Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2000 amounts in order to conform to the 2001 presentation.
Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2000 and 2001 were as follows:
One of the Company’s subsidiaries has tax net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) for Federal income tax purposes totaling approximately $15,602, which may be used only to offset that subsidiary’s income. These NOLs, if not utilized, will expire between 2005 and 2006. In addition, NOLs of approximately $286,288 have been granted as a result of certain losses from leasing activities that are characterized as suspended passive losses. These losses can be carried forward indefinitely to offset income from future leasing activities.
A significant subsidiary of the Company is a Barbados corporation. Under the terms of a protocol between the United States and Barbados, the subsidiary’s leasing income is fully taxable by Barbados, but exempt from U.S. Federal taxation. Since 1991, the Barbados tax rate was a maximum of 2½% of income earned in Barbados. No deferred U.S. Federal income taxes have been provided on the unremitted earnings of the subsidiary since it is the Company’s intention to indefinitely reinvest such earnings. At December 31, 2001 unremitted earnings of this subsidiary were approximately $236,600. The deferred U.S. Federal income taxes related to the unremitted earnings of this subsidiary would be approximately $82,800, assuming these earnings are taxable at the U.S. statutory rate, net of foreign tax credits.
A reconciliation of the U.S. statutory tax rate to the actual tax rate follows:
The provision for income taxes reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of income is as follows:
1999 2000 2001
---- ---- ----
U.S................................. $2,400 $7,459 $5,981
Other............................... 400 716 744
--- --- ---
$2,800 $8,175 $6,725
====== ====== ======
Current............................. $2,248 $2,691 $2,144
Deferred............................ 552 5,484 4,581
--- ----- -----
$2,800 $8,175 $6,725
====== ====== ======
For further information regarding the Company's tax structure reference is made to Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
Note 3 — Leasing Activities:
A. As Lessee—
The net book value of assets acquired through capital leases was $351,040 at December 31, 2001. The aggregate capital lease obligations, secured by equipment, with installments payable in varying amounts through 2011, were $355,252 at December 31, 2001.
As of December 31, 2001, the annual maturities of capital leases and related interest were as follows:
Payment Interest Principal
------- -------- ---------
2002...................... $54,128 $15,482 $38,646
2003...................... 69,741 13,767 55,974
2004...................... 60,226 10,658 49,568
2005...................... 67,797 8,662 59,135
2006...................... 40,989 6,084 34,905
Thereafter................ 124,988 7,964 117,024
-------- ------- --------
$417,869 $62,617 $355,252
======== ======= ========
The Company leases office space and certain leasing equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates through 2010. Rental expense under operating leases aggregated $4,226, $7,581 and $16,902 for the periods ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.
As of December 31, 2001, the aggregate minimum rental commitment under operating leases having initial or remaining noncancellable lease terms in excess of one year was as follows:
2002................................ $ 11,625
2003................................ 9,411
2004................................ 9,388
2005................................ 9,397
2006................................ 8,966
Thereafter.......................... 44,910
B. As lessor—
The Company has entered into various leases of equipment that qualify as direct financing leases. At the inception of a direct finance lease, the Company records a net investment based on the gross investment (representing the total future minimum lease payments plus unguaranteed residual value), net of unearned lease income. The unguaranteed residual value is generally equal to the purchase option of the lessee, which in the case of the Company’s lease contracts is insignificant and is included in total lease receivables. Unearned income represents the excess of gross investment over equipment cost. Receivables under these direct financing leases, net of unearned income, are collectible through 2011 as follows:
December 31, 2001
------------------
Total Lease Unearned Net Lease
Receivable Lease Income Receivable
---------- ------------ ----------
2002.......................... $69,732 $23,376 $46,356
2003.......................... 59,776 18,551 41,225
2004.......................... 55,521 13,699 41,822
2005.......................... 42,258 9,295 32,963
2006.......................... 33,355 6,213 27,142
Thereafter.................... 48,000 8,269 39,731
------ ----- ------
$308,642 $79,403 $229,239
======== ======= ========
As of December 31, 2000, the Company had total lease receivable, unearned lease income and net lease receivable of $189,989, $38,603 and $151,386 respectively.
As of December 31, 2001 the Company also had noncancelable operating leases, under which it will receive future minimum rental payments as follows:
2002....................................... $70,402
2003....................................... 62,194
2004....................................... 40,689
2005....................................... 23,314
2006....................................... 6,735
Thereafter................................. 3,928
Effective January 1, 1995, the Company began capitalizing lease commissions and amortizing this cost over the average life of the related lease contract. At December 31, 2000 and 2001, $3,801 and $3,268 of these commissions were included in other assets.
During the three months ended June 30, 2001, the Company initiated a bankruptcy claim against a customer and sought to collect receivables and to recover equipment values through its insurance policies. The Company has demanded the return of approximately $48,588 of equipment, including $8,482 of direct finance leases which were reclassified to leasing equipment. The total net book value of equipment leased to this customer as of December 31, 2001 was approximately $10,651. The Company anticipates that approximately $8,500 of this equipment will not be recovered from the customer. In addition, the outstanding receivables from this customer as of December 31, 2001 totaled approximately $19,735 of which $18,785 is covered by insurance, with the balance reserved for in the allowance for doubtful accounts.
At this time, the Company has estimated no impairment upon the liquidation and/or re-lease of these assets after considering anticipated insurance proceeds. The maximum insurance coverage related to this claim is $35,000. The overall recovery of the asset values has been evaluated taking into consideration the equipment book value, the cost to recover and re-lease the equipment, and the total outstanding receivables, as well as the likelihood to collect through the recovery and sale of the equipment or the stipulated equipment values within the insurance policy. The Company continued to record revenue from these leases through August 20, 2001 at which time, revenue recognition was discontinued, as lease payments through August 20, 2001 were covered by the insurance policies.
The Company will continue to assess the overall recovery of the asset values and adjust the assumptions used in evaluating the total insurance claim with respect to this customer’s bankruptcy. As additional information becomes available, reserves for the impairment of the asset values may be necessary based upon changes in economic conditions and the assumptions used in evaluating the total insurance claim.
C. Allowance for doubtful accounts—
The following summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts:
1999 2000 2001
---- ---- ----
Balance, beginning of year........................ $4,632 $10,260 $14,271
Provision charged to expense...................... 6,925 2,192 2,302
Acquired.......................................... --- 1,281 ---
Write-offs, net of recoveries..................... (1,297) 538 (10,711)
----- ------- ------
Balance, end of year.............................. $10,260 $14,271 $5,862
======= ======= ======
The allowance for doubtful accounts includes the Company’s estimate of allowances necessary for receivables on both operating and finance lease receivables. Once a finance lease is determined to be non-performing, Company procedures provide for the following events to take place in order to evaluate collectibility:
| • | The past due amounts are reclassified to accounts and notes receivable, |
| • | The equipment value supporting such financing lease is reclassified to leasing equipment, and |
| • | Collectibility is evaluated taking into consideration equipment book value, the total outstanding receivable, as well as the likelihood to collect through the recovery of equipment and the Company’s insurance policies. |
As of December 31, 2000 and 2001, included in accounts and notes receivable are non-performing receivables of $10,034 and $4,887, respectively.
As all outstanding amounts due for non-performing finance lease accounts are reclassified to accounts and notes receivable, an allowance for doubtful accounts for the net investment in direct financing leases is not required.
Note 4 — Debt:
Debt consists of notes and loans with installments payable in varying amounts through 2008, with effective interest rates of approximately 3.9% to 7.9% and a weighted average rate of 5.78% in 2001. The principal amount of debt payable under fixed rate contracts is $309,298. Remaining debt is payable under floating rate arrangements. Approximately $397,028 of floating rate debt outstanding has been converted to fixed rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps as described below. The agreements contain certain covenants, which, among other things, provide for the maintenance of specified levels of tangible net worth (as defined) and a maximum debt to net worth ratio. At December 31, 2001, under covenants in the Company’s loan agreement approximately $177,500 of retained earnings were available for dividends. The Company was in compliance with its debt covenants at December 31, 2001.
As of December 31, 2001, the annual maturities of notes and loans, net of interest thereon were as follows:
2002................................ $141,018
2003................................ 95,561
2004................................ 56,357
2005................................ 219,804
2006................................ 19,365
Thereafter.......................... 447,953
-------
$980,058
========
The Company has a $215,000 revolving credit facility with a group of commercial banks; on December 31, 2001, $215,000 was outstanding, with an interest rate of 6.21%, including the effect of interest rate swap contracts in place as of December 31, 2001. In July 2000, this facility was renewed and amended with the term extended to July 31, 2005. The credit limit remains at $215,000 through July 31, 2003; thereafter the credit limit declines to $193,500 through July 31, 2004 and $172,000 through July 31, 2005. In addition, as of December 31, 2001, the Company had an available line of credit of $10,000 under one facility, under which $3,246 was outstanding. The interest rate under this facility as of December 31, 2001 was 4.3%. Subsequent to December 31, 2001 the Company has continued to incur and repay debt obligations in connection with financing its equipment leasing activities. Under our revolving credit facility and most of our other debt instruments, the Company is required to maintain a tangible net worth (as defined) of $125,000, a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5 to 1 and a funded debt to net worth ratio of 4.0 to 1. At December 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with these requirements.
In October 2000, the Company established a secured financing facility in the amount of $300,000, to fund the TA transaction. At December 31, 2001, $97,656 of this facility was outstanding with an interest rate of 3.94%. The principal balance is payable in quarterly installments of $500, with a balloon payment due in October 2002.
In July 2001, the container securitization facility, which was originally established as an off-balance sheet source of financing in March 1999, was amended allowing additional financings to be accounted for as on-balance sheet secured debt financing. At December 31, 2001, $44,089 of the on-balance sheet container securitization facility was outstanding with an interest rate of 5.10%, including the effect of interest rate swap contracts in place as of December 31, 2001.
In July 2000, the Company established a chassis securitization facility of $280,000. In October 2000, this chassis securitization facility was increased to $300,000. At December 31, 2001, $277,410 of this facility was outstanding with an interest rate of 4.75%, including the effect of interest rate swap contracts in place as of December 31, 2001. This facility provides the Company an additional source of funding and is accounted for as on-balance sheet secured debt financing.
In February 1998, the Company issued $100,000 principal amount of 6-5/8% Notes due 2003 (the “6-5/8% Notes”). The net proceeds were used to repay $83,000 in borrowings under the revolving credit agreement and for other general corporate purposes. During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company retired $17,000 of the 6-5/8% Notes and recognized an extraordinary gain of $740 net of tax expense of $494. During the first quarter of 2000, the Company retired $8,200 of the 6-5/8% Notes and recognized an extraordinary gain of $471 net of tax expense of $314. During 2001, the Company retired $27,174 of the 6-5/8% Notes and recognized an extraordinary gain of $435 net of tax expense of $290. As of December 31, 2001, $47,626 principal amount of the 6-5/8% Notes remains outstanding.
In July and August, 1997, the Company issued $225,000 of ten year notes, comprised of $150,000 of 7.35% Notes due 2007 and $75,000 of 7.20% Notes due 2007. The net proceeds from these offerings were used to repay secured indebtedness, to purchase equipment and for other investments. During the first quarter of 2000, the Company retired $3,000 of the 7.35% Notes and recognized an extraordinary gain of $369 net of tax expense of $246. During 2001, the Company retired $2,075 of the 7.20% Notes and recognized an extraordinary gain of $123 net of tax expense of $82. As of December 31, 2001, $72,925 and $147,000 principal amount of the 7.20% and 7.35% Notes, respectively, remains outstanding.
In addition to the debt specifically identified above, the Company has additional notes and loan outstanding with various financial institutions totaling $75,106, as of December 31, 2001, with installments payable in varying amounts through 2008 with interest rates of approximately 4.2% to 7.9%.
In 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap contract with notional amounts totaling $51,467. These amounts relate to on and off balance sheet financing, of which the notional amounts are $43,330 and $8,137, respectively. The terms of the interest rate swap contract are for six years. The interest rate swap contracts convert variable rate debt into fixed rate debt. The maturity of the contract coincides with the maturity of the underlying debt instruments hedged. At December 31, 2001, the on and off balance sheet notional amounts are approximately $39,575 and $7,432, respectively.
In 2000, the Company entered into interest rate swap contracts with notional amounts totaling $334,882. The terms of the interest rate swap contracts are for two and seven years. The interest rate swap contracts convert variable rate debt into fixed rate debt. The maturity of these contracts coincides with the maturity of the underlying debt instruments hedged. At December 31, 2001, the notional amount was approximately $323,268.
In 1998, the Company entered into interest rate swap contracts with notional amounts totaling $79,709. The terms of the interest rate swap contracts are for three, five and seven years. The interest rate swap contracts convert variable rate debt into fixed rate debt. The maturity of these contracts coincides with the maturity of the underlying debt instruments hedged. In 2000, a portion of the debt instrument hedged was retired and the related portion of the swap contract was closed. At December 31, 2001, the notional amount was approximately $34,185.
Note 5 — Derivative Instruments:
The Company’s assets are primarily fixed rate in nature while its debt instruments are primarily floating rate. The Company employs derivative financial instruments (interest rate swap agreements) to effectively convert certain floating rate debt instruments into fixed rate instruments and thereby manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates.
The unrealized pre-tax losses on cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2001 of $9,911 have been reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), along with the related deferred income tax benefit of $1,928
Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income would be reclassified into earnings upon termination of these interest rate swap agreements prior to their contractual maturity. The Company does not intend to terminate any such interest rate swap agreements prior to maturity and therefore does not expect any gains or losses to be reclassified into income within the next twelve months.
Pre-tax losses for the year ended December 31, 2001 resulting from the change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements held which do not quality as cash flow hedges under Statement 133 of $1,647 have been recorded on the consolidated statements of income as market value adjustment for derivative instruments. Interest rate swap agreements which qualify as perfect cash flow hedges have no ineffectiveness and therefore are not reflected in the consolidated statements of income. Interest rate swap agreements which qualify as cash flow hedges but are not perfectly correlated have associated ineffectiveness of approximately $1,000 which has been recorded in the consolidated statements of income as market value adjustment for derivative instruments.
Note 6 — Acquisition of North American Intermodal Division of Transamerica Leasing, Inc.:
In October, 2000, the Company completed the acquisition of the North American lntermodal division of Transamerica Leasing, Inc. (TA), a subsidiary of Transamerica Finance Corporation and AEGON N.V. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired substantially all of the domestic containers, chassis, and trailers of TA and related assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of the business. The Company paid approximately $681,000 in cash for the acquisition, which includes $8,400 in fees and other costs for advisors, of which $1,650 is payable to a director of the Company for consultation services rendered. The acquisition was financed through a combination of cash on hand, proceeds obtained from a committed secured financing facility in the amount of approximately $300,000, as well as approximately $101,000 of proceeds obtained from a chassis securitization facility established in July 2000.
In the acquisition, the Company acquired approximately 70,000 chassis, 23,000 rail trailers and 18,000 domestic containers. The acquisition was effective October 1, 2000 in a transaction accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, accordingly the acquired assets and liabilities have been recorded at the estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. In January 2001, the Company and TIP Intermodal Services (TIP), a GE Capital Company, announced the signing of a definitive agreement for the sale of 50,000 rail trailers and domestic containers by the Company to TIP, including all of the rail trailers and domestic containers the Company acquired from TA in October 2000. The Company established a basis in the assets acquired from TA to be sold to TIP equal to (i) TA’s historical net book value of the assets ($273,572), (ii) the expected gain to be realized from the sale to TIP ($5,614), (iii) the estimated cash collections (net of cash disbursements) resulting from the operations of these assets from October 1, 2000 through the estimated date of disposition of March 31, 2001 ($7,296) and (iv) the incremental amount of interest expense from October 1, 2000 through March 31, 2001 associated with the acquisition of these assets ($18,828). The excess of the purchase price paid over the book value of the assets and liabilities acquired (after establishing the basis associated with the assets held for sale) in an amount approximating $66,500 has been allocated to the chassis acquired from TA and is being amortized over the remaining depreciable life of those chassis.
During the year ended 2001, the Company adjusted the excess of the purchase price paid over the book value of the assets and liabilities acquired for certain pre-acquisition contingencies and estimated costs included in the original purchase price allocation. This adjustment increased the premium paid over the book value of the assets and liabilities acquired by $5,112, and is being amortized over the average remaining depreciable life of the chassis acquired.
The following table presents the pro forma consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000 as if the above acquisition had occurred on January 1:
1999 2000
---- ----
Revenues............................................. $258,433 $298,484
Income from continuing operations before change in
accounting principle and extraordinary items...... 28,909 47,050
Basic net income per share........................... $1.05 $1.72
Diluted net income per share......................... $1.02 $1.69
Note 7 — Assets held for sale:
In March 2001, the Company sold 50,000 rail trailers and domestic containers, including all 41,000 rail trailers and domestic containers the Company acquired from TA in October 2000, to TIP. The assets held for sale as of December 31, 2000 include $279.2 million related to the units acquired from TA, $5.9 million of accounts receivable and $63.3 million of assets previously owned by the Company. The Company recorded a gain of $1.8 million upon the consummation of this sale, which represents the premium paid for the units previously owned by the Company over their net book value.
Note 8 — Lease securitization program:
On March 30, 1999, the Company entered into an asset backed note program (the “ABN Program”). The ABN Program involved the sale by the Company of direct finance leases (collateralized by intermodal containers) with a historical net book value of $228,832 (the “Assets”). The Assets were sold to a special purpose entity whose sole business activity is issuing asset backed notes (“ABNs”), supported by the future cash flows of the Assets. Proceeds received by the Company upon selling the Assets were $189,087 of cash and the lowest priority ABN issued in the ABN Program (the “retained interest”) with an allocated historical book value of $47,687.
The transaction was accounted for as a sale by the Company for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain from the sale of $7,942 ($5,742 net of expenses) during the quarter ended March 31, 1999, which is included in revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The gain represents the difference between (i) the historical basis in the net assets sold and (ii) the cash received plus the allocated historical book value of the retained interest. The allocated historical book value of the retained interest is determined using the relative amounts of the fair market value of the interests sold to third parties, and the estimated fair market value of retained interest.
The Company classified the retained interest as an available for sale security, which is included in “Other Investment Securities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Accordingly, the retained interest is accounted for at fair value, with any changes in fair value over its allocated historical book value recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, in the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. As of December 31, 2001, the Company estimated the fair market value of retained interest was $15,970 using a discounted cash flow model assuming expected credit losses of 1.5% and a discount rate of 12.6%. For the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, the Company recorded interest income on the retained interest totaling $3,050, $4,145 and $3,558, respectively, which is included in revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. In 2001, defaulted finance leases of bankrupt customers were removed from the securitization program resulting in a reduction of the retained interest totaling $1,798.
Interpool Limited, a subsidiary of the Company (the “Servicer”), acts as servicer for the Assets. Pursuant to the terms of the servicing agreement, the Servicer is paid a fee of 0.40% of the assets under management. The Company’s management has determined that the servicing fee paid approximates the fair value for services provided, as such, no servicing asset or liability has been recorded. Such servicing fees are included in revenues in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.
At December 31, 2001, key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value of residual cash flows to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those assumptions are as follows:
Securitized Lease
Receivables
-----------
Carrying amount/fair value of retained interests............. $15,970
Weighted-average life (in years)............................. 2.0
Expected credit losses (annual rate)......................... 1.5%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change................... $129
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change................... $275
Residual cash flows discount rate (annual)................... 12.6%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change................... $310
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change................... $619
The table below summarizes certain cash flows received from and paid to securitization trusts:
Year Ended December 31
----------------------
2000 2001
---- ----
Proceeds from new securitizations................ $--- $---
Servicing fees received.......................... $611 $486
Cash flows received on retained interest......... $7,593 $15,585
Note 9 — Discontinued operations:
During the three months ended September 30, 2001, the Company adopted a formal plan to dispose of PCR, a 51%-owned subsidiary, and to discontinue the operations of Microtech, a 75.5%-owned subsidiary, and liquidate its lease portfolio. Within the historical financial statements of the Company, PCR and Microtech comprised the computer-leasing segment and specialized in the leasing of microcomputers and related equipment.
As a result of the decision made by the Company, PCR and Microtech have been classified as discontinued operations. Pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions,” the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto have been restated for all comparative periods presented to reflect the decision to discontinue the computer leasing segment. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of PCR and Microtech have been accounted for as “Discontinued Operations” in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
On December 31, 2001, the Company completed the sale of its 51% ownership stake of PCR to an investment group comprised of the management of PCR. Under the agreement, the Company sold its share of PCR for $2,297. As payment for the transaction, the management of PCR transferred its 24.5% ownership in Microtech valued at $792 to the Company, thereby increasing the Company’s ownership in Microtech to 100%. The balance of the purchase price is in the form of a non-recourse note issued by PCR to the Company in the amount of $1,657 at an effective interest rate of 15%, after considering a payment of $640 received by the Company on January 2, 2002. The original terms of the note are interest only at 5% through December 31, 2004 and an annual rate of 7.5% for the period from December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2010 (“the maturity date”). Monthly principal payments in equal installments of $35 commence on January 31, 2005 and continue through the maturity date.
In addition, on April 6, 1999, the Company also entered into a $3,500 long-term revolving credit facility with PCR. This revolving credit facility is due on demand and remains outstanding as of December 31, 2001. The line of credit bears interest at 12% per annum and is payable monthly. This line of credit is secured by substantially all of PCR’s assets, subordinated to the interest of a financial institution which provided PCR an additional line of credit.
Since 2000, the Company has guaranteed PCR debts due to parties other than the Company totaling $5,000, which remain in effect.
The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations, presented in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets are primarily comprised of Cash, Accounts Receivable, Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases, Leasing Equipment, Other Assets, Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses and Debt Obligations.
Note 10 — Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle:
During 2001, the Company recorded the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $833 net of tax expense of $44. This represents the cumulative effect through December 31, 2000 regarding the Company’s accounting for swap transactions not accounted for as hedges in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
During 2000, the Company recorded the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $660 net of tax expense of $440. This represents a change in the Company’s accounting for its maintenance and repairs expense from an accrual to cash basis.
Note 11 — Other contingencies and commitments:
At December 31, 2001, commitments for capital expenditures totaled approximately $70,600.
Under certain of the Company’s leasing agreements, the Company as lessee may be obligated to indemnify the lessor for loss, recapture or disallowance of certain tax benefits arising from the lessor’s ownership of the equipment. This recourse feature is included in capital lease obligations with a net book value of approximately $21,180.
The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain key officers and employees, which provide for minimum salary, bonus arrangements and benefits for periods up to seven years.
The Company has a number of claims pending against it, has filed claims against others and has been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits incidental to its business. The Company believes that such proceedings will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 12 — Cash flow information:
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company includes all highly liquid short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less in cash and short-term investments.
For the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, cash paid for interest was approximately $64,563, $78,880 and $100,043, respectively. Cash paid for income taxes was approximately $2,926, $1,354, and $2,442, respectively.
Note 13 — Related party transactions:
During 2001, the Company leased approximately 28,500 square feet of commercial space for its corporate offices in Princeton, New Jersey from 211 College Road Associates, a New Jersey general partnership in which Martin Tuchman, a director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, held a direct or indirect equity interest of 42.76% and Radcliff Group, Inc., a related party, held a direct or indirect equity interest of 42.17%. The 2001 annual base rental for this property was approximately $557 under a triple net lease expiring in 2010. In the opinion of the Company’s management, rent being paid under this lease does not exceed rent that the Company would have paid in an arms’ length transaction with an unrelated third party. On January 28, 2002 the Company executed a Purchase and Sale Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will acquire the building which houses our corporate offices. The fair market value purchase price of the approximately 39,000 square feet building will be $6,250 as determined by an independent property appraisal firm and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.The Company expects to conclude the transaction during the second quarter of 2002.
In January 1992 the Company executed a Consultation Services Agreement with Radcliff Group, Inc. pursuant to which Radcliff designated Warren L. Serenbetz, a stockholder and director, as an executive consultant. The Consultation Services Agreement was terminated in January 1995. Under the terms of the agreement compensation and payment of health related costs continues through December 31, 2002. Compensation under this agreement was $492 in 1999, 2000 and 2001.
Eurochassis L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership in which Raoul J. Witteveen is one of the limited partners and the general partner, leases 100 chassis to Trac Lease for an annual lease payment of approximately $91. The annual lease term renews automatically unless canceled by either party prior to the first day of the renewal period. The terms of the lease agreement, in the opinion of our management, are comparable to terms that Trac Lease would have obtained in an arms’ length transaction with an unrelated third party.
The Ivy Group, a New Jersey general partnership composed directly or indirectly of Mr. Tuchman, Radcliff Group, Inc., Mr. Witteveen, Thomas P. Birnie and Graham K. Owen, has previously leased chassis to Trac Lease. As of December 31, 2000, pursuant to various equipment lease agreements, Trac Lease leased 6,047 chassis from The Ivy Group and its principals for an aggregate annual lease payment of approximately $2,900. On January 1, 2001, the various leases for the 6,047 units were combined into a single lease pursuant to which The Ivy Group and its principals were paid an aggregate lease payment of approximately $2,691 through June 30, 2001. Effective as of July 1, 2001, the Company restructured its relationship with The Ivy Group and its principals to provide it with managerial control over these 6,047 chassis. As a result of the restructuring, the partners of The Ivy Group contributed these 6,047 chassis and certain other assets and liabilities to a newly formed subsidiary, Chassis Holdings I LLC (Chassis Holdings), in exchange for $26,000 face value of preferred membership units and 10% of the common membership units, and Trac Lease contributed 902 chassis and $2,407 in cash to Chassis Holdings in exchange for $3,000 face value of preferred membership units and 90% of the common membership units. The preferred membership units are entitled to receive a preferred return prior to the receipt of any distributions by the holders of the common membership units. The value of the contributed chassis was determined by taking the arithmetic average of the results of independent appraisals performed by three nationally recognized appraisal firms that were engaged by the Company in connection with our establishment of a chassis securitization facility in July 2000. As the managing member of Chassis Holdings, Trac Lease exercises sole managerial control over the entity’s operations. Chassis Holdings leases all of its chassis to Trac Lease at a rental rate equal to the then current Trac Lease fleet average per diem. Chassis Holdings and the holders of the preferred membership units are party to a Put/Call Agreement which provides that the holders of preferred units may put such units to Chassis Holdings under certain circumstances and Chassis Holdings may redeem such units under certain circumstances. Chassis Holdings will be required to make certain option payments to the holders of the preferred membership units in order to preserve its right to redeem such units.
The terms of all arrangements between Chassis Holdings and Trac Lease, including rental rates, are, in the opinion of our management, comparable to terms that we would have obtained in arms’ length transactions with unrelated third parties. The Ivy Group has entered into an agreement with us pursuant to which it has agreed not to engage in any business activities that are competitive with the business activities of lnterpool or its subsidiaries without our prior written consent.
Trac Lease previously leased an additional 983 chassis from The Ivy Group under a lease with buyout provisions expiring in 2000. In 2000 Trac Lease paid The Ivy Group lease payments of $252 under this agreement. Trac Lease exercised its buyout right under the lease during 2000 and purchased the chassis for $2,212.
During 1992 through 1996, The Ivy Group borrowed $13,433 from the Company. The aggregate loan balance of $13,433 at June 30, 2001 bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% repayable on an interest only basis, subject to maintenance of fixed loan to collateral value ratios, and will mature in 2013. In connection therewith, The Ivy Group executed a Chattel Mortgage Security Agreement and Assignment under which the Company was granted a security interest in 4,364 chassis owned by The Ivy Group and an assignment of all rights to receive rental payments and proceeds related to the lease of these chassis. This Ivy Group collateral was contributed, subject to this debt, to Chassis Holdings as part of the July 1, 2001 restructuring with The Ivy Group.
In February 1998, the Company entered into a non-exclusive Consulting Agreement with Atlas Capital Partners, LLC pursuant to which Mitchell I. Gordon, a Director of Interpool since 1998 and Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President since October 2000, provided investment banking consultation services. Under the terms of the Consulting Agreement, Atlas was to have been paid $240 (plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses), additional compensation of $560 and a twenty percent carried interest in investments made with funds provided by Interpool. In addition, Atlas was contractually entitled to an annual bonus in an amount that is usual and customary in the investment banking business for investment opportunities actually completed by the Company subject to set-off of the $560 additional compensation. In 2000, other compensation in the amount of $1,650 to be paid over three years, was earned by Atlas in connection with the acquisition by the Company of the North American Intermodal Division of Transamerica. As of October 2000, Mitchell Gordon was named the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President and the Consulting Agreement was terminated.
The effect of the above related party transactions included in the accompanying statement of income are as follows:
1999 2000 2001
---- ---- ----
Revenue.................................. $958 $1,104 $496
Lease operating expense.................. $3,030 $3,033 $4,343
Administrative expense................... $1,092 $1,061 $1,379
Interest expense......................... $353 $168 $---
Note 14 — Retirement plans:
Certain subsidiaries have defined contribution plans covering substantially all full-time employees. Participating employees may make contributions to the plan, through payroll deductions. Matching contributions are made by the Company equal to 75% of the employee’s contribution to the extent such employee contribution did not exceed 6% of their compensation. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company expensed approximately $461 related to this plan. No contributions were made by the Company or its subsidiaries to these plans during the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000.
Note 15 — Segment and geographic data:
The Company has two reportable segments: container leasing and domestic intermodal equipment leasing. The container leasing segment specializes in the leasing of intermodal dry freight standard containers, while the domestic intermodal equipment segment specializes in the leasing of intermodal container chassis and freight rail cars.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes and extraordinary items. The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services.
Segment Information:
- -------------------
Domestic
Container Intermodal
1999: Leasing Equipment Totals
----- ------- --------- ------
Revenues from external customers................ $94,608 $95,180 $189,788
Lease operating and administrative expenses..... 16,959 38,267 55,226
Depreciation and amortization................... 32,886 22,749 55,635
Other income/(expense), net..................... (1,953) (869) (2,822)
Interest income................................. 3,563 8,486 12,049
Interest expense................................ 24,635 39,794 64,429
Income from continuing operations before
taxes and extraordinary item.................. 21,738 1,987 23,725
Domestic
Container Intermodal
2000: Leasing Equipment Totals
----- ------- --------- ------
Revenues from external customers................ $103,018 $139,237 $242,255
Lease operating and administrative expenses..... 12,637 48,282 60,919
Depreciation and amortization................... 29,911 30,856 60,767
Other income/(expense), net..................... (719) (1,790) (2,509)
Interest income................................. 5,984 10,527 16,511
Interest expense................................ 32,569 52,027 84,596
Income from continuing operations before
taxes and extraordinary item.................. 33,166 16,809 49,975
Net investment in DFL's......................... 125,046 26,340 151,386
Leasing equipment, net.......................... 483,925 771,010 1,254,935
Equipment purchase.............................. 163,535 129,938 293,473
Total segment assets............................ $795,994 $1,360,794 $2,156,788
Domestic
Container Intermodal
2001: Leasing Equipment Totals
----- ------- --------- ------
Revenues from external customers................ $112,085 $193,048 $305,133
Lease operating and administrative expenses..... 12,443 82,546 94,989
Depreciation and amortization................... 36,583 37,728 74,311
Other income/(expense), net..................... (1,644) 1,178 (466)
Interest income................................. 3,788 5,612 9,400
Interest expense................................ 27,966 67,078 95,044
Income from continuing operations before
taxes and extraordinary item.................. 37,237 12,486 49,723
Net investment in DFL's......................... 168,890 60,349 229,239
Leasing equipment, net.......................... 529,867 842,459 1,372,326
Equipment purchase.............................. 168,906 111,938 280,844
Total segment assets............................ $822,784 $1,084,981 $1,907,765
The Company’s shipping line customers utilize international containers in world trade over many varied and changing trade routes. In addition, most large shipping lines have many offices in various countries involved in container operations. The Company’s revenue from international containers is earned while the containers are used in service carrying cargo around the world, while certain other equipment is utilized in the United States. Accordingly, the information about the business of the Company by geographic area is derived from either international sources or from United States sources. Such presentation is consistent with industry practice.
Geographic Information:
- ----------------------
REVENUES: 1999 2000 2001
---- ---- ----
United States (a)............................ $103,190 $139,312 $193,111
International................................ 86,598 102,943 112,022
------ ------- -------
$189,788 $242,255 $305,133
======== ======== ========
ASSETS:
United States................................ $1,360,794 $1,084,981
International................................ 795,994 822,784
------- -------
$2,156,788 $1,907,765
========== ==========
---------
(a) Includes revenues from related parties of $958, $1,104 and $496 in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.
Note 16 — Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities in subsidiary grantor trusts:
On January 27, 1997, Interpool Capital Trust, a Delaware business trust and special purpose entity (the “Trust”), issued 75,000 shares of 9-7/8% Capital Securities with an aggregate liquidation preference of $75,000 (the “Capital Securities”) for proceeds of $75,000. Costs associated with the transaction amounted to approximately $1,700 and were borne by the Company. Interpool owns all the common securities of the Trust. The proceeds received by the Trust from the sale of the Capital Securities were used by the Trust to acquire $75,000 of 9-7/8% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due February 15, 2027 of the Company (the “Debentures”). The sole asset of the Trust is $77,320 aggregate principal amount of the Debentures. The Capital Securities represent preferred beneficial interests in the Trust’s assets. Distributions on the Capital Securities are cumulative and payable at the annual rate of 9-7/8% of the liquidation amount, semi-annually in arrears and commenced February 15, 1997. The Company has the option to defer payment of distributions for an extension period of up to five years if it is in compliance with the terms of the Capital Securities. Interest at 9-7/8% will accrue on such deferred distributions throughout the extension period. The Capital Securities will be subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the Debentures to the Trust. The redemption price decreases from 104.975% of the liquidation preference in 2007 to 100% in 2017 and thereafter. Under certain limited circumstances, the Company may, at its option, prepay the Debentures and redeem the Capital Securities prior to 2007 at a prepayment price specified in the governing instruments. The obligations of the Company under the Debentures, under the Indenture pursuant to which the Debentures were issued, under certain guarantees and under certain back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the obligations of the Trust under the Capital Securities.
Note 17 — Capital stock:
The Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan for Executive Officers and Directors (the “Stock Option Plan”) was adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors and approved by the stockholders in March 1993. A total of 6 million shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the Stock Option Plan. Options may be granted under the Stock Option Plan to executive officers and directors of the Company or a subsidiary (including any executive consultant of the Company and its subsidiaries), whether or not they are employees. These options vest six months from date of grant and expire ten years from date of grant.
The Company’s Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-employee, Non-consultant Directors (the “Directors’ Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors and approved by the stockholders in March 1993. The Directors’ Plan is administered by the Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors. Under the Directors’ Plan a nonqualified stock option to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock is automatically granted to each non-employee, non-consultant director of the Company, in a single grant at the time the director first joins the Board of Directors. The Directors’ Plan authorizes grants of options up to an aggregate of 150,000 shares of common stock. The exercise price per share is the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date on which the option is granted (the “Grant Date”). The options granted pursuant to the Directors’ Plan may be exercised at the rate of 1/3 of the shares on the first anniversary of the director’s Grant Date and 1/3 of the shares on the second anniversary of the director’s Grant Date and 1/3 of the shares on the third anniversary of the director’s Grant Date, subject to certain holding periods required under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Options granted pursuant to the Directors’ Plan expire ten years from their Grant Date.
Through September 16, 1998, options to purchase 4,408,501 shares under the Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan for Executive Officers and Directors had been granted, 22,500 of which have expired due to failure to exercise and 22,500 of which have been exercised. Options to purchase 90,000 shares have been granted under the Company’s Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-employee, Non-consultant Directors 30,000 of which have expired due to failure to exercise and 15,000 of which have been exercised.
On September 16, 1998 the Company canceled all of the 4,393,501 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding under its 1993 Stock Option Plan for Executive Officers and Directors, as well as the Company’s Nonqualifted Stock Option Plan for Non-employee, Non-consultant Directors and issued 4,393,501 new options in their place. The newly issued options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s stock as of September 16, 1998 (the “date of grant”). This results in a new measurement date whereby the newly issued options vest six months from date of grant and expire ten years from date of grant. All other terms and conditions of the newly issued options are similar to the canceled options.
In February 2000, options to purchase 15,000 shares were granted under the Company’s Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-employee, Non-consultant Directors to Clifton H.W. Maloney upon his appointment to the Company’s Board of Directors.
On October 10, 2000, options to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were granted under the 1993 Stock Option Plan for Executive Officers and Directors to each of Mitchell I. Gordon, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, and Herbert Mertz, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company and Chief Operating Officer of Trac Lease, Inc. The newly issued options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s stock as of October 10, 2000 (the “Grant Date”). The options vest five years from the Grant Date and expire ten years from the Grant Date.
Changes during 1999, 2000 and 2001 in options outstanding for the combined plans were as follow:
Number of Weighted Average
Options Exercise Price
------- --------------
Outstanding at January 1, 1999............. 4,393,501 $10.25
Granted in 1999.......................... --- ---
Canceled in 1999......................... --- ---
Exercised in 1999........................ (13,500) 10.25
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 1999........... 4,380,001 $10.25
Granted in 2000.......................... 115,000 11.21
Canceled in 2000......................... --- ---
Exercised in 2000........................ --- ---
Outstanding at December 31, 2000........... 4,495,001 $10.27
Granted in 2001.......................... --- ---
Canceled in 2001......................... --- ---
Exercised in 2001........................ --- ---
Outstanding at December 31, 2001........... 4,495,001 $10.27
---------
Exercisable at December 31, 2001........... 4,385,001 $10.25
---------
Except as disclosed herein above, no other options under either the 1993 Stock Option Plan for Executive Officers and Directors or the Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Non-employee, Non-consultant Directors have been exercised to date.
Common stock dividends declared and unpaid at December 31, 2000 and 2001 amounted to $1,034 and $1,517, respectively, and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Effective January 1, 1996, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. As permitted by the Statement, the Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method. To date, all options were granted with exercise price equal to the fair market price of the Company’s Stock at Grant Date; accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized. Options issued with an exercise price below the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant will be accounted for as compensatory options. The difference between the exercise price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock will be charged to expense over the shorter of the vesting or service period. Options issued at fair value are non-compensatory. Had the fair value method of accounting been applied to the Company’s stock option plans, pro forma net income and per share amounts would be as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------
1999 2000 2001
---- ---- ----
Net income as reported........................ $22,611 $44,456 $42,480
Net income pro forma.......................... $18,681 $44,423 $42,360
Basic net income per share, as reported....... $0.82 $1.62 $1.55
Basic net income per share, pro forma......... $0.68 $1.62 $1.55
Diluted net income per share, as reported..... $0.80 $1.60 $1.47
Diluted net income per share, pro forma....... $0.66 $1.60 $1.46
This pro forma impact only takes into account options granted since January 1, 1995. The average fair value of options granted during 2000 was $5.35 and $2.62, respectively. The fair value was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the market price at Grant Date of $11.94 and $6.38 in 2000, respectively, and the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 5.97% and 6.70%, expected life of 7 and 7 years, volatility of 37% and 37% and dividend yield of 1.3% and 2.4% in 2000, respectively. No options were granted by the Company in 2001.
On November 9, 1999, the Company authorized the repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock. The shares will be purchased from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company purchased 58,100 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $929. A total of 158,500 shares were purchased by the Company during the fourth quarter 1999, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,170.
Note 18 — 2001 quarterly financial data (unaudited):/FONT>
2000 quarterly financial data (unaudited): 1st 2nd 3rd 4th(a)
- ------------------------------------------ --- --- --- ------
Revenues....................................... $50,529 $54,258 $57,964 $79,504
Income from continuing operations before
results from discontinued operations,
cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle and extraordinary gain............ $8,724 $10,074 $10,709 $12,293
Basic income per share......................... $0.32 $0.37 $0.39 $0.45
Diluted income per share....................... $0.32 $0.37 $0.38 $0.43
2001 quarterly financial data (unaudited): 1st 2nd 3rd 4th(b)
- ------------------------------------------ --- --- --- ------
Revenues....................................... $76,468 $77,653 $74,945 $76,067
Income from continuing operations before
results from discontinued operations,
cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle and extraordinary gain............ $11,035 $12,208 $10,037 $9,718
Basic income per share......................... $0.40 $0.45 $0.37 $0.35
Diluted income per share....................... $0.38 $0.42 $0.34 $0.34
| (a) | Includes contributions from the North American Intermodal division of Transamerica Leasing, Inc., which the Company acquired on October 24, 2000. The acquisition was effective October 1, 2000 and includes only the chassis acquired from TA as the rail trailers and domestic containers were identified as assets held for sale at the time of purchase. |
| (b) | Includes the favorable impact of an adjustment to income earned on finance lease receivables of $1,673 net of tax expense of $70, of which $1,119 net of tax expense of $47 relates to prior years, as well as net gains on sales of equipment recovered from a bankrupt customer of $1,364 net of tax expense of $57. |
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Interpool, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. These condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the results for the interim periods. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2001 and March 31, 2002
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
December 31, March 31,
2001 2002
---- ----
ASSETS (Unaudited)
Cash And Short-Term Investments................................................. $102,189 $170,655
Marketable Securities, at fair value............................................ 638 737
Accounts And Notes Receivable, less allowance of $5,862 and
$6,305 respectively.......................................................... 64,891 68,450
Net Investment In Direct Financing Leases....................................... 229,239 227,821
Other Receivables, net.......................................................... 43,434 51,335
Leasing Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of
$322,702 and $331,621, respectively.......................................... 1,372,326 1,425,082
Other Investment Securities, at fair value...................................... 15,970 13,585
Other Assets.................................................................... 79,078 81,721
Assets Related To Discontinued Operations....................................... 10,020 7,284
------ -----
Total Assets........................................................... $1,917,785 $2,046,670
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accounts Payable And Accrued Expenses........................................... $80,683 $76,885
Income Taxes.................................................................... 30,243 32,516
Deferred Income................................................................. 766 737
Debt And Capital Lease Obligations
Due within one year........................................................ 179,664 148,197
Due after one year......................................................... 1,155,646 1,305,938
--------- ---------
1,335,310 1,454,135
--------- ---------
Liabilities Related To Discontinued Operations.................................. 6,072 3,923
Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred
Securities In Subsidiary Grantor Trusts (holding solely junior
Subordinated Deferrable interest debentures of the Company) (75,000 shares
9-7/8% Capital Securities outstanding, liquidation preference $75,000)....... 75,000 75,000
Minority Interest In Equity Of Subsidiaries..................................... 27,247 26,332
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share; 1,000,000 authorized, none
issued.................................................................... --- ---
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
27,579,952 issued at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001................. 28 28
Additional paid-in capital................................................... 124,184 124,184
Treasury stock, at cost, 218,700 at March 31, 2002 and 216,600 at
December 31, 2001......................................................... (2,099) (2,139)
Retained earnings............................................................ 255,154 264,339
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes........................... (14,803) (9,270)
-------- -------
Total stockholders' equity............................................. 362,464 377,142
------- -------
Total Liabilities And Stockholders' Equity............................. $1,917,785 $2,046,670
========== ==========
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these balance sheets.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
for the three months ended march 31, 2001 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2001 2002
---- ----
REVENUES...................................................................... $76,468 $72,891
COST AND EXPENSES:
Lease operating and administrative expenses................................ 21,905 19,531
Provision for doubtful accounts............................................ 713 821
Market value adjustment for derivative instruments......................... 870 (650)
Depreciation and amortization of leasing equipment......................... 18,769 20,311
Other income, net.......................................................... (1,614) (929)
Interest expense, net...................................................... 21,910 21,274
------ ------
62,553 60,358
------ ------
Income from continuing operations before provision for income
taxes, results from discontinued operations and cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle ....................................... 13,915 12,533
Provision For Income Taxes.................................................... 2,880 1,130
----- -----
Income from continuing operations before results from
discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle .................................................... 11,035 11,403
Loss from discontinued operations, net of applicable
taxes of $20 and $472.................................................... (33) (710)
Gain (loss)from disposal of discontinued operations........................... --- ---
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of
applicable taxes of $44.................................................. 833 ---
--- ---
NET INCOME.................................................................... $11,835 $10,693
======= =======
Income Per Share From Continuing Operations Before Results From
Discontinued Operations And Cumulative Effect Of Change In Accounting
Principle:
Basic................................................................ $0.40 $0.42
===== =====
Diluted.............................................................. $0.38 $0.39
===== =====
Loss From Discontinued Operations:
Basic................................................................ $0.00 ($0.03)
===== =======
Diluted.............................................................. $0.00 ($0.02)
===== =======
Cumulative Effect Of Change In Accounting Principle:
Basic................................................................ $0.03 N/A
===== ===
Diluted.............................................................. $0.03 N/A
===== ===
Net Income Per Share:
Basic................................................................ $0.43 $0.39
===== =====
Diluted.............................................................. $0.41 $0.37
===== =====
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (in thousands):
Basic................................................................ 27,421 27,361
====== ======
Diluted.............................................................. 29,122 29,247
====== ======
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these balance sheets.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
for the Year Ended December 31, 2001 and the Three Months Ended March 31, 2002
(dollars and shares in thousands)
(unaudited)
Preferred Stock Common Stock Accum.
--------------- ------------ Other
Additional Comp. Comp.
Par Par Paid-in Treasury Retained Income Income
Shares Value Shares Value Capital Stock Earnings (Loss) (Loss)
------ ----- ------ ----- ------- ------ -------- ------ ------
Balance, December 31, 2000.. --- $--- 27,580 $28 $124,184 $(1,170) $217,955 $1,234
Net income.................. --- --- --- --- --- --- 42,480 --- $42,480
Adoption of FAS 133-
Cumulative effect through (7,411) (7,411)
December 31, 2000......
Other comprehensive loss.... --- --- --- --- --- --- --- (8,626) (8,626)
-------
Comprehensive income........ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- $26,443
=======
Purchase of 58,100 shares of
treasury stock............ --- --- --- --- --- (929) --- ---
Cash dividends declared.....
Common stock, $0.1925 per
share.................. --- --- --- --- --- --- (5,281) ---
--- --- --- --- --- --- ------- ---
Balance, December 31, 2001.. --- --- 27,580 28 124,184 (2,099) 255,154 (14,803)
Net income.................. --- --- --- --- --- --- 10,693 --- $10,693
Other comprehensive income.. --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 5,533 5,533
-----
Comprehensive income........ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- $16,226
=======
Purchase of 2,100 shares of
treasury Stock........... --- --- --- --- --- (40) --- ---
Cash dividends declared.....
Common stock, $0.055 per
share ................... --- --- --- --- --- --- (1,508) ---
--- --- --- --- --- --- ------- ---
Balance, March 31, 2002..... --- $--- 27,580 $28 $124,184 $(2,139) $264,339 $(9,270)
=== ==== ====== === ======== ======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the Three Months ended March 31, 2001 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2001 2002
---- ----
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income...................................................................... $11,835 $10,693
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax................................ 33 710
Depreciation and amortization................................................ 19,527 21,173
Gain on sale of leasing equipment............................................ (123) (1,605)
Gain on sale of assets held for sale......................................... (1,774) ---
Provision for doubtful accounts.............................................. 713 821
(Gain) loss on market value adjustment for derivative instruments............ 870 (650)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax.............. (833) ---
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts and notes receivable.............................................. 3,601 (4,380)
Other receivables.......................................................... (1,591) 2,880
Other assets .............................................................. 5,025 (1,453)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses...................................... (18,099) (7,320)
Income taxes payable....................................................... 6,378 533
Deferred income............................................................ (39) (29)
Minority interest in equity of subsidiaries................................ (72) (7)
---- ---
Net cash provided by operating activities............................... 25,451 21,366
------ ------
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Acquisition of leasing equipment............................................. (19,889) (90,615)
Proceeds from dispositions of leasing equipment.............................. 10,614 8,409
Proceeds from disposition of assets held for sale............................ 292,294 ---
Investment in direct financing leases........................................ (13,036) (8,587)
Cash collections on direct financing leases, net of income recognized........ 8,987 10,302
Changes in marketable securities and other investing activities.............. (9) (101)
Change in accrued equipment purchases........................................ (20,665) 11,420
Changes in assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations......... 3,582 (1,005)
----- -------
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities.................... 261,878 (70,177)
------- --------
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt..................................... --- 510,052
Payment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations...................... (104,975) (391,227)
Borrowings of revolving credit lines......................................... 384 ---
Repayment of revolving credit lines.......................................... (140,000) ---
Purchase of Treasury Stock................................................... --- (40)
Dividends paid............................................................... (1,028) (1,508)
------- -------
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities.................... (245,619) 117,277
--------- -------
Net increase in cash and short-term investments......................... 41,710 68,466
Cash And Short-Term Investments, beginning of period............................ 155,553 102,189
------- -------
Cash And Short-Term Investments, end of period.................................. $197,263 $170,655
======== ========
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities:
Assumption of debt by purchaser in connection with Assets Held for Sale. $32,686 ---
======= ===
The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
INTERPOOL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
Note 1 — Nature of operations and accounting policies:
A. Nature of Operations —
The Company and its subsidiaries conduct business principally in a single industry segment, the leasing of intermodal dry freight standard containers, chassis and other transportation related equipment. Within this single industry segment, the Company has two reportable segments: container leasing and domestic intermodal equipment. The container-leasing segment specializes in the leasing of intermodal dry freight standard containers, while the domestic intermodal equipment segment specializes in the leasing of intermodal container chassis and freight rail cars. The Company leases its containers principally to international container shipping lines located throughout the world. The customers for the Company's chassis are a large number of domestic companies, many of which are domestic subsidiaries or branches of international shipping lines, as well as major U.S. railroads. Equipment is purchased directly or acquired through conditional sales contracts and lease agreements, many of which qualify as capital leases.
The Company had formerly operated in a third reportable segment, computer equipment leasing. The Company operated in this segment through two majority owned subsidiaries, Microtech Leasing Corporation (Microtech) and Personal Computer Rentals (PCR). During the third quarter of 2001, Company management, having the authority to do so, adopted a formal plan to exit this segment through the sale of PCR and liquidation of Microtech. See Note 2 for further information regarding the sale of PCR and discontinued operations of the computer leasing segment.
The Company’s accounting records are maintained in United States dollars and the consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
B. Basis of consolidation —
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and subsidiaries more than 50% owned. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
C. Net income per share —
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period (which is net of treasury shares). Diluted income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. The dilutive effect of stock options have been added to the weighted shares outstanding in the diluted earnings per share computation.
A reconciliation of weighted average common shares outstanding to weighted average common shares outstanding assuming dilution follows:
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2001 2002
---- ----
Average common shares outstanding....................... 27,421 27,361
Common shares issuable (1).............................. 1,701 1,886
----- -----
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution..... 29,122 29,247
====== ======
-------------
(1) Issuable under stock option plans.
D. Adoption of New Accounting Standard
Prior to the adoption of Statement 133, interest differentials paid or received under these contracts are recognized as yield adjustments to the effective yield of the underlying debt instruments hedged. Interest rate swap contracts would only be recognized at fair value if the hedged relationship is terminated. Gains or losses accumulated prior to termination of the relationship would be amortized as a yield adjustment over the shorter of the remaining life of the contract, or the remaining period to maturity of the underlying debt instrument hedged. If the contract remained outstanding after termination of the hedged relationship, subsequent changes in market value of the contract would be recognized in earnings. The Company does not use leveraged swaps and does not use leverage in any of its investment activities that would put principal capital at risk.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. In June 1999, the FASB issued Statement No. 137,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date of Fasb Statement No. 133. In June 2000, the FASB issued Statement 138,Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of Fasb Statement No. 133. Statement 133, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. The Statement requires that changes in the derivative instrument's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative instrument's gains and losses to offset related results on the hedged item in the income statement, to the extent effective, and requires that a company must formally document, designate, and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting.
On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement 133. Statement 133, in part, allows special hedge accounting for fair value and cash flow hedges. Statement 133 provides that the gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a fair value hedging instrument as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk be recognized currently in earnings in the same accounting period. Statement 133 provides that the effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedging instrument be reported as a component of other comprehensive income and be reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. (The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument, if any, must be recognized currently in earnings.)
As of December 31, 2000, the Company had entered into 13 interest rate swap agreements with various financial institutions. The aggregate notional balance of the swaps was $389,500 as of December 31, 2000. These agreements are used by the Company to manage interest rate risks created by loans indexed to a floating rate index, primarily LIBOR, and contractually terminate at various dates between 2001 and 2007. Under previous generally accepted accounting principals (GAAP), the interest differential payable or receivable by the Company on its interest rate swaps was accrued by the Company as interest rates changed, and was recognized by the Company over the life of the swap agreement. In contrast Statement 133 requires that changes in the fair value of the swap agreements which are designated as effective cash flow hedges, be reported as a component of other comprehensive income and changes in the fair value of the swap agreements that do not qualify for hedge accounting to be reported in earnings. The Company has determined that of the 13 interest rate swap agreements held, 10 qualify under Statement 133 as effective cash flow hedges with no ineffectiveness, while the remaining 3 interest rate swap agreements intended as cash flow hedges do not quality for hedge accounting treatment. The adoption of Statement 133 on January 1, 2001 increased liabilities by approximately $9,012, with offsetting amounts recorded as decreases to deferred tax liabilities of $2,435 and accumulated other comprehensive income of $7,411 and an increase to earnings (net of tax) of $833. See Note 10 for further information regarding the Company’s accounting for the swap agreements under Statement 133.
On June 29, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved its proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Statement 142 applies to all acquired intangible assets whether acquired singly, as part of a group, or in a business combination. This statement supersedes Accounting Principals Board, or APB, Opinion No. 17, "Intangible Assets," and will incorporate provisions in APB Opinion No 17 related to internally developed intangible assets. Adoption of Statement 142 also requires that companies cease amortizing goodwill. During the three months ended March 31, 2001, the Company recorded amortization expense related to its goodwill of $189 which is included in other income, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income. On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement 142. The adoption of this statement did not result in an adjustment to recorded goodwill. Total goodwill recorded by the Company is approximately $9,625 related to certain investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) approved its proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets. Statement 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This Statement supersedes FASB Statement No. 121,Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to be Disposed Of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30,Reporting the Results of Operations-- Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for the disposal of aSegment of a Business (as previously defined in that Opinion). This Statement also amends ARB No. 51,Consolidated Financial Statements, to eliminate the exception to consolidation for a subsidiary for which control is likely to be temporary. During the first quarter of 2002, the Company evaluated the carrying value of its long lived assets as prescribed by Statement 144. The adoption of this statement in the first quarter of 2002 did not result in an adjustment to our consolidated financial statements.
E. Comprehensive income (loss) and accumulated other comprehensive loss—
The tax effect of comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:
>
Before-tax Tax Net of Tax
Amount Effect Amount
------ ------ ------
Three Months Ended March 31, 2001
Unrealized holding losses arising during the period:
Marketable securities..................................... $(14) $5 $(9)
Other investment securities............................... (223) 11 (212)
Swap agreements........................................... (6,317) 1,323 (4,994)
------- ----- -------
$(6,554) $1,339 $(5,215)
======== ====== ========
Three Months Ended March 31, 2002
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period:
Marketable securities..................................... $20 $(7) $13
Swap agreements........................................... 7,249 (1,729) 5,520
----- ------- -----
$7,269 $(1,736) $5,533
====== ======== ======
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, are as follows:
March 31, 2002 December 31, 2001
-------------- -----------------
Marketable securities........................... $(15) $(28)
Other investment securities..................... 618 618
Swap agreements................................. (9,873) (15,393)
------- --------
$(9,270) $(14,803)
======== =========
Note 2 — Discontinued Operations:
During the three months ended September 30, 2001, the Company adopted a formal plan to dispose of PCR, a 51%-owned subsidiary, and to discontinue the operations of Microtech, a 75.5%-owned subsidiary, and liquidate its lease portfolio. Within the historical financial statements of the Company, PCR and Microtech comprised the computer-leasing segment and specialized in the leasing of microcomputers and related equipment.
As a result of the decision made by the Company, PCR and Microtech have been classified as discontinued operations. Pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions,” the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto have been restated for all comparative periods presented to reflect the decision to discontinue the computer leasing segment. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of PCR and Microtech have been accounted for as “Discontinued Operations” in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
On December 31, 2001, the Company completed the sale of its 51% ownership stake of PCR to an investment group comprised of the management of PCR. Under the agreement, the Company sold its share of PCR for $2,297. As payment for the transaction, the management of PCR transferred its 24.5% ownership in Microtech valued at $792 to the Company, thereby increasing the Company’s ownership in Microtech to 100%. The purchase price of $2,297 was settled through the issuance of a non-recourse note issued by the investment group comprised of the management of PCR to the Company in the amount of $1,657 at an effective interest rate of 15%, and a payment of $640 received by the Company on January 2, 2002. The original terms of the note are interest only at 5% through December 31, 2004 and an annual rate of 7.5% for the period from December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2010 (“the maturity date”). Monthly principal payments in equal installments of $35 commence on January 31, 2005 and continue through the maturity date.
During the three months ended March 31, 2002, Microtech experienced $710 of losses primarily the result of additional bad debt reserves due to a weaker economic environment resulting in specific customer defaults. For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the revenues applicable to the discontinued operations were $561 and $9,909, respectively.
In addition, on April 6, 1999, the Company also entered into a $3,500 long-term revolving credit facility with PCR. This revolving credit facility is due on demand and remains outstanding as of March 31, 2002. The line of credit bears interest at 12% per annum and is payable monthly. This line of credit is secured by substantially all of PCR’s assets, subordinated to the interest of a financial institution which provided PCR an additional line of credit. Since 2000, the Company has guaranteed PCR debts due to parties other than the Company totaling $5,000, which remain in effect.
The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations, presented in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are primarily comprised of Cash, Accounts Receivable, Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases, Leasing Equipment, Other Assets, Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses and Debt Obligations.
Note 3 — Chassis Holdings I LLC:
On July 1, 2001, the Company restructured its relationship with The Ivy Group and its principals to provide the Company with managerial control over 6,047 chassis previously leased by Trac Lease, Inc. (Trac Lease), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, from The Ivy Group. As a result of the restructuring, the partners of The Ivy Group contributed these 6,047 chassis and certain other assets and liabilities to a newly formed subsidiary, Chassis Holdings I LLC (Chassis Holdings), in exchange for $26,000 face value of preferred membership units and 10% of the common membership units, and Trac Lease contributed 902 chassis and $2,407 in cash to Chassis Holdings in exchange for $3,000 face value of preferred membership units and 90% of the common membership units. The preferred membership units are entitled to receive a preferred return prior to the receipt of any distributions by the holders of the common membership units. The value of the contributed chassis was determined by taking the arithmetic average of the results of independent appraisals performed by three nationally recognized appraisal firms in connection with the Company’s establishment of a chassis securitization facility in July 2000. As the managing member of Chassis Holdings, Trac Lease exercises sole managerial control over the entity’s operations. Chassis Holdings leases all of its chassis to Trac Lease at a rental rate equal to the then current Trac Lease fleet average per diem. Chassis Holdings and the holders of the preferred membership units are party to a Put/Call Agreement which provides that the holders of preferred units may put such units to Chassis Holdings under certain circumstances and Chassis Holdings may redeem such units under certain circumstances. Chassis Holdings will be required to make certain option payments to the holders of the preferred membership units in order to preserve its right to redeem such units.
The terms of all arrangements between Chassis Holdings and Trac Lease, including rental rates, are, in the opinion of our management, comparable to terms that we would have obtained in arms’ length transactions with unrelated third parties. The Ivy Group has entered into an agreement with us pursuant to which it has agreed not to engage in any business activities that are competitive with the business activities of Interpool or its subsidiaries without our prior written consent.
Based on 90% common unit ownership held by Trac Lease, the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chassis Holding I LLC. The Ivy Group’s interest in the common and preferred units of Chassis Holdings I LLC of approximately $26,326 is classified as minority interest in equity of subsidiaries in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the three months ended March 31, 2002, dividends paid on the common units and distributions on the preferred units owned by the Ivy Group totaling $780, are included in lease operating and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.
Note 4 — Cash flow information:
For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 cash paid for interest was approximately $29,431 and $37,639, respectively. Cash paid for income taxes was approximately $622 and $860, respectively.
Note 5 — Leasing Activities:
As lessor:
During the three months ended June 30, 2001, the Company initiated a bankruptcy claim against a customer and sought to collect receivables and to recover equipment values through its insurance policies. The Company demanded the return of approximately $48,588 of equipment, including $8,482 of direct finance leases which were reclassified to leasing equipment. At March 31, 2002, the outstanding receivables from this customer, including amounts for equipment the Company anticipates will not be recovered, totaled approximately $35,500 which is covered by insurance, or reserved for in the allowance for doubtful accounts. At this time, the Company has estimated no impairment upon the liquidation and/or re-lease of these assets after considering anticipated insurance proceeds. The maximum insurance coverage related to this claim is $35,000. The overall recovery of the asset values has been evaluated taking into consideration the equipment book value, the cost to recover and re-lease the equipment, and the total outstanding receivables, as well as the likelihood to collect through the recovery and sale of the equipment or the stipulated equipment values within the insurance policy. The Company continued to record revenue from these leases through August 20, 2001 at which time, revenue recognition was discontinued, as lease payments through August 20, 2001 were covered by the insurance policies. The Company will continue to assess the overall recovery of the asset values and adjust the assumptions used in evaluating the total insurance claim with respect to this customer’s bankruptcy. As additional information becomes available, reserves for the impairment of the asset values may be necessary based upon changes in economic conditions and the assumptions used in evaluating the total insurance claim.
During the three months ended March 31, 2002, the Company recognized $2,434 of a gain for the excess of amounts billable to the lease customer for unrecovered equipment over the Company’s net book value of the equipment which is expected to be recovered through insurance proceeds.
Allowance for doubtful accounts —
The following summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts:
2001 2002
---- ----
Balance beginning of year................. $14,271 $5,862
Provision charged to expense........... 713 821
Write-offs, net of recoveries.......... (9,804) (378)
------ ----
Balance, March 31......................... $5,180 $6,305
====== ======
Note 6 — Segment and geographic data:
The Company has two reportable segments: container leasing and domestic intermodal equipment. The container leasing segment specializes in the leasing of intermodal dry freight standard containers, while the domestic intermodal equipment segment specializes in the leasing of intermodal container chassis and freight rail cars.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1. The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from continuing operations before income taxes and extraordinary items. The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services.
Segment Information:
- -------------------
Domestic
Container Intermodal
Three Months Ended 2001: Leasing Equipment Totals
------------------------ ------- --------- ------
Revenues from external customers....................... $26,172 $50,296 $76,468
Lease operating and administrative expenses............ 3,863 19,625 23,488
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 8,633 10,136 18,769
Other income/(expense), net............................ (116) 1,730 1,614
Interest income........................................ 2,192 487 2,679
Interest expense....................................... 8,207 16,382 24,589
Income from continuing operations before taxes,
results from discontinued operations and change
in accounting principle............................. 7,545 6,370 13,915
Net investment in DFL's................................ 130,709 25,662 156,371
Leasing equipment, net................................. 484,562 781,414 1,265,976
Equipment purchases.................................... 28,761 4,164 32,925
Total segment assets................................... $742,416 $1,125,977 $1,868,393
Domestic
Container Intermodal
Three Months Ended 2002: Leasing Equipment Totals
------------------------ ------- --------- ------
Revenues from external customers..................... $27,200 $45,691 $72,891
Lease operating and administrative expenses.......... 3,297 16,405 19,702
Depreciation and amortization........................ 9,855 10,456 20,311
Other income/(expense), net.......................... 2,019 (1,090) 929
Interest income...................................... 534 1,538 2,072
Interest expense..................................... 6,050 17,296 23,346
Income from continuing operations before taxes,
Results from discontinued operations and change
in accounting principle........................... 10,551 1,982 12,533
Net investment in DFL's.............................. 164,743 63,078 227,821
Leasing equipment, net............................... 537,489 887,593 1,425,082
Equipment purchases.................................. 30,368 68,834 99,202
Total segment assets................................. $840,025 $1,199,361 $2,039,386
The Company’s shipping line customers utilize international containers in world trade over many varied and changing trade routes. In addition, most large shipping lines have many offices in various countries involved in container operations. The Company’s revenue from international containers is earned while the containers are used in service carrying cargo around the world, while certain other equipment is utilized in the United States. Accordingly, the information about the business of the Company by geographic area is derived from either international sources or from United States sources. Such presentation is consistent with industry practice.
Geographic Information:
- ----------------------
2001 2002
---- ----
REVENUES:
United States...................................... $50,306 $45,731
International...................................... 26,162 27,160
------ ------
$76,468 $72,891
======= =======
ASSETS:
United States...................................... $1,125,977 $1,199,361
International...................................... 742,416 840,025
------- -------
$1,868,393 $2,039,386
========== ==========
Note 7 — Other contingencies and commitments:
At March 31, 2002, commitments for capital expenditures totaled approximately $10,100.
Under certain of the Company’s leasing agreements, the Company, as lessee, may be obligated to indemnify the lessor for loss, recapture or disallowance of certain tax benefits arising from the lessor’s ownership of the equipment.
The Company is engaged in various legal proceedings from time to time incidental to the conduct of its business. In the opinion of management, the Company is adequately insured against the claims relating to such proceedings, and any ultimate liability arising out of such proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
Note 8 — Lease securitization program:
On March 30, 1999, the Company entered into an asset backed note program (the “ABN Program”). The ABN Program involved the sale by the Company of direct finance leases (collateralized by intermodal containers) with a historical net book value of $228,832 (the “Assets”). The Assets were sold to a special purpose entity whose sole business activity is issuing asset backed notes (“ABNs”), supported by the future cash flows of the Assets. Proceeds received by the Company upon selling the Assets were $189,087 of cash and the lowest priority ABN issued in the ABN Program (the “retained interest”) with an allocated historical book value of $47,687.
The Company classified the retained interest as an available for sale security, which is included in “Other Investment Securities” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Accordingly, the retained interest is accounted for at fair value, with any changes in fair value over its allocated historical book value recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, in the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. As of March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company estimated the fair market value of the retained interest was $13,585 and $15,970, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company recorded interest income on the retained interest totaling $544 and $978 which is included in revenues in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.
Interpool Limited, a subsidiary of the Company (the “Servicer”), acts as servicer for the Assets. Pursuant to the terms of the servicing agreement, the Servicer is paid a fee of 0.40% of the assets under management. The Company’s management has determined that the servicing fee paid approximates the fair value for services provided, as such, no servicing asset or liability has been recorded. For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company received servicing fees totaling $126 and $118 which are included in revenues in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income. For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, cash flows received on the retained interest were $2,929 and $3,656, respectively.
At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value of residual cash flows to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those assumptions are as follows:
March 31, 2002 December 31, 2002
-------------- -----------------
Carrying amount/fair value of retained interests..... $13,585 $15,970
Weighted-average life (in years)..................... 1.8 2.0
Expected credit losses (annual rate)................. 1.5 % 1.5 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change........... $94 $129
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change........... $222 $275
Residual cash flows discount rate (annual)........... 12.6 % 12.6 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change........... $250 $310
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change........... $507 $619
Note 9 — Acquisition of North American Intermodal Division of Transamerica Leasing, Inc.:
In October 2000, the Company completed the acquisition of the North American Intermodal division of Transamerica Leasing, Inc. (TA), a subsidiary of Transamerica Finance Corporation and AEGON N.V. In the acquisition, the Company acquired approximately 70,000 chassis, 23,000 rail trailers and 18,000 domestic containers. The acquisition was effective October 1, 2000 in a transaction accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, accordingly the acquired assets and liabilities have been recorded at the estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. In January 2001, the Company and TIP Intermodal Services (TIP), a GE Capital Company, announced the signing of a definitive agreement for the sale of 50,000 rail trailers and domestic containers by the Company to TIP, including all of the rail trailers and domestic containers the Company acquired from TA in October 2000. The Company established a basis in the assets acquired from TA to be sold to TIP equal to (i) TA’s historical net book value of the assets ($273,572), (ii) the expected gain to be realized from the sale to TIP ($5,614), (iii) the estimated cash collections (net of cash disbursements) resulting from the operations of these assets from October 1, 2000 through the estimated date of disposition of March 31, 2001 ($7,296) and (iv) the incremental amount of interest expense from October 1, 2000 through March 31, 2001 associated with the acquisition of these assets ($18,828). The excess of the purchase price paid over the book value of the assets and liabilities acquired (after establishing the basis associated with the assets held for sale) in an amount approximating $66,500 was allocated to the chassis acquired from TA and is being amortized over the remaining depreciable life of those chassis.
During the year ended 2001, the Company adjusted the excess of the purchase price paid over the book value of the assets and liabilities acquired for certain pre-acquisition contingencies and estimated costs included in the original purchase price allocation. This adjustment increased the premium paid over the book value of the assets and liabilities acquired by $5,112, and is being amortized over the average remaining depreciable life of the chassis acquired.
In March 2001, the Company sold 50,000 rail trailers and domestic containers, including all 41,000 rail trailers and domestic containers the Company acquired from TA in October 2000 to TIP. The Company recorded a gain of $1,774 upon the consummation of this sale, which represents the premium paid for the units previously owned by the Company over their net book value.
Note 10 — Derivative instruments:
The Company’s assets are primarily fixed rate in nature while its debt instruments are primarily floating rate. The Company employs derivative financial instruments (interest rate swap agreements) to effectively convert certain floating rate debt instruments into fixed rate instruments and thereby manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates.
The unrealized pre-tax income on cash flow hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2002 of $7,249 have been reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), along with related deferred income tax expense of $1,729.
Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income would be reclassified into earnings upon termination of these interest rate swap agreements prior to their contractual maturity. The Company does not intend to terminate any such interest rate swap agreements prior to maturity and therefore does not expect any gains or losses to be reclassified into income within the next twelve months.
Pre-tax income for the three months ended March 31, 2002 resulting from the change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements held which do not quality as cash flow hedges under Statement 133 of $320 have been recorded on the condensed consolidated statements of income as market value adjustment for derivative instruments. Interest rate swap agreements which qualify as perfect cash flow hedges have no effectiveness and therefore are not reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of income. Interest rate swap agreements which qualify as cash flow hedges but are not perfectly correlated have associated ineffectiveness of $330 which has been recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of income as market value adjustment for derivative instruments. Future ineffectiveness related to these interest rate swap agreements will continue to be recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of income during the next twelve months.
As of March 31, 2002, the Company holds 12 interest rate swap agreements with various financial institutions. The aggregate notional balance of the swaps was $760,746 as of March 31, 2002.
$27,361,250
INTERPOOL, INC.
9.25% Convertible Redeemable
Subordinated Debentures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fb99/8fb99ef65df821f9549c3ab74da62f3974ca94b3" alt=""
P R O S P E C T U S
July 8, 2002