UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM N-CSR CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES Investment Company Act file number: 811-07700 Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) Ronald E. Robison 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 212-762-4000 Date of fiscal year end: March 31, 2007 Date of reporting period: September 30, 2006 Item 1 - Report to Shareholders
Welcome, Shareholder:
In this report, you'll learn about how your investment in Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust performed during the semiannual period. We will provide an overview of the market conditions, and discuss some of the factors that affected performance during the reporting period. In addition, this report includes the Fund's financial statements and a list of Fund investments.
This material must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus for the fund being offered. |
Market forecasts provided in this report may not necessarily come to pass. There is no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective. The Fund is subject to market risk, which is the possibility that market values of securities owned by the Fund will decline and, therefore, the value of the Fund's shares may be less than what you paid for them. Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this Fund. Please see the prospectus for more complete information on investment risks. |
Fund Report | |
For the six months ended September 30, 2006 | |
Total Return for the 6 Months Ended September 30, 2006
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust | Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (10-Year)1 | Lipper Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds Index2 | ||||||||||||
3.12% | 3.87% | 3.01% | ||||||||||||
The Fund's total return assumes the reinvestment of all distributions. See Performance Summary for standardized performance and benchmark information. |
Market Conditions
During the six months ended September 30, 2006, the market focused on the new leadership at the Federal Reserve Board (the ‘‘Fed’’) and the conflicting uncertainties created by inflationary pressures and forecasts of slower economic growth. As consumer spending and housing weakened, the pace of U.S. economic growth moderated and inflation remained within the range that the Fed was apparently willing to tolerate. In its first two meetings during the period the Fed continued its tightening policy, raising the Fed funds target rate in 25 basis point increments, bringing it to 5.25 percent at the end of June. In July, investors began to anticipate that the Fed would take a break from rate increases and in August it did pause, ending a record two-year run of 17 consecutive rate increases. At its September meeting, the Fed again kept its target rate unchanged as the housing market continued to weaken and oil prices declined.
The municipal market reflected this improved outlook for bonds and tracked the third calendar-quarter rally in Treasuries. Representative yields on 10-year AAA-rated municipal bonds, which increased from 4.00 percent in March to 4.15 percent in June, fell to 3.70 percent at the end of September. While yields on longer maturities declined, interest rates on two-year AAA tax-exempt maturities remained unchanged. Accordingly, the spread between short-term and long-term interest rates narrowed and the slope of the municipal yield curve continued to flatten.
Reinvestment of an estimated $100 billion of bond maturities, calls and coupons in June, July and September upheld demand for municipal bonds. However, municipal bond issuance lagged last year's record pace by over 15 percent in the first nine months of 2006. The overall decline was due in great part to a 50 percent slowdown of refunding activity. In California and New York, the drop in new-issue volume exceeded national levels with declines of 20 percent and 35 percent, respectively.
Steady demand and lower supply helped municipal bond performance keep pace with that of Treasuries. The municipal-to-Treasury yield ratio measures the relative attractiveness of the two sectors. A decline in the ratio indicates that while municipals outperformed Treasuries for the period measured, they also become relatively richer (i.e. prices increased to a greater extent). During the six-month reporting period, the 10-year municipal-to-Treasury yield ratio declined slightly from 82 to 80 percent. In comparison, the yield ratio reached a high of 87 percent in 2005.
Performance Analysis
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust underperformed the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (10-Year) and outperformed the Lipper Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds Index for the six months ended September 30, 2006.
2
During the period, the Fund's interest-rate posture continued to reflect the anticipation of higher rates. As a result, at the end of September the Fund's option-adjusted duration* stood at 4.5 years which was at the conservative end of its range. To implement this strategy of reducing the portfolio's duration, we used both a U.S. Treasury futures hedge and a BMA interest-rate swap contract. This helped the Fund's total returns as interest rates rose but tempered performance when rates declined in the third quarter. (The Fund may enter into interest rate swaps in addition to shorting U.S. Treasury futures to help preserve a return or spread on a particular investment or portion of the portfolio. This will subject the fund to the risks inherent in using these investments).
The Fund continued to modestly increase its exposure to BBB rated investment-grade bonds. New purchases included additional tobacco securitization bonds in the industrial development/pollution control sector. This had a positive impact on performance during the period as lower-rated issues outperformed high-grade bonds. Overall, the Fund maintained its high-quality bias with over 80 percent of the portfolio rated A or better. Reflecting a commitment to diversification, the Fund's net assets of $176.8 million were invested among 14 municipal sectors and 98 credits as of the end of the period.
There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform as discussed herein or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future.
* A measure of the sensitivity of a bond's price to changes in interest rates, expressed in years. Each year of duration represents an expected 1 percent change in the price of a bond for every 1 percent change in interest rates. The longer a bond's duration, the greater the effect of interest-rate movements on its price. Typically, funds with shorter durations perform better in rising-interest-rate environments, while funds with longer durations perform better when rates decline. |
TOP FIVE SECTORS | ||||||
Transportation Facilities | 14.7 | % | ||||
Electric | 13.1 | |||||
Educational Facilities | 9.8 | |||||
IDR/PCR** | 9.7 | |||||
Public Facilities | 9.0 | |||||
LONG-TERM CREDIT ANALYSIS | ||||||
Aaa/AAA | 65.5 | % | ||||
Aa/AA | 11.6 | |||||
A/A | 6.3 | |||||
Baa/BBB | 16.0 | |||||
Ba/BB | 0.6 | |||||
** Industrial Development / Pollution Control Revenue |
Data as of September 30, 2006. Subject to change daily. All percentages for top five sectors are as a percentage of net assets and all percentages for long-term credit analysis are as a percentage of total long-term investments. These data are provided for informational purposes only and should not be deemed a recommendation to buy or sell the securities mentioned. Morgan Stanley is a full-service securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities, investment banking, research and analysis, financing and financial advisory services. |
3
Investment Strategy
The Fund will normally invest at least 80 percent of its assets in intermediate-term securities that pay interest exempt from federal income taxes. This policy is fundamental and may not be changed without shareholder approval. The Fund's ‘‘Investment Adviser,’’ Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc., generally invests the Fund's assets in municipal obligations. Municipal obligations are bonds, notes or short-term commercial paper issued by state governments, local governments and their respective agencies. In deciding which securities to buy, hold or sell, the Investment Adviser considers market, economic and political conditions. These municipal obligations will have the following ratings at the time of purchase:
• | municipal bonds—within the four highest grades by Moody's Investors Service Inc. (‘‘Moody's’’), Standard & Poor's Rating Group, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (‘‘S&P’’), or Fitch Ratings (‘‘Fitch’’); |
• | municipal notes—within the two highest grades or, if not rated, have outstanding bonds within the three highest grades by Moody's, S&P or Fitch; and |
• | municipal commercial paper—within the highest grade by Moody's, S&P or Fitch. |
For More Information
About Portfolio Holdings
Each Morgan Stanley fund provides a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in its semiannual and annual reports within 60 days of the end of the fund's second and fourth fiscal quarters. The semiannual reports and the annual reports are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form N-CSRS and Form N-CSR, respectively. Morgan Stanley also delivers the semiannual and annual reports to fund shareholders and makes these reports available on its public web site, www.morganstanley.com. Each Morgan Stanley fund also files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the fund's first and third fiscal quarters on Form N-Q. Morgan Stanley does not deliver the reports for the first and third fiscal quarters to shareholders, nor are the reports posted to the Morgan Stanley public web site. You may, however, obtain the Form N-Q filings (as well as the Form N-CSR and N-CSRS filings) by accessing the SEC's web site, http://www.sec.gov. You may also review and copy them at the SEC's public reference room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the SEC's public reference room may be obtained by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. You can also request copies of these materials, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the SEC's e-mail address (publicinfo@sec.gov) or by writing the public reference section of the SEC, Washington, DC 20549-0102.
4
Householding Notice
To reduce printing and mailing costs, the Fund attempts to eliminate duplicate mailings to the same address. The Fund delivers a single copy of certain shareholder documents, including shareholder reports, prospectuses and proxy materials, to investors with the same last name who reside at the same address. Your participation in this program will continue for an unlimited period of time unless you instruct us otherwise. You can request multiple copies of these documents by calling (800) 350-6414, 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., ET. Once our Customer Service Center has received your instructions, we will begin sending individual copies for each account within 30 days.
5
Distribution by Maturity | |
(% of Long-Term Portfolio) As of September 30, 2006 | |
Weighted Average Maturity: 9 Years(a)
(a) | Where applicable maturities reflect mandatory tenders, puts and call dates. |
Portfolio structure is subject to change. |
Geographic Summary of Investments
Based on Market Value as a Percent of Net Assets
Alabama | 1.2 | % | ||||
Alaska | 2.6 | |||||
Arizona | 2.4 | |||||
Arkansas | 0.6 | |||||
California | 12.2 | |||||
Colorado | 1.8 | |||||
Delaware | 1.2 | |||||
District of Columbia | 1.2 | |||||
Florida | 8.3 | |||||
Georgia | 2.2 | % | ||||
Hawaii | 0.6 | |||||
Illinois | 4.1 | |||||
Indiana | 1.2 | |||||
Kansas | 1.8 | |||||
Kentucky | 0.4 | |||||
Maine | 1.2 | |||||
Maryland | 4.9 | |||||
Massachusetts | 1.3 | |||||
Michigan | 2.8 | % | ||||
Minnesota | 1.8 | |||||
Missouri | 5.8 | |||||
Nevada | 2.4 | |||||
New Hampshire | 1.1 | |||||
New Jersey | 3.1 | |||||
New York | 7.2 | |||||
Ohio | 3.2 | |||||
Oregon | 1.2 | |||||
Pennsylvania | 3.0 | % | ||||
South Carolina | 0.6 | |||||
Tennessee | 1.1 | |||||
Texas | 8.3 | |||||
Virginia | 3.1 | |||||
Washington | 4.9 | |||||
Total† | 98.8 | % | ||||
† | Does not include open short futures contracts with an underlying face amount of $12,814,688 with a total unrealized depreciation of $91,268 and an interest rate swap agreement with an unrealized depreciation of $176,582. |
6
Performance Summary | |
Average Annual Total Returns — Period Ended September 30, 2006
(since 07/12/93) | ||||||||
Symbol | DWLTX | |||||||
1 Year | 4.15 % | 3 | ||||||
5 Years | 4.15 | 3 | ||||||
10 Years | 4.62 | 3 | ||||||
Since Inception | 4.47 | 3 | ||||||
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of future results and current performance may be lower or higher than the figures shown. For most recent month-end performance figures, please visit www.morganstanley.com or speak with your Financial Advisor. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate and fund shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. |
(1) | The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (10-Year) measures the performance of municipal bonds rated at least Baa+ by Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and with maturities ranging between 8 and 12 years. Indexes are unmanaged and their returns do not include any sales charges or fees. Such costs would lower performance. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. |
(2) | The Lipper Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds Index is an equally weighted performance index of the largest qualifying funds (based on net assets) in the Lipper Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds classification. The Index, which is adjusted for capital gains distributions and income dividends, is unmanaged and should not be considered an investment. There are currently 30 funds represented in this Index. |
(3) | Figure shown assumes reinvestment of all distributions. There are no sales charges. |
7
Expense Example | |
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs: (1) transaction costs, including redemption fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including advisory fees and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period 04/01/06 – 09/30/06.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled ‘‘Expenses Paid During Period’’ to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line of the table below provides information about hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing cost of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as redemption fees. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs, and will not help you determine the relative total cost of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period* | ||||||||||||
04/01/06 | 09/30/06 | 04/01/06 – 09/30/06 | ||||||||||||
Actual (3.12% return) | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,031.20 | $ | 3.11 | ||||||||
Hypothetical (5% annual return before expenses) | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,022.01 | $ | 3.09 | ||||||||
* | Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio of 0.61% multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). If the Fund had borne all of its expenses, the annualized expense ratio would have been 0.69%. |
8
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Board reviewed and considered the nature and extent of the investment advisory services provided by the Investment Adviser under the Advisory Agreement, including portfolio management, investment research and fixed income securities trading. The Board also reviewed and considered the nature and extent of the non-advisory, administrative services provided by the Fund's Administrator under the Administration Agreement, including accounting, clerical, bookkeeping, compliance, business management and planning, and the provision of supplies, office space and utilities at the Investment Adviser's expense. (The Investment Adviser and the Administrator together are referred to as the ‘‘Adviser’’ and the Advisory and Administration Agreements together are referred to as the ‘‘Management Agreement.’’) The Board also compared the nature of the services provided by the Adviser with similar services provided by non-affiliated advisers as reported to the Board by Lipper Inc. (‘‘Lipper’’).
The Board reviewed and considered the qualifications of the portfolio managers, the senior administrative managers and other key personnel of the Adviser who provide the advisory and administrative services to the Fund. The Board determined that the Adviser's portfolio managers and key personnel are well qualified by education and/or training and experience to perform the services in an efficient and professional manner. The Board concluded that the nature and extent of the advisory and administrative services provided were necessary and appropriate for the conduct of the business and investment activities of the Fund. The Board also concluded that the overall quality of the advisory and administrative services was satisfactory.
Performance Relative to Comparable Funds Managed by Other Advisers
On a regular basis, the Board reviews the performance of all funds in the Morgan Stanley Fund Complex, including the Fund, compared to their peers, paying specific attention to the underperforming funds. In addition, the Board specifically reviewed the Fund's performance for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended November 30, 2005, as shown in a report provided by Lipper (the ‘‘Lipper Report’’), compared to the performance of comparable funds selected by Lipper (the ‘‘performance peer group’’). The Board also discussed with the Adviser the performance goals and the actual results achieved in managing the Fund. The Board concluded that the Fund's performance was competitive with that of its performance peer group.
Fees Relative to Other Proprietary Funds Managed by the Adviser with Comparable
Investment Strategies
The Board noted that the Adviser did not manage any other proprietary funds with investment strategies comparable to those of the Fund.
Fees and Expenses Relative to Comparable Funds Managed by Other Advisers
The Board reviewed the advisory and administrative fee (together, the ‘‘management fee’’) rate and total expense ratio of the Fund as compared to the average management fee rate and average total expense ratio for funds, selected by Lipper (the ‘‘expense peer group’’), managed by other advisers with investment strategies comparable to those of the Fund, as shown in the Lipper Report. The Board concluded that the Fund's management fee rate and total expense ratio were competitive with those of its expense peer group.
9
Breakpoints and Economies of Scale
The Board reviewed the structure of the Fund's management fee schedule under the Management Agreement and noted that it does not include any breakpoints. The Board noted that the Fund's assets were relatively small. The Board concluded that it would be premature to consider economies of scale in approving the Management Agreement at the present time.
Profitability of the Adviser and Affiliates
The Board considered information concerning the costs incurred and profits realized by the Adviser and affiliates during the last year from their relationship with the Fund and during the last two years from their relationship with the Morgan Stanley Fund Complex and reviewed with the Adviser the cost allocation methodology used to determine the profitability of the Adviser and affiliates. Based on its review of the information it received, the Board concluded that the profits earned by the Adviser and affiliates were not excessive in light of the advisory, administrative and other services provided to the Fund.
Fall-Out Benefits
The Board considered so-called ‘‘fall-out benefits’’ derived by the Adviser and affiliates from their relationship with the Fund and the Morgan Stanley Fund Complex, such as ‘‘float’’ benefits derived from handling of checks for purchases and sales of Fund shares, through a broker-dealer affiliate of the Adviser. The Board concluded that the float benefits were relatively small.
Soft Dollar Benefits
The Board considered whether the Adviser realizes any benefits from commissions paid to brokers who execute securities transactions for the Fund (‘‘soft dollars’’). The Board noted that the Fund invests only in fixed income securities, which do not generate soft dollars.
Adviser Financially Sound and Financially Capable of Meeting the Fund's Needs
The Board considered whether the Adviser is financially sound and has the resources necessary to perform its obligations under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that the Adviser's operations remain profitable, although increased expenses in recent years have reduced the Adviser's profitability. The Board concluded that the Adviser has the financial resources necessary to fulfill its obligations under the Management Agreement.
Historical Relationship Between the Fund and the Adviser
The Board also reviewed and considered the historical relationship between the Fund and the Adviser, including the organizational structure of the Adviser, the policies and procedures formulated and adopted by the Adviser for managing the Fund's operations and the Board's confidence in the competence and integrity of the senior managers and key personnel of the Adviser. The Board concluded that it is beneficial for the Fund to continue its relationship with the Adviser.
10
Other Factors and Current Trends
The Board considered the controls and procedures adopted and implemented by the Adviser and monitored by the Fund's Chief Compliance Officer and concluded that the conduct of business by the Adviser indicates a good faith effort on its part to adhere to high ethical standards in the conduct of the Fund's business.
General Conclusion
After considering and weighing all of the above factors, the Board concluded that it would be in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders to approve renewal of the Management Agreement for another year.
11
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Portfolio of Investments September 30, 2006 (unaudited)
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT IN THOUSANDS | COUPON RATE | MATURITY DATE | VALUE | |||||||||||||||
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds (95.0%) | ||||||||||||||||||
General Obligation (7.3%) | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,000 | Pueblo School District # 60, Colorado, Ser 2002 (FSA) | 5.375 | % | 12/15/14 | $ | 1,099,120 | |||||||||||
2,000 | Sussex County, Delaware, Ser 2003 (Ambac) | 5.00 | 10/15/11 | 2,135,020 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Massachusetts, Ser 2001 D (MBIA) | 6.00 | 11/01/13 | 1,142,360 | ||||||||||||||
3,000 | Jackson County Reorganized School District # 4, Missouri, Ser 2005 (FSA) | 5.00 | 03/01/17 | 3,119,790 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | New York City, New York, 2003 Ser C (FSA) | 5.25 | 08/01/11 | 1,074,600 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | Bellevue School District # 405, Washington, Ser 2002 (FGIC) | 5.00 | 12/01/15 | 2,145,620 | ||||||||||||||
2,030 | North Kitsap School District # 400, Washington, Refg Ser 2005 (FSA) | 5.125 | 12/01/18 | 2,211,441 | ||||||||||||||
12,030 | 12,927,951 | |||||||||||||||||
Educational Facilities Revenue (9.8%) | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | University of Arizona, Ser 2005 B COPs (Ambac) | 5.00 | 06/01/20 | 1,071,480 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | Miami-Dade County Educational Facilities Authority, Florida, University of Miami Ser 2004 A (Ambac) | 5.00 | 04/01/16 | 2,159,240 | ||||||||||||||
1,500 | University of Central Florida, UCF Convocation Corp Ser 2005 A COPs (FGIC) | 5.00 | 10/01/17 | 1,624,050 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | University of Illinois, COPs Ser 2003 (Ambac) | 5.00 | 10/01/14 | 2,155,740 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Purdue University, Indiana, Student Facilities Ser 2003 A | 5.375 | 07/01/14 | 1,093,940 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | University of Maine, Ser 2002 (FSA) | 5.375 | 03/01/12 | 2,178,740 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, Rowan University Ser 2003 I (FGIC) | 5.25 | 07/01/14 | 1,092,160 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Pennsylvania State University, Refg Ser 2002 | 5.25 | 08/15/13 | 1,097,140 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Swarthmore Borough Authority, Pennsylvania, Swarthmore College Ser 2002 | 5.25 | 09/15/14 | 1,085,560 | ||||||||||||||
450 | Chattanooga Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, Tennessee, University of Tennessee Chattanooga Refg Ser 2005 A | 5.00 | 10/01/15 | 463,315 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Southwest Higher Education Authority, Texas, Southern Methodist University Ser 2002 (Ambac) | 5.50 | 10/01/13 | 1,100,660 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | Texas Tech University, Refg & Impr Ser 2003 (Ambac) | 5.25 | 02/15/15 | 2,175,620 | ||||||||||||||
15,950 | 17,297,645 | |||||||||||||||||
Electric Revenue (13.1%) | ||||||||||||||||||
1,500 | Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority, Lake Dorothy Hydroelectric Ser 2006 (AMT) (Ambac) | 5.25 | 12/01/21 | 1,562,535 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Arizona Power Authority, Hoover Uprating Refg Ser 2001 A | 5.25 | 10/01/16 | 1,109,380 | ||||||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
12
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Portfolio of Investments September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT IN THOUSANDS | COUPON RATE | MATURITY DATE | VALUE | ||||||||||||||||||||||
California Department of Water Resources, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,000 | Power Supply Ser 2002 A (MBIA) | 5.50 | % | 05/01/13 | $ | 1,107,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Power Supply Ser 2002 A (Ambac) | 5.50 | 05/01/14 | 2,210,360 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Jacksonville Electric Authority, Florida, St Johns River Power Park Refg Issue 2 Ser 17 | 5.25 | 10/01/13 | 2,141,400 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Combustion Turbine Ser 2002 A (MBIA) | 5.25 | 11/01/14 | 2,170,960 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Michigan Public Power Agency, Belle River Refg 2002 Ser A (MBIA) | 5.25 | 01/01/12 | 2,156,120 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Southern Minnesota Municipal Agency, Ser 2002 A (Ambac) | 5.00 | 01/01/12 | 2,132,380 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Long Island Power Authority, New York, Ser 1998 B (MBIA) | 5.125 | 04/01/11 | 1,032,080 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, American Municipal Power-Ohio Inc Refg 2004 (Ambac) | 5.00 | 02/15/16 | 2,145,480 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | South Carolina Public Service Authority, Refg Ser 2002 D (FSA) | 5.25 | 01/01/15 | 1,085,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, LCRA Services Corp Refg Ser 2004 (FGIC) | 5.00 | 05/15/19 | 1,047,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Klickitat County Public Utilities District # 1, Washington, Refg Ser 2006 B (FGIC) | 5.25 | 12/01/21 | 2,208,020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Seattle, Washington, Municipal Light & Power Refg Ser 2000 | 5.625 | 12/01/14 | 1,073,340 | |||||||||||||||||||||
21,500 | 23,181,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hospital Revenue (8.8%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, John C Lincoln Health Ser 2005 B | 5.25 | 12/01/22 | 2,120,060 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Washington County, Arkansas, Washington Regional Medical Center Ser 2005 B | 5.00 | 02/01/19 | 1,043,930 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Refg Ser 2005 | 5.00 | 11/15/19 | 2,113,960 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,825 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Adventist Health West Ser 2005 A | 5.00 | 03/01/19 | 1,922,309 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,470 | Loma Linda, California, Loma Linda University Medical Center Ser 2005 A | 5.00 | 12/01/17 | 1,549,174 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Alachua County Health Facilities Authority, Florida, Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics Ser 1996 A (MBIA) | 6.25 | 12/01/11 | 1,113,160 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Indiana Health Facilities Financing Authority, Community Hospitals Ser 2005 A (Ambac) | 5.00 | 05/01/20 | 1,067,930 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Medlantic/Helix Ser 1998 A (FSA) | 5.25 | 08/15/12 | 1,042,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,100 | Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, Henry Ford Health Ser 2006 A | 5.00 | 11/15/20 | 1,164,482 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,250 | Franklin County, Ohio, Trinity Health Ser 2005 A | 5.00 | 06/01/17 | 2,411,168 | |||||||||||||||||||||
14,645 | 15,548,173 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
13
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Portfolio of Investments September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT IN THOUSANDS | COUPON RATE | MATURITY DATE | VALUE | |||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Development/Pollution Control Revenue (9.7%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 2,000 | Northern Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Alaska, Asset Backed Ser 2006 A | 4.625 | % | 06/01/23 | $ | 2,001,540 | |||||||||||||||
2,000 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Los Angeles County Securitization Corp Ser 2006 | 0.00 | †† | 06/01/28 | 1,680,700 | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, San Diego Gas & Electric Co 1996 Ser A | 5.90 | 06/01/14 | 1,118,450 | ||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | Clark County Pollution Control Financing Authority, Nevada, Southern California Edison Co 2000 Ser C (AMT) (Mandatory Tender 03/02/09) | 3.25 | 06/01/31 | 2,924,550 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | New York City Industrial Development Agency, New York, Terminal One Group Association Ser 2005 (AMT) | 5.00 | 01/01/10 | 2,066,540 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Westchester Tobacco Asset Securitization Corporation, New York, Ser 2005 | 5.00 | 06/01/26 | 1,019,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corporation, Residuals Ser 47TP | 9.266‡ | 09/01/19 | 1,447,120 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,725 | Sabine River Authority, Texas, TXU Electric Co Refg Ser 2001 B (AMT) (Mandatory Tender 11/01/11) | 5.75 | 05/01/30 | 1,834,762 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Chesterfield County Industrial Development Authority, Virginia, Virginia Electric & Power Co Ser 1985 | 5.50 | 10/01/09 | 2,022,960 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, Virginia, Asset Backed Ser 2005 | 5.25 | 06/01/19 | 1,039,100 | ||||||||||||||||||
16,725 | 17,155,042 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Revenue – Multi-Family (0.9%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1,500 | Independent Cities Lease Financing Authority, California, San Juan Mobile Estates Ser 2006 A | 4.875 | 05/15/26 | 1,512,885 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Revenue – Single Family (0.4%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
705 | Virginia Housing Development Authority, 2001 Ser J (MBIA) | 4.75 | 01/01/12 | 731,825 | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Facilities Revenue (9.0%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Jefferson County, Alabama, School Ser 2004 A | 5.25 | 01/01/15 | 2,168,420 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Manatee County School District, Florida, Sales Tax Ser 2003 (Ambac) | 5.00 | 10/01/15 | 2,161,720 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Orange County School Board, Florida, Ser 2001 A COPs (Ambac) | 5.25 | 08/01/14 | 2,171,240 | ||||||||||||||||||
595 | Kentucky Property & Buildings Commission, Project No. 69 Ser A (FSA) | 5.25 | 08/01/15 | 636,305 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Kansas City School District, Missouri, Elementary School Refg Ser 2003 B (FGIC) | 5.00 | 02/01/14 | 2,161,920 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Missouri Board of Public Buildings, Ser A 2003 | 5.50 | 10/15/13 | 1,114,840 | ||||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
14
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Portfolio of Investments September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT IN THOUSANDS | COUPON RATE | MATURITY DATE | VALUE | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Construction Refg 2005 Ser N-1 (Ambac) † | 5.00 | % | 09/01/17 | $ | 1,083,910 | |||||||||||||||
2,000 | Erie County Industrial Development Agency, New York, Buffalo School District Ser 2003 (FSA) | 5.75 | 05/01/14 | 2,247,660 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | New York State Urban Development Corporation, Correctional & Youth Facilities Refg Ser 2003 A (Mandatory Tender 01/01/09) | 5.25 | 01/01/21 | 1,033,520 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Ohio Building Authority, Highway Safety Building 2001 Ser A | 5.50 | 10/01/15 | 1,083,940 | ||||||||||||||||||
14,595 | 15,863,475 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Recreational Facilities Revenue (4.0%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, California, Ser 2006 | 5.00 | 03/01/20 | 1,007,060 | ||||||||||||||||||
District of Columbia Ballpark, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Ser 2006 B-1 (FGIC) | 5.25 | 02/01/16 | 1,107,490 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Ser 2006 B-1 (FGIC) | 5.00 | 02/01/19 | 1,077,560 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Baltimore, Maryland, Convention Center Hotel Ser 2006 A (XLCA) | 5.25 | 09/01/21 | 1,103,670 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Maryland Economic Development Corporation, Chesapeake Bay Conference Center Ser 2006 A (WI) | 5.00 | 12/01/16 | 1,006,670 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,575 | Detroit, Michigan, CoBo Hall Ser 2003 (MBIA) | 5.00 | 09/30/13 | 1,696,779 | ||||||||||||||||||
6,575 | 6,999,229 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Resource Recovery Revenue (3.4%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority, Montgomery County Refg Ser 2003 (AMT) (Ambac) | 5.50 | 04/01/12 | 3,244,260 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, SEMASS Ser 2001 A (MBIA) | 5.625 | 01/01/12 | 1,088,380 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,645 | Harrisburg Authority, Pennsylvania, Ser D 2003 (FSA) (Mandatory Tender 10/01/13) | 5.00 | 12/01/33 | 1,759,081 | ||||||||||||||||||
5,645 | 6,091,721 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax Allocation Revenue (4.5%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Burbank Public Financing Authority, California, 2003 Ser A (Ambac) | 5.25 | 12/01/14 | 2,195,860 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,100 | Village of Pingree Grove, Illinois, Cambridge Lakes Ser 2005-1 | 5.25 | 03/01/15 | 1,122,077 | ||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas, Area B Refg Ser 2005 | 4.75 | 12/01/16 | 3,097,830 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,500 | Fenton, Missouri, Gravois Bluffs Refg Ser 2006 | 5.00 | 04/01/13 | 1,573,785 | ||||||||||||||||||
7,600 | 7,989,552 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transportation Facilities Revenue (14.7%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | Alaska International Airports, Ser 2002 B (Ambac) | 5.75 | 10/01/13 | 1,108,070 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Orange County Transportation Authority, California, Toll Road Refg Ser 2003 A (Ambac) | 5.25 | 08/15/14 | 2,198,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Colorado Department of Transportation, Refg Ser 2002 B (MBIA) | 5.00 | 06/15/11 | 2,126,120 | ||||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
15
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Portfolio of Investments September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT IN THOUSANDS | COUPON RATE | MATURITY DATE | VALUE | |||||||||||||||
$ | 1,000 | Greater Orlando Aviation Authority, Florida, Ser 1997 (AMT) (FGIC) | 5.75 | % | 10/01/11 | $ | 1,086,700 | |||||||||||
2,000 | Miami-Dade County Aviation, Florida, Miami Int'l Airport Ser 2003 D (AMT) (MBIA) | 5.00 | 10/01/12 | 2,123,380 | ||||||||||||||
960 | Southwestern Development Authority, Illinois, Tri-City Regional Port District Refg Ser 2003 A (AMT) | 4.90 | 07/01/14 | 963,312 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | Maryland Department of Transportation, Ser 2003 | 5.25 | 12/15/14 | 2,220,360 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Minneapolis & St. Paul, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minnesota, Ser 2005 B (AMT) (Ambac) | 5.00 | 01/01/20 | 1,058,840 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission, Ser A 2000 | 5.625 | 02/01/15 | 1,078,540 | ||||||||||||||
1,100 | St Louis, Missouri, Lambert-St Louis Int'l Airport Ser 2003 A (FSA) | 5.25 | 07/01/12 | 1,192,048 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Clark County, Nevada, Aviation Fuel Tax Ser 2003 C (AMT) (Ambac) | 5.00 | 07/01/13 | 1,062,280 | ||||||||||||||
1,750 | New Hampshire, Turnpike Refg Ser 2003 (Ambac) | 5.00 | 02/01/16 | 1,876,385 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, New York, Ser 2001 A | 5.25 | 01/01/14 | 1,076,820 | ||||||||||||||
Dallas Fort Worth International Airport, Texas, | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Refg Ser 2006 (AMT) (XLCA) | 5.00 | 11/01/12 | 2,067,500 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | Refg Ser 2006 A (AMT) (XLCA) | 5.00 | 11/01/13 | 2,064,540 | ||||||||||||||
1,500 | Richmond Metropolitan Authority, Virginia, Ser 2002 (FGIC) | 5.25 | 07/15/13 | 1,645,365 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Port of Seattle, Washington, ROLS-RR-II-R-638-1 (MBIA) | 8.311‡ | 12/01/23 | 1,106,700 | ||||||||||||||
24,310 | 26,055,460 | |||||||||||||||||
Water & Sewer Revenue (5.8%) | ||||||||||||||||||
1,500 | Clayton County Water Authority, Georgia, Refg Ser 2003 | 5.25 | 05/01/14 | 1,650,690 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Honolulu City & County, Hawaii, Wastewater Jr Ser 1998 (FGIC) | 5.25 | 07/01/13 | 1,050,580 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | Passaic Valley Sewage Commission, New Jersey, Sewer Ser 2003 (FGIC) | 5.00 | 12/01/14 | 2,161,980 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | Portland, Oregon, Sewer Refg 2004 Ser B (FSA) | 5.00 | 06/01/17 | 2,175,340 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | Houston, Texas, Combined Utility First Lien Refg Ser 2004 A (MBIA) | 5.25 | 05/15/10 | 1,057,170 | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | West Harris County Regional Water Authority, Texas, Ser 2005 (FSA) | 5.00 | 12/15/17 | 2,146,800 | ||||||||||||||
9,500 | 10,242,560 | |||||||||||||||||
Other Revenue (3.6%) | ||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Asset Backed Ser 2005 A (Ambac) | 5.00 | 06/01/21 | 2,107,540 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Cigarette Tax Ser 2004 (FGIC) | 5.00 | 06/15/12 | 1,066,640 | ||||||||||||||
3,000 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, New York, State Contingency Ser 2003 B | 5.50 | 06/01/15 | 3,177,840 | ||||||||||||||
6,000 | 6,352,020 | |||||||||||||||||
157,280 | Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds (Cost $164,837,339) | 167,949,323 | ||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
16
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Portfolio of Investments September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT IN THOUSANDS | COUPON RATE | MATURITY DATE | VALUE | |||||||||||||||
Short Term Tax-Exempt Municipal Obligations (3.8%) | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 900 | Newport Beach, California, Hoag Memorial Presbyterian Hospital 1992 Ser (Demand 10/02/06) | 3.61* | % | 10/01/22 | $ | 900,000 | |||||||||||
3,000 | Illinois Health Facilities Authority, University of Chicago Hospital Ser 1998 (MBIA) (Demand 10/02/06) | 3.89 | * | 08/01/26 | 3,000,000 | |||||||||||||
300 | Reno, Nevada, St Mary's Medical Center Ser 1998 B (MBIA) (Demand 10/02/06) | 3.80 | * | 05/15/23 | 300,000 | |||||||||||||
1,400 | Geisinger Authority, Pennsylvania, Geisinger Health Ser B 2005 (Demand 10/02/06) | 3.89 | * | 08/01/22 | 1,400,000 | |||||||||||||
1,090 | Bell County Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Scott & White Memorial Hospital Ser 2000 B-2 (MBIA) (Demand 10/02/06) | 3.89 | * | 08/15/29 | 1,090,000 | |||||||||||||
6,690 | Total Short-Term Tax-Exempt Municipal Obligations (Cost $6,690,000) | 6,690,000 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 163,970 | Total Investments (Cost $171,527,339) (a) (b) | 98.8 | % | 174,639,323 | |||||||||||||
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities | 1.2 | 2,136,050 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ | 176,775,373 | ||||||||||||||
AMT | Alternative Minimum Tax. |
COPs | Certificates of Participation. |
Residuals | Residual Interest Bond (Illiquid Security). |
ROLS | Reset Option Longs (Illiquid Security). |
WI | Security purchased on a when-issued basis. |
† | A portion of this security has been physically segregated in connection with open futures contracts in the amount of $60,000. |
‡ | Current coupon rate for inverse floating rate municipal obligation. This rate resets periodically as the auction rate on the related security changes. Positions in inverse floating rate municipal obligations have a total value of $2,553,820 which represents 1.4% of net assets. |
†† | Security is a ‘‘step-up’’ bond where the coupon increases on a predetermined future date. |
* | Current coupon of variable rate demand obligation. |
(a) | Securities have been designated as collateral in an amount equal to $13,836,332 in connection with open futures contracts, purchase of a when-issued security and open interest rate swaps. |
(b) | The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes approximates the aggregate cost for book purposes. The aggregate gross unrealized appreciation is $3,286,185 and the aggregate gross unrealized depreciation is $172,726 resulting in net unrealized appreciation of $3,113,459. |
Bond Insurance: |
Ambac | Ambac Assurance Corporation. |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Company. |
FSA | Financial Security Assurance Inc. |
MBIA | Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation. |
XLCA | XL Capital Assurance Corporation. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
17
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Portfolio of Investments September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
Futures Contracts Open at September 30, 2006:
NUMBER OF CONTRACTS | LONG/SHORT | DESCRIPTION, DELIVERY MONTH AND YEAR | UNDERLYING FACE AMOUNT AT VALUE | UNREALIZED DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||||
60 | Short | U.S. Treasury Notes 5 Year December 2006 | $(6,330,938) | $(32,978) | ||||||||||||||
60 | Short | U.S. Treasury Notes 10 Year December 2006 | (6,483,750) | (58,290) | ||||||||||||||
Total Unrealized Depreciation | $(91,268) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Agreement Open at September 30, 2006:
COUNTERPARTY | NOTIONAL AMOUNT (000) | PAYMENTS MADE BY FUND | PAYMENTS RECEIVED BY FUND | TERMINATION DATE | UNREALIZED DEPRECIATION | |||||||||||||||||
J.P. Morgan Chase Securities | $20,000 | Fixed Rate 3.85% | Floating Rate BMA (Bond Market Association) | 12/19/16 | $(176,582) | |||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
18
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
September 30, 2006 (unaudited)
Assets: | ||||||
Investments in securities, at value (cost $171,527,339) | $ | 174,639,323 | ||||
Cash | 39,796 | |||||
Receivable for: | ||||||
Interest | 2,537,798 | |||||
Shares of beneficial interest sold | 669,902 | |||||
Investments sold | 338,503 | |||||
Variation margin | 9,375 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 14,174 | |||||
Total Assets | 178,248,871 | |||||
Liabilities: | ||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open swap agreement | 176,582 | |||||
Payable for: | ||||||
Investments purchased | 996,000 | |||||
Shares of beneficial interest redeemed | 120,913 | |||||
Investment advisory fee | 46,374 | |||||
Dividends to shareholders | 31,370 | |||||
Administration fee | 11,598 | |||||
Transfer agent fee | 8,489 | |||||
Accrued expenses and other payables | 82,172 | |||||
Total Liabilities | 1,473,498 | |||||
Net Assets | $ | 176,775,373 | ||||
Composition of Net Assets: | ||||||
Paid-in-capital | $ | 174,453,385 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation | 2,844,134 | |||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | 17,005 | |||||
Accumulated net realized loss | (539,151 | ) | ||||
Net Assets | $ | 176,775,373 | ||||
Net Asset Value Per Share 16,146,843 shares outstanding (unlimited shares authorized of $.01 par value) | $ | 10.95 | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
19
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Financial Statements continued
Statement of Operations
For the six months ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited)
Net Investment Income: | ||||||
Interest Income | $ | 3,736,979 | ||||
Expenses | ||||||
Investment advisory fee | 386,357 | |||||
Transfer agent fees and expenses | 75,202 | |||||
Administration fee | 73,592 | |||||
Professional fees | 31,301 | |||||
Shareholder reports and notices | 29,723 | |||||
Registration fees | 8,764 | |||||
Custodian fees | 5,721 | |||||
Trustees' fees and expenses | 4,093 | |||||
Other | 15,327 | |||||
Total Expenses | 630,080 | |||||
Less: amounts waived/reimbursed | (72,146 | ) | ||||
Less: expense offset | (5,995 | ) | ||||
Net Expenses | 551,939 | |||||
Net Investment Income | 3,185,040 | |||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss): | ||||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) on: | ||||||
Investments | (310,995 | ) | ||||
Futures contracts | 148,368 | |||||
Net Realized Loss | (162,627 | ) | ||||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on: | ||||||
Investments | 3,064,608 | |||||
Futures contracts | (467,766 | ) | ||||
Swap agreement | (176,582 | ) | ||||
Net Appreciation | 2,420,260 | |||||
Net Gain | 2,257,633 | |||||
Net Increase | $ | 5,442,673 | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
20
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Financial Statements continued
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 | FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2006 | |||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 3,185,040 | $ | 6,612,316 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) | (162,627 | ) | 1,364,713 | |||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | 2,420,260 | (745,129 | ) | |||||||
Net Increase | 5,442,673 | 7,231,900 | ||||||||
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders from: | ||||||||||
Net investment income | (3,169,506 | ) | (6,612,172 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gain | (278,355 | ) | (227,501 | ) | ||||||
Total Dividends and Distributions | (3,447,861 | ) | (6,839,673 | ) | ||||||
Net decrease from transactions in shares of beneficial interest | (16,862,031 | ) | (10,091,493 | ) | ||||||
Net Decrease | (14,867,219 | ) | (9,699,266 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 191,642,592 | 201,341,858 | ||||||||
End of Period | ||||||||||
(Including accumulated undistributed net investment income of $17,005 and $1,471, respectively) | $ | 176,775,373 | $ | 191,642,592 | ||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2006 (unaudited)
1. Organization and Accounting Policies
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust (the ‘‘Fund’’) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Fund's investment objective is to provide a high level of current income which is exempt from federal income tax, consistent with the preservation of capital and prescribed standards of quality and maturity. The Fund was organized as a Massachusetts business trust on February 25, 1993 and commenced operations on July 12, 1993.
The Fund will assess a 2% redemption fee, which is paid directly to the Fund, for shares redeemed within seven days of purchase, subject to certain exceptions. The redemption fee is designed to protect the Fund and its remaining shareholders from the effects of short-term trading.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies:
A. Valuation of Investments — (1) portfolio securities are valued by an outside independent pricing service approved by the Trustees. The pricing service uses both a computerized grid matrix of tax-exempt securities and evaluations by its staff, in each case based on information concerning market transactions and quotations from dealers which reflect the mean between the last reported bid and asked price. The portfolio securities are thus valued by reference to a combination of transactions and quotations for the same or other securities believed to be comparable in quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, call provisions, trading characteristics and other features deemed to be relevant. The Trustees believe that timely and reliable market quotations are generally not readily available for purposes of valuing tax-exempt securities and that the valuations supplied by the pricing service are more likely to approximate the fair value of such securities; (2) futures are valued at the latest sale price on the commodities exchange on which they trade unless it is determined that such price does not reflect their market value, in which case they will be valued at their fair value as determined in good faith under procedures established by and under the supervision of the Trustees; and (3) short-term debt securities having a maturity date of more than sixty days at time of purchase are valued on a mark-to-market basis until sixty days prior to maturity and thereafter at amortized cost based on their value on the 61st day. Short-term debt securities having a maturity date of sixty days or less at the time of purchase are valued at amortized cost.
B. Accounting for Investments — Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date (date the order to buy or sell is executed). Realized gains and losses on security transactions are determined by the identified cost method. Discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized over the life of the respective securities. Interest income is accrued daily.
C. Futures Contracts — A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy and sell financial instruments or contracts based on financial indices at a set price on a future date. Upon entering into such a contract, the Fund is required to pledge to the broker cash, U.S. Government securities or other liquid portfolio securities equal to the minimum initial margin requirements of the applicable futures exchange.
22
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
Pursuant to the contract, the Fund agrees to receive from or pay to the broker an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the contract. Such receipts or payments known as variation margin are recorded by the Fund as unrealized gains and losses. Upon closing of the contract, the Fund realizes a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed.
D. Interest Rate Swaps — Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of commitments to pay and receive interest based on a notional principal amount. Net periodic interest payments to be received or paid are accrued daily and are recorded as realized gains or losses in the Statement of Operations. Interest rate swaps are marked-to-market daily based upon quotations from market makers and the change, if any, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation in the Statement of Operations.
E. Federal Income Tax Policy — It is the Fund's policy to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its taxable and nontaxable income to its shareholders. Accordingly, no federal income tax provision is required.
F. Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders — Dividends and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
G. Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2. Investment Advisory/Administration Agreements
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement, the Fund pays the Investment Adviser an advisory fee, accrued daily and payable monthly, by applying the annual rate of 0.42% to the net assets of the Fund determined as of the close of each business day.
Pursuant to an Administration Agreement with Morgan Stanley Services Company Inc. (the ‘‘Administrator’’), an affiliate of the Investment Adviser, the Fund pays an administration fee, accrued daily and payable monthly, by applying the annual rate of 0.08% to the Fund's daily net assets.
The Investment Adviser has agreed to cap the Fund's operating expenses (except for brokerage and 12b-1 fees) by assuming the Fund's ‘‘other expenses’’ and/or waiving the Fund's advisory fees, and the Administrator has agreed to waive the Fund's administrative fees, to the extent such operating expenses exceed 0.60% of the average daily net assets of the Fund on an annualized basis. These voluntary assumptions/waivers may be discontinued at any time.
3. Security Transactions and Transactions with Affiliates
The cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended September 30, 2006 aggregated $20,543,329 and $36,431,686, respectively.
23
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
Morgan Stanley Trust, an affiliate of the Investment Adviser and Administrator, is the Fund's transfer agent.
The Fund has an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering certain independent Trustees of the Fund who will have served as independent Trustees for at least five years at the time of retirement. Benefits under this plan are based on factors which include years of service and compensation. The Trustees voted to close the plan to new participants and eliminate the future benefits growth due to increases to compensation after July 31, 2003. Aggregate pension costs for the six months ended September 30, 2006 included in Trustees' fees and expenses in the Statement of Operations amounted to $2,811. At September 30, 2006, the Fund had an accrued pension liability of $51,684 which is included in accrued expenses in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The Fund has an unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan (the ‘‘Compensation Plan’’) which allows each independent Trustee to defer payment of all, or a portion, of the fees he or she receives for serving on the Board of Trustees. Each eligible Trustee generally may elect to have the deferred amounts credited with a return equal to the total return on one or more of the Morgan Stanley funds that are offered as investment options under the Compensation Plan. Appreciation/depreciation and distributions received from these investments are recorded with an offsetting increase/decrease in the deferred compensation obligation and do not affect the net asset value of the Fund.
4. Shares of Beneficial Interest
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 | FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHARES | AMOUNT | SHARES | AMOUNT | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 1,275,367 | $ | 13,815,417 | 3,949,291 | $ | 43,091,484 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends and distributions | 230,297 | 2,493,203 | 448,693 | 4,893,039 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1,505,664 | 16,308,620 | 4,397,984 | 47,984,523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (3,065,734 | ) | (33,170,651 | ) | (5,327,718 | ) | (58,076,016 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net decrease | (1,560,070 | ) | $ | (16,862,031 | ) | (929,734 | ) | $ | (10,091,493 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
5. Federal Income Tax Status
The amount of dividends and distributions from net investment income and net realized capital gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. These ‘‘book/tax’’ differences are either considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification.
24
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
Dividends and distributions which exceed net investment income and net realized capital gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of paid-in-capital.
As of March 31, 2006, the Fund had temporary book/tax differences primarily attributable to book amortization of discounts on debt securities, mark-to-market of open futures contracts and dividend payable.
6. Expense Offset
The expense offset represents a reduction of the fees and expenses for interest earned on cash balances maintained by the Fund with the transfer agent and custodian.
7. Risks Relating to Certain Financial Instruments
The Fund may invest a portion of its assets in residual interest bonds, which are inverse floating rate municipal obligations. The prices of these securities are subject to greater market fluctuations during periods of changing prevailing interest rates than are comparable fixed rate obligations.
To hedge against adverse interest rate changes, the Fund may invest in financial futures contracts or municipal bond index futures contracts (‘‘futures contracts’’).
These futures contracts involve elements of market risk in excess of the amount reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the value of the underlying securities. Risks may also arise upon entering into these contracts from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts.
The Fund may enter into interest rate swaps and may purchase or sell interest rate caps, floors and collars. The Fund expects to enter into these transactions primarily to manage interest rate risk, hedge portfolio positions and preserve a return or spread on a particular investment or portion of its portfolio. The Fund may also enter into these transactions to protect against any increase in the price of securities the Fund anticipates purchasing at a later date. Interest rate swap transactions are subject to market risk, risk of default by the other party to the transaction, risk of imperfect correlation and manager risk. Such risks may exceed the related amounts shown in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
8. Legal Matters
The Investment Adviser, certain affiliates of the Investment Adviser, certain officers of such affiliates and certain investment companies advised by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates, including the Fund, were named as defendants in a consolidated class action. This consolidated action also named as defendants certain individual Trustees and Directors of the Morgan Stanley funds. The consolidated amended complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 16, 2004, generally alleged that defendants, including the Fund, violated their statutory disclosure obligations and fiduciary duties
25
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2006 (unaudited) continued
by failing properly to disclose (i) that the Investment Adviser and certain affiliates of the Investment Adviser allegedly offered economic incentives to brokers and others to recommend the funds advised by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates to investors rather than funds managed by other companies, and (ii) that the funds advised by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates, including the Fund, allegedly paid excessive commissions to brokers in return for their alleged efforts to recommend these funds to investors. The complaint sought, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages, rescissionary damages, fees and costs. On July 2, 2004, defendants moved to dismiss the action. On March 9, 2005, plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Pleading that would, among other things, expand the allegations and alleged class. On April 14, 2006, the Court granted defendants' motion to dismiss in its entirety, with prejudice. Additionally, plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Pleading was denied. The time for plaintiffs to appeal the orders granting defendants' motion to dismiss and denying plaintiffs' motion for supplemental pleading has expired. This case is now concluded.
9. New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Fund will adopt FIN 48 for the fiscal year ending 2008 and the impact to the Fund's financial statements, if any, is currently being assessed.
In addition, in September 2006, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), was issued and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on the Fund's financial statement disclosures.
26
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Financial Highlights
Selected ratios and per share data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each period:
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 | FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Per Share Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ | 10.82 | $ | 10.80 | $ | 11.05 | $ | 10.96 | $ | 10.30 | $ | 10.37 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 0.19 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.36 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 0.15 | 0.03 | (0.25 | ) | 0.09 | 0.66 | (0.07 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total income from investment operations | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.09 | 0.42 | 1.00 | 0.29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions from: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | (0.19 | ) | (0.36 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.33 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.36 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain | (0.02 | ) | (0.01 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions | (0.21 | ) | (0.37 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.33 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.36 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period | $ | 10.95 | $ | 10.82 | $ | 10.80 | $ | 11.05 | $ | 10.96 | $ | 10.30 | |||||||||||||||
Total Return† | 3.12 | % (2) | 3.70 | % | 0.81 | % | 3.90 | % | 9.81 | % | 2.82 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses (before expense offset) | 0.61 | %(1)(3)(4) | 0.61 | %(1)(4) | 0.68 | %(1) | 0.68 | %(1) | 0.70 | %(1) | 0.82 | %(1) | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | 3.46 | %(3)(4) | 3.33 | %(4) | 3.09 | % | 2.97 | % | 3.08 | % | 3.45 | % | |||||||||||||||
Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period, in thousands | $176,775 | $191,643 | $201,342 | $206,133 | $143,939 | $70,934 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 12 | %(2) | 28 | % | 32 | % | 46 | % | 31 | % | 45 | % | |||||||||||||||
† | Calculated based on the net asset value as of the last business day of the period. |
(1) | Does not reflect the effect of expense offset of 0.01%. |
(2) | Not annualized. |
(3) | Annualized. |
(4) | If the Fund had borne all of its expenses that were reimbursed or waived by the Investment Adviser and Administrator, the annualized expense and net investment income ratios would have been as follows: |
PERIOD ENDED | EXPENSE RATIO | NET INVESTMENT INCOME RATIO | ||||||||
September 30, 2006 | 0.69 | % | 3.38 | % | ||||||
March 31, 2006 | 0.69 | 3.25 | ||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Results of Special Shareholder Meeting
On August 1, 2006, a Special Meeting of Shareholders of the Fund was scheduled in order to vote on the proposals set forth below. The proposals failed to obtain the quorum necessary in order to hold the meeting, and, therefore, the meeting was adjourned until August 23, 2006 and further adjourned to September 27, 2006, to permit further solicitation of proxies. The meeting was held on September 27, 2006 and the voting results with respect to these proposals were as follows:
(1) Election of Trustees:
FOR | WITHHOLD | ABSTAIN | BNV* | |||||||||||||||
Frank L. Bowman | 9,542,379 | 376,190 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Kathleen A. Dennis | 9,549,152 | 369,417 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
James F. Higgins | 9,536,174 | 382,395 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Joseph J. Kearns | 9,541,009 | 377,560 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Michael F. Klein | 9,537,292 | 381,277 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
W. Allen Reed | 9,544,178 | 374,391 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Fergus Reid | 9,529,365 | 389,204 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
(2) Elimination of certain fundamental investment restrictions:
FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | BNV* | |||||||||||||||
Elimination of the fundamental policy restricting the Fund’s ability to pledge assets | 8,898,294 | 209,901 | 402,589 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Elimination of the fundamental policy restricting purchases of securities on margin | 8,898,773 | 224,485 | 387,526 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Elimination of the fundamental policy prohibiting investments in oil, gas, and other types of minerals or mineral leases | 8,911,058 | 198,346 | 401,380 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Elimination of the fundamental policy prohibiting or restricting the purchase of securities of issuers in which Trustees or Officers have an interest | 8,932,385 | 192,752 | 385,647 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Elimination of the fundamental policy prohibiting investments for purposes of exercising control | 8,949,080 | 181,739 | 379,965 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Elimination of the fundamental policy prohibiting the purchase of common stocks and other instruments | 8,965,178 | 178,860 | 366,746 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Elimination of the fundamental policy regarding investments in unseasoned companies | 8,926,122 | 205,214 | 379,448 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
28
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
Results of Special Shareholder Meeting continued
(3) Modify certain fundamental investment restrictions:
FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | BNV* | |||||||||||||||
Modify fundamental policy regarding diversification | 8,955,047 | 160,276 | 395,461 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Modify fundamental policy regarding borrowing money | 8,904,409 | 218,367 | 388,008 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Modify fundamental policy regarding loans | 8,930,407 | 193,546 | 386,831 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Modify fundamental policy regarding investment in commodities, commodity contracts and futures contracts | 8,913,942 | 208,374 | 388,468 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Modify fundamental policy regarding issuance of senior securities | 8,944,085 | 178,239 | 388,460 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
(4) Reclassify certain fundamental policies as non-fundamental policies:
FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | BNV* | |||||||||||||||
Reclassification as non-fundamental the fundamental policy regarding the short sale of securities | 8,924,832 | 201,471 | 384,481 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification as non-fundamental the fundamental policy prohibiting investments in other investment companies | 8,949,961 | 173,040 | 387,783 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassification as non-fundamental the fundamental policy on the purchase or sale of puts, calls, and combinations thereof | 8,927,554 | 176,969 | 406,261 | 407,785 | ||||||||||||||
* | Broker ‘‘non-votes’’ are shares held in street name for which the broker indicates that instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or other persons entitled to vote and for which the broker does not have discretionary voting authority. |
29
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
Trustees Frank L. Bowman Officers Michael E. Nugent Ronald E. Robison J. David Germany Dennis F. Shea Barry Fink Amy R. Doberman Carsten Otto Stefanie V. Chang Yu Francis J. Smith Mary E. Mullin Transfer Agent Morgan Stanley Trust Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Deloitte & Touche LLP Investment Adviser Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc. The financial statements included herein have been taken from the records of the Fund without examination by the independent auditors and accordingly they do not express an opinion thereon. This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. For more detailed information about the Fund, its fees and expenses and other pertinent information, please read its Prospectus. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the Fund, including its trustees. It is available, without charge, by calling (800) 869-NEWS. This report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective Prospectus. Read the Prospectus carefully before investing. Investments and services offered through Morgan Stanley DW Inc., member SIPC. Morgan Stanley Distributors Inc., member NASD. © 2006 Morgan Stanley DWLSAR-RA06-01045P-YO9/06 | MORGAN STANLEY FUNDS | |
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust Semiannual Report September 30, 2006 | ||
Item 2. Code of Ethics. Not applicable for semiannual reports. Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert. Not applicable for semiannual reports. Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Not applicable for semiannual reports. Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. Not applicable for semiannual reports. Item 6. Refer to Item 1. Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. Not applicable for semiannual reports. Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies Applicable only to reports filed by closed-end funds. Item 9. Closed-End Fund Repurchases Applicable to reports filed by closed-end funds. Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Not applicable. Item 11. Controls and Procedures (a) The Fund's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Fund's disclosure controls and procedures are sufficient to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Fund in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, based upon such officers' evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report. (b) There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Item 12. Exhibits (a) Code of Ethics - Not applicable for semiannual reports. (b) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant are attached hereto as part of EX-99.CERT. 2 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust /s/ Ronald E. Robison Ronald E. Robison Principal Executive Officer November 21, 2006 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. /s/ Ronald E. Robison Ronald E. Robison Principal Executive Officer November 21, 2006 /s/ Francis Smith Francis Smith Principal Financial Officer November 21, 2006 3 EXHIBIT 12 B1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS -------------- I, Ronald E. Robison, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 4 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. Date: November 21, 2006 /s/ Ronald E. Robison Ronald E. Robison Principal Executive Officer 5 EXHIBIT 12 B2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS -------------- I, Francis Smith, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 6 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. Date: November 21, 2006 /s/ Francis Smith Francis Smith Principal Financial Officer 7 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR (the "Report") of the above-named issuer for the period ended September 30, 2006 that is accompanied by this certification, the undersigned hereby certifies that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. Date: November 21, 2006 /s/ Ronald E. Robison --------------------------- Ronald E. Robison Principal Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust and will be retained by Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 8 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR (the "Report") of the above-named issuer for the period ended September 30, 2006 that is accompanied by this certification, the undersigned hereby certifies that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. Date: November 21, 2006 /s/ Francis Smith ---------------------- Francis Smith Principal Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust and will be retained by Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 9