Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block] | 12. From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of our business. These proceedings include patent enforcement actions initiated by us against others for the infringement of our technologies, as well as proceedings brought by others against us at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTAB”) in an attempt to invalidate certain of our patent claims. The majority of our litigation, including our PTAB proceedings, is being paid for through contingency fee arrangements with our litigation counsel as well as third third ParkerVision v. Qualcomm (Middle District of Florida-Orlando Division) - Appealed to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit We have appealed certain March 2022 The patent infringement case was filed in the Middle District of Florida in May 2014. February 2016 6,091,940 '940 March 2017, sixth September 2018, '940 January 2019, July 2019, '940 may September 2019, '940 January 2020. In April 2020, 19, December 2020 May 2021. October 2020, December 2020; one January 2021. May 3, 2021 July 6, 2021. In March 2021, not November December 2021. Daubert May 2021. March 2021, 2020 July 2021, No. 7,865,177 '177 In January 2022, three March 9, 2022, one March 22, 2022, not three April 20, 2022, 30 ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm (Middle District of Florida-Jacksonville Division) In December 2015, February 2016, July 2016, March 2017, May 2017. July 2017, July 2017, March 2018, March 2018 9,118,528 August 31, 2018. July 2019, August 2020. March 2020, 19, April 2020, ParkerVision v. LG (District of New Jersey) In July 2017, ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm March 2018, ParkerVision v. Intel (Western District of Texas) In February 2020, May 2020 June 2020, one second ParkerVision v. Intel II June 2020 July 2020 September 2020, Inter Partes Review two January 2021, two Intel v. ParkerVision (PTAB) The court issued its claim construction ruling in January 2021 February 7, 2022. April 2021, two first June 2022. In January 2022, February 2022, first six second one second two October 2022. March 2022, December 5, 2022. March 2022, May 2022, June 2022 December 5, 2022 February 6, 2023. Beginning in November 2022, January 2023. February 6, 2023 February 7, 2023, ParkerVision v. Intel II (Western District of Texas) In June 2020, ParkerVision v. Intel second one July 2020, January 2021, one July 2021, 2021 June 2021 July 2021 October 2022. February 2022, Intel II six first none first one February 7, 2023, Intel v. ParkerVision (PTAB) Intel filed IPR petitions against U.S. patent 7,539,474 ‘474 7,110,444 ‘444 ParkerVision v. Intel 8,190,108 ‘108 ParkerVision v. Intel II January 2021, ‘444 ‘474 November 1, 2021 ‘474 ‘444 January 2022. ’444 seven ‘474 ‘444 ParkerVision v. Intel July 2022, '444 In July 2021, ‘108 October 2021 April 2022. June 2022 ‘108 ParkerVision v. Intel Additional Patent Infringement Cases Western District of Texas ParkerVision filed a number of additional patent cases in the Western District of Texas in 2020 ten May 2021, ten second June 2021 two second November 2022 two In November 2022, four We dismissed the actions against Buffalo and Zyxel in 2021 November 2022, two The court has issued claim construction recommendations for the TCL and LGE cases, in which nearly all of the claim terms were decided in our favor. In November 2022, two two TCL, et. al. v. ParkerVision (PTAB) In January 2023, November 2022. February 2023, TCL, et. al. v. ParkerVision (PTAB) In May 2021, 7,292,835 ‘835 ‘444 November 2021, December 2021, two April 2022, September 2022. November 2022, November 2022, |