BACKGROUND OF THE SOLICITATION
On November 11, 2022, Tom Harrington, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Jay Wells, the then-current Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Jon Kathol, the Vice President of Investor Relations of the Company, on behalf of the Company, met with representatives of Legion to discuss the Company’s business and operations. During this meeting, Legion did not raise any concerns regarding the Company’s governance or the Board’s governance.
On December 12, 2022, Messrs. Harrington, Wells and Kathol, on behalf of the Company, met with representatives of Legion to discuss the Company’s business and operations. During this meeting, Legion did not raise any concerns regarding the Company’s governance or the Board’s governance.
On January 9, 2023, Messrs. Harrington and Kathol and David Hass, then Chief Strategy Officer of the Company, on behalf of the Company, met with representatives of Legion to discuss the Company’s business and operations. During this meeting, Legion did not raise any concerns regarding the Company’s governance or the Board’s governance.
On January 19, 2023, Legion sent a letter to the Company requesting that the Company provide a copy of its form of questionnaire required pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated By-Laws in connection with the nomination of directors to the Board.
On January 25, 2023, the Company sent Legion the form of questionnaire.
On February 17, 2023, Legion’s counsel delivered a letter to the Company, demanding that the Company furnish certain books and records of the Company pursuant to Section 146 of the Business Corporations Act of Ontario and Section 6.1 of National Instrument 54-101 (the “February 17 Demand Letter”).
On February 27, 2023, the Company’s counsel delivered a letter to Legion’s counsel in response to the February 17 Demand Letter, acknowledging receipt of the February 17 Demand Letter, providing certain books and records of the Company, and noting that certain other books and records would be provided once available.
On March 6, 2023, Legion’s counsel delivered the Purported Nomination Notice to the Company, purporting to provide qualifying and timely notice of its intent to nominate the Purported Legion Nominees to the Board at the meeting.
On March 6, 2023, Legion issued a press release announcing its intent to nominate the Purported Legion Nominees at the meeting and filed such press release with the SEC.
On March 7, 2023, the Company’s counsel emailed Legion’s counsel stating that the Company was already working with Korn Ferry to recruit new candidates as part of an ongoing director refreshment process for the Board and that Korn Ferry would be reaching out to the Purported Legion Nominees so that the Purported Legion Nominees could be included in the process (the “March 7 Email”). The Board also indicated in the March 7 Email that it was looking forward to meeting the Purported Legion Nominees as part of the process. Also on March 7, 2023, Legion’s counsel responded to the March 7 Email on behalf of Legion and the Purported Legion Nominees, rejecting both the Korn Ferry outreach offer and the opportunity to meet with the Board. Counsel for Legion also noted that Legion would be open to speaking with the Board – the first time since January that Legion showed an interest in engaging with the Company.
On March 7, 2023, Korn Ferry reached out to each of the Purported Legion Nominees. Each of the Purported Legion Nominees rejected such requests.
On March 9, 2023, the Company’s counsel and Legion’s counsel held a telephonic meeting to discuss Legion’s interest in speaking with the Board.
On March 15, 2023, the Board unanimously determined to appoint Eric J. Foss as a new director to the Board and to include Mr. Foss among the Board’s nominees for election at the meeting. The Board’s size was temporarily increased from ten to eleven but will be reduced to ten following Mr. Halperin’s retirement at the meeting.
On March 16, 2023, the Company’s counsel held a telephonic meeting with Legion’s counsel and indicated that the Board had determined that Legion’s Purported Nomination Notice was invalid. After the meeting, the Company’s counsel delivered a letter to Legion and Legion’s counsel, stating that the Board had determined that the Purported Nomination Notice did not comply with applicable requirements for making director nominations as set forth in the Company’s by-laws, and, therefore, did not constitute a qualifying, timely and valid notice of director nominations