UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: March 29, 2008
or
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-14725
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 35-1880244 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
or organization) | | |
91320 Industrial Way
Coburg, Oregon 97408
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (541) 686-8011
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer x | Non-Accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x
The number of shares outstanding of common stock, $.01 par value, as of March 29, 2008: 29,814,141
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
March 29, 2008
INDEX
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
3
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data)
| | December 29, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | | | (unaudited) | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 6,282 | | $ | 8,081 | |
Trade receivables, net | | 88,170 | | 72,570 | |
Inventories, net | | 158,236 | | 161,191 | |
Resort lot inventory | | 8,838 | | 17,010 | |
Prepaid expenses | | 5,142 | | 4,336 | |
Income taxes receivable | | 0 | | 5,018 | |
Debt issuance costs, net | | 0 | | 423 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 37,608 | | 36,446 | |
Total current assets | | 304,276 | | 305,075 | |
| | | | | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | 144,291 | | 141,368 | |
Land held for development | | 24,321 | | 19,136 | |
Investment in joint venture | | 4,059 | | 4,184 | |
Debt issuance costs, net | | 498 | | 0 | |
Goodwill | | 86,323 | | 86,323 | |
| | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 563,768 | | $ | 556,086 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Book overdraft | | $ | 1,601 | | $ | 2,402 | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | 5,714 | | 27,143 | |
Line of credit | | 0 | | 31,592 | |
Income taxes payable | | 3,726 | | 0 | |
Accounts payable | | 82,833 | | 68,405 | |
Product liability reserve | | 14,625 | | 15,489 | |
Product warranty reserve | | 35,171 | | 34,252 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | 48,609 | | 39,251 | |
Total current liabilities | | 192,279 | | 218,534 | |
| | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current portion | | 23,357 | | 500 | |
Deferred income taxes | | 21,506 | | 21,556 | |
Deferred revenue | | 683 | | 633 | |
Total liabilities | | 237,825 | | 241,223 | |
| | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,934,783 shares authorized, no shares outstanding Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 29,989,534 and 29,814,141 issued and outstanding, respectively | | 300 | | 298 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 69,514 | | 70,776 | |
Retained earnings | | 256,129 | | 243,789 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 325,943 | | 314,863 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 563,768 | | $ | 556,086 | |
See accompanying notes.
4
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited: in thousands of dollars, except share and per share data)
| | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 322,244 | | $ | 252,377 | |
Cost of sales | | 286,248 | | 236,571 | |
Gross profit | | 35,996 | | 15,806 | |
| | | | | |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | | 32,358 | | 28,636 | |
Operating income (loss) | | 3,638 | | (12,830 | ) |
| | | | | |
Other income, net | | 113 | | 87 | |
Interest expense | | (967 | ) | (725 | ) |
Income (loss) from investment in joint venture | | (278 | ) | 126 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | 2,506 | | (13,342 | ) |
| | | | | |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | 1,007 | | (4,885 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 1,499 | | $ | (8,457 | ) |
| | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per common share: | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.05 | | $ | (0.28 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | 0.05 | | $ | (0.28 | ) |
| | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | | | | | |
Basic | | 29,829,697 | | 29,746,479 | |
Diluted | | 30,405,671 | | 30,127,263 | |
See accompanying notes.
5
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited: in thousands of dollars)
| | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Cash: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,499 | | $ | (8,457 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | |
Loss (gain) on sale of assets | | (113 | ) | 164 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 3,537 | | 3,457 | |
Deferred income taxes | | (2,223 | ) | 1,212 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | 1,826 | | 2,098 | |
Net income from equity investment | | 0 | | (126 | ) |
Changes in working capital accounts: | | | | | |
Trade receivables, net | | (6,811 | ) | 15,600 | |
Inventories | | (2,134 | ) | (2,955 | ) |
Resort lot inventory | | 1,214 | | (150 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | | 361 | | 806 | |
Land held for development | | 0 | | (2,836 | ) |
Accounts payable | | 35,345 | | (14,428 | ) |
Product liability reserve | | 745 | | 864 | |
Product warranty reserve | | 743 | | (919 | ) |
Income taxes payable (receivable) | | 9,458 | | (8,744 | ) |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | 3,019 | | (9,702 | ) |
Deferred revenue | | (50 | ) | (50 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | (10 | ) | 0 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | 46,406 | | (24,166 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
Additions to property, plant, and equipment | | (1,770 | ) | (637 | ) |
Investment in joint venture | | (88 | ) | 0 | |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | 505 | | 11 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (1,353 | ) | (626 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Book overdraft | | (16,626 | ) | 801 | |
Advance (payments) on lines of credit, net | | (2,036 | ) | 31,592 | |
Payments on long-term notes payable | | (1,428 | ) | (1,428 | ) |
Debt issuance costs | | (193 | ) | (8 | ) |
Dividends paid | | (1,791 | ) | (1,810 | ) |
Issuance of common stock | | 927 | | 625 | |
Repurchase of common stock | | 0 | | (2,829 | ) |
Tax effect of stock-based award activity | | 136 | | (352 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | (21,011 | ) | 26,591 | |
| | | | | |
Net change in cash | | 24,042 | | 1,799 | |
Cash at beginning of period | | 4,984 | | 6,282 | |
| | | | | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 29,026 | | $ | 8,081 | |
See accompanying notes.
6
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Monaco Coach Corporation (the “Company”) without audit. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments necessary, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of December 29, 2007 and March 29, 2008, and the results of its operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008 and its cash flows for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and all significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 29, 2008 is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The balance sheet data as of December 29, 2007 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures contained in the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007, nor does it include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto appearing in the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007.
2. Inventories, net
Inventories are stated at lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. The composition of inventory is as follows:
| | December 29, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 79,640 | | $ | 80,233 | |
Work-in-process | | 54,760 | | 54,364 | |
Finished units | | 33,241 | | 35,481 | |
Raw material reserves | | (9,405 | ) | (8,887 | ) |
| | | | | |
| | $ | 158,236 | | $ | 161,191 | |
3. Joint Venture
On February 25, 2007, the Company closed a transaction with International Truck and Engine Corporation to form a joint venture to manufacture all of the Company’s rear diesel chassis. The terms of the agreement grant the Company a 49% ownership in the joint venture, known as Custom Chassis Products, LLC (CCP). The investment is accounted for under the equity method. The Company contributed $4,060,000 of inventory, $246,000 of fixed assets, and $140,000 of cash to CCP and incurred transaction costs of $226,000. The Company’s portion of CCP’s income for the quarter ended March 29, 2008 was $126,000 (compared to the $278,000 loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2007).
4. Land Held for Development
On March 19, 2008, the Company acquired 25 acres of land near Bay Harbor, Michigan for $2.8 million. The Company plans to develop the parcel into a motorhome resort with approximately 130 lots expected to be available for sale to the public in the third quarter of 2008.
7
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
5. Credit Facilities
The Company’s credit facilities consist of a revolving line of credit (the “Line of Credit”) of up to $105.0 million and a term loan (“Term Debt”). As of March 29, 2008, there was $31.6 million outstanding under the Line of Credit and $27.1 million outstanding on the Term Debt. At the election of the Company, the credit facilities bear interest at rates that fluctuate based on the prime rate or LIBOR and are determined based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company also pays interest quarterly on the unused available portion of the Line of Credit at varying rates, determined by the Company’s leverage ratio. The amounts outstanding under the Line of Credit are due and payable in full on November 17, 2009 and interest is paid monthly. The Term Debt requires quarterly interest and principal payments of $1.4 million, with a final balloon payment of $12.9 million due on November 18, 2010. At March 29, 2008, the weighted-average interest rate on the Revolving Loan and the Term Debt was 5.2% and 4.2%, respectively. The credit facilities are collateralized by all of the assets of the Company. The Company also has four stand-by letters of credit outstanding totaling $3.8 million as of March 29, 2008.
The credit facilities require the Company to maintain a maximum leverage ratio, minimum current ratio, minimum debt service coverage ratio, and minimum tangible net worth. The Company was in violation of its required leverage ratio and debt service coverage ratio as of March 29, 2008. The Company has obtained an agreement from its lenders, dated April 23, 2008, to waive the covenant violations as of March 29, 2008. However, management expects that the Company will also violate these covenants for the next several quarters. Accordingly, the Company has reclassified its long-term debt and related debt issue costs from non-current to current as of March 29, 2008.
Under the waiver agreement, the Company has agreed to provide the lenders an updated business plan by May 9, 2008. Management believes it will be able to successfully negotiate revised financial covenants with its lenders at levels that are attainable by the Company based on its updated business plan. However, there can be no assurance that an agreement will be reached. If an agreement cannot be reached or if an agreement is reached but the Company nevertheless violates the revised covenants, the Company could experience severe liquidity problems unless the lenders were to agree to additional waivers, forbearance, or restructuring of the debt or unless the Company can refinance the debt. Failure to obtain such agreement or to refinance the debt would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Unamortized debt issue costs related to the credit facilities are $423,000 as of March 29, 2008. If the Company’s current credit facility is refinanced in a transaction required to be accounted for as an extinguishment or the outstanding balance is demanded by the lender, unamortized debt issue costs at the demand or refinancing date would be required to be expensed in the period of refinancing or demand.
6. Long-Term Notes Payable
In November 2005, the Company obtained a term loan of $500,000 from the State of Oregon in connection with the relocation of jobs to the Coburg, Oregon production facilities from the Bend, Oregon facility. The principal and interest are due on April 30, 2009. The loan bears a 5% annual interest rate.
8
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
7. Income Taxes
As of March 29, 2008, the Company’s total unrecognized tax benefits were $745,000 and all of these benefits, if recognized, would positively affect the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company also had accrued interest related to these unrecognized tax benefits of $115,000 as of March 29, 2008. The total amount of unrecognized federal and state tax benefits is uncertain due to the subjectivity in the measurement of certain deductions claimed for United States income tax purposes and certain state income tax apportionment matters.
As of March 29, 2008, the Company’s income tax returns that remain subject to examination are tax years 2004 through 2006 for U.S. federal income tax and tax years 2003 through 2006 for major state income tax returns. The statute of limitations for U.S. federal income taxes and some state income taxes for the 2003 and 2004 tax years will expire during fiscal year 2008.
Unrecognized tax benefits are expected to decrease during fiscal 2008 by approximately $100,000 due to the expiration of federal and state statutes of limitations for the 2004 tax year.
8. Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is based on the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is based on the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period, after consideration of the dilutive effect of outstanding stock-based awards. The weighted-average number of common shares used in the computation of earnings per common share were as follows:
| | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | | | | |
Basic | | | | | |
Issued and outstanding shares (weighted-average) | | 29,829,697 | | 29,746,479 | |
| | | | | |
Effect of Dilutive Securities | | | | | |
Stock-based awards | | 575,974 | | 380,784 | |
| | | | | |
Diluted | | 30,405,671 | | 30,127,263 | |
| | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | | | | |
Cash dividends per common share | | $ | 0.06 | | $ | 0.06 | |
Cash dividends paid (in thousands) | | $ | 1,791 | | $ | 1,810 | |
9
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
9. Repurchase of Common Stock
In January 2008, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program whereby up to an aggregate of $30 million worth of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock may be repurchased from time to time. There is no time restriction on this authorization to purchase our Common Stock. The program provides for the Company to repurchase shares through the open market and other approved transactions at prices deemed appropriate by management. The timing and amount of repurchase transactions under the program will depend upon market conditions and corporate and regulatory considerations. During January 2008, the Company repurchased 313,400 shares of Common Stock on the open market at an average purchase price of $9.03 per share. The Company recognized a reduction to additional paid in capital and retained earnings of approximately $727,000 and $2.1 million, respectively.
10. Stock-Based Award Plans
The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”) – 2007, a non-employee 1993 Director Stock Plan (the “Director Plan”), and an amended and restated 1993 Stock Plan (the “Stock Plan”). The Purchase Plan was approved by the Board of Directors in 2007 and stockholder approval will be sought at the May 14, 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The compensation expense recognized in the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008 for the plans was $1.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively. A detailed description of all the plans and the respective accounting treatment is included in the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements” included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2007.
Restricted Stock Units
During the quarter ended March 29, 2008, the Company granted 357,414 restricted stock units (RSU’s) to employees under the Stock Plan. In addition, 68,879 RSU’s from previously granted awards vested during the same period. The compensation expense recognized for RSU’s in the first quarter of 2007 and 2008 was $989,000 and $1.2 million, respectively.
Performance Share Awards
During the quarter ended March 29, 2008, the Company granted 269,764 performance share awards (PSA’s) to employees under the Stock Plan. In addition, 23,077 PSA’s from a previous award vested during the same period. The compensation expense recognized for PSA’s in the first quarter of 2007 and 2008 was $754,000 and $740,000, respectively.
10
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
11. Segment Reporting
The following table provides the results of operations of the three segments of the Company for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008, respectively. All dollars are in thousands.
| | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | | | | |
Motorized Recreational Vehicle Segment | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 245,548 | | $ | 194,737 | |
Cost of sales | | 219,061 | | 182,914 | |
Gross profit | | 26,487 | | 11,823 | |
| | | | | |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses and corporate overhead | | 23,155 | | 20,443 | |
| | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | 3,332 | | $ | (8,620 | ) |
| | | | | |
Towable Recreational Vehicle Segment | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 69,480 | | $ | 55,208 | |
Cost of sales | | 64,753 | | 52,471 | |
Gross profit | | 4,727 | | 2,737 | |
| | | | | |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses and corporate overhead | | 6,372 | | 6,200 | |
| | | | | |
Operating loss | | $ | (1,645 | ) | $ | (3,463 | ) |
| | | | | |
Motorhome Resorts Segment | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 7,216 | | $ | 2,432 | |
Cost of sales | | 2,434 | | 1,186 | |
Gross profit | | 4,782 | | 1,246 | |
| | | | | |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses and corporate overhead | | 2,831 | | 1,993 | |
| | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | 1,951 | | $ | (747 | ) |
11
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
11. Segment Reporting, continued
| | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | | | | |
Reconciliation to Net Income | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Operating income (loss): | | | | | |
Motorized recreational vehicle segment | | $ | 3,332 | | $ | (8,620 | ) |
Towable recreational vehicle segment | | (1,645 | ) | (3,463 | ) |
Motorhome resorts segment | | 1,951 | | (747 | ) |
Total operating income (loss) | | 3,638 | | (12,830 | ) |
| | | | | |
Other income, net | | 113 | | 87 | |
Interest expense | | (967 | ) | (725 | ) |
Income (loss) from investment in joint venture | | (278 | ) | 126 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | 2,506 | | (13,342 | ) |
| | | | | |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | 1,007 | | (4,885 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 1,499 | | $ | (8,457 | ) |
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Repurchase Agreements
Most of the Company’s sales to independent dealers are made on a “floor plan” basis by a bank or finance company which lends the dealer all or substantially all of the wholesale purchase price and retains a security interest in the vehicles. Upon request of a lending institution financing a dealer’s purchases of the Company’s product, the Company will execute a repurchase agreement. These agreements provide that, for up to 15 months after a unit is shipped, the Company will repurchase a dealer’s inventory in the event of a default by a dealer to its lender.
The Company’s liability under repurchase agreements is limited to the unpaid balance owed to the lending institution by reason of its extending credit to the dealer to purchase its vehicles, reduced by the resale value of vehicles which may be repurchased. The risk of loss is spread over numerous dealers and financial institutions.
12
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
12. Commitments and Contingencies, continued
The approximate amount subject to contingent repurchase obligations arising from these agreements at March 29, 2008 is approximately $552.5 million, with approximately 4.6% concentrated with one dealer. If the Company were obligated to repurchase a significant number of units under any repurchase agreement, its business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected. The Company has included the disclosure requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” in its financial statements, and has determined that the recognition provisions of FIN 45 apply to certain guarantees routinely made by the Company, including contingent repurchase obligations to third party lenders for inventory financing of dealer inventories. The Company has recorded a liability of approximately $362,000 for potential losses resulting from guarantees on repurchase obligations for products shipped to dealers. This estimated liability is based on the Company’s experience of losses associated with the repurchase and resale of units in prior years.
Product Liability
The Company is subject to regulations which may require the Company to recall products with design or safety defects, and such recall could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The Company has from time to time been subject to product liability claims. To date, the Company has been successful in obtaining product liability insurance on terms the Company considers acceptable. The terms of the policy contain a self-insured retention amount of $500,000 per occurrence, with a maximum annual aggregate self-insured retention of $3.0 million. Overall product liability insurance, including umbrella coverage, is available up to a maximum amount of $100.0 million for each occurrence, as well as in the aggregate. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain insurance coverage in the future at acceptable levels or that the cost of insurance will be reasonable. Furthermore, successful assertion against the Company of one or a series of large uninsured claims, or of one or a series of claims exceeding any insurance coverage, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. The following table discloses significant changes in the product liability reserve:
| | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | | | | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 15,764 | | $ | 14,625 | |
Expense | | 3,911 | | 4,317 | |
Payments/adjustments | | (3,166 | ) | (3,453 | ) |
| | | | | |
Ending balance | | $ | 16,509 | | $ | 15,489 | |
13
MONACO COACH CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
12. Commitments and Contingencies, continued
Product Warranty
Estimated warranty costs are provided for at the time of sale of products with warranties covering the products for up to one year from the date of retail sale (five years for the front and sidewall frame structure, and three years on the Roadmaster chassis). These estimates are based on historical average repair costs, as well as other reasonable assumptions deemed appropriate by management. The following table discloses significant changes in the product warranty reserve:
| | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, | | March 29, | |
| | 2007 | | 2008 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | | | | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 33,804 | | $ | 35,171 | |
Expense | | 9,883 | | 9,310 | |
Payments/adjustments | | (9,140 | ) | (10,229 | ) |
| | | | | |
Ending balance | | $ | 34,547 | | $ | 34,252 | |
Litigation
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings which are incidental to the industry and for which certain matters are covered in whole or in part by insurance or, for those matters not covered by insurance, the Company has recorded accruals for estimated settlements. Management believes that any liability which may result from these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
13. New Pronouncements
FAS 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” The Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands fair value measurement disclosure. SFAS No. 157 was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-1 and FSP 157-2. FSP 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-recurring non-financial assets and liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of FASB No. 157 were adopted as of December 30, 2007, including the provisions of FSP 157-1. The adoption of the statement had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations of cash flows.
FAS 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The provisions of FASB No. 159 were adopted as of December 30, 2007. We did not elect the Fair Value Option for any of our financial assets or liabilities, and therefore, the adoption of the statement had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
14
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements include, but are not limited to, those in this report that have been marked with an asterisk (*). In addition, statements containing words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including those set forth below in Part II, Item 1A under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The reader should carefully consider, together with the other matters referred to herein, the factors set forth in Part II, Item 1A under the caption “Risk Factors,” as well as in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution the reader, however, that these factors may not be exhaustive. In addition, we do not undertake the obligation to publicly update or revise any “forward-looking statements,” whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law or the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
GENERAL
OVERVIEW
Background
Monaco Coach Corporation (the “Company”) is a leading manufacturer of premium recreational vehicles including class A, B, and C motor coaches, as well as towable recreational vehicles. The Company also develops and sells luxury motorcoach resort facilities. These three operations, while closely tied into the recreational lifestyle, are segmented for reporting purposes as the Motorized Recreational Vehicle (MRV) segment, the Towable Recreational Vehicle (TRV) segment, and the Motorhome Resort (MR) segment.
Motorized and Towable Recreational Vehicle Segment Products
Our products range in suggested retail price from $45,000 to $700,000 for motor coaches and from $11,000 to $80,000 for towables. Based upon retail registrations for the first two months of 2008, we believe we had a 24.8% share of the market for diesel class A motor coaches, a 7.5% share of the market for gas class A motor coaches, a 17.0% share of the market for all class A motor coaches, a 4.5% share of the market for class C motor coaches, a 2.5% share of the market for fifth wheel towables and a 4.5% share of the market for travel trailers.
Motorhome Resort Segment
In addition to the manufacturing of premium recreational vehicles, the Company also owns and operates two motorhome resort properties (the “Resorts”), located in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Indio, California. A resort located in Naples, Florida is currently under development, and the Company has acquired land to develop properties in La Quinta, California, and in Bay Harbor, Michigan. The Resorts offer sales of individual lots to owners, and also offer common interests in the amenities at each resort. Lot prices for remaining unsold lots at the two developed resorts range from $114,900 to $329,900. Amenities at the Resorts include: club house facilities, tennis, swimming, and golf. The Resorts provide destination locations for premium class A motor coach owners, and help to promote the recreational lifestyle.
Business Changes
In March 2007, we completed the formation of a joint venture with International Truck and Engine Corporation (ITEC) for the purpose of manufacturing rear diesel chassis. This joint venture, known as Custom Chassis Products LLC (CCP), enables us to take advantage of purchasing synergies, access engineering and design expertise from ITEC, and improve the utilization of our Roadmaster chassis manufacturing facility in Elkhart, Indiana. Our ownership interest is 49%, and we are accounting for the activity of this operation using the equity method of accounting.
Based on the results of operations for the first quarter of 2008 and the decrease in sales, subsequent to the quarter end, we have undertaken cost reduction strategies within the Company in order to return to profitability. The strategies include further reduction in production output, which has been ongoing, as well as reductions in our personnel across all departments. We are also continuing to reduce manufacturing costs through purchasing initiatives and projects designed to further improve our manufacturing plant utilization costs.
15
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Quarter ended March 29, 2008 Compared to Quarter ended March 31, 2007
The following table illustrates the results of consolidated operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008. All dollar amounts are in thousands.
| | Quarter Ended | | % | | Quarter Ended | | % | | $ | | % | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | of Sales | | March 29, 2008 | | of Sales | | Change | | Change | |
Net sales | | $ | 322,244 | | 100.0 | % | $ | 252,377 | | 100.0 | % | $ | (69,867 | ) | (21.7 | )% |
Cost of sales | | 286,248 | | 88.8 | % | 236,571 | | 93.7 | % | 49,677 | | 17.4 | % |
Gross profit | | 35,996 | | 11.2 | % | 15,806 | | 6.3 | % | (20,190 | ) | (56.1 | )% |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | | 32,358 | | 10.0 | % | 28,636 | | 11.4 | % | 3,722 | | 11.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | 3,638 | | 1.2 | % | $ | (12,830 | ) | (5.1 | )% | $ | (16,468 | ) | (452.7 | )% |
Motorized and Towable Recreational Vehicle Segments
The recreational vehicle (“RV”) market in the first quarter of 2008 continued to decline compared to the first quarter of 2007. Fuel prices reached historical highs and consumer credit markets have deteriorated. The market saw wholesale shipments of class A units decline 34% during the quarter compared to the same period last year. We experienced a 21% decrease in class A sales to dealers in the same period. The overall wholesale contraction in the RV market continues to put pressure on our business, though the class A wholesale market is projected by the RV Industry Association (“RVIA”) to decline by 19% for the full year 2008 compared to 2007.* However, we believe the long-term potential of the RV market is still rooted in solid demographics. This is most readily evidenced by the so-called “baby boomer” generation, which as it ages will continue to expand our target market well into 2015 and should provide a consumer base that is enthusiastic to embrace the RV lifestyle.*
The motorized market has been significantly impacted by the current market conditions. The tightening of the retail credit market is placing pressures on the retail customers and our dealers continue to be cautious in the amount of inventory they are willing to carry. Consequently, we have been very diligent in monitoring the wholesale versus retail shipments of our products. This has enabled us to manage our finished goods inventory levels. The decline in wholesale shipments has created extreme pressure on our pricing to dealers. This is a major factor in the decrease of our gross margins and partially offsets the improvements we have made in our plant efficiencies. We continue to research ways to consolidate component manufacturing operations to improve our indirect costs of sales. We expect that we will have more of these projects over the next several quarters.*
Despite the current cyclical downturn in the motorized market, we continue to remain optimistic on the prospects for long-term growth in this sector, as the demographics for our customer base show a continuing increase in the number of new entrants into our targeted age bracket and economic group.* We continue to be focused on developing new products to augment our business. We will be introducing a class C model built on a Sprinter chassis in the second quarter of 2008 and a Super C model in the later part of the third quarter.
The towable market has continued to slow down. Wholesale shipments of towable recreational vehicles are down 17.3% in the first quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. However, the low-to-mid-priced products are performing better than the higher-end products. We introduced in 2007 several new floorplans and new lightweight and inexpensive models to compete in this market sector. We believe that these new offerings will enable us to compete more effectively in these more challenging market conditions. *
As in the case of our motorized production, we also have excess capacity at our towable facilities. As a result, we consolidated the Elkhart towable production into our Wakarusa and Warsaw, Indiana production facilities during the fourth quarter of 2007. This move will increase plant utilization in the remaining facilities and decrease indirect costs of sales.*
16
The recreational vehicle industry is extremely competitive, and retail customers have many choices available to them. To distinguish ourselves within the industry, we introduced our Franchise For The Future (FFTF) program for our motorized products in June of 2005. This program is designed to introduce the concept to our dealer partners that our specific brands have intrinsic values as a selling tool. To support this, and to encourage our dealers to participate in FFTF, we have worked with outside marketing consultants to develop brand signage, informational computer kiosks, and brand specific displays that are placed within our various independent dealer locations. In 2006, we followed this up with Monaco Financial Services (MFS). MFS is a branded financing program from General Electric Commercial Distribution Finance (GECDF) and General Electric Consumer Finance (GECF). Through MFS, our dealer partners earn rebates from GECDF and GECF for wholesale floorplanning and retail financing for customers. We believe that these concepts, along with other features designed to encourage our dealers to focus selling efforts on our various product offerings, will assist them in their sales efforts through the strength of improved brand identity. *
Motorhome Resort Segment
We have sold nearly all of our lots at the resorts in both Indio and Las Vegas. We currently have 51 lots available between the two resorts. First quarter sales were slower than the prior year. Sales decreased due to having fewer lots available for sale as well as competition with resales of owner lots. In addition, recent softening in overall real estate values have had an impact on the demand for resort lots. Nevertheless, we remain confident that we will continue to sell the remaining lots in these two resorts.* As part of our focus to continue the growth of this segment, we are currently developing a resort in Naples, Florida and have land to develop properties in La Quinta, California and in Bay Harbor, Michigan. We expect some lots at the Naples, Florida and Bay Harbor, Michigan locations to be available for sale in the third quarter of 2008.*
Overall Company Performance in the First Quarter of 2008
First quarter net sales decreased 21.7% to $252.4 million compared to $322.2 million for the same period last year. Gross diesel motorized sales were down 26.0%, gas motorized sales were up 32.3%, and towables were down 18.3%. Diesel products accounted for 63.7% of our first quarter revenues while gas products were 12.1%, and towables were 24.2%. Our overall unit sales were down 15.8% in the first quarter of 2008 to 4,843 units, with diesel motorized unit sales down 30.5% to 773 units, gas motorized unit sales up 22.7% to 427 units, and towable unit sales down 15.1% to 3,643 units. Our total gross average unit selling price decreased to $53,000 from $55,800 in the same period last year, reflecting a shift in the mix of products sold.
Gross profit for the first quarter of 2008 decreased to $15.8 million, down from $36.0 million in the first quarter of 2007, and gross margin decreased from 11.2% in the first quarter of 2007 to 6.3% in the first quarter of 2008. Changes in the components of cost of sales are set forth in the following table (dollars in thousands):
| | Quarter Ended | | % | | Quarter Ended | | % | | Change in | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | of Sales | | March 29, 2008 | | of Sales | | % of Sales | |
Direct materials | | $ | 196,944 | | 61.1 | % | $ | 161,018 | | 63.8 | % | 2.7 | % |
Direct labor | | 32,041 | | 9.9 | % | 25,532 | | 10.1 | % | 0.2 | % |
Warranty | | 9,883 | | 3.1 | % | 9,310 | | 3.7 | % | 0.6 | % |
Other direct | | 16,900 | | 5.2 | % | 13,633 | | 5.4 | % | 0.2 | % |
Indirect | | 30,480 | | 9.5 | % | 27,078 | | 10.7 | % | 1.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of sales | | $ | 286,248 | | 88.8 | % | $ | 236,571 | | 93.7 | % | 4.9 | % |
· Direct materials increases in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 2.7% or $6.8 million. The increase was due partially to the impact of increased sales discounts, which resulted in direct material increases, as a percent of sales, by 0.8% or $1.9 million. The remaining increase was due to change in mix of products sold.
· Direct labor increases in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 0.2% or $505,000. Direct labor decreased $262,000 due to the reclassification of chassis purchased from the CCP joint venture as the direct labor portion of these chassis are now included in direct materials. Other costs more than offset this decrease, such as increased sales discounts, which resulted in direct labor increasing, as a percent of sales, by 0.1% or $302,000. The remaining increase was due to change in mix of products sold.
· Increases in warranty expense in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 0.6% or $1.5 million. These increases were primarily due to an unusually large claim volume received in the first quarter for 2008 as dealers shortened their claims processing time.
· Increases in other direct costs in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 0.2% or $505,000. This increase was primarily the result of higher out-of-policy warranty repairs.
· Decreases in indirect costs in 2008 were $3.4 million. These decreases were the result of improvements in efficiencies at our plants due to consolidation of component facilities, which occurred in the second half of 2007.
17
Selling, general, and administrative expenses (S,G,&A) decreased by $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2008 to $28.6 million compared to the first quarter of 2007 and increased as a percentage of sales from 10.0% in the first quarter of 2007 to 11.4% in the first quarter of 2008. Changes in S,G,&A expenses are set forth in the following table (dollars in thousands):
| | Quarter Ended | | % | | Quarter Ended | | % | | Change in | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | of Sales | | March 29, 2008 | | of Sales | | % of Sales | |
Salaries, bonus, and benefit expenses | | $ | 7,897 | | 2.4 | % | $ | 7,291 | | 2.9 | % | 0.5 | % |
Selling expenses | | 9,846 | | 3.1 | % | 6,580 | | 2.6 | % | (0.5 | )% |
Settlement expense | | 3,911 | | 1.2 | % | 4,317 | | 1.7 | % | 0.5 | % |
Marketing expenses | | 1,667 | | 0.5 | % | 2,175 | | 0.9 | % | 0.4 | % |
Other | | 9,037 | | 2.8 | % | 8,273 | | 3.3 | % | 0.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total S,G,&A expenses | | $ | 32,358 | | 10.0 | % | $ | 28,636 | | 11.4 | % | 1.4 | % |
· Decreases in salaries, bonus and benefit expenses in 2008 were $606,000. This decrease was due to a decrease in management bonus expense of $1.0 million that was offset by an increase in long-term stock-based program expenses of $219,000, increases in salaries and benefit expenses of $216,000, and plus a net decrease of various other expenses.
· Decreases in selling expenses in 2008 were $3.3 million. This decrease was due to lower costs for selling programs at our dealers’ lots of $3.0 million, lower selling costs for resort lots of $262,000, and a $265,000 reduction in sales commissions that were offset by increases in salaries and benefit expenses.
· Settlement expense (litigation settlement expense) in 2008 increased by $406,000. The total dollar increase was the result of increases in the number of litigation cases in 2008 compared to 2007.
· Increases in marketing expenses in 2008 were $508,000. These increases were the result of higher expenses associated with shows and rallies of $369,000 as well as increases in printed material costs and magazines of $139,000.
· Decreases in other expenses in 2008 were $764,000. This decrease was predominately a result of a reduction in resort lot participation accrual expense of $348,000, decrease in loss on sale of assets of $166,000, decrease in contract services of $203,000, offset by an increase in depreciation expense of $142,000. The remainder of the change was due to decreases in various other expenses.
Operating loss was $12.8 million, or 5.1% of sales, in the first quarter of 2008 compared to an operating income of $3.6 million, or 1.2% of sales, in the similar 2007 period. The decrease in operating income was due predominantly to decreased sales, lower gross margins, and higher S,G&A costs as a percent of sales.
Net interest expense was $725,000 in the first quarter of 2008 (net of capitalized interest of $143,000) versus $967,000 in the comparable 2007 period, reflecting higher overall corporate borrowings during the first quarter of 2008 partially offset by lower interest rates as compared to the same period in 2007.
We reported a benefit from income taxes of $4.9 million, or an effective tax rate of 36.6%, in the first quarter of 2008, compared to a provision for income taxes of $1.0 million, or an effective tax rate of 40.2%, in the first quarter of 2007. The income tax benefit in the first quarter of 2008 was due to the loss before income taxes, partially offset by a tax provision for permanent differences and an adjustment to a valuation allowance.
Net loss for the first quarter of 2008 was $8.5 million compared to net income of $1.5 million for the first quarter of 2007 due primarily to lower sales, lower gross margin and higher S,G&A expenses as a percentage of sales.
18
First Quarter 2008 versus First Quarter 2007 for the Motorized Recreational Vehicle Segment
The following table illustrates the results of the MRV segment for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| | Quarter Ended | | % | | Quarter Ended | | % | | $ | | | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | of Sales | | March 29, 2008 | | of Sales | | Change | | Change | |
Net sales | | $ | 245,548 | | 100.0 | % | $ | 194,737 | | 100.0 | % | $ | (50,811 | ) | (20.7 | )% |
Cost of sales | | 219,061 | | 89.2 | % | 182,914 | | 93.9 | % | 36,147 | | 16.5 | % |
Gross profit | | 26,487 | | 10.8 | % | 11,823 | | 6.1 | % | (14,664 | ) | (55.4 | )% |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses and corporate overhead | | 23,155 | | 9.4 | % | 20,443 | | 10.5 | % | 2,712 | | 11.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | 3,332 | | 1.4 | % | $ | (8,620 | ) | (4.4 | )% | $ | (11,952 | ) | (358.7 | )% |
Total net sales for the MRV segment were down from $245.5 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $194.7 million in the first quarter of 2008. Gross diesel motorized revenues were down 26.0% and gross gas motorized revenues were up 32.3%. Diesel products accounted for 84.0% of the MRV segment’s first quarter of 2008 gross revenues while gas products were 16.0%. The overall decrease in revenues is due to the decline in the motorized retail market, as well as the increase of gas motorized units sold in our overall MRV segment mix. Our MRV segment unit sales were down 17.8% year over year from 1,460 units in the first quarter of 2007 to 1,200 units in the first quarter of 2008. Diesel motorized unit sales were down 30.5% to 773 units and gas motorized unit sales were up 22.7% to 427 units.
Gross profit for the MRV segment for the first quarter of 2008 decreased to $11.8 million, down from $26.5 million in the first quarter of 2007, and gross margin decreased from 10.8% in the first quarter of 2007 to 6.1% in the first quarter of 2008. Changes in the components of cost of sales are set forth in the following table (dollars in thousands):
| | Quarter Ended | | % | | Quarter Ended | | % | | Change in | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | of Sales | | March 29, 2008 | | of Sales | | % of Sales | |
Direct materials | | $ | 150,726 | | 61.4 | % | $ | 125,222 | | 64.3 | % | 2.9 | % |
Direct labor | | 24,138 | | 9.8 | % | 19,007 | | 9.8 | % | 0.0 | % |
Warranty | | 7,573 | | 3.1 | % | 7,242 | | 3.7 | % | 0.6 | % |
Other direct | | 10,998 | | 4.5 | % | 9,432 | | 4.8 | % | 0.3 | % |
Indirect | | 25,626 | | 10.4 | % | 22,011 | | 11.3 | % | 0.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of sales | | $ | 219,061 | | 89.2 | % | $ | 182,914 | | 93.9 | % | 4.7 | % |
· Direct materials increases in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 2.9% or $5.6 million. The increase is due to the impact of increased sales discounts, which resulted in direct material increasing, as a percent of sales by, 0.6% or $1.1 million. The remaining increase is due to the change in the product mix, as gross sales of gas motorized units, which have higher material usage rates, increased significantly for the MRV segment compared to the prior year.
· Direct labor, as a percent of sales, was consistent with the prior year at 9.8%. Direct labor decreased $262,000 due to the reclassification of chassis purchased from the CCP joint venture as the direct labor portion of these chassis are now included in direct materials.
· Increase in warranty costs in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 0.6% or $1.2 million. These increases were primarily due to an usually large claim volume received in the first quarter for 2008 as dealers shortened their claims processing time.
· Increases in other direct costs in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 0.3% or $584,000. This change is due to an increase in out-of-warranty repairs of $389,000 and delivery expense of $389,000, offset by decreases in compensation and other employee related benefit costs of $196,000.
· Decreases in indirect costs in 2008 were $3.6 million. These decreases were the result of improvements in efficiencies at our plants as a result of consolidation of component facilities, and the impact of the joint venture operations as previously discussed.
19
S,G,&A expenses for the MRV segment increased, as a percent of sales, due to lower sales levels and increases in salaries and benefit expenses, settlement expense, and marketing expenses as a percentage of sales, partially offset by decreases in other S,G,&A expenses as a percentage of sales.
Operating income decreased due to lower sales, lower gross margins, and higher S,G,&A expenses as a percent of sales.
First Quarter 2008 versus First Quarter 2007 for the Towable Recreational Vehicle Segment
The following table illustrates the results of the TRV Segment for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| | Quarter Ended | | % | | Quarter Ended | | % | | $ | | % | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | of Sales | | March 29, 2008 | | of Sales | | Change | | Change | |
Net sales | | $ | 69,480 | | 100.0 | % | $ | 55,208 | | 100.0 | % | $ | (14,272 | ) | (20.5 | )% |
Cost of sales | | 64,753 | | 93.2 | % | 52,471 | | 95.0 | % | 12,282 | | 19.0 | % |
Gross profit | | 4,727 | | 6.8 | % | 2,737 | | 5.0 | % | (1,990 | ) | (42.1 | )% |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses and corporate overhead | | 6,372 | | 9.2 | % | 6,200 | | 11.3 | % | 172 | | 2.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating loss | | $ | (1,645 | ) | (2.4 | )% | $ | (3,463 | ) | (6.3 | )% | $ | (1,818 | ) | (110.5 | )% |
Total net sales for the TRV segment were down from $69.5 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $55.2 million in the first quarter of 2008. This decrease is mostly due to softer market conditions in the towable sector, as well as to decreases in market share for some of our products. The Company’s unit sales were down 15.1% to 3,643 units. Average unit selling price decreased to $17,100 in the first quarter of 2008 from $17,800 in the same period last year.
Gross profit for the first quarter of 2008 decreased to $2.7 million, down from $4.7 million in the first quarter of 2007, and gross margin decreased from 6.8% in the first quarter of 2007 to 5.0% in the first quarter of 2008. Changes in the components of cost of sales are set forth in the following table (dollars in thousands):
| | Quarter Ended | | % | | Quarter Ended | | % | | Change in | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | of Sales | | March 29, 2008 | | of Sales | | % of Sales | |
Direct materials | | $ | 44,070 | | 63.4 | % | $ | 34,707 | | 62.9 | % | (0.5 | )% |
Direct labor | | 7,693 | | 11.1 | % | 6,488 | | 11.7 | % | 0.6 | % |
Warranty | | 2,310 | | 3.3 | % | 2,068 | | 3.7 | % | 0.4 | % |
Other direct | | 5,875 | | 8.5 | % | 4,197 | | 7.6 | % | (0.9 | )% |
Indirect | | 4,805 | | 6.9 | % | 5,011 | | 9.1 | % | 2.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of sales | | $ | 64,753 | | 93.2 | % | $ | 52,471 | | 95.0 | % | 1.8 | % |
· Direct material decreases in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 0.5% or $276,000. The decrease is the result of the change in product mix to units with lower material usage rates. This was partially offset by an increase in sales discounts, which increased direct material, as a percent of sales, by 1.5% or $855,000.
· Direct labor increases in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 0.6% or $331,000. The increase was due to the impact of increased sales discounts, which resulted in direct labor increasing, as a percent of sales, by 0.2% or $105,000.
· Warranty expense increases in 2008, as a percent of sales, were 0.4% or $221,000. The remaining decrease of $463,000 was due to lower sales volumes.
· Decreases in other direct costs, as a percent of sales, were 0.9% or $497,000. This decrease was the result of improvements in delivery expenses.
· Increases in indirect costs in 2008 of $206,000 were due to increases in the variable portion of costs relative to the reduction in sales.
20
S,G,&,A expenses for the TRV segment increased, as a percent of sales, due to lower sales levels and increased salaries and benefit expenses, selling expenses, and other S,G,&A expenses as a percentage of sales.
Operating loss increased due to lower gross margins and higher S,G,&A expenses as a percent of sales.
First Quarter 2008 versus First Quarter 2007 for the Motorhome Resort Segment
The following table illustrates the results of the Motorhome Resort Segment (MR segment) for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| | Quarter Ended | | % | | Quarter Ended | | % | | $ | | % | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | of Sales | | March 29, 2008 | | of Sales | | Change | | Change | |
Net sales | | $ | 7,216 | | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,432 | | 100.0 | % | $ | (4,784 | ) | (66.3 | )% |
Cost of sales | | 2,434 | | 33.7 | % | 1,186 | | 48.8 | % | 1,248 | | 51.3 | % |
Gross profit | | 4,782 | | 66.3 | % | 1,246 | | 51.2 | % | (3,536 | ) | (73.9 | )% |
Selling, general, and administrative expenses and corporate overhead | | 2,831 | | 39.3 | % | 1,994 | | 82.0 | % | 837 | | 29.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | 1,951 | | 27.0 | % | $ | (748 | ) | (30.8 | )% | $ | (2,699 | ) | (138.3 | )% |
Net sales decreased 66.3% to $2.4 million compared to $7.2 million for the same period last year. The decrease is due in part to fewer lots available for sale in the first quarter of 2008 as the Indio, California and Las Vegas, Nevada resorts are near the end of the sales cycle. As our inventories of available lots shrink, there is greater competition within the Company’s own resorts from owners’ resales. We are currently developing resorts in Naples, Florida and in Bay Harbor, Michigan. Both locations should have lots available for sale in the third quarter of 2008. In addition, recent softening in overall real estate values and the declining sales in the RV market have had an impact on the demand for resort lots. The Company still expects that while sales may remain slower than expected, the need for luxury resort locations within the industry will remain strong.*
Gross profit for the MR segment decreased to 51.2% of sales in the first quarter of 2008 compared to 66.3% of sales in the same period last year. The gross margin decrease was due to the addition of some amenities to certain lots designed to enhance the appeal of the resorts and demand for lots, but this also resulted in a higher increase in the cost of sales. In addition, discounts were given on other lots.
S,G,&A expenses increased, as a percentage of sales, due to lower sales that were not entirely offset by a reduction in total S,G,&A.
Operating income decreased due to lower sales, a decrease in gross margin, and higher S,G,&A as a percent of sales.
21
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are internally generated cash from operations and available borrowings under its credit facilities. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company used cash of $24.2 million for operating activities and had a net cash balance of $8.1 million at March 29, 2008. The Company used $1.7 million of cash from the net loss offset by non-cash expenses such as depreciation, amortization, and stock based compensation. Major uses of cash flows for operating activities include an increase of $2.9 million in inventories, an increase of $2.8 million in land held for development, a decrease of $14.4 million in trade accounts payable, an increase in income tax receivable of $8.7 million, and a decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $9.7 million. The major source of cash was from a decrease of $15.6 million in trade accounts receivable. The increase in inventories was from an increase in finished goods due to a decline in sales in the first quarter of 2008 that was not entirely anticipated. The increase in land held for development is due to the purchase of the Bay Harbor, Michigan property for resort development in March 2008. The decrease in trade accounts payable relates to the decline in purchases of raw materials towards the end of the quarter. As the quarter progressed, production output was reduced and raw materials that had built up towards the beginning of the quarter were used. The increase in income tax receivable is due to the net loss recognized in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities is associated primarily with decreases of accruals for management bonus earned in 2007, payroll and employee benefits, promotions and advertising, and various miscellaneous accruals. The decrease in trade accounts receivable is due to the decline in sales experienced in the first quarter of 2008 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2007 and increases in collections.
The Company’s credit facilities consist of a revolving line of credit (the “Line of Credit”) of up to $105.0 million and a term loan (“Term Debt”). As of March 29, 2008, there was $31.6 million outstanding under the Line of Credit and $27.1 million outstanding on the Term Debt. At the election of the Company, the credit facilities bear interest at rates that fluctuate based on the prime rate or LIBOR and are determined based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company also pays interest quarterly on the unused available portion of the Line of Credit at varying rates, determined by the Company’s leverage ratio. The amounts outstanding under the Line of Credit are due and payable in full on November 17, 2009 and interest is paid monthly. The Term Debt requires quarterly interest and principal payments of $1.4 million, with a final balloon payment of $12.9 million due on November 18, 2010. The credit facilities are collateralized by all of the assets of the Company. The Company utilizes “zero balance” bank disbursement accounts in which an advance on the line of credit is automatically made for checks clearing each day. Since the balance of the disbursement account at the bank returns to zero at the end of each day, the outstanding checks of the Company are reflected as a liability. The outstanding check liability is combined with the Company’s positive cash balance accounts to reflect a net book overdraft or a net cash balance for financial reporting. The cash balance at March 29, 2008 is the cash maintained in the R-Vision bank accounts held with different financial institutions and thus not combined with the Company’s net book overdraft balance.
The credit facilities require the Company to maintain a maximum leverage ratio, minimum current ratio, minimum debt service coverage ratio, and minimum tangible net worth. The Company was in violation of its required leverage ratio and debt service coverage ratio as of March 29, 2008. The Company has obtained an agreement from its lenders, dated April 23, 2008, to waive the covenant violations as of March 29, 2008. However, management expects that the Company will also violate these covenants for the next several quarters. Accordingly, the Company has reclassified its long-term debt and related debt issue costs from non-current to current as of March 29, 2008.
Under the waiver agreement, the Company has agreed to provide the lenders an updated business plan by May 9, 2008. Management believes it will be able to successfully negotiate revised financial covenants with its lenders at levels that are attainable by the Company based on its updated business plan. However, there can be no assurance that an agreement will be reached. If an agreement cannot be reached or if an agreement is reached but the Company nevertheless violates the revised covenants, the Company could experience severe liquidity problems unless the lenders were to agree to additional waivers, forbearance, or restructuring of the debt or unless the Company can refinance the debt. Failure to obtain such agreement or to refinance the debt would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Unamortized debt issue costs related to the credit facilities are $423,000 as of March 29, 2008. If the Company’s current credit facility is refinanced in a transaction required to be accounted for as an extinguishment or the outstanding balance is demanded by the lender, unamortized debt issue costs at the demand or refinancing date would be required to be expensed in the period of refinancing or demand.
In November 2005, the Company obtained a term loan of $500,000 from the State of Oregon in connection with the relocation of jobs to the Coburg, Oregon production facilities from the Bend, Oregon facility. The principal and interest is due on April 30, 2009. The loan bears a 5% annual interest rate.
22
The Company’s principal working capital requirements are for purchases of inventory and financing of trade receivables. Many of the Company’s dealers finance product purchases under wholesale floor plan arrangements with third parties as described below. At March 29, 2008, the Company had working capital of approximately $107.9 million, a decrease of $4.2 million from working capital of $112.0 million at December 29, 2007. The Company has been using short-term credit facilities and operating cash flow to finance its capital expenditures.
Subject to resolving covenant issues previously described, the Company believes that cash flow from operations and funds available under its anticipated credit facilities will be sufficient to meet the Company’s liquidity requirements for the next 12 months.* The Company’s capital expenditures were $637,000 in the first quarter of 2008, which included costs related to additions of automated machinery in many of its production facilities, upgrades to its information systems infrastructure, and other various capitalized upgrades to existing facilities. The Company anticipates that capital expenditures for all of 2008 will be approximately $7 to $8 million, which includes expenditures to purchase additional machinery and equipment in both the Company’s Coburg, Oregon and Wakarusa, Indiana facilities, as well as upgrades to existing information systems infrastructures.* The Company may require additional equity or debt financing to address working capital and facilities expansion needs, particularly if the Company significantly increases the level of working capital assets such as inventory and accounts receivable. The Company may also from time to time seek to acquire businesses that would complement the Company’s current business, and any such acquisition could require additional financing. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available if required or on terms deemed favorable by the Company.
As is typical in the recreational vehicle industry, many of the Company’s retail dealers utilize wholesale floor plan financing arrangements with third party lending institutions to finance their purchases of the Company’s products. Under the terms of these floor plan arrangements, institutional lenders customarily require the recreational vehicle manufacturer to agree to repurchase any unsold units if the dealer defaults on its credit facility from the lender, subject to certain conditions. The Company has agreements with several institutional lenders under which the Company currently has repurchase obligations. The Company’s contingent obligations under these repurchase agreements are reduced by the proceeds received upon the sale of any repurchased units. The Company’s obligations under these repurchase agreements vary from period to period up to 15 months. At March 29, 2008, approximately $552.5 million of products sold by the Company to independent dealers were subject to potential repurchase under existing floor plan financing agreements with approximately 4.6% concentrated with one dealer. Historically, the Company has been successful in mitigating losses associated with repurchase obligations. During the first quarter of 2008, the losses associated with the exercise of repurchase agreements were approximately $126,000. Dealers for the Company undergo a credit review prior to becoming a dealer and periodically thereafter. Financial institutions that provide floor plan financing also perform credit reviews and floor checks on an ongoing basis. We closely monitor sales to dealers that are a higher credit risk. The repurchase period is limited, usually up to a maximum of 15 months. We believe these activities help to minimize the number of required repurchases. Additionally, the repurchase agreement specifies that the dealer is required to make principal payments during the repurchase period. Since the Company repurchases the units based on the schedule of principal payments, the repurchase amount is typically less than the original invoice amount. This lower repurchase amount helps mitigate our loss when we offer the inventory to another dealer at an amount lower than the original invoice as incentive for the dealer to take the repurchased inventory.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of March 29, 2008, the Company did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
23
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
As part of the normal course of business, we incur certain contractual obligations and commitments that will require future cash payments. The following tables summarize the significant obligations and commitments (in thousands).
| | PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD | |
Contractual Obligations | | 1 year or less | | 1 to 3 years | | 4 to 5 years | | Thereafter | | Total | |
Long-Term Debt (1) | | $ | 27,143 | | $ | 500 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 27,643 | |
Operating Leases (2) | | 2,307 | | 4,205 | | 3,100 | | 930 | | 10,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Contractual Cash Obligations | | $ | 29,450 | | $ | 4,705 | | $ | 3,100 | | $ | 930 | | $ | 38,185 | |
| | AMOUNT OF COMMITMENT EXPIRATION BY PERIOD | |
Other Commitments | | 1 year or less | | 1 to 3 years | | 4 to 5 years | | Thereafter | | Total | |
Line of Credit (3) | | $ | 0 | | $ | 31,592 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 31,592 | |
Guarantees (4) | | 0 | | 0 | | 10,930 | | 0 | | 10,930 | |
Repurchase Obligations (5) | | 413,796 | | 138,669 | | 0 | | 0 | | 552,465 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Commitments | | $ | 413,796 | | $ | 170,261 | | $ | 10,930 | | $ | 0 | | $ | 594,987 | |
(1) | See Notes 5 and 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
(2) | Various leases including manufacturing facilities, aircraft, and machinery and equipment. |
(3) | See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The amount listed represents available borrowings on the line of credit at March 29, 2008. |
(4) | Guarantees related to aircraft operating lease. |
(5) | Reflects obligations under manufacturer repurchase commitments. See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
INFLATION
During 2007 and to a lesser extent in the first quarter of 2008, the Company experienced increases in the prices of certain commodity items that we use in manufacturing our products. These include, but are not limited to, steel, copper, aluminum, petroleum, and wood. While price increases for these raw materials are not necessarily indicative of widespread inflationary trends, they had an impact on the Company’s production costs. To date, the Company has been successful in passing along most of these increases by increasing the selling prices of its products. However, there is no certainty that the Company will be able to pass these along successfully in the future. The current trend in these prices, if it continues, could have a materially adverse impact on the Company’s business going forward.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to warranty costs, product liability, and impairment of goodwill. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions and such differences could be material. We believe the following critical accounting policies and related judgments and estimates affect the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
WARRANTY COSTS Estimated warranty costs are provided for at the time of sale of products with warranties covering the products for up to one year from the date of retail sale (five years for the front and sidewall frame structure, and three years on the Roadmaster chassis). These estimates are based on historical average repair costs, as well as other reasonable assumptions as have been deemed appropriate by management.
PRODUCT LIABILITY The Company provides an estimate for accrued product liability based on current pending cases, as well as for those cases which are incurred but not reported. This estimate is developed by legal counsel based on professional judgment, as well as historical experience.
IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL The Company assesses the potential impairment of goodwill in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 142. This annual test involves management comparing the fair value of each of the Company’s reporting units, to the respective carrying amounts, including goodwill, of the net book value of the reporting unit, to determine if goodwill has been impaired. The Company uses an estimate of discounted future cash flows to determine fair value for each reporting unit.
INVENTORY ALLOWANCE The Company writes down its inventory for obsolescence, and the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated fair market value. These write-downs are based on assumptions about future sales demand and market conditions. If actual sales demand or market conditions change from those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
24
INCOME TAXES In conjunction with preparing its consolidated financial statements, the Company must estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves estimating actual current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company must then assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent management believes that recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance must be established. Significant management judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets.
INCENTIVE STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company, like many other companies, sponsors an incentive stock-based compensation plan for key members of the organization. The related expenses recognized are subject to complex calculations based on a variety of assumptions for variables such as risk-free rates of return, stock volatility, expected terminations, and achievements of financial performance measures. To the extent certain of these variables can not be known, management uses estimates to calculate the resulting liability.
REPURCHASE OBLIGATIONS Upon request of a lending institution financing a dealer’s purchases of the Company’s product, the Company will execute a repurchase agreement. The Company has recorded a liability associated with the disposition of repurchased inventory. To determine the appropriate liability, the Company calculates a reserve, based on an estimate of potential net losses, along with qualitative and quantitative factors, including dealer inventory turn rates, and the financial strength of individual dealers.
NEWLY ISSUED FINANCIAL REPORTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
FAS 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” The Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands fair value measurement disclosure. SFAS No. 157 was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-1 and FSP 157-2. FSP 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-recurring non-financial assets and liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of FASB No. 157 were adopted as of December 30, 2007, including the provisions of FSP 157-1. The adoption of the statement had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
FAS 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The provisions of FASB No. 159 were adopted as of December 30, 2007. We did not elect the Fair Value Option for any of our financial assets or liabilities, and therefore, the adoption of the statement had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
No material change since December 29, 2007.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
25
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. Because of inherent limitations in any system of disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all instances of error or fraud, if any, within the Company may be detected. However, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, have designed our disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and have, pursuant to the evaluation discussed above, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are, in fact, effective at this reasonable assurance level.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
We have listed below various risks and uncertainties relating to our businesses. This list is not inclusive of all the risks and uncertainties we face, but any of these could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report or that we may issue from time to time in the future.
WE MAY EXPERIENCE UNANTICIPATED FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR OPERATING RESULTS FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS Our net sales, gross margin, and operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to period due to a number of factors, many of which are not readily predictable. These factors include the following:
· Factors affecting the recreational vehicle industry as a whole, including economic and seasonal factors, such as fuel prices, interest rates and credit availability.
· The varying margins associated with the mix of products we sell in any particular period.
· The fact that we typically ship a large amount of products near quarter end.
· Our ability to utilize and expand our manufacturing resources efficiently.
· Shortages of materials used in our products.
· The effects of inflation on the costs of materials used in our products.
· A determination by us that goodwill or other intangible assets are impaired and have to be written down to their fair values, resulting in a charge to our results of operations.
· Our ability to introduce new models that achieve consumer acceptance.
· The introduction, marketing and sale of competing products by others, including significant discounting offered by our competitors.
· The addition or loss of our dealers.
· The timing of trade shows and rallies, which we use to market and sell our products.
· Our inability to acquire and develop key pieces of property for on-going resort activity.
· Fluctuations in demand for our resort lots due to changing economic and other conditions.
Our overall gross margin may decline in future periods to the extent that we increase the percent of sales of lower gross margin towable products or if the mix of motor coaches we sell shifts to lower gross margin units. In addition, a relatively small variation in the number of recreational vehicles we sell in any quarter can have a significant impact on total sales and operating results for that quarter.
26
Demand in the recreational vehicle industry generally declines during the winter months, while sales are generally higher during the spring and summer months. With the broader range of products we now offer, seasonal factors could have a significant impact on our operating results in the future. Additionally, unusually severe weather conditions in certain markets could delay the timing of shipments from one quarter to another.
We attempt to forecast orders for our products accurately and commence purchasing and manufacturing prior to receipt of such orders. However, it is highly unlikely that we will consistently be able to accurately forecast the timing, rate, and mix of orders. This aspect of our business makes our planning inexact and, in turn, affects our shipments, costs, inventories, operating results, and cash flow for any given quarter.
OUR BUSINESS SEGMENTS ARE CYCLICAL AND SUSCEPTIBLE TO SLOWDOWNS IN THE GENERAL ECONOMY The recreational vehicle industry has been characterized by cycles of growth and contraction in consumer demand, reflecting prevailing economic, demographic, and political conditions that affect disposable income for leisure-time activities. Our business is particularly influenced by cycle swings in the class A market. While there has been strong secular demand for recreational vehicles since the early 90’s it has been driven by demand for towable recreational products. Since 2004, there has been a notable divergence in growth rates between towable and motorized recreational vehicles.
Class A unit shipments peaked at approximately 37,300 units in 1994 and declined to approximately 33,000 units in 1995. The class A segment then went on a steady climb and in 1999 recorded the highest year, in recent history, of class A shipments, approximately 49,400. Over the next two years motorhome shipments declined to 33,400 in 2001. Class A shipments then rose for the next three years and in 2004 reached, 46,300. Over the last three years, however, shipments of class A motorhomes have dropped reaching pre-1994 levels of 32,900 in 2007.
The towable segment moved through many of the same cyclical peaks and troughs historically. The shipment level peaked in 1994 at 201,100 dropping-off to 192,200 in 1996 and then growing to 249,600 in 1999. Towable unit shipments suffered a two-year drop-off like class A motorhomes in 2000 and 2001, dropping to 207,600. Since then, the market has expanded significantly reaching 334,600 in 2006, but falling in 2007 to 297,900. Unlike the class A market, the towables segment did not experience a slow down in 2005 and 2006, because manufacturers have successfully introduced popular new models and the segment was significantly aided by units sold to support the hurricane relief efforts in the gulf coast. The decline in 2007 reflects consumers’ uneasiness surrounding the economy, fuel prices and declining real estate values.
Our business is subject to the cyclical nature of the RV industry and principally the class A segment. Some of the factors that contribute to this cyclicality include fuel availability and costs, interest rate levels, the level of discretionary spending, and availability of credit and overall consumer confidence. Increasing interest rates and fuel prices over the last three years have adversely affected the class A recreational vehicle market. An extended continuation of these conditions would materially affect the results of our operations and financial condition.
Our recreational vehicle resort properties are also impacted by the overall recreational vehicle industry. In addition, our real estate investments in the resort properties are subject to the impacts of lending challenges and general market declines in the real estate market. As a result, we may experience delays in developing and selling our resorts. These delays may result in losses that could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.
WE MAY EXPERIENCE A DECREASE IN SALES OF OUR PRODUCTS DUE TO AN INCREASE IN THE PRICE OR A DECREASE IN THE SUPPLY OF FUEL An interruption in the supply, or significant continued increases in the price or tax on the sale, of diesel fuel or gasoline on a regional or national basis could significantly affect our business. Diesel fuel and gasoline have, at various times in the past, been either expensive or difficult to obtain.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RENEGOTIATE THE FINANCIAL COVENANTS IN OUR CREDIT FACILITY OR ARE UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH THE RENEGOTIATED FINANCIAL COVENANTS, OUR OUTSTANDING DEBT COULD BECOME IMMEDIATELY PAYABLE As of March 29, 2008, we had $31.6 million outstanding under our $105 million line of credit and $27.1 million outstanding on our term loan. As of March 29, 2008, we were in violation of certain of the financial covenants under this credit facility. We obtained an agreement from our lenders to waive the covenant violations as of March 29, 2008; however, we expect that we will also violate these covenants for the next several quarters unless we are able to renegotiate them with our lenders. There can be no assurance that an agreement to revise these covenants will be reached and the current uncertainty in the credit markets may make renegotiation more difficult. If an agreement cannot be reached or if an agreement is reached but the Company nevertheless violates the revised covenants, we could experience severe liquidity problems unless our lenders were to agree to additional waivers, forbearance, or restructuring of the debt or unless we can refinance the debt with other lenders. Failure to renegotiate and comply with our financial covenants or any subsequent failure to obtain waivers or to refinance our debt would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
27
THE EXPECTED BENEFITS OF THE JOINT VENTURE, CCP, MAY NOT BE REALIZED During the first quarter of 2007, we completed the formation of a joint venture (CCP) with International Truck and Engine Corporation (ITEC) for the purpose of manufacturing diesel chassis. The process of establishing the operations of the joint venture may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require a significant amount of management’s attention that would otherwise be focused on the ongoing development of our business. The anticipated advantages of the joint venture, which are purchasing synergies, access to engineering and design expertise from ITEC, and improvement of the utilization of our Roadmaster chassis manufacturing facility in Elkhart, Indiana, may not be realized.
WE DEPEND ON SINGLE OR LIMITED SOURCES TO PROVIDE US WITH CERTAIN IMPORTANT COMPONENTS THAT WE USE IN THE PRODUCTION OF OUR PRODUCTS A number of important components for our products are purchased from a single or a limited number of sources. These include chassis from Workhorse and Ford for gas motor coaches and diesel chassis from our newly formed joint venture with International Truck and Engine Corporation. The joint venture sources turbo diesel engines from Cummins and Caterpillar, substantially all transmissions from Allison and axles from Dana. We have no long-term supply contracts with these suppliers or their distributors, and we cannot be certain that these suppliers will be able to meet our future requirements. Consequently, the Company has periodically been placed on allocation of these and other key components. The last significant allocation occurred in 1997 from Allison, and in 1999 from Ford. An extended delay or interruption in the supply of any components that we obtain from a single supplier or from a limited number of suppliers could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
WE RELY ON A RELATIVELY SMALL NUMBER OF DEALERS FOR A SIGNIFICANT PERCENTAGE OF OUR SALES Although our products were offered by over 700 dealerships located primarily in the United States and Canada as of March 29, 2008, a significant percentage of our sales are concentrated among a relatively small number of independent dealers. For the quarter ended March 29, 2008, sales to one dealer, Lazy Days RV Center, accounted for 9.0% of total sales compared to 10.3% of sales in the same period ended last year. For quarters ended March 31, 2007 and March 29, 2008, sales to our 10 largest dealers, including Lazy Days RV Center, accounted for a total of 35.4% and 32.8% of total sales, respectively. The loss of a significant dealer or a substantial decrease in sales by any of these dealers could have a material impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
WE MAY HAVE TO REPURCHASE A DEALER’S INVENTORY OF OUR PRODUCTS IN THE EVENT THAT THE DEALER DOES NOT REPAY ITS LENDER As is common in the recreational vehicle industry, we enter into repurchase agreements with the financing institutions used by our dealers to finance their purchases of our products. These agreements require us to repurchase the dealer’s inventory in the event that the dealer defaults on its credit facility with its lender. Obligations under these agreements vary from period to period, but totaled approximately $552.5 million as of March 29, 2008, with approximately 4.6% concentrated with one dealer. If we were obligated to repurchase a significant number of units under any repurchase agreement, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
OUR ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE IS SUBJECT TO RISK We sell our product to dealers who are predominantly located in the United States and Canada. The terms and conditions of payment are a combination of open trade receivables and commitments from dealer floor plan lending institutions. For our RV dealers, terms are net 30 days for units that are financed by a third party lender. Terms of open trade receivables are granted by us, on a very limited basis, to dealers who have been subjected to evaluative credit processes conducted by us. For open receivables, terms vary from net 30 days to net 180 days, depending on the specific agreement. Agreements for payment terms beyond 30 days generally require additional collateral, as well as security interest in the inventory sold. As of March 29, 2008, total trade receivables were $72.6 million, with approximately $67.2 million, or 92.6% of the outstanding accounts receivable balance concentrated among floor plan lenders. The remaining $5.4 million of trade receivables were concentrated all with one dealer. For resort lot customers, funds are required at the time of closing.
OUR INDUSTRY IS VERY COMPETITIVE. WE MUST CONTINUE TO INTRODUCE NEW MODELS AND NEW FEATURES TO REMAIN COMPETITIVE The market for our products is very competitive. We currently compete with a number of manufacturers of motor coaches, fifth wheel trailers, and travel trailers. Some of these companies have greater financial resources than we have and extensive distribution networks. These companies, or new competitors in the industry, may develop products that customers in the industry prefer over our products.
28
We believe that the introduction of new products and new features is critical to our success. Delays in the introduction of new models or product features, quality problems associated with these introductions, or a lack of market acceptance of new models or features could affect us adversely. For example, unexpected costs associated with model changes have affected our gross margin in the past. Further, new product introductions can divert revenues from existing models and result in fewer sales of existing products.
OUR PRODUCTS COULD FAIL TO PERFORM ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS OR PROVE TO BE UNRELIABLE, CAUSING DAMAGE TO OUR CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS AND OUR REPUTATION AND RESULTING IN LOSS OF SALES Our customers require demanding specifications for product performance and reliability. Because our products are complex and often use advanced components, processes and techniques, undetected errors and design flaws may occur. Product defects result in higher product service, warranty and replacement costs and may cause serious damage to our customer relationships and industry reputation, all of which would negatively affect our sales and business.
OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO VARIOUS TYPES OF LITIGATION, INCLUDING PRODUCT LIABILITY AND WARRANTY CLAIMS We are subject to litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business, typically for product liability and warranty claims that are common in the recreational vehicle industry. While we do not believe that the outcome of any pending litigation, net of insurance coverage, will materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition, we cannot provide assurances in this regard because litigation is an inherently uncertain process.*
To date, we have been successful in obtaining product liability insurance on terms that we consider acceptable. The terms of the policy contain a self-insured retention amount of $500,000 per occurrence, with a maximum annual aggregate self-insured retention of $3.0 million. Overall product liability insurance, including umbrella coverage, is available to a maximum amount of $100.0 million for each occurrence, as well as in the aggregate. We cannot be certain we will be able to obtain insurance coverage in the future at acceptable levels or that the costs of such insurance will be reasonable. Further, successful assertion against us of one or a series of large uninsured claims, or of a series of claims exceeding our insurance coverage, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
IN ORDER TO BE SUCCESSFUL, WE MUST ATTRACT, RETAIN AND MOTIVATE MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL AND OTHER KEY EMPLOYEES, AND OUR FAILURE TO DO SO COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Company’s future prospects depend upon retaining and motivating key management personnel, including Kay L. Toolson, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and John W. Nepute, the Company’s President. The loss of one or more of these key management personnel could adversely affect the Company’s business. The prospects of the Company also depend in part on its ability to attract and retain highly skilled engineers and other qualified technical, manufacturing, financial, managerial, and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel.
WE MAY EXPERIENCE UNEXPECTED PROBLEMS AND EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH OUR ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEM (ERP) IMPLEMENTATION During 2006, we began utilizing a portion of the capabilities of the ERP system involving customer service, parts, and warranty. The next major implementation of modules within the system will be occurring subsequent to fiscal year 2008 and will be subject to certain risks including the following:
· We must rely on timely performance by contractors whose performance we may be unable to control.
· The implementation could result in significant and unexpected increases in our operating expenses and capital expenditures, particularly if the project takes longer than we expect.
· The project could complicate and prolong our internal data gathering and analysis processes.
· We may need to restructure or develop our internal processes to adapt to the new system.
· We could require extended work hours from our employees and use temporary outside resources, resulting in increased expenses, to resolve any software configuration issues or to process transactions manually until issues are resolved.
29
· As management focuses attention on the implementation, they could be diverted from other issues.
· The project could disrupt our operations if the transition to the ERP system creates new or unexpected difficulties or if the system does not perform as expected.
OUR STOCK PRICE HAS HISTORICALLY FLUCTUATED AND MAY CONTINUE TO FLUCTUATE The market price of our Common Stock is subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarter-to-quarter variations in operating results, changes in earnings estimates by analysts, announcements of new products by us or our competitors, general conditions in the recreational vehicle market, and other events or factors. In addition, the stocks of many recreational vehicle companies have experienced price and volume fluctuations which have not necessarily been directly related to the companies’ operating performance, and the market price of our Common Stock could experience similar fluctuations.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In January 2008, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program where by up to an aggregate of $30 million worth of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock may be repurchased from time to time. There is no time restriction on this authorization to purchase our Common Stock. The program provides for the Company to repurchase shares through the open market and other approved transactions at prices deemed appropriate by management. The timing and amount of repurchase transactions under the program will depend upon market conditions and corporate and regulatory considerations.
The following table sets forth information concerning the number of Common Shares repurchased under our publicly announced program since the beginning of fiscal 2008:
| | | | | | Total | | | |
| | | | | | Number of | | Maximum | |
| | | | | | Shares | | Number of | |
| | | | | | Purchased as | | Shares That | |
| | Total | | | | Part of | | May Yet Be | |
| | Number of | | Average | | Publicly | | Purchased | |
| | Shares | | Price Paid | | Announced | | Under the | |
Period | | Purchased | | Per Share | | Program | | Program* | |
| | | | | | | | | |
January 3 through 9, 2008 | | 313,400 | | $ | 9.03 | | 313,400 | | 254,860,880 | |
Quarter ending March 29, 2008 | | 313,400 | | $ | 9.03 | | 313,400 | | 254,860,880 | |
* The number of shares is based upon the remaining funds available under the program times the market price of Common Stock at March 29, 2008.
30
ITEM 6. Exhibits
10.6.4 | | Waiver Agreement and Fourth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 23, 2008, by and among the Company, the subsidiaries of the Company party thereto as co-borrowers, each of the Lenders and US Bank National Association, as the Administrative Lender. |
| | |
31.1 | | Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302(a) Certification. |
| | |
31.2 | | Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302(a) Certification. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| MONACO COACH CORPORATION |
| |
| |
Dated: May 8, 2008 | /s/ P. Martin Daley |
| P. Martin Daley |
| Vice President and |
| Chief Financial Officer (Duly |
| Authorized Officer and Principal |
| Financial Officer) |
32
EXHIBITS INDEX
Exhibit | | |
Number | | Description of Document |
| | |
10.6.4 | | Waiver Agreement and Fourth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 23, 2008, by and among the Company, the subsidiaries of the Company party thereto as co-borrowers, each of the Lenders and US Bank National Association, as the Administrative Lender. |
| | |
31.1 | | Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302(a) Certification. |
| | |
31.2 | | Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302(a) Certification. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
33