NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: | |
Nature of operations | |
Nature of Operations |
|
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. is a diversified television broadcasting company that owns or provides certain programming, operating or sales services to television stations pursuant to broadcasting licenses that are granted by the Federal Communication Commission (the FCC or Commission). We owned and provided programming and operating services pursuant to local marketing agreements (LMAs) or provided or were provided sales services pursuant to outsourcing agreements to 164 stations in 79 markets which broadcast 373 channels, as of December 31, 2014. For the purpose of this report, these 164 stations and 373 channels are referred to as “our” stations and channels. |
|
|
Principles of Consolidation | |
Principles of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and variable interest entities (VIEs) for which we are the primary beneficiary. Noncontrolling interest represents a minority owner’s proportionate share of the equity in certain of our consolidated entities. All intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
|
Variable Interest Entities | |
Variable Interest Entities |
|
In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE for financial reporting purposes, we consider whether we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and whether we have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns that would be significant to the VIE. We consolidate VIEs when we are the primary beneficiary. The assets of each of our consolidated VIEs can only be used to settle the obligations of the VIE. All the liabilities are non-recourse to us except for certain debt of VIEs which we guarantee. |
|
Third-party station licensees. Certain of our stations provide services to other station owners within the same respective market, such as LMAs, where we provide programming, sales, operational and administrative services, and JSAs and SSAs, where we provide non-programming, sales, operational and administrative services. In certain cases, we have also entered into purchase agreements or options to purchase, the license related assets of the licensee. We typically own the majority of the non-license assets of the stations and in some cases where the licensee acquired the license assets concurrent with our acquisition of the non-license assets of the station, we have provided guarantees to the bank for the licensee’s acquisition financing. The terms of the agreements vary, but generally have initial terms of over five years with several optional renewal terms. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we have concluded that 37 and 34 of these licensees are VIEs, respectively. Based on the terms of the agreements and the significance of our investment in the stations, we are the primary beneficiary of the variable interests because, subject to the ultimate control of the licensees, we have the power to direct the activities which significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE through the services we provide and because we absorb losses and returns that would be considered significant to the VIEs. Several of these VIEs are owned by a related party, Cunningham Broadcasting Corporation (Cunningham). See Note 12. Related Person Transactions for more information about the arrangements with Cunningham. The net revenues of the stations which we consolidate were $286.3 million, $235.8 million and $154.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The fees paid between us and the licensees pursuant to these arrangements are eliminated in consolidation. See Changes in the Rules of Television Ownership and Joint Sale Agreements within Note 11. Commitment and Contingencies for discussion of recent changes in FCC rules related to JSAs. |
|
Up until third quarter of 2014, we had consolidated Cunningham (parent entity), in addition to their stations that we perform services for, as we had previously determined that it was a VIE because it had insufficient equity at risk. As of September 30, 2014, we concluded that Cunningham was no longer a VIE given its significant equity at risk in assets that we have no involvement with, and deconsolidated this entity, along with WTAT and WYZZ, stations that Cunningham acquired from us in July 2014 and November 2013, respectively, with which we have no continuing involvement. As a result of the deconsolidation, we recorded the difference between the proceeds received from Cunningham for the sale of WTAT and WYZZ to additional paid in capital in the consolidated balance sheet, as well as reflected the noncontrolling interest deficit of the remaining Cunningham VIEs which represents their significant cumulative distributions made to Cunningham (parent entity) that were previously eliminated in consolidation. |
|
As of the dates indicated, the carrying amounts and classification of the assets and liabilities of the VIEs mentioned above which have been included in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in thousands): |
|
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 491 | | $ | 4,916 | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | 19,521 | | 18,468 | | | | |
Current portion of program contract costs | | 9,544 | | 10,725 | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 297 | | 247 | | | | |
Total current asset | | 29,853 | | 34,356 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
PROGRAM CONTRACT COSTS, less current portion | | 6,922 | | 5,075 | | | | |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net | | 9,716 | | 11,081 | | | | |
GOODWILL | | 787 | | 6,357 | | | | |
BROADCAST LICENSES | | 16,935 | | 16,768 | | | | |
DEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net | | 96,732 | | 97,496 | | | | |
OTHER ASSETS | | 2,376 | | 22,935 | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 163,321 | | $ | 194,068 | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 68 | | $ | 86 | | | | |
Accrued liabilities | | 1,297 | | 2,536 | | | | |
Current portion of notes payable, capital leases and commercial bank financing | | 3,659 | | 5,731 | | | | |
Current portion of program contracts payable | | 9,714 | | 11,552 | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | 14,738 | | 19,905 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Notes payable, capital leases and commercial bank financing, less current portion | | 28,640 | | 49,850 | | | | |
Program contracts payable, less current portion | | 10,161 | | 6,597 | | | | |
Long term liabilities | | 8,739 | | 10,838 | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 62,278 | | $ | 87,190 | | | | |
|
The amounts above represent the consolidated assets and liabilities of the VIEs described above, for which we are the primary beneficiary, and have been aggregated as they all relate to our broadcast business. Excluded from the amounts above are payments made to Cunningham under the LMA which are treated as a prepayment of the purchase price of the stations and capital leases between us and Cunningham which are eliminated in consolidation. The total payments made under these LMAs as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, which are excluded from liabilities above, were $34.4 million and $32.4 million, respectively. The total capital lease liabilities, net of capital lease assets, excluded from the above were $4.3 million and $5.0 million, respectively for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2013, Cunningham sold a portion of its investment in our Class A Common Stock which was eliminated in consolidation and excluded from assets shown above, for $7.0 million, net of income taxes and has been reflected as an increase in additional paid in capital in the consolidated balance sheet. Also excluded from the amounts above are liabilities associated with the certain outsourcing agreements and purchase options with certain VIEs totaling $78.1 million and $59.9 million as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, as these amounts are eliminated in consolidation. The risk and reward characteristics of the VIEs are similar. |
|
Other investments. We have investments in other real estate ventures and investment companies which are considered VIEs. However, we do not participate in the management of these entities including the day-to-day operating decisions or other decisions which would allow us to control the entity, and therefore, we are not considered the primary beneficiary of these VIEs. We account for these entities using the equity or cost method of accounting. |
|
The carrying amounts of our investments in these VIEs for which we are not the primary beneficiary as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $22.7 million and $26.7 million, respectively, which are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Our maximum exposure is equal to the carrying value of our investments. The income and loss related to these investments are recorded in income from equity and cost method investments in the consolidated statement of operations. We recorded income of $2.2 million, $2.1 million and $6.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to these investments. |
|
|
Use of Estimates | |
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in the consolidated financial statements and in the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued new guidance requiring new disclosure of unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. If a company does not have: (i) a net operating loss carryforward; (ii) a similar tax loss; or (iii) a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The authoritative guidance is effective for fiscal years and the interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2013 and should be applied on a prospective basis. This guidance does not have a material impact on our financial statements. |
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued new guidance that changes the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of and represents a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. Under the revised guidance, it is less likely for any future sales of assets, asset groups, or stations to be considered discontinued operations because such sales would need to represent a strategic shift and have a major effect on our future operations. Historically, under the previous guidance, sales of minor components of our business were required to be classified as discontinued operations. We early adopted this new guidance effective July 1, 2014. If this guidance were effective for the 2013 discontinued operations discussed in Discontinued Operations, then the sale of those television stations would not have met the criteria under the new guidance. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance on revenue recognition for revenue from contracts with customers. This guidance requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers and will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective. This new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is not permitted and the standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our financial statements. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued guidance on disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The new standard is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our financial statements. |
|
In February 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that amends the current consolidation guidance on the determination of whether an entity is a variable interest entity. This new standard is effective for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is allowed, including in any interim period. We are currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on our financial statements. |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. |
|
|
Restricted Cash | |
Restricted Cash |
|
During 2013, we entered into certain definitive agreements to purchase assets of certain stations discussed in Note 2. Acquisitions, which required certain deposits to be made into escrow accounts. As of December 31, 2013, we held $11.4 million, in restricted cash classified as noncurrent related to the amounts held in escrow for these acquisitions. |
|
|
Accounts Receivable | |
Accounts Receivable |
|
Management regularly reviews accounts receivable and determines an appropriate estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the impact of economic conditions on the merchant’s ability to pay, past collection experience and such other factors which, in management’s judgment, deserve current recognition. In turn, a provision is charged against earnings in order to maintain the appropriate allowance level. |
|
A rollforward of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands): |
|
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 3,379 | | $ | 3,091 | | $ | 3,008 | |
Charged to expense | | 2,186 | | 1,802 | | 1,141 | |
Net write-offs | | (1,319 | ) | (1,514 | ) | (1,058 | ) |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 4,246 | | $ | 3,379 | | $ | 3,091 | |
|
|
Programming | |
Programming |
|
We have agreements with distributors for the rights to television programming over contract periods, which generally run from one to seven years. Contract payments are made in installments over terms that are generally equal to or shorter than the contract period. Pursuant to accounting guidance for the broadcasting industry, an asset and a liability for the rights acquired and obligations incurred under a license agreement are reported on the balance sheet where the cost of each program is known or reasonably determinable, the program material has been accepted by the licensee in accordance with the conditions of the license agreement and the program is available for its first showing or telecast. The portion of program contracts which becomes payable within one year is reflected as a current liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
|
The rights to this programming are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at the lower of unamortized cost or estimated net realizable value. With the exception of one-year contracts, amortization of program contract costs is computed using either a four-year accelerated method or based on usage, whichever method results in the earliest recognition of amortization for each program. Program contract costs are amortized on a straight-line basis for one-year contracts. Program contract costs estimated by management to be amortized in the succeeding year are classified as current assets. Payments of program contract liabilities are typically made on a scheduled basis and are not affected by adjustments for amortization or estimated net realizable value. |
|
Estimated net realizable values are based on management’s expectation of future advertising revenues, net of sales commissions, to be generated by the program material. We perform a net realizable value calculation quarterly for each of our program contract costs in accordance with the accounting guidance for the broadcasting industry. We utilize sales information to estimate the future revenue of each commitment and measure that amount against the commitment. If the estimated future revenue is less than the amount of the commitment, a loss is recorded in amortization of program contract costs and net realizable value adjustments in the consolidated statements of operations. |
|
|
Barter Arrangements | |
Barter Arrangements |
|
Certain program contracts provide for the exchange of advertising airtime in lieu of cash payments for the rights to such programming. The revenues realized from station barter arrangements are recorded as the programs are aired at the estimated fair value of the advertising airtime given in exchange for the program rights. Program service arrangements are accounted for as station barter arrangements, however, network affiliation programming is excluded from these calculations. Revenues are recorded as revenues realized from station barter arrangements and the corresponding expenses are recorded as expenses recognized from station barter arrangements. |
|
We broadcast certain customers’ advertising in exchange for equipment, merchandise and services. The estimated fair value of the equipment, merchandise or services received is recorded as deferred barter costs and the corresponding obligation to broadcast advertising is recorded as deferred barter revenues. The deferred barter costs are expensed or capitalized as they are used, consumed or received and are included in station production expenses and station selling, general and administrative expenses, as applicable. Deferred barter revenues are recognized as the related advertising is aired and are recorded in revenues realized from station barter arrangements. |
|
|
Other Assets | |
Other Assets |
|
Other assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands): |
|
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | |
Equity and cost method investments | | $ | 107,847 | | $ | 98,385 | | | | |
Unamortized costs related to debt issuances | | 47,118 | | 46,150 | | | | |
Other | | 53,265 | | 63,674 | | | | |
Total other assets | | $ | 208,230 | | $ | 208,209 | | | | |
|
We have equity and cost method investments primarily in private investment funds and real estate ventures. In the event that one or more of our investments are significant, we are required to disclose summarized financial information. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, none of our investments were significant individually or in the aggregate. |
|
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, our unfunded commitments related to private equity investment funds totaled $15.6 million and $17.0 million, respectively. |
|
When factors indicate that there may be a decrease in value of an equity or cost method investment, we assess whether a loss in value has occurred related to the investment. If that loss is deemed to be other than temporary, an impairment loss is recorded accordingly. For any investments that indicate a potential impairment, we estimate the fair values of those investments using discounted cash flow models, unrelated third party valuations or industry comparables, based on the various facts available to us. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded impairments of $1.3 million related to two of our investments. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded impairments of $0.6 million related to two of our investments. There were no impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2014. The impairments are recorded in the income (loss) from equity and cost method investees in our consolidated statement of operations. |
|
Unamortized costs related to debt issuances represent direct costs incurred to obtain long-term financing and are amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt using the effective interest method. Previously capitalized debt financing costs are expensed and included in loss on extinguishment of debt if we determine that there has been a substantial modification of the related debt. |
|
The decrease in other, in the table above, for 2014 was primarily due to the deconsolidation of investments held by Cunningham, partially offset by long term income tax receivables recorded in connection with the acquisition of the Allbritton Companies. See Variable Interest Entities above for further discussion on the deconsolidation of Cunningham. See Note 2. Acquisitions for further discussion on the acquisition of the Allbritton Companies. |
|
|
Impairment of Intangible and Long-Lived Assets | |
Impairment of Goodwill, Intangibles and Other Long-Lived Assets |
|
We assess annually, in the fourth quarter, whether goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired. Additionally, impairment assessments may be performed on an interim basis when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment potentially exists. We aggregate our stations by market for purposes of our goodwill and license impairment testing. We believe that our markets are most representative of our broadcast reporting units because segment management views, manages and evaluates our stations on a market basis. Furthermore, in our markets, where we operate or provide services to more than one station, certain costs of operating the stations are shared including the use of buildings and equipment, the sales force and administrative personnel. |
|
In our assessment of goodwill for impairment we first determine, based upon a qualitative assessment, whether it is more likely than not a reporting unit has been impaired. As part of this qualitative assessment, for each reporting unit, we weigh the relative impact of factors that are specific to the reporting unit as well as industry and macroeconomic factors. The reporting unit specific factors that we consider include current and forecasted financial performance, the significance of the excess fair value over carrying value in prior quantitative assessments, and any changes to the reporting units’ carrying amounts since the most recent impairment tests. We also consider whether there were any significant changes in the regulatory environment and business climate of the industry, and whether there were any negative pressures on growth rates and discount rates. |
|
If we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired, we will apply the quantitative two-step method. In the first step, the Company determines the fair value of the reporting unit and compares that fair value to the net book value of the reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using various valuation techniques, including quoted market prices, observed earnings/cash flow multiples paid for comparable television stations and discounted cash flow models. Our discounted cash flow model is based on our judgment of future market conditions within each designated market area based on our internal forecast of future performance, as well as discount rates that are based on a number of factors including market interest rates, a weighted average cost of capital analysis based on the target capital structure for a television station, and includes adjustments for market risk and company specific risk. If the net book value of the reporting unit were to exceed the fair value, we would then perform the second step of the impairment test, which requires allocation of the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, with any residual fair value being allocated to goodwill to determine the implied fair value. An impairment charge will be recognized only when the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying amount. |
|
For our annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangibles, broadcast licenses, we apply a qualitative assessment to assess whether it is more likely than not that broadcast licenses of a market are impaired. As part of this qualitative assessment, for each market, we weigh the relative impact of factors that are specific to the market as well as industry and macroeconomic factors that could affect the significant inputs used to determine the fair value of our broadcast license assets. The market specific factors that we consider include recent market projections from both independent and internal sources for advertising revenue and operating costs, estimated normal market share and capital expenditures, as well as the significance of the excess fair value over carrying value in prior quantitative assessments. We also consider whether there were any significant changes in the regulatory environment and business climate of the industry, and whether there were any negative pressures on growth rates and discount rates. When evaluating our broadcast licenses for impairment, the qualitative assessment is done at the market level because the broadcast licenses within the market are complementary and together enhance the single broadcast license of each station. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that one of our broadcast licenses is impaired, we will perform a quantitative assessment by comparing the aggregate fair value of the broadcast licenses in the market to the respective carrying values. We apply the income approach, using a Greenfield method, to estimate the fair values of the broadcast licenses. The income approach method involves a discounted cash flow model that incorporates several variables, including, but not limited to, market revenues and long term growth projections, estimated market share for the typical participant without a network affiliation and estimated profit margins based on market size and station type. The model also assumes outlays for capital expenditures, future terminal values, an effective tax rate assumption and a discount rate based on a number of factors including market interest rates, a weighted average cost of capital analysis based on the target capital structure for a television station, and includes adjustments for market risk and company specific risk. If the carrying amount of the broadcast licenses exceeds the fair value, then an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value of the broadcast licenses exceeds the fair value. |
|
We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment and continue to evaluate them as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be fully recoverable. We evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets by measuring the carrying amount of the assets against the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with them. At the time that such evaluations indicate that the future undiscounted cash flows of certain long-lived assets are not sufficient to recover the carrying value of such assets, the assets are tested for impairment by comparing their estimated fair value to the carrying value. We typically estimate fair value using discounted cash flow models and appraisals. See Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for more information. |
|
|
Accrued Liabilities | |
Accrued Liabilities |
|
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands): |
|
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | |
Compensation and employee health insurance | | $ | 56,871 | | $ | 44,800 | | | | |
Interest | | 33,347 | | 25,133 | | | | |
Deferred revenue | | 27,037 | | 20,128 | | | | |
Programming related obligations | | 65,970 | | 38,225 | | | | |
Other accruals relating to operating expenses | | 62,898 | | 53,899 | | | | |
Total accrued liabilities | | $ | 246,123 | | $ | 182,185 | | | | |
|
We expense these activities when incurred. |
|
|
Income Taxes | |
Income Taxes |
|
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We provide a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if we determine that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In evaluating our ability to realize net deferred tax assets, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, including our past operating results, tax planning strategies and forecasts of future taxable income. In considering these sources of taxable income, we must make certain judgments that are based on the plans and estimates used to manage our underlying businesses on a long-term basis. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, a valuation allowance has been provided for deferred tax assets related to a substantial amount of our available state net operating loss carryforwards based on past operating results, expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary book/tax basis differences, alternative tax strategies and projected future taxable income. Future changes in operating and/or taxable income or other changes in facts and circumstances could significantly impact the ability to realize our deferred tax assets which could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
Management periodically performs a comprehensive review of our tax positions and we record a liability for unrecognized tax benefits when such tax positions do not meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold. Significant judgment is required in determining whether a tax position meets the “more-likely-than-not” threshold, and it is based on a variety of facts and circumstances, including interpretation of the relevant federal and state income tax codes, regulations, case law and other authoritative pronouncements. Based on this analysis, the status of ongoing audits and the expiration of applicable statute of limitations, liabilities are adjusted as necessary. The resolution of audits is unpredictable and could result in tax liabilities that are significantly higher or lower than for what we have provided. See Note 10. Income Taxes, for further discussion of accrued unrecognized tax benefits. |
|
Supplemental Information - Statements of Cash Flows | |
Supplemental Information — Statements of Cash Flows |
|
During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we had the following cash transactions (in thousands): |
|
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Income taxes paid related to continuing operations | | $ | 100,986 | | $ | 26,037 | | $ | 46,964 | |
Income tax refunds received related to continuing operations | | $ | 1,407 | | $ | 4,414 | | $ | 194 | |
Interest paid | | $ | 157,349 | | $ | 147,083 | | $ | 110,973 | |
|
Non-cash transactions related to capital lease obligations were zero, $10.4 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The non-cash conversion of the 4.875% Notes into Class A Common Stock was $8.6 million, net of taxes for the year ended December 31, 2013. |
|
|
Revenue Recognition | |
Revenue Recognition |
|
Total revenues include: (i) cash and barter advertising revenues, net of agency commissions; (ii) retransmission consent fees; (iii) network compensation; (iv) other broadcast revenues and (v) revenues from our other operating divisions. |
|
Advertising revenues, net of agency commissions, are recognized in the period during which time spots are aired. |
|
Our retransmission consent agreements contain both advertising and retransmission consent elements. We have determined that our retransmission consent agreements are revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Advertising and retransmission consent deliverables sold under our agreements are separated into different units of accounting at fair value. Revenue applicable to the advertising element of the arrangement is recognized similar to the advertising revenue policy noted above. Revenue applicable to the retransmission consent element of the arrangement is recognized over the life of the agreement. |
|
Network compensation revenue is recognized over the term of the contract. All other significant revenues are recognized as services are provided. |
|
|
Share Repurchase Program | |
Share Repurchase Program |
|
On October 28, 1999, we announced a $150.0 million share repurchase program, which was renewed on February 6, 2008. On March 20, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized an additional $150.0 million share repurchase authorization. There is no expiration date, and currently management has no plans to terminate this program. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we have purchased approximately 4.9 million shares for $133.2 million. As of December 31, 2014, the total remaining authorization was $134.4 million. In January 2015, we repurchased 0.3 million shares of Class A Common Stock for $7.8 million. |
|
|
Advertising Expenses | |
Advertising Expenses |
|
Promotional advertising expenses are recorded in the period when incurred and are included in station production and other operating division expenses. Total advertising expenses from continuing operations, net of advertising co-op credits, were $21.3 million, $15.4 million and $12.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
|
|
Financial Instruments | |
Financial Instruments |
|
Financial instruments, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, consisted of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes payable. The carrying amounts approximate fair value for each of these financial instruments, except for the notes payable. See Note 7. Notes Payable and Commercial Bank Financing, for additional information regarding the fair value of notes payable. |
|
|
Post-retirement Benefits | |
Post-retirement Benefits |
|
We are required to recognize the funded status (i.e., the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of our pension plan in our consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we recorded a liability of $4.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively, representing the underfunded status of our defined benefit pension plan. |
|
In connection with the acquisition of Fisher Communications, Inc. (Fisher) in 2013 (see Note 2. Acquisitions), we assumed a nonqualified noncontributory supplemental retirement program (Fisher SERP) that was originally established for former executives of Fisher. No new participants have been admitted to this program since 2001 and the benefits of active participants were frozen in 2005. The program participants do not include any active employees. The Fisher SERP required continued employment or disability through the date of expected retirement, unless involuntarily terminated. |
|
While the nonqualified plan is unfunded, Fisher had made investments in annuity contracts and life insurance policies on the lives of certain individual participants to assist in future payment of retirement benefits. The carrying value of the annuity contracts and life insurance policies was $18.2 million as of December 31, 2013, which was included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheet. The majority of these annuities and life insurance policies were surrendered for lower cash value in 2014. |
|
As of December 31, 2014, the estimated projected benefit obligation was $24.0 million, of which $1.5 million is included in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet and the $22.5 million is included in other long-term liabilities. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we made $2.1 million and $0.5 million in benefit payments, recognized $1.0 million and $0.4 million of periodic pension expense, reported in other expenses in the consolidated statement of operations, and $3.2 million of actuarial losses and $0.2 million of actuarial gains through other comprehensive income, respectively. |
|
At December 31, 2014, the projected benefit obligation was measured using a 3.69% discount rate compared to a discount rate of 4.51% for the year ended December 31, 2013. We estimated its discount rate, in consultation with our independent actuaries, based on a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality bonds for which the timing and amount of cash outflows approximate the estimated payouts of the plan. |
|
We estimate that benefits expected to be paid to participants under the Fisher SERP as follows (in thousands): |
|
| | December 31, | | | | | | | |
2015 | | $ | 1,481 | | | | | | | |
2016 | | 1,726 | | | | | | | |
2017 | | 1,665 | | | | | | | |
2018 | | 1,608 | | | | | | | |
2019 | | 1,554 | | | | | | | |
Next 5 years | | 7,196 | | | | | | | |
|
|
Reclassifications | |
Reclassifications |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years’ consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year’s presentation. |
|