Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments | Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments Fair Value Measurements The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using Description Total Carrying Amount Total Fair Value Level 1 (1) Level 2 (2) Level 3 (3) Total Carrying Amount Total Fair Value Level 1 (1) Level 2 (2) Level 3 (3) Assets: Cash and cash equivalents (4) $ 132,603 $ 132,603 $ 132,603 $ — $ — $ 121,565 $ 121,565 $ 121,565 $ — $ — Total Assets $ 132,603 $ 132,603 $ 132,603 $ — $ — $ 121,565 $ 121,565 $ 121,565 $ — $ — Liabilities: Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt) (5) $ 9,347,051 $ 9,859,266 $ — $ 9,859,266 $ — $ 8,478,473 $ 8,895,009 $ — $ 8,895,009 $ — Total Liabilities $ 9,347,051 $ 9,859,266 $ — $ 9,859,266 $ — $ 8,478,473 $ 8,895,009 $ — $ 8,895,009 $ — ___________________________________ (1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment. (2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account the creditworthiness of the Company. (3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 . (4) Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days. (5) Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. Does not include our capital lease obligations. Other Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses approximate fair value at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 . Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company's financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using Description Total Fair Value Level 1 (1) Level 2 (2) Level 3 (3) Total Fair Value Level 1 (1) Level 2 (2) Level 3 (3) Assets: Derivative financial instruments (4) $ 19,397 $ — $ 19,397 $ — $ 134,574 $ — $ 134,574 $ — Investments (5) $ 3,576 3,576 — — $ 3,965 3,965 — — Total Assets $ 22,973 $ 3,576 $ 19,397 $ — $ 138,539 $ 3,965 $ 134,574 $ — Liabilities: Derivative financial instruments (6) $ 373,497 $ — $ 373,497 $ — $ 1,044,292 $ — $ 1,044,292 $ — Total Liabilities $ 373,497 $ — $ 373,497 $ — $ 1,044,292 $ — $ 1,044,292 $ — ___________________________________ (1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment. (2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options' contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company. (3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 . (4) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the "Fair Value of Derivative Instruments" table for breakdown by instrument type. (5) Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds reported within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. (6) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the "Fair Value of Derivative Instruments" table for breakdown by instrument type. The reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions. Accordingly, the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015 , or that will be realized in the future, and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement. In 2016, we purchased Ocean Adventures. The acquisition was accounted for as a business purchase combination using the purchase method of accounting which requires the use of fair value measurements. The business combination, including purchase transaction and assets acquired, was immaterial to our consolidated financial statements. For goodwill attributable to the purchase, refer to Note 3. Goodwill. The following table presents information about the Company's goodwill, indefinite-life intangible assets and long-lived assets for our Pullmantur reporting unit, further discussed in Note 3. Goodwill and Note 4. Intangible Assets , recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using Description Total Carrying Amount Total Fair Value Level 3 Total Impairment Pullmantur Goodwill (1) $ — $ — — $ 123,814 Indefinite-life intangible asset-Pullmantur trademarks and trade names (2) $ — $ — — $ 174,285 Long-lived assets — Pullmantur aircraft and vessels (3) $ 140,846 $ 140,846 $ 140,846 $ 113,168 Total $ 140,846 $ 140,846 $ 140,846 $ 411,267 ___________________________________ (1) We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results, weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value. Significantly impacting these assumptions was the decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur's fleet. The discounted cash flow model used our 2016 projected operating results as a base. To that base we added future years’ cash flows through 2020 assuming multiple revenue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments for this period on Pullmantur’s reporting unit. We assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario. We discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to Pullmantur’s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital, which was determined to be 11% . The fair value of Pullmantur's goodwill was estimated as of August 31, 2015, the date of the last impairment test, at which point it was fully impaired. (2) We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asset using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method. These trademarks and trade names relate to Pullmantur and we have used a discount rate of 11.5% , comparable to the rate used in valuing the Pullmantur reporting unit. The fair value of these assets were estimated as of August 31, 2015, the date of the last impairment test, at which point they were fully impaired. (3) We estimated the fair value of our long-lived assets using the market approach for the aircraft and a blended indication from the cost and market approaches for the vessels as of August 31, 2015, the date of the last impairment test, including depreciation through December 31, 2015. We believe this amount estimates fair value as of December 31, 2015. A significant input in performing the fair value assessments for these assets was comparable market transactions. We have master International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreements in place with our derivative instrument counterparties. These ISDA agreements provide for final close out netting with our counterparties for all positions in the case of default or termination of the ISDA agreement. We have determined that our ISDA agreements provide us with rights of setoff on the fair value of derivative instruments in a gain position and those in a loss position with the same counterparty. We have elected not to offset such derivative instrument fair values in our consolidated balance sheets. See Credit Related Contingent Features for further discussion on contingent collateral requirements for our derivative instruments. The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial assets under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties: Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements As of December 31, 2016 As of December 31, 2015 Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Cash Collateral Net Amount of Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Cash Collateral Net Amount of (In thousands) Derivatives subject to master netting agreements $ 19,397 $ (19,397 ) $ — $ — $ 134,574 $ (129,815 ) $ — $ 4,759 Total $ 19,397 $ (19,397 ) $ — $ — $ 134,574 $ (129,815 ) $ — $ 4,759 The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial liabilities under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties: Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements As of December 31, 2016 As of December 31, 2015 Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Cash Collateral Net Amount of Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Cash Collateral Net Amount of (In thousands) Derivatives subject to master netting agreements $ (373,497 ) $ 19,397 $ 7,213 $ (346,887 ) $ (1,044,292 ) $ 129,815 $ — $ (914,477 ) Total $ (373,497 ) $ 19,397 $ 7,213 $ (346,887 ) $ (1,044,292 ) $ 129,815 $ — $ (914,477 ) Derivative Instruments We are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. We manage these risks through a combination of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies. The financial impact of these hedging instruments is primarily offset by corresponding changes in the underlying exposures being hedged. We achieve this by closely matching the notional amount, term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged. Although certain of our derivative financial instruments do not qualify or are not accounted for under hedge accounting, we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. We monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. We enter into various forward, swap and option contracts to manage our interest rate exposure and to limit our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. These instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and the vast majority are designated as hedges. We also use non-derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of our net investment in our foreign operations and investments. At inception of the hedge relationship, a derivative instrument that hedges the exposure to changes in the fair value of a firm commitment or a recognized asset or liability is designated as a fair value hedge. A derivative instrument that hedges a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows related to a recognized asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments. Gains and losses on derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until the underlying hedged transactions are recognized in earnings. The foreign currency transaction gain or loss of our non-derivative financial instruments and the changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges of our net investment in foreign operations and investments are recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss along with the associated foreign currency translation adjustment of the foreign operation. On an ongoing basis, we assess whether derivatives used in hedging transactions are "highly effective" in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flow of hedged items. We use the long-haul method to assess hedge effectiveness using regression analysis for each hedge relationship under our interest rate, foreign currency and fuel hedging programs. We apply the same methodology on a consistent basis for assessing hedge effectiveness to all hedges within each hedging program (i.e., interest rate, foreign currency and fuel). We perform regression analyses over an observation period of up to three years, utilizing market data relevant to the hedge horizon of each hedge relationship. High effectiveness is achieved when a statistically valid relationship reflects a high degree of offset and correlation between the changes in the fair values of the derivative instrument and the hedged item. The determination of ineffectiveness is based on the amount of dollar offset between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item at the end of the reporting period. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or hedge accounting is discontinued, any change in fair value of the derivative since the last date at which it was determined to be effective is recognized in earnings. In addition, the ineffective portion of our highly effective hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and reported in Other income (expense) in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Cash flows from derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items. In the event that hedge accounting is discontinued, cash flows subsequent to the date of discontinuance are classified within investing activities. Cash flows from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are classified as investing activities. We consider the classification of the underlying hedged item’s cash flows in determining the classification for the designated derivative instrument’s cash flows. We classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of benchmark interest rate or hedges of fuel expense as operating activities due to the nature of the hedged item. Likewise, we classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on our newbuild ship payments as investing activities and derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on debt payments as financing activities. Interest Rate Risk Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our long-term debt obligations including future interest payments. At December 31, 2016 , approximately 40.5% of our long-term debt was effectively fixed as compared to 31.2% as of December 31, 2015 . We use interest rate swap agreements to modify our exposure to interest rate movements and to manage our interest expense. Market risk associated with our long-term fixed rate debt is the potential increase in fair value resulting from a decrease in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating-rate basis to manage this risk. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the following fixed-rate debt instruments: Debt Instrument Swap Notional as of December 31, 2016 (In thousands) Maturity Debt Fixed Rate Swap Floating Rate: LIBOR plus All-in Swap Floating Rate as of December 31, 2016 Oasis of the Seas term loan $ 175,000 October 2021 5.41% 3.87% 5.13% Unsecured senior notes 650,000 November 2022 5.25% 3.63% 4.54% $ 825,000 These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges. Market risk associated with our long-term floating rate debt is the potential increase in interest expense from an increase in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis to manage this risk. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the following floating-rate debt instruments: Debt Instrument Swap Notional as of December 31, 2016 (In thousands) Maturity Debt Floating Rate All-in Swap Fixed Rate Celebrity Reflection term loan $436,333 October 2024 LIBOR plus 0.40% 2.85% Quantum of the Seas term loan 612,500 October 2026 LIBOR plus 1.30% 3.74% Anthem of the Seas term loan 634,375 April 2027 LIBOR plus 1.30% 3.86% Ovation of the Seas term loan 795,417 April 2028 LIBOR plus 1.00% 3.16% Harmony of the Seas term loan (1) 701,056 May 2028 EURIBOR plus 1.15% 2.26% $ 3,179,681 (1) Interest rate swap agreements hedging the Euro-denominated term loan for Harmony of the Seas include EURIBOR zero-floors matching the hedged debt EURIBOR zero-floor. Amount presented is based on the exchange rate as of December 31, 2016 . These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The notional amount of interest rate swap agreements related to outstanding debt and on our current unfunded financing arrangements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $4.0 billion and $4.3 billion , respectively. Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Derivative Instruments Our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to our ship construction contracts denominated in Euros, our foreign currency denominated debt and our international business operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements to manage portions of the exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. As of December 31, 2016 , the aggregate cost of our ships on order, not including the TUI Cruises' ships on order and those subject to conditions to effectiveness, was approximately $8.4 billion , of which we had deposited $316.1 million as of such date. Approximately 66.7% and 58.2% of the aggregate cost of the ships under construction was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at December 31, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. The majority of our foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow, fair value or net investment hedges depending on the designation of the related hedge. On a regular basis, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts and, from time to time, we utilize cross-currency swap agreements to minimize the volatility resulting from the remeasurement of net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than our functional currency or the functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries. During the fourth quarter of 2016 , we maintained an average of approximately $642.4 million of these foreign currency forward contracts. These instruments are not designated as hedging instruments. In 2016 , 2015 and 2014 changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts were losses of approximately $51.1 million , $55.5 million and $48.6 million , respectively, which offset gains arising from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies in those same years of $39.8 million , $34.6 million and $49.5 million , respectively. These changes were recognized in earnings within Other income (expense) in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). The notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts, including our forward contracts and collar options, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $1.3 billion and $2.4 billion , respectively. Non-Derivative Instruments We also address the exposure of our investments in foreign operations by denominating a portion of our debt in our subsidiaries' and investments' functional currencies and designating it as a hedge of these subsidiaries and investments. We had designated debt as a hedge of our net investments in TUI Cruises of approximately €295.0 million , or approximately $311.2 million , through December 31, 2016 . As of December 31, 2015, no debt was designated as a hedge of our net investments in Pullmantur and TUI Cruises. Fuel Price Risk Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates primarily to the consumption of fuel on our ships. We use fuel swap agreements to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices. Our fuel swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges. At December 31, 2016 , we have hedged the variability in future cash flows for certain forecasted fuel transactions occurring through 2020 . As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 , we had the following outstanding fuel swap agreements: Fuel Swap Agreements As of December 31, 2016 As of December 31, 2015 (metric tons) 2016 — 930,000 2017 799,065 854,000 2018 616,300 583,000 2019 521,000 231,000 2020 306,500 — Fuel Swap Agreements As of December 31, 2016 As of December 31, 2015 (% hedged) Projected fuel purchases for year: 2016 — 65 % 2017 60 % 59 % 2018 44 % 40 % 2019 35 % 15 % 2020 20 % — % At December 31, 2016 and 2015 , $138.5 million and $321.0 million , respectively, of estimated unrealized net loss associated with our cash flow hedges pertaining to fuel swap agreements were expected to be reclassified to earnings from Accumulated other comprehensive loss within the next 12 months. Reclassification is expected to occur as the result of fuel consumption associated with our hedged forecasted fuel purchases. The fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows: Fair Value of Derivative Instruments Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives Balance Sheet As of December 31, 2016 As of December 31, 2015 Balance Sheet As of December 31, 2016 As of December 31, 2015 Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value Fair Value (In thousands) Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20 (1) Interest rate swaps Other assets $ 5,246 $ — Other long-term liabilities $ 57,679 $ 67,371 Foreign currency forward contracts Derivative financial instruments — 93,996 Derivative financial instruments 5,574 320,873 Foreign currency forward contracts Other assets — — Other long-term liabilities 68,165 — Fuel swaps Derivative financial instruments — — Derivative financial instruments 129,486 307,475 Fuel swaps Other assets 13,608 — Other long-term liabilities 95,125 325,055 Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20 18,854 93,996 356,029 1,020,774 Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20 Foreign currency forward contracts Derivative Financial Instruments — 32,339 Derivative financial instruments — — Fuel swaps Derivative financial instruments — 8,239 Derivative financial instruments 11,532 23,518 Fuel swaps Other assets 543 — Other long-term liabilities 5,936 — Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20 543 40,578 17,468 23,518 Total derivatives $ 19,397 $ 134,574 $ 373,497 $ 1,044,292 ___________________________________ (1) Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 " Derivatives and Hedging." The carrying value and line item caption of non-derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows: Carrying Value Non-derivative instrument designated as Balance Sheet Location As of December 31, 2016 As of December 31, 2015 (In thousands) Foreign currency debt Current portion of long-term debt $ 61,601 $ — Foreign currency debt Long-term debt 249,624 — $ 311,225 $ — The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as hedging instruments and the related hedged items in fair value hedges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) was as follows: Location of Gain Amount of Gain (Loss) Amount of Gain (Loss) Derivatives and Related Hedged Items Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 (In thousands) Interest rate swaps Interest expense, net of interest capitalized $ 7,448 $ 11,276 $ 7,203 $ 15,743 Interest rate swaps Other income (expense) (3,625 ) 10,779 5,072 (7,533 ) $ 3,823 $ 22,055 $ 12,275 $ 8,210 The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows: Amount of Gain (Loss) Location of Gain Amount of Gain (Loss) Location of Gain Amount of Gain (Loss) Derivatives under Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 (In thousands) Interest rate swaps (31,049 ) (52,602 ) Interest expense (41,480 ) (36,401 ) Other income (expense) — 38 Foreign currency forward contracts (51,092 ) (141,470 ) Depreciation and amortization expenses (8,114 ) (2,871 ) Other income (expense) — — Foreign currency forward contracts — — Other income (expense) (14,342 ) 7,580 Other income (expense) (59 ) — Foreign currency forward contracts — — Other indirect operating expenses (207 ) — Other income (expense) — — Foreign currency collar options — (64,559 ) Depreciation and amortization expenses (2,408 ) (1,605 ) Other income (expense) — — Fuel swaps — — Other income (expense) 13,685 (9,583 ) Other income (expense) — — Fuel swaps 156,139 (439,040 ) Fuel (284,384 ) (248,744 ) Other income (expense) (751 ) (487 ) $ 73,998 $ (697,671 ) $ (337,250 ) $ (291,624 ) $ (810 ) $ (449 ) The effect of non-derivative instruments qualifying and designated as net investment hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows: Amount of Gain (Loss) Location of Gain Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Non-derivative instruments under ASC 815-20 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 (In thousands) Foreign Currency Debt $ 20,295 $ 8,955 Other income (expense) $ — $ — $ 20,295 $ 8,955 $ — $ — The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows: Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Location of Gain (Loss) Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 (In thousands) Foreign currency forward contracts Other income (expense) $ (51,029 ) $ (55,489 ) Fuel swaps Other income (expense) (1,000 ) (175 ) $ (52,029 ) $ (55,664 ) Credit Related Contingent Features Our current interest rate derivative instruments may require us to post collateral if our Standard & Poor's and Moody's credit ratings remain below specified levels. Generally, if on the fifth anniversary of executing a derivative instrument or on any succeeding fifth-year anniversary our credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt were to be rated below BBB- by Standard & Poor's and Baa3 by Moody's, then the counterparty may periodically demand that we post collateral in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the net market value of all derivative transactions with such counterparty that have reached their fifth year anniversary, to the extent negative, and (ii) the applicable minimum call amount. The amount of collateral required to be posted following such event will change as, and to the extent, our net liability position increases or decreases by more than the applicable minimum call amount. If our credit rating for our senior unsecured debt is subsequently equal to, or above BBB- by Standard & Poor's or Baa3 by Moody's, then any collateral posted at such time will be released to us and we will no longer be required to post collateral unless we meet the collateral trigger requirement at the next fifth-year anniversary. Currently, our senior unsecured debt credit rating is BB+ with a positive outlook by Standard & Poor's and Ba1 with a positive outlook by Moody's. We currently have seven interest rate derivative hedges that have a term of at least five years . As of December 31, 2016 , two of these instruments had reached their fifth anniversary and, accordingly, we posted $7.2 million in collateral as of such date. During the next 12 months, two more of our interest rate derivative hedges will reach their fifth anniversary. If each of these two interest rate hedges had already reached its fifth anniversary as of December 31, 2016 , our maximum collateral exposure would have been $22.8 million . Similarly, our maximum collateral exposure as of December 31, 2015 , would have been $14.6 million if all hedges scheduled to reach their fifth anniversary date within one year had instead reached their fifth anniversary as of December 31, 2015 . |