Recent greater oversight by the Cyberspace Administration of China (“CAC”) over data security, particularly for companies seeking to list on a foreign exchange, could adversely impact our business.
The PRC government has recently taken various legislative initiatives in the area of data security and to address market monopoly concerns. On December 28, 2021, the CAC and other relevant PRC governmental authorities jointly promulgated the Cybersecurity Review Measures (the “CAC Revised Measures”) to replace the original Cybersecurity Review Measures. The CAC Revised Measures took effect on February 15, 2022 and provide that (i) critical information infrastructures operators, or CIIOs, must evaluate potential risks that the deployment of any products and services will have on national security prior to the procurement of such products and services, and must apply for a cybersecurity review if such products and services affect or may affect national security, and “online platform operators” must apply for a cybersecurity review if any of their data processing activities affects or may affect national security, and (ii) if an “online platform operator” that is in possession of personal data of more than one million users intends to list its securities on a foreign stock exchange, it must apply for a cybersecurity review. However, the measures have not clarified if any follow-on offering of ADSs by us will be regulated as a “listing shares on a foreign stock exchange” or whether public companies already listed overseas would be subject to regular cybersecurity reviews. In addition, the NDRC, the SAMR and the CAC, among others, jointly issued the Platform Economy Opinions, which embodies legislative and regulatory anti-monopoly initiatives in relation to the “platform economy.” The Platform Economy Opinions focus on the following aspects of the platform economy: formulation and promulgation of regulations on the prohibition of unfair online anti-competitive activities; future issuance of detailed rules applicable to data processing activities conducted by online platform enterprises; the formulation of regulations on pricing; the investigation on monopoly and unfair competition activities; and the enforcement against monopolistic agreements, abuse of dominant market position and unlawful market concentration. During the reporting period of this annual report, we have not received from the CAC, the Ministry of Public Security or its local counterparts, or any industrial regulatory authorities, any notices imposing administrative penalties against us or demanding any remedial actions be taken in relation to data security matters. We do not believe the abovementioned rules currently have a material impact on our capacity to operate our business in the ordinary course, obtain foreign investment, or maintain our listing overseas, they could in the future. To the extent any current regulation or policy promulgated by the CAC applies to us, we believe we are in full compliance. Up to now, we have not received any notices from the CAC, the Ministry of Public Security or its local counterparts that the company is a critical information infrastructures operator. Based on the advice of counsel provided by Beijing Haiwen Law Firm upon which we have relied, we do not believe that we are subject to the review of, nor require the approval of, the CAC at this time. We can provide no assurance, however, that the CAC will not take a different position, or other regulations and policies that may be issued in the future and their implementation may further require the company to comply with stricter compliance conditions, adjust the company’s business operation mode and business plan, or have a significant impact on our ability to accept foreign investment or maintain its listing in the United States or other overseas markets.
Interpretation and enforcement of Chinese laws and regulations is uncertain and may change quickly, which could result in a material and negative impact our business operation, decrease the value of our ordinary shares and limit the legal protections available to us.
The Chinese legal system is based on statutory law. Under this system, prior court decisions may be cited as persuasive authority, but do not have the binding effect of precedents. Since 1979, the Chinese government has been developing a comprehensive system of commercial laws and considerable progress has been made in the promulgation of laws and regulations dealing with economic matters, such as corporate organization and governance, foreign investment, commerce, taxation and trade. Because these laws, regulations and legal requirements are relatively new and prior court decisions have little precedential value, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws, regulations and legal requirements may change quickly and involve greater uncertainty than in other jurisdictions.
From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy. Such uncertainties, including uncertainty over the scope and effect of our contractual, property (including intellectual property) and procedural rights, could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.
5