Net broadcast revenues decreased to $175.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $192.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, or 8.9%. Net broadcast revenues decreased to $325.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $353.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, or 8.0%. The decrease in net broadcast revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2000, was comprised of a decrease of $18.4 million, or 9.6% on a same station basis, offset by an increase of $1.3 million related to television broadcast assets acquired during 2000 (the “2000 Acquisitions”). The decrease in net broadcast revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2000 comprised of a decrease of $34.3 million on a same station basis, or 9.7%, offset by an increase of $6.1 million related to the 2000 Acquisitions. On a same station basis for the three months ended June 30, 2001, national revenues decreased $14.5 million representing a 16.8% decrease over the same prior year period. On a same station basis, for the six months ended June 30, 2001, national revenues decreased $28.5 million, representing an 18.0% decrease over the same prior year’s period. National revenue decreased due to a soft advertising market during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 combined with our strategic focus on local revenue growth. Local revenue decreased on a same station basis by $4.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2000 or 4.4%. Local revenue decreased on a same station basis by $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2000 or 3.9%. The decrease in local revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 was primarily due to the soft advertising market.
Operating costs decreased to $82.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $84.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, or 2.4%. Operating costs decreased to $162.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $162.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, or 0.5%. The decrease in expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2000 comprised of a decrease of $2.2 million on a same station basis and a decrease in corporate overhead of $1.3 million offset by an increase of $0.8 million related to selling, general and administrative expenses incurred by G1440, Inc., our software development and consulting company, and an increase of $0.7 million related to the 2000 Acquisitions. The decrease in expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2000 comprised of $3.5 million related to the 2000 Acquisitions, $2.8 million related to selling, general and administrative expenses incurred by G1440, Inc., offset by a decrease of $2.3 million in corporate expenses and $4.8 million related to a decrease in operating costs on a same station basis, or 3.3%.
Depreciation and amortization increased $5.5 million to $67.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $61.7 million for the three months June 30, 2000. Depreciation and amortization increased $9.0 million to $131.9 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $122.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. The increase in depreciation and amortization for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 was related to property additions associated with the 2000 Acquisitions and program contract additions related to our investment to upgrade our programming.
During the three months ended June 30, 2001, the San Francisco office of our software development and consulting subsidiary was reorganized. The office reduced staff from 40 people at June 30, 2000 to three people at June 30, 2001 due to a significant slow down of business activity in the San Francisco market. In addition, the focus of the San Francisco office has shifted toward marketing an existing G1440, Inc. product. As a result, management determined that the San Francisco office’s goodwill was permanently impaired and, as such, recorded a charge to write-off goodwill in the amount of $2.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2001. Also during the three months ended June 30, 2001, we wrote-off $2.8 million of fixed assets which represents the net book value of damaged, obsolete, or abandoned property.
In June 2001 the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 141 prospectively prohibits the pooling of interest method of accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 requires companies to cease amortizing goodwill and certain other intangible assets including broadcast licenses. The amortization of existing goodwill will cease on December 31, 2001. Any goodwill resulting from acquisitions completed after June 30, 2001 will not be amortized. SFAS No. 142 also establishes a new method of testing goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 will result in our discontinuation of amortization of goodwill; however, we will be required to test goodwill for impairment under the new standard beginning in the first quarter of 2002, which could have an adverse effect on our future results of operations if an impairment occurs. During the six months ended June 30, 2001, we incurred goodwill amortization expense of $36.0 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2001, we incurred amortization expense related to our broadcast licenses of $10.6 million.
Operating income decreased $24.2 million to $24.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $48.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, or 50%. The net decrease in operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2000 was primarily attributable to a decrease in net broadcast revenues, an increase in depreciation and amortization, and an impairment and write down of long-lived assets of $5.6 million, offset by a decrease in operating expenses.
Operating income decreased $40.3 million to $30.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $71.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, or 56.8%. The net decrease in operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2000 was primarily attributable to a decrease in net broadcast revenues, an increase in depreciation and amortization, a restructuring charge of $2.4 million related to a reduction in our work force of 186 employees, and an impairment and write down of long-lived assets of $5.6 million, offset by a decrease in operating expenses.
Interest expense decreased to $35.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $38.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, or 6.3%. Interest expense decreased to $69.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $74.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, or 7.2%. The decrease in interest expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001 resulted from a reduction of indebtedness as a result of the proceeds from the sale of our radio broadcast assets during 2000 and an overall lower interest rate market environment. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below for discussion of an amendment and restatement of our 1998 Bank Credit Facility.
Income tax benefit was $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 compared to an income tax provision of $4.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000. Income tax benefit decreased to $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $12.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. Our effective tax rate decreased to a benefit of 14.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from 75.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2000. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared the six months ended June 30, 2000 resulted from a decrease in the relative impact of the permanent differences between taxable income and book income projected for 2001, as compared to the relative impact of the permanent differences for 2000.
The net deferred tax liability increased to $264.9 million as of June 30, 2001 from $255.1 million at December 31, 2000. The increase in the net deferred tax liability was primarily a result of the tax impact from temporary book-to-tax accounting differences associated with certain derivative instruments.
Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2001 was $17.7 million or net loss of $0.24 per share compared to net income of $1.2 million or net loss of $0.01 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2000. Net loss increased for the three months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2000 due to a decrease in net broadcast revenues, an increase in depreciation and amortization, an impairment and write down of long-lived assets, an extraordinary loss which relates to the write-off of deferred financing costs related to amending the 1998 Bank Credit Agreement (see Liquidity and Capital Resources), and a decrease in net income from discontinued operations, offset by a decrease in operating costs, a decrease in interest expense and an increase in the income tax benefit.
Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2001 was $54.3 million or $0.70 per share compared to net loss of $0.6 million or $0.06 per share. Net loss increased for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2000 due to a decrease in net broadcast revenues, an increase in depreciation and amortization, an impairment and write down of long-lived assets, a restructuring charge related to a reduction in our workforce of 186 employees, an extraordinary loss which relates to the write-off of deferred financing costs, an increase in loss on derivatives, a decrease in the income tax benefit, and a decrease in net income from discontinued operations, offset by a decrease in operating costs and a decrease in interest expense.
Broadcast cash flow decreased to $75.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $92.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, or 19.1%. Broadcast cash flow decreased to $129.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $158.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, or 18.5%. The broadcast cash flow margin for the three months ended June 30, 2001 decreased to 42.7% from 48.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2000. The broadcast cash flow margin for the six months ended June 30, 2001 decreased to 39.7% from 44.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2000. The decreases in broadcast cash flow and margins for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 was primarily due to a decrease in net broadcast revenue and an increase in program contract payments related to our investment to upgrade programming, offset by a decrease in operating costs.
Adjusted EBITDA decreased to $70.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $86.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, or 18.9%. Adjusted EBITDA decreased to $119.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $146.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, or 18.5%. Adjusted EBITDA margin decreased to 39.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from 44.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2000 and to 36.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from 41.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2000. The decreases in Adjusted EBITDA and margins for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 primarily resulted from the decrease in net broadcast revenue and an increase in program contract payments, offset by a decrease in operating costs.
After tax cash flow decreased to $41.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001 from $45.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2000, or 9.8%. After tax cash flow decreased to $53.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $60.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, or 12.3%. The decrease in after tax cash flow for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2000 primarily resulted from a decrease in operating income offset by an increase in the current tax benefit and a decrease in interest expense.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operations and availability under the 1998 Bank Credit Agreement, as amended and restated. As of June 30, 2001, we had $1.4 million in cash balances and working capital of approximately $87.5 million. As of June 30, 2001, the remaining balance available under the Revolving Credit Facility was $230.0 million. Based on pro forma trailing cash flow levels for the twelve months ended June 30, 2001, we had approximately $373.6 million available of current borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility.
On May 16, 2001, we closed on an amendment and restatement of our 1998 Bank Credit Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Bank Credit Agreement”) which allows us more operating capacity and liquidity. The Amended and Restated Bank Credit Agreement reduces our borrowing permitted capacity from a $1.6 billion facility to a $1.1 billion facility. The Amended and Restated Bank Credit Agreement consists of a $600 million Revolving Credit Facility maturing on September 15, 2005 and a $500 million Incremental Term Loan Facility repayable in consecutive quarterly installments amortizing 1% per year commencing March 31, 2003 and continuing through its maturity on September 30, 2009.
The applicable interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility is either LIBOR plus 1.25% to 3.00% or the alternative base rate plus zero to 1.75% adjusted quarterly based on the ratio of total debt to four quarters’ trailing earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted in accordance with the 1998 Bank Credit Agreement. The applicable interest rate on the Incremental Term Loan Facility is LIBOR plus 3.50% or the alternative base rate plus 2.25% through maturity. At June 30, 2001, the interest rate on our Revolving Credit Facility and Incremental Term Loan Facility was LIBOR plus 3.00% and LIBOR plus 3.50%, respectively.
Net cash flows from operating activities was $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to net cash flows used in operating activities of $19.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. We made income tax payments of $37.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $101.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000, including $34.8 million and $99.0 million, respectively, for payments related to the sale of our radio broadcast assets. We made interest payments on outstanding indebtedness and payments for subsidiary trust minority interest expense totaling $80.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to $87.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. The reduction of interest payments for the six months ended June 30, 2001 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2000 primarily related to a reduction of indebtedness as a result of the proceeds from the sale of our radio broadcast assets during 2000 and an overall lower interest rate market environment.
Net cash flows used in investing activities decreased to $14.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $55.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in payments relating to the acquisition of broadcast assets, property and equipment expenditures and equity investments. We made payments for property and equipment of $12.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. We expect that expenditures for property and equipment will increase for the year ended December 31, 2001 over prior years as a result of a larger number of stations owned by us and for capital expenditures incurred during the ordinary course of business, including costs related to our conversion to digital television, and additional strategic station acquisitions and equity investments if suitable investments can be identified on acceptable terms. We expect to fund such capital expenditures with cash generated from operating activities and funding from our Revolving Credit Facility.
Net cash flows from financing activities decreased to $11.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $62.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2000. During the six months ended June 30, 2001, we repaid $226.0 million and $625.0 million under the 1998 Bank Credit Agreement Revolving Credit Facility and Incremental Term Loan Facility, respectively. In addition, we utilized borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and the Incremental Term Loan Facility of $890.0 million during the period. During the six months ended June 30, 2001, we had repurchases of $4.4 million of our common stock while during the same prior year period, we repurchased $53.3 million of our common stock.
Seasonality
Our results usually are subject to seasonal fluctuations, which usually cause fourth quarter broadcast operating income to be greater than first, second and third quarter broadcast operating income. This seasonality is primarily attributable to increased expenditures by advertisers in anticipation of holiday season spending and an increase in viewership during this period. In addition, revenues from political advertising tend to be higher in even numbered years.
Risk Factors
The following sections entitled “Programming and Affiliations” and “Local Marketing Agreements and Duopolies” represent an update to these Risk Factors as contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Programming and Affiliations
We continually review our existing programming inventory and seek to purchase the most profitable and cost-effective syndicated programs available for each time period. In developing our selection of syndicated programming, we balance the cost of available syndicated programs with their potential to increase advertising revenue and the risk of their reduced popularity during the term of the program contract. We seek to purchase programs with contractual periods that permit programming flexibility and which complement a station's overall programming and counter-programming strategy. Programs that can perform successfully in more than one time period are more attractive due to the long lead time and multi-year commitments inherent in program purchasing.
Sixty-one of the 62 television stations that we own and operate or to which we provide programming services currently operate as affiliates of Fox (20 stations), WB (21 stations), ABC (7 stations), NBC (4 stations), UPN (6 stations), or CBS (3 stations). The networks produce and distribute programming in exchange for each station's commitment to air the programming at specified times and for commercial announcement time during the programming. In addition, networks other than Fox, WB and UPN pay each affiliated station a fee for each network-sponsored program broadcast by the station.
The Fox-affiliated stations acquired, to be acquired or being programmed by us as a result of the Sullivan Acquisition and Max Media Acquisition continue to carry Fox programming notwithstanding the fact that their affiliation agreements have expired. Fox affiliation agreements are currently in effect for only eight of our stations, which such affiliation agreements will expire on August 21, 2001 (December 31, 2001, in the case of WBFF-TV, Baltimore, MD), in part as a result of Fox having failed to exercise an option to renew the affiliation agreements for these stations for an additional five years. While we are not currently negotiating with Fox to secure long term affiliation agreements for either the stations that do not currently have affiliation agreements or which have affiliation agreements that are scheduled to expire in 2001, we do not believe that Fox has any current plans to terminate the affiliation of any of these stations. Fox, however, has recently entered into an agreement to acquire television stations in two markets, San Antonio and Baltimore, where Sinclair owns stations currently affiliated with Fox. Fox has entered into an agreement with a third party to swap its San Antonio station and another of its stations in exchange for a station in the Minneapolis market.
In addition, the affiliation agreements of three ABC stations (WEAR-TV, in Pensacola, Florida, WCHS-TV, in Charleston, West Virginia and WXLV-TV, in Greensboro/Winston-Salem, North Carolina) have expired. Sinclair and ABC are not currently discussing extensions of these agreements, but we do not believe ABC has any current plans to terminate the affiliation of any of these stations.
We also recently received a notice from NBC which prevents what would have otherwise been an automatic 5-year extension of the affiliation agreements for WICS/WICD (Champaign, Springfield, Illinois), which are due to expire on June 30, 2002. NBC has offered to enter into a long-term extension of these affiliation agreements, which we are currently considering.
In July 1997, we entered into an agreement with WB (the WB Agreement), pursuant to which we agreed to affiliate certain of our stations with WB for a ten-year term expiring January 15, 2008. Under the terms of the WB Agreement, as modified by the subsequent letter agreement entered into between WB and us on May 18, 1998, WB agreed to pay us an aggregate amount of $64 million in monthly installments during the first eight years commencing on January 16, 1998 in consideration for entering into affiliation agreements with WB.
Local Marketing Agreements and Duopolies
A number of television stations, including certain of our stations, have entered into what have commonly been referred to as local marketing agreements or LMAs. While these agreements may take varying forms, one typical type of LMA is a programming agreement between two separately owned television stations serving a common service area, whereby the licensee of one station programs substantial portions of the broadcast day and sells advertising time during such program segments on the other licensee's station subject to ultimate editorial and other controls being exercised by the latter licensee. The licensee of the station which is being substantially programmed by another entity must maintain complete responsibility for and control over the programming, financing, personnel and operations of its broadcast station and is responsible for compliance with applicable FCC rules and policies. If the FCC were to find that the owners/licensees of the stations with which we have LMAs failed to maintain control over their operations as required by FCC rules and policies, the licensee of the LMA station and/or Sinclair could be fined or set for hearing, the outcome of which could be a monetary forfeiture or, under certain circumstances, loss of the applicable FCC license.
In the past, a licensee could own one station and program and provide other services to another station pursuant to an LMA in the same market because LMAs were not considered attributable interests. However, under the new ownership rules, LMAs are now attributable where a licensee owns a television station and programs a television station in the same market. The new rules provide that LMAs entered into on or after November 5, 1996 have until August 5, 2001 to come into compliance with the new ownership rules, otherwise such LMAs will terminate. LMAs entered into before November 5, 1996 will be grandfathered until the conclusion of the FCC's 2004 biennial review. In certain cases, parties with grandfathered LMAs, may be able to rely on the circumstances at the time the LMA was entered into in advancing any proposal for co-ownership of the station. We currently program 26 television stations pursuant to LMAs. We have entered into agreements to acquire 16 of the stations that we program pursuant to an LMA. Once we acquire these stations, the LMAs will terminate. Of the remaining 10 stations, 3 of the LMAs are not subject to divestiture because they involve stations which Sinclair could own under the new duopoly rules, but either has decided not to acquire at this time or has no right to acquire, 3 LMAs were entered into before November 5, 1996, and 4 LMAs were entered into on or after November 5, 1996 (although we believe a valid position exists that one of these 4 LMAs was actually entered into prior to November 5, 1996). Petitions for reconsideration of the new rules, including a petition submitted by us, were recently denied by the FCC in a Report and Order reaffirming the eight voices test. We filed a Petition for Review of the FCC’s order adopting the duopoly rules in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. On June 21, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted our motion for Stay of the requirement that we divest of LMAs by August 6, 2001, pending the court’s review of a FCC rule limiting the number of stations that television broadcasters can own in a market. We will submit a written brief to the Court during the third quarter 2001 and oral arguments are scheduled for January 2002.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from our derivative instruments. We enter into derivative instruments primarily for the purpose of reducing the impact of changing interest rates on our floating rate debt, and to reduce the impact of changing fair market values on our fixed rate debt.
Interest Rate Derivative Instruments
One of our existing interest rate swap agreements does not qualify for special hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133. As a result, this interest rate swap agreement is reflected on the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. Changes in the fair value of this interest rate swap agreement are recognized currently in earnings. Two of our interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133 whereby changes in the fair market values of the swaps are reflected as adjustments to the carrying amount of two of our debentures. Periodic settlements of these agreements are recorded as adjustments to interest expense in the relevant periods.
Interest Rate Derivative Instruments
As of June 30, 2001, we held three derivative instruments:
| · | An interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $575 million which expires on June 3, 2004. The swap agreement requires us to pay a fixed rate which is set in the range of 6% to 6.55% and we receive a floating rate based on the three month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (measurement and settlement is performed quarterly). This swap agreement is reflected as a derivative obligation based on its fair value of $18 million as a component of other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2001. This swap agreement does not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133; therefore, changes in its fair market value are reflected currently in earnings as gain (loss) on derivative instruments. |
| | |
| · | In June 2001, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $250 million which expires on December 15, 2007 in which we receive a fixed rate of 8.75% and pay a floating rate based on LIBOR (measurement and settlement is performed quarterly). This swap is accounted for as a hedge of our 8.75% debenture in accordance with SFAS 133 whereby changes in the fair market value of the swap are reflected as adjustments to the carrying amount of the debenture. The swap is reflected in the accompanying balance sheet as a derivative liability and as a discount on the 8.75% debenture based on its fair value of $2.8 million. |
| | |
· | In June 2001, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $200 million which expires on July 15th, 2007 in which we receive a fixed rate of 9% and pay a floating rate based on LIBOR (measurement and settlement is performed quarterly). This swap is accounted for as a hedge of our 9% debenture in accordance with SFAS 133 whereby changes in the fair market value of the swap are reflected as adjustments to the carrying amount of the debenture. This swap is reflected in the accompanying balance sheet as a derivative liability and as a discount on the 9% debenture based on its fair value of $2.2 million. |
| |
| | | |
During the three months ended June 30, 2001, we terminated an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $250 million and recognized a mark-to-market loss of $0.8 million which is reflected in the accompanying statement of operations as gain (loss) on derivative instruments.
The counterparties to these agreements are international financial institutions. We estimate the net fair value of these instruments at June 30, 2001 to be a liability of $23 million. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is estimated by obtaining quotations from the financial institutions which are a party to our derivative contracts (the “Banks”). The fair value is an estimate of the net amount that we would pay on June 30, 2001 if the contracts were transferred to other parties or cancelled by us.
Equity Put Option Derivative Instrument
We held a put option derivative which provided for settlement of 2.7 million options of our class A common stock on July 2, 2001. The contract terms required us to make a settlement payment to the counterparties to this contract (payable in either cash or shares of our class A common stock) in an amount that is approximately equal to the put strike price of $28.931 minus the price of our class A common stock as of the termination date. This payment was limited by a strike price differential of $26.038 resulting in a maximum settlement of $2.893 per option. If the put strike price was less than the price of our class A common stock as of the termination date, we would not be obligated to make a settlement payment
The equity put option agreement included a provision whereby it would become immediately exercisable if our closing price was less than $6.45 for five consecutive days. On April 10, 2001, this option became exercisable and, as a result, the contract was settled for $7.7 million in cash on April 16, 2001.
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We filed a Petition for Review of the FCC’s order adopting the duopoly rules in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. On June 21, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted our motion for Stay of the requirement that we divest of LMAs by August 6, 2001, pending the court’s review of a FCC rule limiting the number of stations that television broadcasters can own in a market. We will submit a written brief to the Court during the third quarter 2001 and oral arguments are scheduled for January 2002. See Risk Factors-Local Marketing Agreements and Duopolies in Part I, Item 2 for additional information.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The annual meeting of stockholders of Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. was held on May 22, 2001. At the meeting, two items, as set forth in proxy statement dated April 16, 2001, were submitted to the stockholders for a vote: 1) the stockholders elected, for one-year terms, all persons nominated for directors as set forth in our proxy statement dated April 16, 2001; and 2) the stockholders voted to ratify the selection of Andersen LLP as our independent public accountants for the fiscal year 2001 audit. Approximately 98.70% of the eligible proxies were returned for voting. The table below sets forth the results of the voting at the annual meeting:
| | | For | | Against or Withheld | | Abstentions | |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
(1) | Election of Directors | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| David D. Smith | | 479,254,621 | | 2,382,098 | | | |
| Frederick G. Smith | | 479,255,146 | | 2,381,573 | | | |
| J. Duncan Smith | | 479,254,846 | | 2,381,873 | | | |
| Robert E. Smith | | 479,255,718 | | 2,381,001 | | | |
| Basil A. Thomas | | 481,212,862 | | 423,857 | | | |
| Lawrence E. McCanna | | 481,307,421 | | 329,298 | | | |
| Daniel C. Keith | | 481,213,192 | | 423,527 | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
(2) | Appointment of Independent Accountants | | 481,595,569 | | 26,515 | | 14,635 | |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
a) Exhibits
None
b) Reports on Form 8-K
None
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on the 13th day of August 2001.
| SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP, INC. |
| | |
| by: | /s/ David B. Amy |
| |
|
| | David B. Amy |
| | Executive Vice President and |
| | Chief Financial Officer |