UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OF 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT |
Or the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-49639
Dimeco, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Pennsylvania | | 23-2250152 |
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
820 Church Street
Honesdale, PA 18431
(Address of principal executive officers)
(570) 253-1970
(Issuer’s Telephone Number)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x
As of August 1, 2007, the registrant had outstanding 1,519,990 shares of its common stock, par value $.50 share.
Dimeco, Inc.
INDEX
–2–
Dimeco, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | June 30, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 7,432 | | | $ | 6,684 | |
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks | | | 3,569 | | | | 2,287 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 5,000 | | | | 10,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total cash and cash equivalents | | | 16,001 | | | | 18,971 | |
| | |
Mortgage loans held for sale | | | 181 | | | | — | |
Investment securities available for sale | | | 76,179 | | | | 67,266 | |
| | |
Loans (net of unearned income of $864 and $777) | | | 320,443 | | | | 305,291 | |
Less allowance for loan losses | | | 4,722 | | | | 4,469 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loans | | | 315,721 | | | | 300,822 | |
| | |
Premises and equipment | | | 5,614 | | | | 5,731 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 1,808 | | | | 1,798 | |
Bank-owned life insurance | | | 8,045 | | | | 5,892 | |
Other assets | | | 3,847 | | | | 3,097 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 427,396 | | | $ | 403,577 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Deposits: | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing | | $ | 35,591 | | | $ | 34,172 | |
Interest-bearing | | | 313,286 | | | | 303,945 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total deposits | | | 348,877 | | | | 338,117 | |
| | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 19,165 | | | | 12,705 | |
Other borrowed funds | | | 18,230 | | | | 13,763 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 1,205 | | | | 1,428 | |
Other liabilities | | | 2,869 | | | | 2,227 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 390,346 | | | | 368,240 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $.50 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; | | | | | | | | |
1,572,970 and 1,568,024 shares issued | | | 786 | | | | 784 | |
Capital surplus | | | 4,909 | | | | 4,775 | |
Retained earnings | | | 33,564 | | | | 31,355 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (182 | ) | | | (35 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost (53,000 and 43,000 shares) | | | (2,027 | ) | | | (1,542 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | 37,050 | | | | 35,337 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 427,396 | | | $ | 403,577 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
–3–
Dimeco, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended June 30, | | For the six months ended June 30, |
(in thousands, except per share) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 |
Interest Income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and fees on loans | | | 6,304 | | $ | 5,141 | | $ | 12,378 | | $ | 10,013 |
Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Taxable | | | 904 | | | 593 | | | 1,691 | | | 1,114 |
Exempt from federal income tax | | | 77 | | | 52 | | | 149 | | | 100 |
Other | | | 103 | | | 117 | | | 157 | | | 133 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest income | | | 7,388 | | | 5,903 | | | 14,375 | | | 11,360 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Interest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 2,821 | | | 1,924 | | | 5,581 | | | 3,624 |
Short-term borrowings | | | 111 | | | 112 | | | 176 | | | 176 |
Other borrowed funds | | | 184 | | | 174 | | | 335 | | | 349 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense | | | 3,116 | | | 2,210 | | | 6,092 | | | 4,149 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Interest Income | | | 4,272 | | | 3,693 | | | 8,283 | | | 7,211 |
| | | | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 225 | | | — | | | 450 | | | 215 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses | | | 4,047 | | | 3,693 | | | 7,833 | | | 6,996 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Noninterest Income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Services charges on deposit accounts | | | 406 | | | 373 | | | 788 | | | 738 |
Mortgage loans held for sale gains, net | | | 17 | | | 58 | | | 65 | | | 112 |
Brokerage commissions | | | 101 | | | 98 | | | 196 | | | 177 |
Other income | | | 316 | | | 254 | | | 601 | | | 495 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total noninterest income | | | 840 | | | 783 | | | 1,650 | | | 1,522 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Noninterest Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | | 1,478 | | | 1,329 | | | 2,871 | | | 2,596 |
Occupancy expense, net | | | 195 | | | 199 | | | 404 | | | 407 |
Furniture and equipment expense | | | 138 | | | 128 | | | 271 | | | 250 |
Other expense | | | 751 | | | 794 | | | 1,436 | | | 1,491 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total noninterest expense | | | 2,562 | | | 2,450 | | | 4,982 | | | 4,744 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 2,325 | | | 2,026 | | | 4,501 | | | 3,774 |
Income taxes | | | 726 | | | 646 | | | 1,405 | | | 1,199 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 1,599 | | $ | 1,380 | | $ | 3,096 | | $ | 2,575 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per Share—basic | | $ | 1.05 | | $ | 0.90 | | $ | 2.03 | | $ | 1.69 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per Share—diluted | | $ | 1.01 | | $ | 0.88 | | $ | 1.95 | | $ | 1.64 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends per share | | $ | 0.29 | | $ | 0.26 | | $ | 0.58 | | $ | 0.52 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average shares outstanding—basic | | | 1,529,139 | | | 1,527,395 | | | 1,528,283 | | | 1,525,193 |
Average shares outstanding—diluted | | | 1,587,416 | | | 1,575,616 | | | 1,584,186 | | | 1,573,395 |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
–4–
Dimeco, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, | | | Six months ended June 30, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Net income | | $ | 1,599 | | | $ | 1,380 | | | | 3,096 | | | | 2,575 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities | | | (266 | ) | | | (207 | ) | | | (223 | ) | | | (140 | ) |
| | | | |
Income tax benefit related to other comprehensive loss | | | (91 | ) | | | (70 | ) | | | (76 | ) | | | (48 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | (175 | ) | | | (137 | ) | | | (147 | ) | | | (92 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 1,424 | | | $ | 1,243 | | | $ | 2,949 | | | $ | 2,483 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
–5–
Dimeco, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(amounts in thousands) | | Common Stock | | Capital Surplus | | Retained Earnings | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | | Treasury Stock | | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | |
Balance, December 31, 2006 | | $ | 784 | | $ | 4,775 | | $ | 31,355 | | | $ | (35 | ) | | $ | (1,542 | ) | | $ | 35,337 | |
Net income | | | | | | | | | 3,096 | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,096 | |
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities, net of tax benefit of $76 | | | | | | | | | | | | | (147 | ) | | | | | | | (147 | ) |
Exercise of stock options | | | 2 | | | 134 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 136 | |
Purchase treasury stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (485 | ) | | | (485 | ) |
Cash dividends ($.58 per share) | | | | | | | | | (887 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (887 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, June 30, 2007 | | $ | 786 | | $ | 4,909 | | $ | 33,564 | | | $ | (182 | ) | | $ | (2,027 | ) | | $ | 37,050 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
–6–
Dimeco, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) For the six months ended June 30, | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Operating Activities | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 3,096 | | | $ | 2,575 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 450 | | | | 215 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 367 | | | | 359 | |
Amortization of premium and discount on investment securities, net | | | (1,098 | ) | | | (499 | ) |
Amortization of net deferred loan origination fees | | | (83 | ) | | | (64 | ) |
Origination of loans held for sale | | | (3,677 | ) | | | (3,823 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of loans | | | 3,562 | | | | 4,051 | |
Mortgage loans sold gains, net | | | (66 | ) | | | (112 | ) |
Increase in accrued interest receivable | | | (10 | ) | | | (140 | ) |
Decrease in accrued interest payable | | | (223 | ) | | | (83 | ) |
Deferred federal income taxes | | | (157 | ) | | | (58 | ) |
Earnings on bank owned life insurance | | | (173 | ) | | | (111 | ) |
Other, net | | | 328 | | | | (427 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 2,316 | | | | 1,883 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Investing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Investment securities available for sale: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from maturities or paydown | | | 163,329 | | | | 111,596 | |
Purchases | | | (171,367 | ) | | | (117,639 | ) |
Net increase in loans | | | (15,266 | ) | | | (4,275 | ) |
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | | 40 | | | | 214 | |
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | | (321 | ) | | | (268 | ) |
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance | | | (2,000 | ) | | | — | |
Purchase of premises and equipment | | | (154 | ) | | | (88 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used for investing activities | | | (25,739 | ) | | | (10,460 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in deposits | | | 10,760 | | | | 5,677 | |
Increase in short-term borrowings | | | 6,460 | | | | 8,237 | |
Proceeds from borrowed funds | | | 6,900 | | | | 1,225 | |
Repayment of other borrowed funds | | | (2,433 | ) | | | (3,612 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | | | (485 | ) | | | (180 | ) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | 136 | | | | 111 | |
Cash dividends paid | | | (885 | ) | | | (793 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 20,453 | | | | 10,665 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | (2,970 | ) | | | 2,088 | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 18,971 | | | | 8,477 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 16,001 | | | $ | 10,565 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Amount paid for interest | | $ | 6,315 | | | $ | 4,233 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Amount paid for income taxes | | $ | 1,614 | | | $ | 1,384 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
–7–
Dimeco, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dimeco, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary The Dime Bank (the “Bank”). The financial statements of The Dime Bank include the consolidated financial statements of the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, TDB Insurance Services, LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not necessarily include all information that would be included in audited financial statements. The information furnished reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Certain comparative amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. The reclassifications did not affect net income or equity capital.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which provides all entities with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of the FAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply the complex provisions of hedge accounting. FAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of FAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In March 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 06-10 (“EITF 06-10”), Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Agreements. EITF 06-10 provides guidance for determining a liability for the postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and measurement of the associated asset on the basis of the terms of the collateral assignment agreement. EITF 06-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the EITF will have on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 06-11 (“EITF 06-11”),Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards. EITF 06-11 applies to share-based payment arrangements with dividend protection features that entitle employees to receive (a) dividends on equity-classified nonvested shares, (b) dividend equivalents on equity-classified nonvested share units, or (c) payments equal to the dividends paid on the underlying shares while an equity-classified share option is outstanding, when those dividends or dividend equivalents are charged to retained earnings under FAS No. 123R,Share-Based Payment, and result in an income tax deduction for the employer. A consensus was reached that a realized income tax benefit from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for equity-classified nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units, and outstanding equity share options should be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital. EITF 06-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
Stock Options
The Company maintains a stock option plan for key officers and non-employee directors. There were no options granted in 2006 or 2007.
–8–
As of June 30, 2007 and 2006, there was no unrecognized compensation cost to unvested share-based compensation awards granted.
NOTE 2 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
There are no convertible securities which would affect the numerator in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share; therefore, net income as presented on the Consolidated Statement of Income (unaudited) will be used as the numerator. The following table sets forth the composition of the weighted-average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computation:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, | | | Six months ended June 30, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Weighted average common stock outstanding | | 1,572,249 | | | 1,557,890 | | | 1,571,338 | | | 1,555,442 | |
Average treasury stock | | (43,110 | ) | | (30,495 | ) | | (43,055 | ) | | (30,249 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common stock and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic earnings per share | | 1,529,139 | | | 1,527,395 | | | 1,528,283 | | | 1,525,193 | |
Additional common stock equivalents (stock options) used to calculate diluted earnings per share | | 58,277 | | | 48,221 | | | 55,903 | | | 48,202 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common stock and common stock equivalents used to calculate diluted earnings per share | | 1,587,416 | | | 1,575,616 | | | 1,584,186 | | | 1,573,395 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
–9–
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward Looking Statement
The Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 contains safe harbor provisions regarding forward-looking statements. When used in this discussion, the words, “believes,” “anticipates,” “contemplated,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Those risks and uncertainties include changes in interest rates, the ability to control costs and expenses, and general economic conditions. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to those forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events
Financial Condition
Total assets increased $23,819,000 or 5.9% from December 31, 2006 to June 30, 2007.
Cash and cash equivalents declined $2,970,000 or 15.7%. Assets shifted from federal funds sold to investments and loans during the period while there was a slight increase in interest-bearing deposits in other banks and cash and due from banks. Opportunities to purchase commercial paper at higher yields than federal funds sold were utilized while the loan portfolio expanded to employ some of the liquidity we had been building.
Investment securities available for sale increased $8,913,000 or 13.3% during the first half of 2007 with reinvestment in commercial paper upon maturity, investment of funds that were previously in federal funds sold and from funds received from calls on $4,000,000 of U. S. government agency bonds in the portfolio. Management invested $1,685,000 in longer term municipal bonds as favorable yield opportunities were noted. We have maintained investment in very liquid commercial paper due to the income earned on these type investments as compared to yields available on longer term investments in order to be positioned to invest as bond returns become more attractive or we continue to secure quality loans.
Loans increased $15,152,000 or 5.0% from December 31, 2006 to a balance of $320,443,000 at June 30, 2007. Loans secured by commercial real estate increased by $14,445,000 or 8.5%. The bank granted several large commercial real estate mortgages secured by children’s summer camps and a variety of other businesses. Construction projects being financed by the bank have increased construction and development loans by $2,792,000 over the period. Residential mortgage lending remained relatively constant from year to year with thirty-six mortgages closed this year to date, the same number as were closed in the first half of 2006. The dollar value of loans closed in 2007 was $6,394,000, a decline in value from the loans closed in 2006, which included several jumbo residential mortgages. The bank does not originate subprime mortgage loans and therefore has not had problems that the industry has been experiencing with this type of lending. All other loan categories remained relatively stable since December 2006.
Bank-owned life insurance increased $2,153,000 or 36.5% over the period due to earnings along with the purchase of additional life insurance in the first quarter of 2007 in order to offer benefits for new officers that match those offered to existing officers and also to place additional insurance on key officers while preparing to change their benefit plan.
Total deposits increased $10,760,000 or 3.2% from December 31, 2006 to June 30, 2007. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $1,419,000 or 4.2% with incentives offered to employees for new accounts opened. Growth of interest-bearing deposits was $9,341,000 or 3.1%. While offering very competitive, tiered rates on money market accounts, these balances have increased $6,171,000 or 17.5% over the period. Certificates of deposit less than $100,000 continued to increase due to favorable rates offered on special six and thirteen month offerings. This category of deposit products increased $4,138,000 or 4.2% during the first six months of 2007. Competition continues to be keen on these products and we have chosen to continue to offer attractive rates in order to maintain relationships that we hope to keep after this period. Certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 decreased during the period due to the annual decline in public funds as municipalities spent their operating budgets. We have been successful in the bidding process during recent years and expect to be able to garner a similar share of these deposits as local taxing authorities request interest rate bids this summer and fall.
Short-term borrowings which are comprised of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, or “sweep” accounts, increased $6,460,000 or 50.8% over the period with the average customer balance increasing due to the seasonal nature of their business.
–10–
Other borrowed funds increased $4,467,000 during the first six months of the year. We borrowed $6,900,000 from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh in order to lock in an interest spread on the funding of long term, fixed rate loans to commercial customers. A borrowing of $2,000,000 matured in June 2007 and regularly scheduled principal reductions of $433,000 were also made during the period.
Stockholders’ equity increased $1,713,000 or 4.8% from December 31, 2006 to June 30, 2007. Net income of $3,096,000 was offset by dividend declarations of $887,000. Regulatory capital ratios of 11.3% total risk-based capital and 10.0% Tier I capital continue to exceed the regulatory guidelines of 8.0% and 4.0%, respectively. The Company’s Tier I leverage ratio was 8.9% at June 30, 2007 and compared favorably to the regulatory minimum of 3.0%.
–11–
Results of Operations
Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $1,599,000, representing an increase of $219,000 or 15.9% over the same quarter of 2006.
Net interest income of $4,272,000 represented an increase of $579,000 or 15.7% over that recorded for the second quarter of 2006.
Interest and fees earned on loans was $6,304,000, an increase of $1,163,000 or 22.6% more in 2007 than in 2006. The average interest rate of the portfolio increased .82% from 2006 to 2007, resulting in an average rate earned of 8.06% in 2007 while the average balance of the portfolio increased $28,898,000 or 10.1% over the period. The majority of interest rates in our loan portfolio are variable and with higher values in the prime rate over the past year our rates have concurrently increased over the periods.
Interest earned on taxable investments increased $311,000 or 52.4% in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to 2006 which is attributable to a combination of greater balances invested and higher interest earned. The average rate earned on the portfolio in 2007 was 5.19%, an increase of .38% over the second quarter of 2006. Commercial paper remains the largest segment of this investment portfolio, therefore interest rates earned have risen in correlation to the changes in short-term federal funds rate. Assets invested in taxable investments increased $20,419,000 or 41.4% on average in 2007 over balances at June 30, 2006.
Interest expense increased $906,000 or 41.0% in 2007 as compared to 2006. Interest paid on deposits increased $897,000 or 46.6% in 2007 over the same quarter in 2006. The average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased $46,215,000 or 17.4% while the average interest rate paid increased by. 72% to 3.64% in the second quarter of 2007. Of all deposit products offered, certificates of deposit have increased the greatest on average, growing by $38,073,000 over the period. We have continued to offer competitive rates on certificates of deposit. We are seeing a trend for customers to move funds from other types of lower-cost deposits into these certificates. We believe that the customers are actively looking for greater return on their investment. By offering these aggressive rates, we have maintained relationships and attracted new customers. Money market deposits increased $12,878,000 or 47.4% for the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period of 2006. The average interest rate paid for these deposits increased .72% to 3.79% over the average rate of 3.07% paid in 2006. This product has a tiered interest rate structure; and we have adjusted the pricing in relation to changes in the fed funds rate. We believe that customers are using these accounts to maintain liquidity while receiving very competitive rates in our markets.
The provision for loan losses is charged to operations to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level that represents management’s best estimates of the losses inherent in the portfolio, based on:
• | | type of lending conducted by the Bank; |
• | | the level and status of past due and non-performing loans; |
• | | the general economic conditions in the Bank’s lending area; and |
• | | other factors affecting the collectibility of the loans in its portfolio. |
Provision for loan loss expense was $225,000 in the second quarter of 2007. We did not require any comparable expense in 2006. We analyze the loan portfolio to determine what amount we believe is necessary for an adequate balance in the allowance for loan loss in order to determine the provision expense.
Noninterest income increased $57,000 or 7.3% in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to 2006. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $33,000 or 8.8% in 2007 versus 2006 based on the greater number of accounts serviced. Gains which were earned on the sale of mortgage loans declined $41,000 or 70.7% from 2006 to 2007. We regularly evaluate the criteria, including prepayment speeds, used to calculate the value of mortgage servicing rights. In the second half of 2006, we determined that the prepayment speed used to calculate the values should be lower. The value of these rights is included in the gain or loss on the sale of loans in the secondary market and therefore the benefit earned in 2007 was lower than in 2006. Other income increased $62,000 or 24.4% over a year earlier, due to a number of factors. In 2006 there was a $60,000 nonrecurring reversal of market value in mortgage servicing rights which added to the 2006 income. Offsetting that decline were a number of positive income factors. In
–12–
2006 there were merchant card refunds of $35,000 processed which were not matched in 2007, thereby showing greater income in 2007. Earnings on bank-owned life insurance were $34,000 greater in 2007 due to the purchase of additional life insurance in the first quarter of 2007 and higher rates earned on the existing policies. Interchange fees earned on our customers’ use of debit cards increased $25,000 or 50.2% in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 as we have increased penetration of the cards over the past year. Variances in several other earning categories are responsible for the additional income reported, no one of which was material alone.
Salaries and employee benefits increased $149,000 or 11.2% in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to 2006. Wages increased $87,000 or 9.4% in 2007 as compared to 2006 due to annual salary increases combined with four additional full time equivalent employees in 2007. Expenses related to changes in the supplemental executive retirement plans for key officers increased $43,000 in conjunction with the increased benefits offered in the plan. Smaller variances in employment-related expenses accounted for the remaining increases in 2007 expenses.
Other expense declined $43,000 or 5.4% in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to 2006. Expenses of $28,000 for termination of a contract and $40,000 for a software upgrade which were incurred in 2006 were not matched in 2007. Normal operating increases in various other expense categories are responsible for the remaining increase in expense, none of which were material alone.
Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
Net income for 2007 increased $521,000 or 20.2% over the six months ended June 30, 2006 while net interest income increased $1,072,000, or 14.9%, over that recorded in 2006.
Interest and fees earned on loans increased $2,365,000 or 23.6% based on a combination of $26,012,000 more in the average balance and an increase of .94% in the average interest rate received on loans. Fixed rate loans comprise only 27% of the loan portfolio with interest on the remainder of loans tied to changes in the prime rate. It has been our practice to fix the interest rate on commercial real estate loans for up to three years after which the interest rate varies with changes in the prime rate. Many loans which were granted during a lower point in the interest rate cycle have repriced to higher interest rates, accounting for the increase in the average interest rate earned on loans in 2007.
Interest earned on taxable investments increased $577,000 or 51.8% in the first half of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006. The average portfolio increased $17,449,000 or 36.3% to $65,581,000 in 2007 while the average interest rate earned on the bonds increased 54 basis points to 5.19%. We have continued to invest the majority of investment maturities and additional funds in short-term commercial paper until yields for investing in longer term bonds become more attractive.
Interest expense increased $1,943,000 or 46.8% in 2007 as compared to 2006. All of the increase is attributable to interest paid on deposits. The average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased by $47,237,000 or 18.1% while the average interest rate paid increased 85 basis points to 3.65% in 2007. Money market balances increased $11,402,000 or 42.5% over this time while the average interest rate paid increased by 1.10%. Management raised rates in the third quarter of 2006 in order to offer our customers a reasonable interest rate alternative to money market rates offered by brokerage firms. The average balance of certificates of deposit increased $40,968,000 or 26.0% over balances in 2006. Management has continued to offer very competitive interest rates on special short term certificates in order to maintain current deposits and attract new customers. Local competition for deposits continues to be strong. We believe that people are regaining confidence in the market and have become more proficient at shopping for the best interest rates when investing in certificates of deposit with much less regard to being loyal to one institution.
The provision for loan loss increased $235,000 because there was no expense in the second quarter of 2006, an event that was not matched in 2007. Management reviews the analysis of the allowance for loan loss and believes the level to be adequate at the levels reported for each time frame.
Noninterest income increased $128,000 or 8.4% to $1,650,000 in 2007 from income earned in 2006. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $50,000 or 6.8% based on a greater number of deposit accounts which are eligible for these fees. Other income increased $106,000 or 21.4%. This increase is after the decline of $60,000 in 2007 relating to the market value adjustment of mortgage servicing rights described above. Interchange fees earned on our customers’ use of debit cards increased $41,000 or 44.2% due to an effort to educate customers on the benefits of using the debit card and additional cards placed in service during the past year. Earnings on the cash surrender value of life insurance policies increased $61,000 or 55.1% due to new policy purchases and increases in the variable earnings rate on existing policies. Variances in several other earning categories are responsible for the additional income reported, no one of which was material alone.
–13–
Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $275,000 or 10.6% due to normal annual salary increases along with the associated benefits and the addition of four full time equivalent employees from June 2006 to June 2007. In addition, benefits relating to changes in the supplemental executive retirement plans for key officers increased expense by $43,000 in 2007.
Liquidity and Cash Flows
To ensure that the Company can satisfy customer credit needs for current and future commitments and deposit withdrawal requirements, the Bank manages the liquidity position by ensuring that there are adequate short-term funding sources available for those needs. Liquid assets consist of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits with other banks and investment securities maturing in one year or less. The following table shows these liquidity sources, minus short-term borrowings, as of June 30, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 | |
(dollars in thousands) | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 7,432 | | | $ | 6,684 | |
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks | | | 3,569 | | | | 2,287 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 5,000 | | | | 10,000 | |
Mortgage loans held for sale | | | 181 | | | | — | |
Investment securities maturing or repricing in one year or less | | | 62,210 | | | | 54,714 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 78,392 | | | | 73,685 | |
Less short-term borrowings | | | 19,165 | | | | 14,705 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net liquidity position | | $ | 59,227 | | | $ | 58,980 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As a percent of total assets | | | 13.9 | % | | | 14.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
The Bank has the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh with the maximum borrowing capacity at June 30, 2007 of $81 million. Other sources of liquidity are cash flows from regularly scheduled and prepayments of loans, sales or maturities in the investment portfolio, sales of residential mortgages in the secondary market, operating income and deposit growth. The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows specifically details the contribution of each source.
Management monitors liquidity on a consistent basis and feels that liquidity levels are adequate. We are not aware of any known trends, events or uncertainties that will have or is reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Company’s liquidity, capital resources or operations nor are we aware of any current recommendations by regulatory authorities, which if implemented, would have such an effect.
–14–
Risk Elements
The table below presents information concerning nonperforming assets including nonaccrual loans, renegotiated loans, loans 90 days or more past due, other real estate loans and repossessed assets at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. A loan is classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, there are doubts about collectability of interest and principal. At the time the accrual of interest is discontinued, future income is recognized only when cash is received. Impaired loans are recognized according to FASB 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan – Income Recognition and Disclosure.”
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 | |
(dollars in thousands) | | | | | | |
Loans on nonaccrual basis | | $ | 381 | | | $ | 426 | |
Loans past due 90 days or more | | | 119 | | | | 290 | |
Impaired loans | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total nonperforming loans | | | 500 | | | | 716 | |
Other real estate | | | — | | | | — | |
Repossessed assets | | | 4 | | | | 7 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total nonperforming assets | | $ | 504 | | | $ | 723 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets | | | 0.1 | % | | | 0.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan loss as a percent of loans | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.46 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Management believes the level of the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2007 is adequate to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The relationship between the allowance for loan losses and outstanding loans is a function of the credit quality and known risk attributed to the loan portfolio. The on-going loan review program, along with management analysis, is used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
There were no loans classified as impaired under the terms of FAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan – Income Recognition and Disclosure” at June 30, 2007.
–15–
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
A key function of management in its role as the Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) is to evaluate the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk. The primary business of the Company in the financial services industry is to act as a depository financial intermediary. In this role, an integral element of risk involves the chance that prevailing interest rates will adversely affect assets, liabilities, capital, income and/or expense at different times and in different amounts. The ALCO is comprised of all senior officers of the bank and other key officers. This committee reports directly to the Board of Directors on at least a quarterly basis.
Two separate reports are used to assist in measuring interest rate risk. The first is the Statement of Interest Sensitivity Gap report. This report matches all interest-earning assets and all interest-bearing liabilities by the time frame in which funds can be reinvested or repriced. The second report is the Interest Rate Shock Analysis discussed in more detail below. In both reports, there are inherent assumptions that must be used in the evaluation. These assumptions include the maturity or repricing times of deposits, even though all deposits, other than time deposits, have no stated maturity and the reference that interest rate shifts will be parallel, with the rates of assets and liabilities shifting in the same amount in the same time frame. In reality, various assets and various liabilities will react differently to changes in interest rates, with some lagging behind the change and some anticipating the upcoming change and reacting before any actual change occurs. Each tool also suggests that there is a propensity to replace assets and liabilities with similar assets and liabilities rather than taking into consideration management’s ability to reallocate the Balance Sheet. In addition, the models used do not include any elements to determine how an action by management to increase or decrease interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits or to increase borrowings at the FHLB will affect the results of the analysis. In spite of these limitations, these analyses are still very good tools to assist in management of the Company and similar versions of these same reports are used by all financial institutions.
–16–
Statement of Interest Sensitivity Gap
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 90 days or less | | | >90 days but < 1 year | | | 1 - 5 years | | | >5 years | | | Total |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold | | $ | 8,569 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,569 |
Mortgage loans held for sale | | | 181 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 181 |
Investment securities available for sale(4) (6) | | | 58,648 | | | | 3,562 | | | | 4,208 | | | | 10,956 | | | | 77,374 |
Loans(1) (5) | | | 85,258 | | | | 84,302 | | | | 87,267 | | | | 63,949 | | | | 320,776 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rate sensitive assets | | $ | 152,656 | | | $ | 87,864 | | | $ | 91,475 | | | $ | 74,905 | | | $ | 406,900 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand(2) | | $ | 3,874 | | | $ | 12,106 | | | $ | 32,443 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 48,423 |
Money market(3) | | | 7,046 | | | | 20,723 | | | | 13,677 | | | | — | | | | 41,446 |
Savings(2) | | | 2,712 | | | | 8,474 | | | | 22,712 | | | | — | | | | 33,898 |
Time deposits | | | 59,930 | | | | 89,553 | | | | 40,036 | | | | — | | | | 189,519 |
Short-term borrowings | | | 19,165 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19,165 |
Other borrowings | | | 283 | | | | 867 | | | | 6,140 | | | | 10,940 | | | | 18,230 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rate sensitive liabilities | | $ | 93,010 | | | $ | 131,723 | | | $ | 115,008 | | | $ | 10,940 | | | $ | 350,681 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest sensitivity gap | | $ | 59,646 | | | $ | (43,859 | ) | | $ | (23,533 | ) | | $ | 63,965 | | | $ | 56,219 |
Cumulative gap | | $ | 59,646 | | | $ | 15,787 | | | $ | (7,746 | ) | | $ | 56,219 | | | | |
Cumulative gap to total assets | | | 13.96 | % | | | 3.69 | % | | | (1.81 | %) | | | 13.15 | % | | | |
(1) | Loans are included in the earlier period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust or in which they are due. |
No adjustment has been made for scheduled repayments or for anticipated prepayments.
(2) | Interest-bearing demand deposits and savings are segmented based on the percentage of decay method. |
The decay rates used include “90 days or less” 8%, “ >90 days but <1 year” 25% and “1-5 years” 67%.
(3) | Money market deposits are segmented based on the percentage of decay method. |
The decay rates used include “90 days or less” 17%, “>90 days but < 1 year” 50% and “1-5 years” 33%.
(4) | Includes Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock which is included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
(5) | Does not include loans in nonaccrual status, deposit overdrafts, unposted items or deferred fees on loans. |
(6) | Investments are included in the earlier period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust or in which they are due. |
Included are U.S. Government Agency step-up bonds characterized by having tiered interest rates over their life.
Due to this feature these securities have been reallocated from their matuity date to their next step-up date.
The specific impact of this policy by timeframe is as follows: “90 days or less” increased $8,872, “>90 days but < 1 year” increased $991, “1-5 years” decreased $5,937 and “>5 years” decreased $3,926.
As this report shows, the Company was in an asset sensitive position at June 30, 2007. This means that in the one year time frame there were more interest-sensitive assets than liabilities. Management believes that this sensitivity level is acceptable in light of the current interest rate environment. We have limited our certificate of deposit special rates in order to attract the majority of these liabilities to short term products, which has moved the balance sheet closer to a balanced position.
–17–
The second report used to monitor interest rate risk is the Interest Rate Shock Analysis. This tool attempts to determine the affect on income of various shifts in the interest rate environment. In particular, a shift of 200 basis points, or 2% in interest rates, is the industry standard. Given a downward shift of 200 basis points, net interest income would decrease by $539,000 or 3.1% while net income would decrease $401,000 or 5.7%. The results of a potential shift of 200 basis points in either direction are well within internal policy guidelines. If the results were not tolerable, our policy would determine that management should reallocate the Balance Sheet in order to maintain compliance with the policy. If interest rates were to immediately increase 200 basis points, the economic value of equity (EVE) would decline $3,997,000 or 8.2%. The economic value of equity is sometimes referred to as the present value of equity and is presented as one more statistic to monitor in managing interest rate risk.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 100 basis points | | | 200 basis points | |
| | Up | | | Down | | | Up | | | Down | |
| | Amount | | | % | | | Amount | | | % | | | Amount | | | % | | | Amount | | | % | |
Net interest income | | $ | 347 | | | 1.98 | % | | $ | (250 | ) | | -1.42 | % | | $ | 629 | | | 3.58 | % | | $ | (539 | ) | | -3.07 | % |
Net income | | $ | 260 | | | 3.70 | % | | $ | (146 | ) | | -2.07 | % | | $ | 460 | | | 6.55 | % | | $ | (401 | ) | | -5.71 | % |
EVE | | $ | (1,436 | ) | | -2.94 | % | | $ | 1,404 | | | 2.87 | % | | $ | (3,997 | ) | | -8.17 | % | | $ | 2,334 | | | 4.77 | % |
–18–
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Based on their evaluation as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in internal controls
There were no significant changes in the Registrant’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
–19–
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1—Legal Proceedings
NONE
Item 1a.—Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the risk factors described in Item 1a. in Dimeco’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the period ended December 31, 2006.
Item 2—Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Total number of shares purchased | | Average price paid per share | | Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs | | Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs |
04/01/07 to 04/30/07 | | — | | $ | — | | — | | |
05/01/07 to 05/31/07 | | — | | $ | — | | — | | |
06/01/07 to 06/31/07 | | 10,000 | | $ | 48.50 | | 10,000 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | 10,000 | | $ | 48.50 | | 10,000 | | 129,849 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Item 3—Defaults upon Senior Securities
NONE
Item 4—Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The following represents the result of matters submitted to a vote of shareholders at the Annual Meeting held on April 26, 2007:
The following directors were re-elected with terms to expire in 2010:
| | | | |
| | For | | Withhold Authority |
William E. Schwarz | | 1,168,907 | | 36,982 |
Henry M. Skier | | 1,169,529 | | 36,359 |
| 2. | S.R. Snodgrass, A.C. was elected as the company’s Independent Auditors for the year ended December 31, 2007 by the following vote: |
| | |
For | | 1,204,795 |
Against | | 411 |
Abstain | | 682 |
Item 5— Other Information
NONE
–20–
Item 6—Exhibits
Form 8K—Report on April 23, 2007—News Release of Registrant
| | |
Exhibit Number: | | |
31.1 | | Certification Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 10A, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 |
| |
31.2 | | Certification Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 10A, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 |
| |
32 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
| |
99 | | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
The following exhibits are included in this Report or incorporated herein by reference:
| 3(i) | Articles of Incorporation of Dimeco, Inc.* |
| 3(ii) | Amended Bylaws of Dimeco, Inc.**** |
| 10.1 | 2000 Independent Directors Stock Option Plan** |
| 10.2 | 2000 Stock Incentive Plan*** |
| 10.3 | Form of Salary Continuation Plan for Executive Officers**** |
* | Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit 3A to the Form S-4 (File No. 333-58936) filed with the Commission on February 26, 1993. |
** | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form S-8 (File No. 333-69420) filed with the Commission on September 14, 2002. |
*** | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form S-8 (File No. 333-69416) filed with the Commission on September 14, 2002. |
–21–
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused the report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| | DIMECO, INC. |
| | |
Date: August 9, 2007 | | By: | | /s/ Gary C. Beilman |
| | | | Gary C. Beilman |
| | | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
Date: August 9, 2007 | | By: | | /s/ Maureen H. Beilman |
| | | | Maureen H. Beilman |
| | | | Chief Financial Officer |
–22–