Derivatives and Hedging Activities | Derivatives and Hedging Activities Derivative Activities Derivatives are instruments that derive their value from underlying asset prices, indices, reference rates and other inputs, or a combination of these factors. Derivatives may be traded on an exchange (exchange-traded) or they may be privately negotiated contracts, which are usually referred to as OTC derivatives. Certain of the firm’s OTC derivatives are cleared and settled through central clearing counterparties (OTC-cleared), Market-Making. As a market maker, the firm enters into derivative transactions to provide liquidity to clients and to facilitate the transfer and hedging of their risks. In this role, the firm typically acts as principal and is required to commit capital to provide execution, and maintains inventory in response to, or in anticipation of, client demand. Risk Management. The firm also enters into derivatives to actively manage risk exposures that arise from its market-making and investing and lending activities in derivative and cash instruments. The firm’s holdings and exposures are hedged, in many cases, on either a portfolio or risk-specific basis, as opposed to an instrument-by-instrument non-U.S. The firm enters into various types of derivatives, including: • Futures and Forwards. • Swaps. • Options. Derivatives are reported on a net-by-counterparty The tables below present the gross fair value and the notional amounts of derivative contracts by major product type, the amounts of counterparty and cash collateral netting in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, as well as cash and securities collateral posted and received under enforceable credit support agreements that do not meet the criteria for netting under U.S. GAAP. As of September 2017 As of December 2016 $ in millions Derivative Derivative Derivative Derivative Not accounted for as hedges Exchange-traded $ 566 $ 801 $ 443 $ 382 OTC-cleared 5,273 2,910 189,471 168,946 Bilateral OTC 273,255 249,002 309,037 289,491 Total interest rates 279,094 252,713 498,951 458,819 OTC-cleared 5,934 5,774 4,837 4,811 Bilateral OTC 18,142 16,509 21,530 18,770 Total credit 24,076 22,283 26,367 23,581 Exchange-traded 38 49 36 176 OTC-cleared 859 780 796 798 Bilateral OTC 101,402 96,772 111,032 106,318 Total currencies 102,299 97,601 111,864 107,292 Exchange-traded 4,371 4,247 3,219 3,187 OTC-cleared 213 191 189 197 Bilateral OTC 7,730 9,900 8,945 10,487 Total commodities 12,314 14,338 12,353 13,871 Exchange-traded 11,174 9,656 8,576 8,064 Bilateral OTC 43,537 48,242 39,516 45,826 Total equities 54,711 57,898 48,092 53,890 Subtotal 472,494 444,833 697,627 657,453 Accounted for as hedges OTC-cleared 10 – 4,347 156 Bilateral OTC 2,825 7 4,180 10 Total interest rates 2,835 7 8,527 166 OTC-cleared 8 33 30 40 Bilateral OTC 16 99 55 64 Total currencies 24 132 85 104 Subtotal 2,859 139 8,612 270 Total gross fair value $ 475,353 $ 444,972 $ 706,239 $ 657,723 Offset in condensed consolidated statements of financial condition Exchange-traded $ (12,959 ) $ (12,959 ) $ (9,727 ) $ (9,727 ) OTC-cleared (9,429 ) (9,429 ) (171,864 ) (171,864 ) Bilateral OTC (348,935 ) (348,935 ) (385,647 ) (385,647 ) Counterparty netting (371,323 ) (371,323 ) (567,238 ) (567,238 ) OTC-cleared (2,590 ) (200 ) (27,560 ) (2,940 ) Bilateral OTC (52,208 ) (35,483 ) (57,769 ) (40,046 ) Cash collateral netting (54,798 ) (35,683 ) (85,329 ) (42,986 ) Total amounts offset $(426,121 ) $(407,006 ) $(652,567 ) $(610,224 ) Included in condensed consolidated statements of financial condition Exchange-traded $ 3,190 $ 1,794 $ 2,547 $ 2,082 OTC-cleared 278 59 246 144 Bilateral OTC 45,764 36,113 50,879 45,273 Total $ 49,232 $ 37,966 $ 53,672 $ 47,499 Not offset in condensed consolidated statements of financial condition Cash collateral $ (612 ) $ (2,173 ) $ (535 ) $ (2,085 ) Securities collateral (14,192 ) (8,757 ) (15,518 ) (10,224 ) Total $ 34,428 $ 27,036 $ 37,619 $ 35,190 Notional Amounts as of $ in millions September December Not accounted for as hedges Exchange-traded $ 9,804,797 $ 4,425,532 OTC-cleared 17,244,593 16,646,145 Bilateral OTC 14,402,975 11,131,442 Total interest rates 41,452,365 32,203,119 OTC-cleared 423,723 378,432 Bilateral OTC 973,991 1,045,913 Total credit 1,397,714 1,424,345 Exchange-traded 18,830 13,800 OTC-cleared 107,411 62,799 Bilateral OTC 7,883,247 5,576,748 Total currencies 8,009,488 5,653,347 Exchange-traded 281,291 227,707 OTC-cleared 4,066 3,506 Bilateral OTC 249,020 196,899 Total commodities 534,377 428,112 Exchange-traded 772,320 605,335 Bilateral OTC 1,210,740 959,112 Total equities 1,983,060 1,564,447 Subtotal 53,377,004 41,273,370 Accounted for as hedges OTC-cleared 57,075 55,328 Bilateral OTC 19,654 36,607 Total interest rates 76,729 91,935 OTC-cleared 1,858 1,703 Bilateral OTC 8,255 8,544 Total currencies 10,113 10,247 Subtotal 86,842 102,182 Total notional amounts $53,463,846 $41,375,552 In the tables above: • Gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral, and therefore are not representative of the firm’s exposure. • Where the firm has received or posted collateral under credit support agreements, but has not yet determined such agreements are enforceable, the related collateral has not been netted. • Notional amounts, which represent the sum of gross long and short derivative contracts, provide an indication of the volume of the firm’s derivative activity and do not represent anticipated losses. • Total gross fair value of derivatives included derivative assets and derivative liabilities of $14.35 billion and $14.91 billion, respectively, as of September 2017, and derivative assets and derivative liabilities of $19.92 billion and $20.79 billion, respectively, as of December 2016, which are not subject to an enforceable netting agreement or are subject to a netting agreement that the firm has not yet determined to be enforceable. Pursuant to a rule change at a clearing organization in the first quarter of 2017, transactions with this clearing organization are considered settled each day. In addition, during the third quarter of 2017, consistent with the rules of another clearing organization, the firm elected to consider its transactions with that clearing organization as settled each day. The impact of reflecting transactions with these two clearing organizations as settled would have been a reduction in gross derivative assets and liabilities as of December 2016 of $189.08 billion and $166.04 billion, respectively, and a corresponding decrease in counterparty and cash collateral netting, with no impact to the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Valuation Techniques for Derivatives The firm’s level 2 and level 3 derivatives are valued using derivative pricing models (e.g., discounted cash flow models, correlation models, and models that incorporate option pricing methodologies, such as Monte Carlo simulations). Price transparency of derivatives can generally be characterized by product type, as described below. • Interest Rate. 10-year 2-year • Credit. • Currency. • Commodity. • Equity. Liquidity is essential to observability of all product types. If transaction volumes decline, previously transparent prices and other inputs may become unobservable. Conversely, even highly structured products may at times have trading volumes large enough to provide observability of prices and other inputs. See Note 5 for an overview of the firm’s fair value measurement policies. Level 1 Derivatives Level 1 derivatives include short-term contracts for future delivery of securities when the underlying security is a level 1 instrument, and exchange-traded derivatives if they are actively traded and are valued at their quoted market price. Level 2 Derivatives Level 2 derivatives include OTC derivatives for which all significant valuation inputs are corroborated by market evidence and exchange-traded derivatives that are not actively traded and/or that are valued using models that calibrate to market-clearing levels of OTC derivatives. The selection of a particular model to value a derivative depends on the contractual terms of and specific risks inherent in the instrument, as well as the availability of pricing information in the market. For derivatives that trade in liquid markets, model selection does not involve significant management judgment because outputs of models can be calibrated to market-clearing levels. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, such as contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, discount rates (including those derived from interest rates on collateral received and posted as specified in credit support agreements for collateralized derivatives), credit curves, measures of volatility, prepayment rates, loss severity rates and correlations of such inputs. Significant inputs to the valuations of level 2 derivatives can be verified to market transactions, broker or dealer quotations or other alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Consideration is given to the nature of the quotations (e.g., indicative or firm) and the relationship of recent market activity to the prices provided from alternative pricing sources. Level 3 Derivatives Level 3 derivatives are valued using models which utilize observable level 1 and/or level 2 inputs, as well as unobservable level 3 inputs. The significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm’s level 3 derivatives are described below. • For the majority of the firm’s interest rate and currency derivatives classified in level 3, significant unobservable inputs include correlations of certain currencies and interest rates (e.g., the correlation between Euro inflation and Euro interest rates) and specific interest rate volatilities. • For level 3 credit derivatives, significant unobservable inputs include illiquid credit spreads and upfront credit points, which are unique to specific reference obligations and reference entities, recovery rates and certain correlations required to value credit derivatives (e.g., the likelihood of default of the underlying reference obligation relative to one another). • For level 3 commodity derivatives, significant unobservable inputs include volatilities for options with strike prices that differ significantly from current market prices and prices or spreads for certain products for which the product quality or physical location of the commodity is not aligned with benchmark indices. • For level 3 equity derivatives, significant unobservable inputs generally include equity volatility inputs for options that are long-dated and/or have strike prices that differ significantly from current market prices. In addition, the valuation of certain structured trades requires the use of level 3 correlation inputs, such as the correlation of the price performance of two or more individual stocks or the correlation of the price performance for a basket of stocks to another asset class such as commodities. Subsequent to the initial valuation of a level 3 derivative, the firm updates the level 1 and level 2 inputs to reflect observable market changes and any resulting gains and losses are classified in level 3. Level 3 inputs are changed when corroborated by evidence such as similar market transactions, third-party pricing services and/or broker or dealer quotations or other empirical market data. In circumstances where the firm cannot verify the model value by reference to market transactions, it is possible that a different valuation model could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. See below for further information about significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of level 3 derivatives. Valuation Adjustments Valuation adjustments are integral to determining the fair value of derivative portfolios and are used to adjust the mid-market In addition, for derivatives that include significant unobservable inputs, the firm makes model or exit price adjustments to account for the valuation uncertainty present in the transaction. Fair Value of Derivatives by Level The tables below present the fair value of derivatives on a gross basis by level and major product type, as well as the impact of netting, included in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. As of September 2017 $ in millions Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets Interest rates $ 4 $ 281,349 $ 576 $ 281,929 Credit – 20,258 3,818 24,076 Currencies – 102,146 177 102,323 Commodities – 11,943 371 12,314 Equities 9 54,352 350 54,711 Gross fair value 13 470,048 5,292 475,353 Counterparty netting in levels – (369,339 ) (1,018 ) (370,357 ) Subtotal $ 13 $ 100,709 $ 4,274 $ 104,996 Cross-level counterparty netting (966 ) Cash collateral netting (54,798 ) Net fair value $ 49,232 Liabilities Interest rates $ (8 ) $(251,809 ) $ (903 ) $(252,720 ) Credit – (20,226 ) (2,057 ) (22,283 ) Currencies – (97,520 ) (213 ) (97,733 ) Commodities – (14,033 ) (305 ) (14,338 ) Equities (28 ) (55,939 ) (1,931 ) (57,898 ) Gross fair value (36 ) (439,527 ) (5,409 ) (444,972 ) Counterparty netting in levels – 369,339 1,018 370,357 Subtotal $ (36 ) $ (70,188 ) $(4,391 ) $ (74,615 ) Cross-level counterparty netting 966 Cash collateral netting 35,683 Net fair value $ (37,966 ) As of December 2016 $ in millions Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets Interest rates $ 46 $ 506,818 $ 614 $ 507,478 Credit – 21,388 4,979 26,367 Currencies – 111,762 187 111,949 Commodities – 11,950 403 12,353 Equities 1 47,667 424 48,092 Gross fair value 47 699,585 6,607 706,239 Counterparty netting in levels (12 ) (564,100 ) (1,417 ) (565,529 ) Subtotal $ 35 $ 135,485 $ 5,190 $ 140,710 Cross-level counterparty netting (1,709 ) Cash collateral netting (85,329 ) Net fair value $ 53,672 Liabilities Interest rates $ (27 ) $(457,963 ) $ (995 ) $(458,985 ) Credit – (21,106 ) (2,475 ) (23,581 ) Currencies – (107,212 ) (184 ) (107,396 ) Commodities – (13,541 ) (330 ) (13,871 ) Equities (967 ) (49,083 ) (3,840 ) (53,890 ) Gross fair value (994 ) (648,905 ) (7,824 ) (657,723 ) Counterparty netting in levels 12 564,100 1,417 565,529 Subtotal $(982 ) $ (84,805 ) $(6,407 ) $ (92,194 ) Cross-level counterparty netting 1,709 Cash collateral netting 42,986 Net fair value $ (47,499 ) In the tables above: • The gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral netting, and therefore are not representative of the firm’s exposure. • Counterparty netting is reflected in each level to the extent that receivable and payable balances are netted within the same level and is included in counterparty netting in levels. Where the counterparty netting is across levels, the netting is included in cross-level counterparty netting. • Derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts. Significant Unobservable Inputs The table below presents the amount of level 3 assets (liabilities), and ranges, averages and medians of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm’s level 3 derivatives. Level 3 Assets (Liabilities) and Range of Significant $ in millions September 2017 December 2016 Interest rates, net $(327) $(381) Correlation (10)% to 86% (56%/60%) (10)% to 86% (56%/60%) Volatility (bps) 31 to 151 (84/57) 31 to 151 (84/57) Credit, net $1,761 $2,504 Correlation 35% to 91% (59%/59%) 35% to 91% (65%/68%) Credit spreads (bps) 1 to 637 (89/50) 1 to 993 (122/73) Upfront credit points 0 to 95 (41/36) 0 to 100 (43/35) Recovery rates 22% to 97% (64%/70%) 1% to 97% (58%/70%) Currencies, net $(36) $3 Correlation 25% to 72% (49%/46%) 25% to 70% (50%/55%) Commodities, net $66 $73 Volatility 9% to 65% (27%/27%) 13% to 68% (33%/33%) Natural gas spread $(2.24) to $2.84 ($(0.22)/$(0.12)) $(1.81) to $4.33 ($(0.14)/$(0.05)) Oil spread $(7.10) to $60.00 ($4.67/$(1.54)) $(19.72) to $64.92 Equities, net $(1,581) $(3,416) Correlation (35)% to 94% (51%/48%) (39)% to 88% (41%/41%) Volatility 3% to 87% (24%/22%) 5% to 72% (24%/23%) In the table above: • Derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts. • Ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative. • Averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments. An average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average. For example, the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range. • The ranges, averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative. For example, the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative. Accordingly, the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in, or possible ranges of, fair value measurements of the firm’s level 3 derivatives. • Interest rates, currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models, credit derivatives are valued using option pricing, correlation and discounted cash flow models, and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models. • The fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques. For example, option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value. Therefore, the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques. • Correlation within currencies and equities includes cross-product correlation. • Natural gas spread represents the spread per million British thermal units of natural gas. • Oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products. Range of Significant Unobservable Inputs The following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm’s level 3 derivative instruments: • Correlation. • Volatility. • Credit spreads, upfront credit points and recovery rates. • Commodity prices and spreads. Sensitivity of Fair Value Measurement to Changes in Significant Unobservable Inputs The following is a description of the directional sensitivity of the firm’s level 3 fair value measurements to changes in significant unobservable inputs, in isolation: • Correlation. • Volatility. • Credit spreads, upfront credit points and recovery rates. • Commodity prices and spreads. Due to the distinctive nature of each of the firm’s level 3 derivatives, the interrelationship of inputs is not necessarily uniform within each product type. Level 3 Rollforward The table below presents a summary of the changes in fair value for all level 3 derivatives. Three Months Nine Months Ended September $ in millions 2017 2016 2017 2016 Total level 3 derivatives Beginning balance $ 960 $2,430 $(1,217 ) $ 495 Net realized gains/(losses) (24 ) 17 (82 ) (110 ) Net unrealized gains/(losses) 12 (171 ) (144 ) 620 Purchases 48 43 146 191 Sales (786 ) (38 ) (935 ) (279 ) Settlements (299 ) (194 ) 2,163 622 Transfers into level 3 (34 ) 119 (6 ) 500 Transfers out of level 3 6 86 (42 ) 253 Ending balance $(117 ) $2,292 $ (117 ) $2,292 In the table above: • Changes in fair value are presented for all derivative assets and liabilities that are classified in level 3 as of the end of the period. • Net unrealized gains/(losses) relate to instruments that were still held at period-end. • If a derivative was transferred into level 3 during a reporting period, its entire gain or loss for the period is classified in level 3. Transfers between levels are reported at the beginning of the reporting period in which they occur. • Positive amounts for transfers into level 3 and negative amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative assets. Negative amounts for transfers into level 3 and positive amounts for transfers out of level 3 represent net transfers of derivative liabilities. • A derivative with level 1 and/or level 2 inputs is classified in level 3 in its entirety if it has at least one significant level 3 input. • If there is one significant level 3 input, the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs (i.e., level 1 and level 2 inputs) is classified in level 3. • Gains or losses that have been classified in level 3 resulting from changes in level 1 or level 2 inputs are frequently offset by gains or losses attributable to level 1 or level 2 derivatives and/or level 1, level 2 and level 3 cash instruments. As a result, gains/(losses) included in the level 3 rollforward below do not necessarily represent the overall impact on the firm’s results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. The table below disaggregates, by major product type, the information for level 3 derivatives included in the summary table above. Three Months Ended September Nine Months Ended September $ in millions 2017 2016 2017 2016 Interest rates, net Beginning balance $ (319 ) $ 56 $ (381 ) $ (398 ) Net realized gains/(losses) (34 ) (23 ) (77 ) (43 ) Net unrealized gains/(losses) 38 (48 ) 68 129 Purchases 1 – 5 3 Sales (4 ) (2 ) (12 ) (5 ) Settlements 5 61 78 95 Transfers into level 3 – 9 (11 ) 304 Transfers out of level 3 (14 ) 1 3 (31 ) Ending balance $ (327 ) $ 54 $ (327 ) $ 54 Credit, net Beginning balance $ 1,999 $2,942 $ 2,504 $ 2,793 Net realized gains/(losses) 23 7 52 (50 ) Net unrealized gains/(losses) 54 (31 ) (149 ) 359 Purchases 15 12 30 68 Sales (27 ) (6 ) (40 ) (38 ) Settlements (356 ) (110 ) (607 ) (393 ) Transfers into level 3 8 101 45 191 Transfers out of level 3 45 (4 ) (74 ) (19 ) Ending balance $ 1,761 $2,911 $ 1,761 $ 2,911 Currencies, net Beginning balance $ 25 $ 17 $ 3 $ (34 ) Net realized gains/(losses) (9 ) (12 ) (30 ) (39 ) Net unrealized gains/(losses) (52 ) (14 ) (87 ) 2 Purchases 1 1 3 15 Sales – – – (4 ) Settlements 26 39 88 84 Transfers into level 3 3 – 11 1 Transfers out of level 3 (30 ) 1 (24 ) 7 Ending balance $ (36 ) $ 32 $ (36 ) $ 32 Commodities, net Beginning balance $ 118 $ (222 ) $ 73 $ (262 ) Net realized gains/(losses) (4 ) (2 ) 23 22 Net unrealized gains/(losses) 80 (25 ) 135 34 Purchases 3 1 19 27 Sales (58 ) (4 ) (120 ) (118 ) Settlements (1 ) 34 (42 ) 12 Transfers into level 3 (47 ) 6 (40 ) 10 Transfers out of level 3 (25 ) 210 18 273 Ending balance $ 66 $ (2 ) $ 66 $ (2 ) Equities, net Beginning balance $ (863 ) $ (363 ) $(3,416 ) $(1,604 ) Net realized gains/(losses) – 47 (50 ) – Net unrealized gains/(losses) (108 ) (53 ) (111 ) 96 Purchases 28 29 89 78 Sales (697 ) (26 ) (763 ) (114 ) Settlements 27 (218 ) 2,646 824 Transfers into level 3 2 3 (11 ) (6 ) Transfers out of level 3 30 (122 ) 35 23 Ending balance $(1,581 ) $ (703 ) $(1,581 ) $ (703 ) Level 3 Rollforward Commentary Three Months Ended September 2017. The net realized and unrealized losses on level 3 derivatives of $12 million (reflecting $24 million of net realized losses and $12 million of net unrealized gains) for the three months ended September 2017 included gains/(losses) of $63 million and $(75) million reported in “Market making” and “Other principal transactions,” respectively. The net unrealized gains on level 3 derivatives for the three months ended September 2017 were not material. Both transfers into level 3 derivatives and transfers out of level 3 derivatives during the three months ended September 2017 were not material. Nine Months Ended September 2017. The net realized and unrealized losses on level 3 derivatives of $226 million (reflecting $82 million of net realized losses and $144 million of net unrealized losses) for the nine months ended September 2017 included gains/(losses) of $28 million and $(254) million reported in “Market making” and “Other principal transactions,” respectively. The net unrealized losses on level 3 derivatives for the nine months ended September 2017 were primarily attributable to losses on certain credit derivatives, reflecting the impact of tighter credit spreads, and losses on certain equity derivatives, reflecting the impact of changes in equity prices, partially offset by gains on certain commodity derivatives, reflecting the impact of an increase in commodity prices. Both transfers into level 3 derivatives and transfers out of level 3 derivatives during the nine months ended September 2017 were not material. Three Months Ended September 2016. The net realized and unrealized losses on level 3 derivatives of $154 million (reflecting $17 million of realized gains and $171 million of unrealized losses) for the three months ended September 2016 included losses of $16 million and $138 million reported in “Market making” and “Other principal transactions,” respectively. The net unrealized losses on level 3 derivatives for the three months ended September 2016 were primarily attributable to losses on certain equity derivatives reflecting the impact of an increase in equity prices, and losses on certain interest rate derivatives reflecting the impact of a decrease in interest rates. Transfers into level 3 derivatives during the three months ended September 2016 primarily reflected transfers of certain credit derivative assets from level 2, principally due to unobservable credit spread inputs becoming significant to the net risk of certain portfolios. Transfers out of level 3 derivatives during the three months ended September 2016 primarily reflected transfers of certain commodity derivative liabilities to level 2, principally due to unobservable volatility inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives and transfers of certain equity derivative assets to level 2, primarily due to increased transparency of unobservable correlation and volatility inputs used to value these derivatives. Nine Months Ended September 2016. The net realized and unrealized gains on level 3 derivatives of $510 million (reflecting $110 million of realized losses and $620 million of unrealized gains) for the nine months ended September 2016 included gains/(losses) of $686 million and $(176) million reported in “Market making” and “Other principal transactions,” respectively. The net unrealized gains on level 3 derivatives for the nine months ended September 2016 were primarily attributable to gains on certain credit and interest rate derivatives, principally reflecting the impact of a decrease in interest rates. Transfers into level 3 derivatives during the nine months ended September 2016 primarily reflected transfers of certain interest rate derivative assets from level 2, principally due to reduced transparency of certain unobservable inputs used to value these derivatives, and transfers of certain credit derivative assets from level 2 primarily due to unobservable credit spread inputs becoming significant to the net risk of certain portfolios. Transfers out of level 3 derivatives during the nine months ended September 2016 primarily reflected transfers of certain commodity derivative liabilities to level 2, principally due to unobservable volatility inputs no longer being significant to the valuation of these derivatives. OTC Derivatives The table below presents the fair values of OTC derivative assets and liabilities by tenor and major product type. $ in millions Less than 1 - 5 Greater than Total As of September 2017 Assets Interest rates $ 4,086 $16,288 $55,464 $ 75,838 Credit 1,309 3,554 3,948 8,811 Currencies 14,652 6,158 8,454 29,264 Commodities 2,648 1,596 191 4,435 Equities 3,394 6,659 1,471 11,524 Counterparty netting in tenors (3,426 ) (4,746 ) (3,082 ) (11,254 ) Subtotal $22,663 $29,509 $66,446 $118,618 Cross-tenor counterparty netting (17,778 ) Cash collateral netting (54,798 ) Total $ 46,042 Liabilities Interest rates $ 5,347 $ 9,276 $31,772 $ 46,395 Credit 2,020 3,650 1,347 7,017 Currencies 13,124 6,998 4,542 24,664 Commodities 2,340 1,767 2,476 6,583 Equities 7,335 5,680 3,213 16,228 Counterparty netting in tenors (3,426 ) (4,746 ) (3,082 ) (11,254 ) Subtotal $26,740 $22,625 $40,268 $ 89,633 Cross-tenor counterparty netting (17,778 ) Cash collateral netting (35,683 ) Total $ 36,172 As of December 2016 Assets Interest rates $ 5,845 $18,376 $79,507 $103,728 Credit 1,763 2,695 4,889 9,347 Currencies 18,344 8,292 8,428 35,064 Commodities 3,273 1,415 179 4,867 Equities 3,141 9,249 1,341 13,731 Counterparty netting in tenors (3,543 ) (5,550 ) (3,794 ) (12,887 ) Subtotal $28,823 $34,477 $90,550 $153,850 Cross-tenor counterparty netting (17,396 ) Cash collateral netting (85,329 ) Total $ 51,125 Liabilities Interest rates $ 5,679 $10,814 $38,812 $ 55,305 Credit 2,060 3,328 1,167 6,555 Currencies 14,720 9,771 5,879 30,370 Commodities 2,546 1,555 2,315 6,416 Equities 7,000 10,426 2,614 20,040 Counterparty netting in tenors (3,543 ) (5,550 ) (3,794 ) (12,887 ) Subtotal $28,462 $30,344 $46,993 $105,799 Cross-tenor counterparty netting (17,396 ) Cash collateral netting (42,986 ) Total $ 45,417 In the table above: • Tenor is based on expected duration for mortgage-related credit derivatives and generally on remaining contractual maturity for other derivatives. • Counterparty netting within the same product type and tenor category is included within such product type and tenor category. • Counterparty netting across product types within the same tenor category is included in counterparty netting in tenors. Where the counterparty netting is across tenor categories, the netting is included in cross-tenor counterparty netting. Credit Derivatives The firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market-making and investing and lending activities. Credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm’s net risk position. Credit derivatives are generally individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions. Credit events include failure to pay, bankruptcy, acceleration of indebtedness, restructuring, repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity. The firm enters into the following types of credit derivatives: • Credit Default Swaps. • Credit Options. • Credit Indices, Baskets and Tranches. pro-rata • Total Return Swaps. The firm economically hedges its exposure to written credit derivatives primarily by entering into offsetting purchased credit derivatives with identical underliers. Substantially all of the firm’s purchased credit derivative transactions are with financial institutions and are subject to stringent collateral thresholds. In addition, upon the occurrence of a specified trigger event, the firm may take possession of the reference obligations underlying a particular written credit derivative, and consequently may, upon liquidation of the reference obligations, recover amounts on the underlying reference obligations in the event of default. As of September 2017, written and purchased credit derivatives had total gross notional amounts of $670.14 billion and $727.59 billion, respectively, for total net notional purchased protection of $57.45 billion. As of December 2016, written and purchased credit derivatives had total gross notional amounts of $690.47 billion and $733.98 billion, respectively, for total net notional purchased protection of $43.51 billion. Substantially all of the firm’s written and purchased credit derivatives are credit default swaps. The table below presents certain information about credit derivatives. Credit Spread on Underlier (basis points) $ in millions 0 - 250 251 - 501 - Greater than 1,000 Total As of September 2017 Maximum Payout/Notional Amount of Written Credit Derivatives by Tenor Less than 1 year $208,398 $ 6,880 $ 731 $ 5,048 $221,057 1 - 5 years 327,617 10,426 7,711 7,961 353,715 Greater than 5 years 86,151 5,518 2,578 1,118 95,365 Total $622,166 $22,824 $11,020 $14,127 $670,137 Maximum Payout/Notional Amount of Purchased Credit Derivatives Offsetting $537,389 $17,554 $ 9,831 $12,257 $577,031 Other 136,997 9,672 2,024 1,867 150,560 Fair Value of Written Credit Derivatives Asset $ 14,519 $ 732 $ 229 $ 164 $ 15,644 Liability 1,614 452 810 4,370 7,246 Net asset/(liability) $ 12,905 $ 280 $ (581 ) $ (4,206 ) $ 8,398 As of December 2016 Maximum Payout/Notional Amount of Written Credit Derivatives by Tenor Less than 1 year $207,727 $ 5,819 $ 1,016 $ 8,629 $223,191 1 - 5 years 375,208 17,255 8,643 7,986 409,092 Greater than 5 years 52,977 3,928 1,045 233 58,183 Total $635,912 $27,002 $10,704 $16,848 $690,466 Maximum Payout/Notional Amount o |