PROXY STATEMENT
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q:What am I voting on?
A:You are voting on:
•The election of the following ten directors: James E. Berry II, Thomas D. Berry, John Cohlmia, David S. Crockett Jr., Patrice Douglas, Mark W. Funke, James M. Johnson, Larry J. Lanie, James M. Morris II, and Russell W. Teubner, each for a one-year term;
•An advisory (nonbinding) proposal to approve the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and three most highly compensated other executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”); and
•A proposal to ratify the appointment of BKD LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2015.
Q:Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
A:Holders of the common stock of Southwest Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company,” “Southwest,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) as of the close of business on March 2, 2015 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to vote at the annual meeting of the shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”).
Q:Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials (the "Notice") this year instead of a full set of proxy materials?
A:In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we have sent to most of our shareholders a Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy. In addition, shareholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail. A shareholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the shareholder terminates it.
Q:How do I vote?
A:You may vote by following any of the following methods:
• Internet. Vote on the Internet at http://www.envisionreports.com/oksb by following the online instructions. Shareholders submitting proxies or voting instructions via the Internet should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies that will be borne by the shareholder. If you have Internet access, we encourage you to record your vote on the Internet. The deadline for voting through the Internet is 1:00 a.m. Central Time on April 22, 2015.
• Telephone. Vote by telephone by calling 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) and follow the instructions provided by the recorded message. The deadline for voting by telephone is 1:00 a.m. Central Time on April 22, 2015.
• Mail. If you requested to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, you may vote by completing, signing, and dating the proxy card and returning it in the enclosed, postage-paid envelope. If you return your signed proxy card but do not indicate your voting preference, your card will be voted (i) in favor of the election of all ten directors, (ii) for the proposal to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, and (iii) for the proposal to ratify the appointment of BKD LLP.
• Meeting. You may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. You have the right to revoke your proxy any time before the Annual Meeting, and shareholders who attend the meeting may withdraw their proxies and vote in person if they wish.
Q:Who will count the votes?
A:Computershare Investor Services, LLC, our transfer agent, will tabulate the votes.
Q:What should I do if I receive more than one proxy card?
A:If you receive more than one Notice or proxy card, it indicates that you own shares in more than one account or that your shares are registered in more than one name. You should vote the shares represented by all Notices or proxy cards you receive.
Q:What constitutes a quorum at the Annual Meeting?
A:On the Record Date there were 19,061,437 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. Each share is entitled to one vote on all matters voted on at the Annual Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares present or represented by proxy will be a quorum for the Annual Meeting. If you submit a properly executed proxy card, you will be considered part of the quorum. Abstentions and shares held for you by your broker or nominee (broker shares) that are voted on any matter are included in the quorum.
Q:Who may attend the Annual Meeting?
A:All shareholders as of the Record Date may attend, although seating is limited.
Q:What percentage of our stock did our directors and executive officers own on the Record Date?
A:Together, they owned approximately 4.91% of our issued and outstanding common stock.
Q:Who pays for this proxy solicitation and how will solicitation occur?
A:Our Board of Directors is soliciting this proxy, and Southwest will pay the cost of the solicitation. In addition to the use of the mail, employees of Southwest may solicit proxies personally or by telephone, fax, or electronic mail, without additional compensation. Banks, brokerage houses, and other nominees and fiduciaries are requested to forward the proxy material to beneficial owners of Southwest stock and to obtain authorization to execute proxies on behalf of the beneficial owners. Upon request, Southwest will reimburse these parties for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy material to beneficial owners.
PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Your Board of Directors currently is composed of ten members, each elected annually for a one-year term or until his or her successor is qualified. Ms. Marran H. Ogilvie, who has served as a director of Southwest since 2012, will not be standing for re-election.
The Board of Directors has nominated for election, James E. Berry, II, Thomas D. Berry, John Cohlmia, David S. Crockett Jr., Mark W. Funke, James M. Johnson, Larry J. Lanie, James M. Morris II, and Russell W. Teubner, all of whom currently are directors, and Patrice Douglas, a new director nominee, each to serve for a term of one year or until his or her successor is elected and qualified.
Each nominee must be elected by a plurality of shares voted in this election. The individuals named as proxies on your proxy card will vote for the election of each nominee unless you withhold authorization. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not have any effect on this proposal.
Each shareholder voting in the election of directors is entitled to cumulate his or her votes for the election of directors by multiplying the number of shares of common stock owned of record by the shareholder on the Record Date by the number of directors to be elected. Each shareholder is then entitled to cast his or her total cumulated votes for one nominee or distribute his or her votes among any number of the nominees being voted on at the Annual Meeting. In order to cumulate votes, shareholders of record must attend the meeting and vote in person or make arrangements with their own proxy attending the meeting on their behalf. If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker in order to attend the meeting and vote in person to cumulate votes.
Each nominee has agreed to serve for a one-year term, if elected. If any nominee is unable to stand for election at this Annual Meeting, the Board may either (i) reduce its size or (ii) nominate an alternate candidate, in which case the proxies will be voted for the alternate candidate.
Your Board recommends a vote “FOR” these directors.
Director Nominees
Following are brief descriptions of the business experience of our director nominees, and of additional factors, including special skills, knowledge, and experience, of non-officer directors that support their nomination. The nominees also satisfy the minimum criteria for nomination established by Southwest’s Governance Committee. For additional information regarding nomination criteria, please see “Governance Committee” on page 8.
| |
James E. Berry II | Director Since 1998 |
Mr. Berry, age 69, is the current owner of Pizza West in Stillwater, OK. He previously owned Shading Concepts, a company that manufactured and sold solarium draperies from coast to coast for 22 years. He has a B.S. in finance/money and banking from Oklahoma State University. From 1973 to 1988, Mr. Berry was a stockbroker in Oklahoma City with a major Wall Street firm. He is a past President of the United States Chess Federation. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Berry should be re-elected to the Board include his: knowledge of Oklahoma markets; experience as a small business owner, investor, and securities professional; significant ownership of Southwest common stock; and continuing director education focusing on corporate governance at Harvard Business School, Stanford University, and Wharton.
| |
Thomas D. Berry | Director Since 1981 |
Mr. Berry, age 71, has been a professional auctioneer since 1970 and has conducted over 2,200 successful auctions, marketing several classes of assets, including real estate, equipment, estate property, business liquidation property, mineral rights, firearms, antiques, coin collections, sports memorabilia, restaurant equipment, exotic animals and seized property. Mr. Berry is an active real estate broker and is also actively involved in the Energy business in Oklahoma. He serves as a Director of a private energy company and as the President of T.D. Berry Investment Co., Inc. Mr. Berry earned his B.A. degree in Public Law from Oklahoma State University and served six years in the U.S. military. He is a native of Oklahoma and resides in Stillwater, Oklahoma. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Berry should be re-elected to the Board include his: knowledge of Oklahoma markets; experience as a business owner and investor; and knowledge of the banking industry.
| |
John Cohlmia | Director Since 2006 |
Mr. Cohlmia, age 52, was appointed as a director of the Company on July 27, 2006. He has been a director of Bank SNB since August 2003. Mr. Cohlmia is a Real Estate Broker and owner of Newmark Grubb Levy Strange Beffort of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Cohlmia should be re-elected to the Board include his: current service as Chairman of the Compensation Committee; knowledge of Oklahoma markets; and experience in commercial real estate brokerage.
| |
David S. Crockett Jr. | Director Since 2006 |
Mr. Crockett, age 70, who has an MBA, is Vice-President of Stonetex Oil Corp., and is independently active in oil and gas exploration with various partners. He obtained his CPA designation in 1969 and holds permits to practice in both Texas and Oklahoma. Mr. Crockett is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Texas Society of CPAs, the Dallas Estate Planning Council, and the Petroleum Accounting Society. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Crockett should be re-elected to the Board include his: service as the designated Audit Committee financial expert; training and experience in finance and accounting; experience as owner of an independent accounting firm; knowledge of Dallas, TX area markets; and experience as an investor.
| |
Patrice Douglas | Director Nominee |
Ms. Douglas, age 52, is the President of Emerging Markets of Premier Consulting Partners, a financial services company, as well as an attorney with the law firm of Latham Wagner Steele and Lehman, where she is Of Counsel. Ms. Douglas currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Avondale Acquisition Corp., ACP Sheet Metal Company, and UR Special Ministries. She previously was a Commissioner at the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, where she served as Vice-Chairman from February 2014 to January 2015 and as Chairman from August 2012 to February 2014. Her prior professional experience includes service as an Executive Vice President of First Fidelity Bank from 2008 to 2011, and as President, Greater OKC Metro Market, of SpiritBank from 2004 to 2008. Ms. Douglas was elected Mayor of the City of Edmond, Oklahoma in April 2009 and served for two consecutive terms. Ms. Douglas earned a Bachelor of Science degree in computer information systems from Oklahoma Christian University in 1983, and graduated from the University of Oklahoma College of Law in 1987. Ms. Douglas was the recipient of the Kate Barnard Award for Outstanding Public Service in Oklahoma, she is a three-time finalist for the Journal Record’s Woman of the Year, and has been named Oklahoma Christian University’s Distinguished Alumni for the College of Business. Ms. Douglas was also the recipient of the Energy Visionary Policy Leadership Award in October 2013. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Ms. Douglas should be elected to the Board include her: knowledge of Oklahoma markets; and knowledge of the banking industry.
| |
| |
Mark W. Funke | Director Since October 2012 |
Mr. Funke, age 59, was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Southwest effective October 1, 2012. Mr. Funke is actively engaged in the community and in national banking affairs. He currently serves on the American Bankers Association Government Relations Council. Previously, he served for 28 years with Bank of Oklahoma. He serves on the boards of the Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce and the Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and its executive committee. He also serves on the boards of Allied Arts Foundation, Lyric Theatre of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Health Center Foundation, YMCA of Oklahoma City and Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, where he is the Treasurer. Mr. Funke also serves on the board of United Way of Central Oklahoma. He served as city-wide Campaign Chair in 2010. He is a graduate of Leadership Oklahoma City Class VII and Leadership Oklahoma Class VIII. Mr. Funke was awarded the Paragon award in 2002 by Leadership Oklahoma City, the Urban Pioneer award in 2008 from Oklahoma City’s Plaza District Association and the John Kirkpatrick Award from The Lyric Theatre in 2009. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Funke should be re-elected to the Board include his: service as our President and Chief Executive Officer; knowledge of our geographical banking markets; and knowledge of banking industry.
| |
James M. Johnson | Director Since 2006 |
Mr. Johnson, age 56, has an MBA from Emory University and is a self-employed small business owner. He previously served for fourteen years as a supervisory analyst, financial analyst, and examiner of financial institutions with the federal Office of Thrift Supervision and its predecessor. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Johnson should be re-elected to the Board include his: current service as Chairman of the Directors’ Credit Committee of Bank SNB; training and experience as a federal financial institution regulator; business and finance training; and experience as a small business owner.
Larry J. Lanie | Director Since August 2012 |
Mr. Lanie, age 72, retired on March 31, 2012 as President and Chief Executive Officer of FB Bancorp and Farm Bureau Bank, where he served since they were organized in 1998. He has 47 years of banking experience, including service as President and Chief Executive Officer of USAA Federal Savings Bank from 1983 through 1986, where he established its nationwide banking operations. He is a graduate of Oklahoma State University and is a member of the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma State University Foundation. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Lanie should be re-elected to the Board include his current service as Chairman of the Audit Committee; knowledge of our geographical banking markets; and knowledge of the banking industry.
| |
James M. Morris II | Director Since February 2014 |
Mr. Morris, age 63, graduated from Oklahoma State University with a BS degree in Business Administration in 1973. He joined John Hancock Financial Services in 1973 and was appointed CEO of John Hancock’s Boston, MA based distribution system in May of 1999. In that role, Mr. Morris was in charge of sales and marketing for all life, annuity and long term care products. He also served as Chairman and CEO of John Hancock’s broker dealer, Signator Investors, Inc., as well as Chairman of Essex Co. and Essex National Securities, Inc. Mr. Morris retired in April 2004. Since retirement, Mr. Morris has invested in various closely held businesses, including Choice Capital Partners, Buffalo Creek LLC, Aspen Junction LLC, and InforcePro Corporation. He currently serves on the boards of directors of the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation and the South Central US Chapter of the Multiple Sclerosis Society and is a recipient of the Maureen Reagan award for his work with the Alzheimer’s Association. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Morris should be elected to the Board include his current service as Chairman of the Governance Committee; investment and financial expertise; knowledge of Oklahoma markets; and knowledge of the financial services and banking industries.
| |
Russell W. Teubner | Director Since 2000 |
Mr. Teubner, age 58, has been Chairman of the Board since January 1, 2013. He is the founder and CEO of HostBridge Technology, LLC, a computer software company. The Stillwater Chamber of Commerce honored him as Citizen of the Year in 1992, Small Business Person of the Year in 1991-92, and Small Business Exporter of the Year in 1992-93. In 1993, he received the Outstanding Young Oklahoman award given annually by the Oklahoma Jaycees. In 1997, Oklahoma State University (OSU) named Mr. Teubner as a recipient of their Distinguished Alumni award. During 1996 and 1997 he served on the Citizen's Commission on the Future of Oklahoma Higher Education. In 1998, he was inducted into the OSU College of Business Hall of Fame. Currently, he serves on the board of the OSU Center for Innovation and Economic Development. Mr. Teubner is a past director of the Oklahoma City branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Additional experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion Mr. Teubner should be re-elected to the Board include his: service as Chairman of the Board of Directors; experience in the computer software industry; experience as an officer of a public company; entrepreneurial and consulting experience; and continuing director education focusing on corporate governance, compensation and audit committee matters, among others, at MIT, Harvard Business School, and Wharton.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following paragraph contains certain information about our executive officers other than Mr. Funke, whose biographical information is included under the heading “Director Nominees” above.
Joe T. Shockley, Jr., age 63, has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since December 1, 2012. Mr. Shockley’s employment agreement contemplates a one-year term ending December 31, 2015, with automatic successive one-year terms thereafter. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Shockley served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of BancFirst Corporation and as Corporate Secretary and a member of the Board of Directors of BancFirst from 1996 until his resignation on November 14, 2012. He also worked at Boatmen’s First National Bank of Oklahoma, where he served as the Tulsa Region President and Chief Financial Officer from 1991 to 1996 and as the Controller, Senior Financial Officer, and Executive Vice President from 1980 to 1991. Mr. Shockley is on the board of directors of PLICO, Inc., a medical liability insurance company in Oklahoma City, OK, where he serves as the Chairman of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Executive Committee. Mr. Shockley is a Certified Public Accountant. He served as Manager-Banking of Billups, Arnn & Mascho, CPAs from 1976 to 1980 and as Senior Auditor of Arthur Andersen & Co. from 1973 through 1976. Mr. Shockley earned his BBA degree in Accounting from the University of Oklahoma in 1973. Mr. Shockley is a member of the American Institute of CPAs, the Oklahoma Society of CPAs, and Financial Executives International.
Priscilla Barnes, age 58, has served as the Company’s Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, reporting to the President and Chief Executive Officer, since March 29, 2012. Ms. Barnes previously served as Executive Vice
President and Chief Credit Officer for the Company, Bank SNB, and Bank of Kansas, beginning in July 2011, and Executive Vice President, Regulatory Risk Management. Ms. Barnes joined Bank SNB in 2005. She has thirty-four years of bank experience, including service as a banker, bank director, and federal banking regulator. Ms. Barnes was an Oklahoma State University Regent’s Distinguished Scholar and attended the Graduate School of Banking in Madison, Wisconsin.
Brent Bates, age 40, has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer since March 29, 2012. He previously served as Senior Vice President and Senior Credit Officer of Bank SNB. From 2003 until joining us in September 2011, Mr. Bates held various credit-related positions at Arvest Bank, Oklahoma City, OK, including Vice President and Manager of Commercial Credit Analysis, Commercial Workout Officer, and Senior Loan Review Officer. He also served nearly five years as a safety and soundness bank examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City as well as the Texas Department of Banking. Mr. Bates earned a bachelor’s degree in finance from the University of Oklahoma and graduated with honors from the Graduate School of Banking at Boulder, Colorado.
James D. Bygland, age 53, has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer since July 11, 2013. Mr. Bygland manages aspects of the Information Technology, Deposit Operations, and Loan Operations Departments. From 1998 until joining us in July 2013, Mr. Bygland served as Chief Information Officer/Executive Vice President of West Coast Bancorp, Lake Oswego, Oregon. Mr. Bygland brings a successful and diverse background to our Company. In addition to his information technology responsibilities, Mr. Bygland managed deposit operations, electronic banking, retail customer call center, commercial customer support, loss prevention, project management and facilities. A graduate of the University of Nebraska, he has previously worked for major information technology and banking providers including Information Technology Inc., Fiserv, Sheshunoff Outsourcing Centers and Sheshunoff Consulting.
John Danielson, age 56, has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer since July 11, 2011. He previously served as President of SNB Bank of San Antonio, where he oversaw two full-service branch locations and grew lending relationships in the San Antonio market. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Danielson held various positions with operations in South Texas, including Senior Vice President and regional manager for Compass Bank and Bank of America. His financial experience has been focused on commercial and business banking, commercial real estate, and healthcare and private banking. Mr. Danielson has also served as a District Retail Executive. Mr. Danielson received his Bachelor of Science and Masters of Business Administration degrees from the University of Florida. He has served as Treasurer for the San Antonio Chapter of the University of Florida Alumni Association. Mr. Danielson’s past community involvement includes Kiwanis, Habitat for Humanity, service as a former Director of the San Antonio Business Development Fund, and North San Antonio Chamber of Commerce.
Gregg S. Jaynes, age 51, has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since April 1, 2014. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Jaynes served as the Chief Human Resources Officer of F&M Bancorporation for three years and spent 16 years as Senior Vice President of Human Resources at BOK Financial. Mr. Jaynes has 30 years of Human Resources experience with various financial institutions and a large insurance company. He began his career as a teller in the Washington, DC area, has a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Waynesburg University in Pennsylvania and is a Certified Compensation Professional. He has participated as a volunteer with charity organizations including Habitat for Humanity, United Way and A New Leaf.
Rusty LaForge, age 40, has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel since April 2, 2012. He most recently was an attorney with McAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation, serving as the practice group leader for the firm’s Banking and Financial Institutions practice group, where he concentrated on regulatory and transactional matters affecting banks, bank holding companies, and other financial firms. His career experience includes service as director of investor relations for Guaranty Financial Group and Guaranty Bank, Austin, Texas from May 2007 to August 2009, and as an attorney in the financial services section of the Bracewell & Giuliani LLP law firm. Mr. LaForge earned a bachelor’s degree in accounting from Oklahoma State University in 1998, and graduated from the University of Oklahoma College of Law in 2002. While in law school, he served as a Carl Albert Executive Fellow with the Oklahoma Department of Securities and as a judicial extern in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Oklahoma. Mr. LaForge is a certified public accountant and a member of the Oklahoma Bar Association, the State Bar of Texas, and the American Bar Association. Mr. LaForge currently serves on the Parks Subcommittee of the Oklahoma City MAPS 3 Citizens Advisory Board, the Foundation for Oklahoma City Public Schools’ Board of Directors, the Girl Scouts of Western Oklahoma Board of Directors, the Oklahoma State University Foundation’s Board of Governors, the Oklahoma State University School of Accounting’s Advisory Board, and as a volunteer with charity organizations including Habitat for Humanity and PlaySmart.
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
Southwest’s Board conducts its business through meetings of the Board and of its committees. The Board generally meets monthly and may have additional special meetings. The Board met 12 times during 2014. Each director in office on December 31, 2014 attended more than 75% of the total number of meetings held in 2014 of the Board and the committees on which he or she served.
The Board of Directors believes it is important for all directors to attend the Annual Meeting of shareholders in order to show their support for Southwest and to provide an opportunity for shareholders to express any concerns to them. Southwest has adopted a policy that all directors should attend each annual meeting of shareholders unless they are unable to attend by reason of personal or family illness or pressing matters. Each director in office on the date of the meeting attended the 2014 Annual Meeting.
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE AND ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT
Separate Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
The position of Southwest’s Chairman of the Board and the office of its President and Chief Executive Officer are held by different persons. The Chairman of the Board, Russell W. Teubner, is an independent director and became Chairman on January 1, 2013, after twelve years of service on the Board. He is a member of the Governance Committee and an ex officio, non-voting member of the Audit and Compensation Committees.
The duties of the Chairman of the Board include providing strategic leadership and guidance; presiding at the meetings of the Board and executive sessions of independent directors; calling executive sessions and special meetings of the Board; establishing agendas for meetings of the Board and independent directors with advice from senior management and outside advisers; advising and consulting with the President and Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers, including Southwest’s senior risk officers, and the chairmen of the Audit, Compensation, and other Southwest standing committees regarding strategies, risks, opportunities, and other matters.
The President and Chief Executive Officer, Mark W. Funke, was appointed to those offices effective October 1, 2012. He is the principal management officer of Southwest, with responsibility for supervision of its executive and senior management and the operations of Southwest and its subsidiaries. His duties include developing strategic and tactical initiatives in consultation with other members of executive management and the Chairman of the Board; making recommendations regarding other members of executive management to the Board; and implementing approved strategic and tactical plans and initiatives.
We think separation of the two offices is the appropriate leadership structure for Southwest. We believe the division of duties is especially appropriate as legal and regulatory requirements applicable to the Board and its committees continue to expand, and help provide the appropriate levels of communication between the Board of Directors and executive management for Board oversight of Southwest and its management.
Risk Oversight and the Board
The Board of Directors as a whole is ultimately responsible for risk management oversight of Southwest. It is assisted by its committees, including the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Governance Committee, whose duties are described below, as well as other committees, such as the Directors’ Credit Committee of Bank SNB, our subsidiary bank, which is responsible for oversight of Bank SNB’s credit policies and risks, and the Company’s management-level Risk Management Committee, that meets at least quarterly and reports directly to the Audit Committee. While other Board-appointed committees may have primary oversight of certain risks, the Audit Committee is charged with oversight of all risks on an enterprise wide basis. These committees regularly provide reports of their activities and conclusions to the full Board for discussion and acceptance.
The Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer address risk matters at the regular Board meetings. In addition to Mr. Funke, other members of senior management, including senior risk officers, regularly provide reports directly to the Board of Directors in the Board meetings.
Audit Committee
Southwest’s Audit Committee has adopted a written charter, which has been approved by the Board of Directors. A copy of this charter is available on the governance area of Southwest’s website—www.oksb.com. Current members are Thomas D. Berry, David S. Crockett Jr., and Larry J. Lanie (Chairman). Russell W. Teubner, Chairman of the Board of Directors, is an ex officio, non-voting member of the Audit Committee. The committee met 17 times in 2014.
The Audit Committee of the Board oversees and reports to the Board of Directors regarding accounting and financial reporting processes, the audits of the financial statements, the qualifications and independence of the registered public accounting firm engaged to provide independent audits and related services, and the performance of the internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm, and performs the other duties of the committee specified by federal securities laws and regulations, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and related regulations (the “FDIA”), the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (the “Listing Standards”), enterprise risk management, and its charter. In addition, the committee, as directed by the Board, investigates and reports to the Board with respect to specific matters involving financial reporting, financial accounting, conflicts of interest, internal controls, and compliance with laws and regulations relating to such matters. The committee, in its capacity as a committee of the Board, is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, evaluation, termination, and oversight of the work of
any independent auditor employed by Southwest for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work. The independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the committee. The committee is responsible for the resolution of any disagreements between management of Southwest and the independent registered public accounting firm regarding financial reporting. All members of the committee are “independent” as defined in applicable law, regulations of the SEC, the FDIA, and the Listing Standards. Members of the committee also meet all other applicable requirements of the SEC, FDIA, and the Listing Standards for financial, accounting, or related expertise. The Board has determined that Mr. Crockett qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under the Listing Standards and applicable securities regulations. Under SEC regulations and Southwest policy, the identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations, or liability greater than those to which he or she otherwise is subject as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors.
Compensation Committee
Southwest’s Compensation Committee charter has been approved by the Board of Directors and is available in the governance section of Southwest’s website—www.oksb.com. Current members are John Cohlmia (Chairman), James M. Johnson, and Marran H. Ogilvie. Russell W. Teubner, Chairman of the Board of Directors, is an ex officio, non-voting member of the Compensation Committee. All members of the committee are independent directors within the meaning of the Listing Standards, and may not have any interlocks of the type described below. The committee met 8 times in 2014.
The Compensation Committee of the Board reviews Southwest’s compensation policies and programs and makes recommendations to the Board based on these reviews; reviews and recommends Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) compensation to the Board for its approval; reviews the CEO’s recommendations about other executive officers’ compensation and makes recommendations to the Board based on these reviews; reviews and recommends changes in director compensation to the Board; assists in developing and determining executive management incentive plan awards and stock based awards to eligible officers; reviews and recommends employment agreements, including change-in-control agreements; reviews Southwest’s incentive compensation plans to ensure they do not encourage excessive risk; performs the other duties of the committee specified by federal banking and securities laws and regulations and the Listing Standards; and, as directed by the Board, investigates and reports to the Board with respect to specific matters involving compensation and benefits.
The committee is advised by an independent third-party compensation consulting firm and by Southwest’s outside legal counsel. The committee may delegate to the appropriate officers of Southwest the responsibility for executing and delivering agreements and documents approved by the committee. The Chief Executive Officer is not present during deliberation of his compensation by the committee or the Board. The compensation of other Named Executive Officers is determined by a vote of the independent directors in connection with the annual budget process.
Compensation Committee Interlocks
None of the members of the Compensation Committee has ever been an officer or an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors, or on the compensation committee of the board of directors, of any entities whose executive officers serve on our Board.
Governance Committee
Southwest’s Governance Committee serves as its standing nominating committee. The committee’s charter has been approved by the Board of Directors and is available in the governance section of Southwest’s website—www.oksb.com. Current members of the Governance Committee are James M. Morris II (Chairman), Marran H. Ogilvie, and Russell W. Teubner. All members of the committee are independent directors within the meaning of the Listing Standards. The Committee met 3 times in 2014.
The committee is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors whether or not to nominate each director whose term expires at the next annual meeting of shareholders and for identifying and recommending to the Board of Directors persons to be nominated as new directors of Southwest. In fulfilling these duties the Committee considers whether or not the director meets the minimum criteria for Board membership based upon the director’s honesty, integrity, reputation in his or her community, existence of any actual or potential conflicts of interest, past service as director, and other factors it deems appropriate. In addition to the minimum standards, the Committee intends to ensure that at least one director has the knowledge, training, and experience to qualify as an audit committee financial expert. The Committee also may consider other knowledge, training, experience, ownership of Southwest common stock, and other factors when making recommendations for nominees to the Board of Directors. The Committee’s decisions are made based on the person’s expected contributions to the Board of Directors in furtherance of the interests of shareholders and regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, age, or religion.
The Governance Committee is also responsible for considering persons recommended for nomination as directors by shareholders, other directors, and officers. It is Southwest’s policy that no shareholder nomination or recommendation need be
considered unless the committee determines, in its good faith discretion, that (i) the manner and substance of the recommendation or nomination and the related information and materials provided in connection with the recommendation or nomination comply with the procedural and substantive requirements of Southwest’s Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, and state and federal law, and (ii) if elected, the person recommended or nominated may lawfully serve on the Board. Shareholders may submit recommendations for director candidates for consideration by the Governance Committee to the Secretary by first class mail. Please also see “Shareholder Proposals and Communications” on page 30 of this Proxy Statement.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that all Directors and Director Nominees other than Mr. Funke are independent under the Listing Standards. Those independent directors are:
| | | |
| | | |
| James E. Berry II | Patrice Douglas | James M. Morris II |
| Thomas D. Berry | James M. Johnson | Marran H. Ogilvie |
| John Cohlmia | Larry J. Lanie | Russell W. Teubner |
| David S. Crockett, Jr. | | |
Director Independence Standards
In general, an independent director means a person, other than a person having a relationship that, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In addition, the following persons are not independent:
(i)A person who is now or during the last three years has been an officer or employee of Southwest or of any parent or subsidiary of Southwest;
(ii)A person who accepted, or who has a family member who accepted, any payments in excess of $120,000 from Southwest or any parent or subsidiary of Southwest during the current fiscal year or in any of the three preceding fiscal years, excluding the following payments:
(A)Compensation for Board or committee service;
(B)Payments arising solely from investment in Southwest’s securities (e.g. dividends);
(C)Compensation to a family member who is a “non-executive employee”;
(D)Benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan or “non-discretionary compensation”; and
(E)Loans permitted under Section 13(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), which, in general, include loans made in accordance with regulations governing loans between banks and their directors.
(iii)A director who is a family member of a person who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed as an executive officer by Southwest or of any parent or subsidiary of Southwest;
(iv)A director who is, or who has a family member who is, a partner, controlling shareholder, or executive officer of any organization to which Southwest made, or from which Southwest received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, other than (i) payments arising solely from investments in Southwest’s securities, or (ii) payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs;
(v)A person who is, or who has a family member who is, an executive officer of another entity at which any of the executive officers of Southwest have served on the compensation committee of the other entity; or
(vi)A person who is, or who has a family member who is, a current partner of Southwest’s outside auditor, or who was a partner or employee of Southwest’s outside auditor who worked on Southwest’s audit at any time during the past three years.
Additional Independence Standards for Members of the Audit Committee
Each member of the Audit Committee must meet the independence standards summarized above. In addition, none of the following are considered independent for purposes of Audit Committee membership:
(i)A person who currently accepts, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from Southwest or from any subsidiary of Southwest, other than fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan
(including deferred compensation) for prior service with Southwest if such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service with Southwest or any subsidiary of Southwest; or
(ii)A person who is an affiliated person of Southwest or any subsidiary of Southwest. Affiliated persons are persons who directly or indirectly control Southwest, including, but not limited to, persons who are executive officers of Southwest or a subsidiary of Southwest, a director who is also an employee of Southwest or a subsidiary of Southwest, and a general partner or management member of a subsidiary of Southwest. Affiliated persons do not include persons who do not beneficially own 10% or more of any class of voting securities of Southwest or a subsidiary of Southwest and who are not executive officers of Southwest or a subsidiary of Southwest.
The Board of Directors of Bank SNB, an Oklahoma state banking corporation (“Bank SNB”), Southwest’s banking subsidiary, also has determined that each member of Bank SNB’s Audit Committee, which has the same membership as the Southwest Audit Committee, is independent of management, based upon consideration of whether the director is or has been an officer or employee of Bank SNB or any of its affiliates; serves or served as a consultant, advisor, promoter, underwriter, legal counsel, or trustee of or to Bank SNB or any of its affiliates; is a relative of an officer or other employee of Bank SNB or any of its affiliates; holds or controls or held or controlled, direct or indirect financial interest in Bank SNB or any of its affiliates; or has outstanding extensions of credit from Bank SNB or any of its affiliates, among other factors the Board deems relevant. A director is not considered independent of management if such director is, or has been within the preceding year, an officer or employee of Bank SNB or any of its affiliates, or owns or controls, or has owned or controlled within the preceding year, securities representing 10% or more of any outstanding class of voting securities of Bank SNB.
Additional Independence Standards for Members of the Compensation Committee
Each member of the Compensation Committee must meet the independence standards summarized above. In addition, no member of the Compensation Committee may accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from Southwest or any subsidiary thereof.
Executive Sessions
Independent directors have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present. In 2014, there were 11 executive sessions of the Board of Directors. Executive sessions are presided over by the Chairman of the Board, who is an independent director.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
During 2014, the independent members of our Board of Directors received the following cash compensation:
• an annual retainer of $11,000;
• a meeting fee of $750 per Board meeting and $300 per Committee meeting if held on the same day as a Board meeting and $600 if the Committee meeting is not held on the same day as a Board meeting;
• an additional annual retainer of $10,750 for the Chairman of the Board;
• an additional annual retainer of $6,000 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee;
• an additional annual retainer of $4,500 for the Chairman of the Compensation Committee;
• an additional annual retainer of $4,500 for the Chairman of the Governance Committee;
• an additional annual retainer of $4,500 for the Chairman of Bank SNB’s Directors’ Credit Committee; and
• an additional annual fee of $8,000 for the designated Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Mark Funke, our President and CEO, does not receive any fees for serving on our Board of Directors.
Our directors are also eligible to receive non-incentive stock options and other stock based awards under our 2008 Stock Based Award Plan. We believe equity compensation is an important part of director compensation. Equity grants appropriately link the directors to the shareholders they represent. Director equity grants are awarded in December of the year in which the service was performed to appropriately link the payment and disclosure of director compensation amounts to the year in which the service was performed. As such, on December 17, 2014, we granted restricted stock awards of 1,200 shares to each of Messrs. James E. Berry, II, Thomas D. Berry, John Cohlmia, David S. Crockett Jr., James M. Johnson, Larry J. Lanie, James M. Morris II, and Russell W. Teubner and Ms. Marran H. Ogilvie. The closing market price of our common stock on the day of grant was $16.50 per share. These grants were made for 2014 board service and have a one-year vesting requirement attached to the grant.
The following table summarizes compensation for each person who was a member of Southwest’s Board of directors during 2014.
| | | | | | | |
| Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | Stock Awards (1) | | Total |
| James E. Berry, II | | $21,950 | | $19,800 | | $41,750 |
| Thomas D. Berry | | 31,550 | | 19,800 | | 51,350 |
| John Cohlmia | | 35,150 | | 19,800 | | 54,950 |
| David S. Crockett, Jr. | | 37,450 | | 19,800 | | 57,250 |
| J. Berry Harrison | | 7,000 | | - | | 7,000 |
| James M. Johnson (2) | | 36,350 | | 19,800 | | 56,150 |
| David P. Lambert | | 7,900 | | - | | 7,900 |
| Larry J. Lanie | | 40,550 | | 19,800 | | 60,350 |
| James M. Morris II | | 24,900 | | 19,800 | | 44,700 |
| Marran H. Ogilvie | | 27,200 | | 19,800 | | 47,000 |
| Robert B. Rodgers | | 3,650 | | - | | 3,650 |
| Russell W. Teubner | | 51,000 | | 19,800 | | 70,800 |
| | | | | | | |
(1) | The amounts shown in this column reflect the dollar amounts of the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted in 2014 for the named Directors in accordance with SEC rules. |
(2) | Mr. Johnson elected to defer 50% of the fees for 2014 under the Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan. This plan is unfunded, and for 2014 deferrals, pays interest based on any increase in the value of Southwest's common stock and pays interest on amounts previously deferred at an annual rate of 1.00% less than the rate earned on interest earnings assets by Bank SNB. No other Director participated in the plan during 2014. |
We annually conduct a peer group compensation analysis of director compensation. The compensation review utilizes the same peer group as the annual executive compensation review (the specific peers are identified later in this document). This market compensation study is conducted by Blanchard Consulting Group, the Compensation Committee’s independent third party consultant and the study reviews such items as total director compensation, average director compensation, board structure, board and committee meeting fees, number of board and committee meetings, committee and board chair fees, and breaks down cash and equity compensation as a percentage of total compensation. The Compensation Committee utilizes the findings from this study to assess the appropriateness of its current director compensation practices when compared to those of our peers. We do not make decisions based solely on these market studies. We believe it is appropriate to review the competitive marketplace and then make decisions based on the philosophy, current situation and needs that are unique to Southwest. Southwest generally targets director compensation between the 50th and 75th percentiles of its peers for an average director. However, portions of director compensation are dependent on the number of meetings that are held so we acknowledge that in certain years director compensation may be higher or lower based on the board or committee’s meeting needs for that year. Our general philosophy surrounding director compensation is that Southwest is paying for the time and expertise of our independent directors.
COMMON STOCK OWNED BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The shares of our common stock that were beneficially owned on the Record Date by each person who is a director nominee or was a director or NEO on that date and by all directors and executive officers as a group are shown below.
| | | | | |
| Name | | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) | | Percentage of Shares Outstanding (2) |
| Mark W. Funke | | 241,892 | | 1.27% |
| Joe T. Shockley, Jr. | | 42,013 | | * |
| Priscilla Barnes | | 26,085 | | * |
| James D. Bygland | | 15,894 | | * |
| John Danielson | | 16,748 | | * |
| James E. Berry, II | | 201,770 | | 1.06% |
| Thomas D. Berry | | 77,818 | | * |
| John Cohlmia | | 15,287 | | * |
| David S. Crockett, Jr. | | 15,012 | | * |
| Patrice Douglas | | - | | * |
| James M. Johnson | | 14,977 | | * |
| Larry J. Lanie | | 9,250 | | * |
| James M. Morris II | | 30,300 | | * |
| Marran H. Ogilvie | | 23,344 | | * |
| Russell W. Teubner | | 165,231 | | * |
| All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (18 persons) | | 936,521 | | 4.91% |
| | | | | |
| * Less than one percent of shares outstanding | | | | |
(1) | Beneficial ownership is defined by rules of the SEC and includes shares that the person has or shares voting or investment power over and shares that the person has a right to acquire within 60 days from March 2, 2015. |
(2) | In calculating the percentage ownership of each named individual and the group, the number of shares outstanding includes any shares that the person or the group has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 2, 2015. |
OWNERS OF MORE THAN 5% OF SOUTHWEST’S COMMON STOCK
Beneficial owners of more than 5% of the common stock are required to file certain ownership reports under the federal securities laws. The following table shows the common stock beneficially owned by persons who have filed these reports reporting beneficial ownership that exceeds 5% of Southwest’s outstanding common stock on March 2, 2015.
| | | | | |
| Name | | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) | | Percentage of Shares Outstanding (2) |
| Endeavour Capital Advisors Inc. | (3) | 1,504,267 | | 7.89% |
| Dimensional Fund Advisors LP | (4) | 1,324,577 | | 6.95% |
| BlackRock Inc. | (5) | 1,267,593 | | 6.65% |
| Polaris Capital Management, LLC | (6) | 1,122,534 | | 5.89% |
| Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC | (7) | 1,033,276 | | 5.42% |
| Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. | (8) | 966,815 | | 5.07% |
| | | | | |
(1) | Beneficial ownership is defined by rules of the SEC and includes shares that the person has or shares voting or investment power. A decision to disclaim beneficial ownership or to include shares held by others is made by the shareholder, not by Southwest. |
(2) | Calculated by Southwest based upon shares reported as beneficially owned by the listed persons and shares of Southwest common stock outstanding on March 2, 2015. |
(3) | The address of Endeavour Capital Advisors Inc. is 410 Greenwich Avenue, Greenwich, CT 06830. |
(4) | The address of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746. |
(5) | The address of BlackRock Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022. |
(6) | The address of Polaris Capital Management, LLC is 121 High Street, Boston, MA 02110. |
(7) | The address of Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC is 225 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110. |
(8) | The address of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. is 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282. |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our compensation philosophy, components, goals, processes, and methodologies for determining executive compensation for our NEOs.
The Compensation Committee, our CEO, and the full Board of Directors have important roles in the process of establishing executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee regularly engages a compensation consulting firm to provide independent compensation advice and market data and analysis. The independent third-party consultants are engaged by and report directly to the Compensation Committee and do not perform other work for us or our management outside of compensation consulting services.
The Compensation Committee monitors the results of the advisory “say-on-pay” proposal vote and incorporates such results as one of many factors considered in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities, although no such factor is assigned a quantitative weighting. Because a vast majority (94%) of our shareholders approved the compensation program described in our proxy statement in 2014, the Compensation Committee did not implement any significant changes to our executive compensation program.
Please refer to the Summary Compensation Table, which summarizes compensation for the executive officers for the last three years, and to the detailed compensation disclosures under the heading “Executive Compensation” beginning on page 22.
Philosophy and Guiding Principles
We recognize that the ability to retain and recruit executive officers is critical to the achievement of our annual and long range goals. Our executive compensation philosophy is intended to accomplish the following:
| " | | Maintain a compensation program that will enable the Company to attract and retain top level talent that will support the Company’s current and long-term growth goals. |
| " | | Provide incentive opportunities (both cash and equity) for executive leadership that will be strongly tied to the performance of the organization. |
| " | | Have a compensation program that balances the needs for long-term earnings, a high quality balance sheet that emphasizes solid credit quality and assets, and strong shareholder returns. |
| " | | Promote retention and long-term value within executive leadership by having a significant portion of compensation paid in equity that vests over time and is linked to the long-term return provided to shareholders. |
The Compensation Committee believes in a pay for performance culture that incorporates a balance between driving performance and not promoting excessive risk taking. Our incentive programs for the CEO and NEOs are designed to have the appropriate balance between short-term and long-term rewards. Additionally, we focus on ensuring that our compensation programs contain appropriate risk profiles (i.e., they do not promote excessive risk taking that could be detrimental to our long-term financial health). We have performed risk reviews on all of our incentive compensation programs and will continue to conduct periodic risk reviews in future years. Our Compensation Committee has determined that our current incentive compensation programs do not promote excessive, inappropriate, or unnecessary risk taking that could be detrimental to our long-term health.
Our Compensation Committee believes it is important to have a portion of the NEOs’ compensation linked to the long-term performance of the Company and to shareholder returns. We want our NEOs to be shareholders of the Company and we want their compensation to have a variable portion that is tied to the long-term success of our organization. We believe granting and using equity compensation is an appropriate method to link executive compensation to shareholder returns. Because we want our NEOs to be shareholders, we impose significant minimum equity holding requirements on our NEOs. Our CEO is required to hold equity in the Company worth at least three (3) times his annual base salary. Our NEOs, other than our CEO, are required to hold equity in the Company worth at least one (1) time such NEO’s annual base salary.
We intend that total compensation and each of its components be market competitive and consistent with our short and long-term performance goals. The Compensation Committee annually reviews compensation data from a public peer group of approximately twenty similarly asset sized banking organizations and supplements this peer group data with banking survey compensation data. The specific peer group utilized in 2014 is provided later in this document. This market data is provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultants. The Committee uses this market data to understand the competitive environment, but ultimately makes decisions based on the current needs and compensation philosophy of the Company. Compensation of our CEO and NEOs has a portion that is contingent upon both our annual and long-term performance.
The CEO does not participate in the deliberation of his compensation, but provides recommendations for the other NEOs to the Compensation Committee.
The components of total compensation are (a) base salary compensation, (b) annual cash incentive compensation, (c) equity incentive compensation in the form of stock based awards, and (d) executive retirement programs and perquisites. A detailed discussion of each of these individual compensation components begins in the bullet points below.
| " | | Base Salaries – From a long-term perspective the Company targets the 50th percentile of the market for base salaries of NEOs who are fully functioning and performing in his/her respective roles. However, the short-term philosophy for the Company is to pay above the 50th percentile for base salaries as the Company has needed to attract a new leadership team that will drive the Company to meet its growth and return goals in the next few years. |
| " | | Cash Incentives – The Company believes annual cash incentives/bonuses should be a part of the total compensation package. These cash awards should be based primarily on Company performance at the executive level, but some individual/department components may be utilized where appropriate. The cash incentives should be market competitive, but are not designed to provide large “upside” for short-term performance. |
| " | | Equity Incentives – The Company believes strongly in the use of performance-based equity incentive compensation. The primary equity vehicle that is used at the executive leadership level is restricted stock with multi-year vesting requirements. The Company wants executive leadership to be rewarded for providing long-term value and returns to shareholders. The equity incentive goals should be primarily Company focused. The Company also wants to drive retention and long-term value amongst the NEOs so vesting requirements and holding requirements are a part of the equity incentive plan. The Company believes in providing above market equity awards for above market performance and market competitive awards for at market performance. |
| " | | Retirement Programs & Perquisites – Currently, the Company does not place a large emphasis in the areas of retirement compensation or perquisites. The Company offers a 401(k) and voluntary deferred compensation program, but they are not a primary focus for executive compensation currently. Although retirement programs and perquisites currently represent only a small portion of the total executive compensation package, this could change in the future. |
Further, steps have also been taken to ensure executives’ interests are aligned with shareholders’ interests by instituting stock ownership requirements and clawback provisions. Both policies were in place for the entire 2014 calendar year. The Board may make exceptions to these principles if it is determined to be necessary/appropriate. (See “Board of Directors and Compensation Committee Discretion; Adjustments” on page 19.) We and our subsidiaries are equal employment opportunity employers.
Base Salary Compensation (Salary)
The base salary of our NEOs is typically reviewed annually during the first quarter, and any changes are made effective on April 1st. Base salary compensation is intended to provide a predictable and stable source of income over the year but is subject to increase or decrease at the discretion of the Board.
The base salary of our CEO is approved by the Board of Directors based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The base salary of our other NEOs is established by the Board based upon the recommendations of our CEO in connection with approval of the annual budget. The Compensation Committee and the CEO utilize the data from our independent consulting reports and consider the executive’s responsibilities, qualifications, experience, performance, and internal pay equity when making decisions.
The long-term goal of the Compensation Committee is to maintain the annual base salary level for the CEO and other NEOs at a level comparable to the median of the peer group/market data reflected in the report of the compensation consultant used by the Committee in its annual review. However, over the last few years the Compensation Committee determined it may be appropriate in certain situations to provide a salary level above the peer group median level to attract the executive candidates it desired. The intent of the Compensation Committee is that these executive’s annual base salary will not be increased significantly until such time as peer group market data and internal performance supports such an increase. As an example, none of our NEOs received an annual base salary increase in 2014.
Base salaries and adjustments for our current NEOs during 2014 are shown in the following table.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Base Salary | | Increase |
Name and Position | | 2014 | | 2013 | | Amount | | Percentage |
Mark W. Funke | | $425,000 | | $425,000 | | $ - | | 0.00% |
President and | | | | | | | | |
Chief Executive Officer | | | | | | | | |
Joe T. Shockley, Jr. | | 300,000 | | 300,000 | | - | | 0.00% |
Executive Vice President and | | | | | | | | |
Chief Financial Officer | | | | | | | | |
Priscilla Barnes | | 330,000 | | 330,000 | | - | | 0.00% |
Senior Executive Vice President and | | | | | | | | |
Chief Operating Officer | | | | | | | | |
James D. Bygland | | 225,000 | | 225,000 | | - | | 0.00% |
Executive Vice President and | | | | | | | | |
Chief Information Officer | | | | | | | | |
John Danielson | | 260,000 | | 260,000 | | - | | 0.00% |
Executive Vice President and | | | | | | | | |
Chief Banking Officer | | | | | | | | |
Annual Cash and Equity Incentive Compensation
The Compensation Committee considers annual cash and equity incentive compensation critical to the alignment of executive compensation with the creation of shareholder value. Cash incentives could consist of annual cash incentives or discretionary cash bonuses. Equity incentive compensation could consist of grants of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares or stock options. Equity incentive compensation is designed to focus executives on our long-term success, as reflected in increases to our stock price, growth in our earnings per share, maintenance of a high quality balance sheet that emphasizes solid credit quality and assets, and other elements that may vary from year to year.
Chief Executive Officer
Annual Incentive Compensation
Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement with our CEO, Mark W. Funke, 2014 marked the first year where the CEO’s annual incentive compensation was not guaranteed. Starting in 2014, and ending with calendar year 2016, 50% of the CEO’s annual bonus opportunity (which is defined as 100% of his base salary) is subject to the following specific performance conditions:
(1) no subsidiary Bank has a Classified Asset Ratio greater than 40% for 2014.
(2) the Company and Bank SNB are not under any memorandum of understanding or formal agreement with any regulator; and
(3) Total shareholder return for the applicable calendar year is in the top twenty-fifth (25th) percentile of total shareholder returns for banks in a mutually agreed upon peer group; provided, however, with respect to any applicable calendar year, if the only criterion precluding payment of the portion of the Annual Bonus subject to these conditions is this total shareholder return condition and the Company total shareholder return for the calendar year exceeds the fiftieth (50th) percentile, then a percentage of the portion of the Annual Bonus subject to these conditions will be payable. The percentage payable shall be four percent (4%) multiplied by the number of whole numbers above the fiftieth (50th) percentile ranking that the Company achieves for its total shareholder return.
2014 Results: For 2014, both criteria (1), Classified Asset Ratio, and criteria (2), no regulatory agreements, as described above, were met. As such, the determination of the 50% of the annual bonus opportunity was based on criteria (3), total shareholder return ranking versus peers. For calendar year 2014, the Company ranked at the 61st percentile compared to its peers. Although the Company was not in the top 25th percentile (which would represent a ranking at or above the 75th percentile), it’s ranking was 11 whole numbers above the 50th percentile which resulted in Mr. Funke earning 44% of the bonus payable for reaching this performance metric. Because 50% of Mr. Funke’s annual bonus opportunity was based upon attainment of these metrics, he earned a bonus amount equal to 22% of salary for achieving these performance metrics.
The remaining 50% of the CEO’s annual bonus opportunity is subject to such performance measures as may be established by the Compensation Committee. For 2014, Mr. Funke earned 100% of the remaining half of his annual bonus opportunity as all of the performance measures established by the Compensation Committee for 2014 were met, including: exceeding the 2014 net income goal for Bank SNB, reducing Bank SNB’s Criticized Asset Ratio to below a pre-determined target level, exceeding the 2014 return on average equity goal for the Company, and successfully completing the sale of certain Bank SNB Kansas branch locations. As such, Mr. Funke earned an amount equal to 50% of his salary for achieving these performance criteria.
2014 CEO Annual Incentive Compensation Payout: As described above, Mr. Funke earned a total of 72% of his base salary in annual incentive compensation in 2014. The amount was paid in early 2015 and was paid 60% in the form of restricted stock with a three-year vesting period and 40% in cash.
Performance Stock Awards
Total Shareholder Return
Pursuant to the terms of our employment agreement with our CEO, Mark W. Funke, on February 26, 2013, Mr. Funke was granted a one-time performance award entitling him to earn up to 138,600 shares of Company common stock through December 31, 2016 based upon the total shareholder return of the Company. The table below sets forth the number of shares that will be earned, in addition to the prior level of shares earned, upon reaching each additional specified total shareholder return target:
| |
Total Shareholder Return | Performance Shares Earned |
20% | 3,850 |
30% | 7,700 |
40% | 11,550 |
50% | 15,400 |
60% | 19,250 |
70% | 23,100 |
80% | 26,950 |
90% | 30,800 |
Total shareholder return is measured from August 30, 2012, the date of Mr. Funke’s employment agreement. Once a particular total shareholder return performance measure has been met, Mr. Funke is not eligible to earn the performance shares again even if the Company achieves successive total shareholder returns at or above the threshold level in successive years. Performance shares that are earned are issued and held in escrow subject to a three-year vesting period based on Mr. Funke’s continued employment.
2013 Performance Results: In 2013, as a result of the Company’s 53% total shareholder return from the date of Mr. Funke’s employment agreement through the date of the Company’ release of its financial results for the fourth quarter of 2013, Mr. Funke earned the maximum 34,650 shares that he was able to earn in 2013 under this total shareholder return measure (3,850 shares for reaching 20%, plus 7,700 shares for reaching 30%, plus 11,550 shares for reaching 40%, plus 15,400 shares for reaching 50%, which totaled 38,500 shares, but the total number of performance shares issuable to Mr. Funke based on total shareholder return was capped at 34,650 shares for 2013 per his employment agreement).
2014 Performance Results: For 2014, the Company achieved 45% total shareholder return from the date of Mr. Funke’s employment agreement through the Company release of financial results for fourth quarter 2014. As such, no additional shares were earned beyond the shares that were already earned for 2013 performance as described above and in last year’s proxy statement. Thus, no shares were earned by Mr. Funke under this total shareholder return measure in 2014.
Return on Average Equity
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, on February 14, 2014 Mr. Funke was granted an annual performance stock award entitling him to earn up to 14,400 shares of the Company’s common stock based on the Company’s return on average equity in 2014. The table below sets forth the number of shares that will be earned upon reaching specified return on average equity targets:
Return on Average Equity | Performance Shares Earned |
7.0% | 3,600 |
7.5% | 5,400 |
8.0% | 7,200 |
8.5% | 9,000 |
9.0% | 10,800 |
9.5% | 12,600 |
10.0% | 14,400 |
2014 Performance Results: Performance shares that are earned are issued and held in escrow subject to a three-year vesting period based on Mr. Funke’s continued employment. The Company’s return on average equity for 2014 was 7.8%, therefore, Mr. Funke earned 5,400 performance shares for 2014 under this return on average equity measure.
Conditions to Receiving any Performance Stock Awards
Mr. Funke will not earn any of the performance stock awards unless all of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) a classified asset ratio no greater than 35% in 2015 or 2016, (ii) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 9%, and (iii) no regulatory enforcement action against the Company or its banking subsidiary. As of December 31, 2014, all of these conditions are being met.
Named Executive Officers (Excluding CEO)
In late 2012, the Compensation Committee approved our Senior Management Incentive Plan. The Senior Management Incentive Plan year is based upon performance during a calendar year and 2013 was the first plan year. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer selects the employees who are eligible to participate in the Senior Management Incentive Plan each year (the “Senior Management Incentive Plan Participants”). The Company’s NEOs (excluding the CEO) are all Senior Management Incentive Plan Participants.
The Senior Management Incentive Plan provides annual incentive awards to eligible Plan Participants based on the achievement of a combination of predetermined Company, department, and/or individual performance criteria. The specific goals, weightings and award opportunity levels at threshold, target, and maximum for each plan participant will be determined annually by the Compensation Committee of the Board upon the advice of the CEO, and subject to approval by the Board.
No awards are payable under the Senior Management Incentive Plan unless the Company meets a minimum net income performance level. In addition, no awards will be made with respect to any Company-wide performance criteria unless a minimum credit quality metric is also met. The Compensation Committee required that both a minimum net income and a minimum credit quality “hurdle” be included in the Senior Management Incentive Plan. The net income hurdle ensures incentives are only paid if the Company can afford to pay them and the credit quality hurdle places an appropriate emphasis on credit quality. The Compensation Committee wants to reward Senior Management Incentive Plan Participants for strong Company financial performance, but it also wants to ensure that the performance is created within a strong credit environment. If the Company credit quality ratios fall below acceptable levels, the Company-wide portion of the potential award (which constitutes 70% of the total award potential of the Senior Management Incentive Plan) will not be earned/paid. This requires the Company’s executive management to balance the desire for earnings with the need for good credit quality. If the minimum credit quality performance metric is not met, participants may still be eligible to receive payouts related to their department, discretionary, and/or individual performance objectives, so long as the Company achieves the minimum net income performance in the given year.
For 2014, the minimum net income performance level was set at $13.0 million and the minimum credit quality metric provided that criticized and classified assets as a percentage of capital could not exceed a certain maximum percentage. Both the minimum net income performance level and the minimum credit quality metric were met in 2014.
Award amounts payable to participants achieving performance objectives are calculated as a proportion of threshold, target, and maximum award levels. Each participant earns a payout percentage that is multiplied by his/her eligible salary level to create the actual incentive award amount. For 2014, the threshold payout percentage was 0%, the target payout percentage was 40%, and maximum payout percentage was 80% of eligible salary. The performance objectives are weighted such that a certain percentage of the total potential award is payable for meeting each specific performance criteria. For 2014, each Senior Management Incentive Plan Participant’s award was weighted such that 70% of the total potential award was tied to Company-wide performance objectives and 30% of the total potential award was tied to department/individual performance objectives.
The following table describes the Company-wide threshold, target and maximum award levels, and the actual performance level, applicable to all Senior Management Incentive Plan Participants in 2014, which included each of the NEOs other than the CEO.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Company Goal Weight | | Criteria | | Threshold | | Target | | Max | | Actual Performance |
| 30% | | Net Income | | $14,500,000 | | $16,500,000 | | $19,500,000 | | $18,293,000 | (2) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 20% | | Criticized & Classified Assets as a % of Capital | | (1) | | (1) | | (1) | | Above Maximum | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 20% | | ROE | | 6.0% | | 7.0% | | 8.5% | | 7.8% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | The Company does not disclose information regarding amounts of criticized and classified assets. Such information is highly confidential and would put the Company in a competitive disadvantage if it were disclosed to the public. |
(2) | Excludes the after-tax impact of net gain on the bank branch sales. |
The Company pays the earned incentive award 40% in cash and 60% in restricted stock. The cash portion was paid during the first quarter of 2015 (the year following the Senior Management Incentive Plan calendar year) and was contingent upon the Plan Participant’s continued employment with the Company through the date of payment. For the 2014 plan year, the restricted stock portion was granted at the same time the cash incentive was paid (the number of shares were determined based on the closing price on the grant date) and has a three-year vesting period following the grant date.
For 2014, each of the Senior Management Incentive Plan Participants earned between 65% and 70% of salary under the 2014 Senior Management Incentive Plan. These results were between target and maximum performance levels for each of the NEOs (excluding the CEO).
NEO Discretionary Awards
The Compensation Committee and the CEO may recommend, and the Board may approve, discretionary awards on an annual basis. For 2014, no discretionary awards were made to any of our NEOs.
Retirement Programs and Perquisites
Retirement programs and perquisites are a part of competitive total compensation. We intend to provide benefits and perquisites that are competitive. Our NEOs are eligible to participate in the benefit plans generally available to our employees, including our tax qualified 401(k) and profit sharing plan. In addition, the Bank SNB Elective Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan”) is an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan designed to allow a select group of management or highly compensated employees (each a “Participant” and collectively, the “Participants”) of the Company or Bank SNB to save for retirement on a tax-deferred basis.
The 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan became effective on December 20, 2012 and the initial Plan year was the 2013 calendar year. Participants in the Plan may elect to defer a portion of their upcoming plan year compensation by selecting one of the following options: (a) a specified percentage of Participant’s base salary (not to exceed 50%); (b) all amounts of Participant's base salary for the upcoming Plan year in excess of a specified dollar amount per payroll period (the amount specified must not be less than (i) $60,000 divided by (ii) the number of Participant's payroll periods in a calendar year); or (c) a specified percentage (up to 100%) of any eligible bonus earned by, and which would otherwise be payable to, the Plan Participant during or after the Plan year.
Amounts deferred under the 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan are credited to bookkeeping accounts maintained for each Participant and are credited or debited with the Participant’s proportionate share of any gains or losses attributable to the earnings indices selected by the Participant. The earnings indices are notional investments for earnings and include the following options: (a) an account bearing interest at an annual rate, adjusted each calendar quarter, equal to the greater of (i) one percentage point (1.00%) less than the annualized average interest rate earned (non-taxable equivalent) by Bank SNB on average interest-earning assets for the previous calendar quarter, as calculated in good faith by Bank SNB, or (ii) zero percent (0%); and (b) the common stock of the Company. The earnings indices are to be used for measurement purposes only and amounts deferred under the 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan will not represent any actual investment made on the Participants’ behalf. The amount required to be paid under the 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan is equal to the elective deferrals made by each Participant, as adjusted for the hypothetical gains or losses based on the earnings indices selected by the Participant.
Participants must select one of the following options as to the time of payment of all amounts deferred for all Plan years under the 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan: (a) the Participant's separation from service; (b) the date the Participant
attains seventy-two (72) years of age; or (c) the later of: (i) the Participant's Separation from Service, or (ii) a specific date not later than the date on which the Participant will attain 72 years of age.
Participants must also select one of the following options as to form of payment of all amounts deferred for all Plan years under the 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan: (a) a single lump sum; (b) equal monthly installments over a five (5) year period; (c) equal monthly installments over a ten (10) year period; or (d) equal monthly installments over a fifteen (15) year period.
In 2014, Mr. Funke and Mr. Shockley were the only NEOs who were Participants in the 2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
We also offer a 401(k) plan that is intended to supplement the employee’s personal savings and social security. All employees, including our executive officers, are generally eligible for the 401(k) plan. Executive officers participate in the 401(k) plan on the same basis as other employees. We adopted the 401(k) plan to enable employees to save for retirement through a tax-advantaged combination of employee and Company contributions and to provide employees the opportunity to directly manage their retirement plan assets through a variety of investment options. The 401(k) plan allows eligible employees to elect to contribute up to 90% of their eligible compensation, up to the annual IRS dollar limit. Eligible compensation generally means all wages, salaries and fees for services paid by us. We contribute a non-elective safe harbor minimum of 3% of each eligible employee’s salary per year to their 401(k) plan. We may also elect to make a discretionary profit sharing contribution for each eligible employee. In 2014, our employer contribution was 3%.
Board of Directors and Compensation Committee Discretion; Adjustments
Additional performance bonuses, stock options, and other stock-based awards may be made within the discretion of the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee also may consider other factors, and may change the basis of assessing our performance in the future, based upon our annual or longer-term goals.
Executive Compensation Plan Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee, the Board and management do not believe that there are any significant risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees, including non-executive officers, that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. For 2014, compensation of our NEOs was comprised of both fixed (based salary) and variable (annual cash and equity incentives) compensation. The Compensation Committee, the Board and management do not believe that the compensation paid to our NEOs encouraged unnecessary or excessive risks. Our Compensation Committee intends to continue to conduct periodic risk reviews of our compensation plans in the future. The Compensation Committee factored risk mitigation into the decisions that were made surrounding the CEO’s incentive plan (as detailed in his employment agreement) and the Senior Management Incentive Plan.
As examples, Mr. Funke’s employment agreement contains performance vesting features with respect to restricted stock awards that not only require a traditional performance criterion of return on average equity but are also contingent upon supplemental criteria that ensure that the performance goals do not encourage excess risk taking. The Senior Management Incentive Plan requires both earnings and asset/credit quality hurdles to be met before payouts may be earned. We have also incorporated a clawback clause in the Senior Management Incentive Plan that allows us to recoup awards that are paid based on misstated financial amounts or employee misconduct.
Employment Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mark W. Funke, and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Joe T. Shockley, Jr. The employment agreements between us and each of Mr. Funke and Mr. Shockley provide for (i) general restrictions on the disclosure of confidential information and (ii) an agreement that during employment and for a period of 12 months thereafter each of Mr. Funke and Mr. Shockley will not solicit our customers or employees. Both Messrs. Funke and Shockley remain at-will employees under their employment agreements.
Mark W. Funke
Mr. Funke’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $425,000, a signing bonus, annual incentive compensation, and equity compensation. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, in 2012 Mr. Funke received a one-time signing bonus consisting of a payment of $40,000 in cash and a restricted stock award for 41,700 shares of our common stock, which vested 180 days after the grant date.
Mr. Funke is entitled to an annual bonus opportunity of up to 100% of his base salary. Half of Mr. Funke’s annual bonus opportunity is based on performance measures established by the Compensation Committee. The remaining half is earned if: (1) no subsidiary bank has a classified asset ratio greater than 40% in 2014 and 35% in 2015 and 2016; (2) neither we nor any subsidiary
bank is subject to a regulatory enforcement action; and (3) total shareholder return, as defined in the employment agreement, is in the top 25th percentile of banks in a mutually agreed-upon peer group. If the total shareholder return condition is the only condition not satisfied, Mr. Funke will receive a partial bonus to the extent that we are above the 50th percentile of our peer group. The Board has discretion to pay the annual bonus in cash and/or shares of common stock. Mr. Funke’s total annual bonus in 2014 was $306,850, with $122,740 paid in cash and $184,110 in the form of a restricted stock award subject to a three-year vesting period.
We have granted Mr. Funke a one-time performance stock award entitling Mr. Funke to earn up to 138,600 shares of our common stock based on our total shareholder return through December 31, 2016. Portions of the shares may be earned for interim performance. In 2013, as a result of the Company’s 53% total shareholder return (measured from August 30, 2012, the date of Mr. Funke’s employment agreement), Mr. Funke earned the maximum 34,650 shares of the 138,600 shares granted under his one-time performance stock award that he was able to earn in 2013. In 2014, as a result of the Company’s 45% total shareholder return (measured from August 30, 2012, the date of Mr. Funke’s employment agreement), Mr. Funke earned zero additional shares of the 138,600 shares granted under his one-time performance stock award that he was able to earn in 2014. In 2014, we granted Mr. Funke an annual performance stock award entitling Mr. Funke to earn up to 14,400 shares of our common stock based our return on average equity for 2014. Since the Company’s return on average equity of 7.8% in 2014 was above the minimum threshold, Mr. Funke earned 5,400 shares of our common stock under this annual performance stock award. Mr. Funke has also received an annual performance stock award entitling him to earn up to 14,400 shares of our common stock in 2015 based on our return on average equity in 2015 and he will also receive an annual performance stock award entitling him to earn up to 14,400 shares of our common stock in 2016 based on our annual return on average equity. Mr. Funke will not earn any shares under the performance stock awards unless all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) a classified asset ratio no greater than 35% in 2015 and 2016; (2) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 9%; and (3) no regulatory enforcement action. Any shares earned under the performance stock awards will be subject to a further three-year vesting period.
All shares issued to Mr. Funke are non-transferable until he maintains ownership of our stock at a level that is at least three times his annual base salary. Mr. Funke has also agreed to a clawback of compensation previously paid or made available to him in certain circumstances.
Unless terminated earlier under the terms of the agreement, the initial term of Mr. Funke’s employment agreement will expire on December 31, 2016; thereafter, the employment agreement will automatically renew for successive 12-month terms unless notice of non-renewal is provided by either party in accordance with the employment agreement. Mr. Funke has the right to receive benefits in the event of his termination if certain conditions are met. Please see the description under the heading “Executive Compensation – Change of Control Compensation” for a discussion of the terms upon which Mr. Funke will be paid additional compensation upon the termination of his employment.
Joe T. Shockley, Jr.
Mr. Shockley’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $300,000 per year. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, in 2012 Mr. Shockley received a one-time signing bonus consisting of a payment of $60,000 in cash and a restricted stock award for 14,800 shares of our common stock, with the shares vesting upon Mr. Shockley’s continued employment with us three years after the grant date.
Mr. Shockley is also entitled to participate in any executive annual incentive plan established by our board of directors, upon such terms as established by the board of directors.
All shares issued to Mr. Shockley are non-transferable until he maintains ownership of our stock at a level that is at least equal to his annual base salary. Mr. Shockley has also agreed to a clawback of compensation previously paid or made available to him in certain circumstances.
The initial term of Mr. Shockley’s employment agreement expired on December 31, 2014 and was automatically renewed for a one-year term expiring December 31, 2015; thereafter, the employment agreement automatically renews for successive 12-month terms unless notice of non-renewal is provided by either party in accordance with the employment agreement. Mr. Shockley has the right to receive benefits in the event of his termination in some instances following a change of control if certain conditions are met. Please see the description under the heading “Executive Compensation – Change of Control Compensation” for a discussion of the terms upon which Mr. Shockley will be paid additional compensation upon the termination of his employment following a change of control.
Compensation Consultants
The Compensation Committee engages the independent consulting firm of Blanchard Consulting Group (“Blanchard”) to provide executive and director compensation consulting advice to the Committee. The Compensation Committee considers the independence standards required by the NASDAQ or applicable law in regards to compensation consultants, accountants, legal counsel or other advisors, prior to their retention. Blanchard reports directly to the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation
Committee discusses, reviews, and approves all consulting projects performed by the firm. Blanchard does not provide other services or products to us. In addition, Blanchard does not have any other personal or business relationships with any Board member or any officer of Southwest.
The consulting firm’s role includes preparing analytical peer reviews and other data on market practices for use by the Compensation Committee in its annual compensation reviews of executive and director compensation. These reviews evaluate total compensation and its individual components. The reviews provide peer group market data values at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. The annual director compensation reviews compare our data to general industry data and data from a compensation peer group and provide information on such items as total compensation for an average director, annual retainer amounts, per meeting fees, committee meeting fees, committee and board chair fees, number of board and committee meetings, and both cash and equity compensation. The annual executive compensation reviews compare the compensation of our NEOs to general industry data from industry surveys and data from a compensation peer group. The executive review focuses on total compensation and its individual components. The review provides data on base salaries, annual cash incentives, long-term and/or equity incentives, other compensation amounts, and prevalence data on executive benefits. The executive compensation review is also provided to the CEO for his use in developing compensation recommendations to the Board regarding the other NEOs. The Compensation Committee also consults with Blanchard regarding changes in compensation made during the year and other special projects. Blanchard also assisted the Compensation Committee with designing our Senior Management Incentive Plan.
Peer Analysis
The peer group analysis described above is used as a general guide in assessing the competitiveness of our executive and director compensation programs. The peer group consists of other publicly traded bank holding companies within a specific asset size range and regional location. This group is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and the independent consultant to the Compensation Committee and is revised by the Compensation Committee when appropriate. The purpose of utilizing a regional peer group is to determine competitive compensation levels for executives and directors in areas of the country where Southwest may compete for executive level talent. The median total assets for the group as of September 30, 2014 was approximately $3.0 billion. The nineteen members of the peer group used in the Compensation Committee’s 2014 compensation reviews were:
| |
| |
National Bank Holdings Corporation First Busey Corporation Southside Bancshares, Inc. Enterprise Financial Services Corp. MainSource Financial Group, Inc. QCR Holdings, Inc. Independent Bank Group, Inc. Guaranty Bancorp MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. | Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. ViewPoint Financial Group, Inc. (now known as Legacy Texas Financial Group, Inc.) First NBC Bank Holding Company First Financial Corporation CoBiz Financial Inc. Hills Bancorporation German American Bancorp, Inc. MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. West Bancorporation, Inc. |
The measures used to assess our performance relative to our peer group in the Blanchard reports included net interest margin, efficiency ratio, return on average equity, earnings per share growth, return on average assets, tangible equity ratio, three-year asset growth, and non-performing assets compared to total assets. The analysis also includes market cap values and values for total return on a theoretical investment in the stock of each company over the previous three years.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with our management. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2014 and in this Proxy Statement.
March 10, 2015
John Cohlmia, Chairman
James M. Johnson
Marran H. Ogilvie
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes compensation earned by or awarded to our Named Executive Officers, which include our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers for 2014.
2014 Summary Compensation Table
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary | | Bonus Earned | | Stock Awards (1) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (2) | | Change in Pension Value and Non- qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (3) | | All Other Compensation (4) | | Total |
| Mark W. Funke | | 2014 | | $425,000 | | $0 | | $280,012 | | $122,740 | | $1,901 | | $20,380 | | $850,033 |
| President and | | 2013 | | 425,000 | | 240,000 | | 546,132 | | - | | 520 | | 15,171 | | 1,226,823 |
| Chief Executive Officer* | | 2012 | | 106,250 | | 240,000 | | 560,558 | | - | | - | | 27,383 | | 934,191 |
| Joe T. Shockley, Jr. | | 2014 | | 300,000 | | - | | 123,885 | | 82,590 | | 1,330 | | 25,551 | | 533,356 |
| Executive Vice President and | | 2013 | | 300,000 | | - | | 100,912 | | 67,280 | | 360 | | 17,747 | | 486,299 |
| Chief Financial Officer** | | 2012 | | 25,000 | | 60,000 | | 149,776 | | - | | - | | 1,462 | | 236,238 |
| Priscilla Barnes | | 2014 | | 330,000 | | - | | 136,272 | | 90,849 | | - | | 16,951 | | 574,072 |
| Senior Executive Vice President | | 2013 | | 330,000 | | - | | 111,018 | | 74,008 | | - | | 12,872 | | 527,898 |
| and Chief Operating Officer | | 2012 | | 314,384 | | 30,000 | | - | | - | | - | | 13,515 | | 357,899 |
| James D. Bygland | | 2014 | | 225,000 | | 30,000 | | 92,910 | | 61,943 | | - | | 15,521 | | 425,374 |
| Executive Vice President and | | 2013 | | 106,730 | | 17,500 | | 150,001 | | - | | - | | 13,776 | | 288,008 |
| Chief Information Officer*** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| John Danielson | | 2014 | | 260,000 | | - | | 101,760 | | 67,834 | | - | | 20,832 | | 450,426 |
| Executive Vice President and | | 2013 | | 260,000 | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 20,302 | | 280,302 |
| Chief Banking Officer | | 2012 | | 260,000 | | 7,500 | | - | | - | | - | | 20,052 | | 287,552 |
| * Effective October 1, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ** Effective December 1, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ***Effective July 11, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Represents the grant date fair value for restricted stock awards earned in 2014. See discussion of restricted stock in Notes 1 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Southwest's 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
(2) | Represents the cash incentive payments made to our CEO under his employment agreement and to our other NEOs under our 2014 Senior Management Incentive Plan. |
(3) | Represents amounts earned under an unfunded, unqualified deferred compensation plan, including preferential interest of $0 for Mr. Funke and Mr. Shockley. |
(4) | Please see All Other Compensation table. |
All Other Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year | | Defined Contribution Plan Contribution | | Auto Allowance | | Country Club Dues | | Other Perquisites and Benefits | | Total | |
| Mark W. Funke | | 2014 | | $7,800 | | $0 | | $11,148 | | $1,432 | | $20,380 | |
| | | 2013 | | 3,202 | | - | | 10,937 | | 1,032 | | 15,171 | |
| | | 2012 | | - | | - | | 27,125 | | 258 | | 27,383 | |
| Joe T. Shockley, Jr. | | 2014 | | 7,800 | | 12,000 | | 4,167 | | 1,584 | | 25,551 | |
| | | 2013 | | 789 | | 12,000 | | 3,374 | | 1,584 | | 17,747 | |
| | | 2012 | | - | | 1,000 | | 330 | | 132 | | 1,462 | |
| Priscilla Barnes | | 2014 | | 7,800 | | 7,719 | | - | | 1,432 | | 16,951 | |
| | | 2013 | | 7,650 | | 4,090 | | - | | 1,132 | | 12,872 | |
| | | 2012 | | 7,500 | | - | | - | | 6,015 | | 13,515 | |
| James D. Bygland | | 2014 | | 2,969 | | 12,000 | | - | | 552 | | 15,521 | |
| | | 2013 | | - | | 6,000 | | - | | 7,776 | | 13,776 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| John Danielson | | 2014 | | 7,800 | | 12,000 | | - | | 1,032 | | 20,832 | |
| | | 2013 | | 7,650 | | 12,000 | | - | | 652 | | 20,302 | |
| | | 2012 | | 7,500 | | 12,000 | | - | | 552 | | 20,052 | |
Stock Based Plan
We maintain a stock based plan to attract, retain, and motivate our and our subsidiaries’ key officers and directors by providing them with a stake in our success as measured by the value of our shares.
The 2008 Stock Based Awards Plan (the “2008 Plan”), which was approved by the shareholders at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, authorizes the issuance of up to 800,000 shares of common stock and stock-based awards, subject to certain adjustments for changes in our capital structure.
The 2008 Plan has a term of 10 years from its effective date April 24, 2008 after which date no awards may be granted under the 2008 Plan.
The 2008 Plan provides for the grant of “incentive options” as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, “non-incentive options,” restricted stock, and stock appreciation rights to directors, officers, and non-officer employees on terms and conditions established by the Stock Option Committee, which administers the Plan. The members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors act as the Stock Option Committee.
The following table provides information regarding grants of equity plan based awards during 2014.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | | | All Other Stock Awards: Number of | | Grant Date Fair Value of |
| Name | | Grant Date | | Threshold ($) | | Target ($) | | Maximum ($) | | Threshold (# or $) | | Target (# or $) | | Maximum (# or $) | | Shares of Stock (#) | | Stock Awards ($) |
| Mark W. Funke | | 2/14/2014 | | $0 | | $0 | | | $0 | | | | | | | | | | | 6,000 | | $99,840 |
| | | 2/26/2013 | | | | | | | | | | 3,850 | | 34,650 | | | 138,600 | | | | | 1,785,168 |
| | | 2/14/2014 | | | | | | | | | | 3,600 | | 3,600 | | | 14,400 | | | | | 255,744 |
| Joe T. Shockley, Jr. | | 2/14/2014 | | - | | $48,000 | (1) | | $96,000 | (1) | | $0 | | $72,000 | (2) | | $144,000 | (2) | | | | |
| Priscilla Barnes | | 2/14/2014 | | - | | 52,800 | (1) | | 105,600 | (1) | | - | | 79,200 | (2) | | 158,400 | (2) | | | | |
| James D. Bygland | | 2/14/2014 | | - | | 36,000 | (1) | | 72,000 | (1) | | - | | 54,000 | (2) | | 108,000 | (2) | | | | |
| John Danielson | | 2/14/2014 | | - | | 41,600 | (1) | | 83,200 | (1) | | - | | 62,400 | (2) | | 124,800 | (2) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Represents the 40% of the total awards under the Senior Management Incentive Plan that is payable in cash. The actual cash portion of the award earned for 2014 is shown on the Summary Compensation Table and was paid on March 6, 2015 and is not shown on this table. |
(2) | Represents the 60% of the total awards under the Senior Management Incentive Plan that is payable in stock. The actual stock portion of the award earned for 2014 is shown on the Summary Compensation Table and was paid through restricted stock grant on February 24, 2015 and is not shown on this table. |
The following table provides information regarding awards outstanding at December 31, 2014.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($) (10) | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($) |
| Mark W. Funke | | 8,600 | (1) | | $149,296 | | 118,350 | (2) | | $1,884,132 |
| | | 34,650 | (3) | | 601,524 | | | | | |
| | | 6,000 | (4) | | 104,160 | | | | | |
| Joe T. Shockley, Jr. | | 14,800 | (5) | | 235,616 | | | | | |
| | | 5,682 | (6) | | 98,640 | | | | | |
| Priscilla Barnes | | 6,251 | (7) | | 108,517 | | | | | |
| James D. Bygland | | 10,246 | (8) | | 177,871 | | | | | |
| John Danielson | | 4,398 | (9) | | 76,349 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Mr. Funke's shares were issued February 26, 2013 and vest 100% on February 26, 2016. |
(2) | Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Funke's employment agreement dated November 15, 2012, on February 26, 2013 we also issued Mr. Funke a one-time performance stock award entitling Mr. Funke to earn up to 138,600 shares of our common stock, of which 34,650 have been earned. |
(3) | Mr. Funke's shares were earned as of December 31, 2013 (calculated on February 14, 2014) and vest 100% on December 31, 2016. |
(4) | Mr. Funke's shares were issued February 14, 2014 and vest 100% on February 14, 2017. |
(5) | Mr. Shockley's shares were issued December 20, 2012 and vest 100% on December 20, 2015. |
(6) | Mr. Shockley's shares were issued February 14, 2014 and vest 100% on February 14, 2017. |
(7) | Ms. Barnes' shares were issued February 14, 2014 and vest 100% on February 14, 2017. |
(8) | Mr. Bygland's shares were issued August 23, 2013 and vest 100% on August 23, 2016. |
(9) | Mr. Danielson's shares were issued February 14, 2014 and vest 100% on February 14, 2017. |
(10) | Market values are based on the closing price for our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2014, which was $17.36 per share. |
There were no stock awards that vested during 2014. The table below provides information on the contributions, earnings and account balances for the NEOs participating in our nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name (1) | | Executive Contributions in 2014 (2) | | Registrant Contributions in 2014 | | Aggregate Earnings in 2014 (3) | | Aggregate Withdrawals / Distributions | | Aggregate Balance at December 31, 2014 |
| Mark W. Funke | | $44,772 | | $0 | | $1,881 | | $0 | | $46,653 |
| Joe T. Shockley, Jr. | | 31,539 | | - | | 1,318 | | - | | 32,857 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Mr. Funke and Mr. Shockley are the only Named Executive Officers who participated in this plan. |
(2) | Includes $42,500, net of taxes, and $30,000, net of taxes, for Mr. Funke and Mr. Shockley, respectively, that is included in Salary Compensation on the 2014 Summary Compensation Table. |
(3) | Includes preferential interest of $0 for Mr. Funke and $0 for Mr. Shockley. Amounts included in Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings on 2014 Summary Compensation Table. |
Change of Control Compensation
The employment agreements with Mr. Funke and Mr. Shockley obligate us to pay certain separation benefits to them in the event of termination without cause or constructive termination within twelve (12) months following a change of control. The change of control agreements with Ms. Barnes, Mr. Bygland, and Mr. Danielson obligate us to pay certain separation benefits to them in the event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason within twenty-four (24) months following a change of control. In addition, the employment agreement with Mr. Funke requires us to pay certain separation benefits to him in the event of his termination without cause or resignation for good reason even absent a change of control.
The term “change of control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:
•The date any entity or person, including a group as defined in Section 13(d)(iii) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 shall become the beneficial owner of, or shall have obtained voting control over, fifty percent (50%) or more of the outstanding common shares of either Southwest or Bank SNB;
•The date the shareholders of either Southwest or Bank SNB approve a definitive agreement (i) to merge or consolidate either us or Bank SNB with or into another corporation in which either Southwest or Bank SNB, respectively, are not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which any common shares of either Southwest or Bank SNB would be converted into cash, securities, or other property of another, other than a merger of either Southwest or Bank SNB in which holders of common shares immediately prior to the merger have the same proportionate interest of common stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger as immediately before, or (ii) to sell or otherwise dispose of substantially all of the assets of either Southwest or Bank SNB; or
•The date there shall have been a change in a majority of the Board of Directors of either Southwest or Bank SNB within a 12-month period unless the nomination of each new director was approved by the vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who were in office at the beginning of the 12-month period.
With respect to Mr. Funke and Mr. Shockley’s employment agreements, the term “cause” means:
•A material breach of the terms of the employment agreement by the executive;
•Any act by the executive of fraud against, material misappropriation from, or material dishonesty to us;
•Conviction of the executive of a crime involving breach of trust or moral turpitude or any felony;
•Conduct by the executive that amounts to willful misconduct, gross and willful insubordination, or gross neglect or inattention to the executive’s duties and responsibilities under the employment agreement, including prolonged absences without the written consent of the Board of Directors;
•Conduct in material violation of our written code of conduct as the same may be in force from time to time not cured by the executive within ten (10) business days after the executive’s receipt of written notice thereof;
•Receipt of any form of notice, written or otherwise, that any regulatory agency having jurisdiction over us intends to institute any form of formal regulatory action against the executive; or
•The executive’s removal and/or permanent prohibition from participating in the conduct of our affairs by an order issued under Section 8(e)(4) or 8(g)(1) of the FDIA (12 U.S.C. 1818(e)(4) and (g)(1)).
With respect to Ms. Barnes, Mr. Bygland and Mr. Danielson’s change of control agreements, the term “cause” means:
•The conviction of the executive by a federal or state court of competent jurisdiction of a felony which relates to the executive’s employment;
•An act or acts of dishonesty taken by the executive and intended to result in substantial personal enrichment of the executive at our expense; or
•The executive’s “willful” failure to follow a direct lawful written order from executive’s supervisor, within the reasonable scope of the executive’s duties, which failure is not cured within thirty days.
With respect to Mr. Funke and Mr. Shockley’s employment agreements, the term “constructive termination” means:
•The material reduction of the executive’s annual salary, annual bonus opportunity, opportunity to earn equity compensation, or other benefits, each as provided in the employment agreement or change of control agreement;
•A material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities or a change in his position such that he or she ceases to hold the title of, or serve in the role as, in the case of Mr. Funke, President and Chief Executive Officer, and in the case of Mr. Shockley, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Southwest or any successor;
•The assignment of any duties materially inconsistent with the executive’s position (including status, offices, titles and reporting requirements), authority, duties or responsibilities under the employment agreement; or
•An involuntary relocation of the executive’s primary office or worksite to a place that is beyond a twenty (20) mile radius from 6301 Waterford Boulevard in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
With respect to Mr. Funke’s employment agreement, the term “good reason” means:
•A material reduction of Mr. Funke’s annual base salary from its then current rate, other than a reduction that also is applied to substantially all other executive officers if the executive’s reduction is substantially proportionate to, or no greater than, the reduction applied to substantially all other executive officers;
•A material diminution in Mr. Funke’s authority, duties or responsibilities or a change in his position such that he ceases to hold the title of, or serve in the role as, President and Chief Executive Officer of Southwest or any successor;
•The assignment of any duties materially inconsistent with Mr. Funke’s position (including status, offices, titles and reporting requirements), authority, duties or responsibilities under his employment agreement;
•An involuntary relocation of Mr. Funke’s primary office or worksite to a place that is beyond a twenty (20) mile radius from 6301 Waterford Boulevard in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; or
•A material breach of the terms of the employment agreement by us.
With respect to Ms. Barnes, Mr. Bygland and Mr. Danielson’s change of control agreements, the term “good reason” means:
•A reduction by more than 10% in executive’s base salary and target bonus, as compared with the base salary and most recently established target bonus, or if no target bonus has been set then the bonus most recently paid, prior to the change of control;
•A relocation of executive’s principal office with us or our successor that increases the executive’s commute by more than thirty-five (35) miles per day;
•A substantial and adverse change in the executive’s duties, control, authority, status or position, or the assignment to the executive of duties or responsibilities which are materially inconsistent with such status or position, or a material reduction in the duties and responsibilities previously exercised by the executive, or a loss of title, loss of office, loss of significant authority, power or control, or any removal of executive from, or any failure to reappoint or reelect executive to, such positions; or
•Any material breach by us or its successor of any other material provision of the change of control agreement.
In the event (i) Mr. Funke’s employment is terminated without cause, (ii) Mr. Funke’s employment is constructively terminated within twelve month following a change of control, or (iii) Mr. Funke resigns with good reason:
•We will be obligated to pay severance to Mr. Funke in twelve monthly payments, with the amount of each monthly payment equal to: (i) one-sixth (1/6) of his annual base salary in effect as of the effective date of termination of his employment if the termination occurs on or before December 31, 2015, or (ii) one-twelfth (1/12) of his of the annual base salary in effect as of the effective date of the termination of his employment if the termination occurs after December 31, 2015. Monthly severance payments shall be paid in accordance with our regular payroll practices, commencing with the first payroll date that is more than sixty (60) days following the date of termination of Mr. Funke’s employment;
•Any service condition contained in any equity awards outstanding in favor of Mr. Funke shall be deemed to have been satisfied immediately prior to the effective date of the termination of his employment; and
•Shares of our common stock subject to any performance stock awards granted pursuant to the employment agreement shall be earned if and to the extent applicable performance measures are attained and the applicable conditions in the employment agreement remain satisfied as of the fiscal year ending with or within the twelve-month period immediately following the effective date of the termination of Mr. Funke’s employment.
In the event Mr. Shockley’s employment is (i) terminated without cause within twelve months following a change of control, or (ii) constructively terminated within twelve month following a change of control, we will be obligated to pay severance to Mr. Shockley in an amount equal to two (2) times his annual base salary as in effect on the date of termination of his employment, which amount shall be paid in substantially equal installments not less frequently than monthly over twelve (12) months. Monthly severance payments shall be paid in accordance with our regular payroll practices, commencing with the first payroll date that is more than sixty (60) days following the date of termination of Mr. Shockley’s employment.
Each of Ms. Barnes, Mr. Bygland and Mr. Danielson’s change of control agreement provides that if, within twenty-four (24) months following a change in control, (i) we terminate the executive’s employment other than for cause, disability or death or (ii) the executive resigns for good reason:
•we will be obligated to pay the executive, in a single lump sum payment, within 30 days of the date of termination, executive’s base salary and accrued vacation pay through the date of termination, and an amount equal to 200% in the case of Ms. Barnes and 100% in the case of Messrs. Bygland and Danielson, of executive’s highest annual base salary in effect during the three (3) years immediately prior to the date of the change in control;
•we will maintain in full force and effect, for the continued benefit of the executive (and executive’s spouse and/or eligible dependents, as applicable) for a period of twelve (12) months following the date of termination, participation in the medical, hospitalization, and dental programs maintained by us for the benefit of our executive officers as in effect on the date of termination, at such level and terms and conditions (including, without limitation, contributions required by the executive for such benefits) as in effect on the termination date; provided, if the executive (or executive’s spouse) is eligible for Medicare or a similar type of governmental medical benefit, such benefit shall be the primary provider before Company medical benefits are provided. However, if executive becomes reemployed with another employer and is eligible to receive medical, hospitalization and dental benefits under another employer-provided plan, the medical, hospitalization and dental benefits provided by us shall be secondary to those provided under such other plan during the applicable period;
•we will reimburse executive pursuant to our policy for reasonable business expenses incurred, but not paid, prior to termination of employment, unless such termination resulted from a misappropriation of our funds; and
•Executive will be entitled to any other rights, compensation and/or benefits as may be due to executive following termination to which she is otherwise entitled in accordance with the terms and provisions of any of our plans or programs.
Pursuant to the terms of the Restricted Stock Award Agreements between the Company and our NEOs, all unvested shares of restricted stock granted to our NEOs will vest immediately upon a “Change in Control”. “Change in Control” is defined substantially the same as the term “change of control” is defined in Messrs. Funke and Shockley’s employment agreements.
The following tables provide the amount of compensation payable to Mr. Funke, Mr. Shockley, Ms. Barnes, Mr. Bygland and Mr. Danielson under the terms of their employment agreements or change of control agreements assuming the executive was terminated effective December 31, 2014. The amounts shown below are estimates of the amounts which would be paid to each executive officer upon his or her termination. The actual amounts to be paid to each executive officer can only be determined at the time of that executive officer’s termination.
Mark W. Funke
| | | | |
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination | | Termination Without Cause, Constructive Termination Following a Change of Control, or Resignation for Good Reason |
| Cash Compensation | | | |
| Cash Severance | | | $ 850,000 |
| Equity | | | |
| Restricted Stock (1) | | | 854,980 |
| Total: | | | $ 1,704,980 |
| | | | |
(1) | Market value based on the closing price for our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2014, which was $17.36 per share. |
Joe T. Shockley, Jr.
| | | | |
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination | | Termination Without Cause Following a Change of Control |
| Cash Compensation | | | |
| Cash Severance | | | $ 600,000 |
| Equity | | | |
| Restricted Stock (1) | | | 334,256 |
| Total: | | | $ 934,256 |
| | | | |
(1) | Market value based on the closing price for our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2014, which was $17.36 per share. |
Priscilla Barnes
| | | | |
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination | | Termination Without Cause Following a Change of Control, or Resignation for Good Reason |
| Cash Compensation | | | |
| Cash Severance | | | $ 660,000 |
| Equity | | | |
| Restricted Stock (1) | | | 108,517 |
| Other Benefits | | | |
| Medical, Hospitalization, and Dental (2) | | | 4,989 |
| Total: | | | $ 773,507 |
| | | | |
(1) | Market value based on the closing price for our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2014, which was $17.36 per share. |
(2) | Annual cost of Ms. Barnes' medical, hospitalization, and dental insurance coverage. |
James D. Bygland
| | | | |
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination | | Termination Without Cause Following a Change of Control, or Resignation for Good Reason |
| Cash Compensation | | | |
| Cash Severance | | | $ 225,000 |
| Equity | | | |
| Restricted Stock (1) | | | 177,871 |
| Other Benefits | | | |
| Medical, Hospitalization, and Dental (2) | | | 1,311 |
| Total: | | | $ 404,181 |
| | | | |
(1) | Market value based on the closing price for our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2014, which was $17.36 per share. |
(2) | Annual cost of Mr. Bygland's medical, hospitalization, and dental insurance coverage. |
John Danielson
| | | | |
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination | | Termination Without Cause Following a Change of Control, or Resignation for Good Reason |
| Cash Compensation | | | |
| Cash Severance | | | $ 260,000 |
| Equity | | | |
| Restricted Stock (1) | | | 76,349 |
| Other Benefits | | | |
| Medical, Hospitalization, and Dental (2) | | | 4,939 |
| Total: | | | $ 341,288 |
| | | | |
(1) | Market value based on the closing price for our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2014, which was $17.36 per share. |
(2) | Annual cost of Mr. Danielson's medical, hospitalization, and dental insurance coverage. |
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
Our banking subsidiary, Bank SNB, has and expects to have in the future, banking and other transactions with certain of our and our subsidiaries’ officers and directors and with greater than 5% shareholders of us and their immediate families and associates. These transactions are in the ordinary course of business, and loans have been, and will be, made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to the lender. In the opinion of our management, these loans did not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
Under written policy adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors, extensions of credit from Bank SNB to executive officers, directors, or principal shareholders must be approved by the independent directors on Bank SNB’s Directors Credit Committee and must meet the procedural and financial requirements of Regulation O of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Other transactions between us and any of our subsidiaries and executive officers, directors, or principal shareholder must be approved by the independent directors. These other transactions include any financial transactions, arrangements, or relationships, regardless of dollar amount, other than an extension of credit.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock to file certain reports with the SEC concerning their beneficial ownership of our equity securities. The SEC’s regulations also require that a copy of all such Section 16(a) forms filed must be furnished to us by the executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such forms and amendments thereto received by us with respect to 2014, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were timely met. We make no representation regarding persons who have not identified themselves as being subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or as to the appropriateness of disclaimers of beneficial ownership.
PROPOSAL 2—ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires that we provide our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. This vote is referred to by the SEC as a “say-on-pay” vote. Therefore, we are submitting our compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers for your approval. These decisions, along with other important information regarding executive compensation, are described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 13 and the compensation disclosures under the heading “Executive Compensation” beginning on page 22. These sections contain the compensation disclosures required by Item 402 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K. You are asked to approve the following resolution:
“Resolved, that the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers of Southwest Bancorp, Inc. as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Executive Compensation sections of the 2015 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement of Southwest is hereby approved.”
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented and entitled to vote either in person or by proxy is required to approve this non-binding proposal. Broker discretionary voting of uninstructed shares is not permitted for a shareholder
vote on executive compensation. Broker non-votes will not be counted as shares present in tabulating the votes on the advisory vote on executive compensation.
Your vote is advisory and will not be binding on the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. However, we will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. Approximately 94% of shareholders voting at the 2014 Annual Meeting approved the compensation of Named Executive Officers described in our proxy statement in 2014.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and three most highly compensated other executive officers.
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
A representative of Ernst & Young LLP, Southwest’s independent certified public accounting firm, is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to shareholders’ questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement.
Fees
The following table presents fees billed to Southwest by Ernst & Young LLP for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The tables include fees and expenses for services rendered for the years shown regardless of when the fees and expenses were billed.
| | | | |
Fee Category | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Audit Fees | | $595,535 | | $777,867 |
Audit - Related Fees | | - | | - |
Tax Fees | | - | | - |
All Other Fees | | - | | - |
Total | | $595,535 | | $777,867 |
Audit Fees. Consists of fees and expenses for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements, for review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and for other services normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-Related Fees. Consists of aggregate fees and expenses for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”
Tax Fees. Consists of aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.
All Other Fees. Consists of aggregate fees billed for products and services that are not reported under “Audit Fees,” Audit-Related Fees,” and “Tax Fees.”
Preapproval of Services
The Audit Committee is required by SEC regulations to preapprove all auditing services and permitted non-audit services provided by Southwest’s independent registered public accounting firm. There is an exception for preapproval of non-audit services if the aggregate amount of all such non-audit services provided to us constitutes not more than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid by it to its independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal year in which the non-audit services are provided; such services were not recognized by us at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and the non-audit services are promptly brought to the attention of the committee and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the committee or by one or more members of the committee to whom authority to grant such approval has been delegated by the committee. All audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor have been preapproved by the Audit Committee as required by SEC regulations and the Audit Committee’s charter without exception.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Southwest Audit Committee oversees and reports to the Board of Directors regarding accounting and financial reporting processes, the audits of the financial statements, the qualifications and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm engaged to provide independent audits and related services, and the performance of the internal audit function and
independent registered public accounting firm; and also performs the other duties of the committee specified by federal securities laws and regulations, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and related regulations, the Listing Standards and its charter. The committee (1) has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements included in Southwest’s 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K with management; (2) has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16 (Communication with Audit Committees); and (3) has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the committee concerning independence and has discussed independence with the independent registered public accounting firm. Based upon this review, discussion, disclosures, and materials described in (1) through (3), the committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The committee also has considered whether the amount and nature of non-audit services rendered by the independent accountant are consistent with its independence.
9 | | | |
| | | |
March 10, 2015 | | Larry J. Lanie, Chairman Thomas D. Berry |
| | David S. Crockett Jr. |
PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2015
Our Audit Committee recommended and our Board of Directors approved the change of our independent registered public accounting firm from Ernst & Young LLP to BKD LLP for 2015. The Board of Directors is submitting this appointment to the vote of the shareholders for ratification. A representative of BKD LLP is expected to be present at the meeting and available to respond to appropriate questions and will be provided an opportunity to make a statement.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required to ratify the appointment of BKD LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2015. Therefore, abstentions effectively count as votes against this proposal. If the appointment is not ratified by a majority of the shareholders, the vote will be considered in connection with the auditor appointment for 2016. However, it is not anticipated that any change in our independent registered public accounting firm would be made for 2015 because of the difficulty and expense of making another change so long after the beginning of the year.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of BKD LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2015.
CODE OF ETHICS
Our Board of Directors has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our and our consolidated subsidiaries’ directors, officers, and employees. This code, which fulfills the requirements of the Listing Standards and the criteria established by applicable SEC regulations, is available through the governance area of our website at www.oksb.com.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board is not aware of any business to come before the Annual Meeting other than those matters described above in this Proxy Statement and matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that proxies in the accompanying form will be voted as determined by a majority of the Board of Directors.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Any shareholder proposal to take action at the year 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received at our executive office at 608 South Main Street, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074 no later than November 11, 2015, in order to be eligible for inclusion in Southwest’s proxy materials for that meeting, unless the date of the 2016 annual meeting is more than 30 days from April 22, 2016, in which case the deadline is a reasonable time before we begin to print and send proxy materials. Any such proposals shall be subject to the requirements of the proxy rules adopted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under our Certificate of Incorporation, a shareholder proposal or nomination for director may be eligible for consideration at an annual or special meeting if written notice is delivered or mailed to the Secretary not less than thirty days nor more than sixty days before the meeting, provided that, if less than forty days’ notice of the meeting has been given, such written notice may be delivered or mailed by the close of the tenth day after the date notice of the meeting was mailed. Such notices also must include information required by and comply with procedures established by our Certificate of Incorporation.
Our shareholders may communicate with the Board of Directors or any individual director by addressing correspondence to the Board or such director in care of the Secretary at our main office by mail, courier, or facsimile or by e-mail through Southwest’s “Contact Us” button on the Investor Relations area of our website at www.oksb.com.
| |
| |
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
| |
| |
| RUSTY LAFORGE |
| SECRETARY |
Stillwater, Oklahoma
March 10, 2015
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, will be furnished without charge to shareholders as of the record date upon written request to: Rusty LaForge, Southwest Bancorp, Inc., P.O. Box 1988, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74076.