UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number | 811-6490 |
| |
| Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. | |
| (Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) | |
| | |
| c/o The Dreyfus Corporation 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) | |
| | |
| Michael A. Rosenberg, Esq. 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 | |
| (Name and address of agent for service) | |
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | (212) 922-6000 |
| |
Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 | |
Date of reporting period: | 6/30/11 | |
| | | | | | |
The following N-CSR relates only to the Registrant’s series listed below and does not affect the other series of the Registrant, which has a different fiscal year end and, therefore, different N-CSR reporting requirements. A separate N-CSR Form will be filed for this series, as appropriate.
DREYFUS PREMIER INVESTMENT FUNDS, INC.
- Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund
- Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund
- Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund
- Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund
FORM N-CSR
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
| Contents |
| THE FUND |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
11 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
12 | Statement of Operations |
13 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
15 | Financial Highlights |
18 | Notes to Financial Statements |
| FOR MORE INFORMATION |
| Back Cover |
Dreyfus
Global Real Estate
Securities Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund, covering the six-month period from January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Although 2011 began on an optimistic note amid encouraging economic data, by midyear investors returned to a more cautious outlook. The U.S. and global economies continued to grow over the reporting period, but at a relatively sluggish pace. First, manufacturing activity proved unsustainably strong in late 2010 and early 2011, leading to a subsequent slowdown in new orders. Second, turmoil in the Middle East drove oil prices higher and produced an inflationary drag on real incomes.Third, natural and nuclear disasters in Japan added to upward pressure on energy prices, and these unexpected events disrupted the global supply chain, especially in the automotive sector. Finally, in the United States, disappointing labor and housing markets weighed on investor sentiment. As a result, U.S. stocks generally produced only modest gains over the first half of the year.
We expect economic conditions to improve over the second half of 2011. Inflationary pressures appear to be peaking in most countries, including the United States, and we have already seen energy prices retreat from their highs. In addition, a successful resolution to the current debate regarding government spending and borrowing, without major fiscal tightening over the near term, should help avoid a serious disruption to the domestic economy. To assess how these and other developments may affect your investments, we encourage you, as always, to speak with your financial advisor.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
July 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011, as provided by Peter Zabierek and Dean Frankel, Portfolio Managers, Urdang Securities Management, Inc., Sub-Investment Adviser
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of 5.83%, Class C shares returned 5.31% and Class I shares returned 5.95%.1 In comparison, the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Index, the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of 6.08% for the same period.2
A debt crisis in Europe, natural and nuclear disasters in Japan, turmoil in North Africa, and disappointing global economic data weighed on investor sentiment during the second quarter of 2011, partially offsetting stronger returns stemming from the global economic recovery during the first quarter. The fund’s returns were roughly in line with its benchmark, as successes in the United States, United Kingdom and Singapore were balanced by lagging returns in Hong Kong and Japan.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks to maximize total return consisting of capital appreciation and current income by investing at least 95% of its assets in companies principally engaged in the real estate sector. The fund normally invests approximately 60% of its assets in companies located outside the United States, and invests in at least 10 different countries. The fund also may invest in companies located in emerging markets and in companies of any market capitalization. Our proprietary approach quantifies investment opportunity both from a real estate and stock perspective.
Shifting Sentiment Sparked Market Volatility
Global economic sentiment had improved dramatically by the start of 2011, fueled by quantitative easing of U.S. monetary policy, better-than-expected economic data in Europe and strong corporate earnings across a number of regions. As a result, real estate stock prices moved higher during the first quarter of the year. However, a number of
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
macroeconomic developments soon weighed on investor sentiment. Inflation worries prompted a number of central banks, including those in China and Europe, to raise short-term interest rates and tighten credit standards. Political uprisings in the Middle East and devastating natural and nuclear disasters in Japan added to investors’ concerns. Later, worries intensified regarding the European sovereign debt crisis as Greece teetered on the brink of default. These macroeconomic developments caused real-estate stocks to give back some, but not all, of their earlier gains in the second quarter.
Security Selections Produced Mixed Results
In this choppy market environment, we allocated about 40% of the fund’s assets to U.S. real estate stocks and approximately 60% to opportunities overseas. Our security selection strategy in the United States proved particularly successful over the first half of 2011. The fund scored a number of winners among real estate investment trusts (REITs) focusing on rental apartments, which fared well as demand for rentals increased and home ownership declined. Conversely, we maintained relatively light exposure to U.S. health care-related properties, a position that benefited relative performance when the sub-sector cooled. In addition, the fund’s position in National Health Properties gained value when the company was acquired at a premium to its stock price byVenta REIT.
Investments in the United Kingdom also produced above-average results. Particularly beneficial was an overweighted position in Unite Group, a specialist in student accommodations, which gained value as earlier strategic missteps were addressed.The fund also benefited from overweighted exposure to Land Securities Group, a UK REIT that owns both office and retail properties. In Singapore, overweighted exposure to REITs and an underweighted position in developers bolstered results when the government’s efforts to fight inflation discouraged residential development. Finally, Charter Hall Office REIT, which owns office properties in Australia and the United States, outperformed due to management’s published strategy to sell the company’s US assets and Canadian multifamily specialist Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust advanced after reporting robust financial results.
Disappointments during the reporting period were concentrated in the Hong Kong market, where inflation-fighting measures prompted us to
4
shift the fund’s emphasis from residential properties to the office market. We had established overweighted exposure to Japanese condominiums before the earthquake and tsunami damaged a number of coastal property developments, which dampened investor sentiment and led to the cancellation of some high-rise residential projects. Canada’s Chartwell Senior Housing Real Estate Investment Trust declined despite strong business fundamentals as investors favored the value opportunities.
Selectivity More Important in an Uncertain World
As of midyear, the emerging markets appear to be nearing the end of their inflation-fighting efforts, and we have identified a number of attractive values in Asia and Latin America. However, parts of Europe have remained under pressure from the sovereign debt crisis, leading us to maintain an underweighted position in most European countries outside of the United Kingdom and Scandinavia.We also have reduced the fund’s exposure to Japan and Hong Kong. In our judgment, these are prudent strategies until we see more consistent signs of a robust global recovery.
July 15, 2011
| |
| Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment |
| style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the |
| fund’s prospectus. |
| The fund’s performance will be influenced by political, social and economic factors affecting |
| investments in foreign companies. Special risks associated with investments in foreign companies |
| include exposure to currency fluctuations, less liquidity, less developed or less efficient trading |
| markets, lack of comprehensive company information, political instability and differing auditing |
| and legal standards.These risks are enhanced in emerging market countries. |
1 | Total returns include reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
| consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares, or the applicable |
| contingent deferred sales charges imposed on redemptions in the case of Class C shares. Had these |
| charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future |
| results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be |
| worth more or less than their original cost. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain |
| fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect through May 1, |
| 2012, at which time it may be extended, terminated or modified. |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of net dividends and, where applicable, |
| capital gain distributions.The FTSE European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA) National |
| Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) Developed Global Real Estate |
| Securities Index is an unmanaged index designed to track the performance of listed real estate |
| companies and REITs worldwide. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended June 30, 2011 | | |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 7.45 | $ 11.76 | $ 5.57 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,058.30 | $1,053.10 | $1,059.50 |
|
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 7.30 | $ 11.53 | $ 5.46 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,017.55 | $1,013.34 | $1,019.39 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.46% for Class A, 2.31% for Class C and 1.09% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
|
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | |
Common Stocks—96.5% | Shares | Value ($) |
Australia—8.1% | | |
Charter Hall Office REIT | 309,030 | 1,110,355 |
Goodman Group | 2,221,960 | 1,680,125 |
Investa Office Fund | 830,350 | 574,430 |
Mirvac Group | 2,232,600 | 2,993,211 |
Stockland | 214,540 | 784,655 |
Westfield Group | 625,470 | 5,809,527 |
Westfield Retail Trust | 1,514,970 | 4,403,416 |
| | 17,355,719 |
Brazil—.4% | | |
Iguatemi Empress a De Shopping Centers | 36,800 | 889,547 |
Canada—4.0% | | |
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust | 27,930 | 1,398,455 |
Brookfield Office Properties | 88,180 | 1,703,347 |
Chartwell Seniors Housing | | |
Real Estate Investment Trust | 492,800 | 4,292,104 |
First Capital Realty | 74,420 | 1,271,649 |
| | 8,665,555 |
Finland—.5% | | |
Citycon | 254,400 | 1,143,653 |
France—3.8% | | |
Icade | 17,010 | 2,097,451 |
Unibail-Rodamco | 26,550 | 6,139,096 |
| | 8,236,547 |
Germany—1.8% | | |
Alstria Office REIT | 157,880 | 2,381,090 |
DIC Asset | 122,470 | 1,548,679 |
| | 3,929,769 |
Hong Kong—12.9% | | |
China Overseas Land & Investment | 1,320,600 | 2,830,694 |
Evergrande Real Estate Group | 1,932,000 | 1,258,753 |
Hang Lung Properties | 530,000 | 2,172,662 |
Hongkong Land Holdings | 826,000 | 5,881,120 |
Link REIT | 491,000 | 1,675,219 |
Longfor Properties | 461,500 | 709,297 |
Soho China | 1,310,500 | 1,170,435 |
Sun Hung Kai Properties | 673,000 | 9,798,746 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Hong Kong (continued) | | |
Wharf Holdings | 294,900 | 2,048,311 |
| | 27,545,237 |
Japan—8.4% | | |
Advance Residence Investment | 466 | 974,198 |
AEON Mall | 36,300 | 875,655 |
Kenedix Realty Investment | 318 | 1,224,520 |
Mitsubishi Estate | 250,000 | 4,366,188 |
Mitsui Fudosan | 209,000 | 3,577,442 |
Nippon Building Fund | 30 | 292,901 |
Nomura Real Estate Office Fund | 169 | 1,116,800 |
NTT Urban Development | 1,201 | 1,026,381 |
Orix Jreit | 177 | 976,188 |
Sumitomo Realty & Development | 110,000 | 2,444,444 |
United Urban Investment | 888 | 1,020,309 |
| | 17,895,026 |
Netherlands—1.4% | | |
Corio | 46,080 | 3,053,824 |
Singapore—4.9% | | |
CapitaLand | 518,000 | 1,227,208 |
CapitaMall Trust | 799,000 | 1,216,421 |
Capitamalls Asia | 481,000 | 575,649 |
CDL Hospitality Trusts | 730,000 | 1,224,294 |
City Developments | 126,000 | 1,066,840 |
Fortune Real Estate Investment Trust | 1,512,000 | 748,063 |
Global Logistic Properties | 1,201,000 | 2,014,215 |
Keppel Land | 394,000 | 1,161,182 |
Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust | 1,023,000 | 1,249,288 |
| | 10,483,160 |
Sweden—1.6% | | |
Castellum | 62,930 | 943,174 |
Wihlborgs Fastigheter | 163,550 | 2,365,905 |
| | 3,309,079 |
Switzerland—.8% | | |
PSP Swiss Property | 17,200 a | 1,633,565 |
United Kingdom—6.1% | | |
Capital & Counties Properties | 694,760 | 2,196,667 |
8
| | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
United Kingdom (continued) | | |
Capital Shopping Centres Group | 441,820 | 2,832,861 |
Land Securities Group | 340,350 | 4,656,754 |
London & Stamford Property | 625,500 | 1,309,086 |
Unite Group | 583,450 a | 2,037,632 |
| | 13,033,000 |
United States—41.8% | | |
Alexandria Real Estate Equities | 22,120 | 1,712,531 |
American Campus Communities | 29,460 | 1,046,419 |
Apartment Investment & Management, Cl. A | 49,620 | 1,266,799 |
AvalonBay Communities | 13,670 | 1,755,228 |
Boston Properties | 29,880 | 3,172,061 |
Brandywine Realty Trust | 64,620 | 748,946 |
Camden Property Trust | 31,450 | 2,000,849 |
Colonial Properties Trust | 79,410 | 1,619,964 |
Commonwealth REIT | 66,360 | 1,714,743 |
DCT Industrial Trust | 100,100 | 523,523 |
Developers Diversified Realty | 90,380 | 1,274,358 |
DiamondRock Hospitality | 63,710 | 683,608 |
Digital Realty Trust | 31,970 | 1,975,107 |
Douglas Emmett | 74,490 | 1,481,606 |
Duke Realty | 139,300 | 1,951,593 |
Equity Residential Properties Trust | 97,690 | 5,861,400 |
Essex Property Trust | 19,160 | 2,592,156 |
Federal Realty Investment Trust | 12,270 | 1,045,159 |
General Growth Properties | 79,810 | 1,332,029 |
HCP | 79,290 | 2,909,150 |
Health Care REIT | 72,180 | 3,784,397 |
Host Hotels & Resorts | 125,600 | 2,128,920 |
Hudson Pacific Properties | 47,280 | 734,258 |
Hyatt Hotels, Cl. A | 32,110 a | 1,310,730 |
Kilroy Realty | 38,480 | 1,519,575 |
Kimco Realty | 171,690 | 3,200,302 |
LaSalle Hotel Properties | 41,130 | 1,083,364 |
Macerich | 83,450 | 4,464,575 |
National Retail Properties | 72,009 | 1,764,941 |
Parkway Properties | 25,570 | 436,224 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
United States (continued) | | |
ProLogis | 149,914 | 5,372,918 |
Public Storage | 36,700 | 4,184,167 |
Simon Property Group | 78,360 | 9,107,783 |
SL Green Realty | 21,260 | 1,761,816 |
Sunstone Hotel Investors | 115,800 a | 1,073,466 |
U-Store-It Trust | 67,270 | 707,680 |
UDR | 51,180 | 1,256,469 |
Ventas | 78,700 | 4,148,277 |
Vornado Realty Trust | 52,650 | 4,905,927 |
| | 89,613,018 |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(cost $191,424,980) | | 206,786,699 |
|
Other Investment—1.5% | | |
Registered Investment Company; | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Plus Money Market Fund | | |
(cost $3,288,000) | 3,288,000 b | 3,288,000 |
|
Total Investments (cost $194,712,980) | 98.0% | 210,074,699 |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | 2.0% | 4,281,871 |
Net Assets | 100.0% | 214,356,570 |
| |
REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust |
a | Non-income producing security. |
b | Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
| | | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | | |
|
| Value (%) | | Value (%) |
Diversified Reits | 22.9 | Industrial | 3.7 |
Office | 14.0 | Hotels | 3.4 |
Real Estate Services | 11.9 | Self Storage | 2.3 |
Retail | 9.5 | Money Market Investment | 1.5 |
Multifamily | 7.5 | Residential | 1.2 |
Regional Malls | 7.4 | Specialty | .9 |
Health Care | 7.1 | Financial | .6 |
Shopping Centers | 4.1 | | 98.0 |
|
† Based on net assets. | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
10
|
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | | |
| | Cost | Value |
Assets ($): | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments: | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | 191,424,980 | 206,786,699 |
Affiliated issuers | | 3,288,000 | 3,288,000 |
Cash | | | 792,033 |
Cash denominated in foreign currencies | | 2,618,239 | 2,659,077 |
Receivable for investment securities sold | | | 3,017,752 |
Dividends and interest receivable | | | 596,426 |
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed | | | 565,849 |
Prepaid expenses | | | 16,269 |
| | | 217,722,105 |
Liabilities ($): | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | | | 204,690 |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | | 3,087,167 |
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | | | 23,168 |
Accrued expenses | | | 50,510 |
| | | 3,365,535 |
Net Assets ($) | | | 214,356,570 |
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | 222,951,010 |
Accumulated distributions in excess of investment income—net | | (2,408,424) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | (21,600,350) |
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | |
on investments and foreign currency transactions | | | 15,414,334 |
Net Assets ($) | | | 214,356,570 |
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Net Assets ($) | 2,055,557 | 329,829 | 211,971,184 |
Shares Outstanding | 263,300 | 42,858 | 27,464,507 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 7.81 | 7.70 | 7.72 |
|
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| |
Investment Income ($): | |
Income: | |
Cash dividends (net of $160,954 foreign taxes withheld at source): | |
Unaffiliated issuers | 3,203,900 |
Affiliated issuers | 3,776 |
Interest | 520 |
Total Income | 3,208,196 |
Expenses: | |
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 863,519 |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 50,319 |
Professional fees | 28,877 |
Registration fees | 26,935 |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 8,022 |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 6,027 |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 1,249 |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 1,066 |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 1,031 |
Miscellaneous | 9,783 |
Total Expenses | 996,828 |
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertaking—Note 3(a) | (173) |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(c) | (19) |
Net Expenses | 996,636 |
Investment Income—Net | 2,211,560 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | 9,078,008 |
Net realized gain (loss) on forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 47,337 |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | 9,125,345 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on | |
investments and foreign currency transactions | (1,423,853) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 7,701,492 |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 9,913,052 |
|
See notes to financial statements. | |
12
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended |
| (Unaudited) | December 31, 2010 |
Operations ($): | | |
Investment income—net | 2,211,560 | 1,568,758 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 9,125,345 | 5,141,911 |
Net unrealized appreciation | | |
(depreciation) on investments | (1,423,853) | 11,734,559 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
Resulting from Operations | 9,913,052 | 18,445,228 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | |
Investment income—net: | | |
Class A Shares | (7,296) | (62,237) |
Class C Shares | (665) | (6,541) |
Class I Shares | (1,064,137) | (5,615,484) |
Total Dividends | (1,072,098) | (5,684,262) |
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | |
Class A Shares | 517,151 | 1,507,247 |
Class C Shares | 216,867 | 162,622 |
Class I Shares | 83,391,889 | 58,618,368 |
Dividends reinvested: | | |
Class A Shares | 6,295 | 55,319 |
Class C Shares | 648 | 5,499 |
Class I Shares | 350,884 | 1,798,041 |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | |
Class A Shares | (314,466) | (60,318) |
Class C Shares | (98,071) | (16,590) |
Class I Shares | (19,126,790) | (19,313,174) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
from Capital Stock Transactions | 64,944,407 | 42,757,014 |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 73,785,361 | 55,517,980 |
Net Assets ($): | | |
Beginning of Period | 140,571,209 | 85,053,229 |
End of Period | 214,356,570 | 140,571,209 |
Distributions in excess of | | |
investment income—net | (2,408,424) | (3,547,886) |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
| | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended |
| (Unaudited) | December 31, 2010 |
Capital Share Transactions: | | |
Class A | | |
Shares sold | 67,412 | 213,190 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 831 | 7,537 |
Shares redeemed | (41,922) | (8,403) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 26,321 | 212,324 |
Class C | | |
Shares sold | 28,829 | 22,942 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 86 | 760 |
Shares redeemed | (13,032) | (2,575) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 15,883 | 21,127 |
Class I | | |
Shares sold | 11,041,153 | 8,425,440 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 46,847 | 250,142 |
Shares redeemed | (2,546,726) | (2,831,447) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 8,541,274 | 5,844,135 |
|
See notes to financial statements. | | |
14
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for the fund’s Class A and Class I shares represents the financial highlights of the Class A and Institutional shares, respectively, of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund (“Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund”), before the fund commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of the fund’s Class A and Class I shares thereafter. Before the fund commenced operations, all of the assets of the Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund were transferred to the fund in exchange for Class A and Class I shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s and the fund’s predecessor’s financial statements.
| | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | | Year Ended December 31, | |
Class A Shares† | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006a |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | 7.41 | 6.56 | 5.02 | 9.04 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income—netb | .08 | .05 | .08 | .16 | .18 | — |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .35 | 1.07 | 1.74 | (4.08) | (.97) | — |
Total from Investment Operations | .43 | 1.12 | 1.82 | (3.92) | (.79) | — |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | |
investment income—net | (.03) | (.27) | (.28) | (.10) | (.17) | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 7.81 | 7.41 | 6.56 | 5.02 | 9.04 | 10.00 |
Total Return (%)c | 5.83d | 17.15 | 36.38 | (43.60) | (8.00) | — |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.46e | 1.67 | 4.36 | 1.62 | 1.58 | — |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.46e | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.41 | 1.50 | — |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 2.00e | .74 | 1.44 | 1.83 | 1.87 | — |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 49.50d | 86.02 | 97.43 | 79 | 73 | — |
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | 2,056 | 1,756 | 162 | 12 | 52 | —f |
| |
† | Represents information for Class A shares of the fund’s predecessor, Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund, |
| through September 12, 2008. |
a | From December 29, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
f | Amount represents less than $1,000. |
See notes to financial statements. |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended December 31, |
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008a |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 7.32 | 6.50 | 5.02 | 7.78 |
Investment Operations: | | | | |
Investment income—netb | .05 | .00c | .04 | .01 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .35 | 1.07 | 1.75 | (2.74) |
Total from Investment Operations | .40 | 1.07 | 1.79 | (2.73) |
Distributions: | | | | |
Dividends from investment income—net | (.02) | (.25) | (.31) | (.03) |
Net asset value, end of period | 7.70 | 7.32 | 6.50 | 5.02 |
Total Return (%)d | 5.31e | 16.48 | 35.35 | (34.92)e |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 2.44f | 2.45 | 2.91 | 2.46f |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 2.31f | 2.35 | 2.35 | 2.35f |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.27f | .02 | .71 | .67f |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 49.50e | 86.02 | 97.43 | 79 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 330 | 198 | 38 | 6 |
| |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
d | Exclusive of sales charge. |
e | Not annualized. |
f | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
| | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | | Year Ended December 31, | |
Class I Shares† | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006a |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | 7.33 | 6.49 | 5.02 | 9.04 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income—netb | .09 | .10 | .14 | .16 | .20 | — |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .34 | 1.05 | 1.70 | (4.06) | (.98) | — |
Total from Investment Operations | .43 | 1.15 | 1.84 | (3.90) | (.78) | — |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | |
investment income—net | (.04) | (.31) | (.37) | (.12) | (.18) | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 7.72 | 7.33 | 6.49 | 5.02 | 9.04 | 10.00 |
Total Return (%) | 5.95c | 17.91 | 36.94 | (43.38) | (7.83) | — |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.09d | 1.17 | 1.33 | 1.24 | 1.34 | — |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.09d | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.19 | 1.25 | — |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 2.44d | 1.51 | 2.55 | 2.24 | 1.97 | — |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 49.50c | 86.02 | 97.43 | 79 | 73 | — |
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | 211,971 | 138,618 | 84,854 | 48,255 | 51,140 | —e |
| |
† | Represents information for Institutional shares of the fund’s predecessor, Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities |
| Fund, through September 12, 2008. |
a | From December 29, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Not annualized. |
d | Annualized. |
e | Amount represents less than $1,000. |
See notes to financial statements. |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering ten series, including the fund. The fund’s investment objective is to maximize total return consisting of capital appreciation and current income. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. Urdang Securities Management, Inc. (“Urdang”) serves as the fund’s sub-investment advisor. Urdang is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, is the distributor of the fund’s shares.The fund is authorized to issue 250 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock.The fund currently offers three classes of shares: Class A (100 million shares authorized), Class C (50 million shares authorized) and Class I (100 million shares authorized). Class A shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold at net asset value per share only to institutional investors. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
18
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant American Depository Receipts and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Directors, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. Investments denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at the prevailing rates of exchange. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts (“forward contracts”) are valued at the forward rate.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
20
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
| | | | |
| | Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |
| Level 1— | Significant | Significant | |
| Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total |
Assets ($) | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | | |
Equity Securities— | | | | |
Domestic† | 89,613,018 | — | — | 89,613,018 |
Equity Securities— | | | | |
Foreign† | 117,173,681 | — | — | 117,173,681 |
Mutual Funds | 3,288,000 | — | — | 3,288,000 |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. | |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at June 30, 2011.
In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)”. ASU No. 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition,ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of ASU No. 2011-04 and its impact on the financial statements.
(b) Foreign currency transactions: The fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized on securities transactions between trade and settlement date, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities other than
22
investments resulting from changes in exchange rates. Foreign currency gains and losses on investments are included with net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
(c) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Investing in foreign markets may involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in the U.S. These risks include revaluation of currencies, high rates of inflation, repatriation restrictions on income and capital, and adverse political and economic developments. Moreover, securities issued in these markets may be less liquid, subject to government ownership controls and delayed settlements, and their prices may be more volatile than those of comparable securities in the U.S.
(d) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended June 30, 2011 were as follows:
| | | | | |
Affiliated | | | | | |
Investment | Value | | | Value | Net |
Company | 12/31/2010 ($) | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) | 6/30/2011 ($) | Assets (%) |
Dreyfus | | | | | |
Institutional | | | | | |
Preferred | | | | | |
Plus Money | | | | | |
Market Fund | 4,159,000 | 52,082,000 | 52,953,000 | 3,288,000 | 1.5 |
(e) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(f) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $24,379,441 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to December 31, 2010. If not applied, $6,895,360 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2016 and $17,484,081 expires in fiscal 2017.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows: ordinary income $5,684,262. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
24
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing. During the period ended on June 30, 2011, the fund did not borrow under the Facilities.
NOTE 3—Management Fee, Sub-Investment Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with Dreyfus, the management fee is computed at an annual rate of .95% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
Dreyfus has agreed, from May 1, 2011 until May 1, 2012, to waive receipt of its fee and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of none of the classes (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, shareholder services fees, Rule 12b-1 fees and extraordinary expenses) exceed 1.25% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Dreyfus had contractually agreed, until May 1, 2011, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class I shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) did not exceed 1.20% of the value of Class I shares’ average daily net assets.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Dreyfus had also agreed, until May 1, 2011, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A and Class C shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, shareholder services fees, Rule 12b-1 fees and extraordinary expenses) did not exceed 1.35% of the value of Class A and Class C shares’ average daily net assets.
The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertakings, amounted to $173 during the period ended June 30, 2011.
Pursuant to a sub-investment advisory agreement between Dreyfus and Urdang, Dreyfus pays Urdang a monthly fee at an annual rate of .46% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets.
During the period ended June 30, 2011, the Distributor retained $757 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A shares and $23 from CDSCs on redemptions of the fund’s Class C shares.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended June 30, 2011, Class C shares were charged $1,031 pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services.The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended June 30, 2011, Class A and Class C shares were charged $2,287 and $344, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
26
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $2,896 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $431 pursuant to the cash management agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations. These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $19.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $50,319 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $2,981 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $163,983, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $198, shareholder services plan fees $478, custodian fees $37,096, chief compliance officer fees $2,259 and transfer agency per account fees $874, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $198.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and forward contracts, during the period ended June 30, 2011, amounted to $153,190,032 and $87,843,451, respectively.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts: The fund enters into forward contracts in order to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on its foreign portfolio holdings, to settle foreign currency transactions or as a part of its investment strategy. When executing forward contracts, the fund is obligated to buy or sell a foreign currency at a specified rate on a certain date in the future. With respect to sales of forward contracts, the fund incurs a loss if the value of the contract increases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed.The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract decreases between those dates. With respect to purchases of forward contracts, the fund incurs a loss if the value of the contract decreases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed.The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract increases between those dates. Any realized gain or loss which occurred during the period is reflected in the Statement of Operations.The fund is exposed to foreign currency risk as a result of changes in value of underlying financial instruments. The fund is also exposed to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance on these forward contracts, which is typically limited to the unrealized gain on each open contract. At June 30, 2011, there were no forward contracts outstanding.
28
The following summarizes the average market value of derivatives outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2011:
| |
| Average Market Value ($) |
Forward contracts | 244,181 |
At June 30, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $15,361,719, consisting of $18,726,858 gross unrealized appreciation and $3,365,139 gross unrealized depreciation.
At June 30, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
| Contents |
| THE FUND |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
11 | Statement of Options Written |
12 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
13 | Statement of Operations |
14 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
16 | Financial Highlights |
19 | Notes to Financial Statements |
| FOR MORE INFORMATION |
| Back Cover |
Dreyfus
Large Cap Equity Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund, covering the six-month period from January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Although 2011 began on an optimistic note amid encouraging economic data, by midyear investors returned to a more cautious outlook. The U.S. and global economies continued to grow over the reporting period, but at a relatively sluggish pace. First, manufacturing activity proved unsustainably strong in late 2010 and early 2011, leading to a subsequent slowdown in new orders. Second, turmoil in the Middle East drove oil prices higher and produced an inflationary drag on real incomes.Third, natural and nuclear disasters in Japan added to upward pressure on energy prices, and these unexpected events disrupted the global supply chain, especially in the automotive sector. Finally, in the United States, disappointing labor and housing markets weighed on investor sentiment. As a result, U.S. stocks generally produced only modest gains over the first half of the year.
We expect economic conditions to improve over the second half of 2011. Inflationary pressures appear to be peaking in most countries, including the United States, and we have already seen energy prices retreat from their highs. In addition, a successful resolution to the current debate regarding government spending and borrowing, without major fiscal tightening over the near term, should help avoid a serious disruption to the domestic economy. To assess how these and other developments may affect your investments, we encourage you, as always, to speak with your financial advisor.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
July 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011, as provided by Irene D. O’Neill, Portfolio Manager
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of 5.57%, Class C shares returned 5.26% and Class I shares returned 5.88%.1 In comparison, the Standard and Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index (“S&P 500 Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of 6.01%.2
Although stocks rallied early in the year as an economic recovery appeared to gain traction, renewed concerns later caused the market to give back some of its previous gains.The fund produced lower returns than its benchmark, primarily due to shortfalls in the consumer discretionary and utilities sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.To pursue this goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large-capitalization companies with market capitalizations of $5 billion or more at the time of purchase.
The fund invests primarily in large, established companies that we believe have proven track records and the potential for superior relative earnings growth.The investment process begins with a “top-down” assessment of broad economic, political and social trends and their implications for different market and industry sectors. Fundamental research is used to identify companies with the potential for above-average earnings and revenue growth; sustainable competitive advantage; strong or improving financial condition; and/or earnings power that is either unrecognized or underestimated by the market.
Shifting Sentiment Sparked Heightened Volatility
Investors’ outlooks had improved dramatically by the start of 2011 due to improvements in employment, consumer spending and corporate earnings, sending stock prices broadly higher. However, the rally was interrupted in February when political unrest in North Africa/Middle
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
East led to sharply rising energy prices, and again in March when devastating natural and nuclear disasters in Japan threatened one of the world’s largest economies. Nonetheless, investors proved resilient, and stocks bounced back from these unexpected shocks.
In late April, investor sentiment began to deteriorate in earnest when Greece appeared headed for default on its sovereign debt, U.S. economic data proved disappointing and a contentious debate regarding U.S. government spending and borrowing intensified. Stocks suffered bouts of heightened volatility as newly risk-averse investors shifted their focus from economically sensitive industry groups to those that historically have held up well under uncertain economic conditions.
Security Selections Produced Mixed Results
Although the fund participated to a substantial degree in the market’s gains over the first half of 2011, results compared to the benchmark were undermined by a handful of disappointments in the consumer discretionary sector, where cruise line Carnival suffered when oil prices climbed and itineraries needed to be rerouted due to political instability in Northern Africa. In addition, mass merchandiser Target was hurt by weaker consumer spending among its customer base.The fund did not participate fully in above-average returns from the utilities sector, where most companies did not meet our earnings growth criteria. Moreover, electric utility company Sempra Energy lagged when investors reacted negatively to a management change.
The fund achieved better results in other areas. Overweighted exposure to the better-performing information technology sector produced particularly strong relative performance. Successful stock selections among technology companies included consulting services providers Accenture and International Business Machines, which encountered robust demand from businesses seeking to enhance revenue growth. Software and business analytics specialist Teradata benefited from the accelerating trend toward “cloud computing,” in which businesses manage data and applications over the Internet.The fund also benefited from underweighted exposure to large, slower-growing technology companies such as Microsoft—and no exposure to Cisco Systems—that appear to have missed the cloud computing trend.
The health care sector led the S&P 500 Index during the reporting period, and the fund achieved above-average returns in the sector
4
through successful stock selections. Holdings such as Baxter International, Covidien, Zimmer Holdings and Agilent Technologies bounced back from previous weakness as industry utilization rates increased and investors flocked to traditionally defensive investments. Drug producer Watson Pharmaceuticals advanced after capturing market share and receiving approvals for a number of new generic medicines. In the energy sector, overweighted exposure to natural gas producers bolstered results as commodity prices climbed, benefiting companies such as QEP Resources and Southwestern Energy. Investors responded positively to Plains Exploration & Production Company’s announcement of the sale of its deep-water properties in the Gulf of Mexico, and Halliburton gained value as drilling activity intensified.
Seeking Opportunities in a Choppy Economic Recovery
We expect the U.S. economic rebound to persist fitfully amid significant headwinds over the remainder of 2011, leading us to conclude that investors will continue to favor large-cap companies with solid business fundamentals and strong growth prospects.We have found a number of opportunities in the energy and information technology sectors, but fewer in the consumer staples, utilities and telecommunications services sectors.
July 15, 2011
| |
| Please note, the position in any security highlighted with italicized typeface was sold during the |
| reporting period. |
| Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment |
| style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the |
| fund’s prospectus. |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
| consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares, or the applicable |
| contingent deferred sales charge imposed on the redemption of Class C shares. Had these charges |
| been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth |
| more or less than their original cost. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain fund |
| expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an agreement through May 1, 2012, at which |
| time it may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the |
| fund’s returns would have been lower. |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital |
| gain distributions.The Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index is a widely accepted, |
| unmanaged index of U.S. stock market performance. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended June 30, 2011 | | |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 6.37 | $ 10.38 | $ 3.98 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,055.70 | $1,052.60 | $1,058.80 |
|
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 6.26 | $ 10.19 | $ 3.91 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,018.60 | $1,014.68 | $1,020.93 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.25% for Class A, 2.04% for Class C and .78% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
|
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | | |
Common Stocks—99.4% | Shares | | Value ($) |
Consumer Discretionary—9.3% | | | |
Amazon.com | 12,600 a | 2,576,574 |
Carnival | 63,500 | | 2,389,505 |
International Game Technology | 99,650 | | 1,751,847 |
Johnson Controls | 82,850 | | 3,451,531 |
Lowe’s | 104,110 | | 2,426,804 |
Walt Disney | 85,350 | | 3,332,064 |
Yum! Brands | 35,570 | | 1,964,887 |
| | | 17,893,212 |
Consumer Staples—10.0% | | | |
Avon Products | 34,190 | | 957,320 |
Coca-Cola | 53,500 | | 3,600,015 |
Costco Wholesale | 25,580 | | 2,078,119 |
Kraft Foods, Cl. A | 86,540 | | 3,048,804 |
PepsiCo | 29,950 | | 2,109,378 |
Philip Morris International | 22,760 | | 1,519,685 |
Procter & Gamble | 48,765 | | 3,099,991 |
Walgreen | 64,200 | | 2,725,932 |
| | | 19,139,244 |
Energy—14.3% | | | |
Cameron International | 61,700 a,b | 3,102,893 |
Chevron | 25,300 | | 2,601,852 |
Exxon Mobil | 80,290 | | 6,534,000 |
Halliburton | 43,900 | c | 2,238,900 |
Newfield Exploration | 24,800 a | 1,686,896 |
Plains Exploration & Production | 47,890 a | 1,825,567 |
QEP Resources | 53,510 | | 2,238,323 |
Schlumberger | 22,030 | | 1,903,392 |
Southwestern Energy | 59,490 | a,c | 2,550,931 |
Valero Energy | 108,600 | | 2,776,902 |
| | | 27,459,656 |
Financial—15.3% | | | |
Allstate | 90,800 | | 2,772,124 |
American Express | 52,445 | | 2,711,407 |
BB&T | 108,400 | | 2,909,456 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Financial (continued) | | |
Citigroup | 98,840 | 4,115,698 |
Invesco | 111,546 | 2,610,176 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 111,420 | 4,561,535 |
PNC Financial Services Group | 45,410 | 2,706,890 |
State Street | 44,170 | 1,991,625 |
U.S. Bancorp | 89,150 | 2,274,217 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 94,700 | 2,657,282 |
| | 29,310,410 |
Health Care—12.2% | | |
Agilent Technologies | 43,480 a | 2,222,263 |
Baxter International | 47,800 | 2,853,182 |
Cardinal Health | 52,580 | 2,388,184 |
Covidien | 43,400 | 2,310,182 |
Hospira | 46,480 a,b | 2,633,557 |
Pfizer | 187,900 | 3,870,740 |
Shire, ADR | 24,000 | 2,261,040 |
Watson Pharmaceuticals | 34,750 a,b | 2,388,368 |
Zimmer Holdings | 40,350 a | 2,550,120 |
| | 23,477,636 |
Industrial—11.4% | | |
Caterpillar | 34,940 | 3,719,712 |
Deere & Co. | 27,100 | 2,234,395 |
Eaton | 43,200 | 2,222,640 |
Emerson Electric | 46,850 | 2,635,313 |
General Electric | 130,830 | 2,467,454 |
Honeywell International | 44,070 | 2,626,131 |
Union Pacific | 27,000 | 2,818,800 |
United Technologies | 34,970 | 3,095,195 |
| | 21,819,640 |
Information Technology—20.1% | | |
Accenture, Cl. A | 30,770 | 1,859,123 |
Acme Packet | 32,260 a | 2,262,394 |
8
| | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Information Technology (continued) | | |
Apple | 22,520 a | 7,559,288 |
Baidu, ADR | 12,700 a | 1,779,651 |
EMC | 116,900 a | 3,220,595 |
Intel | 104,100 | 2,306,856 |
International Business Machines | 25,370 | 4,352,224 |
NXP Semiconductors | 109,080 | 2,915,708 |
Riverbed Technology | 51,500 a | 2,038,885 |
Rovi | 39,600 a,b | 2,271,456 |
Salesforce.com | 21,180 a | 3,155,396 |
Taiwan Semiconductor | | |
Manufacturing, ADR | 132,650 b | 1,672,717 |
Teradata | 51,010 a | 3,070,802 |
| | 38,465,095 |
Materials—3.8% | | |
Air Products & Chemicals | 28,200 | 2,695,356 |
Celanese, Ser. A | 50,300 b | 2,681,493 |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold | 36,280 | 1,919,212 |
| | 7,296,061 |
Telecommunication Services—1.9% | | |
AT&T | 73,280 | 2,301,725 |
Verizon Communications | 34,910 | 1,299,699 |
| | 3,601,424 |
Utilities—1.1% | | |
Sempra Energy | 40,350 | 2,133,708 |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(cost $164,371,444) | | 190,596,086 |
|
Other Investment—1.7% | | |
Registered Investment Company; | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | | |
Plus Money Market Fund | | |
(cost $3,218,000) | 3,218,000 d | 3,218,000 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | |
Investment of Cash Collateral | | |
for Securities Loaned—5.0% | Shares | Value ($) |
Registered Investment Company; | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Cash Advantage Fund | | |
(cost $9,609,382) | 9,609,382 d | 9,609,382 |
Total Investments (cost $177,198,826) | 106.1% | 203,423,468 |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (6.1%) | (11,746,751) |
Net Assets | 100.0% | 191,676,717 |
|
ADR—American Depository Receipts |
a Non-income producing security. |
b Security, or portion thereof, on loan.At June 30, 2011, the value of the fund’s securities on loan was $9,538,962 |
and the value of the collateral held by the fund was $9,609,382. |
c Held by a broker as collateral for open options written. |
d Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
| | | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | | |
|
| Value (%) | | Value (%) |
Information Technology | 20.1 | Consumer Discretionary | 9.3 |
Financial | 15.3 | Money Market Investments | 6.7 |
Energy | 14.3 | Materials | 3.8 |
Health Care | 12.2 | Telecommunication Services | 1.9 |
Industrial | 11.4 | Utilities | 1.1 |
Consumer Staples | 10.0 | | 106.1 |
|
† Based on net assets. | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
10
|
STATEMENT OF OPTIONS WRITTEN |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | |
| Number of | |
| Contracts | Value ($) |
Call Options: | | |
Halliburton, | | |
August 2011 @ $52.5 | 100 a | (17,300) |
Southwestern Energy, | | |
September 2011 @ $45 | 150 a | (20,700) |
(premiums received $36,709) | | (38,000) |
|
a Non-income producing security. | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | |
|
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | | |
| | Cost | Value |
Assets ($): | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including | | |
securities on loan, valued at $9,538,962)—Note 1(b): | | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | 164,371,444 | 190,596,086 |
Affiliated issuers | | 12,827,382 | 12,827,382 |
Cash | | | 160,730 |
Receivable for investment securities sold | | | 591,256 |
Dividends and interest receivable | | | 306,760 |
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed | | | 155,195 |
Prepaid expenses | | | 18,004 |
| | | 204,655,413 |
Liabilities ($): | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | | | 114,518 |
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(b) | | | 9,609,382 |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | | 3,032,813 |
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | | | 136,666 |
Outstanding options written, at value (premiums received | | | |
$36,709)—See Statement of Options Written—Note 4 | | | 38,000 |
Accrued expenses | | | 47,317 |
| | | 12,978,696 |
Net Assets ($) | | | 191,676,717 |
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | 226,501,269 |
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | | | 844,432 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | (61,892,335) |
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | |
on investments and options transactions | | | 26,223,351 |
Net Assets ($) | | | 191,676,717 |
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Net Assets ($) | 548,481 | 83,181 | 191,045,055 |
Shares Outstanding | 49,989 | 7,414 | 16,633,947 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 10.97 | 11.22 | 11.49 |
|
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
12
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| |
Investment Income ($): | |
Income: | |
Cash dividends (net of $13,603 foreign taxes withheld at source): | |
Unaffiliated issuers | 1,609,903 |
Affiliated issuers | 968 |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(b) | 1,904 |
Total Income | 1,612,775 |
Expenses: | |
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 690,538 |
Professional fees | 23,056 |
Registration fees | 20,091 |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 17,283 |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 9,940 |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 7,624 |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 6,465 |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 1,579 |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 282 |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 174 |
Miscellaneous | 6,087 |
Total Expenses | 783,119 |
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertaking—Note 3(a) | (15,930) |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(c) | (44) |
Net Expenses | 767,145 |
Investment Income—Net | 845,630 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 8,501,272 |
Net realized gain (loss) on options transactions | 45,357 |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | 8,546,629 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 2,059,105 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on options transactions | (1,291) |
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | 2,057,814 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 10,604,443 |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 11,450,073 |
|
See notes to financial statements. | |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended |
| (Unaudited) | December 31, 2010 |
Operations ($): | | |
Investment income—net | 845,630 | 1,819,024 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 8,546,629 | 7,627,646 |
Net unrealized appreciation | | |
(depreciation) on investments | 2,057,814 | 17,565,021 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
Resulting from Operations | 11,450,073 | 27,011,691 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | |
Investment income—net: | | |
Class A Shares | (3,419) | (2,593) |
Class C Shares | (146) | (465) |
Class I Shares | (1,815,186) | (2,333,419) |
Total Dividends | (1,818,751) | (2,336,477) |
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | |
Class A Shares | 291,451 | 136,510 |
Class C Shares | 25,084 | 11,001 |
Class I Shares | 15,976,114 | 27,234,744 |
Dividends reinvested: | | |
Class A Shares | 3,385 | 2,438 |
Class C Shares | 89 | 383 |
Class I Shares | 305,083 | 395,348 |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | |
Class A Shares | (141,374) | (79,009) |
Class C Shares | (38) | (165) |
Class I Shares | (29,813,090) | (41,869,393) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
from Capital Stock Transactions | (13,353,296) | (14,168,143) |
Settlement payment from | | |
unaffiliated third party† | — | 137,539 |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (3,721,974) | 10,644,610 |
Net Assets ($): | | |
Beginning of Period | 195,398,691 | 184,754,081 |
End of Period | 191,676,717 | 195,398,691 |
Undistributed investment income—net | 844,432 | 1,817,553 |
14
| | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended |
| (Unaudited) | December 31, 2010 |
Capital Share Transactions: | | |
Class A | | |
Shares sold | 27,001 | 15,127 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 311 | 258 |
Shares redeemed | (13,114) | (8,229) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 14,198 | 7,156 |
Class C | | |
Shares sold | 2,273 | 1,225 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 8 | 40 |
Shares redeemed | (4) | (17) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 2,277 | 1,248 |
Class I | | |
Shares sold | 1,410,020 | 2,742,614 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 26,809 | 40,219 |
Shares redeemed | (2,610,197) | (4,296,121) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (1,173,368) | (1,513,288) |
|
† See Note 5. | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for the fund’s Class A and Class I shares represents the financial highlights of the Class A and Institutional shares, respectively of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund (“Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund”), before the fund commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of the fund’s Class A and Class I shares thereafter. Before the fund commenced operations, all of the assets of the Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund were transferred to the fund in exchange for Class A and Class I shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s and the fund’s predecessor’s financial statements.
| | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | | Year Ended December 31, | |
Class A Shares† | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | 10.45 | 9.14 | 7.16 | 14.61 | 14.42 | 13.35 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income—neta | .02 | .03 | .05 | .12 | .10 | .10 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .56 | 1.35 | 1.93 | (6.80) | 1.48 | 2.03 |
Total from Investment Operations | .58 | 1.38 | 1.98 | (6.68) | 1.58 | 2.13 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | |
investment income—net | (.06) | (.08) | — | (.09) | (.10) | (.08) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | |
gain on investments | — | — | — | (.56) | (1.29) | (.98) |
Return of capital | — | — | — | (.12) | — | — |
Total Distributions | (.06) | (.08) | — | (.77) | (1.39) | (1.06) |
Settlement payment from | | | | | | |
unaffiliated third party | — | .01 | — | — | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 10.97 | 10.45 | 9.14 | 7.16 | 14.61 | 14.42 |
Total Return (%)b | 5.57c | 15.23d | 27.62 | (47.50) | 10.94 | 16.11 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.25e | 2.04 | 3.75 | 1.11 | 1.04 | 1.03 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.25e | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.03 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets | .40e | .30 | .61 | .99 | .69 | .69 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 23.68c | 43.92 | 59.68 | 77 | 66 | 53 |
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | 548 | 374 | 262 | 170 | 27,391 | 28,389 |
| |
† | Represents information for Class A shares of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund, |
| through September 12, 2008. |
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Exclusive of sales charge. |
c | Not annualized. |
d | If settlement payment from unaffiliated third party was not made, total return would have been 15.12%. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
| | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended December 31, |
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008a |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 10.68 | 9.40 | 7.38 | 11.05 |
Investment Operations: | | | | |
Investment income (loss)—netb | (.02) | (.02) | (.00)c | .02 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .58 | 1.39 | 2.02 | (3.69) |
Total from Investment Operations | .56 | 1.37 | 2.02 | (3.67) |
Distributions: | | | | |
Dividends from investment income—net | (.02) | (.09) | — | — |
Settlement payment from | | | | |
unaffiliated third party | — | .00c | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 11.22 | 10.68 | 9.40 | 7.38 |
Total Return (%)d | 5.26e | 14.69f | 27.37 | (33.21)e |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 2.04g | 2.02 | 2.26 | 1.88g |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 2.04g | 1.98 | 2.02 | 1.86g |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | |
(loss) to average net assets | (.40)g | (.18) | (.02) | .85g |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 23.68e | 43.92 | 59.68 | 77 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 83 | 55 | 37 | 7 |
| |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
d | Exclusive of sales charge. |
e | Not annualized. |
f | The impact of the settlement payment from unaffiliated third party on total return amounted to less than .01%. |
g | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | | Year Ended December 31, | |
Class I Shares† | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | 10.95 | 9.55 | 7.40 | 14.66 | 14.46 | 13.38 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income—neta | .05 | .10 | .11 | .16 | .14 | .13 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .59 | 1.41 | 2.04 | (6.63) | 1.49 | 2.05 |
Total from Investment Operations | .64 | 1.51 | 2.15 | (6.47) | 1.63 | 2.18 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | |
investment income—net | (.10) | (.12) | — | (.11) | (.14) | (.12) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | |
gain on investments | — | — | — | (.56) | (1.29) | (.98) |
Return of capital | — | — | — | (.12) | — | — |
Total Distributions | (.10) | (.12) | — | (.79) | (1.43) | (1.10) |
Settlement payment from | | | | | | |
unaffiliated third party | — | .01 | — | — | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 11.49 | 10.95 | 9.55 | 7.40 | 14.66 | 14.46 |
Total Return (%) | 5.88b | 16.09c | 29.05 | (45.91) | 11.27 | 16.43 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | .79d | .80 | .86 | .80 | .79 | .78 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | .78d | .77 | .78 | .79 | .79 | .78 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets | .86d | 1.02 | 1.37 | 1.41 | .94 | .93 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 23.68b | 43.92 | 59.68 | 77 | 66 | 53 |
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | 191,045 | 194,970 | 184,456 | 204,051 | 401,002 | 385,132 |
| |
† | Represents information for Institutional shares of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund, |
| through September 12, 2008. |
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Not annualized. |
c | If settlement payment from unaffiliated third party was not made, total return would have been 15.99%. |
d | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering ten series, including the fund. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares.The fund is authorized to issue 250 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock.The fund currently offers three Classes of shares: Class A (100 million shares authorized), Class C (50 million shares authorized) and Class I (100 million shares authorized). Class A shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold at net asset value per share only to institutional investors. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
As of June 30, 2011, MBC Investments Corp., an indirect subsidiary of BNY Mellon, held 904 Class C shares of the fund.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications.The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset
20
value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Directors, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. Options, which are traded on an exchange, are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange on which such securities are primarily traded or at the last sales price on the national securities market on each business day. Options traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean between the bid and asked price.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
| | | | |
| | Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |
| Level 1— | Significant | Significant | |
| Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total |
Assets ($) | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | | |
Equity Securities— | | | | |
Domestic† | 184,882,678 | — | — | 184,882,678 |
Equity Securities— | | | | |
Foreign† | 5,713,408 | — | — | 5,713,408 |
Mutual Funds | 12,827,382 | — | — | 12,827,382 |
Liabilities ($) | | | | |
Other Financial | | | | |
Instruments: | | | | |
Options Written | (38,000) | — | — | (38,000) |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. | |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements
22
as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at June 30, 2011.
In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)”. ASU No. 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition,ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of ASU No. 2011-04 and its impact on the financial statements.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended June 30, 2011, The Bank of New York Mellon earned $816 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended June 30, 2011 were as follows:
| | | | | |
Affiliated | | | | | |
Investment | Value | | | Value | Net |
Company | 12/31/2010 ($) | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) | 6/30/2011 ($) | Assets (%) |
Dreyfus | | | | | |
Institutional | | | | | |
Preferred | | | | | |
Plus Money | | | | | |
Market Fund | 1,448,000 | 15,715,000 | 13,945,000 | 3,218,000 | 1.7 |
Dreyfus | | | | | |
Institutional | | | | | |
Cash | | | | | |
Advantage | | | | | |
Fund | — | 65,916,802 | 56,307,420 | 9,609,382 | 5.0 |
Total | 1,448,000 | 81,631,802 | 70,252,420 | 12,827,382 | 6.7 |
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent
24
basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $70,327,360, available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to December 31, 2010. If not applied, the carryover expires in fiscal 2017.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows: ordinary income $2,336,477.The tax character of the current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing.
The average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facilities during the period ended June 30, 2011, was approximately $25,400 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.38%.
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at an annual rate of .70% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
The Manager has contractually agreed from May 1, 2011 through May 1, 2012, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of none of the classes (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder services fees and 12b-1 fees) exceed 1.25% of the value of the average daily net assets of their class.
The Manager had contractually agreed, until May 1, 2011, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class I shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) did not exceed .79% of the value of Class I shares average daily net assets.
In addition, the Manager had agreed, until May 1, 2011, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A and Class C shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder services fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) did not exceed 1.25% of the value of Class A and Class C shares average daily net assets.
26
The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertakings, amounted to $15,930 during the period ended June 30, 2011.
During the period ended June 30, 2011, the Distributor retained $294 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A shares.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended June 30, 2011, Class C shares were charged $282 pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts.The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services.The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended June 30, 2011, Class A and Class C shares were charged $706 and $94, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $6,327 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $944 pursuant to the cash management agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations. These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $44.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $7,624 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $2,981 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $106,187, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $49, shareholder services plan fees $129, custodian fees $3,816, chief compliance officer fees $2,259 and transfer agency per account fees $2,080, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $2.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and options transactions, during the period ended June 30, 2011, amounted to $46,891,623 and $59,773,114, respectively.
Options: The fund purchases and writes (sells) put and call options to hedge against changes in the values of equities, or as a substitute for an investment.The fund is subject to market risk in the course of pursuing its investment objectives through its investments in options contracts.A
28
call option gives the purchaser of the option the right (but not the obligation) to buy, and obligates the writer to sell, the underlying security or securities at the exercise price at any time during the option period, or at a specified date. Conversely, a put option gives the purchaser of the option the right (but not the obligation) to sell, and obligates the writer to buy the underlying security or securities at the exercise price at any time during the option period, or at a specified date.
As a writer of call options, the fund receives a premium at the outset and then bears the market risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the financial instrument underlying the option. Generally, the fund realizes a gain, to the extent of the premium, if the price of the underlying financial instrument decreases between the date the option is written and the date on which the option is terminated. Generally, the fund incurs a loss, if the price of the financial instrument increases between those dates.
As a writer of put options, the fund receives a premium at the outset and then bears the market risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the financial instrument underlying the option. Generally, the fund realizes a gain, to the extent of the premium, if the price of the underlying financial instrument increases between the date the option is written and the date on which the option is terminated. Generally, the fund incurs a loss, if the price of the financial instrument decreases between those dates.
As a writer of an option, the fund has no control over whether the underlying securities may be sold (call) or purchased (put) and as a result bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option.There is a risk of loss from a change in value of such options which may exceed the related premiums received. One risk of holding a put or a call option is that if the option is not sold or exercised prior to its expiration, it becomes worthless. However, this risk is limited to the premium paid by the fund. Upon the expiration or closing of the option transaction, a gain or loss is reported in the Statement of Operations.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The following summarizes the fund’s call/put options written during the period ended June 30, 2011:
| | | | |
| | | Options Terminated |
| Number of | Premiums | | Net Realized |
Options Written: | Contracts | Received ($) | Cost ($) | Gain ($) |
Contracts outstanding | | | | |
December 31, 2010 | — | — | | |
Contracts written | 691 | 106,737 | | |
Contracts terminated: | | | | |
Contracts closed | 441 | 70,028 | 24,671 | 45,357 |
Contracts Outstanding | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | 250 | 36,709 | | |
The following summarizes the average market value of derivatives outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2011:
| |
| Average Market Value ($) |
Equity options contracts | 20,564 |
At June 30, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $26,224,642, consisting of $31,262,515 gross unrealized appreciation and $5,037,873 gross unrealized depreciation.
At June 30, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
NOTE 5—Other:
During the period ended December 31, 2010, the fund received a regulatory settlement payment of $137,539 from an unaffiliated third party which is included in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets.
30
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
| Contents |
| THE FUND |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
11 | Statement of Options Written |
12 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
13 | Statement of Operations |
14 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
16 | Financial Highlights |
19 | Notes to Financial Statements |
| FOR MORE INFORMATION |
| Back Cover |
Dreyfus
Large Cap Growth Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund, covering the six-month period from January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Although 2011 began on an optimistic note amid encouraging economic data, by midyear investors returned to a more cautious outlook. The U.S. and global economies continued to grow over the reporting period, but at a relatively sluggish pace. First, manufacturing activity proved unsustainably strong in late 2010 and early 2011, leading to a subsequent slowdown in new orders. Second, turmoil in the Middle East drove oil prices higher and produced an inflationary drag on real incomes.Third, natural and nuclear disasters in Japan added to upward pressure on energy prices, and these unexpected events disrupted the global supply chain, especially in the automotive sector. Finally, in the United States, disappointing labor and housing markets weighed on investor sentiment. As a result, U.S. stocks generally produced only modest gains over the first half of the year.
We expect economic conditions to improve over the second half of 2011. Inflationary pressures appear to be peaking in most countries, including the United States, and we have already seen energy prices retreat from their highs. In addition, a successful resolution to the current debate regarding government spending and borrowing, without major fiscal tightening over the near term, should help avoid a serious disruption to the domestic economy. To assess how these and other developments may affect your investments, we encourage you, as always, to speak with your financial advisor.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
July 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011, as provided by Irene D. O’Neill, Portfolio Manager
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of 6.55%, Class C shares returned 6.15% and Class I shares returned 6.88%.1 In comparison, the Russell 1000 Growth Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of 6.83%.2
Although stocks rallied early in the year as an economic recovery appeared to gain traction, renewed concerns later caused the market to give back some of its previous gains.The fund’s returns were roughly in line with its benchmark, as strong performance in the information technology, materials and industrials sectors was balanced by shortfalls in the consumer discretionary, financials and energy sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.To pursue this goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large-capitalization companies with market capitalizations of $5 billion or more at the time of purchase.
The fund invests primarily in large, established companies that we believe have proven track records and the potential for superior relative earnings growth.The investment process begins with a “top-down” assessment of broad economic, political and social trends and their implications for different market and industry sectors. Fundamental research is used to identify companies with the potential for accelerating earnings and revenue growth, favorable market positions, improving operating efficiencies, and/or increasing earnings per share.
Shifting Sentiment Sparked Heightened Volatility
Investors’ outlooks had improved dramatically by the start of 2011 due to improvements in employment, consumer spending and corporate earnings, sending stock prices broadly higher. However, the rally was
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
interrupted in February when political unrest in North Africa/Middle East led to sharply rising energy prices, and in March when devastating natural and nuclear disasters in Japan threatened one of the world’s largest economies. Nonetheless, investors proved resilient, and stocks bounced back from these unexpected shocks.
In late April, investor sentiment began to deteriorate in earnest when Greece appeared headed for default on its sovereign debt and a contentious debate regarding U.S. government spending and borrowing intensified. Stocks suffered bouts of heightened volatility as newly risk-averse investors shifted their focus from economically sensitive industry groups to those that historically have held up well under uncertain economic conditions.
Security Selections Produced Mixed Results
The fund’s investments in the information technology sector produced particularly strong relative performance due to solid stock selection. Successful stock selections included semiconductor manufacturer ARM Holdings, which advanced due to greater adoption of smartphones containing its microchips. Software and business analytics specialist Teradata and communications equipment maker Acme Packet benefited from the trend toward “cloud computing,” in which businesses manage data and applications over the Internet. Search engine Baidu grew more rapidly after Google’s exit from the Chinese market. The fund also benefited from underweighted exposure to large technology companies—and no exposure to Cisco Systems—that appear to have missed the cloud computing trend.
Results in the materials sector were boosted by iron ore producer Cliffs Natural Resources, which benefited from the industry’s limited mining capacity and a change in the pricing methodology for iron ore.Among industrial companies, aerospace giants Honeywell International and Boeing encountered rising orders for commercial aircraft, while heavy equipment maker Caterpillar and transportation company Union Pacific benefited from improved domestic industrial production trends. In the health care sector, holdings such as Baxter International, Covidien, Zimmer Holdings and Agilent Technologies bounced back from previous weakness as industry utilization rates improved. Drug producer Watson Pharmaceuticals advanced after capturing market share and receiving approvals for a number of new generic medicines.
4
Disappointments during the reporting period were concentrated mainly in the consumer discretionary sector, where cruise line Carnival suffered when oil prices climbed and itineraries needed to be rerouted due to political instability in North Africa. In addition, mass merchandiser Target was hurt by weaker consumer spending among its customer base. Results from the financials sector were hindered by municipal bond insurer Assured Guaranty, which suffered when a major bond rating agency changed its evaluation methodologies, and by banking giant Citigroup, which was hurt by volatile capital markets and concerns regarding regulatory capital requirements. In the energy sector, Forest Oil lagged amid disappointing production volumes at some of its properties, and Newfield Exploration was punished when investors worried that the company overpaid for a recent acquisition.
Seeking Opportunities in a Choppy Economic Recovery
We expect the U.S. economic rebound to persist fitfully amid significant headwinds over the remainder of 2011, leading us to conclude that investors will continue to favor large-cap companies with solid business fundamentals and strong growth prospects.We have found a number of opportunities in the energy and information technology sectors, but fewer in the consumer discretionary, utilities and telecommunications services sectors.
July 15, 2011
| |
| Please note, the position in any security highlighted with italicized typeface was sold during the |
| reporting period. |
| Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment |
| style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the |
| fund’s prospectus. |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
| consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares, or the applicable |
| contingent deferred sales charge imposed on the redemption of Class C shares. Had these charges |
| been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth |
| more or less than their original cost. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain fund |
| expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect through May 1, |
| 2012, at which time it may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these expenses not been |
| absorbed, the fund’s returns would have been lower. |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of net dividends and, where applicable, |
| capital gain distributions.The Russell 1000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index that measures |
| the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher |
| forecasted growth values. Index return does not reflect fees and expenses associated with operating a |
| mutual fund. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended June 30, 2011 | | |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 6.81 | $ 11.50 | $ 4.57 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,065.50 | $1,061.50 | $1,068.80 |
|
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 6.66 | $ 11.23 | $ 4.46 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,018.20 | $1,013.64 | $1,020.38 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.33% for Class A, 2.25% for Class C and .89% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
|
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | |
Common Stocks—99.7% | Shares | Value ($) |
Consumer Discretionary—14.6% | | |
Amazon.com | 4,750 a | 971,327 |
Arcos Dorados Holdings, Cl. A | 15,600 | 329,004 |
Carnival | 16,360 | 615,627 |
Colgate-Palmolive | 6,150 | 537,571 |
International Game Technology | 33,310 | 585,590 |
Las Vegas Sands | 14,800 a | 624,708 |
Polo Ralph Lauren | 3,600 b | 477,396 |
Time Warner Cable | 14,300 | 1,115,972 |
Viacom, Cl. B | 12,580 | 641,580 |
Walt Disney | 21,380 | 834,675 |
Yum! Brands | 13,640 | 753,474 |
| | 7,486,924 |
Consumer Staples—8.8% | | |
Coca-Cola | 19,660 | 1,322,921 |
Costco Wholesale | 6,700 | 544,308 |
Kellogg | 11,070 | 612,392 |
PepsiCo | 11,090 | 781,069 |
Philip Morris International | 7,940 | 530,154 |
Walgreen | 16,400 | 696,344 |
| | 4,487,188 |
Energy—12.2% | | |
Cabot Oil & Gas | 8,300 | 550,373 |
Cameron International | 17,700 a | 890,133 |
Exxon Mobil | 17,090 | 1,390,784 |
Halliburton | 17,600 c | 897,600 |
Newfield Exploration | 10,450 a | 710,809 |
QEP Resources | 12,700 | 531,241 |
Schlumberger | 7,210 | 622,944 |
Southwestern Energy | 15,610 a,c | 669,357 |
| | 6,263,241 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Financial—4.3% | | |
Citigroup | 15,200 | 632,928 |
Digital Realty Trust | 8,100 d | 500,418 |
Invesco | 25,128 | 587,995 |
Validus Holdings | 15,300 | 473,535 |
| | 2,194,876 |
Health Care—11.8% | | |
Agilent Technologies | 11,240 a | 574,476 |
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions | 21,700 a | 421,414 |
Amylin Pharmaceuticals | 48,200 a | 643,952 |
Baxter International | 13,100 | 781,939 |
Cardinal Health | 12,080 | 548,674 |
Covidien | 11,800 | 628,114 |
Hospira | 12,300 a | 696,918 |
Mead Johnson Nutrition | 8,300 | 560,665 |
Shire, ADR | 6,450 | 607,655 |
Zimmer Holdings | 9,530 a | 602,296 |
| | 6,066,103 |
Industrial—14.0% | | |
Boeing | 10,300 | 761,479 |
Caterpillar | 10,860 | 1,156,156 |
Danaher | 12,760 | 676,152 |
Dover | 13,800 | 935,640 |
Honeywell International | 18,070 | 1,076,791 |
Parker Hannifin | 10,390 | 932,399 |
Union Pacific | 7,480 | 780,912 |
United Technologies | 9,590 | 848,811 |
| | 7,168,340 |
Information Technology—27.4% | | |
Accenture, Cl. A | 12,100 | 731,082 |
Acme Packet | 8,880 a,b | 622,754 |
8
| | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Information Technology (continued) | | |
Apple | 8,070 a | 2,708,857 |
ARM Holdings, ADR | 26,060 b | 740,886 |
Baidu, ADR | 5,700 a | 798,741 |
Broadcom, Cl. A | 11,730 | 394,597 |
Cognizant Technology Solutions, Cl. A | 6,290 a | 461,309 |
Google, Cl. A | 1,020 a | 516,508 |
International Business Machines | 9,630 | 1,652,026 |
NXP Semiconductors | 22,660 | 605,702 |
Red Hat | 11,200 a | 514,080 |
Riverbed Technology | 19,010 a | 752,606 |
Rovi | 13,950 a | 800,172 |
Salesforce.com | 8,110 a,b | 1,208,228 |
Teradata | 12,720 a | 765,744 |
VMware, Cl. A | 7,820 a | 783,799 |
| | 14,057,091 |
Materials—5.2% | | |
Celanese, Ser. A | 14,600 | 778,326 |
Cliffs Natural Resources | 12,570 | 1,162,096 |
Praxair | 6,860 | 743,555 |
| | 2,683,977 |
Telecommunications—1.4% | | |
Qualcomm | 13,050 | 741,110 |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(cost $41,471,625) | | 51,148,850 |
|
Other Investment—.5% | | |
Registered Investment Company; | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | | |
Plus Money Market Fund | | |
(cost $268,000) | 268,000 e | 268,000 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | |
Investment of Cash Collateral | | |
for Securities Loaned—5.5% | Shares | Value ($) |
Registered Investment Company; | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Cash Advantage Fund | | |
(cost $2,811,344) | 2,811,344 e | 2,811,344 |
Total Investments (cost $44,550,969) | 105.7% | 54,228,194 |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (5.7%) | (2,928,043) |
Net Assets | 100.0% | 51,300,151 |
|
ADR—American Depository Receipts |
a Non-income producing security. |
b Security, or portion thereof, on loan.At June 30, 2011, the value of the fund’s securities on loan was $2,785,277 |
and the value of the collateral held by the fund was $2,811,344. |
c Held by a broker as collateral for open options written. |
d Investment in real estate investment trust. |
e Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
| | | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | | |
|
| Value (%) | | Value (%) |
Information Technology | 27.4 | Money Market Investments | 6.0 |
Consumer Discretionary | 14.6 | Materials | 5.2 |
Industrial | 14.0 | Financial | 4.3 |
Energy | 12.2 | Telecommunications | 1.4 |
Health Care | 11.8 | | |
Consumer Staples | 8.8 | | 105.7 |
|
† Based on net assets. | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
10
|
STATEMENT OF OPTIONS WRITTEN |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | |
| Number of | |
| Contracts | Value ($) |
Call Options: | | |
Halliburton, | | |
August 2011 @ $52.5 | 40 a | (6,920) |
Southwestern Energy, | | |
September 2011 @ $45 | 50 a | (6,900) |
(premiums received $13,360) | | (13,820) |
|
a Non-income producing security. | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | |
|
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | | |
| | Cost | Value |
Assets ($): | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including | | |
securities on loan, valued at $2,785,277)—Note 1(b): | | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | 41,471,625 | 51,148,850 |
Affiliated issuers | | 3,079,344 | 3,079,344 |
Cash | | | 4,472 |
Receivable for investment securities sold | | | 2,647,386 |
Dividends and interest receivable | | | 36,603 |
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed | | | 35 |
Prepaid expenses | | | 20,077 |
| | | 56,936,767 |
Liabilities ($): | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | | | 35,409 |
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(b) | | | 2,811,344 |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | | 2,719,659 |
Outstanding options written, at value (premiums received | | | |
$13,360)—See Statement of Options Written—Note 4 | | | 13,820 |
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | | | 10,000 |
Interest payable—Note 2 | | | 82 |
Accrued expenses | | | 46,302 |
| | | 5,636,616 |
Net Assets ($) | | | 51,300,151 |
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | 47,044,505 |
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | | | 55,684 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | (5,476,803) |
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | |
on investments and options transactions | | | 9,676,765 |
Net Assets ($) | | | 51,300,151 |
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Net Assets ($) | 748,048 | 111,604 | 50,440,499 |
Shares Outstanding | 102,887 | 15,404 | 6,809,805 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 7.27 | 7.25 | 7.41 |
|
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
12
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| |
Investment Income ($): | |
Income: | |
Cash dividends (net of $277 foreign taxes withheld at source): | |
Unaffiliated issuers | 304,007 |
Affiliated issuers | 259 |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(b) | 1,164 |
Total Income | 305,430 |
Expenses: | |
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 193,548 |
Registration fees | 19,911 |
Auditing fees | 19,289 |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 6,191 |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 5,842 |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 4,550 |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 4,497 |
Legal fees | 2,522 |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 482 |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 345 |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 82 |
Miscellaneous | 6,070 |
Total Expenses | 263,329 |
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertaking—Note 3(a) | (14,123) |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(c) | (24) |
Net Expenses | 249,182 |
Investment Income—Net | 56,248 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 3,978,076 |
Net realized gain (loss) on options transactions | 13,915 |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | 3,991,991 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | (258,587) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on options transactions | (460) |
Net Urealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | (259,047) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 3,732,944 |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 3,789,192 |
See notes to financial statements. | |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended |
| (Unaudited) | December 31, 2010 |
Operations ($): | | |
Investment income—net | 56,248 | 307,250 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 3,991,991 | 11,437,550 |
Net unrealized appreciation | | |
(depreciation) on investments | (259,047) | (1,796,783) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
Resulting from Operations | 3,789,192 | 9,948,017 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | |
Investment income—net: | | |
Class A Shares | (1,801) | (1,212) |
Class C Shares | — | (98) |
Class I Shares | (304,502) | (599,892) |
Total Dividends | (306,303) | (601,202) |
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | |
Class A Shares | 351,097 | 182,053 |
Class C Shares | 60,910 | 27,473 |
Class I Shares | 1,298,029 | 5,967,597 |
Dividends reinvested: | | |
Class A Shares | 1,792 | 1,130 |
Class C Shares | — | 89 |
Class I Shares | 93,461 | 165,638 |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | |
Class A Shares | (119,645) | (47,463) |
Class C Shares | (5,218) | (61,817) |
Class I Shares | (10,473,304) | (51,264,910) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
from Capital Stock Transactions | (8,792,878) | (45,030,210) |
Settlement payment from | | |
unaffiliated third party† | — | 129,204 |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (5,309,989) | (35,554,191) |
Net Assets ($): | | |
Beginning of Period | 56,610,140 | 92,164,331 |
End of Period | 51,300,151 | 56,610,140 |
Undistributed investment income—net | 55,684 | 305,739 |
14
| | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended |
| (Unaudited) | December 31, 2010 |
Capital Share Transactions: | | |
Class A | | |
Shares sold | 49,899 | 30,017 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 249 | 184 |
Shares redeemed | (16,749) | (7,624) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 33,399 | 22,577 |
Class C | | |
Shares sold | 8,474 | 4,399 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | — | 14 |
Shares redeemed | (736) | (10,656) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 7,738 | (6,243) |
Class I | | |
Shares sold | 180,432 | 976,707 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 12,786 | 26,544 |
Shares redeemed | (1,428,112) | (8,176,874) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (1,234,894) | (7,173,623) |
|
† See Note 5. | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for the fund’s Class A and Class I shares represents the financial highlights of the Class A and Institutional shares, repectively, of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund (“Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund”), before the fund commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of the fund’s Class A and Class I shares thereafter. Before the fund commenced operations, all of the assets of the Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund were transferred to the fund in exchange for Class A and Class I shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s and the fund’s predecessor’s financial statements.
| | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | | Year Ended December 31, | |
Class A Shares† | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | 6.84 | 5.94 | 4.40 | 8.10 | 7.64 | 7.65 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income (loss)—neta | (.01) | (.01) | .01 | .02 | .01 | .00b |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .46 | .92 | 1.53 | (3.28) | 1.35 | .44 |
Total from Investment Operations | .45 | .91 | 1.54 | (3.26) | 1.36 | .44 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | |
investment income—net | (.02) | (.02) | — | (.01) | (.01) | (.00)b |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | |
gain on investments | — | — | — | (.35) | (.89) | (.45) |
Return of capital | — | — | — | (.08) | — | — |
Total Distributions | (.02) | (.02) | — | (.44) | (.90) | (.45) |
Settlement payment | | | | | | |
from unaffiliated third party | — | .01 | — | — | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 7.27 | 6.84 | 5.94 | 4.40 | 8.10 | 7.64 |
Total Return (%)c | 6.55d | 15.60e | 35.00 | (41.90) | 17.79 | 6.04 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.33f | 1.66 | 2.37 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.09 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.33f | 1.51 | 1.47 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.09 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
(loss) to average net assets | (.20)f | (.13) | .12 | .20 | .10 | .06 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 34.86d | 63.42 | 82.53 | 78 | 52 | 51 |
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | 748 | 475 | 279 | 7 | 4,127 | 5,487 |
| |
† | Represents information for Class A shares of the fund’s predecessor, Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund, through |
| September 12, 2008. |
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | If settlement payment from unaffiliated third party was not made, total return would have been 15.43%. |
f | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
| | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended December 31, |
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008a |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 6.83 | 5.95 | 4.43 | 6.42 |
Investment Operations: | | | | |
Investment income (loss)—netb | (.04) | (.05) | (.03) | .00c |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .46 | .93 | 1.55 | (1.99) |
Total from Investment Operations | .42 | .88 | 1.52 | (1.99) |
Distributions: | | | | |
Dividends from investment income—net | — | (.01) | — | — |
Settlement payment from | | | | |
unaffiliated third party | — | .01 | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 7.25 | 6.83 | 5.95 | 4.43 |
Total Return (%)d | 6.15e | 15.10f | 34.09 | (31.00)e |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 2.31g | 2.16 | 2.06 | 2.01g |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 2.25g | 2.16 | 2.06 | 1.91g |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | |
(loss) to average net assets | (1.14)g | (.81) | (.48) | .04g |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 34.86e | 63.42 | 82.53 | 78 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 112 | 52 | 83 | 12 |
| |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
d | Exclusive of sales charge. |
e | Not annualized. |
f | If settlement payment from unaffiliated third party was not made, total return would have been 14.76%. |
g | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | | Year Ended December 31, | |
Class I Shares† | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | 6.97 | 6.03 | 4.44 | 8.20 | 7.72 | 7.73 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income—neta | .01 | .03 | .04 | .04 | .03 | .02 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .47 | .94 | 1.55 | (3.34) | 1.37 | .45 |
Total from Investment Operations | .48 | .97 | 1.59 | (3.30) | 1.40 | .47 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | |
investment income—net | (.04) | (.04) | — | (.03) | (.03) | (.03) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | |
gain on investments | — | — | — | (.35) | (.89) | (.45) |
Return of capital | — | — | — | (.08) | — | — |
Total Distributions | (.04) | (.04) | — | (.46) | (.92) | (.48) |
Settlement payment from | | | | | | |
unaffiliated third party | — | .01 | — | — | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 7.41 | 6.97 | 6.03 | 4.44 | 8.20 | 7.72 |
Total Return (%) | 6.88b | 16.34c | 35.81 | (42.03) | 18.18 | 6.29 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | .95d | .92 | .88 | .86 | .85 | .84 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | .89d | .88 | .87 | .84 | .85 | .84 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets | .21d | .47 | .75 | .61 | .34 | .30 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 34.86b | 63.42 | 82.53 | 78 | 52 | 51 |
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | 50,440 | 56,083 | 91,803 | 75,292 | 138,729 | 143,479 |
| |
† | Represents information for Institutional shares of the fund’s predecessor, Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund through |
| September 12, 2008. |
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Not annualized. |
c | If settlement payment from unaffiliated third party was not made, total return would have been 16.18%. |
d | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering ten series, including the fund. The fund’s investment objective seeks to provide long-term capital appreciation. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares. The fund is authorized to issue 250 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock. The fund currently offers three Classes of shares: Class A (100 million shares authorized), Class C (50 million shares authorized) and Class I (100 million shares authorized). Class A shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold at net asset value per share only to institutional investors. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net
20
asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Directors, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. Financial futures and options, which are traded on an exchange, are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange on which such securities are primarily traded or at the last sales price on the national securities market on each business day. Options traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean between the bid and asked price.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
| | | | |
| | Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |
| Level 1— | Significant | Significant | |
| Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total |
Assets ($) | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | | |
Equity Securities— | | | | |
Domestic+ | 49,001,568 | — | — | 49,001,568 |
Equity Securities— | | | | |
Foreign+ | 2,147,282 | — | — | 2,147,282 |
Mutual Funds | 3,079,344 | — | — | 3,079,344 |
Liabilities ($) | | | | |
Other Financial | | | | |
Instruments: | | | | |
Options Written | (13,820) | — | — | (13,820) |
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. | |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as
22
well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at June 30, 2011.
In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)”. ASU No. 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition,ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of ASU No. 2011-04 and its impact on the financial statements.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended June 30, 2011, The Bank of New York Mellon earned $499 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended June 30, 2011 were as follows:
| | | | | |
Affiliated | | | | | |
Investment | Value | | | Value | Net |
Company | 12/31/2010 ($) | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) | 6/30/2011 ($) | Assets (%) |
Dreyfus | | | | | |
Institutional | | | | | |
Preferred | | | | | |
Plus Money | | | | | |
Market Fund | 658,000 | 5,628,000 | 6,018,000 | 268,000 | .5 |
Dreyfus | | | | | |
Institutional | | | | | |
Cash | | | | | |
Advantage | | | | | |
Fund | 1,569,094 | 12,209,396 | 10,967,146 | 2,811,344 | 5.5 |
Total | 2,227,094 | 17,837,396 | 16,985,146 | 3,079,344 | 6.0 |
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent
24
basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $9,373,045 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to December 31, 2010. If not applied, the carryover expires in fiscal 2017.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows: ordinary income $601,202. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing.
The average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facilities during the period ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $12,200, with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.36%.
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at an annual rate of .70% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
The Manager has agreed, from May 1, 2011 until May 1, 2012, to waive receipt of its fee and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of none of the classes (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, shareholder services fees, Rule 12b-1 fees and extraordinary expenses) exceed 1.25% of the value of the fund’s average net assets.
The Manager had contractually agreed, until May 1, 2011, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class I shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) did not exceed .87% of the value of Class I shares’ average daily net assets.
In addition, the Manager had agreed, until May 1, 2011, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A and Class C shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, shareholder services fees, Rule 12b-1 fees and extraordinary expenses) did not exceed 1.25% of the value of Class A and Class C shares’ average daily net assets.
26
The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertakings, amounted to $14,123 during the period ended June 30, 2011.
During the period ended June 30, 2011, the Distributor retained $311 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A shares.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended June 30, 2011, Class C shares were charged $345 pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts.The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services.The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended June 30, 2011, Class A and Class C shares were charged $866 and $115, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $3,116 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $518 pursuant to the cash management agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations. These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $24.
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $4,497 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $2,981 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $28,775, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $67, shareholder services plan fees $169, custodian fees $3,000, chief compliance officer fees $2,259 and transfer agency per account fees $1,144, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $5.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and options transactions, during the period ended June 30, 2011, amounted to $19,346,708 and $27,936,099, respectively.
Options: The fund purchases and writes (sells) put and call options to hedge against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for an invest-ment.The fund is subject to interest rate risk in the course of pursuing its investment objectives through its investments in options contracts.A
28
call option gives the purchaser of the option the right (but not the obligation) to buy, and obligates the writer to sell, the underlying security or securities at the exercise price at any time during the option period, or at a specified date. Conversely, a put option gives the purchaser of the option the right (but not the obligation) to sell, and obligates the writer to buy the underlying security or securities at the exercise price at any time during the option period, or at a specified date.
As a writer of call options, the fund receives a premium at the outset and then bears the market risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the financial instrument underlying the option. Generally, the fund realizes a gain, to the extent of the premium, if the price of the underlying financial instrument decreases between the date the option is written and the date on which the option is terminated. Generally, the fund incurs a loss, if the price of the financial instrument increases between those dates.
As a writer of put options, the fund receives a premium at the outset and then bears the market risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the financial instrument underlying the option. Generally, the fund realizes a gain, to the extent of the premium, if the price of the underlying financial instrument increases between the date the option is written and the date on which the option is terminated. Generally, the fund incurs a loss, if the price of the financial instrument decreases between those dates.
As a writer of an option, the fund has no control over whether the underlying securities may be sold (call) or purchased (put) and as a result bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option.There is a risk of loss from a change in value of such options which may exceed the related premiums received. One risk of holding a put or a call option is that if the option is not sold or exercised prior to its expiration, it becomes worthless. However, this risk is limited to the premium paid by the fund. Upon the expiration or closing of the option transaction, a gain or loss is reported in the Statement of Operations.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
The following summarizes the fund’s call/put options written during the period ended June 30, 2011:
| | | | |
| | | Options Terminated |
| Number of | Premiums | | Net Realized |
Options Written: | Contracts | Received ($) | Cost ($) | Gain ($) |
Contracts outstanding | | | | |
December 31, 2010 | — | — | | |
Contracts written | 227 | 34,826 | | |
Contracts terminated: | | | | |
Contracts closed | 137 | 21,466 | 7,551 | 13,915 |
Contracts outstanding | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | 90 | 13,360 | | |
The following summarizes the average market value of derivatives outstanding during the period ended June 30, 2011:
| |
| Average Market Value ($) |
Equity options contracts | 6,876 |
At June 30, 2011, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $9,677,225, consisting of $10,320,769 gross unrealized appreciation and $643,544 gross unrealized depreciation.
At June 30, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
NOTE 5—Other:
During the period ended December 31, 2010, the fund received a regulatory settlement payment of $129,204 from an unaffiliated third party which is included in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets.
30
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
| Contents |
| THE FUND |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
6 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
7 | Statement of Investments |
11 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
12 | Statement of Operations |
13 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
15 | Financial Highlights |
18 | Notes to Financial Statements |
| FOR MORE INFORMATION |
| Back Cover |
Dreyfus
Large Cap Value Fund
The Fund
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund, covering the six-month period from January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Although 2011 began on an optimistic note amid encouraging economic data, by midyear investors returned to a more cautious outlook. The U.S. and global economies continued to grow over the reporting period, but at a relatively sluggish pace. First, manufacturing activity proved unsustainably strong in late 2010 and early 2011, leading to a subsequent slowdown in new orders. Second, turmoil in the Middle East drove oil prices higher and produced an inflationary drag on real incomes.Third, natural and nuclear disasters in Japan added to upward pressure on energy prices, and these unexpected events disrupted the global supply chain, especially in the automotive sector. Finally, in the United States, disappointing labor and housing markets weighed on investor sentiment. As a result, U.S. stocks generally produced only modest gains over the first half of the year.
We expect economic conditions to improve over the second half of 2011. Inflationary pressures appear to be peaking in most countries, including the United States, and we have already seen energy prices retreat from their highs. In addition, a successful resolution to the current debate regarding government spending and borrowing, without major fiscal tightening over the near term, should help avoid a serious disruption to the domestic economy. To assess how these and other developments may affect your investments, we encourage you, as always, to speak with your financial advisor.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
July 15, 2011
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2011, through June 30, 2011, as provided by Brian Ferguson, Portfolio Manager
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of 5.09%, Class C shares returned 4.67% and Class I shares returned 5.34%.1 In comparison, the fund’s benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index (the “Index”), produced a total return of 5.92% for the same period.2
Stocks generally rallied early in the year as an economic recovery appeared to gain traction, but renewed concerns later caused the market to give back some of its previous gains.The fund produced returns that were lower than its benchmark, as a result of lagging returns from the consumer discretionary and energy sectors.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks to provide long-term capital appreciation; its secondary goal is current income. To pursue these goals, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large capitalization companies with market capitalizations of $5 billion or more at the time of purchase.The fund invests primarily in equity securities of U.S. issuers, but may invest up to 20% of its assets in equity securities of foreign issuers, including those in emerging markets.
When choosing stocks, we focus on individual stock selection (a “bottom-up” approach) rather than forecasting stock market trends. We employ a three-step value screening process that seeks to identify the stocks of companies that are underpriced relative to their intrinsic worth or business prospects, and that exhibit sound business fundamentals, positive business momentum or a catalyst that may trigger an improving stock price.
Shifting Sentiment Sparked Heightened Market Volatility
Investors had become more optimistic by the start of 2011 due to gains in employment, consumer spending and corporate earnings, sending stock prices broadly higher. However, the market rally was interrupted
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
in February when political unrest in the Middle East led to sharply rising crude oil prices, and again in March when catastrophic natural and nuclear disasters in Japan threatened one of the world’s largest domestic economies and disrupted industrial supply chains in the global economy. Nonetheless, investors proved resilient, and the U.S. stock market rebounded from these unexpected shocks.
However, investor sentiment deteriorated in earnest in late April and May when Greece again appeared headed for default on its sovereign debt, U.S. economic data proved more disappointing than expected and a contentious debate regarding U.S. government spending and borrowing intensified. Stocks suffered bouts of heightened volatility as newly risk-averse investors shifted their focus from economically sensitive industry groups to those that historically have held up well under uncertain economic conditions. Value-oriented stocks produced slightly lower returns, on average, than growth-oriented stocks over the first half of the year.
Stock Selections Produced Mixed Results
In this choppy market environment, our security selection strategy proved especially successful in the information technology sector, where video game maker Electronic Arts achieved better-than-expected financial results at the start of a new product cycle centered on digital downloads of gaming software. In the corporate technology market, enterprise systems management specialist BMC Software and data warehousing provider Teradata benefited from the growing trend toward “cloud computing,” in which businesses manage applications and data over the Internet. Consulting services provider Accenture also advanced as more businesses sought help in building corporate data centers for cloud computing.
In the financials sector, bond rating agency Moody’s benefited as corporate bond issuance increased and litigation concerns waned in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. Investment manager Franklin Resources gained value due to positive asset inflows to the company’s mutual funds, which helped boost profit margins.
Disappointments over the first half of 2011 included the consumer discretionary sector, where cruise line Carnival suffered shortfalls
4
stemming from higher fuel costs and the need to reroute itineraries in the Mediterranean to avoid political unrest in Northern Africa. Retailer Staples was hurt by sluggish demand for office supplies and intensifying competitive pressures. Apparel seller Guess? encountered lower same-store sales and weaker store traffic. In the energy sector, coal supplier Alpha Natural Resources declined due to higher input prices.
Finding Opportunities Among Quality Companies
Despite ongoing headwinds, we believe the economic recovery is likely to persist. Profits in some industries have returned to pre-recession levels, energy prices have begun to moderate and rebuilding in Japan could boost economic activity.
In this slow-growth environment, we expect investors to remain selective, favoring attractively valued companies with the ability to grow in a sluggish economy and avoiding those with more expensive valuations and weaker underlying business fundamentals. Our bottom-up security selection process has identified a number of opportunities in the consumer discretionary sector, where valuations of media companies appear especially attractive. Fewer stocks in the financials sector have satisfied our value-oriented investment criteria.
July 15, 2011
| |
| Equity funds are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment |
| style risks, among other factors, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the |
| fund’s prospectus. |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into |
| consideration the maximum initial sales charges in the case of Class A shares or the applicable |
| contingent deferred sales charges imposed on redemptions in the case of Class B and Class C |
| shares. Had these charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no |
| guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, |
| fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Return figures provided reflect the |
| absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an agreement |
| through May 1, 2012, at which time it may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these |
| expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s returns would have been lower. |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects the reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, |
| capital gain distributions.The Russell 1000 Value Index is an unmanaged index which measures |
| the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower |
| forecasted growth values. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended June 30, 2011 | | |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 7.73 | $ 12.89 | $ 5.29 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,050.90 | $1,046.70 | $1,053.40 |
|
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 7.60 | $ 12.67 | $ 5.21 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,017.26 | $1,012.20 | $1,019.64 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.52% for Class A, 2.54% for Class C and 1.04% for Class I, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
6
|
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | |
Common Stocks—100.1% | Shares | Value ($) |
Consumer Discretionary—15.3% | | |
Carnival | 21,890 | 823,721 |
CBS, Cl. B | 10,760 | 306,552 |
General Motors | 8,673 | 263,312 |
Guess? | 11,550 | 485,793 |
Home Depot | 16,180 | 586,040 |
Johnson Controls | 25,770 | 1,073,578 |
Newell Rubbermaid | 23,800 | 375,564 |
News, Cl. A | 25,440 | 450,288 |
NVR | 380 a | 275,682 |
Omnicom Group | 35,360 | 1,702,938 |
Staples | 17,650 | 278,870 |
Time Warner | 24,720 | 899,066 |
Toll Brothers | 11,670 a,b | 242,036 |
Viacom, Cl. B | 9,300 | 474,300 |
Walt Disney | 20,670 | 806,957 |
| | 9,044,697 |
Consumer Staples—7.2% | | |
ConAgra Foods | 11,120 | 287,007 |
CVS Caremark | 19,040 | 715,523 |
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group | 17,430 | 730,840 |
Energizer Holdings | 10,790 a,b | 780,764 |
PepsiCo | 20,740 | 1,460,718 |
Walgreen | 6,650 | 282,359 |
| | 4,257,211 |
Energy—15.3% | | |
Alpha Natural Resources | 13,610 a | 618,438 |
Anadarko Petroleum | 17,390 | 1,334,856 |
EOG Resources | 2,880 | 301,104 |
Exxon Mobil | 12,960 | 1,054,685 |
Occidental Petroleum | 26,310 | 2,737,292 |
QEP Resources | 10,890 | 455,529 |
Schlumberger | 29,770 | 2,572,128 |
| | 9,074,032 |
Exchange Traded Funds—.7% | | |
iShares Russell 1000 Value Index Fund | 6,560 b | 447,917 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | | Value ($) |
Financial—20.3% | | | |
American Express | 6,100 | | 315,370 |
Ameriprise Financial | 13,120 | | 756,762 |
AON | 11,930 | | 612,009 |
Bank of America | 43,670 | | 478,623 |
Capital One Financial | 8,510 | | 439,712 |
Citigroup | 21,015 | | 875,065 |
Comerica | 23,050 | | 796,839 |
Franklin Resources | 2,400 | | 315,096 |
Genworth Financial, Cl. A | 34,300 a | 352,604 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 41,610 | | 1,703,513 |
Marsh & McLennan | 19,210 | | 599,160 |
MetLife | 21,580 | | 946,715 |
Moody’s | 8,130 b | 311,786 |
PNC Financial Services Group | 9,530 | | 568,083 |
Prudential Financial | 9,460 | | 601,561 |
SunTrust Banks | 23,010 | | 593,658 |
TD Ameritrade Holding | 21,440 | | 418,294 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 47,800 | | 1,341,268 |
| | | 12,026,118 |
Health Care—16.0% | | | |
Amgen | 10,530 a | 614,426 |
Baxter International | 6,770 | | 404,101 |
CIGNA | 11,020 | | 566,759 |
HCA Holdings | 9,420 | | 310,860 |
Johnson & Johnson | 17,340 | | 1,153,457 |
McKesson | 8,630 | | 721,900 |
Medtronic | 7,360 | | 283,581 |
Merck & Co. | 29,760 | | 1,050,230 |
Mylan | 5,890 a | 145,306 |
Pfizer | 108,130 | | 2,227,478 |
Thermo Fisher Scientific | 5,000 a | 321,950 |
UnitedHealth Group | 15,430 | | 795,879 |
Universal Health Services, Cl. B | 5,540 | | 285,476 |
Watson Pharmaceuticals | 4,430�� | a | 304,474 |
Zimmer Holdings | 4,420 | a | 279,344 |
| | | 9,465,221 |
8
| | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Industrial—10.5% | | |
Caterpillar | 6,600 | 702,636 |
Cooper Industries | 4,460 | 266,128 |
Dover | 13,290 | 901,062 |
Eaton | 9,080 | 467,166 |
General Electric | 89,100 | 1,680,426 |
Honeywell International | 4,760 | 283,648 |
Hubbell, Cl. B | 4,150 | 269,543 |
Owens Corning | 14,250 a | 532,238 |
Pitney Bowes | 25,290 b | 581,417 |
Stanley Black & Decker | 3,900 | 280,995 |
Thomas & Betts | 5,030 a | 270,866 |
| | 6,236,125 |
Information Technology—9.1% | | |
Accenture, Cl. A | 10,300 | 622,326 |
AOL | 23,756 a,b | 471,794 |
BMC Software | 13,670 a | 747,749 |
Cisco Systems | 15,400 | 240,394 |
Corning | 12,600 | 228,690 |
eBay | 8,980 a | 289,785 |
Electronic Arts | 30,070 a,b | 709,652 |
Oracle | 16,780 | 552,230 |
QUALCOMM | 21,490 | 1,220,417 |
Teradata | 4,990 a | 300,398 |
| | 5,383,435 |
Materials—4.2% | | |
Air Products & Chemicals | 2,980 | 284,828 |
Celanese, Ser. A | 12,480 | 665,309 |
Cliffs Natural Resources | 3,330 | 307,859 |
Dow Chemical | 20,750 | 747,000 |
Freeport-McMoRan | | |
Copper & Gold | 8,940 | 472,926 |
| | 2,477,922 |
Telecommunication Services—.5% | | |
Sprint Nextel | 56,624 a | 305,203 |
Utilities—1.0% | | |
NextEra Energy | 5,090 | 292,471 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) |
Utilities (continued) | | |
PPL | 10,600 | 294,998 |
| | 587,469 |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(cost $60,124,484) | | 59,305,350 |
|
Other Investment—.5% | | |
Registered Investment Company; | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | | |
Plus Money Market Fund | | |
(cost $287,000) | 287,000 c | 287,000 |
|
Investment of Cash Collateral | | |
for Securities Loaned—4.4% | | |
Registered Investment Company; | | |
Dreyfus Institutional Cash Advantage Fund | | |
(cost $2,636,201) | 2,636,201 c | 2,636,201 |
Total Investments (cost $63,047,685) | 105.0% | 62,228,551 |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (5.0%) | (2,957,499) |
Net Assets | 100.0% | 59,271,052 |
|
a Non-income producing security. |
b Security, or portion thereof, on loan.At June 30, 2011, the value of the fund’s securities on loan was $2,593,104 |
and the value of the collateral held by the fund was $2,636,201. |
c Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
| | | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | | |
|
| Value (%) | | Value (%) |
Financial | 20.3 | Money Market Investments | 4.9 |
Health Care | 16.0 | Materials | 4.2 |
Consumer Discretionary | 15.3 | Utilities | 1.0 |
Energy | 15.3 | Exchange Traded Funds | .7 |
Industrial | 10.5 | Telecommunication Services | .5 |
Information Technology | 9.1 | | |
Consumer Staples | 7.2 | | 105.0 |
|
† Based on net assets. | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
10
|
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| | | |
| | Cost | Value |
Assets ($): | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments (including | | |
securities on loan, valued at $2,593,104)—Note 1(b): | | | |
Unaffiliated issuers | | 60,124,484 | 59,305,350 |
Affiliated issuers | | 2,923,201 | 2,923,201 |
Cash | | | 11,196 |
Dividends and interest receivable | | | 103,431 |
Prepaid expenses | | | 23,283 |
| | | 62,366,461 |
Liabilities ($): | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | | | 21,744 |
Liability for securities on loan—Note 1(b) | | | 2,636,201 |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | | 286,485 |
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | | | 8,000 |
Accrued expenses | | | 142,979 |
| | | 3,095,409 |
Net Assets ($) | | | 59,271,052 |
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | 93,314,385 |
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | | | 183,747 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | (33,407,946) |
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | | | |
(depreciation) on investments | | | (819,134) |
Net Assets ($) | | | 59,271,052 |
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | |
| Class A | Class C | Class I |
Net Assets ($) | 760,126 | 75,347 | 58,435,579 |
Shares Outstanding | 85,570 | 8,615 | 6,562,448 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 8.88 | 8.75 | 8.90 |
|
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
| |
Investment Income ($): | |
Income: | |
Cash dividends (net of $758 foreign taxes withheld at source): | |
Unaffiliated issuers | 590,158 |
Affiliated issuers | 164 |
Income from securities lending—Note 1(b) | 2,259 |
Total Income | 592,581 |
Expenses: | |
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 272,309 |
Auditing fees | 24,889 |
Registration fees | 14,352 |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 11,900 |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 4,909 |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 4,384 |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 3,805 |
Legal fees | 2,873 |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 562 |
Prospectus fees | 320 |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 236 |
Miscellaneous | 88,963 |
Total Expenses | 429,502 |
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertaking—Note 3(a) | (21,238) |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(c) | (10) |
Net Expenses | 408,254 |
Investment Income—Net | 184,327 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 4,443,744 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 59,482 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 4,503,226 |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 4,687,553 |
|
See notes to financial statements. | |
12
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended |
| (Unaudited) | December 31, 2010 |
Operations ($): | | |
Investment income—net | 184,327 | 1,211,050 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 4,443,744 | (539,921) |
Net unrealized appreciation | | |
(depreciation) on investments | 59,482 | 10,710,749 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
Resulting from Operations | 4,687,553 | 11,381,878 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | |
Investment income—net: | | |
Class A Shares | — | (3,477) |
Class C Shares | — | (183) |
Class I Shares | (10,212) | (1,228,685) |
Total Dividends | (10,212) | (1,232,345) |
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | |
Class A Shares | 397,744 | 268,372 |
Class C Shares | 36,636 | 16,517 |
Class I Shares | 1,152,218 | 2,880,073 |
Dividends reinvested: | | |
Class A Shares | — | 3,320 |
Class C Shares | — | 139 |
Class I Shares | 605 | 85,211 |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | |
Class A Shares | (88,471) | (192,025) |
Class C Shares | — | (2,559) |
Class I Shares | (31,031,733) | (40,551,051) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
from Capital Stock Transactions | (29,533,001) | (37,492,003) |
Settlement payment from | | |
unaffiliated third party† | — | 20,453 |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (24,855,660) | (27,322,017) |
Net Assets ($): | | |
Beginning of Period | 84,126,712 | 111,448,729 |
End of Period | 59,271,052 | 84,126,712 |
Undistributed investment income—net | 183,747 | 9,632 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
| | |
| Six Months Ended | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended |
| (Unaudited) | December 31, 2010 |
Capital Share Transactions: | | |
Class A | | |
Shares sold | 45,220 | 34,728 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | — | 391 |
Shares redeemed | (10,111) | (25,473) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 35,109 | 9,646 |
Class C | | |
Shares sold | 4,234 | 2,216 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | — | 16 |
Shares redeemed | — | (306) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 4,234 | 1,926 |
Class I | | |
Shares sold | 128,008 | 367,744 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 68 | 10,076 |
Shares redeemed | (3,467,629) | (5,172,627) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (3,339,553) | (4,794,807) |
|
† See Note 5. | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | |
14
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for the fund's Class A and Class I shares represents the financial highlights of the Class A and Institutional Shares, respectively, of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund (“Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund”), before the fund commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of the fund’s Class A and Class I shares thereafter. Before the fund commenced operations, all of the assets of the Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund were transferred to the fund in exchange for Class A and Class I shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s and the fund’s predecessor’s financial statements.
| | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | | Year Ended December 31, | |
Class A Shares† | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | 8.45 | 7.56 | 6.56 | 11.55 | 11.85 | 11.24 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income—neta | .00b | .05 | .05 | .15 | .25 | .18 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .43 | .91 | 1.07 | (3.93) | .56 | 1.53 |
Total from Investment Operations | .43 | .96 | 1.12 | (3.78) | .81 | 1.71 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | |
investment income—net | — | (.07) | (.12) | (.11) | (.26) | (.18) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | |
gain on investments | — | — | — | (.59) | (.85) | (.92) |
Return of capital | — | — | — | (.51) | — | — |
Total Distributions | — | (.07) | (.12) | (1.21) | (1.11) | (1.10) |
Settlement payment from | | | | | | |
unaffiliated third party | — | .00b | — | — | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 8.88 | 8.45 | 7.56 | 6.56 | 11.55 | 11.85 |
Total Return (%)c | 5.09d | 12.69e | 17.10 | (35.49) | 6.78 | 15.41 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.52f | 1.65 | 2.11 | 1.07 | 1.04 | 1.03 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.52f | 1.50 | 1.46 | 1.05 | 1.04 | 1.03 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets | .10f | .62 | .78 | 1.38 | 2.04 | 1.50 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 56.90d | 69.86 | 76.38 | 133 | 34 | 59 |
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | 760 | 426 | 309 | 85 | 1,214 | 1,371 |
| |
† | Represents information for Class A shares of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund, through |
| September 12, 2008. |
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | The impact of the settlement payment from unaffiliated third party on total return amounted to less than .01%. |
f | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | |
| June 30, 2011 | Year Ended December 31, |
Class C Shares | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008a |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 8.36 | 7.52 | 6.51 | 8.82 |
Investment Operations: | | | | |
Investment income (loss)—netb | (.04) | (.01) | .02 | .03 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .43 | .89 | 1.05 | (2.34) |
Total from Investment Operations | .39 | .88 | 1.07 | (2.31) |
Distributions: | | | | |
Dividends from investment income—net | — | (.04) | (.06) | — |
Settlement payment from | | | | |
unaffiliated third party | — | .00c | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 8.75 | 8.36 | 7.52 | 6.51 |
Total Return (%)d | 4.67e | 11.69f | 16.43 | (26.19)f |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 2.73g | 2.38 | 2.44 | 2.09g |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 2.54g | 2.25 | 2.15 | 1.98g |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | |
(loss) to average net assets | (.95)g | (.09) | .27 | 1.39g |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 56.90e | 69.86 | 76.38 | 133 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 75 | 37 | 18 | 7 |
| |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
d | Exclusive of sales charge. |
e | Not annualized. |
f | The impact of the settlement payment from unaffiliated third party on total return amounted to less than .01%. |
g | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
| | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | |
June 30, 2011 | | Year Ended December 31, | |
Class I Shares† | (Unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | 8.45 | 7.56 | 6.53 | 11.51 | 11.81 | 11.19 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | |
Investment income—neta | .02 | .10 | .11 | .18 | .28 | .21 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .43 | .91 | 1.07 | (3.93) | .56 | 1.54 |
Total from Investment Operations | .45 | 1.01 | 1.18 | (3.75) | .84 | 1.75 |
Distributions: | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | |
investment income—net | .00b | (.12) | (.15) | (.13) | (.29) | (.21) |
Dividends from net realized | | | | | | |
gain on investments | — | — | — | (.59) | (.85) | (.92) |
Return of capital | — | — | — | (.51) | — | — |
Total Distributions | .00b | (.12) | (.15) | (1.23) | (1.14) | (1.13) |
Settlement payment from | | | | | | |
unaffiliated third party | — | .00b | — | — | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | 8.90 | 8.45 | 7.56 | 6.53 | 11.51 | 11.81 |
Total Return (%) | 5.34c | 13.37d | 17.99 | (35.40) | 7.07 | 15.84 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.10e | .82 | .81 | .83 | .79 | .78 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | |
to average net assets | 1.04e | .80 | .80 | .80 | .79 | .78 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets | .48e | 1.27 | 1.76 | 1.85 | 2.31 | 1.76 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 56.90c | 69.86 | 76.38 | 133 | 34 | 59 |
Net Assets, end of period | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | 58,436 | 83,664 | 111,122 | 167,151 | 329,281 | 361,395 |
| |
† | Represents information for Institutional shares of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund, |
| through September 12, 2008. |
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
c | Not annualized. |
d | The impact of the settlement payment from unaffiliated third party on total return amounted to less than .01%. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 17
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Large CapValue Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering ten series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. Effective May 2, 2011, the fund is closed to any investments for new accounts.
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares.The fund is authorized to issue 250 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock.The fund currently offers three classes of shares: Class A (100 million shares authorized), Class C (50 million shares authorized) and Class I (100 million shares authorized). Class A shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold at net asset value per share only to institutional investors. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
As of June 30, 2011, MBC Investments Corp., an indirect subsidiary of BNY Mellon, held 1,134 Class C shares of the fund.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
18
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications.The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant American Depository Receipts and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Directors, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
20
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of June 30, 2011 in valuing the fund’s investments:
| | | | |
| | Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |
| Level 1— | Significant | Significant | |
| Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total |
Assets ($) | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | | |
Equity Securities— | | | | |
Domestic† | 58,857,433 | — | — | 58,857,433 |
Mutual Funds/ | | | | |
Exchange | | | | |
Traded Funds | 3,371,118 | — | — | 3,371,118 |
|
† See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. | |
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06 “Improving Disclosures about FairValue Measurements”. The portions of ASU No. 2010-06 which require reporting entities to prepare new disclosures surrounding amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements as well as inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3 have been adopted by the fund. No significant transfers between Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements occurred at June 30, 2011.
In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)”. ASU No. 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, ASU No. 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of ASU No. 2011-04 and its impact on the financial statements.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended June 30, 2011, The Bank of New York Mellon earned $968 from lending portfolio securities, pursuant to the securities lending agreement.
22
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
The fund may invest in shares of certain affiliated investment companies also advised or managed by Dreyfus. Investments in affiliated investment companies for the period ended June 30, 2011 were as follows:
| | | | | |
Affiliated | | | | | |
Investment | Value | | | Value | Net |
Company | 12/31/2010 ($) | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) | 6/30/2011 ($) | Assets (%) |
Dreyfus | | | | | |
Institutional | | | | | |
Preferred | | | | | |
Plus Money | | | | | |
Market Fund | — | 6,974,000 | 6,687,000 | 287,000 | .5 |
Dreyfus | | | | | |
Institutional | | | | | |
Cash | | | | | |
Advantage | | | | | |
Fund | 1,977,412 | 30,169,483 | 29,510,694 | 2,636,201 | 4.4 |
Total | 1,977,412 | 37,143,483 | 36,197,694 | 2,923,201 | 4.9 |
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
As of and during the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $ 37,232,232 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent December 31, 2010. If not applied, $36,072,624 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2017 and $1,159,608 expires in fiscal 2018.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows: ordinary income $1,232,345.The tax character of the current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing.
The average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facilities during the period ended June 30, 2011, was approximately $561,900 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.37%.
24
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at an annual rate of .70% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
The Manager has contractually agreed from May 1, 2011 through May 1, 2012, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of none of the classes (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder services fees and 12b-1 fees) exceed 1.25% of the value of the average daily net assets of their class.
The Manager had contractually agreed, until May 1, 2011, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class I shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed .80% of the value of Class I shares average daily net assets.
In addition, the Manager had agreed, until May 1, 2011, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A and Class C shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder services fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) do not exceed 1.25% of the value of Class A and Class C shares average daily net assets.
The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertakings, amounted to $21,238 during the period ended June 30, 2011.
During the period ended June 30, 2011, the Distributor retained $30 from commissions earned on sales of the fund’s Class A shares.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
its shares at an annual rate of .75% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended June 30, 2011, Class C shares were charged $236 pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A and Class C shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts.The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services.The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended June 30, 2011, Class A and Class C shares were charged $920 and $78, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $1,836 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management bank whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $225 pursuant to the cash management agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations. These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $10.
26
The fund also compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended December 31, 2010, the fund was charged $11,900 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended June 30, 2011, the fund was charged $2,981 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due toThe Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $33,810, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $45, shareholder services plan fees $171, custodian fees $4,478, chief compliance officer fees $2,259 and transfer agency per account fees $630, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $19,649.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended June 30, 2011, amounted to $44,232,469 and $74,321,878, respectively.
At June 30, 2011, accumulated net unrealized depreciation on investments was $819,134, consisting of $4,344,923 gross unrealized appreciation and $5,164,057 gross unrealized depreciation.
At June 30, 2011, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
NOTE 5—Other:
During the period ended December 31, 2010, the fund received a regulatory settlement payment of $20,453 from an unaffiliated third party which is included in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
NOTE 6—Plan of Reorganization:
On April 13, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the merger of the fund into Dreyfus Strategic Value Fund. The merger was approved by shareholders of the fund at a meeting held on August 11, 2011. The merger is anticipated to occur on or about November 21, 2011. On the date of the merger, which is a tax-free reorganization, the fund would exchange all of its assets at net asset value, subject to liabilities, for an equivalent value of corresponding Class A, C or I shares of Dreyfus Strategic Value Fund. Those shares then will be distributed pro rata to shareholders of the fund so that each shareholder receives a number of shares of Dreyfus Strategic Value Fund equal to the aggregate net asset value of the shareholder’s fund shares.
28
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable. [CLOSED END FUNDS ONLY]
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures applicable to Item 10.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable.
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc.
By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak |
Bradley J. Skapyak, President |
Date: August 19, 2011 |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
|
By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak |
Bradley J. Skapyak, President |
Date: August 19, 2011 |
|
By: /s/ James Windels |
James Windels, Treasurer |
Date: August 19, 2011 |
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT)
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT)