Exhibit 99.2
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
For Immediate News Release
April 25, 2007
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. ANNOUNCES
FIRST QUARTER 2007 OPERATING RESULTS AND PLANNED RESTATEMENT FOR CHANGE IN LAND LEASE ACCOUNTING
(Alexandria, VA) AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (NYSE: AVB)reported today that Net Income Available to Common Stockholders for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was $44,345,000. This resulted in Earnings per Share — diluted (“EPS”) of $0.56 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, compared to $1.45 for the comparable period of 2006, a per share decrease of 61.4%. This decrease is primarily attributable to gains from sales of land and communities in 2006, partially offset by growth in income from existing and newly developed communities in 2007.
Funds from Operations attributable to common stockholders — diluted (“FFO”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was $89,118,000, or $1.11 per share compared to $84,189,000, or $1.12 per share for the comparable period of 2006. FFO per share includes $0.01 per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and $0.17 per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 related to the sale of land parcels. Adjusting for land sales in both periods, FFO per share increased 15.8%, due primarily to contributions from improved community operating results and newly developed communities. As explained later in this release, the Company made a change related to its accounting for land leases. This change resulted in a non-cash charge to operating expenses and reduced reported FFO by $0.04 per share from what would otherwise have been reported for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2006 have also been restated to reflect the impact of this change.
Operating Results for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to the Prior Year Period
For the Company, including discontinued operations, total revenue increased by $19,917,000, or 11.3% to $196,706,000.For Established Communities, rental revenue increased 6.6%, comprised of an increase in Average Rental Rates of 7.0% and a decrease in Economic Occupancy of 0.4%. As a result, total revenue for Established Communities increased $9,883,000 to $159,665,000. Operating expenses for Established Communities increased $1,333,000, or 2.7% to $51,022,000. Accordingly, Net Operating Income (“NOI”) for Established Communities increased by $8,550,000, or 8.5%, to $108,643,000.
The following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue, operating expenses and NOI for Established Communities from the first quarter of 2006 to the first quarter of 2007:
CopyrightÓ 2007 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rental | | Operating | | | | | | % of |
| | Revenue | | Expenses | | NOI | | NOI (1) |
|
Northeast | | | 4.0 | % | | | 0.4 | % | | | 5.8 | % | | | 41.3 | % |
Mid-Atlantic | | | 8.1 | % | | | 9.3 | % | | | 7.4 | % | | | 16.0 | % |
Midwest | | | 9.5 | % | | | 14.6 | % | | | 6.1 | % | | | 2.0 | % |
Pacific NW | | | 12.7 | % | | | 4.5 | % | | | 17.1 | % | | | 4.6 | % |
No. California | | | 9.1 | % | | | 0.5 | % | | | 12.7 | % | | | 23.4 | % |
So. California | | | 6.1 | % | | | 1.1 | % | | | 8.1 | % | | | 12.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 6.6 | % | | | 2.7 | % | | | 8.5 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Total represents each region’s % of total NOI from the Company, including discontinued operations. |
Cash concessionsare recognized in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and are amortized over the approximate lease term, which is generally one year. The following table reflects the percentage changes in rental revenue on a GAAP basis and Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis for our Established Communities:
| | | | |
|
| | 1Q 07 vs 1Q 06 |
Rental Revenue Change with Concessions on a GAAP Basis | | | 6.6 | % |
| | | | |
Rental Revenue Change with Concessions on a Cash Basis | | | 4.7 | % |
| | | | |
|
CopyrightÓ 2007 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Development and Redevelopment Activity
The Company completed the development of two communities during the first quarter of 2007. Avalon Chestnut Hill, located in Chestnut Hill (Boston), MA, is a mid-rise community containing 204 apartment homes and was completed for a Total Capital Cost of $61,200,000. Avalon at Decoverly II, the second phase of a two-phase community located in Rockville, MD, is a garden-style community containing 196 apartment homes. Avalon at Decoverly II was completed for a Total Capital Cost of $30,800,000.
The Company began construction of Avalon Morningside Park, a wholly owned community in the first quarter of 2007. Avalon Morningside Park is located in New York, NY, and will contain a total of 296 apartment homes when completed for an estimated Total Capital Cost of $125,500,000.
In the first quarter of 2007, the Company completed the redevelopment of one community, Avalon Arlington Heights located in Arlington Heights (Chicago), IL. This community contains an aggregate of 409 apartment homes and was completed for a Total Capital Cost of $6,700,000, excluding costs incurred prior to the start of redevelopment.
During the first quarter of 2007, the Company purchased a parcel of land located in Brooklyn, NY for approximately $70,000,000. In April 2007, the Company acquired additional development rights associated with this land parcel for a purchase price of $10,500,000. The Company expects to begin construction of a 628 apartment home high-rise community in the second half of 2007.
In April 2007, a fire at Avalon Danvers, a development community located in Danvers (Boston), MA, damaged 147 of the planned 433 apartment homes. The impacted apartment homes were under construction and unoccupied. The fire did not damage the structures housing the current leasing operations or occupied apartment homes. The Company expects that insurance proceeds will substantially cover the cost to reconstruct all damaged assets as well as provide for a reimbursement of lost net operating income due to schedule delays, resulting in no material net economic loss to the Company.
Investment Management Fund Activity
AvalonBay Value Added Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”) is a private, discretionary investment vehicle in which the Company holds an equity interest of approximately 15%. During the first quarter of 2007, the Fund acquired three communities:
• | | Centerpoint, located within a single downtown city block of Baltimore, MD, contains a total of 392 apartment homes and approximately 33,000 square feet of retail space, and was acquired for a purchase price of $78,500,000. |
|
• | | Crystal Hill Apartments, a garden-style community consisting of 168 apartment homes located in Pomona (Rockland County), NY was acquired for a purchase price of $37,800,000; and |
|
• | | Middlesex Crossing Apartments, located in Billerica (Boston), MA, was acquired for a purchase price of $37,100,000. Middlesex Crossing Apartments is a garden-style community consisting of 252 apartment homes. |
During the first quarter of 2007, the Fund commenced the redevelopment of Fuller Martel, located in Los Angeles, CA. Fuller Martel contains 82 apartment homes and will be redeveloped for an expected Total Capital Cost of $3,400,000, excluding costs incurred prior to the start of redevelopment.
As of March 31, 2007, the Fund has invested $609,250,000, which represents approximately 70% of the expected total investment.
Financing, Liquidity and Balance Sheet Statistics
In January 2007, the Company filed a new shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, allowing the Company to sell an undetermined number or amount of certain debt and equity securities as defined in the prospectus.
In January 2007, in conjunction with the inclusion of its common stock in the S&P 500 Index, the Company issued 4,600,000 shares of its common stock at $129.30 per share. Net proceeds of approximately $594,000,000 will be used for general corporate purposes.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under its $650,000,000 unsecured credit facility. In addition the Company had $356,400,000 in unrestricted cash available at March 31, 2007. Leverage, calculated as total debt as a percentage of Total Market Capitalization, was 21.2% at March 31, 2007. Unencumbered NOI for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was 82% and Interest Coverage for the first quarter of 2007 was 4.4 times.
Revised Accounting Interpretation
On April 24, 2007, the Company determined to revise its accounting for long-term land leases to provide for the straight-lining of lease payments with fixed, or minimum, escalations over the entire lease term as opposed to the Company’s expected holding period of its interest in the asset. This change primarily impacts the land lease accounting related to one consolidated asset with a 90 year lease in which the land lessor is also the partner in the venture holding the asset. The change is expected to result in an additional non-cash increase to operating expenses of approximately $10,500,000 per year in excess of the current annual cash payments, as well as additional depreciation expense. Information provided in this release for the three months ended March 31, 2006 has been restated from our previously reported results to reflect this accounting change and provide comparable results to the three months ended March 31, 2007. While the amounts involved do not affect the economics of the joint venture or the Company’s cash flows, management intends to seek an amendment of the lease terms or otherwise resolve the need to continue to accrue lease expense that is significantly in excess of our actual cash rental payments. An amendment or sale would eliminate this non-cash expense in the future. A sale of the asset related to this land lease would also trigger the recapture into net income of the cumulative amount of the prior period non-cash accruals at the date of sale. However, no assurance can be provided that an amendment will occur, that the joint venture structure can be changed or that the underlying asset would be sold in such a manner.
The Company will restate its financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 to reflect this revised accounting treatment. This change in accounting will result in a reduction of net income of approximately $11,900,000 in each year, or 4.4%, 3.8% and 5.7% of net income available to common stockholders, respectively.
Second Quarter 2007 Financial Outlook
The Company expects EPS in the range of $0.91 to $0.95 for the second quarter of 2007 and expects Projected FFO per share in the range of $1.13 to $1.17 for the second quarter of 2007. The financial outlook provided for the second quarter 2007 includes $0.03 per share related to the revised lease accounting discussed in this release.
The Company expects to release its second quarter 2007 earnings on August 1, 2007 after the market closes. The Company expects to hold a conference call on August 2, 2007 at 11:00 AM EDT to discuss the second quarter 2007 results.
CopyrightÓ 2007 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Second Quarter 2007 Conference/Event Schedule
The Company is scheduled to participate in the following conferences during the second quarter of 2007:
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | 2Q 2007 Conference Schedule | | |
| | | | |
| | |
Event/Conference | | Date |
AvalonBay New York Area Community Tour | | June 4 |
NAREIT Institutional Investor Forum | | June 5-7 |
Wachovia Securities Equity Conference | | June 25-29 |
The Company is scheduled to present and conduct a question and answer session at each of these conferences. Management’s presentations and discussions at these events may include reference to the Company’s operating environment and trends; development, redevelopment, disposition and acquisition activity; the Company’s outlook and other business and financial matters affecting the Company.
Details on how to access a webcast of each event and/or related materials will be available beginning June 1, 2007 on the Company’s website athttp://www.avalonbay.com/events.
Other Matters
The Company will hold a conference call on April 26, 2007 at 1:00 PM EDT to review and answer questions about this release, its first quarter results, the Attachments (described below) and related matters. To participate on the call, dial 1-877-510-2397 domestically and 1-706-634-5877 internationally.
To hear a replay of the call, which will be available from April 26, 2007 at 5:00 PM EDT until May 3, 2007 at 11:59 PM EDT, dial 1-800-642-1687 domestically and 1-706-645-9291 internationally, and use Access Code: 4853093.
A webcast of the conference call will also be available at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings, and an on-line playback of the webcast will be available for at least 30 days following the call.
The Company produces Earnings Release Attachments (the “Attachments”) that provide detailed information regarding operating, development, redevelopment, disposition and acquisition activity. These Attachments are considered a part of this earnings release and are available in full with this earnings release via the Company’s website at http://www.avalonbay.com/earnings and through e-mail distribution. To receive future press releases via e-mail, please send a request to IR@avalonbay.com.
About AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company owned or held a direct or indirect ownership interest in 171 apartment communities containing 49,402 apartment homes in ten states and the District of Columbia, of which 16 communities were under construction and six communities were under reconstruction. The Company is an equity REIT in the business of developing, redeveloping, acquiring and managing apartment communities in high barrier-to-entry markets of the United States. More information may be found on the Company’s website at the following address http://www.avalonbay.com. For additional information, please contact John Christie, Senior Director of Investor Relations and Research at 1-703-317-4747 or Thomas J. Sargeant, Chief Financial Officer, at 1-703-317-4635.
Forward-Looking Statements
This release, including its Attachments, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Company’s use of words such as “expects,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “believes,” “outlook” and similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties, which include the following: the Company’s ability to obtain an amendment of certain lease terms or sell its interest in the assets subject to such leases, changes in local employment conditions, demand for apartment homes, supply of competitive housing products, and other economic conditions may result in lower than expected occupancy and/or rental rates and adversely affect the profitability of our communities; increases in costs of materials, labor or other expenses may result in communities that we develop or redevelop failing to achieve expected profitability; delays in completing development, redevelopment and/or lease-up may result in increased financing and construction costs and may delay and/or reduce the profitability of a community; debt and/or equity financing for development, redevelopment or acquisitions of communities may not be available on favorable terms; we may be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, necessary governmental permits and authorizations; or we may abandon development or redevelopment opportunities for which we have already incurred costs. In addition, statements herein regarding the impact of the change in accounting for land leases on the restated financial statements we plan to file are based on current estimates.
Additional discussions of risks and uncertainties appear in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 under the headings “Risk Factors” and under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Forward-Looking Statements”
The Company does not undertake a duty to update forward-looking statements, including its expected operating results for the second quarter and full year 2007. The Company may, in its discretion, provide information in future public announcements regarding its outlook that may be of interest to the investment
CopyrightÓ 2007 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
community. The format and extent of future outlooks may be different from the format and extent of the information contained in this release.
Definitions and Reconciliations
Non-GAAP financial measures and other capitalized terms, as used in this earnings release, are defined and further explained on Attachment 13, “Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms.” Attachment 13 is included in the full earnings release available at the Company’s website athttp://www.avalonbay.com/earnings.
CopyrightÓ 2007 AvalonBay Communities, Inc. All Rights Reserved
FIRST QUARTER 2007
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Avalon at Mission Bay North II was completed in the fourth quarter of 2006 and is located in the South of Market area of San Francisco. Completed for a Total Capital Cost of $108.2 million, the community contains 313 apartment homes and 21,196 square feet of retail space. It is the second of a two phase community containing an aggregate of 563 apartment homes. Avalon Mission Bay North I & II are adjacent to the AT&T Park and eight blocks from San Francisco’s financial district.
Avalon at Mission Bay North II has excellent access to nearly every transportation facility in the city, including Highways 280, 101, and 80, three San Francisco MUNI lines, and the Cal-Train station, providing easy access to the job centers on the Peninsula and San Jose. Apartment homes feature upgraded kitchens, private patios or balconies and high speed internet. Community amenities include a fitness center, rock climbing wall and basketball court.
FIRST QUARTER 2007
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
Table of Contents
| | | | |
Company Profile | | | | |
Selected Operating and Other Information | | Attachment 1 |
Detailed Operating Information | | Attachment 2 |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | | Attachment 3 |
| | | | |
Sub-Market Profile | | | | |
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) | | Attachment 4 |
Sequential Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes (Established Communities) | | Attachment 5 |
| | | | |
Development, Redevelopment, Acquisition and Disposition Profile | | | | |
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Activity | | Attachment 6 |
Development Communities | | Attachment 7 |
Redevelopment Communities | | Attachment 8 |
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity | | Attachment 9 |
Future Development | | Attachment 10 |
Unconsolidated Real Estate Investments | | Attachment 11 |
Summary of Disposition Activity | | Attachment 12 |
| | | | |
Definitions and Reconciliations | | | | |
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms | | Attachment 13 |
The following is a “Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The projections and estimates contained in the following attachments are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those projected in such statements. Risks associated with the Company’s development, redevelopment, construction, and lease-up activities, which could impact the forward-looking statements made are discussed in the paragraph titled “Forward-Looking Statements” in the release to which these attachments relate. In particular, development opportunities may be abandoned; Total Capital Cost of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making the community uneconomical and/or affecting projected returns; construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service and construction costs; and other risks described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Attachment 1
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Selected Operating and Other Information
March 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
SELECTED OPERATING INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Q1 | | | Q1 | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 (1) | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
Net Income available to common stockholders | | $ | 44,345 | | | $ | 108,939 | | | $ | (64,594 | ) | | | (59.3 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Per common share — basic | | $ | 0.57 | | | $ | 1.48 | | | $ | (0.91 | ) | | | (61.5 | %) |
Per common share — diluted | | $ | 0.56 | | | $ | 1.45 | | | $ | (0.89 | ) | | | (61.4 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funds from Operations | | $ | 89,118 | | | $ | 84,189 | | | $ | 4,929 | | | | 5.9 | % |
Per common share — diluted | | $ | 1.11 | | | $ | 1.12 | | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.9 | %) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends declared — common | | $ | 67,694 | | | $ | 57,986 | | | $ | 9,708 | | | | 16.7 | % |
Per common share | | $ | 0.85 | | | $ | 0.78 | | | $ | 0.07 | | | | 9.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common shares outstanding | | | 79,639,601 | | | | 74,340,561 | | | | 5,299,040 | | | | 7.1 | % |
Outstanding operating partnership units | | | 129,782 | | | | 152,766 | | | | (22,984 | ) | | | (15.0 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total outstanding shares and units | | | 79,769,383 | | | | 74,493,327 | | | | 5,276,056 | | | | 7.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average shares outstanding — basic | | | 78,431,936 | | | | 73,808,643 | | | | 4,623,293 | | | | 6.3 | % |
Average operating partnership units outstanding | | | 144,586 | | | | 237,575 | | | | (92,989 | ) | | | (39.1 | %) |
Effect of dilutive securities | | | 1,354,226 | | | | 1,243,906 | | | | 110,320 | | | | 8.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average shares outstanding — diluted | | | 79,930,748 | | | | 75,290,124 | | | | 4,640,624 | | | | 6.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
DEBT COMPOSITION AND MATURITIES
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | % of Total | | Average | | |
| | | | | | Market | | Interest | | Remaining |
Debt Composition (2) | | Amount | | Cap | | Rate (3) | | Maturities (2) |
| | |
Conventional Debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2007 | | | $ | 266,202 | |
Long-term, fixed rate | | $ | 2,199,317 | | | | 16.6 | % | | | | | | | 2008 | | | $ | 208,531 | |
Long-term, variable rate | | | 109,975 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | | | | | 2009 | | | $ | 231,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal, Conventional | | | 2,309,292 | | | | 17.4 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 2010 | | | $ | 234,708 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2011 | | | $ | 390,533 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term, fixed rate | | | 173,844 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term, variable rate | | | 327,588 | | | | 2.5 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal, Tax-Exempt | | | 501,432 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 5.2 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Debt | | $ | 2,810,724 | | | | 21.2 | % | | | 6.2 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | 2006 amounts have been restated from amounts previously reported to reflect a change in accounting for land leases. |
|
(2) | | Excludes debt associated with communities classified as held for sale. |
|
(3) | | Includes credit enhancement fees, trustees’ fees, etc. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Non-Rev |
| | Cap | | Cap | | Capex |
| | Interest | | Overhead | | per Home |
| | |
Q107 | | $ | 15,433 | | | $ | 6,606 | | | $ | 9 | |
Q406 | | $ | 13,909 | | | $ | 6,847 | | | $ | 92 | |
Q306 | | $ | 12,910 | | | $ | 6,361 | | | $ | 203 | |
Q206 | | $ | 11,205 | | | $ | 5,377 | | | $ | 164 | |
Q106 | | $ | 8,364 | | | $ | 5,559 | | | $ | 38 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Apartment |
| | Communities | | Homes |
| | |
Current Communities | | | 155 | | | | 44,353 | |
Development Communities | | | 16 | | | | 5,049 | |
Development Rights | | | 56 | | | | 14,809 | |
Attachment 2
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Detailed Operating Information
March 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Q1 | | | Q1 | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006(1) | | | % Change | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental and other income | | $ | 195,262 | | | $ | 173,952 | | | | 12.3% | |
Management, development and other fees | | | 1,444 | | | | 1,207 | | | | 19.6% | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 196,706 | | | | 175,159 | | | | 12.3% | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct property operating expenses, excluding property taxes | | | 47,255 | | | | 41,622 | | | | 13.5% | |
Property taxes | | | 17,726 | | | | 16,904 | | | | 4.9% | |
Property management and other indirect operating expenses | | | 8,439 | | | | 8,631 | | | | (2.2%) | |
Investments and investment management (2) | | | 2,024 | | | | 1,471 | | | | 37.6% | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 75,444 | | | | 68,628 | | | | 9.9% | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | | | (23,878 | ) | | | (28,664 | ) | | | (16.7%) | |
General and administrative expense | | | (6,780 | ) | | | (6,283 | ) | | | 7.9% | |
Joint venture income and minority interest expense | | | (535 | ) | | | 95 | | | | N/A | |
Depreciation expense | | | (44,094 | ) | | | (40,225 | ) | | | 9.6% | |
Gain on sale of land | | | 545 | | | | 13,166 | | | | (95.9%) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 46,520 | | | | 44,620 | | | | 4.3% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discontinued operations: (3) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations | | | — | | | | 1,075 | | | | (100.0%) | |
Gain on sale of communities | | | — | | | | 65,419 | | | | (100.0%) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total discontinued operations | | | — | | | | 66,494 | | | | (100.0%) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 46,520 | | | | 111,114 | | | | (58.1%) | |
Dividends attributable to preferred stock | | | (2,175 | ) | | | (2,175 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income available to common stockholders | | $ | 44,345 | | | $ | 108,939 | | | | (59.3%) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income per common share — basic | | $ | 0.57 | | | $ | 1.48 | | | | (61.5%) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income per common share — diluted | | $ | 0.56 | | | $ | 1.45 | | | | (61.4%) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2006 have been restated from amounts previously reported to reflect a change in accounting for land leases. |
|
(2) | | Reflects costs incurred related to investment acquisition, investment management and abandoned pursuits. |
|
(3) | | Reflects net income for communities classified as discontinued operations as of March 31, 2007 and communities sold during the period from January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007. The following table details income from discontinued operations for the periods shown: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Q1 | | | Q1 | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Rental income | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,630 | |
Operating and other expenses | | | — | | | | (555 | ) |
Interest expense, net | | | — | | | | — | |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,075 | |
| | | | | | |
Attachment 3
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | December 31, |
| | 2007 | | 2006(1) |
Real estate | | $ | 5,838,023 | | | $ | 5,706,423 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | (1,148,518 | ) | | | (1,104,507 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net operating real estate | | | 4,689,505 | | | | 4,601,916 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Construction in progress, including land | | | 685,665 | | | | 641,781 | |
Land held for development | | | 315,241 | | | | 202,314 | |
Operating real estate assets held for sale, net | | | 64,680 | | | | 64,351 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total real estate, net | | | 5,755,091 | | | | 5,510,362 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 356,435 | | | | 8,567 | |
Cash in escrow | | | 132,123 | | | | 136,989 | |
Resident security deposits | | | 28,938 | | | | 26,574 | |
Other assets(2) | | | 151,462 | | | | 162,999 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 6,424,049 | | | $ | 5,845,491 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Unsecured senior notes | | $ | 2,153,184 | | | $ | 2,153,078 | |
Unsecured facility | | | — | | | | — | |
Notes payable | | | 654,723 | | | | 672,508 | |
Resident security deposits | | | 39,819 | | | | 38,803 | |
Liabilities related to assets held for sale | | | 42,792 | | | | 42,985 | |
Other liabilities | | | 350,374 | | | | 346,652 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 3,240,892 | | | $ | 3,254,026 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Minority interest | | | 21,950 | | | | 18,311 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 3,161,207 | | | | 2,573,154 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 6,424,049 | | | $ | 5,845,491 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Amounts as of December 31, 2006 have been restated from amounts previously reported to reflect a change in accounting for land leases. |
(2) | | Other assets include $1,941 and $1,558 relating to assets classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. |
Attachment 4
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Quarterly Revenue and Occupancy Changes — Established Communities (1)
March 31, 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Apartment | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Homes | | | Average Rental Rates(2) | | | Economic Occupancy | | | Rental Revenue ($000’s) (3) | |
| | | | | | Q1 07 | | | Q1 06 | | | % Change | | | Q1 07 | | | Q1 06 | | | % Change | | | Q1 07 | | | Q1 06 | | | % Change | |
Northeast | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Boston, MA | | | 3,621 | | | $ | 1,874 | | | $ | 1,854 | | | | 1.1% | | | | 95.5% | | | | 96.1% | | | | (0.6%) | | | $ | 19,445 | | | $ | 19,348 | | | | 0.5% | |
Fairfield-New Haven, CT | | | 2,412 | | | | 1,985 | | | | 1,851 | | | | 7.2% | | | | 95.1% | | | | 96.4% | | | | (1.3%) | | | | 13,664 | | | | 12,908 | | | | 5.9% | |
New York, NY | | | 1,730 | | | | 2,449 | | | | 2,323 | | | | 5.4% | | | | 95.6% | | | | 97.1% | | | | (1.5%) | | | | 12,150 | | | | 11,692 | | | | 3.9% | |
Long Island, NY | | | 1,469 | | | | 2,296 | | | | 2,187 | | | | 5.0% | | | | 96.8% | | | | 95.5% | | | | 1.3% | | | | 9,790 | | | | 9,213 | | | | 6.3% | |
Northern New Jersey | | | 1,182 | | | | 2,578 | | | | 2,405 | | | | 7.2% | | | | 96.9% | | | | 96.5% | | | | 0.4% | | | | 8,860 | | | | 8,236 | | | | 7.6% | |
Central New Jersey | | | 814 | | | | 1,652 | | | | 1,631 | | | | 1.3% | | | | 96.7% | | | | 95.6% | | | | 1.1% | | | | 3,901 | | | | 3,811 | | | | 2.4% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Northeast Average | | | 11,228 | | | | 2,100 | | | | 2,011 | | | | 4.4% | | | | 95.9% | | | | 96.3% | | | | (0.4%) | | | | 67,810 | | | | 65,208 | | | | 4.0% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mid-Atlantic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Washington, DC | | | 5,215 | | | | 1,734 | | | | 1,589 | | | | 9.1% | | | | 95.9% | | | | 96.7% | | | | (0.8%) | | | | 26,028 | | | | 24,030 | | | | 8.3% | |
Baltimore, MD | | | 542 | | | | 1,256 | | | | 1,160 | | | | 8.3% | | | | 94.8% | | | | 98.2% | | | | (3.4%) | | | | 1,936 | | | | 1,846 | | | | 4.9% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mid-Atlantic Average | | | 5,757 | | | | 1,689 | | | | 1,549 | | | | 9.0% | | | | 95.9% | | | | 96.8% | | | | (0.9%) | | | | 27,964 | | | | 25,876 | | | | 8.1% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Midwest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chicago, IL | | | 887 | | | | 1,181 | | | | 1,095 | | | | 7.9% | | | | 95.4% | | | | 93.9% | | | | 1.5% | | | | 2,994 | | | | 2,735 | | | | 9.5% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Midwest Average | | | 887 | | | | 1,181 | | | | 1,095 | | | | 7.9% | | | | 95.4% | | | | 93.9% | | | | 1.5% | | | | 2,994 | | | | 2,735 | | | | 9.5% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pacific Northwest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Seattle, WA | | | 2,278 | | | | 1,232 | | | | 1,092 | | | | 12.8% | | | | 96.0% | | | | 96.1% | | | | (0.1%) | | | | 8,083 | | | | 7,174 | | | | 12.7% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pacific Northwest Average | | | 2,278 | | | | 1,232 | | | | 1,092 | | | | 12.8% | | | | 96.0% | | | | 96.1% | | | | (0.1%) | | | | 8,083 | | | | 7,174 | | | | 12.7% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Northern California | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
San Jose, CA | | | 4,292 | | | | 1,653 | | | | 1,500 | | | | 10.2% | | | | 97.5% | | | | 97.3% | | | | 0.2% | | | | 20,744 | | | | 18,795 | | | | 10.4% | |
Oakland-East Bay, CA | | | 1,955 | | | | 1,359 | | | | 1,251 | | | | 8.6% | | | | 96.5% | | | | 97.4% | | | | (0.9%) | | | | 7,691 | | | | 7,144 | | | | 7.7% | |
San Francisco, CA | | | 1,862 | | | | 1,944 | | | | 1,791 | | | | 8.5% | | | | 95.9% | | | | 96.8% | | | | (0.9%) | | | | 10,421 | | | | 9,686 | | | | 7.6% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Northern California Average | | | 8,109 | | | | 1,649 | | | | 1,507 | | | | 9.4% | | | | 96.9% | | | | 97.2% | | | | (0.3%) | | | | 38,856 | | | | 35,625 | | | | 9.1% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern California | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Los Angeles, CA | | | 1,198 | | | | 1,640 | | | | 1,530 | | | | 7.2% | | | | 95.2% | | | | 95.8% | | | | (0.6%) | | | | 5,612 | | | | 5,266 | | | | 6.6% | |
San Diego, CA | | | 1,058 | | | | 1,440 | | | | 1,373 | | | | 4.9% | | | | 95.6% | | | | 96.1% | | | | (0.5%) | | | | 4,367 | | | | 4,182 | | | | 4.4% | |
Orange County, CA | | | 916 | | | | 1,434 | | | | 1,347 | | | | 6.5% | | | | 96.9% | | | | 96.1% | | | | 0.8% | | | | 3,821 | | | | 3,562 | | | | 7.3% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern California Average | | | 3,172 | | | | 1,514 | | | | 1,424 | | | | 6.3% | | | | 95.8% | | | | 96.0% | | | | (0.2%) | | | | 13,800 | | | | 13,010 | | | | 6.1% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average/Total Established | | | 31,431 | | | $ | 1,760 | | | $ | 1,645 | | | | 7.0% | | | | 96.1% | | | | 96.5% | | | | (0.4%) | | | $ | 159,507 | | | $ | 149,628 | | | | 6.6% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2006 such that a comparison of 2006 to 2007 is meaningful. |
|
(2) | | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. |
|
(3) | | With concessions reflected on a cash basis, rental revenue from Established Communities increased 4.7% between years. |
Attachment 5
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
*Sequential Quarterly* Revenue and Occupancy Changes — Established Communities (1)
March 31, 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Apartment | | | Average Rental Rates (2) | | | Economic Occupancy | | | Rental Revenue ($000’s) | |
| | Homes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Q1 07 | | | Q4 06 | | | % Change | | | Q107 | | | Q4 06 | | | % Change | | | Q1 07 | | | Q4 06 | | | % Change | |
Northeast | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Boston, MA | | | 3,621 | | | $ | 1,874 | | | $ | 1,876 | | | | (0.1%) | | | | 95.5% | | | | 96.2% | | | | (0.7%) | | | $ | 19,445 | | | $ | 19,604 | | | | (0.8%) | |
Fairfield-New Haven, CT | | | 2,412 | | | | 1,985 | | | | 1,971 | | | | 0.7% | | | | 95.1% | | | | 96.6% | | | | (1.5%) | | | | 13,664 | | | | 13,773 | | | | (0.8%) | |
New York, NY | | | 1,730 | | | | 2,449 | | | | 2,410 | | | | 1.6% | | | | 95.6% | | | | 96.8% | | | | (1.2%) | | | | 12,150 | | | | 12,105 | | | | 0.4% | |
Long Island, NY | | | 1,469 | | | | 2,296 | | | | 2,282 | | | | 0.6% | | | | 96.8% | | | | 96.0% | | | | 0.8% | | | | 9,790 | | | | 9,658 | | | | 1.4% | |
Northern New Jersey | | | 1,182 | | | | 2,578 | | | | 2,560 | | | | 0.7% | | | | 96.9% | | | | 97.1% | | | | (0.2%) | | | | 8,860 | | | | 8,815 | | | | 0.5% | |
Central New Jersey | | | 814 | | | | 1,652 | | | | 1,669 | | | | (1.0%) | | | | 96.7% | | | | 97.2% | | | | (0.5%) | | | | 3,901 | | | | 3,959 | | | | (1.5%) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Northeast Average | | | 11,228 | | | | 2,100 | | | | 2,091 | | | | 0.4% | | | | 95.9% | | | | 96.5% | | | | (0.6%) | | | | 67,810 | | | | 67,914 | | | | (0.2%) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mid-Atlantic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Washington, DC | | | 5,215 | | | | 1,734 | | | | 1,710 | | | | 1.4% | | | | 95.9% | | | | 97.3% | | | | (1.4%) | | | | 26,028 | | | | 26,015 | | | | 0.0% | |
Baltimore, MD | | | 542 | | | | 1,256 | | | | 1,247 | | | | 0.7% | | | | 94.8% | | | | 95.9% | | | | (1.1%) | | | | 1,936 | | | | 1,943 | | | | (0.4%) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mid-Atlantic Average | | | 5,757 | | | | 1,689 | | | | 1,667 | | | | 1.3% | | | | 95.9% | | | | 97.2% | | | | (1.3%) | | | | 27,964 | | | | 27,958 | | | | 0.0% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Midwest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chicago, IL | | | 887 | | | | 1,181 | | | | 1,157 | | | | 2.1% | | | | 95.4% | | | | 96.1% | | | | (0.7%) | | | | 2,994 | | | | 2,955 | | | | 1.3% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Midwest Average | | | 887 | | | | 1,181 | | | | 1,157 | | | | 2.1% | | | | 95.4% | | | | 96.1% | | | | (0.7%) | | | | 2,994 | | | | 2,955 | | | | 1.3% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pacific Northwest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Seattle, WA | | | 2,278 | | | | 1,232 | | | | 1,203 | | | | 2.4% | | | | 96.0% | | | | 96.1% | | | | (0.1%) | | | | 8,083 | | | | 7,902 | | | | 2.3% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pacific Northwest Average | | | 2,278 | | | | 1,232 | | | | 1,203 | | | | 2.4% | | | | 96.0% | | | | 96.1% | | | | (0.1%) | | | | 8,083 | | | | 7,902 | | | | 2.3% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Northern California | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
San Jose, CA | | | 4,292 | | | | 1,653 | | | | 1,631 | | | | 1.3% | | | | 97.5% | | | | 97.1% | | | | 0.4% | | | | 20,744 | | | | 20,392 | | | | 1.7% | |
Oakland-East Bay, CA | | | 1,955 | | | | 1,359 | | | | 1,348 | | | | 0.8% | | | | 96.5% | | | | 96.8% | | | | (0.3%) | | | | 7,691 | | | | 7,650 | | | | 0.5% | |
San Francisco, CA | | | 1,862 | | | | 1,944 | | | | 1,931 | | | | 0.7% | | | | 95.9% | | | | 96.0% | | | | (0.1%) | | | | 10,421 | | | | 10,362 | | | | 0.6% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Northern California Average | | | 8,109 | | | | 1,649 | | | | 1,631 | | | | 1.1% | | | | 96.9% | | | | 96.8% | | | | 0.1% | | | | 38,856 | | | | 38,404 | | | | 1.2% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern California | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Los Angeles, CA | | | 1,198 | | | | 1,640 | | | | 1,616 | | | | 1.5% | | | | 95.2% | | | | 95.8% | | | | (0.6%) | | | | 5,612 | | | | 5,563 | | | | 0.9% | |
San Diego, CA | | | 1,058 | | | | 1,440 | | | | 1,437 | | | | 0.2% | | | | 95.6% | | | | 94.8% | | | | 0.8% | | | | 4,367 | | | | 4,324 | | | | 1.0% | |
Orange County, CA | | | 916 | | | | 1,434 | | | | 1,419 | | | | 1.1% | | | | 96.9% | | | | 96.9% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 3,821 | | | | 3,778 | | | | 1.1% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Southern California Average | | | 3,172 | | | | 1,514 | | | | 1,499 | | | | 1.0% | | | | 95.8% | | | | 95.8% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 13,800 | | | | 13,665 | | | | 1.0% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average/Total Established | | | 31,431 | | | $ | 1,760 | | | $ | 1,744 | | | | 0.9% | | | | 96.1% | | | | 96.6% | | | | (0.5%) | | | $ | 159,507 | | | $ | 158,798 | | | | 0.4% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Established Communities are communities with stabilized operating expenses as of January 1, 2006 such that a comparison of 2006 to 2007 is meaningful. |
|
(2) | | Reflects the effect of concessions amortized over the average lease term. |
Attachment 6
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Activity (1) as of March 31, 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Number | | | Number | | | Total | |
| | | | | | of | | | of | | | Capital Cost (2) | |
| | | | | | Communities | | | Homes | | | (millions) | |
Portfolio Additions: | | | (3 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2007 Annual Completions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Development | | | | | | | 6 | | | | 1,213 | | | $ | 294.9 | |
Redevelopment | | | (4 | ) | | | 3 | | | | 1,573 | | | | 26.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Additions | | | | | | | 9 | | | | 2,786 | | | $ | 320.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2006 Annual Completions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Development | | | | | | | 6 | | | | 1,368 | | | $ | 375.2 | |
Redevelopment | | | (4 | ) | | | 2 | | | | 506 | | | | 10.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Additions | | | | | | | 8 | | | | 1,874 | | | $ | 385.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pipeline Activity: | | | (3 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currently Under Construction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Development | | | | | | | 16 | | | | 5,049 | | | $ | 1,358.5 | |
Redevelopment | | | (4 | ) | | | 6 | | | | 2,054 | | | | 38.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | | | | | 22 | | | | 7,103 | | | $ | 1,397.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Planning | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Development Rights | | | | | | | 56 | | | | 14,809 | | | $ | 3,963 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Pipeline | | | | | | | 78 | | | | 21,912 | | | $ | 5,360.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Represents activity for consolidated and unconsolidated entities. |
|
(2) | | See Attachment #13 — Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
(3) | | Information represents projections and estimates. |
|
(4) | | Represents only cost of redevelopment activity, does not include original acquisition cost. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Company’s Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the first quarter of 2007.
Attachment 7
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Development Communities as of March 31, 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Percentage | | | | | | Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Avg | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Ownership | | # of | | | Capital | | | Schedule | | | Rent | | | | | | | | | | | % Occ | |
| | Upon | | Apt | | | Cost (1) | | | | | | | Initial | | | | | | | Stabilized | | | Per | | | % Comp | | | % Leased | | | Physical | | | Economic | |
| | Completion | | Homes | | | (millions) | | | Start | | | Occupancy | | | Complete | | | Ops (1) | | | Home (1) | | | (2) | | | (3) | | | (4) | | | (1) (5) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Inclusive of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Concessions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | See Attachment #13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Under Construction: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. Avalon Wilshire | | 100% | | | 123 | | | $ | 46.6 | | | Q1 2005 | | | Q2 2007 | | | Q3 2007 | | | Q4 2007 | | | $ | 2,520 | | | | N/A | | | | 16.3 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
Los Angeles, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2. Avalon Lyndhurst (6) | | 100% | | | 328 | | | | 78.8 | | | Q3 2005 | | | Q4 2006 | | | Q4 2007 | | | Q2 2008 | | | | 2,145 | | | | 69.5 | % | | | 46.3 | % | | | 33.2 | % | | | 16.3 | % |
Lyndhurst, NJ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3. Avalon Shrewsbury | | 100% | | | 251 | | | | 36.1 | | | Q3 2005 | | | Q2 2006 | | | Q2 2007 | | | Q4 2007 | | | | 1,340 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 86.9 | % | | | 82.9 | % | | | 61.5 | % |
Shrewsbury, MA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4. Avalon Riverview North | | 100% | | | 602 | | | | 175.6 | | | Q3 2005 | | | Q3 2007 | | | Q3 2008 | | | Q1 2009 | | | | 2,695 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
New York, NY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5. Avalon at Glen Cove North | | 100% | | | 111 | | | | 41.4 | | | Q4 2005 | | | Q1 2007 | | | Q3 2007 | | | Q1 2008 | | | | 2,300 | | | | 51.4 | % | | | 13.5 | % | | | 4.5 | % | | | N/A | |
Glen Cove, NY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6. Avalon Danvers | | 100% | | | 433 | | | | 84.8 | | | Q4 2005 | | | Q1 2007 | | | Q2 2008 | | | Q4 2008 | | | | 1,610 | | | | 17.6 | % | | | 15.0 | % | | | 11.5 | % | | | 2.7 | % |
Danvers, MA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7. Avalon Woburn | | 100% | | | 446 | | | | 83.1 | | | Q4 2005 | | | Q3 2006 | | | Q1 2008 | | | Q3 2008 | | | | 1,545 | | | | 48.2 | % | | | 52.2 | % | | | 40.8 | % | | | 26.8 | % |
Woburn, MA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
8. Avalon on the Sound II | | 100% | | | 588 | | | | 184.2 | | | Q1 2006 | | | Q2 2007 | | | Q3 2008 | | | Q1 2009 | | | | 2,420 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 2.4 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
New Rochelle, NY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
9. Avalon Meydenbauer | | 100% | | | 368 | | | | 84.3 | | | Q1 2006 | | | Q4 2007 | | | Q3 2008 | | | Q1 2009 | | | | 1,625 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
Bellevue, WA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
10. Avalon at Dublin Station I | | 100% | | | 305 | | | | 85.8 | | | Q2 2006 | | | Q3 2007 | | | Q2 2008 | | | Q4 2008 | | | | 1,995 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
Dublin, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11. Avalon at Lexington Hills | | 100% | | | 387 | | | | 86.2 | | | Q2 2006 | | | Q2 2007 | | | Q3 2008 | | | Q1 2009 | | | | 2,105 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
Lexington, MA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12. Avalon Bowery Place II (7) | | 100% | | | 90 | | | | 61.9 | | | Q3 2006 | | | Q4 2007 | | | Q1 2008 | | | Q2 2008 | | | | 3,490 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
New York, NY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
13. Avalon Encino | | 100% | | | 131 | | | | 61.5 | | | Q3 2006 | | | Q3 2008 | | | Q4 2008 | | | Q1 2009 | | | | 2,650 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
Los Angeles, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14. Avalon Canoga Park | | 100% | | | 210 | | | | 53.9 | | | Q4 2006 | | | Q1 2008 | | | Q2 2008 | | | Q4 2008 | | | | 2,020 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
Canoga Park, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15. Avalon Acton (7) | | 100% | | | 380 | | | | 68.8 | | | Q4 2006 | | | Q1 2008 | | | Q4 2008 | | | Q2 2009 | | | | 1,470 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
Acton, MA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
16. Avalon Morningside Park (7) | | 100% | | | 296 | | | | 125.5 | | | Q1 2007 | | | Q3 2008 | | | Q1 2009 | | | Q3 2009 | | | | 3,640 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
New York, NY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal/Weighted Average | | | | | 5,049 | | | $ | 1,358.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,135 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Completed this Quarter: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. Avalon Chestnut Hill | | 100% | | | 204 | | | | 61.2 | | | Q2 2005 | | | Q3 2006 | | | Q1 2007 | | | Q3 2007 | | | | 2,245 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 81.4 | % | | | 75.5 | % | | | 45.6 | % |
Chestnut Hill, MA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2. Avalon at Decoverly II | | 100% | | | 196 | | | | 30.8 | | | Q3 2005 | | | Q2 2006 | | | Q1 2007 | | | Q3 2007 | | | | 1,525 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 82.7 | % | | | 76.5 | % | | | 60.9 | % |
Rockville, MD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal/Weighted Average | | | | | 400 | | | $ | 92.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,890 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total/Weighted Average | | | | | 5,449 | | | $ | 1,450.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,115 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Projected NOI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
as a % of Total Capital Cost (1) (8) | | | | | | | | | 6.6 | % | | Inclusive of Concessions — See Attachment #13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Stabilized Development Communities: (9) | | | | | | | | | | | | % Economic | | | | | | Asset Cost Basis, Non-Stabilized Development | | | | | | | | | | Source | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Occ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prior Quarter Completions: | | | | | | | | | | | | (1) (5) | | | | | | Capital Cost, Prior Quarter Completions | | | | | | $ | 125.6 | | | | Att. 7 (less JV partner share) | |
Avalon at Mission Bay North II | | | | | 313 | | | $ | 108.2 | | | | | | | | | | | Capital Cost, Current Completions | | | | | | | 92.0 | | | Att. 7 | | | | |
Avalon at Bowery Place I | | | | | 206 | | | $ | 98.5 | | | | | | | | | | | Capital Cost, Under Construction | | | | | | | 1,358.5 | | | Att. 7 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | 519 | | | $ | 206.7 | | | 62.7% | | | | | | Less: Remaining to Invest, Under Construction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Remaining to Invest | | | 908.6 | | | | | | | | Att. 9 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Capital Cost, Projected Q2 2007 Starts | | | (308.8 | ) | | | | | | | Att. 9, Footnote 5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (599.8 | ) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Asset Cost Basis, Non-Stabilized Development | | | | | | $ | 976.3 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Q1 2007 Net Operating Income/(Deficit) for communities under construction and non-stabilized development communities was $1.0 million. See Attachment #13.
| | |
(1) | | See Attachment #13 — Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
(2) | | Includes apartment homes for which construction has been completed and accepted by management as of April 20, 2007. |
|
(3) | | Includes apartment homes for which leases have been executed or non-refundable deposits have been paid as of April 20, 2007. |
|
(4) | | Physical occupancy based on apartment homes occupied as of April 20, 2007. |
|
(5) | | Represents Economic Occupancy for the first quarter of 2007. |
|
(6) | | The remediation of the Company’s Avalon Lyndhurst development site, as discussed in the Company’s second quarter 2006 Earnings Release, is substantially complete. The net cost associated with this remediation effort after considering insurance proceeds received to date, including costs associated with construction delays, is expected to total approximately $6.0 million. The Company is pursuing the recovery of these additional costs through insurance as well as from the third parties involved, but any additional recoverable amounts are not currently estimable. The Total Capital Cost and yield cited above do not reflect the potential impact of these additional net costs. |
|
(7) | | This community is being financed in part by third-party tax-exempt debt. |
|
(8) | | The Weighted Average calculation is based on the Company’s pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. |
|
(9) | | Represents Development Communities completed in prior quarters that had not achieved Stabilized Operations for the entire current quarter. Estimates are based on the Company’s pro rata share of the Total Capital Cost for each community. This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Company’s Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the first quarter of 2007. |
Attachment 8
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Redevelopment Communities as of March 31, 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Cost (millions) | | | Schedule | | | Avg | | | Number of Homes | |
| | | | | | # of | | | Pre- | | | Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Rent | | | | | | | Out of | |
| | Percentage | | | Apt | | | Redevelopment | | | Capital | | | Acquisition / | | | | | | | | | | | Restabilized | | | Per | | | Completed | | | Service | |
| | Ownership | | | Homes | | | Capital Cost | | | Cost (1)(2) | | | Completion | | | Start | | | Complete | | | Ops (2) | | | Home (2) | | | to date | | | @ 3/31/07 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Inclusive of | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Concessions | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | See Attachment #13 | | | | | | | | | |
Under Redevelopment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stabilized (3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. Avalon Walk I and II (4) | | | 100 | % | | | 764 | | | $ | 59.4 | | | $ | 71.2 | | | Q3 1992 | | | Q1 2006 | | | Q4 2007 | | | Q2 2008 | | | $ | 1,340 | | | | 523 | | | | 22 | |
Hamden, CT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Q3 1994 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2. Avalon at AutumnWoods | | | 100 | % | | | 420 | | | | 31.2 | | | | 38.3 | | | Q4 1996 | | | Q3 2006 | | | Q3 2008 | | | Q1 2009 | | | | 1,375 | | | | 172 | | | | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fairfax, VA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | | | | | 1,184 | | | $ | 90.6 | | | $ | 109.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,350 | | | | 695 | | | | 38 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acquisitions (3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. Avalon Redmond (5) | | | 15 | % | | | 400 | | | | 49.2 | | | | 56.7 | | | Q4 2004 | | | Q2 2006 | | | Q4 2007 | | | Q2 2008 | | | | 1,335 | | | | 275 | | | | 13 | |
Redmond, WA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2. Civic Center Place | | | 15 | % | | | 192 | | | | 38.1 | | | | 43.5 | | | Q4 2005 | | | Q4 2006 | | | Q2 2008 | | | Q4 2008 | | | | 1,700 | | | | 58 | | | | 13 | |
Norwalk, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3. Avalon at Poplar Creek | | | 15 | % | | | 196 | | | | 25.2 | | | | 28.6 | | | Q2 2006 | | | Q4 2006 | | | Q1 2008 | | | Q3 2008 | | | | 1,245 | | | | 64 | | | | 3 | |
Schaumburg, IL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4. Fuller Martel | | | 15 | % | | | 82 | | | | 17.9 | | | | 21.3 | | | Q4 2005 | | | Q1 2007 | | | Q1 2008 | | | Q3 2008 | | | | 1,970 | | | | 21 | | | | 4 | |
Los Angeles, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | | | | | 870 | | | $ | 130.4 | | | $ | 150.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,455 | | | | 418 | | | | 33 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total/Weighted Average | | | | | | | 2,054 | | | $ | 221.0 | | | $ | 259.6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,395 | | | | 1,113 | | | | 71 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Completed this Quarter: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stabilized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. Avalon Arlington Heights (6) | | | 100 | % | | | 409 | | | $ | 50.2 | | | $ | 56.9 | | | Q4 2000 | | | Q1 2006 | | | Q1 2007 | | | Q3 2007 | | | $ | 1,335 | | | | 409 | | | | — | |
Arlington Heights, IL | | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total/Weighted Average | | | | | | | 2,463 | | | $ | 271.2 | | | $ | 316.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,385 | | | | 1,522 | | | | 71 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Projected NOI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
as a % of Total Capital Cost (2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9.8 | % | | Inclusive of Concessions — See Attachment #13 | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Inclusive of acquisition cost. |
|
(2) | | See Attachment #13 — Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
(3) | | Stabilized Redevelopment Communities have been held for one year or more and have achieved Stabilized Operations before beginning redevelopment. Acquisition redevelopments are those communities that begin redevelopment within one year of acquisition. |
|
(4) | | This community was developed by a predecessor of the Company. Phase I was completed in Q3 1992 and Phase II was completed in Q3 1994. |
|
(5) | | This community, formerly known as Ravenswood at the Park, was acquired in Q4 2004 and was transferred to a subsidiary of the Company’s Investment Management Fund (the “Fund”) in Q1 2005, reducing the Company’s indirect equity interest in the community to 15%. |
|
(6) | | This community was formerly known as 200 Arlington Place. |
|
| | This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Company’s Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the first quarter of 2007. |
Attachment 9
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Development and Redevelopment Community Activity (1) as of March 31, 2007
(Dollars in Thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Apt Homes | | | Total Capital | | | Cost of Homes | | | | | | | Construction in | |
| | Completed & | | | Cost Invested | | | Completed & | | | Remaining to | | | Progress at | |
| | Occupied | | | During Period (3) | | | Occupied (4) | | | Invest (5) | | | Period End (6) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total - 2005 Actual | | | 1,480 | | | $ | 347,839 | | | $ | 219,046 | | | $ | 881,012 | | | $ | 377,320 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2006 Actual: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quarter 1 | | | 267 | | | $ | 113,125 | | | $ | 47,014 | | | $ | 952,410 | | | $ | 468,401 | |
Quarter 2 | | | 302 | | | | 155,381 | | | | 59,948 | | | | 915,400 | | | | 570,875 | |
Quarter 3 | | | 509 | | | | 174,587 | | | | 86,515 | | | | 1,007,188 | | | | 593,160 | |
Quarter 4 | | | 449 | | | | 209,735 | | | | 117,678 | | | | 919,358 | | | | 626,034 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total - 2006 Actual | | | 1,527 | | | $ | 652,828 | | | $ | 311,155 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2007 Projected: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quarter 1 (Actual) | | | 464 | | | $ | 167,109 | | | $ | 106,100 | | | $ | 908,630 | | | $ | 673,945 | |
Quarter 2 (Projected) | | | 707 | | | | 247,902 | | | | 166,655 | | | | 660,728 | | | | 747,432 | |
Quarter 3 (Projected) | | | 742 | | | | 159,314 | | | | 201,357 | | | | 501,414 | | | | 739,033 | |
Quarter 4 (Projected) | | | 634 | | | | 142,268 | | | | 183,951 | | | | 363,904 | | | | 588,152 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total - 2007 Projected | | | 2,547 | | | $ | 716,593 | | | $ | 658,063 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Total Capital | | | | | | | Reconstruction in | |
| | Avg Homes | | | Cost Invested | | | Remaining to | | | Progress at | |
| | Out of Service | | | During Period (3) | | | Invest (5) | | | Period End (6) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total - 2005 Actual | | | | | | $ | 8,972 | | | $ | 13,456 | | | $ | 7,877 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2006 Actual: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quarter 1 | | | 32 | | | $ | 3,433 | | | $ | 18,443 | | | $ | 8,502 | |
Quarter 2 | | | 60 | | | | 3,474 | | | | 21,760 | | | | 10,206 | |
Quarter 3 | | | 89 | | | | 4,258 | | | | 18,549 | | | | 14,763 | |
Quarter 4 | | | 60 | | | | 4,378 | | | | 14,991 | | | | 17,602 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total - 2006 Actual | | | | | | $ | 15,543 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2007 Projected: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quarter 1 (Actual) | | | 63 | | | $ | 3,332 | | | $ | 21,704 | | | $ | 14,538 | |
Quarter 2 (Projected) | | | 98 | | | | 4,942 | | | | 16,762 | | | | 11,657 | |
Quarter 3 (Projected) | | | 102 | | | | 5,244 | | | | 11,518 | | | | 13,156 | |
Quarter 4 (Projected) | | | 43 | | | | 3,034 | | | | 8,484 | | | | 7,253 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total - 2007 Projected | | | | | | $ | 16,552 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Data is presented for all communities currently under development or redevelopment and those communities for which development or redevelopment is expected to begin within the next 90 days. |
|
(2) | | Projected periods include data for consolidated joint ventures at 100%. The offset for joint venture partners’ participation is reflected as minority interest. |
|
(3) | | Represents Total Capital Cost incurred or expected to be incurred during the quarter, year or in total. See Attachment #13 — Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
(4) | | Represents projected Total Capital Cost of apartment homes completed and occupied during the quarter. Calculated by dividing Total Capital Cost for each Development Community by number of homes for the community, multiplied by the number of homes completed and occupied during the quarter. |
|
(5) | | Represents projected Total Capital Cost remaining to invest on communities currently under development or redevelopment and those for which development or redevelopment is expected to begin within the next 90 days. Remaining to invest for Q1 2007 includes $308.8 million attributed to four anticipated Q2 2007 development starts and $10.9 million related to two anticipated Q2 2007 redevelopment starts. |
|
(6) | | Represents period end balance of construction or reconstruction costs. Amount for Q1 2007 includes $2.8 million related to four unconsolidated investments in the Fund, and is reflected in other assets for financial reporting purposes. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Company’s Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the first quarter of 2007.
Attachment 10
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Future Development as of March 31, 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Estimated | | | Total | |
| | | | | | Number | | | Capital Cost (1) | |
Location of Development Right | | | | | of Homes | | | (millions) | |
1. | | White Plains, NY | | (2) | | | 393 | | | $ | 155 | |
2. | | Tinton Falls, NJ | | | | | 216 | | | | 41 | |
3. | | San Diego, CA | | (2) | | | 161 | | | | 65 | |
4. | | Hingham, MA | | (2) | | | 235 | | | | 48 | |
5. | | Union City, CA | | (2) | | | 438 | | | | 120 | |
6. | | Sharon, MA | | | | | 156 | | | | 26 | |
7. | | Coram, NY | | (2) | | | 200 | | | | 47 | |
8. | | Norwalk, CT | | | | | 319 | | | | 83 | |
9. | | Andover, MA | | (2) | | | 115 | | | | 21 | |
10. | | Brooklyn, NY | | (2) | | | 628 | | | | 317 | |
11. | | Wilton, CT | | (2) | | | 100 | | | | 24 | |
12. | | Pleasant Hill, CA | | (4) | | | 416 | | | | 153 | |
13. | | Cohasset, MA | | (2) | | | 200 | | | | 38 | |
14. | | Kirkland, WA Phase II | | (2) | | | 181 | | | | 60 | |
15. | | Northborough, MA | | | | | 350 | | | | 60 | |
16. | | New York, NY II | | | | | 680 | | | | 261 | |
17. | | Dublin, CA Phase II | | | | | 200 | | | | 52 | |
18. | | Dublin, CA Phase III | | | | | 205 | | | | 53 | |
19. | | Irvine, CA III | | | | | 170 | | | | 73 | |
20. | | Bellevue, WA | | | | | 385 | | | | 126 | |
21. | | Bloomingdale, NJ | | | | | 173 | | | | 38 | |
22. | | Camarillo, CA | | | | | 376 | | | | 55 | |
23. | | Seattle, WA | | | | | 202 | | | | 65 | |
24. | | North Bergen, NJ | | (3) | | | 156 | | | | 48 | |
25. | | Howell, NJ | | | | | 265 | | | | 42 | |
26. | | Quincy, MA | | (2) | | | 146 | | | | 24 | |
27. | | West Long Branch, NJ | | (3) | | | 216 | | | | 36 | |
28. | | Shelton, CT | | | | | 302 | | | | 49 | |
29. | | Canoga Park, CA | | (2) | | | 297 | | | | 85 | |
30. | | Irvine, CA | | (2) | | | 280 | | | | 76 | |
31. | | Shelton, CT II | | | | | 171 | | | | 34 | |
32. | | Greenburgh, NY Phase II | | | | | 444 | | | | 112 | |
33. | | San Francisco, CA | | | | | 157 | | | | 50 | |
34. | | Highland Park, NJ | | | | | 285 | | | | 67 | |
35. | | Brooklyn, NY II | | | | | 550 | | | | 284 | |
36. | | Gaithersburg, MD | | | | | 254 | | | | 41 | |
37. | | Milford, CT | | (2) | | | 284 | | | | 45 | |
38. | | Plymouth, MA Phase II | | | | | 69 | | | | 17 | |
39. | | Stratford, CT | | (2) | | | 146 | | | | 23 | |
40. | | Saddle Brook, NJ | | | | | 300 | | | | 55 | |
41. | | Oyster Bay, NY | | (2) | | | 150 | | | | 42 | |
42. | | West Haven, CT | | | | | 170 | | | | 23 | |
43. | | Randolph, NJ | | | | | 115 | | | | 31 | |
44. | | Hackensack, NJ | | | | | 210 | | | | 47 | |
45. | | Garden City, NY | | | | | 160 | | | | 58 | |
46. | | Yonkers, NY | | | | | 400 | | | | 88 | |
47. | | Roselle Park, NJ | | | | | 300 | | | | 70 | |
48. | | Irvine, CA II | | | | | 180 | | | | 57 | |
49. | | Alexandria, VA | | (2) | | | 283 | | | | 73 | |
50. | | Tysons Corner, VA | | (2) | | | 439 | | | | 101 | |
51. | | Oakland, NJ | | | | | 308 | | | | 62 | |
52. | | Plainview, NY | | | | | 160 | | | | 38 | |
53. | | Wheaton, MD | | (2) | | | 320 | | | | 56 | |
54. | | Wanaque, NJ | | | | | 210 | | | | 45 | |
55. | | Yaphank, NY | | (2) | | | 343 | | | | 57 | |
56. | | Rockville, MD | | (2) | | | 240 | | | | 46 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | | | | 14,809 | | | $ | 3,963 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | See Attachment #13 — Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
(2) | | Company owns land, but construction has not yet begun. |
|
(3) | | This Development Right is subject to a joint venture arrangement. |
|
(4) | | This Development Right is subject to a joint venture arrangement. In connection with the pursuit of this Development Right, $125 million in bond financing was issued and immediately invested in a guaranteed investment contract (“GIC”) administered by a trustee. The Company does not have any equity or economic interest in the joint venture entity at this time, but has an option to make a capital contribution to the joint venture entity for a 99% general partner interest. Should the Company exercise this option, the bond proceeds will be released from the GIC and used for future construction of the Development Right. Should the Company decide not to exercise this option, the bond proceeds will be redeemed to the issuer. |
This chart contains forward-looking statements. Please see the paragraph regarding forward-looking statements on the Table of Contents page relating to the Company’s Supplemental Operating and Financial Data for the first quarter of 2007.
Attachment 11
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Unconsolidated Real Estate Investments (1) as of March 31, 2007
(Dollars in Thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AVB | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AVB's | |
| | | | | | | | # of | | | Total | | | Book | | | Outstanding Debt | | | Share | |
Unconsolidated | | Percentage | | | Apt | | | Capital | | | Value | | | | | | | | | | | Interest | | | Maturity | | | of Partnership | |
Real Estate Investments | | Ownership | | | Homes | | | Cost (2) | | | Investment (3) | | | Amount | | | Type | | | Rate | | | Date | | | Debt | |
AvalonBay Value Added Fund, LP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Oct | | | | |
1. | | Avalon at Redondo Beach | | | N/A | | | | 105 | | | $ | 24,408 | | | | N/A | | | $ | 16,765 | | | Fixed | | | 4.84 | % | | | 2011 | | | $ | 2,548 | |
| | Los Angeles, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Mar | | | | |
2. | | Avalon Lakeside | | | N/A | | | | 204 | | | | 18,058 | | | | N/A | | | | 12,056 | | | Fixed | | | 5.74 | % | | | 2012 | | | | 1,833 | |
| | Chicago, IL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Apr | | | | |
3. | | Avalon Columbia | | | N/A | | | | 170 | | | | 29,251 | | | | N/A | | | | 16,575 | | | Fixed | | | 5.25 | % | | | 2012 | | | | 2,519 | |
| | Baltimore, MD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Jul | | | | |
4. | | Avalon Redmond | | | N/A | | | | 400 | | | | 54,432 | | | | N/A | | | | 31,500 | | | Fixed | | | 4.96 | % | | | 2012 | | | | 4,788 | |
| | Seattle, WA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Feb | | | | |
5. | | Fuller Martel | | | N/A | | | | 82 | | | | 18,626 | | | | N/A | | | | 11,500 | | | Fixed | | | 5.41 | % | | | 2014 | | | | 1,748 | |
| | Los Angeles, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Oct | | | | |
6. | | Avalon at Poplar Creek | | | N/A | | | | 196 | | | | 25,760 | | | | N/A | | | | 16,500 | | | Fixed | | | 4.83 | % | | | 2012 | | | | 2,508 | |
| | Chicago, IL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Aug | | | | |
7. | | Civic Center Place (4) | | | N/A | | | | 192 | | | | 39,820 | | | | N/A | | | | 23,806 | | | Fixed | | | 5.29 | % | | | 2013 | | | | 3,619 | |
| | Norwalk, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nov | | | | |
8. | | Paseo Park | | | N/A | | | | 134 | | | | 19,948 | | | | N/A | | | | 11,800 | | | Fixed | | | 5.74 | % | | | 2013 | | | | 1,794 | |
| | Fremont, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Mar | | | | |
9. | | Aurora at Yerba Buena | | | N/A | | | | 160 | | | | 66,517 | | | | N/A | | | | 41,500 | | | Fixed | | | 5.88 | % | | | 2014 | | | | 6,308 | |
| | San Francisco, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sep | | | | |
10. | | Avalon at Aberdeen Station | | | N/A | | | | 290 | | | | 58,036 | | | | N/A | | | | 34,456 | | | Fixed | | | 5.73 | % | | | 2013 | | | | 5,237 | |
| | Aberdeen, NJ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Oct | | | | |
11. | | The Springs | | | N/A | | | | 320 | | | | 47,605 | | | | N/A | | | | 26,000 | | | Fixed | | | 6.06 | % | | | 2014 | | | | 3,952 | |
| | Corona, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Jan | | | | |
12. | | The Covington | | | N/A | | | | 256 | | | | 32,295 | | | | N/A | | | | 17,243 | | | Fixed | | | 5.43 | % | | | 2014 | | | | 2,621 | |
| | Lombard, IL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Feb | | | | |
13. | | Cedar Valley | | | N/A | | | | 156 | | | | 20,767 | | | | N/A | | | | 12,000 | | | Fixed | | | 5.68 | % | | | 2014 | | | | 1,824 | |
| | Columbia, MD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14. | | Avalon Centerpoint | | | N/A | | | | 392 | | | | 78,671 | | | | N/A | | | | — | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | — | |
| | Baltimore, MD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15. | | Middlesex Crossing | | | N/A | | | | 252 | | | | 37,134 | | | | N/A | | | | — | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | — | |
| | Billerica, MA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
16. | | Avalon Crystal Hill | | | N/A | | | | 168 | | | | 37,921 | | | | N/A | | | | — | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | — | |
| | Ponoma, NY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fund corporate debt | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 187,400 | | | Variable | | | 6.35 | % | | | 2008 | (5) | | | 28,485 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 15.2 | % | | | 3,477 | | | $ | 609,249 | | | $ | 95,029 | | | $ | 459,101 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 69,784 | (6) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Operating Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. | | Avalon Grove | | | (7 | ) | | | 402 | | | $ | 51,805 | | | $ | 8,029 | | | $ | — | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | $ | — | |
| | Stamford, CT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nov | | | | |
2. | | Avalon Chrystie Place I (7) | | | 20.0 | % | | | 361 | | | | 129,829 | | | | 25,935 | | | | 117,000 | | | Variable | | | 3.67 | % | | | 2036 | | | | 23,400 | |
| | New York, NY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sep | | | | |
3. | | Avalon at Mission Bay North II (7)(8) | | | 25.0 | % | | | 313 | | | | 108,200 | | | | 25,412 | | | | 83,916 | | | Variable | | | 6.82 | % | | | 2008 | (9) | | | 20,979 | |
| | San Francisco, CA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | 1,076 | | | $ | 289,834 | | | $ | 59,376 | | | $ | 200,916 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 44,379 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | 4,553 | | | $ | 899,083 | | | $ | 154,405 | | | $ | 660,017 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 114,163 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Schedule does not include one community (Avalon Del Rey) that completed development in the third quarter of 2006 under a joint venture arrangement. AVB owns 30% of this community, however due to the Company’s continuing involvement, it is consolidated for financial reporting purposes. |
|
(2) | | See Attachment #13 — Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
(3) | | These unconsolidated real estate investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. AVB Book Value Investment represents the Company’s recorded equity investment plus the Company’s pro rata share of outstanding debt. |
|
(4) | | This community’s debt is a combination of two separate fixed rate loans which both mature in August 2013. The first loan totals $18,154 at a 5.04% interest rate and was assumed by the Fund upon purchase of this community. The second loan was procured in connection with the acquisition in the amount of $5,652 at a 6.08% interest rate. The rate listed in the table above represents a weighted average interest rate. |
|
(5) | | These borrowings include $139,400 in borrowings under the Fund’s credit facility secured by uncalled capital commitments maturing in January 2008 and $48,000 in borrowings under a separate unsecured credit facility maturing in December 2008. |
|
(6) | | The Company has not guaranteed the debt of the Fund and bears no responsibility for the repayment. |
|
(7) | | After the venture makes certain threshold distributions to the third-party partner, the Company generally receives 50% of all further distributions. |
|
(8) | | Total Capital Cost for this community represents the capitalized costs incurred and projected to incur as part of the development completion, and is not the gross real estate cost as recorded by the joint venture as of March 31, 2007. |
|
(9) | | The maturity date as reflected on this attachment may be extended to September 2010 upon exercise of two one-year extension options. |
Attachment 12
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Summary of Disposition Activity (1) as of March 31, 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Weighted | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | Weighted Average | | | | |
Number of | | Average | | | Gross Sales | | | | | | | Depreciation | | | Economic | | | Initial Year | | | Weighted Average | |
Communities Sold | | Holding Period (2) | | | Price | | | GAAP Gain | | | and Other | | | Gain (3) | | | Mkt. Cap Rate(2) (3) | | | Unleveraged IRR(2) (3) | |
1998: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
9 Communities | | | | | | $ | 170,312 | | | $ | 25,270 | | | $ | 23,438 | | | $ | 1,832 | | | | 8.1 | % | | | 16.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1999: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
16 Communities | | | | | | $ | 317,712 | | | $ | 47,093 | | | $ | 27,150 | | | $ | 19,943 | | | | 8.3 | % | | | 12.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2000: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
8 Communities | | | | | | $ | 160,085 | | | $ | 40,779 | | | $ | 6,262 | | | $ | 34,517 | | | | 7.9 | % | | | 15.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2001: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7 Communities | | | | | | $ | 241,130 | | | $ | 62,852 | | | $ | 21,623 | | | $ | 41,229 | | | | 8.0 | % | | | 14.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2002: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Community | | | | | | $ | 80,100 | | | $ | 48,893 | | | $ | 7,462 | | | $ | 41,431 | | | | 5.4 | % | | | 20.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2003: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12 Communities, 1 Land Parcel(4) | | | | | | $ | 460,600 | | | $ | 184,438 | | | $ | 52,613 | | | $ | 131,825 | | | | 6.3 | % | | | 15.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2004: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5 Communities, 1 Land Parcel | | | | | | $ | 250,977 | | | $ | 122,425 | | | $ | 19,320 | | | $ | 103,105 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 16.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2005: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7 Communities, 1 Office |
Building, 3 Land Parcels (5) | | | | | | $ | 382,720 | | | $ | 199,766 | | | $ | 14,929 | | | $ | 184,838 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 18.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2006: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4 Communities, 3 Land |
Parcels (6) | | | | | | $ | 281,485 | | | $ | 117,539 | | | $ | 21,699 | | | $ | 95,840 | | | | 4.6 | % | | | 15.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2007: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Land Parcel(2) | | | | | | $ | 5,800 | | | $ | 545 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 545 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1998 - 2007 Total | | | 6.2 | | | $ | 2,350,921 | | | $ | 849,600 | | | $ | 194,496 | | | $ | 655,105 | | | | 6.2 | % | | | 15.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Activity excludes dispositions to joint venture entities in which the Company retains an economic interest. |
|
(2) | | For purposes of this attachment, land sales and the disposition of an office building are not included in the calculation of Weighted Average Holding Period, Weighted Average Initial Year Market Cap Rate, or Weighted Average Unleveraged IRR. |
|
(3) | | See Attachment #13 — Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms. |
|
(4) | | 2003 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $23,448 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 50% membership interest. |
|
(5) | | 2005 GAAP gain includes the recovery of an impairment loss of $3,000 recorded in 2002 related to one of the land parcels sold in 2005. This loss was recorded to reflect the land at fair value based on its entitlement status at the time it was determined to be planned for disposition. |
|
(6) | | 2006 GAAP gain, for purposes of this attachment, includes $6,609 related to the sale of a community in which the Company held a 25% equity interest. |
Attachment 13
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms
This release, including its attachments, contains certain non-GAAP financial measures and other terms. The definition and calculation of these non-GAAP financial measures and other terms may differ from the definitions and methodologies used by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable. The non-GAAP financial measures referred to below should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and therefore should not be considered as an alternative measure of liquidity or as indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.
FFO is determined based on a definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). FFO is calculated by the Company as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, adjusted for gains or losses on sales of previously depreciated operating communities, extraordinary gains or losses (as defined by GAAP), cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and depreciation of real estate assets, including adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management generally considers FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of previously depreciated operating communities and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. A reconciliation of FFO to net income is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Q1 | | | Q1 | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Net income | | $ | 46,520 | | | $ | 111,114 | |
Dividends attributable to preferred stock | | | (2,175 | ) | | | (2,175 | ) |
Depreciation — real estate assets, including discontinued operations and joint venture adjustments | | | 44,685 | | | | 40,570 | |
Minority interest, including discontinued operations | | | 88 | | | | 99 | |
Gain on sale of previously depreciated real estate assets | | | — | | | | (65,419 | ) |
| | | | | | |
FFO attributable to common stockholders | | $ | 89,118 | | | $ | 84,189 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Average shares outstanding — diluted | | | 79,930,748 | | | | 75,290,124 | |
EPS — diluted | | $ | 0.56 | | | $ | 1.45 | |
| | | | | | |
FFO per common share — diluted | | $ | 1.11 | | | $ | 1.12 | |
| | | | | | |
Attachment 13 (continued)
Projected FFO, as provided within this release in the Company’s outlook, is calculated on a basis consistent with historical FFO, and is therefore considered to be an appropriate supplemental measure to projected net income from projected operating performance. A reconciliation of the range provided for Projected FFO per share (diluted) for the second quarter of 2007 to the range provided for projected EPS (diluted) is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Low | | | High | |
| | range | | | range | |
Projected EPS (diluted) — Q2 07 | | $ | 0.91 | | | $ | 0.95 | |
Projected depreciation (real estate related) | | | 0.54 | | | | 0.58 | |
Projected gain on sale of operating communities | | | (0.32 | ) | | | (0.36 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Projected FFO per share (diluted) — Q2 07 | | $ | 1.13 | | | $ | 1.17 | |
| | | | | | |
NOI is defined by the Company as total property revenue less direct property operating expenses (including property taxes), and excludes corporate-level income (including management, development and other fees), corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses, investments and investment management, net interest expense, general and administrative expense, joint venture income, minority interest expense, depreciation expense, gain on sale of real estate assets and income from discontinued operations. The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income of operating performance of a community or communities because it helps both investors and management to understand the core operations of a community or communities prior to the allocation of corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. This is more reflective of the operating performance of a community, and allows for an easier comparison of the operating performance of single assets or groups of assets. In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different overhead structures, with varying marginal impact to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate asset or groups of assets.
Attachment 13 (continued)
A reconciliation of NOI (from continuing operations) to net income, as well as a breakdown of NOI by operating segment, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Q1 | | | Q1 | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006(1) | |
Net income | | $ | 46,520 | | | $ | 111,114 | |
Indirect operating expenses, net of corporate income | | | 6,996 | | | | 7,435 | |
Investments and investment management | | | 2,024 | | | | 1,471 | |
Interest expense, net | | | 23,878 | | | | 28,664 | |
General and administrative expense | | | 6,780 | | | | 6,283 | |
Joint venture income, minority interest | | | 535 | | | | (95 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | 44,094 | | | | 40,225 | |
Gain on sale of real estate assets | | | (545 | ) | | | (78,585 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations | | | — | | | | (1,075 | ) |
| | | | | | |
NOI from continuing operations | | $ | 130,282 | | | $ | 115,437 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Established: | | | | | | | | |
Northeast | | $ | 45,403 | | | $ | 42,895 | |
Mid-Atlantic | | | 17,632 | | | | 16,423 | |
Midwest | | | 1,768 | | | | 1,666 | |
Pacific NW | | | 5,480 | | | | 4,681 | |
No. California | | | 28,292 | | | | 25,114 | |
So. California | | | 10,068 | | | | 9,314 | |
| | | | | | |
Total Established | | | 108,643 | | | | 100,093 | |
| | | | | | |
Other Stabilized | | | 9,715 | | | | 5,485 | |
Development/Redevelopment | | | 11,924 | | | | 9,859 | |
| | | | | | |
NOI from continuing operations | | $ | 130,282 | | | $ | 115,437 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2006 have been restated from amounts previously reported to reflect a change in accounting for land leases. |
NOI as reported by the Company does not include the operating results from discontinued operations (i.e., assets sold during the period January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007). A reconciliation of NOI from communities sold to net income for these communities is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Q1 | | | Q1 | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Income from discontinued operations | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,075 | |
Interest expense, net | | | — | | | | — | |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
NOI from discontinued operations | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,075 | |
| | | | | | |
NOI from assets sold | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,075 | |
NOI from assets held for sale | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
NOI from discontinued operations | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,075 | |
| | | | | | |
Projected NOI, as used within this release for certain Development and Redevelopment Communities and in calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate for dispositions, represents management’s estimate, as of the date of this release (or as of the date of the buyer’s valuation in the case of dispositions), of projected stabilized rental revenue minus projected stabilized operating expenses. For Development and Redevelopment Communities, Projected NOI is calculated based on the first year of Stabilized Operations, as defined below, following the completion of construction. In calculating the Initial Year Market Cap Rate, Projected NOI for dispositions is calculated for the first twelve months following the date of the buyer’s valuation. Projected stabilized rental revenue represents management’s estimate of projected gross potential (based on leased rents for occupied homes and Market Rents, as defined below, for vacant homes) minus projected economic vacancy and adjusted for concessions. Projected stabilized operating expenses do not include interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation or amortization, or any allocation of corporate-level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. The weighted average Projected NOI as a percentage of Total Capital Cost is weighted based on the Company’s share of the Total Capital Cost of each community, based on its percentage ownership.
Attachment 13 (continued)
Management believes that Projected NOI of the development and redevelopment communities, on an aggregated weighted average basis, assists investors in understanding Management’s estimate of the likely impact on operations of the Development and Redevelopment Communities when the assets are complete and achieve stabilized occupancy (before allocation of any corporate-level property management overhead, general and administrative costs or interest expense). However, in this release the Company has not given a projection of NOI on a company-wide basis. Given the different dates and fiscal years for which NOI is projected for these communities, the projected allocation of corporate-level property management overhead, general and administrative costs and interest expense to communities under development or redevelopment is complex, impractical to develop, and may not be meaningful. Projected NOI of these communities is not a projection of the Company’s overall financial performance or cash flow. There can be no assurance that the communities under development or redevelopment will achieve the Projected NOI as described in this release.
Rental Revenue with Concessions on a Cash Basis is considered by the Company to be a supplemental measure to rental revenue in conformity with GAAP to help investors evaluate the impact of both current and historical concessions on GAAP based rental revenue and to more readily enable comparisons to revenue as reported by other companies. In addition, rental revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) allows an investor to understand the historical trend in cash concessions. A reconciliation of rental revenue from Established Communities in conformity with GAAP to rental revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Q1 | | | Q1 | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Rental revenue (GAAP basis) | | $ | 159,507 | | | $ | 149,628 | |
Concessions amortized | | | 1,491 | | | | 4,485 | |
Concessions granted | | | (1,424 | ) | | | (1,692 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Rental revenue (with concessions on a cash basis) | | $ | 159,574 | | | $ | 152,421 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
% change — GAAP revenue | | | | | | | 6.6 | % |
% change — cash revenue | | | | | | | 4.7 | % |
Economic Gain is calculated by the Company as the gain on sale in accordance with GAAP, less accumulated depreciation through the date of sale and any other non-cash adjustments that may be required under GAAP accounting. Management generally considers Economic Gain to be an appropriate supplemental measure to gain on sale in accordance with GAAP because it helps investors to understand the relationship between the cash proceeds from a sale and the cash invested in the sold community. The Economic Gain for each of the communities presented is estimated based on their respective final settlement statements. A reconciliation of Economic Gain to gain on sale in accordance with GAAP for both the three months ended March 31, 2007 as well as prior years’ activities is presented on Attachment 12.
Interest Coverage is calculated by the Company as EBITDA from continuing operations, excluding land gains, divided by the sum of interest expense, net, and preferred dividends. Interest Coverage is presented by the Company because it provides rating agencies and investors an additional means of comparing our ability to service debt obligations to that of other companies. EBITDA is defined by the Company as net income before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
Attachment 13 (continued)
A reconciliation of EBITDA and a calculation of Interest Coverage for the first quarter of 2007 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | |
Net income | | $ | 46,520 | |
Interest expense, net | | | 23,878 | |
Depreciation expense | | | 44,094 | |
Depreciation expense (discontinued operations) | | | — | |
| | | |
| | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 114,492 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
EBITDA from continuing operations | | $ | 114,492 | |
EBITDA from discontinued operations | | | — | |
| | | |
| | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 114,492 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
EBITDA from continuing operations | | $ | 114,492 | |
Land gains | | | (545 | ) |
| | | |
| | | | |
EBITDA from continuing operations, excluding land gains | | $ | 113,947 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Interest expense, net | | | 23,878 | |
Dividends attributable to preferred stock | | | 2,175 | |
| | | |
Interest charges | | | 26,053 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Interest coverage | | | 4.4 | |
| | | |
Total Capital Cost includes all capitalized costs projected to be or actually incurred to develop the respective Development or Redevelopment Community, or Development Right, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all as determined in accordance with GAAP. For Redevelopment Communities, Total Capital Cost excludes costs incurred prior to the start of redevelopment when indicated. With respect to communities where development or redevelopment was completed in a prior or the current period, Total Capital Cost reflects the actual cost incurred, plus any contingency estimate made by management. Total Capital Cost for communities identified as having joint venture ownership, either during construction or upon construction completion, represents the total projected joint venture contribution amount. For joint ventures not in construction, Total Capital Cost is equal to gross real estate cost.
Initial Year Market Cap Rate is defined by the Company as Projected NOI of a single community for the first 12 months of operations (assuming no repositioning), less estimates for non-routine allowance of approximately $200 — $300 per apartment home, divided by the gross sales price for the community. Projected NOI, as referred to above, represents management’s estimate of projected rental revenue minus projected operating expenses before interest, income taxes (if any), depreciation, amortization and extraordinary items. For this purpose, management’s projection of operating expenses for the community includes a management fee of 3.0% — 3.5%. The Initial Year Market Cap Rate, which may be determined in a different manner by others, is a measure frequently used in the real estate industry when determining the appropriate purchase price for a property or estimating the value for a property. Buyers may assign different Initial Year Market Cap Rates to different communities when determining the appropriate value because they (i) may project different rates of change in operating expenses and capital expenditure estimates and (ii) may project different rates of change in future rental revenue due to different estimates for changes in rent and occupancy levels. The weighted average Initial Year Market Cap Rate is weighted based on the gross sales price of each community.
Unleveraged IRR on sold communities refers to the internal rate of return calculated by the Company considering the timing and amounts of (i) total revenue during the period owned by the Company and (ii) the gross sales price net of selling costs, offset by (iii) the undepreciated capital cost of the communities at the time of sale and (iv) total direct operating expenses during the period owned by the Company. Each of the items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are calculated in accordance with GAAP.
The calculation of Unleveraged IRR does not include an adjustment for the Company’s general and administrative expense, interest expense, or corporate-level property management and other indirect operating expenses.
Attachment 13 (continued)
Therefore, Unleveraged IRR is not a substitute for net income as a measure of our performance. Management believes that the Unleveraged IRR achieved during the period a community is owned by the Company is useful because it is one indication of the gross value created by the Company’s acquisition, development or redevelopment, management and sale of a community, before the impact of indirect expenses and Company overhead. The Unleveraged IRR achieved on the communities as cited in this release should not be viewed as an indication of the gross value created with respect to other communities owned by the Company, and the Company does not represent that it will achieve similar Unleveraged IRRs upon the disposition of other communities. The weighted average Unleveraged IRR for sold communities is weighted based on all cash flows over the holding period for each respective community, including net sales proceeds.
Leverage is calculated by the Company as total debt as a percentage of Total Market Capitalization. Total Market Capitalization represents the aggregate of the market value of the Company’s common stock, the market value of the Company’s operating partnership units outstanding (based on the market value of the Company’s common stock), the liquidation preference of the Company’s preferred stock and the outstanding principal balance of the Company’s debt. Management believes that Leverage can be one useful measure of a real estate operating company’s long-term liquidity and balance sheet strength, because it shows an approximate relationship between a company’s total debt and the current total market value of its assets based on the current price at which the Company’s common stock trades. Changes in Leverage also can influence changes in per share results. A calculation of Leverage as of March 31, 2007 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | |
Total debt | | $ | 2,810,724 | |
| | | |
Common stock | | | 10,353,148 | |
Preferred stock | | | 100,000 | |
Operating partnership units | | | 16,872 | |
Total debt | | | 2,810,724 | |
| | | |
Total market capitalization | | | 13,280,744 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Debt as % of capitalization | | | 21.2% | |
| | | |
Because Leverage changes with fluctuations in the Company’s stock price, which occur regularly, the Company’s Leverage may change even when the Company’s earnings, interest and debt levels remain stable. Investors should also note that the net realizable value of the Company’s assets in liquidation is not easily determinable and may differ substantially from the Company’s Total Market Capitalization.
Unencumbered NOI as calculated by the Company represents NOI generated by real estate assets unencumbered by either outstanding secured debt or land leases (excluding land leases with purchase options that were put in place for governmental incentives or tax abatements) as a percentage of total NOI generated by real estate assets. The Company believes that current and prospective unsecured creditors of the Company view Unencumbered NOI as one indication of the borrowing capacity of the Company. Therefore, when reviewed together with the Company’s Interest Coverage, EBITDA and cash flow from operations, the Company believes that investors and creditors view Unencumbered NOI as a useful supplemental measure for determining the financial flexibility of an entity. A calculation of Unencumbered NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | |
NOI for Established Communities | | $ | 108,643 | |
NOI for Other Stabilized Communities | | | 9,715 | |
NOI for Development/Redevelopment Communities | | | 11,924 | |
NOI for discontinued operations | | | — | |
| | | |
Total NOI generated by real estate assets | | | 130,282 | |
NOI on encumbered assets | | | 24,108 | |
| | | |
NOI on unencumbered assets | | | 106,174 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Unencumbered NOI | | | 81.5% | |
| | | |
Established Communities are identified by the Company as communities where a comparison of operating results from the prior year to the current year is meaningful, as these communities were owned and had Stabilized Operations, as defined below, as of the beginning of the prior year. Therefore, for 2007, Established Communities
Attachment 13 (continued)
are consolidated communities that have Stabilized Operations as of January 1, 2006 and are not conducting or planning to conduct substantial redevelopment activities within the current year. Established Communities do not include communities that are currently held for sale or planned for disposition during the current year.
Development Communities are communities that are under construction and for which a final certificate of occupancy has not been received. These communities may be partially complete and operating.
Redevelopment Communities are communities where substantial redevelopment is in progress or is planned to begin during the current year. For wholly-owned communities, redevelopment is considered substantial when capital invested during the reconstruction effort is expected to exceed the lesser of $5,000,000 or 10% of the community’s acquisition cost. The definition of substantial redevelopment may differ for communities that are not wholly-owned.
Average Rental Rates are calculated by the Company as rental revenue in accordance with GAAP, divided by the weighted average number of occupied apartment homes.
Economic Occupancy is defined as total possible revenue less vacancy loss as a percentage of total possible revenue. Total possible revenue is determined by valuing occupied units at contract rates and vacant units at Market Rents. Vacancy loss is determined by valuing vacant units at current Market Rents. By measuring vacant apartments at their Market Rents, Economic Occupancy takes into account the fact that apartment homes of different sizes and locations within a community have different economic impacts on a community’s gross revenue.
Market Rents as reported by the Company are based on the current market rates set by the managers of the Company’s communities based on their experience in renting their communities’ apartments and publicly available market data. Trends in market rents for a region as reported by others could vary. Market Rents for a period are based on the average Market Rents during that period and do not reflect any impact for cash concessions.
Non-Revenue Generating Capex represents capital expenditures that will not directly result in revenue earnings or expense savings.
Stabilized/Restabilized Operations is defined as the earlier of (i) attainment of 95% physical occupancy or (ii) the one-year anniversary of completion of development or redevelopment.
Average Rent per Home, as calculated for certain Development and Redevelopment Communities in lease-up, reflects (i) actual average leased rents for those apartments leased through the end of the quarter net of estimated stabilized concessions, (ii) estimated market rents net of comparable concessions for all unleased apartments and (iii) includes actual and estimated other rental revenue. For Development and Redevelopment Communities not yet in lease-up, Average Rent per Home reflects management’s projected rents.
Development Rights are development opportunities in the early phase of the development process for which the Company either has an option to acquire land or enter into a leasehold interest, for which the Company is the buyer under a long-term conditional contract to purchase land or where the Company owns land to develop a new community. The Company capitalizes related predevelopment costs incurred in pursuit of new developments for which future development is probable.