Bernardino v. Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.
On June 16, 2017, a putative class action complaint was filed against Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. (B&N Booksellers) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations of the federal Video Privacy Protection Act and related New York law. The plaintiff, who seeks to represent a class of subscribers of Facebook, Inc. (Facebook) who purchased DVDs or other video media from the Barnes & Noble website, seeks damages, injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees, among other things, based on her allegation that B&N Booksellers supposedly knowingly disclosed her personally identifiable information to Facebook without her consent when she bought a DVD from Barnes & Noble’s website. On July 10, 2017, the plaintiff moved for a preliminary injunction requiring Barnes & Noble to change the operation of its website, which motion B&N Booksellers opposed. On July 31, 2017, B&N Booksellers moved to compel the case to arbitration, consistent with the terms of use on Barnes & Noble’s website. On August 28, 2017, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. On January 31, 2018, the court granted B&N Booksellers’ motion to compel arbitration, and the clerk of court closed the case on February 1, 2018. On March 2, 2018, the plaintiff filed an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the district court’s grant of B&N Booksellers’ motion to compel arbitration.
Parneros v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.
On August 28, 2018, Demos Parneros, the former Chief Executive Officer of Barnes & Noble, Inc., filed a complaint against Barnes & Noble, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff asserts claims for breach of contract and defamation under New York law. On October 5, 2018, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint asserting a third cause of action for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and punitive damages, among other things, based on allegations that he did not violate the Company’s policies prior to his employment termination, and that the Company’s press release damaged his reputation. On October 30, 2018, Barnes & Noble, Inc. filed its answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaims. Specifically, the Company asserted counterclaims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, based on allegations that the plaintiff violated his fiduciary duties of loyalty and good faith in connection with a potential transaction, as well as for a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff’s outstanding equity awards at the time of his termination were subject to cancellation under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Incentive Plan. Barnes & Noble, Inc. seeks, among other things, damages in connection with the plaintiff’s breach of his fiduciary duties. The Court held an initial conference on November 13, 2018. The Court adopted the parties’ proposed scheduling order, which provides, inter alia, that discovery will be completed by June 14, 2019, that dispositive motions will be completed by August 23, 2019, and that the parties will be ready for trial on or after October 23, 2019. On December 21, 2018, the plaintiff moved to dismiss the Company’s faithless servant counterclaim, and the Company filed an opposition on January 18, 2019. The plaintiff has also filed a motion for advancement of 50% of his attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in defending against the Company’s counterclaims. The Company filed an opposition to that motion on February 15, 2019. The plaintiff filed reply papers on March 1, 2019.
Vickie Hebert individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive
On February 6, 2019, Vicki Hebert filed a complaint against Barnes & Noble in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego in which she alleges that she is entitled to statutory and punitive damages under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Ms. Hebert seeks to represent a class of allegedly similarly situated individuals for whom Barnes & Noble procured a consumer report for reporting purposes under the FCRA. The Company has until April 2, 2019 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint.
23