Basis of Presentation: (Policies) | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basis of Presentation: |
|
SRA International, Inc., a Virginia corporation, or SRA or the Company, was acquired on July 20, 2011 by private equity investment funds, or the PEP Funds, sponsored by Providence Equity Partners L.L.C., or Providence, collectively referred to as the Transaction. SRA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sterling Parent LLC, or Sterling Parent, which is wholly-owned by Sterling Holdco Inc., or Sterling Holdco, or collectively, the Parent. The Parent was formed by the PEP Funds for the purpose of the Transaction. |
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SRA and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements, which are also prepared in accordance with GAAP, have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. The Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. |
|
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications that are necessary for fair presentation of the periods presented. The results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2013. |
| | |
Nature of Business Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Nature of Business |
|
The Company provides technology and strategic consulting services and solutions primarily to U.S. federal government organizations. The Company provides services and solutions that enable mission performance, improve efficiency of operations, and/or reduce operating costs. In December 2013, the Company realigned its portfolio of clients from four business groups into two business groups: National Security group and Health and Civil group. |
|
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in allocating resources and in assessing performance. Due to the similarities in the types of customers, services and overall economic characteristics of the Company’s two business groups, the Company aggregates all of its operations into one reportable segment. |
|
The Company derives a substantial majority of its revenue from services provided as a prime contractor or subcontractor on engagements with various agencies of the U.S. government. These contracts represented approximately 97% of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2013 and 98% for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013. The Company considers individual agencies that may fall under a larger department as separate customers. No customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenue for any of the periods presented. |
| | |
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fair Value Measurements |
|
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between marketplace participants. Various valuation approaches can be used to determine fair value, each requiring different valuation inputs. The following hierarchy classifies the inputs used to determine fair value into three levels: |
|
| · | Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets; |
| · | Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and |
| · | Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. |
|
Goodwill and trade names were measured at fair value during the fiscal 2013 impairment assessment. As discussed in Note 3 of our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2013, the Company recorded a charge for the impairment of goodwill and trade names to adjust the carrying value of the assets down to fair value in fiscal 2013. The valuation models used in the impairment analysis are based, in part, on estimated future operating results and cash flows. Because these factors are derived from the Company’s estimates and internal market assumptions, they are considered unobservable inputs and the resulting fair value measurements are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|
The Company’s financial instruments include cash, trade receivables, vendor payables, debt, and derivative financial instruments. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013, the carrying value of cash, trade receivables and vendor payables approximated their fair value. See Note 5 for a discussion of the fair value of the Company’s debt. See Note 6 for a discussion of the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments. |
| | |
Disposal Groups Not Discontinued Operations Disclosure [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Divestiture |
|
On July 1, 2013, the Company sold a portion of its Health & Civil business, consisting of six contracts, for approximately $5.5 million. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $1.6 million during the six months ended December 31, 2013 as a component of continuing operations. As a result of the divestiture, goodwill and intangible assets were reduced by approximately $4.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively. |
| | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-02, or ASU 2013-02, an update to Comprehensive Income. This update requires the presentation and disclosure of reclassification adjustments out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, or AOCI, in a single note or on the face of the financial statements. This update is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2012, or the Company’s fiscal 2014. The adoption of this ASU did not impact the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, which requires standard presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a carryforward related to net operating losses or tax credits exist. This update is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013, or the Company’s fiscal 2015. The adoption of this ASU will not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
| | |