Loans | NOTE 4 – LOANS Loans generally are funded at a fixed interest rate with a loan term of up to five years. As of June 30, 2017, 61 (81%) of the partnership’s 75 loans (representing 97% of the aggregate principal of the partnership’s loan portfolio) have a term of five years or less from loan inception. The remaining loans have terms longer than five years. Substantially all loans are written without a prepayment penalty clause. As of June 30, 2017, 30 (40%) of the loans outstanding (representing 67% of the aggregate principal balance of the partnership’s loan portfolio) provide for monthly payments of interest only, with the principal due in full at maturity. The remaining loans require monthly payments of principal and interest, typically calculated on a 30-year amortization, with the remaining principal balance due at maturity. Loans unpaid principal balance (principal) Secured loan transactions are summarized in the following table for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 ($ in thousands). Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Principal, beginning of period $ 98,654 $ 94,851 Loans funded 35,070 42,868 Loans acquired from affiliates 1,000 1,000 Principal payments received (8,947 ) (12,942 ) Principal, end of period $ 125,777 $ 125,777 Three loans with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $8,617,000 were renewed during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Loan characteristics Secured loans had the characteristics presented in the following table as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands). June 30, December 31, 2017 2016 Number of secured loans 75 75 Secured loans – principal $ 125,777 $ 94,851 Secured loans – lowest interest rate (fixed) 5.0 % 5.0 % Secured loans – highest interest rate (fixed) 10.5 % 10.5 % Average secured loan – principal $ 1,677 $ 1,265 Average principal as percent of total principal 1.3 % 1.3 % Average principal as percent of partners’ capital, net of formation loan 1.1 % 0.8 % Average principal as percent of total assets 1.1 % 0.8 % Largest secured loan – principal $ 14,000 $ 14,000 Largest principal as percent of total principal 11.1 % 14.8 % Largest principal as percent of partners’ capital, net of formation loan 9.3 % 8.7 % Largest principal as percent of total assets 9.3 % 8.7 % Smallest secured loan – principal $ 46 $ 48 Smallest principal as percent of total principal 0.1 % 0.1 % Smallest principal as percent of partners’ capital, net of formation loan 0.1 % 0.1 % Smallest principal as percent of total assets 0.1 % 0.1 % Number of counties where security is located (all California) 20 24 Largest percentage of principal in one county 20.6 % 23.1 % Number of secured loans with a filed notice of default 1 1 Secured loans in foreclosure – principal $ 403 $ 405 Number of secured loans with an interest reserve — — Interest reserves $ — $ — As of June 30, 2017, the partnership’s largest loan, in the unpaid principal balance of approximately $14,000,000 (representing 11.1% of outstanding secured loans and 9.3% of partnership total assets), had an interest rate of 7.25%, was secured by a commercial building in Contra Costa county, and has a maturity of January 1, 2019. As of June 30, 2017, the partnership had no outstanding construction or rehabilitation loans and no commitments to fund construction, rehabilitation or other loans. Lien position At funding, secured loans had the following lien positions and are presented in the following table as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands). June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Loans Principal Percent Loans Principal Percent First trust deeds 48 $ 98,940 79 % 48 $ 73,712 78 % Second trust deeds 26 23,837 19 26 18,139 19 Third trust deeds 1 3,000 2 1 3,000 3 Total secured loans 75 $ 125,777 100 % 75 $ 94,851 100 % Liens due other lenders at loan closing 52,189 35,054 Total debt $ 177,966 $ 129,905 Appraised property value at loan closing $ 332,298 $ 245,329 Percent of total debt to appraised values (LTV) at loan closing (1) 56.0 % 54.0 % (1) Based on appraised values and liens due other lenders at loan closing. The weighted-average loan-to-value (LTV) computation above does not take into account subsequent increases or decreases in property values following the loan closing, nor does it include decreases or increases of the amount owing on senior liens to other lenders. Property type Secured loans summarized by property type are presented in the following table as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands). June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Loans Principal Percent Loans Principal Percent Single family (2) 45 $ 44,266 35 % 48 $ 31,773 34 % Multi-family 3 4,289 3 3 1,723 2 Commercial 25 75,247 60 22 59,380 61 Land 2 1,975 2 2 1,975 3 Total secured loans 75 $ 125,777 100 % 75 $ 94,851 100 % (2) Single family properties include owner-occupied and non-owner occupied 1-4 unit residential buildings, condominium units, townhouses, and condominium complexes. The single family property type as of June 30, 2017 consists of 20 loans with principal of approximately $13,473,000 that are owner occupied and 25 loans with principal of approximately $30,793,000 that are non-owner occupied. Single family property type as of December 31, 2016 consists of 21 loans with principal of approximately $11,177,000 that are owner occupied and 27 loans with principal of approximately $20,596,000 that are non-owner occupied. Distribution by California counties The distribution of secured loans outstanding by the California county in which the primary collateral is located is presented in the following table as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands). June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Unpaid Principal Balance Percent Unpaid Principal Balance Percent San Francisco Bay Area (3) San Francisco $ 25,874 20.6 % 7,204 7.6 % Contra Costa 16,860 13.4 16,863 17.7 San Mateo 15,716 12.5 11,267 11.9 Alameda 11,916 9.5 6,626 7.0 Solano 2,875 2.3 1,875 2.0 Santa Clara 2,852 2.3 9,938 10.5 Marin 1,600 1.3 849 0.9 Napa 951 0.7 956 1.0 78,644 62.6 55,578 58.6 Other Northern California Sacramento 3,300 2.5 2,118 2.2 El Dorado 2,044 1.6 2,044 2.2 Monterey 1,846 1.5 4,007 4.2 Santa Cruz 811 0.6 852 0.9 Amador 760 0.6 770 0.8 Lake 297 0.2 298 0.3 Mariposa 46 0.1 48 0.1 Calaveras — — 151 0.2 San Benito — — 94 0.1 9,104 7.1 10,382 11.0 Total Northern California 87,748 69.7 65,960 69.6 Los Angeles & Coastal Los Angeles 24,981 19.9 21,876 23.0 Orange 6,667 5.3 3,765 4.0 San Diego 164 0.1 2,464 2.6 Ventura — — 271 0.3 31,812 25.3 28,376 29.9 Other Southern California San Bernardino 6,024 4.8 124 0.1 Riverside 193 0.2 289 0.3 Kern — — 102 0.1 6,217 5.0 515 0.5 Total Southern California 38,029 30.3 28,891 30.4 Total Secured Loans Balance $ 125,777 100.0 % $ 94,851 100.0 % (3) Includes the Silicon Valley Delinquency Secured loans summarized by payment delinquency are presented in the following table as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands). June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Loans Amount Loans Amount Past Due 30-89 days — $ — 1 $ 164 90-179 days 2 781 1 405 180 or more days 1 164 — — Total past due 3 $ 945 2 569 Current 72 124,832 73 94,282 Total secured loan balance 75 $ 125,777 75 $ 94,851 Interest income of $7,062 was accrued on loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal and/or interest payments during six months ended June 30, 2017. Modifications, workout agreements and troubled debt restructurings At June 30, 2017, the partnership had no modifications, workout agreements, or troubled debt restructurings in effect. At December 31, 2016, the partnership had one workout agreement which qualified as troubled debt restructuring. This loan was paid in full in January 2017. Scheduled maturities Secured loans are scheduled to mature as presented in the following table ($ in thousands). Scheduled maturities, as of June 30, 2017 Loans Principal Percent 2017 (4) 7 $ 7,660 6 % 2018 24 46,479 37 2019 23 59,626 47 2020 11 8,275 7 2021 7 1,983 2 Thereafter 3 1,754 1 Total secured loan balance 75 $ 125,777 100 % (4) Loans maturing in 2017 from July 1 to December 31. It is the partnership’s experience that loans may be repaid or refinanced before, at or after the contractual maturity date. For matured loans, the partnership may continue to accept payments while pursuing collection of amounts owed from borrowers. Therefore, the above tabulation for scheduled maturities is not a forecast of future cash receipts. Loans in non-accrual status Secured loans in non-accrual status are summarized in the following table as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands). June 30, December 31, 2017 2016 Number of loans 2 1 Principal $ 392 $ 230 Advances 6 2 Accrued interest 4 2 Total recorded investment $ 402 $ 234 Foregone interest $ — $ — At June 30, 2017, there were two loans with a principal balance of approximately $781,000 that were contractually 90 or more days past due as to principal or interest and not in non-accrual status. At December 31, 2016, there was one loan with a loan balance of approximately $405,000, that was contractually 90 or more days past due as to principal or interest and not in non-accrual status. Loans designated impaired Impaired loans had the balances shown and the associated allowance for loan losses presented in the following table as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands). June 30, December 31, 2017 2016 Principal $ 392 $ 230 Recorded investment (5) 402 234 Impaired loans without allowance 402 234 Impaired loans with allowance — — Allowance for loan losses, impaired loans — — Number of Loans 2 1 (5) Recorded investment is the sum of principal, advances, and interest accrued for financial reporting purposes. Impaired loans had the average balances and interest income recognized and received in cash as presented in the following table as of, and for, the three months ended June 30, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016 ($ in thousands). June 30, December 31, 2017 2016 Average recorded investment $ 318 $ 509 Interest income recognized 16 27 Interest income received in cash 12 27 Allowance for loan losses At June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the partnership had no allowance for loan losses as all loans had protective equity such that at June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, collection was deemed probable for amounts owing. |