The Sherwin-Williams Company 10K 2015 Annual report | SHW Filing

Exhibit 13

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

FINANCIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS



Financial Summary	20

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21

Reports of Management and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	38

Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes	42

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information	76

Shareholder Information	77

Corporate Officers and Operating Management	78

FINANCIAL SUMMARY

(millions of dollars except as noted and per share data)



	2015			2014			2013			2012			2011
Operations
Net sales	$	11,339		$	11,130		$	10,186		$	9,534		$	8,766
Cost of goods sold	5,780			5,965			5,569			5,328			5,021
Selling, general and administrative expenses	3,914			3,823			3,468			3,260			2,961
Impairments and dissolution										4			5
Interest expense	62			64			63			43			42
Income before income taxes	1,549			1,258			1,086			907			742
Net income	1,054			866			753			631			442
Financial Position
Accounts receivable - net	$	1,114		$	1,131		$	1,098		$	1,033		$	990
Inventories	1,019			1,034			971			920			927
Working capital - net	517			(114		)	630			1,273			99
Property, plant and equipment - net	1,042			1,021			1,021			966			957
Total assets	5,792			5,706			6,383			6,235			5,229
Long-term debt	1,920			1,123			1,122			1,632			639
Total debt	1,963			1,805			1,722			1,705			993
Shareholders’ equity	868			996			1,775			1,792			1,517
Per Common Share Information
Average shares outstanding (thousands)	92,197			96,190			100,898			101,715			103,471
Book value	$	9.41		$	10.52		$	17.72		$	17.35		$	14.61
Net income - diluted (1)	11.16			8.78			7.26			6.02			4.14
Net income - basic (1)	11.38			8.95			7.41			6.15			4.22
Cash dividends	2.68			2.20			2.00			1.56			1.46
Financial Ratios
Return on sales	9.3		%	7.8		%	7.4		%	6.6		%	5.0		%
Asset turnover	2.0		x	2.0		x	1.6		x	1.5		x	1.7		x
Return on assets	18.2		%	15.2		%	11.8		%	10.1		%	8.4		%
Return on equity (2)	105.8		%	48.8		%	42.0		%	41.6		%	27.5		%
Dividend payout ratio (3)	30.5		%	30.3		%	33.2		%	37.7		%	34.7		%
Total debt to capitalization	69.3		%	64.4		%	49.2		%	48.8		%	39.6		%
Current ratio	1.2			1.0			1.2			1.7			1.0
Interest coverage (4)	26.1		x	20.6		x	18.3		x	22.2		x	18.4		x
Net working capital to sales	4.6		%	(1.0		)%	6.2		%	13.3		%	1.1		%
Effective income tax rate (5)	32.0		%	31.2		%	30.7		%	30.4		%	40.4		%
General
Capital expenditures	$	234		$	201		$	167		$	157		$	154
Total technical expenditures (6)	150			155			144			140			130
Advertising expenditures	338			299			263			247			227
Repairs and maintenance	99			96			87			83			78
Depreciation	170			169			159			152			151
Amortization of intangible assets	28			30			29			27			30
Shareholders of record (total count)	6,987			7,250			7,555			7,954			8,360
Number of employees (total count)	40,706			39,674			37,633			34,154			32,988
Sales per employee (thousands of dollars)	$	279		$	281		$	271		$	279		$	266
Sales per dollar of assets	1.96			1.95			1.60			1.53			1.68


(1)	All earnings per share amounts are presented using the two-class method. See Note 15.


(2)	Based on net income and shareholders’ equity at beginning of year.


(3)	Based on cash dividends per common share and prior year’s diluted net income per common share.


(4)	Ratio of income before income taxes and interest expense to interest expense.


(5)	Based on income before income taxes.


(6)	See Note 1, page 49 of this report, for a description of technical expenditures.



	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SUMMARY

The Sherwin-Williams Company, founded in 1866, and its consolidated wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are engaged in the development, manufacture, distribution and sale of paint, coatings and related products to professional, industrial, commercial and retail customers primarily in North and South America with additional operations in the Caribbean region, Europe and Asia. The Company is structured into four reportable segments – Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group (collectively, the “Reportable Segments”) – and an Administrative Segment in the same way it is internally organized for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources. See pages 8 through 17 of this report and Note 18, on pages 72 through 75 of this report, for more information concerning the Reportable Segments.

The Company’s financial condition, liquidity and cash flow continued to be strong in 2015 as net operating cash topped $1.000 billion for the third straight year primarily due to improved operating results in our Paint Stores and Consumer Groups. Net working capital increased $630.9 million at December 31, 2015 compared to 2014 due to a significant decrease in current liabilities and an increase in current assets. Cash and cash equivalents along with cash flow from operations were used primarily to purchase $1.035 billion in treasury stock. Short-term borrowings decreased $640.0 million due to strong cash flow and issuance of long-term debt. On July 28, 2015, the Company issued $400.0 million of 3.45% Senior Notes due 2025 and $400.0 million of 4.55% Senior Notes due 2045. The proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of a portion of the Company’s outstanding short-term borrowings. The Company has been able to arrange sufficient short-term borrowing capacity at reasonable rates, and the Company has sufficient total available borrowing capacity to fund its current operating needs. Net operating cash increased $365.9 million to $1.447 billion in 2015 from $1.082 billion in 2014. Strong net operating cash provided the funds necessary to invest in new stores, manufacturing and distribution facilities, renovate and convert acquired stores, and return cash to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases.

Results of operations for the Company were strong and improved in many areas in 2015, primarily due to an improving domestic architectural paint market. Consolidated net sales increased 1.9 percent in 2015 to $11.339 billion from $11.130 billion in 2014 due primarily to higher paint sales volume in the Paint Stores and Consumer Groups. Consolidated gross profit as a percent of consolidated net sales increased to 49.0 percent in 2015 from 46.4 percent in 2014 due primarily to increased paint sales volume and improved operating efficiency. Gross profit in

2014 included a titanium dioxide suppliers antitrust class action lawsuit settlement of $21.4 million received by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2014 (the "2014 TiO2 settlement"). Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) increased $90.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 and increased as a percent of consolidated net sales to 34.5 percent in 2015 as compared to 34.3 percent in 2014 due primarily due to new stores openings and expenses related to the launch of a new paint program at a national retailer partially offset by foreign currency translation rate fluctuations. Lower average borrowing rates more than offset higher average borrowing levels on total debt throughout 2015 resulting in decreased interest expense of $2.4 million in 2015. The effective income tax rate was 32.0 percent for 2015 and 31.2 percent for 2014. Diluted net income per common share increased 27.1 percent to $11.16 per share for 2015 from $8.78 per share a year ago.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report are the responsibility of management. The consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements contain certain amounts that were based upon management’s best estimates, judgments and assumptions. Management utilized certain outside economic sources of information when developing the bases for their estimates and assumptions. Management used assumptions based on historical results, considering the current economic trends, and other assumptions to form the basis for determining appropriate carrying values of assets and liabilities that were not readily available from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Also, materially different amounts may result under materially different conditions, materially different economic trends or from using materially different assumptions. However, management believes that any materially different amounts resulting from materially different conditions or material changes in facts or circumstances are unlikely to significantly impact the current valuation of assets and liabilities that were not readily available from other sources.

All of the significant accounting policies that were followed in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 1, on pages 46 through 49, of this report. The following procedures and assumptions utilized by management directly impacted many of the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements.



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Non-Traded Investments

The Company has investments in the U.S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate markets and certain other investments that have been identified as variable interest entities. The Company does not have the power to direct the day-to-day operations of the investments and the risk of loss is limited to the amount of contributed capital, and therefore, the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary. In accordance with the Consolidation Topic of the ASC, the investments are not consolidated. For affordable housing investments entered into prior to the January 1, 2015 adoption of ASU No. 2014-01, the Company uses the effective yield method to determine the carrying value of the investments. Under the effective yield method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense over the period that the tax credits are recognized. For affordable housing investments entered into on or after the January 1, 2015 adoption of ASU No. 2014-01, the Company uses the proportional amortization method. Under the proportional amortization method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received. The Company has no ongoing capital commitments, loan requirements or guarantees with the general partners that would require any future cash contributions other than the contractually committed capital contributions that are disclosed in the contractual obligations table on page 29 of this report. See Note 1, on page 46 of this report, for more information on non-traded investments.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable were recorded at the time of credit sales net of provisions for sales returns and allowances. All provisions for allowances for doubtful collection of accounts are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses and were based on management’s best judgment and assessment, including an analysis of historical bad debts, a review of the aging of Accounts receivable and a review of the current creditworthiness of customers. Management recorded allowances for such accounts which were believed to be uncollectible, including amounts for the resolution of potential credit and other collection issues such as disputed invoices, customer satisfaction claims and pricing discrepancies. However, depending on how such potential issues are resolved, or if the financial condition of any of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate and their ability to make required payments became impaired, increases in these allowances may be required. At December 31, 2015, no individual customer constituted more than 5 percent of Accounts receivable.

Inventories

Inventories were stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined principally on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method based on inventory quantities and costs determined during the fourth quarter. Inventory quantities were adjusted during the fourth quarter as a result of annual physical inventory counts taken at all locations. If inventories accounted for on the LIFO method are reduced on a year-over-year basis, then liquidation of certain quantities carried at costs prevailing in prior years occurs. Management recorded the best estimate of net realizable value for obsolete and discontinued inventories based on historical experience and current trends through reductions to inventory cost by recording a provision included in Cost of goods sold. Where management estimated that the reasonable market value was below cost or determined that future demand was lower than current inventory levels, based on historical experience, current and projected market demand, current and projected volume trends and other relevant current and projected factors associated with the current economic conditions, a reduction in inventory cost to estimated net realizable value was made. See Note 3, on page 50 of this report, for more information regarding the impact of the LIFO inventory valuation.

Purchase Accounting, Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In accordance with the Business Combinations Topic of the ASC, the Company used the purchase method of accounting to allocate costs of acquired businesses to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The excess costs of acquired businesses over the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized as Goodwill. The valuations of the acquired assets and liabilities will impact the determination of future operating results. In addition to using management estimates and negotiated amounts, the Company used a variety of information sources to determine the estimated fair values of acquired assets and liabilities including: third-party appraisals for the estimated value and lives of identifiable intangible assets and property, plant and equipment; third-party actuaries for the estimated obligations of defined benefit pension plans and similar benefit obligations; and legal counsel or other experts to assess the obligations associated with legal, environmental and other contingent liabilities. The business and technical judgment of management was used in determining which intangible assets have indefinite lives and in determining the useful lives of finite-lived intangible assets in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC.



	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management performs impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis, as well as whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate impairment has more likely than not occurred. The qualitative assessment allows companies to skip the annual two-step quantitative test if it is not more likely than not that impairment has occurred based on monitoring key Company financial performance metrics and macroeconomic conditions. The optional qualitative assessment is performed when deemed appropriate.

In accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment per the Segment Reporting Topic of the ASC or one level below the operating segment (component level) as determined by the availability of discrete financial information that is regularly reviewed by operating segment management or an aggregate of component levels of an operating segment having similar economic characteristics. At the time of goodwill impairment testing (if performing a quantitative assessment), management determines fair value through the use of a discounted cash flow valuation model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each reporting unit. If the calculated fair value is less than the current carrying value, impairment of the reporting unit may exist. The use of a discounted cash flow valuation model to determine estimated fair value is common practice in impairment testing. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model for impairment testing include discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates are set by using the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) methodology. The WACC methodology considers market and industry data as well as Company-specific risk factors for each reporting unit in determining the appropriate discount rates to be used. The discount rate utilized for each reporting unit is indicative of the return an investor would expect to receive for investing in such a business. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates, sales projections and cash flow projections for each reporting unit. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual cash flow estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. As an indicator that each reporting unit has been valued appropriately through the use of the discounted cash flow valuation model, the aggregate of all reporting units fair value is reconciled to the total market capitalization of the Company.

The Company had six reporting units with goodwill as of October 1, 2015, the date of the annual impairment test. The fair values of each of the reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by more than ten percent and no goodwill impairment was recorded in 2015. The Company performed a sensitivity analysis on the discount rate, which is a significant assumption in the calculation of the fair values. With a one percentage point increase in the discount rate, the reporting units would continue to have fair values in excess of their respective carrying values.

In accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at the asset level, as determined by appropriate asset valuations at acquisition. Management utilizes the royalty savings method and valuation model to determine the estimated fair value for each indefinite-lived intangible asset or trademark. In this method, management estimates the royalty savings arising from the ownership of the intangible asset. The key assumptions used in estimating the royalty savings for impairment testing include discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates used are similar to the rates developed by the WACC methodology considering any differences in Company-specific risk factors between reporting units and trademarks. Royalty rates are established by management and valuation experts and periodically substantiated by valuation experts. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates and sales projections for each significant trademark. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual sales estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. The royalty savings valuation methodology and calculations used in 2015 impairment testing are consistent with prior years.

The discounted cash flow and royalty savings valuation methodologies require management to make certain assumptions based upon information available at the time the valuations are performed. Actual results could differ from these assumptions. Management believes the assumptions used are reflective of what a market participant would have used in calculating fair value considering the current economic conditions. See Notes 2 and 4, on pages 50 through 51 of this report, for a discussion of businesses acquired, the estimated fair values of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets recorded at acquisition date and reductions in carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded as a result of impairment tests in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC.



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Property, Plant and Equipment and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Property, plant and equipment was stated on the basis of cost and depreciated principally on a straight-line basis using industry standards and historical experience to estimate useful lives. In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, if events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable or the useful life had changed, impairment tests were performed or the useful life was adjusted. Undiscounted future cash flows were used to calculate the recoverable value of long-lived assets to determine if such assets were impaired. Where impairment was identified, management determined fair values for assets using a discounted cash flow valuation model, incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each group of assets. Growth models were developed using both industry and company historical results and forecasts. If the usefulness of an asset was determined to be impaired, then management estimated a new useful life based on the period of time for projected uses of the asset. Such models and changes in useful life required management to make certain assumptions based upon information available at the time the valuation or determination was performed. Actual results could differ from these assumptions. Management believes the assumptions used are reflective of what a market participant would have used in calculating fair value or useful life considering the current economic conditions. All tested long-lived assets or groups of long-lived assets had undiscounted cash flows that were substantially in excess of their carrying value, except as noted in Note 4. See Notes 4 and 5, on pages 50 through 53 of this report, for a discussion of the reductions in carrying value or useful life of long-lived assets in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC.

Exit or Disposal Activities

Management is continually re-evaluating the Company’s operating facilities against its long-term strategic goals. Liabilities associated with exit or disposal activities are recognized as incurred in accordance with the Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic of the ASC and property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC. Provisions for qualified exit costs are made at the time a facility is no longer operational, include amounts estimated by management and primarily include post-closure rent expenses or costs to terminate the contract before the end of its term and costs of employee terminations. Adjustments may be made to liabilities accrued for qualified exit costs if information becomes available upon which more accurate amounts can be reasonably estimated. If impairment of property,

plant and equipment exists, then the carrying value is reduced to fair value estimated by management. Additional impairment may be recorded for subsequent revisions in estimated fair value. See Note 5, on pages 51 through 53 of this report, for information concerning impairment of property, plant and equipment and accrued qualified exit costs.

Other Liabilities

The Company retains risk for certain liabilities, primarily worker’s compensation claims, employee medical benefits, and automobile, property, general and product liability claims. Estimated amounts were accrued for certain worker’s compensation, employee medical and disability benefits, automobile and property claims filed but unsettled and estimated claims incurred but not reported based upon management’s estimated aggregate liability for claims incurred using historical experience, actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and actuarially-developed models for estimating certain liabilities. Certain estimated general and product liability claims filed but unsettled were accrued based on management’s best estimate of ultimate settlement or actuarial calculations of potential liability using industry experience and actuarial assumptions developed for similar types of claims.

Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

To determine the Company’s ultimate obligation under its defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans other than pensions, management must estimate the future cost of benefits and attribute that cost to the time period during which each covered employee works. To determine the obligations of such benefit plans, management uses actuaries to calculate such amounts using key assumptions such as discount rates, inflation, long-term investment returns, mortality, employee turnover, rate of compensation increases and medical and prescription drug costs. Management reviews all of these assumptions on an ongoing basis to ensure that the most current information available is being considered. An increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside management’s control could have a direct impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the Company recognizes each plan’s funded status as an asset for overfunded plans and as a liability for unfunded or underfunded plans. Actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs are recognized and recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss, a component of Shareholders’ equity. The amounts recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will continue to be modified as actuarial assumptions and service



	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

costs change, and all such amounts will be amortized to expense over a period of years through the net pension and net periodic benefit costs.

Effective July 1, 2009, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was revised. Prior to July 1, 2009, the contribution was based on six percent of compensation for certain covered employees. Under the revised plan, such participants are credited with certain contribution credits that range from two percent to seven percent of compensation based on an age and service formula.

A reduction in the over-funded status of the Company’s defined benefit pension plans at December 31, 2008 due to the decrease in market value of equity securities held by the plans increased the future amortization of actuarial losses recognized in Cumulative comprehensive loss. This amortization increased net pension costs in 2013, 2014 and 2015. An increase in market value of equity securities held by the plans during 2013 and 2014 will decrease the future amortization of actuarial losses recognized in Cumulative comprehensive loss. The deficit in market value of equity securities held by the plans versus the expected returns in 2015 will increase the future amortization of actuarial losses. The amortization of actuarial losses on plan assets, only partially offset by an increase in discount rates on projected benefit obligations, will increase net pension costs in 2016. See Note 6, on pages 54 through 59 of this report, for information concerning the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans other than pensions.

Debt

The fair values of the Company’s publicly traded long-term debt were based on quoted market prices. The fair values of the Company’s non-traded long-term debt were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. See Note 1, on page 46 of this report, for the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s long-term debt, and Note 7, on page 60 of this report, for a description of the Company’s long-term debt arrangements.

Environmental Matters

The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites and at a number of third-party sites. The Company accrues for environmental-related activities for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and for which costs can be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. All accrued amounts were recorded on an undiscounted basis. Environmental-related expenses included direct costs of investigation and remediation

and indirect costs such as compensation and benefits for employees directly involved in the investigation and remediation activities and fees paid to outside engineering, actuarial, consulting and law firms. Due to uncertainties surrounding environmental investigations and remediation activities, the Company’s ultimate liability may result in costs that are significantly higher than currently accrued. See page 29 and Note 8, on pages 60 through 62 of this report, for information concerning the accrual for extended environmental-related activities and a discussion concerning unaccrued future loss contingencies.

Litigation and Other Contingent Liabilities

In the course of its business, the Company is subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits, including, but not limited to, litigation relating to product liability and warranty, personal injury, environmental, intellectual property, commercial, contractual and antitrust claims. Management believes that the Company has properly accrued for all known liabilities that existed and those where a loss was deemed probable for which a fair value was available or an amount could be reasonably estimated in accordance with all present U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, because litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties and the ultimate result of any present or future litigation is unpredictable, the Company’s ultimate liability may result in costs that are significantly higher than currently accrued. In the event that the Company’s loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. Additionally, due to the uncertainties involved, any potential liability determined to be attributable to the Company arising out of such litigation may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. See Note 9 on pages 62 through 65 of this report for information concerning litigation.

Income Taxes

The Company estimated income taxes in each jurisdiction that it operated. This involved estimating taxable earnings, specific taxable and deductible items, the likelihood of generating sufficient future taxable income to utilize deferred tax assets and possible exposures related to future tax audits. To the extent these estimates change, adjustments to deferred and accrued income taxes will be made in the period in which the changes occur.

See Note 14, on pages 69 and 70 of this report, for information concerning the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties and current and deferred tax expense.



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Stock-Based Compensation

The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in accordance with the Stock Compensation Topic of the ASC. The Company follows the “modified prospective” method as described in the Topic whereby compensation cost is recognized for all share-based payments granted after December 31, 2005.

The Company estimates the fair value of option rights using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model which requires management to make estimates for certain assumptions. Management and a consultant continuously review the following significant assumptions: risk-free interest rate, expected life of options, expected volatility of stock and expected dividend yield of stock. An increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside management’s control could have a direct impact on the Company’s results of operations. See Note 12, on pages 67 and 68 of this report, for more information on stock-based compensation.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue was primarily generated from the sale of products. All sales of products were recognized when shipped and title had passed to unaffiliated customers. Collectibility of amounts recorded as revenue is reasonably assured at time of sale. Discounts were recorded as a reduction to sales in the same period as the sale resulting in an appropriate net sales amount for the period. Standard sales terms are final and returns or exchanges are not permitted unless expressly stated. Estimated provisions for returns or exchanges, recorded as a reduction resulting in net sales, were established in cases where the right of return existed. The Company offered a variety of programs, primarily to its retail customers, designed to promote sales of its products. Such programs required periodic payments and allowances based on estimated results of specific programs and were recorded as a reduction resulting in net sales. The Company accrued the estimated total payments and allowances associated with each transaction at the time of sale. Additionally, the Company offered programs directly to consumers to promote the sale of its products. Promotions that reduced the ultimate consumer sale prices were recorded as a reduction resulting in net sales at the time the promotional offer was made, generally using estimated redemption and participation levels. The Company continually assesses the adequacy of accruals for customer and consumer promotional program costs earned but not yet paid. To the extent total program payments differ from estimates, adjustments may be necessary. Historically, these total program payments and adjustments have not been material.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CASH FLOW

Overview

The Company’s financial condition, liquidity and cash flow continued to be strong in 2015 as net operating cash topped $1.000 billion for the third straight year primarily due to improved operating results in our Paint Stores and Consumer Groups. Net working capital increased $630.9 million at December 31, 2015 compared to 2014 due to a significant decrease in current liabilities and an increase in current assets. Cash and cash equivalents along with cash flow from operations were used primarily to purchase $1.035 billion in treasury stock. Short-term borrowings decreased $640.0 million due to strong cash flow and issuance of long-term debt. On July 28, 2015, the Company issued $400.0 million of 3.45% Senior Notes due 2025 and $400.0 million of 4.55% Senior Notes due 2045. See the section that follows for more information regarding Net Working Capital. Total debt at December 31, 2015 increased $157.4 million to $1.963 billion from $1.805 billion at December 31, 2014 due primarily to the debt issuance on July 28, 2015. Total debt increased as a percentage of total capitalization to 69.3 percent from 64.4 percent at the end of 2014. At December 31, 2015, the Company had remaining borrowing ability of $2.078 billion.

Net operating cash increased $365.9 million to $1.447 billion in 2015 from $1.082 billion in 2014 due primarily to an increase in net income of $188.0 million and a reduction in working capital of $188.9 million due to timing of payments. Net operating cash increased as a percent to sales to 12.8 percent in 2015 compared to 9.7 percent in 2014. Strong Net operating cash provided the funds necessary to invest in new stores, manufacturing and distribution facilities, renovate and convert acquired stores and return cash to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases. In 2015, the Company used Net operating cash and Cash and cash equivalents on hand to purchase $1.035 billion in treasury stock, spend $234.3 million in capital additions and improvements and pay $249.6 million in cash dividends to its shareholders of common stock.

Net Working Capital

Total current assets less Total current liabilities (net working capital) increased $630.9 million to a surplus of $517.0 million at December 31, 2015 from a deficit of $113.9 million at December 31, 2014. The net working capital increase is due to a significant decrease in current liabilities and an increase in current assets. Cash and cash equivalents increased $165.0 million. Short-term borrowings decreased $640.0 million. Accounts payable increased $115.4 million while Accrued taxes decreased $5.6 million and all other current liabilities, excluding current portion of long-term debt, decreased $8.5 million. Accounts receivable were



	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

down $16.3 million, Inventories were down $15.0 million and Deferred tax net assets were down $21.2 million while the remaining current assets decreased $20.4 million. The Company has sufficient total available borrowing capacity to fund its current operating needs. The significant decrease in Short-term borrowings and significant increase in Cash and cash equivalents caused the Company’s current ratio to improve to 1.24 at December 31, 2015 from 0.96 at December 31, 2014. Accounts receivable as a percent of Net sales decreased to 9.8 percent in 2015 from 10.2 percent in 2014. Accounts receivable days outstanding decreased to 54 days in 2015 from 55 days in 2014. In 2015, provisions for allowance for doubtful collection of accounts decreased $4.3 million, or 8.1 percent. Inventories decreased slightly as a percent of Net sales to 9.0 percent in 2015 from 9.3 percent in 2014 due primarily to tighter inventory management. Inventory days outstanding was down at 83 days in 2015 versus 86 days in 2014. Accounts payable increased in 2015 to $1.158 billion compared to $1.042 billion last year due primarily to increased purchases to service higher sales levels and timing of payments.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill, which represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in purchase business combinations, decreased $15.0 million in 2015 due primarily to foreign currency translation rate fluctuations.

Intangible assets decreased $33.8 million in 2015. Decreases from amortization of finite-lived intangible assets of $28.2 million and foreign currency translation rate fluctuations of $7.9 million were partially offset by $2.4 million of capitalized software costs. Acquired finite-lived intangible assets included assets such as covenants not to compete, customer lists and product formulations. Costs related to designing, developing, obtaining and implementing internal use software are capitalized and amortized in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC. See Notes 2 and 4, on pages 50 through 51 of this report, for a description of acquired goodwill, identifiable intangible assets and asset impairments recorded in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC and summaries of the remaining carrying values of goodwill and intangible assets.

Deferred Pension and Other Assets

Deferred pension assets of $244.9 million at December 31, 2015 represent the excess of the fair value of assets over the actuarially determined projected benefit obligations, primarily of the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan. The decrease in Deferred pension assets during 2015 of $5.3 million, from $250.1 million last year, was due primarily to a decrease in the fair

value of equity securities held by the salaried defined benefit pension plan partially offset by a decrease in the projected benefit obligations resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions. In accordance with the accounting prescribed by the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the decrease in the value of the Deferred pension assets is offset in Cumulative other comprehensive loss and is amortized as a component of Net pension costs over a defined period of pension service. See Note 6, on pages 54 through 59 of this report, for more information concerning the excess fair value of assets over projected benefit obligations of the salaried defined benefit pension plan and the amortization of actuarial gains or losses relating to changes in the excess assets and other actuarial assumptions.

Other assets increased $26.9 million to $447.5 million at December 31, 2015 due primarily to long-term deposits and net increases in other investments.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Net property, plant and equipment increased $20.8 million to $1.042 billion at December 31, 2015 due primarily to capital expenditures of $234.3 million partially offset by depreciation expense of $170.3 million, sale or disposition of assets with remaining net book value of $10.5 million and currency translation adjustments of $32.6 million. Capital expenditures during 2015 in the Paint Stores Group were primarily attributable to the opening of new paint stores, renovation and conversion of acquired stores and improvements in existing stores. In the Consumer Group, capital expenditures during 2015 were primarily attributable to improvements and normal equipment replacements in manufacturing and distribution facilities. Capital expenditures in the Global Finishes Group were primarily attributable to improvements in existing manufacturing and distribution facilities. The Administrative Segment incurred capital expenditures primarily for information systems hardware. In 2016, the Company expects to spend more than 2015 for capital expenditures. The predominant share of the capital expenditures in 2016 is expected to be for various productivity improvement and maintenance projects at existing manufacturing, distribution and research and development facilities, new store openings and new or upgraded information systems hardware. The Company does not anticipate the need for any specific long-term external financing to support these capital expenditures.

Debt

There were no borrowings outstanding under the domestic commercial paper program at December 31, 2015 and 2013, respectively. There were $625.9 million in borrowings outstanding under this program at December 31, 2014 with a weighted-average interest rate of 0.3 percent. Borrowings outstanding



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

under various foreign programs at December 31, 2015 were $39.5 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 7.0 percent. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, foreign borrowings were $53.6 million and $96.6 million with weighted-average interest rates of 6.0 percent and 7.8 percent, respectively. Long-term debt, including the current portion, increased $797.4 million during 2015 resulting primarily from long-term debt issued in 2015. On July 28, 2015, the Company issued $400.0 million of 3.45% Senior Notes due 2025 and $400.0 million of 4.55% Senior Notes due 2045. The notes are covered under a shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 28, 2015. The proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of a portion of the Company’s outstanding short-term borrowings.

On July 16, 2015, the Company and three of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sherwin-Williams Canada, Inc. (SW Canada), Sherwin-Williams Luxembourg S.à r.l. (SW Lux) and Sherwin-Williams UK Holding Limited, entered into a new five-year $1.350 billion credit agreement. The credit agreement is being used for general corporate purposes, including the financing of working capital requirements. The credit agreement replaced the previous credit agreements for each of the Company, SW Canada and SW Lux, dated July 8, 2011, June 29, 2012 and September 19, 2012, as amended, respectively. The credit agreement allows the Company to extend the maturity of the facility with two one-year extension options and to increase the aggregate amount of the facility to $1.850 billion, both of which are subject to the discretion of each lender. At December 31, 2015, there was $21.7 million of borrowings outstanding under this credit agreement.

On July 8, 2011, the Company entered into a five-year $1.050 billion revolving credit agreement, which replaced the existing three-year $500.0 million credit agreement. The credit agreement allows the Company to extend the maturity of the facility with two one-year extension options and to increase the aggregate amount of the facility to $1.300 billion, both of which are subject to the discretion of each lender.

See Note 7, on page 60 of this report, for a detailed description of the Company’s debt outstanding and other available financing programs.

Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

In accordance with the accounting prescribed by the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the Company’s total liability for unfunded or underfunded defined benefit pension plans decreased $3.6 million to $50.6 million primarily due to changes in the actuarial assumptions of the Company's foreign plans. Postretirement benefits other than pensions decreased

$31.8 million to $263.4 million at December 31, 2015 due primarily to changes in the actuarial assumptions.

Effective July 1, 2009, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was revised. Prior to July 1, 2009, the contribution was based on six percent of compensation for covered employees. Under the revised plan, such participants are credited with certain contribution credits that range from two percent to seven percent of compensation based on an age and service formula. Amounts previously recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss in accordance with the provisions of the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC were modified in 2009 resulting in a decrease in comprehensive loss due primarily to the change in the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan and an increase in the excess plan assets over the actuarially calculated projected benefit obligation in the domestic defined benefit pension plans. Partially offsetting this decreased loss were modifications to actuarial assumptions used to calculate projected benefit obligations.

Effective October 1, 2011, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was frozen for new hires, and all newly hired U.S. non-collectively bargained employees are eligible to participate in the Company’s domestic defined contribution plan.

The assumed discount rate used to determine the actuarial present value of projected defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit obligations for domestic plans was increased from 3.95 percent to 4.40 percent at December 31, 2015 due to increased rates of high-quality, long-term investments and foreign defined benefit pension plans had similar discount rate increases for the same reasons. The rate of compensation increases used to determine the projected benefit obligations decreased to 3.1 percent in 2015 from 4.0 percent for domestic pension plans and was slightly higher on most foreign plans. In deciding on the rate of compensation increases, management considered historical Company increases as well as expectations for future increases. The expected long-term rate of return on assets remained at 6.0 percent for 2015 for domestic pension plans and was slightly lower for most foreign plans. In establishing the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for 2015, management considered the historical rates of return, the nature of investments and an expectation for future investment strategies. The assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the net periodic benefit cost of postretirement benefits other than pensions for 2015 were 6.5 percent for medical and prescription drug cost increases, both decreasing gradually to 4.5 percent in 2024. The assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2015 were between 11.5 percent and 5.0 percent for medical and prescription drug cost increases. In developing the



	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

assumed health care cost trend rates, management considered industry data, historical Company experience and expectations for future health care costs.

For 2016 Net pension cost and Net periodic benefit cost recognition for domestic plans, the Company will use a discount rate of 4.40 percent, an expected long-term rate of return on assets of 6.0 percent, a rate of compensation increase of 3.1 percent and cost trend rates between 5.0 percent and 11.5 percent for health care and prescription drug cost increases. Slightly lower discount rates, rates of compensation increases and expected long-term rates of return on plan assets will be used for most foreign plans. Use of these assumptions and amortization of actuarial gains will result in a domestic Net pension cost in 2016 that is expected to be approximately $7.2 million higher than in 2015 and a Net periodic benefit cost for postretirement benefits other than pensions that is expected to decrease $3.5 million in 2016 compared to 2015. See Note 6, on pages 54 through 59 of this report, for more information on the Company’s obligations and funded status of its defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefits other than pensions.

Other Long-Term Liabilities

Other long-term liabilities decreased $14.9 million during 2015 due primarily to a decrease in long-term commitments related to the affordable housing and historic renovation real estate properties of $30.1 million, a decrease in non-current deferred tax liabilities of $5.7 million, and a decrease in long-term pension liabilities of $4.3 million partially offset by an increase in accruals for extended environmental-related liabilities of $15.6 million.

Environmental-Related Liabilities

The operations of the Company, like those of other companies in the same industry, are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations not only govern current operations and products, but also impose potential liability on the Company for past operations. Management expects environmental laws and regulations to impose increasingly stringent requirements upon the Company and the industry in the future. Management believes that the Company conducts its operations in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and has implemented various programs designed to protect the environment and promote continued compliance.

Depreciation of capital expenditures and other expenses related to ongoing environmental compliance measures were included in the normal operating expenses of conducting business. The Company’s capital expenditures, depreciation and other expenses related to ongoing environmental compliance measures were not material to the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, cash flow or results of operations during 2015. Management does not expect that such capital expenditures, depreciation and other expenses will be material to the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, cash flow or results of operations in 2016. See Note 8, on pages 60 through 62 of this report, for further information on environmental-related long-term liabilities.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The Company has certain obligations and commitments to make future payments under contractual obligations and commercial commitments. The following table summarizes such obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2015:



(thousands of dollars)	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1–3 Years		3–5 Years		More than 5 Years
Long-term debt	$	1,927,688	$	3,154	$	700,818	$	315	$	1,223,401
Operating leases	1,420,549		317,843		501,728		318,078		282,900
Short-term borrowings	39,462		39,462
Interest on Long-term debt	1,147,842		62,828		115,652		106,160		863,202
Purchase obligations ^(a)	52,052		52,052
Other contractual obligations ^(b)	212,965		93,572		52,072		44,956		22,365
Total contractual cash obligations	$	4,800,558	$	568,911	$	1,370,270	$	469,509	$	2,391,868


^(a)	Relate to open purchase orders for raw materials at December 31, 2015.


^(b)	Relate primarily to estimated future capital contributions to investments in the U.S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate partnerships and various other contractual obligations.



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



	Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
Commercial Commitments	Total		Less than 1 Year		1–3 Years		3–5 Years		More than 5 Years
Standby letters of credit	$	45,407	$	45,407
Surety bonds	64,470		64,470
Other commercial commitments	17,747		17,747
Total commercial commitments	$	127,624	$	127,624	$	—	$	—	$	—

Warranties

The Company offers product warranties for certain products. The specific terms and conditions of such warranties vary depending on the product or customer contract requirements. Management estimated the costs of unsettled product warranty claims based on historical results and experience. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the accrual for product warranty claims and adjusts the accrual as necessary. Changes in the Company’s accrual for product warranty claims during 2015, 2014 and 2013, including customer satisfaction settlements during the year, were as follows:



(thousands of dollars)	2015			2014			2013
Balance at January 1	$	27,723		$	26,755		$	22,710
Charges to expense	43,484			37,879			33,265
Settlements	(39,329		)	(36,911		)	(29,220		)
Balance at December 31	$	31,878		$	27,723		$	26,755

Shareholders’ Equity

Shareholders’ equity decreased $128.6 million to $867.9 million at December 31, 2015 from $996.5 million last year. The decrease in Shareholders’ equity resulted primarily from the purchase of treasury stock for $1.035 billion, treasury stock received from stock option exercises of $34.4 million and an increase in Cumulative other comprehensive loss of $115.1 million partially offset by an increase in retained earnings of $804.2 million and an increase in Other capital of $250.8 million, due primarily to stock options exercised. The Company purchased 3.58 million shares of its common stock during 2015 for treasury. The Company acquires its common stock for general corporate purposes and, depending on its cash position and market conditions, it may acquire additional shares in the future. On October 21, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the Company to purchase an additional 10.0 million shares of its common stock. The Company had remaining authorization from its Board of Directors at December 31, 2015 to purchase 11.65 million shares of its common stock. The increase of $115.1 million in Cumulative other comprehensive loss was due primarily to unfavorable foreign currency translation effects of $128.2 million attributable to the weakening of most foreign

operations’ functional currencies against the U.S. dollar partially offset by $13.8 million in net actuarial gains and prior service costs of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans net of amortization.

The increase in Other capital of $250.8 million was due primarily to the recognition of stock-based compensation expense, stock option exercises and related income tax effect. Retained earnings increased $804.2 million during 2015 due to net income of $1.054 billion partially offset by $249.6 million in cash dividends paid. The Company’s cash dividend per common share payout target is 30.0 percent of the prior year’s diluted net income per common share. The 2015 annual cash dividend of $2.68 per common share represented 30.5 percent of 2014 diluted net income per common share. The 2015 annual dividend represented the thirty-sixth consecutive year of dividend payments since the dividend was suspended in 1978. At a meeting held on February 17, 2016, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly cash dividend to $.84 per common share. This quarterly dividend, if approved in each of the remaining quarters of 2016, would result in an annual dividend for 2016 of $3.36 per common share or a 30.1 percent payout of 2015 diluted net income per common share. See the Statements of Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity, on page 45 of this report, and Notes 10, 11 and 12, on pages 65 through 68 of this report, for more information concerning Shareholders’ equity.

Cash Flow

Net operating cash increased $365.9 million to $1.447 billion in 2015 from $1.082 billion in 2014 due primarily to an increase in net income of $188.0 million and a reduction in working capital of $188.9 million due to timing of payments. Strong Net operating cash provided the funds necessary to invest in new stores, manufacturing and distribution facilities, renovate and convert acquired stores, pay down debt and return cash to shareholders through dividends and treasury stock purchases. Net investing cash improved $21.4 million to a usage of $288.6 million in 2015 from a usage of $310.1 million in 2014 due primarily due to reduced cash used for other investments of $45.4 million partially offset by increased capital expenditures of $33.8 million. Net financing cash improved $486.7 million to a usage of $980.4 million in 2015 from a usage of $1.467 billion in 2014 due primarily



	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

to increased net proceeds of long-term debt of $1.297 billion, decreased treasury stock purchases of $453.4 million partially offset by net decreases in short-term borrowings of $1.222 billion and increased payments of cash dividends of $34.4 million. In 2015, the Company used Net operating cash and Cash and cash equivalents on hand to purchase $1.035 billion in treasury stock, spend $234.3 million in capital additions and improvements and pay $249.6 million in cash dividends to its shareholders of common stock.

Management considers a measurement of cash flow that is not in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to be a useful tool in its determination of appropriate uses of the Company’s Net operating cash. Management reduces Net operating cash, as shown in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, by the amount reinvested in the business for Capital expenditures and the return of investment to its shareholders by the payments of cash dividends. The resulting value is referred to by management as “Free Cash Flow” which may not be comparable to values considered by other entities using the same terminology. The reader is cautioned that the Free Cash Flow measure should not be compared to other entities unknowingly, and it does not consider certain non-discretionary cash flows, such as mandatory debt and interest payments. The amount shown below should not be considered an alternative to Net operating cash or other cash flow amounts provided in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles disclosed in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, on page 44 of this report. Free Cash Flow as defined and used by management is determined as follows:



	Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)	2015			2014			2013
Net operating cash	$	1,447,463		$	1,081,528		$	1,083,766
Capital expenditures	(234,340		)	(200,545		)	(166,680		)
Cash dividends	(249,647		)	(215,263		)	(204,978		)
Free cash flow	$	963,476		$	665,720		$	712,108

Litigation

DOL leveraged ESOP settlement. On February 20, 2013, the Company reached a settlement with the DOL of the DOL's investigation of transactions related to the Company's ESOP that were implemented on August 1, 2006 and August 27, 2003. The DOL had notified the Company, among others, of potential enforcement claims asserting breaches of fiduciary obligations and sought compensatory and equitable remedies. The Company resolved all ESOP related claims with the DOL by agreeing, in part, to make a one-time payment of $80.0 million to the ESOP,

resulting in a $49.2 million after tax charge to earnings in the fourth quarter of 2012. The Company made this required $80.0 million payment to the ESOP during the first quarter of 2013.

Government tax assessment settlements related to Brazilian operations. Charges totaling $28.7 million and $2.9 million were recorded to Cost of goods sold and SG&A, respectively, during the second and third quarters of 2013. The

charges were primarily related to import duty taxes paid to the Brazilian government related to the handling of import duties on products brought into the country for the years 2006 through 2012. The Company elected to pay the taxes through an existing voluntary amnesty program offered by the government to resolve these issues rather than contest them in court. The after-tax charges were $21.9 million for the full year 2013. The Company's import duty process in Brazil was changed to reach a final resolution of this matter with the Brazilian government.

Titanium dioxide suppliers antitrust class action lawsuit. The Company is a member of the plaintiff class related to Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation that was initiated in 2010 against certain suppliers alleging various theories of relief arising from purchases of titanium dioxide made from 2003 through 2012. The Court approved a settlement less attorney fees and expense, and the Company timely submitted claims to recover its pro-rata portion of the settlement. There was no specified deadline for the claims administrator to complete the review of all claims submitted. In October 2014, the Company was notified that it would receive a disbursement of settlement funds, and the Company received a pro-rata disbursement net of all fees of approximately $21.4 million. The Company recorded this settlement gain in the fourth quarter of 2014.

See page 25 of this report and Note 9 on pages 62 through 65 for more information concerning litigation.

Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk associated with interest rate, foreign currency and commodity fluctuations. The Company occasionally utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall financial risk management policy, but does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company entered into foreign currency option and forward currency exchange contracts with maturity dates of less than twelve months in 2015, 2014 and 2013, primarily to hedge against value changes in foreign currency. There were no material derivative contracts outstanding at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. The Company believes it may be exposed to continuing market risk from foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations. However, the Company does not expect that foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations or hedging contract losses will have a material adverse effect on



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See Notes 1 and 13 on pages 47 and 69 of this report.

Financial Covenant

Certain borrowings contain a consolidated leverage covenant. The covenant states the Company’s leverage ratio is not to exceed 3.50 to 1.00. The leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of total indebtedness (the sum of Short-term borrowings, Current portion of long-term debt and Long-term debt) at the reporting date to consolidated “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization” (EBITDA) for the 12-month period ended on the same date. Refer to the “Results of Operations” caption below for a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net income. At December 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with the covenant. The Company’s Notes, Debentures and revolving credit agreement contain various default and cross-default provisions. In the event of default under any one of these arrangements, acceleration of

the maturity of any one or more of these borrowings may result. See Note 7 on page 60 of this report.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)

Participants in the Company’s ESOP are allowed to contribute up to the lesser of twenty percent of their annual compensation or the maximum dollar amount allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches six percent of eligible employee contributions. The Company’s matching contributions to the ESOP charged to operations were $80.4 million in 2015 compared to $74.6 million in 2014. At December 31, 2015, there were 11,333,455 shares of the Company’s common stock being held by the ESOP, representing 12.3 percent of the total number of voting shares outstanding. See Note 11, on pages 66 and 67 of this report, for more information concerning the Company’s ESOP and preferred stock.



	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2015 vs. 2014

Shown below are net sales and segment profit and the percentage change for the current period by segment for 2015 and 2014:



	Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)	2015			2014			Change
Net Sales:
Paint Stores Group	$	7,208,951		$	6,851,581		5.2	%
Consumer Group	1,577,955			1,420,757			11.1	%
Global Finishes Group	1,916,300			2,080,854			-7.9	%
Latin America Coatings Group	631,015			771,378			-18.2	%
Administrative	5,083			4,963			2.4	%
Net sales	$	11,339,304		$	11,129,533		1.9	%

	Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)	2015			2014			Change
Income Before Income Taxes:
Paint Stores Group	$	1,433,504		$	1,201,420		19.3	%
Consumer Group	308,833			252,859			22.1	%
Global Finishes Group	201,881			201,129			0.4	%
Latin America Coatings Group	18,494			40,469			-54.3	%
Administrative	(413,746		)	(437,651		)	5.5	%
Income before income taxes	$	1,548,966		$	1,258,226		23.1	%

Consolidated net sales for 2015 increased due primarily to higher paint sales volume in the Paint Stores and Consumer Groups. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes decreased 2015 consolidated net sales 3.3 percent. Net sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were down 18.8 percent to $1.789 billion for 2015 versus $2.204 billion for 2014 due primarily to unfavorable foreign currency translation rates. Net sales of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 7.0 percent to $9.550 billion for 2015 versus $8.926 billion for 2014.

Net sales in the Paint Stores Group in 2015 increased primarily due to higher architectural paint sales volume across all end market segments. Net sales from stores open for more than twelve calendar months increased 4.2 percent for the full year. During 2015, the Paint Stores Group opened 113 new stores and closed 30 redundant locations for a net increase of 83 stores, increasing the total number of stores in operation at December 31, 2015 to 4,086 in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. The Paint Stores Group’s objective is to expand its

store base an average of two and a half percent each year, primarily through internal growth. Sales of products other than paint increased approximately 8.0 percent for the year over 2014. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of general merchandise sold.

Net sales of the Consumer Group increased due primarily to a new agreement to sell architectural paint under the HGTV HOME^® by Sherwin-Williams brand through a large U.S. national retailer's stores network. Sales of wood care coatings, brushes, rollers, caulk and other paint related products, were all up at least mid to high-single digits as compared to 2014 while sales of aerosol products were down slightly. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of paint-related merchandise sold. The Consumer Group plans to continue its promotions of new and existing products in 2016 and continue expanding its customer base and product assortment at existing customers.

The Global Finishes Group’s net sales in 2015, when stated in U.S. dollars, decreased due primarily to unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Paint sales volume percentage increased slightly as compared to 2014. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 7.5 percent for 2015. In 2015, the Global Finishes Group opened 3 new branches and closed 7 locations decreasing the total from 300 to 296 branches open in the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe and Asia at year-end. In 2016, the Global Finishes Group expects to continue expanding its worldwide presence and improving its customer base.

The Latin America Coatings Group’s net sales in 2015, when stated in U.S. dollars, decreased due primarily to unfavorable currency translation rate changes and lower paint sales volume partially offset by selling price increases. Paint sales volume percentage decreased in the mid-single digits as compared to 2014. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 19.3 percent for 2015. In 2015, the Latin America Coatings Group opened 17 new stores and closed 2 locations for a net increase of 15 stores, increasing the total to 291 stores open in North and South America at year-end. In 2016, the Latin America Coatings Group expects to continue expanding its regional presence and improving its customer base.

Net sales in the Administrative segment, which primarily consist of external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space and leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary business, increased by an insignificant amount in 2015.

Consolidated gross profit increased $394.7 million in 2015 and improved as a percent to net sales to 49.0 percent from



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

46.4 percent in 2014 due primarily to higher paint sales volume, improved operating efficiencies, and decreasing raw material costs partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Gross profit for 2014 included the 2014 TiO2 settlement of $21.4 million received by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2014. The Paint Stores Group’s gross profit for 2015 increased $329.3 million compared to 2014 due primarily to higher paint sales volume. The Paint Stores Group's gross profit margins increased for that same reason. The Consumer Group’s gross profit increased $133.6 million due primarily to improved operating efficiency and increased paint sales volume. The Consumer Group’s gross profit margins increased for those same reasons. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit for 2015 decreased $29.0 million due primarily unfavorable currency translation rate changes partially offset by improved operating efficiencies and decreasing raw material costs. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit increased as a percent of sales due primarily to improved operating efficiencies and decreasing raw material costs. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased Global Finishes Group’s gross profit by $51.4 million for 2015. The Latin America Coatings Group’s gross profit for 2015 decreased $43.9 million and decreased as a percent of sales, when stated in U.S. dollars, primarily due to unfavorable currency translation rate changes and increasing raw material costs. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes and lower volume sales were only partially offset by selling price increases in 2015 compared to 2014. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased gross profit by $41.5 million for 2015. The Administrative segment’s gross profit increased by $4.8 million.

SG&A increased by $90.6 million due primarily to increased expenses to support higher sales levels and net new store openings as well as the impact from a new paint program launch at a national retailer. SG&A increased as a percent of sales to 34.5 percent in 2015 from 34.3 percent in 2014 primarily due to those same reasons. In the Paint Stores Group, SG&A increased $95.4 million for the year due primarily to increased spending due to the number of new store openings and general comparable store expenses to support higher sales levels. The Consumer Group’s SG&A increased by $79.7 million for the year due to a new paint program launch at a national retailer. The Global Finishes Group’s SG&A decreased by $37.4 million for the year relating primarily to foreign currency translation rate fluctuations reducing SG&A by $44.2 million. The Latin America Coatings Group’s SG&A decreased by $22.0 million for the year relating primarily to foreign currency translation rate fluctuations of $27.9 million. The Administrative segment’s SG&A decreased $25.2 million primarily due to incentive compensation.

Other general expense - net decreased $7.2 million in 2015 compared to 2014. The decrease was mainly caused by a decrease of $6.1 million of expense in the Administrative segment, primarily due to a year-over-year decrease in provisions for environmental matters of $5.0 million. See Note 13, on pages 68 and 69 of this report, for more information concerning Other general expense - net.

As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management performed an annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2015. The impairment tests in 2015 and 2014 resulted in no impairment of goodwill and trademarks. See Note 4, on pages 50 and 51 of this report, for more information concerning the impairment of intangible assets.

Interest expense, included in the Administrative segment, decreased $2.4 million in 2015 versus 2014 due primarily to lower borrowing rates partially offset by higher average debt levels.

Other expense (income) - net decreased to $6.1 million expense from $15.4 million income in 2014. This was primarily due to a $6.3 million gain on the early termination of a customer agreement recorded in the Global Finishes Group and a $6.2 million realized gain resulting from final asset valuations related to the acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex recorded in the Administrative segment, both recorded in the third quarter of 2014. Additionally, foreign currency related transaction losses of $9.5 million in 2015 versus foreign currency related transaction losses of $3.6 million in 2014, primarily in the Global Finishes and Latin America Coatings Groups, were unfavorable comparisons. See Note 13, on page 69 of this report, for more information concerning Other expense (income) - net.

Consolidated Income before income taxes in 2015 increased $290.7 million due primarily to an increase of $394.7 million in gross profit partially offset by an increase of $90.6 million in SG&A and an increase of $13.5 million in interest expense, interest and net investment income and other expenses. Income before income taxes increased $232.1 million in the Paint Stores Group, $56.0 million in the Consumer Group, and $0.8 million in the Global Finishes Group but decreased $22.0 million in the Latin America Coatings Group when compared to 2014. The Administrative segment had a favorable impact on Income before income taxes of $23.9 million when compared to 2014. Segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries decreased 34.5 percent to $75.8 million for 2015 versus $115.6 million for 2014. Segment profit of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries increased 28.9 percent to $1.473 billion for 2015 versus $1.143 billion for 2014.



	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net income increased $188.0 million in 2015 due to the increase in Income before income taxes.

The effective income tax rate for 2015 was 32.0 percent. The effective income tax rate for 2014 was 31.2 percent. Diluted net income per common share increased 27.1 percent to $11.16 per share for 2015 from $8.78 per share a year ago. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes decreased diluted net income per common share by $.26 per share.

Management considers a measurement that is not in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles a useful measurement of the operational profitability of the Company. Some investment professionals also utilize such a measurement as an indicator of the value of profits and cash that are generated strictly from operating activities, putting aside working capital and certain other balance sheet changes. For this measurement, management increases Net income for significant non-operating and non-cash expense items to arrive at an amount known as EBITDA. The reader is cautioned that the following value for EBITDA should not be compared to other entities unknowingly. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to Net income or Net operating cash as an indicator of operating performance or as a measure of liquidity. The reader should refer to the determination of Net income and Net operating cash in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles disclosed in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, on pages 42 and 44 of this report. EBITDA as used by management is calculated as follows:



	Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)	2015		2014		2013
Net income	$	1,053,849	$	865,887	$	752,561
Interest expense	61,791		64,205		62,714
Income taxes	495,117		392,339		333,397
Depreciation	170,323		169,087		158,763
Amortization	28,239		29,858		29,031
EBITDA	$	1,809,319	$	1,521,376	$	1,336,466

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2014 vs. 2013

Shown below are net sales and segment profit and the percentage change for the current period by segment for 2014 and 2013:



	Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)	2014			2013			Change
Net Sales:
Paint Stores Group	$	6,851,581		$	6,002,143		14.2	%
Consumer Group	1,420,757			1,341,689			5.9	%
Global Finishes Group	2,080,854			2,004,530			3.8	%
Latin America Coatings Group	771,378			832,450			-7.3	%
Administrative	4,963			4,720			5.1	%
Net sales	$	11,129,533		$	10,185,532		9.3	%

	Year Ended December 31,
(thousands of dollars)	2014			2013			Change
Income Before Income Taxes:
Paint Stores Group	$	1,201,420		$	990,523		21.3	%
Consumer Group	252,859			242,061			4.5	%
Global Finishes Group	201,129			170,591			17.9	%
Latin America Coatings Group	40,469			38,645			4.7	%
Administrative	(437,651		)	(355,862		)	-23.0	%
Income before income taxes	$	1,258,226		$	1,085,958		15.9	%

Consolidated net sales for 2014 increased due primarily to higher paint sales volume in the Paint Stores Group and acquisitions. One acquisition completed in 2013 increased consolidated net sales 3.1 percent. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes decreased 2014 consolidated net sales 1.4 percent. Net sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 3.5 percent to $2.204 billion for 2014 versus $2.130 billion for 2013 due primarily to acquisitions and selling price increases. Unfavorable foreign currency translation rates reduced net sales for all consolidated foreign subsidiaries during 2014 by 6.2 percent. Net sales of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 10.8 percent to $8.926 billion for 2014 versus $8.056 billion for 2013.

Net sales in the Paint Stores Group in 2014 increased primarily due to higher architectural paint sales volume across all end market segments and acquisitions. Acquisitions increased net sales 4.5 percent for the year. Net sales from stores open for more than twelve calendar months increased 8.8 percent for the



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

full year. During 2014, the Paint Stores Group opened 109 new stores and closed 14 redundant locations for a net increase of 95 stores, increasing the total number of stores in operation at December 31, 2014 to 4,003 in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. The Paint Stores Group’s objective is to expand its store base an average of three percent each year, primarily through internal growth. Sales of products other than paint increased approximately 13.7 percent for the year over 2013. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of general merchandise sold.

Net sales of the Consumer Group increased due primarily to acquisitions and higher volume sales to most of the Group's retail customers. Acquisitions increased net sales 3.4 percent compared to 2013. Sales of wood care coatings, brushes, rollers, caulk and other paint related products, excluding acquisitions, were all up at least mid to high-single digits as compared to 2013 while sales of aerosol products were down slightly. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of paint-related merchandise sold. In December 2014, the Consumer Group announced a new agreement to sell architectural paint under the HGTV HOME® by Sherwin-Williams brand through a large U.S. national retailer's stores network.

The Global Finishes Group’s net sales in 2014, when stated in U.S. dollars, increased due primarily to selling price increases and higher paint sales volume partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Paint sales volume percentage increased in the low-single digits as compared to 2013. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 1.6 percent for 2014. In 2014, the Global Finishes Group opened 1 new branch and closed 1 location to remain flat at 300 branches open in the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe and Asia at year-end.

The Latin America Coatings Group’s net sales in 2014, when stated in U.S. dollars, decreased due primarily to unfavorable currency translation rate changes partially offset by selling price increases. Paint sales volume percentage decreased in the low-single digits as compared to 2013. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 12.3 percent for 2014. In 2014, the Latin America Coatings Group opened 3 new stores and closed 9 locations for a net decrease of 6 stores, decreasing the total to 276 stores open in North and South America at year-end.

Consolidated gross profit increased $547.9 million in 2014 and improved as a percent to net sales to 46.4 percent from 45.3 percent in 2013 due primarily to higher paint sales volume partially offset by dilution from acquisitions and unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Further improving the gross profit comparable results were the 2014 TiO2 settlement of $21.4 million received by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2014, recorded primarily in the Paint Stores Group, and charges relating to the Brazil government tax assessments in 2013. The Paint Stores Group’s gross profit for 2014 increased $486.1 million compared to 2013 due primarily to higher paint sales volume and acquisitions and increased as a percent of sales due primarily to higher paint sales volume partially offset by acquisitions. Acquisitions increased Paint Stores Group's gross profits by $107.1 million, or 39.9 percent of acquisition net sales. The Consumer Group’s gross profit increased $32.7 million due primarily to increased production volume and improved operating efficiencies and was flat as a percent of sales for 2014 compared to 2013 due to dilution from acquisitions. Acquisitions increased Consumer Group's gross profits by $15.3 million, or 33.6 percent of acquisition net sales. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit for 2014 increased $35.4 million due primarily to selling price increases and improved operating efficiencies partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit increased as a percent of sales due primarily to selling price increases and improved operating efficiencies partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased Global Finishes Group’s gross profit by $11.8 million for 2014. The Latin America Coatings Group’s gross profit for 2014 increased $0.6 million and increased as a percent of sales. Charges of $28.7 million recorded during 2013 reduced gross profit related to the Brazil government tax assessments for 2013. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes and lower volume sales were only partially offset by selling price increases in 2014 compared to 2013. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased gross profit by $30.6 million for 2014. The Administrative segment’s gross profit decreased by $6.9 million.

SG&A increased by $355.3 million due primarily to increased expenses to support higher sales levels in nearly all Reportable Segments and acquisitions. Acquisitions added $156.8 million of SG&A in 2014, representing 49.6 percent of acquisition net sales. SG&A increased as a percent of sales to 34.3 percent in 2014 from 34.0 percent in 2013 primarily due to acquisitions. In the Paint Stores Group, SG&A increased $278.3 million for the year due primarily to increased spending due to the number of new store openings and increased expenses to maintain customer service and acquisitions SG&A, including integration costs, of



	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
	FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

$140.5 million, or 52.4 percent of acquisition net sales. The Consumer Group’s SG&A increased by $22.4 million for the year due to increased sales levels and acquisitions SG&A of $14.9 million, or 32.6 percent of acquisition net sales. The Global Finishes Group’s SG&A increased by $13.9 million for the year relating primarily to increased sales levels partially offset by foreign currency translation rate fluctuations reducing SG&A by $9.9 million. The Latin America Coatings Group’s SG&A decreased by $4.5 million for the year relating primarily to foreign currency translation rate fluctuations of $18.7 million partially offset by increased expenses in local currencies due to high inflation and increased information systems costs. The Administrative segment’s SG&A increased $45.3 million primarily due to acquisition integration efforts, information systems costs and incentive compensation, including stock-based compensation expense.

Other general expense - net increased $35.0 million in 2014 compared to 2013. The increase was mainly caused by an increase of $35.5 million of expense in the Administrative segment, primarily due to a year-over-year increase in provisions for environmental matters of $38.8 million partially offset by decreased loss on sale or disposal of assets of $3.8 million. See Note 13, on pages 68 and 69 of this report, for more information concerning Other general expense - net.

As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management performed an annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2014. The impairment tests in 2014 and 2013 resulted in no impairment of goodwill and trademarks. See Note 4, on pages 50 and 51 of this report, for more information concerning the impairment of intangible assets.

Interest expense, included in the Administrative segment, increased $1.5 million in 2014 versus 2013 due primarily to higher average debt levels partially offset by a one-time interest expense charge of $3.4 million from early retirement of debt during the fourth quarter of 2013.

Other (income) expense - net increased to $15.4 million income from $0.9 million expense in 2013. This was primarily due to a $6.3 million gain on the early termination of a customer agreement recorded in the Global Finishes Group and a $6.2

million realized gain resulting from final asset valuations related to the acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex recorded in the Administrative segment. Additionally, foreign currency related transaction losses of $3.6 million in 2014 versus foreign currency related transaction losses of $7.7 million in 2013, primarily in the Global Finishes and Latin America Coatings Groups, were favorable comparisons. See Note 13, on page 69 of this report, for more information concerning Other (income) expense - net.

Consolidated Income before income taxes in 2014 increased $172.3 million due primarily to an increase of $547.9 million in gross profit partially offset by an increase of $355.3 million in SG&A and an increase of $20.4 million in interest expense, interest and net investment income and other expenses. Income before income taxes increased $210.9 million in the Paint Stores Group, $30.5 million in the Global Finishes Group $10.8 million in the Consumer Group and $1.8 million in the Latin America Coatings Group when compared to 2013. The Administrative segment had an unfavorable impact on Income before income taxes of $81.8 million when compared to 2013. Segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries increased 8.9 percent to $115.6 million for 2014 versus $106.2 million for 2013 due primarily to increase in gross profit of $56.7 million, which included charges in 2013 to Cost of goods sold due to the Brazil government tax assessments, partially offset by an increase in SG&A of $41.3 million and increased Other expense - net of $5.3 million. Segment profit of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries increased 16.6 percent to $1.143 billion for 2014 versus $979.8 million for 2013.

Net income increased $113.3 million in 2014 due to the increase in Income before income taxes.

The effective income tax rate for 2014 was 31.2 percent. The effective income tax rate for 2013 was 30.7 percent. Diluted net income per common share increased 20.9 percent to $8.78 per share for 2014, which included charges of $.22 per share related to environmental provisions and an $.18 per share loss from acquisitions partially offset by an increase of $.13 per share related to the 2014 TiO2 settlement, from $7.26 per share a year ago, which included charges of $.21 per share relating to Brazil government tax assessments.

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL

OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We recognize that internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and is subject to the possibility of human error or the circumvention or the overriding of internal control. Therefore, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, we believe we have designed into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In order to ensure that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015, we conducted an assessment of its effectiveness under the supervision and with the participation of our management group, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. This assessment was based on the criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Based on our assessment of internal control over financial reporting under the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, we have concluded that, as of December 31, 2015, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and their report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is included on page 39 of this report.

J. G. Morikis

President and Chief Executive Officer

S. P. Hennessy

Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A. J. Mistysyn

Senior Vice President - Corporate Controller

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company

We have audited The Sherwin-Williams Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). The Sherwin-Williams Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, The Sherwin-Williams Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of The Sherwin-Williams Company as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and our report dated February 24, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Cleveland, Ohio

February 24, 2016

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON THE

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company

We are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report of The Sherwin-Williams Company and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and for the years then ended in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial information included in this report contains certain amounts that were based upon our best estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe were reasonable under the circumstances.

We have conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As discussed in the Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting on page 38 of this report, we concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015.

The Board of Directors pursues its responsibility for the oversight of the Company’s accounting policies and procedures, financial statement preparation and internal control over financial reporting through the Audit Committee, comprised exclusively of independent directors. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment and compensation of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee meets at least quarterly with financial management, internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm to review the adequacy of financial controls, the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and the nature, extent and results of the audit effort. Both the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm have private and confidential access to the Audit Committee at all times.

We believe that the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report fairly reflect the form and substance of all material financial transactions and fairly present, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods presented.

J. G. Morikis

President and Chief Executive Officer

S. P. Hennessy

Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A. J. Mistysyn

Senior Vice President - Corporate Controller

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Sherwin-Williams Company as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Sherwin-Williams Company at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), The Sherwin-Williams Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 24, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Cleveland, Ohio

February 24, 2016

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(thousands of dollars except per common share data)



	Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013

Net sales	$	11,339,304		$	11,129,533		$	10,185,532
Cost of goods sold	5,780,078			5,965,049			5,568,966

Gross profit	5,559,226			5,164,484			4,616,566
Percent to net sales	49.0		%	46.4		%	45.3		%

Selling, general and administrative expenses	3,913,518			3,822,966			3,467,681
Percent to net sales	34.5		%	34.3		%	34.0		%

Other general expense - net	30,268			37,482			2,519
Interest expense	61,791			64,205			62,714
Interest and net investment income	(1,399		)	(2,995		)	(3,242		)
Other expense (income) - net	6,082			(15,400		)	936

Income before income taxes	1,548,966			1,258,226			1,085,958
Income taxes	495,117			392,339			333,397

Net income	$	1,053,849		$	865,887		$	752,561

Net income per common share:
Basic	$	11.38		$	8.95		$	7.41
Diluted	$	11.16		$	8.78		$	7.26



	Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013

Net income	$	1,053,849		$	865,887		$	752,561

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:

Foreign currency translation adjustments	(128,245		)	(103,441		)	(46,748		)

Employee benefit plans:
Net actuarial gains (losses) and prior service costs
arising during period ⁽¹⁾	7,974			(56,536		)	85,051
Less: amortization of net actuarial losses and
prior service costs included in Net pension costs ⁽²⁾	5,847			8,980			10,933
	13,821			(47,556		)	95,984

Unrealized net (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains
arising during period ⁽³⁾	(1,191		)	366			134
Less: reclassification adjustments for losses (gains)
included in net income ⁽⁴⁾	478			(283		)	(25		)
	(713		)	83			109

Other comprehensive (loss) income	(115,137		)	(150,914		)	49,345

Comprehensive income	$	938,712		$	714,973		$	801,906

⁽¹⁾Net of taxes of $(3,399), $24,954 and $(63,343), in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

⁽²⁾Net of taxes of $(1,647), $(2,712) and $(7,643), in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

⁽³⁾Net of taxes of $736, $(228) and $(84), in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

⁽⁴⁾Net of taxes of $(296), $178 and $17 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(thousands of dollars)



	December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	205,744		$	40,732		$	744,889
Accounts receivable, less allowance	1,114,275			1,130,565			1,097,751
Inventories:
Finished goods	840,603			841,784			779,057
Work in process and raw materials	177,927			191,743			191,758
	1,018,530			1,033,527			970,815
Deferred income taxes	87,883			109,087			104,496
Other current assets	232,442			252,869			240,766
Total current assets	2,658,874			2,566,780			3,158,717

Goodwill	1,143,333			1,158,346			1,178,687
Intangible assets	255,371			289,127			313,299
Deferred pension assets	244,882			250,144			302,446
Other assets	447,533			420,625			407,975
Property, plant and equipment:
Land	119,530			125,691			125,131
Buildings	696,202			698,202			715,096
Machinery and equipment	2,026,617			1,952,037			1,838,590
Construction in progress	81,082			59,330			62,563
	2,923,431			2,835,260			2,741,380
Less allowances for depreciation	1,881,569			1,814,230			1,719,997
	1,041,862			1,021,030			1,021,383
Total Assets	$	5,791,855		$	5,706,052		$	6,382,507

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings	$	39,462		$	679,436		$	96,551
Accounts payable	1,157,561			1,042,182			998,484
Compensation and taxes withheld	338,256			360,458			337,637
Accrued taxes	81,146			86,744			79,504
Current portion of long-term debt	3,154			3,265			502,948
Other accruals	522,280			508,581			513,433
Total current liabilities	2,141,859			2,680,666			2,528,557

Long-term debt	1,920,196			1,122,715			1,122,373
Postretirement benefits other than pensions	248,523			277,892			268,874
Other long-term liabilities	613,367			628,309			688,168

Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock - $1.00 par value:
92,246,525, 94,704,173 and 100,129,380 shares outstanding
at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively	115,761			114,525			112,902
Preferred stock - convertible, no par value:
40,406 shares outstanding at December 31, 2013							40,406
Unearned ESOP compensation							(40,406		)
Other capital	2,330,426			2,079,639			1,847,801
Retained earnings	3,228,876			2,424,674			1,774,050
Treasury stock, at cost	(4,220,058		)	(3,150,410		)	(1,639,174		)
Cumulative other comprehensive loss	(587,095		)	(471,958		)	(321,044		)
Total shareholders’ equity	867,910			996,470			1,774,535

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	5,791,855		$	5,706,052		$	6,382,507

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

(thousands of dollars)



	Year Ended December 31,
Operating Activities	2015			2014			2013
Net income	$	1,053,849		$	865,887		$	752,561
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net operating cash:
Depreciation	170,323			169,087			158,763
Amortization of intangible assets	28,239			29,858			29,031
Provisions for environmental-related matters	31,071			36,046			(2,751		)
Provisions for qualified exit costs	9,761			13,578			4,682
Deferred income taxes	4,976			(19,038		)	27,775
Defined benefit pension plans net cost	6,491			990			20,641
Stock-based compensation expense	72,342			64,735			58,004
Net (decrease) increase in postretirement liability	(6,645		)	(718		)	5,233
Decrease in non-traded investments	65,144			63,365			57,261
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets	(803		)	1,436			5,207
Other	6,711			203			(27,214		)
Change in working capital accounts:
(Increase) in accounts receivable	(56,873		)	(80,252		)	(41,473		)
(Increase) decrease in inventories	(40,733		)	(101,112		)	25,031
Increase in accounts payable	160,111			78,603			34,685
Increase in accrued taxes	4,606			13,187			11,314
(Decrease) increase in accrued compensation and taxes withheld	(13,128		)	29,513			24,435
Increase (decrease) in refundable income taxes	19,230			(36,601		)	13,244
DOL settlement accrual							(80,000		)
Other	(955		)	(20,029		)	43,804
Costs incurred for environmental-related matters	(11,995		)	(9,676		)	(12,539		)
Costs incurred for qualified exit costs	(11,200		)	(10,882		)	(7,419		)
Other	(43,059		)	(6,652		)	(16,509		)
Net operating cash	1,447,463			1,081,528			1,083,766

Investing Activities
Capital expenditures	(234,340		)	(200,545		)	(166,680		)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired							(79,940		)
Proceeds from sale of assets	11,300			1,516			3,045
Increase in other investments	(65,593		)	(111,021		)	(94,739		)
Net investing cash	(288,633		)	(310,050		)	(338,314		)

Financing Activities
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings	(630,226		)	591,423			31,634
Proceeds from long-term debt	797,514			1,474			473
Payments of long-term debt				(500,661		)	(10,932		)
Payments of cash dividends	(249,647		)	(215,263		)	(204,978		)
Proceeds from stock options exercised	89,990			100,069			69,761
Income tax effect of stock-based compensation exercises and vesting	89,691			68,657			47,527
Treasury stock purchased	(1,035,291		)	(1,488,663		)	(769,271		)
Other	(42,384		)	(24,111		)	(17,522		)
Net financing cash	(980,353		)	(1,467,075		)	(853,308		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(13,465		)	(8,560		)	(9,845		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	165,012			(704,157		)	(117,701		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	40,732			744,889			862,590
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	205,744		$	40,732		$	744,889
Taxes paid on income	$	335,119		$	310,039		$	200,748
Interest paid on debt	48,644			67,306			61,045

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(thousands of dollars except per common share data)



	Common Stock		Preferred Stock			Unearned ESOP Compen-sation			Other Capital		Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Cumulative Other Comprehensive Loss			Total
Balance at January 1, 2013	$	111,623	$	101,086		$	(101,086	)	$	1,673,788	$	1,226,467		$	(849,685	)	$	(370,389	)	$	1,791,804
Net income											752,561									752,561
Other comprehensive income																	49,345			49,345
Treasury stock purchased														(769,271		)				(769,271		)
Redemption of preferred stock			(60,680		)	60,680
Stock options exercised	1,128								68,633					(20,218		)				49,543
Income tax effect of stock compensation									47,527											47,527
Restricted stock and stock option grants (net activity)	151								57,853											58,004
Cash dividends -- $2.00 per common share											(204,978		)							(204,978		)
Balance at December 31, 2013	112,902		40,406			(40,406		)	1,847,801		1,774,050			(1,639,174		)	(321,044		)	1,774,535
Net income											865,887									865,887
Other comprehensive loss																	(150,914		)	(150,914		)
Treasury stock purchased														(1,488,663		)				(1,488,663		)
Redemption of preferred stock			(40,406		)	40,406
Stock options exercised	1,423								98,646					(22,573		)				77,496
Income tax effect of stock compensation									68,657											68,657
Restricted stock and stock option grants (net activity)	200								64,535											64,735
Cash dividends -- $2.20 per common share											(215,263		)							(215,263		)
Balance at December 31, 2014	114,525		—			—			2,079,639		2,424,674			(3,150,410		)	(471,958		)	996,470
Net income											1,053,849									1,053,849
Other comprehensive loss																	(115,137		)	(115,137		)
Treasury stock purchased														(1,035,291		)				(1,035,291		)
Stock options exercised	1,134								88,856					(34,357		)				55,633
Income tax effect of stock compensation									89,691											89,691
Restricted stock and stock option grants (net activity)	102								72,240											72,342
Cash dividends -- $2.68 per common share											(249,647		)							(249,647		)
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	115,761	$	—		$	—		$	2,330,426	$	3,228,876		$	(4,220,058	)	$	(587,095	)	$	867,910

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Sherwin-Williams Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, “the Company”). Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of estimates. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those amounts.

Nature of operations. The Company is engaged in the development, manufacture, distribution and sale of paint, coatings and related products to professional, industrial, commercial and retail customers primarily in North and South America, with additional operations in the Caribbean region, Europe and Asia.

Reportable segments. See Note 18 for further details.

Cash flows. Management considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Fair value of financial instruments. The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported for Cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value.

Short-term investments: The carrying amounts reported for Short-term investments approximate fair value.

Investments in securities: Investments classified as available-for-sale are carried at market value. See the recurring fair value measurement table on page 47.

Non-traded investments: The Company has investments in the U.S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate markets and certain other investments that have been identified as variable interest entities.

However, because the Company does not have the power to direct the day-to-day operations of the investments and the risk of loss is limited to the amount of contributed capital, the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary. In accordance with the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), the investments are not consolidated. For affordable housing investments entered into prior to the January 1, 2015 adoption of Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2014-01, the Company uses the effective yield method to determine the carrying value of the investments. Under the effective yield method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense over the period that the tax credits are recognized. For affordable housing investments entered into on or after the January 1, 2015 adoption of ASU No. 2014-01, the Company uses the proportional amortization method. Under the proportional amortization method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received. The carrying amounts of the investments, included in Other assets, were $189,484, $223,935 and $210,779 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The liabilities recorded on the balance sheets for estimated future capital contributions to the investments were $172,899, $198,776 and $198,761 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts reported for Short-term borrowings approximate fair value.

Long-term debt (including current portion): The fair values of the Company’s publicly traded debt, shown below, are based on quoted market prices. The fair values of the Company’s non-traded debt, also shown below, are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The Company's publicly traded debt and non-traded debt are classified as level 1 and level 2, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 7.



	December 31,
	2015				2014				2013
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Publicly traded debt	$	1,918,568	$	1,960,169	$	1,120,924	$	1,160,280	$	1,620,646	$	1,614,739
Non-traded debt	4,782		4,555		5,056		4,812		4,675		4,430



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Derivative instruments: The Company utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall financial risk management policy. The Company entered into foreign currency option and forward currency exchange contracts with maturity dates of less than twelve months in 2015, 2014 and 2013, primarily to hedge against value changes in foreign currency.

See Note 13. There were no material derivative contracts outstanding at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Fair value measurements. The following tables summarize the Company’s assets and liabilities measured on a recurring and non-recurring basis in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC:

Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis



	Fair Value at December 31, 2015		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Deferred compensation plan asset ^(a)	$	23,662	$	2,295	$	21,367
Liabilities:
Deferred compensation plan liability ^(b)	$	35,150	$	35,150

(a)

The deferred compensation plan asset consists of the investment funds maintained for the future payments under the Company’s executive deferred compensation plan, which is structured as a rabbi trust. The investments are marketable securities accounted for under the Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the ASC. The level 1 investments are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares. The level 2 investments are valued based on vendor or broker models. The cost basis of the investment funds is $24,585.


(b)	The deferred compensation plan liability represents the value of the Company’s liability under its deferred compensation plan based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets.

Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis. Except for the acquisition-related fair value measurements described in Note 2 which qualify as level 2 measurements, there were no assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in 2015, 2014 or 2013.

Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable were recorded at the time of credit sales net of provisions for sales returns and allowances. The Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $49,420, $53,770 and $54,460 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, to reduce Accounts receivable to their estimated net realizable value. The allowance was based on an analysis of historical bad debts, a review of the aging of Accounts receivable and the current creditworthiness of customers. Account receivable balances are written-off against the allowance if a final determination of uncollectibility is made. All provisions for allowances for doubtful collection of accounts are related to the creditworthiness of accounts and are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses.

Reserve for obsolescence. The Company recorded a reserve for obsolescence of $91,217, $90,712 and $97,523 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, to reduce Inventories to their estimated net realizable value.

Goodwill. Goodwill represents the cost in excess of fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for by the purchase method. In accordance with the Impairments

Topic of the ASC, goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and in between annual tests if events or circumstances indicate potential impairment. See Note 4.

Intangible assets. Intangible assets include trademarks, non-compete covenants and certain intangible property rights. As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, indefinite-lived trademarks are not amortized, but instead are tested annually for impairment, and between annual tests whenever an event occurs or circumstances indicate potential impairment. See Note 4. The cost of finite-lived trademarks, non-compete covenants and certain intangible property rights are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit as follows:



	Useful Life
Finite-lived trademarks	5 years
Non-compete covenants	3 – 5 years
Certain intangible property rights	3 – 19 years

Impairment of long-lived assets. In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, management evaluates the recoverability and estimated remaining lives of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. See Notes 4 and 5.

Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment is stated on the basis of cost. Depreciation is provided



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

by the straight-line method. Depreciation and amortization are included in the appropriate Cost of goods sold or Selling, general and administrative expense caption on the Statements of Consolidated Income. Included in Property, plant and equipment are leasehold improvements. The major classes of assets and ranges of annual depreciation rates are:



Buildings	2.5% – 20.0%
Machinery and equipment	5.0% – 20.0%
Furniture and fixtures	10.0% – 33.3%
Automobiles and trucks	10.0% – 33.3%

Standby letters of credit. The Company occasionally enters into standby letter of credit agreements to guarantee various operating activities. These agreements provide credit availability to the various beneficiaries if certain contractual events occur. Amounts outstanding under these agreements totaled $45,407, $23,442 and $25,896 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Product warranties. The Company offers product warranties for certain products. The specific terms and conditions of such warranties vary depending on the product or customer contract requirements. Management estimated the costs of unsettled product warranty claims based on historical results and experience and included an amount in Other accruals. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the accrual for product warranty claims and adjusts the accrual as necessary. Changes in the Company’s accrual for product warranty claims during 2015, 2014 and 2013, including customer satisfaction settlements during the year, were as follows:



	2015			2014			2013
Balance at January 1	$	27,723		$	26,755		$	22,710
Charges to expense	43,484			37,879			33,265
Settlements	(39,329		)	(36,911		)	(29,220		)
Balance at December 31	$	31,878		$	27,723		$	26,755

Environmental matters. Capital expenditures for ongoing environmental compliance measures were recorded in Property, plant and equipment, and related expenses were included in the normal operating expenses of conducting business. The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites and at a number of third-party sites. The Company accrued for environmental-related activities for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and when such costs could be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. All accrued amounts were recorded on an undiscounted basis. Environmental-related

expenses included direct costs of investigation and remediation and indirect costs such as compensation and benefits for employees directly involved in the investigation and remediation activities and fees paid to outside engineering, consulting and law firms. See Notes 8 and 13.

Employee Stock Purchase and Savings Plan and preferred stock. The Company accounts for the Employee Stock Purchase and Savings Plan (ESOP) in accordance with the Employee Stock Ownership Plans Subtopic of the Compensation – Stock Ownership Topic of the ASC. The Company recognized compensation expense for amounts contributed to the ESOP, and the ESOP used dividends on unallocated preferred shares to service debt. Unallocated preferred shares held by the ESOP were not considered outstanding in calculating earnings per share of the Company. During 2014, the Company redeemed all remaining preferred shares for cash. See Note 11.

Defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans in accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, which requires the recognition of a plan’s funded status as an asset for overfunded plans and as a liability for unfunded or underfunded plans. See Note 6.

Stock-based compensation. The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in accordance with the Stock Compensation Topic of the ASC. See Note 12.

Foreign currency translation. All consolidated non-highly inflationary foreign operations use the local currency of the country of operation as the functional currency and translated the local currency asset and liability accounts at year-end exchange rates while income and expense accounts were translated at average exchange rates. The resulting translation adjustments were included in Cumulative other comprehensive loss, a component of Shareholders’ equity.

Cumulative other comprehensive loss. At December 31, 2015, the ending balance of Cumulative other comprehensive loss included adjustments for foreign currency translation of $482,629, net prior service costs and net actuarial losses related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans of $104,346 and unrealized net losses on marketable equity securities of $120. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the ending balance of Cumulative other comprehensive loss included adjustments for foreign currency translation of $354,384 and $250,943, respectively, net prior service costs and net actuarial losses related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans of $118,167 and $70,611, respectively, and unrealized gains on marketable equity securities of $593 and $510, respectively.

Revenue recognition. All revenues were recognized when products were shipped and title had passed to unaffiliated



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

customers. Collectibility of amounts recorded as revenue was reasonably assured at the time of recognition.

Customer and vendor consideration. The Company offered certain customers rebate and sales incentive programs which were classified as reductions in Net sales. Such programs were in the form of volume rebates, rebates that constituted a percentage of sales or rebates for attaining certain sales goals. The Company received consideration from certain suppliers of raw materials in the form of volume rebates or rebates that constituted a percentage of purchases. These rebates were recognized on an accrual basis by the Company as a reduction of the purchase price of the raw materials and a subsequent reduction of Cost of goods sold when the related product was sold.

Costs of goods sold. Included in Costs of goods sold were costs for materials, manufacturing, distribution and related support. Distribution costs included all expenses related to the distribution of products including inbound freight charges, purchase and receiving costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs and all costs incurred to ship products. Also included in Costs of goods sold were total technical expenditures, which included research and development costs, quality control, product formulation expenditures and other similar items. Research and development costs included in technical expenditures were $57,667, $50,019 and $47,042 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The settlement gain related to the titanium dioxide litigation reduced 2014 Costs of goods sold by $21,420. See Note 9.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling costs included advertising expenses, marketing costs, employee and store costs and sales commissions. The cost of advertising was expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $338,188, $299,201 and $262,492 in advertising costs during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. General and administrative expenses included human resources, legal, finance and other support and administrative functions.

Earnings per share. Shares of preferred stock held in an unallocated account of the ESOP (see Note 11) and common stock held in a revocable trust (see Note 10) were not considered outstanding shares for basic or diluted income per common share calculations. All references to “shares” or “per share” information throughout this report relate to common shares and are stated on a diluted per common share basis, unless otherwise indicated. Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated using the two-class method in accordance with the Earnings Per Common Share Topic of the ASC. Basic net income per common share amounts were computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net income per common share amounts were computed based on the weighted-average number of common

shares outstanding plus all dilutive securities potentially outstanding during the year. See Note 15.

Impact of recently issued accounting standards. Effective January 1, 2015, the Company adopted ASU No. 2014-01, "Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects," which allows companies to elect to use the proportional amortization method to account for investments in qualified affordable housing projects if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, which replaces the effective yield method, the cost of the investment is amortized in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received to income tax expense. The adoption of ASU No. 2014-01 did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes - Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” which eliminates the requirement for separate presentation of current and noncurrent portions of deferred tax. All deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities will be presented as non-current on the balance sheet. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Either retrospective or prospective presentation can be used. The company will adopt ASU No. 2015-17 as required. The ASU will not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs," which requires companies to present debt issuance costs associated with a debt liability as a deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability on the balance sheet rather than being capitalized as an asset. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and retrospective presentation is required. The Company will adopt ASU No. 2015-03 as required. The ASU will not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue Recognition - Revenue from Contracts with Customers," which is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The issuance of ASU No. 2015-14 in August 2015 delays the effective date of the standard to interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard.

Reclassification. Certain amounts in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for 2013 and 2014 have been reclassified to conform to the 2015 presentation.



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

NOTE 2 – ACQUISITIONS

On September 16, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive Stock Purchase Agreement and completed the acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Consorcio Comex, S.A. de C.V. (Comex). The U.S./Canada business of Comex focuses on the manufacture and sale of paint and paint related products through retail service centers under various proprietary brands. The acquisition strengthens the ability of the Paint Stores Group and Consumer Group to serve customers in key geographic markets. The acquisition resulted in the recognition of intangible assets of $4,696. Final asset valuation adjustments resulted in a realized gain of $6,198 which was included in Other (income) expense for the year ended December 31, 2014. The acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex has been accounted for as a purchase and the results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.

On April 3, 2014, the Company terminated the Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on November 9, 2013 and subsequently amended and restated for the acquisition of the Mexico business of Comex pursuant to the terms of the agreement.

NOTE 3 – INVENTORIES

Inventories were stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined principally on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. The following presents the effect on inventories, net income and net income per common share had the Company used the first-in, first-out (FIFO) inventory valuation method adjusted for income taxes at the statutory rate and assuming no other adjustments. Management believes that the use of LIFO results in a better matching of costs and revenues. This information is presented to enable the reader to make comparisons with companies using the FIFO method of inventory valuation. During 2014 and 2013, certain inventories accounted for on the LIFO method were reduced, resulting in the liquidation of certain quantities carried at costs prevailing in prior years. The 2014 and 2013 liquidations increased net income by $196 and $169, respectively.



	2015			2014			2013
Percentage of total inventories on LIFO	78		%	76		%	75		%
Excess of FIFO over LIFO	$	251,060		$	331,867		$	337,214
Increase in net income due to LIFO	49,658			3,230			12,299
Increase in net income per common share due to LIFO	.53			.03			.12

NOTE 4 – GOODWILL, INTANGIBLE AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS

During 2013 and 2014, the Company recognized acquired customer relationships and finite-lived trademarks of $3,311 and $1,385, respectively, related to the acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex. The customer relationships and finite-lived trademarks are being amortized over 7 years from the date of acquisition. The Company initially recognized $1,885 of goodwill and $466 of indefinite-lived trademarks in 2013, but subsequently adjusted these amounts to zero based on final asset valuations completed in 2014.

In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable or the useful life may have changed, impairment tests are to be performed. Undiscounted cash flows are to be used to calculate the recoverable value of long-lived assets to determine if such assets are impaired. Where impairment is identified, a discounted cash flow valuation model, incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each group of assets, is to be used to determine the fair value for the assets to measure any potential impairment. No material impairments were recorded in 2015, 2014 and 2013.

In accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually, and interim impairment tests are performed whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate an impairment has more likely than not occurred. October 1 has been established for the annual impairment review. At the time of impairment testing, values are estimated separately for goodwill and trademarks with indefinite lives using a discounted cash flow valuation model, incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each group of assets. An optional qualitative assessment may alleviate the need to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test when impairment is unlikely. The annual impairment reviews performed as of October 1, 2015, 2014 and 2013 did not result in any goodwill or trademark impairment.

Amortization of finite-lived intangible assets is as follows for the next five years: $22,241 in 2016, $16,825 in 2017, $14,195 in 2018, $11,131 in 2019 and $10,951 in 2020.



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

A summary of changes in the Company’s carrying value of goodwill by Reportable Segment is as follows:



Goodwill	Paint Stores Group			Consumer Group			Global Finishes Group			Latin America Coatings Group			Consolidated Totals
Balance at January 1, 2013 ^(a)	$	286,784		$	706,292		$	152,287		$	10,642		$	1,156,005
Acquisitions	1,885						17,963						19,848
Currency and other adjustments	(1,369		)	(2,941		)	8,048			(904		)	2,834
Balance at December 31, 2013 ^(a)	287,300			703,351			178,298			9,738			1,178,687
Currency and other adjustments	(1,866		)	(1,145		)	(17,287		)	(43		)	(20,341		)
Balance at December 31, 2014 ^(a)	285,434			702,206			161,011			9,695			1,158,346
Currency and other adjustments	(28		)	(1,135		)	(13,801		)	(49		)	(15,013		)
Balance at December 31, 2015 ^(a)	$	285,406		$	701,071		$	147,210		$	9,646		$	1,143,333


(a)	Net of accumulated impairment losses of $8,904 ($8,113 in the Consumer Group and $791 in the Global Finishes Group).

A summary of the Company’s carrying value of intangible assets is as follows:



	Finite-lived intangible assets									Trademarks with indefinite lives		Total intangible assets
	Software			All other			Subtotal			Trademarks with indefinite lives		Total intangible assets
December 31, 2015
Weighted-average amortization period	8 years			12 years			11 years
Gross	$	123,863		$	312,119		$	435,982
Accumulated amortization	(95,008		)	(228,921		)	(323,929		)
Net value	$	28,855		$	83,198		$	112,053		$	143,318	$	255,371

December 31, 2014
Weighted-average amortization period	8 years			12 years			11 years
Gross	$	126,258		$	317,005		$	443,263
Accumulated amortization	(88,384		)	(215,518		)	(303,902		)
Net value	$	37,874		$	101,487		$	139,361		$	149,766	$	289,127

December 31, 2013
Weighted-average amortization period	8 years			10 years			9 years
Gross	$	114,404		$	327,962		$	442,366
Accumulated amortization	(77,018		)	(202,084		)	(279,102		)
Net value	$	37,386		$	125,878		$	163,264		$	150,035	$	313,299

NOTE 5 – EXIT OR DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES

Management is continually re-evaluating the Company’s operating facilities, including acquired operating facilities, against its long-term strategic goals. Liabilities associated with exit or disposal activities are recognized as incurred in accordance with the Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic of the ASC. Provisions for qualified exit costs are made at the time a facility is no longer operational. Qualified exit costs primarily include post-closure rent expenses or costs to terminate the contract before the end of its term and costs of employee terminations. Adjustments may be made to liabilities accrued for qualified exit costs if information becomes available upon which more accurate

amounts can be reasonably estimated. Concurrently, property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, and if impairment exists, the carrying value of the related assets is reduced to estimated fair value. Additional impairment may be recorded for subsequent revisions in estimated fair value. Adjustments to prior provisions and additional impairment charges for property, plant and equipment of closed sites being held for disposal are recorded in Other general expense – net.

During 2015, 30 stores in the Paint Stores Group, 7 branches in the Global Finishes Group and 2 stores in the Latin America Coatings Group were closed due to lower demand or



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

redundancy. In addition, the Global Finishes Group exited a business in Europe. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit cost of $168 and $8,329 were charged to the Paint Stores Group and Global Finishes Group, respectively. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs related to manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, stores and branches closed prior to 2015 of $1,264 were recorded.

During 2014, 7 facilities and 24 stores and branches were closed due to lower demand or redundancy. In addition, the Global Finishes Group exited its business in Venezuela. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit cost of $280, $4,809 and $4,767 were charged to the Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group and Global Finishes Group, respectively. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs related to manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, stores and branches closed prior to 2014 of $3,722 were recorded.

During 2013, 5 facilities and 16 stores and branches were closed due to lower demand or redundancy. Provisions for

severance and other qualified exit cost of $1,004, $598, $278 and $123 were charged to the Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group, respectively. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs and adjustments to prior provisions related to manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, stores and branches closed prior to 2013 of $2,679 were recorded.

At December 31, 2015, a portion of the remaining accrual for qualified exit costs relating to facilities shutdown prior to 2013 is expected to be incurred by the end of 2016. The remaining portion of the ending accrual for facilities shutdown prior to 2013 primarily represented post-closure contractual expenses related to certain owned facilities which are closed and being held for disposal. The Company cannot reasonably estimate when such matters will be concluded to permit disposition.

The tables on the following pages summarize the activity and remaining liabilities associated with qualified exit costs:



(Thousands of dollars) Exit Plan	Balance at December 31, 2014		Provisions in Cost of goods sold or SG&A		Actual expenditures charged to accrual			Balance at December 31, 2015
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2015:
Other qualified exit costs			$	168	$	(156	)	$	12
Global Finishes Group stores shutdown in 2015:
Severance and related costs			1,341		(245		)	1,096
Other qualified exit costs			6,988		(4,238		)	2,750
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2014:
Other qualified exit costs	$	280	142		(238		)	184
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2014:
Severance and related costs	2,732		466		(2,753		)	445
Other qualified exit costs	781		6		(735		)	52
Global Finishes Group exit of business in 2014:
Severance and related costs	104		326					430
Other qualified exit costs	1,080		324		(1,051		)	353
Paint Stores Group facility shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs	654				(654		)
Other qualified exit costs	1,205				(411		)	794
Global Finishes Group stores shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs	28				(28		)
Other qualified exit costs	138				(138		)
Severance and other qualified exit costs for facilities shutdown prior to 2013	1,514				(553		)	961
Totals	$	8,516	$	9,761	$	(11,200	)	$	7,077



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)



Exit Plan	Balance at December 31, 2013		Provisions in Cost of goods sold or SG&A		Actual expenditures charged to accrual			Balance at December 31, 2014
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2014:
Other qualified exit costs			$	280				$	280
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2014:
Severance and related costs			4,028		$	(1,296	)	2,732
Other qualified exit costs			781					781
Global Finishes Group exit of business in 2014:
Severance and related costs			2,500		(2,396		)	104
Other qualified exit costs			2,267		(1,187		)	1,080
Paint Stores Group facility shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs	$	977	2,126		(2,449		)	654
Other qualified exit costs			1,499		(294		)	1,205
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs	598		97		(695		)
Global Finishes Group stores shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs	33				(5		)	28
Other qualified exit costs	220				(82		)	138
Latin America Coatings Group facilities shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs	123				(123		)
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2012:
Other qualified exit costs	244				(51		)	193
Global Finishes Group facilities shutdown in 2012:
Severance and related costs	2,177				(1,863		)	314
Other qualified exit costs	83							83
Other qualified exit costs for facilities shutdown prior to 2012	1,365				(441		)	924
Totals	$	5,820	$	13,578	$	(10,882	)	$	8,516



Exit Plan	Balance at December 31, 2012		Provisions in Cost of goods sold or SG&A		Actual expenditures charged to accrual			Adjustments to prior provisions in Other general expense - net			Balance at December 31, 2013
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs			$	1,004	$	(27	)				$	977
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs			598								598
Global Finishes Group branches shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs			278		(25		)				253
Latin America Coatings Group facilities shutdown in 2013:
Severance and related costs			123								123
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2012:
Other qualified exit costs	$	313			(68		)	$	(1	)	244
Global Finishes Group facilities shutdown in 2012:
Severance and related costs	2,236		2,533		(2,592		)				2,177
Other qualified exit costs	3,430		83		(3,530		)	100			83
Global Finishes Group branches shutdown in 2011:
Other qualified exit costs	290				(222		)				68
Other qualified exit costs for facilities shutdown prior to 2011	2,288				(955		)	(36		)	1,297
Totals	$	8,557	$	4,619	$	(7,419	)	$	63		$	5,820



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

NOTE 6 – PENSION, HEALTH CARE AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS

The Company provides pension benefits to substantially all employees through primarily noncontributory defined contribution or defined benefit plans and certain health care and life insurance benefits to domestic active employees and eligible retirees. In accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the Company recognizes an asset for overfunded defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plans and a liability for unfunded or underfunded plans. In addition, actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs of such plans are recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss, a component of Shareholders’ equity. The amounts recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will continue to be modified as actuarial assumptions and service costs change, and all such amounts will be amortized to expense over a period of years through the net pension cost (credit) and net periodic benefit cost.

Health care plans. The Company provides certain domestic health care plans that are contributory and contain cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. There were 21,918, 21,239 and 19,440 active employees entitled to receive benefits under these plans at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The cost of these benefits for active employees, which includes claims incurred and claims incurred but not reported, amounted to $217,781, $202,787 and $174,588 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Defined contribution pension plans. The Company’s annual contribution for its domestic defined contribution pension plan was $35,435, $32,384 and $27,803 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The contribution percentage ranges from two percent to seven percent of compensation for covered employees based on an age and service formula. Assets in employee accounts of the domestic defined contribution pension plan are invested in various investment funds as directed by the participants. These investment funds did not own a significant number of shares of the Company’s common stock for any year presented.

The Company’s annual contributions for its foreign defined contribution pension plans, which are based on various percentages of compensation for covered employees up to certain limits, were $5,888, $4,592 and $1,428 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Assets in employee accounts of the foreign defined contribution pension plans are invested in various investment funds. These investment funds did not own a significant number of shares of the Company’s common stock for any year presented.

Defined benefit pension plans. The Company has one salaried and one hourly domestic defined benefit pension plan, and twenty-two foreign defined benefit pension plans, including three Canadian plans acquired in connection with the 2013 acquisition of Comex's U.S./Canada business. All participants in the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan prior to January 1, 2002 retain the previous defined benefit formula for computing benefits with certain modifications for active employees. Employees who became participants on or after January 1, 2002 are credited with certain contribution credits that range from two percent to seven percent of compensation based on an age and service formula. Contribution credits are converted into units to account for each participant’s benefits. Participants will receive a variable annuity benefit upon retirement or a lump sum distribution upon termination (if vested). The variable annuity benefit is subject to the hypothetical returns achieved on each participant’s allocation of units from investments in various investment funds as directed by the participant. Contribution credits to the revised domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan are being funded through existing plan assets. Effective October 1, 2011, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was frozen for new hires, and all newly hired U.S. non-collectively bargained employees are eligible to participate in the Company’s domestic defined contribution plan.

In connection with the 2013 acquisition of Comex's U.S./Canada business, the Company acquired a domestic defined benefit pension plan (Comex Plan). The Comex Plan was merged into the Company's salaried defined benefit pension plan as of November 29, 2013 and was frozen for new participants as of December 31, 2013. Accrued benefits and vesting service under the Comex Plan were credited under the Company's domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan.

At December 31, 2015, the domestic salaried and hourly defined benefit pension plans were overfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $624,791, fair value of plan assets of $858,605 and excess plan assets of $233,814. The plans are funded in accordance with all applicable regulations at December 31, 2015 and no funding will be required in 2016. At December 31, 2014, the domestic salaried and hourly defined benefit pension plans were overfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $653,338, fair value of plan assets of $896,071 and excess plan assets of $242,733. At December 31, 2013, the domestic salaried and hourly defined benefit pension plan were overfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $582,036, fair value of plan assets of $870,386 and excess plan assets of $288,350.

At December 31, 2015, seventeen of the Company’s foreign defined benefit pension plans were unfunded or underfunded,



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

with combined accumulated benefit obligations, projected benefit obligations, fair values of net assets and deficiencies of plan assets of $102,468, $131,293, $80,710 and $50,583, respectively. A decrease of $32,669 from 2014 in the combined projected benefit obligations of all foreign defined benefit pension plans was primarily due to changes in plan assumptions and a settlement charge related to one of the acquired Canada plans.

The Company expects to make the following benefit payments for all domestic and foreign defined benefit pension plans: $52,635 in 2016; $53,374 in 2017; $54,088 in 2018;

$54,356 in 2019; $55,359 in 2020; and $278,245 in 2021 through 2025. The Company expects to contribute $4,405 to the foreign plans in 2016.

The estimated net actuarial losses and prior service costs for the defined benefit pension plans that are expected to be amortized from Cumulative other comprehensive loss into the net pension costs in 2016 are $6,957 and $1,205, respectively.

The following table summarizes the components of the net pension costs and Cumulative other comprehensive loss related to the defined benefit pension plans:



	Domestic Defined Benefit Pension Plans									Foreign Defined Benefit Pension Plans
	2015			2014			2013			2015			2014			2013
Net pension costs:
Service costs	$	21,120		$	21,342		$	23,176		$	5,071		$	5,261		$	5,039
Interest costs	24,535			26,266			18,444			8,719			10,422			7,940
Expected returns on plan assets	(52,095		)	(51,293		)	(42,937		)	(9,296		)	(10,836		)	(7,487		)
Amortization of prior service costs	1,310			1,837			1,823
Amortization of actuarial losses	1,962						13,147			1,910			1,413			1,716
Ongoing pension (credits) costs	(3,168		)	(1,848		)	13,653			6,404			6,260			7,208
Settlement costs (credits)										3,255			(3,422		)	(220		)
Net pension (credits) costs	(3,168		)	(1,848		)	13,653			9,659			2,838			6,988
Other changes in plan assets and projected benefit obligation recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss (before taxes):
Net actuarial losses (gains) arising during the year	15,359			47,785			(90,669		)	1,907			21,792			(5,487		)
Prior service costs during the year				2,242			1,756
Amortization of prior service costs	(1,310		)	(1,837		)	(1,823		)
Amortization of actuarial losses	(1,962		)				(13,147		)	(1,910		)	(1,413		)	(1,716		)
Exchange rate (loss) gain recognized during year										(5,830		)	(7,988		)	819
Total recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss	12,087			48,190			(103,883		)	(5,833		)	12,391			(6,384		)
Total recognized in net pension costs (credits) and Cumulative other comprehensive loss	$	8,919		$	46,342		$	(90,230	)	$	3,826		$	15,229		$	604

The Company employs a total return investment approach for the domestic and foreign defined benefit pension plan assets. A mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of assets for a prudent level of risk. In determining the expected long-term rate of return on defined benefit pension plan assets,

management considers the historical rates of return, the nature of investments and an expectation of future investment strategies. The target allocations for plan assets are 45 – 65 percent equity securities and 30 – 40 percent fixed income securities.



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

The following tables summarize the fair value of the defined benefit pension plan assets at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:



	Fair Value at December 31, 2015		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Investments at fair value:
Short-term investments ^(a)	$	13,475			$	13,475
Equity investments ^(b)	688,799		$	372,033	316,766
Fixed income investments ^(c)	290,470		141,448		149,022
Other assets ^(d)	28,200				16,361		$	11,839
	$	1,020,944	$	513,481	$	495,624	$	11,839

	Fair Value at December 31, 2014		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Investments at fair value:
Short-term investments ^(a)	$	14,846			$	14,846
Equity investments ^(b)	739,358		$	404,542	334,816
Fixed income investments ^(c)	285,042		141,529		143,513
Other assets ^(d)	44,470				28,436		$	16,034
	$	1,083,716	$	546,071	$	521,611	$	16,034

	Fair Value at December 31, 2013		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Investments at fair value:
Short-term investments ^(a)	$	15,055	$	1,941	$	13,114
Equity investments ^(b)	736,873		419,779		317,094
Fixed income investments ^(c)	255,927		125,377		130,550
Other assets ^(d)	47,494				29,553		$	17,941
	$	1,055,349	$	547,097	$	490,311	$	17,941


(a)	This category includes a full range of high quality, short-term money market securities.


(b)	This category includes actively managed equity assets that track primarily to the S&P 500.


(c)	This category includes government and corporate bonds that track primarily to the Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index.


(d)	This category consists of venture capital funds.

The following tables summarize the changes in the fair value of the defined benefit pension plan assets classified as level 3 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:



	Balance at December 31, 2014		Dispositions			Net Realized and Unrealized Gains		Balance at December 31, 2015
Other assets	$	16,034	$	(5,928	)	$	1,733	$	11,839

	Balance at December 31, 2013		Dispositions			Net Realized and Unrealized Gains		Balance at December 31, 2014
Other assets	$	17,941	$	(4,320	)	$	2,413	$	16,034

	Balance at January 1, 2013		Dispositions			Net Realized and Unrealized Gains		Balance at December 31, 2013
Other assets	$	18,850	$	(4,068	)	$	3,159	$	17,941

Included as equity investments in the domestic defined benefit pension plan assets at December 31, 2015 were 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a market value of $77,880, representing 9.1 percent of total domestic plan assets. Dividends received on the Company’s common stock during 2015 totaled $804.



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

The following table summarizes the obligations, plan assets and assumptions used for the defined benefit pension plans, which are all measured as of December 31:



	Domestic Defined Benefit Pension Plans									Foreign Defined Benefit Pension Plans
	2015			2014			2013			2015			2014			2013
Accumulated benefit obligations at end of year	$	621,873		$	648,480		$	577,736		$	172,426		$	203,610		$	187,670
Projected benefit obligations:
Balances at beginning of year	$	653,338		$	582,036		$	466,827		$	234,524		$	222,996		$	168,758
Service costs	21,120			21,342			23,176			5,071			5,261			5,039
Interest costs	24,535			26,266			18,444			8,719			10,422			7,940
Actuarial (gains) losses	(40,602		)	68,748			(5,488		)	(3,045		)	32,551			5,939
Acquisitions of businesses and other				2,242			113,174			1,072			(6,692		)	39,622
Settlements										(18,707		)	(3,370		)
Effect of foreign exchange										(17,211		)	(18,987		)	1,549
Benefits paid	(33,600		)	(47,296		)	(34,097		)	(8,569		)	(7,657		)	(5,851		)
Balances at end of year	624,791			653,338			582,036			201,854			234,524			222,996
Plan assets:
Balances at beginning of year	896,071			870,386			703,563			187,645			184,963			133,013
Actual returns on plan assets	(3,866		)	72,256			128,117			4,844			20,240			20,316
Acquisitions of businesses and other				725			72,803			11,424			7,328			36,106
Settlements										(18,707		)	(3,370		)
Effect of foreign exchange										(14,298		)	(13,859		)	1,379
Benefits paid	(33,600		)	(47,296		)	(34,097		)	(8,569		)	(7,657		)	(5,851		)
Balances at end of year	858,605			896,071			870,386			162,339			187,645			184,963
Excess (deficient) plan assets over projected benefit obligations	$	233,814		$	242,733		$	288,350		$	(39,515	)	$	(46,879	)	$	(38,033	)
Assets and liabilities recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Deferred pension assets	$	233,814		$	242,733		$	288,350		$	11,068		$	7,411		$	14,096
Other accruals										(1,442		)	(810		)	(1,126		)
Other long-term liabilities										(49,141		)	(53,480		)	(51,003		)
	$	233,814		$	242,733		$	288,350		$	(39,515	)	$	(46,879	)	$	(38,033	)
Amounts recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss:
Net actuarial losses	$	(120,454	)	$	(107,057	)	$	(59,272	)	$	(41,741	)	$	(47,574	)	$	(35,183	)
Prior service costs	(5,138		)	(6,448		)	(6,043		)
	$	(125,592	)	$	(113,505	)	$	(65,315	)	$	(41,741	)	$	(47,574	)	$	(35,183	)
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine projected benefit obligations:
Discount rate	4.40		%	3.95		%	4.65		%	4.20		%	3.92		%	4.89		%
Rate of compensation increase	3.14		%	4.00		%	4.00		%	4.00		%	3.70		%	4.31		%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net pension costs:
Discount rate	3.95		%	4.65		%	3.73		%	3.92		%	4.89		%	4.58		%
Expected long-term rate of return on assets	6.00		%	6.00		%	6.00		%	4.84		%	5.58		%	5.67		%
Rate of compensation increase	4.00		%	4.00		%	4.00		%	3.70		%	4.31		%	4.08		%



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. Employees of the Company hired in the United States prior to January 1, 1993 who are not members of a collective bargaining unit, and certain groups of employees added through acquisitions, are eligible for health care and life

insurance benefits upon retirement, subject to the terms of the unfunded plans. There were 4,442, 4,443 and 4,419 retired employees entitled to receive such postretirement benefits at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The following table summarizes the obligation and the assumptions used for postretirement benefits other than pensions:



	Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions
	2015			2014			2013
Benefit obligation:
Balance at beginning of year - unfunded	$	295,149		$	286,651		$	338,134
Service cost	2,485			2,434			3,061
Interest cost	11,182			12,782			12,183
Actuarial (gain) loss	(19,370		)	27,757			(50,593		)
Plan amendments	(9,269		)	(19,043		)	(2,503		)
Benefits paid	(16,794		)	(15,432		)	(13,631		)
Balance at end of year - unfunded	$	263,383		$	295,149		$	286,651
Liabilities recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Postretirement benefits other than pensions	$	(248,523	)	$	(277,892	)	$	(268,874	)
Other accruals	(14,860		)	(17,257		)	(17,777		)
	$	(263,383	)	$	(295,149	)	$	(286,651	)
Amounts recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss:
Net actuarial losses	$	(15,664	)	$	(36,044	)	$	(8,287	)
Prior service credits	25,784			21,043			2,503
	$	10,120		$	(15,001	)	$	(5,784	)
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation:
Discount rate	4.30		%	3.90		%	4.60		%
Health care cost trend rate - pre-65	6.00		%	7.00		%	7.50		%
Health care cost trend rate - post-65	5.00		%	6.50		%	6.50		%
Prescription drug cost increases	11.50		%	6.50		%	7.00		%
Employer Group Waiver Plan (EGWP) trend rate	11.50		%	8.00		%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
Discount rate	3.90		%	4.60		%	3.70		%
Health care cost trend rate - pre-65	7.00		%	7.50		%	8.00		%
Health care cost trend rate - post-65	6.50		%	6.50		%	8.00		%
Prescription drug cost increases	6.50		%	7.00		%	8.00		%



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic benefit cost and cumulative other comprehensive loss related to postretirement benefits other than pensions:



	Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions
	2015			2014			2013
Net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	2,485		$	2,434		$	3,061
Interest cost	11,182			12,782			12,183
Amortization of actuarial losses	1,011						3,934
Amortization of prior service credit	(4,529		)	(503		)	(328		)
Net periodic benefit cost	10,149			14,713			18,850
Other changes in projected benefit obligation recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss (before taxes):
Net actuarial (gain) loss	(19,370		)	27,757			(50,593		)
Prior service credit arising during the year	(9,269		)	(19,043		)	(2,503		)
Amortization of actuarial losses	(1,011		)				(3,934		)
Amortization of prior service credit	4,529			503			328
Total recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss	(25,121		)	9,217			(56,702		)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and Cumulative other comprehensive loss	$	(14,972	)	$	23,930		$	(37,852	)

The estimated net actuarial losses and prior service (credits) for postretirement benefits other than pensions that are expected to be amortized from Cumulative other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost in 2016 are $0 and $(6,579), respectively.

The assumed health care cost trend rate and prescription drug cost increases used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for postretirement health care benefits for 2016 both decrease in each successive year until reaching 4.5 percent in 2024. The assumed health care and prescription drug cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the postretirement health care benefit obligation. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care and prescription drug cost trend rates would have had the following effects at December 31, 2015:



	One-Percentage Point
	Increase		(Decrease)
Effect on total of service and interest cost components	$	26	$	(70	)
Effect on the postretirement benefit obligation	$	1,667	$	(2,483	)

The Company expects to make retiree health care benefit cash payments as follows:



	Expected Cash Payments
2016	$	14,860
2017	15,856
2018	16,816
2019	17,671
2020	18,294
2021 through 2025	94,114
Total expected benefit cash payments	$	177,611



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

NOTE 7 – DEBT

Long-term debt



	Due Date	2015		2014		2013
1.35% Senior Notes	2017	$	699,643	$	699,460	$	699,277
3.45% Senior Notes	2025	399,774
4.55% Senior Notes	2045	397,634
4.00% Senior Notes	2042	298,645		298,595		298,545
7.375% Debentures	2027	119,372		119,369		119,366
7.45% Debentures	2097	3,500		3,500		3,500
2.02% to 8.00% Promissory Notes	Through 2029	1,628		1,791		1,685
		$	1,920,196	$	1,122,715	$	1,122,373

Maturities of long-term debt are as follows for the next five years: $3,154 in 2016; $700,665 in 2017; $153 in 2018, $156 in 2019 and $159 in 2020. Interest expense on long-term debt was $54,634, $56,408 and $57,949 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Among other restrictions, the Company’s Notes, Debentures and revolving credit agreement contain certain covenants relating to liens, ratings changes, merger and sale of assets, consolidated leverage and change of control as defined in the agreements. In the event of default under any one of these arrangements, acceleration of the maturity of any one or more of these borrowings may result. The Company was in compliance with all covenants for all years presented.

On July 28, 2015, the Company issued $400 million of 3.45% Senior Notes due 2025 and $400 million of 4.55% Senior Notes due 2045. The notes are covered under a shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on July 28, 2015. The proceeds are being used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of a portion of the Company’s outstanding short-term borrowings.

Short-term borrowings. On July 16, 2015, the Company and three of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sherwin-Williams Canada, Inc. (SW Canada), Sherwin-Williams Luxembourg S.à r.l. (SW Lux) and Sherwin-Williams UK Holding Limited, entered into a new five-year $1.350 billion credit agreement (new credit agreement). The new credit agreement is being used for general corporate purposes, including the financing of working capital requirements. The new credit agreement allows the Company to extend the maturity of the facility with two one-year extension options and to increase the aggregate amount of the facility to $1.850 billion, both of which are subject to the discretion of each lender. The new credit agreement replaced the previous credit agreements for the Company, SW Canada and SW Lux in the amounts of $1.05 billion, CAD 150,000 and €95,000 (Euro), respectively. At December 31, 2015, short-term borrowings under the new credit agreement were $21,715 with a weighted average interest rate of 0.9%. Borrowings outstanding under various foreign programs were $17,747 at December 31, 2015 with a weighted average interest rate of 14.4%.

There were no borrowings outstanding under the Company's domestic commercial paper program at December 31, 2015 and 2013, respectively. At December 31, 2014

borrowings outstanding under the domestic commercial paper program totaled $625,860. The weighted average interest rate of these borrowings was 0.3%.

On January 30, 2012, the Company entered into a five-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit of up to an aggregate availability of $500,000. On April 23, 2012, the Company entered into a five-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit up to an aggregate availability of $250,000. On November 14, 2012, the Company entered into a three-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gave the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit up to an aggregate availability of $250,000. The November 14, 2012 credit agreement matured in 2015. At December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding under any of these credit agreements.

NOTE 8 – OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

The operations of the Company, like those of other companies in our industry, are subject to various domestic and foreign environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations not only govern current operations and products, but also impose potential liability on the Company for past operations. Management expects environmental laws and regulations to impose increasingly stringent requirements upon the Company and the industry in the future. Management believes that the Company conducts its operations in compliance



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

with applicable environmental laws and regulations and has implemented various programs designed to protect the environment and promote continued compliance.

The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites (including sites which were previously owned and/or operated by businesses acquired by the Company). In addition, the Company, together with other parties, has been designated a potentially responsible party under federal and state environmental protection laws for the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination and hazardous waste at a number of third-party sites, primarily Superfund sites. In general, these laws provide that potentially responsible parties may be held jointly and severally liable for investigation and remediation costs regardless of fault. The Company may be similarly designated with respect to additional third-party sites in the future.

The Company initially provides for estimated costs of environmental-related activities relating to its past operations and third-party sites for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and when such costs can be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. These estimated costs are determined based on currently available facts regarding each site. If the best estimate of costs can only be identified as a range and no specific amount within that range can be determined more likely than any other amount within the range, the minimum of the range is provided. The Company continuously assesses its potential liability for investigation and remediation-related activities and adjusts its environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated and as additional accounting guidelines are issued. Included in Other long-term liabilities at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were accruals for extended environmental-related activities of $129,856, $114,281 and $86,647, respectively. Included in Other accruals at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were accruals for estimated costs of current investigation and remediation activities of $22,493, $16,868 and $15,385, respectively.

Actual costs incurred may vary from the accrued estimates due to the inherent uncertainties involved including, among others, the number and financial condition of parties involved with respect to any given site, the volumetric contribution which may be attributed to the Company relative to that attributed to other parties, the nature and magnitude of the wastes involved, the various technologies that can be used for remediation and the determination of acceptable remediation with respect to a particular site. If the Company’s future loss contingency is ultimately determined to be at the unaccrued maximum of the

estimated range of possible outcomes for every site for which costs can be reasonably estimated, the Company’s accrual for environmental-related activities would be $88,900 higher than the minimum accruals at December 31, 2015.

Two of the Company’s currently and formerly owned manufacturing sites account for the majority of the accrual for environmental-related activities and the unaccrued maximum of the estimated range of possible outcomes at December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2015, $102,033, or 67.0 percent of the total accrual, related directly to these two sites. In the aggregate unaccrued maximum of $88,900 at December 31, 2015, $61,129, or 68.8 percent, related to the two manufacturing sites. While environmental investigations and remedial actions are in different stages at these sites, additional investigations, remedial actions and monitoring will likely be required at each site.

Management cannot presently estimate the ultimate potential loss contingencies related to these sites or other less significant sites until such time as a substantial portion of the investigation at the sites is completed and remedial action plans are developed. In the event any future loss contingency significantly exceeds the current amount accrued, the recording of the ultimate liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which the additional costs are accrued. Management does not believe that any potential liability ultimately attributed to the Company for its environmental-related matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, or cash flow due to the extended period of time during which environmental investigation and remediation takes place. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s operations cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.

Management expects these contingent environmental-related liabilities to be resolved over an extended period of time. Management is unable to provide a more specific time frame due to the indefinite amount of time to conduct investigation activities at any site, the indefinite amount of time to obtain environmental agency approval, as necessary, with respect to investigation and remediation activities, and the indefinite amount of time necessary to conduct remediation activities.

The Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations Topic of the ASC requires a liability to be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if a settlement date and fair value can be reasonably estimated. The Company recognizes a liability for any conditional asset retirement obligation when sufficient information is available to reasonably estimate a settlement date to determine the fair value of such a liability. The Company has identified certain conditional asset retirement obligations at various current and closed manufacturing,



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

distribution and store facilities. These obligations relate primarily to asbestos abatement, hazardous waste Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) closures, well abandonment, transformers and used oil disposals and underground storage tank closures. Using investigative, remediation and disposal methods that are currently available to the Company, the estimated costs of these obligations were accrued and are not significant. The recording of additional liabilities for future conditional asset retirement obligations may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which the costs are accrued. Management does not believe that any potential liability ultimately attributed to the Company for its conditional asset retirement obligations will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, or cash flow due to the extended period of time over which sufficient information may become available regarding the closure or modification of any one or group of the Company’s facilities. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s operations cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.

NOTE 9 – LITIGATION

In the course of its business, the Company is subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits, including, but not limited to, litigation relating to product liability and warranty, personal injury, environmental, intellectual property, commercial, contractual and antitrust claims that are inherently subject to many uncertainties regarding the possibility of a loss to the Company. These uncertainties will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur confirming the incurrence of a liability or the reduction of a liability. In accordance with the Contingencies Topic of the ASC, the Company accrues for these contingencies by a charge to income when it is both probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that the Company’s loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the additional liability may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such additional liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded because it is not probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of any such loss cannot be reasonably estimated, any potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded or exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued, the Contingencies

Topic of the ASC requires disclosure of the contingency when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss may have been incurred.

Lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. The Company’s past operations included the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The Company, along with other companies, is and has been a defendant in a number of legal proceedings, including individual personal injury actions, purported class actions, and actions brought by various counties, cities, school districts and other government-related entities, arising from the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The plaintiffs’ claims have been based upon various legal theories, including negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentations and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy, violations of unfair trade practice and consumer protection laws, enterprise liability, market share liability, public nuisance, unjust enrichment and other theories. The plaintiffs seek various damages and relief, including personal injury and property damage, costs relating to the detection and abatement of lead-based paint from buildings, costs associated with a public education campaign, medical monitoring costs and others. The Company has also been a defendant in legal proceedings arising from the manufacture and sale of non-lead-based paints that seek recovery based upon various legal theories, including the failure to adequately warn of potential exposure to lead during surface preparation when using non-lead-based paint on surfaces previously painted with lead-based paint. The Company believes that the litigation brought to date is without merit or subject to meritorious defenses and is vigorously defending such litigation. The Company has not settled any material lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation. The Company expects that additional lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation may be filed against the Company in the future asserting similar or different legal theories and seeking similar or different types of damages and relief.

Notwithstanding the Company’s views on the merits, litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties, and the Company ultimately may not prevail. Adverse court rulings or determinations of liability, among other factors, could affect the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation against the Company and encourage an increase in the number and nature of future claims and proceedings. In addition, from time to time, various legislation and administrative regulations have been enacted, promulgated or proposed to impose obligations on present and former manufacturers of lead pigments and lead-based paints respecting asserted health concerns associated with such products or to overturn the effect of court decisions in which the Company and other manufacturers have been successful.



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Due to the uncertainties involved, management is unable to predict the outcome of the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, the number or nature of possible future claims and proceedings or the effect that any legislation and/or administrative regulations may have on the litigation or against the Company. In addition, management cannot reasonably determine the scope or amount of the potential costs and liabilities related to such litigation, or resulting from any such legislation and regulations. The Company has not accrued any amounts for such litigation. With respect to such litigation, including the public nuisance litigation, the Company does not believe that it is probable that a loss has occurred, and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential losses as there is no prior history of a loss of this nature and there is no substantive information upon which an estimate could be based. In addition, any potential liability that may result from any changes to legislation and regulations cannot reasonably be estimated. In the event any significant liability is determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation, the recording of the liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. Additionally, due to the uncertainties associated with the amount of any such liability and/or the nature of any other remedy which may be imposed in such litigation, any potential liability determined to be attributable to the Company arising out of such litigation may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.

Public nuisance claim litigation. The Company and other companies are or were defendants in legal proceedings seeking recovery based on public nuisance liability theories, among other theories, brought by the State of Rhode Island, the City of St. Louis, Missouri, various cities and counties in the State of New Jersey, various cities in the State of Ohio and the State of Ohio, the City of Chicago, Illinois, the City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and the County of Santa Clara, California and other public entities in the State of California. Except for the Santa Clara County, California proceeding, all of these legal proceedings have been concluded in favor of the Company and other defendants at various stages in the proceedings.

The proceedings initiated by the State of Rhode Island included two jury trials. At the conclusion of the second trial, the jury returned a verdict finding that (i) the cumulative presence of lead pigment in paints and coatings on buildings in the State of Rhode Island constitutes a public nuisance, (ii) the Company, along with two other defendants, caused or substantially

contributed to the creation of the public nuisance and (iii) the Company and two other defendants should be ordered to abate the public nuisance. The Company and two other defendants appealed and, on July 1, 2008, the Rhode Island Supreme Court, among other determinations, reversed the judgment of abatement with respect to the Company and two other defendants. The Rhode Island Supreme Court’s decision reversed the public nuisance liability judgment against the Company on the basis that the complaint failed to state a public nuisance claim as a matter of law.

The Santa Clara County, California proceeding was initiated in March 2000 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara. In the original complaint, the plaintiffs asserted various claims including fraud and concealment, strict product liability/failure to warn, strict product liability/design defect, negligence, negligent breach of a special duty, public nuisance, private nuisance, and violations of California’s Business and Professions Code. A number of the asserted claims were resolved in favor of the defendants through pre-trial proceedings. The named plaintiffs in the Fourth Amended Complaint, filed on March 16, 2011, are the Counties of Santa Clara, Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Solano and Ventura, the Cities of Oakland and San Diego and the City and County of San Francisco. The Fourth Amended Complaint asserted a sole claim for public nuisance, alleging that the presence of lead pigments for use in paint and coatings in, on and around residences in the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions constitutes a public nuisance. The plaintiffs sought the abatement of the alleged public nuisance that exists within the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions. A trial commenced on July 15, 2013 and ended on August 22, 2013. The court entered final judgment on January 27, 2014, finding in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Company and two other defendants (ConAgra Grocery Products Company and NL Industries, Inc.). The final judgment held the Company jointly and severally liable with the other two defendants to pay $1.15 billion into a fund to abate the public nuisance. The Company strongly disagrees with the judgment.

On February 18, 2014, the Company filed a motion for new trial and a motion to vacate the judgment. The court denied these motions on March 24, 2014. On March 28, 2014, the Company filed a notice of appeal to the Sixth District Court of Appeal for the State of California. The filing of the notice of appeal effects an automatic stay of the judgment without the requirement to post a bond. The appeal is fully briefed, and the parties are waiting for the Sixth District Court of Appeal to set a date for oral argument. The date for oral argument is at the discretion of the Sixth District Court of Appeal. The Company expects the Sixth District Court of Appeal to issue its ruling within 90 days following oral



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

argument. The Company believes that the judgment conflicts with established principles of law and is unsupported by the evidence. The Company has had a favorable history with respect to lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, particularly other public nuisance litigation, and accordingly, the Company believes that it is not probable that a loss has occurred and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential loss with respect to the case.

Litigation seeking damages from alleged personal injury. The Company and other companies are defendants in a number of legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief from alleged personal injuries. These proceedings include claims by children allegedly injured from ingestion of lead pigment or lead-containing paint and claims for damages allegedly incurred by the children’s parents or guardians. These proceedings generally seek compensatory and punitive damages, and seek other relief including medical monitoring costs. These proceedings include purported claims by individuals, groups of individuals and class actions.

The plaintiff in Thomas v. Lead Industries Association, et al., initiated an action in state court against the Company, other alleged former lead pigment manufacturers and the Lead Industries Association in September 1999. The claims against the Company and the other defendants included strict liability, negligence, negligent misrepresentation and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentation and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy and enterprise liability. Implicit within these claims is the theory of “risk contribution” liability (Wisconsin’s theory which is similar to market share liability, except that liability can be joint and several) due to the plaintiff’s inability to identify the manufacturer of any product that allegedly injured the plaintiff. The case ultimately proceeded to trial and, on November 5, 2007, the jury returned a defense verdict, finding that the plaintiff had ingested white lead carbonate, but was not brain damaged or injured as a result. The plaintiff appealed and, on December 16, 2010, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed the final judgment in favor of the Company and other defendants.

Wisconsin is the only jurisdiction to date to apply a theory of liability with respect to alleged personal injury (i.e., risk contribution/market share liability) that does not require the plaintiff to identify the manufacturer of the product that allegedly injured the plaintiff in the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Although the risk contribution liability theory was applied during the Thomas trial, the constitutionality of this theory as applied to the lead pigment cases has not been judicially determined by the Wisconsin state courts. However, in an unrelated action filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al.,

on November 15, 2010, the District Court held that Wisconsin’s risk contribution theory as applied in that case violated the defendants’ right to substantive due process and is unconstitutionally retroactive. The District Court's decision in Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al., was appealed by the plaintiff to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. On July 24, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the judgment and remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. On January 16, 2015, the defendants filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court seeking that Court's review of the Seventh Circuit's decision, and on May 18, 2015, the United States Supreme Court denied the defendants' petition. Also, in Yasmine Clark v. The Sherwin-Williams Company, et al., the Wisconsin Circuit Court, Milwaukee County, on March 25, 2014, held that the application to a pending case of Section 895.046 of the Wisconsin Statutes (which clarifies the application of the risk contribution theory) is unconstitutional as a violation of the plaintiff’s right to due process of law under the Wisconsin Constitution. The defendants appealed, and the case is currently pending before the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Insurance coverage litigation. The Company and its liability insurers, including certain underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, initiated legal proceedings against each other to primarily determine, among other things, whether the costs and liabilities associated with the abatement of lead pigment are covered under certain insurance policies issued to the Company. The Company’s action, filed on March 3, 2006 in the Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, is currently stayed and inactive. The liability insurers’ action, which was filed on February 23, 2006 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, has been dismissed. An ultimate loss in the insurance coverage litigation would mean that insurance proceeds could be unavailable under the policies at issue to mitigate any ultimate abatement related costs and liabilities. The Company has not recorded any assets related to these insurance policies or otherwise assumed that proceeds from these insurance policies would be received in estimating any contingent liability accrual. Therefore, an ultimate loss in the insurance coverage litigation without a determination of liability against the Company in the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation will have no impact on the Company’s results of operation, liquidity or financial condition. As previously stated, however, the Company has not accrued any amounts for the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation and any significant liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued.



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Government tax assessment settlements related to Brazilian operations. Charges totaling $28,711 and $2,873 were recorded to Cost of goods sold and SG&A, respectively, during the second and third quarters of 2013. The charges were primarily related to import duty taxes paid to the Brazilian government related to the handling of import duties on products brought into the country for the years 2006 through 2012. The Company elected to pay the taxes through an existing voluntary amnesty program offered by the government to resolve these issues rather than contest them in court. The after-tax charges were $21,858 for the full year 2013. The Company's import duty process in Brazil was changed to reach a final resolution of this matter with the Brazilian government.

Litigation related to Consorcio Comex. As previously disclosed, the Company entered into a definitive Stock Purchase Agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the “Purchase Agreement”), with Avisep, S.A. de C.V. (“Avisep”) and Bevisep, S.A. de C.V. (“Bevisep”) to, among other things, acquire the Mexico business of Consorcio Comex, S.A. de C.V. (the "Acquisition"). Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, either the Company or Avisep and Bevisep had the right to terminate the Purchase Agreement in the event that the closing of the Acquisition did not occur on or prior to March 31, 2014 and such party was not in material breach of the Purchase Agreement.

On April 3, 2014, the Company sent notice to Avisep and Bevisep that the Company was terminating the Purchase Agreement. On April 3, 2014, the Company filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, requesting the court to declare that the Company had used commercially reasonable efforts as required under the Purchase Agreement and has not breached the Purchase Agreement. On August 7, 2014, the case was removed by Avisep and Bevisep to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On September 24, 2014, Avisep and Bevisep filed a motion to dismiss the case, including for lack of personal jurisdiction. Oral argument on the motion to dismiss before the District Court occurred on January 27, 2016. On January 29, 2016, the District Court entered a judgment dismissing the case without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. On April 11, 2014, Avisep and Bevisep initiated an arbitration proceeding against the Company in the International Court of Arbitration contending that the Company breached the Purchase Agreement by terminating the Purchase Agreement and not utilizing commercially reasonable efforts under the Purchase Agreement, which allegedly caused Avisep and Bevisep

to incur damages. On June 1, 2015, Avisep and Bevisep filed their statement of claim in the arbitration alleging damages of approximately $85,000. On August 31, 2015, the Company filed its memorial in support of its statement of defense in the arbitration. The hearing on the merits in the arbitration is currently scheduled to begin in April 2016. The Company continues to believe that the claims are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend against such claims.

Titanium dioxide suppliers antitrust class action lawsuit. The Company is a member of the plaintiff class related to Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation that was initiated in 2010 against certain suppliers alleging various theories of relief arising from purchases of titanium dioxide made from 2003 through 2012. The Court approved a settlement less attorney fees and expense, and the Company timely submitted claims to recover its pro-rata portion of the settlement. There was no specified deadline for the claims administrator to complete the review of all claims submitted. In October 2014, the Company was notified that it would receive a disbursement of settlement funds, and the Company received a pro-rata disbursement net of all fees of approximately $21,420. The Company recorded this settlement gain in the fourth quarter of 2014.

NOTE 10 – CAPITAL STOCK

At December 31, 2015, there were 300,000,000 shares of common stock and 30,000,000 shares of serial preferred stock authorized for issuance. Of the authorized serial preferred stock, 3,000,000 shares are designated as cumulative redeemable serial preferred and 1,000,000 shares are designated as convertible serial preferred stock. See Note 11. Under the amended and restated 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (2006 Employee Plan), 19,200,000 common shares may be issued or transferred. See Note 12. An aggregate of 8,824,943, 10,304,816 and 12,121,210 shares of common stock at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were reserved for the exercise and future grants of option rights and future grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units. See Note 12. Common shares outstanding shown in the following table included 487,900, 487,075 and 486,138 shares of common stock held in a revocable trust at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The revocable trust is used to accumulate assets for the purpose of funding the ultimate obligation of certain non-qualified benefit plans. Transactions between the Company and the trust are accounted for in accordance with the Deferred Compensation – Rabbi Trusts Subtopic of the Compensation Topic of the ASC, which requires the assets held by the trust be consolidated with the Company’s accounts.



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)



	Common Shares in Treasury	Common Shares Outstanding
Balance at January 1, 2013	8,352,904	103,270,067
Shares tendered as payment for option rights exercised	2,697	(2,697	)
Shares issued for exercise of option rights		1,127,942
Shares tendered in connection with grants of restricted stock	116,897	(116,897	)
Net shares issued for grants of restricted stock		150,965
Treasury stock purchased	4,300,000	(4,300,000	)
Balance at December 31, 2013	12,772,498	100,129,380
Shares tendered as payment for option rights exercised	7,229	(7,229	)
Shares issued for exercise of option rights		1,423,395
Shares tendered in connection with grants of restricted stock	108,352	(108,352	)
Net shares issued for grants of restricted stock		191,979
Treasury stock purchased	6,925,000	(6,925,000	)
Balance at December 31, 2014	19,813,079	94,704,173
Shares tendered as payment for option rights exercised	14,542	(14,542	)
Shares issued for exercise of option rights		1,133,050
Shares tendered in connection with grants of restricted stock	111,433	(111,433	)
Net shares issued for grants of restricted stock		110,277
Treasury stock purchased	3,575,000	(3,575,000	)
Balance at December 31, 2015	23,514,054	92,246,525

NOTE 11 – STOCK PURCHASE PLAN AND PREFERRED STOCK

As of December 31, 2015, 34,561 employees contributed to the Company’s ESOP, a voluntary defined contribution plan available to all eligible salaried employees. Participants are allowed to contribute, on a pretax or after-tax basis, up to the lesser of twenty percent of their annual compensation or the maximum dollar amount allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches one hundred percent of all contributions up to six percent of eligible employee contributions. Such participant contributions may be invested in a variety of investment funds or a Company common stock fund and may be exchanged between investments as directed by the participant. Participants are permitted to diversify both future and prior Company matching contributions previously allocated to the Company common stock fund into a variety of investment funds.

The Company made contributions to the ESOP on behalf of participating employees, representing amounts authorized by employees to be withheld from their earnings, of $120,514, $109,036 and $97,381 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s matching contributions to the ESOP charged to operations were $80,356, $74,574 and $67,428 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

At December 31, 2015, there were 11,333,455 shares of the Company’s common stock being held by the ESOP, representing 12.3 percent of the total number of voting shares outstanding. Shares of Company common stock credited to each member’s account under the ESOP are voted by the trustee under instructions from each individual plan member. Shares for

which no instructions are received are voted by the trustee in the same proportion as those for which instructions are received.

On August 1, 2006, the Company issued 500,000 shares of convertible serial preferred stock, no par value (Series 2 Preferred stock) with cumulative quarterly dividends of $11.25 per share, for $500,000 to the ESOP. The ESOP financed the acquisition of the Series 2 Preferred stock by borrowing $500,000 from the Company at the rate of 5.5 percent per annum. This borrowing was payable over ten years in equal quarterly installments. Each share of Series 2 Preferred stock was entitled to one vote upon all matters presented to the Company’s shareholders and generally voted with the common stock together as one class. The Series 2 Preferred stock was held by the ESOP in an unallocated account. As the value of compensation expense related to contributions to the ESOP was earned, the Company had the option of funding the ESOP by redeeming a portion of the preferred stock or with cash. Contributions were credited to the members’ accounts at the time of funding. The Series 2 Preferred stock was redeemable for cash or convertible into common stock or any combination thereof at the option of the ESOP based on the relative fair value of the Series 2 Preferred and common stock at the time of conversion. At December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were no allocated or committed-to-be released shares of Series 2 Preferred stock outstanding. In 2013, the Company redeemed for cash 60,681 shares of Series 2 Preferred stock. The fair value of the Series 2 Preferred stock was based on a conversion/redemption formula outlined in the preferred stock terms. At December 31, 2013, the fair value of the Series 2 Preferred stock



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

was $86,309. In 2014, the Company redeemed for cash the remaining 40,406 shares of Series 2 Preferred stock.

NOTE 12 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The amended and restated 2006 Employee Plan authorizes the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board of Directors, to issue or transfer up to an aggregate of 19,200,000 shares of common stock, plus any shares relating to awards that expire, are forfeited or canceled. The Employee Plan permits the granting of option rights, appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs), performance shares and performance units to eligible employees. At December 31, 2015, no appreciation rights, performance shares or performance units had been granted under the 2006 Employee Plan.

The 2006 Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors (Nonemployee Director Plan) authorizes the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board of Directors, to issue or transfer up to an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock, plus any shares relating to awards that expire, are forfeited or are canceled. The Nonemployee Director Plan permits the granting of option rights, appreciation rights, restricted stock and RSUs to members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of the Company. At December 31, 2015, no option rights, appreciation rights or RSUs had been granted under the Nonemployee Director Plan.

The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in accordance with the Stock Compensation Topic of the ASC. The tax benefits associated with these share-based payments are classified as financing activities in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows. At December 31, 2015, the Company had total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense of $88,114 that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.06 years. Stock-based compensation expense during 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $72,342, $64,735 and $58,004, respectively. The Company recognized a total income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense of $27,634, $24,816 and $22,368 during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The company issues new shares upon exercise of option rights, granting of restricted stock and vesting of RSUs.

Option rights. The fair value of the Company’s option rights was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for all options granted:



	2015	2014	2013
Risk-free interest rate	1.37%	1.47%	1.37%
Expected life of option rights	5.05 years	5.10 years	5.10 years
Expected dividend yield of stock	1.13%	1.19%	1.32%
Expected volatility of stock	.245	.223	.281

The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant. The expected life of option rights was calculated using a scenario analysis model. Historical data was used to aggregate the holding period from actual exercises, post-vesting cancellations and hypothetical assumed exercises on all outstanding option rights. The expected dividend yield of stock is the Company’s best estimate of the expected future dividend yield. Expected volatility of stock was calculated using historical and implied volatilities. The Company applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 2.00 percent to the 2015 grants. This rate was calculated based upon historical activity and is an estimate of granted shares not expected to vest. If actual forfeitures differ from the expected rate, the Company may be required to make additional adjustments to compensation expense in future periods.

Grants of option rights for non-qualified and incentive stock options have been awarded to certain officers and key employees under the 2006 Employee Plan and the 2003 Stock Plan. The option rights generally become exercisable to the extent of one-third of the optioned shares for each full year following the date of grant and generally expire ten years after the date of grant. Unrecognized compensation expense with respect to option rights granted to eligible employees amounted to $39,703 at December 31, 2015. The unrecognized compensation expense is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.09 years.

The weighted-average per share grant date fair value of options granted during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was $50.73, $43.11 and $41.91. The total intrinsic value of exercised option rights for employees was $223,417, $195,097 and $129,742. The total fair value of options vested during the year was $32,655, $32,313 and $28,658 during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There were no outstanding option rights for nonemployee directors for 2015, 2014 and 2013.



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

A summary of the Company’s non-qualified and incentive stock option right activity is shown in the following table:



	2015						2014						2013
	Optioned Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Optioned Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Optioned Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding beginning of year	5,699,892		$	117.31			6,484,592		$	96.25			6,748,126		$	79.39
Granted	697,423		241.84				672,565		224.65				898,728		179.67
Exercised	(1,133,287	)	79.41				(1,421,045	)	70.71				(1,127,942	)	61.46
Forfeited	(43,632	)	193.60				(31,617	)	158.92				(33,278	)	115.24
Expired	(890	)	87.59				(4,603	)	86.66				(1,042	)	79.73
Outstanding end of year	5,219,506		$	141.58	$	616,866	5,699,892		$	117.31	$	830,647	6,484,592		$	96.25	$	563,554
Exercisable at end of year	3,807,351		$	110.96	$	565,934	4,095,246		$	87.79	$	717,691	4,424,674		$	71.86	$	492,689

The weighted-average remaining term for options outstanding at the end of 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was 6.44, 6.57 and 6.75 years. The weighted-average remaining term for options exercisable at the end of 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was 5.47, 5.63 and 5.71 years. Shares reserved for future grants of option rights, restricted stock and RSUs were 3,605,437, 4,604,924 and 5,636,618 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Restricted stock and RSUs. Grants of restricted stock and RSUs, which generally require three years of continuous employment from the date of grant before vesting and receiving the stock without restriction, have been awarded to certain officers and key employees under the 2006 Employee Plan. The February 2015, 2014 and 2013 grants consisted of a combination of performance-based awards and time-based awards. The performance-based awards vest at the end of a three-year period based on the Company’s achievement of specified financial goals relating to earnings per share. The time-based awards vest at the end of a three-year period based on continuous employment. Unrecognized compensation expense with respect to grants of restricted stock and RSUs to eligible employees amounted to $46,947 at December 31, 2015 and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.97 years.

Grants of restricted stock and RSUs have been awarded to nonemployee directors under the Nonemployee Plan. These grants generally vest and stock is received without restriction to the extent of one-third of the granted stock for each year following the date of grant. Unrecognized compensation expense with respect to grants of restricted stock and RSUs to nonemployee directors amounted to $1,463 at December 31, 2015

and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.97 years.

A summary of the Company’s restricted stock and RSU activity for the years ended December 31 is shown in the following table:



	2015		2014		2013
Outstanding at beginning of year	655,276		749,382		919,748
Granted	112,494		201,412		172,406
Vested	(290,901	)	(294,438	)	(334,750	)
Forfeited	(9,125	)	(1,080	)	(8,022	)
Outstanding at end of year	467,744		655,276		749,382

The weighted-average per share fair value of restricted stock and RSUs granted during the year was $285.88, $191.60 and $163.63 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

NOTE 13 – OTHER

Other general expense - net. Included in Other general expense - net were the following:



	2015			2014		2013
Provisions for environmental matters - net	$	31,071		$	36,046	$	(2,751	)
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets	(803		)	1,436		5,207
Net expense of exit or disposal activities						63
Total	$	30,268		$	37,482	$	2,519



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Provisions for environmental matters–net represent initial provisions for site-specific estimated costs of environmental investigation or remediation and increases or decreases to environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated and as additional accounting guidelines are issued. Environmental-related accruals are not recorded net of insurance proceeds in accordance with the Offsetting Subtopic of the Balance Sheet Topic of the ASC. See Note 8 for further details on the Company’s environmental-related activities.

The (gain) loss on disposition of assets represents the net realized (gain) loss associated with the disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets previously used in the conduct of the primary business of the Company.

The net expense of exit or disposal activities includes changes to accrued qualified exit costs as information becomes available upon which more accurate amounts can be reasonably estimated, initial impairments of carrying value and additional impairments for subsequent reductions in estimated fair value of property, plant and equipment held for disposal. See Note 5 for further details on the Company’s exit or disposal activities.

Other expense (income) - net. Included in Other expense (income) - net were the following:



	2015			2014			2013
Dividend and royalty income	$	(3,668	)	$	(4,864	)	$	(5,904	)
Net expense from financing activities	11,091			11,367			9,829
Foreign currency transaction related losses	9,503			3,603			7,669
Other income	(23,880		)	(37,524		)	(22,684		)
Other expense	13,036			12,018			12,026
Total	$	6,082		$	(15,400	)	$	936

The Net expense from financing activities includes the net expense relating to changes in the Company’s financing fees.

Foreign currency transaction related losses represent net realized losses on U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and net realized and unrealized losses from foreign currency option and forward contracts. There were no material foreign currency option and forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Other income and Other expense included items of revenue, gains, expenses and losses that were unrelated to the primary business purpose of the Company. Other income for the year

ended December 31, 2014 included a $6,336 gain on the early termination of a customer agreement recorded in the Global Finishes Group and a $6,198 realized gain resulting from final asset valuations related to the acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex recorded in the Administrative segment. There were no other items within Other income or Other expense that were individually significant.

NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes using the enacted tax rates and laws that are currently in effect. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:



	2015		2014		2013
Deferred tax assets:
Exit costs, environ-mental and other similar items	$	63,851	$	56,441	$	45,322
Employee related and benefit items	141,974		141,670		109,254
Other items	116,302		112,149		105,904
Total deferred tax assets	322,127		310,260		260,480
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation and amortization	241,101		227,765		214,696
LIFO inventories	89,330		67,835		60,122
Other items	33,433		44,378		68,709
Total deferred tax liabilities	363,864		339,978		343,527
Net deferred tax liabilities	$	41,737	$	29,718	$	83,047

Netted against the Company’s other deferred tax assets were valuation allowances of $1,077, $1,725 and $7,390 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These reserves resulted from the uncertainty as to the realization of the tax benefits from foreign net operating losses and other foreign assets. The Company has $28,865 of domestic net operating loss carryforwards acquired through acquisitions that have expiration dates through the tax year 2037 and foreign net operating losses of $74,487. The foreign net operating losses are related to various jurisdictions that provide for both indefinite carryforward periods and others with carryforward periods that range from the tax years 2016 to 2035.



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

Significant components of the provisions for income taxes were as follows:



	2015			2014			2013
Current:
Federal	$	399,677		$	308,283		$	229,997
Foreign	30,145			53,045			42,543
State and local	60,319			50,049			33,082
Total current	490,141			411,377			305,622
Deferred:
Federal	13,505			(14,974		)	30,384
Foreign	(10,752		)	(7,361		)	(9,041		)
State and local	2,223			3,297			6,432
Total deferred	4,976			(19,038		)	27,775
Total provisions for income taxes	$	495,117		$	392,339		$	333,397

The provisions for income taxes included estimated taxes payable on that portion of retained earnings of foreign subsidiaries expected to be received by the Company. The effect of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and the provisions of the Income Taxes Topic of the ASC, was $(5,895) in 2015, $(1,887) in 2014 and $4,411 in 2013.

Significant components of income before income taxes as used for income tax purposes, were as follows:



	2015		2014		2013
Domestic	$	1,440,511	$	1,113,528	$	969,790
Foreign	108,455		144,698		116,168
	$	1,548,966	$	1,258,226	$	1,085,958

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate follows:



	2015		2014		2013
Statutory federal income tax rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
Effect of:
State and local income taxes	2.6		2.8		2.4
Investment vehicles	(1.6	)	(2.5	)	(2.1	)
Domestic production activities	(2.2	)	(2.5	)	(2.2	)
Other - net	(1.8	)	(1.6	)	(2.4	)
Effective tax rate	32.0	%	31.2	%	30.7	%

The 2015 state and local income taxes and domestic production activities components of the effective tax rate were consistent with the 2014 tax year. The tax benefit related to investment vehicles decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to a smaller increase in the percentage of tax credits recognized compared to the overall percentage increase in the Company's income before taxes and a smaller favorable impact on the

Company's capital position in these investments in 2015 compared to 2014.

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The IRS completed examinations of the Company's U.S. income tax returns for the 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years during 2015. The net impact of the settlement of the examinations was insignificant. As of December 31, 2015, there were no income tax examinations being conducted by the IRS, however, the statute of limitations has not expired for the 2012, 2013 and 2014 tax years.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company is subject to non-U.S. income tax examinations for the tax years of 2008 through 2015. In addition, the Company is subject to state and local income tax examinations for the tax years 2005 through 2015.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:



	2015			2014			2013
Balance at beginning of year	$	31,560		$	30,997		$	28,119
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year	4,228			3,370			3,480
Additions for tax positions of prior years	8,450			4,428			5,059
Reductions for tax positions of prior years	(4,862		)	(2,349		)	(3,378		)
Settlements	(968		)	(4,089		)	(103		)
Lapses of Statutes of Limitations	(4,535		)	(797		)	(2,180		)
Balance at end of year	$	33,873		$	31,560		$	30,997

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 is $30,007, $28,208 and $27,767 in unrecognized tax benefits, the recognition of which would have an effect on the effective tax rate.

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015 is $3,509 related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could significantly change during the next twelve months. This amount represents a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits comprised primarily of items related to federal audits of partnership investments and expiring statutes in foreign and state jurisdictions.

The Company classifies all income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there was an increase in income tax interest and penalties of $2,918, $2,144 and $103, respectively. At December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company accrued $8,550, $5,732 and $6,246, respectively, for the potential payment of interest and penalties.



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

NOTE 15 – NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE



	2015			2014			2013
Basic
Average common shares outstanding	92,197,207			96,190,101			100,897,512

Net income	$	1,053,849		$	865,887		$	752,561
Less net income allocated to unvested restricted shares	(4,462		)	(4,892		)	(4,596		)
Net income allocated to common shares	$	1,049,387		$	860,995		$	747,965
Net income per common share	$	11.38		$	8.95		$	7.41

Diluted
Average common shares outstanding	92,197,207			96,190,101			100,897,512
Stock options and other contingently issuable shares ^(a)	1,826,885			1,885,334			2,151,359
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution	94,024,092			98,075,435			103,048,871

Net income	$	1,053,849		$	865,887		$	752,561
Less net income allocated to unvested restricted shares assuming dilution	(4,386		)	(4,804		)	(4,509		)
Net income allocated to common shares assuming dilution	$	1,049,463		$	861,083		$	748,052
Net income per common share	$	11.16		$	8.78		$	7.26


(a)	Stock options and other contingently issuable shares excludes 34,463, 608,477 and 842,354 shares at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, due to their anti-dilutive effect.

The Company has two classes of participating securities: common shares and restricted shares, representing 99% and 1% of outstanding shares, respectively. The restricted shares are shares of unvested restricted stock granted under the Company’s restricted stock award program. Unvested restricted shares granted prior to April 21, 2010 received non-forfeitable dividends. Accordingly, the shares are considered a participating security and the two-class method of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share is required. Effective April 21, 2010, the restricted stock award program was revised and dividends on performance-based restricted shares granted after this date are deferred and payment is contingent upon the awards vesting. Only the time-based restricted shares, which continue to receive non-forfeitable dividends, are considered a participating security. Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated using the two-class method in accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of the ASC.

NOTE 16 – SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)



	2015
	1st Quarter		2nd Quarter		3rd Quarter		4th Quarter		Full Year
Net sales	$	2,450,284	$	3,132,139	$	3,152,285	$	2,604,596	$	11,339,304
Gross profit	1,132,449		1,529,986		1,574,552		1,322,239		5,559,226
Net income	131,404		349,937		374,491		198,017		1,053,849
Net income per common share - basic	1.41		3.78		4.04		2.15		11.38
Net income per common share - diluted	1.38		3.70		3.97		2.12		11.16



	2014
	1st Quarter		2nd Quarter		3rd Quarter		4th Quarter		Full Year
Net sales	$	2,366,556	$	3,042,995	$	3,150,570	$	2,569,412	$	11,129,533
Gross profit	1,065,901		1,409,653		1,470,955		1,217,975		5,164,484
Net income	115,457		291,447		326,240		132,743		865,887
Net income per common share - basic	1.16		3.00		3.42		1.40		8.95
Net income per common share - diluted	1.14		2.94		3.35		1.37		8.78



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

NOTE 17 – OPERATING LEASES

The Company leases certain stores, warehouses, manufacturing facilities, office space and equipment. Renewal options are available on the majority of leases and, under certain conditions, options exist to purchase certain properties. Rental expense for operating leases, recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term in accordance with the Leases Topic of the ASC was $394,359, $376,914 and $327,592 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Certain store leases require the payment of contingent rentals based on sales in excess of specified minimums. Contingent rentals included in rent expense were $55,890, $52,379 and $44,084 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Rental income, as lessor, from real estate leasing activities and sublease rental income for all years presented was not significant. The following schedule summarizes the future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year at December 31, 2015:



2016	$	317,843
2017	275,411
2018	226,317
2019	179,874
2020	138,204
Later years	282,900
Total minimum lease payments	$	1,420,549

NOTE 18 – REPORTABLE SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company reports its segment information in the same way that management internally organizes its business for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the ASC. The Company has determined that it has four reportable operating segments: Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group (individually, a "Reportable Segment" and collectively, the “Reportable Segments”). Factors considered in determining the four Reportable Segments of the Company include the nature of business activities, the management structure directly accountable to the Company’s chief operating decision maker (CODM) for operating and administrative activities, availability of discrete financial information and information presented to the Board of Directors. The Company reports all other business activities and immaterial operating segments that are not reportable in the Administrative segment. See pages 8 through 17 of this report for more information about the Reportable Segments.

The Company’s CODM has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer because he has final authority over

performance assessment and resource allocation decisions. Because of the diverse operations of the Company, the CODM regularly receives discrete financial information about each Reportable Segment as well as a significant amount of additional financial information about certain divisions, business units or subsidiaries of the Company. The CODM uses all such financial information for performance assessment and resource allocation decisions. The CODM evaluates the performance of and allocates resources to the Reportable Segments based on profit or loss before income taxes and cash generated from operations. The accounting policies of the Reportable Segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of this report.

The Paint Stores Group consisted of 4,086 company-operated specialty paint stores in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, St. Maarten, Jamaica, Curacao, Aruba and St. Lucia at December 31, 2015. Each store in this segment is engaged in the related business activity of selling paint, coatings and related products to end-use customers. The Paint Stores Group markets and sells Sherwin-Williams^® branded architectural paint and coatings, protective and marine products, OEM product finishes and related items. These products are produced by manufacturing facilities in the Consumer Group. In addition, each store sells select purchased associated products. The loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on the business of this segment. During 2015, this segment opened 83 net new stores, consisting of 113 new stores opened (99 in the United States, 12 in Canada, 1 in Puerto Rico and 1 in Trinidad and Tobago) and 30 stores closed (25 in the United States and 5 in Canada). In 2014 and 2013, this segment opened or acquired 95 and 388 net new stores, respectively. A map on the cover flap of this report shows the number of paint stores and their geographic location. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Paint Stores Group, supplemented with information by geographic region, product type and customer type, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Paint Stores Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Paint Stores Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment.

The Consumer Group develops, manufactures and distributes a variety of paint, coatings and related products to third-party customers primarily in the United States and Canada and the Paint Stores Group. Approximately 63 percent of the total sales of the Consumer Group in 2015 were intersegment transfers of products primarily sold through the Paint Stores Group. Sales and marketing of certain controlled brand and private labeled products is performed by a direct sales staff. The products



	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

distributed through third-party customers are intended for resale to the ultimate end-user of the product. The Consumer Group had sales to certain customers that, individually, may be a significant portion of the sales of the segment. However, the loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on the overall profitability of the segment. This segment incurred most of the Company’s capital expenditures related to ongoing environmental compliance measures at sites currently in operation. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Consumer Group, supplemented with information by product type and customer type, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Consumer Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Consumer Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment.

The Global Finishes Group develops, licenses, manufactures, distributes and sells a variety of protective and marine products, automotive finishes and refinish products, OEM product finishes and related products in North and South America, Europe and Asia. This segment meets the demands of its customers for a consistent worldwide product development, manufacturing and distribution presence and approach to doing business. This segment licenses certain technology and trade names worldwide. Sherwin-Williams^® and other controlled brand products are distributed through the Paint Stores Group and this segment’s 296 company-operated branches and by a direct sales staff and outside sales representatives to retailers, dealers, jobbers, licensees and other third-party distributors. During 2015, this segment opened 3 new branches (2 in Canada and 1 in Mexico) and closed 7 branches (5 in the United States and 2 in Chile) for a net decrease of 4 branches. At December 31, 2015, the Global Finishes Group consisted of operations in the United States, subsidiaries in 35 foreign countries and income from licensing agreements in 15 foreign countries. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Global Finishes Group reportable segment, supplemented with information about geographic divisions, business units and subsidiaries, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Global Finishes Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Global Finishes Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment. A map on the cover flap of this report shows the number of branches and their geographic locations.

The Latin America Coatings Group develops, licenses, manufactures, distributes and sells a variety of architectural paint and coatings, protective and marine products, OEM product finishes and related products in North and South America. This segment meets the demands of its customers for consistent

regional product development, manufacturing and distribution presence and approach to doing business. Sherwin-Williams^® and other controlled brand products are distributed through this segment’s 291 company-operated stores and by a direct sales staff and outside sales representatives to retailers, dealers, licensees and other third-party distributors. During 2015, this segment opened 17 new stores (11 in South America and 6 in Mexico) and closed 2 stores (1 in South America and 1 in Mexico) for a net increase of 15 stores. At December 31, 2015, the Latin America Coatings Group consisted of operations from subsidiaries in 9 foreign countries, 4 foreign joint ventures and income from licensing agreements in 7 foreign countries. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Latin America Coatings Group, supplemented with information about geographic divisions, business units and subsidiaries, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Latin America Coatings Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Latin America Coatings Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment. A map on the cover flap of this report shows the number of stores and their geographic locations.

The Administrative segment includes the administrative expenses of the Company’s corporate headquarters site. Also included in the Administrative segment was interest expense, interest and investment income, certain expenses related to closed facilities and environmental-related matters, and other expenses which were not directly associated with the Reportable Segments. The Administrative segment did not include any significant foreign operations. Also included in the Administrative segment was a real estate management unit that is responsible for the ownership, management and leasing of non-retail properties held primarily for use by the Company, including the Company’s headquarters site, and disposal of idle facilities. Sales of this segment represented external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space or leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary businesses. Gains and losses from the sale of property were not a significant operating factor in determining the performance of the Administrative segment.

Net external sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were $1,788,955, $2,203,804 and $2,129,626 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries was $75,773, $115,629 and $106,166 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Net external sales and segment profit were adversely affected by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. In addition, 2013 segment profit included Brazil tax assessments. Domestic operations accounted for the remaining net external sales and segment profits. Long-lived assets



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)

consisted of Property, plant and equipment, Goodwill, Intangible assets, Deferred pension assets and Other assets. The aggregate total of long-lived assets for the Company was $3,132,981, $3,139,272 and, $3,223,790 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Long-lived assets of consolidated foreign subsidiaries totaled $497,528, $551,364 and $648,908 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total Assets of the Company were $5,791,855, $5,706,052 and $6,382,507 at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total assets of consolidated foreign subsidiaries were $1,172,064, $1,359,991 and $1,625,422, which represented 20.2 percent, 23.8 percent and 25.5 percent of the Company’s total assets at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No single geographic area outside the United States was significant relative to consolidated net sales or operating profits. Export sales and sales to any individual customer were each less than 10 percent of consolidated sales to unaffiliated customers during all years presented.

In the reportable segment financial information that follows, Segment profit was total net sales and intersegment transfers less operating costs and expenses. Identifiable assets were those directly identified with each reportable segment. The Administrative segment assets consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments, deferred pension assets and headquarters property, plant and equipment. The margin for each reportable segment was based upon total net sales and intersegment transfers. Domestic intersegment transfers were primarily accounted for at the approximate fully absorbed manufactured cost, based on normal capacity volumes, plus customary distribution costs for paint products. Non-paint domestic and all international intersegment transfers were accounted for at values comparable to normal unaffiliated customer sales. All intersegment transfers are eliminated within the Administrative segment.



(millions of dollars)	2015
	Paint Stores Group			Consumer Group			Global Finishes Group			Latin America Coatings Group			Administrative			Consolidated Totals
Net external sales	$	7,209		$	1,578		$	1,916		$	631		$	5		$	11,339
Intersegment transfers				2,736			5			40			(2,781		)
Total net sales and intersegment transfers	$	7,209		$	4,314		$	1,921		$	671		$	(2,776	)	$	11,339
Segment profit	$	1,434		$	309		$	202		$	18					$	1,963
Interest expense													$	(62	)	(62		)
Administrative expenses and other													(352		)	(352		)
Income before income taxes	$	1,434		$	309		$	202		$	18		$	(414	)	$	1,549
Reportable segment margins	19.9		%	7.2		%	10.5		%	2.7		%
Identifiable assets	$	1,685		$	1,925		$	814		$	352		$	1,016		$	5,792
Capital expenditures	119			61			21			14			19			234
Depreciation	64			47			25			8			26			170

	2014
	Paint Stores Group			Consumer Group			Global Finishes Group			Latin America Coatings Group			Administrative			Consolidated Totals
Net external sales	$	6,852		$	1,421		$	2,081		$	771		$	5		$	11,130
Intersegment transfers				2,745			8			40			(2,793		)
Total net sales and intersegment transfers	$	6,852		$	4,166		$	2,089		$	811		$	(2,788	)	$	11,130
Segment profit	$	1,201		$	253		$	201		$	40					$	1,695
Interest expense													$	(64	)	(64		)
Administrative expenses and other													(373		)	(373		)
Income before income taxes	$	1,201		$	253		$	201		$	40		$	(437	)	$	1,258
Reportable segment margins	17.5		%	6.1		%	9.6		%	4.9		%
Identifiable assets	$	1,602		$	1,883		$	874		$	427		$	920		$	5,706
Capital expenditures	87			45			16			8			45			201
Depreciation	58			48			28			9			26			169



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated)





	2013
	Paint Stores Group			Consumer Group			Global Finishes Group			Latin America Coatings Group			Administrative			Consolidated Totals
Net external sales	$	6,002		$	1,342		$	2,005		$	832		$	5		$	10,186
Intersegment transfers				2,409			9			39			(2,457		)
Total net sales and intersegment transfers	$	6,002		$	3,751		$	2,014		$	871		$	(2,452	)	$	10,186
Segment profit	$	991		$	242		$	170		$	39					$	1,442
Interest expense													$	(63	)	(63		)
Administrative expenses and other													(293		)	(293		)
Income before income taxes	$	991		$	242		$	170		$	39		$	(356	)	$	1,086
Reportable segment margins	16.5		%	6.5		%	8.4		%	4.5		%
Identifiable assets	$	1,668		$	1,762		$	964		$	485		$	1,504		$	6,383
Capital expenditures	73			40			15			7			32			167
Depreciation	55			45			29			10			20			159

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Letter to Shareholders” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events and conditions and may discuss, among other things, anticipated future performance (including sales and earnings), expected growth, future business plans and the costs and potential liability for environmental-related matters and the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Any statement that is not historical in nature is a forward-looking statement and may be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “will,” “will likely result,” “will continue,” “plans to” and similar expressions.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of the Company, that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements and from the Company’s historical results and experience. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include such things as: (a) general business conditions, strengths of retail and manufacturing economies and the growth in the coatings industry; (b) competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product innovation and quality; (c) changes in raw material and energy supplies and pricing; (d) changes in the Company’s relationships with customers and suppliers; (e) the Company’s ability to attain cost savings from productivity initiatives; (f) the Company’s ability to successfully integrate past and future acquisitions into its existing operations, as well as the performance of the businesses acquired; (g) changes in general

domestic economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates, unemployment rates, higher labor and healthcare costs, recessions, and changing government policies, laws and regulations; (h) risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s expansion into and its operations in Asia, Europe, South America and other foreign markets, including general economic conditions, inflation rates, recessions, foreign currency exchange rates, foreign investment and repatriation restrictions, legal and regulatory constraints, civil unrest and other external economic and political factors; (i) the achievement of growth in foreign markets, such as Asia, Europe and South America; (j) increasingly stringent domestic and foreign governmental regulations including those affecting health, safety and the environment; (k) inherent uncertainties involved in assessing the Company’s potential liability for environmental-related activities; (l) other changes in governmental policies, laws and regulations, including changes in accounting policies and standards and taxation requirements (such as new tax laws and new or revised tax law interpretations); (m) the nature, cost, quantity and outcome of pending and future litigation and other claims, including the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, and the effect of any legislation and administrative regulations relating thereto; and (n) unusual weather conditions.

Readers are cautioned that it is not possible to predict or identify all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect future results and that the above list should not be considered to be a complete list. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION



Annual Meeting The annual meeting of shareholders will be held in the Landmark Conference Center, 927 Midland Building, 101 W. Prospect Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio on Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 9:00 A.M., local time. Headquarters 101 W. Prospect Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1075 (216) 566-2000 www.sherwin.com Investor Relations Robert J. Wells Senior Vice President - Corporate Communications and Public Affairs The Sherwin-Williams Company 101 W. Prospect Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1075	Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Ernst & Young LLP Cleveland, Ohio Stock Trading Sherwin-Williams Common Stock— Symbol, SHW—is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Dividend Reinvestment Program A dividend reinvestment program is available to shareholders of common stock. For information, contact Wells Fargo Shareowner Services. Form 10-K The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is available without charge. To obtain a copy, contact Investor Relations.	Transfer Agent & Registrar Our transfer agent, Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, maintains the records for our registered shareholders and can help with a wide variety of shareholder related services, including the direct deposit of dividends and online access to your account. Contact: Wells Fargo Shareowner Services P.O. Box 64874 St. Paul, MN 55164-0874 www.shareowneronline.com 1-800-468-9716 Toll-free 651-450-4064 outside the United States

COMMON STOCK TRADING STATISTICS



	2015		2014		2013		2012		2011
High	$	292.44	$	266.25	$	195.32	$	159.80	$	90.42
Low	218.94		174.29		153.94		90.21		69.47
Close December 31	259.60		263.04		183.50		153.82		89.27
Shareholders of record	6,996		7,250		7,555		7,954		8,360
Shares traded (thousands)	195,560		152,913		186,854		282,397		286,276

QUARTERLY STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS



2015							2014
Quarter	High		Low		Dividend		Quarter	High		Low		Dividend
1st	$	290.89	$	260.87	$	.670	1st	$	208.63	$	174.29	$	.550
2nd	292.44		274.93		.670		2nd	208.00		188.25		.550
3rd	285.07		218.94		.670		3rd	222.53		201.47		.550
4th	277.56		231.92		.670		4th	266.25		202.01		.550

CORPORATE OFFICERS AND

OPERATING MANAGEMENT



Corporate Officers	Operating Management

Christopher M. Connor, 59*	Joel D. Baxter, 55*	Dennis H. Karnstein, 49
Executive Chairman	President & General Manager	President & General Manager
	Global Supply Chain Division	Product Finishes Division
John G. Morikis, 52*	Consumer Group	Global Finishes Group
President and Chief Executive Officer
	Paul R. Clifford, 52	Cheri M. Phyfer, 44
Sean P. Hennessy, 58*	President & General Manager	President & General Manager
Senior Vice President - Finance and	Canada Division	Diversified Brands Division
Chief Financial Officer	The Americas Group	Consumer Group

Thomas P. Gilligan, 55*	Robert J. Davisson, 55*	Ronald B. Rossetto, 49
Senior Vice President -	President	President & General Manager
Human Resources	The Americas Group	Protective & Marine Coatings Division
		Global Finishes Group
Thomas E. Hopkins, 58*	Brian L. Gallagher, 44
Senior Vice President -	President & General Manager	David B. Sewell, 47*
Special Projects	Eastern Division	President
	The Americas Group	Global Finishes Group
Catherine M. Kilbane, 52*
Senior Vice President, General	Pablo Garcia-Casas, 55	Todd V. Wipf, 51
Counsel and Secretary	President & General Manager	President & General Manager
	Latin America Division	Southeastern Division
Timothy A. Knight, 51*	The Americas Group	The Americas Group
Senior Vice President -
Corporate Planning, Development	Monty J. Griffin, 55
and Administration	President & General Manager
	South Western Division
Allen J. Mistysyn, 47*	The Americas Group
Senior Vice President -
Corporate Controller	Thomas C. Hablitzel, 53
	President & General Manager
Robert J. Wells, 58*	Automotive Division
Senior Vice President - Corporate	Global Finishes Group
Communications and Public Affairs
	Peter J. Ippolito, 51
Jeffrey J. Miklich, 41	President & General Manager
Vice President and Treasurer	Mid Western Division
	The Americas Group
Jane M. Cronin, 48
Vice President - Corporate Audit
and Loss Prevention

Michael T. Cummins, 57
Vice President - Taxes and
Assistant Secretary







* Executive Officer as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. sophomore Avg

The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) 10-K2015 FY Annual report

Content analysis