Income Taxes | (10) INCOME TAXES On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted. The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code that will affect our fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, including, but not limited to (1) reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent; (2) requiring companies to pay a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries; (3) generally eliminating U.S. federal income taxes on dividends from foreign subsidiaries; (4) requiring a current inclusion in U.S. federal taxable income of certain earnings of controlled foreign corporations; (5) creating the base erosion anti-abuse tax (BEAT), a new minimum tax; (6) creating a new limitation on deductible interest expense; (7) revising the rules that limit the deductibility of compensation to certain highly compensated executives, and (8) changing rules related to uses and limitations of net operating loss carryforwards created in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The SEC staff issued SAB 118, which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act. In connection with our initial analysis of the impact of the Tax Act and consistent with the requirement to record a provisional estimate when applicable, the Company recorded a discrete net income tax benefit during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 of approximately $32.6. This provisional estimate primarily consists of a net benefit for the corporate rate reduction due to the revaluing of its net deferred tax liabilities as a result of the reduction in the federal corporate tax rates. The Company’s net deferred tax liabilities represent temporary differences between the book bases of assets which are greater than their tax bases. Upon the reversal of those temporary differences, the future tax impact will be based on the lower federal corporate tax rate enacted by the Tax Act. The Company is continuing to gather information and to analyze aspects of the Tax Act, which could potentially affect the estimated impact on the deferred tax balances. For various reasons that are discussed more fully below, we have not completed our accounting for the income tax effects of certain elements of the Tax Act. To the extent we were not yet able to make reasonable estimates of the impact of certain elements, we have not recorded any adjustments related to those elements and have continued accounting for them in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of the tax laws in effect before the Tax Act. In addition to the discrete benefit recorded during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 for the provisional estimated impact on the Company’s net deferred tax liabilities, the lower federal corporate tax rate reduced the Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate which was applied to year to date operating results in accordance with the interim accounting guidelines. The Company estimates that the reduction in the federal corporate rate will have an ongoing effect to reduce the Company’s income tax expense from continuing operations. As a result of changes made by the Tax Act, Section 162(m) will limit the deduction of compensation, including performance-based compensation, in excess of $1 million paid to anyone who, for tax years beginning after January 1, 2018, serves as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, or who is among the three most highly compensated executive officers for any fiscal year. The only exception to this rule is for compensation that is paid pursuant to a binding written contract in effect on November 2, 2017 that would have otherwise been deductible under the prior Section 162(m) rules. Accordingly, any compensation paid in the future pursuant to new compensation arrangements entered into after November 2, 2017, even if performance-based, will count towards the $1 million fiscal year deduction limit if paid to a covered executive. The Company estimates that there will not be a material impact during the current quarter or fiscal year, as the law is effective for tax years beginning after January 1, 2018. The Company has evaluated its binding contracts entered into prior to November 2, 2017, and believes there will be no material impact for adjustments related to deferred equity compensation currently carried as a deferred tax asset on the Company’s balance sheet. The Company is still analyzing certain aspects of the Act and refining calculations, which could potentially affect the impact of this provision. The Tax Act also implements certain changes on the taxation of the Company’s foreign operations. Our accounting for the following elements of the Tax Act is incomplete, and we were not yet able to make reasonable estimates of the effects. Therefore, no provisional adjustments were recorded. The Deemed Repatriation Transition Tax (Transition Tax) is a tax on previously untaxed accumulated and current earnings and profits (E&P) of certain of our foreign subsidiaries. To determine the amount of the Transition Tax, we must determine, in addition to other factors, the amount of post-1986 E&P of the relevant subsidiaries, as well as the amount of non-U.S. income taxes paid on such earnings. While the Company estimates that there will not be a material impact during the current quarter or current fiscal year due to the Transition Tax, we are not able to make a reasonable estimate of the Transition Tax and have not recorded a provisional amount. We are continuing to gather additional information needed to finalize the amount of post-1986 E&P to more precisely compute the amount of the Transition Tax. The Tax Act creates a new requirement that certain income (i.e., GILTI) earned by controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) must be included currently in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholder. Global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) is the excess of the shareholder’s “net CFC tested income” over the net deemed tangible income return, which is currently defined as the excess of (1) 10 percent of the aggregate of the U.S. shareholder’s pro rata share of the qualified business asset investment of each CFC with respect to which it is a U.S. shareholder over (2) the amount of certain interest expense taken into account in the determination of net CFC-tested income. Because of the complexity of the new GILTI tax rules, we are continuing to evaluate this provision of the Tax Act and the application of ASC 740. Under U.S. GAAP, we are allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (1) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”) or (2) factoring such amounts into a company’s measurement of its deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). The Company is not making a policy election at this time. Our calculation of the deferred balance with respect to the new GILTI tax rules will depend, in part, on analyzing our global income to determine whether we expect to have future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI and, if so, what the impact is expected to be. Because whether we expect to have future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI depends on not only our current structure and estimated future results of global operations but also our intent and ability to modify our structure and/or our business, we are not yet able to reasonably estimate the effect of this provision of the Tax Act. Therefore, we have not made any adjustments related to potential GILTI tax in our financial statements. Other revisions to the taxation of foreign earnings will not be effective until the Company’s fiscal year ending on June 30, 2019. The Company is in the process of evaluating the additional provisions of the Tax Act that will become effective in their fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. The impact of the Tax Act may differ from these estimates, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made, guidance that may be issued and actions the Company may take as a result of the Tax Act. The Company will continue to update the provisional estimates as information is obtained, such as state impacts regarding decoupling from the Tax Act provisions, realization of deferred amounts in the fiscal year, and accounting method elections that may be made by the Company. In order to determine the Company’s quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company used an estimated annual effective tax rate that is based on expected annual income and statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The Tax Act reduces the federal corporate tax rate to 21% in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018. Section 15 of the Internal Revenue Code Stipulates that our fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, will have a blended corporate tax rate of 28 percent, which is based on the applicable tax rates before and after the Tax Act and the number of days in the year. Certain significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter during which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rate from quarter to quarter. Income tax expense (benefit) for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was $(28.4), which included a provisional one-time benefit of $32.6 related to the Tax Act. After excluding the one-time benefit related to the Tax Act, the income tax expense for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was $4.2, or approximately 113.5% of pre-tax income compared to $6.2, or approximately 51.2%% of pre-tax income, for the three months ended December 31, 2016. Income tax expense for the six months ended December 31, 2017 (after excluding the one-time Tax Act benefit of $32.6) was $9.8, or approximately 10.7% of pre-tax income compared to $11.4, or approximately 70.8% of pre-tax income, for the six months ended December 31, 2016. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 is based on the Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, adjusted by discrete items recognized during the period. For the three and six months ended December 31, 2017, the Company’s recognized effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to the effect of fair value adjustments related to acquisition contingent consideration, state income taxes, the prior year adoption of ASU 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting and other benefits realized from the differences related to the earlier recognition of the tax effect of equity compensation expense from incentive stock options and the deduction realized when those options are disqualified upon exercise and sale. The Company files U.S., foreign and state income tax returns in jurisdictions with various statutes of limitations. The Company is currently under audit by the IRS for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2015; the State of New Jersey for the fiscal years June 30, 2007 through 2013; and Canada for the fiscal years June 30, 2014 through 2015. Annual and interim tax provisions include amounts considered necessary to pay assessments that may result from examination of prior year tax returns; however, the amount ultimately paid upon resolution of issues may differ materially from the amount accrued. |