Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Description of Company [Policy Text Block] | ' |
The Company |
|
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) is a biotechnology company that designs, optimizes and develops novel small molecule drugs that block key enzymes involved in the pathogenesis of diseases. The Company focuses on rare diseases in which unmet medical needs exist and that are aligned with its capabilities and expertise. The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1986 and its headquarters is located in Durham, North Carolina. The Company integrates the disciplines of biology, crystallography, medicinal chemistry and computer modeling to discover and develop small molecule pharmaceuticals through the process known as structure-guided drug design. BioCryst has incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception. |
|
Based on its current operating plans, the Company expects it has sufficient liquidity, with its existing cash and investments of $127,586, to continue its planned operations into 2016. The Company’s liquidity needs, and ability to address those needs, will largely be determined by the success of its product candidates and key development and regulatory events in the future. In order to continue its operations beyond 2016 it will need to: (1) successfully secure or increase U.S. Government funding of its programs; (2) out-license rights to certain of its product candidates, pursuant to which the Company would receive cash milestones; (3) raise additional capital through equity or debt financings or from other sources; (4) obtain product candidate regulatory approvals, which would generate revenue and cash flow; (5) reduce spending on one or more research and development programs; and/or (6) restructure operations. The Company will continue to incur operating losses and negative cash flows until revenues reach a level sufficient to support ongoing operations. |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basis of Presentation |
|
Beginning in March 2011, the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, JPR Royalty Sub LLC (“Royalty Sub”). Royalty Sub was formed in connection with a $30,000 financing transaction the Company completed on March 9, 2011. See Note 4, Royalty Monetization, for a further description of this transaction. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. |
|
The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Such financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in management’s opinion, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. There were no adjustments other than normal recurring adjustments. |
|
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the notes thereto included in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
Reclassifications [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Reclassifications |
|
In the first quarter of 2014, the Company changed its classification of legal costs associated with its patents. This change resulted in $242 and $639 of legal expenses being reclassified from research and development expense to general and administrative expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. This reclassification had no effect on previously reported total operating expenses or net loss amounts. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company generally considers cash equivalents to be all cash held in commercial checking accounts, money market accounts or investments in debt instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Restricted Cash |
|
Restricted cash as of September 30, 2014 represents cash the Company is required to maintain in an interest bearing certificate of deposit to serve as collateral for a corporate credit card program. |
Investment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Investments |
|
The Company invests in high credit quality investments in accordance with its investment policy, which is designed to minimize the possibility of loss. The objective of the Company’s investment policy is to ensure the safety and preservation of invested funds, as well as maintaining liquidity sufficient to meet cash flow requirements. The Company places its excess cash with high credit quality financial institutions, commercial companies, and government agencies in order to limit the amount of its credit exposure. Per its policy, the Company is able to invest in marketable debt securities that may consist of U.S. Government and government agency securities, money market and mutual fund investments, municipal and corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper and asset or mortgage-backed securities, among others. The Company’s investment policy requires it to purchase high-quality marketable securities with a maximum individual maturity of three years and requires an average portfolio maturity of no more than 18 months. Some of the securities the Company invests in may have market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. To minimize this risk, the Company schedules its investments with maturities that coincide with expected cash flow needs, thus avoiding the need to redeem an investment prior to its maturity date. Accordingly, the Company does not believe it has a material exposure to interest rate risk arising from its investments. Generally, the Company’s investments are not collateralized. The Company has not realized any significant losses from its investments. |
|
The Company classifies all of its investments as available-for-sale. Unrealized gains and losses on investments are recognized in comprehensive income/(loss), unless an unrealized loss is considered to be other than temporary, in which case the unrealized loss is charged to operations. The Company periodically reviews its investments for other than temporary declines in fair value below cost basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company believes the individual unrealized losses represent temporary declines primarily resulting from interest rate changes. Realized gains and losses are reflected in interest and other income in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss and are determined using the specific identification method with transactions recorded on a settlement date basis. Investments with original maturities at date of purchase beyond three months and which mature at or less than 12 months from the balance sheet date are classified as current. Investments with a maturity beyond 12 months from the balance sheet date are classified as long-term. At September 30, 2014, the Company believes that the costs of its investments are recoverable in all material respects. |
|
The following tables summarize the fair value of the Company’s investments by type. The estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed income investments are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as defined in U.S. GAAP. These fair values are obtained from independent pricing services which utilize Level 2 inputs. |
|
| | September 30, 2014 |
| | Amortized | | Accrued | | Gross | | Gross | | Estimated |
Cost | Interest | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair Value |
| | Gains | Losses | |
Corporate debt securities | | $ | 1,277 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,280 | |
Commercial paper | | | 4,998 | | | | - | | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | 4,999 | |
Total investments | | $ | 6,275 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 6,279 | |
|
| | December 31, 2013 |
| | Amortized | | Accrued | | Gross | | Gross | | Estimated |
Cost | Interest | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair Value |
| | Gains | Losses | |
Obligations of U.S. Government and its agencies | | $ | 4,899 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 4,901 | |
Corporate debt securities | | | 8,528 | | | | 47 | | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | 8,576 | |
Commercial paper | | | 5,994 | | | | - | | | | 2 | | | | - | | | | 5,996 | |
Total investments | | $ | 19,421 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 19,473 | |
|
The following table summarizes the scheduled maturity for the Company’s investments at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. |
|
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maturing in one year or less | | $ | 5,977 | | | $ | 16,891 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maturing after one year through two years | | | 302 | | | | 2,582 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investments | | $ | 6,279 | | | $ | 19,473 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Receivables |
|
Receivables are recorded for amounts due to the Company related to reimbursable research and development costs from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or royalty receivables from Shionogi & Co. Ltd. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had the following receivables. |
|
| | 30-Sep-14 | | | | | | | | |
| | Billed | | Unbilled | | Total | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | | $ | 474 | | | $ | 2,764 | | | $ | 3,238 | | | | | | | | | |
Shionogi & Co. Ltd. | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | | |
Total receivables | | $ | 474 | | | $ | 2,764 | | | $ | 3,238 | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | |
| | Billed | | Unbilled | | Total | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | | $ | 90 | | | $ | 1,573 | | | $ | 1,663 | | | | | | | | | |
Shionogi & Co. Ltd. | | | 452 | | | | - | | | | 452 | | | | | | | | | |
Total receivables | | $ | 542 | | | $ | 1,573 | | | $ | 2,115 | | | | | | | | | |
|
Monthly invoices are submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services related to reimbursable research and development costs. The Company is also entitled to monthly reimbursement of indirect costs based on rates stipulated in the underlying contract. The Company’s calculations of its indirect cost rates are subject to audit by the federal government. |
Intangible Assets, Finite-Lived, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Patents and Licenses |
|
The Company seeks patent protection on internally developed processes and products. All patent related legal costs are expensed to general and administrative expenses when incurred as recoverability of such expenditures is uncertain |
Accrued Expenses [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Accrued Expenses |
|
The Company generally enters into contractual agreements with third-party vendors who provide research and development, manufacturing, and other services in the ordinary course of business. Some of these contracts are subject to milestone-based invoicing and services are completed over an extended period of time. The Company records liabilities under these contractual commitments when it determines an obligation has been incurred, regardless of the timing of the invoice. This process involves reviewing open contracts and purchase orders, communicating with applicable Company personnel to identify services that have been performed on its behalf and estimating the level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for the service when the Company has not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of actual cost. The majority of service providers invoice the Company monthly in arrears for services performed. The Company makes estimates of accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in its financial statements based on the facts and circumstances. The Company periodically confirms the accuracy of its estimates with the service providers and makes adjustments if necessary. Examples of estimated accrued expenses include: |
|
| • | fees paid to Clinical Research Organizations (“CROs”) in connection with preclinical and toxicology studies and clinical trials; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| • | fees paid to investigative sites in connection with clinical trials; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| • | fees paid to Contract Manufacturing Organizations (“CMOs”) in connection with the production of our raw materials, drug substance and drug products; and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| • | professional fees. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company bases its expenses related to clinical trials on its estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with multiple research institutions and clinical research organizations that conduct and manage clinical trials, including manufacturing drug substance, on the Company’s behalf. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. Payments under some of these contracts depend on factors such as the successful enrollment of patients and the completion of clinical trial milestones. In accruing service fees, the Company estimates the time period over which services will be performed and the level of effort expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the estimate, the Company will adjust the accrual accordingly. Accrued expenses as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 included $5,090 and $2,210, respectively, of research and development costs. |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Income Taxes |
|
The liability method is used in the Company’s accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Loss [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on investments available-for-sale and is disclosed as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. No reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income were recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company recognizes revenues from collaborative and other research and development arrangements and product sales. Revenue is realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (iii) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
Collaborative and Other Research and Development Arrangements and Royalties |
|
Revenue from license fees, royalty payments, milestone payments, and research and development fees is recognized as revenue when the earnings process is complete and the Company has no further continuing performance obligations or the Company has completed the performance obligations under the terms of the agreement. Fees received under licensing agreements that are related to future performance are deferred and recognized over an estimated period determined by management based on the terms of the agreement and the products licensed. In the event a license agreement contains multiple deliverables, the Company evaluates whether the deliverables are separate or combined units of accounting. Revisions to revenue or profit estimates as a result of changes in the estimated revenue period are recognized prospectively. |
|
Under certain of our license agreements, the Company receives royalty payments based upon our licensees’ net sales of covered products. The Company recognizes royalty revenues when it can reliably estimate such amounts and collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
Reimbursements received for direct out-of-pocket expenses related to research and development costs are recorded as revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss rather than as a reduction in expenses. Milestone payments are recognized as revenue upon the achievement of specified events if (1) the milestone is substantive in nature and the achievement of the event was not reasonably assured at the inception of the agreement and (2) the fees are non-refundable and non-creditable. Any milestone payments received prior to satisfying these criteria are recorded as deferred revenue. Under the Company’s contracts with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, specifically with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA/HHS”), and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID/HHS”), revenue is recognized as reimbursable direct and indirect costs are incurred. The Company’s advanced development contract with BARDA/HHS for the development of peramivir expired on June 30, 2014 according to its terms. |
|
Product Sales |
|
Product sales are recognized net of estimated allowances, discounts, sales returns, chargebacks and rebates. |
|
The Company recorded the following revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013: |
|
| | Three Months | | Nine Months | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | |
Royalty revenue | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 1,951 | | | $ | 2,042 | | | | | |
Collaborative and other research and development revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | | | 2,937 | | | | 2,085 | | | | 5,323 | | | | 3,834 | | | | | |
Shionogi (Japan) | | | 296 | | | | 296 | | | | 888 | | | | 888 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 3,238 | | | $ | 2,389 | | | $ | 8,162 | | | $ | 6,764 | | | | | |
Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Research and Development Expenses |
|
The Company’s research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred. Research and development expenses include all direct and indirect development costs related to the development of the Company’s portfolio of product candidates. Advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities are deferred and capitalized. Such amounts are recognized as expense when the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed. Research and development expenses include, among other items, personnel costs, including salaries and benefits, manufacturing costs, clinical, regulatory, and toxicology services performed by CROs and CMOs, materials and supplies, and overhead allocations consisting of various administrative and facilities related costs. Most of the Company’s manufacturing and clinical and preclinical studies are performed by third-party CROs and CMOs. Costs for studies performed by CROs and CMOs are accrued by the Company over the service periods specified in the contracts and estimates are adjusted, if required, based upon the Company’s on-going review of the level of services actually performed. |
|
Additionally, the Company has license agreements with third parties, such as Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University (“AECOM”), Industrial Research, Ltd. (“IRL”), and the University of Alabama at Birmingham (“UAB”), which require fees related to sublicense agreements or maintenance fees. The Company expenses sublicense payments as incurred unless they are related to revenues that have been deferred, in which case the expenses are deferred and recognized over the related revenue recognition period. The Company expenses maintenance payments as incurred. |
|
Deferred collaboration expenses represent sub-license payments, paid to the Company’s academic partners upon receipt of consideration from various commercial partners, and other consideration paid to our academic partners for modification to existing license agreements. These deferred expenses would not have been incurred without receipt of such payments or modifications from the Company’s commercial partners and are being expensed in proportion to the related revenue being recognized. The Company believes that this accounting treatment appropriately matches expenses with the associated revenue. |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
All share-based payments, including grants of stock option awards and restricted stock unit awards, are recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss based on their fair values. The fair value of stock option awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of restricted stock unit awards is based on the grant date closing price of the common stock. Stock-based compensation cost is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. For stock option awards with performance conditions, the Company recognizes compensation expense at the time at which the underlying performance condition has been determined to have occurred. |
Interest Expense and Deferred Financing Costs [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Interest Expense and Deferred Financing Costs |
|
Interest expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $1,217 and $1,191, respectively, and $3,684 and $3,536, respectively, and relates to the issuance of the PhaRMA Notes (defined in Note 4). Costs directly associated with the issuance of the PhaRMA Notes have been capitalized and are included in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These costs are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the PhaRMA Notes using the effective interest rate method. Amortization of deferred financing costs included in interest expense was $110 for each of the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and $329 for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. |
Currency Hedge Agreement [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Currency Hedge Agreement |
|
In connection with the issuance by Royalty Sub of the PhaRMA Notes, the Company entered into a Currency Hedge Agreement (defined in Note 4) to hedge certain risks associated with changes in the value of the Japanese yen relative to the U.S. dollar. The Currency Hedge Agreement does not qualify for hedge accounting treatment; therefore, mark-to-market adjustments are recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss. Cumulative mark-to-market adjustments for the nine months ended September 2014 and 2013 resulted in gains of $732 and $3,168, respectively. Mark-to-market adjustments are determined by a third party pricing model that uses quoted prices in markets that are not actively traded and for which significant inputs are observable directly or indirectly, representing Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as defined by U.S. GAAP. The Company is also required to post collateral in connection with the mark-to-market adjustments based on thresholds defined in the Currency Hedge Agreement. No hedge collateral was posted under the agreement as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Net Loss Per Share |
|
Net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is equivalent to basic net loss per share for all periods presented herein because common equivalent shares from unexercised stock options and common shares expected to be issued under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan were anti-dilutive. The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 does not include 5,602 and 2,783, respectively, of such potential common shares, as their impact would be anti-dilutive. The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 does not include 5,288 and 1,731, respectively, of such potential common shares, as their impact would be anti-dilutive. |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
Concentration of Market Risk [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Concentration of Market Risk |
|
The reimbursement of BCX4430 development expenses is a significant source of revenue and one which has an underlying cash flow stream. This revenue and cash flow is earned under a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract with NIAID/HHS. The Company relies on NIAID/HHS to reimburse predominantly all of the development costs for its BCX4430 program. Accordingly, reimbursement of these expenses represents a significant portion of the Company’s collaborative and other research and development revenues. The completion and/or termination of this program/collaboration could negatively impact the Company’s future Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss and Cash Flows. |
|
In addition, the Company also recognizes royalty revenue from the net sales of RAPIACTA®; however, the underlying cash flow from these royalty payments goes directly to pay the interest, and then the principal, on the non-recourse notes payable. Payment of the interest and the ultimate repayment of principal of these notes will be entirely funded by future royalty payments derived from net sales of RAPIACTA. The RAPIACTA royalty stream from Shionogi & Co. Ltd, (“Shionogi”), the Company’s partner in Japan, was insufficient to pay the accrued interest in arrears on the non-recourse PhaRMA Notes by the September 1, 2014 payment date resulting in an event of default with respect to the PhaRMA Notes. Accordingly, the Company has classified the PhaRMA Notes and related accrued interest as current liabilities on its balance sheet as of September 30, 2014. As a result of the event of default, the holders of the PhaRMA Notes may pursue acceleration of the PhaRMA Notes, foreclose on the collateral securing the PhaRMA Notes and the Company’s equity interest in Royalty Sub and exercise other remedies available to them under the indenture in respect of the PhaRMA Notes. In such event, the Company may not realize the benefit of future royalty payments that might otherwise accrue to the Company following repayment of the PhaRMA Notes and it might otherwise be adversely affected. Due to the non-recourse nature of the PhaRMA Notes, in the event of any potential acceleration or foreclosure, the Company believes the primary impact to the Company would be the loss of future royalty payments from Shionogi and legal costs associated with retiring the PhaRMA Notes. In addition, the Company may incur costs associated with liquidating a related Currency Hedge Agreement, which would no longer be required in the event of foreclosure or if the PhaRMA Notes cease to be outstanding. As the PhaRMA Notes are obligations of Royalty Sub, the Company does not currently expect the event of default on the PhaRMA Notes to have a significant impact on the Company’s future results of operations or cash flows. |
|
The Company’s drug development activities are performed by a limited group of third party vendors. If any of these vendors were unable to perform their services, this could significantly impact the Company’s ability to complete its drug development activities. |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Credit Risk |
|
Cash equivalents and investments are financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentration of risk to the extent recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company deposits excess cash with major financial institutions in the United States. Balances may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. The Company believes it has established guidelines for investment of its excess cash relative to diversification and maturities that maintain safety and liquidity. To minimize the exposure due to adverse shifts in interest rates, the Company maintains a portfolio of investments with an average maturity of approximately 18 months or less. The majority of the Company’s receivables are due from the U.S. Government, for which there is no assumed credit risk. |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-15 – Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which defines management’s responsibility to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. In connection with each annual and interim period, management must assess if there is substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the issuance date. Disclosures are required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt. This standard is effective for all companies in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers. The core principal of this ASU is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted and companies can transition to the new standard under the full retrospective method or the modified retrospective method. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12 – Compensation – Stock Compensation: Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, which provides explicit guidance for the accounting treatment for these types of awards. The ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. This update is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |