LOANS AND RELATED ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES | 9. LOANS AND RELATED ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES The following table summarizes the primary segments of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017. December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017 Total Loans Individually evaluated Collectively Total Loans Individually evaluated Collectively for impairment (Dollars in Thousands) First mortgage loans: 1 – 4 family dwellings $ 70,251 $ - $ 70,251 $ 65,153 $ - $ 65,153 Construction 1,823 - 1,823 1,866 - 1,866 Land acquisition & development 48 - 48 462 - 462 Multi-family dwellings 3,521 - 3,521 3,653 - 3,653 Commercial 2,028 - 2,028 2,033 - 2,033 Consumer Loans Home equity 934 - 934 1,017 - 1,017 Home equity lines of credit 2,329 - 2,329 2,275 - 2,275 Other 146 - 146 139 - 139 Commercial Loans 734 - 734 841 - 841 $ 81,814 $ - $ 81,814 $ 77,439 $ - $ 77,439 Plus: Deferred loan costs 460 434 Allowance for loan losses (430 ) (418 ) Total $ 81,844 $ 77,455 Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company collectively evaluates for impairment 1-4 The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “nonaccrual loans,” although the two categories overlap. The Company may choose to place a loan on nonaccrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired if the loan is not a commercial or commercial real estate loan. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value. The amount of impairment for these types of impaired loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loans. When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as 90 days or less, generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case As of December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017 there were no loans considered to be impaired. Total nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017 and the related interest income recognized for the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows: December 31, June 30, (Dollars in Thousands) Principal outstanding 1 – 4 family dwellings $ 242 $ 246 Construction - - Land acquisition & development - - Commercial real estate - - Home equity lines of credit - - Total $ 242 $ 246 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, (Dollars in Thousands) Average nonaccrual loans 1 – 4 family dwellings $ 243 $ 251 $ 244 $ 252 Construction - - - - Land acquisition & development - - - - Commercial real estate - - - - Home equity lines of credit - - - - Total $ 243 $ 251 $ 244 $ 252 Income that would have been recognized $ 4 $ 5 $ 9 $ 8 Interest income recognized $ 5 $ 5 $ 11 $ 9 The Company’s loan portfolio may also include troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced or are expected to experience financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from the Company’s loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions. Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, there were no TDRs. When the Company modifies a loan, management evaluates any possible impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, except when the sole (remaining) source of repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, management uses the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs, instead of discounted cash flows. If management determines that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized by segment or class of loan, as applicable, through an allowance estimate or a charge-off The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged against income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb estimated potential loan losses. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio considering past experience, current economic conditions, composition of the loan portfolio and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change. Federal regulations require that each insured savings institution classify its assets on a regular basis. In addition, in connection with examinations of insured institutions, federal examiners have authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, classify them. There are three classifications for problem assets: “substandard”, “doubtful” and “loss”. Substandard assets have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the insured institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful assets have the weaknesses of those classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified as loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. Another category designated “asset watch” is also utilized by the Bank for assets which do not currently expose an insured institution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification as substandard, doubtful or loss. Assets classified as substandard or doubtful require the institution to establish general allowances for loan losses. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as loss, the insured institution must either establish specific allowances for loan losses in the amount of 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss, or charge-off The Company’s general policy is to internally classify its assets on a regular basis and establish prudent general valuation allowances that are adequate to absorb losses that have not been identified but that are inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company maintains general valuation allowances that it believes are adequate to absorb losses in its loan portfolio that are not clearly attributable to specific loans. The Company’s general valuation allowances are within the following general ranges: (1) 0% to 5% of assets subject to special mention; (2) 1.00% to 100% of assets classified substandard; and (3) 50% to 100% of assets classified doubtful. Any loan classified as loss is charged-off. The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017: Current 30 – 59 60 – 89 90 Days + 90 Days + Non-accrual Total Total (Dollars in Thousands) December 31, 2017 First mortgage loans: 1 – 4 family dwellings $ 70,009 $ - $ - $ - $ 242 $ 242 $ 70,251 Construction 1,823 - - - - - 1,823 Land acquisition & development 48 - - - - - 48 Multi-family dwellings 3,521 - - - - - 3,521 Commercial 2,028 - - - - - 2,028 Consumer Loans: Home equity 934 - - - - - 934 Home equity lines of credit 2,329 - - - - - 2,329 Other 146 - - - - - 146 Commercial Loans 734 - - - - - 734 $ 81,572 $ - $ - $ - $ 242 $ 242 81,814 Plus: Deferred loan fees 460 Allowance for loan losses (430 ) Net Loans Receivable $ 81,844 Current 30 – 59 60 – 89 90 Days + 90 Days + Non-accrual Total Total (Dollars in Thousands) June 30, 2017 First mortgage loans: 1 – 4 family dwellings $ 64,907 $ - $ - $ - $ 246 $ 246 $ 65,153 Construction 1,866 - - - - - 1,866 Land acquisition & development 462 - - - - - 462 Multi-family dwellings 3,653 - - - - - 3,653 Commercial 2,033 - - - - - 2,033 Consumer Loans: Home equity 1,017 - - - - - 1,017 Home equity lines of credit 2,275 - - - - - 2,275 Other 139 - - - - - 139 Commercial Loans 841 - - - - - 841 $ 77,193 $ - $ - $ - $ 246 $ 246 77,439 Plus: Deferred loan fees 434 Allowance for loan losses (418 ) Net Loans Receivable $ 77,455 Credit quality information The following tables represent credit exposure by internally assigned grades for the period ended December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017. The grading system analysis estimates the capability of the borrower to repay the contractual obligations of the loan agreements as scheduled or not at all. The Company’s internal credit risk grading system is based on experiences with similarly graded loans. The Company’s internally assigned grades are as follows: Pass – loans which are protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the value of the underlying collateral. Special Mention – loans where a potential weakness or risk exists, which could cause a more serious problem if not corrected. Substandard – loans that have a well-defined weakness based on objective evidence and can be characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful – loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard loan. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, based on existing circumstances. Loss – loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible, or of such value that continuance as a loan is not warranted. The primary credit quality indicator used by management in the 1 – 4 family and consumer loan portfolios is the performance status of the loans. Payment activity is reviewed by Management on a monthly basis to determine how loans are performing. Loans are considered to be non-performing The following tables present the Company’s internally classified construction, land acquisition and development, multi-family residential, commercial real estate and commercial (not secured by real estate) loans at December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017. December 31, 2017 (Dollars in Thousands) Construction Land Acquisition & Development Loans Multi- Residential Commercial Estate Commercial Pass $ 1,823 $ 48 $ 3,521 $ 2,028 $ 734 Special Mention - - - - - Substandard - - - - - Doubtful - - - - - Ending Balance $ 1,823 $ 48 $ 3,521 $ 2,028 $ 734 June 30, 2017 (Dollars in Thousands) Construction Land Acquisition & Development Loans Multi-family Residential Commercial Estate Commercial Pass $ 1,866 $ 462 $ 3,653 $ 2,033 $ 841 Special Mention - - - - - Substandard - - - - - Doubtful - - - - - Ending Balance $ 1,866 $ 462 $ 3,653 $ 2,033 $ 841 The following table presents performing and non-performing December 31, 2017 1 – 4 Family Consumer (Dollars in Thousands) Performing $ 70,009 $ 3,409 Non-performing 242 - Total $ 70,251 $ 3,409 June 30, 2017 1 – 4 Family Consumer (Dollars in Thousands) Performing $ 64,907 $ 3,431 Non-performing 246 - Total $ 65,153 $ 3,431 The Company determines its allowance for loan losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company uses a systematic methodology as required by Financial Reporting Release No. 28 and the various Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council guidelines. The Company also endeavors to adhere to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102 in connection with loan loss allowance methodology and documentation issues. Our methodology used to determine the allocated portion of the allowance is as follows. For groups of homogenous loans, we apply a loss rate to the groups’ aggregate balance. Our group loss rate reflects our historical loss experience. We may adjust these group rates to compensate for changes in environmental factors; but our adjustments have not been frequent due to a relatively stable charge-off The Company had no unallocated loss allowance balance at December 31, 2017. The allowance for loan losses represents the amount which management estimates is adequate to provide for probable losses inherent in its loan portfolio. The allowance method is used in providing for loan losses. Accordingly, all loan losses are charged to the allowance, and all recoveries are credited to it. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to operations. The provision for loan losses is based on management’s periodic evaluation of individual loans, economic factors, past loan loss experience, changes in the composition and volume of the portfolio, and other relevant factors. The estimates used in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected on impaired loans, are particularly susceptible to changes in the near term. The following tables summarize the primary segments of the allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”), segregated into the amount required for loans individually evaluated for impairment and the amount required for loans collectively evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Activity in the allowance is presented for the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. As of December 31, 2017 First Mortgage Loans 1 – 4 Construction Land Multi- Commercial Consumer Commercial Total (Dollars in Thousands) Beginning ALLL Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 311 $ 32 $ 2 $ 20 $ 21 $ 34 $ 3 $ 423 Charge-offs - - - - - - - - Recoveries - - - - - - - - Provisions 15 (6 ) (2 ) (1 ) (1 ) - 1 6 Ending ALLL Balance at December 31, 2017 $ 326 $ 26 $ - $ 19 $ 20 $ 34 $ 4 $ 429 Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 326 26 - 19 20 34 4 429 $ 326 $ 26 $ - $ 19 $ 20 $ 34 $ 4 $ 429 As of December 31, 2017 First Mortgage Loans 1 – 4 Construction Land Multi- Commercial Consumer Commercial Total (Dollars in Thousands) Beginning ALLL Balance at June 30, 2017 $ 305 $ 30 $ 5 $ 20 $ 20 $ 34 $ 4 $ 418 Charge-offs - - - - - - - - Recoveries - - - - - - - - Provisions 22 (4 ) (5 ) (1 ) - - - 12 Ending ALLL Balance at December 31, 2017 $ 327 $ 26 $ - $ 19 $ 20 $ 34 $ 4 $ 430 Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 327 26 - 19 20 34 4 430 $ 327 $ 26 $ - $ 19 $ 20 $ 34 $ 4 $ 430 As of December 31, 2016 First Mortgage Loans 1 – 4 Construction Land Multi- Commercial Consumer Commercial Total (Dollars in Thousands) Beginning ALLL Balance at September 30, 2016 $ 256 $ 46 $ 7 $ 21 $ 17 $ 24 $ 5 $ 376 Charge-offs - - - - - - - - Recoveries - - - - - - - - Provisions 5 5 - - - 9 - 19 Ending ALLL Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 261 $ 51 $ 7 $ 21 $ 17 $ 33 $ 5 $ 395 Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 261 51 7 21 17 33 5 395 $ 261 $ 51 $ 7 $ 21 $ 17 $ 33 $ 5 $ 395 As of December 31, 2016 First Mortgage Loans 1 – 4 Construction Land Multi- Commercial Consumer Commercial Total (Dollars in Thousands) Beginning ALLL Balance at June 30, 2016 $ 222 $ 57 $ 7 $ 22 $ 16 $ 29 $ 7 $ 360 Charge-offs - - - - - - - - Recoveries - - - - - - - - Provisions 39 (6 ) - (1 ) 1 4 (2 ) 35 Ending ALLL Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 261 $ 51 $ 7 $ 21 $ 17 $ 33 $ 5 $ 395 Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 261 51 7 21 17 33 5 395 $ 261 $ 51 $ 7 $ 21 $ 17 $ 33 $ 5 $ 395 During the three months and six months ended December 31, 2017, the ALLL increased $6 thousand and $12 thousand, respectively. These increases were associated with the 1 – 4 family real estate loan portfolio and were partially offset by decreases in the ALLL associated with construction and land acquisition and development loans. The primary reason for the changes in the ALLL associated with these segments were the changes in associated loan balances. During the three and six months ending December 31, 2016, the ALLL increased $19 thousand and $35 thousand respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2016, the ALLL associated with 1—4 family real estate loans, construction and consumer loans increased. During the six months ended December 31, 2016, the ALLL associated with 1-4 |