Additional information about derivatives financial instruments - Sensitivity analysis of derivative financial instruments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | Dec. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 |
Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Percentage of deterioration of risk variables | 25.00% | |
Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Percentage of deterioration of risk variables | 50.00% | |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | $ (33) | $ (121) |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (33) | |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (300) | |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (567) | |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (33) | |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (42) | |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (53) | |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (33) | |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (35) | |
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (37) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (380) | (622) |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (380) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (705) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (1,029) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (380) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (395) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (409) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (380) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (405) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (427) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | TJLP interest rate decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (380) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | TJLP interest rate decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (403) | |
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap | TJLP interest rate decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (425) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | R$ depreciation | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (54) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (83) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (112) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (54) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (54) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (56) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (54) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (55) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (57) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | TJLP interest rate decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (54) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | TJLP interest rate decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (55) | |
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap | TJLP interest rate decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (56) | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | | (13) |
Fair value of assets | 25 | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 25 | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (57) | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (138) | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 25 | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 13 | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 1 | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 25 | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (2) | |
R$ fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (25) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (35) | (51) |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (34) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (150) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | R$ depreciation | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (266) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (34) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (39) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ interest rate inside Brazil decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (44) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (34) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (50) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (64) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | IPCA index decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (34) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | IPCA index decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (43) | |
IPCA vs. US$ fixed rate swap | IPCA index decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (52) | |
IPCA vs. CDI swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 85 | |
IPCA vs. CDI swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 53 | |
IPCA vs. CDI swap | Brazilian interest rate increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 25 | |
IPCA vs. CDI swap | IPCA index decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 85 | |
IPCA vs. CDI swap | IPCA index decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 67 | |
IPCA vs. CDI swap | IPCA index decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 50 | |
Protected item: R$ denominated debt linked to IPCA | IPCA index decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (67) | |
Protected item: R$ denominated debt linked to IPCA | IPCA index decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (50) | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | | $ (52) |
Fair value of assets | 23 | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | EUR depreciation | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 23 | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | EUR depreciation | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (158) | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | EUR depreciation | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (338) | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Euribor increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 23 | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Euribor increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 15 | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | Euribor increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 8 | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ Libor decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 23 | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ Libor decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 6 | |
EUR fixed rate vs. US$ fixed rate swap | US$ Libor decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (12) | |
Protected item: EUR denominated debt | EUR depreciation | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 158 | |
Protected item: EUR denominated debt | EUR depreciation | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 338 | |
Nickel sales fixed price protection - Forwards | Nickel price decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 24 | |
Nickel sales fixed price protection - Forwards | Nickel price decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (6) | |
Nickel sales fixed price protection - Forwards | Nickel price decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (37) | |
Protected item: Part of nickel revenues with fixed prices | Nickel price fluctuation | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 6 | |
Protected item: Part of nickel revenues with fixed prices | Nickel price fluctuation | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 37 | |
Purchase protection program - Nickel forwards | Nickel price increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 0 | |
Purchase protection program - Nickel forwards | Nickel price increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (1) | |
Purchase protection program - Nickel forwards | Nickel price increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (2) | |
Protected item: Part of costs linked to nickel prices | Nickel price increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 1 | |
Protected item: Part of costs linked to nickel prices | Nickel price increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 2 | |
Purchase protection program - Copper forwards | Copper price increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | 0 | |
Purchase protection program - Copper forwards | Copper price increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (0.2) | |
Purchase protection program - Copper forwards | Copper price increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (0.3) | |
Protected item: Part of costs linked to copper prices | Copper price increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 0.2 | |
Protected item: Part of costs linked to copper prices | Copper price increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 0.3 | |
WPM Warrants | WPM stock price decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 39 | |
WPM Warrants | WPM stock price decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 19 | |
WPM Warrants | WPM stock price decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 6 | |
Conversion options - VLI | VLI stock value increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (57) | |
Conversion options - VLI | VLI stock value increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (92) | |
Conversion options - VLI | VLI stock value increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (137) | |
Options - MBR | MBR stock value decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 251 | |
Options - MBR | MBR stock value decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 150 | |
Options - MBR | MBR stock value decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 74 | |
Embedded derivatives - Raw material purchase (nickel) | Nickel price increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 1 | |
Embedded derivatives - Raw material purchase (nickel) | Nickel price increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (7) | |
Embedded derivatives - Raw material purchase (nickel) | Nickel price increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (14) | |
Embedded derivatives - Raw material purchase (copper) | Copper price increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of assets | 0 | |
Embedded derivatives - Raw material purchase (copper) | Copper price increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (5) | |
Embedded derivatives - Raw material purchase (copper) | Copper price increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (9) | |
Embedded derivatives - Gas purchase | Pellet price increase | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (2) | |
Embedded derivatives - Gas purchase | Pellet price increase | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (4) | |
Embedded derivatives - Gas purchase | Pellet price increase | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (7) | |
Embedded derivatives - Guaranteed minimum return (VLI) | VLI stock value decrease | Probable | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (133) | |
Embedded derivatives - Guaranteed minimum return (VLI) | VLI stock value decrease | Scenario I | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | (262) | |
Embedded derivatives - Guaranteed minimum return (VLI) | VLI stock value decrease | Scenario II | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | |
Fair value of liabilities | $ (472) | |