UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 10, 2006
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
161,146
Commission File Number: 001-12079
I.R.S. Employer Identification Number: 77-0212977
50 West San Fernando Street
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone: (408) 995-5115
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)
Not applicable
(Former name or former address if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act |
(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act |
(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
ITEM 7.01 — REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE
On August 10, 2006, Calpine Corporation (“Calpine” or the “Company”) and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed their unaudited consolidated Monthly Operating Statement for the month ended May 31, 2006 (the “Monthly Operating Statement”), with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “U.S. Bankruptcy Court”) in the matter of In re Calpine Corporation, et al., 05-60200 (BRL). Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K contains the unaudited consolidated Monthly Operating Statement as filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court.
The Monthly Operating Statement is limited in scope, covers a limited time period, and has been prepared solely for the purpose of complying with the monthly reporting requirements of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Certain of the Company’s Canadian subsidiaries were granted relief by the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Calgary (the “Canadian Court”) under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (the “CCAA”). As a result, certain of the Company’s Canadian and other foreign subsidiaries were deconsolidated as of December 20, 2005. Financial information regarding such deconsolidated subsidiaries is not part of the consolidated group included in the Monthly Operating Statement. The financial information in the Monthly Operating Statement is preliminary and unaudited and does not purport to show the financial statements of any of the Debtors in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and therefore may exclude items required by GAAP, such as certain reclassifications, eliminations, accruals, valuations and disclosure items. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon the Monthly Operating Statement. There can be no assurance that such information is complete and the Monthly Operating Statement may be subject to revision. The Monthly Operating Statement is in a format required by the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) and should not be used for investment purposes. The Monthly Operating Statement should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2005 Form 10-K and 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q.
These unaudited financial statements have been derived from the books and records of the Company. This information, however, has not been subject to procedures that would typically be applied to financial information presented in accordance with GAAP and, upon the application of such procedures, the Company believes that the financial information could be subject to changes, and these changes could be material. The information furnished in the Monthly Operating Statement includes primarily normal recurring adjustments but does not include all of the adjustments that would typically be made for quarterly financial statements in accordance with GAAP. In addition, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted.
Access to documents filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and other general information about the Company’s U.S. bankruptcy cases is available at www.kccllc.net/calpine. Certain information regarding the Company’s Canadian cases under the CCAA, including the reports of the monitor appointed by the Canadian Court, is available at the monitor’s website at www.ey.com/ca/calpinecanada. The content of the foregoing websites is not a part of this Report.
Limitation on Incorporation by Reference
The Monthly Operating Statement is being furnished for informational purposes only and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Registration statements or other documents filed with the SEC shall not incorporate the Monthly Operating Statement or any other information set forth in this Report by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing. This Report will not be deemed an admission as to the materiality of any information that is required to be disclosed solely by Regulation FD.
Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company uses words such as “believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “may,” “will” and similar expressions to
1
identify forward-looking statements. Such statements include, among others, those concerning the Company’s expected financial performance and strategic and operational plans, as well as all assumptions, expectations, predictions, intentions or beliefs about future events. You are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that a number of risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (i) the risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s U.S. and Canadian bankruptcy cases, including impact on operations; (ii) the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees and successfully implement new strategies; (iii) the Company’s ability to successfully reorganize and emerge from bankruptcy; (iv) the Company’s ability to attract and retain customers and counterparties; (v) the Company’s ability to implement its business plan; (vi) financial results that may be volatile and may not reflect historical trends; (vii) the Company’s ability to manage liquidity needs and comply with financing obligations; (viii) the direct or indirect effects on the Company’s business of its impaired credit including increased cash collateral requirements; (ix) the expiration or termination of the Company’s PPAs and the related results on revenues; (x) potential volatility in earnings and requirements for cash collateral associated with the use of commodity contracts; (xi) price and supply of natural gas; (xii) risks associated with power project development, acquisition and construction activities; (xiii) unscheduled outages of operating plants; (xiv) factors that impact the output of the Company’s geothermal resources and generation facilities, including unusual or unexpected steam field well and pipeline maintenance and variables associated with the waste water injection projects that supply added water to the steam reservoir; (xv) quarterly and seasonal fluctuations of the Company’s results; (xvi) competition; (xvii) risks associated with marketing and selling power from plants in the evolving energy markets; (xviii) present and possible future claims, litigation and enforcement actions; (xix) effects of the application of laws or regulations, including changes in laws or regulations or the interpretation thereof; and (xx) other risks identified in this report and in the Company’s annual and quarterly reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q. You should also carefully review other reports that the Company files with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
ITEM 9.01 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.
99.1 Calpine Corporation’s Unaudited Monthly Operating Statement for the month ended May 31, 2006.
2
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
CALPINE CORPORATION
| By: | /s/ Charles B. Clark, Jr. |
| | Charles B. Clark, Jr. |
| | Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
| | |
Date: August 10, 2006 | | |
3
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | | Description |
99.1 | | Calpine Corporation’s Unaudited Monthly Operating Statement for the month ended May 31, 2006. |
4
EXHIBIT 99.1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT | | |
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | | |
| x | |
In re: | : | Chapter 11 |
| : | |
CALPINE CORPORATION, et al., | : | Case No. 05-60200 BRL |
| : | |
Debtors. | : | (Jointly Administered) |
| : | |
| x | |
MONTHLY OPERATING STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD
FROM MAY 1, 2006, TO MAY 31, 2006
DEBTORS’ ADDRESS: | 50 West San Fernando Street, San Jose, California 95113 | |
| | |
| MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS MADE BY CALPINE CORPORATION, ET AL. AND ITS DEBTOR SUBSIDIARIES (IN THOUSANDS): |
$641,575
|
| | |
DEBTORS’ ATTORNEY: | Kirkland & Ellis LLP | |
| Richard M. Cieri (RC 6062) | |
| Marc Kieselstein admitted pro hac vice | |
| David R. Seligman admitted pro hac vice | |
| Edward O. Sassower (ES 5823) | |
| Citigroup Center | |
| 153 East 53rd Street | |
| New York, NY 10022-4611 | |
| | |
| MONTHLY OPERATING LOSS (IN THOUSANDS): | $207,194 |
| | |
REPORT PREPARER: | CALPINE CORPORATION, et al. | |
The undersigned, having reviewed the attached report and being familiar with the Debtors’ financial affairs, verifies under penalty of perjury, that the information contained therein is complete, accurate and truthful to the best of my knowledge.
| /s/ CHARLES B. CLARK, JR. |
| Charles B. Clark, Jr. |
| Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
DATE: August 10, 2006 | Calpine Corporation |
5
DEFINITIONS
The following abbreviations contained herein have the meanings set forth below. Additionally, the terms “the Company,” “Calpine,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Calpine Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. For clarification, such terms will not include the Canadian and other foreign subsidiaries that were deconsolidated as a result of the filings by the Canadian Debtors under the CCAA. |
Abbreviation | | Definition |
| | |
2005 Form 10-K | | Calpine Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on May 19, 2006 |
| | |
2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q | | Calpine Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on July 3, 2006 |
| | |
APB | | Accounting Principles Board |
| | |
Bankruptcy Code | | United States Bankruptcy Code |
| | |
Bankruptcy Courts | | The U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Canadian Court |
| | |
Calgary Energy Centre | | Calgary Energy Centre Limited Partnership |
| | |
Calpine Debtor(s) | | The U.S. Debtors and the Canadian Debtors |
| | |
Canadian Court | | The Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Calgary |
| | |
Canadian Debtor(s) | | The subsidiaries and affiliates of Calpine Corporation that have been granted creditor protection under the CCAA in the Canadian Court |
| | |
Cash Collateral Order | | Second Amended Final Order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court Authorizing Use of Cash Collateral and Granting Adequate Protection, dated February 24, 2006, as modified by the Order Granting U.S. Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sections 105,361 and 105,363 modifying Order Authorizing Use of Cash Collateral and Granting Adequate Protection, dated June 21, 2006 |
| | |
CCAA | | Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) |
| | |
CDWR | | California Department of Water Resources |
| | |
CES-Canada | | Calpine Energy Services Canada Partnership |
| | |
Chapter 11 | | Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code |
| | |
DIG | | Derivatives Implementation Group |
| | |
DIP | | Debtor-in-possession |
6
Abbreviation | | Definition |
| | |
DIP Facility | | The Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, as amended on January 26, 2006, and as amended and restated by that certain Amended and Restated Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of February 23, 2006, among Calpine Corporation, as borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as joint syndication agents, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent for the First Priority Lenders, General Electric Capital Corporation, as Sub-Agent for the Revolving Lenders, Credit Suisse, as administrative agent for the Second Priority Term Lenders, Landesbank Hessen Thuringen Girozentrale, New York Branch, General Electric Capital Corporation and HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch, as joint documentation agents for the first priority Lenders and Bayerische Landesbank, General Electric Capital Corporation and Union Bank of California, N.A., as joint documentation agents for the second priority Lenders, as amended thereafter from time to time |
| | |
EITF | | Emerging Issues Task Force |
| | |
EPS | | Earnings per share |
| | |
Exchange Act | | United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
| | |
FASB | | Financial Accounting Standards Board |
| | |
FERC | | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
| | |
First Priority Notes | | Calpine Corporation’s 9 5/8% First Priority Senior Secured Notes Due 2014 |
| | |
First Priority Trustee | | Until February 2, 2006, Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, and from February 3, 2006, and thereafter, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, as successor trustee, under the Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2004, with respect to the First Priority Notes |
| | |
GAAP | | Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States |
| | |
GPC | | Geysers Power Company, LLC |
| | |
ISO | | Independent System Operator |
| | |
LSTC | | Liabilities Subject to Compromise |
| | |
MW | | Megawatt(s) |
| | |
NOL | | Net operating loss |
| | |
Non-Debtor(s) | | The subsidiaries and affiliates of Calpine Corporation that are not Calpine Debtors |
| | |
Non-U.S. Debtor(s) | | The consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates of Calpine Corporation that are not U.S. Debtor(s) |
| | |
PCF | | Power Contract Financing, L.L.C. |
| | |
PCF III | | Power Contract Financing III, LLC |
| | |
Petition Date | | December 20, 2005 |
7
Abbreviation | | Definition |
| | |
PPA(s) | | Power purchase agreement(s) |
| | |
Rosetta | | Rosetta Resources Inc. |
| | |
SDNY Court | | United States District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| | |
SEC | | United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
| | |
Second Priority Debt | | Calpine Corporation’s Second Priority Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2007, 8 1/2% Second Priority Senior Secured Notes Due 2010, 8 3/4% Second Priority Senior Secured Notes Due 2013, 9 7/8% Second Priority Senior Secured Notes Due 2011, and Senior Secured Term Loans Due 2007 |
| | |
Securities Act | | United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended |
| | |
SFAS | | Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
| | |
SFAS No. 123-R | | FASB Statement No. 123-R (As Amended), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Share-Based Payment” |
| | |
SOP | | Statement of Position |
| | |
The Geysers Assets | | 19 geothermal power plant assets located in Geyserville, California |
| | |
ULC I | | Calpine Canada Energy Finance ULC |
| | |
ULC II | | Calpine Canada Energy Finance II ULC |
| | |
U.S. | | United States of America |
| | |
U.S. Bankruptcy Court | | United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York |
| | |
U.S. Debtor(s) | | Calpine Corporation and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates that have filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, which matters are being jointly administered in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court under the caption In re Calpine Corporation, et al., Case No. 05-60200 (BRL) |
8
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
Index to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and Schedules
| | Page |
Financial Statements as of and for the Month Ended May 31, 2006: | |
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations | 10 |
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet | 11 |
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements | 13 |
| 1. | Petition for Relief Under Chapter 11 | 13 |
| 2. | Basis of Presentation | 15 |
| 3. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 16 |
| 4. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements | 16 |
| 5. | Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Margin Deposits | 17 |
| 6. | Rejected Contracts and Related Matters | 18 |
| 7. | Liabilities Subject to Compromise | 20 |
| 8. | DIP Facility | 21 |
| 9. | Reorganization Items | 21 |
Schedules: | | |
Schedule I | Schedule of Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheet as of May 31, 2006 | 22 |
Schedule II | Schedule of Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations for the Month Ended May 31, 2006 | 24
|
Schedule III | Schedule of Payroll and Payroll Taxes | 26 |
Schedule IV | Schedule of Federal, State and Local Taxes Collected, Received, Due or Withheld | 27 |
Schedule V | Schedule of Total Disbursements by Debtor | 28 |
Schedule VI | Insurance Statement | 34 |
| | |
| | |
| | | | | |
9
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
CASE NO. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
For the period from May 1, 2006, through May 31, 2006
Revenue: | | | | |
Electricity and steam revenue | | $ | 397,485 | |
Transmission sales revenue | | | 182 | |
Sales of purchased power and gas for hedging and optimization | | | 132,037 | |
Mark-to-market activities, net | | | (6,450 | ) |
Other revenue | | | 10,047 | |
Total revenue | | | 533,301 | |
Cost of revenue: | | | | |
Plant operating expense | | | 70,292 | |
Royalty expense | | | 946 | |
Transmission purchase expense | | | 5,166 | |
Purchased power and gas expense for hedging and optimization | | | 154,752 | |
Fuel expense | | | 207,264 | |
Depreciation and amortization expense | | | 42,404 | |
Operating plant impairments | | | (4 | ) |
Operating lease expense | | | 6,274 | |
Other cost of revenue | | | 7,270 | |
Total cost of revenue | | | 494,364 | |
Gross profit | | | 38,937 | |
Equipment, development project and other impairments | | | (841 | ) |
Project development expense | | | 1,436 | |
Research and development expense | | | 1,303 | |
Sales, general and administrative expense | | | 16,146 | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | 20,893 | |
Interest expense | | | 100,565 | |
Interest (income) | | | (7,765 | ) |
Minority interest expense | | | 876 | |
(Income) loss from repurchase of various issuances of debt | | | 18,107 | |
Other (income) expense, net | | | (715 | ) |
Loss before reorganization items and provision for income taxes | | | (90,175 | ) |
Reorganization items | | | 114,867 | |
Loss before benefit for income taxes | | | (205,042 | ) |
Provision for income taxes | | | 2,152 | |
Net loss | | $ | (207,194 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
10
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
CASE NO. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
May 31, 2006
ASSETS | | | | |
| | | | |
Current assets: | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 919,875 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 965,334 | |
Margin deposits and other prepaid expense | | | 327,687 | |
Inventories | | | 151,904 | |
Restricted cash | | | 374,962 | |
Current derivative assets | | | 255,611 | |
Current assets held for sale | | | 39,542 | |
Other current assets | | | 85,178 | |
Total current assets | | | 3,120,093 | |
Restricted cash, net of current portion | | | 193,539 | |
Notes receivable, net of current portion | | | 159,024 | |
Project development costs | | | 24,247 | |
Investments | | | 52,957 | |
Deferred financing costs | | | 176,655 | |
Prepaid lease, net of current portion | | | 352,179 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 14,420,259 | |
Goodwill | | | 45,160 | |
Other intangible assets, net | | | 52,507 | |
Long-term derivative assets | | | 475,148 | |
Other assets | | | 601,416 | |
Total assets | | $ | 19,673,184 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
11
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET — (Continued)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | | | |
| | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 469,056 | |
Accrued payroll and related expense | | | 50,306 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 200,533 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 99,073 | |
Notes payable and other borrowings, current portion | | | 187,366 | |
Preferred interests, current portion | | | 9,124 | |
Capital lease obligations, current portion | | | 284,932 | |
CCFC financing, current portion | | | 783,259 | |
CalGen financing, current portion | | | 2,509,201 | |
Construction/project financing, current portion | | | 2,188,527 | |
Senior notes and term loans, current portion | | | 848 | |
DIP Facility, current portion | | | 3,500 | |
Current derivative liabilities | | | 405,592 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 370,795 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 7,562,112 | |
Notes payable and other borrowings, net of current portion | | | 468,208 | |
Preferred interests, net of current portion | | | 579,122 | |
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion | | | 3,578 | |
Construction/project financing, net of current portion | | | 202,179 | |
DIP Facility, net of current portion | | | 995,625 | |
Deferred income taxes, net of current portion | | | 375,426 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 138,319 | |
Long-term derivative liabilities | | | 644,460 | |
Other liabilities | | | 133,863 | |
Total liabilities not subject to compromise | | | 11,102,892 | |
Liabilities subject to compromise | | | 14,842,744 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | |
Minority interests | | | 274,811 | |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit): | | | | |
Common stock | | | 569 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 3,267,885 | |
Additional paid-in capital, loaned shares | | | 258,100 | |
Additional paid-in capital, returnable shares | | | (258,100 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (9,684,020 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (131,697 | ) |
Total stockholders’ deficit | | | (6,547,263 | ) |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit | | $ | 19,673,184 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
12
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
CASE NO. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the period from May 1, 2006, to May 31, 2006
1. Petition for Relief Under Chapter 11
On December 20, 2005 and December 21, 2005, Calpine and 254 of its wholly owned subsidiaries in the United States filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and, in Canada, 12 of its Canadian subsidiaries were granted relief in the Canadian Court under the CCAA, which, like Chapter 11, allows for reorganization under the protection of the court system. On December 27 and 29, 2005, January 8 and 9, 2006, February 3, 2006, and May 2, 2006, 19 additional wholly owned subsidiaries of Calpine commenced Chapter 11 cases in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court has treated December 20, 2005 as the filing date for Calpine and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries that filed voluntary petitions at various dates in December 2005. Certain other subsidiaries could file in the U.S. or Canada in the future. The Chapter 11 cases of the U.S. Debtors are being jointly administered for procedural purposes only by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court under the case captioned In re Calpine Corporation et al., Case No. 05-60200 (BRL).
The Calpine Debtors are continuing to operate their business as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Courts and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the CCAA and applicable court orders, as well as other applicable laws and rules. In general, as debtors-in-possession, each of the Calpine Debtors is authorized to continue to operate as an ongoing business, but may not engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the applicable Bankruptcy Court.
On December 20, 2005, the U.S. Debtors entered into the $2.0 billion DIP Facility. On December 21, 2005, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted interim approval of the DIP Facility, but initially limited access under the DIP Facility to $500 million under the revolving credit facility. On January 26, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court entered a final order approving the DIP Facility and removing the limitation on our ability to borrow thereunder. On February 23, 2006, the DIP Facility was amended and restated and the term loans were funded. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Credit Suisse were co-lead arrangers for the DIP Facility, which will remain in place until the earlier of an effective plan of reorganization or December 20, 2007. In connection with and as a condition to the closing, on February 3, 2006, we acquired ownership of The Geysers Assets, which had previously been leased pursuant to a leveraged lease. We used borrowings under the DIP Facility to pay a portion of the purchase price for The Geysers Assets. The DIP Facility is secured by first priority liens on all of the unencumbered assets of the U.S. Debtors, including The Geysers Assets, and junior liens on all of their encumbered assets. In addition, the DIP Facility was amended on May 3, 2006, to, among other things, provide us with extensions of time to provide certain financial information to the DIP Facility lenders, including financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, and for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. See Note 8 contained herein, Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the 2005 Form 10-K and Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements contained in the 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q for further details regarding the DIP Facility.
In addition, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved cash collateral and adequate assurance stipulations in connection with the approval of the DIP Facility, which has allowed our business activities to continue to function. We have also sought and obtained U.S. Bankruptcy Court approval through our “first day” and subsequent motions to continue to pay critical vendors, meet our pre-petition and post-petition payroll obligations, maintain our cash management systems, collateralize certain of our gas supply contracts, enter into and collateralize trading contracts, pay our taxes, continue to provide employee benefits, maintain our insurance programs and implement an employee severance program, which has allowed us to continue to operate the existing business in the ordinary course. In addition, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court has approved certain trading notification and transfer procedures designed to allow us to restrict trading in our common stock (and related securities) which could negatively impact our accrued NOLs and other tax attributes, and granted us extensions of time to file and seek approval of a plan of reorganization and to assume or reject real property leases.
13
Both the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Canadian Court have established August 1, 2006 as a bar date for filing proofs of claim against the U.S. Debtors’ estates and the Canadian Debtors’ estates, respectively (after the Canadian Court extended its original bar date of June 30, 2006, to August 1, 2006). Under certain limited circumstances, some creditors will be permitted to file claims after August 1, 2006. Differences between amounts recorded by the Calpine Debtors and proofs of claim filed by the creditors will be investigated and resolved through the claims reconciliation process. Because of the number of creditors and claims, the claims reconciliation process may take considerable time to complete and the Company expects will continue after its emergence from bankruptcy. Accordingly, the ultimate number and amount of allowed claims is not presently known, nor can the ultimate recovery with respect to such allowed claims be presently determined. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we have recognized certain charges related to expected allowable claims.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, we have the right to assume, assume and assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, subject to the approval of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and certain other conditions. Parties to executory contracts or unexpired leases rejected by a U.S. Debtor may file proofs of claim against that U.S. Debtor’s estate for damages and parties to executory contracts or unexpired leases that are assumed have an opportunity to assert cure amounts prior to such assumptions. Due to ongoing evaluation of contracts for assumption or rejection and the uncertain nature of many of the potential claims for damages, we cannot project the magnitude of these potential claims at this time. We had until July 18, 2006, to assume unexpired non-residential real property leases. Absent the consent of the applicable counterparty, such leases not assumed by that date are deemed rejected (except for U.S. Debtors filing after the Petition Date, which have a commensurately longer period of time). Accordingly, the Company entered into stipulations with counterparties extending the time to assume certain of such leases that the Company is still examining. All other non-assumed leases have been deemed rejected. Further, on July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motion to extend the time for the Company to assume leases between U.S. Debtor-lessees and any affiliated lessors until the confirmation of a plan of reorganization of the applicable U.S. Debtor-lessee. Without an extension of time to assume, leases between U.S. Debtors and their affiliates would also have been deemed rejected if not assumed by July 18, 2006. See Note 6 for further discussion of significant contracts and leases for which we have received or are seeking approval to reject.
On April 11, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted our application for an extension of the period during which we have the exclusive right to file a reorganization plan or plans from April 20, 2006, to December 31, 2006, and granted us the exclusive right until March 31, 2007, to solicit acceptances of such plan or plans. Also on April 11, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted our application for the repayment of a portion of a loan we had extended to CPN Insurance Corporation, our wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. The repayment of this loan facilitates our ability to continue to provide a portion of our insurance needs through our subsidiary and thus provides us additional flexibility to be able to continue to implement a favorable property insurance program.
By order dated May 10, 2006 (as well as successive orders implementing the May 10 order), the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved our motion to repay the outstanding principal amount of First Priority Notes at par ($646.1 million) plus accrued and unpaid interest. The repayment orders provided that such repayment was without prejudice to rights of the holders of the First Priority Notes to pursue their demand for payment of a “make whole” premium they alleged to be due as a result of our repayment of First Priority Notes prior to their stated maturity. Pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s repayment orders, we completed the repayment of the First Priority Notes in June 2006. The First Priority Trustee appealed each of the repayment orders to the SDNY Court, and in addition, on May 5, 2006, the First Priority Trustee filed an adversary proceeding in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on behalf of the holders of the First Priority Notes seeking a declaratory judgment on the merits of their demand for a “make whole” premium. On June 21, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving our request to extend the date by which we must answer or otherwise move with respect to the First Priority Trustee’s adversary proceeding until after the conclusion of the First Priority Trustee’s appeal to the SDNY Court of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s repayment orders. The First Priority Trustee then appealed the U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s June 21, 2006, order to the SDNY Court as well, and both appeals are pending. The SDNY Court will schedule briefing and argument of the appeals.
At this time, it is not possible to accurately predict the effects of the reorganization process on the business of the Calpine Debtors or if and when some or all of the Calpine Debtors may emerge from bankruptcy. The prospects for future
14
results depend on the timely and successful development, confirmation and implementation of a plan or plans of reorganization. There can be no assurance that a successful plan or plans of reorganization will be proposed by the Calpine Debtors, supported by the Calpine Debtors’ creditors or confirmed by the Bankruptcy Courts, or that any such plan or plans will be consummated. The ultimate recovery, if any, that creditors and equity security holders receive will not be determined until confirmation of a plan or plans of reorganization. No assurance can be given as to what values, if any, will be ascribed in the bankruptcy cases to the interests of each of the various creditor and equity or other security holder constituencies, and it is possible that the equity interests in or other securities issued by Calpine and the other Calpine Debtors will be restructured in a manner that will substantially reduce or eliminate any remaining value of such equity interests or other securities, or that certain creditors may ultimately receive little or no payment with respect to their claims. Whether or not a plan or plans of reorganization are approved, it is possible that the assets of any one or more of the Calpine Debtors may be liquidated.
As a result of our bankruptcy filings and the other matters described herein, including the uncertainties related to the fact that we have not yet had time to complete and have approved a plan of reorganization, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern, including our ability to meet our ongoing operational obligations, is dependent upon, among other things: (i) our ability to maintain adequate cash on hand; (ii) our ability to generate cash from operations; (iii) the cost, duration and outcome of the restructuring process; (iv) our ability to comply with our DIP Facility agreement and the adequate assurance provisions of the Cash Collateral Order and (v) our ability to achieve profitability following a restructuring. These challenges are in addition to those operational and competitive challenges faced by us in connection with our business. In conjunction with our advisors, we are working to design and implement strategies to ensure that we maintain adequate liquidity and will be able to continue as a going concern. However, there can be no assurance as to the success of such efforts.
2. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations and realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business, and in accordance with SOP 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code.” The consolidated condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be required should we be unable to continue to operate as a going concern. In accordance with SOP 90-7, all pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise have been segregated in the consolidated condensed balance sheets and classified as LSTC, at the estimated amount of allowed claims. Interest expense related to pre-petition LSTC has been reported only to the extent that it will be paid during the pendency of the bankruptcy cases or is expected to be an allowed claim. Liabilities not subject to compromise are separately classified as current or noncurrent. Expenses, provisions for losses resulting from reorganization and certain other items directly related to our bankruptcy cases are reported separately as reorganization expenses.
The Monthly Operating Statement is limited in scope, covers a limited time period, and has been prepared solely for the purpose of complying with the monthly reporting requirements of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Certain of our Canadian subsidiaries were granted relief by the Canadian Court under the CCAA. As a result, certain of our Canadian and other foreign subsidiaries were deconsolidated as of December 20, 2005. Financial information regarding such deconsolidated subsidiaries is not included with that of the consolidated group reported in the Monthly Operating Statement. The financial information in the Monthly Operating Statement is preliminary and unaudited and does not purport to show the financial statements of any of the U.S. Debtors in accordance with GAAP, and therefore may exclude items required by GAAP, such as certain reclassifications, eliminations, accruals, valuations and disclosure items. We caution readers not to place undue reliance upon the Monthly Operating Statement. There can be no assurance that such information is complete and the Monthly Operating Statement may be subject to revision. The Monthly Operating Statement is in a format required by the Bankruptcy Code and should not be used for investment purposes. The Monthly Operating Statement should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the 2005 Form 10-K and the 2006 First Quarter 10-Q.
The unaudited financial statements contained in the Monthly Operating Statement have been derived from the books and records of the Company. This information, however, has not been subject to procedures that would typically be applied
15
to financial information presented in accordance with GAAP, and upon the application of such procedures, we believe that the financial information could be subject to changes, and these changes could be material. The information furnished in this Monthly Operating Statement includes primarily normal recurring adjustments but does not include all of the adjustments that would typically be made for financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted.
Mark-to-Market — Mark-to-market, net activity includes realized settlements of and unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses on both power and gas derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges, including those held for trading purposes. Gains and losses due to ineffectiveness on hedging instruments are also included in unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses. Trading activity is presented net in accordance with EITF Issue No. 02-03. Of the total mark-to-market loss of $6.5 million in May 2006, there was $4.4 million of unrealized gains (mostly from open gas contracts), and we had a realized loss of $10.9 million. The realized loss included a non-cash gain of approximately $2.5 million from amortization of various items.
Per agreement among the Company, the Office of the U.S. Trustee and the Committee of Unsecured Creditors, the Statements of Cash Flows will be excluded from Monthly Operating Statements except on a quarterly basis.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
See Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2005 Form 10-K and Note 1 “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in the 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q for a summary of the accounting policies that we believe are significant to us.
4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 123-R
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123-R, which requires a public company to use the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation. We adopted this standard as of January 1, 2006, and applied the modified prospective transition method. The modified prospective approach applies to the unvested portion of all awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, and to all prospective awards. Prior financial statements are not restated under this method.
SFAS No. 123-R also requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits that occur from estimated tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized be presented as financing cash flows in the statement of cash flows. Prior to adopting this statement, we presented tax benefits from allowable deductions as operating cash flows in our Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows.
As we previously adopted the fair value method of accounting under SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 123”) on January 1, 2003, the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
SFAS No. 154
In May 2005, FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” This statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Adoption of this statement did not materially impact our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
16
FASB Interpretation No. 48
In June 2006, FASB issued FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN 48 addresses the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the impact this standard will have on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
5. Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Margin Deposits
Cash and Cash Equivalents — We have certain project finance facilities and lease agreements that establish segregated cash accounts. These accounts have been pledged as security in favor of the lenders to such project finance facilities, and the use of certain cash balances on deposit in such accounts with our project financed securities is limited to the operations of the respective projects. At May 31, 2006, $416.9 million of the cash and cash equivalents balance was subject to such project finance facilities and lease agreements.
Restricted Cash — We are required to maintain cash balances that are restricted by provisions of certain of our debt and lease agreements or by regulatory agencies. These amounts are held by depository banks in order to comply with the contractual provisions requiring reserves for payments such as for debt service, rent, major maintenance and debt repurchases. Funds that can be used to satisfy obligations due during the next twelve months are classified as current restricted cash, with the remainder classified as non-current restricted cash. Restricted cash is generally invested in accounts earning market rates; therefore the carrying value approximates fair value.
The table below represents the components of our consolidated restricted cash as of May 31, 2006, (in thousands):
| | Current | | Non-Current | | Total | |
Debt service | | $ | 124,605 | | $ | 118,889 | | $ | 243,494 | |
Rent reserve | | | 13,701 | | | — | | | 13,701 | |
Construction/major maintenance | | | 81,139 | | | 37,925 | | | 119,064 | |
Proceeds from asset sales | | | 375 | | | — | | | 375 | |
Collateralized letters of credit and other credit support | | | 125,106 | | | — | | | 125,106 | |
Other | | | 30,036 | | | 36,725 | | | 66,761 | |
Total | | $ | 374,962 | | $ | 193,539 | | $ | 568,501 | |
As part of a prior business acquisition, which included certain facilities subject to a pre-existing operating lease, we acquired certain restricted cash balances comprised of a portfolio of debt securities. This portfolio is classified as held-to-maturity because we have the intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. The securities are held in escrow accounts to support operating activities of the leased facilities and consist of a $17.0 million debt security maturing in 2015 and a $7.4 million debt security maturing in 2023. This portfolio is stated at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion discounts to maturity.
Of our restricted cash at May 31, 2006, $269.9 million relates to the assets of the following entities, each an entity with its existence separate from us and our other subsidiaries (in millions).
17
PCF | | $ | 162.6 | |
Gilroy Energy Center, LLC | | | 46.6 | |
Riverside Energy Center, LLC | | | 23.8 | |
Rocky Mountain Energy Center, LLC | | | 22.9 | |
Calpine Northbrook Energy Marketing, LLC | | | 5.8 | |
Calpine King City Cogen, LLC | | | 5.8 | |
Calpine Fox LLC | | | 1.0 | |
PCF III | | | 1.4 | |
| | $ | 269.9 | |
Margin Deposits — As of May 31, 2006, to support commodity transactions, we had margin deposits with third parties of $168.5 million, we made gas and power prepayments of $91.9 million, and had letters of credit outstanding of $5.6 million. Counterparties had deposited with us $15.9 million as margin deposits at May 31, 2006. We use margin deposits, prepayments and letters of credit as credit support for commodity procurement and risk management activities. Future cash collateral requirements may increase based on the extent of our involvement in standard contracts and movements in commodity prices and also based on our credit ratings and general perception of creditworthiness in this market. While we believe that we have adequate liquidity to support our operations at this time, it is difficult to predict future developments and the amount of credit support that we may need to provide as part of our business operations.
6. Rejected Contracts and Related Matters
We continue to evaluate our executory contracts and those real property leases that are not subject to the July 18, 2006, assumption deadline (as described in Note 1) in order to determine which contracts will be assumed, assumed and assigned, or rejected. Once the evaluation is complete with respect to each particular contract or lease, the applicable U.S. Debtor will file the appropriate motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court seeking approval to assume, assume and assign, or reject the contract or lease. Pursuant to applicable orders of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, if a U.S. Debtor seeks to reject a contract or lease, the contract or lease counterparties then have an opportunity to file objections. If an objection has been filed, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court will conduct a hearing to determine any matters raised by the objection. As of the date of this filing, the U.S. Debtors have identified the following significant contracts and leases to be rejected:
| • | On December 21, 2005, we filed a motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to reject eight PPAs and to enjoin FERC from asserting jurisdiction over the rejections. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court issued a temporary restraining order against FERC and set the matter for a hearing on January 5, 2006. Under most of the PPAs sought to be rejected, we are obligated to sell power at prices that are significantly lower than currently prevailing market prices. On December 29, 2005, certain counterparties to the various PPAs filed an action in the SDNY Court arguing that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court did not have jurisdiction over the dispute. On January 5, 2006, the SDNY Court entered an order that had the effect of transferring our motion seeking to reject the eight PPAs and our related request for an injunction against FERC to the SDNY Court from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Earlier, however, on December 19, 2005, CDWR, a counterparty to one of the eight PPAs, had filed a complaint with FERC seeking to obtain injunctive relief to prevent us from rejecting our PPA with CDWR and contending that FERC had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter. On January 3, 2006, FERC determined that it did not have exclusive jurisdiction, and that the matter could be heard by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. However, despite the FERC ruling, on January 27, 2006, the SDNY Court determined that FERC had jurisdiction over whether the contracts could be rejected. We appealed the SDNY Court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The appeal was heard on April 10, 2006 and we have not yet received a decision. We can not determine at this time whether the SDNY Court, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court or FERC will ultimately determine whether we may reject any or all of the eight PPAs, or when such determination will be made. In the meantime, three of the PPAs have been terminated by the applicable counterparties, and two of the PPAs are the subject of negotiated settlements. We continue to perform under the three PPAs that remain in effect. We can not presently determine the ultimate outcome of the pending court cases nor the market factors that will need to be considered |
18
in valuing the rejected contracts and therefore are unable to estimate the expected allowed claims related to these PPAs.
| • | On February 6, 2006, we filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, a notice of rejection of certain of our leases related to the Rumford Power Plant and the Tiverton Power Plant and noticed the proposed surrender of the two plants to their owner-lessor. The owner-lessor declined to take possession and control of the plants at that time and certain objections to the rejection notice and other opposing pleadings were filed by various interested parties. After negotiations with the indenture trustee related to the two leasehold properties, on May 18, 2006, we filed a motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court seeking approval of the terms and conditions of a transition agreement to be entered into between us, the indenture trustee and a receiver for certain assets of the owner-lessor to be appointed on a motion filed with the SDNY Court by the indenture trustee. A receiver was appointed by the SDNY Court on June 6, 2006, and on June 9, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the transition agreement and the effective date of the rejection of the leases. On June 23, 2006, we closed the transaction contemplated in the transition agreement and the receiver now has possession and control of the Rumford and Tiverton power plants, as well as the ancillary assets related to the power plants transferred under the transition agreement. In connection with the lease rejections, we expect to record a non-cash charge of $234.6 million which includes our current estimate of the expected allowed claim related to the lease rejections, the write-off of prepaid lease expense and certain fees and expenses related to the transaction. The amount is expected to be reported as a reorganization item in the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, and the portion representing the expected allowed claim is expected to be included in liabilities subject to compromise in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at June 30, 2006. |
| • | In April 2006, we filed a notice of rejection relating to our office lease in Atlanta, Georgia. In May 2006, we filed a notice of rejection relating to our office lease in Dublin, California. The rejection of each of the foregoing leases has been approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. In June 2006, we filed notices of rejection relating to our office lease and office sublease in Boston, Massachusetts and the seventh floor lease relating to our office in San Jose, California. The rejection of these leases has been approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court with the exception of the Boston office sublease. The counterparty to the Boston office sublease objected to the rejection in order to address the recovery of an associated security deposit. We are in negotiation with the counterparty regarding the security deposit. |
| • | On May 24, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court authorized the amendment and assumption of a steam agreement and related ground lease between Texas City Cogeneration, L.P. and Union Carbide Corporation and the amendment and assumption of a gas refinery agreement between Texas City and BP Products North America Inc. |
| • | On June 5, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motion to assume geothermal leases related to The Geysers Assets steam field operations and the Glass Mountain area, and the associated executory contracts, surface use agreements and site leases that allow the geothermal leases to be utilized to harness geothermal energy and operate these facilities. The geothermal leases combined with the operations at these facilities make up the core collateral for the DIP facility. |
| • | On June 21 and July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motions to assume more than 60 natural gas pipeline leases and related real property licenses that support the Company’s pipelines across the country, covering more than 350 miles of both gathering and transmission pipelines. Assumption of these leases and licenses is intended to allow us to continue to transport gas to our customers, including Calpine affiliates. |
| • | On June 21 and July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motion to assume more than 20 leases related to the operation of the Company’s power plants (e.g., ground leases, facilities leases, operating leases, warehouse leases, etc.). Assumption of these leases was intended to allow the Company to continue to operate these facilities. |
19
| • | On July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved motions to assume (or assume and assign) office leases in Folsom, California; Houston, Texas; Pasadena, Texas; San Jose, California; Boca Raton, Florida; Jupiter, Florida and Washington, D.C. |
| • | On July 12, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the Company’s motion to assume approximately 130 oil and gas leases, to the extent that such leases are, in fact, leases of real property. Many of these oil and gas leases are the subject of an ongoing dispute with Rosetta stemming from the Company’s sale of domestic oil and gas assets to Rosetta in July 2005. By assuming these leases, we preserved our rights in the leases by avoiding the rejection of such leases on July 1, 2006. |
In addition, during the course of the Chapter 11 cases the U.S. Debtors have determined that certain gas transportation contracts no longer provide any benefit to the U.S. Debtors or their estates. In certain instances, the U.S. Debtors have given notice to counterparties to these contracts that the U.S. Debtors will no longer accept or pay for service under such contracts. The Company believes that any claims resulting from the repudiation of these contracts will be treated as pre-petition general unsecured claims. Accordingly, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $308.8 million as its current estimate of the expected allowed claim related to the repudiation of these contracts; of this amount, approximately $159 million and $73 million were recorded in April 2006 and May 2006, respectively, with the remainder recorded in June 2006. These charges are reported as a reorganization item in the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and in liabilities subject to compromise in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet for the respective period.
7. Liabilities Subject to Compromise
The claims bar dates—the dates by which claims against the Calpine Debtors must be filed with the applicable Bankruptcy Court—have been set for August 1, 2006 by each of the Bankruptcy Courts. Accordingly, not all potential claims would have been filed as of May 31, 2006, and we expect that additional claims will be filed against us prior to the claims bar dates.
The amounts of LSTC at May 31, 2006 consisted of the following (in millions):
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 406.1 | |
Terminated derivative liabilities | | | 383.2 | |
Project financing | | | 164.0 | |
Convertible notes | | | 1,823.5 | |
Second priority senior secured notes(1) | | | 3,671.9 | |
Unsecured senior notes | | | 1,880.0 | |
Notes payable and other liabilities – related party | | | 1,156.2 | |
Provision for allowed claims(2) | | | 5,357.8 | |
Total liabilities subject to compromise | | $ | 14,842.7 | |
__________
(1) | We have not made, and currently do not propose to make, an affirmative determination whether our Second Priority Debt is fully secured or under-secured. We do, however, believe that there is uncertainty about whether the market value of the assets securing the obligations owing in respect of the Second Priority Debt is less than, equals or exceeds the amount of these obligations. Accordingly, we have classified the Second Priority Debt as “liabilities subject to compromise.” |
(2) | Consists primarily of estimated allowed claims related to guarantees by Calpine Corporation of repayment of unsecured senior notes (original principal amount of $2,597.2 million) for two wholly owned finance subsidiaries of the Company, ULC I and ULC II. The amounts outstanding to unrelated security holders had been reduced to $1,943.0 million at December 31, 2005, due to repurchases of such senior notes. However, some of the repurchased notes are held by certain of the Company’s Canadian subsidiaries and are expected to give rise to allowed claims by these subsidiaries under the |
20
above guarantees. Additionally, there is a guarantee by Calpine Corporation of the obligations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Quintana Canada Holdings, LLC, under certain subscription agreements with ULC I, under which claims may be asserted for the same amounts sought under the Calpine Corporation guarantees of the ULC I notes. Although the expected claims are redundant relative to the underlying exposure to unrelated security holders, the Company determined that these duplicative claims were probable of being allowed into the claim pool by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, although the U.S. Debtors fully reserve their rights in this regard.
8. DIP Facility
On December 20, 2005, Calpine Corporation, as borrower, entered into the DIP Facility with Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and Credit Suisse, as joint syndication agents, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as administrative agent for the first priority lenders and Credit Suisse as administrative agent for the second priority lenders. The DIP Facility is guaranteed by each of the other U.S. Debtors. On January 26, 2006, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court granted final approval of the DIP Facility, and on February 23, 2006, the DIP Facility was amended and restated and the term loans were funded. On May 3, 2006, the DIP Facility was further amended.
Pursuant to the DIP Facility, and applicable orders of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, the lenders have made available to Calpine up to $2 billion comprising of a $1 billion revolving loan and letter of credit facility, a $400 million first priority term loan facility and a $600 million second priority term loan facility. The proceeds of borrowings and letters of credit issued under the DIP Facility will be used, among other things, for working capital and other general corporate purposes. A portion of the borrowings under the revolving loan facility in February 2006 were used to fund a portion of the costs in connection with the purchase of The Geysers Assets. In May 2006 and June 2006, a portion of the funds drawn under the term loan facilities, together with approximately $409 million of restricted cash, plus related interest thereon, were used to repay $646.1 million of the First Priority Notes. During the month of May 2006, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving loan facility; however, approximately $0.4 million of additional letters of credit were issued against the revolving loan facility. Accordingly, at May 31, 2006, there was $999.1 million outstanding under the term loan facilities, nothing outstanding under the revolving loan facility and $3.4 million of letters of credit issued against the revolving loan facility. At June 30, 2006, there was $998.3 million outstanding under the term loan facilities as a result of the June repayment of $875,000 of the amounts outstanding under the first priority term loan, plus the related interest. Also at June 30, 2006, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving loan facility; however, approximately $11.7 million of letters of credit had been issued against the revolving loan facility.
See Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2005 Form 10-K and Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in the 2006 First Quarter Form 10-Q for further discussion of the DIP Facility.
9. Reorganization Items
Reorganization items represent the direct and incremental costs of being in bankruptcy, such as professional fees, pre-petition liability claim adjustments related to terminated contracts that are probable and can be estimated and charges related to expected allowed claims.
The table below lists the significant items recognized within this category for the month ended May 31, 2006 (in millions)
Provision for allowed claims | | $ | 89.8 | |
Loss on terminated contracts, net | | | 10.9 | |
Professional fees | | | 14.2 | |
Total reorganization items | | $ | 114.9 | |
See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2005 Form 10-K for a discussion of the Reorganization items.
21
Schedule I
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
May 31, 2006
| | U.S. Debtors | | Non-U.S. Debtors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 658,381 | | $ | 261,494 | | $ | — | | $ | 919,875 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 796,297 | | | 169,037 | | | — | | | 965,334 | |
Accounts receivable (payable) from affiliates, net | | | 38,905,506 | | | 2,947,811 | | | (41,853,317 | ) | | — | |
Margin deposits and other prepaid expense | | | 278,927 | | | 50,864 | | | (2,104 | ) | | 327,687 | |
Inventories | | | 125,290 | | | 26,614 | | | — | | | 151,904 | |
Restricted cash | | | 206,343 | | | 168,619 | | | — | | | 374,962 | |
Current derivative assets | | | 173,141 | | | 82,470 | | | — | | | 255,611 | |
Current assets held for sale | | | 39,542 | | | — | | | — | | | 39,542 | |
Other current assets | | | 915,372 | | | 56,277 | | | (886,471 | ) | | 85,178 | |
Total current assets | | | 42,098,799 | | | 3,763,186 | | | (42,741,892 | ) | | 3,120,093 | |
Restricted cash, net of current portion | | | 52,876 | | | 140,663 | | | — | | | 193,539 | |
Notes receivable, net of current portion | | | 157,339 | | | 1,685 | | | — | | | 159,024 | |
Notes receivable from affiliates, net of current portion | | | 4,200,034 | | | 48,918 | | | (4,248,952 | ) | | — | |
Project development costs | | | 24,247 | | | — | | | — | | | 24,247 | |
Investments | | | 11,560,412 | | | 9,253,668 | | | (20,761,123 | ) | | 52,957 | |
Deferred financing costs | | | 47,215 | | | 129,440 | | | — | | | 176,655 | |
Prepaid lease, net of current portion | | | 351,586 | | | 593 | | | — | | | 352,179 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 8,139,052 | | | 6,282,084 | | | (877 | ) | | 14,420,259 | |
Goodwill | | | 45,160 | | | — | | | — | | | 45,160 | |
Other intangible assets, net | | | 15,930 | | | 36,577 | | | — | | | 52,507 | |
Long-term derivative assets | | | 358,078 | | | 117,070 | | | — | | | 475,148 | |
Other assets | | | 266,443 | | | 347,223 | | | (12,250 | ) | | 601,416 | |
Intercompany | | | 521,564 | | | 69,874 | | | (591,438 | ) | | — | |
Total assets | | $ | 67,838,735 | | $ | 20,190,981 | | $ | (68,356,532 | ) | $ | 19,673,184 | |
22
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET — (Continued)
| | U.S. Debtors | | Non-U.S. Debtors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 506,264 | | $ | 2,114,288 | | $ | (2,151,496 | ) | $ | 469,056 | |
Accrued payroll and related expense | | | 48,572 | | | 1,734 | | | — | | | 50,306 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 340,230 | | | 94,325 | | | (234,022 | ) | | 200,533 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 99,073 | | | — | | | — | | | 99,073 | |
Notes payable and other borrowings, current portion | | | 720,318 | | | 178,193 | | | (711,145 | ) | | 187,366 | |
Preferred interests, current portion | | | — | | | 9,124 | | | — | | | 9,124 | |
Capital lease obligations, current portion | | | 189,747 | | | 96,846 | | | (1,661 | ) | | 284,932 | |
CCFC financing, current portion | | | — | | | 783,259 | | | — | | | 783,259 | |
CalGen financing, current portion | | | 2,509,201 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,509,201 | |
Construction/project financing, current portion | | | 380,899 | | | 1,807,628 | | | — | | | 2,188,527 | |
Senior notes and term loans, current portion | | | 848 | | | — | | | — | | | 848 | |
DIP Facility, current portion | | | 3,500 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,500 | |
Current derivative liabilities | | | 292,325 | | | 113,267 | | | — | | | 405,592 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 249,615 | | | 123,284 | | | (2,104 | ) | | 370,795 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 5,340,592 | | | 5,321,948 | | | (3,100,428 | ) | | 7,562,112 | |
Notes payable and other borrowings, net of current portion | | | 4,157,374 | | | 2,108,965 | | | (5,798,131 | ) | | 468,208 | |
Preferred interests, net of current portion | | | — | | | 579,122 | | | — | | | 579,122 | |
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion | | | 318,152 | | | 3,165 | | | (317,739 | ) | | 3,578 | |
Construction/project financing, net of current portion | | | — | | | 202,179 | | | — | | | 202,179 | |
DIP Facility, net of current portion | | | 995,625 | | | — | | | — | | | 995,625 | |
Deferred income taxes, net of current portion | | | 149,292 | | | 226,134 | | | — | | | 375,426 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 129,611 | | | 21,835 | | | (13,127 | ) | | 138,319 | |
Long-term derivative liabilities | | | 491,862 | | | 152,598 | | | — | | | 644,460 | |
Other liabilities | | | 104,360 | | | 29,506 | | | (3 | ) | | 133,863 | |
Total liabilities not subject to compromise | | | 11,686,868 | | | 8,645,452 | | | (9,229,428 | ) | | 11,102,892 | |
Liabilities subject to compromise | | | 53,429,611 | | | 240 | | | (38,587,107 | ) | | 14,842,744 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minority interests | | | 274,811 | | | — | | | — | | | 274,811 | |
Stockholders’ equity (deficit): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock | | | 31,567 | | | 5,096 | | | (36,094 | ) | | 569 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 25,732,020 | | | 10,736,289 | | | (33,200,424 | ) | | 3,267,885 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (23,154,996 | ) | | 818,138 | | | 12,652,838 | | | (9,684,020 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (161,146 | ) | | (14,234 | ) | | 43,683 | | | (131,697 | ) |
Total stockholders’ deficit | | | 2,447,445 | | | 11,545,289 | | | (20,539,997 | ) | | (6,547,263 | ) |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit | | $ | 67,838,735 | | $ | 20,190,981 | | $ | (68,356,532 | ) | $ | 19,673,184 | |
Calpine Corporation’s consolidated results are comprised of U.S. Debtor and Non-U.S. Debtor entities that have affiliated transactions with other U.S. Debtor and Non-U.S. Debtor entities that must be eliminated in consolidation. Amounts listed under the “Eliminations” heading are required to correctly eliminate transactions between any affiliated entities for consolidated financial statement presentation purposes.
23
Schedule II
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
For the Period from May 1, 2006, to May 31, 2006
| | U.S. Debtors | | Non-U.S. Debtors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electricity and steam revenue | | $ | 545,078 | | $ | 192,312 | | $ | (339,905 | ) | $ | 397,485 | |
Transmission sales revenue | | | 182 | | | — | | | — | | | 182 | |
Sales of purchased power and gas for hedging and optimization | | | 370,188 | | | 13,465 | | | (251,616 | ) | | 132,037 | |
Mark-to-market activities, net | | | 1,277 | | | (7,727 | ) | | — | | | (6,450 | ) |
Other revenue from operations | | | 42,195 | | | 4,792 | | | (36,940 | ) | | 10,047 | |
Total revenue | | | 958,920 | | | 202,842 | | | (628,461 | ) | | 533,301 | |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Plant operating expense | | | 419,698 | | | 22,996 | | | (372,402 | ) | | 70,292 | |
Royalty expense | | | 946 | | | — | | | — | | | 946 | |
Transmission purchase expense | | | 3,469 | | | 1,697 | | | — | | | 5,166 | |
Purchased power and gas expense for hedging and optimization | | | 114,094 | | | 43,865 | | | (3,207 | ) | | 154,752 | |
Fuel expense | | | 390,492 | | | 69,620 | | | (252,848 | ) | | 207,264 | |
Depreciation and amortization expense | | | 26,624 | | | 15,782 | | | (2 | ) | | 42,404 | |
Operating plant impairments | | | (4 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (4 | ) |
Operating lease expense | | | 6,274 | | | — | | | — | | | 6,274 | |
Other cost of revenue | | | 7,163 | | | 107 | | | — | | | 7,270 | |
Total cost of revenue | | | 968,756 | | | 154,067 | | | (628,459 | ) | | 494,364 | |
Gross profit | | | (9,836 | ) | | 48,775 | | | (2 | ) | | 38,937 | |
(Income) from unconsolidated investments | | | 437,507 | | | (60,599 | ) | | (376,908 | ) | | — | |
Equipment, development project and other impairments | | | (800 | ) | | (41 | ) | | — | | | (841 | ) |
Project development expense | | | 1,199 | | | 237 | | | — | | | 1,436 | |
Research and development expense | | | 1,303 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,303 | |
Sales, general and administrative expense | | | 15,234 | | | 912 | | | — | | | 16,146 | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | (464,279 | ) | | 108,266 | | | 376,906 | | | 20,893 | |
Interest expense | | | 67,147 | | | 38,186 | | | (4,768 | ) | | 100,565 | |
Interest (income) | | | (9,045 | ) | | (3,488 | ) | | 4,768 | | | (7,765 | ) |
Minority interest expense | | | 876 | | | — | | | — | | | 876 | |
(Income) loss from repurchase of various issuances of debt | | | 18,107 | | | — | | | — | | | 18,107 | |
Other (income) expense, net | | | 7,290 | | | (8,003 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (715 | ) |
Loss before reorganization items and provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | (548,654 | ) | | 81,571 | | | 376,908 | | | (90,175 | ) |
24
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS — (Continued)
| | U.S. Debtors | | Non-U.S. Debtors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | |
Reorganization items | | $ | 114,867 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 114,867 | |
Loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | (663,521 | ) | | 81,571 | | | 376,908 | | | (205,042 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | | 21,420 | | | (19,268 | ) | | — | | | 2,152 | |
Net loss | | $ | (684,941 | ) | $ | 100,839 | | $ | 376,908 | | $ | (207,194 | ) |
Calpine Corporation’s consolidated results are comprised of U.S. Debtor and Non-U.S. Debtor entities that have affiliated transactions with other U.S. Debtor and Non-U.S. Debtor entities that must be eliminated in consolidation. Amounts listed under the “Eliminations” heading are required to correctly eliminate transactions between any affiliated entities for consolidated financial statement presentation purposes.
25
Schedule III
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)
SCHEDULE OF PAYROLL AND PAYROLL TAXES
(in thousands)
For the Period from May 1, 2006, to May 31, 2006
Gross Wages Paid**
| | Employee Payroll Taxes Withheld* | | Employer Payroll Taxes Remitted* |
$19,010 | | $4,975 | | $1,385 |
* | Employee Payroll Taxes are withheld each pay period and remitted by the Company, together with the Employer Payroll Taxes, to the appropriate tax authorities. |
** | Gross Wages were paid by the Company on May 5, 2006, May 12, 2006, May 19, 2006, and May 26, 2006. |
26
Schedule IV
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL TAXES
COLLECTED, RECEIVED, DUE OR WITHHELD
(in thousands)
For the Period from May 1, 2006, to May 31, 2006
| | Amount Withheld/Accrued | | Amount Paid | |
Federal and state income taxes | | $ | 21,420 | | $ | — | |
State and local taxes: | | | | | | | |
Property | | | 3,969 | | | 2,681 | |
Sales and use | | | 8,552 | | | 2,961 | |
Franchise | | | 1,847 | | | 1,847 | |
Other | | | 653 | | | 653 | |
Total state and local taxes | | | 15,021 | | | 8,142 | |
Total taxes | | $ | 36,441 | | $ | 8,142 | |
27
Schedule V
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR
For the Month Ended May 31, 2006
(in dollars)
Legal Entity | Case Number | Disbursements |
Amelia Energy Center, LP | 05-60223-BRL | $ | — |
Anacapa Land Company, LLC | 05-60226-BRL | 1,000 |
Anderson Springs Energy Company | 05-60232-BRL | — |
Androscoggin Energy, Inc. | 05-60239-BRL | — |
Auburndale Peaker Energy Center, LLC | 05-60244-BRL | 74,178 |
Augusta Development Company, LLC | 05-60248-BRL | — |
Aviation Funding Corp. | 05-60252-BRL | — |
Baytown Energy Center, LP | 05-60255-BRL | 754,889 |
Baytown Power GP, LLC | 05-60256-BRL | — |
Baytown Power, LP | 05-60258-BRL | — |
Bellingham Cogen, Inc. | 05-60224-BRL | — |
Bethpage Energy Center 3, LLC | 05-60225-BRL | 202,308 |
Bethpage Fuel Management Inc. | 05-60228-BRL | — |
Blue Heron Energy Center, LLC | 05-60235-BRL | — |
Blue Spruce Holdings, LLC | 05-60238-BRL | — |
Broad River Energy LLC | 05-60242-BRL | 15,142,945 |
Broad River Holdings, LLC | 05-60245-BRL | — |
CalGen Equipment Finance Company, LLC | 05-60249-BRL | — |
CalGen Equipment Finance Holdings, LLC | 05-60251-BRL | — |
CalGen Expansion Company, LLC | 05-60253-BRL | — |
CalGen Finance Corp. | 05-60229-BRL | — |
CalGen Project Equipment Finance Company One, LLC | 05-60236-BRL | 233,197 |
CalGen Project Equipment Finance Company Three, LLC | 05-60259-BRL | — |
CalGen Project Equipment Finance Company Two, LLC | 05-60262-BRL | — |
Calpine Acadia Holdings, LLC | 05-60265-BRL | — |
Calpine Administrative Services Company, Inc. | 05-60201-BRL | 3,290,795 |
Calpine Agnews, Inc. | 05-60268-BRL | — |
Calpine Amelia Energy Center GP, LLC | 05-60270-BRL | — |
Calpine Amelia Energy Center LP, LLC | 05-60272-BRL | — |
Calpine Auburndale Holdings, LLC | 05-60452-BRL | — |
Calpine Baytown Energy Center GP, LLC | 05-60453-BRL | — |
Calpine Baytown Energy Center LP, LLC | 05-60320-BRL | — |
Calpine Bethpage 3 Pipeline Construction Company, Inc. | 05-60330-BRL | — |
Calpine Bethpage 3, LLC | 05-60342-BRL | — |
Calpine c*Power, Inc. | 05-60250-BRL | — |
Calpine CalGen Holdings, Inc. | 05-60352-BRL | — |
Calpine California Development Company, LLC | 05-60355-BRL | — |
Calpine California Energy Finance, LLC | 05-60360-BRL | — |
Calpine California Equipment Finance Company, LLC | 05-60464-BRL | — |
Calpine Calistoga Holdings, LLC | 05-60377-BRL | — |
Calpine Capital Trust | 05-60325-BRL | — |
Calpine Capital Trust II | 05-60379-BRL | — |
Calpine Capital Trust III | 05-60384-BRL | — |
28
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)
Legal Entity | Case Number | Disbursements |
Calpine Capital Trust IV | 05-60391-BRL | — |
Calpine Capital Trust V | 05-60221-BRL | — |
Calpine Central Texas GP, Inc. | 05-60329-BRL | — |
Calpine Central, Inc. | 05-60333-BRL | — |
Calpine Central, L.P. | 05-60351-BRL | 1,716,250 |
Calpine Central-Texas, Inc. | 05-60338-BRL | — |
Calpine Channel Energy Center GP, LLC | 05-60340-BRL | — |
Calpine Channel Energy Center LP, LLC | 05-60343-BRL | — |
Calpine Clear Lake Energy GP, LLC | 05-60345-BRL | — |
Calpine Clear Lake Energy, LP | 05-60349-BRL | — |
Calpine Cogeneration Corporation | 05-60233-BRL | — |
Calpine Construction Management Company, Inc. | 05-60260-BRL | 2,212,922 |
Calpine Corporation | 05-60200-BRL | 292,560,462 |
Calpine Corpus Christi Energy GP, LLC | 05-60247-BRL | — |
Calpine Corpus Christi Energy, LP | 05-60261-BRL | — |
Calpine Decatur Pipeline, Inc. | 05-60263-BRL | — |
Calpine Decatur Pipeline, L.P. | 05-60254-BRL | — |
Calpine Dighton, Inc. | 05-60264-BRL | — |
Calpine East Fuels, Inc. | 05-60257-BRL | — |
Calpine Eastern Corporation | 05-60266-BRL | 160,669 |
Calpine Energy Holdings, Inc. | 05-60207-BRL | — |
Calpine Energy Services Holdings, Inc. | 05-60208-BRL | — |
Calpine Energy Services, L.P. | 05-60222-BRL | 237,299,092 |
Calpine Finance Company | 05-60204-BRL | — |
Calpine Freestone Energy GP, LLC | 05-60227-BRL | — |
Calpine Freestone Energy, LP | 05-60230-BRL | — |
Calpine Freestone, LLC | 05-60231-BRL | — |
Calpine Fuels Corporation | 05-60203-BRL | — |
Calpine Gas Holdings LLC | 05-60234-BRL | — |
Calpine Generating Company, LLC | 05-60237-BRL | 641,618 |
Calpine Geysers Company, LP | 06-10939-BRL | — |
Calpine Gilroy 1, Inc. | 05-60240-BRL | — |
Calpine Gilroy 2, Inc. | 05-60241-BRL | — |
Calpine Gilroy Cogen, L.P. | 05-60243-BRL | 312,704 |
Calpine Global Services Company, Inc. | 05-60246-BRL | 387,984 |
Calpine Gordonsville GP Holdings, LLC | 05-60281-BRL | — |
Calpine Gordonsville LP Holdings, LLC | 05-60282-BRL | — |
Calpine Gordonsville, LLC | 05-60283-BRL | — |
Calpine Greenleaf Holdings, Inc. | 05-60284-BRL | — |
Calpine Greenleaf, Inc. | 05-60285-BRL | 218,991 |
Calpine Hidalgo Design, L.P. | 06-10039-BRL | — |
Calpine Hidalgo Energy Center, L.P. | 06-10029-BRL | 5,012,783 |
Calpine Hidalgo Holdings, Inc. | 06-10027-BRL | — |
Calpine Hidalgo Power GP, LLC | 06-10030-BRL | — |
Calpine Hidalgo Power, LP | 06-10028-BRL | — |
Calpine Hidalgo, Inc. | 06-10026-BRL | — |
Calpine International Holdings, Inc. | 05-60205-BRL | — |
Calpine International, LLC | 05-60288-BRL | 19,449 |
29
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)
Legal Entity | Case Number | Disbursements |
Calpine Investment Holdings, LLC | 05-60289-BRL | — |
Calpine Kennedy Airport, Inc. | 05-60294-BRL | — |
Calpine Kennedy Operators Inc. | 05-60199-BRL | — |
Calpine KIA, Inc. | 05-60465-BRL | — |
Calpine Leasing Inc. | 05-60297-BRL | — |
Calpine Long Island, Inc. | 05-60298-BRL | — |
Calpine Lost Pines Operations, Inc. | 05-60314-BRL | — |
Calpine Louisiana Pipeline Company | 05-60328-BRL | — |
Calpine Magic Valley Pipeline, Inc. | 05-60331-BRL | — |
Calpine Monterey Cogeneration, Inc. | 05-60341-BRL | 144,924 |
Calpine MVP, Inc. | 05-60348-BRL | — |
Calpine NCTP GP, LLC | 05-60359-BRL | — |
Calpine NCTP, LP | 05-60406-BRL | — |
Calpine Northbrook Corporation of Maine, Inc. | 05-60409-BRL | — |
Calpine Northbrook Energy Holdings, LLC | 05-60418-BRL | — |
Calpine Northbrook Energy, LLC | 05-60431-BRL | — |
Calpine Northbrook Holdings Corporation | 05-60286-BRL | — |
Calpine Northbrook Investors, LLC | 05-60291-BRL | — |
Calpine Northbrook Project Holdings, LLC | 05-60295-BRL | — |
Calpine Northbrook Services, LLC | 05-60299-BRL | — |
Calpine Northbrook Southcoast Investors, LLC | 05-60304-BRL | — |
Calpine NTC, LP | 05-60308-BRL | — |
Calpine Oneta Power I, LLC | 05-60311-BRL | — |
Calpine Oneta Power II, LLC | 05-60315-BRL | — |
Calpine Oneta Power, L.P. | 05-60318-BRL | 692,803 |
Calpine Operating Services Company, Inc. | 05-60322-BRL | 25,980,888 |
Calpine Operations Management Company, Inc. | 05-60206-BRL | — |
Calpine Pastoria Holdings, LLC | 05-60302-BRL | — |
Calpine Philadelphia, Inc. | 05-60305-BRL | 22,018 |
Calpine Pittsburg, LLC | 05-60307-BRL | 134,299 |
Calpine Power Company | 05-60202-BRL | 1,472 |
Calpine Power Equipment LP | 05-60310-BRL | — |
Calpine Power Management, Inc. | 05-60319-BRL | — |
Calpine Power Management, LP | 05-60466-BRL | — |
Calpine Power Services, Inc. | 05-60323-BRL | 187,938 |
Calpine Power, Inc. | 05-60316-BRL | — |
Calpine PowerAmerica, Inc. | 05-60211-BRL | — |
Calpine PowerAmerica, LP | 05-60212-BRL | 1,207,897 |
Calpine PowerAmerica-CA, LLC | 05-60213-BRL | 142,518 |
Calpine PowerAmerica-CT, LLC | 05-60214-BRL | — |
Calpine PowerAmerica-MA, LLC | 05-60215-BRL | — |
Calpine PowerAmerica-ME, LLC | 05-60216-BRL | — |
Calpine PowerAmerica-NH, LLC | 06-10032-BRL | — |
Calpine PowerAmerica-NY, LLC | 06-10031-BRL | — |
Calpine PowerAmerica-OR, LLC | 06-10034-BRL | — |
Calpine Producer Services, L.P. | 05-60217-BRL | 8,539,860 |
Calpine Project Holdings, Inc. | 05-60324-BRL | — |
Calpine Pryor, Inc. | 05-60326-BRL | — |
30
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)
Legal Entity | Case Number | Disbursements |
Calpine Rumford I, Inc. | 05-60327-BRL | — |
Calpine Rumford, Inc. | 05-60414-BRL | — |
Calpine Schuylkill, Inc. | 05-60416-BRL | — |
Calpine Siskiyou Geothermal Partners, L.P. | 05-60420-BRL | 15,998 |
Calpine Sonoran Pipeline LLC | 05-60423-BRL | — |
Calpine Stony Brook Operators, Inc. | 05-60424-BRL | — |
Calpine Stony Brook Power Marketing, LLC | 05-60425-BRL | — |
Calpine Stony Brook, Inc. | 05-60426-BRL | — |
Calpine Sumas, Inc. | 05-60427-BRL | — |
Calpine TCCL Holdings, Inc. | 05-60429-BRL | — |
Calpine Texas Pipeline GP, Inc. | 05-60433-BRL | — |
Calpine Texas Pipeline LP, Inc. | 05-60439-BRL | — |
Calpine Texas Pipeline, L.P. | 05-60447-BRL | 4,766 |
Calpine Tiverton I, Inc. | 05-60450-BRL | — |
Calpine Tiverton, Inc. | 05-60451-BRL | — |
Calpine ULC I Holding, LLC | 05-60454-BRL | — |
Calpine University Power, Inc. | 05-60455-BRL | — |
Calpine Unrestricted Funding, LLC | 05-60456-BRL | — |
Calpine Unrestricted Holdings, LLC | 05-60458-BRL | — |
Calpine Vapor, Inc. | 05-60459-BRL | — |
Carville Energy LLC | 05-60460-BRL | 570,579 |
CCFC Development Company, LLC | 05-60267-BRL | — |
CCFC Equipment Finance Company, LLC | 05-60269-BRL | — |
CCFC Project Equipment Finance Company One, LLC | 05-60271-BRL | — |
Celtic Power Corporation | 05-60273-BRL | — |
CES GP, LLC | 05-60218-BRL | — |
CGC Dighton, LLC | 05-60274-BRL | — |
Channel Energy Center, LP | 05-60275-BRL | 1,387,548 |
Channel Power GP, LLC | 05-60276-BRL | — |
Channel Power, LP | 05-60277-BRL | — |
Clear Lake Cogeneration Limited Partnership | 05-60278-BRL | 703,208 |
CogenAmerica Asia Inc. | 05-60372-BRL | — |
CogenAmerica Parlin Supply Corp. | 05-60383-BRL | — |
Columbia Energy LLC | 05-60440-BRL | 539,119 |
Corpus Christi Cogeneration L.P. | 05-60441-BRL | 550,246 |
CPN 3rd Turbine, Inc. | 05-60443-BRL | — |
CPN Acadia, Inc. | 05-60444-BRL | — |
CPN Berks Generation, Inc. | 05-60445-BRL | — |
CPN Berks, LLC | 05-60446-BRL | — |
CPN Bethpage 3rd Turbine, Inc. | 05-60448-BRL | 102,027 |
CPN Cascade, Inc. | 05-60449-BRL | — |
CPN Clear Lake, Inc. | 05-60287-BRL | — |
CPN Decatur Pipeline, Inc. | 05-60290-BRL | — |
CPN East Fuels, LLC | 05-60476-BRL | — |
CPN Energy Services GP, Inc. | 05-60209-BRL | — |
CPN Energy Services LP, Inc. | 05-60210-BRL | — |
CPN Freestone, LLC | 05-60293-BRL | — |
CPN Funding, Inc. | 05-60296-BRL | — |
31
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)
Legal Entity | Case Number | Disbursements |
CPN Morris, Inc. | 05-60301-BRL | — |
CPN Oxford, Inc. | 05-60303-BRL | — |
CPN Pipeline Company | 05-60309-BRL | 103,825 |
CPN Pleasant Hill Operating, LLC | 05-60312-BRL | — |
CPN Pleasant Hill, LLC | 05-60317-BRL | — |
CPN Power Services GP, LLC | 05-60321-BRL | — |
CPN Power Services, LP | 05-60292-BRL | — |
CPN Pryor Funding Corporation | 05-60300-BRL | 122,641 |
CPN Telephone Flat, Inc. | 05-60306-BRL | 52,708 |
Decatur Energy Center, LLC | 05-60313-BRL | 891,763 |
Deer Park Power GP, LLC | 05-60363-BRL | — |
Deer Park Power, LP | 05-60370-BRL | — |
Delta Energy Center, LLC | 05-60375-BRL | 1,199,385 |
Dighton Power Associates Limited Partnership | 05-60382-BRL | 161,378 |
East Altamont Energy Center, LLC | 05-60386-BRL | — |
Fond du Lac Energy Center, LLC | 05-60412-BRL | — |
Fontana Energy Center, LLC | 05-60335-BRL | — |
Freestone Power Generation LP | 05-60339-BRL | 920,645 |
GEC Bethpage Inc. | 05-60347-BRL | — |
Geothermal Energy Partners, LTD., a California limited partnership | 05-60477-BRL | — |
Geysers Power Company II, LLC | 05-60358-BRL | — |
Geysers Power Company, LLC | 06-10197-BRL | 6,710,180 |
Geysers Power I Company | 05-60389-BRL | — |
Goldendale Energy Center, LLC | 05-60390-BRL | 704,234 |
Hammond Energy LLC | 05-60393-BRL | — |
Hillabee Energy Center, LLC | 05-60394-BRL | 62,455 |
Idlewild Fuel Management Corp. | 05-60397-BRL | — |
JMC Bethpage, Inc. | 05-60362-BRL | — |
KIAC Partners | 05-60366-BRL | 2,917,351 |
Lake Wales Energy Center, LLC | 05-60369-BRL | — |
Lawrence Energy Center, LLC | 05-60371-BRL | — |
Lone Oak Energy Center, LLC | 05-60403-BRL | 21,573 |
Los Esteros Critical Energy Facility, LLC | 05-60404-BRL | 667,398 |
Los Medanos Energy Center LLC | 05-60405-BRL | 923,230 |
Magic Valley Gas Pipeline GP, LLC | 05-60407-BRL | — |
Magic Valley Gas Pipeline, LP | 05-60408-BRL | — |
Magic Valley Pipeline, L.P. | 05-60332-BRL | 1,915 |
MEP Pleasant Hill, LLC | 05-60334-BRL | 456,969 |
Moapa Energy Center, LLC | 05-60337-BRL | 895 |
Mobile Energy L L C | 05-60344-BRL | 208,258 |
Modoc Power, Inc. | 05-60346-BRL | — |
Morgan Energy Center, LLC | 05-60353-BRL | 733,115 |
Mount Hoffman Geothermal Company, L.P. | 05-60361-BRL | — |
Mt. Vernon Energy LLC | 05-60376-BRL | — |
NewSouth Energy LLC | 05-60381-BRL | 22,666 |
Nissequogue Cogen Partners | 05-60388-BRL | 423,446 |
Northwest Cogeneration, Inc. | 05-60336-BRL | — |
NTC Five, Inc. | 05-60463-BRL | — |
32
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS BY DEBTOR — (Continued)
Legal Entity | Case Number | Disbursements |
NTC GP, LLC | 05-60350-BRL | — |
Nueces Bay Energy LLC | 05-60356-BRL | 7,600 |
O.L.S. Energy-Agnews, Inc. | 05-60374-BRL | 1,301,486 |
Odyssey Land Acquisition Company | 05-60367-BRL | — |
Pajaro Energy Center, LLC | 05-60385-BRL | — |
Pastoria Energy Center, LLC | 05-60387-BRL | — |
Pastoria Energy Facility L.L.C. | 05-60410-BRL | 2,069,195 |
Philadelphia Biogas Supply, Inc. | 05-60421-BRL | — |
Phipps Bend Energy Center, LLC | 05-60395-BRL | — |
Pine Bluff Energy, LLC | 05-60396-BRL | 571,404 |
Power Investors, L.L.C. | 05-60398-BRL | — |
Power Systems MFG., LLC | 05-60399-BRL | 6,460,166 |
Quintana Canada Holdings, LLC | 05-60400-BRL | — |
RockGen Energy LLC | 05-60401-BRL | 893,648 |
Rumford Power Associates Limited Partnership | 05-60467-BRL | 215,097 |
Russell City Energy Center, LLC | 05-60411-BRL | 138,915 |
San Joaquin Valley Energy Center, LLC | 05-60413-BRL | 4,543 |
Silverado Geothermal Resources, Inc. | 06-10198-BRL | 101,539 |
Skipanon Natural Gas, LLC | 05-60415-BRL | — |
South Point Energy Center, LLC | 05-60417-BRL | 6,132,654 |
South Point Holdings, LLC | 05-60419-BRL | — |
Stony Brook Cogeneration, Inc. | 05-60422-BRL | — |
Stony Brook Fuel Management Corp. | 05-60428-BRL | 2,292,721 |
Sutter Dryers, Inc. | 05-60430-BRL | — |
TBG Cogen Partners | 05-60432-BRL | 1,169,717 |
Texas City Cogeneration, L.P. | 05-60434-BRL | 426,564 |
Texas Cogeneration Company | 05-60435-BRL | — |
Texas Cogeneration Five, Inc. | 05-60436-BRL | — |
Texas Cogeneration One Company | 05-60437-BRL | — |
Thermal Power Company | 05-60438-BRL | — |
Thomassen Turbine Systems America, Inc. | 05-60354-BRL | 3,209 |
Tiverton Power Associates Limited Partnership | 05-60357-BRL | 220,561 |
Towantic Energy, L.L.C. | 05-60364-BRL | — |
VEC Holdings, LLC | 05-60365-BRL | — |
Venture Acquisition Company | 05-60368-BRL | — |
Vineyard Energy Center, LLC | 05-60373-BRL | — |
Wawayanda Energy Center, LLC | 05-60378-BRL | — |
Whatcom Cogeneration Partners, L.P. | 05-60468-BRL | — |
Zion Energy LLC | 05-60380-BRL | 1,089,324 |
| | |
TOTAL | | $ | 641,574,717 |
33
SCHEDULE VI
CALPINE CORPORATION
(Debtor-in-Possession)
CASE No. 05-60200 (Jointly Administered)
DEBTORS’ STATEMENT REGARDING INSURANCE POLICIES
For the Period from May 1, 2006, to May 31, 2006
All insurance policies are fully paid for the current period, including amounts owed for workers’ compensation and disability insurance.
34