UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant | þ |
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant | ¨ |
Check the appropriate box:
| ¨ | Preliminary proxy statement. |
| ¨ | Confidential, for use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)). |
| þ | Definitive Proxy Statement. |
| ¨ | Definitive Additional Materials. |
| ¨ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12. |
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
| ¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| ¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| ¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held May 23, 2012
The 2012 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Aetrium Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation, will be held at Aetrium’s corporate headquarters located at 2350 Helen Street, North St. Paul, Minnesota, beginning at 4:00 p.m., local time, on May 23, 2012, for the following purposes:
| 1. | To elect six (6) persons to serve as directors until the next Annual Meeting or until their respective successors are elected and qualified; |
| 2. | To ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2012 fiscal year; and |
| 3. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. |
The record date for determining the shareholders who are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting, and any postponements or adjournments thereof, is the close of business on March 26, 2012.
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. If you do not plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please be sure you are represented at the Annual Meeting by completing, signing, dating and promptly returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided, which requires no postage if mailed within the United States.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Douglas L. Hemer
Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary
April 9, 2012
North St. Paul, Minnesota
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
2350 Helen Street
North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109
(651) 770-2000
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held May 23, 2012
INTRODUCTION
The 2012 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Aetrium Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation, will be held at Aetrium’s corporate headquarters located at 2350 Helen Street, North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109, beginning at 4:00 p.m., local time, on May 23, 2012.
A proxy card is enclosed for your use.YOU ARE SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO SIGN AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD IN THE ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE. No postage is required if mailed within the United States. We will pay the costs related to soliciting proxies, including preparing, assembling and mailing the proxies and soliciting material, as well as the cost of forwarding such material to the beneficial owners of our common stock. Our directors, officers and regular employees may, without compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies by telephone or personal conversation. We may reimburse brokerage firms and others for expenses in forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our common stock.
Any shareholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before its use at the Annual Meeting either by:
| · | giving written notice of revocation to our Secretary before the Annual Meeting or at the Annual Meeting before the proxy is used; |
| · | submitting a duly executed proxy with a later date to our Secretary; or |
| · | appearing at the Annual Meeting and voting his or her stock in person. |
Proxies will be voted as specified by shareholders. Proxies that are signed by shareholders, but lack any such specification, will be voted in favor of ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2012 fiscal year, and in favor of the nominees for directors listed in this Proxy Statement. Abstention from a proposal set forth in the Notice of Meeting is treated as a vote against such proposal. Broker non-votes on the election of directors (i.e., a card returned by a broker because voting instructions have not been received and the broker has no discretionary authority to vote) are treated as shares with respect to which voting power has been withheld by the beneficial holders of those shares and, therefore, as shares not entitled to vote on such proposal.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS LISTED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND FOR ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2012 fiscal year.
We expect that this Proxy Statement and the proxy card will be first mailed to shareholders on or about April 9, 2012.
The terms “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “company” or similar terms refer to Aetrium Incorporated.
HOUSEHOLDING OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS
Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of our Proxy Statement or Annual Report to Shareholders may have been sent to multiple shareholders who share the same address. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of either document to any shareholder upon written or oral request to our Investor Relations Department, Aetrium Incorporated, 2350 Helen Street, North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109, telephone: (651) 770-2000. Any shareholder who wants to receive separate copies of our Proxy Statement or Annual Report to Shareholders in the future, or any shareholder who is receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy per household, should contact the shareholder’s bank, broker, or other nominee record holder, or the shareholder may contact us at the above address and phone number.
OUTSTANDING SHARES
Only record holders of our common stock at the close of business on March 26, 2012 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On March 26, 2012, we had 10,781,451outstanding shares of common stock, each such share entitling the holder thereof to one vote on each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. The holders of a majority of the shares (5,390,726 shares) entitled to vote and represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. In general, shares of common stock represented by a properly signed and returned proxy card will be counted as shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting for the purposes of determining a quorum, without regard to whether the card reflects an abstention (or is left blank) or reflects a broker non-vote on a matter. Holders of shares of common stock are not entitled to cumulate voting rights.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Proposal 1
Nomination
Our Bylaws provide that the number of directors to constitute our board of directors will be at least one or such other number as may be determined by our board or our shareholders. At our 2011 Annual Meeting, seven directors were elected. Our board has unanimously recommended and determined to nominate six directors to be elected at the 2012 Annual Meeting, comprised of all of the directors elected last year except John J. Pollock, who resigned from our board effective November 28, 2011. The process used to nominate these directors is discussed below under the caption “Board Member Nomination Process.” Directors elected at the 2012 Annual Meeting will hold office until the next regular meeting of shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
All of the nominees for directors are currently members of our board and have consented to serve as directors, if elected. Each nominee will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. The six director nominees receiving the highest vote totals will be elected. Shares represented by proxies that contain instructions to “withhold” voting authority on one or more nominees will not affect the election of nominees receiving a plurality of the votes cast. Our board recommends a voteFOR the election of each of the nominees listed in this Proxy Statement. Our board intends to vote the proxies solicited on its behalf (other than proxies in which the vote is withheld) for the election of each of the nominees as directors. If prior to the Annual Meeting our board should learn that any of the nominees will be unable to serve by reason of death, incapacity or other unexpected occurrence, the proxies will be cast for another nominee to be designated by our board to fill such vacancy, unless a shareholder indicates to the contrary on his or her proxy card. Alternatively, the proxies may, at our board’s discretion, be voted for such fewer nominees as results from such death, incapacity or other unexpected occurrence. Our board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve.
Board Member Nomination Process
We have not established a nominating committee. Our board has determined that because of the relatively small size of the board and the value of all directors participating in the process of nominations for board membership, it is in the company’s best interests for the entire board to exercise the responsibilities of nominations for board membership. In lieu of a charter, the board has adopted principles, objectives and requirements in connection with the nomination process that set forth guidelines and procedures for the selection and evaluation of candidates for nomination as board members. We have posted these principles, objectives and requirements on our website atwww.aetrium.comand refer to them as our nominating procedures. Our board reviews these principles, objectives and requirements periodically to determine if a more formal policy should be adopted.
In evaluating individual candidates for nomination for board membership, the board will seek out individuals who have, at a minimum, the following attributes:
| · | High moral and ethical character; |
| · | Readiness to share constructive ideas, make independent decisions, work proactively and constructively with other board members, and devote the time and energy necessary for comprehensive and timely completion of all board member responsibilities; and |
| · | Adequate education, training and business experience, including knowledge of our business and the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries, to understand and make well informed and well reasoned judgments on all matters within the scope of the board’s responsibilities. |
While the company does not have a specific policy related to board diversity, the board seeks nominees with a broad diversity of experience, expertise and backgrounds. We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the board to fulfill its responsibilities and meet its objectives. Nominees are not discriminated against on the basis of race, gender, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any other basis prescribed by law.
In making nominations for board membership, the board will consider recommendations from a variety of sources, including from shareholders. All recommended candidates will be evaluated under the same criteria. All candidates selected as a nominee for director must be approved by a majority of the independent directors of our board.
Information About Nominees
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 1, 2012, that has been furnished to us by the persons who have been nominated by our board to serve as directors for the ensuing year.
Nominees for Election | | Age | | Principal Occupation | | Director Since |
Joseph C. Levesque | | 67 | | Chairman of the Board of Aetrium Incorporated | | 1986 |
Darnell L. Boehm | | 63 | | Principal of Darnell L. Boehm & Associates | | 1986 |
Terrence W. Glarner | | 68 | | President of West Concord Ventures, Inc. | | 1990 |
Daniel A. Carr | | 51 | | President of The Collaborative | | 2009 |
Charles B. Westling | | 53 | | Chief Executive Officer of Computype, Inc. | | 2010 |
Douglas L. Hemer | | 65 | | Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary of Aetrium Incorporated | | 1986 |
Joseph C. Levesque has served as president, chief executive officer and chairman of our board since 1986, except that Mr. Levesque stepped down as president in October 2009 and resumed the position in November 2011, and he retired as chief executive officer in December 2010 and resumed the position in November 2011. From 1973 to 1986, Mr. Levesque served in various capacities and most recently as executive vice president of Micro Component Technology, Inc., a manufacturer of integrated circuit testers and test handlers. Mr. Levesque’s long history with the semiconductor equipment industry and his long history as our chief executive officer make his participation on our board very valuable in all aspects of our operations and board considerations.
Darnell L. Boehm served as our chief financial officer and secretary from 1986 until May 2000, and has served as one of our directors since 1986. From December 1994 until July 1995, Mr. Boehm had also assumed executive management responsibilities for our former Poway, California operations. Mr. Boehm has been the principal of Darnell L. Boehm & Associates, a management consulting firm, for more than five years. Mr. Boehm is also a director of Rochester Medical Corporation, a publicly held company. Mr. Boehm serves on the compensation committee and is chairman of the audit committee of Rochester Medical Corporation. Mr. Boehm’s deep financial expertise, which includes several years experience as a certified public accountant and several chief financial officer or chief executive officer positions in addition to his services to the company, provides particular value to our board in addition to his insights from his years of executive management services to the company.
Terrence W. Glarner has served as one of our directors since 1990. Mr. Glarner was initially elected as a director to our board because of his affiliation with North Star Ventures, Inc. and Norwest Venture Capital, which were significant shareholders of Aetrium at the time. Since February 1993, Mr. Glarner has been president of West Concord Ventures, Inc., a venture capital company, and has been a consultant to North Star Ventures, Inc. and Norwest Venture Capital. Mr. Glarner is also a director of FSI International, Inc. and NVE Corporation, both of which are publicly held companies, and Bremer Financial Corp., a privately held company. Mr. Glarner also serves on the audit and compensation committees of FSI International, Inc., NVE Corporation and Bremer Financial Corp. Mr. Glarner’s long career as a venture capitalist has provided him with comprehensive perspectives on strategic and operational issues in manufacturing and technology oriented companies that continue to be very valuable to our board.
Daniel A. Carr has served as one of our directors since 2009. He is president of The Collaborative, a Minnesota membership organization that creates publications and events targeted to entrepreneurs, investors and business executives. In addition to his efforts in helping growing companies over the past 25 years with The Collaborative, he also has first-hand entrepreneurial experience as a co-founder of four businesses. Mr. Carr also writes occasionally on entrepreneurship, innovation and the Minnesota economy. Mr. Carr’s experiences as an entrepreneur, his background as a certified public accountant and his extensive experience working with a variety of entrepreneurial companies provide him with unique perspectives that add important value to the full range of our board considerations.
Charles B. Westling has served as one of our directors since March 2010. Since October 2010 he has been chief executive officer of Computype, Inc., a privately held manufacturer of customizable label-based products for identification and tracking. Mr. Westling is also a director of Bremer Bank N.A., a private financial services company, and is a member of the board of trustees of the Dunwoody College of Technology, a private non-profit institution that provides career-focused applied education for people of diverse backgrounds. From 2009 until October 2010, Mr. Westling was a business advisor to emerging growth and middle market companies. Between 2002 and 2009, Mr. Westling held a variety of executive positions at Datalink Corporation, a publicly held provider of data storage solutions and IT services for mid-to-large enterprise customers. Mr. Westling was president, CEO and a director of Datalink from 2005 to 2009. Prior to Datalink, Mr. Westling was executive vice president of Agiliti, Inc., a private managed services and hosting company. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Westling served as senior managing director and director of corporate finance for John G. Kinnard and Company, Incorporated, a publicly held regional brokerage and investment banking firm. From 1990 to 1997, Mr. Westling was a member of the corporate finance department at Dain Bosworth Incorporated, a publicly held regional brokerage and investment banking firm, most recently serving as a managing director and head of technology investment banking. Mr. Westling’s strategic and operational expertise gained through his executive positions with operating companies, his long history of working with technology oriented companies and his extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions, strategic partnerships and capital raising activities, together with his effective ability to leverage off of these strengths in his participation as a board member, make Mr. Westling a valuable member of our board.
Douglas L. Hemer has served as one of our directors since 1986, and has served as our secretary since May 2000 and as our chief administrative officer since March 2001. He served as our group vice president from August 1998 to March 2001, as the president of our former Poway, California operations from February 1997 to August 1998 and as our chief administrative officer from May 1996 until February 1997. Mr. Hemer was a partner in the law firm of Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP for more than 15 years before joining Aetrium. Mr. Hemer’s long history of legal services to a wide range of corporate transactions with manufacturing and technology oriented companies provides particular value to our board in addition to his insights from his years of executive management services to the company.
Additional Information About the Board and Its Committees
General Information.Our board of directors manages our business and affairs. Except for Messrs. Levesque and Hemer, all of our directors are independent directors, as defined by current Nasdaq listing standards and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Our independent directors hold meetings, referred to as “executive sessions,” at which only the independent directors are present on a regular basis and at least two times each year. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, our independent directors held four executive sessions in addition to their participation in Audit Committee and Compensation Committee meetings.
Our board met or took action in writing eight times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Our board maintains an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee. Each of our directors is expected to make a reasonable effort to attend all meetings of the board, applicable committee meetings and our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All of our directors then serving attended 75% or more of the aggregate meetings of our board and all such committees on which they served during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.All of our directors attended our 2011 Annual Meeting.
Audit Committee.Our Audit Committee was established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the purpose of overseeing accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our financial statements. The functions of the Audit Committee include reviewing our financial statements, overseeing the financial reporting and disclosures prepared by management, making recommendations regarding our financial controls, and conferring with our independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee met or took action in writing six times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Messrs. Boehm, Glarner, Carr and Westling are the current members of the Audit Committee, of which Mr. Boehm is Chairman.
Compensation Committee.The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include approving the compensation for our executive officers and setting the terms of and grants of awards under our 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (referred to herein as the 2003 Plan). The Compensation Committee met or took action in writing four times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Messrs. Boehm, Glarner, Carr and Westling are the current members of the Compensation Committee, of which Mr. Glarner is Chairman.
Board Leadership Structure andRisk Oversight. Mr. Levesque has served as chairman of our board and as our chief executive officer since 1986, except that he stepped down from the position of chief executive officer from January to November, 2011. We believe that Mr. Levesque’s in-depth knowledge of the company’s operations and vision for its development make him the best-qualified director to serve as chairman of our board. In addition, we believe that the fact that a majority of our board as well as the entire membership of each of our board committees consists of independent directors balances our governance structure to protect the interests of our stockholders. While we believe that the current board leadership structure is appropriate in the current circumstances, the board may change this structure if it no longer believes it continues to meet our objectives.
Our board administers its risk oversight function directly and through its committees. The board and each of its committees regularly discuss with management our major risk exposures, their potential impact on the company and the steps we take to manage them. In particular, our Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our compensation arrangements and our Audit Committee oversees management of our financial and business risks. We believe our current board leadership structure helps ensure proper risk oversight, based on the allocation of duties among committees and the role of our independent directors in risk oversight.
Shareholder Communications with Our Board.Any shareholder wishing to send communications to our board may send a letter to the board, c/o Corporate Secretary, at Aetrium’s address listed above. Any such communication must be clearly labeled “Security Holder-Board Communication” and must include a signed statement as to the submitting shareholder’s current status as a shareholder and the number of shares currently held. All communications that are reasonably related to Aetrium or its business will be directed by the Corporate Secretary to the board, or particular board members, not later than the next regularly scheduled meeting of the board. The Corporate Secretary has the authority to discard or disregard or take other appropriate actions with respect to any inappropriate communications, such as unduly hostile, illegal or threatening communications.
Shareholders wishing to submit a recommendation for board membership may do so by sending a letter to the board, c/o Corporate Secretary, at Aetrium’s address listed above, that is clearly identified as a “Director Nominee Recommendation” and contains the following information:
| · | Name of the candidate and a brief biographical sketch and resume of the candidate; |
| · | Contact information for the candidate and the shareholder making the recommendation; |
| · | A document evidencing the candidate’s willingness to serve as a director if elected; and |
| · | A signed statement as to the submitting shareholder’s current status as a shareholder and the number of shares currently held. |
Shareholders who wish to make a recommendation for a nominee to be included in our proxy statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit their recommendations to our board by December 10, 2012 to assure time for collection and meaningful consideration and evaluation of information regarding the nominees by our board.
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 awarded to or earned by our directors other than our named executive officers.
Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | | | Stock Awards ($) | | | Option Awards ($) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | | | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | | | All Other Compensation ($) (1) | | | Total ($) | |
Darnell L. Boehm | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,937 | | | | 14,937 | |
Terrence W. Glarner | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Daniel A. Carr | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,570 | | | | 12,570 | |
Charles B. Westling | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| (1) | Includes $3,500 paid to Mr. Boehm for additional services performed as an audit committee member in connection with the investigation of a business acquisition opportunity. The remaining amounts represent premiums and health reimbursement account contributions paid for Mr. Boehm and his family and Mr. Carr and his family under our medical and dental group insurance programs. |
Directors’ Fees.Our directors receive no cash compensation for their services as members of our board, although their out-of-pocket expenses incurred on our behalf are reimbursed.
Option Grants. All of our directors are eligible for grants of options under our 2003 Plan. No options were granted to any of our directors in 2011.
Although our board is not obligated to do so, it currently anticipates that it will grant non-statutory stock options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock to non-employee directors upon their initial election to our board at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Proposal 2
The Audit Committee has approved the engagement of Grant Thornton LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements for the 2012 fiscal year. Grant Thornton LLP has been our independent registered public accounting firm since 2006.
Although not required to do so, the board wishes to submit the selection of Grant Thornton LLP to the shareholders for ratification because the board believes it is good corporate practice. The Board recommends a voteFOR the ratification of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2012. Unless a different choice is given, proxies received by the Board will be votedFOR the ratification of Grant Thornton LLP. The affirmative vote of a majority of the common stock represented and entitled to vote is required for the ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP, provided that the total number of shares of common stock that vote for the proposal represents more than 25% of the shares outstanding on the record date. If the selection of Grant Thornton LLP is not ratified, the board will reconsider its selection but may retain Grant Thornton LLP.
We have requested and expect one or more representatives of Grant Thornton LLP to be present at the Annual Meeting. Such representative(s) will have the opportunity to make a statement at the meeting if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The table below sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 1, 2012, unless otherwise noted, by (a) each shareholder who we know owns beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (b) each of our directors, nominees for directors and executive officers named in the “Summary Compensation Table” below, and (c) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. The address for all our executive officers and directors is 2350 Helen Street, North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109.
| | Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1) | |
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Amount | | | Percent of Class (2) | |
| | | | | | |
Archer Advisors LLC | | | 1,020,618 | (3) | | | 9.5 | % |
Joseph C. Levesque | | | 291,200 | (4) | | | 2.7 | % |
Douglas L. Hemer | | | 142,816 | (5) | | | 1.3 | % |
Paul H. Askegaard | | | 98,478 | (6) | | | * | |
Darnell L. Boehm | | | 97,602 | (7) | | | * | |
Terrence W. Glarner | | | 69,080 | (8) | | | * | |
Daniel A. Carr | | | 30,000 | (9) | | | * | |
Charles B. Westling | | | 21,875 | (10) | | | * | |
John J. Pollock | | | 25,838 | (11) | | | * | |
Executive officers and directors as a group (11 persons)_________________________ | | | 985,685 | (12) | | | 8.7 | % |
*Less than 1%.
| (1) | Shares not outstanding but deemed beneficially owned by virtue of the right of a person or member of a group to acquire them within 60 days of March 1, 2012 are treated as outstanding only when determining the amount and percent owned by such person or group. Unless otherwise noted, all of the shares shown are held by individuals or entities possessing sole voting and investment power with respect to such shares. |
| (2) | Based on 10,781,451shares of common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2012. |
| (3) | Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A dated February 14, 2012, represents 1,020,618 shares of common stock beneficially owned by Archer Advisors LLC (“Archer”), 150 South Broadway, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391, for which Archer has sole dispositive and voting power. |
| (4) | Includes options to purchase 86,250 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days. Also includes an aggregate of 4,765 shares held in educational trusts for Mr. Levesque’s grandchildren, of which he is the trustee. |
| (5) | Includes options to purchase 86,250 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days. |
| (6) | Includes options to purchase 77,500 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days. |
| (7) | Includes options to purchase 36,250 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days. |
| (8) | Includes options to purchase 36,250 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days. |
| (9) | Represents options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days. |
| (10) | Represents options to purchase 21,875 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days. |
| (11) | Number of shares owned as last reported to the company. Mr. Pollock resigned as an officer and director of the company effective November 28, 2011. |
| (12) | Includes options to purchase 573,208 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days. Also includes an aggregate of 4,765 shares held in educational trusts for Mr. Levesque’s grandchildren, of which he is the trustee. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 awarded to or earned by our chief executive officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers whose total compensation exceeded $100,000. The executive officers named in the chart below are referred to in this Proxy Statement as our “named executive officers.”
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal Position (1) | | Year | | | Salary ($) | | | Bonus ($) | | | Stock Awards ($) | | | Option Awards ($) (2) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | | | Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | | | All Other Compensation ($) (3) | | | Total ($) | |
Joseph C. Levesque, | | | 2011 | | | | 4,015 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,713 | | | | 25,728 | |
President and Chief Executive Officer | | | 2010 | | | | 242,307 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,050 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 338,496 | | | | 593,853 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Douglas L. Hemer, | | | 2011 | | | | 202,241 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 202,241 | |
Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary | | | 2010 | | | | 182,923 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,050 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 244,625 | | | | 440,598 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Paul H. Askegaard Treasurer | | | 2011 | | | | 143,048 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 143,048 | |
| | | 2010 | | | | 131,777 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 26,100 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 984 | | | | 158,861 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
John J. Pollock, | | | 2011 | | | | 178,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 194,141 | | | | 372,141 | |
former President and Chief Executive Officer | | | 2010 | | | | 169,879 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 43,500 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 213,379 | |
| (1) | Mr. Levesque retired as chief executive officer effective December 31, 2010, and resumed the positions of president and chief executive officer upon Mr. Pollock’s resignation from those positions effective November 28, 2011. |
| (2) | The fair value of option awards and modifications are computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, "Compensation - Stock Compensation," (ASC 718) but exclude the impact of assumed forfeiture rates. Represents the grant date fair value of a stock option award granted in fiscal year 2010. No stock option awards were granted in fiscal year 2011. |
| (3) | For 2011, includes premiums and health reimbursement account contributions of $12,266 paid for Mr. Levesque and his family under our director medical and dental group insurance programs for the portion of the year prior to when Mr. Levesque resumed the positions of president and chief executive officer. Also includes $9,447 in fair value of deferred compensation earned by Mr. Levesque after he resumed the positions of president and chief executive officer, payable in 2013. For Mr. Pollock, includes severance payments of $180,000 and medical and dental group insurance costs of $14,141 paid or accrued in connection with Mr. Pollock’s resignation effective November 28, 2011. For 2010, includes $1,696, $1,325 and $984 in matching contributions we made to the 401(k) accounts of Messrs. Levesque, Hemer and Askegaard, respectively. Also includes $336,800 and $243,300 in fair value of retirement benefits accrued in 2010 and payable to Messrs. Levesque and Hemer, respectively, over two years from the dates of their respective retirements. See “Executive Compensation and Other Benefits—Retirement Benefits” and “Executive Compensation and Other Benefits—Deferred Compensation Arrangement” below. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table
The following table sets forth equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer outstanding as of the end of our last completed fiscal year.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END—2011
| | Option Awards | |
Name | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | | | Option Exercise Price ($) | | | Option Expiration Date | |
Joseph C. Levesque | | | 50,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.34 | | | 4/23/2012 | |
| | | 27,500 | | | | 2,500 | (1) | | | — | | | | 2.2175 | | | 4/30/2013 | |
| | | 5,000 | | | | 10,000 | (2) | | | — | | | | 2.35 | | | 8/26/2015 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Douglas L. Hemer | | | 50,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.34 | | | 4/23/2012 | |
| | | 27,500 | | | | 2,500 | (1) | | | — | | | | 2.2175 | | | 4/30/2013 | |
| | | 5,000 | | | | 10,000 | (2) | | | — | | | | 2.35 | | | 8/26/2015 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Paul H. Askegaard | | | 40,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.34 | | | 4/23/2012 | |
| | | 22,916 | | | | 2,084 | (1) | | | — | | | | 2.2175 | | | 4/30/2013 | |
| | | 10,000 | | | | 20,000 | (2) | | | — | | | | 2.35 | | | 8/26/2015 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
John J. Pollock | | | 50,000 | | | | — | (3) | | | — | | | | 2.34 | | | 2/26/2012 | (3) |
| | | 26,875 | | | | — | (3) | | | — | | | | 2.2175 | | | 2/26/2012 | (3) |
| | | 15,625 | | | | — | (3) | | | — | | | | 2.35 | | | 2/26/2012 | (3) |
| (1) | The stock option was granted on April 30, 2008. Assuming continued employment or service with us, 625 shares for each of Messrs. Levesque and Hemer, and 521 shares for Mr. Askegaard, become exercisable on the 30th day of January, 2012 and each month thereafter through April 30, 2012. |
| (2) | The stock option was granted on August 26, 2010. Assuming continued employment or service with us, 312.5 shares for each of Messrs. Levesque and Hemer, and 625 shares for Mr. Askegaard, become exercisable on the 26th day of January, 2012 and each month thereafter through August 26, 2014. |
| (3) | Mr. Pollock’s stock options stopped vesting upon his resignation on November 28, 2011, and expired on February 26, 2012. |
Executive Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program has three principal components: base salary, equity based awards (historically these have been in the form of nonqualified stock options), and profit sharing bonuses. Our primary objective in determining base salaries is to provide a fair but conservative level of compensation to our executive management that can be sustained through a wide range of industry conditions without unduly and inappropriately burdening the company during lean conditions. Our primary objective in granting equity based awards is to provide appropriate incentive to our executive management to generate long term growth in the value of the company. Our primary objective in granting profit sharing bonuses is to reward executive management for their successes in generating profitability and positive cash flow. We believe that these three components to our executive compensation program are complementary to each other and provide a balance of long term and short term incentives to management and operational flexibility to the company that best serves the interests of the company.
Base Salaries.Historically, base salaries for our executive management have been adjusted infrequently and typically as a result of changes in responsibilities. In setting and adjusting base salaries for our executive management, we take into account the potential impact of the individual on the company and corporate performance, the skills and experience required by the position, the individual performance and potential of the executive officer, and market data for comparable positions in companies in comparable industries and of comparable development, complexity and size. We believe base salaries for our executive management have provided fair but conservative minimum compensation relative to peer companies in our industry.
In April 2007, we adjusted the base salaries of our executive officers in accordance with these factors, adjusting the annual base salaries of Messrs. Levesque and Hemer to $280,000 and $205,000, respectively. Prior to that, the base salaries for Mr. Levesque, our chief executive officer, and Mr. Hemer, our chief administrative officer, had not been adjusted for over ten years, except, at their initiation, during the severe downturn in our industry in 2001-2003, their base salaries were reduced by 25% and 20% respectively.
In January 2009, as a part of measures we took to address the impact of the worldwide financial collapse that became apparent in late third quarter 2008, at the initiation of our executive management we reduced wage rates of all of our employees by 10% and the salaries for our executive officers by up to 25%. As a result, the base salaries of Messrs. Levesque and Hemer were reduced by 25% and 20%, respectively. In July 2010, reflecting improving conditions in our industry, we reinstated our executive officers to their full base salaries. In September 2011 as a downturn in the semiconductor industry became evident, in addition to other cost control measures and at the initiation of our executive management, we reduced the salaries of our executives by up to 10%, including a 5% reduction to Mr. Hemer’s base salary. Reflecting the current economic climate in the semiconductor industry, when Mr. Levesque resumed his positions as our president and chief executive officer he accepted a reduced base salary of 50% of his full base salary rate at the time of his retirement, and in January 2012, Mr. Hemer accepted a reduction to his base salary to 65% of his full base salary rate in 2011.
Equity Based Awards.We have granted equity based awards under our 2003 Plan and its predecessor plans periodically to achieve an appropriate balance of outstanding options to provide ongoing incentive to executive management to build value in the company over time. As indicated above, historically our equity based awards have been in the form of nonqualified stock options, and we have no current plans to grant other forms of equity based awards. The number of stock options we have granted to executives, including our chief executive officer, has been based upon a number of factors, including base salary level and how such base salary level relates to those of other companies in our industry, the number of options previously granted, individual and corporate performance during the year, the number of options being granted to other executives, and management’s recommendations. The Compensation Committee determines the number of options to be granted to an executive based upon its overall subjective assessment of these factors. There are no formulas, objective criteria or other established relationships between the factors taken into account and the number of options granted to the executive.
We typically grant options on dates we believe the market value of our stock is at relatively low levels to maximize the incentive offered by the stock option awards. The designated grant date for all options that have been granted has always been the date the award was made. We have had no historical practice of awarding options on dates near company public releases of material information, and it is our policy not to do so.
Profit Sharing Bonuses.Under our executive officer profit sharing program, which the board adopted in 2004, the Compensation Committee may award up to an aggregate of 10% of our pre-tax operating income (before such awards) for the quarter as cash bonuses to our executive officers. Bonuses are awarded only for quarters in which we are profitable. The Compensation Committee determines aggregate bonuses to be awarded for a quarter based on its overall subjective assessment of cash flow availability and management’s performance. The Compensation Committee determines the amount of each executive’s bonus based upon its overall subjective assessment of the individual executive’s contributions to the success of our operations. There are no formulas, objective criteria or other established relationships between the factors taken into account and the amount of the bonuses awarded.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.
Effective as of January 6, 2004, or upon their later employment, we entered into Change of Control Agreements with certain of our high-level executives, including all of the named executive officers, that provide severance pay and other benefits in the event of a change of control. The Agreements provide for severance payments of two times the executive’s annual base salary in the event the executive’s employment is terminated, either voluntarily with “good reason” or involuntarily, during the two-year period following a change in control. The severance payments are to be made over twenty-four months following the date of employment termination according to our regular payroll practices and policies. An executive receiving severance payments is also entitled to reimbursement of the employer portion of group medical and group dental premiums under COBRA continuation coverage. The Agreements also provide for immediate vesting of all unvested options outstanding to the executive upon a change in control. In January 2008, the Agreements were amended to conform to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
For purposes of the Change of Control Agreements, a change of control would be deemed to have occurred upon:
| · | the sale or other transfer of all or substantially all of our assets; |
| · | the approval by our shareholders of a liquidation or dissolution of the company; |
| · | any person, other than a bona fide underwriter, becoming the owner of more than 40% of our outstanding shares of common stock; |
| · | a merger, consolidation or exchange involving the company, but only if our shareholders prior to such transaction own less than 65% of the combined voting power of the surviving or acquiring entity following the transaction; or |
| · | the current members of our board, or future members of our board who were approved by at least a majority of our current board, ceasing to constitute at least a majority of the board. |
Retirement Benefits
In November 2010, the Compensation Committee approved retirement benefits for Messrs. Levesque and Hemer equal to approximately 1.2 times their annual base salaries to be paid over the first two years of their respective retirements. In arriving at its decision, the Committee took into consideration contributions of such officers to the successes of the company, the structuring and implementation by such officers of management succession to assure continuity and a smooth executive management transition, severance benefits we have paid to departing division general managers, data on retirement benefits to top executive management at companies considered by the Committee as our industry peer group, and informal advice of employment consultants that the retirement benefits are comfortably within industry norms for retirement benefits to top executive management.
Deferred Compensation Arrangement
Upon Mr. Levesque’s resumption of his positions as our president and chief executive officer, we entered into an agreement with him to defer payment of his base salary for those positions until 2013. We have no general policy or program for deferred compensation.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Boehm, Glarner, Carr and Westling, each of whom is a non-employee director and is independent as defined under the Nasdaq listing standards and by the SEC. Mr. Glarner serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee approves the compensation for our executive officers. With respect to all eligible recipients except members of the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee also administers our 2003 Plan and determines the participants and the amount, timing and other terms and conditions of awards under the Plan. The board as a whole exercises these responsibilities with respect to members of the Compensation Committee as eligible recipients under the Plan.
The Role of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our board on February 21, 2007. We have posted our Compensation Committee Charter on our website at www.aetrium.com. Pursuant to the charter, the members of the Committee are appointed by the board and are to consist of at least three (3) members of the board, each of whom meets the independence requirements defined under the Nasdaq listing standards and by the SEC. The primary duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are to:
| · | establish the compensation philosophy and policy for our executive officers; |
| · | review and evaluate the performance of the chief executive officer and other executive officers and approve their annual compensation packages; |
| · | review and approve, or recommend to the full board, executive incentive compensation plans and stock based plans in which executive officers and members of the board are eligible to participate; |
| · | supervise and oversee the administration of the 2003 Plan; |
| · | have sole authority to retain and terminate executive compensation consultants; and |
| · | review and reassess periodically the adequacy of the Compensation Committee Charter. |
There is no provision for the Compensation Committee to delegate any of its duties and responsibilities to any other persons. Except as indicated above under the caption “Executive Compensation and Other Benefits—Retirement Benefits” with respect to retirement benefits approved for Messrs. Levesque and Hemer, the Compensation Committee has not used any compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive compensation.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Membership and Role of the Audit Committee
The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Boehm, Glarner, Carr and Westling. Mr. Boehm serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. All members of the Audit Committee are independent as defined under the Nasdaq listing standards and the rules and regulations of the SEC. The board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts, as defined by the SEC, based on their past business experience and financial certifications.
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our board on February 18, 2004 as our Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter. In connection with the preparation of the materials for our 2012 Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee determined that the Audit Committee charter is adequate and no revisions need to be made to such charter. We have posted our Audit Committee charter as currently in force on our website at www.aetrium.com. The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial information that will be provided to the shareholders and others, the systems of internal and disclosure controls that management and the board have established, and the audit process, and by overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes, the audits of our financial statements, and our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to:
| · | be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm; |
| · | approve all engagements of our independent registered public accounting firm to render audit or non-audit services prior to such engagement, or pursuant to policies and procedures that are detailed as to the particular service and that do not include delegation of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities to management; |
| · | evaluate our quarterly financial performance as well as our compliance with laws and regulations; |
| · | oversee management’s establishment and enforcement of financial policies and business practices; |
| · | review and determine approval of all related party transactions required to be disclosed by us under SEC rules and regulations; |
| · | establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints we receive regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; |
| · | investigate any matter brought to its attention within the scope of its duties; and |
| · | provide an open avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, financial and senior management, counsel, internal audit personneland our board. |
All services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP, are subject to pre-approval by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures are described below under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.”
Review of Our Audited Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2011
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 with management. The Audit Committee has discussed with Grant Thornton LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA,Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU Section 380).
The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from Grant Thornton LLP regarding their independence as required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Grant Thornton LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Grant Thornton LLP its independence.
Based on the Audit Committee’s review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to our board that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 for filing with the SEC.
| Audit Committee |
| |
| Darnell L. Boehm (Chair) |
| Terrence W. Glarner |
| Daniel A. Carr |
| Charles B. Westling |
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the Audit Committee Report will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have selected Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2012. We have requested that the shareholders ratify this selection under Proposal 2 above.We have requested and expect one or more representatives of Grant Thornton LLP to be present at the Annual Meeting. Such representatives will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
All services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm are subject to pre-approval by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has authorized each of its members to approve services by our independent registered public accounting firm in the event there is a need for such approval prior to the next full Audit Committee meeting. The Audit Committee has also adopted policies and procedures that are detailed as to the particular service and that do not include delegation of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities to management under which management may engage our independent registered public accounting firm to render audit or non-audit services. Any interim approval given by an Audit Committee member and any such engagement by management must be reported to the Audit Committee no later than its next scheduled meeting. Before granting any approval, the Audit Committee (or a committee member if applicable) gives due consideration to whether approval of the proposed service will have a detrimental impact on the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. The full Audit Committee pre-approved all services provided by Grant Thornton LLP in fiscal years 2011 and 2010.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table presents aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Grant Thornton LLP for fiscal years 2011 and 2010. Other than as set forth below, no other professional services were rendered or fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP during fiscal years 2011 or 2010.
Services Rendered | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Audit Fees (1) | | $ | 125,000 | | | $ | 111,295 | |
Audit-Related Fees (2) | | | 10,500 | | | | 11,225 | |
Tax Fees (3) | | | 20,250 | | | | 22,159 | |
| (1) | These fees include the audits of our annual financial statements for fiscal years 2011 and 2010, the reviews of our financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 and services provided in connection with regulatory filings for those fiscal years. |
| (2) | A portion of these fees related to services provided to perform limited scope audits of the Aetrium Salary Savings Plan (401k Plan) for fiscal years 2010 and 2009. The fees related to the 2009 audit were paid by the 401k Plan. The remainder of these fees related to consultations regarding potential business acquisitions. |
| (3) | These fees were for the preparation of federal and state tax returns and tax advice. In 2011 a portion of these fees related to consultations on deferred compensation. |
CODE OF ETHICS
Effective February 18, 2004, the board formally adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which covers a wide range of business practices and procedures and is intended to ensure to the greatest extent possible that Aetrium’s business is conducted in a consistently legal and ethical manner. The Code is consistent with how we have always conducted our business and applies to all of our directors, officers and other employees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. We have posted the Code on our website atwww.aetrium.com. We intend to promptly disclose any grant of waivers from or amendments to a provision of the Code on our website following such amendment or waiver.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR
THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 23, 2012
The 2012 Annual Shareholders Meeting Notice and Proxy Statement and 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders of Aetrium Incorporated are available athttps://materials.proxyvote.com/00817R.As noted above, our shareholders will be asked to ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2012 and will be electing directors at our 2012 Annual Meeting, which will be held at the company’s corporate headquarters located at 2350 Helen Street, North St. Paul, Minnesota.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers and all persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are also required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based upon a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations, we believe that for the year ended December 31, 2011, none of our directors, executive officers or beneficial owners of greater than 10% of our common stock failed to file on a timely basis the forms required by Section 16 of the Exchange Act, except that due to inadvertence Joseph C. Levesque was late in filing four Form 4s related to purchases and sales of company stock by two educational trusts for Mr. Levesque’s grandchildren, of which he is the trustee.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2013 ANNUAL MEETING
Shareholder proposals intended to be presented in our proxy materials relating to our next Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by us at our principal executive offices on or before December 10, 2012 and must satisfy the requirements of the proxy rules promulgated by the SEC.
A shareholder who wishes to make a proposal at our next Annual Meeting without including the proposal in our proxy materials must notify us byFebruary 23, 2013. If a shareholder fails to give notice by this date, then the persons named as proxies in the proxy card solicited by us for the next Annual Meeting will have discretionary authority to vote on the proposal.
OTHER BUSINESS
We know of no business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than that described in this Proxy Statement. As to other business, if any, that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that proxies solicited by our board will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies.
MISCELLANEOUS
WE WILL FURNISH, WITHOUT CHARGE, A COPY OF OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (EXCLUSIVE OF EXHIBITS) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 TO EACH PERSON WHO WAS A SHAREHOLDER OF AETRIUM AS OF MARCH 26, 2012 UPON RECEIPT FROM ANY SUCH PERSON OF A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR SUCH AN ANNUAL REPORT. SUCH REQUEST SHOULD BE SENT TO: AETRIUM INCORPORATED, 2350 HELEN STREET, NORTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55109; ATTN.: SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION.
| By Order of the Board of Directors |
| |
| |
| Joseph C. Levesque |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
April 9, 2012
North St. Paul, Minnesota
Appendix A
AETRIUM INCORPORATED
annual proxy card
This Proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints JOSEPH C. LEVESQUE andDouglas L. Hemer, and each of them, as Proxies, each with full power of substitution, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and to vote, as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of Aetrium Incorporated held of record by the undersigned on March 26, 2012 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 23, 2012 or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS. The Board recommends a vote FOR the following nominees.
| | Name of Nominee | | For | | Withhold |
01 | | JOSEPH C. LEVESQUE | | ¨ | | ¨ |
02 | | DARNELL L. BOEHM | | ¨ | | ¨ |
03 | | TERRENCE W. GLARNER | | ¨ | | ¨ |
04 | | DANIEL A. CARR | | ¨ | | ¨ |
05 | | CHARLES B. WESTLING | | ¨ | | ¨ |
06 | | DOUGLAS L. HEMER | | ¨ | | ¨ |
2. RATIFICATION OF GRANT THORNTON LLP. The Board recommends a vote FOR ratification of Grant Thornton LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2012.
3. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR all nominees named in Proposal 1 above and FOR Proposal 2 above. Please sign exactly as name appears below. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
Dated: _____________, 2012
| |
| Signature |
| |
| |
| Signature if held jointly |
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.
Important notice regarding Internet availability of proxy materials for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 23, 2012: The Proxy Statement and the 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders are available athttps://materials.proxyvote.com/00817R