UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
| |
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
|
| |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-12084
Libbey Inc.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 34-1559357 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
| | |
| 300 Madison Avenue, Toledo, Ohio 43604 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
| | |
| 419-325-2100 | |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | | |
Large Accelerated Filer | o | Accelerated Filer | þ | Non-Accelerated Filer | o | Smaller reporting company | o |
| | | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $.01 par value 19,853,533 shares at November 2, 2011.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
EX-31.1 | |
EX-31.2 | |
EX-32.1 | |
EX-32.2 | |
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | |
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | |
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | |
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | |
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | |
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | |
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Libbey Inc. and all majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively, Libbey or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Item 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, |
| 2011 | | 2010 |
Net sales | $ | 207,246 |
| | $ | 200,007 |
|
Freight billed to customers | 511 |
| | 457 |
|
Total revenues | 207,757 |
| | 200,464 |
|
Cost of sales | 162,873 |
| | 158,779 |
|
Gross profit | 44,884 |
| | 41,685 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 26,739 |
| | 25,335 |
|
Special charges | (232 | ) | | 700 |
|
Income from operations | 18,377 |
| | 15,650 |
|
Other income | 2,237 |
| | 23 |
|
Earnings before interest and income taxes | 20,614 |
| | 15,673 |
|
Interest expense | 10,559 |
| | 11,855 |
|
Income before income taxes | 10,055 |
| | 3,818 |
|
Provision for income taxes | 2,928 |
| | 1,472 |
|
Net income | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
|
Net income per share: | | | |
Basic | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.13 |
|
Diluted | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 0.12 |
|
Dividends per share | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
See accompanying notes
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, |
| 2011 | | 2010 |
Net sales | $ | 602,274 |
| | $ | 576,947 |
|
Freight billed to customers | 1,760 |
| | 1,311 |
|
Total revenues | 604,034 |
| | 578,258 |
|
Cost of sales | 473,168 |
| | 454,665 |
|
Gross profit | 130,866 |
| | 123,593 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 77,365 |
| | 72,878 |
|
Special charges | (281 | ) | | 1,088 |
|
Income from operations | 53,782 |
| | 49,627 |
|
(Loss) gain on redemption of debt | (2,803 | ) | | 56,792 |
|
Other income | 8,307 |
| | 916 |
|
Earnings before interest and income taxes | 59,286 |
| | 107,335 |
|
Interest expense | 32,929 |
| | 33,243 |
|
Income before income taxes | 26,357 |
| | 74,092 |
|
Provision for income taxes | 4,825 |
| | 6,769 |
|
Net income | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
|
Net income per share: | | | |
Basic | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 3.98 |
|
Diluted | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 3.26 |
|
Dividends per share | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
See accompanying notes
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
| (unaudited) | | |
Assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 24,583 |
| | $ | 76,258 |
|
Accounts receivable — net | 93,447 |
| | 92,101 |
|
Inventories — net | 171,217 |
| | 148,146 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets | 13,900 |
| | 6,437 |
|
Total current assets | 303,147 |
| | 322,942 |
|
Pension asset | 14,383 |
| | 12,767 |
|
Purchased intangible assets — net | 21,687 |
| | 23,134 |
|
Goodwill | 166,572 |
| | 169,340 |
|
Derivative asset | 4,075 |
| | 2,589 |
|
Other assets | 15,026 |
| | 17,802 |
|
Total other assets | 221,743 |
| | 225,632 |
|
Property, plant and equipment — net | 263,437 |
| | 270,397 |
|
Total assets | $ | 788,327 |
| | $ | 818,971 |
|
| | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity: | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 52,317 |
| | $ | 59,095 |
|
Salaries and wages | 31,767 |
| | 32,087 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 54,216 |
| | 51,211 |
|
Accrued special charges | — |
| | 768 |
|
Accrued income taxes | — |
| | 3,121 |
|
Pension liability (current portion) | 5,975 |
| | 2,330 |
|
Non-pension postretirement benefits (current portion) | 5,017 |
| | 5,017 |
|
Derivative liability | 1,891 |
| | 3,392 |
|
Long-term debt due within one year | 3,219 |
| | 3,142 |
|
Total current liabilities | 154,402 |
| | 160,163 |
|
Long-term debt | 403,055 |
| | 443,983 |
|
Pension liability | 90,464 |
| | 115,521 |
|
Non-pension postretirement benefits | 68,389 |
| | 67,737 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 8,520 |
| | 8,376 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | 8,854 |
| | 11,925 |
|
Total liabilities | 733,684 |
| | 807,705 |
|
| | | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | |
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 19,853,533 shares issued at September 30, 2011 and 19,682,506 at December 31, 2010 | 199 |
| | 197 |
|
Capital in excess of par value (includes warrants of $1,034 based on 485,309 shares at September 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010) | 304,902 |
| | 300,692 |
|
Retained deficit | (157,145 | ) | | (178,677 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (93,313 | ) | | (110,946 | ) |
Total shareholders’ equity | 54,643 |
| | 11,266 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 788,327 |
| | $ | 818,971 |
|
See accompanying notes
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, |
| 2011 | | 2010 |
Operating activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 10,357 |
| | 10,040 |
|
Loss on asset sales | 347 |
| | 78 |
|
Change in accounts receivable | 2,989 |
| | (15,355 | ) |
Change in inventories | (5,084 | ) | | (2,418 | ) |
Change in accounts payable | (7,855 | ) | | (15 | ) |
Accrued interest and amortization of discounts, warrants and finance fees | (7,135 | ) | | (8,996 | ) |
Pension & non-pension postretirement benefits | (11,530 | ) | | 917 |
|
Restructuring charges | (262 | ) | | 627 |
|
Accrued liabilities & prepaid expenses | 3,673 |
| | 7,099 |
|
Income taxes | 2,578 |
| | 1,129 |
|
Share-based compensation expense | 2,398 |
| | 741 |
|
Other operating activities | (2,293 | ) | | 1,027 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities | (4,690 | ) | | (2,780 | ) |
| | | |
Investing activities: | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (8,059 | ) | | (7,743 | ) |
Net proceeds from sale of Traex | 158 |
| | — |
|
Proceeds from asset sales and other | 65 |
| | — |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (7,836 | ) | | (7,743 | ) |
| | | |
Financing activities: | | | |
Net (repayments) on ABL credit facility | (2,105 | ) | | — |
|
Other repayments | (4,673 | ) | | (878 | ) |
Debt issuance costs and other | (19 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash used in financing activities | (6,797 | ) | | (878 | ) |
| | | |
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash | (403 | ) | | 796 |
|
Decrease in cash | (19,726 | ) | | (10,605 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | 44,309 |
| | 46,173 |
|
Cash at end of period | $ | 24,583 |
| | $ | 35,568 |
|
| | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information: | | | |
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 17,661 |
| | $ | 21,765 |
|
Cash paid (refunded) during the period for income taxes | $ | 1,001 |
| | $ | (243 | ) |
See accompanying notes
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, |
| 2011 | | 2010 |
Operating activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 32,265 |
| | 30,994 |
|
(Gain) loss on asset sales | (6,449 | ) | | 343 |
|
Change in accounts receivable | (1,813 | ) | | (28,967 | ) |
Change in inventories | (24,156 | ) | | (17,218 | ) |
Change in accounts payable | (7,183 | ) | | 773 |
|
Accrued interest and amortization of discounts, warrants and finance fees | (6,309 | ) | | 6,795 |
|
Gain on redemption of new PIK notes | — |
| | (70,193 | ) |
Payment of interest on new PIK notes | — |
| | (29,400 | ) |
Call premium on senior notes and floating rate notes | 1,203 |
| | 8,415 |
|
Write-off of finance fees & discounts on senior notes, old ABL and floating rate notes | 1,600 |
| | 4,986 |
|
Pension & non-pension postretirement benefits | (8,586 | ) | | 3,788 |
|
Restructuring charges | (828 | ) | | 3,023 |
|
Accrued liabilities & prepaid expenses | 4,882 |
| | 4,635 |
|
Income taxes | (7,168 | ) | | 890 |
|
Share-based compensation expense | 4,365 |
| | 2,572 |
|
Other operating activities | (1,211 | ) | | 408 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 2,144 |
| | (10,833 | ) |
| | | |
Investing activities: | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (26,457 | ) | | (19,122 | ) |
Net proceeds from sale of Traex | 13,000 |
| | — |
|
Proceeds from asset sales and other | 5,264 |
| | — |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (8,193 | ) | | (19,122 | ) |
| | | |
Financing activities: | |
| | |
|
Other repayments | (4,770 | ) | | (969 | ) |
Other borrowings | — |
| | 215 |
|
Floating rate note payments | — |
| | (306,000 | ) |
Senior note payments | (40,000 | ) | | — |
|
Call premium on senior notes and floating rate notes | (1,203 | ) | | (8,415 | ) |
PIK note payment | — |
| | (51,031 | ) |
Proceeds from senior secured notes | — |
| | 392,328 |
|
Stock options exercised | 478 |
| | 8 |
|
Debt issuance costs and other | (462 | ) | | (15,496 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (45,957 | ) | | 10,640 |
|
| | | |
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash | 331 |
| | (206 | ) |
Decrease in cash | (51,675 | ) | | (19,521 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | 76,258 |
| | 55,089 |
|
Cash at end of period | $ | 24,583 |
| | $ | 35,568 |
|
| | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information: | | | |
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 38,971 |
| | $ | 27,905 |
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes | $ | 8,689 |
| | $ | 4,459 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:
During the first quarter of 2010, we redeemed our PIK notes, resulting in the recognition of a gain of $70.2 million. The gain was offset by $13.4 million of expenses related to the refinancing of the floating rate notes, resulting in a net gain of $56.8 million on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. See note 4 for further information on this transaction.
See accompanying notes
LIBBEY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
(unaudited)
| |
1. | Description of the Business |
Libbey is the leading producer of glass tableware products in the Western Hemisphere, in addition to supplying key markets throughout the world. We produce glass tableware in five countries and sell to customers in over 100 countries. We have the largest manufacturing, distribution and service network among glass tableware manufacturers in the Western Hemisphere and are one of the largest glass tableware manufacturers in the world. We design and market an extensive line of high-quality glass tableware, ceramic dinnerware, metal flatware, hollowware and serveware to a broad group of customers in the foodservice, retail and business-to-business markets. We own and operate two glass tableware manufacturing plants in the United States as well as glass tableware manufacturing plants in the Netherlands, Portugal, China and Mexico. Until April 28, 2011, we also owned and operated a plastics plant in Wisconsin. On April 28, 2011, we sold substantially all of the assets of our plastics subsidiary, Traex, to the Vollrath Company. See note 14 for further discussion of this transaction. In addition, we import products from overseas in order to complement our line of manufactured items. The combination of manufacturing and procurement allows us to compete in the global tableware market by offering an extensive product line at competitive prices.
Our website can be found at www.libbey.com. We make available, free of charge, at this website all of our reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, as well as amendments to those reports. These reports are made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after their filing with, or furnishing to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and can also be found at www.sec.gov.
Our shares are traded on the NYSE Amex exchange under the ticker symbol LBY.
| |
2. | Significant Accounting Policies |
See our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for a description of significant accounting policies not listed below.
Basis of Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include Libbey Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively, Libbey or the Company). Our fiscal year end is December 31st. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from management’s estimates.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Net sales in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations include revenue earned when products are shipped and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. Revenue is recorded net of returns, discounts and incentives offered to customers. Cost of sales includes cost to manufacture and/or purchase products, warehouse, shipping and delivery costs and other costs.
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate in a local currency environment, where that local currency is the functional currency, are translated to U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, with the resulting translation adjustments directly recorded to a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Income and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates during the year. The effect of exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency is recorded in other income.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax attribute carry-forwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification™ (FASB ASC) Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” requires that a valuation allowance be recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined separately for each tax jurisdiction in which we conduct our operations or otherwise incur taxable income or losses. In the United States, China, the Netherlands and
Portugal we have recorded valuation allowances against our deferred income tax assets.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
We account for stock-based compensation expense in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation,” and FASB ASC Topic 505-50, “Equity — Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”. Stock-based compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. FASB ASC Topics 718 and 505-50 apply to all of our outstanding unvested stock-based payment awards. Stock-based compensation expense charged to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $2.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively. The third quarter of 2011 included non-cash compensation charges of $1.7 million related to accelerated vesting of previously issued equity compensation. Stock-based compensation expense charged to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $0.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
New Accounting Standards
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-28, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (ASU 2010-28). ASU 2010-28 addresses the decision process involved in testing for impairment of goodwill when the carrying value of a reporting unit is zero or less. The provisions of this update are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2010. We do not expect the provisions of this update to have any impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or on our process of testing for potential impairment of goodwill.
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (ASU 2010-29). ASU 2010-29 clarifies the extent to which pro forma historical information must be prepared and presented in comparative financial statements for periods following a merger or acquisition. The amendments in this update specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. ASU 2010-29 also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. For Libbey, the required disclosures are effective for combinations with acquisition dates during or after 2011. The impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements will depend on the nature and timing of any potential future business combinations.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 explains how to measure fair value and improves the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 does not require additional fair value measurements, and it is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The provisions of this update are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the provisions of this update to have any impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 requires presentation of net income, other comprehensive income items and total comprehensive income to be in one continuous statement or two separate but consecutive statements. Other comprehensive income presentation in the statement of stockholders’ equity will no longer be permitted. This update is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Libbey will incorporate the required presentation changes in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in the first quarter 2012.
In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-08, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (ASU 2011-08). ASU 2011-08 allows for an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. If the qualitative factors results in the fair value exceeding the carrying value of a reporting unit, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. This update is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the provisions of this update to have any impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior year’s financial statements may have been reclassified to conform to the presentation used in the current period financial statements. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company revised the classification of the call premium on the senior notes and the floating rate notes and included the cash flow effect within the financing activities.
The following table provides detail of selected balance sheet items:
|
| | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
Accounts receivable: | | | |
Trade receivables | $ | 92,995 |
| | $ | 90,899 |
|
Other receivables | 452 |
| | 1,202 |
|
Total accounts receivable, less allowances of $5,236 and $5,518 | $ | 93,447 |
| | $ | 92,101 |
|
Inventories: | | | |
Finished goods | $ | 154,665 |
| | $ | 132,169 |
|
Work in process | 920 |
| | 653 |
|
Raw materials | 4,224 |
| | 4,444 |
|
Repair parts | 9,945 |
| | 9,496 |
|
Operating supplies | 1,463 |
| | 1,384 |
|
Total inventories, less allowances of $5,003 and $4,658 | $ | 171,217 |
| | $ | 148,146 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets: | | | |
Value added tax | $ | 2,641 |
| | $ | 1,332 |
|
Prepaid expenses | 5,776 |
| | 4,822 |
|
Refundable, deferred and prepaid income taxes | 5,025 |
| | 283 |
|
Derivative asset | 458 |
| | — |
|
Total prepaid and other current assets | $ | 13,900 |
| | $ | 6,437 |
|
Other assets: | | | |
Deposits | $ | 907 |
| | $ | 904 |
|
Finance fees — net of amortization | 10,137 |
| | 13,012 |
|
Other assets | 3,982 |
| | 3,886 |
|
Total other assets | $ | 15,026 |
| | $ | 17,802 |
|
Accrued liabilities: | | | |
Accrued incentives | $ | 24,275 |
| | $ | 15,060 |
|
Workers compensation | 8,871 |
| | 9,608 |
|
Medical liabilities | 3,556 |
| | 3,785 |
|
Interest | 4,696 |
| | 14,416 |
|
Commissions payable | 1,292 |
| | 904 |
|
Other accrued liabilities | 11,526 |
| | 7,438 |
|
Total accrued liabilities | $ | 54,216 |
| | $ | 51,211 |
|
Other long-term liabilities: | | | |
Deferred liability | $ | 3,723 |
| | $ | 4,622 |
|
Derivative liability | 81 |
| | — |
|
Other long-term liabilities | 5,050 |
| | 7,303 |
|
Total other long-term liabilities | $ | 8,854 |
| | $ | 11,925 |
|
On March 25, 2011, Libbey Glass redeemed an aggregate principal amount of $40.0 million of its outstanding 10.0 percent Senior Secured Notes due 2015, on a pro rata basis in accordance with the terms of the New Notes Indenture. Pursuant to the terms of the New Notes Indenture, the redemption price for the Senior Secured Notes was 103.0 percent of the principal amount of the redeemed Senior Secured Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. At completion of the redemption, the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes outstanding was $360.0 million. In conjunction with this redemption, we recorded $2.8 million of expense, representing $1.2 million for an early call premium and $1.6 million for the write off of a pro rata amount of financing fees and discounts.
On February 8, 2010, we completed the refinancing of substantially all of the existing indebtedness of our wholly-owned subsidiaries Libbey Glass and Libbey Europe B.V. The refinancing included:
| |
• | the entry into an amended and restated credit agreement with respect to our ABL Facility; |
| |
• | the issuance of $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 10.0 percent Senior Secured Notes of Libbey Glass due 2015; |
| |
• | the repurchase and cancellation of all of Libbey Glass’s then outstanding $306.0 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes; and |
| |
• | the redemption of all of Libbey Glass’s then outstanding $80.4 million in aggregate principal amount 16.0 percent payment-in-kind notes (New PIK Notes). |
We used the proceeds of the offering of the Senior Secured Notes, together with cash on hand, to fund the repurchase of the floating rate notes, the redemption of the New PIK Notes and to pay certain related fees and expenses. Upon completion of the refinancing, we recorded a gain of $71.7 million related to the redemption of the New PIK Notes. $70.2 million of this gain was recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2010. This gain was partially offset by a $13.4 million write-off of bank fees, discounts and a call premium on the floating rate notes, resulting in a net gain of $58.3 million. $56.8 million of this net gain was recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as shown on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
As part of an exchange transaction in 2009 involving our 16.0 percent payment-in-kind notes, 933,145 shares were issued to Merrill Lynch PCG, Inc. in October, 2009 along with warrants conveying the right to purchase, for $0.01 per share, an additional 3,466,856 shares of our common stock. Please see note 6 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for further information regarding this transaction. The additional 3.5 million shares were issued in August, 2010 as the warrant holder chose to exercise these warrants, and on August 18, 2010, we announced the closing of a secondary offering of these 4.4 million shares of our common stock on behalf of Merrill Lynch PCG, Inc., the selling stockholder, at a price to the public of $10.25 per share. The total offering size reflects the underwriters' exercise of their option to purchase an additional 573,913 shares of common stock, on the same terms and conditions, to cover over-allotments. We did not receive any proceeds from the offering. The fees of approximately $1.1 million related to this transaction were recorded as Selling, General and Administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and were reflected in our Glass Operations segment in the third quarter.
Borrowings consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | Interest Rate | | Maturity Date | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
Borrowings under ABL Facility | floating | | April 29, 2016 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Senior Secured Notes | 10.00% | (1) | February 15, 2015 | 360,000 |
| | 400,000 |
|
Promissory Note | 6.00% | | October, 2011 to September, 2016 | 1,161 |
| | 1,307 |
|
RMB Loan Contract | floating | | December, 2012 to January, 2014 | 34,430 |
| | 37,925 |
|
BES Euro Line | floating | | December, 2011 to December, 2013 | 11,219 |
| | 10,934 |
|
Total borrowings | | | | 406,810 |
| | 450,166 |
|
Less — unamortized discount | | | | 4,644 |
| | 6,307 |
|
Plus — carrying value adjustment on debt related to the Interest Rate Agreement (1) | 4,108 |
| | 3,266 |
|
Total borrowings — net | | | | 406,274 |
| | 447,125 |
|
Less — long term debt due within one year | | | 3,219 |
| | 3,142 |
|
Total long-term portion of borrowings — net | | | $ | 403,055 |
| | $ | 443,983 |
|
| |
(1) | See Interest Rate Agreements under “Senior Secured Notes” below and in note 9. |
Amended and Restated ABL Credit Agreement
Pursuant to the refinancing, Libbey Glass and Libbey Europe entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2010 and amended on April 29, 2011 (ABL Facility), with a group of five financial institutions. The ABL Facility provides for borrowings of up to $100.0 million (reduced from $110.0 million per the amendment on April 29, 2011), subject to certain borrowing base limitations, reserves and outstanding letters of credit.
All borrowings under the ABL Facility are secured by:
| |
• | a first-priority security interest in substantially all of the existing and future real and personal property of Libbey Glass and its domestic subsidiaries (Credit Agreement Priority Collateral); |
| |
• | a first-priority security interest in: |
| |
• | 100 percent of the stock of Libbey Glass and 100 percent of the stock of substantially all of Libbey Glass’s present and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries; |
| |
• | 100 percent of the non-voting stock of substantially all of Libbey Glass’s first-tier present and future foreign subsidiaries; and |
| |
• | 65 percent of the voting stock of substantially all of Libbey Glass’s first-tier present and future foreign subsidiaries |
| |
• | a first priority security interest in substantially all proceeds and products of the property and assets described above; and |
| |
• | a second-priority security interest in substantially all of the owned real property, equipment and fixtures in the United States of Libbey Glass and its domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens (New Notes Priority Collateral). |
Additionally, borrowings by Libbey Europe under the ABL Facility are secured by:
| |
• | a first-priority lien on substantially all of the existing and future real and personal property of Libbey Europe and its Dutch subsidiaries; and |
| |
• | a first-priority security interest in: |
| |
• | 100 percent of the stock of Libbey Europe and 100 percent of the stock of substantially all of the Dutch subsidiaries; and |
| |
• | 100 percent (or a lesser percentage in certain circumstances) of the outstanding stock issued by the first tier foreign subsidiaries of Libbey Europe and its Dutch subsidiaries. |
Swingline borrowings are limited to $15.0 million, with swing line borrowings for Libbey Europe being limited to the US equivalent of $7.5 million. Loans comprising each CBFR (CB Floating Rate) Borrowing, including each Swingline Loan, bear interest at the CB Floating Rate plus the Applicable Rate, and euro-denominated swing line borrowings (Eurocurrency Loans) bear interest calculated at the Netherlands swing line rate, as defined in the ABL Facility. The Applicable Rates for CBFR Loans and Eurocurrency Loans vary depending on our aggregate remaining availability. The Applicable Rates for CBFR Loans and Eurocurrency Loans were 0.75 percent and 1.75 percent, respectively, at September 30, 2011. Libbey pays a quarterly Commitment Fee, as defined by the ABL Facility, on the total credit provided under the ABL Facility. The Commitment Fee was 0.375 percent at September 30, 2011. No compensating balances are required by the Agreement. The Agreement does not require compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, unless aggregate unused availability falls below $10.0 million. If our aggregate unused ABL availability were to fall below $10.0 million, the fixed charge coverage ratio requirement would be 1:10 to 1:00. Libbey Glass and Libbey Europe have the option to increase the ABL Facility by $10.0 million. There were no Libbey Glass or Libbey Europe borrowings under the facility at September 30, 2011, or at December 31, 2010. Interest is payable on the last day of the interest period, which can range from one month to six months depending on the maturity of each individual borrowing on the facility.
The borrowing base under the ABL Facility is determined by a monthly analysis of the eligible accounts receivable and inventory. The borrowing base is the sum of (a) 85 percent of eligible accounts receivable and (b) the lesser of (i) 85 percent of the net orderly liquidation value (NOLV) of eligible inventory, (ii) 65 percent of eligible inventory, or (iii) $75.0 million.
The available total borrowing base is offset by ERISA, rent and tax reserves totaling $2.7 million and mark-to-market reserves for natural gas contracts of $1.8 million as of September 30, 2011. The ABL Facility also provides for the issuance of $30.0 million of letters of credit, which are applied against the $100.0 million limit. At September 30, 2011, we had $10.5 million in letters of credit outstanding under the ABL Facility. Remaining unused availability under the ABL Facility was $85.0 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $65.2 million under the ABL Facility at December 31, 2010.
Senior Secured Notes
On February 8, 2010, Libbey Glass closed its offering of the $400.0 million Senior Secured Notes. The net proceeds of the offering of Senior Secured Notes were approximately $379.8 million, after the 1.918 percent original issue discount of $7.7 million, $10.0 million of commissions payable to the initial purchasers and $2.5 million of fees related to the offering. These fees will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the notes.
The Senior Secured Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture, dated February 8, 2010 (New Notes Indenture), between Libbey Glass, the Company, the domestic subsidiaries of Libbey Glass listed as guarantors therein (Subsidiary Guarantors and together with the Company, Guarantors), and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (New Notes Trustee), and collateral agent. Under the terms of the New Notes Indenture, the Senior Secured Notes bear interest at a rate of 10.0 percent per year and will mature on February 15, 2015. The New Notes Indenture contains covenants that restrict the ability of Libbey Glass and the Guarantors to, among other things:
| |
• | incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; |
| |
• | pay dividends, make certain investments or other restricted payments; |
| |
• | enter into affiliate transactions; |
| |
• | merge or consolidate, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all the assets of Libbey Glass and the Guarantors; and |
| |
• | transfer or sell assets. |
The New Notes Indenture provides for customary events of default. In the case of an event of default arising from bankruptcy or insolvency as defined in the New Notes Indenture, all outstanding Senior Secured Notes will become due and payable immediately without further action or notice. If any other event of default under the Indenture occurs or is continuing, the New Notes Trustee or holders of at least 25 percent in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Senior Secured Notes may declare all the Senior Secured Notes to be due and payable immediately.
The Senior Secured Notes and the related guarantees under the New Notes Indenture are secured by (i) first priority liens on the New Notes Priority Collateral and (ii) second priority liens on the Credit Agreement Priority Collateral.
In connection with the sale of the Senior Secured Notes, Libbey Glass and the Guarantors entered into a registration rights agreement, dated February 8, 2010 (Registration Rights Agreement), under which they agreed to make an offer to exchange the Senior Secured Notes and the related guarantees for registered, publicly tradable notes and guarantees that have substantially identical terms to the Senior Secured Notes and the related guarantees, and in certain limited circumstances, to file a shelf registration statement that would allow certain holders of Senior Secured Notes to resell their respective Senior Secured Notes to the public. On January 25, 2011, we exchanged $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10.0 percent Senior Secured Notes due 2015 for an equal principal amount of a new issue of 10.0 percent Senior Secured Notes due 2015, which have been registered under the Securities act of 1933, as amended.
Prior to August 15, 2012, we may redeem in the aggregate up to 35 percent of the original principal amount of Senior Secured Notes with the net cash proceeds of one or more equity offerings at a redemption price of 110 percent of the principal amount, provided that at least 65 percent of the original principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes must remain outstanding after each redemption and that each redemption occurs within 90 days of the closing of the equity offering. In addition, prior to August 15, 2012, but not more than once in any twelve-month period, we may redeem up to 10 percent of the Senior Secured Notes at a redemption price of 103 percent plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Senior Secured Notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after August 15, 2012 at set redemption prices together with accrued and unpaid interest.
On March 25, 2011, Libbey Glass redeemed an aggregate principal amount of $40.0 million of the Senior Secured Notes in accordance with the terms of the New Notes Indenture. Pursuant to the terms of the New Notes Indenture, the redemption price for the Senior Secured Notes was 103.0 percent of the principal amount of the redeemed Senior Secured Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. At completion of the redemption, the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes outstanding was $360.0 million. In conjunction with this redemption, we recorded $2.8 million of expense, representing $1.2 million for an early call premium and $1.6 million for the write off of a pro rata amount of financing fees and discounts.
We have an Interest Rate Agreement (Rate Agreement) in place with respect to $80.0 million of debt as a means to manage our fixed to variable interest rate ratio. The Rate Agreement effectively converts this portion of our long-term borrowings from fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. Prior to August 15, 2012, but not more than once in any twelve-month period, the counterparty may call up to 10 percent of the Rate Agreement at a call price of 103 percent. The Rate Agreement originally covered $100.0 million of our fixed rate debt, but the counterparty called $10.0 million in August 2010 and another $10.0 in August 2011. The Rate Agreement is callable at the counterparty’s option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after August 15, 2012 at set call premiums. The variable interest rate for our borrowings related to the Rate Agreement at September 30, 2011, excluding applicable fees, is 7.57 percent. This Rate Agreement expires on February 15, 2015. Total remaining Senior Secured Notes not covered by the Rate Agreement have a fixed interest rate of 10.0 percent per year through February 15, 2015. If the counterparty to this Rate Agreement were to fail to perform, this Rate Agreement would no longer afford us a variable rate. However, we do not anticipate non-performance by the counterparty. The interest rate swap counterparty was rated AA, as of September 30, 2011, by Standard and Poor’s.
The fair market value and related carrying value adjustment are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
Fair market value of Rate Agreement - asset | $ | 4,075 |
| | $ | 2,536 |
|
Adjustment to increase the carrying value of the related long-term debt | $ | 4,108 |
| | $ | 3,266 |
|
The net impact recorded in other income on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Income (expense) on hedging activities in other income | | $ | 205 |
| | $ | (237 | ) | | $ | 697 |
| | $ | 179 |
|
The fair value of the Rate Agreement is based on the market standard methodology of netting the discounted expected future fixed cash receipts and the discounted future variable cash payments. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate forward curves. We expect this agreement to expire as originally contracted. See note 9 for further discussion.
Promissory Note
In September 2001, we issued a $2.7 million promissory note at an interest rate of 6.0 percent in connection with the purchase of our Laredo, Texas warehouse facility. At September 30, 2011, we had $1.2 million outstanding on the promissory note. Principal and interest with respect to the promissory note are paid monthly.
Notes Payable
We have an overdraft line of credit for a maximum of €1.0 million. At September 30, 2011, there were no borrowings under the facility, which has an interest rate of 5.80 percent. Interest with respect to the note is paid monthly.
RMB Loan Contract
On January 23, 2006, Libbey Glassware (China) Co., Ltd. (Libbey China), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Libbey Inc., entered into an RMB Loan Contract (RMB Loan Contract) with China Construction Bank Corporation Langfang Economic Development Area Sub-Branch (CCB). Pursuant to the RMB Loan Contract, CCB agreed to lend to Libbey China RMB 250.0 million, or the equivalent of approximately $39.1 million, for the construction of our production facility in China and the purchase of related equipment, materials and services. The loan has a term of eight years and bears interest at a variable rate as announced by the People’s Bank of China. As of the date of the initial advance under the Loan Contract, the annual interest rate was 5.51 percent, and as of September 30, 2011, the annual interest rate was 6.12 percent. As of September 30, 2011, the outstanding balance was RMB 220.0 million (approximately $34.4 million). Interest is payable quarterly. We pre-paid the July 20, 2012 principal payment of 30.0 million RMB (approximately $4.7 million) in September 2011. Payments of principal in the amount of RMB 40.0 million (approximately $6.2 million) must be made on December 20, 2012, and three payments of principal in the amount of RMB 60.0 million (approximately $9.4 million) each must be made on July 20, 2013, December 20, 2013, and January 20, 2014, respectively. The obligations of Libbey China are secured by a guarantee executed by Libbey Inc. for the benefit of CCB and a mortgage lien on the Libbey China facility.
BES Euro Line
In January 2007, Crisal entered into a seven year, €11.0 million line of credit (approximately $15.0 million) with Banco Espírito Santo, S.A. (BES). The $11.2 million outstanding at September 30, 2011, was the U.S. dollar equivalent of the €8.3 million outstanding under the line at an interest rate of 3.77 percent. Payment of principal in the amount of €2.2 million (approximately $3.0 million) is due in December 2011, payment of €2.8 million (approximately $3.8 million) is due in December 2012 and payment of €3.3 million (approximately $4.4 million) is due in December 2013. Interest with respect to the line is paid every six months.
Fair Value of Borrowings
The fair value of our debt has been calculated based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues. Our $360.0 million Senior Secured Notes due February 15, 2015 had an estimated fair value of $382.5 million at September 30, 2011. The fair value of the remainder of our debt approximates carrying value at September 30, 2011 due to variable rates.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Historically, cash flows generated from operations and our borrowing capacity under our ABL Facility have enabled us to meet our cash requirements, including capital expenditures and working capital requirements. As of September 30, 2011 we had no borrowings under our ABL Facility, and we had $10.5 million of letters of credit issued under that facility. As a result, we had $85.0 million of unused availability remaining under the ABL Facility at September 30, 2011. In addition, we had $24.6 million of cash on hand at September 30, 2011.
Based on our operating plans and current forecast expectations, we anticipate that our level of cash on hand, cash flows from
operations and our borrowing capacity under our ABL Facility will provide sufficient cash availability to meet our ongoing liquidity needs.
Facility Closures
In December 2008, we announced that our Syracuse China manufacturing facility and our Mira Loma, California distribution center would be shut down in early to mid-2009 in order to reduce costs. The Syracuse China facility was closed on April 9, 2009 and the Mira Loma distribution center was closed on May 31, 2009. See Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for further discussion.
We incurred no additional charges for the three months ended September 30, 2011. We incurred charges of approximately $0.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 related to other costs net of building site clean-up adjustments in connection with the sale of the property in Syracuse, New York in March 2011. This amount was included in special charges on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the Other Operations segment as detailed in the table below.
There were no additional charges related to these closures in the three months ended September 30, 2010. We incurred additional charges of approximately $0.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to these closures, including charges of $0.4 million primarily related to employee termination and building site cleanup costs. These amounts were included in special charges on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the Glass Operations and Other Operations segment as detailed in the table below.
Other income on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations included a charge of immaterial amounts for the three months ended September 30, 2010, and a charge of $0.1 million for the first nine months of 2010 for the change in fair value of ineffective natural gas hedges related to our Syracuse China operation. These amounts were included in the Other Operations segment.
The following table summarizes the facility closure charges in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, 2011 | | Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
(dollars in thousands) | Glass Operations | | Other Operations | | Total | | Glass Operations | | Other Operations | | Total |
Employee termination cost & other | $ | — |
| | $ | 167 |
| | $ | 167 |
| | $ | 29 |
| | $ | 76 |
| | $ | 105 |
|
Building site clean-up & fixed asset write-down | — |
| | (116 | ) | | (116 | ) | | — |
| | 283 |
| | 283 |
|
Included in special charges | — |
| | 51 |
| | 51 |
| | 29 |
| | 359 |
| | 388 |
|
Ineffectiveness of natural gas hedge | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (130 | ) | | (130 | ) |
Included in other (expense) income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (130 | ) | | (130 | ) |
Total pretax charge | $ | — |
| | $ | 51 |
| | $ | 51 |
| | $ | 29 |
| | $ | 489 |
| | $ | 518 |
|
The following reflects the balance sheet activity related to the facility closure charge for the period ended September 30, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balances at December 31, 2010 | | Total Charge to Earnings | | Cash (payments) receipts | | Inventory & Fixed asset Write Downs | | Non-cash Utilization | | Balances at September 30, 2011 |
(dollars in thousands) | | | | | |
Building site clean-up & fixed asset write-down | $ | 151 |
| | $ | (116 | ) | | $ | (5 | ) | | $ | 21 |
| | $ | (51 | ) | | $ | — |
|
Employee termination cost & other | 301 |
| | 167 |
| | (314 | ) | | — |
| | (154 | ) | | — |
|
Total | $ | 452 |
| | $ | 51 |
| | $ | (319 | ) | | $ | 21 |
| | $ | (205 | ) | | $ | — |
|
The activities related to our closure of the Syracuse China manufacturing facility and our Mira Loma, California distribution center are complete. The following reflects the total cumulative expenses to date (incurred from the fourth quarter of 2008 through the Balance Sheet date) related to the facility closure activity:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | Glass Operations | | Other Operations | | Charges To Date |
Inventory write-down | $ | 192 |
| | $ | 10,541 |
| | $ | 10,733 |
|
Pension & postretirement welfare | — |
| | 4,448 |
| | 4,448 |
|
Fixed asset depreciation | — |
| | 966 |
| | 966 |
|
Included in cost of sales | 192 |
| | 15,955 |
| | 16,147 |
|
Employee termination cost & other | 548 |
| | 6,149 |
| | 6,697 |
|
Building site clean-up & fixed asset write-down | 177 |
| | 10,418 |
| | 10,595 |
|
Included in special charges | 725 |
| | 16,567 |
| | 17,292 |
|
Ineffectiveness of natural gas hedge | — |
| | 745 |
| | 745 |
|
Included in other (income) expense | — |
| | 745 |
| | 745 |
|
Total pretax charge to date | $ | 917 |
| | $ | 33,267 |
| | $ | 34,184 |
|
Fixed Asset and Inventory Write-down
In August 2010, we wrote down decorating assets in our Shreveport, Louisiana facility as a result of our decision to outsource our U.S. decorating business. See Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for further discussion.
During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recorded a $0.2 million and $0.3 million income adjustment, respectively, to special charges on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the Glass Operations segment. In the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recorded charges of $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, to write down inventory and spare machine parts. These amounts were included in cost of sales on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the Glass Operations segment.
In the third quarter of 2010, we recorded a charge of $0.6 million to write down inventory and spare machine parts. This amount was included in cost of sales on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the Glass Operations segment. Charges of $0.7 million were recorded in the third quarter of 2010 for site cleanup and fixed assets write down. This amount was included in special charges on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the Glass Operations segment. No employee related costs were incurred, as all employees were reassigned in the facility.
The following reflects the balance sheet activity related to the fixed asset and inventory write-down charge as of September 30, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserve Balances at December 31, 2010 | | Total Charge to Earnings | | Cash (payments) receipts | | Inventory & Fixed asset Write Downs | | Reserve Balances at September 30, 2011 |
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | |
Building site clean-up & fixed asset write-down | $ | 316 |
| | $ | (135 | ) | | $ | (39 | ) | | $ | (142 | ) | | $ | — |
|
Total | $ | 316 |
| | $ | (135 | ) | | $ | (39 | ) | | $ | (142 | ) |
| $ | — |
|
The activities related to our write-down of decorating fixed assets and inventory are complete.
During the second quarter of 2010, we wrote down certain after-processing equipment within our Glass Operations segment. The non-cash charge of $2.7 million was included in cost of sales on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the second quarter of 2011, we received a $1.0 million credit from the supplier of this equipment. This was recorded in selling, general and administrative expense and other income on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Summary of Total Special Charges
The following table summarizes the special charges mentioned above and their classifications in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Cost of sales | $ | 154 |
| | $ | 578 |
| | $ | 197 |
| | $ | 3,265 |
|
Selling general & administrative | — |
| | — |
| | (805 | ) | | — |
|
Special charges (income) | (232 | ) | | 700 |
| | (281 | ) | | 1,088 |
|
Other (income) expense | — |
| | — |
| | (216 | ) | | 130 |
|
Total (income) expense | $ | (78 | ) | | $ | 1,278 |
| | $ | (1,105 | ) | | $ | 4,483 |
|
The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the United States statutory tax rate primarily due to valuation allowances, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in accruals related to uncertain tax positions and tax planning structures. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 we had $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of gross unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest and penalties.
Further, our current and future provision for income taxes for 2011 is significantly impacted by valuation allowances. In the United States, China, the Netherlands and Portugal we have recorded valuation allowances against our deferred income tax assets. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we did not release any valuation allowance. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we reduced our valuation allowance by $0 and $1.1 million. The release of the valuation allowance in 2010 was related to the utilization of net operating losses in Mexico. In assessing the need for recording a valuation allowance, we weigh all available positive and negative evidence. Examples of the evidence we consider are cumulative losses in recent years, losses expected in early future years, a history of potential tax benefits expiring unused, and whether there was an unusual, infrequent or extraordinary item to be considered. Based on our analysis of all available evidence, we intend to maintain these allowances until it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets will be realized.
Income tax payments consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Total income tax payments (refunds), net | $ | 1,843 |
| | $ | (160 | ) | | $ | 13,029 |
| | $ | 5,379 |
|
Less: credits or offsets | 842 |
| | 83 |
| | 4,340 |
| | 920 |
|
Cash paid (refunded), net | $ | 1,001 |
| | $ | (243 | ) | | $ | 8,689 |
| | $ | 4,459 |
|
| |
7. | Pension and Non-pension Postretirement Benefits |
We have pension plans covering the majority of our employees. Benefits generally are based on compensation for salaried employees and job grade and length of service for hourly employees. Our policy is to fund pension plans such that sufficient assets will be available to meet future benefit requirements. In addition, we have an unfunded supplemental employee retirement plan (SERP) that covers salaried U.S.-based employees of Libbey hired before January 1, 2006. The U.S. pension plans cover the salaried U.S.-based employees of Libbey hired before January 1, 2006 and most hourly U.S.-based employees (excluding employees hired at Shreveport after 2008 and employees hired at Toledo after September 30, 2010). The non-U.S. pension plans cover the employees of our wholly owned subsidiaries in the Netherlands and Mexico. The plan in Mexico is not funded.
The components of our net pension expense, including the SERP, are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months ended September 30, | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans | | Total |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Service cost | $ | 1,372 |
| | $ | 1,106 |
| | $ | 390 |
| | $ | 383 |
| | $ | 1,762 |
| | $ | 1,489 |
|
Interest cost | 4,014 |
| | 3,800 |
| | 1,190 |
| | 1,103 |
| | 5,204 |
| | 4,903 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (4,307 | ) | | (4,141 | ) | | (566 | ) | | (612 | ) | | (4,873 | ) | | (4,753 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prior service cost | 540 |
| | 582 |
| | 77 |
| | 30 |
| | 617 |
| | 612 |
|
Loss | 1,166 |
| | 760 |
| | 113 |
| | 98 |
| | 1,279 |
| | 858 |
|
Pension expense | $ | 2,785 |
| | $ | 2,107 |
| | $ | 1,204 |
| | $ | 1,002 |
| | $ | 3,989 |
| | $ | 3,109 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans | | Total |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Service cost | $ | 4,118 |
| | $ | 4,006 |
| | $ | 1,275 |
| | $ | 1,184 |
| | $ | 5,393 |
| | $ | 5,190 |
|
Interest cost | 12,042 |
| | 11,922 |
| | 3,811 |
| | 3,348 |
| | 15,853 |
| | 15,270 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (12,879 | ) | | (12,513 | ) | | (1,756 | ) | | (1,795 | ) | | (14,635 | ) | | (14,308 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prior service cost | 1,622 |
| | 1,746 |
| | 249 |
| | 92 |
| | 1,871 |
| | 1,838 |
|
Loss | 3,496 |
| | 2,716 |
| | 373 |
| | 308 |
| | 3,869 |
| | 3,024 |
|
Pension expense | $ | 8,399 |
| | $ | 7,877 |
| | $ | 3,952 |
| | $ | 3,137 |
| | $ | 12,351 |
| | $ | 11,014 |
|
We provide certain retiree health care and life insurance benefits covering our U.S and Canadian salaried and non-union hourly employees hired before January 1, 2004 and a majority of our U.S. union hourly employees (excluding employees hired at Shreveport after 2008 and employees hired at Toledo after September 30, 2010). Employees are generally eligible for benefits upon retirement and completion of a specified number of years of creditable service. Benefits for most hourly retirees are determined by collective bargaining. The U.S. non-pension postretirement plans cover the hourly and salaried U.S.-based employees of Libbey (excluding those mentioned above). The non-U.S. non-pension postretirement plans cover the retirees and active employees of Libbey who are located in Canada. The postretirement benefit plans are not funded.
The provision for our non-pension postretirement benefit expense consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months ended September 30, | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans | | Total |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Service cost | $ | 340 |
| | $ | 242 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 340 |
| | $ | 242 |
|
Interest cost | 908 |
| | 877 |
| | 30 |
| | 30 |
| | 938 |
| | 907 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prior service gain | 105 |
| | 296 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 105 |
| | 296 |
|
Loss / (gain) | 277 |
| | 299 |
| | (5 | ) | | (8 | ) | | 272 |
| | 291 |
|
Non-pension postretirement benefit expense | $ | 1,630 |
| | $ | 1,714 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 1,655 |
| | $ | 1,736 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans | | Total |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Service cost | $ | 1,019 |
| | $ | 1,020 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1,020 |
| | $ | 1,021 |
|
Interest cost | 2,724 |
| | 2,713 |
| | 92 |
| | 92 |
| | 2,816 |
| | 2,805 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prior service gain | 316 |
| | 292 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 316 |
| | 292 |
|
Loss / (gain) | 831 |
| | 771 |
| | (13 | ) | | (21 | ) | | 818 |
| | 750 |
|
Non-pension postretirement benefit expense | $ | 4,890 |
| | $ | 4,796 |
| | $ | 80 |
| | $ | 72 |
| | $ | 4,970 |
| | $ | 4,868 |
|
In 2011, we expect to utilize approximately $31.7 million in cash to fund our pension plans and pay for non-pension postretirement benefits. Of that amount, $14.4 million and $24.6 million of cash were utilized in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care Education and Affordability Reconciliation Act (the Acts) were signed into law. The Acts contain provisions that could impact our accounting for retiree medical benefits in future periods. Based on the analysis to date, the impact of provisions in the Acts that are reasonably determinable is not expected to have a material impact on our postretirement benefit plans. We will continue to assess the provisions of the Acts and may consider plan amendments and design changes in future periods to better align these plans with the provisions of the Acts.
| |
8. | Net Income per Share of Common Stock |
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands, except earnings per share) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Numerators for earnings per share — | | | | | | | |
—Net income that is available to common shareholders | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
| | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share — | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | 20,181,558 |
| | 18,148,127 |
| | 20,079,412 |
| | 16,927,812 |
|
Effect of stock options and restricted stock units | 457,247 |
| | 391,486 |
| | 524,769 |
| | 424,602 |
|
Effect of warrants | 76,341 |
| | 1,746,983 |
| | 122,295 |
| | 3,305,639 |
|
Total effect of dilutive securities | 533,588 |
| | 2,138,469 |
| | 647,064 |
| | 3,730,241 |
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share — | | | | | | | |
—Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions | 20,715,146 |
| | 20,286,596 |
| | 20,726,476 |
| | 20,658,053 |
|
Basic earnings per share: | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 3.98 |
|
Diluted earnings per share: | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 3.26 |
|
In October 2009, we entered into a transaction with Merrill Lynch PCG, Inc. to exchange existing 16.0 percent payment-in-kind notes due in December 2011, for a combination of debt and equity securities (Exchange Transaction). As part of the Exchange Transaction, we issued warrants conveying the right to purchase, for $0.01 per share, 3,466,856 shares of Libbey Inc. common stock. These warrants were exercised and shares were issued in August 2010.
When applicable, diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive impact of warrants and restricted stock units. Diluted shares also include the impact of in-the-money employee stock options, which are calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the tax-effected proceeds that hypothetically would be received from the exercise of all in-the-money options are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.
We utilize derivative financial instruments to hedge certain interest rate risks associated with our long-term debt, commodity price risks associated with forecasted future natural gas requirements and foreign exchange rate risks associated with transactions denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. Most of these derivatives, except for certain natural gas contracts originally designated to hedge expected purchases at Syracuse China and the foreign currency contracts, qualify for hedge accounting since the hedges are highly effective, and we have designated and documented contemporaneously the hedging relationships involving these derivative instruments. While we intend to continue to meet the conditions for hedge accounting, if hedges do not qualify as highly effective or if we do not believe that forecasted transactions would occur, the changes in the fair value of the derivatives used as hedges would be reflected in our earnings. All of these contracts were accounted for under FASB ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging.”
Fair Values
The following table provides the fair values of our derivative financial instruments for the periods presented:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Asset Derivatives: |
(dollars in thousands) | | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC 815: | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value |
Interest rate contract | | Derivative asset | | $ | 4,075 |
| | Derivative asset | | $ | 2,536 |
|
Natural gas contracts | | Derivative asset | | — |
| | Derivative asset | | 53 |
|
Total designated | | | | 4,075 |
| | | | 2,589 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC 815: | | | | | | | | |
Currency contracts | | Prepaid and other current assets | | 458 |
| | Prepaid and other current assets | | — |
|
Total undesignated | | | | 458 |
| | | | — |
|
Total | | | | $ | 4,533 |
| | | | $ | 2,589 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Liability Derivatives: |
(dollars in thousands) | | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC 815: | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value | | Balance Sheet Location | | Fair Value |
Natural gas contracts | | Derivative liability | | $ | 1,891 |
| | Derivative liability | | $ | 3,117 |
|
Natural gas contracts | | Other long-term liabilities | | 81 |
| | Other long-term liabilities | | — |
|
Total designated | | | | 1,972 |
| | | | 3,117 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC 815: | | | | | | | | |
Natural gas contracts | | Derivative liability | | — |
| | Derivative liability | | 124 |
|
Currency contracts | | Derivative liability | | — |
| | Derivative liability | | 151 |
|
Total undesignated | | | | — |
| | | | 275 |
|
Total | | | | $ | 1,972 |
| | | | $ | 3,392 |
|
Interest Rate Swaps as Fair Value Hedges
In the first quarter of 2010, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $100.0 million that is to mature in 2015. The swap was executed in order to convert a portion of the Senior Secured Note fixed rate debt into floating rate debt and maintain a capital structure containing appropriate amounts of fixed and floating rate debt. In August 2010, $10.0 million of the swap was called for a premium of $0.3 million. In August 2011, an additional $10.0 million of the swap was called for a premium of $0.3 million. As of September 30, 2011, the notional amount of the interest rate swap agreement is $80.0 million.
Our fixed-to-floating interest rate swap is designated and qualifies as a fair value hedge. The change in the fair value of the derivative instrument related to the future cash flows (gain or loss on the derivative), as well as the offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged long-term debt attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in current earnings. We include the gain or loss on the hedged long-term debt in other income, along with the offsetting loss or gain on the related interest rate swap, on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other income
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Interest rate swap | | $ | 740 |
| | $ | 1,740 |
| | $ | 1,539 |
| | $ | 3,229 |
|
Related long-term debt | | (535 | ) | | (1,977 | ) | | (842 | ) | | (3,050 | ) |
Net impact on other income | | $ | 205 |
| | $ | (237 | ) | | $ | 697 |
| | $ | 179 |
|
Commodity Future Contracts Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
We use commodity futures contracts related to forecasted future North American natural gas requirements. The objective of these futures contracts and other derivatives is to limit the fluctuations in prices paid due to price movements in the underlying commodity. We consider our forecasted natural gas requirements in determining the quantity of natural gas to hedge. We combine the forecasts with historical observations to establish the percentage of forecast eligible to be hedged, typically ranging from 40 percent to 70 percent of our anticipated requirements, up to eighteen months in the future. The fair values of these instruments are determined from market quotes. As of September 30, 2011, we had commodity contracts for 2,640,000 million British Thermal Units (BTUs) of natural gas. At December 31, 2010, we had commodity contracts for 3,090,000 million BTUs of natural gas.
All of our natural gas derivatives qualify and are designated as cash flow hedges at September 30, 2011. Hedge accounting is applied only when the derivative is deemed to be highly effective at offsetting changes in fair values or anticipated cash flows of the hedged item or transaction. For hedged forecasted transactions, hedge accounting is discontinued if the forecasted transaction is no longer probable to occur, and any previously deferred gains or losses would be recorded to earnings immediately. Changes in the effective portion of the fair value of these hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The ineffective portion of the change in the fair value of a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge is recognized in current earnings. As the natural gas contracts mature, the accumulated gains (losses) for the respective contracts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to current expense in cost of sales in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. We paid additional cash of $1.3 million and $2.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $3.4 million and $5.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, due to the difference between the fixed unit rate of our natural gas contracts and the variable unit rate of our natural gas cost from suppliers. Based on our current valuation, we estimate that accumulated losses currently carried in accumulated other comprehensive loss that will be reclassified into earnings over the next twelve months will result in $1.9 million of expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Amount of derivative gain/(loss) recognized in OCI (effective portion)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging relationships: | | | | | | | | |
Natural gas contracts | | $ | (1,587 | ) | | $ | (2,667 | ) | | $ | (2,223 | ) | | $ | (6,816 | ) |
Total | | $ | (1,587 | ) | | $ | (2,667 | ) | | $ | (2,223 | ) | | $ | (6,816 | ) |
Gain / (loss) reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
to Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (effective portion)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Derivative: | Location: | | | | | | | | |
Natural gas contracts | Cost of sales | | $ | (1,340 | ) | | $ | (2,097 | ) | | $ | (3,382 | ) | | $ | (5,213 | ) |
Total impact on net (loss) income | | $ | (1,340 | ) | | $ | (2,097 | ) | | $ | (3,382 | ) | | $ | (5,213 | ) |
Currency Contracts
Our foreign currency exposure arises from transactions denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. During 2010, we entered into a series of foreign currency contracts to sell Canadian dollars. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had contracts for C$8.2 million and C$18.7 million, respectively. The fair values of these instruments are determined from market quotes. The values of these derivatives will change over time as cash receipts and payments are made and as market conditions change.
Gains and losses for derivatives that were not designated as hedging instruments are recorded in current earnings as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Derivative: | Location: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Currency contracts | Other income | | $ | 934 |
| | $ | (491 | ) | | $ | 608 |
| | $ | 148 |
|
Total | | | $ | 934 |
| | $ | (491 | ) | | $ | 608 |
| | $ | 148 |
|
We do not believe we are exposed to more than a nominal amount of credit risk in our interest rate swap, natural gas hedges and currency contracts as the counterparties are established financial institutions. The counterparty for the Interest Rate Agreement is rated AA and the counterparties for the other derivative agreements are rated BBB+ or better as of September 30, 2011, by Standard and Poor’s.
Components of comprehensive income (net of tax) are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Net income | | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
| | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
|
Minimum pension and non-pension postretirement liability and intangible pension asset, net of tax | | 3,488 |
| | 7,420 |
| | 13,296 |
| | 11,330 |
|
Effect of derivatives, net of tax | | (254 | ) | | (573 | ) | | 1,046 |
| | (289 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations | | (5,949 | ) | | 10,221 |
| | 3,291 |
| | (5,441 | ) |
Total comprehensive income | | $ | 4,412 |
| | $ | 19,414 |
| | $ | 39,165 |
| | $ | 72,923 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of tax) is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | | Effect of Exchange Rate Fluctuation | | Cash Flow Derivatives | | Minimum Pension and Non-Pension Retirement Liability and Intangible Pension Asset | | Total Accumulated Comprehensive Loss |
Balance on December 31, 2010 | | $ | (2,661 | ) | | $ | (1,121 | ) | | $ | (107,164 | ) | | $ | (110,946 | ) |
2011 change | | 3,291 |
| | 1,131 |
| | 12,480 |
| | 16,902 |
|
Translation effect | | — |
| | (40 | ) | | 1,030 |
| | 990 |
|
Tax effect | | — |
| | (45 | ) | | (214 | ) | | (259 | ) |
Balance on September 30, 2011 | | $ | 630 |
| | $ | (75 | ) | | $ | (93,868 | ) | | $ | (93,313 | ) |
| |
11. | Condensed Consolidated Guarantor Financial Statements |
Libbey Glass is a direct, 100 percent owned subsidiary of Libbey Inc. and is the issuer of the Senior Secured Notes. The obligations of Libbey Glass under the Senior Secured Notes are fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by Libbey Inc. and by certain indirect, 100 percent owned domestic subsidiaries of Libbey Inc., as described below. All are related parties that are included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010.
At September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, Libbey Inc.’s indirect, 100 percent owned domestic subsidiaries were Syracuse China Company, World Tableware Inc., LGA4 Corp., LGA3 Corp., The Drummond Glass Company, LGC Corp., Dane Holding Co. (known as Traex Company prior to April 28, 2011), Libbey.com LLC, LGFS Inc., and LGAC LLC (collectively, Subsidiary Guarantors). The following tables contain Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of (a) the parent, Libbey Inc., (b) the issuer, Libbey Glass, (c) the Subsidiary Guarantors, (d) the indirect subsidiaries of Libbey Inc. that are not Subsidiary Guarantors (collectively, Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries), (e) the consolidating elimination entries, and (f) the consolidated totals.
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, 2011 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net sales | $ | — |
| | $ | 104,363 |
| | $ | 17,393 |
| | $ | 106,831 |
| | $ | (21,341 | ) | | $ | 207,246 |
|
Freight billed to customers | — |
| | 137 |
| | 174 |
| | 200 |
| | — |
| | 511 |
|
Total revenues | — |
| | 104,500 |
| | 17,567 |
| | 107,031 |
| | (21,341 | ) | | 207,757 |
|
Cost of sales | — |
| | 85,442 |
| | 12,783 |
| | 85,989 |
| | (21,341 | ) | | 162,873 |
|
Gross profit | — |
| | 19,058 |
| | 4,784 |
| | 21,042 |
| | — |
| | 44,884 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | — |
| | 15,587 |
| | 1,704 |
| | 9,448 |
| | — |
| | 26,739 |
|
Special charges | — |
| | (232 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (232 | ) |
Income (loss) from operations | — |
| | 3,703 |
| | 3,080 |
| | 11,594 |
| | — |
| | 18,377 |
|
Other income (expense) | — |
| | 1,083 |
| | (101 | ) | | 1,255 |
| | — |
| | 2,237 |
|
Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes | — |
| | 4,786 |
| | 2,979 |
| | 12,849 |
| | — |
| | 20,614 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | 7,838 |
| | — |
| | 2,721 |
| | — |
| | 10,559 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes | — |
| | (3,052 | ) | | 2,979 |
| | 10,128 |
| | — |
| | 10,055 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | — |
| | 134 |
| | — |
| | 2,794 |
| | — |
| | 2,928 |
|
Net income (loss) | — |
| | (3,186 | ) | | 2,979 |
| | 7,334 |
| | — |
| | 7,127 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries | 7,127 |
| | 10,313 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (17,440 | ) | | — |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,979 |
| | $ | 7,334 |
| | $ | (17,440 | ) | | $ | 7,127 |
|
The following represents the total special items included in the above Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (see notes 5 and 14):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, 2011 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Cost of sales | $ | — |
| | $ | 154 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 154 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | — |
| | 2,091 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,091 |
|
Special charges | — |
| | (232 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (232 | ) |
Other (income) expense | — |
| | — |
| | 81 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 81 |
|
Total pretax special items | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,013 |
| | $ | 81 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,094 |
|
Special items net of tax | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,013 |
| | $ | 81 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,094 |
|
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net sales | $ | — |
| | $ | 97,576 |
| | $ | 20,768 |
| | $ | 99,919 |
| | $ | (18,256 | ) | | $ | 200,007 |
|
Freight billed to customers | — |
| | 146 |
| | 212 |
| | 99 |
| | — |
| | 457 |
|
Total revenues | — |
| | 97,722 |
| | 20,980 |
| | 100,018 |
| | (18,256 | ) | | 200,464 |
|
Cost of sales | — |
| | 80,221 |
| | 15,739 |
| | 81,075 |
| | (18,256 | ) | | 158,779 |
|
Gross profit | — |
| | 17,501 |
| | 5,241 |
| | 18,943 |
| | — |
| | 41,685 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | — |
| | 15,118 |
| | 2,424 |
| | 7,793 |
| | — |
| | 25,335 |
|
Special charges | — |
| | 700 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 700 |
|
Income (loss) from operations | — |
| | 1,683 |
| | 2,817 |
| | 11,150 |
| | — |
| | 15,650 |
|
Other income (expense) | — |
| | 418 |
| | (16 | ) | | (379 | ) | | — |
| | 23 |
|
Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes | — |
| | 2,101 |
| | 2,801 |
| | 10,771 |
| | — |
| | 15,673 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | 10,542 |
| | — |
| | 1,313 |
| | — |
| | 11,855 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes | — |
| | (8,441 | ) | | 2,801 |
| | 9,458 |
| | — |
| | 3,818 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | — |
| | 502 |
| | 18 |
| | 952 |
| | — |
| | 1,472 |
|
Net income (loss) | — |
| | (8,943 | ) | | 2,783 |
| | 8,506 |
| | — |
| | 2,346 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries | 2,346 |
| | 11,289 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (13,635 | ) | | — |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 2,346 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
| | $ | 2,783 |
| | $ | 8,506 |
| | $ | (13,635 | ) | | $ | 2,346 |
|
The following represents the total special items included in the above Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (see notes 4 and 5):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Cost of sales | $ | — |
| | $ | 578 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 578 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | — |
| | 1,096 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,096 |
|
Special Charges | — |
| | 700 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 700 |
|
Total pretax special items | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,374 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,374 |
|
Special items net of tax | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,374 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,374 |
|
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net sales | $ | — |
| | $ | 299,287 |
| | 57,580 |
| | 297,583 |
| | (52,176 | ) | | $ | 602,274 |
|
Freight billed to customers | — |
| | 491 |
| | 744 |
| | 525 |
| | — |
| | 1,760 |
|
Total revenues | — |
| | 299,778 |
| | 58,324 |
| | 298,108 |
| | (52,176 | ) | | 604,034 |
|
Cost of sales | — |
| | 240,893 |
| | 42,621 |
| | 241,830 |
| | (52,176 | ) | | 473,168 |
|
Gross profit | — |
| | 58,885 |
| | 15,703 |
| | 56,278 |
| | — |
| | 130,866 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | — |
| | 43,182 |
| | 6,129 |
| | 28,054 |
| | — |
| | 77,365 |
|
Special charges | — |
| | (332 | ) | | 51 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (281 | ) |
Income (loss) from operations | — |
| | 16,035 |
| | 9,523 |
| | 28,224 |
| | — |
| | 53,782 |
|
Other income (expense) | — |
| | (1,694 | ) | | 3,253 |
| | 3,945 |
| | — |
| | 5,504 |
|
Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes | — |
| | 14,341 |
| | 12,776 |
| | 32,169 |
| | — |
| | 59,286 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | 24,528 |
| | — |
| | 8,401 |
| | — |
| | 32,929 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes | — |
| | (10,187 | ) | | 12,776 |
| | 23,768 |
| | — |
| | 26,357 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | — |
| | 764 |
| | 55 |
| | 4,006 |
| | — |
| | 4,825 |
|
Net income (loss) | — |
| | (10,951 | ) | | 12,721 |
| | 19,762 |
| | — |
| | 21,532 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries | 21,532 |
| | 32,483 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (54,015 | ) | | — |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 12,721 |
| | $ | 19,762 |
| | $ | (54,015 | ) | | $ | 21,532 |
|
The following represents the total special items included in the above Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (see notes 4, 5 and 14):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Cost of sales | $ | — |
| | $ | 197 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 197 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | — |
| | 1,706 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,706 |
|
Special charges | — |
| | (332 | ) | | 51 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (281 | ) |
Other expense (income) | — |
| | 2,803 |
| | (3,240 | ) | | (3,661 | ) | | — |
| | (4,098 | ) |
Total pretax special items | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,374 |
| | $ | (3,189 | ) | | $ | (3,661 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,476 | ) |
Special items net of tax | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,374 |
| | $ | (3,189 | ) | | $ | (3,661 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,476 | ) |
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net sales | $ | — |
| | $ | 287,273 |
| | $ | 63,488 |
| | $ | 272,714 |
| | $ | (46,528 | ) | | $ | 576,947 |
|
Freight billed to customers | — |
| | 471 |
| | 641 |
| | 199 |
| | — |
| | 1,311 |
|
Total revenues | — |
| | 287,744 |
| | 64,129 |
| | 272,913 |
| | (46,528 | ) | | 578,258 |
|
Cost of sales | — |
| | 230,569 |
| | 46,081 |
| | 224,543 |
| | (46,528 | ) | | 454,665 |
|
Gross profit | — |
| | 57,175 |
| | 18,048 |
| | 48,370 |
| | — |
| | 123,593 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | — |
| | 41,369 |
| | 7,012 |
| | 24,497 |
| | — |
| | 72,878 |
|
Special charges | — |
| | 729 |
| | 359 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,088 |
|
Income (loss) from operations | — |
| | 15,077 |
| | 10,677 |
| | 23,873 |
| | — |
| | 49,627 |
|
Other income (expense) | — |
| | 56,809 |
| | (158 | ) | | 1,057 |
| | — |
| | 57,708 |
|
Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes | — |
| | 71,886 |
| | 10,519 |
| | 24,930 |
| | — |
| | 107,335 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | 29,676 |
| | (6 | ) | | 3,573 |
| | — |
| | 33,243 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes | — |
| | 42,210 |
| | 10,525 |
| | 21,357 |
| | — |
| | 74,092 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | — |
| | (241 | ) | | 76 |
| | 6,934 |
| | — |
| | 6,769 |
|
Net income (loss) | — |
| | 42,451 |
| | 10,449 |
| | 14,423 |
| | — |
| | 67,323 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries | 67,323 |
| | 24,872 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (92,195 | ) | | — |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 67,323 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
| | $ | 10,449 |
| | $ | 14,423 |
| | $ | (92,195 | ) | | $ | 67,323 |
|
The following represents the total special items included in the above Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (see note 4 and 5):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Cost of sales | $ | — |
| | $ | (367 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,687 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,320 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | — |
| | 1,096 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,096 |
|
Special charges | — |
| | 729 |
| | 359 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,088 |
|
Other expense (income) | — |
| | (56,792 | ) | | 130 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (56,662 | ) |
Total pretax special items | $ | — |
| | $ | (55,334 | ) | | $ | 489 |
| | $ | 2,687 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (52,158 | ) |
Special items net of tax | $ | — |
| | $ | (55,334 | ) | | $ | 489 |
| | $ | 2,687 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (52,158 | ) |
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
(dollars in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| September 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Cash and equivalents | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,182 |
| | $ | 357 |
| | $ | 22,044 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 24,583 |
|
Accounts receivable — net | — |
| | 43,761 |
| | 4,644 |
| | 45,042 |
| | — |
| | 93,447 |
|
Inventories — net | — |
| | 63,937 |
| | 18,642 |
| | 88,638 |
| | — |
| | 171,217 |
|
Other current assets | — |
| | 19,500 |
| | 3,467 |
| | 12,982 |
| | (22,049 | ) | | 13,900 |
|
Total current assets | — |
| | 129,380 |
| | 27,110 |
| | 168,706 |
| | (22,049 | ) | | 303,147 |
|
Other non-current assets | — |
| | 18,760 |
| | 8 |
| | 32,635 |
| | (17,919 | ) | | 33,484 |
|
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries | 54,643 |
| | 345,199 |
| | 207,643 |
| | (24,818 | ) | | (582,667 | ) | | — |
|
Goodwill and purchased intangible assets — net | — |
| | 26,833 |
| | 12,347 |
| | 149,079 |
| | — |
| | 188,259 |
|
Total other assets | 54,643 |
| | 390,792 |
| | 219,998 |
| | 156,896 |
| | (600,586 | ) | | 221,743 |
|
Property, plant and equipment — net | — |
| | 70,916 |
| | 399 |
| | 192,122 |
| | — |
| | 263,437 |
|
Total assets | $ | 54,643 |
| | $ | 591,088 |
| | $ | 247,507 |
| | $ | 517,724 |
| | $ | (622,635 | ) | | $ | 788,327 |
|
Accounts payable | $ | — |
| | $ | 12,612 |
| | $ | 1,357 |
| | $ | 38,348 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 52,317 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities | — |
| | 59,011 |
| | 25,126 |
| | 38,762 |
| | (24,033 | ) | | 98,866 |
|
Notes payable and long-term debt due within one year | — |
| | 227 |
| | — |
| | 2,992 |
| | — |
| | 3,219 |
|
Total current liabilities | — |
| | 71,850 |
| | 26,483 |
| | 80,102 |
| | (24,033 | ) | | 154,402 |
|
Long-term debt | — |
| | 360,397 |
| | — |
| | 42,658 |
| | — |
| | 403,055 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | — |
| | 129,361 |
| | 12,009 |
| | 50,792 |
| | (15,935 | ) | | 176,227 |
|
Total liabilities | — |
| | 561,608 |
| | 38,492 |
| | 173,552 |
| | (39,968 | ) | | 733,684 |
|
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit) | 54,643 |
| | 29,480 |
| | 209,015 |
| | 344,172 |
| | (582,667 | ) | | 54,643 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit) | $ | 54,643 |
| | $ | 591,088 |
| | $ | 247,507 |
| | $ | 517,724 |
| | $ | (622,635 | ) | | $ | 788,327 |
|
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
(dollars in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2010 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Cash and equivalents | $ | — |
| | $ | 58,277 |
| | $ | 293 |
| | $ | 17,688 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 76,258 |
|
Accounts receivable — net | — |
| | 37,099 |
| | 5,360 |
| | 49,642 |
| | — |
| | 92,101 |
|
Inventories — net | — |
| | 52,398 |
| | 19,902 |
| | 75,846 |
| | — |
| | 148,146 |
|
Other current assets | — |
| | (2,634 | ) | | 10,960 |
| | 10,518 |
| | (12,407 | ) | | 6,437 |
|
Total current assets | — |
| | 145,140 |
| | 36,515 |
| | 153,694 |
| | (12,407 | ) | | 322,942 |
|
Other non-current assets | — |
| | 8,344 |
| | 2,779 |
| | 41,169 |
| | (19,134 | ) | | 33,158 |
|
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries | 11,266 |
| | 360,784 |
| | 189,171 |
| | (32,151 | ) | | (529,070 | ) | | — |
|
Goodwill and purchased intangible assets — net | — |
| | 26,833 |
| | 15,761 |
| | 149,880 |
| | — |
| | 192,474 |
|
Total other assets | 11,266 |
| | 395,961 |
| | 207,711 |
| | 158,898 |
| | (548,204 | ) | | 225,632 |
|
Property, plant and equipment — net | — |
| | 72,892 |
| | 4,862 |
| | 192,643 |
| | — |
| | 270,397 |
|
Total assets | $ | 11,266 |
| | $ | 613,993 |
| | $ | 249,088 |
| | $ | 505,235 |
| | $ | (560,611 | ) | | $ | 818,971 |
|
Accounts payable | $ | — |
| | $ | 13,514 |
| | $ | 2,926 |
| | $ | 42,655 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 59,095 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities | — |
| | 48,092 |
| | 27,811 |
| | 34,430 |
| | (12,407 | ) | | 97,926 |
|
Notes payable and long-term debt due within one year | — |
| | 227 |
| | — |
| | 2,915 |
| | — |
| | 3,142 |
|
Total current liabilities | — |
| | 61,833 |
| | 30,737 |
| | 80,000 |
| | (12,407 | ) | | 160,163 |
|
Long-term debt | — |
| | 398,039 |
| | — |
| | 45,944 |
| | — |
| | 443,983 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | — |
| | 131,100 |
| | 21,964 |
| | 69,629 |
| | (19,134 | ) | | 203,559 |
|
Total liabilities | — |
| | 590,972 |
| | 52,701 |
| | 195,573 |
| | (31,541 | ) | | 807,705 |
|
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit) | 11,266 |
| | 23,021 |
| | 196,387 |
| | 309,662 |
| | (529,070 | ) | | 11,266 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit) | $ | 11,266 |
| | $ | 613,993 |
| | $ | 249,088 |
| | $ | 505,235 |
| | $ | (560,611 | ) | | $ | 818,971 |
|
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, 2011 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net income (loss) | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,979 |
| | $ | 7,334 |
| | $ | (17,440 | ) | | $ | 7,127 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 3,119 |
| | 19 |
| | 7,219 |
| | — |
| | 10,357 |
|
Other operating activities | (7,127 | ) | | (28,646 | ) | | (3,139 | ) | | (702 | ) | | 17,440 |
| | (22,174 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | — |
| | (18,400 | ) | | (141 | ) | | 13,851 |
| | — |
| | (4,690 | ) |
Additions to property, plant & equipment | — |
| | (5,122 | ) | | (27 | ) | | (2,910 | ) | | — |
| | (8,059 | ) |
Other investing activities | — |
| | — |
| | 158 |
| | 65 |
| | — |
| | 223 |
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities | — |
| | (5,122 | ) | | 131 |
| | (2,845 | ) | | — |
| | (7,836 | ) |
Net borrowings (repayments) | — |
| | (49 | ) | | — |
| | (6,729 | ) | | — |
| | (6,778 | ) |
Other financing activities | — |
| | (19 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (19 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | — |
| | (68 | ) | | — |
| | (6,729 | ) | | — |
| | (6,797 | ) |
Exchange effect on cash | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (403 | ) | | — |
| | (403 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in cash | — |
| | (23,590 | ) | | (10 | ) | | 3,874 |
| | — |
| | (19,726 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | — |
| | 25,772 |
| | 367 |
| | 18,170 |
| | — |
| | 44,309 |
|
Cash at end of period | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,182 |
| | $ | 357 |
| | $ | 22,044 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 24,583 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net income (loss) | $ | 2,346 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
| | $ | 2,783 |
| | $ | 8,506 |
| | $ | (13,635 | ) | | $ | 2,346 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 3,571 |
| | 184 |
| | 6,285 |
| | — |
| | 10,040 |
|
Other operating activities | (2,346 | ) | | (16,818 | ) | | (2,783 | ) | | (6,854 | ) | | 13,635 |
| | (15,166 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | — |
| | (10,901 | ) | | 184 |
| | 7,937 |
| | — |
| | (2,780 | ) |
Additions to property, plant & equipment | — |
| | (3,278 | ) | | (62 | ) | | (4,403 | ) | | — |
| | (7,743 | ) |
Other investing activities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities | — |
| | (3,278 | ) | | (62 | ) | | (4,403 | ) | | — |
| | (7,743 | ) |
Net borrowings (repayments) | — |
| | 160 |
| | — |
| | (1,038 | ) | | — |
| | (878 | ) |
Other financing activities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | — |
| | 160 |
| | — |
| | (1,038 | ) | | — |
| | (878 | ) |
Exchange effect on cash | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 796 |
| | — |
| | 796 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash | — |
| | (14,019 | ) | | 122 |
| | 3,292 |
| | — |
| | (10,605 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | — |
| | 33,137 |
| | 246 |
| | 12,790 |
| | — |
| | 46,173 |
|
Cash at end of period | $ | — |
| | $ | 19,118 |
| | $ | 368 |
| | $ | 16,082 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 35,568 |
|
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net income (loss) | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 12,721 |
| | $ | 19,762 |
| | $ | (54,015 | ) | | $ | 21,532 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 10,694 |
| | 278 |
| | 21,293 |
| | — |
| | 32,265 |
|
Other operating activities | (21,532 | ) | | (37,814 | ) | | (26,405 | ) | | (19,917 | ) | | 54,015 |
| | (51,653 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | — |
| | (5,588 | ) | | (13,406 | ) | | 21,138 |
| | — |
| | 2,144 |
|
Additions to property, plant & equipment | — |
| | (9,207 | ) | | (30 | ) | | (17,220 | ) | | — |
| | (26,457 | ) |
Other investing activities | — |
| | 33 |
| | 13,500 |
| | 4,731 |
| | — |
| | 18,264 |
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities | — |
| | (9,174 | ) | | 13,470 |
| | (12,489 | ) | | — |
| | (8,193 | ) |
Net borrowings (repayments) | — |
| | (40,146 | ) | | — |
| | (4,624 | ) | | — |
| | (44,770 | ) |
Other financing activities | — |
| | (1,187 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,187 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | — |
| | (41,333 | ) | | — |
| | (4,624 | ) | | — |
| | (45,957 | ) |
Exchange effect on cash | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 331 |
| | — |
| | 331 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash | — |
| | (56,095 | ) | | 64 |
| | 4,356 |
| | — |
| | (51,675 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | — |
| | 58,277 |
| | 293 |
| | 17,688 |
| | — |
| | 76,258 |
|
Cash at end of period | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,182 |
| | $ | 357 |
| | $ | 22,044 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 24,583 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
| Libbey Inc. (Parent) | | Libbey Glass (Issuer) | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net income (loss) | $ | 67,323 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
| | $ | 10,449 |
| | $ | 14,423 |
| | $ | (92,195 | ) | | $ | 67,323 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 11,282 |
| | 570 |
| | 19,142 |
| | — |
| | 30,994 |
|
Other operating activities | (67,323 | ) | | (102,014 | ) | | (10,994 | ) | | (21,014 | ) | | 92,195 |
| | (109,150 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | — |
| | (23,409 | ) | | 25 |
| | 12,551 |
| | — |
| | (10,833 | ) |
Additions to property, plant & equipment | — |
| | (6,322 | ) | | (76 | ) | | (12,724 | ) | | — |
| | (19,122 | ) |
Other investing activities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities | — |
| | (6,322 | ) | | (76 | ) | | (12,724 | ) | | — |
| | (19,122 | ) |
Net borrowings (repayments) | — |
| | 35,366 |
| | — |
| | (823 | ) | | — |
| | 34,543 |
|
Other financing activities | — |
| | (23,903 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (23,903 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | — |
| | 11,463 |
| | — |
| | (823 | ) | | — |
| | 10,640 |
|
Exchange effect on cash | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (206 | ) | | — |
| | (206 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in cash | — |
| | (18,268 | ) | | (51 | ) | | (1,202 | ) | | — |
| | (19,521 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | — |
| | 37,386 |
| | 419 |
| | 17,284 |
| | — |
| | 55,089 |
|
Cash at end of period | $ | — |
| | $ | 19,118 |
| | $ | 368 |
| | $ | 16,082 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 35,568 |
|
We have revised our segment structure to reflect our reorganization from geographical regions to one global company. Under this new structure, we have two reportable segments: Glass Operations and Other Operations. The classifications are defined as follows:
Glass Operations — includes worldwide sales of glass tableware and other glass products from domestic and international subsidiaries.
Other Operations — includes worldwide sales of ceramic dinnerware, metal tableware, hollowware and serveware and plastic items. Plastic items were sold through April 28, 2011.
Our measure of profit for our reportable segments is Segment Earnings before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) and excludes amounts related to certain items we consider not representative of ongoing operations as well as certain retained corporate costs. We use Segment EBIT, along with net sales and selected cash flow information, to evaluate performance and to allocate resources. Segment EBIT for reportable segments includes an allocation of some corporate expenses based on both a percentage of sales and direct billings based on the costs of services performed.
Certain activities not related to any particular reportable segment are reported within retained corporate costs. These costs include certain headquarter, administrative and facility costs, and other costs that are global in nature and are not allocable to the reporting segments. Corporate assets primarily include finance fees, capitalized software, and income tax assets.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in note 2. We do not have any customers who represent 10 percent or more of total sales. Inter-segment sales are consummated at arm’s length and are reflected in eliminations below.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Net Sales: | | | | | | | |
Glass Operations | $ | 190,813 |
| | $ | 180,225 |
| | $ | 547,353 |
| | $ | 516,184 |
|
Other Operations | 16,597 |
| | 19,953 |
| | 55,448 |
| | 61,203 |
|
Eliminations | (164 | ) | | (171 | ) | | (527 | ) | | (440 | ) |
Consolidated | $ | 207,246 |
| | $ | 200,007 |
| | $ | 602,274 |
| | $ | 576,947 |
|
Segment EBIT: | | | | | | | |
Glass Operations | $ | 29,801 |
| | $ | 24,928 |
| | $ | 77,165 |
| | $ | 71,542 |
|
Other Operations | 2,978 |
| | 2,772 |
| | 9,619 |
| | 11,011 |
|
Total Segment EBIT | $ | 32,779 |
| | $ | 27,700 |
| | $ | 86,784 |
| | $ | 82,553 |
|
Reconciliation of Segment EBIT to Net Income: | | | | | | | |
Segment EBIT | $ | 32,779 |
| | $ | 27,700 |
| | $ | 86,784 |
| | $ | 82,553 |
|
Retained corporate costs | (10,071 | ) | | (9,653 | ) | | (29,974 | ) | | (27,376 | ) |
(Loss) gain on redemption of debt (note 4) | — |
| | — |
| | (2,803 | ) | | 56,792 |
|
(Expense) gain on sale of Traex assets | (81 | ) | | — |
| | 3,240 |
| | — |
|
Gain on sale of land (1) | — |
| | — |
| | 3,445 |
| | — |
|
Restructuring and other charges (note 5) | 78 |
| | (1,278 | ) | | 1,105 |
| | (4,483 | ) |
Other special charges (2) | (2,091 | ) | | (1,096 | ) | | (2,511 | ) | | (151 | ) |
Interest expense | (10,559 | ) | | (11,855 | ) | | (32,929 | ) | | (33,243 | ) |
Income taxes | (2,928 | ) | | (1,472 | ) | | (4,825 | ) | | (6,769 | ) |
Net income | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
| | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
|
Depreciation & Amortization: | | | | | | | |
Glass Operations | $ | 9,999 |
| | $ | 9,517 |
| | $ | 30,779 |
| | $ | 29,386 |
|
Other Operations | 11 |
| | 178 |
| | 257 |
| | 549 |
|
Corporate | 347 |
| | 345 |
| | 1,229 |
| | 1,059 |
|
Consolidated | $ | 10,357 |
| | $ | 10,040 |
| | $ | 32,265 |
| | $ | 30,994 |
|
Capital Expenditures: | | | | | | | |
Glass Operations | $ | 7,511 |
| | $ | 6,466 |
| | $ | 25,280 |
| | $ | 17,267 |
|
Other Operations | 12 |
| | 62 |
| | 15 |
| | 76 |
|
Corporate | 536 |
| | 1,215 |
| | 1,162 |
| | 1,779 |
|
Consolidated | $ | 8,059 |
| | $ | 7,743 |
| | $ | 26,457 |
| | $ | 19,122 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
Segment Assets: | | | |
Glass Operations | $ | 732,759 |
| | $ | 752,058 |
|
Other Operations | 35,762 |
| | 45,944 |
|
Corporate | 19,806 |
| | 20,969 |
|
Consolidated | $ | 788,327 |
| | $ | 818,971 |
|
___________________________________
| |
(1) | Net gain on the sale of land at our Royal Leerdam facility. |
| |
(2) | The three month period ended September 30, 2011 represents CEO transition expenses, primarily non-cash charges related to accelerated vesting of previously issued equity compensation. The nine month period ended September 30, 2011 represents CEO transition expenses including $1.7 million of non-cash charges related to accelerated vesting of previously issued equity compensation, $0.4 million of relocation expenses and $0.4 million of other fees. The three month period ending September 30, 2010 represents equity offering fees related to the secondary stock offering with the nine month period offset by an insurance claim recovery. |
FASB ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:
| |
• | Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| |
• | Level 2 — Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly. |
| |
• | Level 3 — Unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value at | | Fair Value at |
Asset / (Liability) | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
(dollars in thousands) | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Commodity futures natural gas contracts | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,972 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,972 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (3,188 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (3,188 | ) |
Currency contracts | — |
| | 458 |
| | — |
| | 458 |
| | — |
| | (151 | ) | | — |
| | (151 | ) |
Interest rate agreements | — |
| | 4,075 |
| | — |
| | 4,075 |
| | — |
| | 2,536 |
| | — |
| | 2,536 |
|
Net derivative asset (liability) | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,561 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,561 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (803 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (803 | ) |
The fair values of our commodity futures natural gas contracts and currency contracts are determined using observable market inputs. The fair value of our interest rate agreement is based on the market standard methodology of netting the discounted expected future fixed cash receipts and the discounted future variable cash payments. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate forward curves. Since these inputs are observable in active markets over the terms that the instruments are held, the derivatives are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy. We also evaluate Company and counterparty risk in determining fair values. The total derivative position is recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, with $0.4 million in prepaid and other current assets, $4.1 million in derivative asset, $1.9 million in derivative liability and $0.1 million in other long-term liabilities as of September 30, 2011. As of December 31, 2010, $2.6 million was recorded in derivative asset and $3.4 million in derivative liability on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The commodity futures natural gas contracts and interest rate agreements are hedges of either recorded assets or liabilities or anticipated transactions. Changes in values of the underlying hedged assets and liabilities or anticipated transactions are not reflected in the above table.
Items included in other income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Gain on sale of land at Royal Leerdam | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,445 |
| | $ | — |
|
(Loss) gain on sale of Traex assets (1) | (81 | ) | | — |
| | 3,240 |
| | — |
|
Gain (loss) on currency translation | 1,705 |
| | (59 | ) | | 130 |
| | 374 |
|
Income on hedging activities | 503 |
| | 38 |
| | 990 |
| | 353 |
|
Other non-operating income | 110 |
| | 44 |
| | 502 |
| | 189 |
|
Other income | $ | 2,237 |
| | $ | 23 |
| | $ | 8,307 |
| | $ | 916 |
|
(1) On April 28, 2011, we sold substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary (now known as Dane Holding Co.) to the Vollrath Company for $13.0 million, resulting in a gain of $3.2 million.
We are currently undergoing an unclaimed property audit that is being conducted by various state authorities. The property subject to review in this audit process generally includes unclaimed wages, vendor payments and customer refunds. State escheat laws generally require entities to report and remit abandoned and unclaimed property. Failure to timely report and remit the property can result in assessments that include interest and penalties, in addition to the payment of the escheat liability itself. We may have obligations associated with unclaimed property in an estimated amount of approximately $2.7 million.
While we have recorded this estimate as expense of $1.8 million and $0.9 million in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three month and 9 month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively, it is too early to determine the ultimate outcome of these audits and, as a result, our actual obligations may be less than or greater than the amount we have recorded. At this time, we believe that the impact of these adjustments is not material to our results of operations.
| |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors. These factors are summarized in “Risk Factors” under Item 1A of “Part II — Other Information” and are more fully discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Overview
Economic market conditions continued to be challenging during the first three quarters of 2011, and we expect them to remain challenging, in particular in the U.S. and Europe, at least for the remainder of 2011. Nevertheless, we experienced solid net sales growth in our China sales region in the third quarter of 2011, and shipments to our U.S. and Canadian foodservice customers improved modestly during the third quarter, with sales during August and September to foodservice customers being fairly strong. Including the impact of currency, net sales to our European region also increased during the third quarter, although net sales to our European region declined during the quarter when the impact of currency is excluded. The decline is a reflection of the uncertain macroeconomic environment in Europe. Our shipments to customers in Mexico declined slightly during the quarter as a result of economic conditions and a variety of other factors (including credit holds, mix shifts and delays in shipments) that are being resolved.
We continued to reduce leverage during the third quarter by prepaying 30.0 million RMB (approximately $4.7 million) on our loan in China; that installment was not due until July 2012. In addition, on March 25, 2011, we redeemed an aggregate principal amount of $40.0 million of our Senior Secured Notes due 2015. See note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Effective with the first quarter of 2011, we reorganized in order to achieve a global view of our business. As a result, we consolidated our geographical regions and moved to two operating segments: Glass Operations and Other Operations. These operating segments are defined as follows:
Glass Operations—includes worldwide sales of glass tableware and other glass operations from domestic and international subsidiaries.
Other Operations—includes worldwide sales of ceramic dinnerware, metal tableware, hollowware and serveware and plastic items. Plastic items were sold through April 28, 2011.
When discussing sales by region throughout this section, region is defined as our sales force’s regional sales accountability. This definition is used beginning in 2011, and prior year sales by region have been recomputed using this new definition.
Results of Operations — Third Quarter 2011 Compared with Third Quarter 2010
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Variance |
(dollars in thousands, except percentages and per-share amounts) | 2011 | | 2010 | | In dollars | | In percent |
Net sales | $ | 207,246 |
| | $ | 200,007 |
| | $ | 7,239 |
| | 3.6 | % |
Gross profit (2) | $ | 44,884 |
| | $ | 41,685 |
| | $ | 3,199 |
| | 7.7 | % |
Gross profit margin | 21.7 | % | | 20.8 | % | | | | |
Income from operations (IFO) (2)(3) | $ | 18,377 |
| | $ | 15,650 |
| | $ | 2,727 |
| | 17.4 | % |
IFO margin | 8.9 | % | | 7.8 | % | | | | |
Earnings before interest and income taxes (EBIT)(1)(2)(3)(4) | $ | 20,614 |
| | $ | 15,673 |
| | $ | 4,941 |
| | 31.5 | % |
EBIT margin | 9.9 | % | | 7.8 | % | | | | |
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)(1)(2)(3)(4) | $ | 30,971 |
| | $ | 25,713 |
| | $ | 5,258 |
| | 20.4 | % |
EBITDA margin | 14.9 | % | | 12.9 | % | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | $ | 33,065 |
| | $ | 28,087 |
| | $ | 4,978 |
| | 17.7 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA margin | 16.0 | % | | 14.0 | % | | | | |
Net income (2)(3)(4) | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
| | $ | 4,781 |
| | 203.8 | % |
Net income margin | 3.4 | % | | 1.2 | % | | | | |
Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | 0.22 |
| | 183.3 | % |
__________________________________
| |
(1) | We believe that EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP financial measures, are useful metrics for evaluating our financial performance, as they are measures that we use internally to assess our performance. See Table 1 for a reconciliation of net income to EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and a further discussion as to the reasons we believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful. |
| |
(2) | Includes an asset write-down of $0.2 million and $0.6 million related to the closure of the decorating operations at our Shreveport manufacturing facility in 2011 and 2010, respectively. (See note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). |
| |
(3) | In addition to item (2) above, the 2011 period includes a restructuring credit of $0.2 million related to the closure of the decorating operations at our Shreveport manufacturing facility and CEO transition expenses of $2.1 million, which primarily represent non-cash charges related to accelerated vesting of previously issued equity compensation. The 2010 period includes a charge of $1.1 million related to our secondary stock offering and restructuring charges of $0.7 million related to the closure of the decorating operations at our Shreveport manufacturing facility. (See notes 4 and 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.) |
| |
(4) | In addition to item (3) above, the 2011 period includes $0.1 million of expenses in connection with the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary. (See note 14 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). |
Net Sales
For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, net sales increased 3.6 percent to $207.2 million, compared to $200.0 million in the year-ago quarter. Excluding the impact of currency, net sales increased 1.3 percent. Net sales in the Glass Operations segment were $190.8 million, an increase of 5.9 percent (3.3 percent excluding the impact of currency on net sales), compared to $180.2 million in the third quarter of 2010. Primary contributors to the increased net sales were a 47.9 percent increase in net sales within our China sales region (40.2 percent excluding the impact of currency), and a 5.2 percent increase in net sales within our European sales region (4.0 percent decrease excluding the impact of currency) compared to the year-ago quarter. The 40.2 percent increase in our China sales region, excluding the impact of currency, is the result of our change in our go-to-market strategy in the domestic Chinese market. The decrease in the European sales region, excluding the currency impact, is a result of the uncertain macroeconomic conditions in Europe. Net sales within our Mexico region decreased 2.1 percent and decreased 5.2 percent when the currency impact is excluded. Factors contributing to the decline in net sales in our Mexico region included general economic conditions and a variety of other factors that are being resolved (including credit holds, mix shifts and delays in shipments). Net sales to U.S. and Canadian foodservice glassware customers increased 4.8 percent, as shipments to foodservice customers were strong in August and September. Net sales to U.S. and Canadian retail customers increased 8.8 percent during the third quarter of 2011 as a result of increased shipments and a more favorable product mix.
Net sales in the Other Operations segment were $16.6 million, compared to $20.0 million in the prior-year quarter, a decrease of 16.8 percent. The decline in net sales in the Other Operations segment is attributable to a $4.3 million decline in net sales of Traex products compared to the prior-year quarter, partially offset by a 7.2 percent increase in net sales to World Tableware customers and a 2.6 percent increase in net sales of Syracuse China products. The increase in net sales to World Tableware customers and of Syracuse China products was due to increased volume and a stronger mix of products sold. The decrease in net sales of Traex products in the third quarter of 2011 is a result of the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary in late April 2011. The decline in net sales of Traex products accounted for more than the entire $3.4 million decrease in net sales for Other Operations.
Gross Profit
For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, gross profit increased by $3.2 million, or 7.7 percent, to $44.9 million, compared to $41.7 million in the year-ago quarter. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to 21.7 percent, compared to 20.8 percent in the year-ago quarter. The improvement in gross profit is attributable to higher net sales of $7.8 million and a favorable currency impact of $0.2 million, primarily due to the impact of changes in the value of the Euro and the Mexican peso. Offsetting these favorable items for the third quarter 2011 were distribution cost increases of $1.6 million related to the higher level of sales and increased diesel fuel costs for freight, increased costs of production of $1.4 million primarily driven by a change in mix of items produced and a non-cash charge for unclaimed property audits of $1.8 million. In 2010, gross profit was affected by the $2.7 million write-down of certain after-processing equipment recorded in our Glass Operations segment, offset by a $0.9 million insurance claim recovery.
Income From Operations
Income from operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 increased $2.7 million, to $18.4 million, compared to $15.7 million in the year-ago quarter. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales was 8.9 percent in the third quarter of 2011, compared to 7.8 percent in the year-ago quarter. The improvement in income from operations is a result of higher gross profit
(discussed above), offset by a $1.4 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses primarily due to a $1.7 million non-cash charge related to accelerated vesting of previously issued equity compensation and a $0.9 million non-cash charge for unclaimed property audits, offset by a reduction in workers' compensation expense. The third quarter of 2010 included a $0.7 million special charge for the write-down of decorating assets at our Shreveport, Louisiana facility.
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes (EBIT)
EBIT for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 increased by $4.9 million, or 31.5 percent, to $20.6 million in 2011 from $15.7 million in 2010. EBIT as a percentage of net sales increased to 9.9 percent in the third quarter of 2011, compared to 7.8 percent in the year-ago quarter. Key contributors to the increase in EBIT compared to the year-ago quarter are the same as those discussed above under Income From Operations. Other income for the third quarter also includes favorable fluctuations in foreign currency translation gains of $1.8 million and income on hedging activities of $0.5 million.
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization (EBITDA)
EBITDA increased by $5.3 million in the third quarter of 2011, to $31.0 million, compared to $25.7 million in the year-ago quarter. As a percentage of net sales, EBITDA increased to 14.9 percent for the third quarter 2011, from 12.9 percent in the year-ago quarter. The key contributors to the increase in EBITDA were those factors discussed above under EBIT.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $5.0 million in the third quarter of 2011, to $33.1 million, compared to $28.1 million, which included a $1.0 million contribution related to Traex, in the year-ago quarter. As a percentage of net sales, Adjusted EBITDA was 16.0 percent for the third quarter of 2011, compared to 14.0 percent in the year-ago quarter. The key contributors to the increase in Adjusted EBITDA were those factors discussed above under EBITDA and a favorable change of $0.3 million in the items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. CEO transition expenses of $2.1 million were excluded in the current year quarter, while $1.1 million of equity offering fees related to the secondary stock offering and $1.3 million of charges related to the write-off of decorating assets at our Shreveport, Louisiana manufacturing facility were excluded in the prior year quarter.
Net Income and Diluted Net Income Per Share
We recorded net income of $7.1 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2011, compared to $2.3 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. Net income as a percentage of net sales was 3.4 percent in the third quarter of 2011, compared to 1.2 percent in the year-ago quarter. The improvement in net income and diluted net income per share is generally due to the factors discussed in EBIT above, and a $1.3 million reduction in interest expense offset by a $1.5 million increase in the provision for income taxes. The reduction in interest expense is the result of the $40.0 million debt repayment completed in March 2011. The effective tax rate was 29.1 percent for the quarter compared to 38.6 percent in the year-ago quarter. The effective tax rate was influenced by jurisdictions with recorded valuation allowances, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in accruals related to uncertain tax positions and tax planning structures.
Results of Operations — First Nine Months 2011 Compared with First Nine Months 2010
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, | | Variance |
(dollars in thousands, except percentages and per-share amounts) | 2011 | | 2010 | | In dollars | | In percent |
Net sales | $ | 602,274 |
| | $ | 576,947 |
| | $ | 25,327 |
| | 4.4 | % |
Gross profit (2) | $ | 130,866 |
| | $ | 123,593 |
| | $ | 7,273 |
| | 5.9 | % |
Gross profit margin | 21.7 | % | | 21.4 | % | | | | |
Income from operations (IFO)(2)(3) | $ | 53,782 |
| | $ | 49,627 |
| | $ | 4,155 |
| | 8.4 | % |
IFO margin | 8.9 | % | | 8.6 | % | | | | |
Earnings before interest and income taxes (EBIT)(1)(2)(3)(4) | $ | 59,286 |
| | $ | 107,335 |
| | $ | (48,049 | ) | | (44.8 | )% |
EBIT margin | 9.8 | % | | 18.6 | % | | | | |
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)(1)(2)(3)(4) | $ | 91,551 |
| | $ | 138,329 |
| | $ | (46,778 | ) | | (33.8 | )% |
EBITDA margin | 15.2 | % | | 24.0 | % | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | $ | 89,075 |
| | $ | 86,171 |
| | $ | 2,904 |
| | 3.4 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA margin | 14.8 | % | | 14.9 | % | | | | |
Net income (2)(3)(4) | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
| | $ | (45,791 | ) | | (68.0 | )% |
Net income margin | 3.6 | % | | 11.7 | % | | | | |
Diluted net income per share | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 3.26 |
| | $ | (2.22 | ) | | (68.1 | )% |
____________________________________
| |
(1) | We believe that EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP financial measures, are useful metrics for evaluating our financial performance, as they are measures that we use internally to assess our performance. See Table 1 for a reconciliation of net income to EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and a further discussion as to the reasons we believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful. |
| |
(2) | 2011 includes an asset write-down of $0.2 million related to the closure of our Syracuse, New York, manufacturing facility and the decorating operations at our Shreveport manufacturing facility. 2010 includes a fixed asset write-down of $2.7 million related to after-processing equipment, a credit of $0.9 million for an insurance claim recovery in our Glass Operations segment, and $0.6 million related to the closure of the decorating operations at our Shreveport manufacturing facility. (See note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). |
| |
(3) | In addition to item (2) above, the 2011 period includes CEO transition expenses of $2.5 million ($1.7 million of non-cash charges related to accelerated vesting of previously issued equity compensation, $0.4 million of relocation expenses and $0.4 million of search fees and other), net of an equipment credit of $0.8 million and a restructuring credit of $0.3 million related to the closure of the decorating operations at our Shreveport manufacturing facility. The 2010 period includes a $1.1 million charge related to fees for the secondary stock offering, $0.7 million related to the closure of the decorating operations at our Shreveport manufacturing facility, and a restructuring charge of $0.4 million related to the closing of our Syracuse China manufacturing facility and our Mira Loma distribution center. (See notes 4 and 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). |
| |
(4) | In addition to item (3) above, the 2011 period includes a net gain of $3.2 million related to the gain on the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary, income of $3.4 million related to the gain on the sale of land at our Royal Leerdam facility, a loss of $2.8 million related to the redemption of $40.0 million of Senior Secured Notes and an equipment credit of $0.2 million. The 2010 period includes income of $56.8 million related to the gain on redemption of the New PIK Notes and restructuring charges of $0.1 million related to the closure of our Syracuse China manufacturing facility and our Mira Loma distribution center. (See notes 4, 5 and 14 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). |
Net Sales
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net sales increased 4.4 percent to $602.3 million, compared to $576.9 million in the year-ago period. Excluding the impact of currency, net sales increased 2.2 percent. Net sales in the Glass Operations segment were $547.4 million, an increase of 6.0 percent (3.6 percent excluding the impact of currency on net sales), compared to $516.2 million in the first nine months of 2010. Primary contributors to the increased net sales included a 60.5 percent increase in net sales within our China sales region (53.2 percent excluding the impact of currency), an 11.0 percent increase in net sales within our European sales region (3.4 percent excluding the impact of currency), and an 11.2 percent increase in net sales within our International region (11.2 percent excluding the impact of currency), compared to the year-ago period. The 53.2 percent increase in our China sales region, excluding the impact of currency, is the result of our change in our go-to-market strategy in the domestic Chinese market. The increases, excluding the currency impact, in the European and International sales regions are the result of increased shipments to customers. Including the currency impact, net sales within
our Mexico region were flat. Excluding the currency impact, net sales within our Mexico region declined 4.9 percent as a result of decreased sales within our business to business channel. Net sales to U.S. and Canadian foodservice glassware customers increased 2.2 percent, net sales to U.S. and Canadian retail customers increased 3.8 percent and net sales to U.S. and Canadian business to business customers increased 9.3 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010. The 9.3 percent increase in U.S. and Canadian business to business is the result of increased shipments to those customers for various OEM uses. Net sales in the Other Operations segment were $55.4 million, compared to $61.2 million in the prior-year. The decline in net sales in the Other Operations segment is attributable to a $7.5 million decrease in net sales of Traex products as a result of the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary in late April 2011. Partially offsetting the decline in net sales of Traex products were a 4.5 percent increase in net sales of Syracuse China products, as we had a stronger mix of products sold, and a 3.1 percent increase in net sales to World Tableware customers resulting from increased volume.
Gross Profit
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, gross profit increased by $7.3 million, or 5.9 percent, to $130.9 million, compared to $123.6 million in the year-ago period. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to 21.7 percent, compared to 21.4 percent in the year-ago period. Excluding currency impact, the improvement in gross profit was attributable to higher net sales of $12.4 million and a decrease in natural gas of $3.5 million. A favorable currency impact contributed another $1.9 million, primarily due to the changes in the value of the Euro and the Mexican peso. Partially offsetting the favorable items for the first nine months of 2011 was the lost production we experienced in Mexico due to a short-term raw material issue and the lost production we experienced in Holland due to minor flooding. These two situations, which have been resolved, negatively affected gross profit by approximately $1.0 million. In addition, we experienced an increase in distribution costs of $4.0 million related to the higher level of sales and diesel fuel costs for freight, an increase in direct materials (primarily packaging) of $3.1 million and a non-cash charge for unclaimed property audits of $1.8 million. In 2010, gross profit included the $2.7 million write-down of certain after-processing equipment recorded in our Glass Operations segment, partially offset by a $0.9 million insurance claim recovery.
Income From Operations
Income from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased $4.2 million, to $53.8 million, compared to $49.6 million in the year-ago period. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales was 8.9 percent in the first nine months of 2011 and 8.6 percent in the same 2010 period. The $4.2 million improvement in income from operations is a result of higher sales volume, as the gross profit margin (discussed above) increased to 21.7 percent in the current year to date period versus 21.4 percent in the prior year period. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $4.5 million for the 2011 period compared to the prior year. Of the increase in selling, general and administrative expense, $1.3 million is the result of currency exchange rates, $2.5 million is attributable to CEO transition expenses primarily related to a non-cash charge for accelerated vesting of previously issued equity compensation and $0.9 million is a non-cash charge for unclaimed property audits of $0.9 million.
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes (EBIT)
EBIT for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $59.3 million, compared to $107.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. EBIT as a percentage of net sales decreased to 9.8 percent in the first nine months of 2011, compared to 18.6 percent in the year-ago period. EBIT for the first nine months of 2010 included a $56.8 million gain on redemption of debt, net of certain transaction expenses. See note 4 for a further discussion of this gain. Other income increased by $7.4 million in 2011 compared to 2010 due to the $3.2 million gain on the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary, the $3.4 million gain on the sale of land at our facility located in the Netherlands, and an additional $0.6 million of income on hedging activities as compared to the prior-year nine month period.
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization (EBITDA)
EBITDA decreased by $46.8 million, or 33.8 percent, in the first nine months of 2011, to $91.6 million, compared to $138.3 million in the year-ago period. As a percentage of net sales, EBITDA was 15.2 percent for the first nine months of 2011, compared to 24.0 percent in the year-ago period. The key contributors to the decrease in EBITDA were the factors discussed above under EBIT.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $2.9 million, or 3.4 percent, in the first nine months of 2011, to $89.1 million, compared to $86.2 million, which included a $2.4 million contribution related to Traex, in the year-ago period. As a percentage of net sales, Adjusted EBITDA was 14.8 percent for the first nine months of 2011, compared to 14.9 percent in the year-ago period. The key
contributors to the increase in Adjusted EBITDA were the factors discussed above under EBITDA, and the exclusion of a $2.8 million loss on redemption of debt in 2011, a $3.4 million gain on the 2011 sale of land at our Royal Leerdam facility, a $3.2 million gain on the April 2011 sale of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary, an equipment credit of $1.0 million in 2011, $2.5 million of CEO transition expenses in 2011, a $56.8 million gain on redemption of debt in 2010, a $2.7 million fixed asset write down of after-processing equipment in our Glass Operations segment in 2010, $1.1 million of equity offering fees, a $0.9 million insurance claim recovery in 2010 and a $1.8 million facility closure charge in 2010.
Net Income and Diluted Net Income Per Share
We recorded net income of $21.5 million, or $1.04 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2011, compared to net income of $67.3 million, or $3.26 per diluted share, in the year-ago period. Net income as a percentage of net sales was 3.6 percent in the first nine months 2011, compared to 11.7 percent in the year-ago period. The reduction in net income and diluted net income per share is generally due to the factors discussed in EBIT above and a $0.3 million reduction in interest expense. The reduction in interest expense is driven by lower debt levels and the impact of the debt refinancing completed in February 2010. The lower debt levels in 2011 partially offset the change in interest rates. The effective tax rate was 18.3 percent for the current nine month period compared to 9.1 percent in the year-ago period. The effective tax rate was influenced by jurisdictions with recorded valuation allowances, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in accruals related to uncertain tax positions and tax planning structures.
Segment Results of Operations
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Variance | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Variance |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | In dollars | | In percent | | 2011 | | 2010 | | In dollars | | In percent |
Net Sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Glass Operations | $ | 190,813 |
| | $ | 180,225 |
| | $ | 10,588 |
| | 5.9 | % | | $ | 547,353 |
| | $ | 516,184 |
| | $ | 31,169 |
| | 6.0 | % |
Other Operations | 16,597 |
| | 19,953 |
| | (3,356 | ) | | (16.8 | )% | | 55,448 |
| | 61,203 |
| | (5,755 | ) | | (9.4 | )% |
Eliminations | (164 | ) | | (171 | ) | | | | | | (527 | ) | | (440 | ) | | | | |
Consolidated | $ | 207,246 |
| | $ | 200,007 |
| | $ | 7,239 |
| | 3.6 | % | | $ | 602,274 |
| | $ | 576,947 |
| | $ | 25,327 |
| | 4.4 | % |
Segment EBIT (1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Glass Operations | $ | 29,801 |
| | $ | 24,928 |
| | $ | 4,873 |
| | 19.5 | % | | $ | 77,165 |
| | $ | 71,542 |
| | $ | 5,623 |
| | 7.9 | % |
Other Operations | 2,978 |
| | 2,772 |
| | 206 |
| | 7.4 | % | | 9,619 |
| | 11,011 |
| | (1,392 | ) | | (12.6 | )% |
Total Segment EBIT | $ | 32,779 |
| | $ | 27,700 |
| | $ | 5,079 |
| | 18.3 | % | | $ | 86,784 |
| | $ | 82,553 |
| | $ | 4,231 |
| | 5.1 | % |
Segment EBIT Margin: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Glass Operations | 15.6 | % | | 13.8 | % | | | | | | 14.1 | % | | 13.9 | % | | | | |
Other Operations | 17.9 | % | | 13.9 | % | | | | | | 17.3 | % | | 18.0 | % | | | | |
Reconciliation of Segment EBIT to Net Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment EBIT | $ | 32,779 |
| | $ | 27,700 |
| | | | | | $ | 86,784 |
| | $ | 82,553 |
| | | | |
Retained corporate costs (2) | (10,071 | ) | | (9,653 | ) | | | | | | (29,974 | ) | | (27,376 | ) | | | | |
(Loss) gain on redemption of debt (note 4) | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | (2,803 | ) | | 56,792 |
| | | | |
(Expense) gain on sale of Traex | (81 | ) | | — |
| | | | | | 3,240 |
| | — |
| | | | |
Gain on sale of land | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | 3,445 |
| | — |
| | | | |
Restructuring and other charges (note 5) | 78 |
| | (1,278 | ) | | | | | | 1,105 |
| | (4,483 | ) | | | | |
Other special charges | (2,091 | ) | | (1,096 | ) | | | | | | (2,511 | ) | | (151 | ) | | | | |
Interest expense | (10,559 | ) | | (11,855 | ) | | | | | | (32,929 | ) | | (33,243 | ) | | | | |
Income taxes | (2,928 | ) | | (1,472 | ) | | | | | | (4,825 | ) | | (6,769 | ) | | | | |
Net income | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
| | | | | | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
| | | | |
____________________________________
| |
(1) | Segment EBIT represents earnings before interest and taxes and excludes amounts related to certain items we consider not representative of ongoing operations as well as certain retained corporate costs. |
| |
(2) | Retained corporate costs include certain headquarter, administrative and facility costs, and other costs that are not allocable to the reporting segments. |
Segment Results of Operations – Third Quarter 2011 Compared to Third Quarter 2010
Glass Operations
For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, net sales increased 5.9 percent (3.3 percent excluding the impact of currency on net sales) to $190.8 million from $180.2 million in the year-ago quarter. Primary contributors to the increased net sales compared to the year-ago quarter included a 47.9 percent increase in net sales within our China sales region (40.2 percent excluding the currency fluctuation) and a 5.2 percent increase in net sales within our European sales region (negative 4.0 percent excluding the Euro currency effect). The 40.2 percent increase in net sales in our China sales region, excluding the impact of currency, is the result of our change in our go-to-market strategy in the domestic Chinese market. The decrease in the European sales region, excluding the effect of the Euro, is the result of lower volume due to the uncertain macroeconomic conditions in Europe. Net sales within our Mexico region decreased 2.1 percent and decreased 5.2 percent excluding the currency impact. Factors contributing to the decline in net sales in our Mexico region included general economic conditions and a variety of other factors that are being resolved (including credit holds, mix shifts and delays in shipments). Net sales to U.S. and Canadian foodservice glassware customers increased 4.8 percent, as shipments to foodservice customers were strong in August and September. Net sales to U.S. and Canadian retail customers increased 8.8 percent during the third quarter of 2011 as a result of increased shipments and a more favorable mix as compared to the third quarter of 2010.
Segment EBIT increased to $29.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to $24.9 million for the year-ago quarter. Segment EBIT as a percentage of net sales increased to 15.6 percent in the third quarter of 2011, compared to 13.8 percent in the year-ago quarter. The primary drivers for the increase are higher sales of $9.3 million and a favorable change of $1.8 million in other income related to foreign currency conversion. Excluding the effects of currency, partially offsetting these increases were a $1.9 million unfavorable impact from the change in mix of items produced, an increase in distribution costs of $2.1 million related to the higher level of sales and increased diesel fuel costs for freight, and a $1.5 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses primarily from labor and benefit expenses. The negative currency impact was $0.3 million.
Other Operations
For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, net sales decreased 16.8 percent to $16.6 million from $20.0 million in the year-ago quarter. The decrease in net sales is primarily attributable to a $4.3 million reduction in net sales of Traex products as a result of the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary in April 2011, partially offset by a 7.2 percent increase in net sales to World Tableware customers and a 2.6 percent increase in Syracuse China product sales from increased volume and a stronger mix of products sold.
Segment EBIT increased by $0.2 million, or 7.4 percent, to $3.0 million for the third quarter of 2011, compared to $2.8 million in the year-ago quarter. Segment EBIT as a percentage of net sales increased to 17.9 percent in the third quarter of 2011, compared to 13.9 percent in the year-ago quarter. The key contributor to the increased Segment EBIT was the increase in sales from Syracuse China and World Tableware, as explained above, and the elimination of Traex's lower margin business.
Segment Results of Operations – First Nine Months 2011 Compared to First Nine Months 2010
Glass Operations
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net sales increased 6.0 percent (3.6 percent excluding the impact of currency on sales), compared to $516.2 million in the first nine months of 2010. Primary contributors to the increased net sales were a 60.5 percent increase in net sales within our China sales region (53.2 percent excluding the effect of currency), an 11.0 percent increase in net sales within our European sales region (3.4 percent excluding the Euro effect), and an 11.2 percent increase in net sales within our International region (11.2 percent excluding the currency fluctuations), compared to the year-ago period. The 53.2 percent increase in our China sales region, excluding the currency affect, is the result of our change in our go-to-market strategy in the domestic Chinese market. The increases, excluding the currency impact, in the European and International sales regions are the result of increased shipments to customers. Net sales within our Mexico region were flat and, excluding the currency impact, decreased 4.9 percent compared to the prior-year period. The decline is the result of decreased sales within our business to business channel. Net sales to U.S. and Canadian foodservice glassware customers increased 2.2 percent, net sales to U.S. and Canadian retail customers increased 3.8 percent and net sales to U.S. and Canadian business to business customers increased 9.3 percent during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010. The 9.3 percent increase in net sales to U.S. and Canadian business to business customers is the result of increased shipments to those customers for various OEM uses.
Segment EBIT increased to $77.2 million for the first nine months of 2011, compared to $71.5 million for the year-ago period.
Segment EBIT as a percentage of net sales increased to 14.1 percent in the first three quarters of 2011, compared to 13.9 percent in the year-ago period. The primary drivers of the $5.6 million increase in Segment EBIT were a $15.5 million increase in net sales resulting from higher volumes and more favorable mix, excluding the effect of currency, and a $0.5 million favorable currency impact, resulting primarily from changes in value of the Mexican peso and the Euro. Other income includes an unfavorable swing of $0.7 million primarily related to larger foreign currency translation losses versus the prior-year period. In the second quarter, we experienced lost production in Mexico due to a short-term raw material issue and lost production in Holland due to minor flooding. These two situations, which have been resolved, negatively impacted gross profit by approximately $1.0 million. The 2011 period also included increases in distribution costs of $4.6 million related to the higher level of sales and diesel fuel costs for freight, direct materials (primarily packaging) of $3.0 million, and selling, general and administrative expenses of $2.6 million, offset by a decrease in natural gas of $3.5 million.
Other Operations
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net sales decreased 9.4 percent to $55.4 million from $61.2 million in the year-ago period. The decrease in net sales is the result of a $7.5 million reduction in the net sales of Traex products, partially offset by a 3.1 percent increase in net sales to World Tableware customers and a 4.5 percent increase in net sales of Syracuse China product, as we had increased volume and a stronger mix of products sold. The reduction in net sales of Traex products in the first nine months of 2011 is attributable to the sale in late April 2011 of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary.
Segment EBIT decreased by $1.4 million, or 12.6 percent, to $9.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $11.0 million in the year-ago period. Segment EBIT as a percentage of net sales decreased to 17.3 percent in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 18.0 percent in the year-ago period. The key contributor to the decreased Segment EBIT was the decrease in sales volume explained above offset by the $3.2 million gain on the sale of substantially all the assets of our Traex subsidiary.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Balance Sheet and Cash Flows
Cash and Equivalents
At September 30, 2011 our cash balance was $24.6 million, a decrease of $51.7 million from $76.3 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the cash interest payments made on our Senior Secured Notes in February and August, 2011 and the use of cash to redeem 30.0 million RMB (approximately $4.7 million) on our China loan and $40.0 million of Senior Secured Notes in 2011.
Working Capital
The following table presents our working capital components:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Variance |
(dollars in thousands, except percentages and DSO, DIO, DPO and DWC) | | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 | | In dollars | | In percent |
Accounts receivable — net | | $ | 93,447 |
| | $ | 92,101 |
| | $ | 1,346 |
| | 1.5 | % |
DSO (1) | | 41.3 |
| | 42.0 |
| | | | |
Inventories — net | | $ | 171,217 |
| | $ | 148,146 |
| | $ | 23,071 |
| | 15.6 | % |
DIO (2) | | 75.7 |
| | 67.6 |
| | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 52,317 |
| | $ | 59,095 |
| | $ | (6,778 | ) | | (11.5 | )% |
DPO (3) | | 23.1 |
| | 27.0 |
| | | | |
Working capital (4) | | $ | 212,347 |
| | $ | 181,152 |
| | $ | 31,195 |
| | 17.2 | % |
DWC (5) | | 93.9 |
| | 82.6 |
| | | | |
Percentage of net sales | | 25.7 | % | | 22.6 | % | | | | |
DSO, DIO, DPO and DWC are calculated using the last twelve months net sales as the denominator and are based on a 365-day calendar year.
___________________________________________________
| |
(1) | Days sales outstanding (DSO) measures the number of days it takes to turn receivables into cash. |
| |
(2) | Days inventory outstanding (DIO) measures the number of days it takes to turn inventory into cash. |
| |
(3) | Days payable outstanding (DPO) measures the number of days it takes to pay the balances of our accounts payable. |
| |
(4) | Working capital is defined as net accounts receivable plus net inventories less accounts payable. See Table 3 for the |
calculation of this non-GAAP financial measure and for further discussion as to the reasons we believe this non-GAAP financial measure is useful.
| |
(5) | Days working capital (DWC) measures the number of days it takes to turn our working capital into cash. |
Working capital (as defined above) was $212.3 million at September 30, 2011, an increase of $31.2 million from December 31, 2010. Our working capital normally increases during the first nine months of the year due to the seasonality of our business. In particular, inventory normally increases to prepare for seasonally higher orders that typically exceed production levels in the later part of the year. This quarter, our increase is primarily due to higher inventories, as we began to experience the effects of both higher sales and production levels, as well as building inventory for planned maintenance shutdowns. The $6.8 million decrease in accounts payable when compared to the end of 2010 is due to Mexico's accounts payable decreasing $7.5 million ($6.7 million excluding the currency effect). As a result of the factors above, DWC increased from 82.6 at December 31, 2010 to 93.9 at September 30, 2011, and working capital as a percentage of net sales increased to 25.7 percent at September 30, 2011 from 22.6 percent at December 31, 2010. Working capital as a percentage of net sales at September 30, 2011 is improved from that of 27.3 percent at September 30, 2010.
Borrowings
The following table presents our total borrowings:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | Interest Rate | | Maturity Date | | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
Borrowings under ABL Facility | floating | | April 29, 2016 | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Senior Secured Notes | 10.00% | (1) | February 15, 2015 | | 360,000 |
| | 400,000 |
|
Promissory Note | 6.00% | | October, 2011 to September, 2016 | | 1,161 |
| | 1,307 |
|
RMB Loan Contract | floating | | December, 2012 to January, 2014 | | 34,430 |
| | 37,925 |
|
BES Euro Line | floating | | December, 2011 to December, 2013 | | 11,219 |
| | 10,934 |
|
Total borrowings | | | | | 406,810 |
| | 450,166 |
|
Less — unamortized discount | | | | | 4,644 |
| | 6,307 |
|
Plus — carrying value adjustment on debt related to the Interest Rate Agreement (1) | | 4,108 |
| | 3,266 |
|
Total borrowings — net (2) | | | | | $ | 406,274 |
| | $ | 447,125 |
|
____________________________________
| |
(1) | See “Derivatives” below and note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| |
(2) | The total borrowings — net include long-term debt due within one year and long-term debt as stated in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
We had total borrowings of $406.8 million at September 30, 2011, compared to total borrowings of $450.2 million at December 31, 2010. The $43.4 million decrease in borrowings was the result of our redemption, on March 25, 2011, of $40.0 million of Senior Secured Notes, the early repayment of 30.0 million RMB on our RMB Loan Contract and currency conversion fluctuations. The entire increase in the BES Euro Line from December 31, 2010 is the result of a change in exchange rate.
Of our total borrowings, $125.6 million, or approximately 30.9 percent, was subject to variable interest rates at September 30, 2011. A change of one percentage point in such rates would result in a change in interest expense of approximately $1.3 million on an annual basis.
Included in interest expense is the amortization of discounts, warrants and financing fees. These items amounted to $1.0 million and $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $3.3 million and $3.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Cash Flow
The following table presents key drivers to our free cash flow for the third quarter of 2011 and 2010.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Variance |
(dollars in thousands, except percentages) | 2011 | | 2010 | | In dollars | | In percent |
Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (4,690 | ) | | $ | (2,780 | ) | | $ | (1,910 | ) | | (68.7 | )% |
Capital expenditures | (8,059 | ) | | (7,743 | ) | | (316 | ) | | (4.1 | )% |
Net proceeds from sale of Traex | 158 |
| | — |
| | 158 |
| | NM |
Proceeds from asset sales and other | 65 |
| | — |
| | 65 |
| | NM |
Free cash flow (1) | $ | (12,526 | ) | | $ | (10,523 | ) | | $ | (2,003 | ) | | (19.0 | )% |
________________________________________
NM = not meaningful
| |
(1) | We believe that Free cash flow [net cash used in operating activities, less capital expenditures, plus proceeds from asset sales and the sale of Traex] is a useful metric for evaluating our financial performance, as it is a measure we use internally to assess performance. See Table 2 for a reconciliation of net cash provided by (used in) operating activities to Free cash flow and a further discussion as to the reasons we believe this non-GAAP financial measure is useful. |
Our net cash used in operating activities was $4.7 million in the third quarter of 2011, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $2.8 million in the year-ago quarter, an increase in net cash used of $1.9 million. The major factors impacting cash flow from operations were improvements of $4.8 million from net income and $18.3 million from changes in accounts receivable, offset by the unfavorable cash flow impact of $12.4 million from changes in pension and non-pension postretirement benefits, $7.8 million in accounts payable change, $3.4 million in accrued liabilities and prepaid expenses, and $2.7 million in inventories.
Our net cash used in investing activities was $7.8 million and $7.7 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily representing capital expenditures.
Net cash used in financing activities was $6.8 million in the third quarter of 2011, compared to $0.9 million in the year-ago quarter. During the third quarter of 2011, we utilized $2.1 million for repayments on our ABL credit facility, while there were no borrowings or repayments on this facility for the third quarter of 2010. There were $4.7 million of other debt repayments in the third quarter 2011 compared to $0.9 million in the third quarter 2010. Third quarter 2011 debt repayments were primarily related to the repayment of 30.0 million RMB on our loan in China.
Our free cash flow was $(12.5) million during the third quarter of 2011, compared to $(10.5) million in the year-ago quarter, a decrease of $2.0 million. The primary contributor to this change was the $1.9 million decrease in cash flow from operating activities in the current period, as discussed above.
The following table presents key drivers to our free cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine months ended September 30, | | Variance |
(dollars in thousands, except percentages) | 2011 | | 2010 | | In dollars | | In percent |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 2,144 |
| | $ | (10,833 | ) | | $ | 12,977 |
| | 119.8 | % |
Capital expenditures | (26,457 | ) | | (19,122 | ) | | (7,335 | ) | | (38.4 | )% |
Net proceeds from sale of Traex | 13,000 |
| | — |
| | 13,000 |
| | NM |
Proceeds from asset sales and other | 5,264 |
| | — |
| | 5,264 |
| | NM |
Payment of interest on New PIK Notes | — |
| | 29,400 |
| | (29,400 | ) | | 100.0 | % |
Free cash flow (1) | $ | (6,049 | ) | | $ | (555 | ) | | $ | (5,494 | ) | | (989.9 | )% |
________________________________
NM = not meaningful
| |
(1) | We believe that Free cash flow [net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, less capital expenditures, plus proceeds from asset sales and the sale of Traex; further adjusted for payment of interest on New PIK Notes] is a useful metric for evaluating our financial performance, as it is a measure we use internally to assess performance. See Table 2 for a reconciliation of net cash provided by (used in) operating activities to Free cash flow and a further discussion as to the reasons we believe this non-GAAP financial measure is useful. |
Our net cash provided by operating activities was $2.1 million in the first nine months of 2011, compared to net cash used in operating activities of ($10.8) million in the year-ago period, an increase of $13.0 million. The major factors impacting cash
flow from operations were the $45.8 million reduction to net income, $13.1 million from changes in accrued interest and amortization of discounts, warrants and finance fees, $12.4 million from changes in pension and non-pension postretirement benefits, $8.1 million from changes in the income tax accounts, $6.8 million change in (gain) loss on asset sales, offset by $89.0 million of items related to our debt refinancing and $12.3 million from the impact of increased working capital related to increased sales and production.
Our net cash used in investing activities decreased to $8.2 million in the first nine months of 2011, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $19.1 million in the year-ago period, primarily as a result of our receipt in 2011 of the $13.0 million in net proceeds from the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary and $5.3 million in proceeds from asset sales related to land at our Royal Leerdam facility and vacant property in Syracuse, New York, compared to no proceeds in the prior year period. The proceeds were offset by an increase in capital expenditures of $7.3 million for the nine months of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $(46.0) million in the first nine months of 2011, compared to $10.6 million in the year-ago period. During the first nine months of 2011, we redeemed $40.0 million of Senior Secured Notes and prepaid $4.8 million of debt primarily related to the RMB Loan Contract in China. During the same period in 2010, our proceeds from the Senior Secured Notes were more than offset by the repurchase of our floating rate notes, the redemption of the New PIK Notes and payment of debt issuance costs.
Our Free cash flow was ($6.0) million during the first nine months of 2011, compared to ($0.6) million in the year-ago period, a decrease of $5.4 million. The primary contributors to this change were the increase in cash flow from operating activities, which included payment of interest on the New PIK Notes in 2010 and, proceeds from asset sales and the sale of substantially all of the assets of our Traex subsidiary, as discussed above, all offset by a $7.3 million increase in capital expenditures in the current period.
Derivatives
We have an Interest Rate Agreement (Rate Agreement) with respect to $80.0 million of debt in order to convert a portion of the Senior Secured Notes fixed rate debt into floating rate debt and maintain a capital structure containing appropriate amounts of fixed and floating rate debt. The interest rate for our borrowings related to the Rate Agreement at September 30, 2011 is 7.57 percent per year. This Rate Agreement expires on February 15, 2015. Total remaining Senior Secured Notes not covered by the Rate Agreement have a fixed interest rate of 10.0 percent. If the counterparty to this Rate Agreement were to fail to perform, the Rate Agreement would no longer provide the desired results. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparty, which was rated AA as of September 30, 2011, by Standard and Poor’s.
The fair market value for the Rate Agreement at September 30, 2011, was a $4.1 million asset. The fair value of the Rate Agreement is based on the market standard methodology of netting the discounted expected future fixed cash receipts and the discounted future variable cash payments. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate forward curves. We do not expect to cancel this agreement and expect it to mature as originally contracted.
We also use commodity futures contracts related to forecasted future North American natural gas requirements. The objective of these futures contracts is to reduce the effects of fluctuations and price movements in the underlying commodity. We consider our forecasted natural gas requirements in determining the quantity of natural gas to hedge. We combine the forecasts with historical observations to establish the percentage of forecast eligible to be hedged, typically ranging from 40 percent to 70 percent of our anticipated requirements up to eighteen months in the future. The fair values of these instruments are determined from market quotes. At September 30, 2011, we had commodity futures contracts for 2,640,000 million British Thermal Units (BTUs) of natural gas with a fair market value of a $(2.0) million liability. We have hedged a portion of our forecasted transactions through December 2012. At December 31, 2010, we had commodity futures contracts for 3,090,000 million BTUs of natural gas with a fair market value of a $(3.2) million liability. The counterparties for these derivatives were rated BBB+ or better as of September 30, 2011, by Standard & Poor’s.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Historically, cash flows generated from operations and our borrowing capacity under our ABL Facility have enabled us to meet our cash requirements, including capital expenditures and working capital requirements. As of September 30, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under our ABL Facility, and we had $10.5 million of letters of credit issued under that facility. As a result, we had $85.0 million of unused availability remaining under the ABL Facility at September 30, 2011. In addition, we had $24.6 million of cash on hand at September 30, 2011.
Based on our operating plans and current forecast expectations, we anticipate that our level of cash on hand, cash flows from operations and our borrowing capacity under our amended and restated ABL Facility will provide sufficient cash availability to meet our ongoing liquidity needs.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We sometimes refer to data derived from condensed consolidated financial information but not required by GAAP to be presented in financial statements. Certain of these data are considered “non-GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation G. We believe that non-GAAP data provide investors with a more complete understanding of underlying results in our core business and trends. In addition, we use non-GAAP data internally to assess performance. Although we believe that the non-GAAP financial measures presented enhance investors’ understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP measures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP.
Table 1
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of net income to EBIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Net income | $ | 7,127 |
| | $ | 2,346 |
| | $ | 21,532 |
| | $ | 67,323 |
|
Add: Interest expense | 10,559 |
| | 11,855 |
| | 32,929 |
| | 33,243 |
|
Add: Provision for income taxes | 2,928 |
| | 1,472 |
| | 4,825 |
| | 6,769 |
|
Earnings before interest and income taxes (EBIT) | 20,614 |
| | 15,673 |
| | 59,286 |
| | 107,335 |
|
Add: Depreciation and amortization | 10,357 |
| | 10,040 |
| | 32,265 |
| | 30,994 |
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, deprecation and amortization (EBITDA) | 30,971 |
| | 25,713 |
| | 91,551 |
| | 138,329 |
|
Add: Special items before interest and taxes: | | | | | | | |
Loss (gain) on redemption of debt (see note 4) (1) | — |
| | — |
| | 2,803 |
| | (56,792 | ) |
Facility closure charges (see note 5) (2) | (78 | ) | | 1,278 |
| | (84 | ) | | 1,796 |
|
Gain on sale of land at our Royal Leerdam facility | — |
| | — |
| | (3,445 | ) | | — |
|
Expense (gain) on sale of Traex (see note 14) | 81 |
| | — |
| | (3,240 | ) | | — |
|
Fixed asset write-down (see note 5) | — |
| | — |
| | (1,021 | ) | | 2,687 |
|
Expenses of secondary stock offering (see note 4) | — |
| | 1,096 |
| | — |
| | 1,096 |
|
Insurance claim recovery | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (945 | ) |
CEO transition expenses | 2,091 |
| | — |
| | 2,511 |
| | — |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 33,065 |
| | $ | 28,087 |
| | $ | 89,075 |
| | $ | 86,171 |
|
____________________________________
| |
(1) | Loss (gain) on redemption of debt relates to the write-off of finance fees, discounts and a call premium on the redemption of $40.0 million of the Senior Secured Notes in March 2011 and the net gain recorded upon redeeming $80.4 million of New PIK Notes, repurchasing $306.0 million of floating rate notes and writing off finance fees, discounts and a call premium on the floating rate notes in February 2010. |
| |
(2) | Facility closure charges are related to the closure of our Syracuse, New York ceramic dinnerware manufacturing facility, our Mira Loma, California distribution center and the decorating operations at our Shreveport manufacturing facility. |
We define EBIT as net income before interest expense and income taxes. The most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure is net income.
We believe that EBIT is an important supplemental measure for investors in evaluating operating performance in that it provides insight into company profitability. Libbey’s senior management uses this measure internally to measure profitability. EBIT also allows for a measure of comparability to other companies with different capital and legal structures, which accordingly may be subject to different interest rates and effective tax rates.
The non-GAAP measure of EBIT does have certain limitations. It does not include interest expense, which is a necessary and ongoing part of our cost structure resulting from debt incurred to expand operations. Because this is a material and recurring item, any measure that excludes it has a material limitation. EBIT may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
We define EBITDA as net income before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. The most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure is net income.
We believe that EBITDA is an important supplemental measure for investors in evaluating operating performance in that it provides insight into company profitability and cash flow. Libbey’s senior management uses this measure internally to measure
profitability and to set performance targets for managers. It also has been used regularly as one of the means of publicly providing guidance on possible future results. EBITDA also allows for a measure of comparability to other companies with different capital and legal structures, which accordingly may be subject to different interest rates and effective tax rates, and to companies that may incur different depreciation and amortization expenses or impairment charges.
The non-GAAP measure of EBITDA does have certain limitations. It does not include interest expense, which is a necessary and ongoing part of our cost structure resulting from debt incurred to expand operations. EBITDA also excludes depreciation and amortization expenses. Because these are material and recurring items, any measure that excludes them has a material limitation. EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
We present Adjusted EBITDA because we believe it assists investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. In addition, we use Adjusted EBITDA internally to measure profitability and to set performance targets for managers.
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool. Some of these limitations are:
| |
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
| |
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; |
| |
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debts; |
| |
• | Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; |
| |
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations; and |
| |
• | Other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.
Table 2
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of net cash provided by (used in) operating activities to free cash flow | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (4,690 | ) | | $ | (2,780 | ) | | $ | 2,144 |
| | $ | (10,833 | ) |
Capital expenditures | (8,059 | ) | | (7,743 | ) | | (26,457 | ) | | (19,122 | ) |
Net proceeds from sale of Traex | 158 |
| | — |
| | 13,000 |
| | — |
|
Proceeds from asset sales and other | 65 |
| | — |
| | 5,264 |
| | — |
|
Payment of interest on New PIK Notes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29,400 |
|
Free cash flow | $ | (12,526 | ) | | $ | (10,523 | ) | | $ | (6,049 | ) | | $ | (555 | ) |
We define Free cash flow as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures plus proceeds from asset sales (including the sale of substantially all of the assets of Traex), and further adjusted for the payment of interest on the New PIK Notes. The most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure is net cash provided by (used in) operating activities.
We believe that Free cash flow is important supplemental information for investors in evaluating cash flow performance in that it provides insight into the cash flow available to fund such things as discretionary debt service, acquisitions and other strategic investment opportunities. It is a measure of performance we use to internally evaluate the overall performance of the business.
Free cash flow is used in conjunction with and in addition to results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Free cash flow is neither intended to represent nor be an alternative to the measure of net cash provided by (used in) operating activities recorded under U.S. GAAP. Free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Table 3
|
| | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of working capital | September 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
(dollars in thousands) | |
Accounts receivable (net) | $ | 93,447 |
| | $ | 92,101 |
|
Plus: Inventories (net) | 171,217 |
| | 148,146 |
|
Less: Accounts payable | 52,317 |
| | 59,095 |
|
Working capital | $ | 212,347 |
| | $ | 181,152 |
|
We define working capital as net accounts receivable plus net inventories less accounts payable.
We believe that working capital is important supplemental information for investors in evaluating liquidity in that it provides insight into the availability of net current resources to fund our ongoing operations. Working capital is a measure used by management in internal evaluations of cash availability and operational performance.
Working capital is used in conjunction with and in addition to results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Working capital is neither intended to represent nor be an alternative to any measure of liquidity and operational performance recorded under U.S. GAAP. Working capital may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
| |
Item 3. | Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Currency
We are exposed to market risks due to changes in currency values, although the majority of our revenues and expenses are denominated in the U.S. dollar. The currency market risks include devaluations and other major currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar, Euro, RMB or Mexican peso that could reduce the cost competitiveness of our products compared to foreign competition.
Interest Rates
We have an Interest Rate Agreement (Rate Agreement) with respect to $80.0 million of debt in order to convert a portion of the Senior Secured Notes fixed rate debt into floating rate debt and maintain a capital structure containing appropriate amounts of fixed and floating rate debt. The interest rate for our borrowings related to the Rate Agreement at September 30, 2011 is 7.57 percent per year. The Rate Agreement expires on February 15, 2015. Total remaining Senior Secured Notes not covered by the Rate Agreement have a fixed interest rate of 10.0 percent. If the counterparty to the Rate Agreement were to fail to perform, the Rate Agreement would no longer provide the desired results. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparty, which was rated AA as of September 30, 2011, by Standard and Poor’s.
Natural Gas
We are also exposed to market risks associated with changes in the price of natural gas. We use commodity futures contracts related to forecasted future North American natural gas requirements of our manufacturing operations. The objective of these futures contracts is to limit the fluctuations in prices paid and potential volatility in earnings or cash flows from price movements in the underlying natural gas commodity. We consider the forecasted natural gas requirements of our manufacturing operations in determining the quantity of natural gas to hedge. We combine the forecasts with historical observations to establish the percentage of forecast eligible to be hedged, typically ranging from 40 percent to 70 percent of our anticipated requirements up to eighteen months in the future. For our natural gas requirements that are not hedged, we are subject to changes in the price of natural gas, which affect our earnings. If the counterparties to these futures contracts were to fail to perform, we would no longer be protected from natural gas fluctuations by the futures contracts. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by these counterparties. All counterparties were rated BBB+ or better by Standard and Poor’s as of September 30, 2011.
Retirement Plans
We are exposed to market risks associated with changes in the various capital markets. Changes in long-term interest rates affect the discount rate that is used to measure our benefit obligations and related expense. Changes in the equity and debt securities markets affect the performance of our pension plans asset performance and related pension expense. Sensitivity to these key market risk factors is as follows:
| |
• | A change of 1.0 percent in the discount rate would change our total annual pension and nonpension postretirement expense by approximately $4.5 million. |
| |
• | A change of 1.0 percent in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets would change annual pension expense |
by approximately $2.4 million.
| |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) reports are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There has been no change in our controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
This document and supporting schedules contain statements that are not historical facts and constitute projections, forecasts or forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect only our best assessment at this time, and may be identified by the use of words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “planned,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” “would” or similar phrases. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty; actual results may differ materially from such statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the updated risk factor set forth below, please see the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Increasing legal and regulatory complexity will continue to affect our operations and results in potentially material ways.
Our legal and regulatory environment worldwide exposes us to complex compliance, litigation and similar risks that affect our operations and results in ways that potentially may be material. In many of our markets, including the United States and Europe, we are subject to increasing regulation, which has increased our cost of doing business. In developing markets, including in China, we face the risks associated with new and untested laws and judicial systems. Among the more important regulatory and litigation risks we face and must manage are the following:
| |
• | The cost, compliance and other risks associated with the often conflicting and highly prescriptive regulations we face, especially in the United States, where inconsistent standards imposed by local, state and federal authorities can increase our exposure to litigation or governmental investigations or proceedings; |
| |
• | The impact of new, potential or changing regulation that can affect our business plans, such as those relating to the content and safety of our products, as well as the risks and costs of our labeling and other disclosure practices; |
| |
• | The risks and costs to us and our supply chain of increased focus by U.S. and overseas governmental authorities and non-governmental organizations on environmental matters, such as climate change, the reduction of greenhouse gases and water consumption, including as a result of initiatives that effectively impose a tax on carbon emissions; |
| |
• | The impact of litigation trends, particularly in our major markets; the relative level of our defense costs, which vary from period to period depending on the number, nature and procedural status of pending proceedings; and the cost and other effects of settlements or judgments, which may require us to make disclosures or take other actions that may affect perceptions of our brand and products; |
| |
• | Adverse results of pending or future litigation, including litigation relating to our products; |
| |
• | The increasing costs and other effects of compliance with U.S. and overseas regulations affecting our workforce and labor practices, including regulations relating to wage and hour practices, immigration, healthcare, retirement and other employee benefits and unlawful workplace discrimination; |
| |
• | The cost and disruption of responding to governmental audits, investigations or proceedings (including audits of abandoned and unclaimed property, tax audits and audits of pension plans and our compliance with wage and hour laws), whether or not they have merit, and the cost to resolve or contest the results of any such governmental audits, investigations or proceedings; |
| |
• | The legal and compliance risks associated with information technology, such as the costs of compliance with privacy, consumer protection and other laws, the potential costs associated with alleged security breaches (including the loss of consumer confidence that may result and the risk of criminal penalties or civil liability to consumers or employees whose data is alleged to have been collected or used inappropriately) and potential challenges to the associated intellectual property rights or to our use of that intellectual property; and |
| |
• | The impact of changes in financial reporting requirements, accounting principles or practices, including with respect to our critical accounting estimates, changes in tax accounting or tax laws (or authoritative interpretations relating to any of these matters), and the impact of settlements of pending or any future adjustments proposed by the IRS or other taxing authorities in connection with our tax audits, all of which will depend on their timing, nature and scope. |
| |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer’s Purchases of Equity Securities
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1) |
July 1 to July 31, 2011 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,000,000 |
|
August 1 to August 31, 2011 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,000,000 |
|
September 1 to September 30, 2011 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,000,000 |
|
Total | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,000,000 |
|
____________________________________
| |
(1) | We announced on December 10, 2002, that our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 2,500,000 shares of our common stock in the open market and negotiated purchases. There is no expiration date for this plan. In 2003, 1,500,000 shares of our common stock were purchased for $38.9 million. No additional shares were purchased from 2004 through the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Our ABL Facility and the indentures governing the Senior Secured Notes significantly restrict our ability to repurchase additional shares. |
Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying “Exhibit Index” are filed as part of this report.
|
| | |
EXHIBIT INDEX |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
3.1 | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
3.2 | | Amended and Restated By-Laws of Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 1, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
4.1 | | Warrant, issued June 16, 2006. (filed as Exhibit 4.7 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed June 21, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
4.2 | | Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 29, 2009, among Libbey Inc. and Merrill Lynch PCG, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed October 29, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
4.3 | | Amendment and Restated Credit Agreement, dated February 8, 2010, among Libbey Glass Inc. and Libbey Europe B.V., as borrowers, Libbey Inc., as a loan guarantor, the other loan parties party thereto as guarantors, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent with respect to the U.S. loans, J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, as administrative agent with respect to the Netherlands loans, Bank of America, N.A. and Barclays Capital, as Co-Syndication Agents, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Documentation Agent and the other lenders and agents party thereto (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
4.4 | | New Notes Indenture, dated February 8, 2010, among Libbey Glass Inc., Libbey Inc., the domestic subsidiaries of Libbey Glass Inc. listed as guarantors therein, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee and collateral agent (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
4.5 | | Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 8, 2010, among Libbey Glass Inc., Libbey Inc., and the domestic subsidiaries of Libbey Glass Inc. listed as guarantors (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
4.6 | | Intercreditor Agreement, dated February 8, 2010, among Libbey Glass Inc., Libbey Inc., and the domestic subsidiaries of Libbey Glass Inc. listed as guarantors (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
4.7 | | Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 29, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.1 | | Pension and Savings Plan Agreement dated as of June 17, 1993 between Owens-Illinois, Inc. and Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Libbey Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.2 | | Cross-Indemnity Agreement dated as of June 24, 1993 between Owens-Illinois, Inc. and Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Libbey Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.3 | | Libbey Inc. Guarantee dated as of October 10, 1995 in favor of The Pfaltzgraff Co., The Pfaltzgraff Outlet Co. and Syracuse China Company of Canada Ltd. guaranteeing certain obligations of LG Acquisition Corp. and Libbey Canada Inc. under the Asset Purchase Agreement for the Acquisition of Syracuse China (Exhibit 2.0) in the event certain contingencies occur (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 10, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.4 | | Susquehanna Pfaltzgraff Co. Guarantee dated as of October 10, 1995 in favor of LG Acquisition Corp. and Libbey Canada Inc. guaranteeing certain obligations of The Pfaltzgraff Co., The Pfaltzgraff Outlet Co. and Syracuse China Company of Canada, Ltd. under the Asset Purchase Agreement for the Acquisition of Syracuse China (Exhibit 2.0) in the event certain contingencies occur (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 10, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.5 | | First Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. Executive Savings Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.6 | | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Libbey Inc. and certain key employees participating in The 1999 Equity Participation Plan of Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.69 to Libbey Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
10.7 | | The 1999 Equity Participation Plan of Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.67 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.8 | | Stock Promissory Sale and Purchase Agreement between VAA — Vista Alegre Atlantis SGPS, SA and Libbey Europe B.V. dated January 10, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.76 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.9 | | RMB Loan Contract between Libbey Glassware (China) Company Limited and China Construction Bank Corporation Langfang Economic Development Area Sub-branch entered into January 23, 2006 (filed as exhibit 10.75 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.10 | | Guarantee Contract executed by Libbey Inc. for the benefit of China Construction Bank Corporation Langfang Economic Development Area Sub-branch (filed as exhibit 10.76 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.11 | | Guaranty, dated May 31, 2006, executed by Libbey Inc. in favor of Fondo Stiva S.A. de C.V. (filed as exhibit 10.2 to Libbey Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.12 | | Guaranty Agreement, dated June 16, 2006, executed by Libbey Inc. in favor of Vitro, S.A. de C.V. (filed as exhibit 10.3 to Libbey Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.13 | | Libbey Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to Libbey Glass Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4; File No. 333-139358). |
| | |
10.14 | | 2009 Director Deferred Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.51 to Libbey Inc’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.15 | | Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.52 to Libbey Inc’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.16 | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 between Libbey Inc. and John F. Meier (filed as exhibit 10.29 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.17 | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 between Libbey Inc. and Richard I. Reynolds (filed as exhibit 10.30 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.18 | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 between Libbey Inc. and Gregory T. Geswein (filed as exhibit 10.31 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.19 | | Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 between Libbey Inc. and the respective executive officers identified on Appendix 1 thereto (filed as exhibit 10.32 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.20 | | Amended and restated change in control agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 between Libbey Inc. and John F. Meier (filed as exhibit 10.33 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.21 | | Form of amended and restated change in control agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 between Libbey Inc. and the respective executive officers identified on Appendix 1 thereto (filed as exhibit 10.34 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.22 | | Form of amended and restated change in control agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 between Libbey Inc. and the respective individuals identified on Appendix 1 thereto (filed as exhibit 10.35 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.23 | | Form of Amended and Restated Indemnity Agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 between Libbey Inc. and the respective officers identified on Appendix 1 thereto (filed as exhibit 10.36 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.24 | | Form of Amended and Restated Indemnity Agreement dated as of December 31, 2008 between Libbey Inc. and the respective outside directors identified on Appendix 1 thereto (filed as exhibit 10.37 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | |
| Description |
10.25 | | Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan effective December 31, 2008 (filed as exhibit 10.38 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.26 | | Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Libbey Inc. Executive Savings Plan effective December 31, 2008 (filed as exhibit 10.39 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.27 | | Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2010 between Libbey Inc. and Roberto B. Rubio (filed as exhibit 10.39 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.28 | | Change in control agreement dated as of January 1, 2010 between Libbey Inc. and Roberto B. Rubio (filed as exhibit 10.40 to Libbey Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.29 | | Amended and Restated 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan of Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to Libbey Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.30 | | Employment Agreement dated as of June 22, 2011 between Libbey Inc. and Stephanie A. Streeter (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to Libbey Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference). |
| | |
10.31 | | Form of Employment Agreement dated as of October 31, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference) (as to each of Kenneth A. Boerger, Jonathan S. Freeman, Daniel P. Ibele, Timothy T. Paige, Roberto B Rubio and Scott M. Sellick). |
| | |
10.32 | | Form of Employment Agreement dated as of October 31, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Libbey Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference) (as to each of Richard I. Reynolds and Susan A. Kovach). |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) (filed herein). |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) (filed herein). |
| | |
32.1 | | Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herein). |
| | |
32.2 | | Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herein). |
| | |
101 | | Financial statements from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Libbey Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | LIBBEY INC. | |
Date: | November 9, 2011 | By /s/ Richard I. Reynolds | |
| | Richard I. Reynolds, | |
| | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | |