Significant Accounting Policies | Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-K. The Company believes that the disclosures contained herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These Consolidated Financial Statements reflect, in the opinion of the Company, all material adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly present the Company’s financial position as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 , and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Estimates have been prepared on the basis of the most current and best available information, but actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Book value per share is computed by dividing total shareholders' equity by the number of shares issued and outstanding at the end of the measurement period. Reclassification Certain prior period amounts and disclosures may have been reclassified to conform to the current period's financial presentation. Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the operations of the Company and its controlled subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company holds certain investments in the Funds and the ETF we advise for general corporate investment purposes and to provide seed capital for newly formed strategies. The Funds are organized in a series fund structure in which there are multiple mutual funds within one Trust (the "Trust"). The Trust is an open-end investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). The ETF we advise is an individual series of ETF Series Solutions which is also an open-end investment company registered under the 1940 Act. Each of the individual mutual funds and the ETF represent a separate share class of a legal entity organized under the Trust. As of January 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASU 2015-02 - Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis ("ASU 2015-02") and we have performed our analysis at the individual mutual fund and ETF level and have concluded the mutual funds and ETF are voting rights entities ("VREs"). The Company has concluded that the mutual funds and the ETF are VREs because the structure of the investment product is such that the shareholders are deemed to have the power through voting rights to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. To the extent material, these investment products are consolidated if Company ownership, directly or indirectly, represents a majority interest (greater than 50%). The Company records redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated investments for which the Company's ownership is less than 100%. We adopted ASU 2015-02 utilizing the modified retrospective transition method and have recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity of $4.0 million as of January 1, 2016. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2015-02, we performed our analysis at the Trust level and concluded we did not need to consolidate the Funds or the ETF as we owned less than 1% of the voting interest in the respective Trusts. In 2016, the Company consolidated the ETF and one of our individual mutual funds (collectively the "Consolidated Funds") as our ownership was greater than 50% in each. DHCM is the managing member of Diamond Hill General Partner, LLC (the “General Partner”), the general partner of Diamond Hill Investment Partners, L.P. (“DHIP”) and Diamond Hill Global Fund, L.P. ("DHGF"), each a limited partnership whose underlying assets consist primarily of marketable securities, or collectively (the "Partnerships" or “LPs”). DHCM is wholly owned by the Company and is consolidated by us. Further, DHCM through its control of the General Partner, has the power to direct each LP’s economic activities and the right to receive investment advisory and performance incentive fees that may be significant to the LPs. The Company concluded we did not have a variable interest in DHIP as the fees paid to the General Partner are considered to contain customary terms and conditions as found in the market for similar products and the Company has no equity ownership in DHIP. The Company concluded DHGF was a variable interest entity ("VIE") as DHCM has disproportionately less voting interest than economic interests because the Company receives over 95% of the variability of DHGF, yet the limited partners have full power to remove the Company as the General Partner due to the existence of substantive kick-out rights. In addition, substantially all of the LPs' activities are conducted on behalf of the General Partner which has disproportionately few voting rights. The Company concluded we are not the primary beneficiary of DHGF as we lack the power to control the entity due to the existence of single-party kick-out rights where the limited partners have the unilateral ability to remove us as the General Partner without cause. DHCM’s investment in DHGF is reported as a component of the Company’s investment portfolio, valued at DHCM’s proportionate interest in the net asset value ("NAV") of DHGF. The LPs are not subject to lock-up periods and can be redeemed on demand. Gains and losses attributable to changes in the value of DHCM’s interests in the LPs are included in the Company’s reported investment income. The Company’s exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the LPs is limited to the amount of its investments. DHCM is not obligated to provide, and has not provided, financial or other support to the LPs, other than its investments to date and its contractually provided investment advisory responsibilities. The Company has not provided liquidity arrangements, guarantees or other commitments to support the LPs’ operations, and the LPs’ creditors and interest holders have no recourse to the general credit of the Company. Certain board members, officers and employees of the Company invest in DHIP and are not subject to a management fee or an incentive fee. These individuals receive no remuneration as a result of their personal investment in DHIP. The capital of the General Partner is not subject to a management fee or an incentive fee. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest Redeemable noncontrolling interest represents third-party interests in the Consolidated Funds. This interest is redeemable at the option of the investors and therefore is not treated as permanent equity. Redeemable noncontrolling interest is remeasured at redemption value which approximates the fair value each reporting period. Segment Information Management has determined that the Company operates in one business segment, providing investment management and administration services to mutual funds, institutional accounts, and private investment funds. Therefore, no disclosures relating to operating segments are required in the annual financial statements. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits and money market mutual funds. Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable are recorded when they are due and are presented on the balance sheet net of any allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are written off when they are determined to be uncollectible. Any allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on the Company’s historical losses, existing conditions in the industry, and the financial stability of those individuals or entities that owe the receivable. No allowance for doubtful accounts was deemed necessary at December 31, 2016 or 2015 . Accounts Receivable from the Funds were $10.4 million and $9.2 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. Investments Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluates its determination at each reporting period. Investments classified as trading represent Company sponsored investments in the Funds where the Company has neither control nor the ability to exercise significant influence as well as securities held in the Consolidated Funds. These investments are measured at fair value based on quoted market prices. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as investment income (loss) in the Company's consolidated statements of income. Investments classified as equity method investments represent Company sponsored investments in which the Company owns between 20-50% of the outstanding voting interests in the entity or when it is determined that the Company is able to exercise significant influence but not control over the investments. When using the equity method, the Company recognizes its respective share of the investee's net income or loss for the period which is recorded as investment income (loss) in the Company's consolidated statements of income. Valuation of Investment Portfolio Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement ("ASC 820") specifies a hierarchy of valuation classifications based on whether the inputs to the valuation techniques used in each valuation classification are observable or unobservable. These classifications are summarized in the three broad levels listed below: Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-driven valuations in which all significant inputs are observable. Level 3 - Valuations derived from techniques in which significant inputs are unobservable. Inputs used to measure fair value might fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, in which case the Company defaults to the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with investments. The following table summarizes the values of the Company's investments as of December 31, 2016 : Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Investments measured at NAV (a) Total Cash equivalents $ 47,717,187 $ — $ — $ — $ 47,717,187 Trading Investments Securities held in Consolidated Funds (b) 19,835,458 37,520,013 — — $ 57,355,471 Company sponsored investments 20,245 — — — $ 20,245 Company sponsored equity method investments 34,886,484 — — 1,570,965 $ 36,457,449 Deferred compensation investments 14,182,470 — — — $ 14,182,470 (a) Comprised of certain investments in limited partnerships measured at fair value using NAV (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. These investments have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets. (b) Of the equity interests in the Consolidated Funds as of December 31, 2016 , $42.6 million were held directly by the Company and $14.7 million were held by noncontrolling shareholders. Level 1 investments are all registered investment companies (mutual funds) or equity securities held in the Consolidated Funds and include, as of December 31, 2016 , $47.7 million of investments in money market mutual funds that the Company classifies as cash equivalents. Level 2 investments are comprised of investments in debt securities, which are valued by an independent pricing service which uses pricing techniques which take into account factors such as trading activity, readily available market quotations, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, call features, credit rates and other observable inputs. The Company determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers in or out of the levels during the year ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 . Changes in fair values on the investments are recorded in the Company's consolidated statements of income as investment income (loss). Property and Equipment Property and equipment, consisting of leasehold improvements, computer equipment, furniture and fixtures, are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated life of the assets. Revenue Recognition – General The Company earns substantially all of its revenue from investment advisory and fund administration services. Investment advisory and administration fees, generally calculated as a percentage of AUM, are recorded as revenue as services are performed. In addition to fixed fees based on a percentage of AUM, certain client accounts also provide periodic variable fees. Investment advisory revenue from the Funds was $88.9 million , $80.7 million and $65.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively. Revenue Recognition – Variable Fees The Company manages certain client accounts that provide for variable fees. These fees are calculated based on client investment results over rolling five -year periods. The Company records variable fees at the end of the contract measurement period. The following table summarizes the variable fees earned by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 : For the year ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ 6,444,599 $ — $ — During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $6.4 million in variable fees upon the termination of a variable fee contract that was in the final year of the five-year contract measurement period. The table below shows AUM subject to variable fees and the amount of variable fees that would be recognized based upon current investment results as of December 31, 2016 : As Of December 31, 2016 AUM subject to variable fees Variable fees Contractual Period Ends: Quarter Ended December 31, 2018 $ 94,212,727 $ — Quarter Ended September 30, 2019 31,923,922 239,442 Quarter Ended March 31, 2020 10,426,125 — Quarter Ended September 30, 2021 231,220,034 — Total $ 367,782,808 $ 239,442 The contractual end dates highlight the time remaining until the variable fees are scheduled to be earned. The amount of variable fees that would be recognized based upon investments results as of December 31, 2016 will increase or decrease based on future client investment results through the contractual period end. There can be no assurance that the unearned amounts will ultimately be earned. Revenue Recognition – Mutual Fund Administration DHCM has an administrative and transfer agency services agreement with the Funds under which DHCM performs certain services for each Fund. These services include mutual fund administration, fund accounting, transfer agency and other related functions. For performing these services each Fund pays DHCM a fee, which is calculated using an annual rate times the average daily net assets of each respective share class.The Funds have selected and contractually engaged certain vendors to fulfill various services to benefit the Funds’ shareholders or to satisfy regulatory requirements of the Funds. These services include, among others, required shareholder mailings, federal and state registrations, and legal and audit services. DHCM, in fulfilling a portion of its role under the administration agreement with the Funds, acts as agent to pay these obligations of the Funds. Each vendor is independently responsible for fulfillment of the services it has been engaged to provide and negotiates fees and terms with the management and board of trustees of the Funds. The fee that each Fund pays to DHCM is reviewed annually by the Funds’ board of trustees and specifically takes into account the contractual expenses that DHCM pays on behalf of the Funds. As a result, DHCM is not involved in the delivery or pricing of these services and bears no risk related to these services. Revenue has been recorded net of these Fund related expenses, in accordance with FASB ASC 605-45, Revenue Recognition – Principal Agent Considerations . In addition, DHCM advances the upfront commissions which are paid to brokers who sell Class C shares of the Funds. These advances are capitalized and amortized over 12 months to correspond with the repayments DHCM receives from the principal underwriter to recoup this commission advancement. Prior to the sale of Beacon Hill, the Company, through Beacon Hill, had underwriting and administrative service agreements with certain clients, including registered mutual funds. The fee arrangements varied from client to client based upon services provided and have been recorded as revenue under mutual fund administration on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Part of Beacon Hill’s role as underwriter was to act as an agent on behalf of its mutual fund clients to receive 12b-1/service fees and commission revenue and facilitate the payment of those fees and commissions to third parties who provide services to the funds and their shareholders. The majority of 12b-1/service fees were paid to independent third parties and the remainder were retained by the Company as a reimbursement of expenses the Company had incurred. The amounts of 12b-1/service fees and commissions were determined by each mutual fund client, and Beacon Hill bore no financial risk related to these services. As a result, 12b-1/service fees and commission revenue was recorded net of the expense payments to third parties, in accordance with the appropriate accounting treatment for this agency relationship. See Note 11 . Mutual fund administration gross and net revenue are summarized below: Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 Mutual fund administration: Administration revenue, gross $ 26,664,635 $ 27,042,861 $ 22,968,369 12b-1/service fees and commission revenue received from fund clients 6,360,400 11,087,978 10,514,242 12b-1/service fees and commission expense payments to third parties (5,660,430 ) (9,617,568 ) (9,102,565 ) Fund related expense (12,937,067 ) (12,031,353 ) (9,753,359 ) Revenue, net of related expenses 14,427,538 16,481,918 14,626,687 DHCM C-Share financing: Broker commission advance repayments 691,228 991,430 878,105 Broker commission amortization (660,840 ) (962,919 ) (846,861 ) Financing activity, net 30,388 28,511 31,244 Mutual fund administration revenue, net $ 14,457,926 $ 16,510,429 $ 14,657,931 Mutual fund administrative net revenue from the Funds was $13.4 million , $14.3 million and $13.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively. Income Taxes The Company accounts for current and deferred income taxes through an asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. The Company is subject to examination by federal and applicable state and local jurisdictions for various tax periods. The Company’s income tax positions are based on research and interpretations of the income tax laws and rulings in each of the jurisdictions in which it does business. Due to the subjectivity of interpretations of laws and rulings in each jurisdiction, the differences and interplay in tax laws between those jurisdictions, as well as the inherent uncertainty in estimating the final resolution of complex tax audit matters, the Company’s estimates of income tax liabilities may differ from actual payments or assessments. The Company regularly assesses its position with regard to tax exposures and records liabilities for these uncertain tax positions and related interest and penalties, if any, according to the principles of FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes . As of December 31, 2016 , the Company had not recorded any liability for uncertain tax positions. The Company records interest and penalties, if any, within income tax expense on the income statement. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding for the period, which includes participating securities. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution of EPS due to unvested restricted stock grants with forfeitable rights to dividends and restricted stock units. For the periods presented, the Company had unvested stock-based payment awards that contain both forfeitable and nonforfeitable rights to dividends and restricted stock units. See Note 9 . Recently Issued Accounting Standards In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers", which supersedes existing accounting standards for revenue recognition and creates a single framework. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. This standard also specifies the accounting for certain costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer. This ASU will supersede much of the existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, and requires either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, as well as the transition methods. Early application is permitted for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting", which is intended to improve the accounting for share-based payment transactions as part of the FASB's simplification initiative. The standard is intended to simplify several areas of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including the accounting for income taxes, classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, forfeitures, statutory tax withholding requirements, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes. ASU 2016-09 is effective for our interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2017, and is to be applied using a retrospective transition method. Though permitted, we did not early adopt the guidance. The primary impact from this guidance on our consolidated financial statements will be to our tax provision line item as any excess tax benefits or deficiencies from the vesting of stock awards will now be recognized through our income tax provision as opposed to common stock. As of December 31, 2016 , we had approximately 223,800 shares of restricted stock outstanding with a weighted-average grant date price of approximately $132.96 . If the share price of DHIL continues to be greater than the grant date fair value of these awards throughout 2017, we could recognize additional tax benefit in our tax provision for 2017. Based on the closing price of DHIL as of December 31, 2016 , this additional benefit we would record in 2017 would be approximately $2.0 million . We are continuing to evaluate additional impacts the update will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases", which, among other things, requires lessees to recognize most leases on-balance sheet. This will increase lessees' reported assets and liabilities - in some cases significantly. Lessor accounting remains substantially similar to current GAAP. ASU 2016-02 supersedes Topic 840, Leases . ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. ASU 2016-02 mandates a modified retrospective transition method for all entities. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. |