hellman, Jordan Management Co., Boston, MA; Chief Investment Officer, The Putnam Companies, Boston, MA; Credit Analyst and Lending Officer, Fleet Bank; Director and Consultant, EZE Castle Software (investment order management software); and Director, Midway Pacific (lumber).
P. Jerome Richey Birth Date: February 23, 1949 Director Indefinite Term Began serving: October 2013	Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Family; Management Consultant; formerly, Senior Vice Chancellor and Chief Legal Officer, University of Pittsburgh and Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, CNX Resources Corporation (formerly known as CONSOL Energy Inc.). Other Directorships Held: None. Qualifications: Mr. Richey has served in several business and legal management roles and directorship positions throughout his career. Mr. Richey most recently held the positions of Senior Vice Chancellor and Chief Legal Officer, University of Pittsburgh. Mr. Richey previously served as Chairman of the Board, Epilepsy Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Chairman of the Board, World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh. Mr. Richey previously served as Chief Legal Officer and Executive Vice President, CNX Resources Corporation (formerly known as CONSOL Energy Inc.); and Board Member, Ethics Counsel and Shareholder, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC (a law firm).
John S. Walsh Birth Date: November 28, 1957 Director Indefinite Term Began serving: January 1999	Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee, and Chair of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Family; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc. Other Directorships Held: None. Qualifications: Mr. Walsh has served in several business management roles and directorship positions throughout his career. Mr. Walsh previously served as Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc. (paving contractors).

Annual Shareholder Report

49

OFFICERS

Name Birth Date Positions Held with Corporation Date Service Began	Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Lori A. Hensler Birth Date: January 6, 1967 TREASURER Officer since: April 2013	Principal Occupations: Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Family; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp. and Edgewood Services, Inc.; and Assistant Treasurer, Federated Investors Trust Company. Ms. Hensler has received the Certified Public Accountant designation. Previous Positions: Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Assistant Treasurer, Federated Investors Management Company; Treasurer, Federated Investors Trust Company; Assistant Treasurer, Federated Administrative Services, Federated Administrative Services, Inc., Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc., Federated Advisory Services Company, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Investment Counseling, Federated Investment Management Company, Passport Research, Ltd., and Federated MDTA, LLC; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.
Peter J. Germain Birth Date: September 3, 1959 CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER, SECRETARY and EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT Officer since: January 2005	Principal Occupations: Mr. Germain is Chief Legal Officer, Secretary and Executive Vice President of the Federated Fund Family. He is General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer, Secretary and Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc.; Trustee and Senior Vice President, Federated Investors Management Company; Trustee and President, Federated Administrative Services; Director and President, Federated Administrative Services, Inc.; Director and Vice President, Federated Securities Corp.; Director and Secretary, Federated Private Asset Management, Inc.; Secretary, Federated Shareholder Services Company; and Secretary, Retirement Plan Service Company of America. Mr. Germain joined Federated in 1984 and is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar Association. Previous Positions: Deputy General Counsel, Special Counsel, Managing Director of Mutual Fund Services, Federated Investors, Inc.; Senior Vice President, Federated Services Company; and Senior Corporate Counsel, Federated Investors, Inc.
Stephen Van Meter Birth Date: June 5, 1975 CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER AND SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Officer since: July 2015	Principal Occupations: Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Family; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc. and Chief Compliance Officer of certain of its subsidiaries. Mr. Van Meter joined Federated in October 2011. He holds FINRA licenses under Series 3, 7, 24 and 66. Previous Positions: Mr. Van Meter previously held the position of Compliance Operating Officer, Federated Investors, Inc. Prior to joining Federated, Mr. Van Meter served at the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in the positions of Senior Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Investment Management and Senior Counsel, Division of Enforcement.

Annual Shareholder Report

50

Name Birth Date Positions Held with Corporation Date Service Began	Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Deborah A. Cunningham Birth Date: September 15, 1959 Chief Investment Officer Officer since: June 2012	Principal Occupations: Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of Federated's money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1997 and an Executive Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2009. Ms. Cunningham has received the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and holds an M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.
Mary Jo Ochson Birth Date: September 12, 1953 CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER Officer since: May 2004	Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of Federated's tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and Chief Investment Officer of Federated's Tax-Free Money Markets in 2010. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson has received the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and holds an M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.

Annual Shareholder Report

51

Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract–May 2018

Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund (the “Fund”)

At its meetings in May 2018, the Fund's Board of Directors (the “Board”), including a majority of those Directors who are not “interested persons” of the Fund, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Independent Directors”), reviewed and unanimously approved the continuation of the Fund's investment advisory contract for an additional one-year term. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment after considering all of the information received on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

The Board had previously appointed a Senior Officer, whose duties included specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a fund advised by Federated Investment Management Company (the “Adviser”) or its affiliates (collectively, “Federated”) (each, a “Federated fund”). The Senior Officer's responsibilities included preparing and furnishing to the Board an annual independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below. In December 2017, the Senior Officer position was eliminated. Notwithstanding the elimination of the Senior Officer position, at the request of the Independent Directors, the Fund's Chief Compliance Officer (the CCO) furnished to the Board in advance of its May 2018 meetings an independent written evaluation covering substantially the same topics that had been covered in the Senior Officer's written evaluation in prior years. The Board considered the CCO's independent written evaluation (the “CCO Fee Evaluation Report”), along with other information, in evaluating the reasonableness of the Fund's management fee and in deciding to approve the continuation of the investment advisory contract. Consistent with the former Senior Officer position, the CCO, in preparing the CCO Fee Evaluation Report, has the authority to retain consultants, experts or staff as reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and can be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the Independent Directors.

The Board also considered judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees in making its decision. Using these judicial decisions as a guide, the Board observed that the following factors may be relevant to an adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: (1) the nature and quality of the services provided by an adviser to a fund and its shareholders (including the performance of the fund, its benchmark, and comparable funds); (2) an adviser's cost of providing the services (including the profitability to an adviser of providing advisory services to a fund); (3) the extent to which an adviser may realize “economies of scale” as a fund grows larger and, if such economies of scale exist, whether they have been shared with a fund and its shareholders or the family of funds; (4) any “fall-out” financial benefits that accrue to an adviser because of its relationship with a fund (including

Annual Shareholder Report

52

research services received from brokers that execute fund trades and any fees paid to affiliates of an adviser for services rendered to a fund); (5) comparative fee and expense structures (including a comparison of fees paid to an adviser with those paid by similar funds both internally and externally as well as management fees charged to institutional and other advisory clients of the Adviser or its affiliates for what might be viewed as like services); and (6) the extent of care, conscientiousness and independence with which the fund's board members perform their duties and their expertise (including whether they are fully informed about all facts the board deems relevant to its consideration of an adviser's services and fees). The Board noted that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) disclosure requirements regarding the basis for the Board's approval of the Fund's investment advisory contract generally align with the factors listed above. The Board was aware of these factors and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's investment advisory contract to the extent it considered them to be appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these factors in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds. The Independent Directors were assisted in their deliberations by independent legal counsel.

In addition to the extensive materials that comprise and accompany the CCO Fee Evaluation Report, the Board received detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization throughout the year, and in connection with its May meetings at which the Board's formal approval of the advisory and subadvisory contracts occurred. In this regard, Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional information specifically in connection with the May meetings. In the months preceding the May meetings, the Board requested and reviewed written materials prepared by Federated in response to requests on behalf of the Independent Directors encompassing a wide variety of topics. At the May meetings, in addition to meeting in separate sessions of the Independent Directors without management present, senior management of the Adviser also met with the Independent Directors and their counsel to discuss the materials presented and such additional matters as the Independent Directors deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the advisory and subadvisory contracts. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board also received information on particular matters as the need arose.

The Board's consideration of the investment advisory contract included review of the CCO Fee Evaluation Report, accompanying data and additional information covering the following matters, among others: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short-term and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in terms relative to its particular investment program and certain competitor or “peer group” funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate) and comments on the

Annual Shareholder Report

53

reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses, including the advisory fee and the overall expense structure of the Fund (both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds), with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations; the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); and the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates. The Board also considered the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders; the entrepreneurial and other risks assumed by the Adviser in sponsoring the Fund; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are generally available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

While mindful that courts have cautioned against giving too much weight to comparative information concerning fees charged by other advisers for managing funds with comparable investment programs, the Board has found the use of such comparisons to be relevant to its deliberations. In this regard, the Board was presented with, and considered, information regarding the contractual advisory fee rates, net advisory fee rates, total expense ratios and each element of the Fund's total expense ratio (i.e., gross and net advisory fees, custody fees, portfolio accounting fees and transfer agency fees) relative to an appropriate group of peer funds compiled by Federated using data supplied by independent fund ranking organizations (the “Peer Group”). The Board received a description of the composition and methodology used to select the Peer Group. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because it is believed that they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, in that they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles. Also, they are the type of investment vehicle, in fact, chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses, therefore, appears to be a relevant indicator of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the marketplace in which the Fund competes.

Annual Shareholder Report

54

The Board reviewed the contractual advisory fee rate, net advisory fee rate and other expenses of the Fund and noted the position of the Fund's fee rates relative to its Peer Group. In this regard, the Board noted that the contractual advisory fee rate was below the median of the relevant Peer Group and the Board was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive.

For comparison, the CCO reviewed the fees charged by Federated for providing advisory services to products other than the Federated funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts and third-party unaffiliated mutual funds for which Federated serves as sub-adviser) (referenced to as “Comparable Funds/Accounts”). With respect to Comparable Funds/Accounts other than third-party mutual funds, the CCO concluded that they are inherently different products. Those differences include, but are not limited to, different types of targeted investors; different applicable laws and regulations; different legal structures; different average account sizes and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows and different associated costs; and the time spent by portfolio managers and their teams, as well as personnel in the Funds Financial Services, Legal, Compliance and Risk Management departments, in reviewing securities pricing, addressing different administrative responsibilities, addressing different degrees of risk associated with management and a variety of different costs. The CCO also reviewed the differences in the nature of the services required for Federated to manage its proprietary mutual fund business versus managing a discrete pool of assets as a sub-adviser to another institution's mutual fund, and that Federated generally performs significant additional services and assumes substantially greater risk in managing the Fund and other Federated funds than in its role as sub-adviser to an unaffiliated third-party mutual fund. The CCO did not consider the fees for providing advisory services to Comparable Funds/Accounts to be determinative in judging the appropriateness of the Federated funds' advisory fees.

Following such evaluation, and full deliberations, the Board concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund are reasonable and supported renewal of the Fund's investment advisory contract.

The Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and the resources of the Adviser and its affiliates dedicated to the Fund. In this regard, the Board evaluated, among other things, the Adviser's personnel, experience, track record, overall reputation and willingness to invest in personnel and infrastructure that benefit the Fund. In addition, the Board reviewed the qualifications, backgrounds and responsibilities of the portfolio management team primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund and the Adviser's ability and experience in attracting and retaining qualified personnel to service the Fund. The Board noted the compliance program of the Adviser and the compliance-related resources provided to the Fund by the Adviser, including the Adviser's commitment to respond to rulemaking initiatives of the SEC. The Fund's ability to deliver

Annual Shareholder Report

55

competitive performance when compared to its Peer Group was also deemed to be relevant by the Board as a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program. The Adviser's ability to execute this program was one of the Board's considerations in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent and quality of the Adviser's investment management services warrant the continuation of the investment advisory contract.

In evaluating the Fund's investment performance, the Board considered performance results in light of the Fund's investment objective, strategies and risks, as disclosed in the Fund's prospectus. The Board considered detailed investment reports on the Fund's performance that were provided to the Board throughout the year and in connection with the May meetings. The CCO also reviewed information regarding the performance of other mutual funds in the Peer Group, noting the CCO's view that comparisons to fund peer groups may be helpful, though not conclusive, in evaluating the performance of the Adviser in managing the Fund. The Board considered, in evaluating such comparisons, that in some cases individual funds may exhibit significant and unique differences in their objectives and management techniques when compared to other funds within a Peer Group.

The Fund's performance fell below the median of the relevant Peer Group for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods covered by the CCO Fee Evaluation Report. The Board discussed the Fund's performance with the Adviser and recognized the efforts being taken by the Adviser in the context of other factors considered relevant by the Board.

Following such evaluation, and full deliberations, the Board concluded that the performance of the Fund supported renewal of the Fund's investment advisory contract.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including information regarding the compensation and ancillary (or “fall-out”) benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. This information covered not only the fees under the investment advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator and distributor). In this regard, the Board considered that certain Federated subsidiaries provide distribution and shareholder services to the Federated funds, for which they may be compensated through distribution and servicing fees paid pursuant to Rule 12b-1 plans or otherwise. The information also detailed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades. In addition, the Board considered the fact that, in order for a Federated fund to be competitive in the marketplace, the Adviser and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have disclosed to Federated fund investors and/or indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future. Moreover,

Annual Shareholder Report

56

the Board receives regular reporting as to the institution, adjustment or elimination of these voluntary waivers. The Board considered Federated's previous reductions in contractual management fees to certain Federated funds in response to the CCO's recommendations.

In 2016, the Board approved a reduction of 5 basis points in the contractual advisory fee. In 2018, the Board approved an additional reduction of 5 basis points in the contractual advisory fee.

Federated furnished information, requested by the CCO, that reported revenues on a fund-by-fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund-by-fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the CCO. The CCO noted that, while these cost allocation reports apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs continues to cause the CCO to question the precision of the process and to conclude that such reports may be unreliable, since a single change in an allocation estimate may dramatically alter the resulting estimate of cost and/or profitability of a Federated fund and may produce unintended consequences. The allocation information, including the CCO's view that fund-by-fund estimations may be unreliable, was considered in the evaluation by the Board.

The Board and the CCO also reviewed information compiled by Federated comparing its profitability information to other publicly held fund management companies, including information regarding profitability trends over time. In this regard, the CCO concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive. The CCO also noted that Federated appeared financially sound, with the resources necessary to fulfill its obligations under its contracts with the Fund.

The CCO Fee Evaluation Report also discussed the notion of possible realization of “economies of scale” as a fund grows larger. In this regard, the Board considered that the Adviser has made significant and long-term investments in areas that support all of the Federated funds, such as personnel and processes for the portfolio management, shareholder services, compliance, internal audit and risk management functions, as well as systems technology (including technology relating to cybersecurity) and that the benefits of these efforts (as well as any economies of scale, should they exist) were likely to be shared with the Federated fund family as a whole. The Board noted that the Adviser's investments in these areas are extensive. In addition, the Board considered that the Adviser and its affiliates have frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and that this has allowed fund shareholders to share potential economies of scale with shareholders. The Board also considered that such waivers and reimbursements can provide protection from an increase in expenses if a Federated fund's assets decline. Federated, as it does throughout the year, and specifically in connection with the Board's review of the advisory and subadvisory contracts, furnished information relative to revenue sharing or adviser-paid fees. Federated and the CCO noted that this information should be viewed to determine if there was an incentive to either not apply breakpoints, or

Annual Shareholder Report

57

to apply breakpoints at higher levels, and should not be viewed to determine the appropriateness of advisory fees because it would represent marketing and distribution expenses. The Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which (as discussed in the CCO Fee Evaluation Report) is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with “breakpoints” that serve to reduce the fee as a fund attains a certain size.

The CCO stated that his observations and the information accompanying the CCO Fee Evaluation Report supported a finding by the Board that the management fee for the Fund was reasonable. Under these circumstances, no changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of, the Fund's investment advisory contract. The CCO also recognized that the Board's evaluation of the Federated funds' advisory and subadvisory arrangements is a continuing and on-going process that is informed by the information that the Board requests and receives from management throughout the course of the year and, in this regard, the CCO noted certain items for future reporting to the Board or further consideration by management as the Board continues its on-going oversight of the Federated funds.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an investment advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that many shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and with the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the investment advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund. The Board concluded that, in light of the factors summarized above, including the nature, quality and scope of the services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates, continuation of the investment advisory contract was appropriate.

The Board based its decision to approve the investment advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were necessarily relevant to the Fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the continuation of the contract reflects its view that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangement.

Annual Shareholder Report

58

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on “Form N-PX” of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available via the Proxy Voting Record (Form N-PX) link associated with the Fund and share class name at www.FederatedInvestors.com/FundInformation. Form N-PX filings are also available at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on “Form N-Q.” These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. You may also access this information via the link to the Fund and share class name at www.FederatedInvestors.com/FundInformation.

Annual Shareholder Report

59

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

This Report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's Prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses and other information.

Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund

Federated Investors Funds
4000 Ericsson Drive
Warrendale, PA 15086-7561

Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

CUSIP 31417P866
CUSIP 31417P858

29303 (11/18)

Federated is a registered trademark of Federated Investors, Inc.
2018 ©Federated Investors, Inc.

Item 2. Code of Ethics

(a) As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics (the "Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies - Ethical Standards for Principal Executive and Financial Officers") that applies to the registrant's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer; the registrant's Principal Financial Officer also serves as the Principal Accounting Officer.

(c) There was no amendment to the registrant’s code of ethics described in Item 2(a) above during the period covered by the report.

(d) There was no waiver granted, either actual or implicit, from a provision to the registrant’s code of ethics described in Item 2(a) above during the period covered by the report.

(e) Not Applicable

(f)(3) The registrant hereby undertakes to provide any person, without charge, upon request, a copy of the code of ethics. To request a copy of the code of ethics, contact the registrant at 1-800-341-7400, and ask for a copy of the Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies - Ethical Standards for Principal Executive and Financial Officers.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert

The registrant's Board has determined that each of the following members of the Board's Audit Committee is an “audit committee financial expert,” and is "independent," for purposes of this Item:   John T. Collins, G. Thomas Hough and Thomas M. O'Neill.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

(a)       Audit Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2018 - $72,152

Fiscal year ended 2017 - $64,570

(b)       Audit-Related Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2018 - $0

Fiscal year ended 2017 - $2,686

Fiscal year ended 2017- Audit consent for N-1A filing.

Amount requiring approval of the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and $0 respectively.

(c)        Tax Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2018 - $0

Fiscal year ended 2017 - $0

Amount requiring approval of the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and $0 respectively.

(d)       All Other Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2018 - $0

Fiscal year ended 2017 - $0

Amount requiring approval of the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $31,397 and $32,908 respectively. Fiscal year ended 2018- Service fee for analysis of potential Passive Foreign Investment Company holdings. Fiscal year ended 2017- Service fee for analysis of potential Passive Foreign Investment Company holdings.

(e)(1) Audit Committee Policies regarding Pre-approval of Services.

The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such services do not impair the auditor’s independence. Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent auditor has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

Certain services have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of the general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period. The Audit Committee will annually review the services that may be provided by the independent auditor without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee and may grant general pre-approval for such services. The Audit Committee will revise the list of general pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations. The Audit Committee will not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor to management.

The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chairman. The Chairman will report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Committee will designate another member with such pre-approval authority when the Chairman is unavailable.

AUDIT SERVICES

The annual Audit services engagement terms and fees will be subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee must approve any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, registered investment company (RIC) structure or other matters.

In addition to the annual Audit services engagement specifically approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval for other Audit Services, which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide. The Audit Committee has pre-approved certain Audit services, all other Audit services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

AUDIT-RELATED SERVICES

Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. The Audit Committee believes that the provision of Audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor, and has pre-approved certain Audit-related services, all other Audit-related services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

TAX SERVICES

The Audit Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide Tax services to the Company such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditor’s independence. However, the Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent auditor, the purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee has pre-approved certain Tax services, all Tax services involving large and complex transactions must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

ALL OTHER SERVICES

With respect to the provision of services other than audit, review or attest services the pre-approval requirement is waived if:

(1) The aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid by the registrant, the registrant’s adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant to its accountant during the fiscal year in which the services are provided;

(2) Such services were not recognized by the registrant, the registrant’s adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and

(3) Such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Audit Committee of the issuer and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the Audit Committee or by one or more members of the Audit Committee who are members of the board of directors to whom authority to grant such approvals has been delegated by the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to those permissible non-audit services classified as All Other services that it believes are routine and recurring services, and would not impair the independence of the auditor.

The SEC’s rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of prohibited non-audit services and the applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.

PRE-APPROVAL FEE LEVELS

Pre-approval fee levels for all services to be provided by the independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding these levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

PROCEDURES

Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Audit Committee by both the independent auditor and the Principal Accounting Officer and/or Internal Auditor, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request or application is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

(e)(2) Percentage of services identified in items 4(b) through 4(d) that were approved by the registrants audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X:

4(b)

Fiscal year ended 2018 – 0%

Fiscal year ended 2017 - 0%

Percentage of services provided to the registrants investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were approved by the registrants audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

4(c)

Fiscal year ended 2018 – 0%

Fiscal year ended 2017 – 0%

Percentage of services provided to the registrants investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were approved by the registrants audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

4(d)

Fiscal year ended 2018 – 0%

Fiscal year ended 2017 – 0%

Percentage of services provided to the registrants investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were approved by the registrants audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

(f) NA

(g) Non-Audit Fees billed to the registrant, the registrant’s investment adviser, and certain entities controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser:

Fiscal year ended 2018 - $1,158,151

Fiscal year ended 2017 - $176,873

(h) The registrant’s Audit Committee has considered that the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

The registrant’s management and Audit Committee continue to believe that the registrant’s registered public accounting firms, Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) and KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) (as applicable, “EY/KPMG”), have the ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within their audit services. EY/KPMG is required to make a determination that it satisfies certain independence requirements under the federal securities laws. Like other registrants, there is a risk that activities or relationships of EY/KPMG, or its partners or employees, can prevent a determination from being made that it satisfies such independence requirements with respect to the registrant, which could render it ineligible to serve as the registrant’s independent public accountant.

In their respective required communications to the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board, EY/KPMG informed the Audit Committee that EY/KPMG and/or covered person professionals within EY/KPMG maintain lending relationships with certain owners of greater than 10% of the shares of the registrant and/or certain investment companies within the “investment company complex” as defined under Rule 2-01(f)(14) of Regulation S-X, which are affiliates of the registrant. EY/KPMG has advised the Audit Committee that these lending relationships implicate Rule 2-01(c)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (referred to as the “Loan Rule”). The Loan Rule prohibits an independent public accountant, or covered person professionals at such firm, from having a financial relationship (such as a loan) with a lender that is a record or beneficial owner of more than 10% of an audit client’s equity securities. For purposes of the Loan Rule, audit clients include the registrant, as well as all registered investment companies advised by advisory subsidiaries of Federated Investors, Inc., the Adviser (for which EY serves as independent public accountant), and their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Federated Fund Complex”).

EY/KPMG informed the Audit Committee that EY/KPMG believes that these lending relationships described above do not and will not impair EY/KPMG’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with financial statement audits of their respective funds of the registrant and a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY/KPMG has been and is capable of objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY/KPMG’s audits.

On June 20, 2016, the Division of Investment Management of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a no-action letter to another mutual fund complex (see Fidelity Management & Research Company et al., No-Action Letter) related to similar Loan Rule matters as those described above (the “Letter”). In the Letter, the SEC Staff confirmed that it would not recommend enforcement action against an investment company that relied on the audit services performed by an independent public accountant where the Loan Rule was implicated in certain specified circumstances provided that: (1) the auditor has complied with PCAOB Rule 3526(b)(1) and 3526(b)(2); (2) the Loan Rule is implicated because of lending relationships; and (3) notwithstanding such lending relationships that implicate the Loan Rule, the auditor has concluded that it is objective and impartial with respect to the issues encompassed within its engagement as auditor of the funds. The circumstances described in the Letter are substantially similar to the circumstances that implicated the Loan Rule with respect to EY/KPMG and the registrant. On September 22, 2017, the SEC extended the expiration of the Letter until the effectiveness of any amendments to the Loan Rule designed to address the concerns in the Letter. On May 2, 2018, the SEC proposed amendments to the Loan Rule, which, if adopted as proposed, would refocus the analysis that must be conducted to determine whether an auditor is independent when the auditor has a lending relationship with certain shareholders of an audit client at any time during an audit or professional engagement period.

Additionally, on July 18, 2018, EY informed the registrant that Rule 2-01(c)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-X (“Investment Rule”) had also been implicated since July 2, 2018. The Investment Rule prohibits public accounting firms, or covered person professionals and their immediate family members, from having certain direct financial investments in their audit clients and affiliated entities. EY informed the registrant that a pension trust of a non-US affiliated entity of EY had previously made, and as of July 18, 2018 maintained, an investment in a fund (“Hermes Fund”) managed by Hermes Alternative Investment Management Limited (“HAIML”), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hermes Fund Managers Limited (“HFML”). The pension trust’s investment in the Hermes Fund involved the Investment Rule because an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Federated Investors, Inc. (an affiliate of the registrant’s adviser), acquired a 60% majority interest in HFML on July 2, 2018, effective July 1, 2018 (“Hermes Acquisition”). The pension trust first invested in the Hermes Fund in 2007, well prior to the Hermes Acquisition. The pension trust’s investment represented less than 3.3% of the Hermes Fund’s assets as of July 18, 2018. EY subsequently informed the registrant that EY’s affiliated entity’s pension trust had submitted an irrevocable redemption notice to redeem its investment in the Hermes Fund. Pursuant to the redemption terms of the Hermes Fund, the pension trust’s redemption would not be effected until December 26, 2018 at the earliest. The redemption notice could not be revoked by the pension trust. The redemption notice would only be revoked by HAIML, as the adviser for Hermes Fund, if, and to the extent, the pension trust successfully sold its interest in the Hermes Fund in a secondary market transaction. EY also informed the registrant that the pension trust simultaneously submitted a request to HAIML to conduct a secondary market auction for the pension trust’s interests in the Hermes Fund. In addition, the only voting rights shareholders of the Hermes Fund had under the Hermes Fund’s governing documents relate to key appointments, including the election of the non-executive members of the Hermes Fund’s committee, the appointment of the Hermes Fund’s trustee and the adoption of the Hermes Fund’s financial statements. The next meeting of the Hermes Fund at which shareholders could vote on the election of members to the Hermes Fund’s committee was not until June 2019, and the size of the pension trust’s investment in the Hermes Fund would not allow it to unilaterally elect a committee member or the trustee. EY does not audit the Hermes Fund and the Hermes Fund’s assets and operations are not consolidated in the registrant’s financial statements that are subject to audit by EY. Finally, no member of EY’s audit team that provides audit services to the registrant was a beneficiary of EY’s affiliated entity’s pension trust. Management reviewed this matter with the registrant’s Audit Committee, and, based on that review, as well as a letter from EY to the registrant dated July 26, 2018, in which EY indicated that it had determined that this matter does not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audit of the financial statements for the registrant and the belief that a reasonable investor with knowledge of all relevant facts and circumstances would conclude that EY has been and is capable of exercising objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within EY’s audit, the registrant’s management and Audit Committee made a determination that such matter does not impair EY’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audit of the financial statements for the registrant. On August 29, 2018, EY informed the registrant that EY’s affiliated entity’s pension trust sold its entire interest in the Hermes Fund, effective as of August 29, 2018.

If it were to be determined that, with respect to the Loan Rule, the relief available under the Letter was improperly relied upon, or that the independence requirements under the federal securities laws were not complied with regarding the registrant, for certain periods, and/or given the implication of the Investment Rule for certain periods, any of the registrant’s filings with the SEC which contain financial statements of the registrant for such periods may be determined not to be consistent with or comply with applicable federal securities laws, the registrant’s ability to offer shares under its current registration statement may be impacted, and certain financial reporting and/or other covenants with, and representations and warranties to, the registrant’s lender under its committed line of credit may be impacted. Such events could have a material adverse effect on the registrant and the Federated Fund Complex.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

Not Applicable

Item 6. Schedule of Investments

(a) The registrant’s Schedule of Investments is included as part of the Report to Stockholders filed under Item 1 of this form.

(b) Not Applicable; Fund had no divestments during the reporting period covered since the previous Form N-CSR filing.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Not Applicable

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Not Applicable

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers

Not Applicable

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No Changes to Report

Item 11. Controls and Procedures

(a) The registrant’s President and Treasurer have concluded that the

registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Act) are effective in design and operation and are sufficient to form the basis of the certifications required by Rule 30a-(2) under the Act, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR.

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Not Applicable

Item 13. Exhibits

(a)(1) Code of Ethics- Not Applicable to this Report.

(a)(2) Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.

(a)(3) Not Applicable.

(b) Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant Federated Fixed Income Securities, Inc.

By /S/ Lori A. Hensler

Lori A. Hensler, Principal Financial Officer

Date November 20, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By /S/ J. Christopher Donahue

J. Christopher Donahue, Principal Executive Officer

Date November 20, 2018

By /S/ Lori A. Hensler

Lori A. Hensler, Principal Financial Officer

Date November 20, 2018