AQUILA THREE PEAKS OPPORTUNITY GROWTH FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
JUNE 30, 2012 (unaudited)
Management has reviewed the tax positions for each of the open tax years (2008-2010) or expected to be taken in the Fund’s 2011 tax returns and has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements.
f) | Multiple class allocations: All income, expenses (other than class-specific expenses), and realized and unrealized gains or losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class. Class-specific expenses, which include distribution and service fees and any other items that are specifically attributed to a particular class, are also charged directly to such class on a daily basis. |
g) | Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
h) | Reclassification of capital accounts: Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that certain components of net assets relating to permanent differences be reclassified between financial and tax reporting. On December 31, 2011 the Fund decreased undistributed net investment loss by $60,030, decreased accumulated net gain on investments by $92,606 and increased additional paid-in capital by $32,576. These reclassifications were due to a net investment loss and tax equalization and had no effect on net assets or net asset value per share. |
i) | Accounting pronouncement: In December 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 related to disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The amendments in this ASU require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The guidance requires retrospective application for all comparative periods presented. Management is currently evaluating the impact this amendment may have on the Fund’s financial statements. |
3. Fees and Related Party Transactions
a) | Management Arrangements: |
Aquila Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aquila Management Corporation, the Fund’s founder and sponsor, serves as the Manager for the Fund under an Advisory and Administration Agreement with the Fund. The portfolio management of the Fund has been delegated to a Sub-Adviser as described below. Under the Advisory and Administrative Agreement, the Manager provides all administrative services to the Fund, other than those relating to the day-to-day portfolio management. The Manager’s services include providing the office of the Fund and all related services as well as overseeing the activities of the Sub-Adviser and all the various support organizations to the Fund such as the shareholder servicing agent, custodian, legal counsel, fund accounting agent, pricing agent, auditors and distributor. For its services, the Manager is entitled to receive a fee which is payable monthly and computed as of the close of business each day at the annual rate of 0.90 of 1% on the Fund’s net assets up to $100 million, 0.85 of 1% on such assets above $100 million up to $250 million, and 0.80 of 1% on assets above $250 million.
AQUILA THREE PEAKS OPPORTUNITY GROWTH FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
JUNE 30, 2012 (unaudited)
Three Peaks Capital Management, LLC (the “Sub-Adviser”) serves as the Investment Sub-Adviser for the Fund under a Sub-Advisory Agreement between the Manager and the Sub-Adviser. Under this agreement, the Sub-Adviser continuously provides, subject to oversight of the Manager and the Board of Trustees of the Fund, the investment program of the Fund and the composition of its portfolio and arranges for the purchases and sales of portfolio securities. For its services, the Sub-Adviser is entitled to receive a fee from the Manager which is payable monthly and computed as of the close of business each day at the annual rate of 0.50 of 1% on the Fund’s net assets up to $100 million, 0.45 of 1% on such assets above $100 million up to $250 million, and 0.40 of 1% on assets above $250 million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Fund incurred management fees of $88,522, all of which were waived. Additionally, during this period the Manager reimbursed the Fund for other expenses in the amount of $40,565. The Manager has contractually undertaken to waive fees and/or reimburse Fund expenses during the period May 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 so that total Fund expenses will not exceed 1.55% for Class A Shares, 2.25% for Class C Shares, 1.18% for Class I Shares and 1.25% for Class Y Shares. The Sub-Adviser has agreed to waive its fee in the same proportion as the Manager is required to waive its fee in connection with the aforementioned undertaking. For a period of three years, subsequent to the end of each of the Fund’s fiscal years, the Manager may recover from the Fund certain fees and expenses waived or reimbursed to the extent that the net unreimbursed Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses do not exceed any contractual limitations. As of June 30, 2012, the total of these amounts was $379,926 of which $250,839 expires on December 31, 2014 and $129,087 expires on December 31, 2015.
Under a Compliance Agreement with the Manager, the Manager is compensated by the Fund for Chief Compliance Officer related services provided to enable the Fund to comply with Rule 38a-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Specific details as to the nature and extent of the services provided by the Manager are more fully defined in the Fund’s Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
b) | Distribution and Service Fees: |
The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 (the “Rule”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Under one part of the Plan, with respect to Class A Shares, the Fund is authorized to make distribution fee payments to broker-dealers or others (“Qualified Recipients”) selected by Aquila Distributors, Inc. (the “Distributor”), including, but not limited to, any principal underwriter of the Fund, with which the Distributor has entered into written agreements contemplated by the Rule and which have rendered assistance in the distribution and/or retention of the Fund’s shares or servicing of shareholder accounts. The Fund makes payment of this distribution fee at the annual rate of 0.30% of the Fund’s average net assets represented by Class A Shares. During the period January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2012, 0.05% (annualized) of the Class A distribution fee was waived. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, distribution fees on Class A Shares amounted to $19,153, excluding waivers, of which the Distributor retained $1,193.
AQUILA THREE PEAKS OPPORTUNITY GROWTH FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
JUNE 30, 2012 (unaudited)
Under another part of the Plan, the Fund is authorized to make payments with respect to Class C Shares to Qualified Recipients which have rendered assistance in the distribution and/or retention of the Fund’s Class C shares or servicing of shareholder accounts. These payments are made at the annual rate of 0.75% of the Fund’s average net assets represented by Class C Shares and for the six months ended June 30, 2012, amounted to $6,852. In addition, under a Shareholder Services Plan, the Fund is authorized to make service fee payments with respect to Class C Shares to Qualified Recipients for providing personal services and/or maintenance of shareholder accounts. These payments are made at the annual rate of 0.25% of the Fund’s average net assets represented by Class C Shares and for the six months ended June 30, 2012, amounted to $2,284. The total of these payments with respect to Class C Shares amounted to $9,136 of which the Distributor retained $1,657.
Under another part of the Plan, the Fund is authorized to make payments with respect to Class I Shares to Qualified Recipients. Class I payments, under the Plan, may not exceed, for any fiscal year of the Fund a rate (currently 0.20%) set from time to time by the Board of Trustees of not more than 0.25% of the average annual net assets represented by the Class I Shares. In addition, the Fund has a Shareholder Services Plan under which it may pay service fees (currently 0.15%) of not more than 0.25% of the average annual net assets of the Fund represented by Class I Shares. That is, the total payments under both plans will not exceed 0.50% of such net assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, these payments were made at the average annual rate of 0.35% of such net assets and amounted to $24 of which $14 related to the Plan and $10 related to the Shareholder Services Plan.
Specific details about the Plans are more fully defined in the Fund’s Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
Under a Distribution Agreement, the Distributor serves as the exclusive distributor of the Fund’s shares. Through agreements between the Distributor and various brokerage and advisory firms (“intermediaries”), the Fund’s shares are sold primarily through these intermediaries with the bulk of any sales commissions inuring to such intermediaries. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, total commissions on sales of Class A Shares amounted to $9,277 of which the Distributor received $1,183.
4. Purchases and Sales of Securities
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, purchases of securities and proceeds from the sales of securities (excluding short-term investments) aggregated $5,052,548 and $6,275,010, respectively.
At June 30, 2012, the aggregate tax cost for all securities was $17,245,278. At June 30, 2012, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there is an excess of market value over tax cost amounted to $2,800,082 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there is an excess of tax cost over market value amounted to $786,770 for a net unrealized appreciation of $2,013,312.
AQUILA THREE PEAKS OPPORTUNITY GROWTH FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
JUNE 30, 2012 (unaudited)
5. Expenses
The Fund has negotiated an expense offset arrangement with its custodian wherein it receives credit toward the reduction of custodian fees and other Fund expenses whenever there are uninvested cash balances. The Statement of Operations reflects the total expenses before any offset, the amount of offset and the net expenses.
6. Portfolio Orientation
The Fund may invest no less than 70% of its net assets in equity securities believed to have the potential for capital appreciation. The Fund may invest in a range of stock market capitalizations that could include small-cap, mid-cap, and large cap. Thus the Fund may invest in common stocks without regard to whether they could be described as “growth” or “value”. The Fund may, from time-to-time, hold as much as 30% of its net assets in fixed-income securities including lower quality corporate debt securities (often referred to as high yield or “junk” bonds). These bonds generally have a greater credit risk than other types of fixed-income securities.
AQUILA THREE PEAKS OPPORTUNITY GROWTH FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
JUNE 30, 2012 (unaudited)
7. Capital Share Transactions
a) Transactions in Capital Shares of the Fund were as follows:
| | Six Months Ended | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2012 | | | Year Ended | |
| | (unaudited) | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Class A Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 39,293 | | | $ | 966,745 | | | | 212,236 | | | $ | 5,747,454 | |
Reinvested distributions | | | – | | | | – | | | | 41,885 | | | | 960,843 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (57,902 | ) | | | (1,427,313 | )(a) | | | (112,449 | ) | | | (3,004,779 | )(a) |
Net change | | | (18,609 | ) | | | (460,568 | ) | | | 141,672 | | | | 3,703,518 | |
Class C Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 8,757 | | | | 188,644 | | | | 82,163 | | | | 2,009,564 | |
Reinvested distributions | | | – | | | | – | | | | 6,844 | | | | 137,223 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (15,172 | ) | | | (329,989 | ) | | | (36,489 | ) | | | (848,131 | ) |
Net change | | | (6,415 | ) | | | (141,345 | ) | | | 52,518 | | | | 1,298,656 | |
Class I Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | – | | | | – | | | | 309 | | | | 8,007 | |
Reinvested distributions | | | – | | | | – | | | | 93 | | | | 2,188 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (598 | ) | | | (15,710 | ) | | | (362 | ) | | | (9,809 | ) |
Net change | | | (598 | ) | | | (15,710 | ) | | | 40 | | | | 386 | |
Class Y Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 19,989 | | | | 521,310 | | | | 157,869 | | | | 4,473,884 | |
Reinvested distributions | | | – | | | | – | | | | 18,804 | | | | 450,531 | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (34,677 | ) | | | (901,192 | )(b) | | | (91,441 | ) | | | (2,389,889 | )(b) |
Net change | | | (14,688 | ) | | | (379,882 | ) | | | 85,232 | | | | 2,534,526 | |
Total transactions in Fund | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
shares | | | (40,310 | ) | | $ | (997,505 | ) | | | 279,462 | | | $ | 7,537,086 | |
(a) | Net of short-term trading redemption fees of $251 and $3,500 for 2012 and 2011, respectively. (See note 7b) |
(b) | Net of short-term trading redemption fees of $3,277 and $4,020 for 2012 and 2011, respectively. (See note 7b) |
b) | Short-Term Trading Redemption Fee: The Fund and the Distributor may reject any order for the purchase of shares, on a temporary or permanent basis, from investors exhibiting a pattern of frequent or short-term trading in Fund shares. In addition, the Fund imposes a redemption fee of 2.00% of the shares’ redemption value on any redemption of Class A Shares on which a sales charge is not imposed or of Class I and Class Y Shares, if the redemption occurs within 90 days of purchase. The fee is paid to the Fund and is designed to offset the costs to the Fund caused by short-term trading in Fund shares. The Fund retains the fee charged as paid-in capital which becomes part of the Fund’s daily net asset value (NAV) calculation. The fee does not apply to shares sold under an Automatic Withdrawal Plan, or sold due to the shareholder’s death or disability. |
AQUILA THREE PEAKS OPPORTUNITY GROWTH FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
JUNE 30, 2012 (unaudited)
8. Income Tax Information and Distributions
The Fund declares annual distributions to shareholders from net investment income, if any, and from net realized capital gains, if any. Distributions are recorded by the Fund on the ex-dividend date and paid in additional shares at the net asset value per share, in cash, or in a combination of both, at the shareholder’s option. Dividends from net investment income and distributions from realized gains from investment transactions are determined in accordance with Federal income tax regulations, which may differ from investment income and realized gains determined under generally accepted accounting principles. These “book/tax” differences are either considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification. To the extent dividends exceed net investment income and net realized capital gains for tax purposes, they are reported as distributions from paid-in capital. As of December 31, 2011, there were post October capital loss deferrals of $72,311 which will be recognized in the following year.
The tax character of distributions:
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 4,208 | | | $ | – | |
Long-term capital gain | | | 1,927,599 | | | | – | |
| | $ | 1,931,807 | | | $ | – | |
| |
As of December 31, 2011, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows: | |
| |
Accumulated net realized gains | | $ | 1,860 | | | | | |
Deferred post October losses | | | (72,311 | ) | | | | |
Undistributed net investment income | | | 12,842 | | | | | |
Unrealized appreciation | | | (547,344 | ) | | | | |
| | $ | (604,953 | ) | | | | |
AQUILA THREE PEAKS OPPORTUNITY GROWTH FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
For a share outstanding throughout each period
| | Class A | | | Class C | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Six Months | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Ended | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Ended | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 6/30/12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (unaudited) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | (unaudited) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 22.93 | | | $ | 26.64 | | | $ | 22.95 | | | $ | 17.57 | | | $ | 30.39 | | | $ | 32.47 | | | $ | 20.04 | | | $ | 23.81 | | | $ | 20.67 | | | $ | 15.94 | | | $ | 27.84 | | | $ | 30.11 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | | 0.01 | | | | (0.08 | ) | | | (0.09 | ) | | | (0.05 | ) | | | (0.17 | ) | | | (0.20 | ) | | | (0.07 | ) | | | (0.24 | ) | | | (0.23 | ) | | | (0.18 | ) | | | (0.33 | ) | | | (0.42 | ) |
Net gain (loss) on securities (both realized and unrealized) | | | 2.55 | | | | (1.00 | ) | | | 3.78 | | | | 5.43 | | | | (12.31 | ) | | | (0.19 | ) | | | 2.23 | | | | (0.89 | ) | | | 3.37 | | | | 4.91 | | | | (11.23 | ) | | | (0.16 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | 2.56 | | | | (1.08 | ) | | | 3.69 | | | | 5.38 | | | | (12.48 | ) | | | (0.39 | ) | | | 2.16 | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | 3.14 | | | | 4.73 | | | | (11.56 | ) | | | (0.58 | ) |
Less distributions (note 8): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions from capital gains | | | – | | | | (2.64 | ) | | | – | | | | – | | | | (0.34 | ) | | | (1.69 | ) | | | – | | | | (2.64 | ) | | | – | | | | – | | | | (0.34 | ) | | | (1.69 | ) |
Paid-in capital from redemption fees (note 7b) | | | – | | | | 0.01 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | (4) | | | – | (4) | | | – | (4) | | | – | (4) | | | – | (4) | | | – | (4) |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 25.49 | | | $ | 22.93 | | | $ | 26.64 | | | $ | 22.95 | | | $ | 17.57 | | | $ | 30.39 | | | $ | 22.20 | | | $ | 20.04 | | | $ | 23.81 | | | $ | 20.67 | | | $ | 15.94 | | | $ | 27.84 | |
Total return | | | 11.16 | %(2)(5) | | | (4.01 | )%(2) | | | 16.08 | %(2) | | | 30.62 | %(2) | | | (41.07 | )%(2) | | | (1.34 | )%(2) | | | 10.78 | %(3)(5) | | | (4.74 | )%(3) | | | 15.19 | %(3) | | | 29.67 | %(3) | | | (41.53 | )%(3) | | | (2.08 | )%(3) |
Ratios/supplemental data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | $ | 12,758 | | | $ | 11,904 | | | $ | 10,053 | | | $ | 8,682 | | | $ | 8,822 | | | $ | 20,950 | | | $ | 1,820 | | | $ | 1,772 | | | $ | 855 | | | $ | 637 | | | $ | 940 | | | $ | 2,845 | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 1.52 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.54 | % | | | 2.25 | %(6) | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.26 | % | | | 2.29 | % |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets | | | 0.08 | %(6) | | | (0.31 | )% | | | (0.40 | )% | | | (0.26 | )% | | | (0.67 | )% | | | (0.64 | )% | | | (0.67 | )%(6)) | | | (1.03 | )% | | | (1.11 | )% | | | (1.04 | )% | | | (1.43 | )% | | | (1.38 | )% |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 26 | %(5) | | | 39 | % | | | 116 | % | | | 3 | % | | | 4 | % | | | 17 | % | | | 26 | %(5) | | | 39 | % | | | 116 | % | | | 3 | % | | | 4 | % | | | 17 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The expense and net investment income ratios without the effect of the contractual expense cap were (note 3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 2.86 | %(6) | | | 2.87 | % | | | 7.47 | % | | | 4.79 | % | | | 3.51 | % | | | 2.73 | % | | | 3.56 | %(6) | | | 3.50 | % | | | 8.27 | % | | | 5.58 | % | | | 4.22 | % | | | 3.47 | % |
Ratio of net investment loss to average net assets | | | (1.27 | )%(6) | | | (1.68 | )% | | | (6.37 | )% | | | (3.55 | )% | | | (2.68 | )% | | | (1.82 | )% | | | (1.98 | )%(6) | | | (2.27 | )% | | | (7.13 | )% | | | (4.37 | )% | | | (3.39 | )% | | | (2.56 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The expense ratios after giving effect to the contractual expense cap and expense offset for uninvested cash balances were (note 3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 1.52 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 2.25 | %(6) | | | 2 25 | %. | | | 2 25 | %. | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | % |
________________
(1) Per share amounts have been calculated using the daily average shares method.
(2) Not reflecting sales charges.
(3) Not reflecting CDSC.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) Not annualized.
(6) Annualized.
Note: On October 15, 2010, the Fund began operations under the name Aquila Three Peaks Opportunity Growth Fund, with Three Peaks Capital Management, LLC as investment sub-adviser and an investment strategy that differs meaningfully from the prior strategy pursued by the Fund.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
AQUILA THREE PEAKS OPPORTUNITY GROWTH FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
For a share outstanding throughout each period
| | Class I | | Class Y |
| | Six Months | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Six Months | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Ended | | Year Ended December 31, | | Ended | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 6/30/12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (unaudited) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | (unaudited) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $ | 23.45 | | | $ | 27.08 | | | $ | 23.24 | | | $ | 17.73 | | | $ | 30.58 | | | $ | 32.51 | | | $ | 23.96 | | | $ | 27.63 | | | $ | 23.74 | | | $ | 18.13 | | | $ | 31.25 | | | $ | 33.25 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | | 0.07 | | | | 0.04 | | | | 0.06 | | | | 0.03 | | | | (0.11 | ) | | | (0.14 | ) | | | 0.04 | | | | (0.02 | ) | | | 0.08 | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.11 | ) | | | (0.12 | ) |
Net gain (loss) on securities (both realized and unrealized) | | | 2.60 | | | | (1.03 | ) | | | 3.78 | | | | 5.48 | | | | (12.40 | ) | | | (0.10 | ) | | | 2.67 | | | | (1.03 | ) | | | 3.81 | | | | 5.62 | | | | (12.67 | ) | | | (0.19 | ) |
Total from investment operations | | | 2.67 | | | | (0.99 | ) | | | 3.84 | | | | 5.51 | | | | (12.51 | ) | | | (0.24 | ) | | | 2.71 | | | | (1.05 | ) | | | 3.89 | | | | 5.61 | | | | (12.78 | ) | | | (0.31 | ) |
Less distributions (note 8): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions from capital gains | | | – | | | | (2.64 | ) | | | – | | | | – | | | | (0.34 | ) | | | (1.69 | ) | | | – | | | | (2.64 | ) | | | – | | | | – | | | | (0.34 | ) | | | (1.69 | ) |
Paid-in capital from redemption fees (note 7b) | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | 0.02 | | | | 0.02 | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | | | | – | |
Net asset value, end of period | | $ | 26.12 | | | $ | 23.45 | | | $ | 27.08 | | | $ | 23.24 | | | $ | 17.73 | | | $ | 30.58 | | | $ | 26.69 | | | $ | 23.96 | | | $ | 27.63 | | | $ | 23.74 | | | $ | 18.13 | | | $ | 31.25 | |
Total return | | | 11.39 | %(2) | | | (3.65 | )% | | | 16.52 | % | | | 31.08 | % | | | (40.92 | )% | | | (0.87 | )% | | | 11.39 | %(2) | | | (3.72 | )% | | | 16.39 | %. | | | 30.94 | % | | | (40.90 | )% | | | (1.07 | )% |
Ratios/supplemental data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 21 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 4,953 | | | $ | 4,799 | | | $ | 3,178 | | | $ | 447 | | | $ | 558 | | | $ | 1,667 | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 1.14 | %(3) | | | 1.13 | % | | | 1.13 | % | | | 1.12 | % | | | 1.30 | % | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.25 | %(3) | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.26 | % | | | 1.29 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets | | | 0.58 | %(3) | | | 0.14 | % | | | 0.26 | % | | | 0.14 | % | | | (0.46 | )% | | | (0.46 | )% | | | 0.34 | %(3) | | | (0.06 | )% | | | 0.31 | % | | | (0.03 | )% | | | (0.43 | )% | | | (0.39 | )% |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 26 | %(2) | | | 39 | % | | | 116 | % | | | 3 | % | | | 4 | % | | | 17 | % | | | 26 | %(2) | | | 39 | % | | | 116 | % | | | 3 | % | | | 4 | % | | | 17 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The expense and net investment income ratios without the effect of the contractual expense cap were (note 3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 2.72 | %(3) | | | 2.76 | % | | | 8.68 | % | | | 4.40 | % | | | 3.37 | % | | | 2.55 | % | | | 2.56 | %(3) | | | 2.52 | % | | | 9.48 | % | | | 4.55 | % | | | 3.21 | % | | | 2.48 | % |
Ratio of net investment loss to average average net assets | | | (1.00 | )%(3) | | | (1.48 | )% | | | (7.29 | )% | | | (3.14 | )% | | | (2.53 | )% | | | (1.63 | )% | | | (0.97 | )%(3) | | | (1.34 | )% | | | (7.93 | )% | | | (3.33 | )% | | | (2.38 | )% | | | (1.59 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The expense ratios after giving effect to the contractual expense cap and expense offset for uninvested cash balances were (note 3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | 1.14 | %(3) | | | 1.13 | % | | | 1.13 | % | | | 1.12 | % | | | 1.29 | % | | | 1.34 | % | | | 1.25 | %(3) | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % |
________________
(1) Per share amounts have been calculated using the daily average shares method.
(2) Not annualized.
(3) Annualized.
Note: On October 15, 2010, the Fund began operations under the name Aquila Three Peaks Opportunity Growth Fund, with Three Peaks Capital Management, LLC as investment sub-adviser and an investment strategy that differs meaningfully from the prior strategy pursued by the Fund.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Analysis of Expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including front-end sales charges with respect to Class A shares or contingent deferred sales charges (“CDSC”) with respect to Class C shares; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and/or service (12b-1) fees; and other Fund expenses. The table below is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The table below is based on an investment of $1,000 invested on January 1, 2012 and held for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Actual Expenses
This table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information provided in this table, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. To estimate the expenses you paid on your account, divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 ending account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During the Period”.
Six months ended June 30, 2012
| Actual | | | |
| Total Return | Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Without | Account | Account | Paid During |
| Sales Charges(1) | Value | Value | the Period(2) |
Class A | 11.21% | $1,000.00 | $1,112.10 | $ 7.98 |
Class C | 10.78% | $1,000.00 | $1,107.80 | $11.79 |
Class I | 11.39% | $1,000.00 | $1,113.90 | $ 5.99 |
Class Y | 11.39% | $1,000.00 | $1,113.90 | $ 6.57 |
(1) | Assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, at net asset value and does not reflect the deduction of the applicable sales charges with respect to Class A shares or the applicable CDSC with respect to Class C shares. Total return is not annualized, as it may not be representative of the total return for the year. |
(2) | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.52%, 2.25%, 1.14% and 1.25% for the Fund’s Class A, C, I and Y shares, respectively, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Analysis of Expenses (unaudited) (continued)
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use the information provided in this table to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other mutual funds. To do so, compare this 5.00% hypothetical example relating to the Fund with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table below are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs with respect to Class A shares. The example does not reflect the deduction of CDSC with respect to Class C shares. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different mutual funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Six months ended June 30, 2012
| Hypothetical | | | |
| Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Total | Account | Account | Paid During |
| Return | Value | Value | the Period(1) |
Class A | 5.00% | $1,000.00 | $1,017.30 | $ 7.62 |
Class C | 5.00% | $1,000.00 | $1,013.67 | $11.27 |
Class I | 5.00% | $1,000.00 | $1,019.19 | $ 5.72 |
Class Y | 5.00% | $1,000.00 | $1,018.65 | $ 6.27 |
(1) | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.52%, 2.25%, 1.14% and 1.25% for the Fund’s Class A, C , I and Y shares, respectively, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Information Available (unaudited)
Much of the information that the funds in the Aquila Group of Funds produce is automatically sent to you and all other shareholders. Specifically, you are routinely sent your Fund’s entire list of portfolio securities twice a year in the semi-annual and annual reports you receive. Additionally, under Fund policies, the Fund may also disclose other portfolio holdings as of a specified date (currently the Fund discloses its five largest holdings by value as of the close of the last business day of each calendar quarter in a posting to its website on approximately the 30th business day following the month end). Such information remains accessible until the next schedule is made publicly available. You may obtain a copy of the Fund’s portfolio holdings schedule for the most recently completed period by visiting the Fund’s website at www.aquilafunds.com. Whenever you wish to see a listing of your Fund’s portfolio other than in your shareholder reports, please check our website at www.aquilafunds.com or call us at 1-800-437-1020.
The Fund additionally files a complete list of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Forms N-Q are available free of charge on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. You may also review or, for a fee, copy the forms at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. or by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
Proxy Voting Record (unaudited)
Proxy Voting Guidelines and Procedures of the Fund are available without charge, upon request, by calling our toll-free number (1-800-437-1020). This information is also available at www.aquilafunds.com/ATPOGF/ATPOGFproxy.htm or on the SEC’s website www.sec.gov.
Federal Tax Status of Distributions (unaudited)
This information is presented in order to comply with a requirement of the Internal Revenue Code and no current action on the part of shareholders is required.
For the calendar year ended December 31, 2011, 99.78% of distributions paid by Aquila Three Peaks Opportunity Growth Fund during calendar year 2011 are taxable as long-term capital gains, and the balance was ordinary dividend income.
Prior to February 15, 2013, shareholders will be mailed the appropriate tax form(s) which will contain information on the status of distributions paid for the 2012 calendar year.
Additional Information (unaudited)
Renewal of the Advisory and Administration Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement
Aquila Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”) serves as the investment adviser to the Fund pursuant to an Advisory and Administration Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”). The Manager has retained Three Peaks Capital Management, LLC (the “Sub-Adviser”) to serve as the sub-adviser to the Fund pursuant to a Sub-Advisory Agreement between the Manager and the Sub-Adviser (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”). In order for the Manager and the Sub-Adviser to continue to serve in their respective roles, the Trustees of the Fund must determine annually whether to renew the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement for the Fund.
Contract renewal materials were provided to the Trustees in May, 2012. In addition, the Trustees took into account the information related to the Fund provided to the Trustees at each regularly scheduled meeting. The Trustees considered the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement separately as well as in conjunction with each other to determine their combined effects on the Fund.
At a meeting held in June, 2012, based on their evaluation of the information provided by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser, the Trustees of the Fund, including the independent Trustees voting separately, unanimously approved the renewal of each of the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement until June 30, 2013. In considering the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees considered various factors that they determined were relevant, including the factors described below. The Trustees did not identify any single factor as the controlling factor in determining to approve the renewal of the Advisory Agreement or the Sub-Advisory Agreement.
The nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser.
The Trustees considered the nature, extent and quality of the services that had been provided by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser to the Fund, taking into account the investment objectives and strategies of the Fund. The Trustees reviewed the terms of the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement.
The Manager has provided all administrative services to the Fund. The Trustees considered that the Manager supervised and monitored the performance of the Fund’s service providers (including the Sub-Adviser) and provided the Fund with personnel (including Fund officers) and other resources that are necessary for the Fund’s business management and operations.
The Manager has retained the Sub-Adviser to provide investment management of the Fund’s portfolio. The Trustees reviewed the Sub-Adviser’s investment approach for the Fund. The Trustees considered the personnel of the Sub-Adviser who provide investment management services to the Fund. The Trustees noted the extensive experience of the Sub-Adviser’s co-portfolio managers, Messrs. Sandy Rufenacht and Brent Olson. They considered that since mid-October, 2010, the date which the Sub-Adviser commenced portfolio operations with the Fund, they have received detailed presentations by representatives of the Sub-Adviser covering its research and investment process.
The Trustees considered that the Manager and the Sub-Adviser had provided all administrative and advisory services to the Fund that the Trustees deemed necessary or appropriate, including the specific services that the Trustees have determined are required for the Fund, given that it seeks to provide shareholders with capital appreciation primarily through investments in common stock and other equity securities.
Based on these considerations, the Trustees concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services that had been provided by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser to the Fund were satisfactory and consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, as applicable.
The investment performance of the Fund, the Manager and the Sub-Adviser.
The Trustees reviewed each aspect of the Fund’s performance and compared its performance with that of its peer group and its benchmark index, the Russell 3000 Stock Index. The Trustees noted that, unlike the Fund’s returns, the performance of the benchmark index did not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges. Additionally, the Trustees noted that they had discussed with the Manager and the Sub-Adviser that the Fund had performed in a manner consistent with the investment strategy of the Sub-Adviser, which was anticipated to produce performance results different from the benchmark indices as a result of under weighting certain investments that the Sub-Adviser deems to be outside of the Fund’s risk tolerance.
The Trustees concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory in light of market conditions and its investment strategy. Evaluation of this factor indicated to the Trustees that renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement would be appropriate.
The costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser and their affiliates from their relationships with the Fund.
The information provided by the Manager in connection with renewal contained advisory fee and expense data for the Fund and its peer group. The Trustees evaluated both the fee under the Sub-Advisory Agreement and the portion of the fee under the Advisory Agreement retained by the Manager. The materials also showed the profitability to the Manager and the Sub-Adviser of their services to the Fund, as well as the profitability to Aquila Distributors, Inc. (the “Distributor”) of distribution services provided to the Fund.
The Trustees noted that the entire portion of the advisory fee had been waived by the Manager and, in turn, the Sub-Adviser had waived its entire portion of its fees during the latest fiscal year. Additionally, it was noted that the Manager had reimbursed a portion of Fund expenses during the Fund’s fiscal year through a contractual undertaking. The Manager had indicated that it is prepared to waive fees and subsidize expenses as necessary in order that the Fund remains competitive. The Sub-Adviser has agreed to waive its fee in the same proportion as the Manager is required to waive its fee in connection with the aforementioned undertaking.
The Trustees compared the advisory fee and expense data for the Fund to similar data with respect to a peer group of funds that they found to be relevant. The Trustees concluded that the advisory fee and expenses of the Fund (after waivers and the expense reimbursement) were similar to and were reasonable as compared to those advisory fees and expenses being paid by other funds in the peer group and also that the advisory and sub-advisory fees were reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services provided to the Fund by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser.
The Trustees considered information provided by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser regarding the lack of profitability of the Manager and the Sub-Adviser with respect to the services provided by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser to the Fund, including the methodology used by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser in allocating certain of their respective costs to the services provided to the Fund. The Trustees concluded that lack of profitability to the Manager and the Sub-Adviser with respect to advisory services provided to the Fund did not argue against approval of the fees to be paid under the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Fund grows.
The Trustees noted that both the Manager and Sub-Adviser had waived the entire portion of their respective fees during the latest fiscal year. The Manager had additionally reimbursed Fund expenses and indicated that it is prepared to waive fees and subsidize expenses as necessary in order that the Fund remains competitive. The Sub-Adviser has additionally agreed to waive its fee in the same proportion as the Manager in order that the Fund remains competitive. It was noted that the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement contain breakpoints which would be realized as the Fund grows. Evaluation of these factors indicated to the Trustees that the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement should be renewed without any changes at this time.
Benefits derived or to be derived by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser and their affiliates from their relationships with the Fund.
The Trustees observed that, as is generally true of most fund complexes, the Manager and Sub-Adviser and their affiliates, by providing services to a number of funds or other investment clients including the Fund, were able to spread costs as they would otherwise be unable to do. The Trustees noted that while that could produce efficiencies and increased profitability for the Manager and Sub-Adviser and their affiliates, it also makes their services available to the Fund at favorable levels of quality and cost which are more advantageous to the Fund than would otherwise have been possible.
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)