UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-21326
Anika Therapeutics, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Massachusetts | 04-3145961 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Incorporation or Organization) | |
32 Wiggins Avenue, Bedford, Massachusetts | 01730 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (781) 457-9000
Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report: N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer x | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x
As of May 3, 2012, there were 13,763,861 outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share.
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | ||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 34,003,178 | $ | 35,777,222 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $344,520 and $334,473 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 17,002,797 | 17,307,786 | ||||||
Inventories | 9,080,323 | 7,302,483 | ||||||
Current portion deferred income taxes | 1,918,926 | 1,918,926 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | 1,947,394 | 1,831,127 | ||||||
Total current assets | 63,952,618 | 64,137,544 | ||||||
Property and equipment, at cost | 51,541,804 | 50,850,630 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation | (14,868,205 | ) | (14,380,752 | ) | ||||
36,673,599 | 36,469,878 | |||||||
Long-term deposits and other | 151,744 | 205,042 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 23,300,273 | 23,148,563 | ||||||
Goodwill | 9,150,273 | 8,883,407 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 133,228,507 | $ | 132,844,434 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 3,880,840 | $ | 4,299,680 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 4,297,387 | 5,321,594 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 2,866,667 | 2,866,667 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 1,600,000 | 1,600,000 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 235,326 | 450,482 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 12,880,220 | 14,538,423 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 1,556,399 | 1,548,652 | ||||||
Long-term deferred revenue | 4,302,773 | 5,019,440 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability | 7,028,515 | 7,375,141 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 9,200,000 | 9,600,000 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) | - | - | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,250,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | - | - | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized, 13,763,191 and 13,630,607 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 137,631 | 136,305 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital | 64,269,349 | 63,441,433 | ||||||
Accumulated currency translation adjustment | (2,310,720 | ) | (3,067,181 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings | 36,164,340 | 34,252,221 | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 98,260,600 | 94,762,778 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | $ | 133,228,507 | $ | 132,844,434 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income | ||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Product revenue | $ | 13,613,328 | $ | 11,060,159 | ||||
Licensing, milestone and contract revenue | 747,332 | 677,520 | ||||||
Total revenue | 14,360,660 | 11,737,679 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Cost of product revenue | 6,413,481 | 5,604,562 | ||||||
Research & development | 1,533,103 | 1,532,664 | ||||||
Selling, general & administrative | 3,351,016 | 4,043,774 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 11,297,600 | 11,181,000 | ||||||
Income from operations | 3,063,060 | 556,679 | ||||||
Interest income (expense), net | (51,203 | ) | (40,921 | ) | ||||
Income before income taxes | 3,011,857 | 515,758 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | 1,099,738 | 191,346 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 1,912,119 | $ | 324,412 | ||||
Basic net income per share: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.03 | ||||
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding | 13,162,824 | 12,688,819 | ||||||
Diluted net income per share: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.02 | ||||
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 14,089,946 | 13,744,710 | ||||||
Net income | 1,912,119 | 324,412 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 756,461 | 1,749,662 | ||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 2,668,580 | $ | 2,074,074 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | ||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,912,119 | $ | 324,412 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 986,913 | 920,410 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 320,510 | 300,275 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (82,206 | ) | (111,293 | ) | ||||
Provision for inventory | 49,558 | 711,533 | ||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options | (394,076 | ) | - | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | 358,471 | 2,753,690 | ||||||
Inventories | (1,769,606 | ) | (374,014 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses, other current and long-term assets | (324,152 | ) | (580,852 | ) | ||||
Long-term deposits and other | 8,499 | 8,499 | ||||||
Accounts payable | (476,940 | ) | (1,021,405 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses | (1,341,407 | ) | (966,151 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue | (716,667 | ) | (668,190 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable | (215,156 | ) | 2,198 | |||||
Other long-term liabilities | (5,509 | ) | (13,165 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (1,689,649 | ) | 1,285,947 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment, net | (224,059 | ) | (76,570 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (224,059 | ) | (76,570 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Principal payments on debt | (400,000 | ) | (400,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 114,656 | 28,945 | ||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options | 394,076 | - | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 108,732 | (371,055 | ) | |||||
Exchange rate impact on cash | 30,932 | 38,556 | ||||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (1,774,044 | ) | 876,878 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 35,777,222 | 28,201,932 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 34,003,178 | $ | 29,078,810 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ANIKA THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Nature of Business
Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Anika,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) develops, manufactures and commercializes therapeutic products for tissue protection, healing, and repair. These products are based on hyaluronic acid (“HA”), a naturally occurring, biocompatible polymer found throughout the body. Due to its unique biophysical and biochemical properties, HA plays an important role in a number of physiological functions such as the protection and lubrication of soft tissues and joints, the maintenance of the structural integrity of tissues, and the transport of molecules to and within cells.
The Company is subject to risks common to companies in the biotechnology and medical device industries including, but not limited to, development by the Company or its competitors of new technological innovations, dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, commercialization of existing and new products, and compliance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and foreign regulations and approval requirements as well as the ability to grow the Company’s business.
2. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.”). The financial statements include the accounts of Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated. The year-end consolidated balance sheet is derived from our audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the condensed consolidated financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2012 and the results of its operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual financial statements filed with its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. There have been no changes in our significant accounting policies for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. There was no impact on operating income.
3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Issued or Adopted
On May 12, 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), together with the International Accounting Standards Board, jointly issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The provisions of ASU 2011-04 give fair value the same meaning between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards, and improve consistency of disclosures relating to fair value. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this ASU require all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity to be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. This ASU's objective is to simplify the process of performing impairment testing for Goodwill. With this update, a company is allowed to first assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not (greater than 50%) that the fair value of its goodwill and intangible assets is less than the carrying amount. This step is done prior to performing the two-step goodwill impairment testing, as prescribed by Topic 350. This ASU is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
5
4. Fair Value Measurements
We measure certain assets and liabilities, such as fixed income investments, at fair value based upon exit price, representing the amount that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. To increase the comparability of fair value measurements, the following hierarchical levels of inputs to valuation methodologies are used:
• | Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. Level 1 instruments include securities traded on active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. |
• | Level 2 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. |
• | Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimates of assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The following table summarizes our assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, by level, within the fair value hierarchy:
March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Cash equivalents - money market accounts | $ | 20,263,766 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 20,263,766 | ||||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Cash equivalents - money market accounts | $ | 20,263,766 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 20,263,766 |
5. Equity Incentive Plan
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options and stock appreciation rights using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Fair value of restricted stock is measured by the grant-date price of the Company’s shares. The fair value of each stock option award during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2012 | 2011 | ||
Risk free interest rate | 0.64% | 1.51% | |
Expected volatility | 57.60% | 57.60% | |
Expected lives (years) | 4 | 4 | |
Expected dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
The Company recorded $320,510 and $300,275 of share-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for equity compensation awards. The Company presents the expenses related to stock-based compensation awards in the same expense line items as cash compensation paid to the respective employees.
There were 119,000 stock options granted under the Second Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Second Amended 2003 Plan”) during the three months ended March 31, 2012. There were 16,480 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted to members of the Company’s Board of Directors under the Second Amended 2003 Plan during the same period ended March 31, 2012. The stock options and RSUs granted to employees and directors become exercisable or vest ratably over four years from the date of grant.
6
As of March 31, 2012, there was approximately $2.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), and restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) granted under the Company’s incentive plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.
The total intrinsic value of stock options and SARs exercised during the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $1,192,545 and $13,875, respectively. Cash received from the exercise of stock options during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was $114,656 and $28,945, respectively.
There were approximately 2.0 million options and SARs outstanding under the Company’s incentive plans at March 31, 2012 with a weighted-average exercise price of $7.71 per share, an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $9.9 million, and a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 6.78 years.
None of the options or SARs outstanding at March 31, 2012 or 2011, respectively, had cash-settlement features.
The Company may satisfy the awards upon exercise, or upon fulfillment of the vesting requirements for other equity-based awards, with either authorized but unissued shares or shares reacquired by the Company. Stock-based awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Awards contain service or performance conditions and generally become exercisable ratably over one to four years and have a ten year contractual term.
6. Earnings Per Share
The Company reports earnings per share in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260, Earnings Per Share, which establishes standards for computing and presenting earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the number of dilutive potential common share equivalents during the period. Under the treasury stock method, unexercised “in-the-money” stock options are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period or at issuance, if later. The assumed proceeds are then used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period.
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Shares used in the calculation of Basic earnings per share | 13,162,824 | 12,688,819 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||
Stock options, SARs, RSAs, and shares held in escrow | 927,122 | 1,055,891 | ||||||
Diluted shares used in the calculation of earnings per share | 14,089,946 | 13,744,710 |
In connection with the acquisition of Anika Therapeutics S.r.l. (“Anika S.r.l.”) on December 30, 2009, the Company issued 1,981,192 shares of its common stock of which 500,000 of these shares remain in escrow at March 31, 2012. These 500,000 shares are included in the diluted potential common shares but are excluded from the basic earnings per share calculation. See Note 10 for additional information relative to this item.
Equity awards of 380,551 and 979,438 shares were outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the awards’ impact on earnings per share was anti-dilutive.
7
7. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Raw materials | $ | 5,035,600 | $ | 4,091,366 | ||||
Work-in-process | 2,000,603 | 1,503,565 | ||||||
Finished goods | 2,044,120 | 1,707,552 | ||||||
Total | $ | 9,080,323 | $ | 7,302,483 |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out method. Work-in-process and finished goods inventories include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead.
8. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
In connection with the acquisition of Anika S.r.l., the Company acquired various intangible assets and goodwill. The Company evaluated the various intangibles and related cash flows from these intangible assets, as well as the useful lives and amortization methods related to these intangibles. The in-process research and development intangible assets initially have indefinite lives and are reviewed periodically to assess the project status, valuation, and disposition including write-off(s) for abandoned projects. Until such determination is made, they are not amortized.
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment at least annually. Additionally, the Company will initiate a review for impairment if events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of the assets are no longer appropriate. Each impairment test will be based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value of the asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value.
Intangible assets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consist of the following:
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Value | Currency Translation Adjustment | Accumulated Amortization | Net Book Value | Net Book Value | Useful Life | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed technology | $ | 16,700,000 | $ | (1,158,450 | ) | $ | (2,275,506 | ) | $ | 13,266,044 | $ | 13,228,351 | 15 | ||||||||||
In-process research & development | 6,698,000 | (464,629 | ) | - | 6,233,371 | 5,955,066 | Indefinite | ||||||||||||||||
Distributor relationships | 4,700,000 | (326,031 | ) | (1,968,286 | ) | 2,405,683 | 2,547,842 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Patents | 1,000,000 | (69,368 | ) | (130,870 | ) | 799,762 | 790,555 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
Elevess trade name | 1,000,000 | - | (404,587 | ) | 595,413 | 626,749 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 30,098,000 | $ | (2,018,478 | ) | $ | (4,779,249 | ) | $ | 23,300,273 | $ | 23,148,563 |
The aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets was $516,278 and $537,040 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | 8,883,407 | ||
Effect of foreign currency adjustments | 266,866 | |||
Balance at March 31, 2012 | $ | 9,150,273 |
8
9. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Payroll and benefits | $ | 1,783,448 | $ | 2,366,412 | ||||
Professional fees | 483,488 | 793,430 | ||||||
Research grants | 1,019,284 | 989,556 | ||||||
Other | 1,011,167 | 1,172,196 | ||||||
Total | $ | 4,297,387 | $ | 5,321,594 |
10. Commitments and Contingencies
In certain of its contracts, the Company warrants to its customers that the products it manufactures conform to the product specifications as in effect at the time of delivery of the product. The Company may also warrant that the products it manufactures do not infringe, violate or breach any patent or intellectual property rights, trade secret or other proprietary information of any third party. On occasion, the Company contractually indemnifies its customers against any and all losses arising out of, or in any way connected with, any claim or claims of breach of its warranties or any actual or alleged defect in any product caused by the negligence or acts or omissions of the Company. The Company maintains a products liability insurance policy that limits its exposure. Based on the Company’s historical activity in combination with its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. The Company has no accrued warranties and has no history of claims paid.
On July 7, 2010, Genzyme Corporation (“Genzyme”) filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts seeking unspecified damages and equitable relief. The Complaint alleges that the Company has infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,143,724 by manufacturing MONOVISC in the United States for sale outside the United States and will infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 5,143,724 and 5,399,351 if the Company begins manufacture and sale of MONOVISC in the United States. On August 30, 2010, the Company filed an answer denying liability. On April 26, 2011, Genzyme filed a motion to add its newly-issued U.S. Patent No. 7,931,030 to this litigation and also filed a separate new complaint in the District of Massachusetts alleging that the Company's manufacture and sale of MONOVISC in the United States will infringe that patent. On May 23, 2011, the Court entered orders permitting Genzyme to file its supplemental complaint adding its newly-issued U.S. Patent No. 7,931,030 to this litigation and requiring Genzyme to withdraw its separately filed complaint. On July 14, 2011, the Company filed an answer to the supplemental complaint, denying liability. The Company believes that neither MONOVISC, nor its manufacture, does or will infringe any valid and enforceable claim of the asserted patents. Management has assessed and determined that contingent losses related to this matter are not probable. Therefore, pursuant to ASC 450, Contingencies, an accrual has not been recorded for this loss contingency. Pursuant to the terms of the licensing and supply agreement entered into with Depuy Mitek, Inc. in December 2011, DePuy Mitek agreed to assume certain obligations of the Company related to this litigaton.
In 2011, Merogel Injectable was withdrawn from the market due to a labeling error on the product’s packaging. We are working with Medtronic to resolve a dispute related thereto. Medtronic has informed us that if we are unable to resolve this dispute, they will make claims against us. As this labeling error relates to conduct that initially occurred prior to our acquisition of Anika S.r.l. from Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A., we have made claims against Fidia for indemnification for Anika’s losses as well as any potential claims that may be brought by Medtronic. Fidia has informed us that it does not believe that it has liability for this matter, and has made claims against us for refusing to release the Anika shares that were put into escrow in connection with the original transaction. Management has assessed and determined that contingent losses related to this matter are not probable. Therefore, pursuant to ASC 450, Contingencies, an accrual has not been recorded for this loss contingency.
We are also involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, we do not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
9
11. Long-term Debt
On January 31, 2008, the Company entered into an unsecured Credit Agreement with Bank of America. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had an outstanding debt balance of $10,800,000, at an interest rate of 1.72%. The interest payable on our debt is determined, at the Company’s option, based on LIBOR plus 1.25%, or the lender’s prime rate.
ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure about the fair value of financial instruments in interim as well as in annual financial statements. The carrying value of our debt instrument was $10,800,000 and $11,200,000 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, of which $1,600,000 was recorded as current at each date. The estimated fair value of our debt, which is a Level 2 instrument for fair value measurement purposes, approximated book value at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
12. Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $1,099,738 and $191,346 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective tax rates were 36.5% and 37.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
In the normal course of business, Anika and its subsidiaries may be periodically examined by various taxing authorities. We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, in certain U.S. states, and in Italy. The associated tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. The 2008 through 2011 tax years remain subject to examination by the IRS and other taxing authorities for U.S. federal and state purposes. The 2009 through 2011 tax years remain subject to examination by the appropriate governmental authorities in Italy.
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements, the Company performed an analysis to ascertain if it was more likely than not that it would be able to utilize, in future periods, the net deferred tax assets associated with its net operating loss carryforward, research and development (“R&D”) tax credit carryforward, and its investment tax credit carryforward. We have concluded that the positive evidence outweighs the negative evidence and, thus, that those deferred tax assets not otherwise subject to a valuation allowance are realizable on a “more likely than not” basis. As such, we have not recorded a valuation allowance at March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011, respectively.
13. Related Party
In connection with our acquisition of Anika S.r.l. on December 30, 2009, Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A. (“Fidia”) acquired ownership of 1,981,192 shares of the Company's common stock, of which 500,000 shares remain in escrow at March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, Fidia owns approximately 14.4% of the outstanding shares of the Company.
As part of the acquisition, the Company, primarily through Anika S.r.l., entered into a series of operating agreements with Fidia as follows:
Agreement Type | Description | Term in Years |
Lease | Rent of space in Abano Terme, Italy | Six |
Finished goods supply | Manufacture and supply of goods | Three |
Raw material supply | Hyaluronic acid powder | Five |
Services | Finance, administrative, security | One to Six |
Accounts receivable | Collection of trade receivables outstanding as of | Two |
management | December 30, 2009. |
Historically, Anika S.r.l. has relied on Fidia, its former parent company, for several functional activities. In connection with the purchase of Anika S.r.l., the Company has negotiated a lease for approximately 26,000 square feet of office, laboratory and warehouse space in Abano Terme, Italy, and a finished goods supply agreement. At March 31, 2012, Anika S.r.l. had a payable due to Fidia for past products and services of approximately $1.0 million.
10
14. Segment and Geographic Information
The Company has one reportable operating segment, the results of which are disclosed in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Product revenue by product group is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Orthobiologics | $ | 10,116,845 | $ | 8,036,298 | ||||
Dermal | 501,315 | 589,153 | ||||||
Ophthalmic | 1,323,994 | 897,808 | ||||||
Surgical | 983,628 | 1,113,728 | ||||||
Veterinary | 687,546 | 423,172 | ||||||
$ | 13,613,328 | $ | 11,060,159 |
Product revenue by geographic location in total and as a percentage of total product revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of | Percentage of | |||||||||||||||
Geographic Location: | Revenue | Revenue | Revenue | Revenue | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 10,390,045 | 76 | % | $ | 8,343,114 | 76 | % | ||||||||
Europe | 2,155,729 | 16 | % | 2,033,198 | 18 | % | ||||||||||
Other | 1,067,554 | 8 | % | 683,847 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 13,613,328 | 100 | % | $ | 11,060,159 | 100 | % |
11
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding:
● | Our future sales and product revenue, including geographic expansions, possible retroactive price adjustments, and expectations of unit volumes or other offsets to price reductions; |
● | Our manufacturing capacity and efficiency gains and work-in-process manufacturing operations; |
● | The timing, scope and rate of patient enrollment for clinical trials; |
● | The development of possible new products; |
● | Our ability to achieve or maintain compliance with laws and regulations; |
● | The timing of and/or receipt of the Food and Drug Administration, foreign or other regulatory approvals, clearances, and/or reimbursement approvals of current, new or potential products, and any limitations on such approvals; |
● | Our intention to seek patent protection for our products and processes, and protect our intellectual property; |
● | Our ability to effectively compete against current and future competitors; |
● | Negotiations with potential and existing partners, including our performance under any of our existing and future distribution or supply agreements or our expectations with respect to sales and sales threshold milestones pursuant to such agreements; |
● | The level of our revenue or sales in particular geographic areas and/or for particular products, and the market share for any of our products; |
● | Our current strategy, including our corporate objectives and research and development and collaboration opportunities; |
● | Our and Bausch & Lomb’s performance under the non-exclusive supply agreement for AMVISC® and AMVISC® Plus ophthalmic viscoelastic products, and our expectations regarding revenue generated from ophthalmic products; |
● | Our ability to commercialize AnikaVisc and AnikaVisc Plus, and our expectations regarding such commercialization and the potential revenue generated thereby; |
● | Our expectations regarding our joint health products, including expectations regarding new products, expanded uses of existing products, new distribution and revenue growth; |
● | Our intention to increase market share for joint health products in international and domestic markets or otherwise penetrate growing markets for osteoarthritis of the knee and other joints; |
● | Our expectations regarding next generation osteoarthritis/joint health product developments, clinical trials, regulatory approvals and commercial launches; |
● | Our expectations regarding revenue from sales of HYVISC®; |
● | Our ability to identify a new distribution partner for HYDRELLE™ in the United States and the impact this may have on future sales of this product; |
● | Our ability to license our aesthetics product to new distribution partners outside of the United States; our ability, and the ability of our distribution partners, to market our aesthetic dermatology product; and our expectations regarding the distribution and sales of our ELEVESSTM product and the timing thereof; |
12
● | Our expectations regarding our existing aesthetics product line’s extensions; |
● | Our expectations regarding product gross margin; |
● | Our expectations regarding our U.S. MONOVISC® trials and the results of the related premarket approval (“PMA”) filing with the FDA, including the escalation of the appeal process with the FDA as we actively seek an objective review of the scientific and clinical data, and the likelihood of our obtaining such approval and/or the anticipated timing thereof; |
● | Our expectations regarding the commencement of a clinical trial for CINGAL™, including the expense associated therewith, and our ability to obtain regulatory approvals for CINGAL; |
● | Our expectation for changes in operating expenses, including research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses; |
● | The rate at which we use cash, the amounts used and generated by operations, and our expectation regarding the adequacy of such cash; |
● | Our expectation for capital expenditures spending and future amounts of interest income and expense; |
● | Possible negotiations or re-negotiations with existing or new distribution or collaboration partners; |
● | Our expectations regarding the transfer of manufacturing and shipping of Anika products from our Woburn, MA manufacturing facility to our Bedford, MA facility (the “Bedford Facility”); and our ability to complete FDA licensure for the facility; and our expectation regarding the impact of the Bedford Facility on our business and the amount of the annual depreciation expense associated therewith; |
● | Our ability to remain in compliance with debt covenants; |
● | Our ability to obtain additional funds through equity or debt financings, strategic alliances with corporate partners and other sources, to the extent our current sources of funds are insufficient; |
● | Our abilities to successfully manage Anika Therapeutics S.r.l.’s (“Anika S.r.l.”), operations from one with losses, into a company generating profits; |
● | Our abilities to effectively prioritize the many research and development projects underway; |
● | Our ability to obtain U.S. approval for the orthopedic and other product franchises of Anika S.r.l., including the timing and potential success of such efforts, and to expand sales of these products in the U.S., including the impact such efforts may have on our revenue; |
● | Our ability to satisfactorily resolve the potential dispute with Medtronic Xomed and Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A; and |
● | Our ability to successfully defend the Company against lawsuits and claims, including the Genzyme lawsuit, and the uncertain financial impact such lawsuits and claims and related defense costs may have on the Company. |
Furthermore, additional statements identified by words such as “will,” “likely,” “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “designed,” “develop,” “would,” “future,” “can,” “could,” and other expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters, also identify forward-looking statements.
13
You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, including those factors described in the section titled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause our actual results, performance or achievement to be materially different from anticipated future results, performance or achievement, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon the current assumptions of our management and are only expectations of future results. You should carefully review all of these factors, and you should be aware that there may be other factors that could cause these differences, including those factors discussed herein and in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and in our press releases and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors of new information, future events or other changes.
14
Management Overview
Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Anika,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) develops, manufactures and commercializes therapeutic products for tissue protection, healing, and repair. These products are based on hyaluronic acid (“HA”), a naturally occurring, biocompatible polymer found throughout the body. Due to its unique biophysical and biochemical properties, HA plays an important role in a number of physiological functions such as the protection and lubrication of soft tissues and joints, the maintenance of the structural integrity of tissues, and the transport of molecules to and within cells.
In October 2011, we received additional orders from Bausch & Lomb (“B&L”) for ophthalmic products to be delivered in the first half of 2012. Effective January 1, 2012, the parties agreed to a new three year contract for Anika to continue to supply these products to B&L as a second supplier with additional committed volumes for 2012, and reduced annual commitments in 2013 and 2014. Currently we can only produce this product in our Woburn facility, and we expect to continue to occupy our Woburn facility until June 2012 in order to satisfy these commitments. During the first quarter of 2012, we received all FDA approvals required to manufacture our aseptic products in our Bedford facility, except for AmVisc and AmVisc Plus. We are currently working with B&L to obtain FDA approval for these products to be manufactured in our Bedford Facility, and expect to receive approval by the third quarter of 2012.
Anika S.r.l., our Italian subsidiary, has over 20 products currently commercialized, primarily in Europe. These products are all made from HA, and are based on two technologies: HYAFF, which is a solid form of HA, and ACP gel, an autocross-linked polymer of HA. Both technologies are protected by an extensive portfolio of patents. With the 2009 acquisition of Anika S.r.l., the Company is offering therapeutic products in the following areas:
Anika | Anika S.r.l. | |
Orthobiologics | X | X |
Dermal Advanced wound care Aesthetic dermatology | X | X |
Ophthalmic | X | |
Surgical Anti-adhesion Ear, nose and throat care (“ENT”) | X | X X |
Veterinary | X |
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with a new distributor for Anika S.r.l.’s products in the Italian market, which consist of orthopedic and advanced wound care products. The transition to a new distributor resulted in a decline in Italian revenue during the first quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year. A significant portion of the Company’s accounts receivable arising from product sales within Italy by Anika S.r.l. are due from public hospitals and other government-funded healthcare agencies. As of March 31, 2012, the Company’s accounts receivable from all Italian customers totaled approximately $3.2 million of which public hospital and agency receivables were approximately $2.4 million.
Please see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Management Overview (Item 7) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, for a description of each of the above therapeutic areas, including the individual products.
Research and Development
Anika’s research and development efforts primarily consist of the development of new medical applications for our HA-based technologies, the management of clinical trials and studies for certain product candidates, the preparation and processing of applications for regulatory approvals or clearances at all relevant stages of product development, and process development and scale-up manufacturing activities relative to our existing and new products. Our development focus includes products for new indications, chemically modified formulations of HA designed for longer residence time in the body, and other development activities. Our investment in R&D has been important over the years, and varies considerably depending on the number and size of clinical trials and studies underway. We anticipate that we will continue to commit significant resources to research and development, including clinical trials, in the future.
15
With the acquisition of Anika S.r.l., we have enhanced both our research and development capabilities and our pipeline of candidate products. Anika S.r.l. has research and development programs for new products including Hyalobone, a bone tissue filler; Hyalospine, an adhesion prevention gel for use after spinal surgery; and Hyalograft C Autograft (“HCA”) for cartilage regeneration. The Company currently plans to commence a multi-country, multi-year clinical trial for HCA in September 2012.
Hyalograft C Autograft is classified as an advanced therapy medicinal product under the current European Union regulations, which require a centralized marketing authorization by the European Medicines Agency. Our first next generation osteoarthritis product is MONOVISC, a single-injection treatment product that uses a non-animal source HA. MONOVISC is also our first osteoarthritis product based on our proprietary cross-linked HA-technology. We received Conformité Européenne (“CE”) Mark approval for the MONOVISC product in October 2007, and began sales in Europe during the second quarter of 2008, following a small, post-marketing clinical study. In the U.S., we filed the final module of our MONOVISC PMA containing the clinical data in December 2009. We were informed that there were deficiencies in our submissions through a deficiency/non-approvable letter, which is the FDA's mechanism for informing companies of deficiencies. We submitted additional data and analyses throughout 2010, and have been informed by the FDA that deficiencies remain. Acting on an option presented by the FDA to resolve the remaining open issues, Anika requested a review by the Orthopedic Advisory Panel. The FDA has denied our request for an Orthopedic Advisory Panel review of the product, and we are now moving to the next level in the appeal process structure of the FDA with a meeting for an objective review of the scientific and clinical data pending. We continue to believe in MONOVISC and the strength of our data, and that MONOVISC should receive FDA approval. Our second single-injection osteoarthritis product under development is CINGAL, which is based on our hyaluronic acid material with an added active therapeutic molecule to provide broad pain relief for a longer period of time. We filed a CE Mark application in the European Union for CINGAL in November 2011.
Contracts
As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, Anika has been a contract manufacturer for B&L for over 20 years. Anika’s Supply Agreement with B&L expired on December 31, 2010. Effective January 1, 2011, we entered into a non-exclusive, two year contract with B&L intended to transition the manufacture of AMVISC and AMVISC Plus to an alternative, formerly affiliated low-cost supplier to B&L. Effective January 1, 2012, the parties agreed to a new three year contract for Anika to continue to supply these products to B&L as a second supplier with committed annual volumes in 2012, and a lower committed volume for 2013 and 2014. B&L accounted for approximately 16%, or $9.8 million, of our product revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011, but is expected to be moderately lower in 2012 under the new contract.
Litigation and Other Legal Matters
On July 7, 2010, Genzyme Corporation (“Genzyme”) filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts seeking unspecified damages and equitable relief. The Complaint alleges that the Company has infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,143,724 by manufacturing MONOVISC in the United States for sale outside the United States and will infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 5,143,724 and 5,399,351 if the Company begins manufacture and sale of MONOVISC in the United States. On August 30, 2010, the Company filed an answer denying liability. On April 26, 2011, Genzyme filed a motion to add its newly-issued U.S. Patent No. 7,931,030 to this litigation and also filed a separate new complaint in the District of Massachusetts alleging that the Company's manufacture and sale of MONOVISC in the United States will infringe that patent. On May 23, 2011, the Court entered orders permitting Genzyme to file its supplemental complaint adding its newly-issued U.S. Patent No. 7,931,030 to this litigation and requiring Genzyme to withdraw its separately filed complaint. On July 14, 2011, the Company filed an answer to the supplemental complaint, denying liability. The Company believes that neither MONOVISC, nor its manufacture, does or will infringe any valid and enforceable claim of the asserted patents. Management has assessed and determined that contingent losses related to this matter are not probable. Therefore, pursuant to ASC 450, Contingencies, an accrual has not been recorded for this loss contingency. Pursuant to the terms of the licensing and supply agreement entered into with Depuy Mitek, Inc. in December 2011, DePuy Mitek agreed to assume certain obligations of the Company related to this litigaton.
In 2011, Merogel Injectable was withdrawn from the market due to a labeling error on the product’s packaging. We are working with Medtronic to resolve a dispute related thereto. Medtronic has informed us that if we are unable to resolve this dispute, they will make claims against us. As this labeling error relates to conduct that initially occurred prior to our acquisition of Anika S.r.l. from Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A., we have made claims against Fidia for indemnification for Anika’s losses as well as any potential claims that may be brought by Medtronic. Fidia has informed us that it does not believe that it has liability for this matter, and has made claims against us for refusing to release the Anika shares that were put into escrow in connection with the original transaction. Management has assessed and determined that contingent losses related to this matter are not probable. Therefore, pursuant to ASC 450, Contingencies, an accrual has not been recorded for this loss contingency.
16
We are also involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, we do not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
Results of Operations
Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | ||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Inc/(Dec) | Inc/(Dec) | |||||||||||||
Product revenue | $ | 13,613,328 | $ | 11,060,159 | $ | 2,553,169 | 23 | % | ||||||||
Licensing, milestone and contract revenue | 747,332 | 677,520 | 69,812 | 10 | % | |||||||||||
Total revenue | 14,360,660 | 11,737,679 | 2,622,981 | 22 | % | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of product revenue | 6,413,481 | 5,604,562 | 808,919 | 14 | % | |||||||||||
Research & development | 1,533,103 | 1,532,664 | 439 | NM | ||||||||||||
Selling, general & administrative | 3,351,016 | 4,043,774 | (692,758 | ) | -17 | % | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 11,297,600 | 11,181,000 | 116,600 | 1 | % | |||||||||||
Income from operations | 3,063,060 | 556,679 | 2,506,381 | 450 | % | |||||||||||
Interest income (expense), net | (51,203 | ) | (40,921 | ) | (10,282 | ) | 25 | % | ||||||||
Income before income taxes | 3,011,857 | 515,758 | 2,496,099 | 484 | % | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 1,099,738 | 191,346 | 908,392 | 475 | % | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,912,119 | $ | 324,412 | $ | 1,587,707 | 489 | % | ||||||||
Product gross margin | 7,199,847 | 5,455,597 | 1,744,250 | 32 | % | |||||||||||
Product gross margin | 53 | % | 49 | % |
Product Revenue
Product revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 was $13,613,328, an increase of 23%, compared to $11,060,159 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The first quarter increase was primarily driven by another strong quarter for our orthobiologics franchise, as well as strong performances for the quarter in our ophthalmic and veterinary franchises. Product revenue for the first quarter of 2011 was adversely impacted by an equipment problem at the Company’s Woburn, MA facility that caused $1.4 million of product scheduled to be shipped in late March 2011 to be delayed into the second quarter of 2011. Aproximately $1,167,000 of the delay was ophthalmic products, with the balance of the decline in joint health products. The problem also resulted in the loss of in-process product, further reducing gross margins for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
The following table presents product revenue by group for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
Orthobiologics | $ | 10,116,845 | $ | 8,036,298 | $ | 2,080,547 | 26 | % | ||||||||
Dermal | 501,315 | 589,153 | (87,838 | ) | -15 | % | ||||||||||
Ophthalmic | 1,323,994 | 897,808 | 426,186 | 47 | % | |||||||||||
Surgical | 983,628 | 1,113,728 | (130,100 | ) | -12 | % | ||||||||||
Veterinary | 687,546 | 423,172 | 264,374 | 62 | % | |||||||||||
$ | 13,613,328 | $ | 11,060,159 | $ | 2,553,169 | 23 | % |
17
Orthobiologics
The orthobiologics group consists of our joint health and orthopedic products. Overall, sales increased 26% for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011. The increases were led by our joint health products ORTHOVISC and MONOVISC, the latter of which is currently only available outside the U.S. Revenue from joint health products increased 29% during the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same periods in 2011. Our U.S. joint health product revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased 27% as compared to the same period in 2011. This increase reflects DePuy Mitek’s continued market penetration efforts in the U.S. for ORTHOVISC. The improvement in international joint health product revenue was primarily due to increased sales in Europe.
International orthobiologics product revenue increased 23%, as compared to the same period in 2011, led by ORTHOVISC and MONOVISC, and despite a decrease in Anika S.r.l.’s orthopedic sales due to weakness in certain European economies, and reduced sales in Italy during our transition to a new distributor. We expect joint health product revenue to increase in 2012 as compared to 2011, both domestically and internationally.
Dermal
Our dermal products consist of advanced wound care products and aesthetic dermal fillers. Overall, dermal product sales decreased 15% for the quarter to $501,315, primarily due to lower sales in Italy and the U.S. for its advanced wound care products. Anika’s advanced wound care products treat skin wounds ranging from burns to diabetic ulcers. Leading products include Hyalograft 3D, Hyalofill and Hyalomatrix. Aesthetic dermatology revenue was $201,698 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to $15,228 for the same period in 2011, primarily due to sales to our Korean distributor. The aesthetics’ market is crowded with many products, and our sales expectations in this area are modest for 2012.
Ophthalmic
Our ophthalmic business consists of HA viscoelastic products used in ophthalmic surgery. Ophthalmic product sales increased 47% to $1,323,994 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011. The increase during the first quarter was primarily attributable to increased sales to B&L. As previously disclosed, we expect ophthalmic revenue to be slightly lower in 2012 compared to 2011 as B&L continues its transition to a formerly affiliated alternative supplier.
Surgical
Our surgical group consists of products used to prevent post-surgical adhesions in abdominal, spinal, and ear, nose and throat (“ENT”) disorders. Sales of our surgical products decreased 12% to $983,628 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011, primarily due to order timing in the ENT area. Our anti-adhesion products include Hyalobarrier and INCERT. Hyalobarrier had increased sales in both Europe and Korea compared to the same period last year. Sales of our ENT product sold through our worldwide partner, Medtronic, decreased 57% for the three month ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to order timing, which we expect to recover in future quarters.
Veterinary
Veterinary revenue from HYVISC increased 62% to $687,546 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase for the three month period was primarily due to order timing by our distribution partner, Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica. We expect overall HYVISC revenue for 2012 to be at a comparable level to 2011’s revenue for this product.
Licensing, milestone and contract revenue
Licensing, milestone and contract revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $747,332 as compared to $677,520 during the same period in 2011. Licensing and milestone revenue includes the ratable recognition of the $27,000,000 in up-front and milestone payments related to the U.S. distribution agreement with Depuy Mitek received in 2004. These amounts are being recognized in income over the ten-year expected life of the agreement, or $2,700,000 per year. In December 2011, the Company also entered into a fifteen-year licensing and supply agreement with DePuy Mitek to market MONOVISC in the U.S. The Company received an initial payment of $2,500,000 in December 2011, which will be recognized ratably over the fifteen year term of the agreement.
18
Product gross profit and margin
Product gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was $7,199,847 and $5,455,597, or 53% and 49% of product revenue, respectively. The increase in product gross profit and margin for the quarter as compared to the same quarter in the previous year was primarily due to a more favorable product mix, as well as the impact of an equipment problem in late March 2011 at the Company’s Woburn facility that resulted in a loss of a batch of in-process product. In connection with the equipment problem, the Company wrote-down its inventory by approximately $450,000 in the first quarter of 2011.
The Company plans to transfer a significant portion of the Anika S.r.l. product manufacturing to its location in Bedford, MA over the next two years, starting with the ACP gel products in the second half of 2012. This is expected to have a favorable impact on gross margin. Looking forward, we expect gross margin in the U.S. to remain under pressure from government healthcare cost control initiatives. During the first quarter of 2012, we received all FDA approvals required to manufacture our aseptic products in our Bedford Facility, except for AmVisc and AmVisc Plus. We are currently working with B&L to obtain FDA approval for these products, and expect to receive approval by the third quarter of 2012. Commencing with these FDA approvals to manufacture U.S. products in our Bedford Facility, we expect annual depreciation expense to increase approximately $1.5 million.
Research and development
Research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $1,533,103 and $1,532,664, respectively, or 11% and 13% of total revenue, and reflect a relatively low level of clinical study spending. Spending is expected to increase in future quarters with increased expenditures planned on clinical trials for Hyalograft C and CINGAL, as well as spending on further development of Anika’s pipeline of new products and new products expected to be developed based on our technology assets.
Selling, general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $3,351,016 and $4,043,774, respectively, or 23% and 34% of total revenue. This represents a decrease of 17% for the quarter as compared to the same quarter in the prior year. The decrease in expense for the quarter was primarily due to placing in service the remainder of the Bedford manufacturing facility. Prior to this quarter, the previously unoccupied space was expensed to SG&A. We expect general and administrative expenses to show decreases in 2012 compared to the prior year’s quarter, and grow modestly in future years.
Interest income (expense), net
Net interest expense was $51,203 and $40,921 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in interest expense for the quarter is due to a higher interest rate in 2012 as compared to 2011.
Income taxes
Provisions for income taxes were $1,099,738 and $191,346 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, based on effective tax rates of 36.5 % and 37.1 %, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate for 2012 compared to 2011 is due to the improved results for 2012 expected at our Italian subsidiary as compared to the prior year.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. on a federal basis, in certain U.S. states, and in Italy. The associated tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. Our 2008 through 2011 tax years remain subject to examination by the IRS and other taxing authorities for U.S. federal and state tax purposes. The 2009 through 2011 tax years remain subject to examination by the appropriate governmental authorities for Italy.
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements, the Company performed an analysis to ascertain if it was more likely than not that it would be able to utilize, in future periods, the net deferred tax assets associated with its net operating loss carryforward, R&D tax credit carryforward, and its investment tax credit carryforward. We have concluded that the positive evidence outweighs the negative evidence and, thus, that those deferred tax assets not otherwise subject to a valuation allowance are realizable on a “more likely than not” basis. As such, we have not recorded a valuation allowance at March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011, respectively.
19
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We require cash to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditures. We expect that our requirements for cash to fund operations will increase as the scope of our operations expands. Historically, we funded our cash requirements from operations, available cash and investments on hand, and debt. Cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $34.0 million and $35.8 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Working capital totaled approximately $51.1 million at March 31, 2012 and $49.6 million at December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company believes it has adequate financial resources to support its business for the foreseeable future.
Cash used by operating activities was $1,689,649 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to cash provided by operating activites of $1,285,947 for the same period in the prior year. This decrease in cash provided by operations was due primarily to an increase in net working capital requirements as compared to the same period in 2011 related to higher accounts receivable, due to the timing of sales during the quarter, plus a build-up in our inventories related to the Woburn facility closure.
Cash used in investing activities was $224,059 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to $76,570 for the same period in 2011. The increase is due to planned capital projects associated with maintaining our Bedford facility. We expect overall capital spending during 2012 to be higher than in 2011 due to the completion of the capital maintenance projects combined with the planned transfer of manufacturing activities for certain Anika S.r.l. products from Italy to our Bedford facility.
Cash provided by financing activities was $108,732 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to cash used by financing activities of $371,055 for the same period ended 2011. The increase in cash provided is attributable to an increase in funds due to employee stock option exercises, combined with their associated income tax benefits received during the first three months of 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
Critical Accounting Estimates
There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting estimates during the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the critical accounting estimates disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Information with respect to Recent Accounting Pronouncements may be found in Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) in this Form 10-Q, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
We have made significant capital investments related to the build-out and validation of our facility in Bedford, Massachusetts. This capital project has been financed with cash on hand and the proceeds of a $16,000,000 unsecured Credit Agreement with Bank of America entered into on January 31, 2008. This term loan has quarterly principal payments of $400,000 and a final installment of $5,200,000 due on the maturity date of December 31, 2015. We commenced making quarterly principal payments on March 31, 2009. Total debt outstanding was $10,800,000 as of March 31, 2012. Interest is payable at a rate based upon (at the Company’s election) either Bank of America’s prime rate or LIBOR plus 125 basis points.
To the extent that funds generated from our operations, together with our existing capital resources, are insufficient to meet future requirements, we will be required to obtain additional funds through equity or debt financings, strategic alliances with corporate partners and others, or through other sources. No assurance can be given that any additional financing will be made available to us or will be available on acceptable terms should such a need arise.
20
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes to our market risks since the date of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
As of March 31, 2012, we did not utilize any derivative financial instruments, market risk sensitive instruments or other financial and commodity instruments for which fair value disclosure would be required under ASC 825, Financial Instruments, and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Our investments consist of money market funds primarily invested in U.S. Treasury obligations and repurchase agreements secured by U.S. Treasury obligations, and municipal bonds that are carried on our books at amortized cost, which approximates fair market value.
Primary Market Risk Exposures
Our primary market risk exposures are in the areas of interest rate risk and currency rate risk. We have three supplier contracts denominated in foreign currencies. Unfavorable fluctuations in exchange rates would have a negative impact on our financial statements. The impact of changes in currency exchange rates for these supplier contracts on our financial statements was immaterial for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The impact of exchange rates related to the consolidation of the balance sheet amounts for our Anika S.r.l. subsidiary resulted in a favorable currency translation adjustment of $756,461 during the first three months of 2012.
Our investment portfolio of cash equivalents and long-term debt are subject to interest rate fluctuations. As of March 31, 2012, we were subject to interest rate risk on $10.8 million of variable rate debt. The interest payable on our debt is determined, at the Company's option, based on LIBOR plus 1.25% or the lender’s prime rate and, therefore, is affected by changes in market interest rates. Based on the outstanding debt amount as of March 31, 2012, we would have a decrease in future annual cash flow of approximately $100,000 for every 1% increase in the interest rate over the next twelve month period.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. |
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. On an on-going basis, we review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, and our internal control over financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.
(b) | Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. |
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the first three months of fiscal year 2012 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
21
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On July 7, 2010, Genzyme Corporation (“Genzyme”) filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts seeking unspecified damages and equitable relief. The Complaint alleges that the Company has infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,143,724 by manufacturing MONOVISC in the United States for sale outside the United States and will infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 5,143,724 and 5,399,351 if the Company begins manufacture and sale of MONOVISC in the United States. On August 30, 2010, the Company filed an answer denying liability. On April 26, 2011, Genzyme filed a motion to add its newly-issued U.S. Patent No. 7,931,030 to this litigation and also filed a separate new complaint in the District of Massachusetts alleging that the Company's manufacture and sale of MONOVISC in the United States will infringe that patent. On May 23, 2011, the Court entered orders permitting Genzyme to file its supplemental complaint adding its newly-issued U.S. Patent No. 7,931,030 to this litigation and requiring Genzyme to withdraw its separately filed complaint. On July 14, 2011, the Company filed an answer to the supplemental complaint, denying liability. The Company believes that neither MONOVISC, nor its manufacture, does or will infringe any valid and enforceable claim of the asserted patents. Management has assessed and determined that contingent losses related to this matter are not probable. Therefore, pursuant to ASC 450, Contingencies, an accrual has not been recorded for this loss contingency. Pursuant to the terms of the licensing and supply agreement entered into with Depuy Mitek, Inc. in December 2011, DePuy Mitek agreed to assume certain obligations of the Company related to this litigaton.
In 2011, Merogel Injectable was withdrawn from the market due to a labeling error on the product’s packaging. We are working with Medtronic to resolve a dispute related thereto. Medtronic has informed us that if we are unable to resolve this dispute, they will make claims against us. As this labeling error relates to conduct that initially occurred prior to our acquisition of Anika S.r.l. from Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A., we have made claims against Fidia for indemnification for Anika’s losses as well as any potential claims that may be brought by Medtronic. Fidia has informed us that it does not believe that it has liability for this matter, and has made claims against us for refusing to release the Anika shares that were put into escrow in connection with the original transaction. Management has assessed and determined that contingent losses related to this matter are not probable. Therefore, pursuant to ASC 450, Contingencies, an accrual has not been recorded for this loss contingency.
We are also involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, we do not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
To our knowledge, there have been no material changes to the risk factors described in “Part I., Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, except to the extent additional factual information disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates to such risk factors. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
22
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. | Description | |
(31) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications | |
*31.1 | Certification of Charles H. Sherwood, Ph.D. pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*31.2 | Certification of Kevin W. Quinlan pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
(32) | Section 1350 Certifications | |
**32.1 | Certification of Charles H. Sherwood, Ph.D. and Kevin W. Quinlan, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
(101) | XBRL | |
101§ | The following materials from Anika Therapeutics, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the SEC on May 4, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language), as follows: | |
i. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 ii. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) iii. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) iv. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
* | Filed herewith |
** | Furnished herewith. |
§ | As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ANIKA THERAPEUTICS, INC. | ||
May 4, 2012 | By: | /s/ KEVIN W. QUINLAN |
Kevin W. Quinlan | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
(Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
24