As of September 30, 2005, we had net working capital of $51.9 million compared to $50.4 million at June 30, 2005. Our principal sources of liquidity include $44.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments and an Offering Basis Loan Agreement with a bank under which we can request short-term loan advances up to an aggregate principal amount of $10 million. Upon such request, the bank would provide us with the interest rate, terms and conditions applicable to the requested loan advance. The funds would be committed upon agreement of such terms by both parties. Unless otherwise agreed to by the bank, the term for any advance cannot exceed 180 days. There were no borrowings under the Offering Basis Loan Agreement during the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments increased by $900,000 during the September 2005 quarter from June 30, 2005, primarily as a result of operating cash flows and the exercise of stock options and related tax benefits, partially offset by purchases of property and equipment. Subsequent to September 30, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the TeleVideo thin client business which required the payment of $3.4 million of cash. During the quarter ended September 30, 2005, we recorded additional goodwill and accrued expenses of $2.1 million representing the amount earned by the sellers of the Visara thin client business pursuant to an earn-out arrangement based on revenues, as defined, measured from the acquisition date, September 22, 2004, through September 30, 2005. We expect to pay this amount in November 2005.In addition we have other potential earn-out arrangements with recently completed transactions. Generally these earn-outs are based on achieved levels of revenue during the twelve months subsequent to completion of the transaction. In October 2005, we also entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Maxspeed Corporation which is expected to close by December 31, 2005 and will require a net cash payment at closing of approximately $13.6 million.
Cash flows provided by operating activities:Our largest source of operating cash flows is payments from our customers for the purchase or license of our products. Our primary uses of cash from operating activities are for the purchase of thin client appliances, software licenses, personnel related expenditures and marketing expenses. Cash flow from operating activities in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was $522,000 compared to $436,000 used in operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2005. The increase in cash flow from operating activities is primarily due to higher net income exclusive of non-cash charges, including depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense, and higher increases in accounts payable and decreases in prepaid expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 versus the first quarter of fiscal 2005, partially offset by income tax payments made during the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
The above table excludes potential amounts under contractual earn-outs related to our recent acquisitions and up to $1.0 million of contingent amounts payable pursuant to arrangements with executive officers which provide for severance obligations in the event of a change in control. Subsequent to September 30, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the TeleVideo thin client business which required the payment of $3.4 million of cash and entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Maxspeed which will require a net cash payment at closing of approximately $13.6 million. Also, we expect to pay the Visara earn-out consideration of $2.1 million in November 2005.
We expect to fund current operations and other cash expenditures through the use of available cash, cash from operations, funds available under our credit facility and, potentially, new debt or equity financings. Management believes that we will have sufficient funds from current cash, operations and available financing to fund operations and cash expenditures for the foreseeable future. We may seek additional sources of funding in order to fund acquisitions, including using our ability to issue debt and equity securities under our $100 million shelf registration, which was declared effective by the SEC on September 29, 2003.
Back to Index
Factors Affecting Neoware and Future Operating Results
Operating results for a particular future period are difficult to predict and, therefore, prior results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition include, but are not limited to, the following:
Our future results may be affected by industry trends and specific risks in our business. Some of the factors that could materially affect our future results include those described below.
During the past several years, we have increased operating expenses significantly as a foundation for us to stimulate growth in our market, and we expect to increase our operating expenses during fiscal 2006. If we do not increase revenues or appropriately manage further increases in operating expenses, our profitability will suffer.
Our business has grown through both internal expansion and business acquisitions, and this has put pressure on our infrastructure, internal systems and managerial resources. The number of our employees increased from 112 employees at September 30, 2004 to 142 employees at September 30, 2005. Our new employees include a number of senior executive officers and other key managerial, technical, sales and marketing personnel, as well as international employees. To manage our growth effectively, we must continue to improve and expand our infrastructure, including operating and administrative systems and controls, and continue managing and integrating our personnel in an efficient manner. Our business may be adversely affected if we do not integrate and train our new employees quickly and effectively and coordinate among our executive, engineering, finance, marketing, sales, operations and customer support organizations. In addition, because of the growth of our international operations, we now have facilities located in multiple countries, and we have limited experience coordinating a geographically separated organization.
Although we have generated operating profits for the past four fiscal years, we have a prior history of losses and may experience losses in the future, which could result in the market price of our common stock declining.
Although we have generated operating profits in the past several fiscal years, we incurred net losses in prior periods. We expect to continue to incur significant operating expenses. Our operating expenses may increase in the future reflecting the hiring of additional key personnel as we continue to implement our growth strategy, including our plan to introduce new products to compete with PC-based solutions and other thin client companies, and our planned investment in continuing to commercialize the technology we have acquired. As a result, we will need to generate significant revenues to maintain profitability. If we do not maintain profitability, the market price for our common stock may decline.
Our financial resources may not be enough for our capital and corporate development needs, and we may not be able to obtain additional financing. A failure to maintain and increase our revenues would likely cause us to incur losses and negatively impact the price of our common stock.
Our gross margins can vary significantly, based upon a variety of factors. If we are unable to sustain adequate gross margins we may be unable to reduce operating expenses in the short term, resulting in losses.
Our gross margins can vary significantly from quarter to quarter depending on average selling prices, fixed costs in relation to revenue levels and the mix of our business, including the percentage of revenues derived from thin client appliances, software, third party products and consulting services. Our gross profit margin also varies in response to competitive market conditions as well as periodic fluctuations in the cost of memory and other significant components. The PC market in which we compete remains very competitive, and although we intend to continue our efforts to reduce the cost of our products, there can be no certainty that we will not be required to reduce prices of our products without compensating reductions in the cost to produce our products in order to maintain or increase our market share or to meet competitors' price reductions. Our marketing strategy is targeted at increasing the size of the thin client segment of the PC industry, in part by lowering prices to make thin clients more competitive with personal computers, and in addition by selling a larger percentage of products to large enterprise customers, who typically demand lower prices because of their volume purchases. This strategy has resulted in, and may in the future result in, a decline in our gross margins. Additionally, we have recently introduced new products, including our Neoware e900 product line, which has higher average selling prices but lower percentage gross margins than our traditional products. If our sales do not continue to increase as a result of these strategies, our profitability will decline, and we may experience losses.
24
Back to Index
Our business is dependent on customer adoption of thin client appliances as an alternative to personal computers, and a decrease in their rates of adoption could adversely affect our ability to increase our revenues.
We are dependent on the growing use of thin client appliances to perform discrete tasks for corporate and Internet-based networks to increase our revenues. If thin client appliances are not accepted by corporations as an alternative to personal computers, the result would be slower than anticipated revenue growth or even a decline in our revenues.
Thin client appliances have historically represented a very small percentage of the overall PC market, and, if sales do not grow as a percentage of the PC market, or if the overall PC market were to decline, our revenues may not grow or may decline.
We may not be able to effectively compete against PC and thin client providers as a result of their greater financial resources and brand awareness.
In the desktop PC market, we face significant competition from makers of traditional personal computers, many of which are larger companies that have greater name recognition than we have. In addition, we face significant competition from thin client providers, including Hewlett Packard, Wyse Technology and other, smaller companies. Increased competition may negatively affect our business and future operating results by leading to price reductions, higher selling expenses or a reduction in our market share. Our strategy to seek to increase our share of the overall PC market by targeting our core markets may create increased pressure, including pricing pressure, on certain of our thin client appliance products. While we believe that this will enable us to increase our revenues, there is no assurance that we will be successful in this approach. In fact, our implementation of this strategy may result in reductions in gross and operating margins as we compete to attract business. Our inability to successfully implement this strategy could have an adverse impact on our revenues.
Our future competitive performance depends on a number of factors, including our ability to:
| • | continually develop and introduce new products and services with better prices and performance than offered by our competitors in the PC market; |
| | |
| • | offer a wide range of products; and |
| | |
| • | offer high-quality products and services. |
If we are unable to offer products and services that compete successfully with the products and services offered by our competitors in the PC market, our business and our operating results would be harmed. In addition, if in responding to competitive pressures, we are forced to lower the prices of our products and services and we are unable to reduce our costs, our business and operating results would be harmed.
We may not be able to successfully integrate future acquisitions we may complete, which may materially adversely affect our growth and our operating results.
As part of our business strategy, we frequently engage in discussions with third parties regarding, and enter into agreements relating to, possible acquisitions, strategic alliances and outsourcing transactions in order to further our business objectives. In order to pursue this strategy successfully, we must identify suitable candidates for these transactions, complete these transactions, some of which may be complex, and manage post-closing issues such as the integration of acquired companies or employees. Integration and other risks of acquisitions, strategic alliances and outsourcing transactions can be more pronounced for more complicated transactions, or if multiple transactions are pursued simultaneously. However, if we fail to identify and complete successfully transactions that further our strategic objectives, we may be required to expend resources to develop products and technology internally, we may be at a competitive disadvantage or we may be adversely affected by negative market perceptions, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our revenue and selling, general and administrative expenses.
Since June 2001, we have completed nine acquisitions and entered into an alliance with IBM, and we plan to make additional acquisitions as part of our growth strategy. There is no assurance that we will successfully integrate the three European acquisitions we completed in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2005, the TeleVideo or pending Maxspeed acquisition or future acquisitions into our business. We may be unable to retain key employees or key business relationships of the acquired businesses, consolidate IT infrastructures, manage supply chain integration, combine administrative, research and development and other operations and combine product offerings, and integration of the businesses may divert the attention and resources of our management. Our failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses into our operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Even if such acquisitions are successfully integrated, we may not receive the expected benefits of the transactions if we find that the acquired business does not further our business strategy or that we paid more than what the business was worth. Managing acquisitions and alliances requires management resources, which may divert our attention from other business operations. As a result, the effects of any completed or future transactions on financial results may differ from our expectations. During fiscal 2004, we spent approximately $1.6 million pursuing acquisitions that we did not complete. We intend to continue to pursue acquisitions, and if we do not complete them, the cost of pursuing acquisitions will impact our profitability.
Back to Index
Our ability to accurately forecast our quarterly sales is limited, although our costs are relatively fixed in the short term, and we expect our business to be affected by rapid technological change, which may adversely affect our quarterly operating results.
Our ability to accurately forecast our quarterly sales is limited, which makes it difficult to predict the quarterly revenues that we will recognize. In addition, most of our costs are for personnel and facilities, which are relatively fixed in the short term. If we have a shortfall in revenues in relation to our expenses, we may be unable to reduce our expenses quickly enough to avoid losses. As a result, our quarterly operating results could fluctuate.
Future operating results will continue to be subject to quarterly fluctuations based on a wide variety of factors, including:
| • | Linearity – Our quarterly sales have historically reflected a pattern in which a disproportionate percentage of sales occur in the last month of the quarter. This pattern makes prediction of revenues and earnings for each financial period especially difficult and uncertain and increases the risk of unanticipated variations in quarterly results and financial condition; |
| | |
| • | Significant Orders – We are subject to variances in our quarterly operating results because of the fluctuations in the timing of our receipt of large orders. If even a small number of large orders are delayed until after a quarter ends, our operating results could vary substantially from quarter to quarter and net income could be substantially less than expected. Conversely, if even a small number of large orders are completed in an earlier quarter than that which was anticipated, our revenues and net income could be substantially higher than expected, making it possible that sales and net income in future periods may decline sequentially; |
| | |
| • | Seasonality – We have experienced seasonal reductions in business activity in some quarters based upon customer activity and based upon our partners’ seasonality. This pattern has generally resulted in lower sales in our first and third quarters than in the prior sequential quarters; and |
| | |
| • | Stock based compensation expense – Starting in the quarter ending September 30, 2005, we began recording stock-based compensation expense as calculated under SFAS No. 123R. We expect the non-cash impact of stock based compensation expense during fiscal 2006 to be in the range of $2.5 to $3.0 million. Such amounts may change as a result of additional grants, forfeitures, modifications in assumptions and other factors. |
There are factors that may affect the market acceptance of our products, some of which are beyond our control, including the following:
| • | the growth and changing requirements of the thin client segment of the PC market; |
| | |
| • | the quality, price, performance and total cost of ownership of our products compared to personal computers; |
| | |
| • | the availability, price, quality and performance of competing products and technologies; and |
| | |
| • | the successful development of our relationships with software providers, original equipment manufacturers and existing and potential channel partners. |
We may not succeed in developing and marketing our software and thin client appliance products and our operating results may decline as a result.
26
Back to Index
Because some of our products use embedded versions of Microsoft Windows as their operating system, an inability to license these operating systems on favorable terms could impair our ability to introduce new products and maintain market share.
We may not be able to introduce new products on a timely basis because some of our products use embedded versions of Microsoft Windows as their operating system. Microsoft provides Windows to us, and we do not have access to the source code for certain versions of the Windows operating system. If Microsoft fails to continue to enhance and develop its embedded operating systems, or if we are unable to license these operating systems on favorable terms, our operations may suffer.
Because some of our products use Linux as their operating system, the failure of Linux developers to enhance and develop the Linux kernel could impair our ability to release new products and maintain market share.
We may not be able to release new products on a timely basis because some of our products use Linux as their operating system. The heart of Linux, the Linux kernel, is maintained by third parties. If this group of developers fails to further develop the Linux kernel, we would have to either rely on another party to further develop the kernel or develop it ourselves, which would increase our costs and slow our development efforts.
Actions taken by the SCO Group (SCO) could impact the sale of our Linux products, negatively affecting sales of some of our products.
SCO has taken legal action against IBM and certain other corporations, and sent letters to Linux customers alleging that certain Linux kernels infringe on SCO's Unix intellectual property and other rights, and that SCO intends to aggressively protect those rights. While we are not a party to any legal proceeding with SCO, since some of our products use Linux as their operating system, SCO's allegations, regardless of merit, could adversely affect sales of such products. SCO has brought claims against certain end user customers of the Linux operating system and threatened to bring claims against other end-users of Linux for copyright violations arising out of the facts alleged in SCO’s lawsuit against IBM. Some of these claims could be indemnified under indemnities we have given or may give to certain customers. In the event that claims for indemnification are brought against the customers that we have indemnified, we could incur expenses reimbursing the customers for their costs, and if the claims were successful, for damages.
Because we depend on sole source, limited source and foreign source suppliers for the design and manufacture of our thin client products and for key components in our thin client appliance products, we are susceptible to supply shortages that could prevent us from shipping customer orders on time, if at all, and result in lost sales. In addition, our outsourcing activities for other functions may fail to reduce costs and may disrupt operations.
We depend upon single source suppliers for the design and manufacture of our thin client appliance products and for several of the components in them. We also depend on limited sources to supply several other industry standard components. The third party designers and manufacturers of our thin client products have access to our intellectual property which increases the risk of infringement or misappropriation of this intellectual property.
We primarily rely on foreign suppliers, which subjects us to risks associated with foreign operations such as the imposition of unfavorable governmental controls or other trade restrictions, changes in tariffs, political instability and currency fluctuations. A weakening dollar could result in greater costs to us for our components. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and similar medical crises could also disrupt manufacturing processes and result in quarantines being imposed in the future.
We have in the past experienced and may in the future experience shortages of, or difficulties in acquiring, certain components. A significant portion of our revenues is derived from the sale of thin client appliances that are bundled with our software. Third parties design and produce these thin client appliances for us, and we typically do not have long-term supply contracts with them obligating them to continue producing products for us. The absence of such agreements means that, with little or no notice, these suppliers could refuse to continue to manufacture all or some of our products that we require or change the terms under which they manufacture our products. If our suppliers were to stop manufacturing our products, we might be unable to replace the lost manufacturing capacity on a timely basis. If we experience shortages of these products, or of their components, we may not be able to deliver our products to our customers, and our revenues would decline. If these suppliers were to change the terms under which they manufacture for us, our manufacturing costs could increase and our cost of revenues could increase, resulting in a decline in gross margins. If we were unable to adequately address the supply issues, we might have to reengineer some products resulting in further costs and delays. In addition, a failure of our suppliers to maintain their viability and financial condition could result in changes in payment and other terms of our relationships and their inability to produce and deliver our products on time and in sufficient quantities. During fiscal year 2005, we accommodated one of our suppliers by purchasing products for inventory in advance of our contractual obligations due to the supplier’s cash liquidity constraints which increased inventory and decreased cash balances. Additionally, a new domestic supplier required an advance payment of $1.1 million at June 30, 2005, which was recorded as a prepaid expense, to fund a portion of the initial start up production quantities related to a larger order.
Back to Index
In addition to using third party suppliers for the manufacture of our products and supply of our components, to achieve additional cost savings or operational benefits, we have expanded, and may in the future expand, our outsourcing activities where we believe a third party may be able to provide those services in a more efficient manner. In fiscal year 2005, we entered into an agreement with a company located in India under which they provide software development services to us. To the extent that we rely on partners or third party service providers for the provision of software development services and key business process functions, we may incur increased business continuity risks. We may no longer be able to exercise control over some aspects of software development and the development, support or maintenance of operations and processes, including the internal controls associated with our business operations and processes, which could adversely affect our business.If we are unable to effectively develop and implement our outsourcing strategy, we may not realize cost structure efficiencies and our operating and financial results could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if our third party service providers experience business difficulties or are unable to provide the services as anticipated, we may need to seek alternative service providers or resume providing such services internally which could be costly and time consuming and have an adverse material effect on our operating and financial results.
If we are unable to continue generating substantial revenues from international sales and effectively managing our international operations our business could be adversely affected.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from international sales primarily in Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA). Our EMEA activities accounted for approximately 35% of revenues for the 2005 fiscal year. In addition, a portion of our operations consists of manufacturing, software and product development, and sales activities outside of the U.S.Our ability to sell our products and conduct our operations internationally is subject to a number of risks. General economic and political conditions in each country could adversely affect demand for our products and services in these markets. We may also experience reduced intellectual property and contract rights protection as a result of different business practices in certain countries, which could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results. Although most of our international sales are denominated in U.S. Dollars, currency exchange rate fluctuations could result in lower demand for our products or lower pricing resulting in reduced revenue and margins, as well as currency translation losses. In addition, a weakening dollar has resulted in increased costs for our international operations, and could result in greater costs for our international operations in the future.
Changes to and compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations may increase our cost of doing business in these jurisdictions. We incur additional legal compliance costs associated with our international operations and could become subject to legal penalties in foreign countries if we do not comply with local laws and regulations which may be substantially different from those in the United States. In many foreign countries, particularly those with developing economies, it is common to engage in business practices that are prohibited by United States regulations applicable to us, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and any violations of such laws by our employees or contractors could have a material adverse effect on our business. Trade protection measures and import and export licensing requirements subject us to additional regulation and may prevent us from shipping products to a particular market, and increase our operating costs. In addition, our future results could be adversely affected by difficulties in staffing and managing our international operations, which have significantly expanded and become more complex as a result of the European acquisitions completed in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2005.
Because we rely on distributors, IBM and Lenovo to sell our products, our revenues could be negatively impacted if these companies do not continue to purchase products from us.
We cannot be certain that we will be able to attract or retain distributors to market our products effectively or provide timely and cost-effective customer support and service. None of our current distributors, including IBM or Lenovo, is obligated to continue selling our products or to sell our new products. We cannot be certain that any distributors will continue to represent our products or that our distributors will devote a sufficient amount of effort and resources to selling our products in their territories. We need to expand our indirect sales channels, and if we fail to do so, our growth could be limited. A number of our distributors in turn distribute via their own networks of channel partners with whom we have no direct relationship. Our distribution channel could be affected by disruptions in the relationships of and with our channel partners and their networks.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from sales made directly to IBM customers through Lenovoand through our other distributors. A significant portion of our other revenue is derived from sales to resellers. If Lenovo or our distributors were to discontinue sales of our products or reduce their sales efforts, it could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, there can be no assurance as to the continued viability and financial condition of our distributors.
Back to Index
As a result of our alliance with IBM and Lenovo, we rely on the parties for distribution of our products to their customers. Sales directly to IBM and Lenovo accounted for 19% of our net sales during fiscal 2005. IBM and Lenovo are under no obligation to continue to actively market our products. In addition to our direct sales to IBM and Lenovo, IBM and Lenovo can purchase our products through individual distributors and/or resellers. Furthermore, IBM can influence an end-user’s decisions to purchase our products even though the end-user may not purchase our products through IBM or Lenovo. While it is difficult to quantify the net revenues associated with these purchases we believe that these sales could be significant and can vary significantly from quarter to quarter.
Our business may suffer if it is alleged or found that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of others.
In the course of our business, third parties may claim that we are infringing upon their intellectual property rights. We evaluate the validity of the claims and determine whether we will negotiate licenses to use the technology. Even if we believe that the claims are without merit, responding to such claims could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, divert management's attention and resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. There is no assurance, in the event of such claims, that we would be able to enter into a licensing arrangement on acceptable terms or that litigation would not occur. In the event that there were a temporary or permanent injunction entered prohibiting us from marketing or selling certain of our products, or a successful claim of infringement against us requiring us to pay royalties to a third party, and we failed to develop or license a substitute technology, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
In addition, certain products or technologies developed by us, including for example the Linux-based products, may incorporate so-called “open source” software. Open source software is typically licensed for use at no initial charge, but certain open source software licenses impose on the licensee of the applicable open source software certain requirements to license or make available to others both the open source software as well as the software that relates to, or interacts with, the open source software. Our ability to commercialize products or technologies incorporating open source software may be restricted as a result of using such open source software because, among other reasons:
| • | open source license terms may be ambiguous and may result in being subject to unanticipated obligations regarding our products and technologies; |
| | |
| • | competitors may have improved access to information that may help them develop competitive products; |
| | |
| • | open source software cannot be protected under trade secret law; and |
| | |
| • | it may be difficult for us to accurately determine the origin of the open source code and whether the open source software in fact infringes third party intellectual property rights. |
Thin client appliance products, like personal computers, are subject to rapid technological change due to changing operating system software and network hardware and software configurations, and our products could be rendered obsolete by new technologies.
The PC market is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, uncertain product life cycles, changes in customer demands and evolving industry standards. Our products could be rendered obsolete if products based on new technologies are introduced or new industry standards emerge.
We may not be able to preserve the value of our products' intellectual property because we do not have any patents and other vendors could challenge our other intellectual property rights.
Our products are differentiated from those of our competitors by our internally developed technology that is incorporated into our products. We rely upon patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws in the United States and similar laws in other countries, and agreements with our employees, customers, suppliers and other parties, to establish and maintain our intellectual property rights. However, any of our intellectual property rights could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, which could result in costly product redesign efforts, discontinuance of certain product offerings or other competitive harm. Further, the laws of certain countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Therefore, in certain jurisdictions in which we operate or in which we have outsourced operations we may be unable to protect our proprietary technology adequately against unauthorized third-party copying or use, which could adversely affect our competitive position and cause us to incur substantial legal fees. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, other vendors could sell products with features similar to ours, and this could reduce demand for our products, which would harm our operating results.
29
Back to Index
We may repatriate cash from our foreign subsidiaries, which could result in additional income taxes that could negatively impact our results of operations and financial position. In addition, if foreign countries’ currency policies limit our ability to repatriate the needed funds, our business and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
One or more of our foreign subsidiaries may hold a portion of our cash and cash equivalents. If we need additional cash to acquire assets or technology, or to support our operations in the United States, and if the currency policies of these foreign countries allow us, we may repatriate some of our cash from these foreign subsidiaries to the United States. Depending on our financial results and the financial results of our subsidiaries at the time that the cash is repatriated, we may incur additional income taxes from the repatriation, which could negatively affect our results of operations and financial position. In addition, if the currency policies of these foreign countries prohibit or limit our ability to repatriate the needed funds, our business and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
Unforeseen environmental costs could impact our future earnings.
The European Union (“EU”) has adopted two directives to facilitate the recycling of electrical and electronic equipment sold in the EU. The first of these is the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“WEEE”) directive, which directs EU member states to enact laws, regulations and administrative provisions to ensure that producers of electrical and electronic equipment are financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment, and environmentally sound disposal of products placed on the market after August 13, 2005, and from products in use prior to that date that are being replaced. The EU has also adopted the Restriction on the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“RoHS”) directive. The RoHS directive restricts the use of lead, mercury, and certain other substances in electrical and electronic products placed on the market in the European Union after July 1, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact of these directives. Similar legislation has been or may be enacted in other areas, including in the United States, the cumulative impact of which could be significant if we are unable to recover these costs in the price of our product.
We may not be able to attract software developers to bundle their products with our thin client appliances.
Our thin client appliances include our own software, plus software from other companies for specific markets. If we are unable to attract software developers, and are unable to include their software in our products, we may not be able to offer our thin client appliances for certain important target markets, and our financial results will suffer.
In order to continue to grow our revenues, we may need to hire additional personnel.
In order to continue to develop and market our line of thin client appliances, we may need to hire additional personnel. Competition for employees is significant and we may experience difficulty in attracting qualified people.
Future growth that we may experience will place a significant strain on our management, systems and resources. To manage the anticipated growth of our operations, we may be required to:
| • | improve existing and implement new operational, financial and management information controls, reporting systems and procedures; |
| | |
| • | hire, train and manage additional qualified personnel; and |
| | |
| • | establish relationships with additional suppliers and partners while maintaining our existing relationships. |
We rely on the services of certain key personnel, and those persons' knowledge of our business and technical expertise would be difficult to replace.
Our products, technologies and operations are complex and we are substantially dependent upon the continued service of our existing personnel. The loss of any of our key employees could adversely affect our business and profits and slow our product development processes. Except for our Chairman and CEO, we generally do not have employment agreements with our key employees. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our employees.
Recent and proposed regulations related to equity compensation could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key personnel and affect our operating results.
Back to Index
We have historically used stock options as a key component of our employee compensation program. We believe that stock options and other long-term equity incentives directly motivate our employees to maximize long-term stockholder value, and, through the use of vesting, encourage employee retention and allow us to provide competitive compensation packages, although in recent periods many of our employee stock options have had exercise prices in excess of our stock price, which could affect our ability to retain or attract present and prospective employees. The adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”(SFAS No. 123R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values beginning with the first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. We adopted SFAS No. 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 and expect that it will have a material impact on our financial statements. In addition, new regulations implemented by The Nasdaq National Market requiring stockholder approval for all stock option plans, as well as new regulations implemented by the New York Stock Exchange prohibiting NYSE member organizations from voting on equity-compensation plans unless the beneficial owner of the shares has given voting instructions, could make it more difficult for us to grant options to employees in the future. As a result of these new regulations, it may be more difficult or expensive for us to grant options to employees, we will incur increased cash compensation costs, and we may change our equity compensation strategy, which may make it more difficult to attract, retain and motivate employees, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business.
In the event we are unable to satisfy regulatory requirements relating to internal controls over financial reporting, or if these internal controls are not effective, our business and financial results may suffer.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and newly enacted rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Association of Securities Dealers impose new duties on us and our executives, directors, attorneys and independent registered public accountants. In order to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and such new rules and regulations, we have recently completed our evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, our internal controls over financial reporting. As a result, we have incurred additional expenses and diversion of management’s time, which has materially increased our operating expenses and accordingly reduced our net income. While our evaluation resulted in our conclusion that as of June 30, 2005 our internal controls over financial reporting were effective, we cannot be certain as to the outcome of our testing in future periods.If our independent registered public accounting firm is not satisfied with our internal controls over financial reporting or the level at which these controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if our independent registered public accounting firm’s interpretation of the requirements, rules or regulations are different than ours in the future, then they may decline to attest to management’s assessment or issue an adverse opinion on management’s assessment and/or our internal controls over financial reporting. This could result in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which ultimately could negatively impact the market price of our shares.
Errors in our products could harm our business and our operating results.
Because our software and thin client appliance products are complex, they could contain errors or bugs that can be detected at any point in a product's life cycle. Although many of these errors may prove to be immaterial, any of these errors could be significant. Detection of any significant errors may result in:
| • | the loss of or delay in market acceptance and sales of our products; |
| | |
| • | diversion of development resources; |
| | |
| • | injury to our reputation; or |
| | |
| • | increased maintenance and warranty costs. |
These problems could harm our business and future operating results. Occasionally, we have warranted that our products will operate in accordance with specified customer requirements. If our products fail to conform to these specifications, customers could demand a refund for the purchase price or assert claims for damages.
Moreover, because our products are used in connection with critical distributed computing systems services, we may receive significant liability claims if our products do not work properly. Our agreements with customers typically contain provisions intended to limit our exposure to liability claims. However, these limitations may not preclude all potential claims. Liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or to pay significant damages. Any such claims, whether or not successful, could seriously damage our reputation and our business.
31
Back to Index
If our contracts with Citrix and other vendors of software applications were terminated, our IT services business would be materially adversely affected.
We depend on third-party suppliers to provide us with key software applications in connection with our IT services business. If such contracts and relationships were terminated, our revenues would be negatively affected.
Our stock price can be volatile.
Our stock price, like that of other technology companies, can be volatile. For example, our stock price can be affected by many factors such as quarterly increases or decreases in our revenues or earnings, changes in revenues or earnings estimates or publication of research reports by analysts; speculation in the investment community about our financial condition or results of operations and changes in revenue or earnings estimates, announcement of new products, technological developments, alliances, acquisitions or divestitures by us or one of our competitors or the loss of key management personnel. In addition, general macroeconomic and market conditions unrelated to our financial performance may also affect our stock price.
Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may delay or prevent acquisition of us, which could decrease the value of your shares.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could make it harder for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as directors. Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock.
The issuance of additional equity securities may have a dilutive effect on our existing stockholders and could lead to a decline in the price of our common stock.
Any additional issuance of equity securities, including for acquisitions, may have a dilutive effect on our existing stockholders. In addition, the perceived risk associated with the possible sale of a large number of shares could cause some of our stockholders to sell their stock, thus causing the price of our stock to decline. Subsequent sales of our common stock in the open market or the private placement of our common stock or securities convertible into common stock could also have an adverse effect on the market price of the shares. If our stock price declines, it may be more difficult or we may be unable to raise additional capital.
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains statements that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements regarding: our expectation to grow the company organically and through acquisitions; the expansion of our geographic reach and distribution channels; our expectations regarding revenues, gross margins, operating expenses, research and development expenses, sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses and our effective tax rate for fiscal 2006; our acquisition of businesses and technologies; future strategic partnerships; our expectation of stock-based compensation for the balance of fiscal 2006; the closing of the Maxspeed acquisition; the availability of cash or other financing sources to fund future operations; cash expenditures and acquisitions, and our potential issuance of debt and equity securities under our $100 million shelf registration. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The factors set forth below, and those contained in "Factors Affecting the Company and Future Operating Results" and set forth elsewhere in this report, could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in any such forward-looking statement. Factors that could affect our actual results include our ability to maintain our relationship with IBM, Lenovo and other partners, the timing and receipt of future orders, our timely development and customers' acceptance of our products, pricing pressures, rapid technological changes in the industry, growth of overall thin client sales through the capture of a greater portion of the PC market, increased competition, our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, the economic viability of our suppliers and channel partners, adverse changes in customer order patterns, our ability to identify and successfully consummate and integrate future acquisitions, including the Maxspeed acquisition, adverse changes in general economic conditions in the U. S. and internationally, risks associated with foreign operations and political and economic uncertainties associated with current world events.
32
Back to Index
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We earn interest income from our balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. This interest income is subject to market risk related to changes in interest rates that primarily affects our investment portfolio. We invest in instruments that meet high credit quality standards, as specified in our investment policy.
As of September 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005, cash equivalents and short-term investments consisted primarily of corporate notes and government securities, certificates of deposit, auction rate securities and other specific money market instruments of similar liquidity and credit quality. Due to the conservative nature of our investment portfolio, a sudden change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the value of the portfolio.
We have operations in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Austria, Sweden and Australia that are subject to foreign currency fluctuations. As currency rates change, translation of the foreign entities’ statements of operations from local currencies to U.S. dollars affects year-to-year comparability of operating results. Additionally, we have investments in each of these countries for which we recognize unrealized gains and losses through other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity for foreign currency fluctuations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures; as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of September 30, 2005 (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on the evaluation performed, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting in the periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed or furnished under the Exchange Act.
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are being filed as part of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q:
Exhibit | | |
Numbers | | Description |
| |
|
31.1 | | Certification of Michael Kantrowitz as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Neoware |
| | Systems, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Keith D. Schneck as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of |
| | Neoware Systems, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Michael Kantrowitz as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of |
| | Neoware Systems, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification Keith D. Schneck as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Neoware |
| | Systems, Inc pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
33
Back to Index
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunder duly authorized.
| NEOWARE SYSTEMS, INC. |
| |
| |
Date: November 9, 2005 | By: /s/ MICHAEL KANTROWITZ |
| Michael Kantrowitz |
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| |
| |
Date: November 9, 2005 | By: /s/ KEITH D. SCHNECK |
| Keith D. Schneck |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
34