UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
_____________________________________________
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 29, 2014
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 000-22780
_____________________________________________
FEI COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_____________________________________________
Oregon | 93-0621989 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
5350 NE Dawson Creek Drive, Hillsboro, Oregon | 97124-5793 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 503-726-7500
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | o | |
Non-accelerated filer | o | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of July 28, 2014 was 41,959,939.
FEI COMPANY
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 3. | ||
Item 4. | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 1A. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 6. | ||
1
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
FEI Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
June 29, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
Assets | |||||||
Current Assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 272,372 | $ | 384,170 | |||
Short-term investments in marketable securities | 125,945 | 108,191 | |||||
Short-term restricted cash | 19,176 | 18,798 | |||||
Receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $2,974 and $2,969 | 225,174 | 194,418 | |||||
Inventories | 195,712 | 181,725 | |||||
Deferred tax assets | 10,670 | 15,114 | |||||
Other current assets | 35,913 | 28,324 | |||||
Total current assets | 884,962 | 930,740 | |||||
Non-current investments in marketable securities | 57,643 | 47,278 | |||||
Long-term restricted cash | 35,075 | 32,718 | |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $135,750 and $125,405 | 171,937 | 157,829 | |||||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $24,826 and $19,385 | 65,121 | 47,197 | |||||
Goodwill | 184,994 | 136,152 | |||||
Deferred tax assets | 7,528 | 1,751 | |||||
Non-current inventories | 57,326 | 62,104 | |||||
Other assets, net | 13,668 | 10,315 | |||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,478,254 | $ | 1,426,084 | |||
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | |||||||
Current Liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 87,975 | $ | 73,247 | |||
Accrued payroll liabilities | 41,123 | 45,146 | |||||
Accrued warranty reserves | 12,620 | 12,705 | |||||
Short-term deferred revenue | 91,033 | 91,563 | |||||
Income taxes payable | 8,651 | 4,579 | |||||
Accrued restructuring, reorganization, relocation and severance | 1,398 | 50 | |||||
Other current liabilities | 52,331 | 46,324 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 295,131 | 273,614 | |||||
Long-term deferred revenue | 35,710 | 30,744 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 11,521 | 8,931 | |||||
Other liabilities | 36,472 | 35,227 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||
Shareholders’ Equity: | |||||||
Preferred stock - 500 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | — | — | |||||
Common stock - 70,000 shares authorized; 41,959 and 42,136 shares issued and outstanding, no par value | 626,814 | 637,482 | |||||
Retained earnings | 427,307 | 392,958 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 45,299 | 47,128 | |||||
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 1,099,420 | 1,077,568 | |||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 1,478,254 | $ | 1,426,084 |
See accompanying Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
FEI Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Net sales: | |||||||||||||||
Products | $ | 179,030 | $ | 170,337 | $ | 348,328 | $ | 339,832 | |||||||
Service | 57,925 | 52,141 | 114,892 | 103,835 | |||||||||||
Total net sales | 236,955 | 222,478 | 463,220 | 443,667 | |||||||||||
Cost of sales: | |||||||||||||||
Products | 92,077 | 82,680 | 178,673 | 167,863 | |||||||||||
Service | 35,027 | 32,901 | 68,371 | 66,356 | |||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 127,104 | 115,581 | 247,044 | 234,219 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 109,851 | 106,897 | 216,176 | 209,448 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Research and development | 26,221 | 25,413 | 51,866 | 50,222 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 50,587 | 42,639 | 99,050 | 86,163 | |||||||||||
Restructuring, reorganization, relocation and severance | 2,228 | 395 | 3,559 | 1,090 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 79,036 | 68,447 | 154,475 | 137,475 | |||||||||||
Operating income | 30,815 | 38,450 | 61,701 | 71,973 | |||||||||||
Other expense: | |||||||||||||||
Interest income | 221 | 137 | 373 | 253 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (173 | ) | (669 | ) | (272 | ) | (1,485 | ) | |||||||
Other, net | (854 | ) | (920 | ) | (1,177 | ) | (1,725 | ) | |||||||
Total other expense, net | (806 | ) | (1,452 | ) | (1,076 | ) | (2,957 | ) | |||||||
Income before income taxes | 30,009 | 36,998 | 60,625 | 69,016 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 5,061 | 7,005 | 10,599 | 12,222 | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 24,948 | $ | 29,993 | $ | 50,026 | $ | 56,794 | |||||||
Basic net income per share | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 1.46 | |||||||
Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.36 | |||||||
Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.20 | |||||||
Shares used in per share calculations: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 42,080 | 39,496 | 42,135 | 39,012 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 42,627 | 42,281 | 42,701 | 42,227 |
See accompanying Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
FEI Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 24,948 | $ | 29,993 | $ | 50,026 | $ | 56,794 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes: | |||||||||||||||
Change in cumulative translation adjustment | (1,863 | ) | 6,361 | (1,756 | ) | (9,353 | ) | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities | 39 | (10 | ) | 40 | (3 | ) | |||||||||
Change in minimum pension liability | 17 | (56 | ) | 33 | (71 | ) | |||||||||
Changes due to cash flow hedging instruments: | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) gain on hedge instruments | (1,022 | ) | 70 | (1,775 | ) | (1,855 | ) | ||||||||
Reclassification to net income of previously deferred losses related to hedge derivatives instruments | 1,096 | 304 | 1,629 | 626 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 23,215 | $ | 36,662 | $ | 48,197 | $ | 46,138 |
See accompanying Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
FEI Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||
Net income | $ | 50,026 | $ | 56,794 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation | 14,640 | 11,451 | |||||
Amortization | 6,864 | 5,248 | |||||
Stock-based compensation | 10,961 | 8,712 | |||||
Asset impairments, write-offs of intangible assets and other | 282 | 16 | |||||
Income taxes (receivable) payable, net | (1,691 | ) | 8,188 | ||||
Deferred income taxes | (2,411 | ) | (4,389 | ) | |||
Decrease (increase), net of acquisitions, in: | |||||||
Receivables | (28,932 | ) | 8,517 | ||||
Inventories | (18,243 | ) | (5,171 | ) | |||
Other assets | 710 | 1,348 | |||||
Increase (decrease), net of acquisitions, in: | |||||||
Accounts payable | 10,411 | 6,356 | |||||
Accrued payroll liabilities | (4,574 | ) | (4,759 | ) | |||
Accrued warranty reserves | (88 | ) | 258 | ||||
Deferred revenue | (785 | ) | 8,188 | ||||
Accrued restructuring, reorganization, relocation and severance | 1,354 | (1,601 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities | 5,900 | (7,628 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 44,424 | 91,528 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||
Increase in restricted cash | (3,154 | ) | (6,561 | ) | |||
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | (23,322 | ) | (42,566 | ) | |||
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (65,049 | ) | — | ||||
Purchase of investments in marketable securities | (133,213 | ) | (73,397 | ) | |||
Redemption of investments in marketable securities | 105,267 | 69,915 | |||||
Other | (499 | ) | (1,304 | ) | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (119,970 | ) | (53,913 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||
Redemption of 2.875% convertible notes | — | (73 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid on common stock | (10,129 | ) | (6,164 | ) | |||
Withholding taxes paid on issuance of vested restricted stock units | (1,331 | ) | (439 | ) | |||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases | 7,880 | 6,816 | |||||
Excess tax benefit for share based payment arrangements | 2,011 | 1,069 | |||||
Repurchases of common stock | (30,479 | ) | — | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (32,048 | ) | 1,209 | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes | (4,204 | ) | (1,056 | ) | |||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (111,798 | ) | 37,768 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | |||||||
Beginning of period | 384,170 | 266,302 | |||||
End of period | $ | 272,372 | $ | 304,070 | |||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: | |||||||
Cash paid for income taxes, net | $ | 9,883 | $ | 6,204 | |||
Cash paid for interest | 196 | 1,439 | |||||
Increase in fixed assets related to transfers with inventories | 2,657 | 5,873 | |||||
Dividends declared but not paid | 10,564 | 4,996 | |||||
Conversion of 2.875% convertible notes | — | 88,937 | |||||
Accrued purchases of plant and equipment | 4,619 | — |
See accompanying Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
FEI COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. | ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
Nature of Business
We are a leading supplier of scientific instruments and related services for nanoscale applications and solutions for industry and science. We report our revenue based on a group structure organization, which we categorize as the Industry Group and the Science Group.
Our products include transmission electron microscopes ("TEMs"); scanning electron microscopes ("SEMs"); DualBeamTM systems which combine a SEM and a focused ion beam system ("FIB") on a single platform; stand-alone FIBs; high-performance optical microscopes, three-dimensional modeling software, and service and components to support the products. TEMs provide the highest resolution images of samples and their internal structure, down to the atomic level. SEMs provide detailed images of the surface and shape of samples. Optical microscopes provide a wider field of view than SEMs and TEMs. DualBeams and FIBs image, manipulate, mill and deposit material for a variety of purposes, including preparation of samples for TEMs. Substantially all of these product categories are sold into all of our markets. Individual models of our products are increasingly designed to provide specific solutions and applications in each of our markets.
Our DualBeam systems include models that have wafer handling capability and are purchased by semiconductor equipment manufacturers (“wafer-level DualBeam systems”) and models that have small stages and are sold to customers in several markets (“small-stage DualBeam systems”).
Our significant research and development and manufacturing operations are located in Hillsboro, Oregon; Eindhoven, The Netherlands; and Brno, Czech Republic; and our software development is managed principally from Bordeaux, France. Our sales and service operations are conducted in the United States (U.S.) and approximately 50 other countries around the world. We also sell our products through independent agents, distributors and representatives in additional countries.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FEI Company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “FEI”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and condensed footnotes have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 21, 2014.
Use of Estimates in Financial Reporting
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant accounting policies and estimates underlying the accompanying consolidated financial statements include:
• | the timing of revenue recognition; |
• | valuations of excess and obsolete inventory; |
• | the lives and recoverability of equipment and other long-lived assets such as goodwill; |
• | the valuations of intangible assets; |
• | restructuring, reorganization, relocation and severance costs; |
• | tax valuation allowances and unrecognized tax benefits; |
• | stock-based compensation; and |
6
• | accounting for derivatives. |
It is reasonably possible that management's estimates may change in the future.
NOTE 2. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
Following is a reconciliation of basic earnings per share (“EPS”) and diluted EPS (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirteen Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income | Shares | Per Share Amount | Net Income | Shares | Per Share Amount | ||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS | $ | 24,948 | 42,080 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 29,993 | 39,496 | $ | 0.76 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of 2.875% convertible debt | — | — | — | 325 | 2,164 | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock units, and shares issuable to Philips | — | 547 | — | — | 621 | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS | $ | 24,948 | 42,627 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 30,318 | 42,281 | $ | 0.72 |
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income | Shares | Per Share Amount | Net Income | Shares | Per Share Amount | ||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS | $ | 50,026 | 42,135 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 56,794 | 39,012 | $ | 1.46 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of 2.875% convertible debt | — | — | — | 780 | 2,595 | (0.08 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock units, and shares issuable to Philips | — | 566 | (0.02 | ) | — | 620 | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||
Diluted EPS | $ | 50,026 | 42,701 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 57,574 | 42,227 | $ | 1.36 |
The following table sets forth the schedule of anti-dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted EPS (number of shares, in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||
Stock options | 244 | 226 | 190 | 219 | |||||||
Restricted stock units | 12 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
NOTE 3. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
Employee Share Purchase Plan
At our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which was held on May 8, 2014, our shareholders approved an amendment to our Employee Share Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the plan from 3,950,000 to 4,200,000.
1995 Stock Incentive Plan
Also at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved an amendment to our 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1995 Plan”) to increase the number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the plan from 11,000,000 to 11,250,000.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the 1995 Plan:
June 29, 2014 | ||
Shares available for grant | 1,877,083 | |
Shares of common stock reserved for issuance | 3,595,338 |
7
The following table sets forth certain information regarding all options outstanding and exercisable:
June 29, 2014 | |||||||
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | ||||||
Number | 868,143 | 175,414 | |||||
Weighted average exercise price | $ | 60.16 | $ | 38.64 | |||
Aggregate intrinsic value | $ 27.0 million | $ 9.2 million | |||||
Weighted average remaining contractual term | 5.3 years | 3.9 years |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding all RSUs nonvested and expected to vest:
June 29, 2014 | |||||||
RSUs Nonvested | RSUs Expected to Vest | ||||||
Number | 850,114 | 748,279 | |||||
Weighted average grant date per share fair value | $ | 63.36 | $ | 62.30 | |||
Aggregate intrinsic value | $ 77.6 million | $ 68.3 million | |||||
Weighted average remaining term to vest | 1.5 years | 1.5 years |
As of June 29, 2014, unrecognized stock-based compensation related to outstanding, but unvested stock options and RSUs was $55.5 million, which will be recognized over the weighted average remaining vesting period of 2.0 years.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Our stock-based compensation expense was included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales | $ | 857 | $ | 616 | $ | 1,583 | $ | 1,211 | |||||||
Research and development | 713 | 545 | 1,330 | 1,076 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 4,253 | 3,187 | 8,048 | 6,425 | |||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation | $ | 5,823 | $ | 4,348 | $ | 10,961 | $ | 8,712 |
NOTE 4. | CREDIT FACILITIES AND RESTRICTED CASH |
Multibank Credit Agreement
We have a multibank credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), which provides for a $100.0 million secured revolving credit facility, including a $50.0 million subfacility for the issuance of letters of credit. The credit agreement expires April 1, 2016. We may, upon notice to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., the Administrative Agent (the "Agent"), request to increase the revolving loan commitments by an aggregate amount of up to $50.0 million with new or additional commitments subject only to the consent of the lender(s) providing the new or additional commitments, for a total secured credit facility of up to $150.0 million. As of June 29, 2014, there were no revolving loans or letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement, we were in compliance with all covenants and we were not in default under the Credit Agreement.
On July 3, 2014, we entered into the Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the "Third Amendment") with the Agent, various lenders (the "Lenders") and certain other parties. Among other things, the Third Amendment amended the Credit Agreement to increase the permitted amount of restricted payments, subject to certain conditions and certain technical amendments.
Restricted Cash
As part of our contracts with certain customers, we are required to provide letters of credit or bank guarantees which these customers can draw against in the event we do not perform in accordance with our contractual obligations. Restricted cash balances securing bank guarantees that expire within 12 months of the balance sheet date are recorded as a current asset on our consolidated balance sheets. Restricted cash balances securing bank guarantees that expire beyond 12 months from the balance sheet date are recorded as long-term restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheets.
8
The following table sets forth information related to guarantees and letters of credit (in thousands):
June 29, 2014 | |||
Guarantees and letters of credit outstanding | $ | 54,391 | |
Amount secured by restricted cash deposits: | |||
Current | $ | 19,176 | |
Long-term | 35,075 | ||
Total secured by restricted cash | $ | 54,251 |
NOTE 5. | INVENTORIES |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by standard cost methods, which approximate the first-in, first-out method. Inventory costs include material, labor and manufacturing overhead. Service inventories that exceed the estimated requirements for the next 12 months based on recent usage levels are reported as a long-term asset. Management has established inventory reserves based on estimates of excess and/or obsolete current and non-current inventory.
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 29, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
Raw materials and assembled parts | $ | 59,407 | $ | 61,235 | |||
Service inventories, estimated current requirements | 14,046 | 15,197 | |||||
Work-in-process | 88,237 | 75,883 | |||||
Finished goods | 34,022 | 29,410 | |||||
Total current inventories | $ | 195,712 | $ | 181,725 | |||
Non-current inventories | $ | 57,326 | $ | 62,104 |
NOTE 6. | GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
Goodwill
The roll-forward of activity related to our goodwill was as follows (in thousands):
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 136,152 | $ | 131,320 | |||
Goodwill additions | 46,880 | — | |||||
Goodwill adjustments | 1,962 | (2,198 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 184,994 | $ | 129,122 |
Additions to goodwill represent goodwill from acquisitions made during the period. Adjustments to goodwill include translation adjustments resulting from a portion of our goodwill being recorded on the books of our foreign subsidiaries as well as an adjustment related to the finalization of the purchase price allocation of the acquisition of ASPEX Corporation in 2012.
Acquisition of Lithicon AS
On February 5, 2014 we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Lithicon AS ("Lithicon"), which has operations in Norway and Australia. Lithicon provides digital rock technology services and pore-scale micro computed tomography (microCT) equipment to oil and gas companies. In conjunction with the acquisition we have obtained the helical scan microCT product and associated software from the Australian National University through a licensing and development agreement.
The total purchase price of the acquisition was $68.0 million, plus an adjustment for the change in final closing accounts of $0.4 million. We paid $0.4 million in transaction costs, of which $0.3 million was paid in the first quarter. Those costs were expensed as incurred and are recorded in selling, general and administrative costs on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The total purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired based on their preliminary fair values as of February 5, 2014. The fair value of net tangible assets acquired was $7.7 million and the fair value of net intangible assets acquired was $22.0 million, which consisted of $18.6 million in developed technology, $2.2 million of customer relationships and $1.2 million
9
of purchased backlog. Including an increase to net deferred tax liabilities of $8.1 million, the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired was $46.9 million, which was recorded as goodwill in the Industry Group. For the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 the acquired business added $1.6 million and $2.4 million of revenue, respectively, and a net loss of $1.1 million and $2.1 million, respectively, to our consolidated financial results.
The goodwill arising from the acquisition of Lithicon is primarily related to expected future cash flows from expansion of our product offerings in the oil and gas market to include digital rock services, as well as synergies from the introduction of the microCT product to the existing FEI product suite.
The acquired developed technology, customer relationships and purchased backlog will be amortized over a period of 10 years, 5 years and 2 years, respectively.
No pro forma financial information has been provided for this acquisition as it is insignificant.
Other Intangible Assets
Patents, trademarks and other are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 2 to 10 years. Customer relationships are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 5 to 10 years. Developed technology is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related technology, which ranges from 5.5 to 10 years. Note issuance costs were amortized over the life of the related debt, which was 7 years.
The gross amount of our other intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization were as follows (in thousands):
June 29, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
Patents, trademarks and other | $ | 25,936 | $ | 24,327 | |||
Accumulated amortization | (11,340 | ) | (9,296 | ) | |||
Net patents, trademarks and other | 14,596 | 15,031 | |||||
Customer relationships | 24,052 | 21,650 | |||||
Accumulated amortization | (4,967 | ) | (3,547 | ) | |||
Net customer relationships | 19,085 | 18,103 | |||||
Developed technology | 37,514 | 18,161 | |||||
Accumulated amortization | (6,074 | ) | (4,098 | ) | |||
Net developed technology | 31,440 | 14,063 | |||||
Note issuance costs | 2,445 | 2,445 | |||||
Accumulated amortization | (2,445 | ) | (2,445 | ) | |||
Net note issuance costs | — | — | |||||
Total intangible assets included in other long-term assets | $ | 65,121 | $ | 47,197 |
Amortization expense was as follows (in thousands):
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||
Patents, trademarks and other | $ | 2,119 | $ | 1,777 | |||
Customer relationships | 1,421 | 1,073 | |||||
Developed technology | 1,976 | 1,102 | |||||
Note issuance costs | — | 146 | |||||
Total amortization expense | $ | 5,516 | $ | 4,098 |
10
Expected amortization, without consideration for foreign currency effects, is as follows over the next five years and thereafter (in thousands):
Patents, Trademarks and Other | Customer Relationships | Developed Technology | Total | ||||||||||||
Remainder of 2014 | $ | 1,864 | $ | 1,447 | $ | 2,112 | $ | 5,423 | |||||||
2015 | 3,704 | 2,894 | 4,224 | 10,822 | |||||||||||
2016 | 2,826 | 2,894 | 4,224 | 9,944 | |||||||||||
2017 | 2,271 | 2,546 | 3,946 | 8,763 | |||||||||||
2018 | 1,656 | 2,461 | 3,729 | 7,846 | |||||||||||
Thereafter | 2,275 | 6,843 | 13,205 | 22,323 | |||||||||||
Total future amortization expense | $ | 14,596 | $ | 19,085 | $ | 31,440 | $ | 65,121 |
NOTE 7. | WARRANTY RESERVES |
Our products generally carry a one-year warranty. A reserve is established at the time of sale to cover estimated warranty costs and certain commitments for product upgrades as a component of cost of sales on our consolidated statements of operations. Our estimate of warranty cost is primarily based on our history of warranty repairs and maintenance, as applied to systems currently under warranty. For our new products without a history of known warranty costs, we estimate the expected costs based on our experience with similar product lines and technology. While most new products are extensions of existing technology, the estimate could change if new products require a significantly different level of repair and maintenance than similar products have required in the past. Our estimated warranty costs are reviewed and updated on a quarterly basis. Changes to the reserve occur as volume, product mix and warranty costs fluctuate.
The following is a summary of warranty reserve activity (in thousands):
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 12,705 | $ | 12,049 | |||
Reductions for warranty costs incurred | (6,430 | ) | (6,580 | ) | |||
Warranties issued | 6,347 | 6,804 | |||||
Translation and changes in estimates | (2 | ) | (127 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 12,620 | $ | 12,146 |
NOTE 8. | INCOME TAXES |
Our tax provision for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 consisted primarily of taxes accrued in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, offset by a reduction of unrecognized tax benefits due primarily to settlements with taxing authorities. We continue to record a valuation allowance against a portion of our U.S. and foreign deferred tax assets as we do not believe it is more likely than not that we will be able to utilize the deferred tax assets in future periods.
Deferred Income Taxes
Net deferred tax assets were classified on the balance sheet as follows (in thousands):
June 29, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets – current | $ | 10,670 | $ | 15,114 | |||
Deferred tax assets – non-current | 7,528 | 1,751 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities – current | (54 | ) | (9 | ) | |||
Deferred tax liabilities – non-current | (11,521 | ) | (8,931 | ) | |||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 6,623 | $ | 7,925 | |||
Valuation allowance | $ | 4,511 | $ | 2,723 |
11
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
During the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014, unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively, primarily due to settlements with taxing authorities which were partially offset by additional uncertainty surrounding permanent establishment and transfer pricing in various foreign jurisdictions. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense.
For our major tax jurisdictions, the following years were open for examination by the tax authorities as of June 29, 2014:
Jurisdiction | Open Tax Years | |
U.S. | 2010 and forward | |
The Netherlands | 2011 and forward | |
Czech Republic | 2011 and forward |
NOTE 9. | RELATED-PARTY ACTIVITY |
Related parties with which we had transactions during the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 were as follows:
• | one of the members of our Board of Directors serves on the Board of Directors of Applied Materials, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation; |
• | our Chief Financial Officer is on the Board of Directors of Cascade Microtech, Inc.; |
• | one of the members of our Board of Directors serves on the Supervisory Board of TMC BV; and |
• | our Chief Executive Officer is on the Board of Trustees for the Oregon Health and Science University Foundation. |
Transactions with these related parties were as follows (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
Sales to Related Parties | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | |||||||||||
Product sales: | |||||||||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. | $ | 1,383 | $ | 99 | $ | 2,342 | $ | 3,591 | |||||||
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | — | 4 | — | 4 | |||||||||||
Cascade Microtech, Inc. | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Oregon Health and Science University | 119 | 126 | 249 | 255 | |||||||||||
Total product sales to related parties | 1,502 | 229 | 2,591 | 3,850 | |||||||||||
Service sales: | |||||||||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. | 187 | 197 | 355 | 330 | |||||||||||
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
Cascade Microtech, Inc. | 8 | 8 | 16 | 16 | |||||||||||
Oregon Health and Science University | 93 | 7 | 175 | 16 | |||||||||||
Total service sales to related parties | 291 | 215 | 552 | 368 | |||||||||||
Total sales to related parties | $ | 1,793 | $ | 444 | $ | 3,143 | $ | 4,218 | |||||||
Purchases from Related Parties | |||||||||||||||
TMC BV | $ | 882 | $ | 23 | $ | 1,290 | $ | 48 | |||||||
Oregon Health and Science University | 39 | 175 | 78 | 175 | |||||||||||
Total purchases from related parties | $ | 921 | $ | 198 | $ | 1,368 | $ | 223 |
12
Amounts due from (to) related parties were as follows (in thousands):
June 29, 2014 | |||
Applied Materials, Inc. | $ | 1,755 | |
Cascade Microtech, Inc. | 8 | ||
TMC BV | (657 | ) | |
Oregon Health and Science University | (34 | ) | |
Due from related parties, net | $ | 1,072 |
NOTE 10. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
From time to time, we may be a party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Currently, we are not a party to any litigation that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Purchase Obligations
We have commitments under non-cancelable purchase orders, primarily relating to inventory, totaling $87.9 million at June 29, 2014. These commitments expire at various times through the second quarter of 2016.
NOTE 11. | SEGMENT INFORMATION |
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer.
We currently report our segments based on a group structure organization. Our segments are Industry Group and Science Group.
The following tables summarize various financial amounts for each of our business segments (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Sales to External Customers: | |||||||||||||||
Industry Group | $ | 127,225 | $ | 103,702 | $ | 233,664 | $ | 202,766 | |||||||
Science Group | 109,730 | 118,776 | 229,556 | 240,901 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 236,955 | $ | 222,478 | $ | 463,220 | $ | 443,667 | |||||||
Gross Profit: | |||||||||||||||
Industry Group | $ | 64,088 | $ | 53,788 | $ | 120,221 | $ | 104,302 | |||||||
Science Group | 45,763 | 53,109 | 95,955 | 105,146 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 109,851 | $ | 106,897 | $ | 216,176 | $ | 209,448 |
June 29, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
Goodwill: | |||||||
Industry Group | $ | 100,814 | $ | 51,532 | |||
Science Group | 84,180 | 84,620 | |||||
Total | $ | 184,994 | $ | 136,152 | |||
Total Assets: | |||||||
Industry Group | $ | 419,289 | $ | 297,987 | |||
Science Group | 355,961 | 365,571 | |||||
Corporate and Eliminations | 703,004 | 762,526 | |||||
Total | $ | 1,478,254 | $ | 1,426,084 |
13
Market segment disclosures are presented to the gross profit level as this is the primary performance measure for which the segment general managers are responsible. Selling, general and administrative, research and development and other operating expenses are managed and reported at the corporate level and, because allocation to the market segments would be arbitrary, have not been allocated to the market segments. See the Consolidated Statements of Operations for reconciliations from gross profit to income before income taxes. These reconciling items are not included in the measure of profit and loss for each reportable segment.
NOTE 12. | RESTRUCTURING, REORGANIZATION, RELOCATION AND SEVERANCE |
Second Quarter 2014 Realignment
During the second quarter of 2014 we began to implement a resource realignment plan that will cause us to incur expenses during the remainder of 2014. The realignment plan aims to improve our operational efficiency by eliminating redundancies in sites and personnel resulting from recent acquisitions and expansion activities. We intend to shift our resources to growing regions, such as Asia, and potential growth markets, such as structural biology, oil and gas, near-line semiconductor processing and metals research, and expect the realignment plan to better position us to pursue our growth strategy. The realignment plan activities currently include the consolidation of our three Australia sites in Canberra; the closure of our facility in Delmont, Pennsylvania and relocation of such operations to our new facility in the Czech Republic; relocation of our Japan demonstration facility to our Shanghai facility; selective reductions in staffing, relocations and compensation adjustments related to the foregoing activities and other realignment of management resources.
During the second quarter of 2014, we incurred approximately $2.2 million of severance and site relocation fees, $2.5 million related to acceleration of an acquisition-related earn-out, $0.5 million for impairment and other asset write-offs, and $0.7 million for inventory write-offs related to the realignment plan. These costs have been recorded in the second quarter of 2014 in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows: $0.7 million in cost of sales, $3.0 million in selling, general and administrative expenses and $2.2 million in restructuring, reorganization, relocation, and severance expenses. For the remainder of 2014, we expect to incur additional costs of approximately $18.0 million, including costs to move to our new facility in the Czech Republic, most of which are expected to be cash expenditures. The total cost of the realignment plan is estimated to be approximately $24.0 million, with all costs to be incurred during 2014. Savings from the realignment plan are expected to be approximately $10.0 million on an annual basis.
First Quarter 2014 Restructuring
During the first quarter of 2014 we engaged in a restructuring plan principally aimed at consolidating our sales force in Europe. The $1.3 million cost incurred in implementing the restructuring plan primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination related costs, and was incurred during the first quarter of 2014. We do not expect to incur any additional costs under this plan. Savings from this plan are expected to be approximately $1.8 million on an annual basis.
Group Structure Reorganization
In January 2013, we announced our intention to reorganize the company into a group structure in order to enable us to efficiently execute our growth strategy. The reorganization was completed in the first quarter of 2013. The costs associated with the reorganization consisted primarily of severance costs and resulted in the termination of certain positions throughout the company. In anticipation of this reorganization, we incurred $2.9 million of costs during the fourth quarter of 2012, and recorded $1.1 million of severance costs during 2013, for a total cost of $4.0 million. We do not expect to incur any additional costs under this reorganization plan.
Restructuring, Reorganization, Relocation and Severance Accrual
The following table summarizes the charges, expenditures, write-offs and adjustments related to our restructuring, reorganization, relocation and severance accrual (in thousands):
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 29, 2014 | Second Quarter 2014 Realignment | First Quarter 2014 Restructuring | Group Structure Reorganization | Total | |||||||||||
Beginning accrued liability | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 50 | $ | 50 | |||||||
Charged to expense, net | 2,228 | 1,331 | — | 3,559 | |||||||||||
Expenditures | (880 | ) | (1,331 | ) | — | (2,211 | ) | ||||||||
Ending accrued liability | $ | 1,348 | $ | — | $ | 50 | $ | 1,398 |
14
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 30, 2013 | Group Structure Organization | Total | |||||
Beginning accrued liability | $ | 2,692 | $ | 2,692 | |||
Charged to expense, net | 1,090 | 1,090 | |||||
Expenditures | (2,744 | ) | (2,744 | ) | |||
Write-offs and adjustments | 16 | 16 | |||||
Ending accrued liability | $ | 1,054 | $ | 1,054 |
NOTE 13. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
Factors used in determining the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities are summarized into three broad categories:
• | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities as of the reporting date; |
• | Level 2 – other significant directly or indirectly observable inputs, including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit risk; and |
• | Level 3 – significant inputs that are generally less observable than objective sources, including our own assumptions in determining fair value. |
The factors or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Following are the disclosures related to the fair value of our financial assets and (liabilities) (in thousands):
June 29, 2014 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||
Available for sale marketable securities: | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government-backed securities | $ | 15,063 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 15,063 | ||||
Agency bonds | — | 37,481 | — | 37,481 | ||||||||
Commercial paper | — | 45,824 | — | 45,824 | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit | — | 13,663 | — | 13,663 | ||||||||
Municipal bonds | — | 49,929 | — | 49,929 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | — | 14,948 | — | 14,948 | ||||||||
Trading securities: | ||||||||||||
Equity securities – mutual funds | 6,680 | — | — | 6,680 | ||||||||
Derivative contracts, net | — | (2,932 | ) | — | (2,932 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 21,743 | $ | 158,913 | $ | — | $ | 180,656 |
December 31, 2013 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||
Available for sale marketable securities: | ||||||||||||
U.S. treasury notes | $ | 10,128 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 10,128 | ||||
Agency bonds | — | 37,961 | — | 37,961 | ||||||||
Commercial paper | — | 39,987 | — | 39,987 | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit | — | 7,786 | — | 7,786 | ||||||||
Municipal bonds | — | 49,319 | — | 49,319 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | — | 5,001 | — | 5,001 | ||||||||
Trading securities: | ||||||||||||
Equity securities – mutual funds | 5,287 | — | — | 5,287 | ||||||||
Derivative contracts, net | — | (1,113 | ) | — | (1,113 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 15,415 | $ | 138,941 | $ | — | $ | 154,356 |
Agency bonds are securities backed by U.S. government-sponsored entities. U.S. Government-backed securities include Treasury Bills and Treasury Notes.
We use an income approach to value the assets and liabilities for outstanding derivative contracts using current market information as of the reporting date, such as spot rates, interest rate differentials and implied volatility.
There were no transfers between fair value categories or changes to our valuation techniques during the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014.
15
We believe the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities are a reasonable approximation of the fair value of those financial instruments because of the nature of the underlying transactions and the short-term maturities involved.
NOTE 14. | DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS |
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency risk and we use derivatives to mitigate financial exposure from movements in foreign currency exchange rates.
The aggregate notional amount of outstanding derivative contracts were as follows (in thousands):
June 29, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
Cash flow hedges | $ | 161,000 | $ | 208,446 | |||
Balance sheet hedges | 200,433 | 172,947 | |||||
Total outstanding derivative contracts | $ | 361,433 | $ | 381,393 |
The outstanding contracts at June 29, 2014 have varying maturities through the fourth quarter of 2015. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
We attempt to mitigate derivative credit risk by transacting with highly rated counterparties. We have evaluated the credit and nonperformance risks associated with our derivative counterparties and believe them to be insignificant and not warranting a credit adjustment at June 29, 2014. In addition, there are no credit contingent features in our derivative instruments.
Balance Sheet Related
In countries outside of the U.S., we transact business in U.S. dollars and in various other currencies. We attempt to mitigate our currency exposures for recorded transactions by using forward exchange contracts to reduce the risk that our future cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. We enter into forward sale or purchase contracts for foreign currencies to economically hedge specific cash, receivables or payables positions denominated in foreign currencies.
Changes in fair value of derivatives entered into to mitigate the foreign exchange risks related to these balance sheet items are recorded in other income (expense) together with the transaction gain or loss from the respective balance sheet position as follows (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency loss, inclusive of the impact of derivatives | $ | (723 | ) | $ | (927 | ) | $ | (953 | ) | $ | (1,526 | ) |
Cash Flow Hedges
We use zero cost collar contracts and option contracts to hedge certain anticipated foreign currency exchange transactions. The foreign exchange hedging structure may extend, generally, up to a twenty-four month time horizon. The hedging transactions we undertake primarily limit our exposure to changes in the U.S. dollar/euro and the U.S. dollar/Czech koruna exchange rate. The zero cost collar contract hedges are designed to protect us as the U.S. dollar weakens, but also provide us with some flexibility if the dollar strengthens.
These derivatives meet the criteria to be designated as hedges and, accordingly, we record the change in fair value of the effective portion of these hedge contracts relating to anticipated transactions in other comprehensive income rather than net income until the underlying hedged transaction affects net income. Gains and losses resulting from the ineffective portion of the hedge contracts, if any, are recognized as a component of net income. Gains and losses related to cash flow derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments are recorded as a component of net income.
16
Summary
Our derivative instruments are subject to master netting arrangements and are presented net in our balance sheet. We do not have any financial collateral related to these netting arrangements. The effect of these netting arrangements on our balance sheet is as follows (in thousands):
Offsetting of Derivative Assets | Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets | Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet | Net Amounts Presented in Other Current Assets | Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities | Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet | Net Amounts Presented in Other Current Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts designated as hedging instruments | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,528 | $ | (985 | ) | $ | 1,543 | ||||||
Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments | 373 | (107 | ) | 266 | 2,073 | (418 | ) | 1,655 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 373 | $ | (107 | ) | $ | 266 | $ | 4,601 | $ | (1,403 | ) | $ | 3,198 |
Offsetting of Derivative Assets | Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 | Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets | Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet | Net Amounts Presented in Other Current Assets | Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities | Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet | Net Amounts Presented in Other Current Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts designated as hedging instruments | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,362 | $ | (3,042 | ) | $ | 1,320 | ||||||
Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments | 2,171 | (698 | ) | 1,473 | 2,916 | (1,650 | ) | 1,266 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,171 | $ | (698 | ) | $ | 1,473 | $ | 7,278 | $ | (4,692 | ) | $ | 2,586 |
The effect of derivative instruments was as follows (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Contracts in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | |||||||||||
Amount of gain/(loss): | |||||||||||||||
Recognized in AOCI (effective portion) | $ | (2,057 | ) | $ | (1,131 | ) | $ | (4,259 | ) | $ | (2,930 | ) | |||
Reclassified from AOCI into revenue (effective portion) | 9 | — | 46 | — | |||||||||||
Reclassified from AOCI into cost of sales (effective portion) | (1,096 | ) | (283 | ) | (1,666 | ) | (580 | ) | |||||||
Recognized in other, net (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) | (9 | ) | (21 | ) | (9 | ) | (46 | ) | |||||||
Foreign Exchange Contracts Not in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | |||||||||||||||
Amount of gain/(loss): | |||||||||||||||
Recognized in other, net | $ | (636 | ) | $ | 2,324 | $ | (3,745 | ) | $ | 3,091 |
The unrealized losses at June 29, 2014 are expected to be reclassified to net income during the next eighteen months as a result of the underlying hedged transactions also being recorded in net income.
NOTE 15. | CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME BY COMPONENT |
The following tables illustrate the disclosure of changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"), as well as details the effect of reclassifications out of AOCI on the line items in the Consolidated Statements of Operations by component (net of tax, in thousands):
17
Thirteen Weeks Ended June 29, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Items | Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges | Total | |||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance | $ | 48,972 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (536 | ) | $ | (1,394 | ) | $ | 47,032 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | (1,863 | ) | 39 | 17 | (1,022 | ) | (2,829 | ) | |||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to: | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | — | — | — | (9 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | — | — | — | 1,096 | 1,096 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) | — | — | — | 9 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Total reclassifications out of AOCI | — | — | — | 1,096 | 1,096 | ||||||||||||||
Net current period other comprehensive income | (1,863 | ) | 39 | 17 | 74 | (1,733 | ) | ||||||||||||
Ending balance | $ | 47,109 | $ | 29 | $ | (519 | ) | $ | (1,320 | ) | $ | 45,299 |
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 29, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Items | Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges | Total | |||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance | $ | 48,865 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (552 | ) | $ | (1,174 | ) | $ | 47,128 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | (1,756 | ) | 40 | 33 | (1,775 | ) | (3,458 | ) | |||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to: | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | — | — | — | (46 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | — | — | — | 1,666 | 1,666 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) | — | — | — | 9 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Total reclassifications out of AOCI | — | — | — | 1,629 | 1,629 | ||||||||||||||
Net current period other comprehensive income | (1,756 | ) | 40 | 33 | (146 | ) | (1,829 | ) | |||||||||||
Ending balance | $ | 47,109 | $ | 29 | $ | (519 | ) | $ | (1,320 | ) | $ | 45,299 |
Thirteen Weeks Ended June 30, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Items | Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges | Total | |||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance | $ | 23,176 | $ | 11 | $ | (834 | ) | $ | (1,122 | ) | $ | 21,231 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | 6,361 | (10 | ) | (56 | ) | 70 | 6,365 | ||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to: | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | — | — | — | 283 | 283 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) | — | — | — | 21 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
Total reclassifications out of AOCI | — | — | — | 304 | 304 | ||||||||||||||
Net current period other comprehensive income | 6,361 | (10 | ) | (56 | ) | 374 | 6,669 | ||||||||||||
Ending balance | $ | 29,537 | $ | 1 | $ | (890 | ) | $ | (748 | ) | $ | 27,900 |
18
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 30, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Items | Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities | Defined Benefit Pension Items | Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges | Total | |||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance | $ | 38,890 | $ | 4 | $ | (819 | ) | $ | 481 | $ | 38,556 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | (9,353 | ) | (3 | ) | (71 | ) | (1,855 | ) | (11,282 | ) | |||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to: | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | — | — | — | 580 | 580 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) | — | — | — | 46 | 46 | ||||||||||||||
Total reclassifications out of AOCI | — | — | — | 626 | 626 | ||||||||||||||
Net current period other comprehensive income | (9,353 | ) | (3 | ) | (71 | ) | (1,229 | ) | (10,656 | ) | |||||||||
Ending balance | $ | 29,537 | $ | 1 | $ | (890 | ) | $ | (748 | ) | $ | 27,900 |
NOTE 16. | FACTORING OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE |
We entered into agreements under which we sold a total of $2.8 million and $4 million of our accounts receivable at a discount to unrelated third party financiers without recourse during the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014, respectively. The transfers qualified for sales treatment and, accordingly, discounts related to the sale of the receivables, which were immaterial, were recorded on our Consolidated Statements of Operations as other expense. We sold $9.9 million of accounts receivable under these agreements during 2013.
NOTE 17. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
ASU 2014-09
On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard will become effective for us on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.
19
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that include guidance for revenue, earnings per share and bookings for the third quarter of 2014, revenue expectations for the remainder of 2014, the impact of certain items on our results for these periods and assumptions about tax rates. Factors that could affect these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: the global economic environment; lower than expected customer orders, including for recently-introduced products; potential weakness of the Science and Industry market segments; potential disruption in manufacturing or unexpected additional costs due to the transition from older to newer products; potential delayed or reduced governmental spending to support expected orders; potential disruption in the company's operations due to organizational changes; cyclical changes in the semiconductor industry, which is a major component of Industry market segment revenue; the relative mix of higher-margin and lower-margin products; potential for increased volatility resulting from larger sales transactions; risks associated with a high percentage of the company's revenue coming from "turns" business, when the order for a product is placed by the customer in the same quarter as the planned shipment, and risks associated with building and shipping a high percentage of the company’s quarterly revenue in the last month of the quarter; delays in meeting all accounting requirements for revenue recognition; fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, which can affect margins or the competitive pricing of our products; additional costs related to future merger and acquisition activity; failure of the company to achieve anticipated benefits of acquisitions and collaborations, including failure to achieve financial goals and integrate acquisitions successfully; reduced profitability due to failure to achieve or sustain margin improvement in service or product manufacturing; failure to achieve improved operational efficiency and other benefits from infrastructure investments and restructuring activities; changes to current restructuring activities, including greater than estimated costs, or potential additional restructurings and reorganizations; potential customer cancellations or requests to defer planned shipments; changes in backlog and the timing of shipments from backlog; inability to deploy products as expected or delays in shipping products due to technical problems or barriers, especially with regard to recently introduced TEM products; potential shipment or supply chain disruptions; and additional selling, general and administrative or research and development expenses.
From time to time, we also may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above include, but are not limited to, those discussed here and the risks discussed from time to time in our other public filings. All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on information available to us as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. You also should read the section titled “Risk Factors” included in Part II, Item 1A. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for factors that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Other factors could also adversely affect us.
Summary of Products and Segments
We are a leading supplier of scientific instruments and related services for nanoscale applications and solutions for industry and science. We report our revenue based on a group structure organization, which we categorize as the Industry Group and the Science Group.
Our products include transmission electron microscopes ("TEMs"); scanning electron microscopes ("SEMs"); DualBeamTM systems which combine a SEM and a focused ion beam system ("FIB") on a single platform; stand-alone FIBs; high-performance optical microscopes, three-dimensional modeling software, and service and components to support the products. TEMs provide the highest resolution images of samples and their internal structure, down to the atomic level. SEMs provide detailed images of the surface and shape of samples. Optical microscopes provide a wider field of view than SEMs and TEMs. DualBeams and FIBs image, manipulate, mill and deposit material for a variety of purposes, including preparation of samples for TEMs. Substantially all of these product categories are sold into all of our markets. Individual models of our products are increasingly designed to provide specific solutions and applications in each of our markets.
Our DualBeam systems include models that have wafer handling capability and are purchased by semiconductor equipment manufacturers (“wafer-level DualBeam systems”) and models that have small stages and are sold to customers in several markets (“small-stage DualBeam systems”).
Our significant research and development and manufacturing operations are located in Hillsboro, Oregon; Eindhoven, The Netherlands; and Brno, Czech Republic; and our software development is managed principally from Bordeaux, France. Our sales and service operations are conducted in the United States (U.S.) and approximately 50 other countries around the world. We also sell our products through independent agents, distributors and representatives in additional countries.
20
The Industry Group consists of customers in semiconductor integrated circuit manufacturing and related industries such as manufacturers of data storage equipment and other technologies, as well as customers in the natural resources industries including mining and oil and gas. The tools we develop for our Industry Group customers are generally aimed at improving their processes to increase overall yields, whether in a factory, at a mine or at an oil and gas rig. For the semiconductor market, our growth is driven by shrinking line widths and process nodes of 45 nanometers and smaller, increasing complexity in their materials such as high-k metal gates and low-k dielectrics and increasing device complexity such as 3D transistor architectures. Such products are used primarily in laboratories or near the fabrication line to speed new product development and increase yields by enabling 3D wafer metrology, defect analysis, root cause failure analysis and circuit edit for modifying device functionality. For the natural resource market, our products are used to increase yields in mining through automated mineralogy and in oil and gas exploration and laboratory analysis. We also provide support for products and customers within this group for the entire life cycle of a tool from installation through the warranty period, and after the warranty period through contract coverage or on a time and materials basis.
The Science Group includes universities, public and private research laboratories and customers in a wide range of industries, including metals, automobiles, aerospace, and forensics. The tools we develop for our customers in the Science Group are generally aimed at the exploration and discovery of new materials and chemistries or solving for causes and cures of diseases. The tools are used in a laboratory and are generally not used in industrial applications. The Science Group also includes customers at universities, government laboratories and research institutes engaged in biotech and life sciences applications, as well as pharmaceutical, biotech and medical device companies and hospitals. Growth in these markets is driven by global corporate and government funding for research and development and by development of new products and processes based on innovations at the nanoscale. Our solutions enable scientific discovery and advancement for researchers and help manufacturers develop, analyze and produce advanced products. Our products are also used in root cause failure analysis and quality control applications across a range of industries. Our products’ ultra-high resolution imaging allows structural biologists to create detailed 3D reconstructions of complex biological structures such as proteins and viruses. Cellular biologists use our tools to correlate wide-field, lower resolution optical images with higher resolution electron microscope imaging. Our products are also used by drug researchers and in particle analysis and a range of pathology and quality control applications. We also provide support for products and customers within this group for the entire life cycle of a tool from installation through the warranty period, and after the warranty period through contract coverage or on a time and materials basis.
Overview - Orders and Backlog
Orders received in a particular period that are not scheduled to be built and shipped to the customer in that period represent backlog. We only recognize backlog for purchase commitments for which the terms of the sale have been agreed upon, including price, configuration, options and payment terms. Purchase commitments may include letters of intent. Product backlog consists of all open orders meeting these criteria. Service backlog consists of open orders for service, unearned revenue on service contracts and open orders for spare parts. U.S. government backlog is limited to contracted amounts. In addition, some of the U.S. government backlog represents uncommitted funds. At June 29, 2014, our total backlog was $516.7 million, compared to $473.5 million in total backlog at December 31, 2013.
At June 29, 2014, our backlog consisted of $373.2 million of products and $143.5 million related to service, compared to product backlog of $349.3 million and service backlog of $124.2 million at December 31, 2013. Generally, at least 90% of our backlog is shippable within one year. Recently, we have seen a trend where our orders have longer lead times resulting in less backlog shippable in the near quarter and more in one quarter out. In addition, the size of individual orders has increased due to our customers ordering higher priced tools and multiple tool orders as well as multi-year service contracts. These factors may increase the volatility of our future revenue forecasts.
Customers may cancel or delay delivery on previously placed orders, although our standard terms and conditions include penalties for cancellations made close to the scheduled delivery date. As a result, the timing of the receipt of orders or the shipment of products could have a significant impact on our backlog at any date. Historically, cancellations have been low. There were no cancellations during the first twenty-six weeks of 2014 and we experienced cancellations of $4.2 million during all of 2013. From time to time, we have experienced difficulty in shipping our product from backlog due to single-sourcing issues and problems in securing electronic components from a certain vendor. In addition, product shipments have been extended due to delays in completing certain application development, by our customers pushing out shipments because their facilities are not ready to install our systems and by our own manufacturing delays due to the technical complexity of our products and supply chain issues. A significant portion of our backlog is denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and, therefore, our reported backlog fluctuates, to an extent, as a result of foreign currency exchange rate movements. For these reasons, the amount of backlog at any date is not necessarily indicative of revenue to be recognized in future periods.
21
Outlook for the Remainder of 2014
Based on our current backlog of unfilled orders, our pipeline of potential orders, conditions in each of our markets, the impact of new products that we have introduced in the last few years and our strategies and competitive positioning, we expect revenue to increase in the second half compared with the first half of 2014. For all of 2014, we expect revenue to grow compared to 2013.
Within the Industry Group, we expect growth in the semiconductor business. Our equipment has been used primarily in laboratories for new process development and yield improvement, and the increasing complexity and shrinking dimensions of the devices made by our customers have increased the demand for our workflow solutions. In addition, we have introduced products that are intended to move our tools closer to the production line. We believe our volume will increase in part due to demand for those products. Within the overall context of growth, the timing of orders and revenue growth from quarter to quarter will depend on capital spending commitments by major customers.
Our Industry Group also includes, to a much lesser extent, sales to companies in the mining and oil and gas markets. Orders from mining company customers remain constrained due to market conditions affecting their business. We continue to reorient our oil and gas business toward reservoir characterization where we believe there is substantial opportunity. As part of that strategy, in the first quarter of 2014 we acquired Lithicon AS, a provider of digital rock technology services and pore-scale micro computed tomography (µCT, or microCT) equipment to oil and gas companies worldwide, and we have begun the integration of Lithicon with our existing operations for oil and gas customers. While we believe this strategy will better position us to introduce new products and address new markets, we do not expect it to materially impact our revenues until after 2014. In addition, we are experiencing a decline in revenue from customers in mining and we are de-emphasizing our products for mining.
Within the Science Group, sales of our products to customers engaged in materials research have historically driven the largest portion of revenues. Sales to these customers were relatively weak in the first quarter but orders recovered somewhat in the second quarter. We expect improved revenue performance in the second half of 2014. In addition, we also expect increasing contribution in the second half from new products introduced last year.
Sales to customers engaged in structural and cell biology research were up in the first half of 2014 compared with last year, continuing the growth that developed at the end of 2013. The primary driver of this growth has been increased penetration of electron microscopy into structural biology applications and adoption of our products in correlative microscopy for cell biology. While we may experience variation from quarter to quarter, we expect revenues from customers in the biological sciences to continue to grow.
Gross margin decreased by 50 basis points from the first half of 2013 to the first half 2014. The decrease was principally caused by inventory write-offs related to our realignment activities and to a certain number of orders that had lower margins. We are seeking continued gross margin improvement in 2014. In addition to increasing our proportion of newer, higher-margin products and higher-margin application-specific products, we expect lower costs from continued sourcing improvements and initial production from our new leased facility in the Czech Republic, which is scheduled to open in the third quarter of 2014.
Operating expenses are expected to increase in the second half of 2014 due to recent acquisitions, the increase of sales and service personnel, increased spending for research and development and higher stock-based compensation expense. We will also incur additional costs of approximately $18 million as part of our realignment plan announced in the second quarter of 2014 and moving costs associated with our new facility in the Czech Republic. These realignment expenses are expected to reduce operating expenses by approximately $10 million annually beginning in 2015.
Growth in net income for the remainder of 2014 will be primarily dependent on expected increases in revenue and further improvements in gross margin, although it will be impacted by the realignment expenses previously discussed.
Please see the risk factors listed in Part II, Item 1A. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the risk factors that could cause our results to vary from this Outlook for the remainder of 2014.
Critical Accounting Policies and the Use of Estimates
Preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We believe the most complex and sensitive judgments, because of their significance to the Consolidated Financial Statements, result primarily from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K describe the significant accounting estimates and policies used in preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results in these areas could differ from management’s estimates. During the first twenty-six weeks of 2014, there were no significant changes in our critical accounting policies or estimates from those reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2014.
22
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth our statement of operations data, in absolute dollars and as a percentage(1) of consolidated net sales (dollars in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirteen Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 236,955 | 100.0 | % | $ | 222,478 | 100.0 | % | |||||
Cost of sales | 127,104 | 53.6 | 115,581 | 52.0 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 109,851 | 46.4 | 106,897 | 48.0 | |||||||||
Research and development | 26,221 | 11.1 | 25,413 | 11.4 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 50,587 | 21.3 | 42,639 | 19.2 | |||||||||
Restructuring, reorganization, relocation and severance | 2,228 | 0.9 | 395 | 0.2 | |||||||||
Operating income | 30,815 | 13.0 | 38,450 | 17.3 | |||||||||
Other expense, net | (806 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (1,452 | ) | (0.7 | ) | |||||
Income before income taxes | 30,009 | 12.7 | 36,998 | 16.6 | |||||||||
Income tax expense | 5,061 | 2.1 | 7,005 | 3.1 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 24,948 | 10.5 | % | $ | 29,993 | 13.5 | % |
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 463,220 | 100.0 | % | $ | 443,667 | 100.0 | % | |||||
Cost of sales | 247,044 | 53.3 | 234,219 | 52.8 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 216,176 | 46.7 | 209,448 | 47.2 | |||||||||
Research and development | 51,866 | 11.2 | 50,222 | 11.3 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 99,050 | 21.4 | 86,163 | 19.4 | |||||||||
Restructuring, reorganization, relocation and severance | 3,559 | 0.8 | 1,090 | 0.2 | |||||||||
Operating income | 61,701 | 13.3 | 71,973 | 16.2 | |||||||||
Other expense, net | (1,076 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (2,957 | ) | (0.7 | ) | |||||
Income before income taxes | 60,625 | 13.1 | 69,016 | 15.6 | |||||||||
Income tax expense | 10,599 | 2.3 | 12,222 | 2.8 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 50,026 | 10.8 | % | $ | 56,794 | 12.8 | % |
___________________________
(1) | Percentages may not add due to rounding. |
Net Sales
Net sales increased $14.5 million, or 6.5%, to $237.0 million in the thirteen week period ended June 29, 2014 (the second quarter of 2014) compared to $222.5 million in the thirteen week period ended June 30, 2013 (the second quarter of 2013). Revenue from acquired businesses increased net sales by $3.1 million, or 1.4%, in the thirteen week period ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same period of 2013.
Net sales increased $19.6 million, or 4.4%, to $463.2 million in the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014 compared to $443.7 million in the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2013. Revenue from acquired businesses increased net sales by $5.6 million, or 1.3%, in the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same period of 2013.
Currency fluctuations decreased net sales by $0.4 million, or 0.2%, and increased net sales by $0.3 million, or 0.1%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013. Strengthening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies generally has the effect of decreasing net sales and backlog.
The factors affecting net sales are discussed in more detail in the Net Sales by Segment discussion below.
23
Net Sales by Segment
Net sales by market segment (in thousands) and as a percentage of net sales were as follows:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Industry Group | $ | 127,225 | 53.7 | % | $ | 103,702 | 46.6 | % | |||||
Science Group | 109,730 | 46.3 | 118,776 | 53.4 | |||||||||
Consolidated net sales | $ | 236,955 | 100.0 | % | $ | 222,478 | 100.0 | % |
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Industry Group | $ | 233,664 | 50.4 | % | $ | 202,766 | 45.7 | % | |||||
Science Group | 229,556 | 49.6 | 240,901 | 54.3 | |||||||||
Consolidated net sales | $ | 463,220 | 100.0 | % | $ | 443,667 | 100.0 | % |
Industry Group
The $23.5 million, or 22.7%, increase and the $30.9 million, or 15.2%, increase, respectively, in Industry Group sales in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013 were primarily due to increased sales to semiconductor customers, mainly as a result of their ongoing investment in advanced technologies and the continued adoption of our near-line product solutions. This increase was partially offset by reduced demand for our products from oil and gas customers and continued weakness in the mining sector driven by lower commodity prices and a corresponding reduction in capital spending.
Currency fluctuations decreased Industry Group revenue by $1.2 million, or 1.1%, and by $1.2 million, or 0.6%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013. Revenue from acquired businesses increased Industry Group revenue by $2.1 million, or 2.0%, and by $3.1 million, or 1.5%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
Science Group
The $9.0 million, or 7.6%, decrease and the $11.3 million, or 4.7%, decrease, respectively, in Science Group sales in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013 were primarily driven by decreased revenue from high-end, high-resolution systems sold to research and science customers globally. The decrease was partially offset by increased demand for our structural and cell biology applications solutions, and increased revenue from our installed base.
Currency fluctuations increased Science Group revenue by $0.8 million, or 0.7%, and increased Science Group revenue by $1.4 million, or 0.6%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013. Revenue from acquired businesses increased Science Group revenue by $1.0 million, or 0.8%, and increased Science Group revenue by $2.5 million, or 1.0%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
Net Sales by Geographic Region
Most of our net sales are derived from customers outside of the U.S., which we expect to continue. The following tables show our net sales by geographic region (dollars in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
U.S. and Canada | $ | 80,463 | 34.0 | % | $ | 61,413 | 27.6 | % | |||||
Europe | 63,561 | 26.8 | 70,538 | 31.7 | |||||||||
Asia-Pacific Region and Rest of World | 92,931 | 39.2 | 90,527 | 40.7 | |||||||||
Consolidated net sales | $ | 236,955 | 100.0 | % | $ | 222,478 | 100.0 | % |
24
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
U.S. and Canada | $ | 152,729 | 33.0 | % | $ | 130,122 | 29.3 | % | |||||
Europe | 130,603 | 28.2 | 136,211 | 30.7 | |||||||||
Asia-Pacific Region and Rest of World | 179,888 | 38.8 | 177,334 | 40.0 | |||||||||
Consolidated net sales | $ | 463,220 | 100.0 | % | $ | 443,667 | 100.0 | % |
U.S. and Canada
The $19.1 million, or 31.0%, increase and the $22.6 million, or 17.4%, increase, respectively, in sales to the U.S. and Canada in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013 were primarily due to increased sales to customers engaged in semiconductor manufacturing, structural and cell biology research, and materials research. We also saw increased service revenue from our installed base.
Europe
Our European region also includes Central America, South America, Africa (excluding South Africa), the Middle East and Russia.
Sales to Europe decreased $7.0 million, or 9.9%, and decreased $5.6 million, or 4.1%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013, primarily as a result of lower revenues from semiconductor manufacturing customers as their demand shifts to the Asia-Pacific region. The decrease was offset by increased purchases from research customers in the thirteen week period, and by structural and cell biology customers in the twenty-six week period. Revenue from our installed base increased in both the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014. Currency fluctuations increased sales to Europe by $1.7 million, or 2.4%, and increased sales to Europe by $4.9 million, or 3.6%, respectively, during the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
Asia-Pacific Region and Rest of World
The $2.4 million, or 2.7%, increase and the $2.6 million, or 1.4%, increase, respectively, in sales to the Asia-Pacific Region and Rest of World in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013 were largely due to increased purchases by our semiconductor customers as the region continues to expand manufacturing capacity. The increase was offset by declines in sales to customers engaged in research activities in Japan. Currency fluctuations, specifically the weakening of the dollar against the yen, decreased sales to this region by $2.1 million, or 2.3%, and decreased sales to this region by $4.6 million, or 2.6%, respectively, during the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
Cost of Sales and Gross Margin
Our gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of net sales) by segment was as follows:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||
Industry Group | 50.4 | % | 51.9 | % | 51.5 | % | 51.4 | % | |||
Science Group | 41.7 | 44.7 | 41.8 | 43.6 | |||||||
Overall | 46.4 | 48.0 | 46.7 | 47.2 |
Cost of sales includes manufacturing costs, such as materials, labor (both direct and indirect) and factory overhead, as well as all of the costs of our customer service function such as labor, materials, travel and overhead. The four primary drivers affecting gross margin include: product mix, operational efficiencies, competitive pricing pressure and currency movements.
Cost of sales increased $11.5 million, or 10.0%, to $127.1 million in the thirteen week period ended June 29, 2014 compared to $115.6 million in the thirteen week period ended June 30, 2013 and increased $12.8 million, or 5.5%, to $247.0 million in the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014 compared to $234.2 million in the comparable period of 2013, due primarily to higher sales volume, higher costs on several transactions, write-offs of excess and obsolete inventory associated with our realignment plan and a change in product mix of systems sold. Currency fluctuations increased cost of sales by $1.5 million, or 1.3% and by $3.4 million, or 1.5%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
Currency fluctuations reduced gross margin by $1.8 million, or 0.7 percentage points, and by $3.1 million, or 0.7 percentage points, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
25
Industry Group
The Industry Group gross margin percentage declined by 1.5 percentage points and was essentially flat during the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2013. The decrease is primarily due to lower margins on higher resolution systems sold to our semiconductor customers, as well as on lower resolution systems sold to mining, oil and gas customers. We also saw reduced margins on liquidation of certain older product models and on revenue earned from our installed base, and we incurred write-offs of excess and obsolete inventory associated with our realignment plan. Currency fluctuations decreased Industry Group gross margin by $1.6 million, or 0.8 percentage points, and by $2.1 million, or 0.6 percentage points, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
Science Group
The decrease in Science Group gross margin in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013 was due primarily to reduced margins on higher resolution systems sold to our structural and cell biology customers and write-offs of excess and obsolete inventory associated with our realignment plan. Currency fluctuations decreased Science Group gross margin by $0.2 million, or 0.5 percentage points, and by $1.1 million, or 0.7 percentage points, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
Research and Development Costs
Research and Development (“R&D”) costs include labor, materials, overhead and payments to third parties for research and development of new products and new software or enhancements to existing products and software and are expensed as incurred. We periodically receive funds from various organizations to subsidize our research and development. These funds are reported as an offset to research and development expense. During the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014, and for the comparable periods in 2013, we received subsidies from European governments for technological developments primarily for semiconductor and life sciences equipment.
R&D costs, net of subsidies, were as follows (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-Six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2014 | June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Gross spending | $ | 27,588 | $ | 26,924 | $ | 54,171 | $ | 53,055 | |||||||
Less subsidies | (1,367 | ) | (1,511 | ) | (2,305 | ) | (2,833 | ) | |||||||
Net expense | $ | 26,221 | $ | 25,413 | $ | 51,866 | $ | 50,222 |
R&D costs increased $0.8 million, or 3.2%, and $1.6 million, or 3.3%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013 primarily due to increased labor costs and project spending focused on support of current growth opportunities, inclusion of R&D costs from acquired companies, and reduced subsidies from European governments. Currency fluctuations increased R&D costs by $0.6 million, or 2.3%, and increased R&D costs by $1.1 million, or 2.2%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
We anticipate investing between 10% and 11% of revenue in R&D for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, as revenues increase, we expect R&D expenditures will also increase. Actual future spending, however, will depend on market conditions.
Selling, General and Administrative Costs
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) costs include labor, travel, outside services and overhead incurred in our sales, marketing, management and administrative support functions. SG&A costs also include sales commissions paid to our employees as well as to our agents.
SG&A costs increased $7.9 million, or 18.6%, to $50.6 million in the thirteen week period ended June 29, 2014 compared to $42.6 million in the thirteen week period ended June 30, 2013 and increased $12.9 million, or 15.0%, to $99.1 million in the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014 compared to $86.2 million in the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to the acceleration of an acquisition-related earn-out and site consolidation costs related to our realignment plan, increased headcount, higher stock-based compensation cost, additional depreciation, and the inclusion of SG&A costs of our acquired companies. Currency fluctuations increased SG&A costs by $0.6 million, or 1.2%, and increased SG&A costs by $1.1 million, or 1.2%, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013.
26
Restructuring, Reorganization, Relocation and Severance
Second Quarter 2014 Realignment
During the second quarter of 2014 we began to implement a resource realignment plan that will cause us to incur expenses during the remainder of 2014. The realignment plan aims to improve our operational efficiency by eliminating redundancies in sites and personnel resulting from recent acquisitions and expansion activities. We intend to shift our resources to growing regions, such as Asia, and potential growth markets, such as structural biology, oil and gas, near-line semiconductor processing and metals research, and expect the realignment plan to better position us to pursue our growth strategy. The realignment plan activities currently include the consolidation of our three Australia sites in Canberra; the closure of our facility in Delmont, Pennsylvania and relocation of such operations to our new facility in the Czech Republic; relocation of our Japan demonstration facility to our Shanghai facility; selective reductions in staffing, relocations and compensation adjustments related to the foregoing activities and other realignment of management resources.
During the second quarter of 2014, we incurred approximately $2.2 million of severance and site relocation costs, $2.5 million related to acceleration of acquisition-related earn-out, $0.5 million for impairment and other asset write-offs, and $0.7 million for inventory write-offs related to the realignment plan. These costs have been recorded in the second quarter of 2014 in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows: $0.7 million in cost of sales, $3.0 million in selling, general and administrative expenses and $2.2 million in restructuring, reorganization, relocation, and severance expenses. For the remainder of 2014, we expect to incur additional costs of approximately $18.0 million, including costs to move to our new facility in the Czech Republic, most of which are expected to be cash expenditures. The total cost of the realignment plan is estimated to be approximately $24.0 million, with all costs to be incurred during 2014. Savings from the realignment plan are expected to be approximately $10.0 million on an annual basis.
First Quarter 2014 Restructuring
During the first quarter of 2014 we engaged in a restructuring plan principally aimed at consolidating our sales force in Europe. The $1.3 million cost incurred in implementing the restructuring plan primarily consisted of severance and other employee termination related costs, and was incurred during the first quarter of 2014. We do not expect to incur any additional costs under this plan. Savings from this plan are expected to be approximately $1.8 million on an annual basis.
Group Structure Reorganization
In January 2013, we announced our intention to reorganize the company into a group structure in order to enable us to efficiently execute our growth strategy. The reorganization was completed in the first quarter of 2013. The costs associated with the reorganization consisted primarily of severance costs and resulted in the termination of certain positions throughout the company. In anticipation of this reorganization, we incurred $2.9 million of costs during the fourth quarter of 2012, and recorded $1.1 million of severance costs during 2013, for a total cost of $4.0 million. We do not expect to incur any additional costs under this reorganization plan.
For information regarding the related accrued liability, see Note 12 of the Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net includes interest income, interest expense, foreign currency transaction gains and losses and other miscellaneous items.
Interest income represents interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities and totaled $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 and $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in the comparable periods of 2013. The increases in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 compared to the same periods of 2013 were primarily due to mix in investment balances.
Interest expense was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 and $0.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in the comparable periods of 2013. The decreases in interest expense related primarily to our 2.875% convertible notes, which converted to common stock on June 1, 2013.
Other, net primarily consists of foreign currency gains and losses on transactions and realized and unrealized gains and losses on the changes in fair value of derivative contracts entered into to hedge these transactions.
27
Income Tax Expense
Our effective income tax rates for the twenty-six week periods ended June 29, 2014 and June 30, 2013 were 16.9% and 17.5%, respectively, and reflected taxes accrued in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. The tax rate in the thirteen week period ended June 29, 2014 is lower than the comparable period in 2013 due to the reduction of unrecognized tax benefits for settlements with tax authorities.
Our effective tax rate may differ from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate primarily as a result of the effects of state and foreign income taxes, research and development tax credits earned in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, adjustments to our unrecognized tax benefits and our ability or inability to utilize various carry forward tax items. In addition, our effective income tax rate may be affected by changes in statutory tax rates and laws in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions and other factors.
As of June 29, 2014, total unrecognized tax benefits were $23.4 million and related primarily to uncertainty surrounding tax credits, transfer pricing and permanent establishment. All unrecognized tax benefits would decrease the effective tax rate if recognized.
Our net deferred tax assets totaled $6.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively, at June 29, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets totaled $4.5 million and $2.7 million as of June 29, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The increase is due to additional valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets recorded as part of the Lithicon acquisition. We continue to record a valuation allowance against a portion of U.S. and foreign deferred tax assets, as we do not believe it is more likely than not that we will be able to utilize the deferred tax assets in future periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our sources of liquidity and capital resources as of June 29, 2014 consisted of $417.5 million of cash, cash equivalents, short-term restricted cash and short-term investments, $57.6 million in non-current investments, $35.1 million of long-term restricted cash, $100.0 million available under revolving credit facilities, as well as potential future cash flows from operations. At June 29, 2014 $215.7 million of our $510.2 million in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and investments, including long-term restricted cash, was located outside of the United States. Although we do not intend to do so, repatriation of these funds would subject us to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries where funds are held. Restricted cash relates to deposits to secure bank guarantees for customer prepayments that expire through 2019.
We believe that we have sufficient cash resources and available credit lines to meet our expected operational and capital needs for at least the next twelve months from June 29, 2014.
In the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014, cash and cash equivalents and short-term restricted cash decreased $111.4 million to $291.5 million from $403.0 million as of December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of $23.3 million used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, dividends paid on common stock of $10.1 million, the net purchase of marketable securities of $27.9 million, the purchase of Lithicon for $65.0 million, the repurchase of common stock for $30.5 million, and an increase in restricted cash of $3.2 million. These factors were partially offset by $44.4 million provided by operations and $7.9 million of proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options.
Accounts receivable increased $30.8 million to $225.2 million as of June 29, 2014 from $194.4 million as of December 31, 2013. This increase was primarily due to the timing of shipments. The June 29, 2014 balance included a $2.0 million increase related to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Our days sales outstanding, calculated on a quarterly basis, was 87 days at June 29, 2014 and 81days at June 30, 2013.
Inventories increased $14.0 million to $195.7 million as of June 29, 2014 compared to $181.7 million as of December 31, 2013, mainly due to plans to increase sales volumes in the second half of 2014. The June 29, 2014 balance included a $3.0 million increase related to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Our annualized inventory turnover rate, calculated on a quarterly basis, was 2.0 times for the quarter ended June 29, 2014 and 1.9 times for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.
Deferred tax assets, current and long term, net of deferred tax liabilities, decreased $1.3 million to $6.6 million as of June 29, 2014 compared to $7.9 million as of December 31, 2013 primarily from the inclusion of additional deferred tax liabilities from our newly acquired companies, offset by additional deferred tax assets for accrued liabilities and stock-based compensation.
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment of $23.3 million and transfers to fixed assets from inventories of $2.7 million in the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2014 primarily consisted of payments for equipment related to the build-out of our leased Brno facility and demonstration equipment.
Accounts payable increased $14.7 million to $88.0 million as of June 29, 2014 compared to $73.2 million as of December 31, 2013, primarily due to accrued purchases of equipment related to the build-out of the new leased facility in Brno and increased purchases of inventory in anticipation of increased sales volumes in the second half of 2014.
28
Accrued payroll liabilities decreased $4.0 million to $41.1 million as of June 29, 2014 compared to $45.1 million as of December 31, 2013, primarily due to the payout of employee incentive compensation.
Other Credit Facilities and Letters of Credit
We have a $100.0 million secured revolving credit facility, including a $50.0 million subfacility for the issuance of letters of credit. The credit agreement expires April 1, 2016. We may, upon notice to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., the Administrative Agent (the "Agent"), request to increase the revolving loan commitments by an aggregate amount of up to $50.0 million with new or additional commitments subject only to the consent of the lender(s) providing the new or additional commitments, for a total secured credit facility of up to $150.0 million. There were no amounts outstanding under this facility as of June 29, 2014.
On July 3, 2014, we entered into the Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the "Third Amendment") with the Agent, various lenders (the "Lenders") and certain other parties. Among other things, the Third Amendment amended the Credit Agreement to increase the permitted amount of restricted payments, subject to certain conditions and certain technical amendments.
We mitigate credit risk by transacting with highly rated counterparties. We have evaluated the credit and non-performance risks associated with our lenders and believe them to be insignificant.
As part of our contracts with certain customers, we are required to provide letters of credit or bank guarantees which these customers can draw against in the event we do not perform in accordance with our contractual obligations. Restricted cash balances securing bank guarantees that expire within 12 months of the balance sheet date are recorded as a current asset on our consolidated balance sheets. Restricted cash balances securing bank guarantees that expire beyond 12 months from the balance sheet date are recorded as long-term restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheets.
The following table sets forth information related to guarantees and letters of credit (in thousands):
June 29, 2014 | |||
Guarantees and letters of credit outstanding | $ | 54,391 | |
Amount secured by restricted cash deposits: | |||
Current | $ | 19,176 | |
Long-term | 35,075 | ||
Total secured by restricted cash | $ | 54,251 |
Share Repurchase Plan
A plan to repurchase up to a total of 4.0 million shares of our common stock was approved by our Board of Directors in September 2010, re-authorized in December 2012, and does not have an expiration date. The amount and timing of specific repurchases are subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The purchases are funded from existing cash resources and may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our discretion without prior notice.
During the second quarter of 2014 we repurchased 373,938 shares for a total of $30.5 million, or an average of $81.51 per share. We did not repurchase any shares during the first quarter of 2014 or the second quarter or the first twenty-six weeks of 2013. As of June 29, 2014, 1,745,862 shares remained available for purchase pursuant to this plan.
See the section titled "Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds" in Part II, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information on the Share Repurchase Plan.
Dividends to Shareholders
In June 2012 we announced our plan to initiate a quarterly dividend and our Board of Directors has declared dividends each quarter since the plan's inception. During the second quarter of 2014, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.25 per share of common stock. Dividend payments during the first twenty-six weeks of 2014 totaled $10.1 million. The declaration and payment of dividends to shareholders in the future is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 17 of the Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.
29
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
30
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
There have been no material changes in our reported market risks and risk management policies since the filing of our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2014.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation and under the supervision of our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
31
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
We are involved in various legal proceedings and receive claims from time to time, arising in the normal course of our business activities, including claims for alleged infringement or violation of intellectual property rights. We are not a party to any litigation that is expected to have a significant effect on our operations or business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
A description of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business is set forth below. You should carefully consider such risks and uncertainties, together with the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other public filings. If any of such risks and uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could differ materially from the plans, projections and other forward-looking statements included in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other public filings and public disclosures. In addition, if any of the following risks and uncertainties, or if any other risks and uncertainties, actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be harmed substantially, which could cause the market price of our stock to decline, perhaps significantly.
We operate in highly competitive industries, and we cannot be certain that we will be able to compete successfully in such industries.
The industries in which we operate are intensely competitive. Established companies, both domestic and foreign, compete with us in each of our product lines. Some of our competitors have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do and may price their products very aggressively. In addition, these competitors may be willing to operate at a less profitable level than at which we would expect to operate. Our significant competitors include, among others: JEOL Ltd., Carl Zeiss SMT A.G., Hitachi High Technologies Corporation and Tescan, a.s. In addition, some of our competitors have formed collaborative relationships and otherwise may cooperate with each other.
The identity and composition of our competitors may change as we increase our focus on application-specific workflows and new market opportunities, such as the oil and gas services sector. As we expand into new markets, we will face competition not only from our existing competitors, but also from other competitors, including companies with stronger technological, marketing and sales positions in those markets.
Our customers must make a substantial investment to install and integrate capital equipment into their laboratories and process applications. For example, once a manufacturer has selected a particular vendor’s capital equipment, the manufacturer generally relies on that equipment for a specific production line or process control application and frequently will attempt to consolidate its other capital equipment requirements with the same vendor. Accordingly, if a particular customer selects a competitor’s capital equipment, we expect to experience difficulty selling to that customer for a significant period of time.
Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors both within and outside of our control, including:
• | price; |
• | product quality; |
• | breadth of product line; |
• | system performance; |
• | ease of use; |
• | type and breadth of product applications; |
• | cost of ownership; |
• | global technical service and support; |
• | success in developing or otherwise introducing new products; and |
• | foreign currency fluctuations. |
We cannot be certain that we will be able to compete successfully on these or other factors, which could negatively impact our revenues, gross margins and net income in the future.
32
Because many of our shipments occur in the last month of a quarter, we are at risk of one or more transactions not being delivered according to forecast.
We have historically shipped approximately 75% of our products in the last month of each quarter. In addition, we rely on a significant amount of turns business (revenue from tools booked and sold in the same quarter) in any given quarter. As any one sale may be significant to meeting our quarterly sales projection (as our average selling price for a tool is over $1 million), any slippage of shipments into a subsequent quarter may result in our not meeting our quarterly sales projection, which may adversely impact our results of operations for the quarter.
Because we have significant operations outside of the U.S., we are subject to political, economic and other international conditions that could result in increased operating expenses and regulation of our products and increased difficulty in maintaining operating and financial controls.
Because a significant portion of our operations occur outside of the U.S., our revenues and expenses are impacted by foreign economic and regulatory conditions. Approximately 67%, 71% and 67% of our sales came from outside the U.S. in the first twenty-six weeks of 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our sales to China have grown considerably in recent years. We have manufacturing facilities in Brno, Czech Republic, Eindhoven, The Netherlands and Munich, Germany and sales offices in many other countries. Over 80% of our products are manufactured in Europe.
Moreover, we operate in over 50 countries, including in 25 where we have a direct presence, and we are seeking to establish a direct presence in additional countries. Some of our global operations are geographically isolated, are distant from corporate headquarters and/or have little infrastructure support. Therefore, maintaining and enforcing operating and financial controls can be difficult. Failure to maintain or enforce controls could have a material adverse effect on our control over service inventories, quality of service, customer relationships and financial reporting.
Our exposure to the business risks presented by foreign economies will increase to the extent we continue to expand our global operations. International operations will continue to subject us to a number of risks, including:
• | longer sales cycles; |
• | multiple, conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations; |
• | protectionist laws and business practices that favor local companies; |
• | price and currency exchange rates and controls; |
• | taxes and tariffs; |
• | export restrictions; |
• | business practices that we are prohibited from engaging in by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-corruption laws and regulations; |
• | difficulties in collecting accounts receivable; |
• | travel and transportation difficulties resulting from actual or perceived health or other risks; |
• | changes in the regulatory environment in countries where we do business, which could lead to delays in the importation of products into those countries; |
• | the implementation and administration of the Control of Electronic Information Products (often referred to as China RoHS) regulations could lead to delays in the importation of products into China; |
• | European Union Regulation of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) which could create problems in manufacture and delivery of certain products in Europe; |
• | political and economic instability (e.g. unrest in Mexico, Egypt, the Middle East and Eastern Europe); |
• | risk of failure of internal controls and failure to detect unauthorized transactions; and |
• | potential labor unrest. |
The industries in which we sell our products are cyclical, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate.
Our business depends in large part on the capital expenditures of customers within our Industry Group and Science Group. See “Net Sales by Segment” included in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.
33
The largest part of the Industry Group is the semiconductor industry. This industry is cyclical and has experienced significant economic downturns at various times in the last decade. Such downturns have been characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of average selling prices and production overcapacity. A downturn in this industry, or the businesses of one or more of our customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. During downturns, our sales and gross profit margins generally decline.
The Science Group is also affected by overall economic conditions, but is not as cyclical as the Industry Group.
A significant portion of our Science Group revenue is dependent on government investments in, and tax credits for, research and development of new technology. To the extent that governments, especially in Europe or the U.S., reduce their spending in response to budget deficits and debt limitations, demand for our products could be affected. To date, we have not seen an impact from such actions, although the U.S. government has indicated that it plans to reduce funding for research. The funding cycles for our customers tend to extend over multiple quarters and several countries have reaffirmed their commitment to scientific research, but the longer-term impact of potential government fiscal austerity measures on our growth rate cannot be determined at this time.
As a capital equipment provider, our revenues depend in large part on the spending patterns of our customers, who could delay expenditures or cancel orders in reaction to variations in their businesses or general economic conditions. Because a high proportion of our costs are fixed, we have a limited ability to reduce expenses quickly in response to revenue shortfalls. In a prolonged economic downturn, we may not be able to reduce our significant fixed costs, such as manufacturing overhead, capital equipment or research and development costs, which may cause our gross margins to erode and our net loss to increase or earnings to decline.
Our acquisition and investment strategy subjects us to risks associated with evaluating and pursuing these opportunities and integrating these businesses.
In addition to our efforts to develop new technologies from internal sources, we may also seek to acquire new technologies or operations from external sources. On August 9, 2013 we acquired nanoTechnology Systems Pty. Ltd. of Melbourne, Australia, which previously operated as our exclusive distributor in Australia and New Zealand for approximately 10 years. On February 5, 2014 we acquired Lithicon AS, a provider of digital rock technology services and pore-scale micro computed tomography equipment to oil and gas companies worldwide. We continue to work to integrate these new entities.
Acquisitions can involve numerous risks, including management issues and costs in connection with the integration of the operations and personnel, technologies and products of the acquired companies, legal and intellectual property issues, failure to properly integrate acquisitions, the possible write-downs of impaired assets and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies. The inability to effectively manage any of these risks could seriously harm our business. Additionally, difficulties in integrating our acquisitions into our internal control structure could result in a failure of our internal control over financial reporting, which, in turn, could create a material weakness.
To the extent we make investments in entities that we control, or have significant influence in, our financial results will reflect our proportionate share of the financial results of the entity.
We may suffer manufacturing capacity limitations on occasion.
Recently, demand for our product has accelerated and, as orders increase, we may not be able to ramp our manufacturing capacity and supply chain fast enough to keep pace with order intake for every product line offered. As a consequence, our ability to realize revenue on orders may be delayed or, in some cases, reduced and we may suffer cancellations. In addition, the quality of the products we ship may suffer, damaging our reputation and future sales.
The relocation of a portion of our manufacturing operations to a new leased facility may involve significant costs and risks of operational interruption and product quality.
We are in the process of moving our operations in the Czech Republic to a new leased facility. Our current facility accounts for over half of the total product shipments each quarter. Moving product manufacturing includes, among others, the following risks:
• | unanticipated additional costs connected to such moves; |
• | higher than expected employee attrition; |
• | delay or failure in being able to build the transferred product at the new facility; |
• | unanticipated additional labor and materials costs related to the move; |
• | logistical issues arising from the move; and |
• | product quality falling short of the product standard when manufactured at the prior location. |
Any of these factors could cause us to miss product orders, cause a decline in product quality and completeness, damage our reputation, increase costs of goods sold or decrease revenue and gross margins.
34
If our customers cancel or reschedule orders or if an anticipated order for even one of our systems is not received in time to permit shipping during a certain fiscal period, our operating results for that fiscal period may fluctuate and our business and financial results for such period could be materially and adversely affected. Cancellation risks rise in periods of economic uncertainty.
Our customers are able to cancel or reschedule orders, generally with limited or no penalties, depending on the product’s stage of completion. The amount of purchase orders at any particular date, therefore, is not necessarily indicative of sales to be made in any given period. Our build cycle, or the time it takes us to build a product to customer specifications, typically ranges from one to six months. During this period, the customer may cancel the order, although generally we will be entitled to receive a cancellation fee based on the agreed-upon shipment schedule. In addition, we derive a substantial portion of our net sales in any fiscal period from the sale of a relatively small number of high-priced systems, with a large portion in the last month of the quarter.
Further, in some cases, our customers have to make changes to their facilities to accommodate the site requirements for our systems and may reschedule their orders because of the time required to complete these facility changes. This is particularly true of our high-performance TEMs. As a result, the timing of revenue recognition for a single transaction could have a material effect on our revenue and results of operations for a particular fiscal period. We experienced no cancellations during the first twenty-six weeks of 2014 and $4.2 million in all of 2013.
Due to these and other factors, our net revenues and results of operations have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate significantly in the future on a quarterly and annual basis. It is possible that in some future quarter or quarters our results of operations will be below the expectations of public market analysts or investors. In such event, the market price of our common stock may decline significantly.
Due to our extensive international operations and sales, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks that could adversely affect our revenues, gross margins and results of operations.
A significant portion of our sales and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally the euro and Czech Koruna. For the first twenty-six weeks of 2014, 2013 and 2012, approximately 28%, 31% and 25% of our revenue was denominated in euros, respectively, while more than half of our expenses were denominated in euros, Czech Koruna, yen or other foreign currencies. Particularly as a result of this imbalance, changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies, principally the euro, Czech Koruna and Japanese yen, can impact our revenues, gross margins, results of operations and cash flows. We undertake hedging transactions primarily to limit our exposure to changes in the dollar/euro and dollar/Czech Koruna exchange rates. The hedges are designed to protect us as the dollar weakens but also provide us with some flexibility if the dollar strengthens.
Achieving hedge designation is based on evaluating the effectiveness of the derivative contracts’ ability to mitigate the foreign currency exposure of the linked transaction. We are required to monitor the effectiveness of all new and open derivative contracts designated as hedges on a quarterly basis. Failure to meet the hedge accounting requirements could result in the requirement to record deferred and current realized and unrealized gains and losses into net income in the current period. This failure could result in significant fluctuations in operating results. In addition, we will continue to recognize unrealized gains and losses related to the changes in fair value of derivative contracts not designated as hedges in the current period net income. Accordingly, the related impact to operating results may be recognized in a different period than the foreign currency impact of the hedged transaction.
We also enter into foreign forward exchange contracts that are designed to partially mitigate the impact of specific cash, receivables or payables positions denominated in foreign currencies. See Note 14 of the Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.
The volatility of dollar/euro and dollar/Czech Koruna exchange rates can make it more difficult for us to deploy our hedging program and create effective hedges.
Global economic conditions may adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations.
The future economic climate may continue to be less favorable than that of the past. Any slowdown in global economic conditions has led, and could lead, to reduced consumer and business spending in the future, including by our customers and the purchasers of their products and services. If such spending slows down or decreases, our industry, business and results of operations may be adversely impacted. Also, in times of economic distress, hardship, bankruptcy and insolvency among our customers could increase. This may make it more difficult to collect on receivables.
35
Our gross margin improvement strategy is dependent on multiple factors that, if not achieved, could hinder our ability to reach our gross margin targets.
Our gross margins are dependent on many factors, some of which are not directly controlled by the company. These factors are:
• | our gross margins vary significantly between products. Any substantial change in product mix could change our gross margin; |
• | sales to our Industry Group customers are volatile and contribute, on average, a higher proportion of our gross margin. Any significant downturn affecting these customers would have a negative impact on our gross margin; |
• | pricing and acceptance of higher-margin new products; |
• | realization of the manufacturing efficiencies from our new facilities; |
• | realization of material cost savings through migration of the supply chain to lower cost suppliers and re-engineering of existing products; and |
• | continued improvement in gross margins from our installed base. |
Our inability to control any one of these factors could result in us not achieving our gross margin targets and could negatively impact our operating results.
Our business is complex, and changes to the business may not achieve their desired benefits.
Our business is based on a myriad of technologies, encompassed in multiple different product lines, addressing various customers in a range of markets in different regions of the world. A business of our breadth and complexity requires significant management time, attention and resources. In addition, significant changes to our business, such as changes in manufacturing, operations, product lines, market focus or organizational structure or focus, can be distracting, time-consuming and expensive. These changes can have short-term adverse effects on our financial results. Moreover, we operate through various foreign subsidiaries that are subject to local corporate, labor and other laws. Specifically, the requirements that certain actions of our subsidiaries are subject to approval by local workers councils and supervisory boards could impair the company's ability to take various actions and could result in unanticipated additional expense and delays.
In addition, the complexity of product lines and diversity of our customer base creates manufacturing planning and control challenges that may lead to higher costs of materials and labor, increased service costs, delayed shipments and excessive inventory. Our products incorporate leading-edge technology, including both hardware and software components. Software typically contains bugs that can unexpectedly interfere with expected operations. There can be no assurance that our pre-shipment testing programs will be adequate to detect all defects, which may interfere with customer satisfaction, reduce sales opportunities, or affect gross margins. Failure to effectively manage these manufacturing and product testing issues may materially impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
We rely on a limited number of suppliers to provide certain key parts and components. Failure of any of these suppliers to provide us with quality products in a timely manner could negatively affect our revenues and results of operations.
Failure of critical suppliers of parts, components and manufacturing equipment to deliver sufficient quantities to us in a timely and cost-effective manner could negatively affect our business, including our ability to convert backlog into revenue. Although we currently use numerous vendors to supply parts, components and subassemblies for the manufacture and support of our products, some key parts may only be obtained from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. In particular, we rely on: VDL Enabling Technologies Group, NTS Group, Frencken Mechatronics B.V., Keller Technology and AZD Praha SRO for our supply of mechanical parts and subassemblies; Gatan, Inc., Edax Inc. and Bruker Corp. for critical accessory products; and Neways Electronics, N.V. for some of our electronic subassemblies. A portion of the subcomponents that make up the components and sub-assemblies supplied to us are proprietary in nature and are provided to our suppliers only from single sources. We monitor those parts subject to single or a limited source supply to seek to minimize factory down time due to unavailability of such parts, which could impact our ability to meet manufacturing schedules. In addition, some of our suppliers rely on sole suppliers. As a result of this concentration of key suppliers, our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected if we do not timely and cost-effectively receive a sufficient quantity of quality parts to meet our production requirements or if we are required to find alternative suppliers for these supplies. We may not be able to expand our supplier group or to reduce our dependence on single suppliers. If our suppliers are not able to meet our supply requirements, constraints may affect our ability to deliver products to customers in a timely manner, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, restrictions regulating the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment in various jurisdictions may impact parts and component availability or our electronics suppliers’ ability to source parts and components in a timely and cost-effective manner. Overall, because we only have a few equipment suppliers, we may be more exposed to future cost increases for this equipment.
36
Our maintenance and repair revenue depends on our ability to reliably supply replacement parts and consumables to our customers and failure to deliver high quality parts and consumables in a timely manner could cause our business to suffer.
Our installed base of approximately 9,400 tools includes diverse products of varying ages, configurations, use cases, condition, and customer requirements and is dispersed in approximately 50 countries around the globe. Providing logistical support for delivery of spare parts and consumables to these tools, particularly the older tools, can be difficult. We have attempted to address the complexity of our maintenance and repair requirements, in part, through a remote diagnostics system that allows us to remotely access tools through a virtual private network. If we are unable to effectively manage and support the supply and delivery of spare parts and consumables to our customers we may damage our reputation and business.
Our business relies on various electronic data systems and their functioning is important to our business. Our business could be damaged if those systems fail or suffer a security breach or compromise.
We use a number of electronic data systems to help operate our business. If we are unable to maintain and safeguard our electronic data, our operating activities, financial reporting and intellectual property could be compromised, which may disrupt operations, harm our reputation and damage customer relationships. Further, we maintain personal information of our employees and a data breach that leads to the misuse or misappropriation of this information could cause the company to incur liability and damage our relationship with our employees and our reputation. Moreover, if we suffer an unauthorized intrusion into our own systems or the virtual private network providing for remote tool diagnostics at customer sites, we, or our customers, may suffer a loss of proprietary information that could create liability for us and undermine our business. Further, if our systems are inaccessible for a period of time, it may compromise our ability to perform business functions in a timely manner.
We depend on certain business processes for order entry and failure to adhere to those processes could impair our ability to properly book and fulfill orders.
We use business processes, including automated systems, to enter and track customer orders. Failure to adhere to these processes could result in errors in bookings, discounts on tool sales and failure to meet our global export compliance obligations. Further, inaccurate bookings information could lead to delays in shipping and having to rework orders. These problems could, in turn, cause us to suffer reduced margins, delayed revenue and governmental fines and penalties.
Our sales contracts often require delivery of multiple elements with complex terms and conditions that may cause our quarterly results to fluctuate.
Our system sales contracts include multiple elements such as delivery of more than one system, installation obligations (sometimes for multiple tools), accessories and/or service contracts, as well as provisions for customer acceptance. Typically, we recognize revenue as the various elements are delivered to the customer or the related services are provided. However, certain of these contracts have complex terms and conditions or technical specifications that require us to deliver most, or sometimes all, elements under the contract before revenue can be recognized. This could result in a significant delay between production and delivery of products and when revenue is recognized, which may cause volatility in, or adversely impact, our quarterly results of operations and cash flows.
The loss of one or more of our key customers would result in the loss of significant net revenues.
A relatively small number of our customers account for a large percentage of our net revenues, and one customer accounted for just over 10% of total annual net revenues during 2013. Our business will be seriously harmed if we do not generate as much revenue as we expect from these key customers, if we experience a loss of any of our key customers or if we suffer a substantial reduction in orders from these customers. Our ability to continue to generate revenues from our key customers will depend on our ability to introduce new products that are desirable to these customers.
We may not be able to enforce our intellectual property rights, especially in foreign countries, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our success depends in large part on the protection of our proprietary rights. We generally rely on patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to establish and maintain proprietary rights in our technology, products and services. We incur significant costs to obtain and maintain patents and other intellectual property rights and to defend our intellectual property. We also rely on the laws of the U.S. and other countries where we develop, manufacture or sell products and services to protect our proprietary rights. We may not be successful in protecting these proprietary rights, these rights may not provide the competitive advantages that we expect or other parties may challenge, invalidate or circumvent these rights. More specifically, we depend on trade secrets used in the development and manufacture of our products and delivery of our services. We endeavor to protect these trade secrets, but the measures taken to protect these trade secrets may be inadequate or ineffective. Our ability to claim trade secret protection may increase as we focus on application-specific workflows and new market opportunities, such as those in the oil and gas services sector, where key aspects of the technology may be publicly available to competitors and new market entrants.
37
Further, our efforts to protect our intellectual property may be less effective in some countries where intellectual property rights are not as well protected as they are in the U.S. Many U.S. companies have encountered substantial problems in protecting their proprietary rights against infringement in foreign countries. Approximately 67%, 71% and 67% of our sales occurred outside the U.S. in the first twenty-six weeks of 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and if we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights in these countries, our business may be materially adversely affected.
Infringement of our proprietary rights could result in weakened capacity to compete for sales and increased litigation costs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, product gross margins, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
If third parties assert that we violate their intellectual property rights, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Several of our competitors hold patents or other intellectual property rights covering a variety of technologies that may be included in some of our products and services. In addition, some of our customers may use our products for applications that are similar to those covered by these patents or other intellectual property rights. From time to time, we, and our respective customers, have received correspondence from our competitors claiming that some of our products, as sold by us or used by our customers, may be infringing one or more of these patents or other intellectual property rights. Any claim of infringement from a third party, even one without merit, could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against the claim, and could distract our management from running the business.
In addition, our competitors or other entities, including non-practicing entities, may assert infringement claims against us or our customers in the future with respect to current or future products or uses, and these assertions may result in costly litigation or require us to obtain a license to use intellectual property rights of others. Additionally, if claims of infringement are asserted against our customers, those customers may seek indemnification from us for damages or expenses they incur.
If we become subject to additional infringement claims, we will evaluate our position and consider the available alternatives, which may include seeking licenses to use the technology in question, developing non-infringing technology or defending our position. These licenses, however, may not be available on satisfactory terms or at all. If we are not able to negotiate the necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, develop non-infringing technology or successfully defend our position, these potential infringement claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Our exposure to risks associated with the use of intellectual property may be increased as a result of acquisitions due to our lower level of visibility into the development process with respect to such technology or the care taken to safeguard against infringement risk.
If we are unable to pay quarterly dividends or repurchase our stock at intended levels, our reputation and stock price may be harmed.
In September 2010, our Board of Directors approved a plan to repurchase up to a total of 4.0 million shares of our common stock. In June 2012, our Board of Directors approved the initiation of quarterly cash dividends to holders of our common stock. The declaration and payment of dividends to shareholders in the future is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and capital availability. Dividends have been paid under this program each quarter since its inception in June 2012. The dividend and stock repurchase program may require the use of a significant portion of our cash earnings. As a result, we may not retain a sufficient amount of cash to fund our operations or finance future growth opportunities, new product development initiatives and unanticipated capital expenditures. Further, our Board of Directors may, at its discretion, decrease the intended level of dividends or entirely discontinue the payment of dividends at any time. The stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date and may be limited at any time. Our ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock will depend on our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations in the future. This ability may be subject to certain economic, financial, competitive and other factors that are beyond our control. Any failure to pay dividends or repurchase stock after we have announced our intention to do so may negatively impact our reputation and investor confidence in us and may negatively impact our stock price.
Restructuring activities may be disruptive to our business and financial performance. Any delay or failure by us to execute planned cost reductions could also be disruptive and could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected.
From time to time, we have engaged in various restructuring and infrastructure improvement programs in order to increase operational efficiency, consolidate sites, reduce costs and balance the effects of currency fluctuations on our financial results. These actions have included reductions of work-force, site consolidations, and costs to migrate portions of our supply chain to dollar-linked contracts.
38
Restructuring has the potential to adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations in other respects as well. This includes potential disruption of manufacturing operations, our supply chain and other aspects of our business. Employee morale and productivity could also suffer and result in unintended employee attrition. Loss of sales, service and engineering talent, in particular, could damage our business. Restructuring requires substantial management time and attention and has the potential to divert management from other important work. Moreover, we could encounter delays in executing our plans, which could cause further disruption and additional unanticipated expense. Some of our employees work in areas, such as Europe and Asia, where workforce reductions are highly regulated, and this could slow the implementation of planned workforce reductions. Restructuring plans may also fail to achieve the stated aims for reasons similar to those described in this paragraph.
During the course of executing a restructuring, we could incur material non-cash charges such as write-downs of inventories or other tangible assets. We test our goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment annually or when an event occurs indicating the potential for impairment. If we record an impairment charge as a result of this analysis, it could have a material impact on our results of operations.
Because we do not have long-term contracts with our customers, our customers may stop purchasing our products at any time, which makes it difficult to forecast our results of operations and to plan expenditures accordingly.
We do not have long-term contracts with our customers. Accordingly:
• | customers can stop purchasing our products at any time without penalty; |
• | customers may cancel orders that they previously placed; |
• | customers may purchase products from our competitors; |
• | we are exposed to competitive pricing pressure on each order; and |
• | customers are not required to make minimum purchases. |
If we do not succeed in obtaining new sales orders from new and existing customers, our results of operations will be negatively impacted.
Many of our projects are funded under various government contracts and if we are found to have violated the terms of the government contracts or applicable statutes and regulations, we are subject to the risk of suspension or debarment from government contracting activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Many of our projects are funded under various government contracts worldwide. Government contracts are subject to specific procurement regulations, contract provisions and requirements relating to the formation, administration, performance and accounting of these contracts. Many of these contracts include express or implied certifications of compliance with applicable laws and contract provisions. As a result of our government contracting, claims for civil or criminal fraud may be brought by the government for violations of these regulations, requirements or statutes. Further, if we fail to comply with any of these regulations, requirements or statutes, our existing government contracts could be terminated, we could be suspended or debarred from government contracting or subcontracting, including federally funded projects at the state level. If one or more of our government contracts are terminated for any reason, or if we are suspended from government work, we could suffer the loss of future contracts, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Changes and fluctuations in government spending priorities could adversely affect our revenue.
Because a significant part of our overall business is generated either directly or indirectly as a result of worldwide federal and local government regulatory and infrastructure priorities, shifts in these priorities due to changes in policy imperatives or economic conditions or government administration, which are often unpredictable, may affect our revenues.
Political instability in key regions around the world, the U.S. government’s commitment to military related expenditures and current uncertainty around global sovereign debt put at risk federal discretionary spending, including spending on nanotechnology research programs and projects that are of particular importance to our business. Also, changes in U.S. Congressional appropriations practices could result in decreased funding for some of our customers. At the state and local levels, the need to compensate for reductions in federal matching funds, as well as financing of federal unfunded mandates, creates strong pressures to cut back on research expenditures as well. A potential reduction of federal funding may adversely affect our business.
We have long sales cycles for our systems, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate.
Our sales cycle can be 18 months or longer and is unpredictable. Variations in the length of our sales cycle could cause our net sales and, therefore, our business, financial condition, results of operations, operating margins and cash flows, to fluctuate widely from period to period. These variations could be based on factors partially or completely outside of our control.
39
The length of time it takes us to complete a sale depends on many factors, including:
• | the efforts of our sales force and our independent sales representatives; |
• | changes in the composition of our sales force, including the departure of senior sales personnel; |
• | the history of previous sales to a customer; |
• | the complexity of the customer’s manufacturing processes; |
• | the introduction, or announced introduction, of new products by our competitors; |
• | the economic environment; |
• | the internal technical capabilities and sophistication of the customer; and |
• | the capital expenditure budget cycle of the customer. |
Our sales cycle also extends in situations where the sale involves developing new applications for a system or technology. As a result of these and a number of other factors that could influence sales cycles with particular customers, the period between initial contact with a potential customer and the time when we recognize revenue from that customer, if we ever do, may vary widely.
The loss of key management or our inability to attract and retain managerial, engineering and other technical personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Attracting qualified personnel is difficult, and our recruiting efforts may not be successful. Specifically, our product generation efforts depend on hiring and retaining qualified engineers. The market for qualified engineers is very competitive. In addition, experienced management and technical, sales, marketing and service personnel in the technology industry are in high demand, and competition for such talent is intense. The loss of key personnel, or our inability to attract key personnel, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our customers experience rapid technological changes, with which we must keep pace. We may be unable to properly ascertain new market needs, or introduce new products responsive to those needs, on a timely and cost-effective basis.
Customers in each of our Groups experience rapid technological change that requires new product introductions and enhancements. Our ability to remain competitive depends in large part on our ability to understand these changes and develop, in a timely and cost-effective manner, new and enhanced systems at competitive prices that respond to, and accurately predict, new market requirements. We may fail to ascertain and respond to the needs of our customers or fail to develop and introduce new and enhanced products that meet their needs, which could adversely affect our financial position. In addition, new product introductions or enhancements by competitors could cause a decline in our sales or a loss of market acceptance of our existing products. Increased competitive pressure also could lead to intensified price competition, resulting in lower margins, which could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success in developing, introducing and selling new and enhanced systems depends on a variety of factors, including:
• | selection and development of product offerings; |
• | timely and efficient completion of product design and development; |
• | timely and efficient implementation of manufacturing processes; |
• | effective sales, service and marketing functions; and |
• | product performance. |
Because new product development commitments must be made well in advance of sales, new product decisions must anticipate both the future demand for products under development and the equipment required to produce such products. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing and marketing new products or in enhancing existing products. On occasion, certain product and application developments have taken longer than expected. These delays can have an adverse effect on product shipments and results of operations.
The process of developing new high technology capital equipment products and services is complex and uncertain, and failure to accurately anticipate customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends, to complete engineering and development projects in a timely manner and to develop or obtain appropriate intellectual property could significantly harm our results of operations. We must make long-term investments and commit significant resources before knowing whether our predictions will result in products that the market will accept.
40
To the extent that a market does not develop for a new product, we may decide to discontinue or modify the product. These actions could involve significant costs and/or require us to take charges in future periods. If these products are accepted by the marketplace, sales of our new products may cannibalize sales of our existing products. Further, after a product is developed, we must be able to manufacture sufficient volume quickly and at low cost. To accomplish this objective, we must accurately forecast production volumes, mix of products and configurations that meet customer requirements. If we are not successful in making accurate forecasts, our business and results of operations could be significantly harmed.
We may have exposure to income tax rate fluctuations as well as to additional tax liabilities, which would impact our financial position.
As a corporation with operations both in the U.S. and abroad, we are subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and various foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate is subject to significant fluctuation from one period to the next as the income tax rates for each year are a function of the following factors, among others:
• | the effects of a mix of profits or losses earned by us and our subsidiaries in numerous foreign tax jurisdictions with a broad range of income tax rates; |
• | our ability to utilize recorded deferred tax assets; |
• | changes in uncertain tax positions, interest or penalties resulting from tax audits; and |
• | changes in tax rates and laws or the interpretation of such laws. |
Changes in the mix of these items and other items may cause our effective tax rate to fluctuate between periods, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We are also subject to non-income taxes, such as payroll, sales, use, value-added, net worth, property and goods and services taxes, in both the U.S. and various foreign jurisdictions.
We are regularly under audit by tax authorities with respect to both income and non-income taxes and may have exposure to additional tax liabilities as a result of these audits.
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities. Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the final determination of tax audits or tax disputes will not be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals.
Many of our current and planned products are highly complex and may contain defects or errors that can only be detected after installation, which may harm our reputation and damage our business.
Our products are highly complex, and our extensive product development, manufacturing and testing processes may not be adequate to detect all defects, errors, failures and quality issues that could impact customer satisfaction or result in claims against us. As a result, we could have to replace certain components and/or provide remediation in response to the discovery of defects in products after they are shipped. The occurrence of any defects, errors, failures or quality issues could result in cancellation of orders, product returns, diversion of our resources, legal actions by our customers and other losses to us or to our customers. These occurrences could also result in the loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of our products and loss of sales, which would harm our business and adversely affect our revenues and profitability. Also, our ability to recognize revenue that has been deferred on sales of new products could be negatively impacted if all conditions for revenue recognition are not met.
Some of our systems use hazardous gases and high voltage power supplies as well as emit x-rays, which, if not properly contained, could result in property damage, bodily injury and death.
A product safety failure, such as a hazardous gas release, high voltage power supply problem, x-ray leak or extreme pressure release, could result in substantial liability and could also significantly damage customer relationships and our reputation and disrupt future sales. Moreover, remediation could require redesign of the tools involved, creating additional expense, increasing tool costs and damaging sales. In addition, a product safety failure could involve significant litigation that would divert management time and resources and cause unanticipated legal expense. Further, if such a failure involved violation of health and safety laws, we may suffer substantial fines and penalties in addition to the other damage suffered. Finally, failure to properly manage the regulatory requirements for shipment of dangerous products could cause delays in clearing customs and thereby cause delay or loss of revenue in any particular quarter.
Natural disasters, catastrophic events, terrorist acts and acts of war may seriously harm our business and revenues, costs and expenses and financial condition.
Our worldwide operations could be subject to earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, telecommunications failures, power interruptions, water shortages, closure of transport routes, tsunamis, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, fires, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics or pandemics, terrorist acts, acts of war and other natural or manmade disasters or business interruptions. For many of
41
these events we carry no insurance. The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could seriously harm our revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. The impact of such events could be disproportionately greater on us than on other companies as a result of our significant international presence. Our corporate headquarters, and a portion of our research and development activities, are located on the Pacific coast, and other critical business operations and some of our suppliers are located in Asia, near major earthquake faults. We rely on major logistics hubs, primarily in Europe, Asia and the U.S. to manufacture and distribute our products and to move products to customers in various regions. Our operations could be adversely affected if manufacturing, logistics or other operations in these locations are disrupted for any reason, including those described above. The ultimate impact on us, our significant suppliers and our general infrastructure of being consolidated in certain geographical areas is unknown, but our revenue, profitability and financial condition could suffer in the event of a catastrophic event.
Unforeseen health, safety and environmental costs could impact our future net earnings.
Some of our operations use substances that are regulated by various federal, state and international laws governing health, safety and the environment. We could be subject to liability if we do not handle these substances in compliance with safety standards for storage and transportation and applicable laws. We will record a liability for any costs related to health, safety or environmental remediation when we consider the costs to be probable and the amount of the costs can be reasonably estimated.
We may not be successful in obtaining the necessary export licenses to conduct operations abroad, and the U.S. Congress may prevent proposed sales to foreign customers.
We are subject to export control laws that limit which products we sell and where and to whom we sell our products. Moreover, export licenses are required from government agencies for some of our products and accessories in accordance with various statutory authorities, including U.S. statutes such as the Export Administration Act of 1979, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 and the Arms Export Control Act of 1976. Depending on the shipment, we are also subject to Dutch or Czech law regarding export controls and licensing requirements. We may not be successful in obtaining these necessary licenses in order to conduct business abroad. In addition, we may suffer from process failures that would cause us to violate export laws. Failure to comply with applicable export controls or the termination or significant limitation on our ability to export certain of our products would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices may affect how we conduct our business.
Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results. New accounting pronouncements or taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements or taxation practices have occurred and may occur in the future. New rules, changes to existing rules, or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or change the way we conduct our business.
Provisions of our charter documents, our shareholder rights plan and Oregon law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if the offer may be considered beneficial by our shareholders.
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could make it harder for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors has also adopted a shareholder rights plan, or “poison pill,” which would significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer. In addition, the Oregon Control Share Act and the Oregon Business Combination Act limit the ability of parties who acquire a significant amount of voting stock to exercise control over us. These provisions may have the effect of lengthening the time required for a person to acquire control of us through a proxy contest or the election of a majority of our Board of Directors, may deter efforts to obtain control of us and may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without negotiation. These provisions may apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by our shareholders.
42
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
A plan to repurchase up to a total of 4.0 million shares of our common stock was approved by our Board of Directors in September 2010 and does not have an expiration date. The amount and timing of specific repurchases are subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The purchases are funded from existing cash resources and may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our discretion without prior notice. Repurchases are made in the open market.
The following table sets forth share repurchase information for the periods indicated:
Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans | ||||||
Period: | |||||||||
March 31 - April 27, 2014 | — | $ | — | — | 2,119,800 | ||||
April 28 - May 25, 2014 | 373,938 | 81.51 | 373,938 | 1,745,862 | |||||
May 26 - June 29, 2014 | — | — | — | 1,745,862 | |||||
Total second quarter | 373,938 | $ | 81.51 | 373,938 | 1,745,862 |
43
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference hereto and this list is intended to constitute the exhibit index:
3.1 | Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation.(1) | |
3.2 | Articles of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation.(2) | |
3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended on November 14, 2012.(3) | |
10.1 | Third Amendment to Credit Agreement.(5) | |
10.2 | 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended.(4)(6) | |
10.3 | Employee Share Purchase Plan, as amended.(4)(6) | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
_____________________________
(1) | Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2003. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 27, 2005. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2012. |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2014. |
(5) | Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2014. |
(6) | These exhibits relate to management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements. |
44
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FEI COMPANY | |||
Dated: | August 1, 2014 | /s/ DON R. KANIA | |
Don R. Kania | |||
President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
(Principal Executive Officer) | |||
Dated: | August 1, 2014 | /s/ RAYMOND A. LINK | |
Raymond A. Link | |||
Executive Vice President and | |||
Chief Financial Officer | |||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
45