Pathfinder Cell Therapy (PFND) 10-Q 2010 Q2 Quarterly report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

OR

¨   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to

Commission file number:  0-20580

SYNTHEMED, INC.

(Exact  name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	14-1745197
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

200 Middlesex Essex Turnpike, Suite 210	08830
Iselin, New Jersey	(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

(732) 404-1117

(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ¨  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer¨ Accelerated filer¨ Non-accelerated filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $.001 Par Value – 109,430,964 shares outstanding at June 30, 2010

SYNTHEMED, INC.

INDEX

		Page
Part I -	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Condensed Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2010	3
	Condensed Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited)	4
	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2010	5
	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	12
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	15
Part II -	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	15
Item 6.	Exhibits	16
	Signature	16

2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SYNTHEMED, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

	(In thousands, except per share data)
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2009			2010			2009			2010
Revenue
Product sales	$	90		$	134		$	160		$	265
Revenue		90			134			160			265
Cost of goods sold		42			31			61			58
Gross profit		48			103			99			207
Operating expenses:
Research and development		328			247			667			484
General and administrative		401			268			833			752
Sales and marketing		500			187			781			392
Operating expenses		1,229			702			2,281			1,628
(Loss) from operations		(1,181	)		(599	)		(2,182	)		(1,421	)
Other income/(expense):
Interest income		5			1			19			2
Interest expense		(1	)		(2	)		(1	)		(3	)
Other income/(expense)		4			(1	)		18			(1	)
Loss before income tax benefit		(1,177	)		(600	)		(2,164	)		(1,422	)
Income tax benefit		-			-			-			433
Net loss	$	(1,177	)	$	(600	)	$	(2,164	)	$	(989	)
Net loss per common share-basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		99,636			109,206			99,314			109,125

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

3

SYNTHEMED, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

	(In thousands, except per share data)
	December 31,			June 30,
	2009			2010
				(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	963		$	253
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $29 and $0, respectively		49			96
Inventory, net		126			77
Prepaid expenses and deposits		57			122
Total current assets		1,195			548
Machinery, equipment and software, less accumulated depreciation		26			19
TOTAL	$	1,221		$	567
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	64		$	46
Accrued expenses		308			357
Insurance note payable		7			81
Total current liabilities		379			484
Commitments and other contingencies (Note P)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; shares authorized - 5,000; issued and outstanding - none
Common stock, $.001 par value; shares authorized - 150,000 issued and outstanding - 109,041 and 109,431		109			109
Additional paid-in capital		62,008			62,238
Accumulated deficit		(61,275	)		(62,264	)
Total stockholders' equity		842			83
TOTAL	$	1,221		$	567

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

4

SYNTHEMED, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

	(In thousands, except for per share data)
	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2009			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(2,164	)	$	(989	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		30			7
Stock based compensation		299			190
Shares issued in settlement of Board of Directors fees		16			40
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) in accounts receivable		(60	)		(47	)
Decrease in inventory		12			49
Decrease in prepaid expenses		53			59
(Decrease) in accounts payable		(139	)		(18	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses		(28	)		49
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,981	)		(660	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments of insurance note payable		(56	)		(50	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants		10			-
Net cash used in financing activities		(46	)		(50	)
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(2,027	)		(710	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		2,944			963
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	917		$	253
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash operating activities:
Financing of insurance premiums through notes payable	$	134		$	124

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

5

SYNTHEMED, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

A) Basis of Presentation and Substantial Doubt on Going Concern

The accompanying condensed financial statements of SyntheMed, Inc. (the “Company”) do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; but, in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments (which consist of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of such financial information.  Results of operations and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those to be achieved for full fiscal years. These condensed financial statements have been presented on a going concern basis and do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

The balance of existing cash and cash equivalents, together with anticipated revenue from operations, is not sufficient to fund the Company’s planned operations through September 30, 2010.  As a result, the Company, with the assistance of an investment banking firm, is pursuing strategic transactions to generate cash including the sale of its assets. Insufficient funds have required the Company to delay, scale back or eliminate some of its operations including research and development programs and certain commercialization activities and will require the Company to license or sell to third parties certain products or technologies that management would otherwise seek to commercialize independently. No assurance can be given that additional financing through strategic transactions will be available on acceptable terms or at all. In the absence of additional cash infusion, the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern.

These condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of the carrying amount of recorded assets and liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm contained in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K also contains an explanatory paragraph referring to an uncertainty concerning our ability to continue as a going concern. Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

B) Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company deposits cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and believe any amounts in excess of insurance limitations to be at minimal risk.  Cash and cash equivalents held in these accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to a maximum of $250,000 through December 31, 2013, and $100,000 thereafter.

C) Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable value. Management evaluates the need for an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a combination of historical experience, aging analysis and information on specific accounts. In cases where management is aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations, management records a specific allowance against amounts due and reduces the net recognized receivable to the amount that we believe will be collected. For all other customers, the Company maintains a reserve that considers the total receivables outstanding, historical collection rates and economic trends. Account balances are written off when collection efforts have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. At December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $29,000 and $0, respectively.

6

D)  Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, as determined by the first-in, first-out method. The Company maintains an allowance for potentially slow moving and obsolete inventories. Management reviews on-hand inventory for potential slow moving and obsolete amounts and estimates the level of inventory reserve accordingly. The Company’s allowance for slow moving and obsolete inventories includes an allowance for on-hand finished goods inventory which is within six months of the expiration date.

	December 31,			June 30,
	2009			2010
Raw materials	$	79,000		$	59,000
Finished goods		53,000			23,000
		132,000			82,000
Slow moving and obsolete inventories		(6,000	)		(4,000	)
	$	126,000		$	78,000

             The production of the Company’s inventory is outsourced to third party facilities located in Ohio, Minnesota and Prince Edward Island, Canada.

E)  Stock Based Compensation Plans

At June 30, 2010, the Company has two stock-based compensation plans: the 2001 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue non-qualified stock options to purchase up to an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of common stock; and the 2006 Stock Option Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to purchase up to an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of common stock. At June 30, 2010, there were 228,000 options available for grant under these plans.  The exercise price is determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at the time of the granting of an option. Options vest over a period not greater than five years, and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant.

The Company follows the FASB ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period) in the financial statements based on their fair values. For options with graded vesting, the Company values the stock option grants and recognizes compensation expense as if each vesting portion of the award was a separate award. The impact of forfeitures that may occur prior to vesting is also estimated and considered in the amount of expense recognized. In addition, the realization of tax benefits in excess of amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes will be recognized in the cash flow statement as a financing activity rather than as an operating activity.

No tax benefits were attributed to the stock-based compensation expense because a valuation allowance was maintained for substantially all net deferred tax assets. The Company elected to adopt the alternative method of calculating the historical pool of windfall tax benefits. This is a simplified method to determine the pool of windfall tax benefits that is used in determining the tax effects of stock compensation in the results of operations and cash flow reporting for awards that were outstanding as of the adoption of ASC 718.

           The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the weighted average fair value of options. The fair value of options at date of grant and the assumptions utilized to determine such values are indicated in the following table:

7

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2010
Weighted average fair value at date of grant for options granted during the period	$	0.18		$	0.11
Risk-free interest rates		2.68%-3.91	%		3.35%- 3.70	%
Expected option life in  years		8-10			10
Expected forfeiture rate		0	%		0	%
Actual vesting terms in years		2			1
Expected stock price volatility		98.0	%		107.2% - 108.3	%
Expected dividend yield		-0-			-0-

The following summarizes the activities of the Company’s stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (shares in thousands):

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Number of shares under option plans:
Outstanding at January 1, 2010		13,195		$	0.43	4.3 Years
Granted		1,061			0.12	9.6 Years
Exercised		-			-
Canceled, expired or forfeited		(1,205	)		0.34
Outstanding at June 30, 2010		13,051		$	0.41	4.1 Years	$	3,000
Vested and expected to vest after June 30, 2010 (A)		12,313		$	0.39	4.0 Years	$	3,000

(A) Options expected to vest, for options with vesting conditions based on performance or market     condition, are based on management’s estimate of the probability of their vesting at the end of the reporting period.

As of June 30, 2010, there was approximately $46,000 of unrecognized stock compensation related to unvested awards (net of estimated forfeitures) expected to be recognized over the next 13 months.

The Company granted 1,470,000 and 1,061,000 options in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Of the 1,061,000 options granted during the period ended June 30, 2010, 351,000 vested immediately and 710,000 vest upon the achievement of certain performance criteria during 2010. The Company has recorded a charge of $9,000 and $17,000 in research and development and general and administrative expense, respectively, for the fair value of the options granted for the six months ended June 30, 2010.Of the 1,470,000 options granted during the period ended June 30, 2009, 360,000 vested immediately, 100,000 vest one year from the date of grant, 100,000 vest two years from the date of grant and 910,000 vest upon the achievement of certain performance criteria during 2009. The Company has recorded a charge of $7,000, $81,000 and $42,000 in research and development, general and administrative and sales and marketing expense, respectively, for the fair value of the options granted for the six months ended June 30, 2009.Vesting of the 910,000 options granted during the period ended June 30, 2009 was similarly subject to achievement of certain performance criteria during 2009.

Under ASC 718 forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.

8

At June 30, 2010, the Company had 1,300,000 options outstanding which vest upon the achievement of certain performance criteria including FDA-related milestones associated with REPEL-CV and other product development programs, certain sales and marketing activities, new product and business development initiatives, financing activities and market based criteria. The performance-based options have a term of 10 years from date of grant and an exercise price range of $0.11 to $1.00. Of these options, 100,000 relate to the achievement of certain FDA-related milestones for which the Company has recorded an estimated credit of $8,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 related to the reversal of previously recorded charges, 700,000 relate to specific performance criteria including FDA-related milestones associated with REPEL-CV and other product development programs, certain sales and marketing activities, new product and business development initiatives, financing activities, regulatory and administrative activities and the Company has recorded an estimated charge of $9,000 and $17,000 in research and development and general and administrative expense for the six months period ended June 30, 2010, respectively, for these options, and 500,000 relate to market condition criteria for the Company’s common stock and recorded an estimated charge of $22,000 in general and administrative expense for these options for the six months period ended June 30, 2010. The Company has valued these market condition options utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model rather than the preferable Lattice method due to the subjectivity of the Lattice method’s assumptions when compared to the Black-Scholes pricing model and the estimated immaterial difference between the two methods given the short term vesting requirements of one and two years. At each reporting period for the performance based grants only, management re-evaluates the probability that the vesting contingency will be satisfied and adjusts the fair value charge accordingly.

In March 2010, the Board of Directors extended to December 31, 2010 the expiration date of the following stock options that were scheduled to expire on March 21, 2010: Dr. Richard Franklin, 1,000,000 options; Mr. Robert Hickey, 500,000 options; and Dr. Eli Pines, 233,333 options. At the same time, the exercise price for each of these stock options was increased from $0.12 per share to $0.14 per share. The Company has recorded a charge of $14,000 and $91,000 in research and development and general and administrative expense, respectively, for the fair value of the options extended for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

F)  Insurance Note Payable

In March 2010, the Company entered into two short term financing agreements for product liability and director and officer liability insurance premiums totaling $124,000, payable in monthly installments including total interest of $6,000 and $6,700, respectively. The monthly installments are due through December 2010 and January 2011, respectively, and carry interest of 4.5% per annum and 3.75% per annum, respectively.

G)  Net Loss Per Common Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period, which excludes 33,591,000 potential common shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants since their inclusion would have been be anti-dilutive.

H)  Common Stock

For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 162,500 shares of common stock, representing 65% of the $25,000 in fees due to the Company’s non-employee directors for their service during the quarter with the remaining $8,750 paid in cash.. This policy was recently modified so that for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 227,274 shares of common stock, representing 100% of the $25,000 in fees due to the Company’s non-employee directors and attributable to their services rendered during the second quarter of 2010.   In each case, the shares were valued at fair market value on the date of grant, the last trading day of the quarter, as reflected in the closing price on that day. See Item 2.

I)  Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-09 Subsequent Event (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. ASU 2010-09 removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements.  That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The Company adopted ASU 2010-09 in February 2010 and did not disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated.

9

In June 2009, the FASB has issued FASB ASC 810-10 (previously known as SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No 46(R)) which amends certain requirements to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. The adoption of FASB ASC 810-10 effective January 1, 2010 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

J)  Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for revenue recognition with multiple deliverables, which is effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, although early adoption is permitted. This guidance eliminates the residual method under the current guidance and replaces it with the “relative selling price” method when allocating revenue in a multiple deliverable arrangement. The selling price for each deliverable shall be determined using vendor specific objective evidence of selling price, if it exists, otherwise third-party evidence of selling price shall be used. If neither exists for a deliverable, the vendor shall use its best estimate of the selling price for that deliverable. After adoption, this guidance will also require expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures. The Company does not currently enter into multiple deliverable revenue arrangements and, as a result, does not anticipate any impact, upon adoption of the statement, on its financial statements.

K) Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method described in FASB ASC 740-10 (Previously known as: SFAS No. 109), Income Taxes, the objective of which is to establish deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. At June 30, 2010, the Company had a deferred tax asset which was fully reserved by a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is expected to be realized.

On January 14, 2010, the Company received proceeds of $433,000 from the sale of certain New Jersey state tax losses. This is reflected as income tax benefits in the accompanying Statement of Operations.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in general and administrative expense. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has not recorded any provisions for accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

By statute, tax years 2006 through 2009 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.

L)  Revenue Recognition Policy

The Company recognizes revenue when the amounts become fixed and determinable, when product is shipped to customers and receipt of payment is reasonably assured. Terms of sale are “f.o.b. shipping point” with the customer covering all costs of shipment and insurance. All sales are final with no right of return except for defective product.

M)  Retirement Plan

In March 2007, the Company adopted a defined contribution retirement plan which qualifies under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan allows all employees, upon commencement of employment, to voluntarily contribute amounts not exceeding the maximum allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. The Company is obligated to make a matching contribution equal to 100% of each employee’s salary deferral contributions made at the rate of 4% of total compensation up to a maximum of $245,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, the Company made matching contributions to the plan in the amount of $20,000 and $13,000, respectively.

10

N)  Shareholders Rights Plan

On April 25, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the adoption of a shareholder rights plan. The Board of Directors has declared a dividend distribution of one right for each share of our common stock outstanding as of the close of business on June 2, 2008. Initially, the rights will be represented by common stock certificates, will not be traded separately from the common stock and will not be exercisable. The rights generally will become exercisable following any person becoming an “acquiring person” by acquiring, or commencing a tender offer to acquire, beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. If a person becomes an “acquiring person,” each holder of a right, other than the acquirer, would be entitled to receive, upon payment of the then purchase price, a number of shares of our common stock or other securities having a value equal to twice the purchase price. If the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after any such event, each holder of a right, other than the acquirer, would be entitled to receive, upon payment of the then purchase price, shares of the acquiring company having a value equal to twice the purchase price. The rights are scheduled to expire on June 2, 2018 unless earlier redeemed, terminated or exchanged in accordance with the terms of the shareholder rights plan.

O)  Geographic Information

Commencing in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company began selling REPEL-CV in the United States, in addition to other countries around the world. The following table summarizes the Company’s revenues and long-lived assets by country for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				As of June 30,
	2009		2010		2009		2010		2009		2010
	Revenues				Revenues				Long-Lived Assets
United States	$	41	$	59	$	41	$	122	$	44	$	19
Brazil		-		45		-		61		-		-
Saudi Arabia		18		-		24		15		-		-
Italy		-		-		24		14		-		-
Czech Republic		10		5		20		10		-		-
Turkey		-		-		-		7		-		-
Romania		13		-		13		-		-		-
Other countries		8		25		38		36		-		-
	$	90	$	134	$	160	$	265	$	44	$	19

P) Commitments and Other Matters

 Under the Yissum agreement, the Company is obligated to pay a 5% royalty on net sales, or, to preserve its rights under the agreement if its net sales or income does not reach $1,000,000 by the end of fiscal 2010, an annual minimum royalty of $250,000. At June 30, 2010, the Company has recorded a charge of $125,000 for the anticipated annual minimum royalty obligation under the Yissum Agreement attributable to the first six months of 2010.

11

Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Certain statements in this Report under this Item 2 and elsewhere constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, without limitation, statements regarding future cash requirements, the success of any pending or proposed clinical trial and the timing or ability to achieve necessary regulatory approvals.  Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of our Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Such risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to (i) potential adverse developments regarding our efforts to obtain and maintain required FDA and other approvals including, without limitation, approval by the FDA of an expanded indication of REPEL-CV to include adult cardiac surgery patients; (ii) potential inability to secure funding to engage in a strategic or other fundamental transaction and (iii) unanticipated delays associated with manufacturing and marketing activities.  Reference is made to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for a description of some of these risks and uncertainties.  Without limiting the foregoing, the words “anticipates”, “plans”, “intends”, “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date hereof.  We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations set forth below under “Results of Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.

Substantial Doubt on Going Concern

Our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with anticipated revenue from operations, is not sufficient to fund our planned operations through September 30, 2010.  As a result, the Company, with the assistance of an investment banking firm, is pursuing strategic transactions to generate cash including the sale of its assets. Insufficient funds have required the Company to delay, scale back or eliminate some of its operations including research and development programs and certain commercialization activities and will require the Company to license or sell to third parties certain products or technologies that management would otherwise seek to commercialize independently. No assurance can be given that additional financing through strategic transactions will be available on acceptable terms or at all. In the absence of additional cash infusion, the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern.

General

We are a biomaterials company engaged in the development and commercialization of innovative and cost-effective medical devices for therapeutic applications.  Our products and product candidates, all of which are based on our proprietary, bioresorbable polymer technology, are primarily surgical implants designed to prevent or reduce the formation of adhesions (scar tissue) following a broad range of surgical procedures.  Our commercialization efforts are currently focused on our lead product, REPEL-CV® Bioresorbable Adhesion Barrier (“REPEL-CV”), for use in cardiac surgery.  REPEL-CV is a bioresorbable film designed to be placed over the surface of the heart at the conclusion of surgery to reduce the formation of post-operative adhesions.

We have been selling REPEL-CV domestically since obtaining US Food and Drug Administration clearance in March 2009 and internationally since obtaining CE Mark approval in August 2006.  In the United States and some foreign countries, our marketing approval is limited to the pediatric market, while the CE Mark approval, which covers the European Union (EU) and other countries, as well as other foreign approvals subsequently obtained, apply broadly to both the adult and pediatric market segments.

Following FDA approval for the pediatric indication, we focused on clarifying the additional clinical data that the FDA would require as a basis for expanding US regulatory approval to include the adult indication.  In August 2009, we reached an understanding with the FDA regarding these data requirements and the scope of the related clinical studies.  Clearance to commence these clinical studies is subject to submission to and approval by the FDA of an IDE application.  We do not have sufficient cash resources, either on hand or anticipated from operations, to fund these clinical studies.

12

We believe that there are a number of opportunities to leverage our polymer film technology used in REPEL-CV in other anatomic sites where the presence of a temporary barrier at the surgical site may provide clinical benefit at the point of a subsequent surgery through the reduction of post-operative adhesions. In May 2010, we obtained CE Mark approval for REPEL-GYN™, a barrier film indicated for use in reducing the incidence, extent and severity of post-operative adhesions in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.  In November 2008, we received 510(k) clearance from the FDA to market SinusShield™, another application of our polymer film that is intended to reduce adhesions and act as a space-occupying stent in nasal and sinus surgical procedures.  Due to our limited financial resources, we are not currently engaged in commercialization efforts with respect to these products.

Results of Operations

Revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $134,000 and $265,000, respectively, compared to $90,000 and $160,000 for the comparable prior year periods, an increase of 48.9% or $44,000 for the three month period and an increase of 65.6% or $105,000 for the six month period. The increase in revenue is primarily attributable to our launch of REPEL-CV in the United States in April 2009 and growth in our international sales.  The continued growth in US sales of REPEL-CV for use in pediatric patients who are likely to require reoperation via sternotomy, coupled with the expansion of our international distribution network, should result in increased revenue in future periods.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2010, revenue in the United States was $122,000 which represented 46% of total revenue for the period. For more detail on geographic breakdown, see Note O of Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

Cost of goods sold was $31,000 and $58,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $42,000 and $61,000 for the comparable prior year periods, representing a decrease of 26.2% or $11,000 for the three month period and a decrease of 4.9% or $3,000. The decrease in cost of goods sold for the three and six month periods is mainly attributable to a charge of $28,000 in the prior year for a failed inventory production lot which was partially offset by higher current year sales.

 Cost of goods sold reflects raw material costs and the cost of processing and packaging REPEL-CV into saleable form.

We incurred research and development expenses of $247,000 and $484,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $328,000 and $667,000 for the comparable prior year periods, a decrease of 24.7% or $81,000 for the three month period and a decrease of 27.4% or $183,000 for the six month period. The decrease for the three month period is primarily attributable to reductions of $55,000 in new product development program costs and lower regulatory costs of $27,000 due to higher costs associated with FDA discussions during the prior year. The decrease for the six month period is mainly attributable to reductions of $99,000 in new product development program costs and lower regulatory costs of $89,000 similar to the three month reduction. We have suspended funding of all product development and clinical development programs as a means of conserving cash.

General and administrative expenses totaled $268,000 and $752,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $401,000 and $833,000 for the comparable prior year periods, a decrease of 33.2% or $133,000 for the three month period and a decrease of 9.7% or $81,000 for the six month period. The decrease for the three month period is mainly attributable to lower stock-based compensation of $88,000, reduced legal fees of $29,000 and lower investor relations expense of $15,000. The decrease for the six month period is primarily attributable to reductions in legal fees of $56,000, depreciation expense of $23,000, investor relations expense of $18,000 and bad debt expense of $10,000, partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation of $31,000.

We incurred sales and marketing expenses of $187,000 and $392,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $500,000 and $781,000 for the comparable prior year periods, a decrease of 62.6% or $313,000 for the three month period and a decrease of 49.8% or $389,000 for the six month period.  The decrease for the three month period is primarily attributable to reductions in compensation-related expenses of $178,000, consulting fees of $52,000, recruiting expenses of $46,000, travel expenses of $36,000 and training expenses of $28,000, partially offset by increases in royalty expense of $58,000 and sales commissions of $16,000. The decrease for the six month period is primarily attributable to reductions in compensation-related expenses of $295,000, consulting fees of $91,000, recruiting expenses of $46,000, travel expenses of $28,000 and  training expenses of $31,000, partially offset by increases in royalty expense of $118,000 and sales commissions of $34,000.

13

Interest income totaled $1,000 and $2,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $5,000 and $19,000 for the comparable prior year periods, a decrease of 80% or $4,000 for the three month period and a decrease of 89.5% or $17,000 for the six month period. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower average cash balances.

We recorded an income tax benefit of $433,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This amount was attributable to the receipt of funds associated with the sale of certain accumulated New Jersey State tax operating losses. There was no comparable amount for 2009.

Our net loss was $600,000 and $989,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1,177,000 and $2,164,000 for the comparable prior year periods, a decrease of 49% or $577,000 for the three month period and a decrease of 54.3% or $1,175,000 for the six month period. The decrease is primarily attributable to the factors mentioned above. We expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $253,000, compared to $917,000 at June 30, 2009.

At June 30, 2010, we had working capital of $64,000, compared to $1,020,000 at June 30, 2009.

Net cash used in operating activities was $660,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1,981,000 for the comparable prior year period.  Net cash used in operating activities for the current year period was primarily comprised of a net loss of $989,000, a decrease of $18,000 in accounts payable and an increase of $47,000 in accounts receivable, partially offset by decreases totaling $108,000 in inventory and prepaid expenses, an increase in accrued expenses of $49,000 and the impact of $237,000 in non-cash charges, primarily for stock-based compensation and depreciation expenses. Net cash used in operating activities for the prior year period was primarily comprised of a net loss of $2,164,000, an increase in accounts receivable of $60,000 and decreases of $167,000 in accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by the impact of $345,000 in such non-cash expenses as stock-based compensation and depreciation, and decreases totaling $65,000 in inventory and prepaid expenses.

Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $50,000 compared to $46,000 for the prior year period. The current year amount was comprised of $50,000 in payments of an insurance note payable for the financing of our product liability and directors and officers insurance premiums; the prior year amount was comprised of $56,000 in payments of an insurance note payable for the financing of our product liability and directors and officers insurance premiums partially offset by proceeds of $10,000 from the exercise of stock options. (See Note F of Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.)

Our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with anticipated revenue from operations, is not sufficient to fund our planned operations through September 30, 2010.  As a result, the Company, with the assistance of an investment banking firm, is pursuing strategic transactions to generate cash including the sale of its assets. Insufficient funds have required the Company to delay, scale back or eliminate some of its operations including research and development programs and certain commercialization activities and will require the Company to license or sell to third parties certain products or technologies that management would otherwise seek to commercialize independently. No assurance can be given that additional financing through strategic transactions will be available on acceptable terms or at all. In the absence of additional cash infusion, the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm contained in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, also contains an explanatory paragraph referring to an uncertainty concerning our ability to continue as a going concern.

At June 30, 2010, the Company had employment agreements with four individuals that expire as follows: two in September 2010, one in March 2011 and one in October 2012. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company’s commitment regarding cash severance benefits aggregates $542,000 at June 30, 2010. The Company has also entered into change of control agreements with its two executive officers pursuant to which, upon the occurrence of events described therein, the Company could become obligated, in addition to certain other benefits, to pay either 150% or 200%, depending on the executive, of each such executive’s annual base salary plus the greater of the prior year’s cash bonus or current year’s target bonus.  Any severance payments under the employment agreements would offset amounts required to be paid under the change of control agreements.

14

Item 4T.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer who is also our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating  the effectiveness of our  "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(e); collectively, “Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the  "Evaluation  Date") has concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our Disclosure Controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and that material information relating to our company and any consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

In connection  with the  evaluation referred to in the foregoing paragraph, we have  identified no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer who is the same person, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Our non-employee directors are entitled to cash compensation for their service as directors, payable quarterly.  In accordance with cash conserving measures adopted by our Board of Directors that stipulates that such quarterly cash compensation would be paid in shares, effective June 30, 2010 we granted an aggregate of 227,274 shares of common stock to our non-employee directors in full satisfaction of $25,000 in aggregate board fees otherwise payable at that time in cash to such directors and attributable to the second quarter of 2010.  The shares were valued at fair market value on June 30, 2010, the last trading day of the quarter, as reflected in the closing price on that day.  In prior quarters, such compensation was payable 65% in shares and the balance in cash. Commencing with the second quarter, the full amount of such compensation is payable in shares to further conserve cash.  The transactions were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) thereunder.

15

Item 6.  Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURE

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SyntheMed, Inc.
By:	/s/ Robert P. Hickey
Robert P. Hickey
President, CEO and CFO
Dated:  August 11, 2010

EXHIBIT INDEX

ITEM

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

16