Fair Value Measurements | (10) Fair Value Measurements ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements" clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The three levels are defined as follows: level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Effective January 2018 we have elected to use the fair value method to value our portfolio of finance receivables acquired in January 2018 and thereafter. Our valuation policies and procedures have been developed by our Accounting department in conjunction with our Risk department and with consultation with outside valuation experts. Our policies and procedures have been approved by our Chief Executive and our Board of Directors and include methodologies for valuation, internal reporting, calibration and back testing. Our periodic review of valuations includes an analysis of changes in fair value measurements and documentation of the reasons for such changes. There is little available third-party information such as broker quotes or pricing services available to assist us in our valuation process. Our level 3, unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions about the factors that market participants use in pricing similar receivables and are based on the best information available in the circumstances. They include such inputs as estimates for the magnitude and timing of net charge-offs and the rate of amortization of the portfolio of finance receivable. Significant changes in any of those inputs in isolation would have a significant impact on our fair value measurement. The table below presents a reconciliation of the finance receivables measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended September 30, September 30, 2018 2017 2018 2017 (In thousands) (In thousands) Balance at beginning of period $ 412,895 $ – $ – $ – Finance receivables at fair value acquired during period 229,030 – 659,641 – Payments received on finance receivables at fair value (18,851 ) – (31,824 ) – Net interest income accretion on fair value receivables (8,267 ) – (13,010 ) – Mark to fair value – – – – Balance at end of period $ 614,807 $ – $ 614,807 $ – The table below compares the fair values of these finance receivables to their contractual balances for the periods shown: September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 Contractual Fair Contractual Fair Balance Value Balance Value (In thousands) Finance receivables measured at fair value $ 614,578 $ 614,807 $ – $ – The following table provides certain qualitative information about our level 3 fair value measurements: Financial Instrument Fair Values as of Inputs as of September 30, December 31, S eptember 30, December 31, 2018 2017 Unobservable Inputs 2018 2017 Assets: Finance receivables measured at fair value $ 614,807 $ – Discount rate 8.9% - 10.7% n/a Cumulative net losses 15% - 16% n/a The following table summarizes the delinquency status of these finance receivables measured at fair value as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017: September 30, December 31, 2018 2017 (In thousands) Delinquency Status Current $ 595,920 $ – 31 - 60 days 12,812 – 61 - 90 days 3,975 – 91 + days 1,871 – $ 614,578 $ – Repossessed vehicle inventory, which is included in Other assets on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet, is measured at fair value using level 2 assumptions based on our actual loss experience on sale of repossessed vehicles. At September 30, 2018 the finance receivables related to the repossessed vehicles in inventory totaled $32.3 million. We have applied a valuation adjustment, or loss allowance, of $23.3 million, which is based on a recovery rate of approximately 28%, resulting in an estimated fair value and carrying amount of $9.0 million. The fair value and carrying amount of the repossessed inventory at December 31, 2017 was $9.7 million after applying a valuation adjustment of $24.0 million. There were no transfers in or out of level 1 or level 2 assets and liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. We have no material level 3 assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, were as follows: As of September 30, 2018 Financial Instrument (In thousands) Carrying Fair Value Measurements Using: Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 10,537 $ 10,537 $ – $ – $ 10,537 Restricted cash and equivalents 110,473 110,473 – – 110,473 Finance receivables, net 1,615,369 – – 1,620,076 1,620,076 Finance receivables measured at fair value 614,807 – – 614,807 614,807 Accrued interest receivable 36,232 – – 36,232 36,232 Liabilities: Warehouse lines of credit $ 127,695 $ – $ – $ 127,695 $ 127,695 Accrued interest payable 4,797 – – 4,797 4,797 Securitization trust debt 2,034,281 – – 2,033,598 2,033,598 Subordinated renewable notes 16,948 – – 16,948 16,948 As of December 31, 2017 Financial Instrument (In thousands) Carrying Fair Value Measurements Using: Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 12,731 $ 12,731 $ – $ – $ 12,731 Restricted cash and equivalents 111,965 111,965 – – 111,965 Finance receivables, net 2,195,797 – – 2,171,846 2,171,846 Accrued interest receivable 46,753 – – 46,753 46,753 Liabilities: Warehouse lines of credit $ 112,408 $ – $ – $ 112,408 $ 112,408 Accrued interest payable 4,212 – – 4,212 4,212 Securitization trust debt 2,083,215 – – 2,089,678 2,089,678 Subordinated renewable notes 16,566 – – 16,566 16,566 The following summary presents a description of the methodologies and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of our financial instruments. Much of the information used to determine fair value is highly subjective. When applicable, readily available market information has been utilized. However, for a significant portion of our financial instruments, active markets do not exist. Therefore, significant elements of judgment were required in estimating fair value for certain items. The subjective factors include, among other things, the estimated timing and amount of cash flows, risk characteristics, credit quality and interest rates, all of which are subject to change. Since the fair value is estimated as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the amounts that will actually be realized or paid at settlement or maturity of the instruments could be significantly different. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Equivalents The carrying value equals fair value. Finance Receivables, net The fair value of finance receivables is estimated by discounting future cash flows expected to be collected using discount rates at which similar receivables could be sold. Finance Receivables Measured at Fair Value The carrying value equals fair value. Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable The carrying value approximates fair value. Warehouse Lines of Credit and Subordinated Renewable Notes The carrying value approximates fair value because the related interest rates are estimated to reflect current market conditions for similar types of secured instruments. Securitization Trust Debt The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using interest rates that we believe reflect the current market rates. |