Exhibit 99.1
| | | | |
Contact: | | Chris Papa | |  |
| | Post Properties, Inc. (404) 846-5028 | |
| | |
Post Properties Announces Third Quarter 2009 Earnings
Investor/Analyst Conference Call Scheduled for November 3, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. ET
ATLANTA, November 2, 2009 – Post Properties, Inc. (NYSE: PPS) announced today net income available to common shareholders of $50.2 million for the third quarter of 2009, compared to net income available to common shareholders of $25.2 million for the third quarter of 2008. On a diluted per share basis, net income available to common shareholders was $1.13 for the third quarter of 2009, compared to $0.57 for the third quarter of 2008.
The Company reported a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. On a diluted per share basis, the net loss attributable to common shareholders was less than $0.01 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $0.02 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The Company’s net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended September 30, 2009 included net gains of approximately $54.6 million on the sales of two apartment communities in July 2009, offset by severance charges of approximately $0.4 million relating to headcount reductions that were initiated during the third quarter. The Company’s net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended September 30, 2008 included a net gain of approximately $23.5 million on the sale of one apartment community, offset by hurricane casualty losses of approximately $2.8 million and severance charges totaling approximately $2.2 million.
The Company’s net loss attributable to common shareholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 included net gains of approximately $79.4 million on the sales of three apartment communities and gains of approximately $2.3 million relating to the early extinguishment of indebtedness, the mark-to-market of an interest rate swap, and changes in previous hurricane loss estimates. These gains were offset by non-cash impairment charges of approximately $76.3 million relating to the Company’s investment in a condominium project and adjacent land and the severance charges discussed above totaling approximately $0.4 million. The Company’s net loss attributable to common shareholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included net gains of approximately $25.8 million on the sale of two apartment communities, offset by non-cash impairment charges of approximately $28.9 million, hurricane casualty losses of approximately $2.8 million, severance charges of approximately $2.6 million and approximately $8.2 million in costs related to the Company’s formal process to pursue a business combination or other sale transaction.
The Company uses the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition of Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as an operating measure of the Company’s financial performance. A reconciliation of FFO to GAAP net income is included in the financial data (Table 1) accompanying this press release.
FFO for the third quarter of 2009 was $13.9 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, compared to $16.1 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2008. The Company’s reported FFO for the third quarter of 2009 included the severance charges discussed above totaling approximately $0.4 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, and for the third quarter of 2008 included the severance charges and hurricane casualty losses discussed above totaling approximately $5.0 million, or $0.11 per diluted share.
FFO for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was a deficit of $28.2 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, compared to FFO of $17.4 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The Company’s reported FFO for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 included the impairment and severance charges discussed above totaling approximately $76.7 million, offset by the income items discussed above totaling approximately $2.3 million, resulting in total net charges of approximately $74.4 million, or $1.67 per diluted share. The Company’s reported FFO for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included the charges discussed above in the aggregate of approximately $42.5 million, or $0.95 per diluted share.
Mature (Same Store) Community Data
Average economic occupancy at the Company’s 41 mature (same store) communities, containing 14,921 apartment units, was 94.5% and 95.2% for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Total revenues for the mature communities decreased 6.0% and total operating expenses decreased 0.1% during the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, resulting in a 10.0% decrease in same store net operating income
-1-
(“NOI”). The average monthly rental rate per unit decreased 5.5% during the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008.
On a sequential basis, total revenues for the mature communities decreased 1.6% and total operating expenses increased 6.1%, producing a 6.7% decrease in same store NOI for the third quarter of 2009, compared to the second quarter of 2009. On a sequential basis, the average monthly rental rate per unit decreased 2.6%. For the third quarter of 2009, average economic occupancy at the mature communities was 94.5%, compared to 93.4% for the second quarter of 2009.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, average economic occupancy at the Company’s mature communities was 93.9%, compared to 94.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Total revenues for the mature communities decreased 3.7% and total operating expenses decreased 4.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008, resulting in a 3.3% decrease in same store NOI. The average monthly rental rate per unit decreased 3.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Same store NOI is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation of same store NOI to the comparable GAAP financial measure is included in the financial data (Table 2) accompanying this press release. Same store NOI and average rental rate per unit by geographic market is also included in the financial data (Table 3) accompanying this press release.
Financing Activity
Common Stock Offering and Debt Prepayment
Late in the third quarter, the Company completed a public offering of 4,025,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $17.75 per share. The offering generated proceeds of approximately $68.0 million after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. In October 2009, the Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the offering to repay approximately $39.2 million of existing mortgage indebtedness secured by the Company’s Post Fallsgrove property that was scheduled to mature in November 2011, and to pay an approximately $4.0 million prepayment penalty in connection the early extinguishment of that debt. The interest rate on the mortgage indebtedness was 6.1%. The remaining net proceeds from the offering will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include funding the Company’s development pipeline or the repurchase of its outstanding preferred stock or senior unsecured notes. In October 2009, the Company repurchased approximately $6.1 million of its 6.3% senior unsecured notes due 2013 through open-market repurchases.
Other Financing Activity
Total debt and preferred equity as a percentage of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt) was 44.8% at September 30, 2009, and variable rate debt as a percentage of total debt was 0.8% as of that same date.
As of October 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding borrowings and letters of credit totaling approximately $3.6 million under its combined $630 million unsecured lines of credit and held available cash and cash equivalents of approximately $54 million.
Computations of debt ratios and reconciliations of the ratios to the appropriate GAAP measures in the Company’s financial statements are included in the financial data (Table 4) accompanying this press release.
Disposition, Development and Other Investment Activity
Disposition Activity
In July 2009, the Company closed the sale of its Post Forest® apartment community located in the greater Washington, D.C. area for a gross sales price of approximately $57.5 million. Post Forest® is a 364-unit garden-style apartment community located in Fairfax County, VA and was completed in 1990. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of approximately $37.3 million in the third quarter of 2009.
The Company also closed in July 2009 the sale of its Post Ridge® apartment community, located in Atlanta, Georgia, for a gross sales price of approximately $44.8 million. Post Ridge® is a 434-unit garden-style apartment community located in the northwest area of Atlanta and was completed in 1998. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of approximately $17.3
-2-
million in the third quarter of 2009.
The Company currently has no other apartment communities being marketed for sale.
Development Activity
As of September 30, 2009, the Company’s aggregate pipeline of development projects under construction and/or in lease-up (before the impact of impairment charges recorded in the second quarter) totaled approximately $487 million. As of that same date, approximately $100 million of estimated construction costs remained to be funded by the Company, including retainage and construction payables. The Company expects to fund future estimated construction expenditures primarily by utilizing available cash and cash equivalents and borrowing capacity under its unsecured revolving lines of credit and under a construction loan.
Apartment Community Renovation and Remediation Activity
As previously announced, the Company continues its initiative to remediate communities with stucco exteriors or exterior insulation finishing systems. The Company currently estimates that the aggregate cost of this initiative will be approximately $45 million. Through September 30, 2009, the Company had incurred approximately $23.9 million of capital expenditures relating to these remediation projects. The Company expects to fund future estimated remediation expenditures primarily by utilizing available cash and cash equivalents and borrowing capacity under its revolving lines of credit.
Condominium Activity
The Company recognized incremental gains in FFO of approximately $0.4 million, net of income tax expense, from condominium sales activities during the third quarter of 2009 compared to incremental losses in FFO of approximately $0.2 million during the third quarter of 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company sold 27 condominium units for aggregate gross sales revenues of approximately $6.6 million, compared to 30 condominium units sold in the third quarter of 2008 for aggregate gross sales revenues of approximately $8.6 million. In October 2009, the Company completed the sell out of the remaining units at its Mercer Square™ condominium development in a bulk sale transaction totaling 15 units for a gross sales price of approximately $2.2 million.
Legal Matters
On September 28, 2009, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed in its entirety the lawsuit filed against the Company by the Equal Rights Center alleging various violations of the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. In granting the Company’s request to dismiss the suit, the Court held that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring the claims. Subsequent to the dismissal, the Company asked the Court to require ERC’s attorneys to reimburse the Company’s costs, expenses and attorney’s fees incurred in defending the action. ERC has filed a notice of appeal of the Court’s decision to dismiss the action to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The Company’s motion and the appeal are both pending.
2009 Revised Outlook
The estimates and assumptions presented below are forward-looking and are based on the Company’s current and expected future view of the apartment and condominium markets and general economic conditions, as well as other risks outlined below under the caption “Forward Looking Statements.” There can be no assurance that the Company’s actual results will not differ materially from the estimates set forth below. The Company assumes no obligation to update this guidance in the future.
Based on its current outlook, the Company expects that FFO for the full year 2009 will be a deficit in the range of $0.40 to $0.45 per diluted share, including net charges totaling $1.72 per diluted share relating to non-cash impairment charges, severance charges and losses relating to the early extinguishment of indebtedness, offset by income relating to the mark-to-market of an interest rate swap and changes in previous hurricane loss estimates, all as discussed previously in this earnings release. Excluding the above-mentioned items totaling $1.72 per diluted share, the revised estimates of $1.27 to $1.32 per diluted share of FFO are within the Company’s previously reported guidance.
The revised estimates include approximately $0.4 million of severance charges recorded in the third quarter and an approximately $4.0 million loss on the early extinguishment of indebtedness expected to be reported in the fourth quarter that were not included in the Company’s previously reported guidance.
-3-
The revised estimates also reflect the impact on weighted average shares outstanding of the Company’s recent common stock offering. As previously announced, the Company may use a portion of the proceeds from its common stock offering to repurchase its preferred stock or senior unsecured notes. If the Company does so, it could incur additional charges in the fourth quarter of 2009 in connection with any repurchases completed in 2009, which charges are not included in its 2009 guidance described above. Additionally, while the Company’s 2009 guidance includes a $76.3 million loss relating to non-cash impairment charges, it does not assume any additional impairment charges for 2009. The Company continually evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of its real estate assets and there can be no assurance that the Company will not take additional impairment charges in the future.
The revised estimates also assume that the Company’s same store net operating income for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 will be within the range of its previously reported guidance, as follows:
| | • | | same store revenues are expected to decline by 4.1% to 4.3% for the full year 2009, compared to 2008, |
| | • | | same store operating expenses are expected to decline by 1.9% to 2.5% for the full year 2009, compared to 2008, and |
| | • | | same store net operating income is expected to decline by 5.2% to 5.9% for the full year 2009, compared to 2008. |
Supplemental Financial Data
The Company also produces Supplemental Financial Data that includes detailed information regarding the Company’s operating results, investment activity, financing activity and balance sheet. This Supplemental Financial Data is considered an integral part of this earnings release and is available on the Company’s website. The Company’s Earnings Release and the Supplemental Financial Data are available through the For Investors/Financial Reports/Quarterly and Other Reports section of the Company’s website at www.postproperties.com.
The ability to access the attachments on the Company’s website requires the Adobe Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded at http://get.adobe.com/reader/.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Defined Terms
The Company uses certain non-GAAP financial measures and other defined terms in this press release and in its Supplemental Financial Data available on the Company’s website. The non-GAAP financial measures include FFO, Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”), net operating income, same store capital expenditures, and certain debt statistics and ratios. The definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures are summarized below and on page 21 of the Supplemental Financial Data. The Company believes that these measures are helpful to investors in measuring financial performance and/or liquidity and comparing such performance and/or liquidity to other REITs.
Funds from Operations – The Company uses FFO as an operating measure. The Company uses the NAREIT definition of FFO. FFO is defined by NAREIT to mean net income (loss) available to common shareholders determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from extraordinary items and sales of depreciable operating property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustment for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures all determined on a consistent basis in accordance with GAAP. FFO presented in the Company’s press release and Supplemental Financial Data is not necessarily comparable to FFO presented by other real estate companies because not all real estate companies use the same definition. The Company’s FFO is comparable to the FFO of real estate companies that use the current NAREIT definition.
Accounting for real estate assets using historical cost accounting under GAAP assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. NAREIT stated in its April 2002 White Paper on Funds from Operations that “since real estate asset values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.” As a result, the concept of FFO was created by NAREIT for the REIT industry to provide an alternate measure. Since the Company agrees with the concept of FFO and appreciates the reasons surrounding its creation, the Company believes that FFO is an important supplemental measure of operating performance. In addition, since most equity REITs provide FFO information to the investment community, the Company believes that FFO is a useful supplemental measure for comparing the Company’s results to those of other equity REITs. The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income available to common shareholders” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO.
Adjusted Funds From Operations – The Company also uses adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO”) as an operating
-4-
measure. AFFO is defined as FFO less operating capital expenditures and after adjusting for the impact of non-cash straight-line, long-term ground lease expense, non-cash impairment charges, non-cash income (loss) related to mark-to-market of interest rate swap agreements, non-cash debt extinguishment costs and strategic review costs. The Company believes that AFFO is an important supplemental measure of operating performance for an equity REIT because it provides investors with an indication of the REIT’s ability to fund its operating capital expenditures through earnings. In addition, since most equity REITs provide AFFO information to the investment community, the Company believes that AFFO is a useful supplemental measure for comparing the Company to other equity REITs. The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income available to common shareholders” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to AFFO.
Property Net Operating Income(“NOI”)– The Company uses property NOI, including same store NOI and same store NOI by market, as an operating measure. NOI is defined as rental and other revenues from real estate operations less total property and maintenance expenses from real estate operations (exclusive of depreciation and amortization). The Company believes that NOI is an important supplemental measure of operating performance for a REIT’s operating real estate because it provides a measure of the core operations, rather than factoring in depreciation and amortization, financing costs and general and administrative expenses generally incurred at the corporate level. This measure is particularly useful, in the opinion of the Company, in evaluating the performance of geographic operations, same store groupings and individual properties. Additionally, the Company believes that NOI, as defined, is a widely accepted measure of comparative operating performance in the real estate investment community. The Company believes that the line on its consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI.
Same Store Capital Expenditures – The Company uses same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures as cash flow measures. Same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. The Company believes that same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures are important indicators of the costs incurred by the Company in maintaining its same store communities on an ongoing basis. The corresponding GAAP measures include information with respect to the Company’s other operating segments consisting of communities stabilized in the prior year, lease-up communities, rehabilitation properties, sold properties and commercial properties in addition to same store information. Therefore, the Company believes that the Company’s presentation of same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures is necessary to demonstrate same store replacement costs over time. The Company believes that the most directly comparable GAAP measure to same store annually recurring and periodically recurring capital expenditures are the lines on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows entitled “annually recurring capital expenditures” and “periodically recurring capital expenditures.”
Debt Statistics and Debt Ratios – The Company uses a number of debt statistics and ratios as supplemental measures of liquidity. The numerator and/or the denominator of certain of these statistics and/or ratios include non-GAAP financial measures that have been reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. These debt statistics and ratios include: (1) an interest coverage ratio; (2) a fixed charge coverage ratio; (3) total debt as a percentage of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s share of debt); (4) total debt plus preferred equity as a percentage of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partner’s share of debt); (5) a ratio of consolidated debt to total assets; (6) a ratio of secured debt to total assets; (7) a ratio of total unencumbered assets to unsecured debt; and (8) a ratio of consolidated income available to debt service to annual debt service charge. A number of these debt statistics and ratios are derived from covenants found in the Company’s debt agreements, including, among others, the Company’s senior unsecured notes. In addition, the Company presents these measures because the degree of leverage could affect the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes. The Company uses these measures internally as an indicator of liquidity and the Company believes that these measures are also utilized by the investment and analyst communities to better understand the Company’s liquidity.
Average Economic Occupancy – The Company uses average economic occupancy as a statistical measure of operating performance. The Company defines average economic occupancy as gross potential rent less vacancy losses, model expenses and bad debt expenses divided by gross potential rent for the period, expressed as a percentage.
Conference Call Information
The Company will hold its quarterly conference call on Tuesday, November 3, at 10:00 a.m. ET. The telephone numbers are 888-686-9703 for US and Canada callers and 913-981-5532 for international callers. The access code is 2149705. The conference call will be open to the public and can be listened to live on Post’s website at www.postproperties.com under For Investors/Event Calendar. The replay will begin at 1:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, November 3, and will be available until Monday, November 9, at 11:59 p.m. ET. The telephone numbers for the replay are 888-203-1112 for US and Canada callers
-5-
and 719-457-0820 for international callers. The access code for the replay is 2149705. A replay of the call also will be archived on Post’s website under For Investors/Audio Archive. The financial and statistical information that will be discussed on the call is contained in this press release and the Supplemental Financial Data. Both documents will be available through the For Investors/Financial Reports/Quarterly & Other Reports section of the Company’s website at www.postproperties.com.
About Post
Post Properties, founded more than 38 years ago, is one of the largest developers and operators of upscale multifamily communities in the United States. The Company’s mission is delivering superior satisfaction and value to its residents, associates, and investors, with a vision of being the first choice in quality multifamily living. Operating as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), the Company focuses on developing and managing Post® branded resort-style garden and high density urban apartments. In addition, the Company has also developed high-quality condominiums and converted existing apartments to for-sale multifamily communities. Post Properties is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, and has operations in nine markets across the country.
Post Properties owns 19,864 apartment units in 55 communities, including 1,747 apartment units in five communities held in unconsolidated entities and 1,429 apartment units in four communities currently under construction and/or in lease-up. The Company is also developing and selling 277 luxury for-sale condominium homes in two communities (including 129 units in one community held in an unconsolidated entity) and is completing the sell out of units in two other condominium conversion communities through a taxable REIT subsidiary.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this press release and other written or oral statements made by or on behalf of the Company, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Statements regarding future events and developments and the Company’s future performance, as well as management’s expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates or projections relating to the future, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. Examples of such statements in this press release include expectations with respect to the Company’s anticipated funds from operations and net operating income for the year ending December 31, 2009, expected use of proceeds from the Company’s common stock offering, anticipated losses on early extinguishment of indebtedness and the Company’s anticipated development, renovation and remediation activities (including the projected costs, timing and anticipated potential sources of financing of projected future development, renovation and remediation activities). All forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events to differ materially from those projected. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on such statements. These statements are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date of such statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise.
The following are some of the factors that could cause the Company’s actual results and its expectations to differ materially from those described in the Company’s forward-looking statements: the success of the Company’s business strategies discussed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2008 and in subsequent filings with the SEC; future conditions in the global capital markets, including changes in the availability of credit and liquidity; future local and national economic conditions, including changes in levels of employment, interest rates, the availability of mortgage and other financing and related factors; a downgrade in the credit rating of the Company’s securities; demand for apartments in the Company’s markets and the effect on occupancy and rental rates; the impact of competition on the Company’s business, including competition for tenants and development locations for its apartment communities and competing for-sale housing in the markets where the Company is completing condominium conversions or developing new condominiums; the uncertainties associated with the Company’s current and planned future real estate development, including actual costs exceeding the Company’s budgets or development periods exceeding expectations; uncertainties associated with the timing and amount of asset sales, the market for asset sales and the resulting gains/losses associated with such asset sales; the Company’s ability to enter into new joint ventures and the availability of equity financing from traditional real estate investors to fund development activities; the Company’s ability to obtain construction loan financing to fund development activities; uncertainties associated with the Company’s condominium conversion and for-sale housing business, including the lack of demand for for-sale housing and the Company’s inability to sell for-sale products at attractive pricing levels; uncertainties associated with loss of personnel in connection with the Company’s reduction of corporate and property development and management overhead; conditions affecting ownership of residential real estate and general conditions in the multifamily residential real estate market; uncertainties associated with environmental and other regulatory matters; the impact of ongoing litigation with the Equal Rights Center regarding compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
-6-
the Fair Housing Act (including any award of compensatory or punitive damages or injunctive relief requiring the Company to retrofit apartments or public use areas or prohibiting the sale of apartment communities or condominium units) as well as the impact of other litigation; the effects of changes in accounting policies and other regulatory matters detailed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission; the costs of remediating damage to the Company’s communities that have stucco or exterior insulation finishing systems for potential water penetration and other related issues; and the Company’s ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code. Other important risk factors regarding the Company are included under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2008 and may be discussed in subsequent filings with the SEC. The risk factors discussed in Form 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors” are specifically incorporated by reference into this press release.
Financial Highlights
(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share and unit amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three months ended
September 30, | | Nine months ended
September 30, |
| | | 2009 | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
OPERATING DATA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues from continuing operations | | $ | 69,388 | | $ | 71,910 | | $ | 207,684 | | $ | 212,173 |
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | | $ | 50,226 | | $ | 25,167 | | $ | (66) | | $ | (1,029) |
Funds (deficit) from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders (Table 1) | | $ | 13,857 | | $ | 16,136 | | $ | (28,191) | | $ | 17,405 |
| | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted | | | 44,220 | | | 44,047 | | | 44,151 | | | 43,976 |
Weighted average shares and units outstanding - diluted | | | 44,419 | | | 44,340 | | | 44,363 | | | 44,306 |
| | | | |
PER COMMON SHARE DATA - DILUTED | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | | $ | 1.13 | | $ | 0.57 | | $ | - | | $ | (0.02) |
| | | | |
Funds (deficit) from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders (Table 1) (1) | | $ | 0.31 | | $ | 0.36 | | $ | (0.63) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | | | |
Dividends declared | | $ | 0.20 | | $ | 0.45 | | $ | 0.60 | | $ | 1.35 |
| (1) | Funds (deficit) from operations per share were computed using weighted average shares and units outstanding, including the impact of dilutive securities totaling 39 and 110 for the three months ended and 0 and 242 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These dilutive securities were antidilutive to the computation of income (loss) per share, as the Company reported a loss from continuing operations for these periods under generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, diluted weighted average shares and units included the impact of non-vested shares and units totaling 226 and 80 for the three months ended and 215 and 92 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for the computation of funds (deficit) from operations per share. Such non-vested shares and units are considered in the income (loss) per share computations under generally accepted accounting principles using the “two-class method.” |
-7-
Table 1
Reconciliation of Net Income Available to Common Shareholders to
Funds From Operations Available to Common Shareholders and Unitholders
(Unaudited; in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three months ended
September 30, | | Nine months ended
September 30, |
| | | 2009 | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | | $ | 50,226 | | $ | 25,167 | | $ | (66) | | $ | (1,029) |
Noncontrolling interests - Operating Partnership | | | 248 | | | 198 | | | - | | | (8) |
Depreciation on consolidated real estate assets, net | | | 18,284 | | | 14,569 | | | 52,862 | | | 45,851 |
Depreciation on real estate assets held in unconsolidated entities | | | 352 | | | 347 | | | 1,052 | | | 1,042 |
Gains on sales of apartment communities | | | (54,624) | | | (23,520) | | | (79,366) | | | (25,831) |
Gains on sales of condominiums | | | (1,069) | | | (476) | | | (1,041) | | | (2,227) |
Incremental gains on condominium sales (1) | | | 440 | | | (149) | | | (1,632) | | | (393) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funds (deficit) from operations available to common shareholders and unitholders | | $ | 13,857 | | $ | 16,136 | | $ | (28,191) | | $ | 17,405 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Funds (deficit) from operations - per share and unit - diluted (2) | | $ | 0.31 | | $ | 0.36 | | $ | (0.63) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Weighted average shares and units outstanding - diluted (2) | | | 44,684 | | | 44,530 | | | 44,578 | | | 44,640 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | For condominium conversion projects, the Company recognizes incremental gains on condominium sales in FFO, net of provision for income taxes, to the extent that net sales proceeds, less costs of sales and expenses, from the sale of condominium units exceeds the greater of their fair value or net book value as of the date the property is acquired by the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary. For condominium development projects, gains on condominium sales in FFO are equivalent to gains reported under GAAP. See the table entitled “Summary of Condominium Projects” on page 15 of the Supplemental Financial Data for further detail. |
| (2) | Diluted weighted average shares and units include the impact of dilutive securities totaling 39 and 110 for the three months ended and 0 and 242 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These dilutive securities were antidilutive to the computation of income (loss) per share, as the Company reported a loss from continuing operations for this period under generally accepted accounting principles. Additionally, diluted weighted average shares and units included the impact of non-vested shares and units totaling 226 and 80 for the three months ended and 215 and 92 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for the computation of funds (deficit) from operations per share. Such non-vested shares and units are considered in the income (loss) per share computations under generally accepted accounting principles using the “two-class method.” |
-8-
Table 2
Reconciliation of Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) to GAAP Net Income
(Unaudited; In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three months ended | | Nine months ended |
| | | September 30,
2009 | | September 30,
2008 | | June 30,
2009 | | September 30,
2009 | | September 30,
2008 |
Total same store NOI | | $ | 32,277 | | $ | 35,845 | | $ | 34,590 | | $ | 101,491 | | $ | 104,984 |
Property NOI from other operating segments | | | 2,905 | | | 1,668 | | | 1,593 | | | 6,128 | | | 2,727 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated property NOI | | | 35,182 | | | 37,513 | | | 36,183 | | | 107,619 | | | 107,711 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Add (subtract): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 49 | | | 96 | | | 23 | | | 187 | | | 367 |
Other revenues | | | 298 | | | 261 | | | 277 | | | 801 | | | 735 |
Depreciation | | | (18,787) | | | (14,980) | | | (18,009) | | | (54,388) | | | (45,290) |
Interest expense | | | (12,978) | | | (12,340) | | | (12,241) | | | (39,397) | | | (34,375) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | (726) | | | (869) | | | (682) | | | (2,342) | | | (2,579) |
General and administrative | | | (3,892) | | | (3,859) | | | (3,964) | | | (12,265) | | | (13,344) |
Investment and development | | | (1,096) | | | (1,509) | | | (793) | | | (2,886) | | | (4,173) |
Other investment costs | | | (697) | | | (463) | | | (646) | | | (1,996) | | | (962) |
Strategic review costs | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (8,161) |
Impairment, severance and other charges | | | (391) | | | (5,002) | | | (9,658) | | | (10,049) | | | (34,302) |
Gains (losses) on sales of real estate assets, net | | | 1,069 | | | 476 | | | 232 | | | 1,041 | | | 2,227 |
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated real estate entities | | | (31) | | | 260 | | | (74,656) | | | (74,577) | | | 1,081 |
Other income (expense), net | | | (472) | | | 535 | | | 50 | | | 637 | | | 427 |
Net gain (loss) on early extinguishment of indebtedness | | | - | | | - | | | (79) | | | 819 | | | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | (2,472) | | | 119 | | | (83,963) | | | (86,796) | | | (30,638) |
Income from discontinued operations | | | 54,861 | | | 27,344 | | | 26,768 | | | 84,238 | | | 35,691 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 52,389 | | $ | 27,463 | | $ | (57,195) | | $ | (2,558) | | $ | 5,053 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
-9-
Table 3
Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) and Average Rental Rate per Unit by Market
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three months ended | | Q3 ‘09
vs. Q3 ‘08
% Change | | Q3 ‘09
vs. Q2 ‘09
% Change | | Q3 ‘09
% Same
Store NOI |
| | | September 30,
2009 | | September 30,
2008 | | June 30,
2009 | | | |
Rental and other revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta | | $ | 14,040 | | $ | 15,075 | | $ | 14,422 | | (6.9)% | | (2.6)% | | |
Dallas | | | 10,766 | | | 11,784 | | | 10,982 | | (8.6)% | | (2.0)% | | |
Washington, D.C. | | | 10,192 | | | 10,400 | | | 10,215 | | (2.0)% | | (0.2)% | | |
Tampa | | | 6,908 | | | 7,141 | | | 6,966 | | (3.3)% | | (0.8)% | | |
Charlotte | | | 4,371 | | | 4,937 | | | 4,443 | | (11.5)% | | (1.6)% | | |
New York | | | 3,467 | | | 3,809 | | | 3,634 | | (9.0)% | | (4.6)% | | |
Houston | | | 3,074 | | | 3,134 | | | 3,072 | | (1.9)% | | 0.1% | | |
Austin | | | 1,206 | | | 1,299 | | | 1,196 | | (7.2)% | | 0.8% | | |
Orlando | | | 2,337 | | | 2,379 | | | 2,362 | | (1.8)% | | (1.1)% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total rental and other revenues | | | 56,361 | | | 59,958 | | | 57,292 | | (6.0)% | | (1.6)% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property operating and maintenance expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta | | | 6,720 | | | 6,461 | | | 5,958 | | 4.0% | | 12.8% | | |
Dallas | | | 5,147 | | | 5,143 | | | 4,650 | | 0.1% | | 10.7% | | |
Washington, D.C. | | | 3,647 | | | 3,746 | | | 3,524 | | (2.6)% | | 3.5% | | |
Tampa | | | 2,614 | | | 2,930 | | | 2,866 | | (10.8)% | | (8.8)% | | |
Charlotte | | | 1,696 | | | 1,633 | | | 1,588 | | 3.9% | | 6.8% | | |
New York | | | 1,436 | | | 1,119 | | | 1,206 | | 28.3% | | 19.1% | | |
Houston | | | 1,290 | | | 1,464 | | | 1,259 | | (11.9)% | | 2.5% | | |
Austin | | | 573 | | | 589 | | | 541 | | (2.7)% | | 5.9% | | |
Orlando | | | 961 | | | 1,028 | | | 1,110 | | (6.5)% | | (13.4)% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 24,084 | | | 24,113 | | | 22,702 | | (0.1)% | | 6.1% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Net operating income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta | | | 7,320 | | | 8,614 | | | 8,464 | | (15.0)% | | (13.5)% | | 22.7% |
Dallas | | | 5,619 | | | 6,641 | | | 6,332 | | (15.4)% | | (11.3)% | | 17.4% |
Washington, D.C. | | | 6,545 | | | 6,654 | | | 6,691 | | (1.6)% | | (2.2)% | | 20.3% |
Tampa | | | 4,294 | | | 4,211 | | | 4,100 | | 2.0% | | 4.7% | | 13.3% |
Charlotte | | | 2,675 | | | 3,304 | | | 2,855 | | (19.0)% | | (6.3)% | | 8.3% |
New York | | | 2,031 | | | 2,690 | | | 2,428 | | (24.5)% | | (16.4)% | | 6.3% |
Houston | | | 1,784 | | | 1,670 | | | 1,813 | | 6.8% | | (1.6)% | | 5.5% |
Austin | | | 633 | | | 710 | | | 655 | | (10.8)% | | (3.4)% | | 2.0% |
Orlando | | | 1,376 | | | 1,351 | | | 1,252 | | 1.9% | | 9.9% | | 4.2% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total same store NOI | | $ | 32,277 | | $ | 35,845 | | $ | 34,590 | | (10.0)% | | (6.7)% | | 100.0% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Average rental rate per unit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta | | $ | 1,073 | | $ | 1,152 | | $ | 1,114 | | (6.9)% | | (3.6)% | | |
Dallas | | | 1,047 | | | 1,108 | | | 1,078 | | (5.5)% | | (2.9)% | | |
Washington, D.C. | | | 1,780 | | | 1,819 | | | 1,787 | | (2.1)% | | (0.4)% | | |
Tampa | | | 1,180 | | | 1,250 | | | 1,214 | | (5.6)% | | (2.8)% | | |
Charlotte | | | 1,055 | | | 1,188 | | | 1,108 | | (11.2)% | | (4.8)% | | |
New York | | | 3,730 | | | 3,911 | | | 3,843 | | (4.6)% | | (2.9)% | | |
Houston | | | 1,247 | | | 1,266 | | | 1,263 | | (1.5)% | | (1.2)% | | |
Austin | | | 1,296 | | | 1,351 | | | 1,325 | | (4.1)% | | (2.2)% | | |
Orlando | | | 1,307 | | | 1,417 | | | 1,339 | | (7.8)% | | (2.4)% | | |
Total average rental rate per unit | | | 1,253 | | | 1,326 | | | 1,287 | | (5.5)% | | (2.6)% | | |
-10-
Table 3 (con’t)
Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI) and Average Rental Rate per Unit by Market
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Nine months ended | | % Change |
| | | September 30,
2009 | | September 30,
2008 | |
Rental and other revenues | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta | | $ | 42,981 | | $ | 44,831 | | (4.1)% |
Dallas | | | 32,937 | | | 34,677 | | (5.0)% |
Washington, D.C. | | | 30,529 | | | 30,930 | | (1.3)% |
Tampa | | | 20,904 | | | 21,424 | | (2.4)% |
Charlotte | | | 13,391 | | | 14,633 | | (8.5)% |
New York | | | 10,775 | | | 11,302 | | (4.7)% |
Houston | | | 9,208 | | | 9,235 | | (0.3)% |
Austin | | | 3,616 | | | 3,770 | | (4.1)% |
Orlando | | | 7,005 | | | 7,062 | | (0.8)% |
| | | | | | | | |
Total rental and other revenues | | | 171,346 | | | 177,864 | | (3.7)% |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Property operating and maintenance expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta | | | 18,743 | | | 18,661 | | 0.4% |
Dallas | | | 14,351 | | | 15,846 | | (9.4)% |
Washington, D.C. | | | 10,756 | | | 11,003 | | (2.2)% |
Tampa | | | 8,311 | | | 9,223 | | (9.9)% |
Charlotte | | | 4,859 | | | 5,112 | | (4.9)% |
New York | | | 4,062 | | | 3,710 | | 9.5% |
Houston | | | 4,005 | | | 4,377 | | (8.5)% |
Austin | | | 1,675 | | | 1,772 | | (5.5)% |
Orlando | | | 3,093 | | | 3,176 | | (2.6)% |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 69,855 | | | 72,880 | | (4.2)% |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Net operating income | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta | | | 24,238 | | | 26,170 | | (7.4)% |
Dallas | | | 18,586 | | | 18,831 | | (1.3)% |
Washington, D.C. | | | 19,773 | | | 19,927 | | (0.8)% |
Tampa | | | 12,593 | | | 12,201 | | 3.2% |
Charlotte | | | 8,532 | | | 9,521 | | (10.4)% |
New York | | | 6,713 | | | 7,592 | | (11.6)% |
Houston | | | 5,203 | | | 4,858 | | 7.1% |
Austin | | | 1,941 | | | 1,998 | | (2.9)% |
Orlando | | | 3,912 | | | 3,886 | | 0.7% |
| | | | | | | | |
Total same store NOI | | $ | 101,491 | | $ | 104,984 | | (3.3)% |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Average rental rate per unit | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta | | $ | 1,107 | | $ | 1,149 | | (3.7)% |
Dallas | | | 1,073 | | | 1,102 | | (2.6)% |
Washington, D.C. | | | 1,789 | | | 1,813 | | (1.3)% |
Tampa | | | 1,208 | | | 1,277 | | (5.4)% |
Charlotte | | | 1,105 | | | 1,187 | | (6.9)% |
New York | | | 3,837 | | | 3,894 | | (1.5)% |
Houston | | | 1,259 | | | 1,248 | | 0.9% |
Austin | | | 1,322 | | | 1,334 | | (0.9)% |
Orlando | | | 1,340 | | | 1,443 | | (7.1)% |
Total average rental rate per unit | | | 1,283 | | | 1,326 | | (3.2)% |
-11-
Table 4
Computation of Debt Ratios
(In thousands)
| | | | | | |
| | | As of September 30, |
| | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| | |
Total real estate assets per balance sheet | | $ | 2,099,926 | | $ | 2,123,061 |
Plus: | | | | | | |
Company share of real estate assets held in unconsolidated entities | | | 92,185 | | | 113,210 |
Company share of accumulated depreciation - assets held in unconsolidated entities | | | 8,324 | | | 6,499 |
Accumulated depreciation per balance sheet | | | 605,694 | | | 514,029 |
Accumulated depreciation on assets held for sale | | | - | | | 86,383 |
| | | | | | |
Total undepreciated real estate assets(A) | | $ | 2,806,129 | | $ | 2,843,182 |
| | | | | | |
| | |
Total debt per balance sheet | | $ | 1,056,499 | | $ | 1,043,418 |
Plus: | | | | | | |
Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities | | | 106,969 | | | 74,928 |
| | | | | | |
Total debt (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt)(B) | | $ | 1,163,468 | | $ | 1,118,346 |
| | | | | | |
| | |
Total debt as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt(B÷A) | | | 41.5% | | | 39.3% |
| | | | | | |
| | |
Total debt per balance sheet | | $ | 1,056,499 | | $ | 1,043,418 |
Plus: | | | | | | |
Company share of third party debt held in unconsolidated entities | | | 106,969 | | | 74,928 |
Preferred shares at liquidation value | | | 95,000 | | | 95,000 |
| | | | | | |
Total debt and preferred equity (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt)(C) | | $ | 1,258,468 | | $ | 1,213,346 |
| | | | | | |
| | |
Total debt and preferred equity as a % of undepreciated real estate assets (adjusted for joint venture partners’ share of debt)(C÷A) | | | 44.8% | | | 42.7% |
| | | | | | |
-12-
