UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-7492
Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Kevin J. McCarthy
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (312) 917-7700
Date of fiscal year end: February 28
Date of reporting period: August 31, 2010
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. ss. 3507.
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/cover.jpg)
NUVEEN INVESTMENTS ANNOUNCES STRATEGIC COMBINATION WITH FAF ADVISORS
On July 29, 2010, Nuveen Investments, Inc. announced that U.S. Bancorp will receive a 9.5% stake in Nuveen Investments and cash consideration in exchange for the long-term asset business of U.S. Bancorp’s FAF Advisors (FAF). Nuveen Investments is the parent of Nuveen Asset Management (NAM), the investment adviser for the Funds included in this report.
FAF Advisors, which currently manages about $25 billion of long-term assets and serves as the advisor of the First American Funds, will be combined with NAM, which currently manages about $75 billion in municipal fixed income assets. Upon completion of the transaction, Nuveen Investments, which currently manages about $150 billion of assets across several high-quality affiliates, will manage a combined total of about $175 billion in institutional and retail assets.
This combination will not affect the investment objectives, strategies or policies of the Funds in this report. Over time, Nuveen Investments expects that the combination will provide even more ways to meet the needs of investors who work with financial advisors and consultants by enhancing the multi-boutique model of Nuveen Investments, which also includes highly respected investment teams at NWQ Investment Management, Santa Barbara Asset Management, Symphony Asset Management, Tradewinds Global Investors, Winslow Capital and Nuveen HydePark.
The transaction is expected to close late in 2010, subject to customary conditions.
Chairman’s
Letter to Shareholders
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/bremner.jpg)
Dear Shareholder,
Recent months have revealed the fragility and disparity of the global economic recovery. In the U.S., the rate of economic growth has slowed as various stimulus programs have started to wind down, exposing weakness in the underlying economy. In contrast, many emerging market countries are experiencing a return to comparatively high rates of growth. Confidence in global financial markets has been undermined by concerns about high sovereign debt levels in Europe and the U.S. Until these countries can begin credible programs to reduce their budgetary deficits, market unease and hesitation will remain. On a more positive note, even though the countries now enjoying the strongest recovery depend on exports to countries with trade deficits, these importing countries have resisted the temptation to damage world trade by erecting trade barriers.
The U.S. economy is subject to unusually high levels of uncertainty as it struggles to recover from a devastating financial crisis. Unemployment remains stubbornly high, due to what appears to be both cyclical and structural forces. Federal Reserve policy makers are considering novel approaches to provide support to the economy, and administration policy makers are debating additional stimulus measures. However, the high levels of debt owed both by U.S. consumers and the U.S. government limit their ability to engineer a stronger economic recovery.
The U.S. financial markets reflect the crosscurrents now impacting the U.S. economy. Today’s historically low interest rates reflect the Fed’s easy monetary policy and the demand for U.S. government debt by U.S. and overseas investors looking for a safe haven for investment. Despite a continued corporate earnings recovery, equity markets continue to reflect concern about the possibility of a “double dip” recession. Encouragingly, financial institutions are rebuilding their balance sheets and the financial reform legislation enacted this summer has the potential to address many of the most significant contributors to the financial crisis, although many details still have to be worked out.
In this difficult environment, your Nuveen investment team continues to seek sustainable investment opportunities and, at the same time, remains alert for potential risks that may result from a recovery still facing many headwinds. As your representative, the Nuveen Fund Board monitors the activities of each investment team to assure that all maintain their investment disciplines. As always, I encourage you to contact your financial consultant if you have any questions about your investment in a Nuveen Fund.
On behalf of the other members of your Fund Board, we look forward to continuing to earn your trust in the months and years ahead.
Sincerely,
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/bremnersign.jpg)
Robert P. Bremner
Chairman of the Board
October 21, 2010
Nuveen Investments 1
Portfolio Manager’s Comments
Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. (NPC)
Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc. (NCL)
Nuveen California Premium Income Municipal Fund (NCU)
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (NAC)
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (NVX)
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (NZH)
Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (NKL)
Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund (NKX)
Portfolio manager Scott Romans examines key investment strategies and the performance of the Nuveen California Municipal Funds for the six-month period ended August 31, 2010. Scott, who joined Nuveen in 2000, has managed NCU, NAC, NVX, NZH, NKL and NKX since 2003. He assumed portfolio management responsibility for NPC and NCL in 2005.
What key strategies were used to manage the California Funds during the six-month reporting period ended August 31, 2010?
During this period, the combination of strong demand and tighter supply of new tax-exempt municipal issuance continued to create favorable supply/demand conditions that helped to support municipal bond prices. One reason for the decline in new tax-exempt supply was the considerable issuance of taxable municipal debt under the Build America Bond program. These bonds, first issued in April 2009, offer municipal issuers a federal subsidy equal to 35% of a security’s interest payments, providing issuers with an attractive alternative to traditional tax-exempt debt. For the six months ended August 31, 2010, taxable Build America Bond issuance totaled $49.4 billion, representing more than 24% of new bonds in the municipal marketplace nationwide. Of that total, almost $9 billion in Build American Bonds were issued in California, accounting for appro ximately 30% of municipal supply in the state. Since California’s total new issuance—both tax-exempt and taxable—was already down substantially from the same period a year earlier, the availability of tax-exempt bonds in California was significantly impacted. Because interest payments from Build America Bonds represent taxable income, we do not view these bonds as good investment opportunities for the Funds.
For the four insured California Funds, the supply situation was compounded by the continued decline in the issuance of AAA rated insured bonds. Over the period, new insured paper accounted for approximately 7% of national issuance, compared with 11% a year earlier and historical levels of approximately 50%. In response to this situation, in May 2010 the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees approved changes to the Funds’ investment policies that increased their investment flexibility while retaining the
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements. Discussions of specific investments are for illustration only and are not intended as recommendations of individual investments. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are those of the portfolio manager as of the date of this report. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and the views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. The Funds disclaim any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein.
Any reference to credit ratings for portfolio holdings refers to the highest rating assigned by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”) such as Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, or Fitch. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below investment grade. Holdings and ratings may change over time.
2 Nuveen Investments
insured nature of their portfolios. The insured California Funds can now invest at least 80% of their net assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance from insurers with a claims-paying ability rated at least BBB-at the time of purchase. In addition, the Funds may also invest up to 20% of their net assets in uninsured investment-grade credits rated BBB-or higher. The investment policy changes are discussed in more detail on page eight.
Despite the constrained issuance on tax-exempt municipal bonds, we continued to find attractive value opportunities by exploring both the primary and secondary markets for undervalued sectors and individual credits with the potential to perform well over the long term. We found value in a variety of sectors, including lower-rated health care credits, redevelopment agency (RDA) issues and bonds issued for school districts and community colleges. During this period, a number of bonds issued by redevelopment agencies became available in the secondary market. The proceeds of these bonds are used to fund programs to improve deteriorated, blighted and economically depressed areas. The quantity of RDA bonds available in the marketplace allowed us to be very selective in evaluating these bonds on a case by case basis, buying only those where our research i ndicated that we potentially would be compensated for taking on additional risk.
We also purchased zero coupon and convertible zero coupon1 bonds issued for school districts and community colleges. These bonds, some of which were insured with underlying ratings of AA or A, offered longer durations with very attractive yields relative to their credit quality. Due to the low yield environment, bonds with longer durations were in less demand during this period, so this also meant very attractive pricing. Because the Funds tended to be at or short of their target duration, they were in a position to take advantage of this situation, benefiting from both the longer durations and strong yields of the bonds we added to our portfolios. With both the RDA bonds and the school district and community college credits, we were able to discover attractive candidate s for purchase in both the insured and uninsured segments of the market.
Early in the period, we also added bonds issued by the state of California, including California general obligation (GO) and public works bonds, which are backed by appropriations of the state. We believed that these bonds offered good value, as credit spreads remained relatively wide. As the period progressed, these spreads began to tighten, and we reduced our purchases of California GOs as their spreads became less attractive.
Some of our investment activity during this period resulted from opportunities created by the provisions of the Build America Bond program. For example, tax-exempt supply was more plentiful in the health care sector because, as 501(c)(3) (non-profit) organizations, hospitals generally do not qualify for the Build America Bond program and must continue to issue bonds in the tax-exempt municipal market. Bonds with proceeds earmarked for refundings, working capital, and private activities also are not covered by the Build America Bond program, and this resulted in attractive opportunities in various other sectors of the market.
The impact of the Build America Bond program was also evident in the area of longer-term issuance, as municipal issuers sought to take full advantage of the attractive
1 | Convertible zero coupon bonds are tax-exempt municipal bonds that can be converted into corporate bonds of the issuing company. These bonds are generally sold at a discount from par and mature at par. |
Nuveen Investments 3
financing terms offered by these bonds. Approximately 70% of Build America Bonds were issued with maturities of at least 30 years. Even though this program significantly reduced the availability of tax-exempt credits with longer maturities, we continued to find good opportunities to purchase attractive longer-term bonds for these Funds.
Cash for new purchases during this period was generated primarily by the proceeds from called and maturing bonds, which we worked to redeploy to keep the Funds fully invested. Selling was relatively insignificant, as the bonds in our portfolios generally offered higher yields than those available in the current marketplace.
As of August 31, 2010, all eight of these Funds continued to use inverse floating rate securities.2 We employ inverse floaters as a form of leverage for a variety of reasons, including duration management, income enhancement and total return enhancement.
How did the Funds perform?
Individual results for the Nuveen California Funds, as well as relevant index and peer group information, are presented in the accompanying table.
Average Annual Total Returns on Common Share Net Asset Value*
For periods ended 8/31/10
6-Month | 1-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year | ||||||||
Uninsured Funds | |||||||||||
NCU | 9.48 | % | 17.30 | % | 4.69 | % | 6.66 | % | |||
NAC | 8.06 | % | 17.03 | % | 4.50 | % | 6.93 | % | |||
NVX | 7.51 | % | 16.39 | % | 4.98 | % | N/A | ||||
NZH | 7.51 | % | 17.91 | % | 3.64 | % | N/A | ||||
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) California Municipal Bond Index3 | 6.71 | % | 10.79 | % | 4.56 | % | 5.49 | % | |||
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) National Municipal Bond Index4 | 5.53 | % | 10.19 | % | 4.77 | % | 5.67 | % | |||
Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Average5 | 9.32 | % | 17.96 | % | 3.65 | % | 6.00 | % | |||
Insured Funds | |||||||||||
NPC | 7.69 | % | 12.75 | % | 4.73 | % | 6.24 | % | |||
NCL | 9.69 | % | 15.91 | % | 4.89 | % | 6.30 | % | |||
NKL | 7.62 | % | 14.52 | % | 5.06 | % | N/A | ||||
NKX | 6.96 | % | 13.23 | % | 4.60 | % | N/A | ||||
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) California Municipal Bond Index3 | 6.71 | % | 10.79 | % | 4.56 | % | 5.49 | % | |||
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Insured National Municipal Bond Index6 | 5.72 | % | 10.21 | % | 4.73 | % | 5.80 | % | |||
Lipper Single-State Insured Municipal Debt Funds Average7 | 7.90 | % | 14.13 | % | 4.67 | % | 6.26 | % |
For the six months ended August 31, 2010, the cumulative returns on common share net asset value (NAV) for all four of the uninsured Funds—NCU, NAC, NVX and NZH—exceeded the returns on the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) California Municipal Bond Index as well as the S&P National Municipal Bond Index. NCU also outperformed the average return for the Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Average, while the other three uninsured Funds underperformed this Lipper average. For the same period, all four of the insured Funds—NPC, NCL, NKL and NKX—exceeded the returns on the S&P California Municipal Bond Index and the S&P Insured National Municipal Bond Index. NCL outper-
* | Six-month returns are cumulative; all other returns are annualized. |
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. | |
For additional information, see the individual Performance Overview for your Fund in this report. | |
2 | An inverse floating rate security, also known as an inverse floater, is a financial instrument designed to pay long-term tax-exempt interest at a rate that varies inversely with a short-term tax-exempt interest rate index. For the Nuveen Funds, the index typically used is the Securities Industry and Financial Markets (SIFM) Municipal Swap Index (previously referred to as the Bond Market Association Index or BMA). Inverse floaters, including those inverse floating rate securities in which the Funds invested during this reporting period, are further defined within the Notes to Financial Statements and Glossary of Terms Used in this Report sections of this report. |
3 | The Standard & Poor’s (S&P) California Municipal Bond Index is an unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment-grade California municipal bond market. This index does not reflect any initial or ongoing expenses and is not available for direct investment. |
4 | The Standard & Poor’s (S&P) National Municipal Bond Index is an unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment-grade U.S. municipal bond market. This index does not reflect any initial or ongoing expenses and is not available for direct investment. |
5 | The Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Average is calculated using the returns of all leveraged and unleveraged closed-end funds in this category for each period as follows: 6-month, 24 funds; 1-year, 24 funds; 5-year, 24 funds; and 10-year, 12 funds. Lipper returns account for the effects of management fees and assume reinvestment of dividends, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges. The Lipper average is not available for direct investment. |
6 | The Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Insured National Municipal Bond Index is an unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the insured segment of the U.S. municipal bond market. This index does not reflect any initial or ongoing expenses and is not available for direct investment. |
7 | The Lipper Single-State Insured Municipal Debt Funds Average is calculated using the returns of all leveraged and unleveraged closed-end funds in this category for each period as follows: 6-month, 44 funds; 1-year, 44 funds; 5-year, 44 funds; and 10-year, 24 funds. Lipper returns account for the effects of management fees and assume reinvestment of dividends, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges. The Lipper average is not available for direct investment. |
4 Nuveen Investments
formed the average return on the Lipper Single-State Insured Municipal Debt Funds Average, while the remaining three insured Funds trailed the Lipper average.
Key management factors that influenced the Funds’ returns during this period included yield curve positioning and duration, credit exposure and sector allocation. In addition, the use of structural leverage was an important positive factor during this period. The impact of structural leverage is discussed in more detail on page six.
For this period, municipal bonds with longer maturities generally outperformed those with shorter maturities, with credits at the longest end of the municipal yield curve posting the strongest returns. The outperformance of longer term bonds was due in part to the decline in interest rates, particularly at the longer end of the curve. The scarcity of tax-exempt bonds with longer maturities also drove up the prices of these bonds. Among these Funds, NCL and NCU were the most strongly positioned in terms of duration and yield curve, with overweights in the outperforming longer part of the yield curve and underexposure to the shorter end of the curve that did not perform as well. NVX, on the other hand, was relatively weaker in its duration and yield curve positioning, which negatively affected its performance. The net impact of duration and yield cur ve positioning varied in the other Funds from positive in NPC and NKX to neutral in NAC, NZH and NKL, depending upon their individual weightings along the yield curve.
During this period, we saw the demand for municipal bonds increase among both institutional and individual investors. This increase was driven by a variety of factors, including concerns about potential tax increases, the need to rebalance portfolio allocations and a growing appetite for additional risk for certain higher yielding bonds. Over time, this has caused credit spreads to narrow, and the trend greatly helped our lower-rated positions, especially those we bought at depressed values several years ago. At the same time, the supply of new tax-exempt municipal paper declined, due largely to the Build America Bond program. As investors bid up municipal bond prices, bonds rated A, BBB or below, and non-rated bonds generally outperformed those rated AAA or AA. NCU and NKL benefited from their heavier weightings in bonds rated A; NCU also had the smallest allocation of bonds rated AAA among these Funds. In NVX, an underweighting of the top-performing A rated credit category detracted from this Fund’s performance. Although the remaining Funds were generally helped by their allocations to lower-rated bonds, credit exposure tended to be a neutral factor in their performance for the period.
Holdings that positively contributed to the Funds’ returns during this period included health care and transportation bonds. Revenue bonds as a whole performed well, with leasing, special tax and education among the other sectors that outperformed the general municipal market. Zero coupon bonds also were among the strongest performers and general obligation (GO) and other tax-supported bonds outpaced the market for the first time in about a year. Most of these Funds, especially NZH, tended to be underweight in the tax-supported sector, particularly in California GOs, relative to the California market. This underweighting was due to the fact that California GOs comprise such a large portion of the tax-supported sector in California that it is very difficult to match the market weighting in our portfolios. During this period, the more underweig ht a Fund was in California GOs, the more it hurt that Fund’s performance.
Nuveen Investments 5
Among the poorest performers during this period were pre-refunded bonds, which are often backed by U.S. Treasury securities. The underperformance of these bonds can be attributed primarily to their shorter effective maturities and higher credit quality. As of August 31, 2010, NVX held the heaviest weightings of pre-refunded bonds among these Funds, while NCL had the smallest allocation of these bonds. Among the revenue sectors, resource recovery trailed the overall municipal market by the widest margin, and industrial development revenue (IDR), housing and electric utilities also turned in weaker performances. The performances of NPC and NKX also were hurt by their allocations to the “other revenue” sector, which focuses largely on community facilities district (CFD) or land development bonds, also known as “dirt deals.” Thi s area of the market was hard hit in the states most affected by the housing crisis, including California.
IMPACT OF THE FUNDS’ LEVERAGE STRATEGIES ON PERFORMANCE
One important factor impacting the returns of these Funds relative to the comparative indexes was the Funds’ use of financial leverage. The Funds use leverage because their managers believe that, over time, leveraging provides opportunities for additional income and total return for common shareholders. However, use of leverage also can expose common shareholders to additional volatility. For example, as the prices of securities held by a Fund decline, the negative impact of these valuation changes on common share net asset value and common shareholder total return is magnified by the use of leverage. Conversely, leverage may enhance common share returns during periods when the prices of securities held by a Fund generally are rising.
Leverage made a positive contribution to the performance of all these Funds over this reporting period.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING THE FUNDS’ LEVERAGED CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Shortly after their inceptions, each of the Funds issued auction rate preferred shares (ARPS) to create financial leverage. As noted in past shareholder reports, the ARPS issued by many closed-end funds, including these Funds, have been hampered by a lack of liquidity since February 2008. Since that time, more ARPS have been submitted for sale in each of their regularly scheduled auctions than there have been offers to buy. In fact, offers to buy have been almost completely non-existent since late February 2008. This means that these auctions have “failed to clear,” and that many, or all, of the ARPS shareholders who wanted to sell their shares in these auctions were unable to do so. This lack of liquidity in ARPS did not lower the credit quality of these shares, and ARPS shareholders unable to sell their shares continued to receive dis tributions at the “maximum rate” applicable to failed auctions, as calculated in accordance with the pre-established terms of the ARPS. In the recent market, with short-term rates at multi-generational lows, those maximum rates also have been low.
One continuing implication for common shareholders from the auction failures is that each Fund’s cost of leverage likely has been incrementally higher at times than it otherwise might have been had the auctions continued to be successful. As a result, each Fund’s common share earnings likely have been incrementally lower at times than they otherwise might have been.
6 Nuveen Investments
As noted in past shareholder reports, the Nuveen funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees authorized several methods to refinance a portion of the Nuveen funds’ outstanding ARPS. Some funds have utilized tender option bonds (TOBs), also known as inverse floating rate securities, for leverage purposes. The amount of TOBs that a fund may use varies according to the composition of each fund’s portfolio. Some funds have a greater ability to use TOBs than others. Some funds have issued Variable Rate Demand Preferred (VRDP) Shares, a floating rate form of preferred stock. Some funds have issued MuniFund Term Preferred (MTP) Shares, a fixed rate form of preferred stock with a mandatory redemption period of five years.
While all these efforts have reduced the total amount of outstanding ARPS issued by the Nuveen funds, the funds cannot provide any assurance on when the remaining outstanding ARPS might be redeemed.
During 2010, 33 Nuveen leveraged closed-end funds, (including NAC, NZH and NKX), received a demand letter from a law firm on behalf of purported holders of common shares of each such fund, alleging that Nuveen and the funds’ officers and Board of Directors/ Trustees breached their fiduciary duties related to the redemption at par of the funds’ ARPS. In response, the Board established an ad hoc Demand Committee consisting of certain of its disinterested and independent Board members to investigate the claims. The Demand Committee retained independent counsel to assist it in conducting an extensive investigation. Based upon its investigation, the Demand Committee found that it was not in the best interests of each fund or its shareholders to take the actions suggested in the demand letters, and recommended that the full Board reject the d emands made in the demand letters. After reviewing the findings and recommendation of the Demand Committee, the full Board of each fund unanimously adopted the Demand Committee’s recommendation.
Subsequently, twenty of the funds that received demand letters (including NKX) were named as nominal defendants in a putative shareholder derivative action complaint captioned Safier and Smith v. Nuveen Asset Management, et al. that was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division (the “Cook County Chancery Court”) on July 27, 2010. Three additional funds were named as nominal defendants in a similar complaint captioned Curbow v. Nuveen Asset Management, et al. filed in the Cook County Chancery Court on August 12, 2010, and three additional funds were named as nominal defendants in a similar complaint captioned Beidler v. Nuveen Asset Management, et al. filed in the Cook County Chancery Court on September 21, 2010 (collectively, the “Complaints”). The Complaints, filed on behalf of purported holders of each fund’s common shares, also name Nuveen Asset Management as a defendant, together with current and former Officers and interested Trustees of each of the funds (together with the nominal defendants, collectively, the “Defendants”). The Complaints contain the same basic allegations contained in the demand letters. The suits seek a declaration that the Defendants have breached their fiduciary duties, an order directing the Defendants not to redeem any ARPS at their liquidation value using fund assets, indeterminate monetary damages in favor of the funds and an award of plaintiffs’ costs and disbursements in pursuing the action. Nuveen Asset Management believes that the Complaints are without merit, and intends to defend vigorously against these charges.
Nuveen Investments 7
As of August 31, 2010, the amounts of ARPS redeemed by the Funds are as shown in the accompanying table.
Fund | Auction Rate Preferred Shares Redeemed | % of Original Auction Rate Preferred Share | |||||
NPC | $ | 45,000,000 | 100.0 | % | |||
NCL | $ | 21,675,000 | 22.8 | % | |||
NCU | $ | 8,625,000 | 20.1 | % | |||
NAC | $ | 39,475,000 | 22.6 | % | |||
NVX | $ | 16,225,000 | 14.8 | % | |||
NZH | $ | 117,500,000 | 62.8 | % | |||
NKL | $ | 14,250,000 | 12.1 | % | |||
NKX | $ | 45,000,000 | 100.0 | % |
As of August 31, 2010, NZH had issued and outstanding $86,250,000 of MTP.
During this six-month reporting period, NCU, NAC, NVX and NKL filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration statements seeking to register MTP. These registration statements, declared effective by the SEC, enable the Funds to issue to the public shares of MTP to refinance all or a portion of their ARPS. The issuance of MTP by these Funds is subject to market conditions. There is no assurance that these MTP shares will be issued.
As noted in previous shareholder reports, NKX has issued and outstanding $35.5 million of VRDP. During this six-month reporting period, NPC issued $42.7 million of VRDP to redeem at par its remaining outstanding ARPS. As noted previously, VRDP is a newly-developed instrument that essentially replaces all or a portion of the ARPS used as leverage and potentially could be used to refinance all or a portion of the ARPS of other Funds. VRDP shares include a liquidity feature that allows holders of VRDP to have their shares purchased by a liquidity provider in the event that sell orders have not been matched with purchase orders and successfully settled in a remarketing. VRDP is offered only to qualified institutional buyers, defined pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.
During September 2010, subsequent to the reporting period, NCU completed the issuance of $35.25 million of 2.00%, Series 2015 MTP. The net proceeds from this offering were used to refinance the Fund’s remaining outstanding ARPS at par. The newly-issued MTP shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “NCU Pr C”. MTP is a fixed-rate form of preferred stock with a mandatory redemption period, in this case, of five years. By issuing MTP, the Fund seeks to take advantage of the current historically low interest rate environment to lock in an attractive federally tax-exempt cost of leverage for a period as long as the term of the MTP. The Fund’s managers believe that issuing MTP may help the Fund mitigate the risk of a significant increase in their cost of leverage should short-term interest rates rise shar ply in the coming years. Using the proceeds from the issuance of MTP, NCU redeemed at par the remaining $34.375 million of its outstanding ARPS.
Refer to Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies and Footnote 4 – Fund Shares for further details on MTP and VRDP Shares.
As of August 31, 2010, 83 out of the 84 Nuveen closed-end municipal funds that had issued ARPS have redeemed at par all or a portion of these shares. These redemptions
8 Nuveen Investments
bring the total amount of Nuveen’s municipal closed-end funds’ ARPS redemptions to approximately $5.5 billion of the approximately $11 billion outstanding.
For up-to-date information, please visit the Nuveen CEF Auction Rate Preferred Resource Center at: http://www.nuveen.com/arps.
RECENT CHANGES TO INVESTMENT POLICIES OF NUVEEN INSURED FUNDS
As a result of the “credit crunch” that began in 2007 and that led to the financial crisis that peaked in late 2008, the financial strength ratings assigned to most municipal bond insurers have been downgraded by the primary ratings agencies. These ratings downgrades generally have reduced, and any additional ratings downgrades may further reduce, the effective rating of many of the bonds insured by those bond insurers, including bonds held by the Funds. This in turn has sharply reduced, and in some cases may have eliminated, the value provided by such insurance. Nonetheless, the Fund’s holdings continue to be well diversified and on the whole, the underlying credit quality of its holdings are of medium to high quality. It is also important to note that municipal bonds historically have had a very low rate of default.
On May 3, 2010, the Nuveen funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees approved changes to the investment policies of all of the Nuveen insured municipal bond closed-end funds, including NPC, NCL, NKL and NKX. The Board took this action in response to the continuing challenges faced by municipal bond insurers. The changes to each Fund’s investment policies are intended to increase the Fund’s investment flexibility in pursuing its investment objective, while retaining the insured nature of its portfolio.
The changes, which were effective immediately, provide that under normal circumstances, the Funds invest at least 80% of their net assets (as defined in Footnote 7—Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates) in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. For purposes of this 80%, insurers must have a claims-paying ability rated at least BBB-at the time of purchase by at least one independent rating agency. In addition, each Fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in municipal securities that are rated at least BBB-at the time of purchase (based on the higher of the rating of the insurer, if any, or the underlying security) by at least one independent rating agency, or that are unrated but judged to be of similar credit quality by Nuveen Asset Management, or that are backed by an escrow or trust account containing sufficient U.S. government or U.S. government agency securities or U.S. Treasury-issued State and Local Government Series securities to ensure timely payment of principal and interest. Inverse floating rate securities with underlying bonds that are covered by insurance are included for purposes of the 80%. Each Fund may also invest up to 20% of its net assets in municipal securities that are rated at least BBB-(based on the higher of the rating of the insurer, if any, or the underlying bond) or that are unrated but judged to be of comparable quality by Nuveen Asset Management.
Nuveen Investments 9
Common Share Dividend and Share Price Information
During the six-month reporting period ended August 31, 2010, NPC, NCU, NAC, NVX, NKL and NKX each had one monthly dividend increase. NPC, NCL and NCU also had an additional dividend increase that was declared just prior to the start of this reporting period and took effect in March 2010. The dividend of NCL and NZH remained stable throughout the period.
All of the Funds in this report seek to pay stable dividends at rates that reflect each Fund’s past results and projected future performance. During certain periods, each Fund may pay dividends at a rate that may be more or less than the amount of net investment income actually earned by the Fund during the period. If a Fund has cumulatively earned more than it has paid in dividends, it holds the excess in reserve as undistributed net investment income (UNII) as part of the Fund’s NAV. Conversely, if a Fund has cumulatively paid dividends in excess of its earnings, the excess constitutes negative UNII that is likewise reflected in the Fund’s NAV. Each Fund will, over time, pay all of its net investment income as dividends to shareholders. As of August 31, 2010, all of the Funds in this report had positive UNII balances, based upon our best estimate, for tax purposes and positive UNII balances for financial reporting purposes.
COMMON SHARE REPURCHASES AND SHARE PRICE INFORMATION
As of August 31, 2010, and the since inception of the Funds’ repurchase program, the following Funds have cumulatively repurchased common shares as shown in the accompanying table.
Fund | Common Shares Repurchased | % of Outstanding Common Shares | |||||
NPC | 17,700 | 0.3 | % | ||||
NCL | 53,500 | 0.4 | % | ||||
NCU | 42,100 | 0.7 | % | ||||
NAC | — | — | |||||
NVX | 50,700 | 0.3 | % | ||||
NZH | 12,900 | 0.1 | % | ||||
NKL | 32,700 | 0.2 | % | ||||
NKX | — | — |
10 Nuveen Investments
During the six-month reporting period, the Funds did not repurchased any of their outstanding common shares.
As of August 31, 2010, the Funds’ common share prices were trading at (-) discounts to their common share NAVs as shown in the accompanying table.
Fund | 8/31/10 (-) Discount | Six-Month Average (-) Discount | |||||
NPC | -3.69 | % | -7.54 | % | |||
NCL | -3.83 | % | -4.25 | % | |||
NCU | -2.95 | % | -6.91 | % | |||
NAC | -0.96 | % | -5.11 | % | |||
NVX | -1.66 | % | -3.46 | % | |||
NZH | -0.07 | % | -1.32 | % | |||
NKL | -1.37 | % | -3.24 | % | |||
NKX | -3.22 | % | -5.26 | % |
Nuveen Investments 11
NPC | Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. as of August 31, 2010 | |
Performance OVERVIEW | ||
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/npc.jpg)
Fund Snapshot | ||||
Common Share Price | $ | 14.86 | ||
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV) | $ | 15.43 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV | -3.69 | % | ||
Market Yield | 5.85 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield3 | 8.99 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000) | $ | 99,399 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years) | 16.57 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration | 8.93 |
Average Annual Total Return (Inception 11/19/92) | |||||||
On Share Price | On NAV | ||||||
6-Month (Cumulative) | 15.18 | % | 7.69 | % | |||
1-Year | 20.75 | % | 12.75 | % | |||
5-Year | 4.82 | % | 4.73 | % | |||
10-Year | 6.53 | % | 6.24 | % |
Portfolio Composition (as a % of total investments) | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited | 35.1 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General | 23.6 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed | 19.0 | % | ||
Water and Sewer | 13.0 | % | ||
Other | 9.3 | % |
Insurers (as a % of total Insured investments) | ||||
NPFG4 | 31.9 | % | ||
AGM | 25.8 | % | ||
AMBAC | 19.0 | % | ||
FGIC | 13.5 | % | ||
AGC | 7.6 | % | ||
SYNCORA GTY | 2.2 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page. | |
1 | The Fund intends to invest at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Insurance for more information. As of August 31, 2010, the Fund includes 81% (as a % of total investments) of Insured securities. |
2 | Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
3 | Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 34.9%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower. |
4 | MBIA’s public finance subsidiary. |
12 Nuveen Investments
NCL Performance OVERVIEW | Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc. as of August 31, 2010 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/ncl.jpg)
Fund Snapshot | ||||
Common Share Price | $ | 14.32 | ||
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV) | $ | 14.89 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV | -3.83 | % | ||
Market Yield | 6.03 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield3 | 9.26 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000) | $ | 188,649 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years) | 17.56 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration | 9.37 |
Average Annual Total Return (Inception 3/18/93) | |||||||
On Share Price | On NAV | ||||||
6-Month (Cumulative) | 16.16 | % | 9.69 | % | |||
1-Year | 20.92 | % | 15.91 | % | |||
5-Year | 4.88 | % | 4.89 | % | |||
10-Year | 6.20 | % | 6.30 | % |
Portfolio Composition (as a % of total investments) | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited | 41.7 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General | 20.8 | % | ||
Water and Sewer | 14.4 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed | 6.7 | % | ||
Utilities | 5.6 | % | ||
Transportation | 5.0 | % | ||
Other | 5.8 | % |
Insurers (as a % of total Insured investments) | ||||
AMBAC | 27.3 | % | ||
NPFG4 | 21.7 | % | ||
AGM | 20.7 | % | ||
FGIC | 18.1 | % | ||
AGC | 11.6 | % | ||
SYNCORA GTY | 0.6 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page. | |
1 | The Fund intends to invest at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Insurance for more information. As of August 31, 2010, the Fund includes 96% (as a % of total investments) of Insured securities. |
2 | Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
3 | Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 34.9%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower. |
4 | MBIA’s public finance subsidiary. |
Nuveen Investments 13
NCU Performance OVERVIEW | Nuveen California Premium Income Municipal Fund as of August 31, 2010 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/ncu.jpg)
Fund Snapshot | ||||
Common Share Price | $ | 14.13 | ||
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV) | $ | 14.56 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV | -2.95 | % | ||
Market Yield | 6.16 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield2 | 9.46 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000) | $ | 83,486 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years) | 17.61 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration | 8.87 |
Average Annual Total Return (Inception 6/18/93) | |||||||
On Share Price | On NAV | ||||||
6-Month (Cumulative) | 20.51 | % | 9.48 | % | |||
1-Year | 24.58 | % | 17.30 | % | |||
5-Year | 5.52 | % | 4.69 | % | |||
10-Year | 6.74 | % | 6.66 | % |
Portfolio Composition (as a % of total investments) | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited | 30.3 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General | 18.9 | % | ||
Health Care | 17.8 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed | 8.5 | % | ||
Utilities | 5.3 | % | ||
Water and Sewer | 5.0 | % | ||
Other | 14.2 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page. | |
1 | Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
2 | Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 34.9%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower. |
14 Nuveen Investments
NAC Performance OVERVIEW | Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund as of August 31, 2010 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/nac.jpg)
Fund Snapshot | ||||
Common Share Price | $ | 14.40 | ||
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV) | $ | 14.54 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV | -0.96 | % | ||
Market Yield | 6.21 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield2 | 9.54 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000) | $ | 341,415 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years) | 19.41 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration | 9.61 |
Average Annual Total Return (Inception 5/26/99) | |||||||
On Share Price | On NAV | ||||||
6-Month (Cumulative) | 18.05 | % | 8.06 | % | |||
1-Year | 25.62 | % | 17.03 | % | |||
5-Year | 4.61 | % | 4.50 | % | |||
10-Year | 7.24 | % | 6.93 | % |
Portfolio Composition (as a % of total investments) | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited | 22.7 | % | ||
Health Care | 19.0 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General | 13.7 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed | 11.7 | % | ||
Transportation | 9.1 | % | ||
Water and Sewer | 7.1 | % | ||
Education and Civic Organizations | 4.7 | % | ||
Other | 12.0 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page. | |
1 | Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
2 | Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 34.9%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower. |
Nuveen Investments 15
NVX Performance OVERVIEW | Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 as of August 31, 2010 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/nvx.jpg)
Fund Snapshot | ||||
Common Share Price | $ | 14.83 | ||
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV) | $ | 15.08 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV | -1.66 | % | ||
Market Yield | 6.47 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield2 | 9.94 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000) | $ | 222,421 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years) | 14.80 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration | 8.73 |
Average Annual Total Return (Inception 3/27/01) | |||||||
On Share Price | On NAV | ||||||
6-Month (Cumulative) | 13.10 | % | 7.51 | % | |||
1-Year | 24.51 | % | 16.39 | % | |||
5-Year | 5.68 | % | 4.98 | % | |||
Since Inception | 6.17 | % | 6.48 | % |
Portfolio Composition (as a % of total investments) | ||||
U.S. Guaranteed | 25.4 | % | ||
Health Care | 13.9 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/Limited | 11.1 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General | 9.0 | % | ||
Transportation | 8.6 | % | ||
Water and Sewer | 7.5 | % | ||
Utilities | 6.3 | % | ||
Education and Civic Organizations | 5.5 | % | ||
Other | 12.7 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page. | |
1 | Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
2 | Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 34.9%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower. |
16 Nuveen Investments
NZH Performance OVERVIEW | Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 as of August 31, 2010 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/nzh.jpg)
Fund Snapshot | ||||
Common Share Price | $ | 13.69 | ||
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV) | $ | 13.70 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV | -0.07 | % | ||
Market Yield | 6.57 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield2 | 10.09 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000) | $ | 330,409 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years) | 16.90 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration | 8.77 |
Average Annual Total Return (Inception 9/25/01) | |||||||
On Share Price | On NAV | ||||||
6-Month (Cumulative) | 11.79 | % | 7.51 | % | |||
1-Year | 20.19 | % | 17.91 | % | |||
5-Year | 5.06 | % | 3.64 | % | |||
Since Inception | 5.24 | % | 5.45 | % |
Portfolio Composition (as a % of total investments) | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited | 28.4 | % | ||
Health Care | 19.1 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed | 13.4 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General | 11.7 | % | ||
Consumer Staples | 5.2 | % | ||
Transportation | 5.0 | % | ||
Water and Sewer | 4.0 | % | ||
Other | 13.2 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page. | |
1 | Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
2 | Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 34.9%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower. |
Nuveen Investments 17
NKL Performance OVERVIEW | Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund as of August 31, 2010 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/nkl.jpg)
Fund Snapshot | ||||
Common Share Price | $ | 15.14 | ||
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV) | $ | 15.35 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV | -1.37 | % | ||
Market Yield | 6.22 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield3 | 9.55 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000) | $ | 234,211 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years) | 16.10 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration | 7.11 |
Average Annual Total Return (Inception 3/25/02) | �� | ||||||
On Share Price | On NAV | ||||||
6-Month (Cumulative) | 14.40 | % | 7.62 | % | |||
1-Year | 22.68 | % | 14.52 | % | |||
5-Year | 6.22 | % | 5.06 | % | |||
Since Inception | 6.39 | % | 6.83 | % |
Portfolio Composition (as a % of total investments) | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited | 32.8 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General | 19.2 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed | 11.6 | % | ||
Utilities | 9.9 | % | ||
Water and Sewer | 9.8 | % | ||
Health Care | 4.4 | % | ||
Other | 12.3 | % |
Insurers (as a % of total Insured investments) | ||||
AGM | 26.5 | % | ||
AMBAC | 26.0 | % | ||
NFPG4 | 21.5 | % | ||
FGIC | 17.4 | % | ||
SYNCORA GTY | 5.3 | % | ||
Other | 3.3 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page. | |
1 | The Fund intends to invest at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Insurance for more information. As of August 31, 2010, the Fund includes 82% (as a % of total investments) of Insured securities. |
2 | Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
3 | Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 34.9%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower. |
4 | MBIA’s public finance subsidiary. |
18 Nuveen Investments
NKX Performance OVERVIEW | Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund as of August 31, 2010 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000891804-10-005517/nkx.jpg)
Fund Snapshot | ||||
Common Share Price | $ | 14.12 | ||
Common Share Net Asset Value (NAV) | $ | 14.59 | ||
Premium/(Discount) to NAV | -3.22 | % | ||
Market Yield | 5.69 | % | ||
Taxable-Equivalent Yield3 | 8.74 | % | ||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000) | $ | 85,868 | ||
Average Effective Maturity on Securities (Years) | 18.24 | |||
Leverage-Adjusted Duration | 8.88 |
Average Annual Total Return (Inception 11/21/02) | |||||||
On Share Price | On NAV | ||||||
6-Month (Cumulative) | 13.00 | % | 6.96 | % | |||
1-Year | 17.57 | % | 13.23 | % | |||
5-Year | 5.31 | % | 4.60 | % | |||
Since Inception | 5.01 | % | 5.86 | % |
Portfolio Composition (as a % of total investments) | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited | 32.3 | % | ||
Health Care | 16.3 | % | ||
Tax Obligation/General | 12.9 | % | ||
U.S. Guaranteed | 11.8 | % | ||
Water and Sewer | 9.7 | % | ||
Transportation | 5.6 | % | ||
Long-Term Care | 5.1 | % | ||
Other | 6.3 | % |
Insurers (as a % of total Insured investments) | ||||
AMBAC | 44.7 | % | ||
NPFG4 | 20.2 | % | ||
AGM | 12.1 | % | ||
AGC | 9.4 | % | ||
BHAC | 5.5 | % | ||
SYNCORA GTY | 4.5 | % | ||
FGIC | 3.6 | % |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page. | |
1 | The Fund intends to invest at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Insurance for more information. As of August 31, 2010, the Fund includes 77% (as a % of total investments) of Insured securities. |
2 | Ratings shown are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. AAA includes bonds with an implied AAA rating since they are backed by U.S. Government or agency securities. AAA, AA, A and BBB ratings are investment grade; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D ratings are below-investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
3 | Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 34.9%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower. |
4 | MBIA’s public finance subsidiary. |
Nuveen Investments 19
Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. | ||
NPC | Portfolio of Investments | |
August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Education and Civic Organizations – 4.5% (3.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 750 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Cal Loan Program, Series 2001A, 5.400%, 3/01/21 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 9/10 at 100.00 | Baa1 | $ | 750,735 | ||
1,500 | California State University, Systemwide Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 11/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 5/15 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 1,616,115 | ||||
2,000 | California State University, Systemwide Revenue Bonds, Series 2005C, 5.000%, 11/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 11/15 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 2,153,320 | ||||
4,250 | Total Education and Civic Organizations | 4,520,170 | ||||||
Health Care – 5.4% (3.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
3,000 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Insured Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 1998A, 5.375%, 8/15/30 – NPFG Insured | 2/11 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 3,001,860 | ||||
724 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph Health System, Trust 2554, 18.104%, 7/01/47 – AGM Insured (IF) | 7/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 842,186 | ||||
1,500 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Certificates of Participation, Sutter Health Obligated Group, Series 1999, 5.500%, 8/15/19 – AGM Insured | 2/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,505,985 | ||||
5,224 | Total Health Care | 5,350,031 | ||||||
Housing/Single Family – 0.2% (0.1% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
145 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006H, 5.750%, 8/01/30 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 2/16 at 100.00 | A | 148,468 | ||||
Tax Obligation/General – 32.6% (23.6% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
Bonita Unified School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004A: | ||||||||
1,890 | 5.250%, 8/01/23 – NPFG Insured | 8/14 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,111,943 | ||||
1,250 | 5.250%, 8/01/25 – NPFG Insured | 8/14 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,382,638 | ||||
El Segundo Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004: | ||||||||
2,580 | 5.250%, 9/01/21 – FGIC Insured | 9/14 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,918,831 | ||||
1,775 | 5.250%, 9/01/22 – FGIC Insured | 9/14 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,993,520 | ||||
1,130 | Fontana Unified School District, San Bernardino County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Trust 2668, 9.269%, 2/01/16 – AGM Insured (IF) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 1,351,344 | ||||
1,225 | Fresno Unified School District, Fresno County, California, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1998A, 6.550%, 8/01/20 – NPFG Insured | 2/13 at 103.00 | Aa3 | 1,407,378 | ||||
1,180 | Jurupa Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 8/01/21 – FGIC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | A | 1,236,286 | ||||
3,000 | Pomona Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A, 6.500%, 8/01/19 – NPFG Insured | 8/11 at 103.00 | A | 3,243,330 | ||||
160 | Roseville Joint Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 8/01/27 – FGIC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | AA– | 169,304 | ||||
3,000 | Sacramento City Unified School District, Sacramento County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 7/15 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 3,167,610 | ||||
San Diego Unified School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 1998, Series 2001C: | ||||||||
1,335 | 5.000%, 7/01/21 – AGM Insured | 7/11 at 102.00 | AAA | 1,408,398 | ||||
3,500 | 5.000%, 7/01/22 – AGM Insured | 7/11 at 102.00 | AAA | 3,692,430 | ||||
4,895 | 5.000%, 7/01/23 – AGM Insured | 7/11 at 102.00 | AAA | 5,164,127 | ||||
3,000 | San Jacinto Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.250%, 8/01/32 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 3,153,270 | ||||
29,920 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 32,400,409 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/Limited – 48.5% (35.1% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,000 | Brea and Olinda Unified School District, Orange County, California, Certificates of Participation Refunding, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 8/01/26 – AGM Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | AAA | 1,040,010 |
20 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | ||||||||
California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds, North County Center for Self-Sufficiency Corporation, Series 2004: | ||||||||
$ | 1,215 | 5.000%, 12/01/19 – AMBAC Insured | 12/13 at 100.00 | AA– | $ | 1,299,430 | ||
1,615 | 5.000%, 12/01/21 – AMBAC Insured | 12/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,709,962 | ||||
195 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/24 – FGIC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | 198,058 | ||||
595 | Chino Redevelopment Agency, California, Merged Chino Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 9/01/38 – AMBAC Insured | 9/16 at 101.00 | A– | 555,563 | ||||
3,190 | Chula Vista Public Financing Authority, California, Pooled Community Facility District Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 4.500%, 9/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | 2,921,434 | ||||
1,900 | Corona-Norco Unified School District, Riverside County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 98-1, Series 2002, 5.100%, 9/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 9/12 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,908,588 | ||||
5,000 | El Monte, California, Senior Lien Certificates of Participation, Department of Public Services Facility Phase II, Series 2001, 5.250%, 1/01/34 – AMBAC Insured | 1/11 at 100.00 | A2 | 5,009,100 | ||||
3,180 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bonds Trust 4686, 9.053%, 6/01/45 – AGC Insured (IF) | 6/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,148,327 | ||||
700 | Hesperia Public Financing Authority, California, Redevelopment and Housing Projects Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/17 at 100.00 | Ba1 | 585,781 | ||||
435 | Indian Wells Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Consolidated Whitewater Project Area, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 9/01/20 – AMBAC Insured | 9/13 at 100.00 | A | 448,276 | ||||
345 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Manchester Social Services Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A1 | 322,951 | ||||
895 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Bunker Hill Project, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 12/01/20 – AGM Insured | 12/14 at 100.00 | AAA | 995,813 | ||||
1,500 | Los Angeles, California, Municipal Improvement Corporation, Lease Revenue Bonds, Police Headquarters, Series 2006A, 4.750%, 1/01/31 – FGIC Insured | 1/17 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,502,760 | ||||
3,150 | Moreno Valley Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 8/01/38 – AMBAC Insured | 8/17 at 100.00 | A– | 2,878,376 | ||||
7,000 | Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, California, Housing Set-Aside Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 9/01/34 – NPFG Insured | 9/17 at 100.00 | A+ | 6,712,090 | ||||
165 | Rialto Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A– | 155,250 | ||||
205 | Roseville, California, Certificates of Participation, Public Facilities, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 208,465 | ||||
5,150 | San Jacinto Unified School District, Riverside County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2010, 5.375%, 9/01/40 – AGC Insured | 9/20 at 100.00 | AAA | 5,343,640 | ||||
1,500 | San Jose Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 8/01/28 – NPFG Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | A | 1,516,545 | ||||
3,565 | Sweetwater Union High School District Public Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/25 – AGM Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,678,617 | ||||
3,250 | Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Housing Bonds Series 2010, 5.250%, 9/01/39 – AGM Insured | 9/20 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,359,850 | ||||
2,805 | Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District, San Bernardino County, California, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2001A, 5.000%, 10/01/31 – NPFG Insured | 10/11 at 100.00 | A | 2,738,802 | ||||
48,555 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 48,237,688 | ||||||
Transportation – 2.5% (1.8% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
2,400 | San Diego Unified Port District, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B, 5.000%, 9/01/29 – NPFG Insured | 9/14 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,465,568 | ||||
U.S. Guaranteed – 26.4% (19.0% of Total Investments) (4) | ||||||||
6,000 | Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency, California, Single Family Residential Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1986A, 8.000%, 12/01/19 (ETM) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 8,932,320 | ||||
5,135 | Palmdale Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Single Family Restructured Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1986A, 8.000%, 3/01/16 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (ETM) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 6,683,870 |
Nuveen Investments 21
Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. (continued) | ||
NPC | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
U.S. Guaranteed (4) (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 6,220 | Riverside County, California, GNMA Mortgage-Backed Securities Program Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1987A, 9.000%, 5/01/21 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (ETM) | No Opt. Call | AAA | $ | 8,697,488 | ||
1,485 | San Jose, California, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1985A, 9.500%, 10/01/13 (ETM) | No Opt. Call | Aaa | 1,890,257 | ||||
18,840 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 26,203,935 | ||||||
Utilities – 0.3% (0.2% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
345 | Merced Irrigation District, California, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.125%, 9/01/31 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | N/R | 322,892 | ||||
Water and Sewer – 17.9% (13.0% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
2,200 | Atwater Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3145, 17.905%, 5/01/40 – AGM Insured (IF) | 5/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,555,344 | ||||
5,255 | El Dorado Irrigation District, California, Water and Sewer Certificates of Participation, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 3/01/20 – FGIC Insured | 3/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 5,527,577 | ||||
1,230 | El Dorado Irrigation District, California, Water and Sewer Certificates of Participation, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 3/01/21 – FGIC Insured | 3/14 at 100.00 | A1 | 1,298,954 | ||||
235 | Healdsburg Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA– | 240,038 | ||||
5,000 | Indio Water Authority, California, Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/31 – AMBAC Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 5,155,650 | ||||
220 | Marina Coast Water District, California, Enterprise Certificate of Participation, Series 2006, 5.000%, 6/01/31 – NPFG Insured | 6/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 226,008 | ||||
1,500 | Placerville Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater System Refinancing and Improvement Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 9/01/34 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,355,445 | ||||
1,345 | West Basin Municipal Water District, California, Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/20 – NPFG Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 1,471,686 | ||||
16,985 | Total Water and Sewer | 17,830,702 | ||||||
$ | 126,664 | Total Investments (cost $129,201,536) – 138.3% | 137,479,863 | |||||
Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (43.0)% (5) | (42,700,000 | ) | ||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities - 4.7% | 4,618,697 | |||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares - 100% | $ | 99,398,560 |
The Fund intends to invest at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Insurance for more information. | ||
(1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted. | |
(2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. | |
(3) | Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. | |
(4) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. | |
(5) | Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 31.1%. | |
N/R | Not rated. | |
(ETM) | Escrowed to maturity. | |
(IF) | Inverse floating rate investment. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
22 Nuveen Investments
Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc. | ||
NCL | Portfolio of Investments | |
August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Education and Civic Organizations – 5.0% (3.5% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 620 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of the Pacific, Series 2000, 5.875%, 11/01/20 – NPFG Insured | 11/10 at 100.00 | AAA | $ | 622,641 | ||
750 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Cal Loan Program, Series 2001A, 5.400%, 3/01/21 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 9/10 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 750,735 | ||||
1,500 | California State University, Systemwide Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 11/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 5/15 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 1,616,115 | ||||
6,000 | University of California, Revenue Bonds, Multi-Purpose Projects, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 5/15/27 – AMBAC Insured (UB) | 5/13 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 6,441,540 | ||||
8,870 | Total Education and Civic Organizations | 9,431,031 | ||||||
Health Care – 2.3% (1.6% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,410 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph Health System, Trust 2554, 18.104%, 7/01/47 – AGM Insured (IF) | 7/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,640,168 | ||||
2,000 | The Regents of the University of California, Medical Center Pooled Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 4.500%, 5/15/37 – NPFG Insured | 5/15 at 101.00 | Aa2 | 1,975,360 | ||||
650 | University of California, Hospital Revenue Bonds, UCLA Medical Center, Series 2004A, 5.500%, 5/15/18 – AMBAC Insured | 5/12 at 101.00 | N/R | 676,221 | ||||
4,060 | Total Health Care | 4,291,749 | ||||||
Housing/Single Family – 1.0% (0.7% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
275 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006H, 5.750%, 8/01/30 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 2/16 at 100.00 | A | 281,578 | ||||
1,530 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006K, 5.500%, 2/01/42 – AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 2/16 at 100.00 | Aaa | 1,569,122 | ||||
1,805 | Total Housing/Single Family | 1,850,700 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/General – 29.9% (20.8% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,425 | Bassett Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.250%, 8/01/30 – FGIC Insured | 8/16 at 100.00 | A | 1,492,730 | ||||
3,000 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 4.500%, 9/01/36 – AGM Insured | 9/16 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,917,080 | ||||
4,400 | California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 2/01/31 – NPFG Insured | 2/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 4,443,164 | ||||
3,200 | Coast Community College District, Orange County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C, 0.000%, 8/01/31 – AGM Insured | 8/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,806,144 | ||||
2,500 | Corona-Norco Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election 2006 Series 2009B, 5.375%, 2/01/34 – AGC Insured | 8/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,684,700 | ||||
East Side Union High School District, Santa Clara County, California, General Obligation Bonds, 2008 Election Series 2010B: | ||||||||
3,490 | 5.000%, 8/01/27 – AGC Insured | 8/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,749,482 | ||||
3,545 | 5.000%, 8/01/28 – AGC Insured | 8/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,775,709 | ||||
3,110 | 5.000%, 8/01/29 – AGC Insured | 8/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,286,244 | ||||
2,210 | Fontana Unified School District, San Bernardino County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Trust 2668, 9.269%, 2/01/16 – AGM Insured (IF) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 2,642,895 | ||||
1,255 | Los Angeles Community College District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 8/01/24 – AGM Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,357,759 | ||||
4,000 | Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007A, 4.500%, 7/01/24 – AGM Insured | 7/17 at 100.00 | AAA | 4,214,960 | ||||
Los Rios Community College District, Sacramento, El Dorado and Yolo Counties, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C: | ||||||||
2,110 | 5.000%, 8/01/21 – AGM Insured (UB) | 8/14 at 102.00 | AAA | 2,369,066 | ||||
3,250 | 5.000%, 8/01/22 – AGM Insured (UB) | 8/14 at 102.00 | AAA | 3,730,253 | ||||
3,395 | 5.000%, 8/01/23 – AGM Insured (UB) | 8/14 at 102.00 | AAA | 3,896,679 | ||||
1,270 | Merced City School District, Merced County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 8/01/22 – FGIC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | A | 1,380,109 |
Nuveen Investments 23
Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc. (continued) | ||
NCL | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/General (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 305 | Roseville Joint Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 8/01/27 – FGIC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | AA– | $ | 322,736 | ||
2,500 | Sacramento City Unified School District, Sacramento County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 7/15 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 2,639,675 | ||||
1,125 | San Diego Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 1998, Series 1999A, 0.000%, 7/01/21 – FGIC Insured | No Opt. Call | Aa1 | 736,414 | ||||
2,000 | San Francisco Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 6/15/26 – FGIC Insured | 6/11 at 101.00 | Aa2 | 2,045,260 | ||||
2,000 | San Jacinto Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.250%, 8/01/32 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 2,102,180 | ||||
1,000 | San Ramon Valley Unified School District, Contra Costa County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 8/01/24 – AGM Insured | 8/14 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,096,970 | ||||
2,445 | Washington Unified School District, Yolo County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 8/01/21 – FGIC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,681,089 | ||||
53,535 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 56,371,298 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/Limited – 59.8% (41.7% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
Anaheim Public Finance Authority, California, Subordinate Lease Revenue Bonds, Public Improvement Project, Series 1997C: | ||||||||
5,130 | 0.000%, 9/01/18 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 3,865,250 | ||||
8,000 | 0.000%, 9/01/21 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 4,838,960 | ||||
California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds, North County Center for Self-Sufficiency Corporation, Series 2004: | ||||||||
1,535 | 5.000%, 12/01/20 – AMBAC Insured | 12/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,632,258 | ||||
1,780 | 5.000%, 12/01/23 – AMBAC Insured | 12/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,868,911 | ||||
3,725 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Series 2005J, 5.000%, 1/01/17 – AMBAC Insured | 1/16 at 100.00 | A2 | 4,088,560 | ||||
380 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/24 – FGIC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | 385,958 | ||||
7,000 | Chula Vista Public Financing Authority, California, Pooled Community Facility District Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 4.500%, 9/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | 6,410,670 | ||||
1,430 | Cloverdale Community Development Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Cloverdale Redevelopment Project Series 2006, 5.000%, 8/01/36 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A– | 1,357,313 | ||||
5,625 | El Monte, California, Senior Lien Certificates of Participation, Department of Public Services Facility Phase II, Series 2001, 5.000%, 1/01/21 – AMBAC Insured | 1/11 at 100.00 | A2 | 5,656,275 | ||||
8,280 | Fontana Public Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, North Fontana Redevelopment Project, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 10/01/32 – AMBAC Insured | 10/15 at 100.00 | A | 8,058,341 | ||||
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A: | ||||||||
7,250 | 5.000%, 6/01/35 – FGIC Insured | 6/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 7,252,465 | ||||
7,500 | 5.000%, 6/01/45 – AGC Insured | 6/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 7,450,425 | ||||
6,215 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bonds Trust 4686, 9.053%, 6/01/45 – AGC Insured (IF) | 6/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 6,153,099 | ||||
2,000 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bonds Trust 2040, 10.300%, 6/01/45 – FGIC Insured (IF) | 6/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 1,651,640 | ||||
875 | Hesperia Public Financing Authority, California, Redevelopment and Housing Projects Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/17 at 100.00 | Ba1 | 732,226 | ||||
1,700 | Hesperia Unified School District, San Bernardino County, California, Certificates of Participation, Capital Improvement, Series 2007, 5.000%, 2/01/41 – AMBAC Insured | 2/17 at 100.00 | A– | 1,576,223 | ||||
1,810 | Kern County Board of Education, California, Certificates of Participation Refunding, Series 1998A, 5.200%, 5/01/28 – NPFG Insured | 11/10 at 100.00 | A | 1,812,299 | ||||
5,000 | La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Redevelopment Project Area 1, Series 1998, 5.200%, 9/01/28 – AMBAC Insured | 9/10 at 100.00 | A+ | 5,014,050 | ||||
2,185 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Manchester Social Services Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,045,357 |
24 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 1,000 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Bunker Hill Project, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 12/01/20 – AGM Insured | 12/14 at 100.00 | AAA | $ | 1,112,640 | ||
1,250 | Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California, Proposition A First Tier Senior Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 7/01/19 – NPFG Insured | 7/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,381,175 | ||||
4,000 | Los Angeles, California, Certificates of Participation, Municipal Improvement Corporation, Series 2003AW, 5.000%, 6/01/33 – AMBAC Insured | 6/13 at 100.00 | A+ | 4,050,920 | ||||
3,000 | Los Angeles, California, Municipal Improvement Corporation, Lease Revenue Bonds, Police Headquarters, Series 2006A, 4.750%, 1/01/31 – FGIC Insured | 1/17 at 100.00 | A+ | 3,005,520 | ||||
6,120 | Moreno Valley Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 8/01/38 – AMBAC Insured | 8/17 at 100.00 | A– | 5,592,272 | ||||
2,810 | Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Administration Building Projects, Series 2008B, 5.000%, 8/01/21 – AGC Insured | 8/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,125,675 | ||||
4,140 | Plumas County, California, Certificates of Participation, Capital Improvement Program, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 6/01/28 – AMBAC Insured | 6/13 at 101.00 | A– | 4,153,000 | ||||
390 | Poway Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Paguay Redevelopment Project, Series 2000, 5.750%, 6/15/33 – NPFG Insured | 12/10 at 102.00 | A | 393,073 | ||||
325 | Rialto Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A– | 305,796 | ||||
1,000 | Rocklin Unified School District, Placer County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 1, Series 2004, 5.000%, 9/01/25 – NPFG Insured | 9/13 at 100.00 | A | 1,012,070 | ||||
2,500 | Roseville Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 9/01/33 – AMBAC Insured | 9/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 2,339,525 | ||||
405 | Roseville, California, Certificates of Participation, Public Facilities, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 411,845 | ||||
4,655 | San Bernardino Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Certificates of Participation Refunding, Police Station Financing Project, Series 1999, 5.500%, 9/01/20 – NPFG Insured | 9/10 at 101.00 | A | 4,719,099 | ||||
1,500 | San Jose Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 8/01/28 – NPFG Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | A | 1,516,545 | ||||
5,510 | Sweetwater Union High School District Public Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/28 – AGM Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 5,633,369 | ||||
1,205 | Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Housing Bonds Series 2010, 5.000%, 9/01/30 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 1,254,080 | ||||
1,020 | Washington Unified School District, Yolo County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2007, 5.125%, 8/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 8/17 at 100.00 | A | 1,040,471 | ||||
118,250 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 112,897,355 | ||||||
Transportation – 7.1% (5.0% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
6,500 | Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1999, 0.000%, 1/15/18 – NPFG Insured | 1/11 at 68.38 | A | 4,105,660 | ||||
4,000 | Orange County Transportation Authority, California, Toll Road Revenue Bonds, 91 Express Lanes Project, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/15/18 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 4,354,840 | ||||
5,000 | San Francisco Airports Commission, California, Revenue Refunding Bonds, San Francisco International Airport, Second Series 2001, Issue 27A, 5.250%, 5/01/31 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 5/11 at 100.00 | A1 | 5,008,550 | ||||
15,500 | Total Transportation | 13,469,050 | ||||||
U.S. Guaranteed – 9.7% (6.7% of Total Investments) (4) | ||||||||
1,380 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of the Pacific, Series 2000, 5.875%, 11/01/20 (Pre-refunded 11/01/10) – NPFG Insured | 11/10 at 100.00 | A2 (4) | 1,393,069 | ||||
1,900 | Central Unified School District, Fresno County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1993, 5.625%, 3/01/18 – AMBAC Insured (ETM) | 9/10 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 1,945,600 | ||||
3,000 | Escondido Union High School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1996, 5.700%, 11/01/10 – NPFG Insured (ETM) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 3,027,390 |
Nuveen Investments 25
Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc. (continued) | ||
NCL | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
U.S. Guaranteed (4) (continued) | ||||||||
Manteca Unified School District, San Joaquin County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004: | ||||||||
$ | 1,000 | 5.250%, 8/01/21 (Pre-refunded 8/01/14) – AGM Insured | 8/14 at 100.00 | AAA | $ | 1,180,110 | ||
1,000 | 5.250%, 8/01/22 (Pre-refunded 8/01/14) – AGM Insured | 8/14 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,180,110 | ||||
1,610 | Poway Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Paguay Redevelopment Project, Series 2000, 5.750%, 6/15/33 (Pre-refunded 12/15/10) – NPFG Insured | 12/10 at 102.00 | AAA | 1,668,041 | ||||
4,320 | Riverside County, California, GNMA Mortgage-Backed Securities Program Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1987B, 8.625%, 5/01/16 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (ETM) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 5,917,104 | ||||
1,000 | Sacramento County Sanitation District Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A, 5.500%, 12/01/20 (Pre-refunded 12/01/10) – AMBAC Insured | 12/10 at 101.00 | N/R (4) | 1,023,270 | ||||
905 | University of California, Hospital Revenue Bonds, UCLA Medical Center, Series 2004A, 5.500%, 5/15/18 (Pre-refunded 5/15/12) – AMBAC Insured | 5/12 at 101.00 | N/R (4) | 994,405 | ||||
16,115 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 18,329,099 | ||||||
Utilities – 8.1% (5.6% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
670 | Merced Irrigation District, California, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.125%, 9/01/31 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | N/R | 627,066 | ||||
100 | Sacramento City Financing Authority, California, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Solid Waste and Redevelopment Projects, Series 1999, 5.800%, 12/01/19 – AMBAC Insured | 12/10 at 101.00 | N/R | 101,800 | ||||
1,950 | Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 5.250%, 8/01/27 – AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 8/12 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,950,780 | ||||
Santa Clara, California, Subordinate Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A: | ||||||||
2,800 | 5.000%, 7/01/24 – NPFG Insured | 7/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,926,840 | ||||
5,000 | 5.000%, 7/01/28 – NPFG Insured | 7/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 5,170,350 | ||||
4,000 | Southern California Public Power Authority, California, Milford Wind Corridor Phase I Revenue Bonds, Series 2010-1, 5.000%, 7/01/28 | No Opt. Call | AA– | 4,428,680 | ||||
14,520 | Total Utilities | 15,205,516 | ||||||
Water and Sewer – 20.7% (14.4% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,100 | Atwater Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3145, 17.905%, 5/01/40 – AGM Insured (IF) | 5/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,277,672 | ||||
2,000 | El Dorado Irrigation District, California, Water and Sewer Certificates of Participation, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 3/01/21 – FGIC Insured | 3/14 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,112,120 | ||||
750 | Fortuna Public Finance Authority, California, Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 10/01/36 – AGM Insured | 10/16 at 100.00 | AAA | 769,133 | ||||
460 | Healdsburg Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA– | 469,862 | ||||
2,700 | Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Financing Authority, California, Senior Revenue Bonds, Capital Projects, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 10/01/21 – AGM Insured | 10/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,016,170 | ||||
2,000 | Los Angeles, California, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 4.500%, 6/01/29 – NPFG Insured | 6/15 at 100.00 | AA | 2,044,940 | ||||
430 | Marina Coast Water District, California, Enterprise Certificate of Participation, Series 2006, 5.000%, 6/01/31 – NPFG Insured | 6/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 441,743 | ||||
12,000 | Orange County Sanitation District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2003, 5.000%, 2/01/33 – FGIC Insured (UB) | 8/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 12,361,920 | ||||
1,520 | San Buenaventura, California, Water Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2004, 5.000%, 10/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 10/14 at 100.00 | AA | 1,586,287 | ||||
1,000 | San Diego County Water Authority, California, Water Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 5/01/38 – AGM Insured | 5/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,056,960 | ||||
3,675 | San Dieguito Water District, California, Water Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2004, 5.000%, 10/01/23 – FGIC Insured | 10/14 at 100.00 | AA+ | 4,023,317 |
26 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Water and Sewer (continued) | ||||||||
Santa Clara Valley Water District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2004A: | ||||||||
$ | 1,400 | 5.000%, 2/01/19 – FGIC Insured | 2/14 at 100.00 | AA+ | $ | 1,517,208 | ||
445 | 5.000%, 2/01/20 – FGIC Insured | 2/14 at 100.00 | AA+ | 477,730 | ||||
465 | 5.000%, 2/01/21 – FGIC Insured | 2/14 at 100.00 | AA+ | 496,569 | ||||
2,500 | West Basin Municipal Water District, California, Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/30 – NPFG Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 2,561,875 | ||||
Yorba Linda Water District, California, Certificates of Participation, Highland Reservoir Renovation, Series 2003: | ||||||||
2,010 | 5.000%, 10/01/28 – FGIC Insured | 10/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,185,192 | ||||
2,530 | 5.000%, 10/01/33 – FGIC Insured | 10/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,686,405 | ||||
36,985 | Total Water and Sewer | 39,085,103 | ||||||
$ | 269,640 | Total Investments (cost $260,027,897) – 143.6% | 270,930,901 | |||||
Floating Rate Obligations – (9.5)% | (17,880,000 | ) | ||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 4.8% | 8,923,092 | |||||||
Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (38.9)% (5) | (73,325,000 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100% | $ | 188,648,993 |
The Fund intends to invest at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Insurance for more information. |
(1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted. |
(2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
(3) | Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
(4) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Such investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA rated securities. |
(5) | Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 27.1%. |
N/R | Not rated. |
(ETM) | Escrowed to maturity. |
(IF) | Inverse floating rate investment. |
(UB) | Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 27
Nuveen California Premium Income Municipal Fund | ||
NCU | Portfolio of Investments | |
August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Consumer Staples – 6.5% (4.5% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 1,500 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Alameda County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corporation, Series 2002, 5.750%, 6/01/29 | 6/12 at 100.00 | Baa3 | $ | 1,500,585 | ||
215 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Sonoma County Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Series 2005, 4.250%, 6/01/21 | 6/15 at 100.00 | BBB | 203,003 | ||||
2,950 | California Statewide Financing Authority, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Pooled Tobacco Securitization Program, Series 2002A, 5.625%, 5/01/29 | 5/12 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 2,917,845 | ||||
1,350 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-2, 0.000%, 6/01/37 | 6/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 846,950 | ||||
6,015 | Total Consumer Staples | 5,468,383 | ||||||
Education and Civic Organizations – 6.2% (4.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
70 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of Redlands, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 10/01/35 | 10/15 at 100.00 | A3 | 70,293 | ||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of the Pacific, Series 2006: | ||||||||
45 | 5.000%, 11/01/21 | 11/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 48,520 | ||||
60 | 5.000%, 11/01/25 | 11/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 63,116 | ||||
1,112 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, University of California Regents, Tender Option Bond Trust 1065, 9.041%, 3/01/33 (IF) | 3/18 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 1,173,583 | ||||
2,000 | California State University, Systemwide Revenue Bonds, Series 2005C, 5.000%, 11/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 11/15 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 2,153,320 | ||||
University of California, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A: | ||||||||
255 | 5.125%, 5/15/17 – AMBAC Insured (UB) | 5/13 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 285,368 | ||||
1,245 | 5.125%, 5/15/17 – AMBAC Insured (UB) | 5/13 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 1,377,530 | ||||
4,787 | Total Education and Civic Organizations | 5,171,730 | ||||||
Energy – 0.6% (0.4% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
500 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Refinery Project Hovensa LLC, Series 2007, 4.700%, 7/01/22 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 1/15 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 466,005 | ||||
Health Care – 25.9% (17.8% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
3,435 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Downey Community Hospital, Series 1993, 5.750%, 5/15/15 (5) | 11/10 at 100.00 | N/R | 2,275,825 | ||||
155 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/37 | 4/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 155,668 | ||||
3,525 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 11/15/46 (UB) | 11/16 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 3,572,376 | ||||
1,500 | California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Hospital Assistance LLC, Series 2001A, 5.550%, 8/01/31 | 8/11 at 102.00 | A+ | 1,534,305 | ||||
685 | California Municipal Financing Authority, Certificates of Participation, Community Hospitals of Central California, Series 2007, 5.250%, 2/01/46 | 2/17 at 100.00 | Baa2 | 638,173 | ||||
1,000 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Insured Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 10/01/37 | 10/17 at 100.00 | A– | 978,180 | ||||
1,740 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Daughters of Charity Health System, Series 2005A, 5.250%, 7/01/30 | 7/15 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,604,837 | ||||
490 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 3/01/41 | 3/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 490,701 | ||||
730 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanente System, Series 2001C, 5.250%, 8/01/31 | 8/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 748,228 | ||||
3,000 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Methodist Hospital Project, Series 2009, 6.750%, 2/01/38 | 8/19 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 3,422,490 | ||||
2,100 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sherman Oaks Health System, Series 1998A, 5.000%, 8/01/22 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A1 | 2,201,892 | ||||
1,690 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 11/15/43 | 11/15 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 1,692,873 |
28 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Health Care (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 377 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph Health System, Trust 2554, 18.104%, 7/01/47 – AGM Insured (IF) | 7/18 at 100.00 | AAA | $ | 437,960 | ||
760 | Loma Linda, California, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series 2008A, 8.250%, 12/01/38 | 12/17 at 100.00 | BBB | 871,249 | ||||
1,000 | The Regents of the University of California, Medical Center Pooled Revenue Bonds, Series 2009E, 5.000%, 5/15/38 | 5/17 at 101.00 | Aa2 | 1,036,470 | ||||
22,187 | Total Health Care | 21,661,227 | ||||||
Housing/Single Family – 3.2% (2.2% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
2,500 | California Housing Finance Agency, California, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2008L, 5.500%, 8/01/38 | 2/18 at 100.00 | A | 2,539,400 | ||||
130 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006H, 5.750%, 8/01/30 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 2/16 at 100.00 | A | 133,110 | ||||
2,630 | Total Housing/Single Family | 2,672,510 | ||||||
Industrials – 0.6% (0.4% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
500 | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Waste Management Inc., Series 2002A, 5.000%, 1/01/22 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 1/16 at 102.00 | BBB | 511,360 | ||||
Tax Obligation/General – 27.5% (18.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,500 | California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 2/01/31 – NPFG Insured | 2/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 1,514,715 | ||||
California, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2009: | ||||||||
2,350 | 6.000%, 11/01/39 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,635,666 | ||||
1,300 | 5.500%, 11/01/39 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A1 | 1,397,188 | ||||
4,000 | California, General Obligation Veterans Welfare Bonds, Series 1999BR, 5.300%, 12/01/29 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 12/10 at 100.00 | AA | 4,001,080 | ||||
6,000 | Hartnell Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 6/01/29 – AGM Insured (UB) | 6/16 at 100.00 | AAA | 6,325,620 | ||||
3,000 | Pomona Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A, 6.150%, 8/01/15 – NPFG Insured | 8/11 at 103.00 | A | 3,238,830 | ||||
15 | Riverside Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.250%, 8/01/22 – NPFG Insured | 8/14 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 16,991 | ||||
135 | Roseville Joint Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 8/01/27 – FGIC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | AA– | 142,850 | ||||
1,355 | San Jose-Evergreen Community College District, Santa Clara County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/25 – NPFG Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 1,451,015 | ||||
8,345 | Yosemite Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation, Election 2004, Series 2010D, 0.000%, 8/01/42 | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 2,260,243 | ||||
28,000 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 22,984,198 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/Limited – 44.0% (30.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,000 | Bell Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Bell Project Area, Series 2003, 5.625%, 10/01/33 – RAAI Insured | 10/13 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 940,940 | ||||
California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds, North County Center for Self-Sufficiency Corporation, Series 2004: | ||||||||
1,695 | 5.000%, 12/01/22 – AMBAC Insured | 12/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,787,683 | ||||
1,865 | 5.000%, 12/01/24 – AMBAC Insured | 12/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,949,951 | ||||
5,920 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of Veterans Affairs, Southern California Veterans Home – Chula Vista Facility, Series 1999A, 5.600%, 11/01/19 – AMBAC Insured | 11/10 at 100.50 | A2 | 5,987,487 | ||||
1,000 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Various Capital Projects, Series 2009G-1, 5.750%, 10/01/30 | 10/19 at 100.00 | A2 | 1,064,310 | ||||
2,000 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Various Capital Projects, Series 2009I-1, 6.375%, 11/01/34 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A2 | 2,217,140 | ||||
535 | California, Economic Recovery Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 7/01/15 | 7/14 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 610,398 |
Nuveen Investments 29
Nuveen California Premium Income Municipal Fund (continued) | ||
NCU | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 165 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/24 – FGIC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | $ | 167,587 | ||
500 | Chino Redevelopment Agency, California, Merged Chino Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 9/01/38 – AMBAC Insured | 9/16 at 101.00 | A– | 466,860 | ||||
Irvine, California, Unified School District, Community Facilities District Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006A: | ||||||||
75 | 5.000%, 9/01/26 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 73,225 | ||||
175 | 5.125%, 9/01/36 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 159,458 | ||||
3,500 | Livermore Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Livermore Redevelopment Project Area, Series 2001A, 5.000%, 8/01/26 – NPFG Insured | 8/11 at 100.00 | A | 3,505,915 | ||||
310 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Manchester Social Services Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A1 | 290,188 | ||||
2,000 | Los Angeles, California, Municipal Improvement Corporation, Lease Revenue Bonds, Police Headquarters, Series 2006A, 4.750%, 1/01/31 – FGIC Insured | 1/17 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,003,680 | ||||
3,230 | Murrieta Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 8/01/35 – NPFG Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | A | 2,977,285 | ||||
155 | Rialto Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A– | 145,841 | ||||
190 | Roseville, California, Certificates of Participation, Public Facilities, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 193,211 | ||||
1,500 | Sacramento City Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A, 5.400%, 11/01/20 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A1 | 1,663,335 | ||||
3,000 | Sacramento City Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1993B, 5.400%, 11/01/20 | No Opt. Call | A1 | 3,326,670 | ||||
2,000 | San Francisco City and County, California, Certificates of Participation, Multiple Capital Improvement Projects, Series 2009A, 5.200%, 4/01/26 | 4/19 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,159,260 | ||||
San Marcos Public Facilities Authority, California, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1998: | ||||||||
1,500 | 5.800%, 9/01/18 | 9/10 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 1,513,605 | ||||
1,000 | 5.800%, 9/01/27 | 9/10 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 1,002,040 | ||||
325 | San Mateo Union High School District, San Mateo County, California, Certificates of Participation, Phase 1, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 12/15/30 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA– | 319,485 | ||||
2,050 | Santa Barbara County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2001, 5.250%, 12/01/19 – AMBAC Insured | 12/11 at 102.00 | AA+ | 2,195,817 | ||||
35,690 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 36,721,371 | ||||||
Transportation – 3.5% (2.4% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
780 | Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2006F, 5.000%, 4/01/31 (UB) | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA | 824,538 | ||||
220 | Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2008, Trust 3211, 13.243%, 10/01/32 (IF) | 4/18 at 100.00 | AA | 286,147 | ||||
2,000 | Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Series 1995A, 5.000%, 1/01/35 | 1/11 at 100.00 | BBB– | 1,831,539 | ||||
3,000 | Total Transportation | 2,942,224 | ||||||
U.S. Guaranteed – 12.4% (8.5% of Total Investments) (4) | ||||||||
2,000 | California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 5/01/18 (Pre-refunded 5/01/12) | 5/12 at 101.00 | Aaa | 2,179,780 | ||||
3,000 | California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, First Lien Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 7/01/22 – AGM Insured (ETM) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 3,727,530 | ||||
370 | California, Economic Recovery Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 7/01/15 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14) | 7/14 at 100.00 | AAA | 431,217 | ||||
3,495 | Orange County Sanitation District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2003, 5.250%, 2/01/21 (Pre-refunded 8/01/13) – FGIC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,987,236 | ||||
8,865 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 10,325,763 |
30 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Utilities – 7.7% (5.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 890 | Long Beach Bond Finance Authority, California, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.500%, 11/15/37 | No Opt. Call | A | $ | 897,458 | ||
275 | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California, Power System Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A-2, 5.000%, 7/01/21 – NPFG Insured | 7/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 305,159 | ||||
295 | Merced Irrigation District, California, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.125%, 9/01/31 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | N/R | 276,096 | ||||
4,580 | Sacramento Municipal Utility District, California, Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002Q, 5.250%, 8/15/20 – AGM Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 4,914,798 | ||||
6,040 | Total Utilities | 6,393,511 | ||||||
Water and Sewer – 7.3% (5.0% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,125 | Burbank, California, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 6/01/23 – AMBAC Insured | 6/14 at 100.00 | AA+ | 1,189,969 | ||||
205 | Healdsburg Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA– | 209,395 | ||||
670 | Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Waterworks Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 09-8B, 16.914%, 7/01/35 (IF) | 7/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 929,290 | ||||
1,500 | Orange County Water District, California, Revenue Certificates of Participation, Tender Option Bond Trust 11782-1, 17.261%, 2/15/35 (IF) | 8/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,917,420 | ||||
1,795 | Woodbridge Irrigation District, California, Certificates of Participation, Water Systems Project, Series 2003, 5.500%, 7/01/33 | 7/13 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,815,463 | ||||
5,295 | Total Water and Sewer | 6,061,537 | ||||||
$ | 123,509 | Total Investments (cost $116,309,786) – 145.4% | 121,379,819 | |||||
Floating Rate Obligations – (8.0)% | (6,650,000 | ) | ||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 3.8% | 3,131,401 | |||||||
Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (41.2)% (6) | (34,375,000 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100% | $ | 83,486,220 |
(1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted. |
(2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
(3) | Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
(4) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. |
(5) | For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information. |
(6) N/R | Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 28.3%. Not rated. |
(ETM) | Escrowed to maturity. |
(IF) | Inverse floating rate investment. |
(UB) | Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 31
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund | ||
NAC | Portfolio of Investments | |
August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Consumer Staples – 6.4% (4.4% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 910 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Sonoma County Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Series 2005, 4.250%, 6/01/21 | 6/15 at 100.00 | BBB | $ | 859,222 | ||
7,500 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1, 5.750%, 6/01/47 | 6/17 at 100.00 | BBB | 5,618,025 | ||||
24,265 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-2, 0.000%, 6/01/37 | 6/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 15,223,133 | ||||
32,675 | Total Consumer Staples | 21,700,380 | ||||||
Education and Civic Organizations – 6.9% (4.7% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
290 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of Redlands, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 10/01/35 | 10/15 at 100.00 | A3 | 291,215 | ||||
10,000 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of Southern California, Series 2007A, 4.500%, 10/01/33 (UB) | 10/17 at 100.00 | AA+ | 10,203,400 | ||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of the Pacific, Series 2006: | ||||||||
200 | 5.000%, 11/01/21 | 11/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 215,646 | ||||
265 | 5.000%, 11/01/25 | 11/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 278,761 | ||||
4,685 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, University of California Regents, Tender Option Bond Trust 1065, 9.041%, 3/01/33 (IF) | 3/18 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 4,944,455 | ||||
615 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Notre Dame de Namur University, Series 2003, 6.500%, 10/01/23 | 10/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 607,503 | ||||
3,000 | Long Beach Bond Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Long Beach Aquarium of the South Pacific, Series 2001, 5.500%, 11/01/17 – AMBAC Insured | 11/11 at 100.00 | BBB | 3,062,880 | ||||
University of California, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A: | ||||||||
600 | 5.125%, 5/15/17 – AMBAC Insured (UB) | 5/13 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 671,454 | ||||
2,900 | 5.125%, 5/15/17 – AMBAC Insured (UB) | 5/13 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 3,208,705 | ||||
22,555 | Total Education and Civic Organizations | 23,484,019 | ||||||
Health Care – 27.6% (19.0% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
2,160 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Adventist Health System/West, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 3/01/15 | 3/13 at 100.00 | A | 2,287,591 | ||||
660 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/37 | 4/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 662,845 | ||||
10,000 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 11/15/42 – NPFG Insured | 11/16 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 10,041,600 | ||||
14,895 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 11/15/46 (UB) | 11/16 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 15,095,189 | ||||
1,120 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Adventist Health System West, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 3/01/35 | 3/15 at 100.00 | A | 1,120,896 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, ValleyCare Health System, Series 2007A: | ||||||||
810 | 4.800%, 7/15/17 | No Opt. Call | N/R | 815,144 | ||||
3,325 | 5.125%, 7/15/31 | 7/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 2,992,001 | ||||
1,760 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Daughters of Charity Health System, Series 2005A, 5.250%, 7/01/24 | 7/15 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,751,323 | ||||
19,420 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 3/01/41 | 3/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 19,447,771 | ||||
3,095 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanente System, Series 2001C, 5.250%, 8/01/31 | 8/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 3,172,282 | ||||
9,980 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanente System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 3/01/41 – BHAC Insured (UB) | 3/16 at 100.00 | AA+ | 10,252,554 | ||||
2,250 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Methodist Hospital Project, Series 2009, 6.750%, 2/01/38 | 8/19 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 2,566,868 |
32 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Health Care (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 1,586 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph Health System, Trust 2554, 18.104%, 7/01/47 – AGM Insured (IF) | 7/18 at 100.00 | AAA | $ | 1,844,899 | ||
10,500 | Duarte, California, Certificates of Participation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Series 1999A, 5.250%, 4/01/31 | 10/10 at 100.50 | A+ | 10,530,555 | ||||
1,000 | Loma Linda, California, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 12/01/23 | 12/15 at 100.00 | BBB | 967,000 | ||||
2,860 | Loma Linda, California, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series 2008A, 8.250%, 12/01/38 | 12/17 at 100.00 | BBB | 3,278,647 | ||||
1,000 | Madera County, California, Certificates of Participation, Children’s Hospital Central California, Series 2010, 5.375%, 3/15/36 | 3/20 at 100.00 | A– | 1,017,520 | ||||
675 | Oak Valley Hospital District, Stanislaus County, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 6.500%, 11/01/29 | 11/20 at 100.00 | BBB– | 694,643 | ||||
2,570 | Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 7/01/38 | 7/17 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 2,412,099 | ||||
3,000 | Santa Clara County Financing Authority, California, Insured Revenue Bonds, El Camino Hospital, Series 2007A, 5.750%, 2/01/41 – AMBAC Insured | 8/17 at 100.00 | A+ | 3,165,030 | ||||
92,666 | Total Health Care | 94,116,457 | ||||||
Housing/Multifamily – 2.3% (1.6% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
4,895 | Contra Costa County, California, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Delta View Apartments Project, Series 1999C, 6.750%, 12/01/30 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 12/10 at 101.00 | N/R | 4,796,562 | ||||
320 | Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority, California, Mobile Home Park Revenue Bonds, San Juan Mobile Estates, Series 2006B, 5.850%, 5/15/41 | 5/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 294,435 | ||||
1,725 | Rohnert Park Finance Authority, California, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park, Series 2003A, 5.750%, 9/15/38 | 9/13 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,730,175 | ||||
1,120 | Rohnert Park Finance Authority, California, Subordinate Lien Revenue Bonds, Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park, Series 2003B, 6.625%, 9/15/38 | 9/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,136,733 | ||||
8,060 | Total Housing/Multifamily | 7,957,905 | ||||||
Housing/Single Family – 0.6% (0.4% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
530 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006H, 5.750%, 8/01/30 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 2/16 at 100.00 | A | 542,678 | ||||
2,395 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3206, 8.347%, 2/01/24 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (IF) | 2/17 at 100.00 | A | 1,385,627 | ||||
2,925 | Total Housing/Single Family | 1,928,305 | ||||||
Industrials – 1.4% (1.0% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
2,000 | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Waste Management Inc., Series 2002A, 5.000%, 1/01/22 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 1/16 at 102.00 | BBB | 2,045,440 | ||||
5,120 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, EnerTech Regional Biosolids Project, Series 2007A, 5.500%, 12/01/33 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | No Opt. Call | BB | 2,830,438 | ||||
7,120 | Total Industrials | 4,875,878 | ||||||
Long-Term Care – 2.5% (1.7% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Harbor Regional Center Project, Series 2009, 8.000%, 11/01/29 | 11/19 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 1,066,120 | ||||
8,500 | Riverside County Public Financing Authority, California, Certificates of Participation, Air Force Village West, Series 1999, 5.800%, 5/15/29 | 11/10 at 100.50 | BB+ | 7,550,975 | ||||
9,500 | Total Long-Term Care | 8,617,095 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/General – 19.9% (13.7% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
8,000 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2010, 5.500%, 3/01/40 | 3/20 at 100.00 | A1 | 8,603,280 | ||||
10,000 | California, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2009, 6.000%, 11/01/39 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A1 | 11,215,600 | ||||
4,435 | California, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 6.000%, 4/01/16 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A1 | 5,320,980 |
Nuveen Investments 33
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (continued) | ||
NAC | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/General (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 38,365 | Chabot-Las Positas Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C, 0.000%, 8/01/41 – AMBAC Insured | 8/16 at 28.46 | Aa1 | $ | 5,182,344 | ||
3,425 | Coast Community College District, Orange County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C, 0.000%, 8/01/31 – AGM Insured | 8/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,003,451 | ||||
5,150 | Hacienda La Puente Unified School District Facilities Financing Authority, California, General Obligation Revenue Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 8/01/26 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 6,007,372 | ||||
5,210 | Oak Valley Hospital District, Stanislaus County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 7/01/35 – FGIC Insured | 7/14 at 101.00 | A1 | 5,158,473 | ||||
575 | Roseville Joint Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 8/01/27 – FGIC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | AA– | 608,436 | ||||
5,000 | San Diego Unified School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003E, 5.250%, 7/01/20 – AGM Insured | 7/13 at 101.00 | AAA | 5,649,000 | ||||
3,605 | West Contra Costa Unified School District, Contra Costa County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 8/01/21 – AGM Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | AAA | 3,775,589 | ||||
50,070 | Yosemite Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation, Election 2004, Series 2010D, 0.000%, 8/01/42 | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 13,561,460 | ||||
133,835 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 68,085,985 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/Limited – 32.9% (22.7% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
Beaumont Financing Authority, California, Local Agency Revenue Bonds, Series 2004D: | ||||||||
1,000 | 5.500%, 9/01/24 | 9/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 994,220 | ||||
615 | 5.800%, 9/01/35 | 9/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 594,545 | ||||
1,910 | Borrego Water District, California, Community Facilities District 2007-1 Montesoro, Special Tax Bonds, Series 2007, 5.750%, 8/01/25 (4), (5) | 8/17 at 102.00 | N/R | 1,529,452 | ||||
1,990 | Brentwood Infrastructure Financing Authority, California, Infrastructure Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 9/02/24 – AGM Insured | 9/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,123,370 | ||||
Brentwood Infrastructure Financing Authority, Contra Costa County, California, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2001: | ||||||||
1,110 | 5.375%, 11/01/18 – AGM Insured | 11/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,164,945 | ||||
1,165 | 5.375%, 11/01/19 – AGM Insured | 11/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,221,689 | ||||
1,000 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Various Capital Projects, Series 2009G-1, 5.750%, 10/01/30 | 10/19 at 100.00 | A2 | 1,064,310 | ||||
2,000 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Various Capital Projects, Series 2009I-1, 6.375%, 11/01/34 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A2 | 2,217,140 | ||||
2,000 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 90-2 – Talega, Series 2003, 6.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 2,016,340 | ||||
710 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/24 – FGIC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | 721,133 | ||||
1,225 | Chino Redevelopment Agency, California, Merged Chino Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 9/01/38 – AMBAC Insured | 9/16 at 101.00 | A– | 1,143,807 | ||||
3,490 | Fontana, California, Senior Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Heritage Village Community Facilities District 2, Series 1998A, 5.250%, 9/01/17 – NPFG Insured | 9/10 at 100.00 | A | 3,510,661 | ||||
1,125 | Fontana, California, Special Tax Bonds, Sierra Community Facilities District 22, Series 2004, 6.000%, 9/01/34 | 9/14 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,129,354 | ||||
3,980 | Garden Grove, California, Certificates of Participation, Financing Project, Series 2002A, 5.500%, 3/01/22 – AMBAC Insured | 3/12 at 101.00 | A | 4,242,043 | ||||
31,090 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 6/01/35 – FGIC Insured | 6/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 31,100,567 | ||||
2,850 | Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | BBB– | 2,429,454 | ||||
4,500 | Inglewood Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Merged Area Redevelopment Project, Series 1998A, 5.250%, 5/01/23 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | N/R | 4,595,400 |
34 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | ||||||||
Irvine, California, Unified School District, Community Facilities District Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006A: | ||||||||
$ | 325 | 5.000%, 9/01/26 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | $ | 317,307 | ||
755 | 5.125%, 9/01/36 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 687,948 | ||||
675 | Lammersville School District, San Joaquin County, California, Community Facilities District 2002, Mountain House Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006, 5.125%, 9/01/35 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 595,053 | ||||
2,000 | Lee Lake Water District, Riverside County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 1 of Sycamore Creek, Series 2003, 6.500%, 9/01/24 | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R | 2,030,600 | ||||
1,000 | Lindsay Redevelopment Agency, California, Project 1 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 8/01/37 – RAAI Insured | 8/17 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 839,240 | ||||
1,290 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Manchester Social Services Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A1 | 1,207,556 | ||||
1,530 | Moreno Valley Unified School District, Riverside County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2005, 5.000%, 3/01/24 – AGM Insured | 3/14 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,600,977 | ||||
3,500 | Murrieta Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 8/01/37 – NPFG Insured | 8/17 at 100.00 | A | 3,207,365 | ||||
9,200 | Norco Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Project Area 1, Series 2001, 5.000%, 3/01/19 – NPFG Insured | 3/11 at 102.00 | A | 9,421,628 | ||||
North Natomas Community Facilities District 4, Sacramento, California, Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006D: | ||||||||
545 | 5.000%, 9/01/26 | 9/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 526,372 | ||||
250 | 5.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 229,525 | ||||
3,290 | Oakland Redevelopment Agency, California, Subordinate Lien Tax Allocation Bonds, Central District Redevelopment Project, Series 2003, 5.500%, 9/01/16 – FGIC Insured | 3/13 at 100.00 | A | 3,468,877 | ||||
5,600 | Palm Springs Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Convention Center Project, Series 2001A, 5.000%, 11/01/22 – NPFG Insured | 11/11 at 101.00 | A | 5,730,256 | ||||
1,000 | Palmdale Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Redevelopment Project Areas, Series 2004, 5.000%, 12/01/24 – AMBAC Insured | 12/14 at 100.00 | A– | 1,025,880 | ||||
1,570 | Poway Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Paguay Redevelopment Project, Series 2000, 5.750%, 6/15/33 – NPFG Insured | 12/10 at 102.00 | AAA | 1,582,372 | ||||
620 | Rialto Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A– | 583,364 | ||||
1,860 | Riverside Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Merged Project Areas, Series 2003, 5.250%, 8/01/22 – NPFG Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | A | 1,888,012 | ||||
770 | Roseville, California, Certificates of Participation, Public Facilities, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 783,013 | ||||
2,500 | Sacramento City Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A, 5.400%, 11/01/20 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A1 | 2,772,225 | ||||
1,150 | Sacramento, California, Special Tax Bonds, North Natomas Community Facilities District 4, Series 2003C, 6.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/14 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,168,343 | ||||
2,695 | San Jose Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Civic Center Project, Series 2002B, 5.250%, 6/01/19 – AMBAC Insured | 6/12 at 100.00 | AA+ | 2,886,965 | ||||
1,000 | San Jose Redevelopment Agency, California, Housing Set-Aside Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Area Redevelopment Project, Series 2010A-1, 5.500%, 8/01/35 | 8/20 at 100.00 | A1 | 1,025,700 | ||||
1,000 | Washington Unified School District, Yolo County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2007, 5.125%, 8/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 8/17 at 100.00 | A | 1,020,070 | ||||
600 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 01-1, Refunding Series 2009A, 8.625%, 9/01/39 | 9/14 at 105.00 | N/R | 646,722 | ||||
2,810 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 01-1, Series 2003B, 7.000%, 9/01/38 | 9/13 at 103.00 | N/R | 2,612,569 | ||||
2,000 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 01-1, Series 2004B, 6.000%, 9/01/39 | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R | 1,625,380 | ||||
1,350 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 2001-1, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/39 | 9/13 at 103.00 | N/R | 1,116,761 | ||||
112,645 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 112,398,510 |
Nuveen Investments 35
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (continued) | ||
NAC | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Transportation – 13.3% (9.1% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 1,430 | Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2006F, 5.000%, 4/01/31 (UB) | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA | $ | 1,511,653 | ||
830 | Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2008, Trust 3211, 13.243%, 10/01/32 (IF) | 4/18 at 100.00 | AA | 1,079,556 | ||||
11,150 | Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1999, 5.750%, 1/15/40 | 1/11 at 100.50 | BBB– | 10,978,179 | ||||
8,515 | Los Angeles Harbors Department, California, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2001B, 5.500%, 8/01/18 – AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 8/11 at 100.00 | AA | 8,796,080 | ||||
120 | Palm Springs Financing Authority, California, Palm Springs International Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.450%, 7/01/20 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 112,931 | ||||
22,825 | Port of Oakland, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2000K, 5.750%, 11/01/29 – FGIC Insured | 11/10 at 100.00 | A | 22,834,815 | ||||
44,870 | Total Transportation | 45,313,214 | ||||||
U.S. Guaranteed – 16.9% (11.7% of Total Investments) (6) | ||||||||
9,750 | California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 5/01/18 (Pre-refunded 5/01/12) | 5/12 at 101.00 | Aaa | 10,626,428 | ||||
115 | California Department of Water Resources, Water System Revenue Bonds, Central Valley Project, Series 2001W, 5.250%, 12/01/22 (Pre-refunded 12/01/11) – AGM Insured | 12/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 122,247 | ||||
715 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Thomas Jefferson School of Law, Series 2005A, 4.875%, 10/01/31 (Pre-refunded 10/01/15) | 10/15 at 100.00 | N/R (6) | 806,205 | ||||
3,840 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2003A-1, 6.250%, 6/01/33 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13) | 6/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 4,296,000 | ||||
1,940 | Lincoln, California, Special Tax Bonds, Lincoln Crossing Community Facilities District 03-1, Series 2003A, 6.500%, 9/01/25 (Pre-refunded 9/01/13) | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R (6) | 2,315,836 | ||||
1,335 | Lincoln, California, Special Tax Bonds, Lincoln Crossing Community Facilities District 03-1, Series 2004, 6.000%, 9/01/34 (Pre-refunded 9/01/13) | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R (6) | 1,573,832 | ||||
10,845 | Los Angeles Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002E, 5.000%, 7/01/19 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12) – NPFG Insured | 7/12 at 100.00 | AA– (6) | 11,770,946 | ||||
Northern California Tobacco Securitization Authority, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2001A: | ||||||||
2,500 | 5.250%, 6/01/31 (Pre-refunded 6/01/11) | 6/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,592,975 | ||||
4,500 | 5.375%, 6/01/41 (Pre-refunded 6/01/11) | 6/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 4,671,585 | ||||
5,840 | Orange County Water District, California, Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 1999A, 5.375%, 8/15/29 (ETM) | 2/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 6,393,048 | ||||
6,530 | Poway Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Paguay Redevelopment Project, Series 2000, 5.750%, 6/15/33 (Pre-refunded 12/15/10) – NPFG Insured | 12/10 at 102.00 | AA (6) | 6,765,407 | ||||
2,860 | Tobacco Securitization Authority of Southern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, San Diego County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corporation, Senior Series 2001A, 5.250%, 6/01/27 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) | 6/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,109,649 | ||||
2,500 | Whittier, California, Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Series 2002, 5.600%, 6/01/22 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) | 6/12 at 101.00 | N/R (6) | 2,756,975 | ||||
53,270 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 57,801,133 | ||||||
Utilities – 4.3% (2.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
3,630 | Imperial Irrigation District, California, Certificates of Participation, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.250%, 11/01/23 – AGM Insured | 11/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 4,016,777 | ||||
3,775 | Long Beach Bond Finance Authority, California, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 11/15/35 | No Opt. Call | A | 3,563,109 | ||||
5,500 | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California, Power System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A-1, 5.000%, 7/01/31 – AGM Insured (UB) | 7/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 5,829,780 | ||||
1,270 | Merced Irrigation District, California, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.125%, 9/01/31 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,188,618 | ||||
14,175 | Total Utilities | 14,598,284 |
36 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Water and Sewer – 10.4% (7.1% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 875 | Healdsburg Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA– | $ | 893,760 | ||
2,500 | Indio Water Authority, California, Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/31 – AMBAC Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,577,825 | ||||
835 | Marina Coast Water District, California, Enterprise Certificate of Participation, Series 2006, 5.000%, 6/01/31 – NPFG Insured | 6/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 857,804 | ||||
8,250 | Pico Rivera Water Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2001A, 6.250%, 12/01/32 | 12/11 at 102.00 | N/R | 8,200,005 | ||||
2,250 | Sacramento County Sanitation District Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 12/01/31 – FGIC Insured | 6/16 at 100.00 | AA | 2,376,855 | ||||
11,000 | San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority, California, Sewerage Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2010A, 5.250%, 5/15/26 | 5/20 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 12,758,570 | ||||
5,115 | San Francisco City and County Public Utilities Commission, California, Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 11/01/18 – NPFG Insured | 11/12 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 5,618,316 | ||||
2,000 | West Basin Municipal Water District, California, Certificates of Participation, Refunding Series 2008B, 5.000%, 8/01/28 – AGC Insured | 8/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,144,320 | ||||
32,825 | Total Water and Sewer | 35,427,455 | ||||||
$ | 567,121 | Total Investments (cost $484,282,684) – 145.4% | 496,304,620 | |||||
Floating Rate Obligations – (8.4)% | (28,545,000 | ) | ||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 2.7% | 9,180,013 | |||||||
Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (39.7)% (7) | (135,525,000 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100% | $ | 341,414,633 |
(1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted. |
(2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
(3) | Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
(4) | For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information. |
(5) | Subsequent to the reporting period, the Adviser has concluded this issue is not likely to meet its future interest payment obligations and has directed the Fund’s custodian to cease accruing additional income on the Fund’s records. |
(6) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Such investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA rated securities. |
(7) | Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 27.3%. |
N/R | Not rated. |
(ETM) | Escrowed to maturity. |
(IF) | Inverse floating rate investment. |
(UB) | Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 37
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 | ||
NVX | Portfolio of Investments | |
August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Consumer Staples – 7.1% (4.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 565 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Sonoma County Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Series 2005, 4.250%, 6/01/21 | 6/15 at 100.00 | BBB | $ | 533,473 | ||
4,230 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Stanislaus County Tobacco Funding Corporation, Series 2002A, 5.500%, 6/01/33 | 6/12 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 3,799,894 | ||||
4,000 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1, 5.750%, 6/01/47 | 6/17 at 100.00 | BBB | 2,996,280 | ||||
13,480 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-2, 0.000%, 6/01/37 | 6/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 8,456,948 | ||||
22,275 | Total Consumer Staples | 15,786,595 | ||||||
Education and Civic Organizations – 7.9% (5.5% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
2,000 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Stanford University, Series 2001Q, 5.250%, 12/01/32 | 6/11 at 101.00 | AAA | 2,080,700 | ||||
2,745 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of Southern California, Tender Option Bond Trust 09-11B, 17.064%, 10/01/38 (IF) | 10/18 at 100.00 | AA+ | 3,579,041 | ||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of the Pacific, Series 2006: | ||||||||
125 | 5.000%, 11/01/21 | 11/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 134,779 | ||||
165 | 5.000%, 11/01/25 | 11/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 173,568 | ||||
2,250 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Cal Loan Program, Series 2001A, 5.400%, 3/01/21 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 9/10 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 2,252,205 | ||||
2,945 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, University of California Regents, Tender Option Bond Trust 1065, 9.041%, 3/01/33 (IF) | 3/18 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 3,108,094 | ||||
620 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Notre Dame de Namur University, Series 2003, 6.500%, 10/01/23 | 10/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 612,442 | ||||
3,000 | Long Beach Bond Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Long Beach Aquarium of the South Pacific, Series 2001, 5.250%, 11/01/30 – AMBAC Insured | 11/11 at 101.00 | BBB | 2,957,580 | ||||
2,680 | University of California, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 5/15/33 – AMBAC Insured (UB) | 5/13 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 2,744,802 | ||||
16,530 | Total Education and Civic Organizations | 17,643,211 | ||||||
Health Care – 20.0% (13.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
2,000 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Casa Colina Inc., Series 2001, 6.000%, 4/01/22 | 4/12 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 2,037,460 | ||||
415 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/37 | 4/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 416,789 | ||||
9,260 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 11/15/46 (UB) | 11/16 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 9,384,454 | ||||
500 | California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Hospital Assistance LLC, Series 2001A, 5.550%, 8/01/31 | 8/11 at 102.00 | A+ | 511,435 | ||||
2,520 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Adventist Health System West, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 3/01/35 | 3/15 at 100.00 | A | 2,522,016 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, ValleyCare Health System, Series 2007A: | ||||||||
810 | 4.800%, 7/15/17 | No Opt. Call | N/R | 815,144 | ||||
2,225 | 5.125%, 7/15/31 | 7/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 2,002,166 | ||||
2,185 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Health Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Memorial Health Services, Series 2003A, 6.000%, 10/01/11 | No Opt. Call | AA– | 2,309,742 | ||||
2,500 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Monterey Peninsula Hospital, Series 2003B, 5.250%, 6/01/18 – AGM Insured | 6/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,725,250 | ||||
1,755 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 3/01/41 | 3/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,757,510 |
38 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Health Care (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 425 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanente System, Series 2001C, 5.250%, 8/01/31 | 8/16 at 100.00 | A+ | $ | 435,612 | ||
1,000 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 2004D, 5.050%, 8/15/38 – AGM Insured | 8/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,041,510 | ||||
California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 2005A: | ||||||||
2,705 | 5.000%, 11/15/43 | 11/15 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 2,709,599 | ||||
3,315 | 5.000%, 11/15/43 (UB) | 11/15 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 3,320,636 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph Health System, Trust 2554: | ||||||||
1,325 | 18.071%, 7/01/47 – AGM Insured (IF) | 7/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,541,293 | ||||
998 | 18.104%, 7/01/47 – AGM Insured (IF) | 7/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,160,332 | ||||
2,000 | Loma Linda, California, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series 2008A, 8.250%, 12/01/38 | 12/17 at 100.00 | BBB | 2,292,760 | ||||
1,610 | Madera County, California, Certificates of Participation, Children’s Hospital Central California, Series 2010, 5.375%, 3/15/36 | 3/20 at 100.00 | A– | 1,638,207 | ||||
455 | Oak Valley Hospital District, Stanislaus County, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 6.500%, 11/01/29 | 11/20 at 100.00 | BBB– | 468,241 | ||||
5,785 | Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 7/01/38 | 7/17 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 5,429,570 | ||||
43,788 | Total Health Care | 44,519,726 | ||||||
Housing/Multifamily – 5.0% (3.5% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
5,962 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds, Claremont Village Apartments, Series 2001D, 5.500%, 6/01/31 (Mandatory put 6/01/16) (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 6/11 at 102.00 | AAA | 6,168,464 | ||||
205 | Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority, California, Mobile Home Park Revenue Bonds, San Juan Mobile Estates, Series 2006B, 5.850%, 5/15/41 | 5/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 188,623 | ||||
1,055 | Rohnert Park Finance Authority, California, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park, Series 2003A, 5.750%, 9/15/38 | 9/13 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,058,165 | ||||
700 | Rohnert Park Finance Authority, California, Subordinate Lien Revenue Bonds, Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park, Series 2003B, 6.625%, 9/15/38 | 9/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 710,458 | ||||
3,045 | Yucaipa Redevelopment Agency, California, Mobile Home Park Revenue Bonds, Rancho del Sol and Grandview, Series 2001A, 6.750%, 5/15/36 | 5/11 at 102.00 | N/R | 3,105,078 | ||||
10,967 | Total Housing/Multifamily | 11,230,788 | ||||||
Housing/Single Family – 2.6% (1.8% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
325 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006H, 5.750%, 8/01/30 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 2/16 at 100.00 | A | 332,774 | ||||
5,775 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006M, 4.650%, 8/01/31 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 2/16 at 100.00 | A | 4,899,048 | ||||
420 | California Rural Home Mortgage Finance Authority, Mortgage-Backed Securities Program Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2001A, 5.650%, 12/01/31 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 6/11 at 102.00 | A– | 440,765 | ||||
6,520 | Total Housing/Single Family | 5,672,587 | ||||||
Industrials – 1.4% (0.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,250 | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Waste Management Inc., Series 2002A, 5.000%, 1/01/22 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 1/16 at 102.00 | BBB | 1,278,400 | ||||
3,175 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, EnerTech Regional Biosolids Project, Series 2007A, 5.500%, 12/01/33 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | No Opt. Call | BB | 1,755,204 | ||||
4,425 | Total Industrials | 3,033,604 |
Nuveen Investments 39
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (continued) | ||
NVX | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Long-Term Care – 2.3% (1.6% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 1,550 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Cal-Mortgage Insured Revenue Bonds, Northern California Retired Officers Community Corporation – Paradise Valley Estates, Series 2002, 5.125%, 1/01/22 | 1/13 at 100.00 | A– | $ | 1,602,716 | ||
3,750 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Inland Regional Center Project, Series 2007, 5.375%, 12/01/37 | 12/17 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 3,557,250 | ||||
5,300 | Total Long-Term Care | 5,159,966 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/General – 13.0% (9.0% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
10,000 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006CD, 4.600%, 12/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 12/15 at 100.00 | AA | 9,372,700 | ||||
3,615 | Colton Joint Unified School District, San Bernardino County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.500%, 8/01/22 – FGIC Insured | 8/12 at 102.00 | Aa3 | 3,941,977 | ||||
Contra Costa County Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002: | ||||||||
3,005 | 5.000%, 8/01/21 – FGIC Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 3,239,600 | ||||
3,300 | 5.000%, 8/01/22 – FGIC Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 3,517,833 | ||||
1,285 | Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009D, 5.000%, 7/01/27 | 7/19 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 1,408,309 | ||||
2,000 | Puerto Rico, General Obligation and Public Improvement Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.500%, 7/01/20 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,247,000 | ||||
355 | Roseville Joint Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 8/01/27 – FGIC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | AA– | 375,643 | ||||
17,510 | Yosemite Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation, Election 2004, Series 2010D, 0.000%, 8/01/42 | No Opt. Call | AA– | 4,742,584 | ||||
41,070 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 28,845,646 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/Limited – 16.0% (11.1% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
Beaumont Financing Authority, California, Local Agency Revenue Bonds, Series 2004D: | ||||||||
650 | 5.500%, 9/01/24 | 9/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 646,243 | ||||
385 | 5.800%, 9/01/35 | 9/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 372,195 | ||||
1,190 | Borrego Water District, California, Community Facilities District 2007-1 Montesoro, Special Tax Bonds, Series 2007, 5.750%, 8/01/25 (4), (5) | 8/17 at 102.00 | N/R | 952,904 | ||||
4,900 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of Corrections, Series 2003C, 5.500%, 6/01/16 | 12/13 at 100.00 | A2 | 5,302,143 | ||||
1,245 | California, Economic Recovery Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 7/01/15 | 7/14 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 1,420,458 | ||||
1,200 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 90-2 – Talega, Series 2003, 6.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,209,804 | ||||
435 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/24 – FGIC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | 441,821 | ||||
750 | Fontana, California, Special Tax Bonds, Sierra Community Facilities District 22, Series 2004, 6.000%, 9/01/34 | 9/14 at 100.00 | N/R | 752,903 | ||||
1,785 | Hawthorne Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Project Area 2 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.250%, 9/01/36 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/16 at 100.00 | A– | 1,736,894 | ||||
1,800 | Hesperia Unified School District, San Bernardino County, California, Certificates of Participation, Capital Improvement, Series 2007, 5.000%, 2/01/41 – AMBAC Insured | 2/17 at 100.00 | A– | 1,668,942 | ||||
Irvine, California, Unified School District, Community Facilities District Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006A: | ||||||||
205 | 5.000%, 9/01/26 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 200,148 | ||||
470 | 5.125%, 9/01/36 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 428,259 | ||||
2,000 | Lake Elsinore Public Finance Authority, California, Local Agency Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003H, 6.000%, 10/01/20 | 10/13 at 102.00 | N/R | 2,067,500 | ||||
415 | Lammersville School District, San Joaquin County, California, Community Facilities District 2002, Mountain House Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006, 5.125%, 9/01/35 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 365,847 | ||||
1,265 | Lee Lake Water District, Riverside County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 1 of Sycamore Creek, Series 2003, 6.500%, 9/01/24 | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R | 1,284,355 |
40 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 800 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Manchester Social Services Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A1 | $ | 748,872 | ||
495 | North Natomas Community Facilities District 4, Sacramento, California, Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006D, 5.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 454,460 | ||||
2,000 | Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 02-1 of Ladera Ranch, Series 2003A, 5.550%, 8/15/33 | 8/11 at 101.00 | N/R | 2,001,540 | ||||
385 | Rialto Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A– | 362,250 | ||||
475 | Roseville, California, Certificates of Participation, Public Facilities, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 483,028 | ||||
700 | Sacramento, California, Special Tax Bonds, North Natomas Community Facilities District 4, Series 2003C, 6.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/14 at 100.00 | N/R | 711,165 | ||||
San Buenaventura Redevelopment Agency, California, Merged Project Areas Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2008: | ||||||||
1,000 | 7.750%, 8/01/28 | 8/16 at 102.00 | A | 1,145,070 | ||||
1,325 | 8.000%, 8/01/38 | 8/16 at 102.00 | A | 1,494,799 | ||||
1,530 | San Marcos Public Facilities Authority, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Project Areas 2 and 3, Series 2005C, 5.000%, 8/01/35 – AMBAC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | A– | 1,439,669 | ||||
825 | San Mateo Union High School District, San Mateo County, California, Certificates of Participation, Phase 1, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 12/15/30 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA– | 811,000 | ||||
415 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 01-1, Refunding Series 2009A, 8.625%, 9/01/39 | 9/14 at 105.00 | N/R | 447,316 | ||||
1,930 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 01-1, Series 2003B, 6.750%, 9/01/30 | 9/13 at 103.00 | N/R | 1,794,418 | ||||
500 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 01-1, Series 2004B, 6.000%, 9/01/39 | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R | 406,345 | ||||
850 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 2001-1, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/39 | 9/13 at 103.00 | N/R | 703,146 | ||||
3,715 | Western Placer Unified School District, Placer County, California, Certiciates of Particpation, Series 2008, 5.000%, 8/01/47 – AGC Insured | 8/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,755,271 | ||||
35,640 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 35,608,765 | ||||||
Transportation – 12.5% (8.6% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
3,000 | Bay Area Governments Association, California, BART SFO Extension, Airport Premium Fare Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 8/01/32 – AMBAC Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | N/R | 2,527,230 | ||||
1,930 | Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2006F, 5.000%, 4/01/31 (UB) | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA | 2,040,203 | ||||
1,430 | Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2008, Trust 3211, 13.243%, 10/01/32 (IF) | 4/18 at 100.00 | AA | 1,859,958 | ||||
7,000 | Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1999, 5.875%, 1/15/27 | 1/14 at 101.00 | BBB– | 7,172,270 | ||||
5,585 | Port of Oakland, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2002N, 5.000%, 11/01/16 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 11/12 at 100.00 | A | 5,811,807 | ||||
San Francisco Airports Commission, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco International Airport, Second Series 2003, Issue 29A: | ||||||||
2,430 | 5.250%, 5/01/18 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 5/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,542,606 | ||||
2,555 | 5.250%, 5/01/19 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 5/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,658,631 | ||||
1,000 | San Francisco Airports Commission, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco International Airport, Second Series 2003, Issue 29B, 5.125%, 5/01/17 – FGIC Insured | 5/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 1,077,130 | ||||
2,000 | San Francisco Airports Commission, California, Revenue Refunding Bonds, San Francisco International Airport, Second Series 2002, Issue 28A, 5.250%, 5/01/17 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 5/12 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,109,800 | ||||
26,930 | Total Transportation | 27,799,635 |
Nuveen Investments 41
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (continued) | ||
NVX | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
U.S. Guaranteed – 36.7% (25.4% of Total Investments) (6) | ||||||||
$ | 9,000 | Anitoch Area Public Facilities Financing Agency, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 1989-1, Series 2001, 5.250%, 8/01/25 (Pre-refunded 8/01/11) – NPFG Insured | 8/11 at 100.00 | A (6) | $ | 9,420,120 | ||
6,000 | California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 5/01/18 (Pre-refunded 5/01/12) | 5/12 at 101.00 | Aaa | 6,539,340 | ||||
450 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Thomas Jefferson School of Law, Series 2005A, 4.875%, 10/01/31 (Pre-refunded 10/01/15) | 10/15 at 100.00 | N/R (6) | 507,402 | ||||
860 | California, Economic Recovery Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 7/01/15 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14) | 7/14 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,002,287 | ||||
4,000 | Daly City Housing Development Finance Agency, California, Mobile Home Park Revenue Bonds, Franciscan Mobile Home Park Project, Series 2002A, 5.850%, 12/15/32 (Pre-refunded 12/15/13) | 12/13 at 102.00 | N/R (6) | 4,747,320 | ||||
4,900 | East Bay Municipal Utility District, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California, Water System Subordinated Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, 5.000%, 6/01/26 (Pre-refunded 6/01/11) – NPFG Insured | 6/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 5,071,549 | ||||
2,365 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2003A-1, 6.250%, 6/01/33 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13) | 6/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,645,844 | ||||
1,170 | Lincoln, California, Special Tax Bonds, Lincoln Crossing Community Facilities District 03-1, Series 2003A, 6.500%, 9/01/25 (Pre-refunded 9/01/13) | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R (6) | 1,396,664 | ||||
885 | Lincoln, California, Special Tax Bonds, Lincoln Crossing Community Facilities District 03-1, Series 2004, 6.000%, 9/01/34 (Pre-refunded 9/01/13) | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R (6) | 1,043,327 | ||||
9,510 | Los Angeles Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002E, 5.000%, 7/01/19 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12) – NPFG Insured | 7/12 at 100.00 | AA– (6) | 10,321,964 | ||||
3,000 | Northern California Tobacco Securitization Authority, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2001A, 5.375%, 6/01/41 (Pre-refunded 6/01/11) | 6/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,114,390 | ||||
2,000 | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corporation, Commonwealth Appropriation Bonds, Series 2002E, 6.000%, 8/01/26 (ETM) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 2,665,860 | ||||
6,000 | Riverside County Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Jurupa Valley Project Area, Series 2001, 5.250%, 10/01/35 (Pre-refunded 10/01/11) – AMBAC Insured | 10/11 at 102.00 | N/R (6) | 6,440,940 | ||||
12,090 | Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, California, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2001A, 5.000%, 6/01/25 (Pre-refunded 6/01/11) – NPFG Insured | 6/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 12,529,099 | ||||
2,700 | Santa Rosa High School District, Sonoma County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2001, 5.300%, 5/01/26 (Pre-refunded 5/01/11) – FGIC Insured | 5/11 at 101.00 | A+ (6) | 2,819,448 | ||||
6,200 | Southwestern Community College District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2001, 5.375%, 8/01/25 (Pre-refunded 8/01/11) – AMBAC Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | Aa2 (6) | 6,558,422 | ||||
2,800 | Tobacco Securitization Authority of Southern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, San Diego County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corporation, Senior Series 2001A, 5.500%, 6/01/36 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) | 6/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,056,620 | ||||
1,500 | Whittier, California, Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Series 2002, 5.600%, 6/01/22 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) | 6/12 at 101.00 | N/R (6) | 1,654,185 | ||||
75,430 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 81,534,781 | ||||||
Utilities – 9.1% (6.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
5,000 | Anaheim Public Finance Authority, California, Second Lien Electric Distribution Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 5.250%, 10/01/21 – NPFG Insured | 10/14 at 100.00 | A+ | 5,432,600 | ||||
2,355 | Long Beach Bond Finance Authority, California, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 11/15/35 | No Opt. Call | A | 2,222,814 | ||||
1,000 | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California, Power System Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A-2, 5.000%, 7/01/23 – NPFG Insured | 7/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,092,920 | ||||
500 | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California, Power System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A-1, 5.000%, 7/01/31 – AGM Insured (UB) | 7/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 529,980 | ||||
Merced Irrigation District, California, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005: | ||||||||
790 | 5.125%, 9/01/31 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | N/R | 739,377 | ||||
1,500 | 5.250%, 9/01/36 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,389,930 | ||||
2,000 | Santa Clara, California, Subordinate Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.250%, 7/01/20 – NPFG Insured | 7/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,136,440 |
42 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Utilities (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 2,500 | Southern California Public Power Authority, California, Milford Wind Corridor Phase I Revenue Bonds, Series 2010-1, 5.000%, 7/01/28 | No Opt. Call | AA– | $ | 2,767,925 | ||
4,000 | Southern California Public Power Authority, Natural Gas Project 1 Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 11/01/33 | No Opt. Call | A | 3,877,000 | ||||
19,645 | Total Utilities | 20,188,986 | ||||||
Water and Sewer – 10.8% (7.5% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,400 | Castaic Lake Water Agency, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2006C, 5.000%, 8/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 8/16 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,425,032 | ||||
545 | Healdsburg Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA– | 556,685 | ||||
1,160 | Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Waterworks Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 09-8B, 16.914%, 7/01/35 (IF) | 7/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,608,920 | ||||
1,500 | Orange County Water District, California, Revenue Certificates of Participation, Tender Option Bond Trust 11782-1, 17.261%, 7/01/35 (IF) | 8/20 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,917,420 | ||||
750 | Sacramento County Sanitation District Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 12/01/31 – FGIC Insured | 6/16 at 100.00 | AA | 792,285 | ||||
1,700 | San Buenaventura, California, Wastewater Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2004, 5.000%, 3/01/24 – NPFG Insured | 3/14 at 100.00 | AA | 1,794,214 | ||||
4,785 | San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority, California, Subordinate Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 8/01/21 – NPFG Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 5,120,620 | ||||
10,000 | San Francisco City and County Public Utilities Commission, California, Clean Water Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.250%, 10/01/20 – NPFG Insured | 4/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 10,913,300 | ||||
21,840 | Total Water and Sewer | 24,128,476 | ||||||
$ | 330,360 | Total Investments (cost $309,617,366) – 144.4% | 321,152,766 | |||||
Floating Rate Obligations – (5.1)% | (11,390,000 | ) | ||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 2.9% | 6,433,696 | |||||||
Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (42.2)% (7) | (93,775,000 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100% | $ | 222,421,462 | ||||||
(1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted. |
(2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
(3) | Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
(4) | For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information. |
(5) | Subsequent to the reporting period, the Adviser has concluded this issue is not likely to meet its future interest payment obligations and has directed the Fund’s custodian to cease accruing additional income on the Fund’s records. |
(6) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Such investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA rated securities. |
(7) | Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 29.2%. |
N/R | Not rated. |
(ETM) | Escrowed to maturity. |
(IF) | Inverse floating rate investment. |
(UB) | Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 43
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 | ||
NZH | Portfolio of Investments | |
August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Consumer Staples – 7.6% (5.2% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 915 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Sonoma County Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Series 2005, 4.250%, 6/01/21 | 6/15 at 100.00 | BBB | $ | 863,943 | ||
7,500 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1, 5.750%, 6/01/47 | 6/17 at 100.00 | BBB | 5,618,025 | ||||
29,660 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-2, 0.000%, 6/01/37 | 6/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 18,607,794 | ||||
38,075 | Total Consumer Staples | 25,089,762 | ||||||
Education and Civic Organizations – 4.2% (2.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
290 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of Redlands, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 10/01/35 | 10/15 at 100.00 | A3 | 291,215 | ||||
California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of the Pacific, Series 2006: | ||||||||
200 | 5.000%, 11/01/21 | 11/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 215,646 | ||||
270 | 5.000%, 11/01/25 | 11/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 284,021 | ||||
1,500 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Cal Loan Program, Series 2001A, 5.400%, 3/01/21 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 9/10 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 1,501,470 | ||||
6,000 | California State University, Systemwide Revenue Bonds, Series 2005C, 5.000%, 11/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 11/15 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 6,459,960 | ||||
615 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Notre Dame de Namur University, Series 2003, 6.500%, 10/01/23 | 10/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 607,503 | ||||
4,000 | University of California, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 5/15/23 – AMBAC Insured (UB) | 5/13 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 4,367,840 | ||||
12,875 | Total Education and Civic Organizations | 13,727,655 | ||||||
Health Care – 27.6% (19.1% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Casa Colina Inc., Series 2001: | ||||||||
4,000 | 6.000%, 4/01/22 | 4/12 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 4,074,920 | ||||
2,000 | 6.125%, 4/01/32 | 4/12 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 2,016,480 | ||||
670 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/37 | 4/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 672,888 | ||||
2,000 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 11/15/42 – NPFG Insured | 11/16 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 2,008,320 | ||||
3,735 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Tender Option Bonds Trust 3765, 18.348%, 5/15/39 (IF) (4) | 11/16 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 3,935,644 | ||||
9,000 | California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Hospital Assistance LLC, Series 2001A, 5.550%, 8/01/31 | 8/11 at 102.00 | A+ | 9,205,830 | ||||
2,520 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Adventist Health System West, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 3/01/35 | 3/15 at 100.00 | A | 2,522,016 | ||||
1,650 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Adventist Health System West, Series 2007B, 5.000%, 3/01/37 – AGC Insured | 3/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,690,788 | ||||
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, ValleyCare Health System, Series 2007A: | ||||||||
805 | 4.800%, 7/15/17 | No Opt. Call | N/R | 810,112 | ||||
3,435 | 5.125%, 7/15/31 | 7/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 3,090,985 | ||||
6,525 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Health Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Memorial Health Services, Series 2003A, 6.000%, 10/01/12 | No Opt. Call | AA– | 7,173,846 | ||||
6,450 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Monterey Peninsula Hospital, Series 2003B, 5.250%, 6/01/18 – AGM Insured | 6/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 7,031,145 |
44 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Health Care (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 4,500 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Insured Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2008K, 5.500%, 7/01/41 – AGC Insured | 7/17 at 100.00 | AAA | $ | 4,736,205 | ||
7,665 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Insured Mortgage Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mission Community Hospital, Series 2001, 5.375%, 11/01/21 | 11/10 at 102.00 | A– | 7,770,854 | ||||
2,000 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Daughters of Charity Health System, Series 2005A, 5.250%, 7/01/35 | 7/15 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,793,200 | ||||
12,425 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 3/01/41 | 3/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 12,442,768 | ||||
645 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanente System, Series 2001C, 5.250%, 8/01/31 | 8/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 661,106 | ||||
5,600 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Tender Option Bond Trust 3102, 18.100%, 11/15/46 (IF) | 11/16 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 5,900,944 | ||||
1,594 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph Health System, Trust 2554, 18.104%, 7/01/47 – AGM Insured (IF) | 7/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,853,623 | ||||
2,950 | Loma Linda, California, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series 2008A, 8.250%, 12/01/38 | 12/17 at 100.00 | BBB | 3,381,821 | ||||
695 | Oak Valley Hospital District, Stanislaus County, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 6.500%, 11/01/29 | 11/20 at 100.00 | BBB– | 715,225 | ||||
Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 2007A: | ||||||||
5,790 | 5.000%, 7/01/38 | 7/17 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 5,434,262 | ||||
2,500 | 5.000%, 7/01/47 | 7/17 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 2,289,775 | ||||
89,154 | Total Health Care | 91,212,757 | ||||||
Housing/Multifamily – 3.4% (2.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
325 | Independent Cities Lease Finance Authority, California, Mobile Home Park Revenue Bonds, San Juan Mobile Estates, Series 2006B, 5.850%, 5/15/41 | 5/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 299,036 | ||||
1,735 | Rohnert Park Finance Authority, California, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park, Series 2003A, 5.750%, 9/15/38 | 9/13 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,740,205 | ||||
1,125 | Rohnert Park Finance Authority, California, Subordinate Lien Revenue Bonds, Rancho Feliz Mobile Home Park, Series 2003B, 6.625%, 9/15/38 | 9/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,141,808 | ||||
3,610 | San Bernardino County Housing Authority, California, GNMA Collateralized Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Pacific Palms Mobile Home Park, Series 2001A, 6.700%, 12/20/41 | 11/11 at 105.00 | Aaa | 3,826,239 | ||||
San Jose, California, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, GNMA Mortgage-Backed Securities Program, Lenzen Housing, Series 2001B: | ||||||||
1,250 | 5.350%, 2/20/26 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 8/11 at 102.00 | AAA | 1,278,163 | ||||
2,880 | 5.450%, 2/20/43 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 8/11 at 102.00 | AAA | 2,921,645 | ||||
10,925 | Total Housing/Multifamily | 11,207,096 | ||||||
Housing/Single Family – 2.7% (1.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
540 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006H, 5.750%, 8/01/30 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 2/16 at 100.00 | A | 552,917 | ||||
California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3206: | ||||||||
10,180 | 7.974%, 2/01/24 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (IF) | 2/16 at 100.00 | A | 6,320,457 | ||||
3,805 | 8.347%, 2/01/24 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (IF) | 2/17 at 100.00 | A | 2,201,383 | ||||
14,525 | Total Housing/Single Family | 9,074,757 | ||||||
Industrials – 3.3% (2.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
3,000 | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Waste Management Inc., Series 2002A, 5.000%, 1/01/22 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 1/16 at 102.00 | BBB | 3,068,160 | ||||
5,000 | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Waste Management Inc., Series 2005C, 5.125%, 11/01/23 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 11/15 at 101.00 | BBB | 5,091,150 | ||||
5,205 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, EnerTech Regional Biosolids Project, Series 2007A, 5.500%, 12/01/33 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | No Opt. Call | BB | 2,877,428 | ||||
13,205 | Total Industrials | 11,036,738 |
Nuveen Investments 45
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (continued) | ||
NZH | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Long-Term Care – 2.0% (1.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 2,450 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Cal-Mortgage Insured Revenue Bonds, Northern California Retired Officers Community Corporation – Paradise Valley Estates, Series 2002, 5.125%, 1/01/22 | 1/13 at 100.00 | A– | $ | 2,533,325 | ||
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Insured Senior Living Revenue Bonds, Aldersly Project, Series 2002A: | ||||||||
1,500 | 5.125%, 3/01/22 | 3/12 at 101.00 | A– | 1,529,565 | ||||
1,315 | 5.250%, 3/01/32 | 3/12 at 101.00 | A– | 1,319,734 | ||||
1,000 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Harbor Regional Center Project, Series 2009, 8.000%, 11/01/29 | 11/19 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 1,066,120 | ||||
6,265 | Total Long-Term Care | 6,448,744 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/General – 16.9% (11.7% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,960 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2010, 5.500%, 3/01/40 | 3/20 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,107,804 | ||||
9,335 | California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 6.000%, 2/01/16 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 11,257,077 | ||||
California, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2009: | ||||||||
3,040 | 6.000%, 11/01/39 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A1 | 3,409,542 | ||||
3,500 | 5.500%, 11/01/39 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A1 | 3,761,660 | ||||
1,955 | California, General Obligation Veterans Welfare Bonds, Series 2001BZ, 5.350%, 12/01/21 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 12/10 at 100.00 | AA | 1,956,896 | ||||
3,000 | Contra Costa County Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 8/01/23 – FGIC Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 3,198,030 | ||||
2,500 | Fullerton Joint Union High School District, Orange County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 8/01/23 – AGM Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 2,587,175 | ||||
2,260 | Jurupa Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 5.125%, 8/01/22 – FGIC Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | A | 2,319,958 | ||||
870 | Puerto Rico, General Obligation and Public Improvement Bonds, Series 2001, 5.000%, 7/01/24 – AGM Insured | 7/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 879,083 | ||||
575 | Roseville Joint Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 8/01/27 – FGIC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | AA– | 608,436 | ||||
10,810 | San Diego Unified School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 1998, Series 2001C, 5.000%, 7/01/26 – AGM Insured | 7/11 at 102.00 | AAA | 11,404,334 | ||||
4,000 | San Diego Unified School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 1998, Series 2002D, 5.250%, 7/01/21 – FGIC Insured | 7/12 at 101.00 | Aa1 | 4,355,360 | ||||
2,715 | San Jose-Evergreen Community College District, Santa Clara County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/25 – NPFG Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 2,907,385 | ||||
1,630 | West Contra Costa Unified School District, Contra Costa County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003C, 5.000%, 8/01/22 – FGIC Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | A | 1,661,671 | ||||
12,520 | Yosemite Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation, Election 2004, Series 2010D, 0.000%, 8/01/42 | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 3,391,042 | ||||
60,670 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 55,805,453 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/Limited – 41.0% (28.4% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,960 | Borrego Water District, California, Community Facilities District 2007-1 Montesoro, Special Tax Bonds, Series 2007, 5.750%, 8/01/25 (5), (6) | 8/17 at 102.00 | N/R | 1,569,490 | ||||
7,135 | Brentwood Infrastructure Financing Authority, Contra Costa County, California, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, 5.000%, 11/01/25 – AGM Insured | 11/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 7,429,890 | ||||
8,210 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of Corrections, Series 2003C, 5.500%, 6/01/16 | 12/13 at 100.00 | A2 | 8,883,795 | ||||
4,000 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of General Services, Series 2002B, 5.000%, 3/01/27 – AMBAC Insured | 3/12 at 100.00 | A2 | 4,022,080 | ||||
4,510 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of Mental Health, Hospital Addition, Series 2001A, 5.000%, 12/01/26 – AMBAC Insured | 12/11 at 102.00 | A2 | 4,575,124 |
46 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 1,000 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Various Capital Projects, Series 2009G-1, 5.750%, 10/01/30 | 10/19 at 100.00 | A2 | $ | 1,064,310 | ||
2,260 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Various Capital Projects, Series 2010A-1, 5.750%, 3/01/30 | 3/20 at 100.00 | A2 | 2,410,719 | ||||
Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 90-2 – Talega, Series 2003: | ||||||||
1,750 | 5.875%, 9/01/23 | 9/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,802,973 | ||||
550 | 6.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 554,494 | ||||
715 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/24 – FGIC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | 726,211 | ||||
2,160 | Chino Redevelopment Agency, California, Merged Chino Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 9/01/38 – AMBAC Insured | 9/16 at 101.00 | A– | 2,016,835 | ||||
1,125 | Fontana, California, Special Tax Bonds, Sierra Community Facilities District 22, Series 2004, 6.000%, 9/01/34 | 9/14 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,129,354 | ||||
3,500 | Fremont, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 1, Pacific Commons, Series 2005, 6.300%, 9/01/31 | 3/11 at 101.00 | N/R | 3,540,775 | ||||
1,000 | Fullerton Community Facilities District 1, California, Special Tax Bonds, Amerige Heights, Series 2002, 6.100%, 9/01/22 | 9/12 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,021,450 | ||||
Irvine, California, Unified School District, Community Facilities District Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006A: | ||||||||
330 | 5.000%, 9/01/26 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 322,189 | ||||
760 | 5.125%, 9/01/36 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 692,504 | ||||
3,000 | Lake Elsinore Public Finance Authority, California, Local Agency Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003H, 6.000%, 10/01/20 | 10/13 at 102.00 | N/R | 3,101,250 | ||||
685 | Lammersville School District, San Joaquin County, California, Community Facilities District 2002, Mountain House Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006, 5.125%, 9/01/35 | 9/16 at 100.00 | N/R | 603,869 | ||||
5,250 | Lammersville School District, San Joaquin County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District of Mountain House, Series 2002, 6.300%, 9/01/24 | 9/12 at 101.00 | N/R | 5,366,183 | ||||
2,000 | Lee Lake Water District, Riverside County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 1 of Sycamore Creek, Series 2003, 6.500%, 9/01/24 | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R | 2,030,600 | ||||
1,000 | Lindsay Redevelopment Agency, California, Project 1 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 8/01/37 – RAAI Insured | 8/17 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 839,240 | ||||
5,425 | Lodi, California, Certificates of Participation, Public Improvement Financing Project, Series 2002, 5.000%, 10/01/26 – NPFG Insured | 10/12 at 100.00 | A | 5,529,486 | ||||
1,310 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Manchester Social Services Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A1 | 1,226,278 | ||||
1,675 | Moreno Valley Unified School District, Riverside County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2005, 5.000%, 3/01/26 – AGM Insured | 3/14 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,738,901 | ||||
North Natomas Community Facilities District 4, Sacramento, California, Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006D: | ||||||||
545 | 5.000%, 9/01/26 | 9/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 526,372 | ||||
250 | 5.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/14 at 102.00 | N/R | 229,525 | ||||
3,000 | Oakland Redevelopment Agency, California, Subordinate Lien Tax Allocation Bonds, Central District Redevelopment Project, Series 2003, 5.500%, 9/01/19 – FGIC Insured | 3/13 at 100.00 | A | 3,111,990 | ||||
4,520 | Ontario Redevelopment Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Capital Projects, Series 2001, 5.000%, 8/01/24 – AMBAC Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | A+ | 4,713,411 | ||||
2,000 | Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 02-1 of Ladera Ranch, Series 2003A, 5.550%, 8/15/33 | 8/11 at 101.00 | N/R | 2,001,540 | ||||
11,165 | Palm Desert Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Refunding Bonds, Project Area 1, Series 2002, 5.100%, 4/01/30 – NPFG Insured | 4/12 at 102.00 | A | 10,704,099 |
Nuveen Investments 47
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (continued) | ||
NZH | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 3,250 | Pomona Public Financing Authority, California, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Merged Redevelopment Projects, Series 2001AD, 5.000%, 2/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 2/11 at 100.00 | A | $ | 3,252,178 | ||
1,000 | Poway Unified School District, San Diego County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 14 Del Sur, Series 2006, 5.125%, 9/01/26 | 3/11 at 103.00 | N/R | 946,190 | ||||
6,000 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Highway Revenue Bonds, Series 2007N, 5.250%, 7/01/39 – FGIC Insured | No Opt. Call | A3 | 6,379,860 | ||||
625 | Rialto Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A– | 588,069 | ||||
3,375 | Riverside County Redevelopment Agency, California, Interstate 215 Corridor Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2010E, 6.500%, 10/01/40 | 10/20 at 100.00 | A– | 3,479,186 | ||||
780 | Roseville, California, Certificates of Participation, Public Facilities, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 793,182 | ||||
1,145 | Sacramento, California, Special Tax Bonds, North Natomas Community Facilities District 4, Series 2003C, 6.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/14 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,163,263 | ||||
14,505 | San Diego Redevelopment Agency, California, Subordinate Lien Tax Allocation Bonds, Centre City Project, Series 2001A, 5.000%, 9/01/26 – AGM Insured | 9/11 at 101.00 | AAA | 14,852,830 | ||||
2,300 | San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, California, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, 5.000%, 7/01/26 – AMBAC Insured | 7/11 at 100.00 | AA+ | 2,362,100 | ||||
1,345 | San Mateo Union High School District, San Mateo County, California, Certificates of Participation, Phase 1, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 12/15/30 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,322,175 | ||||
8,710 | South Orange County Public Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Ladera Ranch, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 8/15/32 – AMBAC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 8,400,447 | ||||
600 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 01-1, Refunding Series 2009A, 8.625%, 9/01/39 | 9/14 at 105.00 | N/R | 646,722 | ||||
2,810 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 01-1, Series 2003B, 7.000%, 9/01/38 | 9/13 at 103.00 | N/R | 2,612,569 | ||||
2,000 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 01-1, Series 2004B, 6.000%, 9/01/39 | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R | 1,625,380 | ||||
1,375 | West Patterson Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 2001-1, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/39 | 9/13 at 103.00 | N/R | 1,137,441 | ||||
2,500 | Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District, San Bernardino County, California, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2001A, 5.000%, 10/01/26 – NPFG Insured | 10/11 at 100.00 | A | 2,507,850 | ||||
135,110 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 135,554,379 | ||||||
Transportation – 7.2% (5.0% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,690 | Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2006F, 5.000%, 4/01/31 (UB) | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA | 1,786,499 | ||||
11,750 | Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1999, 5.875%, 1/15/28 | 1/14 at 101.00 | BBB– | 11,984,530 | ||||
San Francisco Airports Commission, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco International Airport, Second Series 2003, Issue 29B: | ||||||||
4,110 | 5.125%, 5/01/17 – FGIC Insured | 5/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 4,427,004 | ||||
5,140 | 5.125%, 5/01/19 – FGIC Insured | 5/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 5,474,408 | ||||
22,690 | Total Transportation | 23,672,441 | ||||||
U.S. Guaranteed – 19.4% (13.4% of Total Investments) (7) | ||||||||
4,000 | Beaumont Financing Authority, California, Local Agency Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, 6.750%, 9/01/25 (Pre-refunded 9/01/12) | 9/12 at 102.00 | N/R (7) | 4,572,960 | ||||
8,880 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Merced County Tobacco Funding Corporation, Series 2002A, 5.500%, 6/01/33 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) | 6/12 at 100.00 | BBB (7) | 9,426,742 |
48 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
U.S. Guaranteed (7) (continued) | ||||||||
California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A: | ||||||||
$ | 3,500 | 5.375%, 5/01/17 (Pre-refunded 5/01/12) – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 5/12 at 101.00 | Aaa | $ | 3,829,140 | ||
8,000 | 5.125%, 5/01/18 (Pre-refunded 5/01/12) | 5/12 at 101.00 | Aaa | 8,719,120 | ||||
720 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Thomas Jefferson School of Law, Series 2005A, 4.875%, 10/01/31 (Pre-refunded 10/01/15) | 10/15 at 100.00 | N/R (7) | 811,843 | ||||
2,000 | Daly City Housing Development Finance Agency, California, Mobile Home Park Revenue Bonds, Franciscan Mobile Home Park Project, Series 2002A, 5.800%, 12/15/25 (Pre-refunded 12/15/13) | 12/13 at 102.00 | N/R (7) | 2,370,420 | ||||
4,505 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2003A-1, 6.250%, 6/01/33 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13) | 6/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 5,039,969 | ||||
1,940 | Lincoln, California, Special Tax Bonds, Lincoln Crossing Community Facilities District 03-1, Series 2003A, 6.500%, 9/01/25 (Pre-refunded 9/01/13) | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R (7) | 2,315,836 | ||||
1,335 | Lincoln, California, Special Tax Bonds, Lincoln Crossing Community Facilities District 03-1, Series 2004, 6.000%, 9/01/34 (Pre-refunded 9/01/13) | 9/13 at 102.00 | N/R (7) | 1,573,832 | ||||
5,500 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Highway Revenue Bonds, Series 2002D, 5.375%, 7/01/36 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12) | 7/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 5,987,080 | ||||
3,975 | San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, California, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, 5.000%, 7/01/26 (Pre-refunded 7/01/11) – AMBAC Insured | 7/11 at 100.00 | AA+ (7) | 4,131,218 | ||||
7,595 | San Francisco State University Foundation Inc., California, Auxiliary Organization Student Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, 5.000%, 9/01/26 (Pre-refunded 9/01/11) – NPFG Insured | 9/11 at 101.00 | A (7) | 8,035,738 | ||||
4,200 | Tobacco Securitization Authority of Southern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, San Diego County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corporation, Senior Series 2001A, 5.500%, 6/01/36 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) | 6/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 4,584,930 | ||||
2,500 | Whittier, California, Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital, Series 2002, 5.600%, 6/01/22 (Pre-refunded 6/01/12) | 6/12 at 101.00 | N/R (7) | 2,756,975 | ||||
58,650 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 64,155,803 | ||||||
Utilities – 3.6% (2.5% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
3,815 | Long Beach Bond Finance Authority, California, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 11/15/35 | No Opt. Call | A | 3,600,864 | ||||
1,285 | Merced Irrigation District, California, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.125%, 9/01/31 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,202,657 | ||||
5,000 | Merced Irrigation District, California, Revenue Certificates of Participation, Electric System Project, Series 2003, 5.700%, 9/01/36 | 9/13 at 102.00 | Baa3 | 4,826,050 | ||||
2,250 | Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 5.125%, 8/01/22 – AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 8/12 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,264,378 | ||||
12,350 | Total Utilities | 11,893,949 | ||||||
Water and Sewer – 5.8% (4.0% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,070 | Burbank, California, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 6/01/22 – AMBAC Insured | 6/14 at 100.00 | AA+ | 1,137,699 | ||||
1,125 | Fortuna Public Finance Authority, California, Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 10/01/36 – AGM Insured | 10/16 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,153,699 | ||||
890 | Healdsburg Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA– | 909,082 | ||||
850 | Marina Coast Water District, California, Enterprise Certificate of Participation, Series 2006, 5.000%, 6/01/31 – NPFG Insured | 6/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 873,214 | ||||
1,000 | Pico Rivera Water Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Series 2001A, 6.250%, 12/01/32 | 12/11 at 102.00 | N/R | 993,940 | ||||
1,000 | San Buenaventura, California, Wastewater Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2004, 5.000%, 3/01/24 – NPFG Insured | 3/14 at 100.00 | AA | 1,055,420 |
Nuveen Investments 49
Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (continued) | ||
NZH | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Water and Sewer (continued) | ||||||||
San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority, California, Subordinate Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2002: | ||||||||
$ | 2,500 | 5.000%, 8/01/23 – NPFG Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Aa3 | $ | 2,656,200 | ||
6,260 | 5.000%, 8/01/24 – NPFG Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 6,651,125 | ||||
3,315 | San Francisco City and County Public Utilities Commission, California, Clean Water Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.250%, 10/01/18 – NPFG Insured | 4/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 3,630,555 | ||||
18,010 | Total Water and Sewer | 19,060,934 | ||||||
$ | 492,504 | Total Investments (cost $471,099,574) – 144.7% | 477,940,468 | |||||
Floating Rate Obligations – (1.2)% | (3,845,000 | ) | ||||||
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (26.1)% (8) | (86,250,000 | ) | ||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 3.6% | 12,063,240 | |||||||
Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (21.0)% (8) | (69,500,000 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100% | $ | 330,408,708 |
(1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted. |
(2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
(3) | Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
(4) | Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in derivatives and/or inverse floating rate transactions. |
(5) | For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information. |
(6) | Subsequent to the reporting period, the Adviser has concluded this issue is not likely to meet its future interest payment obligations and has directed the Fund’s custodian to cease accruing additional income on the Fund’s records. |
(7) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Such investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA rated securities. |
(8) | MuniFund Term Preferred Shares and Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments are 18.0% and 14.5%, respectively. |
N/R | Not rated. |
(IF) | Inverse floating rate investment. |
(UB) | Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
50 Nuveen Investments
Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund | ||
NKL | Portfolio of Investments | |
August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Consumer Staples – 3.8% (2.6% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
$ | 14,155 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-2, 0.000%, 6/01/37 | 6/22 at 100.00 | BBB | $ | 8,880,422 | ||
Education and Civic Organizations – 4.8% (3.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,675 | California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of San Diego, Series 2002A, 5.250%, 10/01/30 | 10/12 at 100.00 | A2 | 1,718,751 | ||||
9,000 | California State University, Systemwide Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 11/01/26 – AMBAC Insured | 11/12 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 9,466,290 | ||||
10,675 | Total Education and Civic Organizations | 11,185,041 | ||||||
Health Care – 6.4% (4.4% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
5,000 | ABAG Finance Authority for Non-Profit Corporations, California, Cal-Mortgage Insured Revenue Bonds, Sansum-Santa Barbara Medical Foundation Clinic, Series 2002A, 5.600%, 4/01/26 | 4/12 at 100.00 | A– | 5,078,750 | ||||
2,815 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital, Series 2003C, 5.000%, 8/15/20 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AA | 2,934,947 | ||||
1,748 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph Health System, Trust 2554, 18.104%, 7/01/47 – AGM Insured (IF) | 7/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,032,762 | ||||
5,000 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 3/01/41 | 3/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 5,007,150 | ||||
14,563 | Total Health Care | 15,053,609 | ||||||
Housing/Multifamily – 1.3% (0.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,000 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Student Housing Revenue Bonds, EAH – Irvine East Campus Apartments, LLC Project, Series 2002A, 5.500%, 8/01/22 – ACA Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 1,011,900 | ||||
1,905 | Los Angeles, California, GNMA Mortgage-Backed Securities Program Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Park Plaza West Senior Apartments, Series 2001B, 5.300%, 1/20/21 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/11 at 102.00 | AAA | 1,964,055 | ||||
2,905 | Total Housing/Multifamily | 2,975,955 | ||||||
Housing/Single Family – 0.1% (0.1% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
350 | California Housing Finance Agency, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2006H, 5.750%, 8/01/30 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 2/16 at 100.00 | A | 358,372 | ||||
Industrials ��� 1.1% (0.8% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
2,435 | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Republic Services Inc., Series 2002C, 5.250%, 6/01/23 (Mandatory put 12/01/17) (Alternative Minimum Tax) | No Opt. Call | BBB | 2,536,783 | ||||
Long-Term Care – 1.3% (0.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
3,000 | ABAG Finance Authority for Non-Profit Corporations, California, Insured Senior Living Revenue Bonds, Odd Fellows Home of California, Series 2003A, 5.200%, 11/15/22 | 11/12 at 100.00 | A– | 3,057,000 | ||||
Tax Obligation/General – 27.7% (19.2% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
900 | California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 2/01/21 | 8/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 978,435 | ||||
8,250 | California, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 2/01/22 – NPFG Insured | 2/12 at 100.00 | A1 | 8,624,303 | ||||
20,750 | Coachella Valley Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation, Election 2005 Series 2010C, 0.000%, 8/01/43 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 2,719,288 | ||||
3,375 | Coast Community College District, Orange County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C, 0.000%, 8/01/31 – AGM Insured | 8/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,959,605 | ||||
230 | El Monte Union High School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 6/01/28 – AGM Insured | 6/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 236,856 | ||||
2,730 | Fontana Unified School District, San Bernardino County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Trust 2668, 9.269%, 2/01/16 – AGM Insured (IF) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 3,264,752 |
Nuveen Investments 51
Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (continued) | ||
NKL | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/General (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 10,000 | Fremont Unified School District, Alameda County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – FGIC Insured | 8/12 at 101.00 | Aa2 | $ | 10,733,500 | ||
1,000 | Los Rios Community College District, Sacramento, El Dorado and Yolo Counties, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – AGM Insured (UB) | 8/14 at 102.00 | AAA | 1,140,560 | ||||
1,500 | Madera Unified School District, Madera County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 8/01/28 – AGM Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,566,015 | ||||
2,000 | Murrieta Valley Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 4.500%, 9/01/30 – AGM Insured | 9/17 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,033,040 | ||||
2,500 | Oakland Unified School District, Alameda County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 5.250%, 8/01/21 – FGIC Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,621,550 | ||||
375 | Roseville Joint Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 8/01/27 – FGIC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | AA– | 396,806 | ||||
3,250 | San Diego Unified School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 1998, Series 2001C, 5.000%, 7/01/22 – AGM Insured | 7/11 at 102.00 | AAA | 3,428,685 | ||||
1,500 | San Juan Capistano, California, General Obligation Bonds, Open Space Program, Tender Option Bond Trust 3646, 17.470%, 8/01/17 (IF) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 1,953,060 | ||||
3,500 | San Mateo County Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 9/01/26 – FGIC Insured | 9/12 at 100.00 | Aaa | 3,695,860 | ||||
15,780 | Sylvan Union School District, Stanislaus County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Series 2010, 0.000%, 8/01/49 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 4,308,413 | ||||
10,000 | Vista Unified School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 8/01/23 – AGM Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 10,325,800 | ||||
3,905 | West Kern Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election 2004, Series 2007C, 5.000%, 10/01/32 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 11/17 at 100.00 | A+ | 4,030,468 | ||||
91,545 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 65,016,996 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/Limited – 47.5% (32.8% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,450 | Baldwin Park Public Financing Authority, California, Sales Tax and Tax Allocation Bonds, Puente Merced Redevelopment Project, Series 2003, 5.250%, 8/01/21 | 8/13 at 102.00 | BBB | 1,506,768 | ||||
6,895 | Brea and Olinda Unified School District, Orange County, California, Certificates of Participation Refunding, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 8/01/26 – AGM Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | AAA | 7,170,869 | ||||
2,200 | California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, Los Angeles County, Revenue Bonds, Department of Public Social Services, Series 2003, 5.000%, 9/01/28 – AMBAC Insured | 9/13 at 101.00 | N/R | 2,132,724 | ||||
3,100 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of Health Services, Richmond Lab, Series 2005B, 5.000%, 11/01/30 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 11/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 3,108,866 | ||||
465 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/24 – FGIC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | 472,291 | ||||
1,400 | Chino Redevelopment Agency, California, Merged Chino Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 9/01/38 – AMBAC Insured | 9/16 at 101.00 | A– | 1,307,208 | ||||
7,035 | Corona-Norco Unified School District, Riverside County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 98-1, Series 2003, 5.000%, 9/01/28 – NPFG Insured | 9/13 at 100.00 | A | 7,108,094 | ||||
3,145 | Culver City Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Redevelopment Project, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 11/01/25 – NPFG Insured | 5/11 at 101.00 | A | 3,089,491 | ||||
8,170 | El Monte, California, Senior Lien Certificates of Participation, Department of Public Services Facility Phase II, Series 2001, 5.000%, 1/01/21 – AMBAC Insured | 1/11 at 100.00 | A2 | 8,215,425 | ||||
4,000 | Folsom Public Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 9/01/21 – AMBAC Insured | 9/12 at 102.00 | N/R | 4,115,960 | ||||
7,780 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 6/01/45 – AMBAC Insured | 6/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 7,518,281 | ||||
7,700 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bonds Trust 4686, 9.053%, 6/01/45 – AGC Insured (IF) | 6/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 7,623,303 |
52 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 910 | Hesperia Public Financing Authority, California, Redevelopment and Housing Projects Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/17 at 100.00 | Ba1 | $ | 761,515 | ||
2,115 | Inglewood Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Merged Area Redevelopment Project, Series 1998A, 5.250%, 5/01/23 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | N/R | 2,159,838 | ||||
3,500 | La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Redevelopment Project Area 1, Series 2001, 5.100%, 9/01/31 – AMBAC Insured | 9/11 at 102.00 | A+ | 3,520,755 | ||||
3,400 | La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Redevelopment Project Area 1, Series 2002, 5.000%, 9/01/22 – AMBAC Insured | 9/12 at 102.00 | A+ | 3,537,258 | ||||
845 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Manchester Social Services Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A1 | 790,996 | ||||
1,460 | Los Angeles, California, Certificates of Participation, Municipal Improvement Corporation, Series 2003AW, 5.000%, 6/01/33 – AMBAC Insured | 6/13 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,478,586 | ||||
7,000 | Los Angeles, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2002, 5.200%, 4/01/27 – AMBAC Insured | 4/12 at 100.00 | A+ | 7,117,740 | ||||
8,470 | Ontario Redevelopment Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Capital Projects, Series 2001, 5.200%, 8/01/29 – AMBAC Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | A+ | 8,815,576 | ||||
5,000 | Palm Desert Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Refunding Bonds, Project Area 1, Series 2002, 5.000%, 4/01/25 – NPFG Insured | 4/12 at 102.00 | A | 5,008,700 | ||||
405 | Rialto Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A– | 381,069 | ||||
3,000 | Riverside County Public Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Multiple Projects, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 10/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 10/15 at 100.00 | BBB | 2,597,670 | ||||
4,475 | Riverside County, California, Asset Leasing Corporate Leasehold Revenue Bonds, Riverside County Hospital Project, Series 1997B, 5.000%, 6/01/19 – NPFG Insured | 6/12 at 101.00 | A | 4,603,030 | ||||
2,500 | Roseville Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 9/01/33 – AMBAC Insured | 9/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 2,339,525 | ||||
505 | Roseville, California, Certificates of Participation, Public Facilities, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 513,535 | ||||
3,175 | San Buenaventura, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2001C, 5.250%, 2/01/31 – AMBAC Insured | 2/11 at 101.00 | N/R | 3,177,350 | ||||
3,730 | San Diego Redevelopment Agency, California, Subordinate Lien Tax Increment and Parking Revenue Bonds, Centre City Project, Series 2003B, 5.250%, 9/01/26 | 9/10 at 100.50 | Baa2 | 3,738,430 | ||||
4,000 | San Jose Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Convention Center Project, Series 2001F, 5.000%, 9/01/19 – NPFG Insured | 9/11 at 100.00 | AA+ | 4,162,600 | ||||
1,000 | San Jose Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 8/01/28 – NPFG Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | A | 1,011,030 | ||||
2,160 | Temecula Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Redevelopment Project 1, Series 2002, 5.125%, 8/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 2/11 at 100.00 | A | 2,160,367 | ||||
110,990 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 111,244,850 | ||||||
Transportation – 5.3% (3.7% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
7,500 | Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1999, 5.875%, 1/15/29 | 1/14 at 101.00 | BBB– | 7,632,225 | ||||
San Francisco Airports Commission, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco International Airport, Second Series 2003, Issue 29A: | ||||||||
2,185 | 5.250%, 5/01/16 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 5/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,323,398 | ||||
2,300 | 5.250%, 5/01/17 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 5/13 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,419,807 | ||||
11,985 | Total Transportation | 12,375,430 |
Nuveen Investments 53
Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (continued) | ||
NKL | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
U.S. Guaranteed – 16.7% (11.6% of Total Investments) (4) | ||||||||
$ | 6,000 | California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 5/01/18 (Pre-refunded 5/01/12) | 5/12 at 101.00 | Aaa | $ | 6,539,340 | ||
35 | California Department of Water Resources, Water System Revenue Bonds, Central Valley Project, Series 2002X, 5.150%, 12/01/23 (Pre-refunded 12/01/12) – FGIC Insured | 12/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 38,737 | ||||
2,250 | California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, First Lien Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 7/01/36 (Pre-refunded 1/01/28) – AMBAC Insured | 1/28 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,811,218 | ||||
8,900 | Eastern Municipal Water District, California, Water and Sewerage System Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2001B, 5.000%, 7/01/30 (Pre-refunded 7/01/11) – FGIC Insured | 7/11 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 9,259,738 | ||||
4,500 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A-2, 7.900%, 6/01/42 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13) | 6/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 5,368,860 | ||||
5,000 | Los Angeles Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002E, 5.125%, 1/01/27 (Pre-refunded 7/01/12) – NPFG Insured | 7/12 at 100.00 | AA– (4) | 5,438,300 | ||||
3,380 | Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 2004, 5.875%, 7/01/26 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14) | 7/14 at 100.00 | Baa1 (4) | 4,043,967 | ||||
2,980 | Santa Clarita Community College District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 5.125%, 8/01/26 (Pre-refunded 8/01/11) – FGIC Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | AA (4) | 3,145,450 | ||||
2,460 | Vacaville Unified School District, Solano County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 8/01/26 (Pre-refunded 8/01/11) – AGM Insured | 8/11 at 101.00 | AAA | 2,593,775 | ||||
35,505 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 39,239,385 | ||||||
Utilities – 14.4% (9.9% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
9,000 | Anaheim Public Finance Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Electric System Distribution Facilities, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 10/01/27 – AGM Insured | 10/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 9,471,960 | ||||
10,000 | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Remarketed Revenue Bonds, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Series 1996A, 5.350%, 12/01/16 – NPFG Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 4/11 at 102.00 | A | 10,358,500 | ||||
2,490 | Long Beach Bond Finance Authority, California, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 11/15/35 | No Opt. Call | A | 2,350,236 | ||||
830 | Merced Irrigation District, California, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.125%, 9/01/31 ��� SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | N/R | 776,814 | ||||
1,775 | Northern California Power Agency, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Hydroelectric Project 1, Series 1998A, 5.200%, 7/01/32 – NPFG Insured | 1/11 at 100.00 | A | 1,775,586 | ||||
3,000 | Sacramento Municipal Utility District, California, Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 2001N, 5.000%, 8/15/28 – NPFG Insured | 8/11 at 100.00 | A+ | 3,036,240 | ||||
5,630 | Southern California Public Power Authority, Subordinate Revenue Refunding Bonds, Transmission Project, Series 2002A, 4.750%, 7/01/19 – AGM Insured | 7/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 5,878,227 | ||||
32,725 | Total Utilities | 33,647,563 | ||||||
Water and Sewer – 14.2% (9.8% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
2,965 | California Department of Water Resources, Water System Revenue Bonds, Central Valley Project, Series 2002X, 5.150%, 12/01/23 – FGIC Insured | 12/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 3,223,667 | ||||
750 | Fortuna Public Finance Authority, California, Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 10/01/36 – AGM Insured | 10/16 at 100.00 | AAA | 769,133 | ||||
570 | Healdsburg Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA– | 582,221 | ||||
4,500 | Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Financing Authority, California, Senior Revenue Bonds, Capital Projects, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 10/01/23 – AGM Insured | 10/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 4,973,490 | ||||
2,085 | Manteca Financing Authority, California, Sewerage Revenue Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 12/01/33 – NPFG Insured | 12/13 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 2,089,358 | ||||
500 | Marina Coast Water District, California, Enterprise Certificate of Participation, Series 2006, 5.000%, 6/01/31 – NPFG Insured | 6/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 513,655 |
54 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Water and Sewer (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 9,185 | Orange County Sanitation District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2003, 5.000%, 2/01/33 – FGIC Insured (UB) | 8/13 at 100.00 | AAA | $ | 9,462,020 | ||
8,000 | San Diego County Water Authority, California, Water Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 5/01/38 – AGM Insured | 5/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 8,455,680 | ||||
Semitropic Water Storage District, Kern County, California, Water Banking Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A: | ||||||||
1,315 | 5.500%, 12/01/20 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 12/14 at 100.00 | AA | 1,502,164 | ||||
1,415 | 5.500%, 12/01/21 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 12/14 at 100.00 | AA | 1,616,397 | ||||
31,285 | Total Water and Sewer | 33,187,785 | ||||||
$ | 362,118 | Total Investments (cost $323,952,023) – 144.6% | 338,759,191 | |||||
Floating Rate Obligations – (3.2)% | (7,385,000) | |||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 2.9% | 6,586,862 | |||||||
Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (44.3)% (5) | (103,750,000) | |||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100% | $ | 234,211,053 |
The Fund intends to invest at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Insurance for more information. | ||
(1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted. | |
(2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. | |
(3) | Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. | |
(4) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Such investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA rated securities. | |
(5) | Auction Rate Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 30.6%. | |
N/R | Not rated. | |
(IF) | Inverse floating rate investment. | |
(UB) | Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 55
Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund | ||
NKX | Portfolio of Investments | |
August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3 | ) | Value | ||||
Consumer Staples – 4.4% (3.1% of Total Investments) | |||||||||
$ | 6,070 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-2, 0.000%, 6/01/37 | 6/22 at 100.00 | BBB | $ | 3,808,136 | |||
Health Care – 23.0% (16.3% of Total Investments) | |||||||||
1,630 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Series 2010A, 5.250%, 7/01/38 – AGC Insured | 7/20 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,683,627 | |||||
1,800 | California Infrastructure Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Hospital Assistance LLC, Series 2001A, 5.550%, 8/01/31 | 8/11 at 102.00 | A+ | 1,841,166 | |||||
4,000 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Insured Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2008K, 5.500%, 7/01/41 – AGC Insured | 7/17 at 100.00 | AAA | 4,209,960 | |||||
1,815 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 3/01/41 | 3/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,817,595 | |||||
5,020 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanente System, Series 2006, 5.000%, 3/01/41 – BHAC Insured (UB) | 3/16 at 100.00 | AA+ | 5,157,096 | |||||
4,060 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sherman Oaks Health System, Series 1998A, 5.000%, 8/01/22 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A1 | 4,256,991 | |||||
662 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph Health System, Trust 2554, 18.104%, 7/01/47 – AGM Insured (IF) | 7/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 769,483 | |||||
18,987 | Total Health Care | 19,735,918 | |||||||
Housing/Multifamily – 1.4% (1.0% of Total Investments) | |||||||||
1,165 | Poway, California, Housing Revenue Bonds, Revenue Bonds, Poinsettia Mobile Home Park, Series 2003, 5.000%, 5/01/23 | 5/13 at 102.00 | AA– | 1,198,587 | |||||
Long-Term Care – 7.2% (5.1% of Total Investments) | |||||||||
3,000 | ABAG Finance Authority for Non-Profit Corporations, California, Cal-Mortgage Insured Revenue Bonds, Channing House, Series 2010, 6.125%, 5/15/40 | 5/20 at 100.00 | A– | 3,098,250 | |||||
1,000 | ABAG Finance Authority for Non-Profit Corporations, California, Insured Senior Living Revenue Bonds, Odd Fellows Home of California, Series 2003A, 5.200%, 11/15/22 | 11/12 at 100.00 | A– | 1,019,000 | |||||
2,000 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Cal-Mortgage Insured Revenue Bonds, Northern California Retired Officers Community Corporation – Paradise Valley Estates, Series 2002, 5.250%, 1/01/26 | 1/13 at 100.00 | A– | 2,051,020 | |||||
6,000 | Total Long-Term Care | 6,168,270 | |||||||
Tax Obligation/General – 18.3% (12.9% of Total Investments) | |||||||||
2,000 | Butte-Glenn Community College District, Butte and Glenn Counties, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 8/01/26 – NPFG Insured | 8/12 at 101.00 | Aa2 | 2,124,820 | |||||
1,030 | Fontana Unified School District, San Bernardino County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Trust 2668, 9.269%, 2/01/16 – AGM Insured (IF) | No Opt. Call | AAA | 1,231,756 | |||||
450 | Fremont Unified School District, Alameda County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – FGIC Insured | 8/12 at 101.00 | Aa2 | 483,008 | |||||
2,000 | Los Angeles, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 9/01/22 – NPFG Insured | 9/12 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 2,141,220 | |||||
1,000 | Murrieta Valley Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 9/01/26 – FGIC Insured | 9/13 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 1,074,530 | |||||
1,000 | Murrieta Valley Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 4.500%, 9/01/30 – AGM Insured | 9/17 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,016,520 | |||||
140 | Roseville Joint Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 8/01/27 – FGIC Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | AA– | 148,141 |
56 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/General (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 3,855 | San Rafael City High School District, Marin County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/28 – AGM Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | AAA | $ | 4,062,322 | ||
12,520 | Yosemite Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation, Election 2004, Series 2010D, 0.000%, 8/01/42 | No Opt. Call | AA– | 3,391,042 | ||||
23,995 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 15,673,359 | ||||||
Tax Obligation/Limited – 45.5% (32.3% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
550 | Baldwin Park Public Financing Authority, California, Sales Tax and Tax Allocation Bonds, Puente Merced Redevelopment Project, Series 2003, 5.250%, 8/01/21 | 8/13 at 102.00 | BBB | 571,533 | ||||
1,165 | Burbank Public Financing Authority, California, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Golden State Redevelopment Project, Series 2003A, 5.250%, 12/01/22 – AMBAC Insured | 12/13 at 100.00 | A | 1,201,721 | ||||
4,000 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of General Services, Capital East End Project, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 12/01/27 – AMBAC Insured | 12/12 at 100.00 | A2 | 4,032,280 | ||||
170 | Capistrano Unified School District, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/24 – FGIC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A | 172,666 | ||||
525 | Chino Redevelopment Agency, California, Merged Chino Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 9/01/38 – AMBAC Insured | 9/16 at 101.00 | A– | 490,203 | ||||
1,610 | Folsom Public Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 9/01/21 – AMBAC Insured | 9/12 at 102.00 | N/R | 1,656,674 | ||||
3,285 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 6/01/45 – AMBAC Insured | 6/15 at 100.00 | A2 | 3,174,493 | ||||
2,905 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bonds Trust 4686, 9.053%, 6/01/45 – AGC Insured (IF) | 6/15 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,876,066 | ||||
700 | Hesperia Public Financing Authority, California, Redevelopment and Housing Projects Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/17 at 100.00 | Ba1 | 585,781 | ||||
5,540 | Irvine Public Facilities and Infrastructure Authority, California, Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2003C, 5.000%, 9/02/21 – AMBAC Insured | 9/13 at 100.00 | N/R | 5,614,014 | ||||
315 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Manchester Social Services Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A1 | 294,868 | ||||
1,770 | Los Angeles Unified School District, California, Certificates of Participation, Administration Building Project II, Series 2002C, 5.000%, 10/01/27 – AMBAC Insured | 10/12 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 1,788,921 | ||||
2,000 | Los Angeles, California, Certificates of Participation, Municipal Improvement Corporation, Series 2003AW, 5.000%, 6/01/33 – AMBAC Insured | 6/13 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,025,460 | ||||
1,500 | Los Angeles, California, Municipal Improvement Corporation, Lease Revenue Bonds, Police Headquarters, Series 2006A, 4.750%, 1/01/31 – FGIC Insured | 1/17 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,502,760 | ||||
1,500 | Los Osos, California, Improvement Bonds, Community Services Wastewater Assessment District 1, Series 2002, 5.000%, 9/02/33 – NPFG Insured | 9/10 at 103.00 | A | 1,401,855 | ||||
150 | Rialto Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | A– | 141,137 | ||||
190 | Roseville, California, Certificates of Participation, Public Facilities, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – AMBAC Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 193,211 | ||||
San Buenaventura, California, Certificates of Participation, Golf Course Financing Project, Series 2002D: | ||||||||
3,000 | 5.000%, 2/01/27 – AMBAC Insured | 2/12 at 100.00 | AA– | 3,037,320 | ||||
3,300 | 5.000%, 2/01/32 – AMBAC Insured | 2/12 at 100.00 | AA– | 3,322,506 | ||||
1,200 | San Diego Redevelopment Agency, California, Subordinate Lien Tax Increment and Parking Revenue Bonds, Centre City Project, Series 2003B, 5.250%, 9/01/26 | 9/10 at 100.50 | Baa2 | 1,202,712 | ||||
2,770 | San Jose Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Civic Center Project, Series 2002B, 5.000%, 6/01/32 – AMBAC Insured | 6/12 at 100.00 | AA+ | 2,803,794 |
Nuveen Investments 57
Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund (continued) | ||
NKX | Portfolio of Investments August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) | |
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | ||||||||
$ | 1,000 | San Jose Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Project Area, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 8/01/28 – NPFG Insured | 8/15 at 100.00 | A | $ | 1,011,030 | ||
39,145 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 39,101,005 | ||||||
Transportation – 7.8% (5.6% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
5,480 | Bay Area Governments Association, California, BART SFO Extension, Airport Premium Fare Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 8/01/26 – AMBAC Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | N/R | 4,902,134 | ||||
2,000 | Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Series 1995A, 5.000%, 1/01/35 | 1/11 at 100.00 | BBB– | 1,831,540 | ||||
7,480 | Total Transportation | 6,733,674 | ||||||
U.S. Guaranteed – 16.7% (11.8% of Total Investments) (4) | ||||||||
1,000 | Berryessa Union School District, Santa Clara County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003C, 5.000%, 8/01/21 (Pre-refunded 8/01/12) – AGM Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,090,060 | ||||
California State, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002: | ||||||||
1,000 | 5.000%, 4/01/27 (Pre-refunded 4/01/12) – AMBAC Insured | 4/12 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,074,100 | ||||
2,945 | 5.250%, 4/01/30 (Pre-refunded 4/01/12) – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 4/12 at 100.00 | A1 (4) | 3,174,828 | ||||
500 | California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 5.250%, 4/01/34 (Pre-refunded 4/01/14) | 4/14 at 100.00 | AAA | 584,920 | ||||
1,625 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A-2, 7.900%, 6/01/42 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13) | 6/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,938,755 | ||||
2,030 | Hacienda La Puente Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 8/01/27 (Pre-refunded 8/01/13) – AGM Insured | 8/13 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,301,188 | ||||
1,260 | Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 2004, 5.875%, 7/01/26 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14) | 7/14 at 100.00 | Baa1 (4) | 1,507,514 | ||||
2,390 | Solano County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2002, 5.250%, 11/01/24 (Pre-refunded 11/01/12) – NPFG Insured | 11/12 at 100.00 | AA– (4) | 2,632,561 | ||||
12,750 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 14,303,926 | ||||||
Utilities – 3.1% (2.2% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,000 | Anaheim Public Finance Authority, California, Second Lien Electric Distribution Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 5.250%, 10/01/21 – NPFG Insured | 10/14 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,086,520 | ||||
945 | Long Beach Bond Finance Authority, California, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.500%, 11/15/37 | No Opt. Call | A | 952,919 | ||||
275 | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California, Power System Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A-2, 5.000%, 7/01/21 – NPFG Insured | 7/13 at 100.00 | AA– | 305,159 | ||||
310 | Merced Irrigation District, California, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.125%, 9/01/31 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 9/15 at 100.00 | N/R | 290,135 | ||||
2,530 | Total Utilities | 2,634,733 | ||||||
Water and Sewer – 13.6% (9.7% of Total Investments) | ||||||||
1,000 | Castaic Lake Water Agency, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2006C, 5.000%, 8/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 8/16 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,017,880 | ||||
750 | Fortuna Public Finance Authority, California, Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 10/01/36 – AGM Insured | 10/16 at 100.00 | AAA | 769,133 | ||||
215 | Healdsburg Public Financing Authority, California, Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 4/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 4/16 at 100.00 | AA– | 219,610 | ||||
770 | Manteca Financing Authority, California, Sewerage Revenue Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 12/01/33 – NPFG Insured | 12/13 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 771,609 | ||||
170 | Marina Coast Water District, California, Enterprise Certificate of Participation, Series 2006, 5.000%, 6/01/31 – NPFG Insured | 6/16 at 100.00 | A+ | 174,643 |
58 Nuveen Investments
Principal | Optional Call | |||||||
Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||
Water and Sewer (continued) | ||||||||
San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority, California, Subordinate Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2002: | ||||||||
$ | 3,000 | 5.000%, 8/01/22 – NPFG Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Aa3 | $ | 3,210,420 | ||
2,500 | 5.000%, 8/01/23 – NPFG Insured | 8/12 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 2,656,200 | ||||
1,180 | South Feather Water and Power Agency, California, Water Revenue Certificates of Participation, Solar Photovoltaic Project, Series 2003, 5.375%, 4/01/24 | 4/13 at 100.00 | A | 1,199,977 | ||||
1,600 | Sunnyvale Financing Authority, California, Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2001, 5.000%, 10/01/26 – AMBAC Insured | 10/11 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,683,152 | ||||
11,185 | Total Water and Sewer | 11,702,624 | ||||||
$ | 129,307 | Total Investments (cost $118,056,528) – 141.0% | 121,060,232 | |||||
Floating Rate Obligations – (3.9)% | (3,360,000) | |||||||
Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (41.3)% (5) | (35,500,000) | |||||||
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 4.2% | 3,668,113 | |||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100% | $ | 85,868,345 |
The Fund intends to invest at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Insurance for more information. | ||
(1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted. | |
(2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. | |
(3) | Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. | |
(4) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Such investments are normally considered to be equivalent to AAA rated securities. | |
(5) | Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 29.3%. | |
N/R | Not rated. | |
(IF) | Inverse floating rate investment. | |
(UB) | Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 59
Statement of | |
Assets & Liabilities | |
August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | California Premium Income (NCU) | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | ||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments, at value (cost $129,201,536, $260,027,897, $116,309,786 and $484,282,684, respectively) | $ | 137,479,863 | $ | 270,930,901 | $ | 121,379,819 | $ | 496,304,620 | |||||
Cash | — | — | 2,123,833 | 226,906 | |||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||
Interest | 2,536,667 | 3,421,632 | 1,496,018 | 7,601,850 | |||||||||
Investments sold | 2,326,875 | 7,537,035 | — | 3,338,050 | |||||||||
Deferred offering costs | 844,923 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Other assets | 49,282 | 59,442 | 21,466 | 135,967 | |||||||||
Total assets | 143,237,610 | 281,949,010 | 125,021,136 | 507,607,393 | |||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Cash overdraft | 220,323 | 967,664 | — | — | |||||||||
Floating rate obligations | — | 17,880,000 | 6,650,000 | 28,545,000 | |||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||
Auction Rate Preferred share dividends | — | 5,571 | 932 | 5,934 | |||||||||
Common share dividends | 422,165 | 844,821 | 390,145 | 1,688,254 | |||||||||
Interest | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Offering costs | 372,233 | — | — | — | |||||||||
MuniFund Term Preferred shares, at liquidation value | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Variable Rate Demand Preferred shares, at liquidation value | 42,700,000 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Accrued expenses: | |||||||||||||
Management fees | 77,168 | 148,725 | 66,110 | 267,849 | |||||||||
Other | 47,161 | 128,236 | 52,729 | 160,723 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | 43,839,050 | 19,975,017 | 7,159,916 | 30,667,760 | |||||||||
Auction Rate Preferred shares, at liquidation value | — | 73,325,000 | 34,375,000 | 135,525,000 | |||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares | $ | 99,398,560 | $ | 188,648,993 | $ | 83,486,220 | $ | 341,414,633 | |||||
Common shares outstanding | 6,442,132 | 12,665,422 | 5,733,088 | 23,480,254 | |||||||||
Net asset value per Common share outstanding (net assets applicable to Common shares, divided by Common shares outstanding) | $ | 15.43 | $ | 14.89 | $ | 14.56 | $ | 14.54 | |||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares consist of: | |||||||||||||
Common shares, $.01 par value per share | $ | 64,421 | $ | 126,654 | $ | 57,331 | $ | 234,803 | |||||
Paid-in surplus | 89,211,338 | 175,788,190 | 77,894,732 | 334,306,843 | |||||||||
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income | 1,478,237 | 3,246,426 | 1,427,661 | 5,739,396 | |||||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) | 366,237 | (1,415,281 | ) | (963,537 | ) | (10,888,345 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 8,278,327 | 10,903,004 | 5,070,033 | 12,021,936 | |||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares | $ | 99,398,560 | $ | 188,648,993 | $ | 83,486,220 | $ | 341,414,633 | |||||
Authorized shares: | |||||||||||||
Common | 200,000,000 | 200,000,000 | Unlimited | Unlimited | |||||||||
Auction Rate Preferred | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | Unlimited | Unlimited | |||||||||
MuniFund Term Preferred | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Variable Rate Demand Preferred | Unlimited | — | — | — |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
60 Nuveen Investments
California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments, at value (cost $309,617,366, $471,099,574, $323,952,023 and $118,056,528, respectively) | $ | 321,152,766 | $ | 477,940,468 | $ | 338,759,191 | $ | 121,060,232 | |||||
Cash | — | — | 3,336,889 | 1,884,896 | |||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||
Interest | 4,482,594 | 7,577,989 | 4,231,830 | 1,485,742 | |||||||||
Investments sold | 4,950,984 | 12,510,114 | 390,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||
Deferred offering costs | — | 1,430,299 | — | 498,078 | |||||||||
Other assets | 83,529 | 132,307 | 86,005 | 30,412 | |||||||||
Total assets | 330,669,873 | 499,591,177 | 346,803,915 | 125,259,360 | |||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Cash overdraft | 1,644,746 | 6,929,296 | — | — | |||||||||
Floating rate obligations | 11,390,000 | 3,845,000 | 7,385,000 | 3,360,000 | |||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||
Auction Rate Preferred share dividends | 1,970 | 7,055 | 5,977 | — | |||||||||
Common share dividends | 1,143,905 | 1,738,377 | 1,151,963 | 381,662 | |||||||||
Interest | — | 212,031 | — | — | |||||||||
Offering costs | — | 314,240 | — | 81,639 | |||||||||
MuniFund Term Preferred shares, at liquidation value | — | 86,250,000 | — | — | |||||||||
Variable Rate Demand Preferred shares, at liquidation value | — | — | — | 35,500,000 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses: | |||||||||||||
Management fees | 159,882 | 223,550 | 154,569 | 58,386 | |||||||||
Other | 132,908 | 162,920 | 145,353 | 9,328 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | 14,473,411 | 99,682,469 | 8,842,862 | 39,391,015 | |||||||||
Auction Rate Preferred shares, at liquidation value | 93,775,000 | 69,500,000 | 103,750,000 | — | |||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares | $ | 222,421,462 | $ | 330,408,708 | $ | 234,211,053 | $ | 85,868,345 | |||||
Common shares outstanding | 14,746,722 | 24,123,725 | 15,256,178 | 5,887,263 | |||||||||
Net asset value per Common share outstanding (net assets applicable to Common shares, divided by Common shares outstanding) | $ | 15.08 | $ | 13.70 | $ | 15.35 | $ | 14.59 | |||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares consist of: | |||||||||||||
Common shares, $.01 par value per share | $ | 147,467 | $ | 241,237 | $ | 152,562 | $ | 58,873 | |||||
Paid-in surplus | 209,634,495 | 342,694,682 | 216,718,484 | 83,086,089 | |||||||||
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income | 3,798,373 | 4,193,072 | 4,029,623 | 735,870 | |||||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) | (2,694,273 | ) | (23,561,177 | ) | (1,496,784 | ) | (1,016,191 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 11,535,400 | 6,840,894 | 14,807,168 | 3,003,704 | |||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares | $ | 222,421,462 | $ | 330,408,708 | $ | 234,211,053 | $ | 85,868,345 | |||||
Authorized shares: | |||||||||||||
Common | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | |||||||||
Auction Rate Preferred | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | |||||||||
MuniFund Term Preferred | — | Unlimited | — | — | |||||||||
Variable Rate Demand Preferred | — | — | — | Unlimited |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 61
Statement of | |
Operations | |
Six Months Ended August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | California Premium Income (NCU) | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | ||||||||||
Investment Income | $ | 3,699,701 | $ | 6,978,564 | $ | 3,289,135 | $ | 13,517,994 | |||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||
Management fees | 452,399 | 869,914 | 387,014 | 1,576,291 | |||||||||
Auction fees | 7,804 | 56,034 | 25,994 | 102,479 | |||||||||
Dividend disbursing agent fees | — | 10,082 | 5,041 | 10,082 | |||||||||
Shareholders’ servicing agent fees and expenses | 3,512 | 5,691 | 2,558 | 1,971 | |||||||||
Interest expense and amortization of offering costs | 86,339 | 63,137 | 22,179 | 103,232 | |||||||||
Liquidity fees | 193,040 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Custodian’s fees and expenses | 14,637 | 26,003 | 14,137 | 47,265 | |||||||||
Directors’/Trustees’ fees and expenses | 1,784 | 3,179 | 1,438 | 5,862 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 7,109 | 11,761 | 6,842 | 12,562 | |||||||||
Shareholders’ reports – printing and mailing expenses | 20,300 | 33,719 | 18,021 | 44,862 | |||||||||
Stock exchange listing fees | 4,572 | 4,572 | 402 | 4,572 | |||||||||
Investor relations expense | 5,198 | 9,402 | 4,569 | 14,886 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 6,105 | 4,049 | 6,548 | 14,937 | |||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee credit and expense reimbursement | 802,799 | 1,097,543 | 494,743 | 1,939,001 | |||||||||
Custodian fee credit | (405 | ) | (418 | ) | (431 | ) | (523 | ) | |||||
Expense reimbursement | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Net expenses | 802,394 | 1,097,125 | 494,312 | 1,938,478 | |||||||||
Net investment income | 2,897,307 | 5,881,439 | 2,794,823 | 11,579,516 | |||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investments | 176,646 | 3,806,738 | 26,464 | 3,923,725 | |||||||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 4,141,597 | 7,381,190 | 4,607,116 | 10,722,505 | |||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 4,318,243 | 11,187,928 | 4,633,580 | 14,646,230 | |||||||||
Distributions to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders | |||||||||||||
From net investment income | (25,864 | ) | (155,104 | ) | (72,453 | ) | (282,064 | ) | |||||
Decrease in net assets applicable to Common shares from distributions to Auction Rate Preferred shareholders | (25,864 | ) | (155,104 | ) | (72,453 | ) | (282,064 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares from operations | $ | 7,189,686 | $ | 16,914,263 | $ | 7,355,950 | $ | 25,943,682 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
62 Nuveen Investments
California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||
Investment Income | $ | 8,950,272 | $ | 13,775,904 | $ | 9,011,131 | $ | 3,159,614 | |||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||
Management fees | 1,024,129 | 1,571,722 | 1,082,753 | 392,443 | |||||||||
Auction fees | 70,910 | 52,554 | 78,868 | 18,144 | |||||||||
Dividend disbursing agent fees | 10,082 | 10,082 | 10,082 | — | |||||||||
Shareholders’ servicing agent fees and expenses | 859 | 1,452 | 913 | 495 | |||||||||
Interest expense and amortization of offering costs | 34,516 | 1,526,716 | 27,162 | 290,782 | |||||||||
Liquidity fees | — | — | — | 147,173 | |||||||||
Custodian’s fees and expenses | 29,967 | 42,840 | 30,382 | 12,472 | |||||||||
Directors’/Trustees’ fees and expenses | 3,888 | 5,931 | 4,148 | 2,105 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 11,267 | 16,423 | 12,343 | 6,792 | |||||||||
Shareholders’ reports – printing and mailing expenses | 30,218 | 47,130 | 34,406 | 16,938 | |||||||||
Stock exchange listing fees | 1,036 | 1,694 | 1,071 | 414 | |||||||||
Investor relations expense | 10,567 | 14,917 | 10,801 | 4,208 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 13,631 | 11,065 | 6,950 | 15,578 | |||||||||
Total expenses before custodian fee credit and expense reimbursement | 1,241,070 | 3,302,526 | 1,299,879 | 907,544 | |||||||||
Custodian fee credit | (138 | ) | (285 | ) | (387 | ) | (610 | ) | |||||
Expense reimbursement | (95,692 | ) | (253,633 | ) | (188,016 | ) | (49,407 | ) | |||||
Net expenses | 1,145,240 | 3,048,608 | 1,111,476 | 857,527 | |||||||||
Net investment income | 7,805,032 | 10,727,296 | 7,899,655 | 2,302,087 | |||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investments | 296,316 | (1,087,594 | ) | 93,037 | 105,652 | ||||||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 7,863,953 | 13,852,120 | 9,118,059 | 3,222,481 | |||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 8,160,269 | 12,764,526 | 9,211,096 | 3,328,133 | |||||||||
Distributions to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders | |||||||||||||
From net investment income | (196,473 | ) | (145,520 | ) | (218,750 | ) | — | ||||||
Decrease in net assets applicable to Common shares from distributions to Auction Rate Preferred shareholders | (196,473 | ) | (145,520 | ) | (218,750 | ) | — | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares from operations | $ | 15,768,828 | $ | 23,346,302 | $ | 16,892,001 | $ | 5,630,220 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 63
Statement of | |
Changes in Net Assets (Unaudited) |
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | California Premium Income (NCU) | |||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||||||
Operations | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 2,897,307 | $ | 6,202,024 | $ | 5,881,439 | $ | 12,393,332 | $ | 2,794,823 | $ | 5,420,568 | |||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from: | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments | 176,646 | 208,253 | 3,806,738 | 905,377 | 26,464 | 771,424 | |||||||||||||
Forward swaps | — | — | — | 2,508,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation | |||||||||||||||||||
(depreciation) of: | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments | 4,141,597 | 3,266,189 | 7,381,190 | 10,832,050 | 4,607,116 | 5,758,190 | |||||||||||||
Forward swaps | — | — | — | (1,751,141 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
Distributions to Auction Rate Preferred | |||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders: | |||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | (25,864 | ) | (160,577 | ) | (155,104 | ) | (280,372 | ) | (72,453 | ) | (196,230 | ) | |||||||
From accumulated net realized gains | — | (125,550 | ) | — | (219,424 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares from operations | 7,189,686 | 9,390,339 | 16,914,263 | 24,387,822 | 7,355,950 | 11,753,952 | |||||||||||||
Distributions to Common Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | (2,734,685 | ) | (4,841,052 | ) | (5,470,727 | ) | (9,927,691 | ) | (2,450,895 | ) | (4,156,357 | ) | |||||||
Decrease in net assets applicable to Common shares from distributions to Common shareholders | (2,734,685 | ) | (4,841,052 | ) | (5,470,727 | ) | (9,927,691 | ) | (2,450,895 | ) | (4,156,357 | ) | |||||||
Capital Share Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||
Common shares: | |||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 36,242 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Repurchased and retired | — | (137,066 | ) | — | (122,212 | ) | — | (276,239 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares from capital share transactions | — | (137,066 | ) | 36,242 | (122,212 | ) | — | (276,239 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares | 4,455,001 | 4,412,221 | 11,479,778 | 14,337,919 | 4,905,055 | 7,321,356 | |||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares at the beginning of period | 94,943,559 | 90,531,338 | 177,169,215 | 162,831,296 | 78,581,165 | 71,259,809 | |||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares at the end of period | $ | 99,398,560 | $ | 94,943,559 | $ | 188,648,993 | $ | 177,169,215 | $ | 83,486,220 | $ | 78,581,165 | |||||||
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income at the end of period | $ | 1,478,237 | $ | 1,341,479 | $ | 3,246,426 | $ | 2,990,818 | $ | 1,427,661 | $ | 1,156,186 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
64 Nuveen Investments
California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | |||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||||||
Operations | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 11,579,516 | $ | 23,628,358 | $ | 7,805,032 | $ | 15,761,479 | $ | 10,727,296 | $ | 23,612,940 | |||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from: | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments | 3,923,725 | 1,654,622 | 296,316 | (224,116 | ) | (1,087,594 | ) | (1,481,783 | ) | ||||||||||
Forward swaps | — | — | — | — | — | (1,938,000 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation | |||||||||||||||||||
(depreciation) of: | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments | 10,722,505 | 36,206,667 | 7,863,953 | 21,083,029 | 13,852,120 | 37,608,511 | |||||||||||||
Forward swaps | — | — | — | — | — | 2,841,843 | |||||||||||||
Distributions to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders: | |||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | (282,064 | ) | (466,845 | ) | (196,473 | ) | (520,453 | ) | (145,520 | ) | (747,503 | ) | |||||||
From accumulated net realized gains | — | (387,199 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares from operations | 25,943,682 | 60,635,603 | 15,768,828 | 36,099,939 | 23,346,302 | 59,896,008 | |||||||||||||
Distributions to Common Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||
From net investment income | (10,319,572 | ) | (19,065,967 | ) | (7,034,186 | ) | (12,903,633 | ) | (10,854,389 | ) | (20,091,489 | ) | |||||||
Decrease in net assets applicable to Common shares from distributions to Common shareholders | (10,319,572 | ) | (19,065,967 | ) | (7,034,186 | ) | (12,903,633 | ) | (10,854,389 | ) | (20,091,489 | ) | |||||||
Capital Share Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||
Common shares: | |||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | — | — | — | — | 56,651 | — | |||||||||||||
Repurchased and retired | — | — | — | (333,589 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares from capital share transactions | — | — | — | (333,589 | ) | 56,651 | — | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares | 15,624,110 | 41,569,636 | 8,734,642 | 22,862,717 | 12,548,564 | 39,804,519 | |||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares at the beginning of period | 325,790,523 | 284,220,887 | 213,686,820 | 190,824,103 | 317,860,144 | 278,055,625 | |||||||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares at the end of period | $ | 341,414,633 | $ | 325,790,523 | $ | 222,421,462 | $ | 213,686,820 | $ | 330,408,708 | $ | 317,860,144 | |||||||
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income at the end of period | $ | 5,739,396 | $ | 4,761,516 | $ | 3,798,373 | $ | 3,224,000 | $ | 4,193,072 | $ | 4,465,685 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 65
Statement of | |
Changes in Net Assets (Unaudited) (continued) |
Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||
Operations | |||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 7,899,655 | $ | 16,095,615 | $ | 2,302,087 | $ | 5,027,504 | |||||
Net realized gain (loss) from: | |||||||||||||
Investments | 93,037 | 53,877 | 105,652 | (4,642 | ) | ||||||||
Forward swaps | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation | |||||||||||||
(depreciation) of: | |||||||||||||
Investments | 9,118,059 | 15,219,178 | 3,222,481 | 6,385,845 | |||||||||
Forward swaps | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Distributions to Auction Rate Preferred | |||||||||||||
Shareholders: | |||||||||||||
From net investment income | (218,750 | ) | (548,107 | ) | — | — | |||||||
From accumulated net realized gains | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares from operations | 16,892,001 | 30,820,563 | 5,630,220 | 11,408,707 | |||||||||
Distributions to Common Shareholders | |||||||||||||
From net investment income | (7,024,373 | ) | (12,835,656 | ) | (2,348,820 | ) | (4,491,527 | ) | |||||
Decrease in net assets applicable to Common shares from distributions to Common shareholders | (7,024,373 | ) | (12,835,656 | ) | (2,348,820 | ) | (4,491,527 | ) | |||||
Capital Share Transactions | |||||||||||||
Common shares: | |||||||||||||
Net proceeds from shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | 42,871 | — | 8,413 | — | |||||||||
Repurchased and retired | — | (151,512 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares from capital share transactions | 42,871 | (151,512 | ) | 8,413 | — | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares | 9,910,499 | 17,833,395 | 3,289,813 | 6,917,180 | |||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares at the beginning of period | 224,300,554 | 206,467,159 | 82,578,532 | 75,661,352 | |||||||||
Net assets applicable to Common shares at the end of period | $ | 234,211,053 | $ | 224,300,554 | $ | 85,868,345 | $ | 82,578,532 | |||||
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income at the end of period | $ | 4,029,623 | $ | 3,373,091 | $ | 735,870 | $ | 782,603 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
66 Nuveen Investments
Statement of | |
Cash Flows | |
Six Months Ended August 31, 2010 (Unaudited) |
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) In Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares from Operations | $ | 7,189,686 | $ | 23,346,302 | $ | 5,630,220 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile the net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common shares from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||||
Purchases of investments | (5,926,979 | ) | (51,473,918 | ) | (10,429,041 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments | 10,165,438 | 64,378,348 | 8,974,794 | |||||||
Proceeds from (Purchases of) short-term investments, net | — | — | 3,000,000 | |||||||
Amortization (Accretion) of premiums and discounts, net | 198,315 | (689,514 | ) | (168,947 | ) | |||||
(Increase) Decrease in receivable for interest | (167,732 | ) | (26,095 | ) | 15,014 | |||||
(Increase) Decrease in receivable for investments sold | 7,057,650 | (11,506,964 | ) | (300,000 | ) | |||||
(Increase) Decrease in other assets | (34,044 | ) | 5,601 | (29,975 | ) | |||||
Increase (Decrease) in payable for investments purchased | (6,185,626 | ) | — | — | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in payable for Auction Rate Preferred share dividends | (2,160 | ) | (385 | ) | — | |||||
Increase (Decrease) in payable for interest | — | 52,851 | — | |||||||
Increase (Decrease) in accrued management fees | 8,976 | 46,634 | 6,205 | |||||||
Increase (Decrease) in accrued other liabilities | (10,747 | ) | (19,862 | ) | (3,875 | ) | ||||
Net realized (gain) loss from investments | (176,646 | ) | 1,087,594 | (105,652 | ) | |||||
Change in net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation of investments | (4,141,597 | ) | (13,852,120 | ) | (3,222,481 | ) | ||||
Taxes paid on undistributed capital gains | (91 | ) | (49 | ) | — | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 7,974,443 | 11,348,423 | 3,366,262 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | ||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in cash overdraft balance | (2,516,093 | ) | 6,570,572 | — | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in floating rate obligations | — | (7,255,000 | ) | — | ||||||
Cash distributions paid to Common shareholders | (2,685,660 | ) | (10,799,381 | ) | (2,334,468 | ) | ||||
(Increase) Decrease in deferred offering costs | (844,923 | ) | 166,146 | 8,539 | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in payable for offering costs | 372,233 | (30,760 | ) | 81,639 | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Auction Rate Preferred shares, at liquidation value | (45,000,000 | ) | — | — | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Variable Rate Demand Preferred shares, at liquidation value | 42,700,000 | — | — | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (7,974,443 | ) | (11,348,423 | ) | (2,244,290 | ) | ||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash | — | — | 1,121,972 | |||||||
Cash at the beginning of period | — | — | 762,924 | |||||||
Cash at the End of Period | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,884,896 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information | ||||||||||
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest (excluding amortization of offering costs, where applicable) | $ | 74,263 | $ | 1,148,538 | $ | 82,230 |
Non-cash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestments of Common share distributions of $56,651 and $8,413 for California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX), respectively.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 67
Notes to | |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
1. General Information and Significant Accounting Policies
The funds covered in this report and their corresponding Common share stock exchange symbols are Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc. (NPC), Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc. (NCL), Nuveen California Premium Income Municipal Fund (NCU), Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (NAC), Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 (NVX), Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 (NZH), Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund (NKL) and Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund (NKX) (collectively, the “Funds”). Common shares of Insured California Premium Income (NPC), Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) and California Dividend Advantage (NAC) are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) while C ommon shares of California Premium Income (NCU), California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX), California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH), Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) are traded on the NYSE Amex. The Funds are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as closed-end management investment companies.
Each Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from both regular federal and California state income taxes, and in the case of Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) the alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals, by investing primarily in a portfolio of municipal obligations issued by state and local government authorities within the state of California or certain U.S. territories.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
Investment Valuation
Prices of fixed-income securities and forward swap contracts are provided by a pricing service approved by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees. These securities are generally classified as Level 2. Fixed-income securities and forward swap contracts are valued by a pricing service that values portfolio securities at the mean between the quoted bid and ask prices or the yield equivalent when quotations are readily available. Securities for which quotations are not readily available (which is usually the case for municipal securities) are valued at fair value as determined by the pricing service using methods that may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated c ash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. The pricing service may employ electronic data processing techniques and/or a matrix system to determine valuations. In pricing certain securities, particularly less liquid and lower quality securities, the pricing service may consider information provided by Nuveen Asset Management (the “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (“Nuveen”) in establishing a fair valuation for the security. These securities are generally classified as Level 2.
Temporary investments in securities that have variable rate and demand features qualifying them as short-term investments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. These securities are generally classified as Level 1.
Certain securities may not be able to be priced by the pre-established pricing methods as described above. Such securities may be valued by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees or its designee at fair value. These securities generally include, but are not limited to, restricted securities (securities which may not be publicly sold without registration under the Securities Act) for which a pricing service is unable to provide a market price; securities whose trading has been formally suspended; fixed-income securities that have gone into default and for which there is no current market quotation; a security whose market price is not available from a pre-established pricing source; a security with respect to which an event has occurred that is likely to materially affect the value of the security after the market has closed but before the cal culation of a Fund’s net asset value (as may be the case in non-U.S. markets on which the security is primarily traded) or make it difficult or impossible to obtain a reliable market quotation; and a security whose price, as provided by the pricing service, is not deemed to reflect the security’s fair value. As a general principle, the fair value of an issue of securities would appear to be the amount that the owner might reasonably expect to receive for them in a current sale. A variety of factors may be considered in determining the fair value of these securities, which may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. These securities are generally classifi ed as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the priority of the significant inputs. Regardless of the method employed to value a particular security, all valuations are subject to review by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees or its designee.
Refer to Footnote 2 – Fair Value Measurements for further details on the leveling of securities held by the Funds as of the end of the reporting period.
68 Nuveen Investments
Investment Transactions
Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from transactions are determined on the specific identification method. Investments purchased on a when-issued/delayed delivery basis may have extended settlement periods. Any investments so purchased are subject to market fluctuation during this period. The Funds have instructed the custodian to segregate assets with a current value at least equal to the amount of the when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments. At August 31, 2010, there were no such outstanding purchase commitments in any of the Funds.
Investment Income
Interest income, which includes the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts for financial reporting purposes, is recorded on an accrual basis. Investment income also includes paydown gains and losses, if any.
Income Taxes
Each Fund is a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net capital gains to shareholders and to otherwise comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. Furthermore, each Fund intends to satisfy conditions that will enable interest from municipal securities, which is exempt from regular federal and California state income taxes, and in the case of Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) the alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals, to retain such tax-exempt status when distributed to shareholders of the Funds. Net realized capital gains and ordinary income distributions paid by the Funds are subject to federal taxati on.
For all open tax years and all major taxing jurisdictions, management of the Funds has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Open tax years are those that are open for examination by taxing authorities (i.e., generally the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then). Furthermore, management of the Funds is also not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders
Dividends from tax-exempt net investment income are declared monthly. Net realized capital gains and/or market discount from investment transactions, if any, are distributed to shareholders at least annually. Furthermore, capital gains are distributed only to the extent they exceed available capital loss carryforwards.
Distributions to Common shareholders of tax-exempt net investment income, net realized capital gains and/or market discount, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount and timing of distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP.
Auction Rate Preferred Shares
The following Funds have issued and outstanding Auction Rate Preferred Shares (“ARPS”), $25,000 stated value per share, which approximates market value, as a means of effecting financial leverage. Each Fund’s ARPS are issued in one or more Series. The dividend rate paid by the Funds on each Series is determined every seven days, pursuant to a dutch auction process overseen by the auction agent, and is payable at the end of each rate period. As of August 31, 2010, the number of ARPS outstanding, by Series and in total, for each Fund is as follows:
Insured | Insured | ||||||||||||||||||
California | California | California | California | California | California | ||||||||||||||
Premium | Premium | Dividend | Dividend | Dividend | Dividend | ||||||||||||||
Income 2 | Income | Advantage | Advantage 2 | Advantage 3 | Advantage | ||||||||||||||
(NCL) | (NCU) | (NAC) | (NVX) | (NZH) | (NKL) | ||||||||||||||
Number of shares: | |||||||||||||||||||
Series M | — | 1,375 | — | 1,875 | 1,389 | — | |||||||||||||
Series T | 1,467 | — | — | — | — | 2,075 | |||||||||||||
Series TH | 1,466 | — | 2,710 | — | 1,391 | — | |||||||||||||
Series F | — | — | 2,711 | 1,876 | — | 2,075 | |||||||||||||
Total | 2,933 | 1,375 | 5,421 | 3,751 | 2,780 | 4,150 |
Nuveen Investments 69
Notes to | |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued) |
Beginning in February 2008, more shares for sale were submitted in the regularly scheduled auctions for the ARPS issued by the Funds than there were offers to buy. This meant that these auctions “failed to clear,’’ and that many ARPS shareholders who wanted to sell their shares in these auctions were unable to do so. ARPS shareholders unable to sell their shares received distributions at the “maximum rate’’ applicable to failed auctions as calculated in accordance with the pre-established terms of the ARPS. As of August 31, 2010, the aggregate amount of outstanding ARPS redeemed by each Fund is as follows:
Insured | Insured | ||||||||||||
California | California | California | California | ||||||||||
Premium | Premium | Premium | Dividend | ||||||||||
Income | Income 2 | Income | Advantage | ||||||||||
(NPC) | (NCL) | (NCU) | (NAC) | ||||||||||
ARPS redeemed, at liquidation value | $ | 45,000,000 | $ | 21,675,000 | $ | 8,625,000 | $ | 39,475,000 | |||||
Insured | Insured | ||||||||||||
California | California | California | California | ||||||||||
Dividend | Dividend | Dividend | Tax-Free | ||||||||||
Advantage 2 | Advantage 3 | Advantage | Advantage | ||||||||||
(NVX) | (NZH) | (NKL) | (NKX) | ||||||||||
ARPS redeemed, at liquidation value | $ | 16,225,000 | $ | 117,500,000 | $ | 14,250,000 | $ | 45,000,000 |
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares
California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) has issued and outstanding $86,250,000, of 2.95%, Series 2015 MuniFund Term Preferred (“MTP”) Shares, with a $10 stated value per share. Proceeds from the issuance of MTP Shares, net of offering expenses, were used to redeem a portion of the Fund’s outstanding ARPS. Dividends, which are recognized as interest expense for financial reporting purposes, are paid monthly at a fixed annual rate of 2.95%, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
The Fund is obligated to redeem its MTP Shares on January 1, 2015, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased by the Fund. MTP Shares are subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. As of January 1, 2011, the MTP Shares will be subject to redemption at the option of the Fund, subject to payment of a premium until December 31, 2011, and at par thereafter. The MTP Shares also will be subject to redemption, at the option of the Fund, at par in the event of certain changes in the credit rating of the MTP Shares. The Fund may be obligated to redeem certain of the MTP Shares if the Fund fails to maintain certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements and such failures are not cured by the applicable cure date. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpa id dividends. The MTP Shares trade on NYSE under the ticker symbol “NZH Pr C.”
During the six months ended August 31, 2010, California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) had an average liquidation value of $86,250,000 MTP Shares outstanding.
For financial reporting purposes only, the liquidation value of MTP Shares is recorded as a liability on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Unpaid dividends on MTP Shares are recognized as “Interest payable” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends paid on MTP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.
Net amounts earned by Nuveen as underwriter of the Fund’s MTP Share offering were recorded as reductions of offering costs recognized by the Fund. For the six months ended August 31, 2010, the net amount earned by California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) was $6,122.
Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) have issued and outstanding 427 Series 1 and 355 Series 2 Variable Rate Demand Preferred (“VRDP”) Shares, $100,000 liquidation value per share, respectively.
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) issued its 427 Series 1 VRDP Shares in a privately negotiated offering in March 2010.
Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) issued its 355 Series 1 VRDP Shares in a privately negotiated offering in August 2008. Concurrent with renewing agreements with the liquidity provider for its VRDP Shares in June 2010. Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) exchanged all its 355 Series 1 VRDP Shares for 355 Series 2 VRDP Shares. The principal difference in terms between Series 1 and Series 2 VRDP Shares is the requirement that the Fund redeem VRDP Shares owned by the liquidity provider if the VRDP Shares have been owned by the liquidity provider through six months of continuous, unsuccessful remarketing. Proceeds of each Fund’s offering were used to redeem a portion of each Fund’s outstanding ARPS. The VRDP Shares were offered to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and hav e a maturity date of March 1, 2040, for Insured California Premium Income (NPC) and June 1, 2040, for Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX).
VRDP Shares include a liquidity feature that allows VRDP shareholders to have their shares purchased by a liquidity provider with whom the Fund has contracted in the event that purchase orders for VRDP Shares in a remarketing are not sufficient in number to be matched with the sale orders in that remarketing. Each Fund is required to redeem any VRDP Shares that are still owned by the liquidity provider after six months of continuous, unsuccessful remarketing.
70 Nuveen Investments
Dividends on the VRDP Shares (which are treated as interest payments for financial reporting purposes) are set weekly at a rate established by a remarketing agent; therefore, the market value of the VRDP Shares is expected to approximate its liquidation value. If remarketing for VRDP Shares is continuously unsuccessful for six months, the maximum rate is designed to escalate according to a specified schedule in order to enhance the remarketing agent’s ability to successfully remarket the VRDP Shares.
Subject to certain conditions, VRDP Shares may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time at the option of the Fund. The Fund may also redeem certain of the VRDP Shares if the Fund fails to maintain certain asset coverage requirements and such failures are not cured by the applicable cure date. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends.
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) had all $42,700,000 of its VRDP Shares issued and outstanding during the period March 31, 2010 through August 31, 2010, with an annualized dividend rate of 0.21%. Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) had all $35,500,000 of its VRDP Shares outstanding during the six months ended August 31, 2010, with an annualized dividend rate of 0.19%.
For financial reporting purposes only, the liquidation value of VRDP Shares is recognized as a liability on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Unpaid dividends on VRDP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest payable” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends paid on the VRDP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations. In addition to interest expense, each Fund also pays a per annum liquidity fee to the liquidity provider, which is recognized as “Liquidity fees” on the Statement of Operations.
Insurance
During the period March 1, 2010 through May 2, 2010, except to the extent that Insured California Premium Income (NPC) invests in temporary investments, all of the net assets (as defined in Footnote 7 – Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates) of the Fund were invested in municipal securities that were covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest or backed by an escrow or trust account containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities to ensure timely payment of principal and interest. Insurers had a claims paying ability rated “Aaa” by Moody’s or “AAA” by Standard & Poor’s. Municipal securities backed by an escrow account or trust account did not constitute more than 20% of the Fund’s net assets.
Under normal circumstances, and during the period March 1, 2010 through May 2, 2010, Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL), Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) invested at least 80% of their net assets (as defined in Footnote 7 – Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates) in municipal securities that were covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. For purposes of this 80%, insurers had a claims paying ability rated at least “A” at the time of purchase by at least one independent rating agency. In addition, each of Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL), Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) invested at least 80% of their net assets in municipal securities that were r ated at least “BBB” at the time of purchase (based on the higher of the rating of the insurer, if any, or the underlying security) by at least one independent rating agency, or are unrated but judged to be of similar credit quality by the Adviser, or are backed by an escrow or trust account containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities or U.S. Treasury-issued State and Local Government Series securities to ensure timely payment of principal and interest. Inverse floating rate securities whose underlying bonds are covered by insurance were included for purposes of this 80%. Each of Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL), Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) also invested up to 20% of its net assets in municipal securities rated at least “BBB” (based on the higher rating of the insurer, if any, or the underlying bond) or are unrated but judged to be of comparable quality by the Adviser.
On May 3, 2010, the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees approved changes to Insured California Premium Income’s (NPC), Insured California Premium Income 2’s (NCL), Insured California Dividend Advantage’s (NKL) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage’s (NKX) insurance investment policies in response to the continuing challenges faced by municipal bond insurers. The changes to Insured California Premium Income (NPC), Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL), Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage’s (NKX) investment policies are intended to increase the Funds’ investment flexibility in pursuing their investment objective, while retaining the insured nature of their portfolios.
The changes, which were effective immediately, provide that under normal circumstances, Insured California Premium Income (NPC), Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL), Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) invest at least 80% of their managed assets in municipal securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest. In addition, the municipal securities in which Insured California Premium Income (NPC), Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL), Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) invests will be investment grade at the time of purchase (including (i) bonds insured by investment grade insurers or rated investment grade; (ii) unrated bonds that are judged to be investment grade by the Adviser; and (iii) escrowed bonds). Ratings below BBB by one or more national rating agencies are considered to be below investment grade.
Each insured municipal security is covered by Original Issue Insurance, Secondary Market Insurance or Portfolio Insurance. Such insurance does not guarantee the market value of the municipal securities or the value of the Funds’ Common shares. Original Issue Insurance and Secondary Market Insurance remain in effect as long as the municipal securities covered thereby remain outstanding and the insurer remains in business, regardless of whether the Funds ultimately dispose of such municipal securities. Consequently, the market value of the municipal securities covered by Original Issue Insurance or Secondary Market Insurance may reflect value attributable to the insurance. Portfolio Insurance, in contrast, is effective only while the municipal securities are held by the Funds and is reflected as an expense over the term of the policy, when appl icable. Accordingly, neither the
Nuveen Investments 71
Notes to | |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued) |
prices used in determining the market value of the underlying municipal securities nor the Common share net asset value of the Funds include value, if any, attributable to the Portfolio Insurance. Each policy of the Portfolio Insurance does, however, give the Funds the right to obtain permanent insurance with respect to the municipal security covered by the Portfolio Insurance policy at the time of its sale.
Inverse Floating Rate Securities
Each Fund is authorized to invest in inverse floating rate securities. An inverse floating rate security is created by depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose trust created by a broker-dealer. In turn, this trust (a) issues floating rate certificates, in face amounts equal to some fraction of the deposited bond’s par amount or market value, that typically pay short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties, and (b) issues to a long-term investor (such as one of the Funds) an inverse floating rate certificate (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) that represents all remaining or residual interest in the trust. The income received by the inverse floater holder varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to the floating rate certificates’ holders, and in most circumstances the inverse floater holder bears substantially all of the underlying bond’s downside investment risk and also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the underlying bond’s value. The price of an inverse floating rate security will be more volatile than that of the underlying bond because the interest rate is dependent on not only the fixed coupon rate of the underlying bond but also on the short-term interest paid on the floating rate certificates, and because the inverse floating rate security essentially bears the risk of loss of the greater face value of the underlying bond.
A Fund may purchase an inverse floating rate security in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond (referred to as an “externally-deposited inverse floater”), or instead by first selling a fixed-rate bond to a broker-dealer for deposit into the special purpose trust and receiving in turn the residual interest in the trust (referred to as a “self-deposited inverse floater”). The inverse floater held by a Fund gives the Fund the right (a) to cause the holders of the floating rate certificates to tender their notes at par, and (b) to have the broker transfer the fixed-rate bond held by the trust to the Fund, thereby collapsing the trust. An investment in an externally-deposited inverse floater is identified in the Portfolio of Investments as “(IF) – Inverse floating rate investment.R 21; An investment in a self-deposited inverse floater is accounted for as a financing transaction. In such instances, a fixed-rate bond deposited into a special purpose trust is identified in the Portfolio of Investments as “(UB) – Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction,” with the Fund accounting for the short-term floating rate certificates issued by the trust as “Floating rate obligations” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. In addition, the Fund reflects in “Investment Income” the entire earnings of the underlying bond and the related interest paid to the holders of the short-term floating rate certificates is recognized as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.
During the six months ended August 31, 2010, each Fund invested in externally-deposited inverse floaters and/or self-deposited inverse floaters.
Each Fund may also enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements (sometimes referred to as a “recourse trust” or “credit recovery swap”) (such agreements referred to herein as “Recourse Trusts”) with a broker-dealer by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the broker-dealer, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the fixed-rate bond held by the trust and the liquidation value of the floating rate certificates issued by the trust plus any shortfalls in interest cash flows. Under these agreements, a Fund’s potential exposure to losses related to or on inverse floaters may increase beyond the value of a Fund’s inverse floater investments as a Fund may potentially be liable to fulfill all amounts owed to holders of the floating rate certificates. At period end, any such shortfall is recognized as “Unrealized depreciation on Recourse Trusts” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
At August 31, 2010, each Fund’s maximum exposure to externally-deposited Recourse Trusts, is as follows:
Insured | Insured | Insured | Insured | |||||||||||||||||||||
California | California | California | California | California | California | California | California | |||||||||||||||||
Premium | Premium | Premium | Dividend | Dividend | Dividend | Dividend | Tax-Free | |||||||||||||||||
Income | Income 2 | Income | Advantage | Advantage 2 | Advantage 3 | Advantage | Advantage | |||||||||||||||||
(NPC) | (NCL) | (NCU) | (NAC) | (NVX) | (NZH) | (NKL) | (NKX) | |||||||||||||||||
Maximum exposure to Recourse Trusts | $ | 9,780,000 | $ | 9,515,000 | $ | 6,510,000 | $ | 3,590,000 | $ | 16,210,000 | $ | 69,935,000 | $ | 7,700,000 | $ | 2,905,000 |
The average floating rate obligations outstanding and average annual interest rate and fees related to self-deposited inverse floaters for the following Funds during the six months ended August 31, 2010, were as follows:
Insured | ||||||||||
California | California | California | ||||||||
Premium | Premium | Dividend | ||||||||
Income 2 | Income | Advantage | ||||||||
(NCL) | (NCU) | (NAC) | ||||||||
Average floating rate obligations outstanding | $ | 17,880,000 | $ | 6,650,000 | $ | 28,545,000 | ||||
Average annual interest rate and fees | 0.70 | % | 0.66 | % | 0.72 | % |
72 Nuveen Investments
Insured | Insured | ||||||||||||
California | California | California | California | ||||||||||
Dividend | Dividend | Dividend | Tax-Free | ||||||||||
Advantage 2 | Advantage 3 | Advantage | Advantage | ||||||||||
(NVX) | (NZH) | (NKL) | (NKX) | ||||||||||
Average floating rate obligations outstanding | $ | 9,836,875 | $ | 10,902,853 | $ | 7,385,000 | $ | 3,360,000 | |||||
Average annual interest rate and fees | 0.70 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.73 | % | 0.89 | % |
Forward Swap Contracts
Each Fund is authorized to enter into forward interest rate swap contracts consistent with their investment objectives and policies to reduce, increase or otherwise alter its risk profile or to alter its portfolio characteristics (i.e. duration, yield curve positioning and credit quality).
Each Fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Each Fund’s use of forward interest rate swap transactions is intended to help the Fund manage its overall interest rate sensitivity, either shorter or longer, generally to more closely align the Fund’s interest rate sensitivity with that of the broader municipal market. Forward interest rate swap transactions involve each Fund’s agreement with a counterparty to pay, in the future, a fixed or variable rate payment in exchange for the counterparty paying the Fund a variable or fixed rate payment, the accruals for which would begin at a specified date in the future (the “effective date”). The amount of the payment obligation is based on the notional amount of the swap contract and the termination date of the swap (which is akin to a bond’s maturity). The value of the Fund’s swap commitment would increase or decrease based primarily on the extent to which long-term interest rates for bonds having a maturity of the swap’s termination date increases or decreases. Forward interest rate swap contracts are valued daily. The net amount recorded on these transactions for each counterparty is recognized on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a component of “Unrealized appreciation or depreciation on forward swaps” with the change during the fiscal period recognized on the Statement of Operations as a component of “Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of forward swaps.”
Each Fund may terminate a swap contract prior to the effective date, at which point a realized gain or loss is recognized. When a forward swap is terminated, it ordinarily does not involve the delivery of securities or other underlying assets or principal, but rather is settled in cash on a net basis. Net realized gains and losses during the fiscal period are recognized on the Statement of Operations as a component of “Net realized gain (loss) from forward swaps.” Each Fund intends, but is not obligated, to terminate its forward swaps before the effective date. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to the swap counterparty on such transactions is limited to the credit risk associated with a counterparty failing to honor its commitment to pay any realized gain to the Fund upon termination. The Funds did not invest in forward interes t rate swap transactions during the six months ended August 31, 2010.
Market and Counterparty Credit Risk
In the normal course of business each Fund may invest in financial instruments and enter into financial transactions where risk of potential loss exists due to changes in the market (market risk) or failure of the other party to the transaction to perform (counterparty credit risk). The potential loss could exceed the value of the financial assets recorded on the financial statements. Financial assets, which potentially expose each Fund to counterparty credit risk, consist principally of cash due from counterparties on forward, option and swap transactions, when applicable. The extent of each Fund’s exposure to counterparty credit risk in respect to these financial assets approximates their carrying value as recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Futures contracts, when applicable, expose a Fund to minimal counterparty credit ri sk as they are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, which is counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Each Fund helps manage counterparty credit risk by entering into agreements only with counterparties the Adviser believes have the financial resources to honor their obligations and by having the Adviser monitor the financial stability of the counterparties. Additionally, counterparties may be required to pledge collateral daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial asset) on behalf of each Fund with a value approximately equal to the amount of any unrealized gain above a pre-determined threshold. Reciprocally, when each Fund has an unrealized loss, the Funds have instructed the custodian to pledge assets of the Funds as collateral with a value approximately equal to the amount of the unrealized loss above a pre-determined threshold. Collateral pledges are monitored and subsequently adjusted if and when the valuations fluctuate, either up or down, by at least the predetermined threshold amount.
Zero Coupon Securities
Each Fund is authorized to invest in zero coupon securities. A zero coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the security. Tax-exempt income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the security at issuance and the par value of the security at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon securities generally are more volatile than the market prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
Offering Costs
Cost incurred by California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) in connection with its offering of MTP Shares ($1,658,750) were recorded as a deferred charge, which will be amortized over the 5-year life of the shares. Costs incurred by Insured California Premium Income (NPC) and Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) in connection with their offerings of VRDP Shares ($857,000 and $530,000, respectively) were recorded as deferred charges which will be amortized over the 30-year life of the shares. Costs incurred by Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) in connection with its
Nuveen Investments 73
Notes to | |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued) |
exchange of Series 1 VRDP Shares for Series 2 VRDP Shares were expensed as incurred. Each Fund’s amortized deferred charges are included as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.
Custodian Fee Credit
Each Fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby certain custodian fees and expenses are reduced by net credits earned on each Fund’s cash on deposit with the bank. Such deposit arrangements are an alternative to overnight investments. Credits for cash balances may be offset by charges for any days on which a Fund overdraws its account at the custodian bank.
Indemnifications
Under the Funds’ organizational documents, their officers and directors/trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Funds enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occurred. However, the Funds have not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expect the risk of loss to be remote.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets applicable to Common shares from operations during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
2. Fair Value Measurements
In determining the value of each Fund’s investments, various inputs are used. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1 – | Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. | |
Level 2 – | Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). | |
Level 3 – | Significant unobservable inputs (including management’s assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The following is a summary of each Fund’s fair value measurements as of August 31, 2010:
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 137,479,863 | $ | — | $ | 137,479,863 | |||||
Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 270,930,901 | $ | — | $ | 270,930,901 | |||||
California Premium Income (NCU) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 119,103,994 | $ | 2,275,825 | $ | 121,379,819 | |||||
California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 494,775,168 | $ | 1,529,452 | $ | 496,304,620 | |||||
California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 320,199,862 | $ | 952,904 | $ | 321,152,766 | |||||
California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 476,370,978 | $ | 1,569,490 | $ | 477,940,468 | |||||
Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 338,759,191 | $ | — | $ | 338,759,191 | |||||
Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 121,060,232 | $ | — | $ | 121,060,232 |
74 Nuveen Investments
The following is a reconciliation of each Fund’s Level 3 investments held at the beginning and end of the measurement period:
California Premium Income (NCU) Level 3 Municipal Bonds | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) Level 3 Municipal Bonds | California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) Level 3 Municipal Bonds | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) Level 3 Municipal Bonds | ||||||||||
Balance at the beginning of period | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Gains (losses): | |||||||||||||
Net realized gains (losses) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Net purchases at cost (sales at proceeds) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Net discounts (premiums) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Net transfers in to (out of) at end of period fair value | 2,275,825 | 1,529,452 | 952,904 | 1,569,490 | |||||||||
Balance at the end of period | $ | 2,275,825 | $ | 1,529,452 | $ | 952,904 | $ | 1,569,490 |
“Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments” presented on the Statement of Operations includes net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to securities classified as Level 3 at period end as follows:
California Premium Income (NCU) | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | ||||||||||
Level 3 net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $ | 223,899 | $ | (147,477 | ) | $ | (91,866 | ) | $ | (151,563 | ) |
3. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Funds record derivative instruments at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized on the Statement of Operations, when applicable. Even though the Funds’ investments in derivatives may represent economic hedges, they are not considered to be hedge transactions for financial reporting purposes. The Funds did not invest in derivative instruments during the six months ended August 31, 2010.
4. Fund Shares
Common Shares
Transactions in Common shares were as follows:
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||
Common shares: | |||||||||||||
Issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 2,552 | — | |||||||||
Repurchased and retired | — | (11,500 | ) | — | (11,700 | ) | |||||||
Weighted average Common share: | |||||||||||||
Price per share repurchased and retired | — | $ | 11.90 | — | $ | 10.43 | |||||||
Discount per share repurchased and retired | — | 16.06 | % | — | 18.03 | % |
California Premium Income (NCU) | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||
Common shares: | |||||||||||||
Issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Repurchased and retired | — | (27,400 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Weighted average Common share: | |||||||||||||
Price per share repurchased and retired | — | $ | 10.06 | — | — | ||||||||
Discount per share repurchased and retired | — | 19.22 | % | — | — |
Nuveen Investments 75
Notes to | |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued) |
California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||
Common shares: | |||||||||||||
Issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 4,291 | — | |||||||||
Repurchased and retired | — | (32,400 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Weighted average Common share: | |||||||||||||
Price per share repurchased and retired | — | $ | 10.28 | — | — | ||||||||
Discount per share repurchased and retired | — | 19.87 | % | — | — |
Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||
Common shares: | |||||||||||||
Issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | 2,873 | — | 596 | — | |||||||||
Repurchased and retired | — | (13,700 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Weighted average Common share: | |||||||||||||
Price per share repurchased and retired | — | $ | 11.04 | — | — | ||||||||
Discount per share repurchased and retired | — | 18.04 | % | — | — |
Preferred Shares
California Dividend Advantage (NAC) did not redeem any of its outstanding ARPS during the six months ended August 31, 2010 or the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010. Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) redeemed all of its outstanding ARPS during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008.
Transactions in ARPS were as follows:
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
ARPS redeemed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series T | 1,800 | $ | 45,000,000 | — | $ | — | 130 | $ | 3,250,000 | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
Series TH | — | — | — | — | 130 | 3,250,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 1,800 | $ | 45,000,000 | — | $ | — | 260 | $ | 6,500,000 | — | $ | — |
California Premium Income (NCU) | California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
ARPS redeemed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series M | — | $ | — | 260 | $ | 6,500,000 | — | $ | — | 325 | $ | 8,125,000 | |||||||||||||
Series F | — | — | — | — | — | — | 324 | 8,100,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | — | $ | — | 260 | $ | 6,500,000 | — | $ | — | 649 | $ | 16,225,000 |
76 Nuveen Investments
California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
ARPS redeemed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series M | — | $ | — | 1,692 | $ | 42,300,000 | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
Series T | — | — | — | — | 90 | 2,250,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Series TH | — | — | 1,691 | 42,275,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Series F | — | — | — | — | 90 | 2,250,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total | — | $ | — | 3,383 | $ | 84,575,000 | 180 | $ | 4,500,000 | — | $ | — |
Transactions in MTP Shares were as follows:
California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | |||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | ||||||||||
MTP Shares issued: | |||||||||||||
Series 2015 | — | $ | — | 8,625,000 | $ | 86,250,000 |
Transactions in VRDP Shares were as follows:
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | |||||||||||||
Six Months Ended 8/31/10 | Year Ended 2/28/10 | ||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | ||||||||||
VRDP Shares issued: | |||||||||||||
Series 1 | 427 | $ | 42,700,000 | — | $ | — |
During the six months ended August 31, 2010, Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) completed a private exchange offer in which all of its 355 Series 1 VRDP Shares were exchanged for 355 Series 2 VRDP Shares.
5. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales (including maturities but excluding short-term investments) during the six months ended August 31, 2010, were as follows:
Insured | Insured | ||||||||||||
California | California | California | California | ||||||||||
Premium | Premium | Premium | Dividend | ||||||||||
Income | Income 2 | Income | Advantage | ||||||||||
(NPC) | (NCL) | (NCU) | (NAC) | ||||||||||
Purchases | $ | 5,926,979 | $ | 48,016,101 | $ | 4,583,311 | $ | 71,718,842 | |||||
Sales and maturities | 10,165,438 | 58,120,454 | 5,837,768 | 73,148,334 |
Insured | Insured | ||||||||||||
California | California | California | California | ||||||||||
Dividend | Dividend | Dividend | Tax-Free | ||||||||||
Advantage 2 | Advantage 3 | Advantage | Advantage | ||||||||||
(NVX) | (NZH) | (NKL) | (NKX) | ||||||||||
Purchases | $ | 11,426,189 | $ | 51,473,918 | $ | 18,595,802 | $ | 10,429,041 | |||||
Sales and maturities | 10,885,491 | 64,378,348 | 24,678,111 | 8,974,794 |
6. Income Tax Information
The following information is presented on an income tax basis. Differences between amounts for financial statement and federal income tax purposes are primarily due to timing differences in recognizing taxable market discount, timing differences in recognizing certain gains and losses on investment transactions and the treatment of investments in inverse floating rate securities reflected as financing transactions, if any. To the extent that differences
Nuveen Investments 77
Notes to | |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued) |
arise that are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities presented in the annual report, based on their federal tax basis treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification. Temporary and permanent differences do not impact the net asset values of the Funds.
At August 31, 2010, the cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | California Premium Income (NCU) | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | ||||||||||
Cost of investments | $ | 129,126,486 | $ | 241,871,661 | $ | 109,562,988 | $ | 455,410,026 | |||||
Gross unrealized: | |||||||||||||
Appreciation | $ | 9,216,684 | $ | 13,137,581 | $ | 7,333,544 | $ | 26,622,808 | |||||
Depreciation | (863,307 | ) | (1,959,080 | ) | (2,169,683 | ) | (14,267,598 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $ | 8,353,377 | $ | 11,178,501 | $ | 5,163,861 | $ | 12,355,210 |
California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||
Cost of investments | $ | 298,195,676 | $ | 467,128,297 | $ | 316,269,919 | $ | 114,664,577 | |||||
Gross unrealized: | |||||||||||||
Appreciation | $ | 19,517,740 | $ | 21,846,093 | $ | 19,689,826 | $ | 5,704,641 | |||||
Depreciation | (7,947,178 | ) | (14,878,922 | ) | (4,585,102 | ) | (2,666,500 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $ | 11,570,562 | $ | 6,967,171 | $ | 15,104,724 | $ | 3,038,141 |
The tax components of undistributed net tax-exempt income, net ordinary income and net long-term capital gains at February 28, 2010, the Funds’ last tax year end, were as follows:
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | California Premium Income (NCU) | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | ||||||||||
Undistributed net tax-exempt income * | $ | 1,674,185 | $ | 3,564,683 | $ | 1,427,246 | $ | 5,997,103 | |||||
Undistributed net ordinary income ** | — | 24,968 | 5,784 | 47,938 | |||||||||
Undistributed net long-term capital gains | 189,500 | — | — | — |
California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||
Undistributed net tax-exempt income * | $ | 4,247,557 | $ | 6,317,898 | $ | 4,081,372 | $ | 1,124,400 | |||||
Undistributed net ordinary income ** | 1,239 | 5,352 | — | — | |||||||||
Undistributed net long-term capital gains | — | — | — | — |
* | Undistributed net tax-exempt income (on a tax basis) has not been reduced for the dividend declared on February 1, 2010, paid on March 1, 2010. |
** | Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any. |
78 Nuveen Investments
The tax character of distributions paid during the Funds’ last tax year ended February 28, 2010, was designated for purposes of the dividends paid deduction as follows:
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | California Premium Income (NCU) | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | ||||||||||
Distributions from net tax-exempt income | $ | 5,137,076 | $ | 10,331,450 | $ | 4,307,774 | $ | 19,787,318 | |||||
Distributions from net ordinary income ** | 78,012 | 18,216 | — | 209,009 | |||||||||
Distributions from net long-term capital gains | 47,538 | 201,208 | — | 178,190 |
California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||
Distributions from net tax-exempt income | $ | 13,349,752 | $ | 20,781,977 | $ | 13,395,977 | $ | 4,573,073 | |||||
Distributions from net ordinary income ** | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Distributions from net long-term capital gains | — | — | — | — |
** Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any.
At February 28, 2010, the Funds’ last tax year end, the following Funds had unused capital loss carryforwards available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future capital gains, if any. If not applied, the carryforwards will expire as follows:
Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | California Premium Income (NCU) | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||||||||
Expiration: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
February 28, 2011 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,816,211 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
February 29, 2012 | — | — | — | — | 323,840 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
February 29, 2016 | — | — | — | — | 3,869,938 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
February 28, 2017 | — | 88,523 | 14,137,598 | 926,547 | 4,536,999 | 240,670 | 590,949 | |||||||||||||||
February 28, 2018 | 5,325,933 | 881,108 | 731,149 | 1,921,563 | 10,646,251 | 1,227,051 | 530,894 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 5,325,933 | $ | 969,631 | $ | 14,868,747 | $ | 2,848,110 | $ | 22,193,239 | $ | 1,467,721 | $ | 1,121,843 |
California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) elected to defer net realized losses from investments incurred from November 1, 2009 through February 28, 2010, the Fund’s last tax year end, (“post-October losses”) in accordance with federal income tax regulations. Post-October capital losses of $307,631 are treated as having arisen on the first day of the current fiscal year.
7. Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Each Fund’s management fee is separated into two components – a fund-level fee, based only on the amount of assets within each individual Fund, and a complex-level fee, based on the aggregate amount of all fund assets managed by the Adviser. This pricing structure enables each Fund’s shareholders to benefit from growth in the assets within their respective Fund as well as from growth in the amount of complex-wide assets managed by the Adviser.
Nuveen Investments 79
Notes to | |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued) |
The annual fund-level fee for each Fund, payable monthly, is calculated according to the following schedule:
Average Daily Net Assets* | Insured California Premium Income (NPC) Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) California Premium Income (NCU) Fund-Level Fee Rate | |||
For the first $125 million | .4500 | % | ||
For the next $125 million | .4375 | |||
For the next $250 million | .4250 | |||
For the next $500 million | .4125 | |||
For the next $1 billion | .4000 | |||
For the next $3 billion | .3875 | |||
For net assets over $5 billion | .3750 |
Average Daily Net Assets* | California Dividend Advantage (NAC) California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) Fund-Level Fee Rate | |||
For the first $125 million | .4500 | % | ||
For the next $125 million | .4375 | |||
For the next $250 million | .4250 | |||
For the next $500 million | .4125 | |||
For the next $1 billion | .4000 | |||
For net assets over $2 billion | .3750 |
The annual complex-level fee for each Fund, payable monthly, is calculated according to the following schedule:
Complex-Level Managed Asset Breakpoint Level* | Effective Rate at Breakpoint Level | |||
$55 billion | .2000 | % | ||
$56 billion | .1996 | |||
$57 billion | .1989 | |||
$60 billion | .1961 | |||
$63 billion | .1931 | |||
$66 billion | .1900 | |||
$71 billion | .1851 | |||
$76 billion | .1806 | |||
$80 billion | .1773 | |||
$91 billion | .1691 | |||
$125 billion | .1599 | |||
$200 billion | .1505 | |||
$250 billion | .1469 | |||
$300 billion | .1445 |
* | The complex-level fee is calculated based upon the aggregate daily managed assets of all Nuveen funds, with such daily managed assets defined separately for each fund in its management agreement, but excluding assets attributable to investments in other Nuveen funds. For the complex-level and fund-level fees, daily net assets and managed assets include closed-end fund assets managed by the Adviser that are attributable to financial leverage. For these purposes, financial leverage includes the funds’ use of preferred stock and borrowings and certain investments in the residual interest certificates (also called inverse floating rate securities) in tender option bond (TOB) trusts, including the portion of assets held by a TOB trust that has been effectively financed by the trust’s issuance of floating rate securities, subject to an agreement by the Adviser to limit the amount of such assets for determining managed assets in certain c ircumstances. As of August 31, 2010, the complex-level fee rate was .1831%. |
The management fee compensates the Adviser for overall investment advisory and administrative services and general office facilities. The Funds pay no compensation directly to those of its directors/trustees who are affiliated with the Adviser or to its officers, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the Funds from the Adviser or its affiliates. The Board of Directors/Trustees has adopted a deferred compensation plan for independent directors/trustees that enables directors/trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from certain Nuveen advised funds. Under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of select Nuveen advised funds.
As of July 31, 2009, the Adviser is no longer reimbursing California Dividend Advantage (NAC) for any portion of its fees or expenses.
80 Nuveen Investments
For the first ten years of California Dividend Advantage 2’s (NVX) operations, the Adviser has agreed to reimburse the Fund, as a percentage of average daily net assets, for fees and expenses in the amounts and for the time periods set forth below:
Year Ending | Year Ending | |||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||
2001* | .30% | 2007 | .25 | % | ||
2002 | .30 | 2008 | .20 | |||
2003 | .30 | 2009 | .15 | |||
2004 | .30 | 2010 | .10 | |||
2005 | .30 | 2011 | .05 | |||
2006 | .30 |
* From the commencement of operations.
The Adviser has not agreed to reimburse California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) for any portion of its fees and expenses beyond March 31, 2011.
For the first ten years of California Dividend Advantage 3’s (NZH) operations, the Adviser has agreed to reimburse the Fund, as a percentage of average daily net assets, for fees and expenses in the amounts and for the time periods set forth below:
Year Ending | Year Ending | |||
September 30, | September 30, | |||
2001* | .30% | 2007 | .25 | % |
2002 | .30 | 2008 | .20 | |
2003 | .30 | 2009 | .15 | |
2004 | .30 | 2010 | .10 | |
2005 | .30 | 2011 | .05 | |
2006 | .30 |
* From the commencement of operations.
The Adviser has not agreed to reimburse California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) for any portion of its fees and expenses beyond September 30, 2011.
For the first ten years of Insured California Dividend Advantage’s (NKL) operations, the Adviser has agreed to reimburse the Fund, as a percentage of average daily net assets, for fees and expenses in the amounts and for the time periods set forth below:
Year Ending | Year Ending | |||
March 31, | March 31, | |||
2002* | .30% | 2008 | .25 | % |
2003 | .30 | 2009 | .20 | |
2004 | .30 | 2010 | .15 | |
2005 | .30 | 2011 | .10 | |
2006 | .30 | 2012 | .05 | |
2007 | .30 |
* From the commencement of operations.
The Adviser has not agreed to reimburse Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) for any portion of its fees and expenses beyond March 31, 2012.
For the first eight years of Insured California Tax-Free Advantage’s (NKX) operations, the Adviser has agreed to reimburse the Fund, as a percentage of average daily net assets, for fees and expenses in the amounts and for the time periods set forth below:
Year Ending | Year Ending | |||
November 30, | November 30, | |||
2002* | .32% | 2007 | .32 | % |
2003 | .32 | 2008 | .24 | |
2004 | .32 | 2009 | .16 | |
2005 | .32 | 2010 | .08 | |
2006 | .32 |
* From the commencement of operations.
The Adviser has not agreed to reimburse Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) for any portion of its fees and expenses beyond November 30, 2010.
8. New Accounting Standards
Fair Value Measurements
On January 21, 2010, Financial Accounting Standards Board issued changes to the authoritative guidance under U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements. The objective of which is to provide guidance on how investment assets and liabilities are to be valued and disclosed. Specifically, the amendment requires reporting entities disclose Level 3 activity for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the Level 3 roll-forward on a gross
Nuveen Investments 81
Notes to | |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued) |
basis rather than as one net number. The effective date of the amendment is for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of this guidance and the impact it will have to the financial statement amounts and footnote disclosures, if any.
9. Subsequent Events
MTP Shares
During September 2010, California Premium Income (NCU) successfully completed the issuance of $35.25 million of 2.00%, Series 2015 MTP Shares. The newly-issued MTP Shares trade on the NYSE under the symbol “NCU Pr C.”
ARPS Noticed for Redemption
During September 2010, California Premium Income (NCU) noticed for redemption all $34.375 million of its ARPS, at liquidation value, using the proceeds from the issuance of MTP Shares as described above.
Other Matters
During July 2010, lawsuits pursuing claims made in the demand letter alleging that Insured California Tax-Free Advantage’s (NKX) Board of Trustees breached their fiduciary duties related to the redemption at par of its ARPS had been filed on behalf of shareholders of Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX), against the Adviser, the Nuveen holding company, the majority owner of the holding company, the lone interested trustee, and current and former officers of Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX). Nuveen and the other named defendants believe these lawsuits to be without merit, and all named parties intend to defend themselves vigorously. Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) believes that these lawsuits will not have a material effect on it or on the Adviser’s ability to serve as investment adviser to it.
82 Nuveen Investments
Financial | |
Highlights (Unaudited) |
Nuveen Investments 83
Financial | |
Highlights (Unaudited) |
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
Investment Operations | Less Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Common Share Net Asset Value | Net Investment Income | Net Realized/ Unrealized Gain (Loss) | Distributions from Net Investment Income to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders(a) | Distributions from Capital Gains to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders(a) | Total | Net Investment Income to Common Share-holders | Capital Gains to Common Share-holders | Total | Discount from Common Shares Repurchased and Retired | Ending Common Share Net Asset Value | Ending Market Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | $ | 14.74 | $ | .45 | $ | .66 | $ | — | ** | $ | — | $ | 1.11 | $ | (.42 | ) | $ | — | $ | (.42 | ) | $ | — | $ | 15.43 | $ | 14.86 | |||||||||
2010 | 14.03 | .96 | .55 | (.03 | ) | (.02 | ) | 1.46 | (.75 | ) | — | (.75 | ) | — | ** | 14.74 | 13.30 | |||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 14.93 | .47 | (.74 | ) | (.11 | ) | (.02 | ) | (.40 | ) | (.36 | ) | (.14 | ) | (.50 | ) | — | ** | 14.03 | 12.04 | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 15.04 | .95 | (.10 | ) | (.22 | ) | — | ** | .63 | (.73 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.74 | ) | — | 14.93 | 13.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 15.58 | .90 | (.40 | ) | (.21 | ) | (.02 | ) | .27 | (.73 | ) | (.08 | ) | (.81 | ) | — | 15.04 | 14.96 | ||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 16.21 | .92 | (.38 | ) | (.18 | ) | (.02 | ) | .34 | (.83 | ) | (.14 | ) | (.97 | ) | — | 15.58 | 15.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 16.23 | .95 | .22 | (.10 | ) | (.01 | ) | 1.06 | (.92 | ) | (.16 | ) | (1.08 | ) | — | 16.21 | 15.90 | |||||||||||||||||||
Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | 13.99 | .46 | .88 | (.01 | ) | — | 1.33 | (.43 | ) | — | (.43 | ) | — | 14.89 | 14.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 12.85 | .98 | .99 | (.03 | ) | (.02 | ) | 1.92 | (.78 | ) | — | (.78 | ) | — | ** | 13.99 | 12.72 | |||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 14.13 | .44 | (1.12 | ) | (.10 | ) | (.02 | ) | (.80 | ) | (.34 | ) | (.14 | ) | (.48 | ) | — | ** | 12.85 | 10.89 | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 14.50 | .95 | (.44 | ) | (.24 | ) | — | .27 | (.64 | ) | — | (.64 | ) | — | 14.13 | 12.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 14.99 | .89 | (.46 | ) | (.25 | ) | — | .18 | (.67 | ) | — | (.67 | ) | — | 14.50 | 13.71 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 15.33 | .90 | (.28 | ) | (.20 | ) | — | .42 | (.76 | ) | — | (.76 | ) | — | 14.99 | 14.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 15.12 | .91 | .29 | (.11 | ) | — | 1.09 | (.88 | ) | — | (.88 | ) | — | 15.33 | 15.05 |
Auction Rate Preferred Shares at End of Period | Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares at End of Period | ||||||||||||||||||
Aggregate Amount Outstanding (000) | Liquidation Value Per Share | Asset Coverage Per Share | Aggregate Amount Outstanding (000) | Liquidation Value Per Share | Asset Coverage Per Share | ||||||||||||||
Insured California Premium Income (NPC) | |||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | |||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 42,700 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 332,784 | |||||||
2010 | 45,000 | 25,000 | 77,746 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
2009(f) | 45,000 | 25,000 | 75,295 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | |||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 45,000 | 25,000 | 78,590 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
2007 | 45,000 | 25,000 | 78,987 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
2006 | 45,000 | 25,000 | 80,878 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
2005 | 45,000 | 25,000 | 83,061 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Insured California Premium Income 2 (NCL) | |||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | |||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | 73,325 | 25,000 | 89,319 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
2010 | 79,825 | 25,000 | 80,487 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
2009(f) | 79,825 | 25,000 | 75,996 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | |||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 87,400 | 25,000 | 76,411 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
2007 | 95,000 | 25,000 | 73,511 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
2006 | 95,000 | 25,000 | 75,150 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
2005 | 95,000 | 25,000 | 76,288 | — | — | — |
84 Nuveen Investments
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Returns | Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares(c)(d) | ||||||||||||||||||
Based on Market Value | (b) | Based on Common Share Net Asset Value | (b) | Ending Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares (000) | Expenses Including Interest | (e) | Expenses Excluding Interest | Net Investment Income | Portfolio Turnover Rate | ||||||||||
15.18 | % | 7.69 | % | $ | 99,399 | 1.66 | %* | 1.51 | %* | 6.00 | %* | 4 | % | ||||||
17.13 | 10.66 | 94,944 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 6.68 | 10 | |||||||||||||
(9.25 | ) | (2.43 | ) | 90,531 | 1.27 | * | 1.27 | * | 6.88 | * | 1 | ||||||||
(2.21 | ) | 4.23 | 96,462 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 6.24 | 17 | ||||||||||||
4.61 | 1.70 | 97,176 | 1.22 | 1.16 | 5.84 | 9 | |||||||||||||
1.00 | 2.23 | 100,581 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 5.89 | 9 | |||||||||||||
7.58 | 6.74 | 104,510 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 5.85 | 9 | |||||||||||||
16.16 | 9.69 | 188,649 | 1.21 | * | 1.14 | * | 6.47 | * | 18 | ||||||||||
24.41 | 15.35 | 177,169 | 1.27 | 1.18 | 7.25 | 7 | |||||||||||||
(9.95 | ) | (5.40 | ) | 162,831 | 1.53 | * | 1.24 | * | 7.15 | * | 9 | ||||||||
(3.06 | ) | 1.86 | 179,734 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 6.56 | 12 | ||||||||||||
1.26 | 1.18 | 184,343 | 1.24 | 1.18 | 6.00 | 19 | |||||||||||||
(.63 | ) | 2.91 | 190,571 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 6.05 | 14 | ||||||||||||
5.10 | 7.42 | 194,895 | 1.17 | 1.17 | 6.03 | 7 |
(a) | The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents. |
(b) | Total Return Based on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
Total Return Based on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. | |
(c) | Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Auction Rate Preferred shareholders; Net Investment Income ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets attributable to Auction Rate Preferred shares and/or Variable Rate Demand Preferred shares, where applicable. |
(d) | Ratios do not reflect the effect of custodian fee credits earned on the Fund’s net cash on deposit with the custodian bank, where applicable. |
(e) | The expense ratios reflect, among other things, payments to Variable Rate Demand Preferred shareholders and/or the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, both as described in Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares and Inverse Floating Rate Securities, respectively. |
(f) | For the six months ended February 28, 2009. |
(g) | For the six months ended August 31, 2010. |
* | Annualized. |
** | Rounds to less than $.01 per share. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 85
Financial | |
Highlights (Unaudited)(continued) |
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
Investment Operations | Less Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Common Share Net sset Value | Net Investment Income | Net Realized/ Unrealized Gain (Loss) | Distributions from Net Investment Income to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders | (a) | Distributions from Capital Gains to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders | (a) | Total | Net Investment Income to Common Share- holders | Capital Gains to Common Share- holders | Total | Discount from Common Shares Repurchased and Retired | Ending Common Share Net Asset Value | Ending Market Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
California Premium Income (NCU) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | $ | 13.71 | $ | .49 | $ | .80 | $ | (.01 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1.28 | $ | (.43 | ) | $ | — | $ | (.43 | ) | $ | — | $ | 14.56 | $ | 14.13 | ||||||||||
2010 | 12.37 | .95 | 1.13 | (.03 | ) | — | 2.05 | (.72 | ) | — | (.72 | ) | .01 | 13.71 | 12.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 13.67 | .43 | (1.29 | ) | (.10 | ) | — | ** | (.96 | ) | (.33 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.34 | ) | — | ** | 12.37 | 10.06 | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 14.06 | .92 | (.43 | ) | (.24 | ) | — | .25 | (.64 | ) | — | (.64 | ) | — | 13.67 | 12.58 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 14.63 | .90 | (.52 | ) | (.24 | ) | (.01 | ) | .13 | (.67 | ) | (.03 | ) | (.70 | ) | — | 14.06 | 13.03 | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 15.03 | .89 | (.30 | ) | (.21 | ) | — | .38 | (.77 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.78 | ) | — | 14.63 | 14.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 14.51 | .90 | .60 | (.12 | ) | — | 1.38 | (.86 | ) | — | (.86 | ) | — | 15.03 | 14.37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | 13.88 | .49 | .62 | (.01 | ) | — | 1.10 | (.44 | ) | — | (.44 | ) | — | 14.54 | 14.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 12.10 | 1.01 | 1.63 | (.03 | ) | (.02 | ) | 2.59 | (.81 | ) | — | (.81 | ) | — | 13.88 | 12.60 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 14.43 | .49 | (2.07 | ) | (.09 | ) | (.02 | ) | (1.69 | ) | (.38 | ) | (.26 | ) | (.64 | ) | — | 12.10 | 10.82 | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 14.93 | 1.02 | (.50 | ) | (.23 | ) | (.01 | ) | .28 | (.74 | ) | (.04 | ) | (.78 | ) | — | 14.43 | 13.44 | |||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 15.59 | 1.00 | (.56 | ) | (.24 | ) | (.01 | ) | .19 | (.80 | ) | (.05 | ) | (.85 | ) | — | 14.93 | 14.34 | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 15.98 | 1.01 | (.25 | ) | (.21 | ) | — | .55 | (.91 | ) | (.03 | ) | (.94 | ) | — | 15.59 | 15.97 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 15.59 | 1.04 | .50 | (.12 | ) | — | 1.42 | (.98 | ) | (.05 | ) | (1.03 | ) | — | 15.98 | 16.07 |
Auction Rate Preferred Shares at End of Period | ||||||||||
Aggregate Amount Outstanding (000) | Liquidation Value Per Share | Asset Coverage Per Share | ||||||||
California Premium Income (NCU) | ||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||
2011(g) | $ | 34,375 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 85,717 | ||||
2010 | 34,375 | 25,000 | 82,150 | |||||||
2009(f) | 40,875 | 25,000 | 68,584 | |||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||
2008 | 43,000 | 25,000 | 70,910 | |||||||
2007 | 43,000 | 25,000 | 72,209 | |||||||
2006 | 43,000 | 25,000 | 74,109 | |||||||
2005 | 43,000 | 25,000 | 75,456 | |||||||
California Dividend Advantage (NAC) | ||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||
2011(g) | 135,525 | 25,000 | 87,980 | |||||||
2010 | 135,525 | 25,000 | 85,098 | |||||||
2009(f) | 135,525 | 25,000 | 77,430 | |||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||
2008 | 135,525 | 25,000 | 87,485 | |||||||
2007 | 175,000 | 25,000 | 75,075 | |||||||
2006 | 175,000 | 25,000 | 77,217 | |||||||
2005 | 175,000 | 25,000 | 78,466 |
86 Nuveen Investments
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Returns | Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares Before Reimbursement(c) | Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares After Reimbursement(c)(d) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on Market Value | (b) | Based on Common Share Net Asset Value | (b) | Ending Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares (000) | Expenses Including Interest | (e) | Expenses Excluding Interest | Net Investment Income | Expenses Including Interest | (e) | Expenses Excluding Interest | Net Investment Income | Portfolio Turnover Rate | ||||||||||||||||
20.51 | % | 9.48 | % | $ | 83,486 | 1.23 | %* | 1.17 | %* | 6.93 | %* | N/A | N/A | N/A | 4 | % | |||||||||||||
28.13 | 17.06 | 78,581 | 1.30 | 1.24 | 7.18 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(17.22 | ) | (6.92 | ) | 71,260 | 1.57 | * | 1.37 | * | 7.06 | * | N/A | N/A | N/A | 14 | |||||||||||||||
1.51 | 1.81 | 78,966 | 1.34 | 1.23 | 6.56 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(2.21 | ) | .82 | 81,200 | 1.29 | 1.21 | 6.14 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||
3.14 | 2.72 | 84,467 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 6.09 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
11.76 | 9.75 | 86,785 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 6.08 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
18.05 | 8.06 | 341,415 | 1.17 | * | 1.10 | * | 6.96 | * | 1.17 | %* | 1.10 | %* | 6.96 | %* | 15 | ||||||||||||||
24.62 | 21.97 | 325,791 | 1.21 | 1.13 | 7.63 | 1.18 | 1.10 | 7.66 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(14.14 | ) | (11.45 | ) | 284,221 | 1.31 | * | 1.17 | * | 7.92 | * | 1.24 | * | 1.10 | * | 7.99 | * | 14 | ||||||||||||
(.84 | ) | 1.85 | 338,732 | 1.26 | 1.15 | 6.77 | 1.11 | 1.00 | 6.92 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||
(5.19 | ) | 1.16 | 350,523 | 1.17 | 1.12 | 6.24 | .95 | .90 | 6.46 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||
5.47 | 3.63 | 365,516 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 6.22 | .84 | .84 | 6.50 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
14.62 | 9.41 | 374,265 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 6.22 | .75 | .75 | 6.59 | 4 |
(a) | The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents. |
(b) | Total Return Based on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
Total Return Based on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. | |
(c) | Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Auction Rate Preferred shareholders; Net Investment Income ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets attributable to Auction Rate Preferred shares. |
(d) | After expense reimbursement from the Adviser, where applicable. Ratios do not reflect the effect of custodian fee credits earned on the Fund’s net cash on deposit with the custodian bank, where applicable. As of July 31, 2009, the Adviser is no longer reimbursing California Dividend Advantage (NAC) for any fees or expenses. |
(e) | The expense ratios reflect, among other things, the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, as described in Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities. |
(f) | For the six months ended February 28, 2009. |
(g) | For the six months ended August 31, 2010. |
* | Annualized. |
** | Rounds to less than $.01 per share. |
N/A | Fund does not have a contractual reimbursement agreement with the Adviser. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 87
Financial | |
Highlights (Unaudited) (continued) |
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
Investment Operations | Less Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Common Share Net Asset Value | Net Investment Income | Net Realized/ Unrealized Gain (Loss) | Distributions from Net Investment Income to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders | (a) | Distributions from Capital Gains to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders | (a) | Total | Net Investment Income to Common Share- holders | Capital Gains to Common Share- holders | Total | Discount from Common Shares Repurchased and Retired | Ending Common Share Net Asset Value | Ending Market Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | $ | 14.49 | $ | .53 | $ | .55 | $ | (.01 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1.07 | $ | (.48 | ) | $ | — | $ | (.48 | ) | $ | — | $ | 15.08 | $ | 14.83 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 12.91 | 1.07 | 1.43 | (.04 | ) | — | 2.46 | (.88 | ) | — | (.88 | ) | — | ** | 14.49 | 13.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 14.39 | .51 | (1.47 | ) | (.11 | ) | (.01 | ) | (1.08 | ) | (.36 | ) | (.04 | ) | (.40 | ) | — | ** | 12.91 | 10.51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 14.69 | 1.01 | (.37 | ) | (.25 | ) | — | .39 | (.69 | ) | — | (.69 | ) | — | 14.39 | 12.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 15.36 | .96 | (.62 | ) | (.25 | ) | — | .09 | (.76 | ) | — | (.76 | ) | — | 14.69 | 13.73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 15.63 | .97 | (.19 | ) | (.21 | ) | — | .57 | (.84 | ) | — | (.84 | ) | — | 15.36 | 14.95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 14.97 | .98 | .71 | (.12 | ) | — | 1.57 | (.91 | ) | — | (.91 | ) | — | 15.63 | 15.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | 13.18 | .44 | .54 | (.01 | ) | — | .97 | (.45 | ) | — | (.45 | ) | — | 13.70 | 13.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 11.53 | .98 | 1.53 | (.03 | ) | — | 2.48 | (.83 | ) | — | (.83 | ) | — | 13.18 | 12.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 13.62 | .50 | (2.13 | ) | (.09 | ) | — | (1.72 | ) | (.37 | ) | — | (.37 | ) | — | ** | 11.53 | 10.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 14.25 | 1.03 | (.70 | ) | (.25 | ) | — | .08 | (.71 | ) | — | (.71 | ) | — | 13.62 | 12.87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 15.03 | .98 | (.73 | ) | (.27 | ) | — | (.02 | ) | (.76 | ) | — | (.76 | ) | — | 14.25 | 13.52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 15.31 | .97 | (.20 | ) | (.22 | ) | — | .55 | (.83 | ) | — | (.83 | ) | — | 15.03 | 14.84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 14.65 | .97 | .68 | (.13 | ) | — | 1.52 | (.86 | ) | — | (.86 | ) | — | 15.31 | 14.49 |
Auction Rate Preferred Shares at End of Period | MuniFund Term Preferred Shares at End of Period | Auction Rate Preferred Shares and MuniFund Term Preferred Shares at End of Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggregate Amount Outstanding (000) | Liquidation Value Per Share | Asset Coverage Per Share | Aggregate Amount Outstanding (000) | Liquidation Value Per Share | Ending Market Value Per Share | Average Market Value Per Share | Asset Coverage Per Share | Asset Coverage Per $1 Liquidation Preference | ||||||||||||||||||||
California Dividend Advantage 2 (NVX) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | $ | 93,775 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 84,297 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
2010 | 93,775 | 25,000 | 81,968 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 110,000 | 25,000 | 68,369 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 110,000 | 25,000 | 73,384 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 110,000 | 25,000 | 74,394 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 110,000 | 25,000 | 76,627 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 110,000 | 25,000 | 77,532 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
California Dividend Advantage 3 (NZH) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | 69,500 | 25,000 | 78,035 | 86,250 | 10.00 | 10.28 | 10.14 | 31.21 | 3.12 | |||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 69,500 | 25,000 | 76,021 | 86,250 | 10.00 | 10.11 | 10.09^ | 30.41 | 3.04 | |||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 154,075 | 25,000 | 70,117 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 159,925 | 25,000 | 76,377 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 187,000 | 25,000 | 70,963 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 187,000 | 25,000 | 73,459 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 187,000 | 25,000 | 74,367 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
88 Nuveen Investments
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Returns | Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares Before Reimbursement(c) | Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares After Reimbursement(c)(d) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on Market Value | (b) | Based on Common Share Net Asset Value | (b) | Ending Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares (000) | Expenses Including Interest | (e) | Expenses Excluding Interest | Net Investment Income | Expenses Including Interest | (e) | Expenses Excluding Interest | Net Investment Income | Portfolio Turnover Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.10 | % | 7.51 | % | $ | 222,421 | 1.14 | %* | 1.11 | %* | 7.11 | %* | 1.06 | %* | 1.02 | %* | 7.19 | %* | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
38.29 | 19.52 | 213,687 | 1.20 | 1.16 | 7.58 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 7.74 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(13.83 | ) | (7.40 | ) | 190,824 | 1.37 | * | 1.32 | * | 7.85 | * | 1.14 | * | 1.09 | * | 8.08 | * | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(2.80 | ) | 2.76 | 212,890 | 1.25 | 1.16 | 6.56 | .99 | .90 | 6.83 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3.39 | ) | .46 | 217,332 | 1.25 | 1.17 | 5.97 | .91 | .83 | 6.31 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.19 | 3.82 | 227,160 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 5.94 | .74 | .74 | 6.35 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14.98 | 10.80 | 231,140 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 5.94 | .71 | .71 | 6.39 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11.79 | 7.51 | 330,409 | 2.04 | * | 1.20 | * | 6.48 | * | 1.89 | * | 1.05 | * | 6.64 | * | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
32.93 | 22.17 | 317,860 | 1.36 | 1.17 | 7.68 | 1.16 | .97 | 7.88 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(17.58 | ) | (12.54 | ) | 278,056 | 1.39 | * | 1.27 | * | 8.50 | * | 1.13 | * | 1.01 | * | 8.75 | * | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
.46 | .60 | 328,659 | 1.21 | 1.19 | 6.96 | .90 | .88 | 7.27 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4.12 | ) | (.32 | ) | 343,806 | 1.22 | 1.16 | 6.16 | .83 | .78 | 6.54 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.50 | 3.81 | 362,473 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 6.08 | .71 | .71 | 6.53 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.75 | 10.69 | 369,262 | 1.17 | 1.17 | 6.05 | .71 | .71 | 6.50 | 5 |
(a) | The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents. |
(b) | Total Return Based on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
Total Return Based on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. | |
(c) | Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Auction Rate Preferred shareholders; Net Investment Income ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets attributable to Auction Rate Preferred shares and/or MuniFund Term Preferred shares, where applicable. (d) After expense reimbursement from the Adviser, where applicable. Ratios do not reflect the effect of custodian fee credits earned on the Fund’s net cash on deposit with the custodian bank, where applicable. |
(e) | The expense ratios reflect, among other things, payments to MuniFund Term Preferred shareholders and/or the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, both as described in Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Polices, MuniFund Term Preferred Shares and Inverse Floating Rate Securities, respectively. |
(f) | For the six months ended February 28, 2009. |
(g) | For the six months ended August 31, 2010. |
* | Annualized. |
** | Rounds to less than $.01 per share. |
^ | For the period December 21, 2009 (first issuance dates of shares) through February 28, 2010. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 89
Financial | |
Highlights (Unaudited) (continued) |
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each period:
Investment Operations | Less Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Common Share Net Asset Value | Net Investment Income | Net Realized/ Unrealized Gain (Loss) | Distributions from Net Investment Income to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders | (a) | Distributions from Capital Gains to Auction Rate Preferred Shareholders | (a) | Total | Net Investment Income to Common Share- holders | Capital Gains to Common Share- holders | Total | Discount from Common Shares Repurchased and Retired | Ending Common Share Net Asset Value | Ending Market Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | $ | 14.71 | $ | .52 | $ | .59 | $ | (.01 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1.10 | $ | (.46 | ) | $ | — | $ | (.46 | ) | $ | — | $ | 15.35 | $ | 15.14 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 13.52 | 1.06 | 1.01 | (.04 | ) | — | 2.03 | (.84 | ) | — | (.84 | ) | — | ** | 14.71 | 13.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 14.61 | .50 | (1.07 | ) | (.10 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.68 | ) | (.37 | ) | (.04 | ) | (.41 | ) | — | ** | 13.52 | 11.16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 14.91 | 1.03 | (.33 | ) | (.25 | ) | (.01 | ) | .44 | (.72 | ) | (.02 | ) | (.74 | ) | — | 14.61 | 13.50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 15.50 | 1.01 | (.57 | ) | (.26 | ) | — | ** | .18 | (.77 | ) | — | ** | (.77 | ) | — | 14.91 | 14.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 15.81 | 1.01 | (.25 | ) | (.22 | ) | — | .54 | (.85 | ) | — | (.85 | ) | — | 15.50 | 15.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 15.35 | 1.01 | .52 | (.12 | ) | — | 1.41 | (.90 | ) | (.05 | ) | (.95 | ) | — | 15.81 | 15.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | 14.03 | .39 | .57 | — | — | .96 | (.40 | ) | — | (.40 | ) | — | 14.59 | 14.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 12.85 | .85 | 1.09 | — | — | 1.94 | (.76 | ) | — | (.76 | ) | — | 14.03 | 12.87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 14.19 | .39 | (1.32 | ) | — | ** | (.01 | ) | (.94 | ) | (.35 | ) | (.05 | ) | (.40 | ) | — | 12.85 | 11.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 14.47 | .97 | (.30 | ) | (.24 | ) | — | .43 | (.71 | ) | — | (.71 | ) | — | 14.19 | 13.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 14.92 | .96 | (.46 | ) | (.24 | ) | — | .26 | (.71 | ) | — | (.71 | ) | — | 14.47 | 14.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 15.17 | .95 | (.25 | ) | (.21 | ) | — | .49 | (.74 | ) | — | (.74 | ) | — | 14.92 | 14.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 14.62 | .96 | .57 | (.13 | ) | — | 1.40 | (.85 | ) | — | (.85 | ) | — | 15.17 | 14.38 |
Auction Rate Preferred Shares at End of Period | Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares at End of Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggregate Amount Outstanding (000) | Liquidation Value Per Share | Asset Coverage Per Share | Aggregate Amount Outstanding (000) | Liquidation Value Per Share | Asset Coverage Per Share | |||||||||||||||||||
Insured California Dividend Advantage (NKL) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | $ | 103,750 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 81,436 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
2010 | 108,250 | 25,000 | 76,802 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | 108,250 | 25,000 | 72,683 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 118,000 | 25,000 | 72,321 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 118,000 | 25,000 | 73,289 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 118,000 | 25,000 | 75,111 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 118,000 | 25,000 | 76,113 | �� | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Insured California Tax-Free Advantage (NKX) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 2/28: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011(g) | — | — | — | 35,500 | 100,000 | 341,883 | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | — | — | — | 35,500 | 100,000 | 332,616 | ||||||||||||||||||
2009(f) | — | — | — | 35,500 | 100,000 | 313,131 | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended 8/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | — | — | — | 35,500 | 100,000 | 335,299 | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 45,000 | 25,000 | 72,302 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 45,000 | 25,000 | 73,764 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 45,000 | 25,000 | 74,595 | — | — | — |
90 Nuveen Investments
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Returns | Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares Before Reimbursement(c) | Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares After Reimbursement(c)(d) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on Market Value | (b) | Based on Common Share Net Asset Value | (b) | Ending Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares (000) | Expenses Including Interest | (e) | Expenses Excluding Interest | Net Investment Income | Expenses Including Interest | (e) | Expenses Excluding Interest | Net Investment Income | Portfolio Turnover Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14.40 | % | 7.62 | % | $ | 234,211 | 1.14 | %* | 1.12 | %* | 6.76 | %* | .97 | %* | .95 | * % | 6.92 | %* | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
30.55 | 15.42 | 224,301 | 1.19 | 1.16 | 7.21 | .95 | .93 | 7.45 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(14.22 | ) | (4.50 | ) | 206,467 | 1.32 | * | 1.23 | * | 7.36 | * | 1.01 | * | .92 | * | 7.67 | * | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(.03 | ) | 2.98 | 223,356 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 6.52 | .84 | .84 | 6.87 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4.64 | ) | 1.13 | 227,923 | 1.21 | 1.16 | 6.12 | .79 | .74 | 6.54 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10.72 | 3.62 | 236,525 | 1.17 | 1.17 | 6.12 | .71 | .71 | 6.58 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.00 | 9.46 | 241,254 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 6.06 | .72 | .72 | 6.50 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.00 | 6.96 | 85,868 | 2.17 | * | 1.98 | * | 5.39 | * | 2.06 | * | 1.86 | * | 5.51 | * | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
16.39 | 15.49 | 82,579 | 1.68 | 1.46 | 6.11 | 1.47 | 1.25 | 6.32 | — | *** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(11.55 | ) | (6.42 | ) | 75,661 | 2.57 | * | 1.54 | * | 5.89 | * | 2.27 | * | 1.24 | * | 6.19 | * | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
.12 | 2.97 | 83,531 | 1.33 | 1.26 | 6.28 | .94 | .86 | 6.67 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.35 | 1.69 | 85,144 | 1.27 | 1.21 | 5.95 | .79 | .73 | 6.43 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.56 | 3.43 | 87,775 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 5.97 | .74 | .74 | 6.45 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.46 | 9.84 | 89,272 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 5.95 | .74 | .74 | 6.42 | 3 |
(a) | The amounts shown are based on Common share equivalents. |
(b) | Total Return Based on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
Total Return Based on Common Share Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in Common share net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. | |
(c) | Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Auction Rate Preferred shareholders; Net Investment Income ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets attributable to Auction Rate Preferred shares and/or Variable Rate Demand Preferred shares, where applicable. |
(d) | After expense reimbursement from the Adviser, where applicable. Ratios do not reflect the effect of custodian fee credits earned on the Fund’s net cash on deposit with the custodian bank, where applicable. |
(e) | The expense ratios reflect, among other things, payments to Variable Rate Demand Preferred shareholders and/or the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, both as described in Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares and Inverse Floating Rate Securities, respectively. |
(f) | For the six months ended February 28, 2009. |
(g) | For the six months ended August 31, 2010. |
* | Annualized. |
** | Rounds to less than $.01 per share. |
*** | Calculates to less than 1%. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Nuveen Investments 91
Annual Investment Management
Agreement Approval Process (Unaudited)
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board members, including by a vote of a majority of the board members who are not parties to the advisory agreement or “interested persons” of any parties (the “Independent Board Members”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval. In connection with such approvals, the fund’s board members must request and evaluate, and the investment adviser is required to furnish, such inf ormation as may be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the advisory agreement. Accordingly, at a meeting held on May 25-26, 2010 (the “May Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees or Directors (as the case may be) (each a “Board” and each Trustee or Director, a “Board Member”) of the Funds, including a majority of the Independent Board Members, considered and approved the continuation of the advisory agreements (each an “Advisory Agreement”) between each Fund and Nuveen Asset Management (the “Adviser”) for an additional one-year period. In preparation for their considerations at the May Meeting, the Board also held a separate meeting on April 21-22, 2010 (the “ April Meeting”). Accordingly, the factors considered and determinations made regarding the renewals by the Independent Board Members include those made at the April Meeting.
In addition, in evaluating the Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members reviewed a broad range of information relating to the Funds and the Adviser, including absolute and comparative performance, fee and expense information for the Funds (as described in more detail below), the profitability of Nuveen for its advisory activities (which includes its wholly owned subsidiaries), and other information regarding the organization, personnel, and services provided by the Adviser. The Independent Board Members also met quarterly as well as at other times as the need arose during the year and took into account the information provided at such meetings and the knowledge gained therefrom. Prior to approving the renewal of the Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members reviewed the foregoing information with their independent legal counsel a nd with management, reviewed materials from independent legal counsel describing applicable law and their duties in reviewing advisory contracts, and met with independent legal counsel in private sessions without management present. The Independent Board Members considered the legal advice provided by independent legal counsel and relied upon their knowledge of the Adviser, its services and the Funds resulting from their meetings and other interactions throughout the year and their own business judgment in determining the factors to be considered in evaluating the
92 Nuveen Investments
Advisory Agreements. Each Board Member may have accorded different weight to the various factors in reaching his or her conclusions with respect to a Fund’s Advisory Agreement. The Independent Board Members did not identify any single factor as all-important or controlling. The Independent Board Members’ considerations were instead based on a comprehensive consideration of all the information presented. The principal factors considered by the Board and its conclusions are described below.
A. Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering renewal of the Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members considered the nature, extent and quality of the Adviser’s services, including advisory services and administrative services. The Independent Board Members reviewed materials outlining, among other things, the Adviser’s organization and business; the types of services that the Adviser or its affiliates provide and are expected to provide to the Funds; the performance record of the applicable Fund (as described in further detail below); and any initiatives Nuveen had taken for the applicable fund product line, including continued activities to refinance auction rate preferred securities, manage leverage during periods of market turbulence and implement an enhanced leverage management process, modify investment mandates in light of market conditions and seek shareholder approval as necessary, maintain the fund share repurchase program and maintain shareholder communications to keep shareholders apprised of Nuveen’s efforts in refinancing preferred shares. In addition to the foregoing, the Independent Board Members also noted the additional services that the Adviser or its affiliates provide to closed-end funds, including, in particular, Nuveen’s continued commitment to supporting the secondary market for the common shares of its closed-end funds through a variety of programs designed to raise investor and analyst awareness and understanding of closed-end funds. These efforts include maintaining an investor relations program to provide timely information and education to financial advisers and investors; providing marketing for the closed-end funds; maintaining and enhancing a closed-end fund website; participating in conferences and having direct communications with analysts and financial advisors.
As part of their review, the Independent Board Members also evaluated the background, experience and track record of the Adviser’s investment personnel. In this regard, the Independent Board Members considered any changes in the personnel, and the impact on the level of services provided to the Funds, if any. The Independent Board Members also reviewed information regarding portfolio manager compensation arrangements to evaluate the Adviser’s ability to attract and retain high quality investment personnel, preserve stability, and reward performance but not provide an incentive for taking undue risks.
In addition to advisory services, the Independent Board Members considered the quality of administrative services provided by the Adviser and its affiliates including product management, fund administration, oversight of service providers, shareholder services,
Nuveen Investments 93
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
administration of Board relations, regulatory and portfolio compliance and legal support. Given the importance of compliance, the Independent Board Members also considered the Adviser’s compliance program, including the report of the chief compliance officer regarding the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members found that, overall, the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the respective Funds under the Advisory Agreements were satisfactory.
B. The Investment Performance of the Funds and the Adviser
The Board considered the performance results of each Fund over various time periods. The Board reviewed, among other things, each Fund’s historic investment performance as well as information comparing the Fund’s performance information with that of other funds (the “Performance Peer Group”) based on data provided by an independent provider of mutual fund data and with recognized and/or customized benchmarks. In this regard, the Board reviewed each Fund’s total return information compared to its Performance Peer Group for the quarter, one-, three-and five-year periods ending December 31, 2009 and for the same periods ending March 31, 2010 (or for the periods available for Funds that did not exist during part of the foregoing time frame). In addition, the Board re viewed each Fund’s total return information compared to recognized and/or customized benchmarks for the quarter, one-and three-year periods ending December 31, 2009 and for the same periods ending March 31, 2010 (or for the periods available for Funds that did not exist during part of the foregoing time frame). Moreover, the Board reviewed the peer ranking of the Nuveen municipal funds advised by the Adviser in the aggregate. The Independent Board Members also reviewed historic premium and discount levels. This information supplemented the Fund performance information provided to the Board at each of its quarterly meetings.
In reviewing peer comparison information, the Independent Board Members recognized that the Performance Peer Group of certain funds may not adequately represent the objectives and strategies of the funds, thereby limiting the usefulness of comparing a fund’s performance with that of its Performance Peer Group. In this regard, the Independent Board Members considered that the Performance Peer Groups of certain funds (including the Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc., Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund and Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund) were classified as having significant differences from such funds based on considerations such as special fund objectives, potential investable universe and the compos ition of the peer set (e.g., the number and size of competing funds and number of competing managers).
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members determined that each Fund’s investment performance over time had been satisfactory. The Independent Board Members noted that the Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund
94 Nuveen Investments
generally demonstrated favorable performance in comparison to peers, performing in the top two quartiles in the one-, three-and five-year periods ending March 31, 2010. The Independent Board Members noted that the Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc., Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund and Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund underperformed their benchmarks in the three-year period but outperformed their benchmarks in the one-year period. The performance of the Nuveen California Premium Income Municipal Fund over time was satisfactory compared to peers, falling within the second or third quartile over various periods. While the Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 2 lagged its peers somewhat in the short-term one-year period, it demonstrated more favorable performance in the longer three-and five-year periods. Although the performance of the Nuveen California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund 3 lagged its peers somewhat in the longer periods, the performance had improved in the one-year period, performing in the first or second quartile.
C. Fees, Expenses and Profitability
1. Fees and Expenses
The Board evaluated the management fees and expenses of each Fund reviewing, among other things, such Fund’s gross management fees, net management fees and net expense ratios in absolute terms as well as compared to the fee and expenses of a comparable universe of funds based on data provided by an independent fund data provider (the “Peer Universe”) and in certain cases, to a more focused subset of funds in the Peer Universe (the “Peer Group”) and any expense limitations.
The Independent Board Members further reviewed the methodology regarding the construction of the applicable Peer Universe and/or Peer Group. In reviewing the comparisons of fee and expense information, the Independent Board Members took into account that in certain instances various factors such as: the asset level of a fund relative to peers; the limited size and particular composition of the Peer Universe or Peer Group; the investment objectives of the peers; expense anomalies; changes in the funds comprising the Peer Universe or Peer Group from year to year; levels of reimbursement; the timing of information used; the differences in the type and use of leverage; and differences in the states reflected in the Peer Universe or Peer Group may impact the comparative data, thereby limiting the ability to make a meaningful comparison with peers, incl uding, in particular, the Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund and Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund.
In reviewing the fee schedule for a Fund, the Independent Board Members also considered the fund-level and complex-wide breakpoint schedules (described in further detail below) and any fee waivers and reimbursements provided by Nuveen (applicable, in particular, for certain closed-end funds launched since 1999). Except
Nuveen Investments 95
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
as set forth in the following sentence, the Independent Board Members noted that the Funds had net management fees and/or net expense ratios below, at or near (within 5 basis point or less) the peer averages of their Peer Group or Peer Universe. Although the net management fees of the Nuveen Insured California Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund were above the peer average and the available peer set was limited, the net expense ratio was below or near the peer average. In addition, although the Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund, Inc., Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc., Nuveen California Premium Income Municipal Fund and Nuveen Insured California Tax-Free Advantage Municipal Fund had net advisory fees and net expense ratios above the peer average, the Board members recognized the limited peers avail able for comparison.
Based on their review of the fee and expense information provided, the Independent Board Members determined that each Fund’s management fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund.
2. Comparisons with the Fees of Other Clients
The Independent Board Members further reviewed information regarding the nature of services and fee rates offered by the Adviser to other clients, including municipal separately managed accounts and passively managed municipal bond exchange traded funds (ETFs) that are sub-advised by the Adviser. In evaluating the comparisons of fees, the Independent Board Members noted that the fee rates charged to the Funds and other clients vary, among other things, because of the different services involved and the additional regulatory and compliance requirements associated with registered investment companies, such as the Funds. Accordingly, the Independent Board Members considered the differences in the product types, including, but not limited to, the services provided, the structure and operations, product distribution and costs thereof, portfolio investm ent policies, investor profiles, account sizes and regulatory requirements. The Independent Board Members noted, in particular, that the range of services provided to the Funds (as discussed above) is much more extensive than that provided to separately managed accounts. Given the inherent differences in the products, particularly the extensive services provided to the Funds, the Independent Board Members believe such facts justify the different levels of fees.
3. Profitability of Nuveen
In conjunction with its review of fees, the Independent Board Members also considered the profitability of Nuveen for its advisory activities (which incorporated Nuveen’s wholly-owned affiliated sub-advisers) and its financial condition. The Independent Board Members reviewed the revenues and expenses of Nuveen’s advisory activities for the last two years, the allocation methodology used in preparing the profitability data and an analysis of the key drivers behind the changes in revenues and expenses that impacted profitability in 2009. The Independent Board Members noted this information supplemented the profitability information
96 Nuveen Investments
requested and received during the year to help keep them apprised of developments affecting profitability (such as changes in fee waivers and expense reimbursement commitments). In this regard, the Independent Board Members noted that they had also appointed an Independent Board Member as a point person to review and keep them apprised of changes to the profitability analysis and/or methodologies during the year. The Independent Board Members also considered Nuveen’s revenues for advisory activities, expenses, and profit margin compared to that of various unaffiliated management firms with similar amounts of assets under management and relatively comparable asset composition prepared by Nuveen.
In reviewing profitability, the Independent Board Members recognized the subjective nature of determining profitability which may be affected by numerous factors including the allocation of expenses. Further, the Independent Board Members recognized the difficulties in making comparisons as the profitability of other advisers generally is not publicly available and the profitability information that is available for certain advisers or management firms may not be representative of the industry and may be affected by, among other things, the adviser’s particular business mix, capital costs, types of funds managed and expense allocations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Independent Board Members reviewed Nuveen’s methodology and assumptions for allocating expenses across product lines to determine profitability. In reviewing profitabi lity, the Independent Board Members recognized Nuveen’s investment in its fund business. Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that Nuveen’s level of profitability for its advisory activities was reasonable in light of the services provided.
In evaluating the reasonableness of the compensation, the Independent Board Members also considered other amounts paid to the Adviser by the Funds as well as any indirect benefits (such as soft dollar arrangements, if any) the Adviser and its affiliates receive, or are expected to receive, that are directly attributable to the management of the Funds, if any. See Section E below for additional information on indirect benefits the Adviser may receive as a result of its relationship with the Funds. Based on their review of the overall fee arrangements of each Fund, the Independent Board Members determined that the advisory fees and expenses of the respective Fund were reasonable.
D. Economies of Scale and Whether Fee Levels Reflect These Economies of Scale
With respect to economies of scale, the Independent Board Members have recognized the potential benefits resulting from the costs of a fund being spread over a larger asset base, although economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, particularly on a fund-by-fund basis. One method to help ensure the shareholders share in these benefits is to include breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule. Generally, management fees for funds in the Nuveen complex are comprised of a fund-level
Nuveen Investments 97
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
component and a complex-level component, subject to certain exceptions. Accordingly, the Independent Board Members reviewed and considered the applicable fund-level breakpoints in the advisory fee schedules that reduce advisory fees as asset levels increase. Further, the Independent Board Members noted that although closed-end funds may from time-to-time make additional share offerings, the growth of their assets will occur primarily through the appreciation of such funds’ investment portfolio.
In addition to fund-level advisory fee breakpoints, the Board also considered the Funds’ complex-wide fee arrangement. Pursuant to the complex-wide fee arrangement, the fees of the funds in the Nuveen complex are generally reduced as the assets in the fund complex reach certain levels. The complex-wide fee arrangement seeks to provide the benefits of economies of scale to fund shareholders when total fund complex assets increase, even if assets of a particular fund are unchanged or have decreased. The approach reflects the notion that some of Nuveen’s costs are attributable to services provided to all its funds in the complex and therefore all funds benefit if these costs are spread over a larger asset base.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that the breakpoint schedules and complex-wide fee arrangement were acceptable and reflect economies of scale to be shared with shareholders when assets under management increase.
E. Indirect Benefits
In evaluating fees, the Independent Board Members received and considered information regarding potential ���fall out” or ancillary benefits the Adviser or its affiliates may receive as a result of its relationship with each Fund. In this regard, the Independent Board Members considered any revenues received by affiliates of the Adviser for serving as agent at Nuveen’s trading desk and as co-manager in initial public offerings of new closed-end funds.
In addition to the above, the Independent Board Members considered whether the Adviser received any benefits from soft dollar arrangements whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a Fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research that may be useful to the Adviser in managing the assets of the Funds and other clients. The Independent Board Members noted that the Adviser does not currently have any soft dollar arrangements; however, to the extent certain bona fide agency transactions that occur on markets that traditionally trade on a principal basis and riskless principal transactions are considered as generating “commissions,” the Adviser intends to comply with the applicable safe harbor provisions.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that any indirect benefits received by the Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Funds were reasonable and within acceptable parameters.
98 Nuveen Investments
F. Other Considerations
The Independent Board Members did not identify any single factor discussed previously as all-important or controlling. The Board Members, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously concluded that the terms of the Advisory Agreements are fair and reasonable, that the Adviser’s fees are reasonable in light of the services provided to each Fund and that the Advisory Agreements be renewed.
Nuveen Investments 99
Reinvest Automatically
Easily and Conveniently
Nuveen makes reinvesting easy. A phone call is all it takes to set up your reinvestment account.
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Your Nuveen Closed-End Fund allows you to conveniently reinvest dividends and/or capital gains distributions in additional Fund shares.
By choosing to reinvest, you’ll be able to invest money regularly and automatically, and watch your investment grow through the power of tax-free compounding. Just like dividends or distributions in cash, there may be times when income or capital gains taxes may be payable on dividends or distributions that are reinvested.
It is important to note that an automatic reinvestment plan does not ensure a profit, nor does it protect you against loss in a declining market.
Easy and convenient
To make recordkeeping easy and convenient, each month you’ll receive a statement showing your total dividends and distributions, the date of investment, the shares acquired and the price per share, and the total number of shares you own.
How shares are purchased
The shares you acquire by reinvesting will either be purchased on the open market or newly issued by the Fund. If the shares are trading at or above net asset value at the time of valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at the greater of the net asset value or 95% of the then-current market price. If the shares are trading at less than net asset value, shares for your account will be purchased on the open market. If the Plan Agent begins purchasing Fund shares on the open market while shares are trading below net asset value, but the Fund’s shares subsequently trade at or above their net asset value before the Plan Agent is able to complete its purchases, the Plan Agent may cease open-market purchases and may invest the uninvested portion of the distribution in newly-issued Fund shares at a price equal to the greater of the shares’ ne t asset value or 95% of the shares’ market value on the last business day immediately prior to the purchase date. Dividends and distributions received to purchase shares in the open market will normally be invested shortly after the dividend payment date. No interest will be paid on dividends and distributions awaiting reinvestment. Because the market price of the shares may increase before purchases are completed, the average purchase price
100 Nuveen Investments
per share may exceed the market price at the time of valuation, resulting in the acquisition of fewer shares than if the dividend or distribution had been paid in shares issued by the Fund. A pro rata portion of any applicable brokerage commissions on open market purchases will be paid by Plan participants. These commissions usually will be lower than those charged on individual transactions.
Flexible
You may change your distribution option or withdraw from the Plan at any time, should your needs or situation change.
You can reinvest whether your shares are registered in your name, or in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee. Ask your investment advisor if his or her firm will participate on your behalf. Participants whose shares are registered in the name of one firm may not be able to transfer the shares to another firm and continue to participate in the Plan.
The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Although the Fund reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants, there is no direct service charge to participants in the Plan at this time.
Call today to start reinvesting dividends and/or distributions
For more information on the Nuveen Automatic Reinvestment Plan or to enroll in or withdraw from the Plan, speak with your financial advisor or call us at (800) 257-8787.
Nuveen Investments 101
Glossary of Terms
Used in this Report
■ | Auction Rate Bond: An auction rate bond is a security whose interest payments are adjusted periodically through an auction process, which process typically also serves as a means for buying and selling the bond. Auctions that fail to attract enough buyers for all the shares offered for sale are deemed to have “failed,” with current holders receiving a formula-based interest rate until the next scheduled auction. |
■ | Average Annual Total Return: This is a commonly used method to express an investment’s performance over a particular, usually multi-year time period. It expresses the return that would have been necessary each year to equal the investment’s actual cumulative performance (including change in NAV or market price and reinvested dividends and capital gains distributions, if any) over the time period being considered. |
■ | Average Effective Maturity: The average of the number of years to maturity of the bonds in a Fund’s portfolio, computed by weighting each bond’s time to maturity (the date the security comes due) by the market value of the security. This figure does not account for the likelihood of prepayments or the exercise of call provisions unless an escrow account has been established to redeem the bond before maturity. The market value weighting for an investment in an inverse floating rate security is the value of the portfolio’s residual interest in the inverse floating rate trust, and does not include the value of the floating rate securities issued by the trust. |
■ | Inverse Floaters: Inverse floating rate securities, also known as inverse floaters, are created by depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose trust created by a broker-dealer. This trust, in turn, (a) issues floating rate certificates typically paying short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties in amounts equal to some fraction of the deposited bond’s par amount or market value, and (b) issues an inverse floating rate certificate (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) to an investor (such as a Fund) interested in gaining investment exposure to a long-term municipal bond. The income received by the holder of the inverse floater varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to the floating ra te certificates’ holders, and in most circumstances the holder of the inverse floater bears substantially all of the underlying bond’s downside investment risk. The holder of the inverse floater typically also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the underlying bond’s value. Hence, an inverse floater essentially represents an investment in the underlying bond on a leveraged basis. |
102 Nuveen Investments
■ | Leverage-Adjusted Duration: Duration is a measure of the expected period over which a bond’s principal and interest will be paid, and consequently is a measure of the sensitivity of a bond’s or bond Fund’s value to changes when market interest rates change. Generally, the longer a bond’s or Fund’s duration, the more the price of the bond or Fund will change as interest rates change. Leverage-adjusted duration takes into account the leveraging process for a Fund and therefore is longer than the duration of the Fund’s portfolio of bonds. |
■ | Market Yield (also known as Dividend Yield or Current Yield): An investment’s current annualized dividend divided by its current market price. |
■ | Net Asset Value (NAV): A Fund’s NAV per common share is calculated by subtracting the liabilities of the Fund (including any Preferred shares issued in order to leverage the Fund) from its total assets and then dividing the remainder by the number of common shares outstanding. Fund NAVs are calculated at the end of each business day. |
■ | Pre-refunding: Pre-refunding, also known as advanced refundings or refinancings, is a procedure used by state and local governments to refinance municipal bonds to lower interest expenses. The issuer sells new bonds with a lower yield and uses the proceeds to buy U.S. Treasury securities, the interest from which is used to make payments on the higher-yielding bonds. Because of this collateral, pre-refunding generally raises a bond’s credit rating and thus its value. |
■ | Taxable-Equivalent Yield: The yield necessary from a fully taxable investment to equal, on an after-tax basis, the yield of a municipal bond investment. |
■ | Zero Coupon Bond: A zero coupon bond does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the bond. Tax-exempt income to the holder of the bond comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the bond at issuance and the par value of the bond at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon bonds generally are more volatile than the market prices of bonds that pay interest periodically. |
Nuveen Investments 103
Notes
104 Nuveen Investments
Other Useful Information
Board of
Directors/Trustees
John P. Amboian
Robert P. Bremner
Jack B. Evans
William C. Hunter
David J. Kundert
William J. Schneider
Judith M. Stockdale
Carole E. Stone
Terence J. Toth
Fund Manager
Nuveen Asset Management
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Custodian
State Street Bank & Trust
Company
Boston, MA
Transfer Agent and
Shareholder Services
State Street Bank & Trust
Company
Nuveen Funds
P.O. Box 43071
Providence, RI 02940-3071
(800) 257-8787
Legal Counsel
Chapman and Cutler LLP
Chicago, IL
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, IL
Quarterly Portfolio of Investments and Proxy Voting Information
You may obtain (i) each Fund’s quarterly portfolio of investments, (ii) information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, and (iii) a description of the policies and procedures that the Funds used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities without charge, upon request, by calling Nuveen Investments toll-free at (800) 257-8787 or on Nuveen’s website at www.nuveen.com.
You may also obtain this and other Fund information directly from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC may charge a copying fee for this information. Visit the SEC on-line at http://www.sec.gov or in person at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call the SEC at (202) 942-8090 for room hours and operation. You may also request Fund information by sending an e-mail request to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing to the SEC’s Public References Section at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
CEO Certification Disclosure
Each Fund’s Chief Executive Officer has submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) the annual CEO certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
Each Fund has filed with the SEC the certification of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Common and Preferred Share Information
Each Fund intends to repurchase and/or redeem shares of its own common and/or auction rate preferred stock in the future at such times and in such amounts as is deemed advisable. During the period covered by this report, the Funds repurchased and/or redeemed shares of their common and/or auction rate preferred stock as shown in the accompanying table.
Fund | Common Shares Repurchased | Preferred Shares Redeemed | |||||
NPC | — | 1,800 | |||||
NCL | — | 260 | |||||
NCU | — | — | |||||
NAC | — | — | |||||
NVX | — | — | |||||
NZH | — | — | |||||
NKL | — | 180 | |||||
NKX | — | — |
Any future repurchases and/or redemptions will be reported to shareholders in the next annual or semi-annual report.
Nuveen Investments 105
Nuveen Investments:
Serving Investors for Generations
Since 1898, financial advisors and their clients have relied on Nuveen Investments to provide dependable investment solutions through continued adherence to proven, long-term investing principles. Today, we offer a range of high quality equity and fixed-income solutions designed to be integral components of a well-diversified core portfolio.
Focused on meeting investor needs.
Nuveen Investments is a global investment management firm that seeks to help secure the long-term goals of institutions and high net worth investors as well as the consultants and financial advisors who serve them. We market our growing range of specialized investment solutions under the high-quality brands of HydePark, NWQ, Nuveen, Santa Barbara, Symphony, Tradewinds and Winslow Capital. In total, Nuveen Investments managed more than $160 billion of assets on September 30, 2010.
Find out how we can help you.
To learn more about the products and services of Nuveen Investments may be able to help you meet your financial goals, talk to your financial advisor, or call us at (800) 257-8787. Please read the information provided carefully before you invest. Investors should consider the investment objective and policies, risk considerations, charges and expenses of any investment carefully. Where applicable, be sure to obtain a prospectus, which contains this and other relevant information. To obtain a prospectus, please contact your securities representative or Nuveen Investments, 333 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60606. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. Learn more about Nuveen Funds at: www.nuveen.com/cef
Nuveen makes things e-simple. It only takes a minute to sign up for e-Reports. Once enrolled, you’ll receive an e-mail as soon as your Nuveen Investments Fund information is ready—no more waiting for delivery by regular mail. Just click on the link within the e-mail to see the report and save it on your computer if you wish. Free e-Reports right to your e-mail! www.investordelivery.com If you receive your Nuveen Fund distributions and statements from your financial advisor or brokerage account. OR www.nuveen.com/accountaccess If you receive your Nuveen Fund distributions and statements directly from Nuveen. |
Distributed by
Nuveen Investments, LLC
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
www.nuveen.com
ESA-B-0810D
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
(a) See Portfolio of Investments in Item 1.
(b) Not applicable.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant's Board of Directors or Trustees implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to this Item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) | The registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act") (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")(17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)). |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.
File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form.
(a)(1) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Not applicable to this filing. |
(a)(2) | A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) in the exact form set forth below: See Ex-99.CERT attached hereto. |
(a)(3) | Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.23c-1) sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons: Not applicable. |
(b) | If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)); Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: See Ex-99.906 CERT attached hereto. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Nuveen Insured California Premium Income Municipal Fund 2, Inc.
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Kevin J. McCarthy
Kevin J. McCarthy
(Vice President and Secretary)
Date: November 8, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Gifford R. Zimmerman
Gifford R. Zimmerman
Chief Administrative Officer
(principal executive officer)
Date: November 8, 2010
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Stephen D. Foy
Stephen D. Foy
Vice President and Controller
(principal financial officer)
Date: November 8, 2010