UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-01976
Sequoia Fund, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
9 West 57th Street, Suite 5000
New York, NY 10019
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
John B. Harris
Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb L.P.
9 West 57th Street
Suite 5000
New York, NY 10019
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 686-6884
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: June 30, 2022
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
(a) Report to Stockholders.
SEMI-ANNUAL
REPORT
(Unaudited)
JUNE 30, 2022
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Page | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
7 | ||||
8 | ||||
10 | ||||
11 | ||||
12 | ||||
13 | ||||
14 | ||||
20 | ||||
20 |
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Illustration of an Assumed Investment of $10,000 (Unaudited)
The graph below covers the period from July 15, 1970 (the date Sequoia Fund, Inc. (the ”Fund“) shares were first offered to the public) through June 30, 2022.
Sequoia Fund’s results as of June 30, 2022 appear below with results of the S&P 500 Index for the same periods:
Period ended June 30, 2022 | Sequoia Fund | S&P 500 Index* | ||||
6 Months | -29.30% | -19.96% | ||||
1 Year | -23.56% | -10.62% | ||||
5 Years (Annualized) | 8.54% | 11.31% | ||||
10 Years (Annualized) | 8.53% | 12.96% | ||||
Since inception (Annualized)** | 13.09% | 10.91% |
The results shown in the graph and table, which assume reinvestment of distributions, represent past performance and do not guarantee future results. The graph and table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance data current to the most recent month end can be obtained by calling DST Systems, Inc. at (800) 686-6884.
*The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of the common stocks of 500 major U.S. corporations. The Index does not incur expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in the Index.
**Inception Date: July 15, 1970.
Please consider the investment objectives, risks and charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. The Fund’s prospectus and summary prospectus contain this and other information about the Fund. You may obtain year to date performance as of the most recent quarter end, and copies of the prospectus and summary prospectus, by calling 1-800-686-6884, or on the Fund’s website at www.sequoiafund.com. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing.
Shares of the Fund are distributed by Foreside Financial Services, LLC (Member of FINRA). An investment in the Fund is not a deposit of a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
|
3
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
July 12, 2022
Dear Sequoia Fund shareholders:
For the second quarter of 2022, Sequoia Fund generated a negative return of 19.12%1, net of fees, versus negative 16.10% for the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index. For the year to date through June 30, the Fund generated a total negative return of 29.30%, versus negative 19.96% for the Index.
During the quarter we opportunistically trimmed the Fund’s stakes in Elevance Health (formerly known as Anthem) and UnitedHealth and increased our investment in Intercontinental Exchange. We also made minor additions to our holdings in Netflix and Wayfair. Finally, we initiated a new position in SAP, an industry leader in the global ERP software market. We discuss the Fund’s activity in more detail in our Q2 video commentary, and as usual will provide a detailed review of new investments and meaningful portfolio changes in our year-end letter.
**********
We enjoyed seeing so many shareholders in person in May during our annual investor day. The video replay and transcript are available on our website.
Sincerely,
The Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Investment Committee,
Arman Gokgol-Kline |
John B. Harris |
Trevor Magyar |
D. Chase Sheridan |
1The performance data for the Fund shown above represents past performance and assumes reinvestment of dividends. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The Fund’s 1-year, 5-year and 10-year average annual total returns through June 30, 2022 were -23.56%, 8.54% and 8.53%, respectively. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Performance data current to the most recent month-end can be obtained by calling DST Systems, Inc. at (800) 686-6884.
4
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Fund’s Largest Holdings (Unaudited)
The table below shows the Fund’s positions that constituted at least 3% of the Fund’s net assets as of June 30, 2022:
% of net assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Position | 06/30/2022 | 12/31/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alphabet, Inc. | 7.8% | 8.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 7.3% | 6.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liberty Media Corp.-Liberty Formula One | 7.1% | 4.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CarMax, Inc. | 6.6% | 6.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 5.8% | 6.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 5.2% | 3.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Charles Schwab Corp. | 5.1% | 5.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elevance Health, Inc. | 5.1% | 5.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Constellation Software, Inc. | 5.1% | 4.7% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meta Platforms, Inc. | 4.8% | 6.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Universal Music Group NV | 4.7% | 4.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Micron Technology, Inc. | 4.5% | 5.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liberty Broadband Corp. | 4.4% | 4.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Acceptance Corp. | 4.3% | 4.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. | 4.0% | 2.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Netflix, Inc. | 3.8% | 3.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eurofins Scientific SE | 3.6% | 3.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SAP SE | 3.0% | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
92.2% | 85.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
5
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
As of June 30, 2022 | % of net assets | |||||||||||
Movies & Entertainment | 15.6% | |||||||||||
Interactive Media & Services | 12.6% | |||||||||||
Managed Health Care | 12.4% | |||||||||||
Semiconductors | 10.3% | |||||||||||
Application Software | 8.1% | |||||||||||
Automotive Retail | 6.6% | |||||||||||
Financial Exchanges & Data | 5.2% | |||||||||||
Investment Banking & Brokerage | 5.1% | |||||||||||
Cable & Satellite | 4.4% | |||||||||||
Consumer Finance | 4.3% | |||||||||||
Research & Consulting Services | 4.0% | |||||||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services | 3.6% | |||||||||||
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail | 2.3% | |||||||||||
Aerospace & Defense | 2.2% | |||||||||||
Multi-Sector Holdings | 1.3% | |||||||||||
Other Assets | 2.0% | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
100.0% | ||||||||||||
|
|
6
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (Unaudited)
This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the Fund.
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from your investment)
The Fund does not impose any sales charges, exchange fees or redemption fees.
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that are deducted from Fund assets)
Management Fees | 1.00% | |||||
Other Expenses | 0.07% | |||||
|
| |||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses* | 1.07% | |||||
Expense Reimbursement by Investment Adviser* | -0.07% | |||||
|
| |||||
Net Annual Fund Operating Expenses* | 1.00% | |||||
|
|
* It is the intention of Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb L.P. (the “Investment Adviser”) to ensure the Fund does not pay in excess of 1.00% in Net Annual Fund Operating Expenses. This expense reimbursement obligation is a provision of the Investment Adviser’s investment advisory contract with the Fund and the reimbursement obligation will be in effect only so long as that investment advisory contract is in effect. The expense ratio presented is from the Fund’s prospectus dated April 29, 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Fund’s annual operating expenses and investment advisory fee, net of the reimbursement, were 1.00% and 0.93%, respectively.
Fees and Expenses of the Fund (Unaudited)
Shareholder Expense Example
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022).
Actual Expenses
The first line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled ‘‘Expenses Paid During Period’’ to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.
Beginning Account Value January 1, 2022 | Ending Account Value June 30, 2022 | Expenses Paid During Period** January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 | ||||||
Actual | $1,000 | $ | 707.00 | $4.23 | ||||
Hypothetical (5% return per year before expenses) | $1,000 | $ | 1,019.84 | $5.01 |
** Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized net expense ratio of 1.00%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
7
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)
June 30, 2022
(Percentages are of the Fund’s Net Assets)
Common Stocks (98.0%)
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |||||||
Aerospace & Defense (2.2%) | ||||||||
71,249,483 | Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (United Kingdom)(a) | $ | 71,944,190 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Application Software (8.1%) | ||||||||
111,427 | Constellation Software, Inc. (Canada) | 165,415,251 | ||||||
1,082,791 | SAP SE (Germany) | 98,640,413 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
264,055,664 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Automotive Retail (6.6%) | ||||||||
2,375,390 | CarMax, Inc.(a) | 214,925,287 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Cable & Satellite (4.4%) | ||||||||
350,539 | Liberty Broadband Corp. - Class A(a) | 39,803,703 | ||||||
893,831 | Liberty Broadband Corp. - Class C(a) | 103,362,617 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
143,166,320 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Consumer Finance (4.3%) | ||||||||
298,244 | Credit Acceptance Corp.(a) | 141,191,692 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Financial Exchanges & Data (5.2%) | ||||||||
1,807,536 | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 169,980,686 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Interactive Media & Services (12.6%) | ||||||||
100,042 | Alphabet, Inc. - Class A(a) | 218,017,529 | ||||||
17,120 | Alphabet, Inc. - Class C(a) | 37,449,144 | ||||||
976,009 | Meta Platforms, Inc. - Class A(a) | 157,381,451 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
412,848,124 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail (2.3%) | ||||||||
1,703,591 | Wayfair, Inc. - Class A(a) | 74,208,424 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Investment Banking & Brokerage (5.1%) | ||||||||
2,638,524 | The Charles Schwab Corp. | 166,701,946 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services (3.6%) | ||||||||
1,508,166 | Eurofins Scientific SE (Luxembourg) | 118,662,631 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Managed Health Care (12.4%) | ||||||||
343,094 | Elevance Health, Inc. | 165,570,303 | ||||||
465,224 | UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 238,953,003 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
404,523,306 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Movies & Entertainment (15.6%) | ||||||||
43,481 | Liberty Media Corp.-Liberty Formula One - Class A(a) | 2,520,593 | ||||||
3,618,557 | Liberty Media Corp.-Liberty Formula One - Class C(a) | 229,669,813 | ||||||
711,575 | Netflix, Inc.(a) | 124,433,120 | ||||||
7,643,231 | Universal Music Group NV (Netherlands) | 153,258,058 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
509,881,584 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Multi-Sector Holdings (1.3%) | ||||||||
153,616 | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. - Class B(a) | 41,940,240 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Research & Consulting Services (4.0%) | ||||||||
1,020,323 | Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. | 129,713,663 | ||||||
|
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these Financial Statements.
8
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Schedule of Investments (Unaudited) (Continued)
June 30, 2022
Shares | Value (Note 1) | |||||||
Semiconductors (10.3%) | ||||||||
2,653,239 | Micron Technology, Inc. | $ | 146,671,052 | |||||
2,324,303 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. - SP ADR (Taiwan) | 190,011,770 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
336,682,822 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $2,427,438,980) | 3,200,426,579 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Investments (98.0%) | ||||||||
(Cost $2,427,438,980)(b) | 3,200,426,579 | |||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities (2.0%) | 66,837,580 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Net Assets (100.0%) | $ | 3,267,264,159 | ||||||
|
|
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(b) | The cost for federal income tax purposes is $2,466,499,067. The difference between book cost and tax cost is attributable to financial and tax accounting differences on a corporate spin-off. |
Abbreviation:
SP ADR Sponsored American Depository Receipt
Generally accepted accounting principles establish a disclosure hierarchy that categorizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to value the investments at measurement date. These inputs are summarized in the three levels listed below:
Level 1 | – | unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. | ||
Level 2 | – | other significant observable inputs (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit risk). | ||
Level 3 | – | unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. As of June 30, 2022, all financial instruments listed in the Schedule of Investments are considered Level 1. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, there were no transfers between Levels and there were no Level 3 securities held by the Fund.
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these Financial Statements.
9
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (Unaudited)
June 30, 2022
Assets | ||||
Investments in securities, at value (cost $2,427,438,980) (Note 1) | $ | 3,200,426,579 | ||
Cash on deposit | 69,120,582 | |||
Receivable for investments sold | 14,437,170 | |||
Receivable for capital stock sold | 554,646 | |||
Dividends receivable | 1,375,817 | |||
Other assets | 279 | |||
|
| |||
Total assets | 3,285,915,073 | |||
|
| |||
Liabilities | ||||
Payable for capital stock repurchased | 15,806,592 | |||
Accrued investment advisory fee | 2,648,365 | |||
Accrued professional fees | 89,207 | |||
Accrued transfer agent fees | 64,173 | |||
Accrued custodian fees | 20,224 | |||
Accrued other expenses | 22,353 | |||
|
| |||
Total liabilities | 18,650,914 | |||
|
| |||
Net Assets | $ | 3,267,264,159 | ||
|
| |||
Net Assets Consist of | ||||
Capital (par value and paid in surplus) $.10 par value capital stock, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 25,744,117 shares outstanding | $ | 2,448,848,290 | ||
Total distributable earnings (loss) | 818,415,869 | |||
|
| |||
Net Assets | $ | 3,267,264,159 | ||
|
| |||
Net asset value per share | $ | 126.91 | ||
|
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these Financial Statements.
10
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Statement of Operations (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
Investment Income | ||||
Income | ||||
Dividends, net of $733,552 foreign tax withheld | $ | 9,474,463 | ||
|
| |||
Total investment income | 9,474,463 | |||
|
| |||
Expenses | ||||
Investment advisory fee (Note 2) | 20,046,239 | |||
Professional fees | 279,548 | |||
Transfer agent fees | 345,501 | |||
Independent Directors fees and expenses | 264,986 | |||
Custodian fees | 61,891 | |||
Other | 674,641 | |||
|
| |||
Total expenses | 21,672,806 | |||
Less expenses reimbursed by Investment Adviser (Note 2) | 1,552,183 | |||
|
| |||
Net expenses | 20,120,623 | |||
|
| |||
Net investment loss | (10,646,160 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Foreign Currency Transactions | ||||
Realized gain (loss) on | ||||
Investments (Note 3) | 129,820,847 | |||
Foreign currency transactions | (758,169 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency transactions | 129,062,678 | |||
|
| |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on | ||||
Investments | (1,534,003,023 | ) | ||
Foreign currency translations | (33,878 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net decrease in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and foreign currency translations | (1,534,036,901 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net realized and unrealized losses on investments, foreign currency transactions and translations | (1,404,974,223 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net decrease in net assets from operations | $ | (1,415,620,383 | ) | |
|
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these Financial Statements.
11
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Six Months Ended 6/30/22 (Unaudited) | Year Ended 12/31/21 | |||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||||||
From operations | ||||||||
Net investment loss | $ | (10,646,160 | ) | $ | (12,975,889 | ) | ||
Net realized gain on investments, swap agreements and foreign currency transactions | 129,062,678 | 749,406,703 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments and foreign currency translations. | (1,534,036,901 | ) | 337,323,837 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | (1,415,620,383 | ) | 1,073,754,651 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Distributions to shareholders from: | ||||||||
Total distributable earnings | (98,740,874 | ) | (674,733,986 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Capital share transactions | ||||||||
Shares sold | 41,572,559 | 120,159,208 | ||||||
Shares issued to shareholders on reinvestment of net income and net realized gain distributions | 79,067,771 | 532,377,789 | ||||||
Shares repurchased | (238,110,022 | ) | (482,858,696 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase (decrease) from capital shares transactions | (117,469,692 | ) | 169,678,301 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets | (1,631,830,949 | ) | 568,698,966 | |||||
Net Assets | ||||||||
Beginning of period | 4,899,095,108 | 4,330,396,142 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
End of period | $ | 3,267,264,159 | $ | 4,899,095,108 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Share transactions | ||||||||
Shares sold | 262,369 | 640,337 | ||||||
Shares issued to shareholders on reinvestment of net income and net realized gain distributions | 626,031 | 2,866,958 | ||||||
Shares repurchased | (1,627,307 | ) | (2,554,813 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase (decrease) from capital share transactions | (738,907 | ) | 952,482 | |||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these Financial Statements.
12
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance (for a share outstanding throughout the period) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ | 184.99 | $ | 169.62 | $ | 157.27 | $ | 132.20 | $ | 169.55 | $ | 161.28 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Income from investment operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment loss | (0.56 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.95 | ) | (0.62 | ) | (0.69 | ) | (0.59 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments | (53.67 | ) | 42.92 | 36.20 | 38.50 | (2.67 | ) | 32.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | (54.23 | ) | 42.79 | 35.25 | 37.88 | (3.36 | ) |
| 31.53 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | (0.02 | )(a) | (4.93 | )(a) | — | (1.16 | )(a) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains | (3.83 | ) | (22.49 | ) | (22.90 | ) | (11.65 | ) | (33.99 | ) | (23.26 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions | (3.85 | ) | (27.42 | ) | (22.90 | ) | (12.81 | ) | (33.99 | ) | (23.26 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $ | 126.91 | $ | 184.99 | $ | 169.62 | $ | 157.27 | $ | 132.20 | $ | 169.55 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total Return | (29.30 | )%(b) | 25.48 | % | 23.33 | % | 29.12 | % | (2.62 | )% | 20.07 | %(c) | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplementary data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in millions) | $ | 3,267 | $ | 4,899 | $ | 4,330 | $ | 3,980 | $ | 3,436 | $ | 4,246 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before expenses reimbursed by Investment Adviser | 1.08 | %(d) | 1.07 | % | 1.09 | %(e) | 1.07 | %(e) | 1.06 | %(e) | 1.07 | %(e) | ||||||||||||||||
After expenses reimbursed by Investment Adviser | 1.00 | %(d) | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment loss to average net assets | (0.53 | )%(d) | (0.27 | )% | (0.63 | )% | (0.42 | )% | (0.42 | )% | (0.35 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 9 | %(b) | 23 | % | 28 | % | 16 | % | 27 | % | 18 | % |
(a) | The difference of net investment income/(loss) for financial and tax reporting is attributable to financial and tax accounting differences on a corporate spin–off. As a result, the Fund was required to make a distribution from net investment income for tax purposes. |
(b) | Not annualized. |
(c) | Includes the impact of proceeds received and credited to the Fund resulting from a class action settlement, which enhanced the Fund’s performance for the year ended December 31, 2017 by 0.05%. |
(d) | Annualized. |
(e) | Reflects reductions of 0.00%, 0.02%, 0.05% and 0.02% for expenses reimbursed by insurance company for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these Financial Statements.
13
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1— Significant Accounting Policies
Sequoia Fund, Inc. (the ‘‘Fund’’) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a non-diversified, open-end management investment company. The investment objective of the Fund is long-term growth of capital. The Fund follows investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification Topic 946 Financial Services— Investment Companies. The following accounting policies conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (”GAAP“). The Fund consistently follows such policies in the preparation of its financial statements.
A. | Valuation of investments: Investments are carried at fair value as determined under the supervision of the Fund’s Board of Directors. Securities traded on a national securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price on the principal exchange on which the security is listed; securities traded in the NASDAQ Stock Market (”NASDAQ“) are valued in accordance with the NASDAQ Official Closing Price. Securities for which there is no sale or Official Closing Price are valued at the mean of the last reported bid and asked prices. |
Securities traded on a foreign exchange are valued at the closing price on the last business day of the period on the principal exchange on which the security is primarily traded. The value is then converted into its U.S. dollar equivalent at the foreign exchange rate in effect at the close of the New York Stock Exchange on the date of valuation.
U.S. Treasury Bills with remaining maturities of 60 days or less are valued at their amortized cost. U.S. Treasury Bills that when purchased have a remaining maturity in excess of 60 days are valued on the basis of market quotations and estimates until the sixtieth day prior to maturity, at which point they are valued at amortized cost. Fixed-income securities, other than U.S. Treasury Bills, are valued at the last quoted sales price or, if adequate trading volume is not present, at the mean of the last bid and asked prices.
When reliable market quotations are insufficient or not readily available at the time of valuation or when Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb L.P. (the ”Investment Adviser“) determines that the prices or values available do not represent the fair value of a security, such security is valued as determined in good faith by the Investment Adviser, in conformity with procedures adopted by and subject to review by the Fund’s Board of Directors.
B. | Foreign currency translations: Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts at the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of foreign securities are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing when such securities are acquired or sold. Income and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing when accrued. The Fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss from investments. Reported net realized gains or losses on foreign currency transactions arise from the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions and translations arise from changes in the fair values of assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities at fiscal period end, resulting from changes in exchange rates. |
C. | Investment transactions and investment income: Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date and dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income is accrued as earned. Premiums and discounts on fixed income securities are amortized over the life of the respective security. The net realized gain or loss on security transactions is determined for accounting and tax purposes on the specific identification basis. |
D. | Federal income taxes: The Fund’s policy is to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies, and it intends to distribute all of its taxable income to its stockholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. |
E. | Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
14
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
F. | Dividends and distributions: Dividends and distributions are recorded by the Fund on the ex-dividend date. |
Note 2— Investment Advisory Contract and Payments to Affiliates
The Investment Adviser provides the Fund with investment advice and administrative services pursuant to an investment advisory contract (the “Advisory Contract”) with the Fund.
Under the terms of the Advisory Contract, the Investment Adviser receives an investment advisory fee equal to 1.00% per annum of the Fund’s average daily net asset value. Under the Advisory Contract, the Investment Adviser is contractually obligated to reimburse the Fund for the amount, if any, by which the operating expenses of the Fund (including the investment advisory fee) in any year exceed the sum of 11⁄2% of the average daily net asset value of the Fund for such year up to a maximum of $30,000,000 of net assets, plus 1.00% of the average daily net asset value in excess of $30,000,000. The expenses incurred by the Fund exceeded the limitation for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and the Investment Adviser reimbursed the Fund $1,167,083. Such reimbursement is not subject to recoupment by the Investment Adviser.
The Fund has contractually agreed to pay an asset-based fee to certain financial intermediaries for providing recordkeeping and other administrative services for sub-accounts maintained by the intermediaries. The Investment Adviser has contractually agreed to pay such fees on behalf of the Fund as long as the Advisory Contract remains in effect. Total fees paid by the Investment Adviser to the intermediaries on behalf of the Fund for the six months ended June 30, 2022 were approximately $385,100, which is included in expenses reimbursed by the Investment Adviser in the Statement of Operations.
For the six months ended June 30, 2022, advisory fees of $20,046,239 were earned by the Investment Adviser. Certain officers of the Fund are also officers of the Investment Adviser. There were no other amounts accrued or paid to interested persons, including officers and directors.
Note 3— Investment Transactions
The aggregate cost of purchases and the proceeds from the sales of securities, excluding short-term securities, for the six months ended June 30, 2022 were $336,634,787 and $587,325,610, respectively. Included in proceeds of sales is $51,643,254 representing the value of securities distributed in payment of redemptions in-kind, resulting in realized gains of $46,368,004.
Note 4— Federal Income Tax Information
Distributions to shareholders are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from those determined for financial statement purposes. To the extent these differences are permanent such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, permanent differences due primarily to realized gains on redemptions in-kind not recognized for tax purposes and net operating loss resulted in a net decrease in total distributable earnings (loss) of $35,721,844 with a corresponding increase in paid in capital of $35,721,844. These reclassifications had no effect on net assets.
At June 30, 2022 the federal tax cost, aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of securities for federal income tax purposes were $2,466,499,067, $1,177,866,064 and $443,938,552, respectively. The net unrealized depreciation on foreign currencies was $54,898.
15
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
The tax character of distributions paid for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021 was as follows:
2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||
Distributions paid from | ||||||||||||
Ordinary income | $ | 619,402 | $ | 121,822,116 | ||||||||
Long-term capital gains | 98,121,472 | 552,911,870 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
$ | 98,740,874 | $ | 674,733,986 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
Distributions from net investment income and short-term capital gains are treated as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes.
As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||
Undistributed ordinary income /(ordinary loss deferral) | $ | — | $ | 617,065 | ||||||||
Undistributed long-term gains | 84,543,255 | 98,119,600 | ||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation | 733,872,614 | 2,269,762,305 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
$ | 818,415,869 | $ | 2,368,498,970 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
The Fund recognizes the tax benefits or expenses of uncertain tax positions only when the positions are ‘‘more likely than not’’ to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has reviewed the Fund’s tax positions for all open years (tax years ended December 31, 2018 through December 31, 2021) and has concluded that no provision for unrecognized tax benefits or expenses is required in these financial statements.
Note 5— Interim Financial Statement
The interim financial statements have not been examined by the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm and accordingly it does not express an opinion thereon.
Note 6— Indemnification
The Fund’s officers, directors and agents are indemnified against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, except as noted in the following paragraph, the Fund has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these arrangements and expects the risk of loss thereunder to be remote.
Note 7— Legal Proceedings
On January 8, 2016, Stanley H. Epstein, Harriet P. Epstein, and SEP IRA A/C Peter Christopher Gardner, derivatively and on behalf of Sequoia Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”), filed a suit against Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc. (“RCG”), Robert D. Goldfarb, David Poppe, Robert L. Swiggett and Roger Lowenstein (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The Fund was also named in the suit as a Nominal Defendant. On May 9, 2016, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, adding Edward Lazarus as an additional Defendant. The amended complaint asserted derivative claims in connection with certain of the Fund’s investments against the Defendants for alleged breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract and gross negligence. The case is Epstein v. Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc. et al., 650100/2016, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. In February 2017, the court granted the Defendants’ motion to dismiss all claims in the action. On March 22, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from the court’s dismissal. On July 5, 2018, the Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department,
16
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
unanimously affirmed the dismissal of all claims. On November 29, 2018, the plaintiffs filed an application for leave to appeal the Appellate Division’s ruling to the New York Court of Appeals. That application was denied on February 21, 2019.
On November 14, 2017, Donald Tapert, derivatively and on behalf of the Fund, filed a suit against David M. Poppe, Edward Lazarus, Robert L. Swiggett, Roger Lowenstein, Tim Medley, John B. Harris, Peter Atkins, Melissa Crandall, Robert D. Goldfarb, and RCG, in the Baltimore City Circuit Court, Maryland. The Fund was also named in the suit as a Nominal Defendant. The complaint asserted derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. The case is Tapert v. Poppe et al., Case No. 24-C-17-005430, Baltimore City Circuit Court, Maryland. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on March 19, 2018, and the Court granted that motion on August 14, 2019 and dismissed the claims with prejudice. Plaintiff appealed the court’s decision to the Maryland Court of Special Appeals on September 13, 2019, and that appeal was dismissed in May 2020 as a matter of law when Plaintiff failed to file his appellate brief by the last date it was due.
On February 9, 2018, Charles Wilfong & Ann R. Wilfong JTWROS, derivatively and on behalf of the Fund, filed a suit against RCG, Robert D. Goldfarb, David Poppe and Roger Lowenstein, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. The Fund was also named in the suit as a Nominal Defendant. The complaint asserted derivative claims for breach of duty of loyalty, breach of duty of care, and wrongful refusal to take action. The case is Wilfong v. Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc. et al., 650699/2018, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The action was dismissed by stipulation of the parties on September 20, 2019 without prejudice to Plaintiffs refiling the action solely in the event that the Maryland Court of Special Appeals reversed the Baltimore City Circuit Court’s decision in the Tapert action. By virtue of the dismissal of the Tapert appeal, the dismissal of this action is now with prejudice as a result of the terms of the stipulation.
On May 21, 2018, Thomas Edwards and Michael Fortune, individually and as representatives of a purported class, filed a suit against the Fund in the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York. The complaint asserted a claim for breach of contract. The case is Edwards v. Sequoia Fund, Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-04501, S.D.N.Y. On October 18, 2018, the court granted the Fund’s motion to dismiss all claims. On November 15, 2018, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision on September 9, 2019.
On March 14, 2016, Clive Cooper, individually and as a representative of a class, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”), filed a suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against RCG, DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc., Jerome H. Bailey, Lynn Dorsey Bleil, Lowell L. Bryan, Gary D. Forsee, Gregg Wm. Givens, Charles E. Haldeman, Jr., Samuel G. Liss and John Does 1-20. The Fund is not a defendant in this lawsuit. The complaint asserted claims for alleged breach of fiduciary duty and violation of ERISA’s prohibited transaction rules, co-fiduciary breach, and breach of trust in connection with certain investments made on behalf of the Plan. The case is Cooper v. DST Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-01900-WHP, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Upon being presented with an arbitration agreement between plaintiff and DST, plaintiff dismissed without prejudice all claims against all of the defendants other than RCG, which was thereby the only defendant remaining in the case. On August 15, 2017, the court granted RCG’s motion to compel arbitration and the case was dismissed on August 17, 2017. On September 8, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from the District Court’s order granting the motion to compel arbitration and dismissing the case. On March 4, 2021, the Second Circuit reversed the District Court’s order and remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings.
On September 1, 2017, plaintiffs Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat and Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, filed a suit in the Southern District of New York against RCG, DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc., George L. Argyros, Tim Bahr, Jerome H. Bailey, Lynn Dorsey Bleil, Lowell L. Bryan, Ned Burke, John W. Clark, Michael G. Fitt, Gary D. Forsee, Steven Gebben, Gregg Wm. Givens, Kenneth Hager, Charles E. Haldeman, Jr., Lawrence M. Higby, Joan Horan, Stephen Hooley, Robert T. Jackson, Gerard M. Lavin, Brent L. Law, Samuel G. Liss, Thomas McDonnell, Jude C. Metcalfe, Travis E. Reed, M. Jeannine Strandjord, Beth Sweetman, Douglas Tapp and RandallYoung. The Fund is not a defendant in this lawsuit. The complaint asserts claims for alleged breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA, breach
17
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
of trust, and other claims. The case is Ferguson, et al. v. Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-06685-ALC (S.D.N.Y.). On July 25, 2018, Stephanie Ostrander, a Plan participant, filed a motion in Ferguson seeking to intervene in that case to assert a class action on behalf of certain Plan participants. The court denied the motion to intervene on March 29, 2019. On December 14, 2018, the DST defendants filed a partial motion to dismiss, seeking dismissal of certain claims relating solely to the 401(k) portion of the Plan, with which RCG had no involvement. The court granted the motion to dismiss on September 18, 2019. On April 5, 2021, Plaintiffs moved to amend their complaint to add class allegations and to delete the allegations relating to the 401(k) portion of the Plan. Contemporaneously, Plaintiffs also filed a motion to certify the class. The court granted both motions on August 17, 2021. On August 30, 2021, intervenor parties moved for leave to appeal the class certification decision to the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit denied that motion on May 24, 2022. On January 31, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint containing class allegations in accordance with the court’s August 17, 2021 order.
On September 7, 2017, plaintiff Stephanie Ostrander, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, filed suit in the Western District of Missouri against DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc., 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, The Compensation Committee of The Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc., RCG and John Does 1-20. The complaint asserted claims for alleged breach of fiduciary duty, breach of trust, and other claims. The case is Ostrander v. DST Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 4:17-cv-00747-BCW. The Fund is not a defendant in this lawsuit. On February 2, 2018, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss all claims.
On September 28, 2018, counsel for Stephanie Ostrander filed another suit, Canfield v. SS&C Tech. Holdings, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-08913-ALC (S.D.N.Y.), asserting claims that are virtually identical to those asserted in the Cooper, Ferguson, and Ostrander cases. The Fund is not a defendant in this lawsuit.
On November 5, 2018, counsel for Stephanie Ostrander filed another suit, Mendon v. SS&C Tech. Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-10252-ALC (S.D.N.Y.), asserting claims that are virtually identical to those asserted in the Cooper, Ferguson, Ostrander, and Canfield cases. The Fund is not a defendant in this lawsuit.
On August 6, 2018, eleven participants of the DST Profit Sharing Plan submitted arbitration demands (the “Demands”) to the American Arbitration Association (the “Arbitrations”). The Demands assert claims that are virtually identical to those in the Cooper, Ferguson, Ostrander, Canfield, and Mendon cases. An additional approximately 574 claimants have sent demands, similar to the Demands, for submission to the American Arbitration Association. Hearings have been held in more than 350 of the arbitration proceedings, and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri has confirmed approximately 150 arbitration awards. Those awards are currently on appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fund is not a defendant in these proceedings.
RCG reached an agreement to settle the claims asserted against it in the Arbitrations, Canfield and Mendon on June 5, 2020.
On October 8, 2019, the Secretary of Labor filed a suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against RCG, DST Systems, Inc., Robert D. Goldfarb, The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc., Kenneth Hager, Randall D. Young, Gregg W. Givins, Gerard M. Lavin, M. Elizabeth Sweetman, Douglas W. Tapp, George L. Argyros, Lawrence M. Higby, Travis E. Reed, Lowell L. Bryan, Samuel G. Liss, Brent L. Law, Lynn Dorsey Bleil, Jerome H. Bailey, Gary D. Forsee, and Charles E. Haldeman, Jr. The Fund is not a defendant in this lawsuit. The Secretary’s complaint asserts claims for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties and co-fiduciary breach. The case is Walsh v. Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-9302-ALC (S.D.N.Y.). RCG, Mr. Goldfarb, and the DST defendants all moved to dismiss the Secretary’s complaint on December 4, 2020. On March 28, 2022, the court issued an Opinion and Order denying the motions to dismiss.
On November 11, 2020, plaintiffs DST Systems, Inc., the Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc. filed suit against RCG, Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb LLC, Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb L.P., and certain current and former officers, directors and owners of RCG. The case is DST Systems, Inc., et al. v. Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-9472 (S.D.N.Y.). The Fund is not a defendant in this lawsuit. The complaint asserts claims for indemnification, contribution, fraudulent
18
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)
conveyance, and breach of contract in connection with the litigations relating to the DST pension funds. A motion to dismiss the complaint was filed on December 17, 2021. On July 27, 2022, the court denied the motion to dismiss without prejudice and granted defendants leave to renew the motion at a later date.
RCG believes that the foregoing lawsuits are without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously against the allegations in them.
On December 10, 2019, RCG filed a suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the claimants in the arbitrations pending before the American Arbitration Association (the “Claimants”). The suit also names, as nominal defendants, DST Systems, Inc., the plaintiffs in the Ferguson, Canfield, and Mendon cases, and the Secretary of Labor. RCG’s complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief regarding the overlapping and duplicative actions pending against RCG. On December 18, 2019, RCG filed a motion for preliminary injunction and appointment of a special master, seeking a stay of the arbitrations pending before the American Arbitration Association. Claimants and the Secretary of Labor opposed that motion. In addition, Claimants moved to dismiss RCG’s complaint on January 6, 2020. The Secretary of Labor requested a pre-motion conference in connection with an anticipated motion to dismiss RCG’s complaint on February 18, 2020. The case is Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc. v. Payne, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-11297-ALC (S.D.N.Y.). On July 10, 2020, RCG moved for voluntary dismissal of the action as a result of the settlements of the claims asserted against RCG in the Arbitrations, Canfield, and Mendon. The court granted that motion on September 28, 2020.
The outcomes of these lawsuits are not expected to have a material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
Note 8— Subsequent Events
Management, on behalf of the Fund, has evaluated the need for disclosures and/or adjustments to the financial statements from subsequent events. As a result of this evaluation, no subsequent events require disclosure and/or adjustment to the financial statements.
19
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Statement Regarding Liquidity Risk Management Program (Unaudited)
Pursuant to Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Fund has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) designed to assess and manage the risk that the Fund could not meet requests to redeem Fund shares without significant dilution of remaining investors’ interests in the Fund. In assessing, managing and reviewing liquidity risk under the Program, the Fund considers a variety of factors, including its investment strategy, portfolio investments, portfolio concentration, cash flow projections, redemption policy and redemption history. In addition, the Program requires the Fund to, among other things, classify its investments into specific liquidity categories and monitor compliance with its limit on illiquid investments.
During the one-year period ended December 31, 2021 (the “Covered Period”), the Fund maintained a high level of liquidity and primarily held assets that were “highly liquid investments” (defined as cash and any investment reasonably expected to be convertible to cash in current market conditions in three business days or less without the conversion to cash significantly changing the market value of the investment). During the Covered Period, there were no liquidity events that materially affected the Fund’s performance or ability to timely meet redemptions without dilution to remaining investors’ interests in the Fund.
The Investment Adviser, which the Board has designated to administer the Program, prepared a written report (the “Report”) that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed the Program’s adequacy and effectiveness of implementation during the Covered Period. The Board reviewed and accepted the Report, which determined that the Program is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund’s liquidity risk and that during the Covered Period the Program operated adequately and effectively in managing the Fund’s liquidity risk.
Shares of the Fund may be offered only to persons in the United States and by way of a prospectus. This should not be considered a solicitation or offering of any product or service to investors residing outside of the United States.
The Fund is non-diversified, meaning that it invests its assets in a smaller number of companies than many other funds. As a result, an investment in the Fund has the risk that changes in the value of a single security may have a significant effect, either negative or positive, on the Fund’s net asset value per share.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. The Fund’s Form N-PORT reports are available on the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov. The Fund’s portfolio holdings information for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year is also available at http://www.sequoiafund.com/prospectus.
You may obtain a description of the Fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, and information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge.Visit the Fund’s web site at www.sequoiafund.com and use the link under “Prospectus” - “Our Proxy Voting Policies & Procedures” to obtain all proxy information. This information may also be obtained from the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov or by calling DST Systems, Inc. at 1-800-686-6884.
20
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
Sequoia Fund
|
June 30, 2022
|
Sequoia Fund, Inc.
9 West 57th Street, Suite 5000
New York, New York 10019-2701
1-800-686-6884
Website: www.sequoiafund.com
Interested Directors
John B. Harris
Gregory W. Steinmetz
Independent Directors
Peter Atkins, Chairman of the Board
Melissa Crandall
Edward Lazarus
Roger Lowenstein
Katharine Weymouth
Officers | ||||
John B. Harris | — | President & CEO | ||
Wendy Goodrich | — | Executive Vice President | ||
Patrick Dennis | — | Treasurer | ||
Yau Dun Lee | — | Chief Compliance Officer & Secretary | ||
Michael Valenti | — | Assistant Secretary |
Investment Adviser |
Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb L.P. 9 West 57th Street, Suite 5000 |
New York, New York 10019-2701 |
Distributor |
Foreside Financial Services, LLC |
Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100 |
Portland, Maine 04101 |
Custodian |
The Bank of New York Mellon |
MF Custody Administration Department 225 Liberty Street, 25th Floor |
New York, New York 10286 |
Registrar and Transfer Agent |
DST Systems, Inc. |
P.O. Box 219477 |
Kansas City, Missouri 64121 |
Accounting Agent |
The Bank of New York Mellon 4400 Computer Drive |
Westborough, Massachusetts 01581 |
Legal Counsel |
Seward & Kissel LLP |
901 K Street, NW |
Washington, DC 20001 |
9 West 57th Street, Suite 5000
New York, NY 10019
(212) 832-5280
info@ruanecunniff.com
For additional information about Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb and Sequoia Fund, please visit www.ruanecunniff.com and www.sequoiafund.com.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) | Schedule of Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers as of the close of the reporting period is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1(a) of this form. |
(b) | Not applicable. |
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. |
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which the shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of directors, where those changes were implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 407(c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K (as required by Item 22(b)(15) of Schedule 14A), or this Item.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) | The registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)), are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 13. Exhibits.
| (a)(1) | Not applicable. | ||
(a)(2) | ||||
(a)(3) | Not applicable. | |||
(a)(4) | Not applicable. | |||
(b) |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Sequoia Fund, Inc. |
By (Signature and Title) /s/ John B. Harris |
John B. Harris, President and CEO |
(principal executive officer) |
Date August 30, 2022
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ John B. Harris | |
John B. Harris, President and CEO | ||
(principal executive officer) |
Date August 30, 2022
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Patrick Dennis | |
Patrick Dennis, Treasurer | ||
(principal financial officer) |
Date August 30, 2022