Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
or
o | Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-20086
UNIVERSAL HOSPITAL SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 41-0760940 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
7700 France Avenue South, Suite 275
Edina, Minnesota 55435-5228
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(952) 893-3200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer o |
| | |
Non-accelerated filer x | | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of November 1, 2011: 1,000
Table of Contents
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements — Unaudited
Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(unaudited)
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Assets | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 13,059 | | $ | — | |
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,922 at September 30, 2011 and $2,000 at December 31, 2010 | | 68,214 | | 59,962 | |
Inventories | | 6,151 | | 4,761 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 12,980 | | 10,715 | |
Other current assets | | 5,433 | | 3,342 | |
Total current assets | | 105,837 | | 78,780 | |
| | | | | |
Property and equipment, net: | | | | | |
Medical equipment, net | | 233,785 | | 206,842 | |
Property and office equipment, net | | 23,278 | | 20,762 | |
Total property and equipment, net | | 257,063 | | 227,604 | |
| | | | | |
Other long-term assets: | | | | | |
Goodwill | | 323,989 | | 280,211 | |
Other intangibles, net | | 247,565 | | 234,915 | |
Other, primarily deferred financing costs, net | | 13,902 | | 11,518 | |
Total assets | | $ | 948,356 | | $ | 833,028 | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | $ | 5,168 | | $ | 3,764 | |
Interest rate swap | | 7,774 | | — | |
Book overdrafts | | 4,321 | | 3,566 | |
Accounts payable | | 31,103 | | 26,943 | |
Accrued compensation | | 12,708 | | 11,648 | |
Accrued interest | | 18,706 | | 3,601 | |
Dividend payable | | 771 | | — | |
Other accrued expenses | | 10,829 | | 9,472 | |
Total current liabilities | | 91,380 | | 58,994 | |
| | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current portion | | 649,295 | | 521,281 | |
Interest rate swap | | — | | 16,347 | |
Pension and other long-term liabilities | | 8,525 | | 6,302 | |
Payable to Parent | | 18,037 | | 13,702 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 76,534 | | 69,663 | |
| | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | | | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 | | — | | — | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 214,294 | | 248,794 | |
Accumulated deficit | | (100,576 | ) | (87,276 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (9,525 | ) | (14,779 | ) |
Total Universal Hospital Services, Inc. equity | | 104,193 | | 146,739 | |
Non controlling interest | | 392 | | — | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | 104,585 | | 146,739 | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 948,356 | | $ | 833,028 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | |
Medical equipment outsourcing | | $ | 74,787 | | $ | 59,393 | | $ | 214,873 | | $ | 185,385 | |
Technical and professional services | | 13,852 | | 11,512 | | 36,083 | | 33,477 | |
Medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 6,490 | | 4,900 | | 17,972 | | 13,850 | |
Total revenues | | 95,129 | | 75,805 | | 268,928 | | 232,712 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Sales | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of medical equipment outsourcing | | 29,599 | | 22,998 | | 82,499 | | 68,067 | |
Cost of technical and professional services | | 10,540 | | 8,155 | | 26,650 | | 24,003 | |
Cost of medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 5,215 | | 3,725 | | 14,115 | | 10,796 | |
Medical equipment depreciation | | 17,006 | | 17,229 | | 51,678 | | 52,044 | |
Total costs of medical equipment outsourcing, technical and professional services and medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 62,360 | | 52,107 | | 174,942 | | 154,910 | |
Gross margin | | 32,769 | | 23,698 | | 93,986 | | 77,802 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 22,756 | | 23,139 | | 72,247 | | 65,192 | |
Acquisition and integration expenses | | 622 | | — | | 2,621 | | — | |
Operating income | | 9,391 | | 559 | | 19,118 | | 12,610 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | 15,122 | | 11,651 | | 39,572 | | 35,013 | |
Loss before income taxes and non controlling interest | | (5,731 | ) | (11,092 | ) | (20,454 | ) | (22,403 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (145 | ) | 1,688 | | (7,451 | ) | (2,202 | ) |
Consolidated net loss | | $ | (5,586 | ) | $ | (12,780 | ) | $ | (13,003 | ) | $ | (20,201 | ) |
Net income attributable to non controlling interest | | 159 | | — | | 297 | | — | |
Net loss attributable to Universal Hospital Services, Inc. | | $ | (5,745 | ) | $ | (12,780 | ) | $ | (13,300 | ) | $ | (20,201 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Consolidated net loss | | $ | (13,003 | ) | $ | (20,201 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation | | 58,351 | | 58,400 | |
Amortization of intangibles, deferred financing costs and bond premium | | 13,339 | | 12,260 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | 593 | | (7 | ) |
Provision for inventory obsolescence | | 99 | | 37 | |
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | | 3,294 | | 5,094 | |
Non-cash gain on trade-in of recalled equipment | | (8,360 | ) | — | |
Gain on sales and disposals of equipment | | (1,297 | ) | (715 | ) |
Deferred income taxes | | (7,758 | ) | (2,452 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | (4,328 | ) | 4,586 | |
Inventories | | (267 | ) | 690 | |
Other operating assets | | (759 | ) | (656 | ) |
Accounts payable | | 813 | | (1,550 | ) |
Other operating liabilities | | 15,350 | | 13,189 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 56,067 | | 68,675 | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Medical equipment purchases | | (60,563 | ) | (56,575 | ) |
Property and office equipment purchases | | (5,861 | ) | (3,800 | ) |
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment | | 2,599 | | 2,134 | |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | (65,039 | ) | — | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (128,864 | ) | (58,241 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Proceeds under senior secured credit facility | | 132,250 | | 109,929 | |
Payments under senior secured credit facility | | (185,150 | ) | (102,179 | ) |
Payments of principal under capital lease obligations | | (4,286 | ) | (4,001 | ) |
Payment of deferred financing costs | | (4,340 | ) | (1,746 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of bonds | | 178,938 | | — | |
Accrued interest received from bondholders | | 661 | | — | |
Cash paid to non controlling interests | | (291 | ) | — | |
Contributions from new members to limited liability companies | | 7 | | — | |
Proceeds from exercise of parent company stock options | | 41 | | — | |
Repayment of 10.125% senior notes | | — | | (9,945 | ) |
Dividend Payments | | (32,729 | ) | — | |
Change in book overdrafts | | 755 | | (2,492 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | 85,856 | | (10,434 | ) |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | 13,059 | | — | |
| | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period | | — | | — | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period | | $ | 13,059 | | $ | — | |
| | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 22,711 | | $ | 22,992 | |
Income taxes paid | | $ | 361 | | $ | 156 | |
Non-cash activities: | | | | | |
Medical equipment purchases included in accounts payable (at end of period) | | $ | 13,113 | | $ | 5,819 | |
Dividend declared to Parent | | $ | 1,771 | | $ | — | |
Capital lease additions | | $ | 3,191 | | $ | 6,195 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared by Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (“we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company”, or “UHS”) without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
On April 1, 2011 we completed our acquisition of Emergent Group Inc. (“Emergent Group”), as described in Note 4, Acquisitions. The results of operations of Emergent Group have accordingly been included in UHS’s consolidated results of operations since the date of acquisition. Emergent Group is included in the Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment.
The interim consolidated financial statements presented herein as of September 30, 2011, reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. These adjustments are all of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
The December 31, 2010 balance sheet amounts were derived from audited financial statements.
We are required to make estimates and assumptions about future events in preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses at the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. While we believe that our past estimates and assumptions have been materially accurate, our current estimates are subject to change if different assumptions as to the outcome of future events are made. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and predicate those estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. We make adjustments to our assumptions and judgments when facts and circumstances dictate. Since future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements.
A description of our significant accounting policies is included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. With the exception of ‘Principles of Consolidation’ listed below, there have been no material changes to these policies for the quarter ended September 30, 2011.
4
Table of Contents
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of UHS and of Emergent Group Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“Emergent Group”) since its acquisition on April 1, 2011. In addition, in accordance with guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), we have accounted for our equity investments in entities in which we are the primary beneficiary under the full consolidation method. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated through consolidation. As the primary beneficiary, we consolidate the limited liability companies (“LLCs”) referred to in Note 12, Limited Liability Companies, as we effectively receive the majority of the benefits from such entities and we provide equipment lease guarantees for such entities.
2. Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss is comprised of consolidated net loss and other comprehensive income attributable to UHS. Other comprehensive loss includes unrealized gains from derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. Accumulated other comprehensive loss is displayed separately on the balance sheets. A reconciliation of net loss to comprehensive loss is provided below:
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
(in thousands) | | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Net loss attributable to UHS | | $ | (5,745 | ) | $ | (12,780 | ) | $ | (13,300 | ) | $ | (20,201 | ) |
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge, net of tax | | 1,970 | | 497 | | 5,254 | | 1,263 | |
Comprehensive loss | | $ | (3,775 | ) | $ | (12,283 | ) | $ | (8,046 | ) | $ | (18,938 | ) |
3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Standard Adopted
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements — A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. This update provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific nor third-party evidence is available. We prospectively adopted this standard in January 2011. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Standards Not Yet Adopted
In September 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the authoritative guidance on goodwill impairment testing. The objective of this amendment is to simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. The amendment permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is
5
Table of Contents
unnecessary. The amendment will be effective for our quarter ending March 31, 2012. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the authoritative guidance on comprehensive income. The amendment eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity or include the components in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and instead requires the presentation of comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or a separate but consecutive statement. The amendment will be effective for our quarter ending March 31, 2012. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, but will require a change to present comprehensive income (loss) on the face of our consolidated financial statements.
4. Acquisitions
Emergent Group Inc.
On April 1, 2011 (the “Acquisition Date”), we completed our acquisition of Emergent Group for a total purchase price of approximately $65.3 million, which represents the sum of $60.0 million of cash paid for equity, $4.8 million of capital lease liability assumed and $2.0 million of transaction costs, less cash acquired of $1.5 million. All outstanding Emergent Group shares were purchased at a price of $8.46 per share. Emergent Group’s wholly owned subsidiary, PRI Medical Technologies, Inc. (“PRI Medical”), is a provider of surgical laser equipment services primarily for the urology community. The purchase of Emergent Group supports our strategic growth initiatives to diversify our outsourcing offerings to our customers. The acquisition of Emergent Group was funded primarily by drawings under our $195.0 million Senior Secured Credit Facility, which is described below in Note 9, Long-Term Debt.
The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the Acquisition Date:
6
Table of Contents
(in thousands) | | April 1, 2011 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,480 | |
Accounts receivable | | 4,517 | |
Inventories | | 1,222 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 208 | |
Other current assets | | 1,403 | |
Medical equipment | | 7,540 | |
Property and equipment | | 234 | |
Intangible assets | | 22,150 | |
Other assets | | 79 | |
Total identifiable assets | | 38,833 | |
| | | |
Accounts payable | | 1,972 | |
Accrued expenses | | 1,571 | |
Other liabilities | | 1,454 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 9,523 | |
Capital leases | | 4,763 | |
Total liabilities assumed | | 19,283 | |
Net identifiable assets acquired | | 19,550 | |
Non controlling interests | | (379 | ) |
Goodwill | | 40,848 | |
Net assets acquired | | $ | 60,019 | |
The above estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are provisional and are based on the information that was available as of the Acquisition Date to estimate the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Additionally, we believe our net accounts receivable to be collectible. The Company believes that the available information provides a reasonable basis for preliminarily estimating the fair values. We will continue to evaluate the above purchase price allocation as better information becomes available, particularly as it relates to income taxes. We anticipate additional relevant information to become available as we complete and file our related tax returns. We expect to finalize the valuation and complete the purchase price allocation as soon as practicable, but no later than one year from the Acquisition Date.
The valuation of the intangible assets acquired and related amortization periods are as follows:
| | Valuation | | Amortization Period | |
| | (in thousands) | | (in years) | |
Customer relationships | | $ | 17,669 | | 8 | |
Trade names | | 4,264 | | 10 | |
Proprietary software | | 217 | | 3 | |
Total | | $ | 22,150 | | | |
The $40.8 million of goodwill was assigned to our Outsourcing segment. The goodwill recognized is attributable primarily to strategic and synergistic opportunities across Emergent Group, the assembled workforce of Emergent Group and other factors. The goodwill recognized is not deductible for income tax purposes.
7
Table of Contents
The Company expensed $0.6 million and $2.6 million of Emergent Group acquisition-related costs for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively. These costs are included in the line item entitled “acquisition and integration expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and are comprised of the following items:
(in thousands) | | Acquisition and integration expenses | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, 2011 | | September 30, 2011 | |
Investment banking fees | | $ | — | | $ | 825 | |
Legal, accounting and other costs | | 622 | | 1,796 | |
Total | | $ | 622 | | $ | 2,621 | |
The amounts of revenue and net income of Emergent Group included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations from the Acquisition Date to September 30, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
| | Revenue and income included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations from April 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011 | |
Revenue | | $ | 16,461 | |
Net income attributable to Emergent Group | | $ | 603 | |
The following supplemental pro forma information presents the financial results as if the acquisition of Emergent Group had occurred on January 1, 2011 and January 1, 2010 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. This supplemental pro forma information has been prepared for comparative purposes and does not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition been made on January 1, 2011 or January 1, 2010, nor are they indicative of any future results.
| | Nine Months Ended | |
(in thousands) | | September 30, 2011 | |
Pro forma consolidated results | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 276,757 | |
Net loss attributable to Universal Hospital Services, Inc. | | (14,986 | ) |
| | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
(in thousands) | | September 30, 2010 | | September 30, 2010 | |
Pro forma consolidated results | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 83,400 | | $ | 254,927 | |
Net loss attributable to Universal Hospital Services, Inc. | | (13,215 | ) | (21,354 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
These amounts have been calculated after applying the Company’s accounting policies and adjusting the results of Emergent Group to reflect the additional depreciation, amortization and interest that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments primarily to medical equipment and intangible
8
Table of Contents
assets, and draws on the line of credit to fund the acquisition had been applied on January 1, 2011 and 2010, as applicable, together with the consequential tax effects.
Other Acquisition
On May 31, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of the equipment rental division of a medical equipment manufacturer for $6.5 million in cash. The assets acquired primarily consisted of movable medical equipment of approximately $1.7 million, customer relationship intangibles of approximately $1.9 million and goodwill of approximately $2.9 million. The acquisition was funded through our $195.0 million Senior Secured Credit Facility, which is described below in Note 9, Long-Term Debt.
The following table summarizes the impact of our second quarter acquisitions related to goodwill at September 30, 2011:
(in thousands) | | Goodwill | |
| | | |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | $ | 280,211 | |
Acquisition of Emergent Group Inc. | | 40,848 | |
Other acquisition | | 2,930 | |
Balance at September 30, 2011 | | $ | 323,989 | |
There is no aggregate goodwill impairment for any of the periods presented in our financial statements.
5. Fair Value Measurements
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, are summarized in the following table by type of inputs applicable to the fair value measurements:
| | Fair Value at September 30, 2011 | | Fair Value at December 31, 2010 | |
(in thousands) | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
Interest Rate Swap | | $ | — | | $ | 7,774 | | $ | — | | $ | 7,774 | | $ | — | | $ | 16,347 | | $ | — | | $ | 16,347 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
A description of the inputs used in the valuation of assets and liabilities is summarized as follows:
Level 1 — Inputs represent unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities exchanged in active markets.
Level 2 — Inputs include directly or indirectly observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities exchanged in active or inactive markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities exchanged in inactive markets; other inputs that are considered in fair value determinations of the assets or liabilities, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates;
9
Table of Contents
and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 — Inputs include unobservable inputs used in the measurement of assets and liabilities. Management is required to use its own assumptions regarding unobservable inputs because there is little, if any, market activity in the assets or liabilities or related observable inputs that can be corroborated at the measurement date. Measurements of nonexchange traded derivative contract assets and liabilities are primarily based on valuation models, discounted cash flow models or other valuation techniques that are believed to be used by market participants. Unobservable inputs require management to make certain projections and assumptions about the information that would be used by market participants in pricing assets or liabilities.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The Company considers the carrying amount of financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, as the approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The fair value of our outstanding PIK Toggle Notes and Floating Rate Notes as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, based on the quoted market price for the same or similar issues of debt, is approximately:
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
(in millions) | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | |
PIK Toggle Notes | | $ | 400.4 | | $ | 240.9 | |
Floating Rate Notes | | 200.1 | | 210.9 | |
| | | | | | | |
6. Shareholders’ Equity
The following tables represent changes in shareholders’ equity that are attributable to our shareholders and non controlling interests for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2011 and 2010.
| | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | |
| | Additional | | | | Other | | | | | |
| | Paid-in | | Accumulated | | Comprehensive | | Non controlling | | Total | |
(in thousands) | | Capital | | Deficit | | Loss | | Interests | | Equity | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | $ | 248,794 | | $ | (87,276 | ) | $ | (14,779 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 146,739 | |
Consolidation of Emgergent Group non controlling interests | | — | | — | | — | | 379 | | 379 | |
Net income (loss) | | — | | (13,300 | ) | — | | 297 | | (13,003 | ) |
Dividend declared | | (34,500 | ) | — | | — | | — | | (34,500 | ) |
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge, net of tax | | — | | — | | 5,254 | | — | | 5,254 | |
Cash distributions to non controlling interests | | — | | — | | — | | (291 | ) | (291 | ) |
Contributions from new members to non controlling interests | | — | | — | | — | | 7 | | 7 | |
Balance at September 30, 2011 | | $ | 214,294 | | $ | (100,576 | ) | $ | (9,525 | ) | $ | 392 | | $ | 104,585 | |
| | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | |
| | Additional | | | | Other | | | | | |
| | Paid-in | | Accumulated | | Comprehensive | | Non controlling | | Total | |
(in thousands) | | Capital | | Deficit | | Loss | | Interests | | Equity | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balances at December 31, 2009 | | $ | 248,794 | | $ | (58,165 | ) | $ | (16,638 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 173,991 | |
Net loss | | — | | (20,201 | ) | — | | — | | $ | (20,201 | ) |
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge, net of tax | | — | | — | | 1,263 | | — | | $ | 1,263 | |
Balance at September 30, 2010 | | $ | 248,794 | | $ | (78,366 | ) | $ | (15,375 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 155,053 | |
10
Table of Contents
7. Stock-Based Compensation
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, activity under the 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Stock Option Plan”), of UHS Holdco, Inc., our parent company (“Parent”), was as follows:
(in thousands except exercise price) | | Number of Options | | Weighted average exercise price | | Aggregate intrinsic value | | Weighted average remaining contractual term (years) | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 | | 39,523 | | $ | 1.06 | | $ | 37,315 | | 6.8 | |
Granted | | — | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | (41 | ) | $ | 1.00 | | $ | 34 | | | |
Forfeited or expired | | (676 | ) | $ | 1.07 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 | | 38,806 | | $ | 1.06 | | $ | 25,412 | | 6.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 | | 23,964 | | $ | 1.01 | | $ | 16,651 | | 5.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Remaining authorized options available for issue | | 5,099 | | | | | | | |
The exercise price of each stock option award is equal to the market value of Parent’s common stock on the grant date as determined reasonably and in good faith by Parent’s board of directors and Parent’s compensation committee and based on an analysis of a variety of factors including peer group multiples, merger and acquisition multiples, and discounted cash flow analyses.
The intrinsic value of a stock award is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the award.
We determine the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The estimated fair value of options, including the effect of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the options’ expected vesting periods. There were no stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Expected volatility is based on an independent valuation of the stock of companies within our peer group. Given the lack of a true comparable company, the peer group consists of selected public health care companies representing our suppliers, customers and competitors within certain product lines. The risk free-interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the grant date based on the expected option life. The expected option life represents the result of the “simplified” method applied to “plain vanilla” options granted during the period, as provided within ASC Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation.” Parent used the simplified method as Parent does not have sufficient historical exercise experience to provide a basis upon which to estimate the expected term.
Although Parent grants stock options, the Company recognizes compensation expense related to these options since the services are performed for its benefit. Along with this expense, which is primarily included in selling, general and administrative expense, the Company records an offsetting payable to Parent liability which is not expected to be settled within the next twelve months.
11
Table of Contents
At September 30, 2011, unearned non-cash stock-based compensation that we expect to recognize as expense over a weighted average period of 1.9 years, totals approximately $6.9 million, net of our estimated forfeiture rate of 2.0%. The expense could be accelerated upon the sale of Parent or the Company.
8. Dividend Declared
On June 8, 2011 the Company and Parent’s Boards of Directors declared a dividend of $0.12 per share to the Parent’s shareholders of record on June 10, 2011 and a $0.12 per share distribution to be paid to the holders of vested options on the Parent’s stock as of June 10, 2011, subject to the consummation of the note offering which occurred on June 17, 2011 (see Note 9, Long-term Debt), and payable on July 1, 2011.
Also on June 8, 2011, the Boards of Directors declared a distribution of $0.12 per option to holders of outstanding options on the Parent’s stock on June 10, 2011 that are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015.
Our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2011 reflects the decrease in shareholders’ equity for dividends paid to Parent shareholders and vested option holders on July 1, 2011, as well as estimated amounts to be paid to holders of options expected to vest on December 31, 2011 though 2015 based on the an estimated option forfeiture rate of 2% annually. It also reflects the related current dividend payable and long-term dividend payable included in Payable to Parent.
9. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
PIK toggle notes | | $ | 405,000 | | $ | 230,000 | |
Floating rate notes | | 230,000 | | 230,000 | |
Unamortized bond premium | | 3,651 | | — | |
Senior secured credit facility | | — | | 52,900 | |
Capital lease obligations | | 15,812 | | 12,145 | |
| | 654,463 | | 525,045 | |
Less: Current portion of long-term debt | | (5,168 | ) | (3,764 | ) |
Total long-term debt | | $ | 649,295 | | $ | 521,281 | |
PIK Toggle Notes. Our 8.50% / 9.25% Second Lien Senior Secured PIK Toggle Notes due 2015 (the “PIK Toggle Notes”) consist of $230.0 million aggregate principal amount of PIK Toggle Notes issued on May 31, 2007 (the “Existing Notes”), and $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of PIK Toggle Notes issued on June 17, 2011 (the “Additional Notes”) for a total aggregate outstanding principal amount of $405.0 million. All of the PIK Toggle Notes were issued under a Second Lien Senior Indenture dated as of May 31, 2007 (the “Second Lien Senior Indenture”).
12
Table of Contents
The Additional Notes were issued in a private placement, at a premium of 102.250% for an aggregate total of $178.9 million in proceeds and are subject to the same terms as the Existing Notes under the Second Lien Senior Indenture. The premium is being amortized over the remaining life of the Additional Notes using the effective interest rate of 7.824%. The proceeds of the issuance of the Additional Notes were used to (i) repay the revolving borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, (ii) pay fees and expenses relating to the offering of the Additional Notes and (iii) pay a dividend as declared by the Company and Parent’s Board of Directors on June 8, 2011 (see Note 8, Divided Declared). In connection with the issuance of the Additional Notes, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers of the Additional Notes. On September 12, 2011, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed to register the exchange of the Additional Notes for fully registered Additional Notes, and was declared effective by the SEC. The exchange offer expired on October 12, 2011 and on October 18, 2011we completed the exchange offer. See Note 17, Subsequent Events.
The PIK Toggle Notes mature on June 1, 2015. Interest on the PIK Toggle Notes is payable semiannually in arrears on each June 1 and December 1. Beginning June 1, 2011, the Company was required to make all interest payments on the PIK Toggle Notes entirely as cash interest. Cash interest on the PIK Toggle Notes accrues at the rate of 8.50% per annum. The PIK Toggle Notes are redeemable, at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at specified redemption prices (as defined in the Second Lien Senior Indenture) plus accrued interest to the date of redemption.
We may redeem some or all of the PIK Toggle Notes at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the PIK Toggle Notes redeemed, to the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on June 1 of the years indicated below, subject to the rights of noteholders:
Year | | Percentage | |
2011 | | 104.250 | % |
2012 | | 102.125 | % |
2013 and thereafter | | 100.000 | % |
In addition, the PIK Toggle Notes have a change of control provision, which gives each holder the right to require the Company to purchase all or a portion of such holders’ PIK Toggle Notes upon a change in control, as defined in the Second Lien Senior Indenture, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount plus accrued interest to the date of purchase. The PIK Toggle Notes, subject to certain definitions and exceptions, have covenants that restrict, among other things, the incurrence of additional debt, the payment of dividends and the issuance of preferred stock. The PIK Toggle Notes are uncollateralized.
Floating Rate Notes. Our Floating Rate Notes (the “Floating Rate Notes”) were issued on May 31, 2007 in the aggregate principal amount of $230.0 million under the Second Lien Senior Indenture. The Floating Rate Notes mature on June 1, 2015. Interest on the Floating Rate Notes is payable semiannually in arrears on each June 1 and December 1. Interest on the Floating Rate Notes is reset for each semi-annual interest period and is calculated at the current LIBOR rate plus 3.375%. At September 30, 2011, our LIBOR-based rate was 3.778%, which includes the credit spread. The Floating Rate Notes are redeemable, at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at specified redemption prices (as defined in the Second Lien Senior Indenture) plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. In addition, the Floating Rate Notes have a change of control provision, which gives each holder the right to require the
13
Table of Contents
Company to purchase all or a portion of such holders’ Floating Rate Notes upon a change in control, as defined in the Second Lien Senior Indenture, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount plus accrued interest to the date of purchase. The Floating Rate Notes, subject to certain definitions and exceptions, have covenants that restrict, among other things, the incurrence of additional debt, the payment of dividends and the issuance of preferred stock. The Floating Rate Notes are uncollateralized.
We may redeem some or all of the Floating Rate Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date, if redeemed, subject to the rights of noteholders.
Upon the occurrence of a change of control, each holder of the Floating Rate Notes has the right to require the Company to repurchase some or all of such holder’s Floating Rate Notes at a price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase.
Interest Rate Swap. In June 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for $230.0 million, which has the effect of converting the interest rate applicable to our $230.0 million of Floating Rate Notes to a fixed interest rate. The effective date for the interest rate swap agreement was December 2007 and the expiration date is May 2012.
The interest rate swap agreement qualifies for cash flow hedge accounting under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Both at inception and on an on-going basis, we must perform an effectiveness test. In accordance with ASC Topic 815, the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement at September 30, 2011 is included as a cash flow hedge on our balance sheet. The change in fair value was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on our balance sheet, net of tax, since the instrument was determined to be an effective hedge at September 30, 2011. We expect to reclassify approximately $4.9 million into earnings, net of tax, currently recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, in the next eight months.
As a result of our interest rate swap agreement, we expect the effective interest rate on our $230.0 million Floating Rate Notes to be 9.065% through May 2012.
Second Lien Senior Indenture. Our PIK Toggle Notes and Floating Rate Notes (collectively, the “Notes”) are guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a second priority senior secured basis, by Emergent Group and PRI Medical, and are also similarly guaranteed by certain of our future domestic subsidiaries. The Notes are our second priority senior secured obligations and rank (i) equal in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, and effectively senior to any such unsecured indebtedness to the extent of the value of collateral; (ii) senior in right of payment to all of our and our guarantors’ existing and future subordinated indebtedness; (iii) effectively junior to our Senior Secured Credit Facility and other obligations that are secured by first priority liens on the collateral securing the Notes or that are secured by a lien on assets that are not part of the collateral securing the Notes, in each case, to the extent of the value of such collateral or assets; and (iv) structurally subordinated to any indebtedness and other liabilities (including trade payables) of any of our future subsidiaries that are not guarantors.
The Second Lien Senior Indenture governing the Notes contains covenants that limit our and our guarantors’ ability, subject to certain definitions and exceptions, and certain of our future subsidiaries’ ability to:
14
Table of Contents
· incur additional indebtedness;
· pay cash dividends or distributions on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock or subordinated debt;
· issue redeemable stock or preferred stock;
· issue stock of subsidiaries;
· make certain investments;
· transfer or sell assets;
· create liens on our assets to secure debt;
· enter into transactions with affiliates; and
· merge or consolidate with another company.
Senior Secured Credit Facility. On May 6, 2010 we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with GE Business Financial Services, Inc., as agent for the lenders, and the lenders party thereto, which amended the Senior Secured Credit Facility dated as of May 31, 2007. The Senior Secured Credit Facility is a first lien senior secured asset based revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Senior Secured Credit Facility”). The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement increased the aggregate amount the Company may borrow under the Senior Secured Credit Facility from $135.0 million to $195.0 million and extended the maturity date to November 30, 2014. Additionally, we capitalized deferred financing costs related to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement in the amount of $1.7 million. As of September 30, 2011, we had $183.4 million of availability under the Senior Secured Credit Facility based on a borrowing base of $187.9 million, after giving effect to $4.5 million used for letters of credit. Our obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of our assets, excluding a pledge of our and Parent’s capital stock, any joint ventures and certain other exceptions. Our obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by Parent.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility requires our compliance with various affirmative and negative covenants. Pursuant to the affirmative covenants, we and Parent agreed to, among other things, deliver financial and other information to the agent, provide notice of certain events (including events of default), pay our obligations, maintain our properties, maintain the security interest in the collateral for the benefit of the agent and the lenders and maintain insurance.
Among other restrictions, and subject to certain definitions and exceptions, the Senior Secured Credit Facility restricts our ability to:
· incur indebtedness;
· create or permit liens;
· declare or pay dividends and certain other restricted payments;
· consolidate, merge or recapitalize;
· acquire or sell assets;
· make certain investments, loans or other advances;
· enter into transactions with affiliates;
· change our line of business; and
· enter into hedging transactions.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility also contains a financial covenant that is triggered if our available borrowing capacity is less than $15.0 million for a certain period, which consists of a minimum ratio of
15
Table of Contents
trailing four-quarter EBITDA to cash interest expense, as such terms are defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility specifies certain events of default, including, among others, failure to pay principal, interest or fees, violation of covenants, inaccuracy of representations or warranties, bankruptcy events, certain ERISA-related events, cross-defaults to other material agreements, change of control events and invalidity of guarantees or security documents. Some events of default will be triggered only after certain cure periods have expired, or will provide for materiality thresholds. If such a default occurs, the lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facility would be entitled to take various actions, including all actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor and the acceleration of amounts due under the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility accrue interest (including a credit spread varying with facility usage):
· at a per annum rate equal to 1.75% above the rate announced from time to time by the agent as the “prime rate” payable quarterly in arrears; and
· at a per annum rate equal to 2.75% above the adjusted LIBOR rate used by the agent, for the respective interest rate period determined at our option, payable in arrears upon cessation of the interest rate period elected.
At September 30, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
10.125% Senior Notes. On June 14, 2010, we redeemed, at par value plus accrued interest to the redemption date, all of our 10.125% Senior Notes. The funds used to redeem our 10.125% Senior Notes were obtained from our Senior Secured Credit Facility. The 10.125% Senior Notes were redeemable, at our option, in whole or in part of, at specified redemption prices (as defined) plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. The transaction resulted in a redemption price of $10.0 million of which $9.9 million related to principal and $0.1 million related to interest.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company, from time to time, may become involved in litigation arising out of operations in the normal course of business. Asserted claims are subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of individual matters is not predictable with assurance.
On July 13, 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) issued a final order and transition plan to Baxter Healthcare Corporation (“Baxter”) to recall all Colleague infusion pumps currently in use in the United States. The FDA order establishes the framework for the recall by providing for a cash refund, generally, $1,500 for single channel pumps and $3,000 for triple channel pumps, or a replacement pump to owners within a two-year period. At the time of the recall notice, we owned approximately 11,900 Colleague infusion pumps.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized recalled equipment net gains of approximately $9.5 million of which $8.4 million were non-cash gains. Non-cash gains result from receiving a replacement pump for a recalled pump. The gains are a result of the fair market value of the replacement pump less the net book value of the recalled pump. At September 30, 2011, we owned approximately 7,200 Colleague pumps. We are continuing the process of evaluating the course of action
16
Table of Contents
that best meets the infusion technology needs of our customers and our business. As such, we expect to continue to recognize gains and also expect to increase purchases of infusion pumps to replace recalled units as they are accepted by Baxter. While the timing and extent of those gains or capital expenditures are not readily estimable, we expect them to extend through 2011 and mid-2012.
On October 19, 2009, Freedom Medical, Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Company and others in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The federal complaint alleges violation of state and federal antitrust laws, tortuous interference with business relationships, business disparagement and common law conspiracy in connection with the biomedical equipment rental market. Freedom Medical, Inc. is seeking unspecified damages and injunctive relief. We believe these claims are without merit and will vigorously defend against them. Because of the preliminary nature of this proceeding, the difficulty in ascertaining the applicable facts, and the difficulty of predicting the settlement value of the proceeding, we are not able to estimate an amount or range of any reasonably possible loss and the effect it may have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
On February 6, 2011, we and our wholly owned subsidiary, Sunrise Merger Sub, Inc. (“Sunrise Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Emergent Group, pursuant to which we and Sunrise Merger Sub commenced a tender offer (the “Offer”) to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of Emergent Group’s common stock at a purchase price of $8.46 per share in cash, followed by a merger of Sunrise Merger Sub with and into Emergent Group with Emergent Group surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed on April 1, 2011. Three putative shareholder class action complaints challenging the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement were filed on behalf of three separate plaintiffs (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) in the Superior Court of the State of California in the County of Los Angeles (the “Court”) against Emergent Group, UHS, Sunrise Merger Sub and the individual members of the Emergent Group Board (collectively, the “Defendants”). One was filed on February 22, 2011 by Brian McManus, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, a second was filed on February 28, 2011 by Bryan Lamb, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, and the third was filed on March 2, 2011 by Leena Dave, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. Each complaint alleges, among other things, that the members of the Emergent Group Board breached their fiduciary duties owed to the public shareholders of Emergent Group by attempting to sell Emergent Group by means of an unfair process with preclusive deal protection devices at an unfair price of $8.46 in cash per share and by entering into the Merger Agreement, approving the Offer and the proposed Merger, engaging in self dealing and failing to take steps to maximize the value of Emergent Group to its public shareholders. The complaints further allege that Emergent Group, UHS and Sunrise Merger Sub aided and abetted such breaches of fiduciary duties. In addition, the complaints allege that certain provisions of the Merger Agreement unduly restricted Emergent Group’s ability to negotiate with rival bidders. The complaints sought, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief concerning the alleged fiduciary breaches, injunctive relief prohibiting the defendants from consummating the Merger and other forms of equitable relief.
On March 22, 2011, the Court ordered the consolidation of the lawsuits for all purposes, and renamed the consolidated lawsuits “In re Emergent Group Inc. Shareholder Litigation”. On March 24, 2011, a memorandum of understanding regarding settlement of the consolidated lawsuits (the “MOU”) was agreed to by the Plaintiffs and the Defendants. Following entry of the MOU the parties entered into a definitive Settlement Agreement, subject to Court approval, that provided in exchange for the Emergent Group’s amendment of its Schedule 14D-9 to include certain supplemental disclosures Plaintiffs will seek an order dismissing all actions alleging claims relating to the Merger and providing a full and final
17
Table of Contents
release in favor of the Defendants and their related parties from any claims that arose pursuant to or are related to the Offer or the Merger. The Defendants have agreed that Emergent Group or its successor or their respective insurers will pay the Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and expenses as are awarded by the Court not to exceed $225,000. At September 30, 2011, we have paid $75,000 and anticipate the remainder of the balance to be paid by our insurers. The Court asked for additional information from the parties during the first preliminary approval hearing and declined to preliminarily approve the settlement. The second motion to obtain preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement was filed on July 15, 2011 and was approved on September 7, 2011. Notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to Emergent Group common shareholders and the final settlement hearing will take place on November 9, 2011.
As of September 30, 2011, we were not a party to any other pending legal proceedings the adverse outcome of which could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial position or cash flows.
11. Related Party Transactions
Management Agreement
On May 31, 2007, we and Irving Place Capital entered into a professional services agreement pursuant to which Irving Place Capital provides general advisory and management services to us with respect to financial and operating matters. Irving Place Capital is a principal owner of Parent, and the following members of our board of directors are associated with Irving Place Capital: John Howard, Robert Juneja, Bret Bowerman and David Crane. We paid Irving Place Capital professional services fees of $0.8 and $0.6 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Business Relationship
In the ordinary course of business, we entered into an operating lease for our Minneapolis, Minnesota district office with Ryan Companies US, Inc. (“Ryan”), which began on May 1, 2007. One member of our board of directors is also a director of Ryan. We made payments to Ryan totaling $258,000 and $265,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Company believes that the aforementioned arrangements and relationships were provided in the ordinary course of business at prices and on terms similar to those that would result from arm’s length negotiation between unrelated parties.
12. Limited Liability Companies
In connection with expanding our business, PRI Medical participates with others in the formation of limited liability companies (“LLCs”) in which PRI Medical becomes a partner and shares the financial interest with the other investors. PRI Medical is the primary beneficiary of these LLCs. These LLCs acquire certain medical equipment for use in their respective business activities, which generally focus on surgical procedures. The LLCs will acquire medical equipment for rental purposes under equipment financing leases. At September 30, 2011, the LLCs had approximately $1.0 million of total assets. The third party investors in each respective LLC generally provide the lease financing company with individual proportionate lease guarantees based on their respective ownership percentages in the LLCs. In addition, PRI Medical will provide such financing companies with its corporate guarantee based on its respective ownership interest in each LLC. In certain instances, PRI Medical has provided such financing companies with an overall corporate guarantee in connection with equipment financing transactions. In such instances, the individual investors in each respective LLC will generally indemnify
18
Table of Contents
us against losses, if any, incurred in connection with its corporate guarantee. Additionally, PRI Medical provides operational and administrative support to the LLCs in which it is a partner. As of September 30, 2011, we held interests in six active LLCs.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, in accordance with guidance issued by the FASB, PRI Medical accounted for its equity investments in LLCs (in which it is the primary beneficiary) under the full consolidation method whereby transactions between the PRI Medical and the LLCs have been eliminated through consolidation.
13. Segment Information
Our reporting segments consist of Medical Equipment Outsourcing, Technical and Professional Services, and Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing. Certain operating information for our segments as well as a reconciliation of total Company gross margin to loss before income tax was as follows:
Medical Equipment Outsourcing
(in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Revenues | | $ | 74,787 | | $ | 59,393 | | $ | 214,873 | | $ | 185,385 | |
Cost of revenue | | 29,599 | | 22,998 | | 82,499 | | 68,067 | |
Medical equipment depreciation | | 17,006 | | 17,229 | | 51,678 | | 52,044 | |
Gross margin | | $ | 28,182 | | $ | 19,166 | | $ | 80,696 | | $ | 65,274 | |
Technical and Professional Services
(in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Revenues | | $ | 13,852 | | $ | 11,512 | | $ | 36,083 | | $ | 33,477 | |
Cost of revenue | | 10,540 | | 8,155 | | 26,650 | | 24,003 | |
Gross margin | | $ | 3,312 | | $ | 3,357 | | $ | 9,433 | | $ | 9,474 | |
Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing
(in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Revenues | | $ | 6,490 | | $ | 4,900 | | $ | 17,972 | | $ | 13,850 | |
Cost of revenue | | 5,215 | | 3,725 | | 14,115 | | 10,796 | |
Gross margin | | $ | 1,275 | | $ | 1,175 | | $ | 3,857 | | $ | 3,054 | |
19
Table of Contents
Total Gross Margin and Reconciliation to Loss Before Income Tax
(in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Total gross margin | | $ | 32,769 | | $ | 23,698 | | $ | 93,986 | | $ | 77,802 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 22,756 | | 23,139 | | 72,247 | | 65,192 | |
Acquisition and integration expenses | | 622 | | — | | 2,621 | | — | |
Interest expense | | 15,122 | | 11,651 | | 39,572 | | 35,013 | |
Loss before income tax | | $ | (5,731 | ) | $ | (11,092 | ) | $ | (20,454 | ) | $ | (22,403 | ) |
Total Assets by Reporting Segment
(in thousands)
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Medical Equipment Outsourcing | | $ | 438,968 | | $ | 409,315 | |
Technical and Professional Services | | 87,586 | | 85,175 | |
Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing | | 18,603 | | 18,603 | |
Corporate and Unallocated | | 403,199 | | 319,935 | |
Total Company Assets | | $ | 948,356 | | $ | 833,028 | |
14. Pension Plan
The components of net periodic pension costs are as follows:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Interest cost | | $ | 274 | | $ | 272 | | $ | 821 | | $ | 816 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | (308 | ) | (305 | ) | (925 | ) | (914 | ) |
Recognized net actuarial loss | | 88 | | 38 | | 265 | | 116 | |
Net periodic cost | | $ | 54 | | $ | 5 | | $ | 161 | | $ | 18 | |
Future benefit accruals for all participants were frozen as of December 31, 2002. We made required contributions of $0.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
15. Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. We evaluate the recoverability of our deferred tax assets by scheduling the expected reversals of deferred tax assets and liabilities in order to determine whether net operating loss carry forwards are recoverable prior to expiration in accordance with ASC Topic 740. We determined that neither expected reversals of these deferred tax assets and liabilities nor future earnings or other assumptions assured recoverability of all of our net operating loss carry forwards prior to their expiration and accordingly established a valuation allowance in the third quarter of 2010. The April 1, 2011 acquisition of Emergent Group resulted in larger deferred tax liabilities than deferred tax assets due to opening balance
20
Table of Contents
sheet deferred tax liabilities recorded for intangibles and fixed assets. This discrete event had the one-time effect of reducing our valuation allowance by approximately $8.3 million on that date, though this amount was offset by approximately $8.0 million of additional valuation allowance resulting from year-to-date losses. In future reporting periods, we will continue to assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realizable.
Reconciliations between the Company’s effective income tax rate and the U.S. statutory rate follow:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Statutory U.S. Federal income tax rate | | (35.0 | )% | (35.0 | )% | (35.0 | )% | (35.0 | )% |
State income taxes, net of U.S. Federal income tax | | (3.7 | ) | (4.8 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (4.8 | ) |
Permanent items | | 3.3 | | 0.5 | | 2.7 | | 1.0 | |
Valuation allowance | | 36.7 | | 56.6 | | (1.2 | ) | 28.0 | |
Other | | (3.7 | ) | (2.1 | ) | 1.2 | | 1.0 | |
Effective income tax rate | | (2.4 | )% | 15.2 | % | (35.9 | )% | (9.8 | )% |
At September 30, 2011, the Company had available unused federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $152.3 million. The net operating loss carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2020 through 2030.
16. Consolidating Financial Statements
In accordance with the provisions of the Second Lien Senior Indenture, as wholly owned subsidiaries of UHS, Emergent Group and PRI Medical have jointly and severally guaranteed all the Company’s Obligations (as defined in the Second Lien Senior Indenture) under the Second Lien Senior Indenture on a full and unconditional basis. Consolidating financial information of UHS and the guarantors is presented on the following pages.
21
Table of Contents
Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
Consolidating Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(unaudited)
| | At September 30, 2011 | |
| | Parent | | Subsidiary | | | | | |
| | Issuer | | Guarantor | | Consolidating | | | |
| | UHS | | Emergent Group | | Adjustments | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 11,200 | | $ | 1,859 | | $ | — | | $ | 13,059 | |
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts | | 63,806 | | 4,408 | | — | | 68,214 | |
Due from (to) affiliates | | (2,162 | ) | 2,162 | | — | | — | |
Inventories | | 5,009 | | 1,142 | | — | | 6,151 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 12,680 | | 300 | | — | | 12,980 | |
Other current assets | | 4,072 | | 1,361 | | — | | 5,433 | |
Total current assets | | 94,605 | | 11,232 | | — | | 105,837 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net: | | | | | | | | | |
Medical equipment, net | | 226,428 | | 7,357 | | — | | 233,785 | |
Property and office equipment, net | | 23,107 | | 171 | | — | | 23,278 | |
Total property and equipment, net | | 249,535 | | 7,528 | | — | | 257,063 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other long-term assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | 283,141 | | 40,848 | | — | | 323,989 | |
Investment in subsidiary | | 60,316 | | — | | (60,316 | ) | — | |
Other intangibles, net | | 226,770 | | 20,795 | | — | | 247,565 | |
Other, primarily deferred financing costs, net | | 13,827 | | 75 | | — | | 13,902 | |
Total assets | | $ | 928,194 | | $ | 80,478 | | $ | (60,316 | ) | $ | 948,356 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | $ | 3,591 | | $ | 1,577 | | $ | — | | $ | 5,168 | |
Interest rate swap | | 7,774 | | — | | — | | 7,774 | |
Book overdrafts | | 4,321 | | — | | — | | 4,321 | |
Accounts payable | | 29,153 | | 1,950 | | — | | 31,103 | |
Accrued compensation | | 11,181 | | 1,527 | | — | | 12,708 | |
Accrued interest | | 18,706 | | — | | — | | 18,706 | |
Dividend payable | | 771 | | — | | — | | 771 | |
Other accrued expenses | | 9,788 | | 1,041 | | — | | 10,829 | |
Total current liabilities | | 85,285 | | 6,095 | | — | | 91,380 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current portion | | 647,173 | | 2,122 | | — | | 649,295 | |
Pension and other long-term liabilities | | 7,059 | | 1,466 | | — | | 8,525 | |
Payable to Parent | | 18,037 | | — | | — | | 18,037 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 66,754 | | 9,780 | | — | | 76,534 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 214,294 | | 60,019 | | (60,019 | ) | 214,294 | |
Accumulated income (deficit) | | (101,180 | ) | 604 | | — | | (100,576 | ) |
Accumulated earnings in subsidiary | | 297 | | — | | (297 | ) | — | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (9,525 | ) | — | | — | | (9,525 | ) |
Total Universal Hospital Services, Inc. equity | | 103,886 | | 60,623 | | (60,316 | ) | 104,193 | |
Non controlling interest | | — | | 392 | | — | | 392 | |
Total equity | | 103,886 | | 61,015 | | (60,316 | ) | 104,585 | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 928,194 | | $ | 80,478 | | $ | (60,316 | ) | $ | 948,356 | |
22
Table of Contents
Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
Consolidating Statements of Operations
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | For the three months ended September 30, 2011 | |
| | Parent | | Subsidiary | | | | | |
| | Issuer | | Guarantor | | Consolidating | | | |
| | UHS | | Emergent Group | | Adjustments | | Consolidated | |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | |
Medical equipment outsourcing | | $ | 66,380 | | $ | 8,407 | | $ | — | | $ | 74,787 | |
Technical and professional services | | 13,852 | | — | | — | | 13,852 | |
Medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 6,490 | | — | | — | | 6,490 | |
Total revenues | | 86,722 | | 8,407 | | — | | 95,129 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Sales | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of medical equipment outsourcing | | 25,237 | | 4,362 | | — | | 29,599 | |
Cost of technical and professional services | | 10,540 | | — | | — | | 10,540 | |
Cost of medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 5,215 | | — | | — | | 5,215 | |
Medical equipment depreciation | | 16,333 | | 673 | | — | | 17,006 | |
Total costs of medical equipment outsourcing, technical and professional services and medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 57,325 | | 5,035 | | — | | 62,360 | |
Gross margin | | 29,397 | | 3,372 | | — | | 32,769 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 20,814 | | 1,942 | | — | | 22,756 | |
Acquisition and integration expenses | | 18 | | 604 | | — | | 622 | |
Operating income | | 8,565 | | 826 | | — | | 9,391 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Equity in earnings of subsidiary | | 573 | | — | | (573 | ) | — | |
Interest expense | | 15,060 | | 62 | | — | | 15,122 | |
Loss before income taxes and non controlling interest | | (5,922 | ) | 764 | | (573 | ) | (5,731 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (336 | ) | 191 | | — | | (145 | ) |
Consolidated net loss | | (5,586 | ) | 573 | | (573 | ) | (5,586 | ) |
Net income attributable to non controlling interest | | 159 | | 159 | | (159 | ) | 159 | |
Net loss attributable to Universal Hospital Services, Inc. | | $ | (5,745 | ) | $ | 414 | | $ | (414 | ) | $ | (5,745 | ) |
23
Table of Contents
Consolidating Statements of Operations
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 | |
| | Parent | | Subsidiary | | | | | |
| | Issuer | | Guarantor | | Consolidating | | | |
| | UHS | | Emergent Group | | Adjustments | | Consolidated | |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | |
Medical equipment outsourcing | | $ | 198,412 | | $ | 16,461 | | $ | — | | $ | 214,873 | |
Technical and professional services | | 36,083 | | — | | — | | 36,083 | |
Medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 17,972 | | — | | — | | 17,972 | |
Total revenues | | 252,467 | | 16,461 | | — | | 268,928 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Sales | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of medical equipment outsourcing | | 73,935 | | 8,564 | | — | | 82,499 | |
Cost of technical and professional services | | 26,650 | | — | | — | | 26,650 | |
Cost of medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 14,115 | | — | | — | | 14,115 | |
Medical equipment depreciation | | 50,309 | | 1,369 | | — | | 51,678 | |
Total costs of medical equipment outsourcing, technical and professional services and medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 165,009 | | 9,933 | | — | | 174,942 | |
Gross margin | | 87,458 | | 6,528 | | — | | 93,986 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 68,211 | | 4,036 | | — | | 72,247 | |
Acquisition and integration expenses | | 1,623 | | 998 | | — | | 2,621 | |
Operating income | | 17,624 | | 1,494 | | — | | 19,118 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Equity in earnings of subsidiary | | 900 | | — | | (900 | ) | — | |
Interest expense | | 39,423 | | 149 | | — | | 39,572 | |
Loss before income taxes and non controlling interest | | (20,899 | ) | 1,345 | | (900 | ) | (20,454 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (7,896 | ) | 445 | | — | | (7,451 | ) |
Consolidated net loss | | (13,003 | ) | 900 | | (900 | ) | (13,003 | ) |
Net income attributable to non controlling interest | | 297 | | 297 | | (297 | ) | 297 | |
Net loss attributable to Universal Hospital Services, Inc. | | $ | (13,300 | ) | $ | 603 | | $ | (603 | ) | $ | (13,300 | ) |
24
Table of Contents
Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | For the nine months ended September, 2011 | |
| | Parent | | Subsidiary | | | | | |
| | Issuer | | Guarantor | | Consolidating | | | |
| | UHS | | Emergent Group | | Adjustments | | Consolidated | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated net loss | | $ | (13,903 | ) | $ | 900 | | $ | — | | $ | (13,003 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | 56,903 | | 1,448 | | — | | 58,351 | |
Amortization of intangibles, deferred financing costs and bond premium | | 11,985 | | 1,354 | | — | | 13,339 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | 598 | | (5 | ) | — | | 593 | |
Provision for inventory obsolescence | | 99 | | — | | — | | 99 | |
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | | 3,294 | | — | | — | | 3,294 | |
Non-cash gain on trade-in of recalled equipment | | (8,360 | ) | — | | — | | (8,360 | ) |
Loss (gain) on sales and disposals of equipment | | (1,303 | ) | 6 | | — | | (1,297 | ) |
Deferred income taxes | | (8,192 | ) | 434 | | — | | (7,758 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | (4,443 | ) | 115 | | — | | (4,328 | ) |
Due from (to) affiliates | | 2,162 | | (2,162 | ) | — | | — | |
Inventories | | (346 | ) | 79 | | — | | (267 | ) |
Other operating assets | | (806 | ) | 47 | | — | | (759 | ) |
Accounts payable | | 995 | | (182 | ) | — | | 813 | |
Other operating liabilities | | 14,610 | | 740 | | — | | 15,350 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 53,293 | | 2,774 | | — | | 56,067 | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Medical equipment purchases | | (59,537 | ) | (1,026 | ) | — | | (60,563 | ) |
Property and office equipment purchases | | (5,834 | ) | (27 | ) | — | | (5,861 | ) |
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment | | 2,594 | | 5 | | — | | 2,599 | |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | (66,519 | ) | — | | 1,480 | | (65,039 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (129,296 | ) | (1,048 | ) | 1,480 | | (128,864 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds under senior secured credit facility | | 132,250 | | — | | — | | 132,250 | |
Payments under senior secured credit facility | | (185,150 | ) | — | | — | | (185,150 | ) |
Payments of principal under capital lease obligations | | (3,223 | ) | (1,063 | ) | — | | (4,286 | ) |
Payment of deferred financing costs | | (4,340 | ) | — | | — | | (4,340 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of bonds | | 178,938 | | — | | — | | 178,938 | |
Accrued interest received from bondholders | | 661 | | — | | — | | 661 | |
Cash paid to non controlling interests | | — | | (291 | ) | — | | (291 | ) |
Contributions from new members to limited liability companies | | — | | 7 | | — | | 7 | |
Proceeds from exercise of parent company stock options | | 41 | | — | | — | | 41 | |
Dividend Payment | | (32,729 | ) | — | | — | | (32,729 | ) |
Change in book overdrafts | | 755 | | — | | — | | 755 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 87,203 | | (1,347 | ) | — | | 85,856 | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | 11,200 | | 379 | | 1,480 | | 13,059 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period | | — | | 1,480 | | (1,480 | ) | — | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period | | $ | 11,200 | | $ | 1,859 | | $ | — | | $ | 13,059 | |
17. Subsequent Events
On October 3, 2011, we completed the acquisition, effective October 1, 2011, of all of the outstanding stock of a surgical laser equipment service provider for approximately $5.5 million in cash. The $5.5 million purchase price includes $.05 million of debt which was paid off at closing. This acquisition is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or our financial position for the 2011 fiscal year. In conjunction with this acquisition, the Company began executing a rebranding strategy of its surgical services business and is examining the remaining estimated useful life of the PRI Medical trade name intangible asset.
On October 18, 2011, we completed an offer to exchange all of the then outstanding Additional Notes, which we originally issued in a private placement, for an equivalent amount of new Additional Notes which have been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In connection with this
25
Table of Contents
offer, we exchanged a total of $175 million aggregate principal amount, or 100%, of the original Additional Notes for an equivalent amount of newly issued Additional Notes. We did not receive any additional proceeds from the exchange offer.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Our Company
Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (“we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company”, or “UHS”) is a leading nationwide provider of medical equipment management and service solutions to the United States health care industry. Our customers include national, regional and local acute and long-term acute care hospitals, alternate site providers (such as long-term acute care hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals, nursing homes, and home care providers) and medical equipment manufacturers. We provide our customers solutions across the spectrum of the equipment life cycle as a result of our position as one of the industry’s largest purchasers and outsourcers of medical equipment. During the twelve months ended September 30, 2011, we owned or managed over 585,000 pieces of medical equipment consisting of 390,000 owned or managed pieces in our Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment and 195,000 pieces of customer owned equipment we managed in our Technical and Professional Services segment. Our diverse medical equipment outsourcing customer base includes more than 4,275 acute care hospitals and approximately 4,400 alternate site providers. We also have relationships with more than 200 medical equipment manufacturers and many of the nation’s largest group purchasing organizations (“GPOs”) and many of the integrated delivery networks (“IDNs”). All of our solutions leverage our nationwide network of 84 offices and our more than 70 years of experience managing and servicing all aspects of medical equipment. Our fees are paid directly by our customers rather than by direct reimbursement from third-party payors, such as private insurers, Medicare, or Medicaid.
We commenced operations in 1939, originally incorporated in Minnesota in 1954 and reincorporated in Delaware in 2001. Historically, we have experienced significant and sustained growth. Our overall growth strategy is to continue to grow both organically, through strategic acquisitions, and potential international growth opportunities.
On April 1, 2011 we expanded our equipment product line by completing our acquisition of Emergent Group Inc. (“Emergent Group”) and its wholly owned subsidiary PRI Medical Technologies, Inc. (“PRI Medical”). See Note 4, Acquisitions. PRI Medical makes mobile surgical services available by providing mobile lasers and other surgical equipment on a per procedure basis to hospitals, outpatient surgery centers and physician offices along with technical support and disposable supplies required to utilize the equipment. At the time of the acquisition, PRI Medical had over 900 active accounts in 16 states. The total purchase price of the acquisition was approximately $65.3 million. Emergent Group is included in the Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment.
26
Table of Contents
On May 31, 2011 we acquired certain assets of an equipment rental division of a medical equipment manufacturer for approximately $6.5 million.
On October 3, 2011, we completed the acquisition, effective October 1, 2011, of all of the outstanding stock of a surgical laser equipment service provider for approximately $5.5 million in cash. The $5.5 million purchase price includes $.05 million of debt which was paid off at closing. This acquisition is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or our financial position for the 2011 fiscal year. In conjunction with this acquisition, the Company began executing a rebranding strategy of its surgical services business and is examining the remaining estimated useful life of the PRI Medical trade name intangible asset.
As one of the nation’s leading medical equipment management and service solutions companies, we focus on offering our customers comprehensive solutions that help reduce capital and operating expenses, increase equipment and staff productivity and support improved patient safety and outcomes.
We report our financial results in three segments. Our reporting segments consist of Medical Equipment Outsourcing, Technical and Professional Services, and Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing. We evaluate the performance of our reporting segments based on gross margin and gross margin, before purchase accounting adjustments. The accounting policies of the individual reporting segments are the same as those of the entire company.
We present the non-generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial measure gross margin, before purchase accounting adjustments, because we use this measure to monitor and evaluate the operational performance of our business and to assist analysts, investors and lenders in their comparisons of operational performance across companies, many of whose results will not include similar adjustments. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to its equivalent GAAP measure is included in the respective tables.
Medical Equipment Outsourcing Segment - Manage & Utilize
Our flagship business is our Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment, which accounted for $74.8 million, or approximately 78.7 % of our revenues, for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 and $214.9 million, or approximately 79.9% of our revenues, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2011, we owned or managed over 390,000 pieces in our Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment, primarily in the categories of respiratory therapy, newborn care, critical care, patient monitors, patient handling (which includes fall management, bariatrics, beds, stretchers and wheelchairs), pressure area management (such as therapy surfaces), wound therapy and following our acquisition of Emergent Group, laser surgical services. Historically, we have purchased and owned directly the equipment used in our Medical Equipment Outsourcing programs. During 2007, we entered into “revenue sharing” agreements with a select few manufacturers of equipment where the manufacturers retain ownership of the equipment, but UHS takes possession and manages the rental of the equipment to customers. Such arrangements are less capital intensive for us. In January 2010, one of these agreements was modified such that the Company purchased the manufacturer’s equipment it had managed and the revenue share portion of the agreement was terminated. Additionally, the Company’s revenue sharing agreement with a manufacturer of negative pressure wound therapy devices expires in October 2012. The Company provided notice of non renewal to this manufacturer in October 2011.
We have four primary outsourcing programs:
· Supplemental and Peak Needs Usage;
27
Table of Contents
· Customized Outsourcing Agreements;
· Asset360TM Equipment Management Program, (“Asset360 Program”); and
· Laser Surgical Services.
Our primary customer relationships are with local healthcare providers such as hospitals, surgery centers, long-term care providers, and nursing homes. These organizations may belong to regional or national groups of facilities, and often participate in GPOs. We contract at the local, regional and national level, as requested by our customers. We expect much of our future growth in this segment to be driven by our customers outsourcing more of their medical equipment needs and taking full advantage of our diversified product offering, customized outsourcing agreements and Asset360 Programs.
On July 13, 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) issued a final order and transition plan to Baxter Healthcare Corporation (“Baxter”) to recall all Colleague infusion pumps currently in use in the United States. The FDA order establishes the framework for the recall by providing for a cash refund, generally, $1,500 for single channel pumps and $3,000 for triple channel pumps, or a replacement pump to owners within a two-year period. At the time of the recall notice, we owned approximately 11,900 Colleague infusion pumps.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized recalled equipment net gains of approximately $9.5 million of which $8.4 million were non-cash gains. Non-cash gains result from receiving a replacement pump for a recalled pump. The gains are a result of the fair market value of the replacement pump less the net book value of the recalled pump. At September 30, 2011, we owned approximately 7,200 Colleague pumps. We are continuing the process of evaluating the course of action that best meets the infusion technology needs of our customers and our business. As such, we expect to continue to recognize gains and also expect to increase purchases of infusion pumps to replace recalled units as they are accepted by Baxter. While the timing and extent of those gains or capital expenditures are not readily estimable, we expect them to extend through 2011 and mid-2012.
Technical and Professional Services Segment - Plan & Acquire; Maintain & Repair
Our Technical and Professional Services segment accounted for $13.9 million, or approximately 14.6% of our revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 and $36.1 million, or approximately 13.4% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We leverage our over 70 years of experience and our extensive equipment database in repairing and maintaining medical equipment. We offer a broad range of inspection, preventative maintenance, repair, logistic and consulting services through our team of over 270 technicians and professionals located throughout the United States in our nationwide network of offices and managed over 195,000 units of customer owned equipment during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011. In addition, during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011, we serviced over 390,000 units that we own or directly manage. Our Technical and Professional Service offerings provide a complementary alternative for customers that wish to own their medical equipment, but lack the infrastructure, expertise or scale to perform routine maintenance, repair, record-keeping and lifecycle analysis and planning functions.
Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing Segment - Redeploy & Remarket
Our Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing segment accounted for $6.5 million, or approximately 6.8%, of our revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 and $18.0 million, or approximately
28
Table of Contents
6.7% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. This segment includes three distinct business activities:
Medical Equipment Remarketing and Disposal. We are one of the nation’s largest buyers and sellers of pre-owned medical equipment. We buy, source, remarket and dispose of pre-owned medical equipment for our customers and for our own behalf. We provide our customers with the ability to sell their unneeded medical equipment for immediate cash or credit. We provide fair market value assessments and buy-out proposals on equipment the customer intends to trade in for equipment upgrades so that the customer can evaluate the manufacturers’ or alternative offers. Customers can also take advantage of our disposal services, where we dispose of equipment that has no remaining economic value in a safe and environmentally appropriate manner.
We remarket pre-owned medical equipment to hospitals, alternate site providers, veterinarians and equipment brokers. This segment of our business focuses on providing solutions to customers that have capital budget dollars available to purchase equipment. We offer a wide range of equipment including equipment we use in our outsourcing programs and diagnostic, ultrasound and x-ray equipment.
Specialty Medical Equipment Sales and Distribution. We use our national infrastructure to provide sales and distribution services to manufacturers of specialty medical equipment on a limited basis. Our distribution services include providing demonstration services and product maintenance services. We act as a distributor for only a limited number of products that are particularly suited to our national distribution network or that fit with our ability to provide technical support. We currently sell equipment in selected product lines including, but not limited to, respiratory percussion vests, continuous passive motion machines, patient monitors, patient handling equipment and infant security systems.
Sales of Disposables. We offer our customers single use disposable items. Most of these items are used in connection with our outsourced equipment. We offer these products as a convenience to customers and to complement our full medical equipment management and service solutions.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion addresses:
· our financial condition as of September 30, 2011 and
· the results of operations for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
On April 1, 2011 we completed our acquisition of Emergent Group, as described in Note 4, Acquisitions. The results of operations of Emergent Group have accordingly been included in UHS’s consolidated results of operations since the date of acquisition. Emergent Group is included in the Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment.
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
29
Table of Contents
The following table provides information on the percentages of certain items of selected financial data compared to total revenues for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The table below also indicates the percentage increase or decrease over the prior comparable period.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | Percent | | | | | | Percent | |
| | Percent of Total Revenues | | Increase | | Percent of Total Revenues | | Increase | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | (Decrease) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | (Decrease) | |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Medical equipment outsourcing | | 78.6 | % | 78.3 | % | 25.9 | % | 79.9 | % | 79.7 | % | 15.9 | % |
Technical and professional services | | 14.6 | | 15.2 | | 20.3 | | 13.4 | | 14.4 | | 7.8 | |
Medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 6.8 | | 6.5 | | 32.4 | | 6.7 | | 5.9 | | 29.8 | |
Total revenues | | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 25.5 | | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 15.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of medical equipment outsourcing | | 31.1 | | 30.3 | | 28.7 | | 30.7 | | 29.3 | | 21.2 | |
Cost of technical and professional services | | 11.1 | | 10.8 | | 29.2 | | 9.9 | | 10.3 | | 11.0 | |
Cost of medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 5.5 | | 4.9 | | 40.0 | | 5.2 | | 4.6 | | 30.7 | |
Medical equipment depreciation | | 17.9 | | 22.7 | | (1.3 | ) | 19.2 | | 22.4 | | (0.7 | ) |
Total costs of medical equipment outsourcing, technical and professional services and medical equipment sales and remarketing | | 65.6 | | 68.7 | | 19.7 | | 65.0 | | 66.6 | | 12.9 | |
Gross margin | | 34.4 | | 31.3 | | 38.3 | | 35.0 | | 33.4 | | 20.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 23.9 | | 30.5 | | (1.7 | ) | 26.9 | | 28.0 | | 10.8 | |
Acquisition and intergration expenses | | 0.7 | | — | | * | | 1.0 | | — | | * | |
Operating income | | 9.8 | | 0.8 | | * | | 7.1 | | 5.4 | | 51.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | 15.9 | | 15.4 | | 29.8 | | 14.7 | | 15.0 | | 13.0 | |
Loss before income taxes and non controlling interest | | (6.1 | ) | (14.6 | ) | (48.3 | ) | (7.6 | ) | (9.6 | ) | (8.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (0.2 | ) | 2.2 | | (108.6 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (0.9 | ) | 238.4 | |
Consolidated net loss | | (5.9 | )% | (16.8 | )% | (56.3 | ) | (4.8 | )% | (8.7 | )% | (35.6 | ) |
*Not meaningful
30
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010
Medical Equipment Outsourcing Segment — Manage & Utilize
(in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | Change | | % Change | |
Total revenue | | $ | 74,787 | | $ | 59,393 | | $ | 15,394 | | 25.9 | % |
Cost of revenue | | 29,599 | | 22,998 | | 6,601 | | 28.7 | |
Medical equipment depreciation | | 17,006 | | 17,229 | | (223 | ) | (1.3 | ) |
Gross margin | | $ | 28,182 | | $ | 19,166 | | $ | 9,016 | | 47.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin % | | 37.7 | % | 32.3 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | $ | 28,182 | | $ | 19,166 | | $ | 9,016 | | 47.0 | |
Purchase accounting adjustments, primarily non-cash charges related to step-up in carrying value of medical equipment | | 131 | | 3,152 | | (3,021 | ) | (95.8 | ) |
Gross margin, before purchase accounting adjustments | | $ | 28,313 | | $ | 22,318 | | $ | 5,995 | | 26.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin %, before purchase accounting adjustments | | 37.9 | % | 37.6 | % | | | | |
Total revenue in the Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment increased $15.4 million, or 25.9%, to $74.8 million in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The increase was primarily due to revenues of $8.4 million related to our laser surgical services business, which we acquired on April 1, 2011 through the acquisition of Emergent Group, revenue related to recalled equipment of $5.8 million, the net addition of seven Asset360TM Equipment Management Programs (“Asset360 Programs”) and increased revenues driven by incremental business from new and existing technology, both owned and managed, partially offset by sluggish patient census and what we believe has been a sustained customer effort to control outsourcing expenses. Our Asset360 Programs increased from 68 programs at September 30, 2010 to 75 programs at September 30, 2011.
Total cost of revenue in the segment increased $6.6 million, or 28.7%, to $29.6 million in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. This increase, in addition to the costs of $4.4 million related to our new laser surgical services business, is attributable to higher employee-related expenses, including costs related to our continued build of clinical resources to support growth initiatives in patient handling and wound therapy.
Medical equipment depreciation decreased $0.2 million, or 1.3%, to $17.0 million in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The decrease in medical equipment depreciation was due to the decrease in purchase accounting adjustments related to the step-up in carrying value of our medical equipment related to our 2007 recapitalization. Depreciation of those purchase accounting adjustments was completed in May of 2011. Medical equipment depreciation for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 included $0.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively, of purchase accounting adjustments related to the step-up in carrying value of our medical equipment.
Gross margin percentage for the Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment increased from 32.3% in the third quarter of 2010 to 37.7% in the third quarter of 2011. This increase was attributable to higher margin on recall gains and in our recently acquired laser surgical services business. Gross margin percentage, before purchase accounting adjustments, increased from 37.6 % in the third quarter of 2010 to 37.9% in the third quarter of 2011. The higher gross margin from recalled equipment and
31
Table of Contents
laser surgical services business more than offset the decrease in gross margin on our traditional outsourcing business.
Technical and Professional Services Segment — Plan & Acquire; Maintain & Repair
(in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | Change | | % Change | |
Total revenue | | $ | 13,852 | | $ | 11,512 | | $ | 2,340 | | 20.3 | % |
Cost of revenue | | 10,540 | | 8,155 | | 2,385 | | 29.2 | |
Gross margin | | $ | 3,312 | | $ | 3,357 | | $ | (45 | ) | (1.3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin % | | 23.9 | % | 29.2 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | $ | 3,312 | | $ | 3,357 | | $ | (45 | ) | (1.3 | ) |
Purchase accounting adjustments, primarily non-cash charges related to favorable lease commitments | | 2 | | 3 | | (1 | ) | (33.3 | ) |
Gross margin, before purchase accounting adjustments | | $ | 3,314 | | $ | 3,360 | | $ | (46 | ) | (1.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin %, before purchase accounting adjustments | | 23.9 | % | 29.2 | % | | | | |
Total revenue in the Technical and Professional Services segment increased $2.3 million, or 20.3%, to $13.9 million in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The increase was due to increased activity of $1.7 and $0.8 million in our provider and manufacturer services units, respectively, offset by a decrease in other revenue of $0.2 million.
Total cost of revenue in the segment increased $2.4 million, or 29.2%, to $10.5 million in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The increase is attributable to expenses related to supporting the increased activity in our provider and manufacturer service units of $1.8 and $0.8 million, respectively, offset by a decrease in other expense of $0.2 million.
Gross margin percentage for the Technical and Professional Services segment decreased from 29.2% for the third quarter of 2010 to 23.9% for the same period of 2011. Gross margin percentage will fluctuate based on the variability of third-party vendor expenses in our BioMed360 TM Equipment Management Programs (BioMed360 Program”) and supplemental service programs. Additionally, gross margin includes revenues and expenses related to a large BioMed360 Program whose gross margin percentage is expected to be lower than our historical service gross margins.
32
Table of Contents
Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing Segment — Redeploy & Remarket
(in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | Change | | % Change | |
Total revenue | | $ | 6,490 | | $ | 4,900 | | $ | 1,590 | | 32.4 | % |
Cost of revenue | | 5,215 | | 3,725 | | 1,490 | | 40.0 | |
Gross margin | | $ | 1,275 | | $ | 1,175 | | $ | 100 | | 8.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin % | | 19.6 | % | 24.0 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | $ | 1,275 | | $ | 1,175 | | $ | 100 | | 8.5 | |
Purchase accounting adjustments, primarily non-cash charges related to the step-up in carrying value of our medical equipment | | 2 | | 51 | | (49 | ) | (96.1 | ) |
Gross margin, before purchase accounting adjustments | | $ | 1,277 | | $ | 1,226 | | $ | 51 | | 4.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin %, before purchase accounting adjustments | | 19.7 | % | 25.0 | % | | | | |
Total revenue in the Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing segment increased $1.6 million, or 32.4%, to $6.5 million in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The increase was driven by an increase in sales of disposables and used equipment of $1.2 and $0.4 million, respectively.
Total cost of revenue in the segment increased $1.5 million, or 40.0%, to $5.2 million in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The increase was the result of increases in the cost of disposable, new, and used sales of $1.0, $0.3 and $0.2 million, respectively.
Gross margin percentage for the Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing segment decreased from 24.0% in the third quarter of 2010 to 19.6% for the same period of 2011. Gross margin percentage, before purchase accounting adjustments, decreased from 25.0% in the third quarter of 2010 to 19.7% for the same period of 2011. We expect margins and activity in this segment to fluctuate based on the transactional nature of the business.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, General and Administrative and Interest Expense
(in thousands)
| | Three Months Ended | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | Change | | % Change | |
Selling, general and administrative | | $ | 22,756 | | $ | 23,139 | | $ | (383 | ) | (1.7 | )% |
Acquisition and integration expenses | | 622 | | — | | 622 | | * | |
Interest expense | | 15,122 | | 11,651 | | 3,471 | | 29.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
*Not meaningful
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased $0.4 million, or 1.7%, to $22.8 million for the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $3.3 million in stock option expense related to an amendment to our stock option plan in August 2010, offset by an increase of $1.9 million related to our laser surgical business, as well as increases in employee-related expenses, bad debt expense, strategic and board-related expenses, and other expenses of $0.3, $0.3, $0.2, and $0.2 million, respectively. Acquisition and integration expenses were $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. These charges were related primarily
33
Table of Contents
to our acquisition of Emergent Group on April 1, 2011. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of total revenue was 23.9% and 30.5% for each of the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $3.5 million to $15.1 million for the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. This increase is due to the interest expense related to the issuance of $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 8.50% / 9.25% Second Lien Senior Secured PIK Toggle Notes due 2015 (“PIK Toggle Notes”) in the second quarter. See Note 9 Long-Term Debt.
Income Taxes
Income taxes were a benefit of $0.1 million and an expense $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The change of $1.8 million reflects the fact that in the third quarter of 2011, increases in income tax valuation allowance offset virtually all tax benefits from net operating losses.
Net Loss
Net loss decreased $7.1 million to $5.7 million in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. Net loss was impacted primarily by operational benefits resulting from our acquisition of Emergent Group during 2011.
Results of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010
Medical Equipment Outsourcing Segment — Manage & Utilize
(in thousands)
| | Nine Months Ended | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | Change | | % Change | |
Total revenue | | $ | 214,873 | | $ | 185,385 | | $ | 29,488 | | 15.9 | % |
Cost of revenue | | 82,499 | | 68,067 | | 14,432 | | 21.2 | |
Medical equipment depreciation | | 51,678 | | 52,044 | | (366 | ) | (0.7 | ) |
Gross margin | | $ | 80,696 | | $ | 65,274 | | $ | 15,422 | | 23.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin % | | 37.6 | % | 35.2 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | $ | 80,696 | | $ | 65,274 | | $ | 15,422 | | 23.6 | |
Purchase accounting adjustments, primarily non-cash charges related to step-up in carrying value of medical equipment | | 4,725 | | 9,890 | | (5,165 | ) | (52.2 | ) |
Gross margin, before purchase accounting adjustments | | $ | 85,421 | | $ | 75,164 | | $ | 10,257 | | 13.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin %, before purchase accounting adjustments | | 39.8 | % | 40.5 | % | | | | |
34
Table of Contents
Total revenue in the Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment increased $29.5 million, or 15.9%, to $214.9 million in the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The increase was primarily due to revenues of $16.5 million related to our laser surgical services business, which we acquired on April 1, 2011 through our acquisition of Emergent Group, through the net addition of seven Asset360 Programs, revenue related to recalled equipment of $9.7 million, and increased revenues driven by incremental business from new and existing technology, both owned and managed, partially offset by sluggish patient census and what we believe has been a sustained customer effort to control outsourcing expenses. Our Asset360 Programs increased from 68 programs at September 30, 2010 to 75 programs at September 30, 2011.
Total cost of revenue in the segment increased $14.4 million, or 21.2%, to $82.5 million in the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. In addition to costs of $8.6 million related to our new laser surgical business, the increase is attributable to higher employee-related expenses, including costs related to our continued build of clinical resources to support growth initiatives in patient handling and wound therapy.
Medical equipment depreciation decreased $0.4 million, or 0.7%, to $51.7 million in the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The decrease in medical equipment depreciation was due to the decrease in purchase accounting adjustments related to the step-up in carrying value of our medical equipment related to our 2007 recapitalization. Depreciation of those purchase accounting adjustments was completed in May of 2011. The decrease in medical equipment depreciation was offset by increases in depreciation related to our capital expenditures and additions resulting from non-cash swaps of recalled equipment for new equipment. Medical equipment depreciation for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 included $4.7 million and $9.5 million, respectively, of purchase accounting adjustments related to the step-up in carrying value of our medical equipment.
Gross margin percentage for the Medical Equipment Outsourcing segment increased from 35.2% in the first nine months of 2011 to 37.6% in the first nine months of 2011. This increase was attributable to higher margin on recall gains and in our recently acquired laser surgical services business. Gross margin percentage, before purchase accounting adjustments, decreased from 40.5% in the first nine months of 2010 to 39.8% in the first nine months of 2011. Lower margins on our traditional business were offset by higher margins related to recalled equipment and our laser surgical services business.
35
Table of Contents
Technical and Professional Services Segment — Plan & Acquire; Maintain & Repair
(in thousands)
| | Nine Months Ended | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | Change | | % Change | |
Total revenue | | $ | 36,083 | | $ | 33,477 | | $ | 2,606 | | 7.8 | % |
Cost of revenue | | 26,650 | | 24,003 | | 2,647 | | 11.0 | |
Gross margin | | $ | 9,433 | | $ | 9,474 | | $ | (41 | ) | (0.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin % | | 26.1 | % | 28.3 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | $ | 9,433 | | $ | 9,474 | | $ | (41 | ) | (0.4 | ) |
Purchase accounting adjustments, primarily non-cash charges related to favorable lease commitments | | 6 | | 9 | | (3 | ) | (33.3 | ) |
Gross margin, before purchase accounting adjustments | | $ | 9,439 | | $ | 9,483 | | $ | (44 | ) | (0.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin %, before purchase accounting adjustments | | 26.2 | % | 28.3 | % | | | | |
Total revenue in the Technical and Professional Services segment increased $2.6 million, or 7.8%, to $36.1 million in the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The increase was due to increased activity of $2.4 and $0.7 million in our provider and manufacturer services units, respectively, offset by a decrease in other revenue of $0.5 million.
Total cost of revenue in the segment increased $2.6 million, or 11.0%, to $26.7 million in the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The increase is attributable to increased expenses to support the increased activity associated with our provider and manufacturer services unit of $2.4 and $0.8 million offset by a decrease in other expenses of $0.6 million.
Gross margin percentage for the Technical and Professional Services segment decreased from 28.3% for the first nine months of 2010 to 26.1% for the same period of 2011. Gross margin percentage will fluctuate based on the variability of third-party vendor expenses in our BioMed360 Programs, and supplemental service programs. Additionally, gross margin includes revenues and expenses related to a large BioMed360 Program whose gross margin percentage is expected to be lower than our historical service gross margins.
36
Table of Contents
Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing Segment — Redeploy & Remarket
(in thousands)
| | Nine Months Ended | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | Change | | % Change | |
Total revenue | | $ | 17,972 | | $ | 13,850 | | $ | 4,122 | | 29.8 | % |
Cost of revenue | | 14,115 | | 10,796 | | 3,319 | | 30.7 | |
Gross margin | | $ | 3,857 | | $ | 3,054 | | $ | 803 | | 26.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin % | | 21.5 | % | 22.1 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | $ | 3,857 | | $ | 3,054 | | $ | 803 | | 26.3 | |
Purchase accounting adjustments, primarily non-cash charges related to step-up in carrying value of our medical equipment | | 32 | | 208 | | (176 | ) | (85.0 | ) |
Gross margin, before purchase accounting adjustments | | $ | 3,889 | | $ | 3,262 | | $ | 627 | | 19.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin %, before purchase accounting adjustments | | 21.6 | % | 23.6 | % | | | | |
Total revenue in the Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing segment increased $4.1 million, or 29.8%, to $18.0 million in the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The increase was primarily driven by sales of disposables and new equipment of $3.2 and $0.9 million, respectively.
Total cost of revenue in the segment increased $3.3 million, or 30.7%, to $14.1 million in the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. The cost of revenue was impacted by an increase in the cost of disposable, new and other equipment sales of $2.5, $0.6 and $0.2, respectively.
Gross margin percentage for the Medical Equipment Sales and Remarketing segment decreased from 22.1% in the first nine months of 2010 to 21.5% for the same period of 2011. Gross margin percentage, before purchase accounting adjustments, decreased from 23.6% in the first nine months of 2010 to 21.6% for the same period of 2011. We expect margins and activity in this segment to fluctuate based on the transactional nature of the business.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, General and Administrative and Interest Expense
(in thousands)
| | Nine Months Ended | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | $ Change | | % Change | |
Selling, general and administrative | | $ | 72,247 | | $ | 65,192 | | $ | 7,055 | | 10.8 | % |
Acquisition and integration expenses | | 2,621 | | — | | 2,621 | | * | |
Interest expense | | 39,572 | | 35,013 | | 4,559 | | 13.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
* Not meaningful
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $7.1 million, or 10.8%, to $72.2 million for the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. This increase was due to a one-time
37
Table of Contents
charge of $1.0 million related to notice of termination of the lease for our corporate offices, an additional $4.0 million due to our newly acquired laser surgical business and increases in strategic and board-related expenses, employee-related expenses, and bad debt expense of $2.2, $1.7, and $0.6 million, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in stock option and other expense of $1.8 and $0.6 million. The stock option expense is related to an amendment of our stock option plan in August of 2010. Acquisition and integration expenses were $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. These charges were related to our laser surgical business, which we acquired on April 1, 2011 through the acquisition of Emergent Group. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of total revenue was 26.9% and 28.0% for each of the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $4.6 million to $39.6 million for the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. This increase is due to the interest expense related to the issuance of $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 8.50% / 9.25% Second Lien Senior Secured PIK Toggle Notes due 2015 (“PIK Toggle Notes”) in the second quarter. See Note 9 Long-Term Debt.
Income Taxes
Income taxes were a benefit of $7.5 and $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The change of $5.3 million is primarily attributable to discrete second quarter tax benefits resulting from our acquisition of Emergent Group in the second quarter of 2011.
Net Loss
Net loss decreased by $6.9 million to $13.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was impacted primarily by tax and operational benefits resulting from our acquisition of Emergent Group in the second quarter of 2011.
EBITDA
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) was $88.6 and $81.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was impacted by the acquisition of Emergent Group, increased employee-related expenses, including costs related to our continued build of clinical resources to support growth initiatives in patient handling and wound therapy, and outside service fees related to mergers and acquisitions activity.
In addition to using EBITDA internally as a measure of operational performance, we disclose it externally to assist analysts, investors and lenders in their comparisons of operational performance, valuation and debt capacity across companies with differing capital, tax and legal structures. Management also understands that some industry analysts and investors consider EBITDA as a supplementary non-GAAP financial measure useful in analyzing a company’s ability to service debt. EBITDA, however, is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities or as a measure of
38
Table of Contents
liquidity. Since EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with GAAP and is thus susceptible to varying interpretations and calculations, EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. EBITDA does not represent an amount of funds that is available for management’s discretionary use. A reconciliation of EBITDA to net cash provided by operating activities is included below:
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 56,067 | | $ | 68,675 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | (10,809 | ) | (16,259 | ) |
Other non-cash expenses (income) | | 11,193 | | (3,881 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | (7,451 | ) | (2,202 | ) |
Interest expense | | 39,572 | | 35,013 | |
EBITDA | | $ | 88,572 | | $ | 81,346 | |
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | |
(in thousands) | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
EBITDA | | $ | 88,572 | | $ | 81,346 | |
| | | | | |
Other Financial Data: | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 56,067 | | $ | 68,675 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (128,864 | ) | (58,241 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | 85,856 | | (10,434 | ) |
| | | | | |
Other Operating Data (as of end of period): | | | | | |
Medical equipment (approximate number of owned outsourcing units) | | 244,000 | | 227,000 | |
District offices | | 84 | | 84 | |
Number of outsourcing hospital customers | | 4,275 | | 4,250 | |
Number of total outsourcing customers | | 8,675 | | 8,600 | |
SEASONALITY
Quarterly operating results are typically affected by seasonal factors. Historically, our first and fourth quarters are the strongest, reflecting increased customer utilization during the fall and winter months.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
PIK Toggle Notes. Our 8.50% / 9.25% Second Lien Senior Secured PIK Toggle Notes due 2015 (the “PIK Toggle Notes”) consist of $230.0 million aggregate principal amount of PIK Toggle Notes issued on May 31, 2007 (the “Existing Notes”), and $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of PIK Toggle Notes issued on June 17, 2011 (the “Additional Notes”) for a total aggregate outstanding principal amount of $405.0 million. All of the PIK Toggle Notes were issued under a Second Lien Senior Indenture dated as of May 31, 2007 (the “Second Lien Senior Indenture”).
39
Table of Contents
The Additional Notes were issued, in a private placement, at a premium of 102.250% for an aggregate total of $178.9 million in proceeds and are subject to the same terms as the Existing Notes under the Second Lien Senior Indenture. The premium is being amortized over the remaining life of the Additional Notes using the effective interest rate of 7.824%. The proceeds of the issuance of the Additional Notes were used to (i) repay the revolving borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, (ii) pay fees and expenses relating to the offering of the Additional Notes and (iii) pay a dividend as declared by the Company and Parent’s Board of Directors on June 8, 2011 (see Note 8, Divided Declared). In connection with the issuance of the Additional Notes, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers of the Additional Notes. On October 18, 2011, we completed an offer to exchange all of the then outstanding Additional Notes, which we originally issued in a private placement, for an equivalent amount of new Additional Notes which have been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In connection with this offer, we exchanged a total of $175 million aggregate principal amount, or 100%, of the original Additional Notes for an equivalent amount of newly issued Additional Notes. We did not receive any additional proceeds from the exchange offer.
Our principal sources of liquidity are expected to be cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operating activities, and borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, which provides for loans in an amount of up to $195.0 million, subject to our borrowing base. See Note 9, Long-Term Debt for details related to our Senior Secured Credit Facility. It is anticipated that our principal uses of liquidity will be to fund capital expenditures related to purchases of medical equipment, provide working capital, meet debt service requirements and finance our strategic plans.
We require substantial cash to operate our Medical Equipment Outsourcing programs and service our debt. Our outsourcing programs require us to invest a significant amount of cash in medical equipment purchases. To the extent that such expenditures cannot be funded from cash and cash equivalents, our operating cash flow, borrowing under our Senior Secured Credit Facility or other financing sources, we may not be able to conduct our business or grow as currently planned. We anticipate additional capital investment of approximately $5.0 million during the remaining three months of 2011.
If we are unable to service our debt obligations through our cash and cash equivalents, generating sufficient cash flow from operations, and additional borrowings under our first lien senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt or seeking additional equity capital. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. If we are unable to repay our debt at maturity, we may have to obtain alternative financing, which may not be available to us.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $56.1 and $68.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was impacted by the presence of non-cash gains on trade-in swaps of recalled equipment and the increase in net loss as compared to the same period of 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities was $128.9 and $58.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The change in net cash used in investing activities was primarily the result of our April 1, 2011 acquisition of Emergent Group ($60.0 million) and our May 31, 2011 acquisition of the rental division of a medical equipment manufacturer ($6.5 million).
40
Table of Contents
Net cash provided by financing activities was $85.9 and $10.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the increase in net cash provided by financing activities was primarily impacted by our issuance of the Additional Notes on June 17, 2011 at a premium of $3.9 million. Proceeds from the Additional Notes were used primarily to repay existing borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility and to fund on July 1, 2011, the dividend declared on June 8, 2011 by the Company and Parent’s Board of Directors.
Our cash balances were $13.1 million as of September 30, 2011 compared to zero as of September 30, 2010.
Based on the level of operating performance expected in 2011, we believe our cash and cash equivalents, cash from operations, and additional borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, will meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future, exclusive of any borrowings that we may make to finance potential acquisitions. However, if during that period or thereafter we are not successful in generating sufficient cash flows from operations or in raising additional capital when required in sufficient amounts and on terms acceptable to us, our business could be adversely affected. As of September 30, 2011, we had $183.4 million of availability under the Senior Secured Credit Facility based on a borrowing base of $187.9 million, after giving effect to $4.5 million used for letters of credit.
Our levels of borrowing are further restricted by the financial covenants set forth in our Senior Secured Credit Facility agreement and the second lien senior indenture governing our PIK Toggle Notes and Floating Rate Notes, as described in Note 9, Long-Term Debt. As of September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Second Lien Senior Indenture.
During the second quarter we paid a termination fee to our current landlord based on our decision to relocate our corporate headquarters. During the third quarter, we entered into a new 10-year lease commencing April 1, 2012.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
Standard Adopted
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements — A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. This update provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific or third-party evidence is available. We prospectively adopted this standard in January 2011. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Standards Not Yet Adopted
In September 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the authoritative guidance on goodwill impairment testing. The objective of this amendment is to simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. The amendment permits an entity to first assess qualitative
41
Table of Contents
factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The amendment will be effective for our quarter ending March 31, 2012. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the authoritative guidance on comprehensive income. The amendment eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity or include the components in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, and instead requires the presentation of comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or a separate but consecutive statement. The amendment will be effective for our quarter ending March 31, 2012. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, but will require a change to present comprehensive income (loss) on the face of our consolidated financial statements.
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: We believe statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q looking forward in time involve risks and uncertainties. The following factors, among others, could adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition, causing our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements:
· our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health;
· risks associated with our substantial leverage;
· risk associated with our ability to fund our significant cash needs;
· risks associated with the current economic environment, including the credit markets;
· revenue generation related to decreases in patient census or services;
· the effect of the global economic downturn on our customers and suppliers;
· risks associated with supplier concentration;
· health care providers willingness to alter their procurement of medical equipment;
· risks associated with competition;
· risk associated with bundling of products and services by competitors;
· risks associated with our lack of long-term commitments from some customers;
· consolidation in the health care industry;
· our ability to successfully identify and manage our acquisitions;
· uncertainties regarding the impact of U.S. healthcare reform on our business;
· changes in third-party payor reimbursement for health care items and services;
· our inability to attract or retain skilled employees and the loss of any of our key personnel;
· our ability to maintain contracts with existing customers and enter into new contracts with our customers;
· risks associated with cash flow fluctuations;
· risks associated with credit risks posed by our home care provider and nursing home customers;
· risk associated with our pension plan;
42
Table of Contents
· our customers being subject to extensive government regulation and our exposure to potential costs and fines associated with such regulations;
· the effect of expenditures related to equipment recalls or obsolescence;
· liabilities for legal claims associated with medical equipment that we outsource and service;
· risks associated with the failure of our management information systems;
· risks related to increased costs that cannot be passed on to our customers;
· inherent limitations in our internal control systems over financial reporting;
· conflicts of interest between our principal equity holder and our other security holders; and
· the risk factors as set forth in Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk arising from adverse changes in interest rates, fuel costs, and pension valuation. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Interest Rates
We use both fixed and variable rate debt as sources of financing. At September 30, 2011, we had approximately $654.5 million of total debt outstanding. After taking into account the effect of our interest rate swap agreement, we did not have any debt accruing interest at variable rates at September 30, 2011.
In June 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for $230.0 million, which has the effect of converting the interest rate applicable to our $230.0 million of Floating Rate Notes to a fixed interest rate. The effective date for the interest rate swap agreement was December 2007; the expiration date is May 2012.
The interest rate swap agreement qualifies for cash flow hedge accounting under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Both at inception and on an on-going basis, we must perform an effectiveness test. In accordance with ASC Topic 815, the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement at September 30, 2011 is included as a cash flow hedge on our balance sheet. The change in fair value was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, on our balance sheet since the instrument was determined to be an effective hedge at September 30, 2011. We have not recorded any amounts due to ineffectiveness for any periods presented. We expect to reclassify approximately $4.9 million into earnings, net of tax, currently recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, in the next eight months. As a result of our interest rate swap agreement, we expect the effective interest rate on our $230.0 million Floating Rate Notes to be 9.065% through May 2012.
Fuel Costs
We are also exposed to market risks related to changes in the price of gasoline used to fuel our fleet of delivery and sales vehicles. A hypothetical 10% increase in the third quarter of 2011 average price of unleaded gasoline, assuming gasoline usage levels for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, would lead to an annual increase in fuel costs of approximately $0.5 million.
43
Table of Contents
Pension
Our pension plan assets, which were approximately $14.1 million at December 31, 2010 are subject to volatility that can be caused by fluctuations in general economic conditions. Continued market volatility and disruption could cause further declines in asset values, and if this occurs, we may need to make additional pension plan contributions and our pension expense in future years may increase. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2010 would lead to a decrease in the funded status of the plan of approximately $1.4 million.
Other Market Risk
As of September 30, 2011, we have no other material exposure to market risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There were no changes that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
In making its assessment of changes in internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, management has excluded those companies acquired in purchase business combinations during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the control environments of these acquisitions.
The results reported in this quarterly report include those of Emergent Group Inc. acquired in April 2011.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 19, 2009, Freedom Medical, Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Company and others in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The federal complaint alleges violation of state and federal antitrust laws, tortuous interference with business relationships, business disparagement and common law conspiracy in connection with the biomedical equipment rental market. Freedom Medical, Inc. is seeking unspecified damages and injunctive relief. We believe these claims are without merit and will vigorously defend against them. Because of the preliminary nature of this proceeding, the difficulty in ascertaining the applicable facts, and the difficulty of predicting the settlement value of the proceeding, we are not able to estimate an amount or range of any reasonably possible loss and the effect it may have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
44
Table of Contents
On February 6, 2011, we and our wholly owned subsidiary, Sunrise Merger Sub, Inc. (“Sunrise Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Emergent Group, pursuant to which we and Sunrise Merger Sub commenced a tender offer (the “Offer”) to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of Emergent Group’s common stock at a purchase price of $8.46 per share in cash, followed by a merger of Sunrise Merger Sub with and into Emergent Group with Emergent Group surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed on April 1, 2011. Three putative shareholder class action complaints challenging the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement were filed on behalf of three separate plaintiffs (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) in the Superior Court of the State of California in the County of Los Angeles (the “Court”) against Emergent Group, UHS, Sunrise Merger Sub and the individual members of the Emergent Group Board (collectively, the “Defendants”). One was filed on February 22, 2011 by Brian McManus, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, a second was filed on February 28, 2011 by Bryan Lamb, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, and the third was filed on March 2, 2011 by Leena Dave, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. Each complaint alleges, among other things, that the members of the Emergent Group Board breached their fiduciary duties owed to the public shareholders of Emergent Group by attempting to sell Emergent Group by means of an unfair process with preclusive deal protection devices at an unfair price of $8.46 in cash per share and by entering into the Merger Agreement, approving the Offer and the proposed Merger, engaging in self dealing and failing to take steps to maximize the value of Emergent Group to its public shareholders. The complaints further allege that Emergent Group, UHS and Sunrise Merger Sub aided and abetted such breaches of fiduciary duties. In addition, the complaints allege that certain provisions of the Merger Agreement unduly restricted Emergent Group’s ability to negotiate with rival bidders. The complaints sought, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief concerning the alleged fiduciary breaches, injunctive relief prohibiting the defendants from consummating the Merger and other forms of equitable relief.
On March 22, 2011, the Court ordered the consolidation of the lawsuits for all purposes, and renamed the consolidated lawsuits “In re Emergent Group Inc. Shareholder Litigation”. On March 24, 2011, a memorandum of understanding regarding settlement of the consolidated lawsuits (the “MOU”) was agreed to by the Plaintiffs and the Defendants. Following entry of the MOU the parties entered into a definitive Settlement Agreement, subject to Court approval, that provided in exchange for the Emergent Group’s amendment of its Schedule 14D-9 to include certain supplemental disclosures Plaintiffs will seek an order dismissing all actions alleging claims relating to the Merger and providing a full and final release in favor of the Defendants and their related parties from any claims that arose pursuant to or are related to the Offer or the Merger. The Defendants have agreed that Emergent Group or its successor or their respective insurers will pay the Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and expenses as are awarded by the Court not to exceed $225,000. At September 30, 2011, we have paid $75,000 and anticipate the remainder of the balance to be paid by our insurers. The Court asked for additional information from the parties during the first preliminary approval hearing and declined to preliminarily approve the settlement. The second motion to obtain preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement was filed on July 15, 2011 and was approved on September 7, 2011. Notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to Emergent Group common shareholders and the final settlement hearing will take place on November 9, 2011.
In addition to the foregoing, the Company, from time to time, may become involved in litigation arising out of operations in the normal course of business, including the matters discussed in Item 3 of Part I of the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As of September 30, 2011, we were not a party to any other pending legal proceedings the adverse outcome of which could reasonably be expected to have a
45
Table of Contents
material adverse effect on our operating results, financial position or cash flows. See the additional information in Item 1 of Part I, Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies.
Asserted claims are subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of individual matters is not predictable with assurance.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Any of the risks discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors set forth in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Number | | Description |
| | |
31.1* | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2* | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1* | | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.2* | | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
101.INS* | | XBRL Instance Document |
| | |
101.SCH* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| | |
101.CAL* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| | |
101.LAB* | | XBRL Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
| | |
101.DEF* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| | |
101.PRE* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* Filed Herewith
46
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 9, 2011
| Universal Hospital Services, Inc. |
| |
| By | /s/ Gary D. Blackford |
| Gary D. Blackford, |
| Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
| |
| By | /s/ Rex T. Clevenger |
| Rex T. Clevenger, |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |
47