UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
0-20159
(Commission File Number)
CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Ohio | | 31-1073048 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
| |
323 Croghan Street, Fremont, Ohio | | 43420 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(419) 332-7301
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer ¨ | | Accelerated filer ¨ | | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | | Smaller reporting company x |
| | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The Registrant had 1,673,380 common shares, par value $12.50 per share, outstanding as of April 27, 2012.
This document contains 41 pages. The Exhibit Index is on page 38 immediately preceding the filed exhibits.
CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC.
Index
2
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31 2012 | | | December 31 2011 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands, except par value) | |
ASSETS | | | | |
| |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 18,597 | | | $ | 21,787 | |
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks | | | 1,813 | | | | 38,306 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total cash and cash equivalents | | | 20,410 | | | | 60,093 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
SECURITIES | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale, at fair value | | | 270,981 | | | | 225,282 | |
Restricted stock | | | 3,844 | | | | 3,844 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total securities | | | 274,825 | | | | 229,126 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
LOANS | | | 295,823 | | | | 301,965 | |
Less: Allowance for loan losses | | | 4,598 | | | | 4,778 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loans | | | 291,225 | | | | 297,187 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Premises and equipment, net | | | 7,892 | | | | 8,215 | |
Cash surrender value of life insurance | | | 10,828 | | | | 10,766 | |
Goodwill | | | 14,629 | | | | 14,675 | |
Core deposit intangible asset, net | | | 1,227 | | | | 1,327 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 3,010 | | | | 2,485 | |
Other real estate owned | | | 1,824 | | | | 1,877 | |
Other assets | | | 3,101 | | | | 3,900 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 628,971 | | | $ | 629,651 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | |
Demand, non-interest bearing | | $ | 83,035 | | | $ | 77,056 | |
Savings, NOW, and Money Market deposits | | | 250,290 | | | | 231,182 | |
Time | | | 184,541 | | | | 193,599 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total deposits | | | 517,866 | | | | 501,837 | |
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | | | 24,730 | | | | 40,861 | |
Borrowed funds | | | 18,500 | | | | 18,500 | |
Dividends payable | | | 535 | | | | 535 | |
Other liabilities | | | 3,852 | | | | 5,035 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 565,483 | | | | 566,768 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $12.50 par value. Authorized 6,000,000 shares; issued 1,914,109 shares | | | 23,926 | | | | 23,926 | |
Surplus | | | 224 | | | | 179 | |
Retained earnings | | | 43,061 | | | | 42,662 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 4,502 | | | | 4,341 | |
Treasury stock, 240,729 shares in 2012 and 2011, at cost | | | (8,225 | ) | | | (8,225 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 63,488 | | | | 62,883 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 628,971 | | | $ | 629,651 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands, | |
| | except per share data) | |
INTEREST INCOME | | | | | | | | |
Loans, including fees | | $ | 4,092 | | | $ | 4,114 | |
Securities: | | | | | | | | |
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations | | | 437 | | | | 641 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 735 | | | | 527 | |
Other | | | 43 | | | | 54 | |
Interest on deposits in other banks | | | 11 | | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total interest income | | | 5,318 | | | | 5,341 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
INTEREST EXPENSE | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 725 | | | | 765 | |
Other borrowings | | | 198 | | | | 226 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense | | | 923 | | | | 991 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net interest income | | | 4,395 | | | | 4,350 | |
| | |
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES | | | 125 | | | | 100 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses | | | 4,270 | | | | 4,250 | |
| | | | | | | | |
NON-INTEREST INCOME | | | | | | | | |
Gain on sale of loans | | | 5 | | | | 39 | |
Loss on write down of securities | | | 0 | | | | (111 | ) |
Trust income | | | 230 | | | | 284 | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | | 417 | | | | 332 | |
Other | | | 248 | | | | 222 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total non-interest income | | | 900 | | | | 766 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES | | | | | | | | |
Salaries, wages, and employee benefits | | | 2,159 | | | | 2,095 | |
Occupancy of premises | | | 253 | | | | 231 | |
Amortization of core deposit intangible asset | | | 100 | | | | 14 | |
Other operating | | | 1,604 | | | | 1,452 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total non-interest expenses | | | 4,116 | | | | 3,792 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before federal income taxes | | | 1,054 | | | | 1,224 | |
| | |
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES | | | 120 | | | | 215 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 934 | | | $ | 1,009 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net income per share, based on 1,673,380 shares in 2012 and 1,674,980 shares in 2011 | | $ | 0.56 | | | $ | 0.60 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Dividends declared per share | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | 0.32 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands, | |
| | except per share data) | |
| | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 934 | | | $ | 1,009 | |
| | |
Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities: | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized holding gains during period | | | 244 | | | | 696 | |
| | |
Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net income | | | 0 | | | | 111 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Other comprehensive income, before income taxes | | | 244 | | | | 807 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Less: Income tax expense related to other comprehensive income | | | 83 | | | | 274 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Other comprehensive income | | | 161 | | | | 533 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total comprehensive income | | $ | 1,095 | | | $ | 1,542 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands, | |
| | except per share data) | |
| | |
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | $ | 62,883 | | | $ | 56,513 | |
| | |
Comprehensive Income: | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 934 | | | | 1,009 | |
Change in net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, net of reclassification adjustments and related income taxes | | | 161 | | | | 533 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total comprehensive income | | | 1,095 | | | | 1,542 | |
| | |
Purchase of 3,000 treasury shares in 2011 | | | 0 | | | | (76 | ) |
| | |
Stock based compensation | | | 45 | | | | 0 | |
| | |
Cash dividends declared, $.32 per share in 2012 and 2011 | | | (535 | ) | | | (535 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD | | $ | 63,488 | | | $ | 57,444 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | |
NET CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | $ | 3,138 | | | $ | 1,653 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities | | | 15,751 | | | | 8,930 | |
Purchases of available-for-sale securities | | | (62,638 | ) | | | (25,917 | ) |
Final settlement payment for branch acquisition | | | (1,026 | ) | | | 0 | |
Net decrease in loans | | | 5,736 | | | | 1,874 | |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment | | | 170 | | | | 0 | |
Additions to premises and equipment | | | (40 | ) | | | (45 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net cash from investing activities | | | (42,047 | ) | | | (15,158 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net change in deposits | | | 15,892 | | | | 5,985 | |
Net change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | | | (16,131 | ) | | | 1,582 | |
Net change in borrowed funds | | | 0 | | | | (3,000 | ) |
Cash dividends paid | | | (535 | ) | | | (536 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | 0 | | | | (76 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net cash from financing activities | | | (774 | ) | | | 3,955 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | (39,683 | ) | | | (9,550 | ) |
| | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | 60,093 | | | | 21,856 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | $ | 20,410 | | | $ | 12,306 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 845 | | | $ | 1,095 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Federal income taxes | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
NON-CASH OPERATING ACTIVITY: | | | | | | | | |
Change in deferred income taxes on net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities | | $ | 83 | | | $ | 274 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITY: | | | | | | | | |
Change in net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities | | $ | 244 | | | $ | 807 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
NON-CASH OPERATING AND INVESTING ACTIVITY: | | | | | | | | |
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned | | $ | 90 | | | $ | 25 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 – CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The consolidated financial statements of Croghan Bancshares, Inc. (“Croghan” or the “Corporation”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Croghan Colonial Bank (the “Bank”), have been prepared without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Corporation’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and changes in cash flows have been made.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been omitted. The Corporation’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Annual Report”), contains consolidated financial statements and related footnote disclosures which should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
Management evaluated subsequent events through April 27, 2012, the date the financial statements were issued. Events or transactions occurring after March 31, 2012, but prior to when the consolidated financial statements were issued, that provided additional evidence about conditions that existed at March 31, 2012, have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2012. Events or transactions that provided evidence about conditions that arose before the consolidated financial statements were issued, but did not exist at March 31, 2012, have not been recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2012.
8
NOTE 2 – NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2011, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2011-04,Fair Value Measurement;amending ASC Topic 820 which eliminates terminology differences between U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on the measurement of fair value and related fair value disclosures. While largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles and disclosures, the changes were made as part of the continuing efforts to converge GAAP and IFRS. This adoption of this guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and its adoption did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.
In June 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-05Comprehensive Income; amending ASC Topic 220 to require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Additionally, the guidance requires entities to present, on the face of the financial statements, reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement or statements where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ equity was eliminated. In December 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-12 to defer changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments until FASB has to time to reconsider the presentation of such adjustments. The remaining portion of ASU 2011-05 was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and its adoption did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.
In December 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-11,Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, amending ASC Topic 210 requiring an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The amendment is effective for the annual and interim periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and the Corporation has not yet determined the financial statement impact.
9
NOTE 3 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair values of recognized financial instruments were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | | |
| | Carrying | | | Fair | | | Carrying | | | Fair | |
| | amount | | | value | | | amount | | | value | |
| | | | | (Dollars in thousands) | | | | |
FINANCIAL ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 20,410 | | | $ | 20,410 | | | $ | 60,093 | | | $ | 60,093 | |
Securities | | | 274,825 | | | | 274,825 | | | | 229,126 | | | | 229,126 | |
Loans, net | | | 291,225 | | | | 299,861 | | | | 297,187 | | | | 302,984 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 586,460 | | | $ | 595,096 | | | $ | 586,406 | | | $ | 592,203 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Deposits | | $ | 517,866 | | | $ | 518,776 | | | $ | 501,837 | | | $ | 503,563 | |
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | | | 24,730 | | | | 24,730 | | | | 40,861 | | | | 39,932 | |
Borrowed funds | | | 18,500 | | | | 19,868 | | | | 18,500 | | | | 19,980 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 561,096 | | | $ | 563,374 | | | $ | 561,198 | | | $ | 563,475 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The preceding summary does not include accrued interest receivable, cash surrender value of life insurance, dividends payable, and other liabilities which are also considered financial instruments. The estimated fair value of such items is considered to be their carrying amount.
The Bank also has unrecognized financial instruments which relate to commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The contract amount of such financial instruments totaled $83,368,000 at March 31, 2012 and $76,793,000 at December 31, 2011. Since many of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, these contract amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate fair value of each class of financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Fair value is determined to be the carrying amount for these items because they represent cash or mature in 90 days or less and do not represent unanticipated credit concerns.
Securities
The fair value of securities (both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity) is determined based on quoted market prices of the individual securities or, if not available, estimated fair value is obtained by comparison to other known securities with similar risk and maturity characteristics. Such value does not consider possible tax ramifications or estimated transaction costs. The fair value of restricted stock is considered to be its carrying amount.
10
Loans
Fair value for loans is estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. For adjustable rate loans, which re-price at least annually and generally possess low risk characteristics, the carrying amount is believed to be a reasonable estimate of fair value. For fixed-rate loans, the fair value is estimated based on a discounted cash flow analysis, considering weighted average rates and terms of the portfolio, adjusted for credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loans. Fair value for non-performing loans is based on recent appraisals or estimated discounted cash flows. The estimated value of credit card loans is based on existing loans and does not include the value that relates to estimated cash flows from new loans generated from existing cardholders over the remaining life of the portfolio.
Deposit Liabilities
The fair value of core deposits, including demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits, is the amount payable on demand. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates offered at period end for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The estimated fair value does not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the marketplace.
Other Financial Instruments
The fair value of federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, as well as borrowed funds, is determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current interest rates.
The fair value estimates of financial instruments are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.
NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are required to be classified and disclosed according to this process for determining fair value. There are three levels of determining fair value:
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability for which there is little, if any, market activity at the measurement date. Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporation’s own assumptions about what market participants would use to price the asset or liability. The inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include the Corporation’s own financial data such as internally developed pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, as well as instruments for which the fair value determination requires significant management judgment.
11
There were no financial instruments measured at fair value that moved to a lower level in the fair value hierarchy due to the lack of observable quotes in inactive markets for those instruments at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
The following summarizes financial assets (there were no financial liabilities) measured at fair value as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 inputs | | | Level 2 inputs | | | Level 3 inputs | | | Total fair value | |
| | | | | (Dollars in thousands) | | | | |
March 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recurring: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities available-for-sale: | | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | |
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations | | $ | — | | | $ | 174,288 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 174,288 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | — | | | | 96,343 | | | | — | | | | 96,343 | |
Other | | | — | | | | 350 | | | | — | | | | 350 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | 270,981 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 270,981 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Nonrecurring: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,824 | | | $ | 1,824 | |
Impaired loans | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,696 | | | | 15,696 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,520 | | | $ | 17,520 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 inputs | | | Level 2 inputs | | | Level 3 inputs | | | Total fair value | |
| | | | | (Dollars in thousands) | | | | |
December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recurring: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations | | $ | — | | | $ | 137,244 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 137,244 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | — | | | | 87,688 | | | | — | | | | 87,688 | |
Other | | | — | | | | 350 | | | | — | | | | 350 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | 225,282 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 225,282 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonrecurring: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,877 | | | $ | 1,877 | |
Impaired loans | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,876 | | | | 15,876 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,753 | | | $ | 17,753 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, follows.
In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, the corporation’s creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Corporation’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Corporation’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Securities Available-for-Sale
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities would typically include certain government bonds and exchange traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Examples of such instruments, which would generally be classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, include corporate and municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The Corporation did not have any securities classified as Level 1 or Level 3 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Impaired Loans
The Corporation does not record impaired loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, periodically, a loan is considered impaired and is reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral, less estimated costs to sell, if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 2 inputs, including recent appraisals and Level 3 inputs based on customized discounting criteria. Due to the significance of the Level 3 inputs, impaired loans have been classified as Level 3.
Other Real Estate Owned
The Corporation values other real estate owned at the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral less expected selling costs. Such values are estimated primarily using appraisals and reflect a market value approach. Due to the significance of the Level 3 inputs, other real estate owned has been classified as Level 3.
13
NOTE 5 – SECURITIES
Amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities were as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | | |
| | Amortized | | | Fair | | | Amortized | | | Fair | |
| | cost | | | value | | | cost | | | value | |
| | | | |
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations | | $ | 171,847 | | | $ | 174,288 | | | $ | 135,929 | | | $ | 137,244 | |
| | | | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 91,963 | | | | 96,343 | | | | 82,426 | | | | 87,688 | |
| | | | |
Other | | | 350 | | | | 350 | | | | 350 | | | | 350 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total available-for-sale | | | 264,160 | | | | 270,981 | | | | 218,705 | | | | 225,282 | |
| | | | |
Restricted stock | | | 3,844 | | | | 3,844 | | | | 3,844 | | | | 3,844 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 268,004 | | | $ | 274,825 | | | $ | 222,549 | | | $ | 229,126 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities were as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | | |
| | Gross | | | Gross | | | Gross | | | Gross | |
| | unrealized gains | | | unrealized losses | | | unrealized gains | | | unrealized losses | |
| | | | |
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations | | $ | 3,033 | | | $ | 592 | | | $ | 2,142 | | | $ | 827 | |
| | | | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 4,618 | | | | 238 | | | | 5,264 | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 7,651 | | | $ | 830 | | | $ | 7,406 | | | $ | 829 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14
NOTE 6 – LOANS
The following presents the balances and activity in the allowance for loan losses for the period ended March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Commercial | | | Residential real estate | | | Non-residential real estate | | | Construction real estate | | | Consumer | | | Credit card | | | Total | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | $ | 615 | | | $ | 1,905 | | | $ | 1,926 | | | $ | 179 | | | $ | 84 | | | $ | 69 | | | $ | 4,778 | |
Provision charged to expense | | | (194 | ) | | | 274 | | | | (67 | ) | | | 75 | | | | 34 | | | | 3 | | | | 125 | |
Losses charged off | | | (2 | ) | | | (138 | ) | | | (158 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (19 | ) | | | (9 | ) | | | (326 | ) |
Recoveries | | | 4 | | | | 6 | | | | 8 | | | | 0 | | | | 1 | | | | 2 | | | | 21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at March 31, 2012 | | $ | 423 | | | $ | 2,047 | | | $ | 1,709 | | | $ | 254 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 65 | | | $ | 4,598 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Commercial | | | Residential real estate | | | Non-residential real estate | | | Construction real estate | | | Consumer | | | Credit card | | | Total | |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | $ | 542 | | | $ | 1,857 | | | $ | 2,049 | | | $ | 347 | | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 75 | | | $ | 4,955 | |
Provision charged to expense | | | (74 | ) | | | 720 | | | | 256 | | | | (168 | ) | | | 14 | | | | 27 | | | | 775 | |
Losses charged off | | | (56 | ) | | | (746 | ) | | | (903 | ) | | | — | | | | (38 | ) | | | (43 | ) | | | (1,786 | ) |
Recoveries | | | 203 | | | | 74 | | | | 524 | | | | — | | | | 23 | | | | 10 | | | | 834 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | $ | 615 | | | $ | 1,905 | | | $ | 1,926 | | | $ | 179 | | | $ | 84 | | | $ | 69 | | | $ | 4,778 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following presents the balances in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Non- | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Residential | | | residential | | | Construction | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | real | | | real | | | real | | | | | | Credit | | | | |
3/31/2012 | | Commercial | | | estate | | | estate | | | estate | | | Consumer | | | card | | | Total | |
| | | | | (Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually evaluated for impairment | | $ | — | | | $ | 525 | | | $ | 395 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 973 | |
Collectively evaluated for impairment | | | 423 | | | | 1,522 | | | | 1,314 | | | | 201 | | | | 100 | | | | 65 | | | | 3,625 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 423 | | | $ | 2,047 | | | $ | 1,709 | | | $ | 254 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 65 | | | $ | 4,598 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans individually evaluated for impairment | | $ | 607 | | | $ | 3,095 | | | $ | 10,948 | | | $ | 1,046 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 15,696 | |
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment | | | 18,317 | | | | 123,901 | | | | 120,015 | | | | 3,516 | | | | 11,872 | | | | 2,506 | | | | 280,127 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 18,924 | | | $ | 126,996 | | | $ | 130,963 | | | $ | 4,562 | | | $ | 11,872 | | | $ | 2,506 | | | $ | 295,823 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Non- | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Residential | | | residential | | | Construction | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | real | | | real | | | real | | | | | | Credit | | | | |
12/31/2011 | | Commercial | | | estate | | | estate | | | estate | | | Consumer | | | card | | | Total | |
| | | | | (Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Individually evaluated for impairment | | $ | — | | | $ | 496 | | | $ | 646 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,195 | |
Collectively evaluated for impairment | | | 615 | | | | 1,409 | | | | 1,280 | | | | 126 | | | | 84 | | | | 69 | | | | 3,583 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 615 | | | $ | 1,905 | | | $ | 1,926 | | | $ | 179 | | | $ | 84 | | | $ | 69 | | | $ | 4,778 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans individually evaluated for impairment | | $ | 685 | | | $ | 2,912 | | | $ | 11,220 | | | $ | 1,059 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 15,876 | |
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment | | | 28,278 | | | | 124,538 | | | | 115,195 | | | | 4,178 | | | | 11,203 | | | | 2,697 | | | | 286,089 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 28,963 | | | $ | 127,450 | | | $ | 126,415 | | | $ | 5,237 | | | $ | 11,203 | | | $ | 2,697 | | | $ | 301,965 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
16
The following represents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 ( dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
3/31/2012 | | Unpaid principal balance | | | Recorded investment | | | Allowance for loan loss allocated | |
With no related allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agricultural loans | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Commercial loans | | | 551 | | | | 551 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 56 | | | | 56 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 36 | | | | 36 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 874 | | | | 874 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 77 | | | | 77 | | | | 0 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 290 | | | | 290 | | | | 0 | |
Farm real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 8,129 | | | | 8,129 | | | | 0 | |
Construction real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
With an allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agricultural loans | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial loans | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 1,912 | | | | 1,700 | | | | 480 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 128 | | | | 118 | | | | 45 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Farm real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 3,194 | | | | 2,819 | | | | 395 | |
Construction real estate | | | 1,046 | | | | 1,046 | | | | 53 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Total | | $ | 16,293 | | | $ | 15,696 | | | $ | 973 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
17
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
12/31/2011 | | Unpaid principal balance | | | Recorded investment | | | Allowance for loan loss allocated | |
With no related allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agricultural loans | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Commercial loans | | | 630 | | | | 630 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 55 | | | | 55 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 19 | | | | 19 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 873 | | | | 863 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 77 | | | | 77 | | | | 0 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Farm real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 8,246 | | | | 8,246 | | | | 0 | |
Construction real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
With an allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agricultural loans | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial loans | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 2,097 | | | | 1,818 | | | | 433 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 135 | | | | 135 | | | | 63 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Farm real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 3,395 | | | | 2,974 | | | | 646 | |
Construction real estate | | | 1,059 | | | | 1,059 | | | | 53 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Total | | $ | 16,586 | | | $ | 15,876 | | | $ | 1,195 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
18
The Bank categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of the borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Bank uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
| • | | Special Mention – Loans classified as “special mention” possess some credit deficiency or potential weakness that deserves close attention, but do not yet warrant substandard classification. Such loans pose unwarranted financial risk that, if not corrected, could weaken the loan and increase risk of losses in the future. |
| • | | Substandard –Loans classified as “substandard” are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified as substandard have well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are categorized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. |
| • | | Doubtful – Loans classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses of those classified as substandard. Additionally, however, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full based on existing conditions improbable. |
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. The following presents loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 that are collectively evaluated for impairment and are considered not impaired. Investments in each category found below do not include loans that are deemed impaired and analyzed individually for impairment which were presented previously (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3/31/2012 | | Pass | | | Special mention | | | Substandard | | | Doubtful | | | Not rated | |
Agricultural loans | | $ | 1,851 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Commercial loans | | | 15,269 | | | | 178 | | | | 2 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 176 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 841 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 26,124 | | | | 366 | | | | 317 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 83,867 | | | | 1,457 | | | | 2,373 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 9,107 | | | | 0 | | | | 290 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 6,486 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,507 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Farm real estate | | | 8,565 | | | | 296 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 86,594 | | | | 11,378 | | | | 4,189 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Construction real estate | | | 2,562 | | | | 0 | | | | 954 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 4,055 | | | | 1 | | | | 4 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 243 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 671 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 193 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 6,643 | | | | 20 | | | | 42 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,506 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 252,828 | | | $ | 13,696 | | | $ | 10,678 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 2,925 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12/31/2011 | | Pass | | | Special mention | | | Substandard | | | Doubtful | | | Not rated | |
Agricultural loans | | $ | 3,207 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Commercial loans | | | 23,596 | | | | 192 | | | | 10 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 353 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 920 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 26,879 | | | | 449 | | | | 268 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 83,743 | | | | 1,233 | | | | 2,250 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 9,416 | | | | 0 | | | | 300 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 5,973 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,856 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Farm real estate | | | 8,645 | | | | 47 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 80,391 | | | | 12,279 | | | | 5,004 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Construction real estate | | | 3,220 | | | | 0 | | | | 958 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 3,408 | | | | 3 | | | | 5 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 236 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 706 | | | | 18 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 194 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 6,577 | | | | 36 | | | | 20 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,697 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 256,875 | | | $ | 14,257 | | | $ | 11,671 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3,286 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
20
The following presents the recorded investment by class of loans which are not on nonaccrual and have collectively been evaluated for impairment as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3/31/2012 | | 30-89 days past due | | | 90+ days past due | | | Total past due | | | Not past due | | | Total | |
Agricultural loans | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,851 | | | $ | 1,851 | |
Commercial loans | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 15,449 | | | | 15,449 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 176 | | | | 176 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 841 | | | | 841 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 260 | | | | 137 | | | | 397 | | | | 26,410 | | | | 26,807 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 1,712 | | | | 557 | | | | 2,269 | | | | 85,428 | | | | 87,697 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 103 | | | | 0 | | | | 103 | | | | 9,294 | | | | 9,397 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 8,993 | | | | 8,993 | |
Farm real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 8,861 | | | | 8,861 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 569 | | | | 49 | | | | 618 | | | | 101,543 | | | | 102,161 | |
Construction real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 3,516 | | | | 3,516 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 1 | | | | 0 | | | | 1 | | | | 4,059 | | | | 4,060 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 5 | | | | 2 | | | | 7 | | | | 236 | | | | 243 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 671 | | | | 671 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 2 | | | | 0 | | | | 2 | | | | 191 | | | | 193 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 16 | | | | 20 | | | | 36 | | | | 6,669 | | | | 6,705 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 11 | | | | 14 | | | | 25 | | | | 2,481 | | | | 2,506 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,679 | | | $ | 779 | | | $ | 3,458 | | | $ | 276,669 | | | $ | 280,127 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12/31/2011 | | 30-89 days past due | | | 90+ days past due | | | Total past due | | | Not past due | | | Total | |
Agricultural loans | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3,207 | | | $ | 3,207 | |
Commercial loans | | | 16 | | | | 0 | | | | 16 | | | | 23,782 | | | | 23,798 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 353 | | | | 353 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 920 | | | | 920 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 213 | | | | 91 | | | | 304 | | | | 27,293 | | | | 27,597 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 2,046 | | | | 566 | | | | 2,612 | | | | 84,614 | | | | 87,226 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 48 | | | | 9 | | | | 57 | | | | 9,658 | | | | 9,715 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 8,829 | | | | 8,829 | |
Farm real estate | | | 38 | | | | 0 | | | | 38 | | | | 8,655 | | | | 8,693 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 616 | | | | 0 | | | | 616 | | | | 97,057 | | | | 97,673 | |
Construction real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 4,178 | | | | 4,178 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 6 | | | | 0 | | | | 6 | | | | 3,410 | | | | 3,416 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 9 | | | | 0 | | | | 9 | | | | 227 | | | | 236 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 18 | | | | 0 | | | | 18 | | | | 706 | | | | 724 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 194 | | | | 194 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 41 | | | | 0 | | | | 41 | | | | 6,592 | | | | 6,633 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 30 | | | | 6 | | | | 36 | | | | 2,661 | | | | 2,697 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 3,081 | | | $ | 672 | | | $ | 3,753 | | | $ | 282,336 | | | $ | 286,089 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
22
The following presents the recorded investment in loans past due 90 days or more still accruing, nonaccrual, and Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDR) by class as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
3/31/2012 | | Loans past due 90+ days and still accruing | | | Nonaccrual | | | TDR | |
Agricultural loans | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Commercial loans | | | 0 | | | | 40 | | | | 39 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 137 | | | | 18 | | | | 17 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 557 | | | | 2,078 | | | | 713 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 0 | | | | 102 | | | | 92 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 0 | | | | 290 | | | | 0 | |
Farm real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 49 | | | | 684 | | | | 3,166 | |
Construction real estate | | | 0 | | | | 1,046 | | | | 679 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 2 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 20 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 14 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 779 | | | $ | 4,258 | | | $ | 4,706 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
23
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
12/31/2011 | | Loans past due 90+ days and still accruing | | | Nonaccrual | | | TDR | |
Agricultural loans | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Commercial loans | | | 0 | | | | 88 | | | | 54 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 91 | | | | 19 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 566 | | | | 2,338 | | | | 413 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 9 | | | | 113 | | | | 99 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Farm real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 0 | | | | 1,054 | | | | 3,569 | |
Construction real estate | | | 0 | | | | 1,059 | | | | 692 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 6 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 672 | | | $ | 4,671 | | | $ | 4,827 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
24
The following presents the recorded investment in TDR loans by class, which occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of contracts | | | Recorded investment | | | Allowance for loan losses allocated | |
Agricultural loans | | | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Commercial loans | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Commercial non-profit/political subdivisions | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Open-end home equity | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (1st mortgages) | | | 2 | | | | 173 | | | | 0 | |
1 – 4 family real estate (Jr. mortgages) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Multifamily real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Farm real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Non-farm/non-residential real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Construction real estate | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – vehicle | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer overdraft LOC | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – mobile home | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – home improvement | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Consumer loans – other | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
MasterCard/VISA | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 2 | | | $ | 173 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, there was a recorded investment of restructured loans totaling $173,000 that resulted from TDR, however, of that, no balance was added to the Allowance for Loan Losses.
Within the TDR loan portfolio, one of the loan modifications resulted in delaying a portion of principal payments which results in a balloon payment of interest and principal at the maturity of the loan. The other loan modification resulted in a reduced interest rate.
25
NOTE 7 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Corporation established a Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) in 2002, which permitted the Corporation to award stock options and/or stock appreciation rights to directors and managerial and other key employees of the Corporation. The awards could be in the form of stock options and/or stock appreciation rights. The Plan, which provided for the issuance of up to 190,951 shares, expired in March 2012.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Outstanding Stock Options | | | Exercisable Stock Options | |
| | | | | Weighted | | | Weighted | | | | | | Weighted | | | Weighted | |
Exercise | | | | | Average | | | Average | | | | | | Average | | | Average | |
Price | | | | | Exercise | | | Contractual | | | | | | Exercise | | | Contractual | |
Range | | Number | | | Price | | | Life (years) | | | Number | | | Price | | | Life (years) | |
| | | | | | |
$24.99 | | | 28,869 | | | $ | 24.99 | | | | 8 | | | | 0 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
The following summarizes stock option activity for the first three months of 2012:
| | | | |
Outstanding, January 1, 2012 | | | 28,869 | |
Granted | | | — | |
Exercised | | | — | |
| | | | |
Outstanding, March 31, 2012 | | | 28,869 | |
| | | | |
Exercisable, March 31, 2012 | | | — | |
| | | | |
The fair value of options granted is estimated at the date of grant using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The following shows the weighted-average fair value of options granted and the assumptions used in calculating that value for the years indicated:
| | | | |
| | 2011 | |
Weighted-average fair value of options granted | | $ | 3.62 | |
Average dividend yield | | | 5.0 | % |
Expected volatility | | | 25 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 2.85 | % |
Expected term (in years) | | | 8 | |
There were no new options granted in the first quarter 2012, however compensation expense related to options granted in 2011, which is included in salaries and wages in the consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2012, amounted to $12,000. Compensation expense is recognized over the three year vesting period of the options. As of March 31, 2012, there was $55,000 of unrecognized compensation expense expected to be recognized over the vesting period.
26
NOTE 8 – BRANCH ACQUISITION
On August 31, 2011, the Bank entered into an agreement to purchase four branch offices of The Home Savings and Loan Company of Youngstown, Ohio, (“HSL”) located in Fremont, Clyde, and Tiffin, Ohio. Under the terms of the agreement, the Bank assumed all related deposits and purchased the related branch premises and certain loans. The transaction was completed on December 16, 2011, with assets acquired and deposits assumed being recorded at their estimated fair values as follows:
| | | | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| |
Cash | | $ | 83,496 | |
Loans | | | 21,502 | |
Bank premises and equipment | | | 1,801 | |
Goodwill | | | 4,245 | |
Core deposit intangible asset | | | 1,269 | |
Other assets | | | 71 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total assets acquired | | $ | 112,384 | |
| | | | |
| |
Deposits assumed | | $ | 111,072 | |
Other liability – payable to seller | | | 1,312 | |
| | | | |
| |
Total liabilities assumed | | $ | 112,384 | |
| | | | |
The “other liability—payable to seller” represents the changes in the amounts of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed between the final settlement date and December 16, 2011, the actual closing (transfer) date. Under the terms of the agreement, a final closing statement was prepared by seller within 30 days after closing and received by the Bank on January 15, 2012, and the Bank made final payment to seller based on the final closing statement.
On December 16, 2011, the contractual balance of loans transferred was $21,697,000, and the contractual balance of deposits transferred was $109,970,000. Loans acquired include residential real estate and consumer loans secured by real estate and personal property that management determined to be risk graded as a pass rated loans as defined in Note 6.
The operating results of the acquired branches subsequent to the closing are included in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. The core deposit intangible asset is amortized on a sum of digits basis over a period of ten years, the CD market valuation is amortized on a straight-line basis over a two year period, and the discounted loan market valuation is accreted to income on a straight-line basis over a five year period.
Goodwill of $4,245,000 arose in the acquisition of the HSL branches because consideration paid effectively included amounts relating to the benefit of expected synergies, revenue growth, and future market development. These benefits are not recognized separately from goodwill because they do not meet the recognition requirement for identifiable intangible assets. All goodwill arising from this acquisition is expected to be deductible for tax purposes on a straight-line basis over a 15 year period.
The excess cash in the transaction was used to increase the Bank’s investment portfolio and cash balances. Going forward, excess cash will be used in the form of continued investment growth and to fund anticipated loan growth.
27
On March 12, 2012, the Bank made a payment of $1,026,000 to settle differences between the final settlement statement and the draft settlement statement. The settlement amount reduced the previously reported cash, goodwill, and other liability categories. Goodwill was reduced by $46,000, as result of the final payment, reducing related goodwill amount to $4,199,000.
| ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Where appropriate, the following discussion relating to the Corporation contains the insights of management into known events and trends that have or may be expected to have a material effect on the Corporation’s operations and financial condition. The information presented may also contain certain forward-looking statements regarding future financial performance, which are not historical facts and which involve various risks and uncertainties. When used herein, the terms “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “intends”, “expects”, “estimates”, “projects”, “targets”, “will”, “would”, “should”, “could”, and similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. The Corporation’s actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause or contribute to such material differences include, but are not limited to, changes in regional and/or national economic conditions, changes in policies by regulatory agencies, fluctuations in interest rates, changes in FDIC insurance assessment rates, demand for loans in the Corporation’s market area, and competitive conditions in the financial services industry. Additional information concerning a number of important factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements is available in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including the disclosure in“Item 1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of Croghan’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Form 10-K”).
The Corporation cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements, except to the extent required by law.
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Net income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 was $934,000, or $.56 per common share, compared to $1,009,000, or $.60 per common share, for the same period in 2011, a decrease of $75,000 (7.4%). The results for the first quarter were positively affected by a $45,000 increase in net interest income, a $134,000 increase in non-interest income, and a $95,000 decrease in federal income taxes. Results were offset by a $324,000 increase in non-interest expenses and a $25,000 increase in the provision for loan losses.
Assets at March 31, 2012 totaled $628,971,000, compared to $629,651,000 at December 31, 2011. Total cash and cash equivalents decreased $39,683,000 during the quarter ended March 31, 2012. Total loans decreased to $295,823,000 from $301,965,000 at 2011 year end. Total securities increased to $274,825,000 from $229,126,000 at 2011 year end. Total deposits increased to $517,866,000 from $501,837,000 at 2011 year end.
28
FINANCIAL POSITION
The following comments are based upon a comparison of Croghan’s financial position at March 31, 2012 to December 31, 2011.
Total cash and cash equivalents decreased $39,683,000 (66.0%) and total securities increased $45,699,000 (19.9%) during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012. Total loans decreased $6,142,000 (2.0%) to $295,823,000 at March 31, 2012, compared to $301,965,000 at December 31, 2011. During the same period, deposits increased $16,029,000 (3.2%) to $517,866,000 at March 31, 2012, compared to $501,837,000 at December 31, 2011.
The increase in securities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 primarily resulted from purchases of available-for-sale securities of $62,638,000, with maturities during the period of $15,751,000. There were no sales of securities during the period. The security balance increase was the result of using the excess cash from the HSL acquisition to purchase securities, as well the continuation of investing pay downs and maturing securities back into the portfolio.
The total loan balance decreased $6,142,000 (2.0%) during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012. The decrease resulted from pay downs from commercial borrowers and a continuation of the soft demand in the Bank’s lending markets. The Bank is working on growing the portfolio through the increased markets gained from the HSL acquisition.
Components of the increase in deposits included a $25,087,000 (8.1%) increase in the liquid deposit category (demand, savings, NOW, and money market deposit accounts), which was partially offset by a $9,058,000 (4.7%) decrease in the time deposit category. Croghan strives to maintain a strong interest margin by balancing deposit needs to fund anticipated loan demand and by maintaining the necessary deposit pricing structure.
Stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2012 increased to $63,488,000, or $37.94 book value per common share, compared to $62,883,000, or $37.58 book value per common share, at December 31, 2011. The balance in stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2012 included accumulated other comprehensive income, consisting of net unrealized gains on securities classified as available-for-sale, net of related income taxes. At March 31, 2012, Croghan held $270,981,000 in available-for-sale securities with an unrealized gain of $4,502,000, net of income taxes. This compares to 2011 year-end holdings of $225,282,000 in available-for-sale securities with an unrealized gain of $4,341,000, net of income taxes.
Beginning in February 2002, Croghan instituted a stock buy-back program; however the Board of Directors opted not to renew the stock buy-back program during the first quarter of 2012. During the life span of the program, a total of 248,791 shares were repurchased by Croghan. The 240,729 treasury shares held as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are reported at their acquired cost.
A cash dividend of $.32 per share was declared on March 13, 2012, payable on April 30, 2012 to shareholders of record as of April 13, 2012.
29
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income, which represents the excess revenue generated from interest-earning assets over the interest cost of funding those assets, increased $45,000 (1.0%), for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011. The net interest yield decreased to 3.18% for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, compared to 3.87% for the same period in 2011. The increase of $103,441,000 in average interest-earning assets and the increase of $109,441,000 in average interest bearing liabilities year-over-year was primarily due to acquisition of cash, loans, and deposits in the HSL branch acquisition. The excess cash that was acquired was used to increase the security portfolio.
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES AND THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Croghan’s comprehensive loan policy provides guidelines for managing credit risk and asset quality. The policy details acceptable lending practices, establishes loan-grading classifications, and stipulates the use of a loan review process. Croghan directly employs three staff members dedicated to the credit analysis function to aid in facilitating the early identification of problem loans, to help ensure sound credit decisions, and to assist in the determination of the allowance for loan losses. Croghan also engages an outside credit review firm to supplement the credit analysis function and to provide an independent assessment of the loan review process. Croghan’s loan policy, loan review process, and credit analysis staff facilitate management’s evaluation of the credit risk inherent in the lending function.
The following table details factors relating to the provision and allowance for loan losses for the periods noted:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | | Three months ended | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | | March 31, 2011 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | | |
Provision for loan losses charged to expense | | $ | 125 | | | | | $ | 100 | |
Net loan charge-offs | | | 305 | | | | | | 313 | |
Annualized net loan charge-offs as a percent of average outstanding loans | | | .41 | % | | | | | .43 | % |
30
The following table details factors relating to non-performing and potential problem loans as of the dates noted:
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | |
Nonaccrual loans | | $ | 3,023 | | | $ | 3,376 | |
Loans contractually past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest | | | 779 | | | | 672 | |
| | |
TDR-accruing | | | 3,471 | | | | 3,532 | |
TDR-non-accruing | | | 1,235 | | | | 1,295 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total TDR loans | | | 4,706 | | | | 4,827 | |
| | |
Potential problem loans, other than those past due 90 days or more, nonaccrual, or restructured | | | 10,034 | | | | 18,161 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total potential problem and non-performing loans | | $ | 18,542 | | | $ | 27,036 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Allowance for loan losses | | $ | 4,598 | | | $ | 4,778 | |
| | |
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of period-end loans | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.58 | % |
During the first quarter of 2012, the Bank recognized a $125,000 provision for loan losses as compared to a $100,000 provision during the same period a year ago. Net loan charge-offs decreased $8,000 to $305,000 during the first quarter of 2012 compared to the same period a year ago. The continued downward trend in the 2012 and 2011 first quarter provision is the result of the loan loss calculation having decreases in the average historical loss rates, which are used to calculate certain segments of the allowance for loan losses.
Total potential problem and non-performing loans, which are summarized in the preceding table, decreased $8,494,000, or 31.4%, to $18,542,000 at March 31, 2012, compared to $27,036,000 at December 31, 2011. Favorable components included an $8,127,000 decrease in potential problem loans other than those past due 90 days or more, nonaccrual, or restructured. This was the result of one large commercial borrower having significant financial improvement, which allowed the Bank to upgrade this credit. Other favorable components included a $353,000 decrease in nonaccrual loans and a $121,000 decrease in the total TDR loan category. An unfavorable component was a $107,000 increase in loans contractually past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest.
As illustrated in the following table, $8,991,000, or 89.6%, of total potential problem loans are less than 30 days past due and $10,027,000, or 99.9%, are secured with collateral at March 31, 2012.
Croghan typically classifies credits as potential problem loans, regardless of collateralization or the existence of contractually obligated guarantors, when a review of the borrower’s financial statements indicates that the borrowing entity does not generate sufficient operating cash flow to adequately service its debts. All of the potential problem loans at March 31, 2012, totaling $10,034,000, are currently performing loans (less than 90 days past due) and a majority are collateralized by an interest in real property.
31
The following table provides additional detail pertaining to the past due status of Croghan’s potential problem loans as of the dates noted:
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | |
Potential problem loans not currently past due | | $ | 7,341 | | | $ | 16,984 | |
Potential problem loans past due one day or more but less than 10 days | | | 506 | | | | 91 | |
Potential problem loans past due 10 days or more but less than 30 days | | | 1,144 | | | | 167 | |
Potential problem loans past due 30 days or more but less than 60 days | | | 390 | | | | 342 | |
Potential problem loans past due 60 days or more but less than 90 days | | | 653 | | | | 577 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total potential problem loans | | $ | 10,034 | | | $ | 18,161 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total potential problem loans decreased $9,643,000 in the loans not currently past due category during the first quarter 2012, which was the result primarily from the previously mentioned commercial borrower being upgraded. This decrease was partially offset by a $1,516,000 increase in the aggregate amount of potential problem loans in the past due categories.
The following table provides additional detail pertaining to the collateralization of Croghan’s potential problem loans as of the dates noted:
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | |
Collateralized by an interest in real property | | $ | 10,007 | | | $ | 17,582 | |
Collateralized by an interest in assets other than real property | | | 20 | | | | 575 | |
Unsecured | | | 7 | | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total potential problem loans | | $ | 10,034 | | | $ | 18,161 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Management will continue to monitor asset quality trends throughout 2012 to ensure adequate provisions for loan losses are made in a timely manner. It is Croghan’s policy to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to provide for losses inherent in the portfolio. Management believes the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2012 is adequate to provide for those losses identified as well as those losses inherent within the loan portfolio.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Total non-interest income increased $134,000, or 17.5%, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. During the first quarter of 2012, service charges on deposits and other non-interest income increased $111,000. Also contributing to the increase during the first quarter of 2012, compared to the same period in 2011, was the absence of any security write downs, which totaled $111,000 for the same period in 2011. Decreasing in the non-interest income category was gains on sale of loans, which decreased $34,000 to $5,000 during the first quarter of 2012. The decrease was due to the Bank keeping many of these loans in-house instead of selling them into the secondary market. Also decreasing within the non-interest income category was trust income, which decreased $54,000 during the first quarter 2012 compared to 2011.
32
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
Total non-interest expenses increased $324,000, or 8.5%, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011. Salaries, wages, and employee benefits increased $64,000 (3.1%), between comparable three-month periods. Occupancy of premises expense increased $22,000 (9.5%), between comparable three-month periods. Amortization of core deposit intangible increased $86,000 between comparable three-month periods, due to the core deposit intangible that resulted from the HSL acquisition. Other operating expenses increased $152,000 (10.5%), between comparable three-month periods. These increases are attributable to the HSL acquisition and the fixed costs associated with operating the new banking centers.
Within the other operating expense category is the FDIC insurance expense. During the first quarter of 2012, the FDIC insurance expense was $100,000, compared to $129,000 during the same period in 2011. The Bank prepaid the amount of $1,797,000 in December 2009 and had a remaining prepaid balance of $795,000 at March 31, 2012. This prepaid assessment amount is included in other assets of the Corporation. Future quarterly assessments will be charged against the prepaid asset until such time as the prepaid asset has been full expensed, at which point the Bank will resume paying premiums to the FDIC.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Federal income tax expense decreased $95,000, or 44.2%, between comparable three-month periods. The Corporation’s effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was 11.4%, compared to 17.6% for the same period in 2011. The decrease in the effective tax rate is a result of an increase in tax exempt interest income from investment securities, as well as a decrease in income before federal income taxes.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Short-term borrowings of federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements averaged $28,557,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012. This compares to $22,228,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, and $23,433,000 for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2011.
Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and Great Lakes Bankers Bank totaled $18,500,000 at March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, compared to $22,500,000 at March 31, 2011.
Capital expenditures for premises and equipment totaled $40,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, compared to $45,000 for the same period in 2011. The 2012 expenditures included improvements to the acquired HSL banking centers.
Loan commitments, including letters of credit, as of March 31, 2012 totaled $83,368,000 compared to $76,793,000 at December 31, 2011. Since many of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, these totals do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
| ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
There have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative information about market risk from the information provided in Croghan’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Form 10-K”).
33
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
With the participation of the Corporation’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Corporation’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the Corporation’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that:
(a) | information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the other reports which the Corporation files or submits under the Exchange Act would be accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure; |
(b) | information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the other reports which the Corporation files or submits under the Exchange Act would be recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and |
(c) | the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There were no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Corporation’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Management is not aware of any pending legal proceedings, except for routine legal proceedings to which the Corporation’s subsidiary Bank is a party incidental to its banking business. Management considers none of those proceedings to be material.
34
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are certain risks and uncertainties in our business that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of the 2011 Form 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results. There have been no material changes from those risk factors previously disclosed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of the 2011 Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
35
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description and Exhibit Location |
| |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification – Principal Executive Officer (included with this filing) |
| |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification – Principal Financial Officer (included with this filing) |
| |
32 | | Section 1350 Certification – Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer (included with this filing) |
| |
101 | | The following materials from Croghan Bancshares, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited); (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited); (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited); (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited); and (vi) the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text (included with this filing)* |
* Pursuant to Rule 406T of SEC Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are furnished and not deemed filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those Sections.
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | |
| | | | CROGHAN BANCSHARES, INC. Registrant |
| | | |
Date: April 27, 2012 | | | | By: | | /s/ RICK M. ROBERTSON |
| | | | | | Rick M. Robertson, President and CEO |
| | | | | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
Date: April 27, 2012 | | | | By: | | /s/ KENDALL W. RIEMAN |
| | | | | | Kendall W. Rieman, Treasurer |
| | | | | | (Principal Financial Officer) |
37
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description | | Exhibit Location |
| | |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification – Principal Executive Officer | | Filed herewith |
| | |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification – Principal Financial Officer | | Filed herewith |
| | |
32 | | Section 1350 Certification – Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer | | Filed herewith |
| | |
101 | | The following materials from Croghan Bancshares, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited); (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited); (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited); (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited); and (vi) the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text* | | Filed herewith |
| |
| | * Pursuant to Rule 406T of SEC Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are furnished and not deemed filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those Sections. |
38