(d)(1) The costs of the proceedings, including reasonable compensation and expenses of the appraisers, shall be set by the court and assessed against the successor. However, the court may direct the costs to be apportioned and assessed against any objecting stockholder if the court finds that the failure of the stockholder to accept an offer for the stock made under § 3-207 of this subtitle was arbitrary and vexatious or not in good faith. In making this finding, the court shall consider:
(e) The judgment is final and conclusive on all parties and has the same force and effect as other decrees in equity. The judgment constitutes a lien on the assets of the successor with priority over any mortgage or other lien attaching on or after the effective date of the consolidation, merger, transfer, or charter amendment.
The successor is not required to pay for the stock of an objecting stockholder or to pay a judgment rendered against it in a proceeding for an appraisal unless, simultaneously with payment:
(a) A successor which acquires the stock of an objecting stockholder is entitled to any dividends or distributions payable to holders of record of that stock on a record date after the close of business on the day as at which fair value is to be determined under § 3-202 of this subtitle.
(b) After acquiring the stock of an objecting stockholder, a successor in a transfer of assets may exercise all the rights of an owner of the stock.
(c) Unless the articles provide otherwise, stock in the successor of a consolidation, merger, or share exchange otherwise deliverable in exchange for the stock of an objecting stockholder has the status of authorized but unissued stock of the successor. However, a proceeding for reduction of the capital of the successor is not necessary to retire the stock or to reduce the capital of the successor represented by the stock.
Appendix D
Form 10-KSB
FORM 10-KSB
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
Commission File Number: 0-20990
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland 52-1786341
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
25 West Fayette Street 21201
Baltimore, Maryland (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive officer)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (410) 528-1800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
(Title of Class)
Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. |_|
Check whether the issuer (1 filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes |X| No |_|
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes |_| No |X|
Issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year:
As of March 3, 2006, the registrant had 675,579 shares of Common Stock issued
and outstanding, including 33,795 non-voting shares. The aggregate market value
of shares held by nonaffiliates on such date was $12,060,050 based on the
average of the bid and asked price of $25.00 per share of the Registrant's
Common Stock on that date. For purposes of this calculation, it is assumed that
the 193,177 shares held by directors and executive officers of the Registrant,
are shares held by affiliates.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: Portions of the Registrant's Annual Report
to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Transitional small business disclosure format (check one): Yes |_| No |X|
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-KSB
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Description of Business.....................................................................1
Item 2. Description of Property....................................................................18
Item 3. Legal Proceedings..........................................................................18
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........................................18
PART II
Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters...................................19
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations......20
Item 7. Financial Statements.......................................................................27
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.......56
Item 8A. Controls and Procedures...................................................................56
Item 8B. Other Information.........................................................................56
PART III
Item 9. Directors, and Executive Officers and Control Persons; Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act........................................................56
Item 10. Executive Compensation....................................................................60
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters...............................................................63
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions............................................64
Item 13. Exhibits..................................................................................64
Item 15. Principal Accountant Fees and Services....................................................65
SIGNATURES.........................................................................................66
EXHIBITS
ii
PART I
Forward Looking Statements
Harbor Bankshares Corporation (the "Corporation") makes forward-looking
statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB that are subject to risks and
uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include: statements of the
Corporation's goals, intentions, and expectations; estimates of risks and of
future costs and benefits; expectations regarding future financial performance
of the Corporation; assessments of loan quality, probable loan losses, and the
amount and timing of loan payoffs; liquidity, contractual obligations,
off-balance sheet risk, and market or interest rate risk; and statements of the
Corporation's ability to achieve financial and other goals. These
forward-looking statements are subject to significant uncertainties because they
are based upon: the amount and timing of future changes in interest rates,
market behavior, and other economic conditions; future laws, regulations and
accounting principles; and a variety of other matters. Because of these
uncertainties, the actual future results may be materially different from the
results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, the
Corporation's past growth and performance do not necessarily indicate its future
results.
Item 1. Description of Business
Harbor Bankshares Corporation
Harbor Bankshares Corporation (the "Corporation") is a bank holding
company with one bank subsidiary and two Community Development financial
subsidiaries, one for profit, The Harbor Bank of Baltimore LLC and a non-profit,
The Harbor Bank CDC. Both were established during 2002. The Corporation has no
investment in either subsidiary as of December 31, 2004. The Corporation was
organized under the laws of the State of Maryland in 1992. On November 2, 1992,
Harbor Bankshares Corporation acquired all outstanding stock of The Harbor Bank
of Maryland (the "Bank"), headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.
The Harbor Bank of Maryland
The Bank is a Maryland chartered commercial bank headquartered in
Baltimore, Maryland. The Bank was opened on September 13, 1982. The deposits of
the Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The Bank conducts general banking business in seven (7) locations and
serves primarily the Baltimore Metropolitan area. It offers checking, savings
and time deposits, commercial, real estate, personal, home improvement,
automobile and other installment loans, credit cards and term loans. The Bank is
also a member of a local and national ATM network. The retail nature of the Bank
allows for diversification of deposits and borrowers so it is not dependent upon
a single or a few customers.
Harbor Financial Services, a company dealing with the sale of mutual
funds, stocks, insurance, etc., was established as a subsidiary of the Bank
during May 1997 in order to compete with that expanding market.
Competition
The Corporation's subsidiary, The Harbor Bank of Maryland, competes
with virtually all banks and savings institutions that offer services in its
market area. The Bank directly competes with branches of most of the State's
largest banks, each of which has greater financial and other resources to
conduct large advertising campaigns and to allocate their investment assets to
regions of higher yield and demand. To attract business in this competitive
environment, the Bank relies heavily on local promotional activities and
personal contact by its officers and directors and by its ability to provide
personalized services.
Supervision and Regulation
Following is a brief summary of certain statutes and regulations that
significantly affect the Corporation and the Bank. A number of other statutes
and regulations affect the Corporation and the Bank but are not summarized
below.
Bank Holding Company Regulation. The Corporation is registered as a
bank holding company under the Holding Company Act and, as such, is subject to
supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (the "Federal Reserve"). As a bank holding company, the Corporation is
required to furnish to the Federal Reserve regular reports of its operations and
additional information and reports. The Corporation is also subject to regular
examination by the Federal Reserve.
1
Under the Holding Company Act, a bank holding company must obtain the
prior approval of the Federal Reserve before (1) acquiring direct or indirect
ownership or control of any class of voting securities of any bank or bank
holding company if, after the acquisition, the bank holding company would
directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of the class; (2) acquiring
all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company;
or (3) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.
Under the Holding Company Act, any company must obtain approval of the
Federal Reserve prior to acquiring control of the Corporation or the Bank. For
purposes of the Holding Company Act, "control" is defined as ownership of 25% or
more of any class of voting securities of the Corporation or the Bank, the
ability to control the election of a majority of the directors, or the exercise
of a controlling influence over management or policies of the Corporation or the
Bank.
The Change in Bank Control Act and the related regulations of the
Federal Reserve require any person or persons acting in concert (except for
companies required to make application under the Holding Company Act), to file a
written notice with the Federal Reserve before the person or persons acquire
control of the Corporation or the Bank. The Change in Bank Control Act defines
"control" as the direct or indirect power to vote 25% or more of any class of
voting securities or to direct the management or policies of a bank holding
company or an insured bank.
The Holding Company Act also limits the investments and activities of
bank holding companies. In general, a bank holding company is prohibited from
acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting
shares of a company that is not a bank or a bank holding company or from
engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking,
managing or controlling banks, providing services for its subsidiaries, non-bank
activities that are closely related to banking, and other financially related
activities. The activities of the Corporation are subject to these legal and
regulatory limitations under the Holding Company Act and Federal Reserve
regulations.
In general, bank holding companies that qualify as financial holding
companies under federal banking law may engage in an expanded list of non-bank
activities. Non-bank and financially related activities of bank holding
companies, including companies that become financial holding companies, also may
be subject to regulation and oversight by regulators other than the Federal
Reserve.
The Federal Reserve has the power to order a holding company or its
subsidiaries to terminate any activity, or to terminate its ownership or control
of any subsidiary, when it has reasonable cause to believe that the continuation
of such activity or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the
financial safety, soundness, or stability of any bank subsidiary of that holding
company.
The Federal Reserve has adopted guidelines regarding the capital
adequacy of bank holding companies, which require bank holding companies to
maintain specified minimum ratios of capital to total assets and capital to
risk-weighted assets. See "Regulatory Capital Requirements."
The Federal Reserve has the power to prohibit dividends by bank holding
companies if their actions constitute unsafe or unsound practices. The Federal
Reserve has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank
holding companies, which expresses the Federal Reserve's view that a bank
holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the company's
net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and
a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the company's capital
needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition.
Bank Regulation. The Bank is subject to supervision by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (`FDIC") and the State of Maryland. Deposits of
the Bank are insured by the FDIC to the legal maximum of $100,000 for each
insured depositor. Deposits, reserves, investments, loans, consumer law
compliance, issuance of securities, payment of dividends, establishment of
branches, mergers and acquisitions, corporate activities, changes in control,
electronic funds transfers, responsiveness to community needs, management
practices, compensation policies, and other aspects of operations are subject to
regulation by the appropriate federal and state supervisory authorities. In
addition, the Bank is subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and
regulations which set forth specific restrictions and procedural requirements
with respect to extensions of credit (including to insiders), credit practices,
disclosure of credit terms and discrimination in credit transactions.
The FDIC regularly examines the operations and condition of the Bank,
including, but not limited to, its capital adequacy, reserves, loans,
investments, and management practices. These examinations are for the protection
of the Bank's depositors and the FDIC's insurance fund. In addition, the Bank is
required to furnish quarterly and annual reports to the FDIC. The FDIC's
enforcement authority includes the power to remove officers and directors and
the authority to issue cease-and-desist orders to prevent a bank from engaging
in unsafe or unsound practices or violating laws or regulations governing its
business.
The FDIC has adopted regulations regarding the capital adequacy, which
require FDIC supervised banks to maintain specified minimum ratios of capital to
total assets and capital to risk-weighted assets. See "Regulatory Capital
Requirements." Regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank may pay
to the Corporation. See Note 15 "Regulatory Matters" on page 22 of the Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements section of the Corporation's Annual Report to
Shareholders.
2
The Bank is subject to restrictions under federal law which limit the
transfer of funds by the Bank to the Corporation and its non-banking
subsidiaries, whether in the form of loans, extensions of credit, investments,
asset purchases, or otherwise. Such transfers by the Bank to the Corporation or
any of the Corporation 's non-banking subsidiaries are limited in amount to 10%
of the Bank's capital and surplus and, with respect to the Corporation and all
such non-banking subsidiaries, to an aggregate of 20% of the Bank's capital and
surplus. Furthermore, such loans and extensions of credit are required to be
secured in specified amounts.
The Bank is subject to restrictions imposed by federal law on
extensions of credit to, and certain other transactions with, the Corporation
and other affiliates, and on investments in their stock or other securities.
These restrictions prevent the Corporation and the Bank's other affiliates from
borrowing from the Bank unless the loans are secured by specified collateral,
and require those transactions to have terms comparable to terms of arms-length
transactions with third persons. In addition, secured loans and other
transactions and investments by the Bank are generally limited in amount as to
the Corporation and as to any other affiliate to 10% of the Bank's capital and
surplus and as to the Corporation and all other affiliates together to an
aggregate of 20% of the Bank's capital and surplus. Certain exemptions to these
limitations apply to extensions of credit and other transactions between the
Bank and its subsidiaries. These regulations and restrictions may limit the
Corporation's ability to obtain funds from the Bank for its cash needs,
including funds for acquisitions and for payment of dividends, interest, and
operating expenses.
Under Federal bank regulations, banks must adopt and maintain written
policies that establish appropriate limits and standards for extensions of
credit secured by liens or interests in real estate or are made for the purpose
of financing permanent improvements to real estate. These policies must
establish loan portfolio diversification standards; prudent underwriting
standards, including loan-to-value limits, that are clear and measurable; loan
administration procedures; and documentation, approval, and reporting
requirements. A bank's real estate lending policy must reflect consideration of
the Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate Lending Policies (the "Interagency
Guidelines") adopted by the federal bank regulators. The Interagency Guidelines,
among other things, call for internal loan-to-value limits for real estate loans
that are not in excess of the limits specified in the Guidelines. The
Interagency Guidelines state, however, that it may be appropriate in individual
cases to originate or purchase loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of the
supervisory loan-to-value limits.
The FDIC has established a risk-based deposit insurance premium
assessment system for insured depository institutions. Under the system, the
assessment rate for an insured depository institution depends on the assessment
risk classification assigned to the institution by the FDIC, based upon the
institution's capital level and supervisory evaluations. Institutions are
assigned to one of three capital groups -- well-capitalized, adequately
capitalized, or undercapitalized -- based on the data reported to regulators.
Well-capitalized institutions are institutions satisfying the following capital
ratio standards: (i) total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater; (ii) Tier
1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater; and (iii) Tier 1 leverage ratio of
5% or greater. Adequately capitalized institutions are institutions that do not
meet the standards for well-capitalized institutions but that satisfy the
following capital ratio standards: (i) total risk-based capital ratio of 8% or
greater; (ii) Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4% or greater; and (iii) Tier 1
leverage ratio of 4% or greater. Institutions that do not qualify as either
well-capitalized or adequately capitalized are deemed to be undercapitalized.
Within each capital group, institutions are assigned to one of three subgroups
on the basis of supervisory evaluations by the institution's primary supervisory
authority and such other information as the FDIC determines to be relevant to
the institution's financial condition and the risk it poses to the deposit
insurance fund. Subgroup A consists of financially sound institutions with only
a few minor weaknesses. Subgroup B consists of institutions with demonstrated
weaknesses that, if not corrected, could result in significant deterioration of
the institution and increased risk of loss to the deposit insurance fund.
Subgroup C consists of institutions that pose a substantial probability of loss
to the deposit insurance fund unless effective corrective action is taken.
Deposit insurance rates may be increased during 2006 or later years.
Regulatory Capital Requirements. The Federal bank regulators have
established guidelines for maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by bank
holding companies and banks. The regulations impose two sets of capital adequacy
requirements: minimum leverage rules, which require bank holding companies and
banks to maintain a specified minimum ratio of capital to total assets, and
risk-based capital rules, which require the maintenance of specified minimum
ratios of capital to "risk-weighted" assets.
The regulations require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a
minimum leverage ratio of "Tier 1 capital" (as defined in the risk-based capital
guidelines discussed in the following paragraphs) to total assets of 3.0%. The
capital regulations state, however, that only the strongest bank holding
companies and banks, with composite examination ratings of 1 under the rating
system used by the federal bank regulators, would be permitted to operate at or
near this minimum level of capital. All other bank holding companies and banks
are expected to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 1% to 2% above the minimum
ratio, depending on the assessment of an individual organization's capital
adequacy by its primary regulator. A bank or bank holding company experiencing
or anticipating significant growth is expected to maintain capital well above
the minimum levels. In addition, the bank regulators have indicated that they
also may consider the level of an organization's ratio of tangible Tier 1
capital (after deducting all intangibles) to total assets in making an overall
assessment of capital.
3
The risk-based capital rules require bank holding companies and member
banks to maintain minimum regulatory capital levels based upon a weighting of
their assets and off-balance sheet obligations according to risk. The risk-based
capital rules have two basic components: a core capital (Tier 1) requirement and
a supplementary capital (Tier 2) requirement. Core capital consists primarily of
common stockholders' equity, certain perpetual preferred stock (noncumulative
perpetual preferred stock with respect to banks), and minority interests in the
equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries; less all intangible assets, except
for certain mortgage servicing rights and purchased credit card relationships.
Supplementary capital elements include, subject to certain limitations, the
allowance for losses on loans and leases; perpetual preferred stock that does
not qualify as Tier 1 capital; long-term preferred stock with an original
maturity of at least 20 years from issuance; hybrid capital instruments,
including perpetual debt and mandatory convertible securities; subordinated
debt, intermediate-term preferred stock, and up to 45% of pre-tax net unrealized
gains on available-for-sale equity securities.
In 2003, the Corporation, through its subsidiary, Harbor Bankshares
Corporation Capital Trust, issued $7.2 million in trust preferred securities in
a private placement. These securities are shown as junior subordinated
debentures on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Corporation. These trust
preferred securities issued are believed to meet the Federal Reserve's
regulatory criteria for Tier 1 capital, subject to Federal Reserve guidelines
that limit the amount of trust preferred securities (and any cumulative
perpetual preferred stock) that may be included in Tier 1 capital to an
aggregate of 25% of Tier 1 capital. Any excess may be included as supplementary
capital. See Note 12 "Junior Subordinated Debentures" on page 20 of the Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements section of the Corporation's Annual Report to
Shareholders.
The risk-based capital regulations assign balance sheet assets and
credit equivalent amounts of off-balance sheet obligations to one of four broad
risk categories based principally on the degree of credit risk associated with
the obligor. The assets and off-balance sheet items in the four risk categories
are weighted at 0%, 20%, 50% and 100%. These computations result in the total
risk-weighted assets.
The risk-based capital regulations require all commercial banks and
bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to total
risk-weighted assets of 8%, with at least 4% as core capital. For the purpose of
calculating these ratios: (i) supplementary capital is limited to no more than
100% of core capital; and (ii) the aggregate amount of certain types of
supplementary capital is limited. In addition, the risk-based capital
regulations limit the allowance for credit losses that may be included in
capital to 1.25% of total risk-weighted assets.
The federal bank regulatory agencies have established a joint policy
regarding the evaluation of commercial banks' capital adequacy for interest rate
risk. Under the policy, the Federal Reserve's assessment of a bank's capital
adequacy includes an assessment of the bank's exposure to adverse changes in
interest rates. The Federal Reserve has determined to rely on its examination
process for such evaluations rather than on standardized measurement systems or
formulas. The Federal Reserve may require banks that are found to have a high
level of interest rate risk exposure or weak interest rate risk management
systems to take corrective actions. Management believes its interest rate risk
management systems and its capital relative to its interest rate risk are
adequate.
Federal banking regulations also require banks with significant trading
assets or liabilities to maintain supplemental risk-based capital based upon
their levels of market risk. The Bank did not have significant levels of trading
assets or liabilities during 2004, and was not required to maintain such
supplemental capital.
Well-capitalized institutions are not subject to limitations on
brokered deposits, while an adequately capitalized institution is able to
accept, renew, or rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC
and subject to certain restrictions on the yield paid on such deposits.
Undercapitalized institutions are not permitted to accept brokered deposits.
The Federal bank regulators have established regulations that classify
banks by capital levels and provide for the Federal Reserve to take various
"prompt corrective actions" to resolve the problems of any bank that fails to
satisfy the capital standards. Under these regulations, a well-capitalized bank
is one that is not subject to any regulatory order or directive to meet any
specific capital level and that has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or
more, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or more, and a leverage ratio of
5% or more. An adequately capitalized bank is one that does not qualify as
well-capitalized but meets or exceeds the following capital requirements: a
total risk-based capital ratio of 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4%,
and a leverage ratio of either (i) 4% or (ii) 3% if the bank has the highest
composite examination rating. A bank that does not meet these standards is
categorized as undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically
undercapitalized, depending on its capital levels. A bank that falls within any
of the three undercapitalized categories established by the prompt corrective
action regulation is subject to severe regulatory sanctions. As of December 31,
2005, the Bank was well-capitalized as defined in the regulations.
4
For information regarding the Corporation's and the Bank's compliance
with their respective regulatory capital requirements, see note 16 "Regulatory
Matters" on page 22 of the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements section of
the Corporation's Annual Report to Shareholders.
Community Reinvestment
Under the Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA"), a financial institution
has a continuing and affirmative obligation to help meet the credit needs of its
entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does
not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial
institutions, or limit an institution's discretion to develop the types of
products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular
community. However, institutions are rated on their performance in meeting the
needs of their communities. Performance is tested in three areas: (a) lending,
to evaluate the institution's record of making loans in its assessment areas;
(b) investment, to evaluate the institution's record of investing in community
development projects, affordable housing, and programs benefiting low or
moderate income individuals and business; and (c) service, to evaluate the
institution's delivery of services through its branches, ATMs and other offices.
The CRA requires each federal banking agency, in connection with its examination
of a financial institution, to assess and assign one of four ratings to the
institution's record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take
such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by the
institution, including applications for charters, branches and other deposit
facilities, relocations, mergers, consolidations, acquisitions of assets or
assumptions of liabilities, and savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
The CRA also requires that all institutions make public disclosure of their CRA
ratings. The Bank was assigned an "outstanding" rating as a result of its last
CRA examination.
Bank Secrecy Act
Under the Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA"), a financial institution is required to have
systems in place to detect certain transactions, based on the size and nature of
the transaction. Financial institutions are generally required to report cash
transactions involving more than $10,000 to the United States Treasury. In
addition, financial institutions are required to file suspicious activity
reports for transactions that involve more than $5,000 and which the financial
institution knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect involves illegal funds, is
designed to evade the requirements of the BSA, or has no lawful purpose. The
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to
Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act, commonly referred to as the "USA Patriot
Act" or the "Patriot Act", enacted in response to the September 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks, enacted prohibitions against specified financial transactions
and account relationships, as well as enhanced due diligence standards intended
to prevent the use of the United States financial system for money laundering
and terrorist financing activities. The Patriot Act requires banks and other
depository institutions, brokers, dealers and certain other businesses involved
in the transfer of money to establish anti-money laundering programs, including
employee training and independent audit requirements meeting minimum standards
specified by the act, to follow standards for customer identification and
maintenance of customer identification records, and to compare customer lists
against lists of suspected terrorists, terrorist organizations and money
launderers. The Patriot Act also requires federal bank regulators to evaluate
the effectiveness of an applicant in combating money laundering in determining
whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition... On May 18, 2005, the Bank
executed a memorandum of understanding with the FDIC and the Maryland
Commissioner of Financial Regulation, in which it agreed to take certain steps
to improve its Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering compliance programs,
including independent testing of compliance. Management believes that the Bank
is fully in compliance with the terms of the memorandum.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley") established a broad range of
corporate governance and accounting measures intended to increase corporate
responsibility and protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability
of disclosures under federal securities laws. The Corporation is subject to
Sarbanes-Oxley because it is required to file periodic reports with the SEC
under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Among other things,
Sarbanes-Oxley, its implementing regulations have established new membership
requirements and additional responsibilities for the Corporation's audit
committee, imposed restrictions on the relationship between the Corporation and
its outside auditors (including restrictions on the types of non-audit services
our auditors may provide to us), imposed additional financial statement
certification responsibilities for the Company's chief executive officer and
chief financial officer, expanded the disclosure requirements for corporate
insiders, and require management to evaluate the Corporation's disclosure
controls and procedures and report material changes in the Corporation's
internal control over financial reporting. Under current regulations, in future
periods, Sarbanes-Oxley will require the management to evaluate the
Corporation's internal control over financial reporting and will require
Corporation's auditors to issue a report on the Corporation's internal control
over financial reporting.
5
Other Laws and Regulations
Some of the aspects of the lending and deposit business of the Bank that are
subject to regulation by the FDIC include reserve requirements and disclosure
requirements in connection with personal and mortgage loans and deposit
accounts. In addition, the Bank is subject to numerous federal and state laws
and regulations that include specific restrictions and procedural requirements
with respect to the establishment of branches, investments, interest rates on
loans, credit practices, the disclosure of credit terms, and discrimination in
credit transactions.
Enforcement Actions
Federal statutes and regulations provide financial institution regulatory
agencies with great flexibility to undertake an enforcement action against an
institution that fails to comply with regulatory requirements. Possible
enforcement actions range from the imposition of a capital plan and capital
directive to civil money penalties, cease and desist orders, receivership,
conservatorship, or the termination of deposit insurance.
Governmental Monetary Policies and Economic Controls
The earnings and growth of the banking industry and ultimately of The
Harbor Bank of Maryland, Harbor Bankshares Corporation's sole subsidiary, are
affected by the credit policies of monetary authorities including the Federal
Reserve System. An important function of the Federal Reserve System is to
regulate the national supply of bank credit in order to control recessionary and
inflationary pressures. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the
Federal Reserve to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S.
Government securities, changes in the discount rate of member bank borrowings,
and changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These means
are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth of bank loans and
investments and deposits, and may also affect interest rates charged on loans or
paid for deposits. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve authorities have
had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the
past and are expected to continue to have such an effect in the future.
In view of changing conditions in the national economy and in the money
markets, as well as the effect of actions by monetary and fiscal authorities,
including the Federal Reserve System, no prediction can be made as to possible
future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, and loan demand, or their
effect on the business and earnings of the Corporation and its subsidiary.
6
Employees
At December 31, 2005, Harbor Bankshares Corporation and its
subsidiaries employed 77 individuals, of which 27 were officers and 50 were
full-time employees.
Executive Officers
Information concerning executive officers of the Corporation is listed
below:
Age Position
Joseph Haskins, Jr. 58 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Bank and Corporation
John Paterakis 77 Chairman of the Executive Committee of the
Corporation and the Bank
Teodoro J. Hernandez 60 Treasurer of the Corporation and Senior Vice
President and Cashier of the Bank
Each of the executive officer has been employed in his current capacity
for more than five years.
7
Tabular Information
The information in this description of business should be read in
conjunction with the information provided in the Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Operations, which is incorporated herein
from the Annual Report...
Consolidated Five-Years Selected Financial Data
(In thousands, except per share data)
Year ended December 31,
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
OPERATING DATA
Interest Income $15,014 $12,648 $11,886 $11,647 $13,609
Interest Expense 3,787 2,283 2,411 3,402 5,973
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net Interest Income 11,227 10,365 9,475 8,245 7,636
Provision for Loan Losses 410 360 755 340 400
Non-Interest Income 1,771 1,514 2,506 2,220 2,329
Non-Interest Expenses 9,638 9,295 8,610 8,575 8,526
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income Before Taxes 2,950 2,224 2,616 1,550 1,039
Income Taxes 1,067 762 831 473 309
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net Income $ 1,883 $ 1,462 $ 1,785 $ 1,077 $ 730
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
PER SHARE DATA
Net Income - Basic $2.73 $2.07 $2.46 $1.47 $1.02
Net Income - Diluted 2.55 1.93 2.36 1.43 0.99
Cash and Stock Dividends 0.40 0.35 0.25 0.25 --
Book Value $24.73 $23.04 $21.69 $19.23 $16.72
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Total Assets $256,636 $235,464 $219,547 $210,234 $186,586
Deposits 229,845 210,224 195,901 193,294 171,531
Total Net Loans 188,936 172,205 149,729 120,523 105,847
Total Stockholder's Equity 16,954 16,240 15,274 14,149 12,241
Return on Average Assets 0.78% 0.63% 0.84% 0.54% 0.37%
Return on Average Equity 11.57% 9.33% 12.23% 8.20% 6.20%
Tier 1 Regulatory Capital to Average Assets 7.31% 7.36% 7.46% 5.20% 5.40%
Average Equity to Average Assets 6.74% 7.27% 6.48% 5.24% 4.77%
Dividend Paid to
Diluted Net Income 15.69% 18.13% 10.59% 17.48% --
8
Average Balances, Yields/Rates and Income/Expense
Years ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003
Average Yields/ Income Average Yields/ Income Average Yields/ Income
Balances Rates Expense Balances Rates Expense Balances Rates Expense
-------- ----- ------- -------- ----- ------- -------- ----- -------
ASSETS
U. S. Treasury Securities $ -- --% $ -- $ 836 3.11% $ 26 $ 3,048 2.79% $ 85
U.S. Government Agencies 27,230 3.11 848 35,824 3.08 1,104 39,878 3.39 1,354
Interest-Bearing Deposits
with Other Banks 562 3.20 18 1,510 2.91 44 2,100 3.24 68
FHLB Stock and Other
Securities 507 4.14 21 550 3.82 21 1,051 3.61 38
Federal Funds Sold 6,440 3.35 216 7,776 1.21 94 9,397 1.03 97
-------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------
34,739 3.18% 1,103 46,496 2.77% 1,289 55,474 2.96% 1,642
-------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------
Loans
Commercial Loans 75,390 8.70 6,556 64,090 7.37 4,725 44,887 7.03 3,156
Real Estate Loans 102,932 6.67 6,863 91,544 6.68 6,113 85,226 7.16 6,102
Consumer Loans 6,052 8.11 491 8,032 6.49 521 10,263 9.61 986
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- -------
Loans Net of Unearned Income 184,374 7.54 13,910 163,666 6.94 11,359 140,376 7.30 10,244
------- -------- ------- -------- -------
Total Earning Assets 219,113 6.85% $15,013 210,162 6.02% $12,648 195,850 6.07% $11,886
======= ======= =======
Allowance for Possible Losses (2,059) (1,543) (1,488)
Other Assets 24,183 23,461 18,909
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS $241,237 $232,080 $213,271
======== ======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
Non-Interest Bearing Deposits $ 47,933 --% $ -- $ 40,646 --% $ -- $ 31,641 --% $ --
Interest-Bearing Transaction
Accounts 26,020 .22 57 24,370 .18 43 23,515 .16 38
Savings 81,048 1.74 1,409 85,059 .79 670 84,715 .82 696
Time - $100,000 or more 28,268 2.35 664 22,627 2.02 456 25,172 2.63 662
Other Time 32,208 3.70 1,192 34,968 2.24 782 29,831 2.81 840
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- -------
Savings and Time Deposits 167,544 1.98% 3,322 167,024 1.17% 1,951 163,233 1.37% 2,236
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL Deposits 215,477 207,670 194,874
Junior Subordinated
Debentures 7,217 6.15% 444 7,217 4.41% 318 1,611 4.40% 71
Other Borrowed Money 611 3.44 21 720 1.94 14 -- -- --
Notes payable -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,310 7.00 104
Other Liabilities 1,661 795 871
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL Liabilities 224,966 2.15% $ 3,787 216,402 1.30% $ 2,283 198,666 1.45% $ 2,411
======= ======= =======
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 16,271 15,678 14,605
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $241,237 $232,080 $213,271
======== ======== ========
Net Yield on Interest
Earning Assets 4.70% 4.72% 4.62%
Benefit of Non-Interest
Bearing Funds .45% .25% .22%
Net Interest Margin 5.15% 4.97% 4.84%
Nonaccrual loans are included in the
appropriate loan categories, above.
9
Interest Variance Analysis
(dollars in thousands)
2005 Compared to 2004 2004 Compared to 2003
Increase (Decrease) Due to: Increase (Decrease) Due to:
--------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Volume Rate Net Volume Rate Net
------ ---- --- ------ ---- ---
INTEREST INCOME
Loans $ 1,437 $ 1,114 $ 2,551 $ 1,700 $ (585) $ 1,115
Investment Securities (266) (16) (282) (227) (99) (326)
Federal Funds Sold (16) 138 122 (17) 14 (3)
Other Interest Bearing Assets (1) (25) -- (25) (21) (3) (24)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL Interest Income $ 1,130 $ 1,236 $ 2,366 $ 1,435 $ (673) $ 762
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest-Bearing Transaction
Accounts $ 3 $ 11 $ 14 $ 1 $ 4 $ 5
Savings (32) 771 739 3 (29) (26)
Time - $100,000 or more 114 94 208 (67) (139) (206)
Other Time (62) 472 410 144 (202) (58)
Other Borrowed Money (2) 9 7 14 -- 14
Subordinate Debentures -- 126 126 246 2 248
Notes Payable -- -- -- (104) -- (104)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL Interest Expense $ 21 $ 1,483 $ 1,504 $ 237 $ (364) $ (127)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
NET INTEREST INCOME $ 1,108 $ (247) $ 862 $ 1,198 $ (309) $ 889
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Note: Loan fees, which were included in interest income, were $981 in 2005,
$1,024 in 2004, and $814 in 2003. A change in Rate/Volume has been
allocated to the change in rate.
(1) Certificates of Deposit with other financial institutions.
Maturity Distribution of Investment Securities (dollars in thousands)
- ----------------------------------------------
U.S Treasuries U.S Agencies Other Securities TOTAL
-------------- ------------ ---------------- -----
Maturing Within One Year $ -- $ 2,438 $ -- $ 2,438
Maturing After One But Within Five Years -- 23,544 -- 23,544
Maturing After Five But Within Ten Years -- -- -- --
Maturing After Ten Years -- 135 30 165
------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL $ -- $26,117 $ 30 $26,147
======= ======= ======= =======
10
Weighted Average Interest Rates of Investment Securities at December 31, 2005
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S Government Other
U.S Treasuries Agencies Securities TOTAL
-------------- -------- ---------- -----
Maturing Within One Year --% 2.22% --% 2.22%
Maturing After One But Within Five Years --% 3.07% --% 3.07%
Maturing After Five But Within Ten Years --% --% --% --%
Maturing After Ten Years --% 5.15% 7.25% 6.20%
TOTAL --% 3.48% 7.25% 3.83%
Amortized cost and the fair value of Investment Securities at 2005 , 2004
and 2003 (dollars in thousands)
- -------------------------------
2005 2004 2003
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
Amortized Fair Amortized Fair Amortized Fair
Cost Value Cost Value Cost Value
---- ----- ---- ----- ---- -----
U.S. Treasuries, Government Agencies
and Mortgage Backed Securities $26,979 $26,117 $28,988 $28,606 $37,258 $37,369
Other Securities 30 30 36 36 548 549
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL $27,009 $26,147 $29,024 $28,642 $37,806 $37,918
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
11
Loan Distribution
Five-Year Loan Distribution at December 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands)
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Commercial Loans $ 82,845 $ 72,414 $ 55,184 $ 30,964 $ 23,126
Real Estate Loans 102,404 94,204 87,228 78,856 71,962
Consumer Loans 5,746 7,198 8,806 11,751 11,718
------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
TOTAL $190,995 $173,816 $151,218 $121,571 $106,806
======================================================= ====================================
Five-Year Loan Distribution at December 31 (expressed as percentages)
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Commercial Loans 43.37% 38.87% 36.49% 25.47% 21.65%
Real Estate Loans 53.62% 56.90% 57.69% 64.86% 67.38%
Consumer Loans 3.01% 4.23% 5.82% 9.67% 10.97%
------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
TOTAL 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
======================================================= ====================================
Maturity and Repricing of Loans at December 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial Real Estate Consumer
Loans Loans Loans TOTAL
----- ----- ----- -----
Within One Year $44,970 $23,325 $1,043 $69,338
After One Year But Within Five Years 37,131 22,516 3,068 $62,715
After Five Years 744 56,563 1,635 $58,942
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------
TOTAL $82,845 $102,404 $5,746 $190,995
============= ============= ============= ============
Loans Classified by Sensitivity to Changes in Interest Rates
(dollars in thousands)
- ----------------------
Adjustable
Fixed Rate Interest Rate
Loans Loans TOTAL
----- ----- -----
Within One Year $18,221 $51,742 $69,963
After One Year But Within Five Years 62,719 -- $62,719
After Five Years 58,313 -- $58,313
------------------ ------------------- -------------
TOTAL $139,253 $51,742 $190,995
================== =================== =============
The total amount of Real Estate Construction and Mortgage loans due after one
year included above are $2,600 and $2,441 respectively.
Asset Quality
One of the Corporation's main objectives has been and continues to be
the achievement of a high level of asset quality. We maintain a large portion of
loans secured by residential one-to four- family properties and commercial
properties. As of December 31, 2005, those loans totaled $89 million or 46.35
percent of total outstanding loans. We set sound credit standards for new loan
originations, and follow careful loan administration procedures. We strengthened
our focus on credit risk by having independent reviews of all major credits with
detailed reports to management.
Delinquent Loans and Foreclosed Assets: The Corporation policies
require that management continuously monitor the status of the loan portfolio
and report to the Board of Directors on a monthly basis. These reports include
information on delinquent loans and foreclosed real estate, and actions and
plans to cure the delinquent status of the loans and to dispose of the
foreclosed properties.
12
Interest on Non-accrual Loans. (dollars in thousands)
- -----------------------------------------------------
2005 2004
---- ----
Interest Income that Would Have Been Recorded Under Original Terms $ 27 $ 52
--------- -------
Interest Income Recorded during the Period $ -- $ --
--------- -------
It is the policy of the Corporation to place a loan on non-accrual status
whenever there is substantial doubt about the ability of a borrower to pay
principal or interest on any outstanding credit. Management considers such
factors as payment history, the nature of the collateral securing the loan, and
the overall economic situation of the borrower when making a non-accrual
decision. Non-accrual loans are closely monitored by management. A non-accruing
loan is restored to accrual status when principal and interest payments have
been brought current or it becomes well-secured or is in the process of
collection and the prospects of future contractual payments are no longer in
doubt.
We generally stop accruing income when interest or principal payments are
90 days in arrears. We may stop accruing income on such loans earlier than 90
days when we consider the timely collectibility of interest or principal payment
to be doubtful.
When we designate non-accrual loans, we reverse all outstanding interest
that we had previously credited. If we receive a payment on a non-accrual loan,
we may recognize a portion of that payment as interest income if we determine
that the ultimate collectibility of principal is no longer in doubt. However,
such loans may remain in non-accrual status.
Impaired Loans
At December 31, 2005, the Corporation had $576 thousand of impaired loans
for which the borrowers were experiencing financial difficulties. Those loans
are subject to constant management attention and their classification is
reviewed monthly. Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine whether
the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the collateral.
Foreclosed Real Estate
Foreclosed real estate consists of property we have acquired through
foreclosed or deed in lieu of foreclosure. Foreclosed real estate properties are
initially recorded at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan or fair
value. At December 31, 2005 and 2004 we had no foreclosed real estate.
Potential Nonperforming Loans
Those performing loans considered potential nonperforming loans, loans
which are not included in the past due, nonaccrual or restructured categories,
but for which known information about possible credit problems cause management
to be uncertain as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present
loan repayment terms over the next six months, amounted to approximately $7,149
thousand at December 31, 2005, compared to $3,716 thousand at December 31, 2004,
and $3,502 thousand at December 31, 2003. These loans are subject to continuing
management attention and are considered by management in determining the level
of the allowance for loan losses.
13
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporation's allowance for loan loss methodology is a loan
classification-based system, based on the required allowance on a percentage of
the loan balance for each type of loan and classification level. Allowance
percentages are 3.0% and 5.0% for watch loans, 10.0% for special mention, 15.0%
and 20.0% for substandard and 50.0% for doubtful loans. Allowance percentages
are based on each individual lending program, its loss history and underwriting
characteristics such as: loan to value, credit score, debt coverage, collateral,
and capacity to service debt. This analysis is used to validate the loan loss
allowance matrix as well as to assist in establishing overall lending direction.
While management considers the Corporation's allowance for loan losses to be
adequate based on information currently available, future adjustments to the
allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, management's
assumptions as to future delinquencies or loss rates, and management's intent
with regard to asset disposition options. In addition, the Corporation's
allowance for loan losses is periodically reviewed by the bank regulatory
agencies and an independent external loan review as an integral part of their
examination process. Based on their reviews, the agencies may require the
Corporation to adjust the allowance.
14
Allowance for Loan Losses
(dollars in thousands)
Year ended December 31, 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Balance at Beginning of Period $ 1,612 $ 1,488 $ 1,049 $ 959 $ 732
Loans Charged Off:
Commercial Loans -- 108 71 109 65
Real Estate Loans -- 10 11 26 70
Consumer Loans 91 295 341 178 111
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
TOTAL Loans Charged Off 91 413 423 313 246
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Recoveries of Loans:
Commercial Loans 45 13 22 42 39
Real Estate Loans -- 1 22 11 22
Consumer Loans 83 163 63 10 12
--------- --------- --------- ---------
TOTAL Loans Recovered 128 177 107 63 73
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net Loans Charged Off (Recovered) (37) 236 316 250 173
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Provisions Charged to Operations 410 360 755 340 400
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at End of Period $ 2,059 $ 1,612 $ 1,488 $ 1,049 $ 959
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Daily Average Amount of Loans $ 184,374 $ 163,656 $ 140,376 $ 110,293 $ 105,067
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Allowance for Possible Loan Losses to
Loans Outstanding 1.08% .93% .98% .86% .90%
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Net Charge Offs (Recoveries) to Average
Loans Outstanding (.02%) .14% .22% .22% .16%
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
A breakdown of the Allowance is provided in the table below; however,
management does not believe that the Allowance can be segregated y category with
precision. The breakdown of the Allowance is based primarily on hose factors
discussed previously in evaluating the Allowance as a whole. Since all of those
factors are subject to change, the breakdown is not necessarily indicative of
the category of actual or realized credit losses. The following table presents
the allocation of the Allowance among the various loan categories at December
31:
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2005 % 2004 % 2003 % 2002 % 2001 %
---- - ---- - ---- - ---- - ---- -
Commercial Loans $573 45.1% 44.7% $825 36.9% $555 25.4% $557 21.7%
$406
Real Estate Loans 702 52.8 746 54.1 151 57.3 138 64.9 110 67.4
Consumer Loans 65 2.2 83 3.7 35 5.2 76 8.9 80 9.9
Credit Cards 38 .4 41 .5 47 .6 46 .8 55 1.0
Unallocated 681 -- 336 -- 430 -- 234 -- 157 --
------- ---- ------- ---- ------- ---- ------ ---- ----- ----
TOTAL Allowance for
Loan Losses $ 2,059 100% $ 1,612 100% $ 1,488 100% $1,049 100% $ 959 100%
======= ==== ======= ==== ======= ==== ====== ==== ===== ====
15
Maturities of Time Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 or More Outstanding at
December 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands)
2005 2004
---- ----
Three months or less $7,145 $5,804
Three to six months 2,111 2,746
Six to twelve months 13,315 8,187
Over twelve months 10,239 8,662
-------- -----------
TOTAL $32,810 $25,399
======== ===========
Long And Short Term Borrowings
Junior Subordinated Debt Security
On October 9, 2003, Harbor Bankshares Corporation issued a Floating Rate
Junior Subordinated Debt Securities due 2033 in the amount of $7.2 million. The
Debt Security was issued by the Corporation pursuant to an Indenture, dated as
of October 9, 2003, between the Corporation and Wilmington Trust Company. The
Capital Securities were issued by Harbor Bankshares Corporation Capital Trust
pursuant to a Purchase Agreement dated September 18, 2003, among the
Corporation, the Trust and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Upon receipt of the
funds, the corporation paid off its long-term debt to the National Community
Investment Fund ("NCIF") in the amount of $1.8 million and placed the remaining
funds in its subsidiary, The Harbor Bank of Maryland, increasing the Bank's Tier
One capital. This capital infusion increased the Bank's lending limit and
allowed for future growth.
16
Borrowings for the Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
(dollars in thousands)
2005 2004
---- ----
Amount outstanding at period-end:
Subordinated Debt Securities 7,217 7,217
Average outstanding:
Subordinated Debt Securities 7,217 7,217
Weighted average interest rate during the period:
Subordinated Debt Securities 6.15% 4.41%
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the
Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit
risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that
involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank holds collateral
supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary. The
Harbor Bank of Maryland has not been required to perform on any financial
guarantees and has not incurred any losses on its commitments. The issuance of
letters of credit is not a significant activity of the Bank.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to customers
as long as there are no violations of any condition established in the loan
contracts. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The
Bank evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The
amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Bank upon
extension of credit, is based on credit evaluation by management. Collateral
held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and
equipment as well as income producing properties. We believe that we have
adequate resources to fund all loan commitments.
The Bank has entered into leases for some of its branches, most of
which contain renewal options.
For additional information regarding off-balance sheet arrangements,
please see Notes 7 and 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the
discussion of the Debt Security in "Long and Short Term Borrowings," above.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Corporation's consolidated financial statements are prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates.
Application of these principles requires management to make estimates,
assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments
are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements;
accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect
different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies inherently have
a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as
such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially
different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are
necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value,
when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial statements
at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be
established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon
a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results
in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used
to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based
either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources,
when available.
17
The most significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation are
presented in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. These policies,
along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and
in this discussion, provide information on how significant assets and
liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are
determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of
financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying
those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for
loan losses as the accounting area that requires the most subjective or complex
judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information
becomes available.
The Corporation believes it has developed appropriate policies and
procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses,
recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates
with respect to its loan portfolio. The Corporation's assessments may be
affected in future periods by changes in economic conditions, the impact of
regulatory examinations, and the discovery of information with respect to
borrowers which is not known to management at the time of the issuance of the
consolidated financial statements. For additional discussion concerning the
Corporation's allowance for loan losses and related matters, see "Provision for
Loan Losses and Asset Quality" above and Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Item 2. Description of Property
The Corporation's Headquarters is located at 25 West Fayette Street,
Baltimore, Maryland 21201. This location is approximately 60,000 square feet and
was bought by the Corporation during September 2003 for $2.9 million. The
renovation of the building is completed.
The Bank also maintains another six (6) branch offices, five (5) are
leased; three (3) located in Baltimore City, 1000 Lancaster Street Baltimore,
Maryland 21202, 5000 Park Heights Avenue Baltimore, Maryland 21215 and 800 West
Baltimore Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, one (1) located in Prince George's
County, Maryland at 6820 Riverdale Road Riverdale, Maryland 20737 and one (1)
located in Baltimore County, Maryland at 3825 Liberty Plaza Randallstown,
Maryland 21133. The Bank owns another branch facility in Baltimore City located
at 3240 Belair Road Baltimore, Maryland 21213.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, the Corporation is at all times subject
to various pending and threatened legal actions. The relief or damages sought in
some of these actions may be substantial. After reviewing pending and threatened
actions with counsel, management considers that the outcome of such actions will
not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial position;
however, the Corporation is not able to predict whether the outcome of such
actions may or may not have a material adverse effect on results of operations
in a particular future period as the timing and amount of any resolution of such
actions and relationship to the future results of operations are not known.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
18
PART II
Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
Harbor Bankshares Corporation is traded privately and is not listed on
any exchange. During 2005 and 2004, there was little trading activity in the
stock. The bid and ask price during 2005 and 2004 was $25.00 per share. On
December 31, 2005 the Corporation had 626 common stockholders of record.
A cash dividend of $.40 per share was paid during the first quarter of
2005.
The following table presents disclosure regarding equity compensation
plans in existence at December 31, 2005, consisting only of the stock option
plan arrangements described further under the caption "Stock Options" in Note 14
to the consolidated financial statements.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
- ------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
Plan Category Number of securities to be Weighted average exercise Number of securities
issued upon exercise of price of outstanding remaining available for
outstanding options, options, warrants and future issuance under
warrants and rights rights equity compensation plans
(a) (b) excluding securities
reflected in column (a)
(c)
- ------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
Equity compensation plans -- -- --
approved by security holders
- ------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
Equity compensation plans not 132,741 $18.80 94,145
approved by security holders
- ------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
Total 132,741 $18.80 94,145
- ------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
19
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations should be read in conjunction with Item 1. Business, and Item 7,
Financial Statements, of this Report.
OVERVIEW - 2005 COMPARED TO 2004
All references to Harbor Bankshares Corporation (the "Corporation") should be
interpreted to include The Harbor Bank of Maryland (the "Bank") whenever
appropriate, except when specifically noted otherwise.
The Corporation earnings increased for the year 2005 when compared to the prior
year. Earnings for the year were $1.9 million in comparison to $1.5 million
earned during 2004, an increase of $421 thousand or 28.8 %. The 2005 earnings
did not include any securities gains or Federal agency awards. The earnings for
2004 reflected only $17 thousand of securities gains and no awards.
The Harbor Bank of Maryland, the Corporation's subsidiary, achieved earnings of
$2.5 million in comparison to $1.9 million for the prior year, an increase of
$564 thousand or 29.0%.
Returns on average assets (ROAA) and average equity (ROAE) for the Corporation
in 2005 were .78% and 11.57%, respectively, compared to the .63% and 9.33%
achieved during the prior year. The return on average assets for the Bank in
2005 was 1.04%, compared to .84% for the prior year.
NET-INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the difference between interest income and related fees
on earning assets and the interest expense incurred on deposits and other
borrowings. Net interest income continues to be the Corporation's main source of
earnings. Net interest income for 2005 increased by $862 thousand or 8.3 %. The
increase reflects the growth of the loan portfolio during 2005, mainly in the
commercial and commercial real estate categories.
Total interest income increased by $2.4 million or 18.7% to $15.0 million for
2005 in comparison to the $12.7 million earned during 2004. As stated above, the
growth of the loan portfolio combined with higher rates were the main reasons
for the increase.
Total interest expense increased by $1.5 million or 6.6 % to $3.8 million in
2005 from $2.3 million in 2004. Higher interest rates combined with interest
bearing deposit increases resulted in the increase.
Net interest margin for 2005 was 5.15% compared to 4.97% for 2004.
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES AND ASSET QUALITY
For the year 2005, the Corporation recorded a $410 thousand provision for loan
losses, compared to $360 for the year 2004. Gross charge-offs totaled $91
thousand for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to the prior year total
of $413 thousand. These charge-offs in 2004 primarily relate to credit card,
consumer and commercial loans.
The allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2005, was 1.08% of total loans
and .93% at the end of the comparable 2004 period.
Future provisions for loan losses will continue to be based upon our assessment
of the overall loan portfolio and its underlying collateral, the mix of loans
within the portfolio, delinquency trends, economic conditions, current and
prospective trends in real estate values, and other relevant factors.
20
The table below shows the non-performing assets for a five-year period:
Non-Performing Assets (in thousands except percentages)
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Non-accrual Loans $558 $799 $ 220 $409 $620
Accruing Loans past due 90 days
or more 18 9 506 746 135
Foreclosed Real Estate - - - 70 14
Total Non-performing Assets and ---- ---- ---- ------ ----
past due Loans $576 $808 $726 $1,225 $769
==== ==== ==== ====== ====
Total Non-performing Assets and
past due Loans to year-end Assets .22% .34% .33% .58% .41%
Total Non-performing Loans to
year-end Loans .30% .46% .48% 1.01% .72%
The Corporation's allowance for loan loss methodology is a loan
classification-based system, based on the required allowance on a percentage of
the loan balance for each type of loan and classification level. Allowance
percentages are 3.0% and 5.0% for watch loans, 10.0% for special mention, 15.0%
and 20.0% for substandard and 50.0% for doubtful loans. Allowance percentages
are based on each individual lending program, its loss history and underwriting
characteristics such as: loan to value, credit score, debt coverage, collateral,
and capacity to service debt. This analysis is used to validate the loan loss
allowance matrix as well as to assist in establishing overall lending direction.
While management considers the Corporation's allowance for loan losses to be
adequate based on information currently available, future adjustments to the
allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, management's
assumptions as to future delinquencies or loss rates, and management's intent
with regard to asset disposition options. In addition, the Corporation's
allowance for loan losses is periodically reviewed by the bank regulatory
agencies and an independent external loan review as an integral part of their
examination process. Based on their reviews, the agencies may require the
Corporation to adjust the allowance.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Non-interest income increased by $257 thousand or 17.0% to $1.8 million in 2005.
Included in the 2004 non-interest income were $6 thousand in gain on sale of
loans, $17 thousand in securities gains and no Community Development Financial
Institution Fund ("CDFI") awards. In 2005, there were no gains on the sale of
securities or loans, and no CDFI awards. Service charges on deposit accounts
increased by $98 thousand or 12.2% and other non-interest income by $152
thousand or 31.9%. Included in other non-interest income are fees in the amount
of $82 thousand for reimbursement for services and expenses incurred by the Bank
in the formation of one of the Holding Company unconsolidated subsidiaries in
2002.
Non-Interest Income Summary (in thousands)
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Service charges on deposit accounts $900 $802 $855 $910 $965
ATM fees 224 195 216 274 166
Awards & Grants -- -- 664 214 229
Gain on sale of real estate -- -- -- -- --
Gain on sale of loans -- 6 51 54 45
Gain on sale of securities -- 17 225 226 197
Servicing fees 18 17 16 26 27
Other non-interest income 629 477 479 517 700
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total non-interest income $1,771 $1,514 $2,506 $2,221 $2,329
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
21
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
Non-interest expenses of $9.6 million in 2005 increased by $343 thousand or 3.7
% when compared to the prior year. Salaries and benefits of $4.4 million in 2005
reflected a decrease of $85 thousand or 1.9% when compared to the prior year
salaries and benefits cost. Advertising expenses increased by $69 thousand or
23.0%. Occupancy expense increased by $414 thousand or 61.0% due to the
renovation of the Corporation's Headquarters building and the opening of a new
branch facility. Equipment expense decreased by $32 thousand or 9.0% due to
lower depreciation. Professional fees, which include legal expenses, decreased
by $98 thousand or 19.0%. In 2005, the Bank settled its claims against third
parties in connection with a 2004 ATM cash shortage upon payment to the Bank of
$575,000. The Bank recorded losses of $225,000 in 2005 and $275,000 in 2004
relating to this cash shortage. The amortization expense in 2002 through 2005
includes amortization of core deposit intangibles recorded in the purchase of a
branch facility during 2002. Amortization in 2001 and 2002 reflects amortization
of goodwill. Other non-interest expenses increased by $46 thousand or 3.0 %.
Non-Interest Expenses Summary (In thousands)
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Salaries and Employee Benefits $4,425 $4,510 $4,368 $ 4,230 $ 3,989
Occupancy Expense, net 1,093 679 720 785 778
Advertising 369 300 344 287 115
Equipment Expenses 324 356 386 478 654
Data Processing Fees 1,110 1,031 973 976 918
Professional Fees 420 518 303 399 327
Amortization of Intangible Assets 81 81 81 47 331
Amortization
ATM Loss 225 275 -- -- --
Other Non-Interest Expense 1,590 1,544 1,435 1,373 1,414
------ ------ ------- ------- -------
Total Non-Interest Expense $9,637 $9,294 $ 8,610 $ 8,575 $ 8,526
====== ====== ======= ======= =======
APPLICABLE INCOME TAXES
Applicable income taxes include current and deferred portions, which are
detailed in Note 10 of the audited consolidated financial statements. Taxes for
2005 were $1,067 thousand compared to $762 thousand for 2004. The effective tax
rate for the year 2005 was 36.2% compared to 34.3% for the year 2004.
CREDIT RISK ANALYSIS
The Corporation, through its subsidiary, The Harbor Bank of Maryland, has in
place credit policies and procedures designed to control and monitor credit
risk. Credit analysis and loan review functions have provided a check and
balance system for assessing initial and on-going risk associated with the
lending process.
Credit risk is mitigated through portfolio diversification, limiting exposure to
any single industry or customer, requiring collateral and employing standard
lending policies and underwriting criteria across the Corporation. Independent
third party credit reviews are performed quarterly. During 2005, 70.0% of the
loan portfolio was analyzed. During these reviews, any weaknesses are brought to
management's attention for corrective action. Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements describes the Corporation's accounting policies related to
nonperforming loans and charge-offs and describes the methodologies used to
develop the allowance, including both the allocated and unallocated components.
The Corporation's policies are consistent with regulatory standards.
22
ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The Investment Committee of the Corporation reviews policies regarding the
sources and uses of funds, maturity distribution, and associated interest rate
sensitivities. This effort is aimed at minimizing risks associated with
fluctuating interest rates, as well as maintaining sufficient liquidity.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity describes the ability of the Corporation to meet financial
obligations, including lending commitments and contingencies that arise during
the normal course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the
borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of the customers of the
Corporation, as well as to meet current and planned expenditures. The
Corporation, through the Bank, is required to maintain adequate sources of cash
in order to meet its financial commitments in an organized manner without
incurring substantial losses. These commitments relate principally to changes in
the Bank's deposit base through withdrawals and changes in funds required to
meet normal and seasonal loan demands. The Bank, and thereby the Corporation,
derives liquidity through the maturity distribution of the investment portfolio,
loan repayments and income from earning assets. The Bank maintains a portion of
its investment portfolio as a liquidity reserve, which can be converted to cash
on an immediate basis.
The Bank has also established secured lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan
Bank as an additional source of liquidity. Collateral must be pledged to the
FHLB before advances can be obtained. At December 31, 2005, the Corporation had
sufficient collateral in order to borrow up to an aggregate of $25.7 million
from the FHLB under the established lines of credit, if necessary. Liquidity is
also provided through the Corporation's portfolio of liquid assets, consisting
of cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks and
investment securities available for sale. Such assets totaled $49.1 million or
19.1% of total assets at December 31, 2005.
The Corporation derives its cash from a combination of operating activities,
investing activities and financing activities as disclosed in the consolidated
statement of cash flows. Cash flows from operating activities consist of
interest income collected on loans and investments, interest expense paid on
deposits and other borrowings, other income collected, such as cash received
relating to service charges, and cash payments for other operating expenses
including income taxes.
Cash flows from investing activities include the purchase, sale and maturity of
investments and interest bearing deposits in other banks, the net decrease in
the level of loans, and purchases of premises and equipment. Cash flows from
financing activities consist of movements in the level of deposits and other
borrowings, and proceeds from the issuance of stock.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, net cash provided by operating activities
totaled $4.6 million. Net cash used by investing activities totaled $16.5
million resulting primarily from a net increase in loans of $16.7 million and
net purchases of premises and equipment of $3.1 million, offset in part by the
proceeds of maturities and principal payments of investment securities of $2.0
million and a decrease in deposits at other banks of $1.3 million. Net cash
provided by financing activities totaled $18.7 million, mainly resulting from
the net increase in total deposits of $19.6 million.
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
The Corporation's net income is largely dependent on its net interest income.
The Corporation seeks to maximize its net interest margin within an acceptable
level of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk can be defined as the amount of
forecasted net interest income that may be gained or lost due to favorable or
unfavorable movements in interest rates. Interest rate risk, or sensitivity,
arises when the maturity or repricing characteristics of assets differ
significantly from the maturity or repricing characteristics of liabilities. Net
interest income is also affected by changes in the portion of interest-earning
assets that are funded by interest-bearing liabilities rather than by other
sources of funds, such as noninterest-bearing deposits and stockholders' equity.
The Corporation attempts to manage interest rate risk while enhancing net
interest margin by adjusting its asset/liability position. At times, depending
on the level of general interest rates, the relationship between long-term and
short-term interest rates, market conditions and competitive factors, the
Corporation may determine to increase its interest rate risk position somewhat
in order to increase its net interest margin. The Corporation monitors interest
rate risk and adjust the composition of its interest-related assets and
liabilities in order to limit its exposure to changes in interest rates on net
interest income over time. The Corporation's Investment Committee reviews its
interest rate risk position and profitability, and recommends adjustments. The
Investment Committee also reviews the securities portfolio, formulates
investment strategies, and oversees the timing and implementation of
transactions. Notwithstanding The Corporation's interest rate risk management
activities, the potential for changing interest rates is an uncertainty that can
have an adverse effect on net income.
23
The Bank also analyzes interest rate risk based upon quantitative measures of
the percentage changes in fair value of equity capital resulting from a
hypothetical immediate change (or shock) of plus or minus 100 and 200 basis
points in interest rate levels. This analysis is based upon models, which are
based upon a number of significant assumptions regarding reactions of interest
rates. These models also provide an analysis of interest rate shock effects on
net interest income. The maximum decrease of net interest income, based upon the
Bank's December 31, 2005 asset/liability position, was 1.3% from a 200 basis
point rate shock.
One measure of interest rate sensitivity is the difference between interest
sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities called the "interest
sensitivity gap." The following table shows an analysis of the Corporation's
cumulative interest sensitivity gap position.
Cumulative Interest Sensitivity Gap
1 YEAR
Interest sensitive assets $ 28.5
Interest sensitive liabilities 12.4
---------
Interest sensitivity gap $ 16.1
=========
Gap to total assets 6.3%
=========
LONG AND SHORT TERM BORROWINGS
On October 9, 2003, Harbor Bankshares Corporation issued a Floating Rate Junior
Subordinated Debt Security due 2033 in the amount of $7.2 million. The Debt
Security was issued by the Corporation pursuant to an Indenture, dated as of
October 9, 2003, between the Corporation and Wilmington Trust Company. The
Capital Securities were issued by Harbor Bankshares Corporation Capital Trust
pursuant to a Purchase Agreement dated September 18, 2003, among the
Corporation, the Trust and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Upon the receipt of the
funds, the Corporation paid off its long-term debt to National Community
Investment Fund in the amount of $1.9 million and placed the remaining funds in
the amount of $4.9 million in its subsidiary, The Harbor Bank of Maryland,
increasing the Bank's Tier One capital. There were no other borrowings as of
December 31, 2005.
24
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES, AND OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Contractual Obligations: The following table presents, as of December 31, 2005,
significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by
payment date.
(In thousands) One Year or Less One to Three Years Three to Five Years Over Five Years
---------------- ------------------ ------------------- ---------------
Deposits without a stated
maturity $163,495 $ -- $ -- $ --
Certificates of deposit 43,038 19,814 3,498 --
Operating leases 203 311 227 506
Junior
Subordinated Debentures -- -- -- 7,217
-------- ------- ------ ------
Total $206,736 $20,125 $3,725 $7,723
======== ======= ====== ======
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements: Standby letters of credit are conditional
commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
The Bank holds collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is
deemed necessary. The Bank has not been required to perform on any financial
guarantees and has not incurred any losses on its commitments. The issuance of
letters of credit is not a significant activity of the Bank.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to customers as long
as there are no violations of any condition established in the loan contracts.
Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses
and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to
expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer's credit
worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is
deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on credit
evaluation by management. Collateral held varies but may include accounts
receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment as well as income producing
properties. We believe that we have adequate resources to fund all loan
commitments.
The Bank has entered into leases for its branch and office space, most of which
contain renewal options. For additional information regarding off-balance sheet
arrangements, please see Notes 7, 11 and 17 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Stockholders' equity increased by $714 thousand or 4.4% to $16.9 million. This
increase was mainly due to net income of $1.9 million, and proceeds from the
sale of common stock of $172 thousand, offset by the unrealized loss of
securities held for sale, which was $522 thousand at December 31, 2005, compared
to a loss of $238 thousand for 2004 and retirement of common stock of $775
thousand. As of year-end, based on borrowing arrangements with the Federal Home
Loan Bank with unused credit availability of $25.6 million, the Corporation had
sufficient liquidity to withstand any unusual demand of funds without
liquidating its investment securities. Stockholders' equity was 6.6% of total
assets as of the year-end. The Tier 1 capital ratio as of December 31, 2005, was
7.3%, and the risk-based capital ratio was 11.67%. The minimum requirements
established by regulators are 4.0% for Tier 1 capital and 8.0% for total
risk-based capital. The book value of each share of common stock was $24.73 as
of December 31, 2005.
The Tier I capital ratio for the Corporation's subsidiary, The Harbor Bank of
Maryland as of December 31, 2005, was 8.8% and the risk-based total capital
ratio was 11.6%, both above the established regulatory requirements.
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
The Corporation, through its subsidiary, The Harbor Bank of Maryland, continued
its growth during 2005. Total assets increased by $21.1 million or 9.0 %.
25
Deposits increased from $210.2 million in 2004 to $229.8 million in 2005, an
increase of $19.6 million or 9.3%. Net loans reached to $188.9 million in 2005
from $172.2 million in 2004, an increase of $16.7 million or 8.8%.
The Corporation plans to continue its expansion through marketing efforts by its
Management and Board of Directors.
OTHER INFORMATION
The Harbor Bank Community Development Corporation ("CDC") and The Harbor Bank of
Baltimore LLC ("LLC") were established in 2003. The CDC is a non-profit company
established with the purpose of bringing financial assistance to underserved
areas in the City of Baltimore. The Corporation has no investments in this
company. The Harbor Bank of Maryland, one of the Corporation's subsidiaries has
a $1.8 million loan to the CDC. As of December 31, 2005, the CDC had earnings of
$3.0 thousand and a $28 thousand accumulated deficit since inception. These
numbers exclude any tax benefit that may be available.
The Harbor Bank of Baltimore LLC was established with the purpose of taking
advantage of the New Markets Tax Credit program offered by the U.S. Treasury
Department for the development of certain targeted markets in the country. In
the case of the LLC, the targeted market is the City of Baltimore. The LLC
received a $50 million New Market Tax Credit award in September 2004, and has
written commitments from various investors in the amount of $64 million. The
Corporation has no investment in this company. The financial data from these
companies is not included in the Corporation's financial statements, in
accordance with FIN 46 (R) "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities."
For a complete discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and their effect
on the Corporation's financial statements, please refer to Note 3 of the
Corporation's audited consolidated financial statements.
26
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON AUDITS OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004
No extracts from this report may be published without our written consent.
Stegman & Company
27
TABLE OF CONTENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page
----
Balance Sheets 30 - 31
Statements of Income 32
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity 33
Statements of Cash Flows 34 - 35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 36 - 55
28
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Harbor Bankshares Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Harbor Bankshares Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the management of Harbor Bankshares Corporation. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Harbor
Bankshares Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the
results of their operations and cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Stegman & Company
Baltimore, Maryland
February 18, 2006
29
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004
ASSETS
2005 2004
-------------- --------------
Cash and due from banks $ 7,259,358 $ 6,867,063
Federal funds sold 15,624,890 9,845,813
Interest bearing deposits in other banks 74,996 1,352,791
Investment securities:
Available for sale - at fair value 26,116,631 26,600,079
Held to maturity - at amortized cost (fair value of
$30,402 in 2005 and $2,042,147 in 2004) 30,402 2,036,622
-------------- --------------
Total investment securities 26,147,033 28,636,701
-------------- --------------
Loans 190,994,929 173,816,465
Allowance for loan losses (2,058,561) (1,611,880)
-------------- --------------
Net loans 188,936,368 172,204,585
-------------- --------------
Premises and equipment, net 7,526,340 5,137,720
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock - at cost 470,000 438,200
Goodwill 2,506,226 2,506,226
Other intangible assets 462,667 547,040
Bank-owned life insurance 4,178,774 4,023,808
Other assets 3,449,790 3,903,752
-------------- --------------
TOTAL ASSETS $256,636,442 $235,463,699
============== ==============
See accompanying notes.
30
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
2005 2004
------------- -------------
LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing demand $ 50,433,169 $ 49,342,950
Interest bearing transaction accounts 25,562,641 22,981,734
Savings 87,498,709 78,610,482
Time, $100,000 or more 32,810,327 25,339,116
Other time 33,539,740 33,949,621
------------- -------------
Total deposits 229,844,586 210,223,903
Accrued interest payable 683,762 356,184
Junior subordinated debentures 7,217,000 7,217,000
Other liabilities 1,937,184 1,426,651
------------- -------------
Total liabilities 239,682,532 219,223,738
------------- -------------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock (par value $0.01):
Authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued 685,579 and
704,934, including 33,795 common nonvoting
at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively 6,856 7,049
Additional paid-in capital 6,615,906 7,218,340
Retained earnings 10,853,086 9,252,307
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (521,938) (237,735)
------------- -------------
Total stockholders' equity 16,953,910 16,239,961
------------- -------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY $256,636,442 $235,463,699
============= =============
31
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004
2005 2004
-------------- ---------------
INTEREST INCOME:
Interest and fees on loans $13,909,841 $11,359,107
Interest on investments - taxable 850,262 1,135,744
Interest on deposits in other banks 18,200 44,488
Interest on federal funds sold 216,379 93,993
Other interest income 19,164 14,528
-------------- --------------
Total interest income 15,013,846 12,647,860
-------------- ---------------
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest bearing transaction accounts 57,097 43,147
Savings 1,408,670 669,696
Time, $100,000 or more 664,051 456,056
Other time 1,192,439 783,198
Interest on junior subordinated debentures 443,779 317,690
Federal funds purchased 20,738 13,095
-------------- ---------------
Total interest expense 3,786,774 2,282,882
-------------- ---------------
NET INTEREST INCOME 11,227,072 10,364,978
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 410,000 360,000
-------------- ---------------
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES 10,817,072 10,004,978
-------------- ---------------
NONINTEREST INCOME:
Service charges on deposit accounts 899,883 802,192
Other service charges 455,230 279,464
Gain on sale of securities - 16,733
Gain on sales of loans - 6,027
Cash surrender value life insurance 175,547 197,900
Loan servicing fees 9,747 16,729
Other income 230,696 195,095
-------------- ---------------
Total noninterest income 1,771,103 1,514,140
-------------- ---------------
NONINTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits 4,425,478 4,510,208
Advertising 368,689 300,130
Occupancy expense of premises 1,093,193 679,386
Equipment expense 323,747 355,698
Data processing fees 1,110,060 1,031,317
Professional fees 420,564 518,180
Amortization of intangible assets 80,460 80,460
ATM loss 225,000 275,000
Other expenses 1,590,433 1,544,358
-------------- ---------------
Total noninterest expense 9,637,624 9,294,737
-------------- ---------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 2,950,551 2,224,381
APPLICABLE INCOME TAXES 1,067,377 762,326
-------------- ---------------
NET INCOME $1,883,174 $ 1,462,055
============== ===============
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE $2.73 $2.07
===== =====
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE $2.55 $1.93
===== =====
See accompanying notes.
32
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004
Accumulated
Other
Additional Comprehensive Total
Common Paid-in Retained Income Stockholders'
Stock Capital Earnings (Loss) Equity
----------- ------------- ------------ ------------------ ---------------
Balance at January 1, 2004 $7,041 $7,210,178 $8,036,714 $ 20,835 $15,274,768
Comprehensive income:
Net income - - 1,462,055 - 1,462,055
Reclassification adjustment,
net of taxes of $6,462 - - - (10,271) (10,271)
Unrealized losses on securities
available-for-sale, net of taxes
of $156,228 - - - (248,299) (248,299)
-----------
Total comprehensive income 1,203,485
Payment of cash dividends
$0.35 per share - - (246,462) - (246,462)
Stock options exercised 8 8,162 - - 8,170
------ ---------- ----------- --------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 2004 7,049 7,218,340 9,252,307 (237,735) 16,239,961
Comprehensive income:
Net income - - 1,883,174 - 1,883,174
Unrealized losses on securities
available-for-sale, net of taxes
of $112,260 - - - (284,203) (284,203)
------------
Total comprehensive income 1,598,971
Retirement of stock (310) (774,690) - - (775,000)
Payment of cash dividends
$.40 per share - - (282,395) - (282,395)
Stock options exercised 117 172,256 - - 172,373
------ ---------- ----------- --------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 2005 $6,856 $6,615,906 $10,853,086 $(521,938) $16,953,910
====== ========== =========== ========= ===========
See accompanying notes.
33
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004
2005 2004
----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 1,883,174 $ 1,462,055
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 761,363 492,332
Provision for loan losses 410,000 360,000
Deferred income taxes (323,885) 40,388
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance (154,966) (165,183)
Gains on sales of loans - (6,027)
Gain on sale securities - (16,733)
Origination of loans held for sale - (2,802,440)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale - 2,808,467
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets 718,666 (285,590)
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities 838,111 629,267
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 4,132,463 2,516,536
----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net decrease in deposits at other banks 1,277,795 547,209
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale - (13,999,000)
Proceeds from calls, maturities and principal payments of
investment securities available-for-sale 2,008,765 15,694,410
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale - 7,032,625
Net increase in loans (16,298,793) (22,475,090)
Purchases of premises and equipment - net (3,069,523) (1,829,589)
----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (16,081,756) (15,029,435)
----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposits 19,620,683 14,322,479
Proceeds from sale of common stock 172,373 8,170
Cash dividends paid (282,395) (246,462)
Retirement of stock (775,000) -
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by financing activities 18,735,661 14,084,187
----------- -----------
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 6,786,368 1,571,288
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 16,172,876 15,141,588
----------- -----------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $22,959,244 $16,712,876
=========== ===========
34
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
2005 2004
---------- ------------
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:
Cash paid for income taxes $1,075,000 $ 825,000
========== ============
Cash paid for interest $3,459,196 $2,160,463
========== ==========
See accompanying notes.
35
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Harbor Bankshares Corporation (the "Corporation") is a bank holding
company organized under the laws of the State of Maryland in 1992. The
Corporation owns all of the outstanding stock of the Harbor Bank of Maryland
(the "Bank") which owns all of the outstanding stock of the Bank's subsidiary,
Harbor Financial Services.
The Bank is a commercial bank headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.
The deposits of the Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation. The Bank conducts general banking business in six locations and
primarily serves the Baltimore, Maryland metropolitan area. The Bank also has a
branch in Riverdale, Prince George's County, Maryland. It offers checking,
savings and time deposits, commercial real estate, personal, home improvement,
automobile, and other installment and term loans. The Bank is also a member of a
national ATM network. The retail nature of the Bank allows for diversification
of depositors and borrowers so it is not dependent upon a single or a few
customers.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Corporation and its
subsidiary conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain
reclassifications have been made to amounts previously reported to conform to
the classifications made in 2005. The following is a summary of the more
significant accounting policies:
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the
Corporation considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original
maturities of three months or less and money market funds to be cash
equivalents.
36
Investment Securities
Debt securities that the Corporation has the positive intent
and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and recorded
at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities are classified as trading
securities if bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the
near term. Trading securities are reported at estimated fair value, with
unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Debt securities not classified
as held to maturity and debt and equity securities not classified as trading
securities are considered available for sale and are reported at estimated fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a
separate component of stockholders' equity, net of tax effects, in accumulated
other comprehensive income.
The Corporation designates securities into one of the three
categories at the time of purchase. If a decline in value of an individual
security classified as held to maturity or available for sale is judged to be
other than temporary, the cost basis of that security is reduced to its fair
value and the amount of the write-down is reflected in earnings. Estimated fair
value is determined based on bid prices published in financial newspapers or bid
quotations received from securities dealers. Gains or losses on the sales of
investments are calculated using a specific identification basis and are
determined on a trade-date basis. Premiums and discounts on investment and
mortgage-backed securities are amortized over the term of the security using
methods that approximate the interest method.
Loans Held for Sale
The Corporation engages in sales of residential mortgage loans
originated by the Bank. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of
aggregate cost or fair value. Gains and losses on sales of these loans are
recorded as a component of non-interest income in the accompanying consolidated
statements of income. The amount of loans held for sale as of December 31, 2005
and 2004 was not considered material.
Loans
Loans are stated at their principal balance outstanding net of
any deferred fees and costs. Interest income on loans is accrued at the
contractual rate based on the principal outstanding. The Corporation places
loans, on non-accrual when any portion of the principal or interest is ninety
days past due and collateral is insufficient to discharge the debt in full.
Interest accrual may also be discontinued earlier if, in management's opinion,
collection is unlikely.
Loans are considered impaired when, based on current
information, it is probable that the Corporation will not collect all principal
and interest payments according to contractual terms. Generally, loans are
considered impaired once principal or interest payments become ninety days or
more past due and they are placed on non-accrual. Management also considers the
financial condition of the borrower, cash flows of the loan and the value of the
related collateral. Impaired loans do not include large groups of smaller
balance homogeneous credits such as residential real estate and consumer
installment loans, which are evaluated collectively for impairment. Loans
specifically reviewed for impairment are not considered impaired during periods
of "minimal delay" in payment
37
(ninety days or less) provided eventual collection of all amounts due is
expected. The impairment of a loan is measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, or
the fair value of the collateral if repayment is expected to be provided by the
collateral. Generally, the Corporation's impairment on such loans is measured by
reference to the fair value of the collateral. Income on impaired loans is
recognized on the cash basis and is first applied against the principal balance
outstanding.
Discounts and premiums on purchased loans are amortized to
income using the interest method over the remaining period to contractual
maturity, adjusted for anticipated prepayments.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents an amount which, in
management's judgment, will be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing
loans that may become uncollectible. The allowance for loan losses consists of
an allocated component and an unallocated component. The components of the
allowance for loan losses represent an estimation done pursuant to either
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, or SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is determined through
careful and continuous review and evaluation of the loan portfolio and involves
the balancing of a number of factors as outlined below to establish a prudent
level. Loans deemed uncollectible are charged against, while recoveries are
credited to, the allowance. Management adjusts the level of the allowance
through the provision for loan losses, which is recorded as a current period
operating expense. The Corporation's methodology for assessing the
appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements, which include
the formula allowance, specific allowances and the unallocated allowance.
The formula allowance is calculated by applying loss factors
to corresponding categories of outstanding loans. Loss factors are based on the
Corporation's historical loss experience. The use of these loss factors is
intended to reduce the difference between estimated losses inherent in the
portfolio and observed losses.
Specific allowances are established in cases where management
has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a loan that
management believes indicate the probability that a loss may be incurred in an
amount different from the amount determined by application of the formula
allowance. For other problem graded credits, allowances are established
according to the application of credit risk factors. These factors are set by
management to reflect its assessment of the relative level of risk inherent in
each grade.
The unallocated allowance is based upon management's
evaluation of various conditions that are not directly measured in the
determination of the formula and specific allowances. Such conditions include
general economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas, credit
quality trends (including trends in delinquencies and nonperforming loans
expected to result from existing conditions), loan volumes and concentrations,
specific industry conditions within portfolio categories, recent loss experience
in particular loan categories, duration of the current business cycle, bank
regulatory examination results, findings of internal loan examiners, and
management's judgment with respect to various other conditions including loan
administration and management and the quality of risk identification systems.
Executive management reviews these conditions quarterly.
38
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is
adequate. However, the determination of the allowance requires significant
judgment, and estimates of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio can
vary significantly from the amounts actually observed. While management uses
available information to recognize probable losses, future additions to the
allowance may be necessary based on changes in the loans comprising the loan
portfolio and changes in the financial condition of borrowers, such as may
result from changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory
agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review
the Bank's loan portfolio and allowance for loan losses. Such review may result
in recognition of additions to the allowance based on their judgments of
information available to them at the time of their examination.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization computed using the straight-line method. Premises
and equipment are depreciated over the useful lives of the assets, except for
leasehold improvements which are amortized over the terms of the respective
leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
Useful lives range from three to seven years for furniture, fixtures and
equipment and forty years for buildings. The costs of major renewals and
betterments are capitalized, while the costs of ordinary maintenance and repairs
are expensed as incurred.
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta Stock
The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, is
required to maintain an investment in capital stock of the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB") in varying amounts based on balances of outstanding
home loans and on amounts borrowed from the FHLB. Because no ready market exists
for this stock and it has no quoted market value, the Bank's investment in this
stock is carried at cost.
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
OREO comprises properties acquired in partial or total
satisfaction of problem loans. The properties are recorded at the lower of cost
or fair value at the date acquired. Losses arising at the time of acquisition of
such properties are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent
write-downs that may be required are added to a valuation reserve. Gains and
losses realized from the sale of OREO, as well as valuation adjustments, are
included in noninterest income. Expenses of operation are included in
noninterest expense. There was no OREO as of December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of assets acquired
in business combinations accounted for under the purchase method over the fair
value of the net assets at dates of acquisition and is annually tested for
impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142.
39
Core Deposit Intangibles
Upon acquiring the branches of another financial institution,
the Bank engages an independent third party of experts to analyze and prepare a
core deposit study. This study reflects the cumulative present value benefit of
acquiring deposits versus an alternative source of funding. Based upon this
analysis, the amount of the premium related to the core deposits of the business
purchased is calculated along with the estimated life of the acquired deposits.
The core deposit intangible is being amortized over an approximate life of 9
years.
Loan Servicing
The cost of mortgage servicing rights is amortized in
proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenue.
Impairment of mortgage servicing rights is assessed based on the fair value of
those rights. Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows based on a
current market interest rate. The amount of impairment recognized is the amount
by which the capitalized mortgage servicing rights exceed their fair value.
When participating interests in loans sold have an average
contractual interest rate, adjusted for normal servicing fees, that differs from
the agreed yield to the purchaser, gains or losses are recognized equal to the
present value of such differential over the estimated remaining life of such
loans. The resulting "excess servicing receivable" or "deferred servicing
revenue" is amortized over the estimated life using a method approximating the
interest method.
Quoted market prices are not available for the excess
servicing receivables. Thus, the excess servicing receivables and the
amortization thereon are periodically evaluated in relation to estimated future
servicing revenue, taking into consideration changes in interest rates, current
repayment rates, and expected future cash flows. The Corporation evaluates the
carrying value of the excess servicing receivables by estimating the future
servicing income of the excess servicing receivables based on management's best
estimate of remaining loan lives and discounted at the original discount rate.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
The Bank is the beneficiary of insurance policies on the lives
of certain officers of the Bank. The Bank has recognized the amount that could
be realized under the insurance policies as an asset in the consolidated balance
sheets. Appreciation in the value of the insurance policies is classified in
non-interest income.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense is based on the results of operations,
adjusted for permanent differences between items of income or expense reported
in the financial statements and those reported for tax purposes. Under the
liability method, deferred income taxes are determined based on the differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts and the income tax basis of
assets and liabilities and are measured at the enacted tax rates that will be in
effect when these differences reverse.
40
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted
earnings per share is determined using the weighted-average number of shares
outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock
equivalents, consisting of shares that might be issued upon exercise of common
stock options.
Stock Based Compensation
The Corporation's stock-based compensation plan is accounted
for based on the intrinsic value method set forth in Accounting Principles Board
Opinion ("APB") No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related
interpretations. Compensation expense for stock options is generally not
recognized if the exercise price of the option equals or exceeds the fair market
value of the stock on the date of grant.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
earnings per share if the Corporation had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 to all stock option awards.
For the Year Ended
---------------------------------
2005 2004
---------- ----------
Net income, as reported $1,883,174 $1,462,055
Less: total option expense determined under
fair value method for all option awards, net
of related tax effects (10,937) (103,150)
---------- ----------
Pro forma net income $1,872,237 $1,358,905
========== ==========
Pro forma net income per share:
Basic - as reported $2.73 $2.07
===== =====
Basic - pro forma $2.72 $1.93
===== =====
Diluted - as reported $2.55 $1.93
===== =====
Diluted - pro forma $2.53 $1.80
===== =====
The fair values of stock options granted were estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes
option pricing model was originally developed for use in estimating the fair
value of traded options, which have different characteristics from the
Corporation's employee stock options. The model is also sensitive to changes in
assumptions, which can materially affect the fair value estimate. The following
weighted-average assumptions were used to determine the fair value of options
granted on the Corporation's common stock:
For the Year Ended
-----------------------------------
2005 2004
---------- ----------
Risk-free interest rate 4.23% 5.0%
Expected volatility 20% 20%
Expected life (in years) 10 10
Expected dividend yield 1.50% 1.50%
41
The Corporation expects to adopt the provisions of SFAS No.
123(R), Share-Based Payment (Revised 2005), on January 1, 2006. Among other
things, SFAS 123(R) eliminates the ability to account for stock-based
compensation using APB No. 25 and requires that such transactions be recognized
as compensation cost in the income statement based on their fair values on the
date of the grant.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising
expense was $368,689 and $300,130 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
Awards and Grants
Income from awards and grants represents awards from the
Community Development Financial Institution Fund and is recognized when a
definitive commitment from the federal government agency is received. There were
no awards or grants in 2005 or 2004.
Business Segments
The Corporation has determined that its current business and
operations consist of one business segment.
3. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This statement replaces SFAS
No. 123, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. SFAS 123(R) will require compensation costs related to share-based
payment transactions to be recognized in the financial statements (with limited
exceptions). The amount of compensation cost will be measured based on the
grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued.
Compensation cost will be recognized over the period that an employee provides
service in exchange for the award. The Company is evaluating the requirements of
implementation and plans to adopt the provisions under the prospective method
beginning January 1, 2006. The impact of this Statement on the Corporation in
2006 and beyond will depend upon various factors, among them being the
Corporation's future compensation strategy. As of December 31, 2005, all stock
options outstanding are fully vested.
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued Statement No. 154, ("SFAS No. 154") Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections - a Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. This
new standard replaces Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and FASB Statement No. 3 Reporting Accounting Changes in
Interim Financial Statements. Among other changes, SFAS No. 154 requires that a
voluntary change in accounting principle be applied retrospectively with all
prior period financial statements presented on the new accounting principle,
unless it is impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 also provides that (1) a
change in method of depreciating or amortizing a long-lived nonfinancial asset
be accounted for as a change in estimate (prospectively) that was effected by a
change in accounting principle, and (2) correction of errors in previously
issued financial statements should be termed a "restatement". The new standard
is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Corporation does not anticipate
this revision will have a material effect on its financial statements.
42
On November 3, 2005, the FASB issued FSP Nos. FAS 115-1 and FAS
124-1 to address the determination as to when an investment is considered
impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement
of the impairment loss. The FSPs also includes guidance on the accounting
subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires
additional disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as
other-than-temporary impairments. The guidance in this FAS amends FASB
Statements No. 115 Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities. The guidance in this FSP shall be applied to reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2005. This revision will not have a material effect
on the Corporation's financial statements.
4. RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The Bank is required by the Federal Reserve to maintain a reserve
balance based principally on deposit liabilities. The balance maintained is
included in cash and due from banks. The reserve balances kept at the Federal
Reserve Bank as of December 31, 2005 were $25,000.
5. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments
securities are as follows:
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
------------ ---------- --------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 2005:
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $ 26,847,870 $ - $(865,740) $25,982,130
Mortgage-backed securities 131,468 3,033 - 134,501
------------ ---------- --------- -----------
Total $ 26,979,338 $ 3,033 $(865,740) $26,116,631
============ ========== ========= ===========
Held-to-maturity:
Other $ 30,402 $ - $ - $ 30,402
============ ========== ========= ===========
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
------------ ---------- --------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 2004:
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $ 26,847,162 $ - $(390,740) $26,456,422
Mortgage-backed securities 140,233 3,424 - 143,657
State and political subdivisions - - - -
------------ ---------- --------- -----------
Total $ 26,987,395 $ 3,424 $(390,740) $26,600,079
============ ========== ========= ===========
Held-to-maturity:
U.S. Government agencies 2,000,735 5,525 - 2,006,260
Other 35,887 - - 35,887
------------ ---------- --------- -----------
Total $ 2,036,622 $ 5,525 $ - $ 2,042,147
============ ========== ========= ===========
43
Securities, with unrealized losses segregated by length of
impairment, were as follows:
Less than 12 Months More than 12 Months Total
---------------------------- ---------------------------- -------------------------------
Estimated Unrealized Estimated Unrealized Estimated Unrealized
Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses
------------ ------------- ------------ ------------- ------------ --------------
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Government
agencies and
corporations $2,438,275 $(61,725) $23,543,855 $(804,015) $26,982,130 $(865,740)
========== ======== =========== ========= =========== =========
Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and
available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than
temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating
other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other
things, (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been
less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the
issuer, and (iii) the intent and ability of the Corporation to retain its
investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in fair value.
Management has the ability and intent to hold the securities
classified as held-to-maturity until they mature, at which time the Corporation
will receive full value for the securities. Furthermore, as of December 31,
2005, management also had the ability and intent to hold the securities
classified as available-for-sale for a period of time sufficient for a recovery
of cost. The unrealized losses are largely due to increases in market interest
rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were
purchased. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach their
maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments
decline. Management does not believe any of the securities are impaired due to
reasons of credit quality. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2005, management
believes the impairments detailed in the table above are temporary and no
impairment loss has been realized in the Corporation's consolidated statement of
income.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at
December 31, 2005, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities
may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to call
or repay obligations without call or prepayment penalties.
Estimated
Amortized Fair
Cost Value
---------------- ---------------
Available-for-sale:
Due after one year through five years $26,847,870 $25,982,130
Due after five years through ten years - -
Mortgage-backed securities 131,468 134,501
----------- -----------
Total $26,979,338 $26,116,631
=========== ===========
Held-to-maturity:
Due after one year through five years $ - $ -
Due after ten years 30,402 30,402
----------- -----------
Total $ 30,402 $ 30,402
=========== ===========
44
During the year ended December 31, 2005 no available-for-sale
securities were sold. During 2004, the gross proceeds for the sale of available
securities were $7,032,625 and gains of $16,733.
Securities with a fair value of $14,975,010 at December 31, 2005
have been pledged as collateral for money market and certificate of deposit
accounts.
The only investments to a single issuer that exceeds 10% of
stockholders' equity are to government sponsored entities.
6. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The composition of loans, net of unearned income at December 31 is
as follows:
2005 2004
------------ ------------
Real estate $102,404,253 $ 94,543,110
Commercial 82,844,979 72,075,164
Consumer 4,980,479 6,368,380
Credit card loans 765,218 829,811
------------ ------------
$190,994,929 $173,816,465
============ ============
Transactions in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as
follows:
2005 2004
----------- -----------
Balance at January 1 $ 1,611,880 $ 1,488,212
----------- -----------
Provision charged to operating expense 410,000 360,000
----------- -----------
Loans charged-off (91,302) (413,390)
Recovery on loans previously charged-off 127,983 177,058
----------- -----------
Net recovery (charged-off) 36,681 (236,332)
----------- -----------
Balance at December 31 $ 2,058,561 $ 1,611,880
=========== ===========
Information with respect to impaired loans at December 31, 2005 and
2004 and for the years then ended is as follows:
2005 2004
----------- -----------
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance $ 558,128 $ 749,794
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance 17,805 49,355
----------- -----------
Total impaired loans $ 575,933 $ 799,149
=========== ===========
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans $ 50,808 $ 102,127
Allowance for loan losses related to other than
impaired loans 2,007,753 1,509,753
----------- -----------
Total allowance for loan losses $ 2,058,561 $ 1,611,880
=========== ===========
Average impaired loans for the year $ 752,271 $ 746,909
=========== ===========
45
Approximately $34,700 and $9,157 of interest income was recognized
on impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Interest income recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis during 2005 and
2004 was not considered material.
The Bank has sold certain real estate mortgage loans without
recourse and in some cases retained the related servicing rights. The principal
balances of these serviced loans, which are not included in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets, totaled $4,331,326 and $4,988,951 at December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively. There were $716,000 of loans held for sale at
December 31, 2005 and $1,149,000 at December 31, 2004.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004 the net carrying amount of mortgage
servicing rights was $-0- and $3,913, respectively, which approximated fair
value and are included in other assets.
The Bank has granted loans to certain officers and directors of the
Bank and their associates. Related party loans are made on substantially the
same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the
time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons and do not involve more
than the normal risk of collectibility. The aggregate dollar amount of these
loans was $13,465,670 and $11,508,543 at December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. During 2005, $7,851,906 of new loans were made while repayments
totaled $5,894,779. During 2004, $5,116,420 of new loans were made while
repayments totaled $2,306,545. The 2004 numbers for loans to officers and
directors include two directors that no longer serve on the Board. As of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Bank had outstanding loans to the Harbor Bank of
Maryland Community Development Corporation amounting to $1,795,444 and
$2,000,000, respectively.
7. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
The major classes of premises and equipment at December 31 are
summarized as follows:
2005 2004
------------ -----------
Land $ 661,900 $ 661,900
Buildings 2,400,196 3,947,253
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 2,575,067 2,111,982
Leasehold improvements 4,778,883 625,877
------------ -----------
10,416,046 7,347,012
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 2,889,706 2,209,292
------------ ----------
Total $ 7,526,340 $5,137,720
============ ==========
Depreciation expense was $680,903 and $427,497 for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004.
The Bank leases branch and office facilities. The lease agreements
provide for the payment of utilities and taxes by the lessee. Future minimum
payments for each of the five succeeding years under noncancelable operating
leases consisted of the following at December 31, 2005:
2006 $203,216
2007 196,999
2008 113,542
2009 113,542
2010 113,542
Thereafter 506,572
46
Total rental expense under operating leases amounted to $212,914
and $168,096 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
8. CORE DEPOSIT INTANGIBLE
The Corporation has a finite-lived core deposit intangible asset
created in 2002 which is being amortized over a 9-year period beginning in 2002.
Annual amortization expense related to this intangible is expected to be $80,460
per year through 2010 and $60,367 in 2011.
9. TIME DEPOSITS
At December 31, 2005, time deposits with a remaining maturity of
one year or more amounted to $21,924,052. Maturities of all time deposits are as
follows:
2007 $10,071,533
2008 9,742,793
2009 1,398,195
2010 482,009
2011 229,522
Deposits are the Corporation's primary funding source for loans and
investment securities. The mix and repricing alternatives can significantly
affect the cost of this source of funds and, therefore, impact the margin.
10. INCOME TAX
The Corporation's provision for income taxes for the years ended
December 31, is summarized as follows:
2005 2004
---------- --------
Taxes currently payable $1,205,592 $868,436
Deferred taxes (138,225) (106,110)
---------- --------
Income tax expense for the year $1,067,367 $762,326
========== ========
A reconcilement of the difference between the statutory federal
income tax rate and the effective tax rate for the Corporation is as follows:
2005 2004
-------- --------
Federal income tax rate 34.00% 34.00%
State income taxes, net of federal income tax effect 4.02 2.30
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Increase in value of bank-owned life insurance (2.50) (2.50)
Other 0.65 .50
------ -------
Effective tax rate 36.17% 34.30%
====== =======
47
Significant components of the Corporation's deferred tax
liabilities and assets at December 31 are as follows:
2005 2004
----------- ---------
Deferred tax liabilities -
Goodwill $ 511,749 $383,812
----------- ---------
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued liability - 106,205
Allowance for loan losses 598,506 440,988
Deferred loan origination fees - 14,457
Depreciation 120,884 19,189
Deferred compensation 333,716 237,865
Deposit premium 90,121 63,890
----------- ---------
Total gross deferred tax assets 1,143,227 882,594
----------- ---------
Net deferred tax assets attributable to operations 631,478 498,782
Unrealized loss (gain) on investments charged
to other comprehensive income 340,769 149,581
----------- ---------
Net deferred income tax assets $ 972,247 $648,363
=========== ========
11. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
As of December 31, 2005, the Bank had an unused available
line-of-credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB") of
$25,610,000.
12. JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
On October 9, 2004, the Corporation issued floating rate junior
subordinated debt securities due 2033 in the amount of $7.2 million. The debt
security was issued by the Corporation pursuant to an indenture, dated as of
October 9, 2004, between the Corporation and Wilmington Trust Company. The
capital securities will be issued by Harbor Bankshares Corporation Capital Trust
(the "Trust") pursuant to a purchase agreement dated September 18, 2004, among
the Corporation, the Trust and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Upon the receipt of
the funds, the Corporation paid off its long-term debt in the amount of $1.8
million and invested the remaining funds in the amount of $4.9 million as
capital in the Bank, increasing the Bank's tier one capital. The interest rate
on the debentures was 7.25% at December 31, 2005.
13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Stock Options
The Corporation has stock option award arrangements which
provide for the granting of options to acquire common stock by directors and key
employees. Option prices are equal to or greater than the estimated fair market
value of the common stock at the date of the grant. Options are generally
exercisable immediately after the date of the grant.
48
A summary of the Corporation's stock options as of December
31, 2005 and 2004 and changes during the years ended on those dates is presented
below:
2005 2004
------------------------ -------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Exercise Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price
--------- ---------- -------- ---------
Outstanding at the beginning of the year 150,826 $15.93 151,843 $15.49
Granted 4,891 23.04 9,820 21.69
Exercised (11,645) 14.80 (758) 11.61
Forfeited (11,331) 14.80 (10,079) 15.76
--------- --------
Outstanding at end of year 132,741 16.24 150,826 15.93
======= =======
Options exercisable at year-end 132,741 $16.24 150,826 $15.93
======= ====== ======= ======
Weighted average fair value of options
granted during the year $6.78 $10.50
===== ======
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2005:
Options Outstanding and Exercisable
-----------------------------------
Weighted- Weighted-
Remaining Average Average
Exercise Number Life Exercise
Price Range Outstanding (Years) Price
------------- ----------- ------------ ------------------
$15.24 - $23.04 132,741 3.6 $16.24
=============== ======= === ======
Profit Sharing Retirement Savings Plan
The Corporation has established a defined contribution plan
covering employees meeting certain age and service eligibility requirements. The
plan provides for cash deferrals qualifying under Section 401(k). Matching
contributions made by the Corporation totaled $67,169 and $77,324 for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Deferred Compensation
The Bank has entered into deferred compensation agreements
with two of its executive officers. Under the agreements, the Bank is obligated
to provide for the officer or his beneficiaries, during a period of fifteen
years after the employee's death, disability or retirement, annual benefits
ranging from $40,000 to $200,000. The estimated present value of future benefits
to be paid is being accrued over the period from the effective date of the
agreements until the full eligibility dates of the participants. The expense
incurred for this plan for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 was
$248,190 and $225,411, respectively. The Bank is the beneficiary of life
insurance policies, with aggregate cash surrender value of $4,178,774 at
December 31, 2005, that was purchased as a method of partially financing
benefits under this plan.
49
14. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
Real estate loans comprise $102,903,065 and $94,543,110 of the
total loan portfolio at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. All real
estate mortgage loans are collateralized by real property and/or other assets.
15. REGULATORY MATTERS
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to
meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly
additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have
a direct material effect on the Corporation's and the Bank's financial
statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that
involve quantitative measures of the Bank's assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The
Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital
adequacy require the Corporation and the Bank to maintain amounts and ratios
(set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the
regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as
defined) to average assets (as defined). As of December 31, 2005, the capital
levels of the Corporation and the Bank exceed all minimum capital adequacy
requirements to which they are subject. There are no conditions or events since
December 31, 2005 that management believes have changed the Bank's capital
rating.
The Corporation's and the Bank's actual capital amounts and ratios
are also presented in the table: (in thousands)
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
For Capital Prompt Corrective
Actual Adequacy Purposes Action Provisions
----------------- ------------------------ ---------------------
Minimum Required Minimum Required
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
------ ----- --------- ----------- -------- -----------
As of December 31, 2005:
Total Capital (to risk-weighted total assets)
Harbor Bankshares Corporation $23,566 11.67% $16,154 8.0% $20,192 10.0%
Harbor Bank of Maryland 23,356 11.59% 16,119 8.0% 20,150 10.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets)
Harbor Bankshares Corporation $18,321 9.07% $ 8,077 4.0% $12,116 6.0%
Harbor Bank of Maryland 21,297 9.47% 8,060 4.0% 12,080 6.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
Harbor Bankshares Corporation $18,321 7.31% $ 9,666 4.0% $12,083 5.0%
Harbor Bank of Maryland 21,297 8.83% 9,649 4.0% 12,062 5.0%
50
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
For Capital Prompt Corrective
Actual Adequacy Purposes Action Provisions
------------------ --------------------- --------------------
Minimum Required Minimum Required
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
-------- ------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
As of December 31, 2004:
Total Capital (to risk-weighted total assets)
Harbor Bankshares Corporation $22,040 12.10% $14,535 8.0% $18,169 10.0%
Harbor Bank of Maryland 21,830 12.01% 14,535 8.0% 18,169 10.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets)
Harbor Bankshares Corporation $17,242 9.47% $ 7,267 4.0% $10,901 6.0%
Harbor Bank of Maryland 20,218 9.47% 7,267 4.0% 10,901 6.0%
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
Harbor Bankshares Corporation $17,242 7.36% $9,365 4.0% $11,707 5.0%
Harbor Bank of Maryland 20,218 8.63% 9,365 4.0% 11,707 5.0%
Bank and holding company regulations, as well as Maryland law,
impose certain restrictions on dividend payments by the Bank, as well as
restricting extensions of credit and transfers of assets between the Bank and
the Company. At December 31, 2005, the Bank could have paid additional dividends
of $10,008,477 to its parent company without regulatory approval.
16. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per common share calculations for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
2005 2004
---------- ----------
BASIC:
Net income $1,883,174 $1,462,055
---------- ----------
Average common shares outstanding 689,134 704,602
---------- ----------
Earnings per common share - basic $2.73 $2.07
===== =====
DILUTED:
Net income $1,883,174 $1,462,055
---------- ----------
Average common shares outstanding 689,134 704,569
Stock option adjustment 49,488 51,654
---------- ----------
Average common shares outstanding - diluted 738,622 756,223
---------- ----------
Earnings per common share - diluted $2.55 $1.93
===== =====
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net
income by the weighted- average number of common shares outstanding for the
period.
51
Diluted earnings per common shares takes into consideration the pro
forma dilution assuming the Corporation's outstanding in-the-money stock options
were converted or exercised into common shares. The average price of the
Corporation's common stock for the period is used to determine the dilutive
effect of outstanding stock options. As of December 31, 2005 none of the
Corporation's 132,741 outstanding stock options were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share.
17. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
In the normal course of business, the Corporation has various
outstanding credit commitments which are properly not reflected in the financial
statements. These commitments are made to satisfy the financing needs of the
Corporation's clients. The associated credit risk is controlled by subjecting
such activity to the same credit and quality controls as exist for the
Corporation's lending and investing activities. The commitments are generally
variable rate and involve diverse business and consumer customers and are
generally well collateralized. Management does not anticipate that losses, if
any, which may occur as a result of these commitments would materially affect
the stockholders' equity of the Corporation. Since a portion of the commitments
have some likelihood of not being exercised, the amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements.
Loan and credit line commitments, totaled $27,913,000 at December
31, 2005 and $24,301,000 at December 31, 2004. These commitments are contingent
upon continuing customer compliance with the terms of the agreement.
Commercial letters of credit, totaling $907,810 at December 31,
2005 and $1,744,640 at December 31, 2004, are obligations to make payments under
certain conditions to meet contingencies related to customers' contractual
agreements. They are primarily used to guarantee a customer's contractual and/or
financial performance, and are seldom exercised.
18. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
SFAS No. 107, Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments
requires the Corporation to disclose fair value information about financial
instruments for which it is practicable to estimate, whether or not such fair
values are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets. Estimated fair value
amounts have been determined using available market information and other
valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret
market data in developing the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the
estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amount that could be
realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions
and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair
value amounts.
Cash and Due from Banks and Federal Funds Sold
The carrying amount approximated fair value.
Interest-Bearing Deposits in Other Banks
Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amount
approximated fair value.
52
Investment Securities
The fair values of securities are based upon quoted market
prices when available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values
are based upon quoted market prices of comparable instruments.
Loans
The fair values of variable-rate loans and fixed-rate loans
that reprice within one year, with no significant credit risk, are based upon
their carrying amounts. The fair values of all other loans are estimated using
discounted cash flow analysis, which utilizes interest rates currently being
offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The
reserve for possible loan losses is allocated to the various components of the
loan portfolio in determining the fair value.
FHLB of Atlanta Stock
Due to its restrictive nature, the fair value of FHLB of
Atlanta Stock approximates its carrying value.
Accrued Interest Receivable
The carrying amount reported in the consolidated balance
sheets is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
The carrying amount reported in the consolidated balance
sheets represents cash to be received on the surrender value of life insurance
policies and is a reasonable estimate of value.
Deposits
The fair value for demand deposits is, by definition, equal to
the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The carrying amounts for
variable rate deposits and fixed-rate certificates of deposit that reprice
within one year approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values
for longer-term fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using
discounted cash flow analysis that applies interest rates currently being
offered on certificates.
Accrued Interest Payable
Accrued interest payable includes interest expensed but not
yet paid for deposits and notes payable. The carrying amount approximates its
fair value.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt is discounted on a cash flow approach based on
market rates as of December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
The fair value of loan commitments and letters of credit was
estimated based upon the estimated amount of unamortized fees collected or paid
incident to granting or receiving the commitment.
53
The carrying values and estimated fair values of the
Corporation's financial assets and liabilities are as follows:
December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004
-------------------------------- -------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Value Value Value Value
---------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks $ 7,259,358 $ 7,259,358 $ 6,867,063 $ 6,867,063
Federal funds sold 15,624,890 15,624,890 9,845,813 9,845,813
Interest bearing deposits
in other banks 74,996 74,996 1,352,791 1,352,791
Investment securities 26,147,033 26,147,033 28,636,701 28,642,226
Loans, net of reserves 188,936,368 190,388,999 172,204,585 172,904,585
FHLB of Atlanta stock 470,000 470,000 438,200 438,200
Accrued interest receivable 1,101,742 1,101,742 1,034,913 1,034,913
Bank-owned life insurance 4,178,774 4,178,774 4,023,808 4,023,808
Financial liabilities:
Deposits 229,844,586 229,843,382 210,223,903 210,030,821
Accrued interest payable 683,762 683,762 356,184 356,184
Junior subordinated debentures 7,217,000 7,217,000 7,217,000 7,217,000
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Assets
2005 2004
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value
------------- ------------ ----------- -------------
Commitments to extend credit $25,585,000 $27,913,000 $24,301,000 $24,301,000
Other unused commitments 2,328,000 2,328,000 3,886,000 3,886,000
Commercial letters of credit 907,810 907,810 1,744,640 1,744,640
19. PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
----------------------------------
2005 2004
----------- -----------
Assets:
Balance with subsidiary $ 95,867 $ 66,968
Investment in bank subsidiary 23,960,910 23,245,961
Prepaid placement fee 193,665 201,666
----------- -----------
Total assets $24,250,442 $23,514,595
=========== ===========
Liabilities:
Accrued interest payable $ 79,532 $ 57,634
Junior subordinated debentures 7,217,000 7,217,000
Stockholders' equity 16,953,910 16,239,961
----------- -----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $24,250,442 $23,514,595
=========== ===========
54
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Years Ended December 31
2005 2004
----------- ----------
Dividend from subsidiary $1,681,445 $ 731,715
Interest and other expenses (625,052) (485,838)
Income tax benefit 212,518 165,802
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary 614,263 1,050,376
----------- ----------
Net income $1,883,174 $1,462,055
========== ==========
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31
2005 2004
------------ -------------
Operating activities:
Net income $ 1,883,174 $ 1,462,055
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities
Change in other assets and liabilities, net (354,990) (176,979)
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary (614,263) (1,050,376)
------------ -------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 913,921 234,700
------------ -------------
Investing activities - Investment in subsidiary - -
------------ -------------
Financing activities:
Retirement of stock (775,000) -
Proceeds from sale of common stock 172,373 8,170
Payments of cash dividends (282,395) (246,462)
------------ -------------
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities (885,022) (238,292)
------------ -------------
Change in cash and cash equivalents 28,899 (3,592)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 66,968 70,560
------------ -------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 95,867 $ 66,968
============ =============
55
Item 8. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None
Item 8A. Controls and Procedures
The Corporation's management, under the supervision and with the
participation of it Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
evaluated as of the last day of the period covered by this report, the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation's disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation's disclosure controls and
procedures were adequate. There were no significant changes in the Corporation's
internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the
Securities Act of 1934) during the quarter ended December 31, 2005, that have
materially effected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Corporation's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 8B. Other Information.
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers and Control Persons; Compliance with
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Information required by this item is listed below and on page 7 of this report
under the caption of "Executive Officers" of the Registrant.
The charter and by-laws of the Company provide that the directors shall
be classified into three classes as equal in number as possible, with each
director serving a three-year term. Currently, the Board of Directors is
composed of 13 members with Classes I and II each consisting of four member and
Class III consisting of five members. The Board of Directors currently also has
three open board seats which will remain open until suitable candidates are
located. The terms of the Class II directors are scheduled to expire at the 2006
annual meeting or until their respective successors have been duly elected and
qualified.
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders
of shares of Common Stock present in person or represent
NAME OF NOMINEES INFORMATION REGARDING CLASS II DIRECTORS
- ---------------- ----------------------------------------
Nathaniel Higgs Reverend Higgs is 75 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation since its formation in
1992 and of the Bank since 1981. From December 1966
to December 2002, he served as the Pastor of
Southern Baptist Church and has now retired.
Delores G. Kelley Dr. Kelley is 69 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation since its formation in
1992 and of the Bank since 1980. She is a retired
educator and Senator in the Maryland State Senate.
Erich March Mr. March is 54 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation since its formation in
1992 and of the Bank since 1981. His is Vice
President of March Funeral Homes, Inc.
Stanley W. Tucker Mr. Tucker is 58 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation and of the Bank since
1996. He is President of Meridian management
Company, Inc., which is the managing general
partner of MMG Ventures, L.P., an investment
management company.
56
Directors to serve until 2007 Annual Meeting (Class III)
NAME OF CLASS III DIRECTORS INFORMATION REGARDING CLASS III DIRECTORS
- --------------------------- -----------------------------------------
John Paterakis Mr. Paterakis is 77 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation since its formation in
1992 and of the Bank since 1982. He is President
and Chief Executive Officer of H & S Bakery, Inc.
and Northeast Foods, Inc.
James Scott, Jr. Mr. Scott is 48 years old and has served a s
director of the Corporation and the Bank since
November 2000. He is a principal of Pennan & Scott
P.C., an accounting firm. Mr. Scott is a certified
public accountant.
Edward St. John Mr. St. John is 68 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation since its formation in
1992 and of the Bank since 1990. He is President
and Chief Executive Officer of M.I.E. Investment
Company, a real estate development company.
Walter S. Thomas Pastor Thomas is 55 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation and the Bank since
November 2000. He is the Pastor of New Psalmist
Church.
George F. Vaeth, Jr. Mr. Vaeth is 72 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation since its formation in
1992 and of the Bank since 1981. He has served as
Secretary of the Company since its formation and of
the Bank since 1986. He is an architect with
G.V.A., an architectural and interior design firm.
2008 Annual Meeting (Class I)
NAME OF CLASS I DIRECTORS INFORMATION REGARDING CLASS I DIRECTORS
- ------------------------- ---------------------------------------
James H. Degraffereidt, Jr. Mr. Degraffenreidt is 52 years old and has served
as a director of the Corporation and of the Bank
since 1996. He is Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of WGL Holdings, Inc., distributors of
natural gas.
Louis J. Grasmick Mr. Grasmick is 76 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation since its formation in
1992 and of the Bank since 1982. He is Chief
Executive Officer of Louis J. Grasmick Lumber
Company, Inc.
Joseph Haskins, Jr. Mr. Haskins is 58 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation since its formation in
1992 and of the Bank since 1980. He has served as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company since its
formation in 1992, Chairman of the Board of the
Company Bank since 1995 and Chief Executive Officer
of the Bank since 1987.
John D. Ryder Mr. Ryder is 58 years old and has served as a
director of the Corporation and the Bank since
January 2000. He was President and Chief Operating
Officer of Metro Food Markets, a supermarket chain,
until 2000. He was President of AXS Technologies, a
software company, until July 2003. Currently, he is
President of Tree Top Kids, Inc.
57
CONTINUING DIRECTORS
The following information is provided with respect directors who will
continue to serve as directors of the Company until the expiration of their
terms at the times indicated.
COMPANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
GENERAL
The Corporation's business is managed under the direction of its Board
of Directors. The Board of Directors seeks to increase stockholder value and
promote the Corporation's long-term growth. The Board of Directors establishes
Corporation policies and strategies and regularly monitors the effectiveness of
the Corporation's management in carrying out these policies and strategies. As
part of the Board of Director's commitment to these principles, the Board of
Directors regularly reviews the Corporation's corporate governance policies and
practices. This review includes comparing the Corporation's current policies and
practices to the policies and practices suggest by various groups and
authorities active in corporate governance and policies and practices of public
companies in general. The Board of Directors will continue to consider the
adoption of changes, as appropriate, to enhance the Corporation's corporate
governance policies and practices and to comply with any rule changes made by
the SEC.
BOARD ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION
Members of the Board of Directors are kept informed of the Corporation
business through discussions with key member of the Corporation's management
team, by reviewing materials provided to the Board of Directors and by
participating in meetings of the Board and its committees.
The Board of Directors has adopted standards for director independence
that are in accordance with the standards adopted by the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (the "NASD") and utilized by companies with securities
quoted on Nasdaq. The Board of Directors is not required to adhere to the
independence standards adopted by the NASD because the common Stock is not
quoted or listed on Nasdaq or any other quotation system or exchange. The Board
of Directors believes, however, that a board with at least a majority of
independent directors is an important part of good corporate governance
principles. Based on the Board of Directors' adopted standards, the Board of
Directors has determined that none of its members has a material relationship
with the Corporation and that all of its members are independent directors,
except for Messrs. Haskins and Paterakis who are not independent directors
because each is an executive officer of the Corporation. As a result, a
significant majority of the members of the Board of Directors is independent.
During 2005, the Board of Directors met 12 times. Each of the nominees
and the other directors attended at least 75% of the total Board of Directors
meetings and meetings of the board committees on which he or she served, with
the exception of Mr. Thomas who attended 60% of these meetings. When necessary
or appropriate, the Corporation's independent directors meet in executive
sessions without the presence of the Corporation's management. This gives the
independent directors the opportunity to discuss management's performance and
any other matter that one or more independent directors would like to discuss.
BOARD COMMITTEES
Each director who serves on the Board of Directors is also a director
on the Bank's Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has one standing
committee: the Audit Committee (the "Audit Committee"). The Bank's Board of
Directors has a Compensation Committee (the "Compensation Committee") and an
Executive Committee (the "Executive Committee")
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee responsibilities include the
appointment of the Corporation's independent accountants, the preapproval of all
audit services and permitted non-audit services provided to the Corporation by
the Corporation's independent accountants, reviews of the independence of the
Corporation's independent accountants, and review of the adequacy of internal
accounting and disclosure controls of the Corporation. The Audit Committee
operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. In 2005, the
Audit Committee met four times. The current members of the Audit Committee are:
Messrs. Vaeth, Chair, Higgs, March, Scott and Tucker. Each member of the Audit
Committee is an independent director as defined by the current NASD rules. Mr.
Scott has the professional experience deemed necessary o qualify as an audit
committee financial expert under the SEC's rules and regulations.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee structures the
compensation of the Corporation's executive officers and administers the
Corporation's employee benefit plans. The Compensation Committee currently does
not operate under written charter. The Compensation Committee met once in 2005.
The current members of the Compensation Committee are: Messrs. Grasmick, Chair,
DeGraffenreidt and St. John. Each member of the Compensation Committee is an
independent director as defined by the current NASD rules.
58
Executive Committee. The Executive Committee generally has the
authority to exercise all of the power of the Bank's Board of Director in the
management and direction of the business affairs of the Bank, subject to
specific directions of the Bank's Board of Directors and the limitation of
Maryland law. The Executive Committee met 13 times in 2005. The current members
of the Executive Committee are: Messrs. Paterakis, Chair, Haskins,
Degraffenreidt, Grasmick, March, Vaeth and Dr. Kelley. A majority of the members
of the Executive Committee is independent as defined by the current NASD rules.
NOMINATION PROCESS
The Board of Directors does not have a nominating committee. The full
Board of Directors performs the functions of a nominating committee. The Board
of Directors does not believe it needs a separate nominating committee because
the full Board is comprised predominantly of independent directors and has the
time and resources to perform the function of selecting board nominees. When the
Board of Directors performs nominating function, the Board of Directors acts in
accordance with the Corporation's corporate charter and bylaws but does not have
a separate charter related to the nomination process. Under the Corporation's
charter, nominations for director may be made by the Board of Directors or by a
stockholder of record who delivers notice along with the additional information
and materials required by the Corporation's charter to the Corporation Corporate
Secretary not less then 30 days and no more than 60 days before the annual
meeting date. For the Corporation's annual meeting in 2007, the Corporation must
receive this notice on or after February 18, 2007 and on or before March 20,
2007. The Corporation's stockholders may obtain a copy of the Corporation
charter by writing to the Corporation Corporate Secretary, Harbor Bankshares
Corporation, 25 West Fayette Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
The Corporation's directors have a critical role in guiding the
Corporation's strategic direction and in overseeing the Corporation's
management. The Board of Directors considers candidates for the Board based upon
several criteria, including their broad-based business and professional skills
and experiences, concern for the long-term interests of stockholders, and
personal integrity and judgment. Candidates should have reputations, both
personal and professional, consistent with the Corporation's image and
reputation. Because diversity is important, the Board of Directors seeks to
ensure that its directors reflect the gender and ethnic diversity of the
Corporation's community. The majority of directors on the Board of Directors
should be "independent," not only as that term may be legally defined, but also
without the appearance of any conflict in serving as a director. In addition,
directors must have time available to devote to Board activities and to enhance
their knowledge of the banking industry. Accordingly, the Board of Directors
seeks to attract and retain highly qualified directors who have sufficient time
to attend to their substantial duties and responsibilities to the Corporation.
The Board of Directors utilizes the following process for identifying
and evaluating nominees to the Board. In the case of incumbent directors whose
terms of office are set to expire, the Board of Directors review such directors'
overall service to the company during their term, including the number of
meetings attended, level of participation and quality of performance. In the
case of new director candidates, the directors on the Board of Directors are
polled for suggestions as to potential candidates that may meet the criteria
above, discuss candidates suggested by the Corporation's stockholders and may
also engage, if the Board of Directors deems appropriate, a professional search
firm. To date, the Board of Directors has not engaged professional search firms
to identify or evaluate potential nominees but may do so in the future, if
necessary. The Board of Directors then meets to discuss and consider these
candidates' qualifications and then chooses a candidate by a majority vote.
DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT THE CORPORATION ANNUAL MEETING
The Corporation does not have a formal policy regarding attendance by
members of the Board of Director at the Corporation's annual meetings of
stockholders. The Corporation has always encouraged its directors to attend its
annual meetings of stockholders and expects to continue this policy. In 2005, 13
Corporation directors attended the Corporation's annual meeting of stockholders.
STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD
The Corporation does not have a formal process for stockholder
communications with the Board of Directors. The Corporation has made an effort
to ensure that the Board of Directors or individual directors, as applicable,
hear the views of Corporation's stockholders. The Corporation believes that it
has been responsive regarding conveying stockholder communications to the Board
of Directors.
59
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE.
Based solely on the Corporation's review of the copies of initial statements of
beneficial ownership on Form 3 and reports of changes in beneficial ownership on
Form 4 that it has received in the past year, annual statements of changes in
beneficial ownership on Form 5 with respect to the last fiscal year, and written
representations that no such annual statement of change in beneficial ownership
was required, all directors, executive officers, and beneficial owners of more
than 10% of its common stock have timely filed those reports with respect to
2005, except for a Form 4 reporting acquisition of shares upon option exercise
by Director Grasmick, which was inadvertently filed 1 day late. . The
Corporation makes no representation regarding persons who have not identified
themselves as being subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or as to the appropriateness of disclaimers
of beneficial ownership.
Item 10. Executive Compensation
Information required by this item is listed below.
CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT
For years the Corporation has had policies regarding conflicts of
interest and securities law compliance. The Corporation has adopted a Code of
Ethics and Business Conduct that reflects these longstanding policies and
contains additional policy initiatives. The Corporation requires all its
directors, executive officers and employees to adhere to the Code of Ethics and
Business Conduct in addressing the legal and ethical issues encountered in
conducting their work. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct requires that the
Corporation's directors, executive officers and employees avoid conflict of
interest, comply with securities laws and other legal requirements and conduct
business in an honest and ethical manner. The Corporation conveys to its
directors, executive officers and employees both their obligations and
responsibilities under and the importance of the Code of Ethics and Business
Conduct.
Directors, executive officers and employees are required to report any
conduct that they believe in good faith to be an actual or apparent violation of
the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. The Corporation has established
procedures for receiving, retaining and treating complaints received regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and for the
confidential and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Corporation's stockholders may
obtain a copy of the Code of Ethics and Business conduct by writing to the
Corporation's Corporate Secretary, Harbor Bankshares Corporation, 25 West
Fayette Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. A Copy of the Code of Ethics and
Business Conduct has been filed with the SEC as an exhibit to the Corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table shows compensation paid to certain executive
officers of the Corporation for the three-year period ended December 31, 2005.
No other executive officer of the Corporation received total annual compensation
in excess of $100,000 during such period.
ANNUAL COMPENSATION
------------------------------
ALL OTHER
NAME AND POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION
- ----------------- ---- --------- ------- ------------
Joseph Haskins, Jr. (1)(2) 2005 $213,383 170,706 $6,191
Chairman, President and 2004 207,168 165,734 6,191
Chief Executive Officer 2003 203,105 182,795 6,191
Teodoro J. Hernandez 2005 99,548 14,955 --
Vice President and Treasurer 2004 91,781 9,179 --
2003 90,000 17,000 --
Darius L. Davis 2005 101,904 15,000 --
Executive Vice President/Bank 2004 86,797 15,000 --
(1) Bonus paid pursuant to the terms of Mr. Haskins' employment agreement.
(2) All other compensation represents premiums for term life benefit paid by the
Corporation.
60
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The Corporation has adopted stock option plans, pursuant to which it
has reserved 226,886 shares of its Common Stock for the issuance of options. The
following table sets forth information regarding the options granted to the
named executive officers during 2005.
NUMBER OF PERCENT OF TOTAL EXERCISE OR MARKET PRICE PER
SHARES UNDERLYING OPTIONS GRANTED TO BASE PRICE SHARE ON DATE
NAME OPTIONS GRANTED EMPLOYEES IN FISCAL YEAR PER SHARE OF GRANT EXPIRATION DATE
- ---- --------------- ------------------------ --------- -------- ---------------
Joseph Haskins, Jr. ...... 2,560 42.3% $25.00 $25.00 1/1/2016
Teodoro J. Hernandez...... 796 13.2 25.00 25.00 1/1/2016
Darius L. Davis........... 1,223 20.2 25.00 25.00 1/1/2016
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND YEAR END VALUE OF OPTIONS
The following table set for the aggregated option exercises in 2005 and
the option values at December 31, 2005, based upon a market value for Company
Common Stock of $25.00 per share:
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF VALUE OF UNEXERCISE
SHARES ACQUIRED VALUE UNEXERCISED OPTIONS IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
NAME ON EXERCISE REALIZED AT FISCAL YEAR-END(1) AT FISCAL YEAR-END
- ---- ----------- -------- --------------------- ------------------
Joseph Haskins, Jr. ......... 4,053 41,330 50,938 $345,989
Teodoro J. Hernandez ........ -- -- 8,775 59,085
Daruius L. Davis............. -- -- 3,048 5,024
- -----------------
(1) Currently exercisable options.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Directors of the Corporation receive a fee of $533 for each board
meeting attended ($1,066 if the director is a member of the Corporation's
Executive Committee), but do not receive a fee for attendance at the committee
meetings. Mr. Vaeth received an additional fee of 4,340 for acting as secretary
at each of the board and board committee meetings. Total fees paid to directors
of the Corporation during 2005 were $104,605. Directors who are not employed by
the Corporation or the Bank are permitted to elect whether to receive their fees
in the form of cash or in the form of options to purchase Common Stock of the
Corporation under the 1995 Director Stock Option Plan which has been approved by
the Corporation's stockholders. The exercise prices of the options will equal
the market price of the Common Stock on the date of grant. The Corporation did
not grant any options to its directors in 2005.
MR. HASKINS' EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AND RETIREMENT BENEFIT
Joseph Haskins, Jr. has an employment agreement with the Corporation
and the Bank for a four-year term commencing as of January 1, 2000, which term
may be automatically renewed for additional three-year terms unless earlier
terminated. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Haskins will serve as
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation
and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank at an annual
salary of $182,330, subject to annual increases approved by the Corporation and
the Bank. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Haskins may also receive an annual
incentive bonus based upon the attainment of goals and objectives set by the
Corporation's Board of Directors. If the minimum level of such goals and
objectives is not met, Mr. Haskins will not be entitled to an incentive bonus.
If the Corporation's Board of Directors awards Mr. Haskins an incentive bonus,
the amount of the bonus will range from 60% to 100% of Mr. Haskins's then
current salary, as determined by the Board of Directors. In addition to the
benefit programs, plans, and arrangements of the Corporation and the Bank
generally available to their employees and the normal perquisites provided to
their senior executive officers, the employment agreement provides that Mr.
Haskins will receive long-term disability insurance, life insurance, and an
automobile allowance. Further, the Corporation must maintain a key man life
insurance policy on the life of Mr. Haskins in order to provide the funds
necessary to buy his shares of Corporation Common Stock from his estate or his
heirs.
61
If the Corporation terminates Mr. Haskins' employment because he
becomes disabled, the Corporation will continue to provide Mr. Haskins with
long-term disability insurance and medical and group life insurance until he
attains age 65. Upon termination without cause or resignation with good reason
(as those terms are used in the employment agreement), Mr. Haskins would be
entitled to (1) severance pay equal to three times his base salary at the time
of termination, payable in three equal annual installments, the first of which
is due within 30 day of termination, (2) a pro rated bonus based upon the bonus
paid in the year prior to termination or resignation, and (3) immediate vesting
of his outstanding options. If Mr. Haskins voluntarily resigns without good
reason or if the Corporation terminates his employment for cause, the
Corporation would not have any further obligations to Mr. Haskins under his
employment agreement.
The Corporation must pay a change of control benefit to Mr. Haskins if
either (1) within 12 months after a change of control of the Corporation, the
Corporation terminates Mr. Haskins' employment without cause or Mr. Haskins
terminate his employment for good reason or (2) within 30 days after the
expiration of six month after the change in control, Mr. Haskins' terminates his
employment for any reason. The change of control benefit would equal the greater
of (1) 2.99 times the average of Mr. Haskins' gross compensation from the
Corporation over the five-year period before the termination or (2) the amount
Mr. Haskins would receive if he was terminated without cause, as described in
the prior paragraph. Further, in such event, Mr. Haskins would be entitled to
the immediate vesting of his options.
Mr. Haskins may be entitled to receive a retirement benefit under an
executive supplemental retirement plan. Mr. Haskins will receive 15 annual
payment of the greater of (1) 63% of his final base salary or (2) $200,000,
payable at the time of retirement, if he retires at or after age 62. Mr. Haskins
will receive 15 annual payments, each payment being equal to 63% of his final
base salary, payable at the time of retirement or termination (or in the case of
a disability, at the age of 65), if before age 62:
o Mr. Haskins terminates his employment for good reason or, within
30 days after the expiration of six months after a change of
control of the Corporation, Mr. Haskins terminates his
employment with or without good reason; or
o the Corporation terminates Mr. Haskins' employment without cause
or because of a disability.
If Mr. Haskins terminates his employment before age 62 without good
reason, Mr. Haskins will be entitled to a prorated amount of 63% of his
final base salary based upon the number of years he provided services
to the Corporation from the year 2000 until such time has he retires.
However, if the Corporation terminates Mr. Haskins' employment for
cause, Mr. Haskins will forfeit his retirement benefit. In the event of
Mr. Haskins' death, Mr. Haskins' beneficiaries would be entitled to
receive the reminder of the retirement benefit should he die before
receipt of the full retirement benefit.
INFORMATION REGARDING MR. HERNANDEZ
Mr. Hernandez is 61 years old and has served as Vice President and
Cashier of the Bank since 1982 and Vice President and Treasurer of the
Corporation since its formation in 1992. He became a Senior Vice President of
the Bank in 1998.
Mr. Hernandez may be entitled to receive a retirement benefit under an
executive supplemental retirement plan. Mr. Hernandez will receive 15 annual
payments of $40,000, payable at the time of retirement, if he retires at or
after age 65. Mr. Hernandez will receive 15 annual payments, in amounts ranging
from $5,309 to $40,000, if Mr. Hernandez retires before age 65. In the event of
a change of control of the Bank, if Mr. Hernandez's employment is terminated for
any reason (other than a Bank-approved leave of absence), Mr. Hernandez will be
entitled to receive the same benefit as if he retired at or after age 65. Mr.
Hernandez's beneficiaries would be entitled to receive the remainder of the
retirement benefit should he die before receipt of the full retirement benefit.
In the event of Mr. Hernandez's death while in active services of the Bank, Mr.
Hernandez's beneficiaries would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment
ranging from $38,676 to $396,987, depending upon the year of his death. However,
if the Board of Directors terminates Mr. Hernandez's employment for cause, Mr.
Hernandez will forfeit his retirement benefit.
62
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
Information required by this item is listed below:
STOCK OWNERSHIP
There were 641,784 shares of the Common Stock issued and outstanding on
March 3, 2006. The following table shows the beneficial ownership of the Common
Stock as of this dates by: (1) each of the Corporation's current named executive
officers and directors and (2) all of the Corporation's current directors and
executive officers as a group.
NUMBER OF SHARES
BENEFICIALLY PERCENTAGE OF SHARES
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER(1)(2) OWNED(3) BENEFICIALLY OWNED
- ------------------------------ ----------------- --------------------
Joseph Haskins, Jr. (4) .................................. 95,538 13.79%
Teodoro J. Hernandez (5) ................................. 8,775 1.35%
James H. Degraffereidt, Jr. (6) .......................... 13,928 2.13%
Louis J. Grasmick (7) .................................... 23,227 3.42%
Nathaniel Higgs (8) ...................................... 9,545 1.47%
Delores G. Kelley (9) .................................... 16,923 2.60%
Erich March (10) ......................................... 26,093 4.00%
John Paterakis (11) ...................................... 58,789 9.16%
John D. Ryder ............................................ 3,219 *
James Scott, Jr. (12) .................................... 3,747 *
Edward St. John .......................................... 13,488 2.10%
Walter S. Thomas (13) .................................... 228 *
Stanley W. Tucker (14) ................................... 13,268 2.07%
George F. Vaeth, Jr. (15) ................................ 20,725 3.18%
All directors and executive officers
As a group (14 persons) (16) ............................. 307,493 40.40%
- ----------------
* Less Than 1%
(1) Unless otherwise specified, the address of these persons is c/o Harbor
Bankshares Corporation, 25 West Fayette Street, Baltimore, Maryland
21201.
(2) The Corporation uses the SEC's definition of beneficial ownership. This
means that the person named in this table have sole or shared voting
and/or investment power over the shares shown. Beneficial ownership also
includes shares underlying options currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days.
(3) Unless otherwise specified, the number of shares shown represents shares
of Common Stock.
(4) Represents 44,600 shares of Common Stock and 50,938 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon the exercise of options.
(5) Represents 8,775 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of
options.
(6) Represents 4,325 hares of Common Stock and 9,603 shares of Common Stock
issuable upon the exercise of options.
(7) Represents 13,227 shares of Common Stock (including 3,848 shares jointly
owned with Mr. Grasmick and his son and 8,780 shares jointly owned by Mr.
Grasmick and his wife) and 10,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon
the exercise of options.
(8) Represents 4,545 shares of Common Stock (including 4,175 shares jointly
owned by Reverend Higgs and his wife) and 5,000 shares of Common Stock
issuable upon the exercise of options.
(9) Represents 6,923 shares of Common Stock (including 619 shares jointly
owned by Dr. Kelley and her husband) and 10,000 shares of Common Stock
issuable upon the exercise options.
(10) Represents 16,093 shares of Common Stock (including 15,435 shares owned
by a corporation over which Mr. March has the power to vote) and 10,000
shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options.
(11) Includes 32,874 shares of Common Stock owned by three corporations
controlled by Mr. Paterakis (J and B Associates, Inc. - 16,437 shares; H
& S Bakery, Inc. - 6,164 shares; Northeast Food, Inc. 10,273 shares) and
11,300 shares of Common Stock owned by Paterakis Limited Partnership,
LLP.
(12) Includes 3,430 shares of Common Stock jointly owned by Mr. Scott and his
wife.
(13) The number of shares of Common Stock owned does not include 3,757 shares
owned by a religious organization over which Pastor Thomas has the power
to vote.
(14) Includes 13,234 shares of Common Stock owned by MMG ventures L.P. over
which Mr. Tucker has authority to vote.
(15) Represents 10,725 shares of Common Stock and 10,000 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon the exercise of options.
(16) Represents 193,177 shares of Common Stock and 114,316 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon the exercise of options.
63
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
During the past year the Bank has had loan transactions in the ordinary
course of its banking business with directors and executive officers of the Bank
and with their affiliates. Loans to such persons were made in the ordinary
course of business and did not and do not currently involve more than the normal
risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. All such loans
were made on substantially the same terms including interest rates and
collateral requirements, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with non-affiliates. The bank expects to enter into such
transaction in the future. As of December 31, 2005, loans to directors and
executive officers of the Bank, and their affiliates, including loans guaranteed
by such persons and unfunded commitments made in 2005, aggregated $13,468,000 or
approximately 63.2% of tangible stockholders' equity of the Bank.
Item 13. Exhibits
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB.
No. Exhibit
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of Harbor Bankshares Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to Registration Statement
on Form S-4 filed July 17, 1992.
3.2 Bylaws of Harbor Bankshares Corporation (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3(b) to Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed July 17,
1992.
10.1* Harbor Bankshares Corporation Stock Option Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(b) to Registration Statement on Form S-4
filed July 17, 1992.
10.2* Employment Agreement by and between Joseph Haskins, Jr., Harbor
Bankshares Corporation, and the Harbor Bank of Maryland effective
January 1, 2000.
10.3 1995 Directors Stock Option Plan
10.4,10.5 Deferred Compensation Agreements.
13 Portions of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the Year Ended
December 31, 2005
14 Code of Ethics
23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31(a),(b) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
32(a),(b) 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
The Corporation will furnish copies of the exhibits to this report upon request
of its stockholders upon payment of a reasonable fee upon request to Teodoro J.
Hernandez, Treasurer, Harbor Bankshares Corporation, 25 West Fayette Street,
Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
64
Item 15. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
GENERAL
The Audit Committee has retained Stegman & Company as independent
public accountants to audit the Corporation's 2006 consolidated financial
statements. Stegman & Company also audited the Corporation's consolidated
financial statements for 2004 and 2005. A representative of Stegman & Company is
expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, with the opportunity to make a
statement if he or she decides, and will respond to appropriate questions.
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT FEES
2005 2004
---- ----
Audit Fees $60,500 $59,950
Audit-Related Fees 1,950 2,250
Tax Fees 10,425 10,725
All Other Fees -- --
Total $72,875 $72,925
Fees that the Corporation paid to Stegman & Company in 2004 and 2005
are set forth in the above table. Audit fees are fees the Corporation paid
Stegman & Company for the audit and quarterly reviews of the Corporation's
consolidated financial statements, assistance with the review of documents filed
with the SEC, consent procedures and accounting consultation related to
transaction and the adoption of new accounting pronouncements. Audit-related
fees are fees for services that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit or the review of the Corporation's consolidated financial statements and
principally included consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting
standards. Tax fee primarily included tax compliance services. Stegman & Company
did not provide any other services to the Corporation in 2004 and 2005.
POLICY ON AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDI AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
The Audit committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit and
non-audit services proved by the independent public accountants. These services
may include audit services, and audit-related services, tax services and other
services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any
pre-approval is derailed as to the particular service or category of services
and is generally subject to a specific budget. The Audit Committee has delegated
pre-approval authority to its Chair when expedition of services is necessary.
The Chair is required to report any decision to pre-approve such services to the
full Audit Committee at its next meeting. The independent public accountants and
management are required to periodically report to the full Audit Committee
regarding the extent of services provided by the independent public accountants
in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to
date.
65
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION
By: /s/ Teodoro J. Hernandez
Title: Vice President and Treasurer
Date: March 8, 2006
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, this
report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant, and
in the capacities, and on the dates indicated:
By: /s/ Joseph Haskins, Jr.
Title: Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive
Officer
Date: March 8, 2006
- ---------------------------------------
By: /s/ Nathaniel Higgs By: /s/ James H. DeGraffenreidt
Title: Director Title: Director
Date: March 8, 2006 Date: March 8, 2006
- --------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
By: /s/ George F. Vaeth, Jr. By: /s/ Louis Grasmick
Title: Director Title: Director
Date: March 8, 2006 Date: March 8, 2006
- --------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
By: /s/ Stanley W. Tucker By: /s/ John D. Ryder
Title: Director Title: Director
Date: March 8, 2006 Date: March 8, 2006
- --------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
By: James Scott, Jr. By: /s/ Erich W. March
Title: Director Title: Director
Date: March 8, 2006 Date: March 8, 2006
- --------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
By: /s/ John Paterakis By: /s/ Edward St. John
Title: Director Title: Director
Date: March 8, 2006 Date: March 8, 2006
- ---------------------------------------
By: /s/ Walter S. Thomas, Sr.
Title: Director
Date: March 8, 2006
- ---------------------------------------
By: /s/ Delores J. Kelly
Title: Director
Date: March 8, 2006
- ---------------------------------------
66
APPENDIX I
-FORM OF PROXY-
REVOCABLE PROXY
HARBOR BANKSHARES CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
JUNE 14, 2006
The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Joseph Haskins, Jr. and George F. Vaeth, Jr. and each of them the proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to attend the annual meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Harbor Bankshares Corporation (the “Company”) to be held at the Harbor Inn–Pier 5 Hotel, 711 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21202 on Wednesday, June 14, 2006, at 12:00 noon Eastern Time, or at any adjournment thereof, and to vote all the shares of stock of the Company that the undersigned may be entitled to vote, upon the following matters:
| | THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK | |
| | | |
| 1. | Approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 5, 2006, by and between Harbor Bankshares Corporation and Harbor Merger Corporation, a Maryland corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Harbor Bankshares Corporation (the “merger subsidiary”), pursuant to which the merger subsidiary will merge with and into Harbor Bankshares Corporation, with Harbor Bankshares Corporation being the surviving corporation. | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | FOR | | AGAINST | | ABSTAIN | | |
| |
|
| |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| 2. | The election of four Class II Directors, each to serve for a three-year term. | |
| |
| | For all nominees listed below (except as marked to the contrary below). | |
| |
| | Withhold authority to vote for all nominees listed below. | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nominees: | | Nathaniel Higgs, Delores G. Kelley, Erich March, and Stanley W. Tucker | |
| | | |
| | (To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, strike out the nominee’s name.) | |
| | | |
| 3. | The transaction of such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. | |
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS MARKED HEREIN. IF NO INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY ARE MARKED HEREIN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, AND AS DETERMINED BY A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS TO OTHER MATTERS.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
The undersigned shareholder hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement and hereby revokes any proxy or proxies previously given. This proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise.
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN, AND MAIL THIS PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE.
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.
Signature of Shareholder | Date: |
| |
Signature of Shareholder | Date: |
Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.