Other | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Other [Abstract] | ' |
Other | ' |
5. Other |
|
Margin Stabilization |
|
Margin Stabilization allows us to review our actual demand-related costs of service and demand revenue and adjust revenues from our member distribution cooperatives to meet our financial coverage requirements and accumulate additional equity as approved by our board of directors. Our formula rate allows us to recover and refund amounts utilizing Margin Stabilization. Pursuant to FERC’s acceptance of the revisions to the formula rate as issued in FERC’s December 2, 2013 order (see “FERC Proceeding Related to Formula Rate” below), effective January 1, 2014: |
|
| · | | At year end, if the actual net margin attributable to ODEC, excluding any budgeted additional equity contributions, equals more than 20% of our actual total interest charges, our board of directors may approve that, utilizing Margin Stabilization, revenues will be reduced by the amount of such excess margins, or that such excess margins will be retained as an additional equity contribution. For year-to-date interim reporting, if the actual net margin attributable to ODEC, excluding any budgeted additional equity contributions, equals more than 20% of our actual total interest charges, utilizing Margin Stabilization, revenues will be reduced by the amount of such excess margins. |
|
| · | | At year end and for year-to-date interim reporting, if the actual net margin attributable to ODEC, excluding any budgeted additional equity contributions, equals more than 10% but less than 20% of our actual total interest charges, no adjustment is required. |
|
| · | | At year end and for year-to-date interim reporting, if the actual net margin attributable to ODEC, excluding any budgeted additional equity contributions, equals less than 10% of our actual total interest charges, utilizing Margin Stabilization, revenues will be increased to produce a net margin attributable to ODEC, excluding any budgeted additional equity contributions, equal to 10% of our actual total interest charges. |
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded a reduction in operating revenues of $40,100 and $1.9 million, respectively, utilizing Margin Stabilization, to produce a net margin equal to 20% of our actual total interest charges. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recorded a reduction to operating revenues of $2.3 million and $10.6 million, respectively, utilizing Margin Stabilization, to produce a net margin equal to 20% of our actual total interest charges. |
|
|
Three and Nine Months Ended September 2014 Results and the Impact on Deferred Energy |
Deferred energy expense represents the difference between energy revenues, which are based upon energy rates approved by our board of directors, and energy expenses, which are based upon actual energy costs incurred. In the three months ended September 30, 2014, we over-collected energy costs from our member distribution cooperatives by $12.7 million and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we under-collected energy costs from our member distribution cooperatives by $64.3 million. As a result, our deferred energy balance changed from an over-collection of $37.2 million at December 31, 2013, to an under-collection of $27.1 million at September 30, 2014. This under-collection was driven by first quarter 2014 results when the entire mid-Atlantic region experienced extremely cold weather, which increased our energy sales in MWh to our member distribution cooperatives 10.2% over the expected requirements, and which had a significant effect on our fuel and purchased power costs. To address the under-collection of energy costs, we increased our total energy rate 11.8% effective April 1, 2014, and an additional 2.4% effective October 1, 2014. |
Wildcat Point Generation Facility |
|
On April 23, 2013, we announced our intention to seek approval to develop and construct a 1,000 MW natural gas-fueled generation facility, named Wildcat Point, in Cecil County, Maryland. The development, construction, and operation of Wildcat Point are subject to obtainment of necessary governmental and regulatory approvals. On April 8, 2014, we received a Final Order granting approval of the CPCN from the MPSC. On June 2, 2014, we selected White Oak Power Constructors as the EPC contractor under a fixed price contract. Site preparation and engineering activities are in process and we anticipate permanent construction will begin in late 2014, and the facility will become operational in mid-2017. We currently anticipate that the project cost will be approximately $790.0 million, including financing costs. |
|
Wildcat Point will consist of two combustion turbines, two heat recovery steam generators and one steam turbine generator. Mitsubishi will supply the combustion turbines and Alstom will supply the heat recovery steam generators and the steam turbine generator. Beginning in June 2014, following the approval of the CPCN and our selection of the EPC contractor, we began capitalizing all construction-related costs related to Wildcat Point. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we expensed $4.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively, of non-capital costs related to Wildcat Point. As of September 30, 2014, we capitalized progress payments for major equipment, EPC payments, emission reduction credits, and land and land rights totaling $76.2 million, which are recorded in construction work in progress. |
|
FERC Proceeding Related to Formula Rate |
|
On September 30, 2013, we filed with FERC to revise our cost-based formula rate to more closely align our cost recovery from our member distribution cooperatives with the methodologies used by PJM to allocate costs to us. On November 8, 2013, Bear Island, a customer of REC, filed a motion to intervene, protest, and request for hearing. On December 2, 2013, FERC issued its order accepting the proposed revisions for filing to become effective January 1, 2014, subject to refund, and establishing hearing and settlement procedures. Settlement discussions have been terminated and a litigation schedule has been set with a hearing date of December 9, 2014. The presiding judge of the proceeding referred the parties to dispute resolution procedures with the assistance of FERC Dispute Resolution Service; however, dispute resolution procedures have been terminated and the hearing procedures continue. |
|
Recovery of Costs from PJM |
|
On June 23, 2014, we filed a petition at FERC seeking recovery from PJM of approximately $14.9 million of unreimbursed costs, which were incurred during the first quarter of 2014 related to the dispatch of our combustion turbine generating facilities. The results of our petition cannot currently be determined and we have not recorded a receivable related to this matter. |
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
|
We currently maintain a $500.0 million, five-year revolving credit facility to cover our short-term and medium-term funding needs. Commitments under this syndicated credit agreement extend until March 5, 2019. At September 30, 2014, we had $35.0 million in borrowings outstanding under this facility, which are recorded in long-term debt. Additionally, at September 30, 2014, we had a letter of credit in the amount of $7.0 million outstanding. At December 31, 2013, we did not have any borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under this facility. |
|
Long-term debt |
|
We currently anticipate that we will issue long-term debt in the first quarter of 2015 to fund capital expenditures related to the construction of Wildcat Point. |
|
|