Filed by Alamos Gold Inc.
Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
Subject Company: Aurizon Mines Ltd.
Commission File Number: 333-186004
Date: March 4, 2013
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
March 2013 Corporate Presentation
Forward-Looking Statements and Disclaimer
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this presentation are forward-looking statements, including within the meaning of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. All statements other than statements of historical fact included herein, including, without limitation, statements regarding forecast gold production, gold grades, recoveries, waste-to-ore ratios, total cash costs, potential mineralization and reserves, exploration results, and future plans and objectives of Alamos Gold Inc. (“Alamos”), are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to mining and processing of mined ore, achieving projected recovery rates, anticipated production rates and mine life, operating efficiencies, costs and expenditures, changes in mineral resources and conversion of mineral resources to proven and probable reserves, and other information that is based on forecasts of future operational or financial results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.
Exploration results that include geophysics, sampling, and drill results on wide spacings may not be indicative of the occurrence of a mineral deposit. Such results do not provide assurance that further work will establish sufficient grade, continuity, metallurgical characteristics and economic potential to be classed as a category of mineral resource. A mineral resource that is classified as “inferred” or “indicated” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that any or part of an “indicated mineral resource” or “inferred mineral resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher category of resource. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into proven and probable reserves.
Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements.
There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Alamos’ expectations include risks related to the offer, fluctuations in the value of the consideration; integration issues; the effect of the offer on the market price of Alamos common shares; the exercise of dissent rights in connection with a compulsory acquisition or subsequent acquisition transaction; the liquidity of the Aurizon Mines Ltd. (“Aurizon”) common shares; risks associated with Aurizon becoming a majority-owned subsidiary of Alamos; differences in Aurizon common shareholder interests; the reliability of the information regarding Aurizon; change of control provisions; risks associated with obtaining governmental and regulatory approvals; failure to maintain effective internal controls; the liquidity of Alamos common shares on the New York Stock Exchange; and the effect of the offer on non-Canadian holders of Aurizon common shares, and risks related to the on-going business of Alamos, including risks related to international operations; the actual results of current exploration activities; conclusions of economic evaluations and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined as well as future prices of gold and silver, as well as those risk factors described in the section entitled “Risk Factors Related to the Offer” that is included in Alamos’ take-over bid circular dated January 14, 2013 and in the section entitled “Risk Factors” that is included in Alamos’ annual information form dated March 29, 2012. Although Alamos has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Disclaimers
This presentation is presented in conjunction with Alamos’ Registration Statement on Form F-10 (the “Registration Statement”) and Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (the “Tender Offer Statement”) as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The securities registered pursuant to the Registration Statement are not offered for sale in any jurisdiction in which such offer or sale is not permitted. You should only rely on the information contained in the offer and circular (the “Offer and Circular”) in each of the Registration Statement and the Tender Offer Statement. The information included in this presentation is only a summary and you should read the entire Offer and Circular carefully. The Registration Statement and the Tender Offer Statement are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
This presentation does not constitute an offer to buy or the solicitation of an offer to sell any of the securities of Alamos or Aurizon.
Each of Alamos and Aurizon prepare its disclosure in accordance with the requirements of securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Terms relating to mineral resources in this presentation are defined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects under the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. The SEC permits mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. Alamos and Aurizon may use certain terms, such as “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources”, “inferred mineral resources” and “probable mineral reserves” that the SEC does not recognize (these terms may be used in this presentation and are included in the public filings of each of Alamos and Aurizon, which have been filed with the SEC and the securities commissions or similar authorities in Canada).
All figures in US$ unless otherwise indicated.
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
2
We Expect Alamos to Remain...
• A leader in growing low-cost production
• A leader in financial performance
• A leader in delivering shareholder value
Since its inception, Alamos has focused successfully on these three areas. They will remain fundamental to the Company’s growth.
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
3
A Strong Company Positioned to Lead
• Low-cost, mid-tier gold producer
• Met production guidance and increased production by 32% in 2012 to 200,000 ounces at a cash operating cost (pre-5% royalty) of $355/oz
• Production guidance of 180,000-200,000 ounces Au in 2013; cash cost guidance of $415-$435/oz (pre-5% royalty)
• Mexico (Sonora State): own and operate the Mulatos Mine
• Acquired in 2003 for about $10 million; initial production in 2005
• Turkey (Cannakale): advanced-stage development projects
• Acquired in 2010 for $90 million; fast-tracking production for 2014
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
4
A Leader in Maintaining Low Costs First Quartile Cash Cost
Performance
Alamos Cash Margins Per Ounce
$2,000
$1,600
$1,200 US$
$800
$400
$76 $281 $259 $488 $637 $865 $1,111 $1,230
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Cash Operating Cost Royalty (5%) Margin
2013 Average Cash Costs ($/oz) - Net of By-products
$882
$810
$750
$742
$731
$598
$577
$543
$500-$5201
$222
IAMGOLD Osisko Alacer Randgold Agnico- Allied Eldorado AuRico New Gold
Eagle Nevada
Source: Analyst reports.
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
1 Based on Alamos guidance. Including royalties assuming a $1,700/oz Au price.
5
A Leader in Growing Production
Replacing Reserves Enables Production Growth
Reserves & Resources 1
10
8
Au oz (millions)
6
4
2
2P Reserves
Measured & Indicated Inferred
1.92
1.58
0.59
1.69
1.93
0.45
2.05
1.66
1.04
2.39 3.18 1.56
2.39
4.40
0.92
2.39
4.98
1.59
2004 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Production
Production (k oz Au)
250 200 150 100 50
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
1 Please refer to press releases dated March 27, 2012 and June 28, 2012 on the 2011 Mineral Reserves and Resources statement and Camyurt initial mineral resource estimate, respectively
6
Mexico: Mulatos Mine
Record Production in 2012
• Open-pit, heap leach operation (100% ownership)
• 17,000 tpd throughput budgeted
• 500 tpd gravity mill for Escondida high-grade ore
• Commenced operation in Q1 2012
• Achieving design throughput and budgeted grades
• Large exploration package (30,325 ha /117 sq. miles)
• ~56,000 m drill program in 2012 (completed)
• +72,000 m drill program planned in 2013
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
7
Mexico: The High-Grade Story Continues
Cerro Pelon
PdA Extension
East Estrella PdA
Estrella
El Salto/
Mina Vieja
Escondida
Gap
El Victor
San Carlos
February 2012
LEGEND
Mineralized trends
+1 opt intercepts
8
Mexico: San Carlos
Potential to Double High-Grade Mill Feed
‘In-pit’ high-grade mineral reserves:
649,000 tonnes @ 7.67 g/t Au1
N
500m
San Carlos Pit
High-gold grade structural trend
12SC182
6.09 m/ 12.850
4.65m/ 7.729
12SC177
17.55m/3.839
12SC178
12SC178B
17.3m/5.154
2011 Reserve pit outline
Drill collar, with assay interval
Drill collar
4.65m/7.729 Assay Interval (drilled meters / Au grams per tonne)
1 Please refer to press release dated February 21, 2013,Alamos Gold Reports Fourth Quarter and Year-end 2012 Results, and press release dated March 27, 2012 on 2011 Mineral Reserves and Resources statement
9
Mexico: El Victor
Overhead View
N
50.80m / 1.735
76.22m / 2.04
12EV248
12EV242
12EV289
27.44m / 1.304
Mineralized Trend
2011 Reserve pit outline
Drill collar, with assay interval
Drill collar
4.65 m / 7.729 Assay Interval (drilled meters / Au grams per tonne)
Please refer to press release dated February 21, 2013, Alamos Gold Reports Fourth Quarter and Year-end 2012 Results
10
Mexico: El Victor
Potential Reserve Pit Expansion
N
12EV198
12EV182
12EV180
12EV171
12EV210
12EV170
45.7 m @
1.59 g/t Au
35.1 m @
1.86 g/t Au
35.1 m @
6.43 g/t Au
Planned Reserve Pit Outline (2011)
1150 m
1050 m
950 m
Intercepts > 0.35 grams per tonne Au
0
40m
Please refer to press release dated March 27, 2012
11
Turkey: Low-Cost Production Growth
Canakkale
Akbaba
Kartaldag
TV Tower
Karlncall
Legend
City or Town
Alamos Mineral Claim
Gold Occurrence
Major Roads
Can Coal Mine
0 km Scale 4 km
Kirazli
Rock Pile
Catalkaya
Kale
Kirazli
Iri
Can Coal Mine
Coal Power Plant
Can
Pirentepe
Etili
Halilaga Cu
Ayitepe
Agi Dagi
Tavsan
Ihlamur
Deli
Fire Tower
Baba
Planned Water Reservoir
Camyurt
12
Turkey: Agi Dagi and Kirazli
Path To Production
Acquired projects
Positive
Pre-feasibility Study1,2
IRR: 22.3%3 NPV : $276M3
5%
Environmental Impact Assessment responses
First gold pour at Kirazli
First gold pour at Agi
Dagi
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Permitting and construction period
M&I - 2.2Moz Au3
Pit-constrained inferred - 213,000oz Au3 Camyurt inferred - 640,000 oz Au3
1 Initial capex of $424.4M (including $63M contingency), internally funded
2 At $1,239/oz Au and $24.56/oz Ag, after-tax IRR and NPV are 22.3% and $276M, respectively. At $1,575/oz Au and $27/oz Ag, after-tax IRR and NPV are 36.5% and $604.6M, respectively
3 Please refer to press release dated June 28, 2012 on Turkey PFS and Camyurt initial mineral resource estimate. Camyurt resource not included in PFS.
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
13
Turkey: Kirazli and Agi Dagi1,2,3
Camyurt Would Enhance Robust
Agi Dagi and Kirazli Mine Plan
Au oz (000)
250 200 150 100 50
Kirazli
Agi Dagi
LOM total production: 1.5Moz Au Combined annual production: 166,000 oz Au
545,000 oz Ag
2014E
2015E
2016E
2017E
2018E
2019E
2020E
2021E
2022E
2023E
1 Please refer to press release dated June 28, 2012 on Turkey PFS and Camyurt initial mineral resource estimate
2 Not shown: 4.9M oz of silver production over nine-year mine life
3 Cash costs (by-product) $544/oz excluding 1.5% royalty payable to Turkish government and 2% royalty on the Agi Dagi project payable to Franco-Nevada
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
14
Turkey: Camyurt
Significant Opportunity to Boost Project Economics
• 640,000 oz @ 0.81 g/t Au1 pit-constrained inferred resources
• Higher grades = chance to reduce combined operating cost
• Capex synergy – Camyurt may substantially utilize existing Agi Dagi infrastructure
185.7 m @
1.60 g/t Au
36.5 m @
3.2 g/t Au
11CYD14A
11CYD14
11CYD28
11CYD33
11CYD10
11CYD40
11CYD15
11CYD15A
11CYD09
11CYD01
151.2 m @
1.62 g/t Au
11CYD39
11CYD34
11CYD17
11CYD16
550m
450m
Resource cone outline (2012)
Intercepts > 0.2 grams per tonne Au
Camyurt long section
0 40m
350m
1 Please refer to press release dated June 28, 2012 on Turkey PFS and Camyurt initial mineral resource estimate
15
Succeeding in Turkey
An Alignment of Interests
Turkey Needs Mining
• Government calls mining a key to economic growth
• New Mining Law 2010; New Commercial Code 2012
• 2011 current account deficit 9.9% of GDP
• New investment system promotes foreign direct investment
• Tax incentive became law in June 2012
• Alamos expects to qualify for 80% reduction in corporate tax rate
• Corporate tax rate 4%, until savings cap of 40% of capex reached
• Earning our social license
• Generations have consumed substandard, unhealthy water (acidic; high alumina)
• Reservoir: process water for operations, potable water for communities
• Finalizing water protocol – planned commissioning in 2014; PFS Plan1: Capex $32M
1 Please refer to “NI 43-101 Technical Report Kirazli and Agi Dagi Gold Project” dated July 31, 2012
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
16
A Leader in Financial
Performance
Revenue ($ millions)
$133.0
$171.4
$189.3
$227.4
$329.4
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Earnings ($ millions)
$29.4
$56.0
$63.8
$60.1
$118.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Cash Balance ($ millions) 1
$43.8
$186.9
$188.2
$222.6
$353.7
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Cash Flow from Operations ($ millions) 2
$65.8
$94.6
$89.6
$106.5
$184.6
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
1Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments as reported in the Company’s Statements of Financial Position.
2After changes in working capital.
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
17
A Financially Strong Company
Robust, Clean Balance Sheet
Cash & Equivalents1
Working Capital1 Debt Gold Hedging
> US$360 million
> US$385 million None None
Semi-Annual Dividend
Shares Outstanding1 Employee Options1
US$0.10/share
127.5 million 4.8 million
Fully Diluted
132.3 million
Recent Share Price (TSX)2
Market Capitalization
C$14.70
~C$1.9 billion
1 Unaudited - management’s estimate as of February 26, 2013.
2 As of February 26, 2013.
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
18
A Leader in Delivering Shareholder Value
AGI 10-year Price Performance
Percentage Growth
2,500% 2,000% 1,500% 1,000% 500% 0%
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
AGI Gold Spot
Dividend Growth Per Share
$0.10
$0.05
$0.03
$0.04
$0.05
$0.07
$0.10
$0.10
Apr ‘10 Oct ‘10 Apr ‘11 Oct ‘11 Apr ‘12 Oct ‘12
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
19
Appendices
ALAMOS GOLD INC. 20
Mulatos
Alteration Map
N
La Chipriona Pb-Zn-Ag
La Cieneguita
Ostimuri Ag
La India
El Realito
La Viruela
La Cruz
El Jaspe
Juliana
La Dura
Zaragosa
Los Bajios Cu
El Halcon Cu
C. Pelon
La Yaqui
Escondida
Mina Vieja
Gap
El Victor
San Carlos
PdA Extension
Puerto Del Aire (PdA)
Mulatos Deposit
Las Carboneras
San Nicolas
La Palma
LEGEND
Silicic Alteration
Argillic Alteration
Propylitic Alteration
Gold Occurrence
Alamos Mineral Claim
0 Km Scale 4.0 Km
El Carricito
Image 2011 DigitalGlobe
2011 Cnes/Spot Image
Image 2011 GeoEye
28 38’27.69” N 108 48’06.85” W elev 5154 ft
21
San Carlos
The High-Grade Story Continues
Potential to double high-grade mill feed for gravity mill
‘In-pit’ mineral reserves: 649,000 tonnes @ 7.67 g/t Au1
Recent drilling highlights2:
o 7.729 g/t Au over 4.65 m (12SC177)
o 3.839 g/t Au over 17.55 m, including 10.517 g/t Au over 4.15 m (12SC178)
o 5.154 g/t Au over 17.3 m (12SC178B)
o 12.850 g/t Au over 6.09m, including 24.325 g/t Au over 3.04m (12SC183)
High-grade ore amenable to gravity separation
Gravity plus leach recovery3,4 70% and 78%, +15-20% higher than leaching alone
1 Please refer to press release dated March 27, 2012 on 2011 Mineral Reserves and Resources statement
2 Please refer to press release dated February 21, 2013,Alamos Gold Reports Fourth Quarter and Year-end 2012 Results
3Based on preliminary metallurgical testing of two high-grade composite samples. Potential to improve recovery rates exists and will be evaluated in the next phase of testing
4 Please refer to press release dated June 21, 2011 on San Carlos metallurgical testing results
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
22
San Carlos: Cross Section NW
Underground Mining Optimization
Mineral reserve pit shell (2011)
Underground model
Underground access
0.0 - 0.2 gpt Au
0.2 - 0.5 gpt Au
0.5 - 1.0 gpt Au
1.0 - 2.0 gpt Au
2.0 - 5.0 gpt Au
5.0 - 10.0 gpt Au
>10.0 gpt Au
23
El Victor
Reserve and Resource Growth
Potential to expand reserves along and across trend
Silica alteration identical to El Victor deposit
Believed to be northern extension of El Victor reserves
Extends pit north and west of present pit limits
Recent drilling highlights1:
o 2.040 g/t Au over 76.22 m (12EV242)
o 1.735 g/t Au over 50.80 m (12EV248)
o 1.304 g/t Au over 27.44 m and 1.725 g/t Au over 30.49 m (12EV289)
1 Please refer to press release dated February 21, 2013,Alamos Gold Reports Fourth Quarter and Year-end 2012 Results
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
24
Turkey Pre-feasibility (PFS) Highlights1
Strong Future Cash Flow Generation
Highlights
LOM production (combined 9-year mine life)
Combined annual production
Cash costs (by-product)
Capital expenditure Internally financed through cash on balance sheet and future cash flows
Camyurt
Value
1.5M oz Au 4.9M oz Ag
166,000 oz Au 545,000 oz Ag
$544/oz2 $8.60/tonne of ore
Initial: $424.4M (including $63M contingency) Sustaining: $26.9M
640K3 oz NOT included in PFS PFS incorporates significant capex that will benefit Camyurt economics
1 Please refer to press release dated June 28, 2012 on Turkey PFS and Camyurt initial mineral resource estimate
2 Excluding 1.5% royalty payable to the Turkish government and 2% royalty on the Agi Dagi project payable to Franco-Nevada
3 Inferred mineral resources, pit-constrained
ALAMOS GOLD INC. 25
Turkey PFS Highlights1
Robust Project Economics
AFTER TAX NPV(millions)
Discount Rate (%) Agi Dagi Kirazli Combined
0% $258.3 $214.2 $472.5
3% $167.7 $175.9 $343.6
5% $121.5 $154.1 $275.6
10% $40.9 $109.8 $150.7
Spot 2(@ 5% discount) $362.2 $242.4 $ 604.6
AFTER TAX IRR (%)
Silver Price (per oz) Gold Price (per oz)
$1,000 $1,200 $1,500 $1,800 $2,000
$15.00 1.5% 16.6% 31.2% 44.3% 54.6%
$20.00 2.3% 17.4% 32.0% 46.7% 55.8%
$22.50 5.6% 17.8% 32.4% 47.3% 56.4%
$25.00 6.0% 18.2% 32.8% 47.9% 57.1%
$30.00 6.9% 19.1% 33.6% 49.1% 58.3%
1 Please refer to press release dated June 28, 2012 on Turkey PFS and Camyurt initial mineral resource estimate
2 Based on $1,575/oz Au and $27.00/oz Ag
ALAMOS GOLD INC. 26
Turkey PFS Highlights1
Pit-Constrained Inferred Ounces Could Boost Production
213,000 oz Au mineable, pit-constrained inferred mineral ounces
Classified as waste in PFS due to insufficient drill spacing
Baba pit Agi Dagi Deli pit
160,000 inferred ounces
Kirazli
53,000 inferred ounces
Inferred mineral ounces (pit-constrained)
Measured mineral ounces
Indicated mineral ounces
Pit outlines not to scale
1 Please refer to press release dated June 28, 2012 on Turkey PFS and Camyurt initial mineral resource estimate
ALAMOS GOLD INC. 27
ADR Plant
Leach pad
Crushers
Baba pit
Waste Dump
Deli pit
Agi Dagi Project: Site Plan
Alteration Types
Propylitic
Argilic
Advanced Argilic
Silicic
PFS pit outline
Mineral resource cones
Camyurt
1km
28
Kirazli Project: Site Plan
Kirazli pit
Crushers
Waste Dump
Leach pad
ADR Plant
ADVANCED ARGILLIC
ARGILL
SILICIC
Alteration Types
Argilic
Advanced Argilic
Silicic
PFS pit outline
Mineral resource cones
1.0 km
29
Agi Dagi and Kirazli
Excellent Infrastructure
Sea port
Power Lines
Kirazli Hill
Paved roads and power lines
Access to power grid
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
30
Turkey EIA Process
Environmental Impact Assessment Application (EIA) File is prepared and submitted to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (Ministry)
The Ministry examines EIA Application File for compliance with the format specified in the EIA Regulation and establishes the Review Commission
Public Participation Meeting (published in newspaper at least 10 days before) and Special Format
Submission of EIA report to the Ministry (within 1 year maximum)
The Ministry examines the EIA report for compliance with the Special Format
Review Commission examines and assess the EIA report
“Final EIA Report” is submitted to the Ministry
“Final EIA Report” is made available for public comment
EIA Decision by the Ministry
EIA modified and resubmitted to meet recommendations provided by the Ministry
EIA Approved AGI Goal: Q1-13 Kirazli Q2-13 Agi Dagi
31
2011 Mulatos Mineral Reserves
PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES(1)
Proven(2) Probable(2) Proven + Probable(2)
Reserve Area Tonnes (000s) Grade (g/t Au) Contained Ounces Au Tonnes (000s) Grade (g/t Au) Contained Ounces Au Tonnes (000s) Grade (g/t Au) Contained Ounces Au
Mulatos Mine(3),(4),(5) 8,626 1.55 423,659 48,788 0.98 1,527,442 57,414 1.08 1,951,101
Existing Stockpiles 3,347 2.01 216,550 - - - 3,347 2.01 216,550
La Yaqui Pit(6) - - - 1,574 1.58 79,826 1,574 1.58 79,826
Cerro Pelon Pit(7) - - - 2,673 1.64 140,525 2,673 1.64 140,525
TOTAL 11,973 1.66 640,209 53,035 1.03 1,747,793 65,008 1.14 2,388,002
(1) The Company’s mineral reserves as at December 31, 2011 are classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining Metallurgy and Petroleum’s “CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definition and Guidelines” as per Canadian Securities Administrator’s National Instrument 43-101 requirements.
(2) Tonnes are rounded to the closest “000s” and grades are rounded to the closest “0.00”s.
(3) The mineral reserve estimate for the Mulatos Mine incorporates the Estrella, Escondida, Puerto del Aire, El Salto, Mina Vieja, El Victor, and San Carlos areas.
(4) Mineral reserve gold cut-off grade for the Mulatos Mine is determined as a net of process value of $0.10 per tonne for each model block. The determination was based on an $1,150 per ounce gold price, a December 2011 resource and recovery model, and the 2012 budget costs based on the actual cost figures from current mining operations.
(5) Pit-contained mineral reserves for the Escondida high-grade zone are 434,000 tonnes grading 11.81 g/t Au for 164,792 ounces and San Carlos highgrade is 649,000 tonnes grading 7.67g/t Au for 160,043 ounces.
(6) Mineral reserve gold cut-off grade for the La Yaqui Pit is a 0.30 g/t gold. The determination was based on an $800 per ounce gold price, a May 2009 resource model, gold recovery at the current mining operations, and the 2010 budget costs based on the actual cost figures from current mining operations.
(7) Mineral reserve gold cut-off grade for the Cerro Pelon Pit is determined as a net of process value of $0.10 per tonne, for each model block. The determination was based on an $800 per ounce gold price, a November 2009 resource model, gold recovery at the current mining operations, and the 2010 budget costs based on the actual cost figures from current mining operations
ALAMOS GOLD INC. 32
2011 Mulatos Mineral Resources
MEASURED AND INDICATED, AND INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES
Measured(1),(2),(3) Indicated(1),(2),(3) Measured + Indicated(1),(2),(3) Inferred Resources(1),(3)
Cut-off Grade (g/t Au) Tonnes (000s) Grade (g/t Au) Contained Ounces Au Tonnes (000s) Grade (g/t Au) Contained Ounces Au Tonnes (000s) Grade (g/t Au) Contained Ounces Au Tonnes (000s) Grade (g/t Au) Contained Ounces Au
2.0 699 4.17 93,704 4,948 3.38 537,036 5,647 3.47 630,740 794 3.14 80,207
1.5 1,214 3.13 122,109 9,419 2.59 784,025 10,633 2.65 906,134 1,848 2.33 138,669
1.0 2,595 2.11 175,662 21,536 1.81 1,251,513 24,131 1.84 1,427,175 3,880 1.74 217,561
0.7 4,816 1.51 234,049 43,913 1.31 1,848,584 48,729 1.33 2,082,633 8,043 1.27 327,780
0.5 7,818 1.16 290,657 77,173 1.00 2,475,562 84,991 1.01 2,766,219 17,432 0.90 506,031
0.3 13,197 0.85 361,974 147,200 0.71 3,356,485 160,397 0.72 3,718,459 37,488 0.63 755,141
(1) The updated mineral resource estimate incorporates the Estrella, Escondida, Puerto del Aire, El Salto, Mina Vieja, El Victor, and San Carlos areas.
(2) In-pit measured and indicated mineral resource blocks are exclusive of pit-contained reserves.
(3) Measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resources outside of the Mulatos Mine have no economic restrictions and are tabulated by gold cut-off grade.
ALAMOS GOLD INC. 33
2011 Turkey Mineral Resources
MEASURED AND INDICATED AND INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES(1)
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources(2)
Inferred Resources(3)
Resource Area Tonnes (000s) Grade (g/t Au)(3) Grade (g/t Ag) Contained Ounces Au Contained Ounces Ag Tonnes (000s) Grade (g/t Au)(3) Grade (g/t Ag) Contained Ounces Au Contained Ounces Ag
Agi Dagi 79,366 0.59 3.32 1,509,804 8,478,675 20,861 0.53 2.86 355,793 1,920,374
Kirazli 30,748 0.71 8.49 706,437 8,392,499 5,575 0.52 9.95 93,288 1,783,621
Camyurt(4) 24,557 0.81 4.77 639,531 3,766,129
TOTAL 110,114 0.62 4.76 2,216,241 16,871,174 50,993 0.66 4.55 1,088,612 7,470,124
(1) The economic cut-off grade is 0.2 g/t Au
(2) Measured and indicated resource for the Agi Dagi project (which includes the Baba, Ayitepe, Deli, and Fire Tower zones) and the Kirazli project are pit-constrained, include oxide and transition material only (no sulphide), with cut-off determined as a net of process value of $0.10 per tonne, for each model block. The determination was based on a US$1,250 per ounce gold price and a US$22.50 per ounce silver price, a March 2012 resource model, average pit slope angle of 38, and estimated costs and recoveries based on Pre-feasibility study specifications. The resources were then tabulated by gold cut-off grade.
(3) Inferred resource for the projects at Kirazli and Agi Dagi (which includes the Baba, Ayitepe, Deli, and Fire Tower zones) are pit-constrained, include oxide and transition material only (no sulphide), with cut-off determined as a net of process value of $0.10 per tonne, for each model block. The determination was based on a US$1,250 per ounce gold price and a US$22.50 per ounce silver price, a March 2012 resource model, average pit slope angle of 38, and estimated costs and recoveries based on Pre-feasibility study specifications. Resources were then tabulated by gold cut-off grade. Inferred resources for the Camyurt project are pit-constrained, using a $1,250 per ounce gold price, a 60:1 Ag:Au value ratio (Au equivalent = Au + ((Ag/60) x Ag recovery)), an average pit slope angle of 45, estimated costs based on the Pre-feasibility study, and recoveries for Au and Ag based on grade ranges (refer to Table 1 of Alamos press release dated June 28, 2012). Only oxide and transition material (no sulphide) were considered in the pit run.
(4) Initial inferred mineral resources published on June 28, 2012.
ALAMOS GOLD INC.
34
Jo Mira Clodman
Vice President, Investor Relations
416.368.9932 x 401
jmclodman@alamosgold.com