The Company’s results of operations are dependent primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on its loan, mortgage-backed securities and investment portfolios and its cost of funds, consisting of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. General economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities, also significantly affect the Company’s results of operations. Future changes in applicable laws, regulations or government policies may also have a material impact on the Company.
The lower level of prepayments experienced during the three months ended September 30, 2004 positively impacted PennFed’s interest income and contributed to growth in the average balance of loans outstanding, when compared to the prior year period. The Company’s interest income is primarily driven by interest earned on residential first mortgage loans, which increased $1.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to the same period in the prior year. The strong origination levels and the significant slowdown in the amount of prepayments, relative to the prior year period, have contributed to the increase in residential first mortgage interest income. Overall, net interest income increased $2.1 million during the current year period compared to the prior year period and the net interest margin increased from 2.11% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to 2.38% during the three months ended September 30, 2004. Lower cost of funds on other borrowings due to the interest rate environment and the maturity of FHLB of New York advances were the primary factors responsible for a decrease of $518,000 in interest expense on FHLB of New York advances and other borrowings for the current year period compared to the prior year period. A slowdown in loan prepayments, growth in the loan portfolio and the repricing of certain deposits and other borrowings contributed to an expansion in the net interest margin.
With a slowdown in refinance activity, non-interest income has decreased compared to the level seen in the prior year period. Loan service fees related to modifications and prepayments were not at the levels seen in the three months ended September 30, 2003, when interest rates caused many customers to refinance their loans or modify to reduce the interest rate of their loans.
While non-interest expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2004 reflected the end of costs associated with funding the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (shares became fully allocated in the 2004 fiscal year), current expenses included a much less expensive replacement benefit plan (essentially an increase in the 401(k) match) as well as costs associated with the three branches opened during or since September 2003.
PennFed’s future earnings are inherently tied to the level of interest rates prevailing in the environment in which the Company operates. If interest rates increase, the Company’s interest expense on deposits and wholesale borrowings will increase at a faster pace than the effects will be seen in the Company’s interest income on loans. This effect on interest expense is due to the short-term repricing characteristics of a portion of the Company’s deposit and borrowing portfolios. As for interest income, loan commitments, generally locked in at receipt, will result in loans closed at below-market rates should rates continue to rise. As interest rates rise, a decline in loan prepayments will reduce cashflows available for reinvestment at higher rates. By emphasizing the origination of adjustable rate and biweekly loan products and continuing the sale of long-term fixed rate residential loans, while also focusing on increasing the balance of core and longer term certificates of deposit products and borrowings, PennFed can position itself to mitigate the effects of rising interest rates.
Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity at September 30, 2004 totaled $122.8 million compared to $118.4 million at June 30, 2004. The increase primarily reflects the net income recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and the exercise of stock options, including the related tax effect, partially offset by the repurchase of 177,800 shares of the Company’s outstanding stock at an average price of $15.27 per share and the declaration of a cash dividend.
Results of Operations
General. For the three months ended September 30, 2004, net income was $3.8 million, or $0.27 per diluted share, compared to net income of $3.4 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the comparable prior year period. Earnings per share amounts reflect the effect of a stock split described inNote 5. — Stock Split,in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income for the three months ended September 30, 2004 increased to $25.8 million from $23.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003. In general, the increase in interest and dividend income reflects a higher level of interest-earning assets due to strong originations and the slowdown in prepayments in the Company’s loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolios during the current year period. The effects of the increase were slightly offset by a lower yield earned on assets as a result of prepayments of higher yielding loans and the origination of loans at lower market interest rates during the last year. Average interest-earning assets were $1.881 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $1.716 billion for the comparable prior year period. The average yield earned on interest-earning assets decreased to 5.47% for the three months ended September 30, 2004 from 5.51% for the three months ended September 30, 2003.
Interest income on residential one- to four-family mortgage loans for the three months ended September 30, 2004 increased $1.4 million when compared to the prior year period. The increase in interest income on residential one- to four-family mortgage loans was due to an increase in the average balance of residential one- to four-family mortgage loans outstanding to $1.044 billion from $927.7 million for the prior year period, as the result of strong origination levels and a slowdown in prepayments during the current year period. Somewhat offsetting the increase in interest income on residential one- to four-family mortgage loans for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was a slight decrease in the average yield earned on this loan portfolio to 5.32% for the three months ended September 30, 2004 from 5.39% for the comparable prior year period, reflecting the payoff or refinance of higher yielding loans and the origination of lower yielding loans over the last twelve months.
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, interest income on commercial and multi-family real estate loans was relatively unchanged when compared to the prior year period. The average outstanding balance of commercial and multi-family real estate loans increased $9.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, when compared to the prior year period. The effects of the increase in the average balance of commercial and multi-family real estate loans was offset by a decrease in the average yield earned on this loan portfolio. The average yield decreased to 6.88% for the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared to 7.48% for the three months ended September 30, 2003. As with other loans, the payoff of higher yielding loans and the origination of loans at lower market interest rates has resulted in a decline in the yield of the commercial and multi-family real estate loan portfolio.
Interest income on consumer loans decreased $93,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, when compared to the prior year period. The decrease in interest income for this loan portfolio was reflective of the lower market interest rates. The average yield earned on consumer loans decreased to 5.21% for the three months ended September 30, 2004 from 5.65% for the prior year period. The effects of the lower average yield were nearly offset by an increase of $2.8 million in the average balance outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2004, when compared to the prior year period.
Interest income on investment securities and other interest-earning assets increased $817,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to the prior year period. The increase in interest income on investment securities and other interest-earning assets for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was due to a $58.2 million increase in the average balance outstanding, when compared to the prior year period. As a partial offset to the reduction in loans and mortgage-backed securities during the past year due to increased prepayments, additional investment securities were purchased. Further adding to the increase in interest income on investment securities and other interest-earning assets for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was a slight increase in the average yield earned on these securities and other interest-earning assets. The average yield increased to 5.42% for the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared to 5.39% for the three months ended September 30, 2003.
14
Interest income on the mortgage-backed securities portfolio increased $101,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, when compared to the prior year period. The average balance outstanding of mortgage-backed securities increased $7.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2003. As with investment securities, the purchase of mortgage-backed securities periodically over the last twelve months was used as a partial offset to the reduction in loans and mortgage-backed securities during the past year due to increased prepayments. In addition, the increase in interest income on mortgage-backed securities was partially attributable to an increase in the average yield earned on this securities portfolio to 5.09% for the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 5.05% for the prior year period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $70,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, when compared to the prior year period. While the Company’s cost of funds decreased, total average deposits and borrowings increased. The average rate on deposits and borrowings was 3.22% for the three months ended September 30, 2004, down from 3.55% for the prior year period, as a result of lower market interest rates. Total average deposits and borrowings increased $162.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2003.
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, the average rate paid on deposits decreased to 2.30% from 2.43% for the three months ended September 30, 2003. Average deposit balances increased $132.8 million from $1.074 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2003 to $1.207 billion for the current year period. The growth in deposits is partially reflective of the addition of three new branches opened during or since September 2003 and the addition of wholesale certificates of deposit.
The average cost of FHLB of New York advances for the three months ended September 30, 2004 increased to 5.71% from 5.66% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 while the average balance of FHLB of New York advances decreased $69.9 million during the current year period, when compared to the prior year period. For the three months ended September 30, 2004, the average balance of other borrowings increased $99.7 million when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2003. The average rate paid on other borrowings decreased significantly to 2.22% for the three months ended September 30, 2004 from 4.50% for the comparable prior year period.
Net Interest and Dividend Income. Net interest and dividend income before provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was $11.1 million compared to $8.9 million recorded in the prior year period. Average net interest-earning assets increased $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004, when compared to the prior year period. The net interest rate spread and net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2004 were 2.25% and 2.38%, respectively, an increase from 1.96% and 2.11% for the three months ended September 30, 2003. The net interest margin expanded during the current year period when compared to the prior year period principally due to a slowdown in loan prepayments, growth in the loan portfolio and the repricing of certain deposits and other borrowings.
Provision for Loan Losses. There was no provision for loan losses recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2004, which is consistent with the continuation of the Company’s historically low levels of non-accruing loans and loan chargeoffs. There was also no loan loss provision recorded in the comparable prior year period. Management believes the current allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. The allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2004 was $6.1 million compared to $6.2 million at June 30, 2004. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-accruing loans was 365.88% at September 30, 2004, compared to 286.39% at June 30, 2004. Non-accruing loans were $1.7 million at September 30, 2004 compared to $2.2 million at June 30, 2004. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans at September 30, 2004 was 0.45% compared to 0.48% at June 30, 2004, primarily due to the increase in the balance of the overall loan portfolio. See the discussion in this Form 10-Q under “Critical Accounting Policies”.
Non-Interest Income. For the three months ended September 30, 2004, non-interest income was $1.1 million compared to $2.0 million for the prior year period. The decrease in non-interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was primarily due to decreases in service charges and net gain on sales of loans, when compared to the prior year period.
Service charge income for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was $726,000, reflecting a decrease of $577,000 from the $1.3 million recorded for the prior year period. Service charges decreased during the three months ended September 30, 2004 principally due to a decline in fees associated with various loan prepayments and/or modifications.
15
During the three months ended September 30, 2004, the net gain on sales of loans was $24,000 compared to $334,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003. Approximately $2.6 million of conforming, fixed rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans were sold into the secondary market during the three months ended September 30, 2004. During the three months ended September 30, 2003, approximately $38.5 million of conforming, fixed rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans were sold into the secondary market. The reduction in loan sales can be attributed to a reduction in origination volumes coupled with borrowers’ increased interest in adjustable rate and biweekly loans, which are retained in portfolio. During the current year period, the Company also sold approximately $1.9 million of fixed rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans to another financial institution, compared to $17.7 million sold to other financial institutions during the three months ended September 30, 2003.
Non-Interest Expenses. Non-interest expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2004 were $6.1 million, or 1.26% of average assets. For the comparable prior year period, non-interest expenses were $5.7 million, or 1.28% of average assets. While current period expense levels reflect the end of costs associated with funding the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”), expenses in the current year period include a much less expensive replacement benefit plan for the ESOP, increased advertising expense and costs associated with the three branches opened during or since September 2003.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $2.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was 37.4% compared to 35.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to adjustments in valuation allowances established against state deferred tax assets.
16
Analysis of Net Interest Income
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and reflects the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the periods indicated. Such yields and costs are derived from average daily balances. The average balance of loans receivable includes non-accruing loans. The yields and costs include fees which are considered adjustments to yields.
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
| 2004 | | 2003 |
|
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Average Outstanding Balance
| | Interest Earned/ Paid
| | Yield/ Rate (1)
| | Average Outstanding Balance
| | Interest Earned/ Paid
| | Yield/ Rate (1) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| (Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One- to four-family mortgage | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
loans | $ | 1,043,983 | | $ | 13,919 | | | 5.32 | % | | $ | 927,739 | | $ | 12,530 | | | 5.39 | % |
Commercial and multi-family real | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
estate loans | | 170,603 | | | 2,988 | | | 6.88 | | | | 161,036 | | | 3,067 | | | 7.48 | |
Consumer loans | | 119,621 | | | 1,570 | | | 5.21 | | | | 116,774 | | | 1,663 | | | 5.65 | |
|
| |
| | | | |
| |
| | | |
Total loans receivable | | 1,334,207 | | | 18,477 | | | 5.51 | | | | 1,205,549 | | | 17,260 | | | 5.70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds sold | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | 28,745 | | | 71 | | | 0.97 | |
Investment securities and other | | 450,365 | | | 6,099 | | | 5.42 | | | | 392,195 | | | 5,282 | | | 5.39 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | 96,538 | | | 1,229 | | | 5.09 | | | | 89,398 | | | 1,128 | | | 5.05 | |
|
| |
| | | | |
| |
| | | |
Total interest-earning assets | | 1,881,110 | | $ | 25,805 | | | 5.47 | | | | 1,715,887 | | $ | 23,741 | | | 5.51 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-interest earning assets | | 61,912 | | | | | | | | | | 63,256 | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 1,943,022 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,779,143 | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits and borrowings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market and demand deposits | $ | 167,246 | | $ | 95 | | | 0.23 | % | | $ | 172,117 | | $ | 87 | | | 0.20 | % |
Savings deposits | | 428,319 | | | 2,416 | | | 2.24 | | | | 360,394 | | | 2,289 | | | 2.52 | |
Certificates of deposit | | 611,354 | | | 4,501 | | | 2.92 | | | | 541,653 | | | 4,214 | | | 3.09 | |
|
| |
| | | | |
| |
| | | |
Total deposits | | 1,206,919 | | | 7,012 | | | 2.30 | | | | 1,074,164 | | | 6,590 | | | 2.43 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FHLB of New York advances | | 432,992 | | | 6,315 | | | 5.71 | | | | 502,865 | | | 7,260 | | | 5.66 | |
Other borrowings | | 123,338 | | | 699 | | | 2.22 | | | | 23,688 | | | 272 | | | 4.50 | |
Junior subordinated debentures | | 42,042 | | | 708 | | | 6.66 | | | | 41,999 | | | 682 | | | 6.42 | |
|
| |
| | | | |
| |
| | | |
Total deposits and borrowings | | 1,805,291 | | $ | 14,734 | | | 3.22 | | | | 1,642,716 | | $ | 14,804 | | | 3.55 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | 17,785 | | | | | | | | | | 18,828 | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities | | 1,823,076 | | | | | | | | | | 1,661,544 | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | 119,946 | | | | | | | | | | 117,599 | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
equity | $ | 1,943,022 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,779,143 | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income and net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
interest rate spread | | | | $ | 11,071 | | | 2.25 | % | | | | | $ | 8,937 | | | 1.96 | % |
| |
| |
| | | |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest-earning assets and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
interest margin | $ | 75,819 | | | | | | 2.38 | % | | $ | 73,171 | | | | | | 2.11 | % |
|
| | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of interest-earning assets to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
deposits and borrowings | | | | | | | | 104.20 | % | | | | | | | | | 104.45 | % |
| | |
| | | | | |
| |
(1) Annualized.
17
Non-Performing Assets
The table below sets forth the Company’s amounts and categories of non-performing assets. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when the collection of principal or interest becomes delinquent more than 90 days. There are no loans delinquent more than 90 days which are still accruing. Real estate owned represents assets acquired in settlement of loans (generally through foreclosure or a deed in lieu) and is shown net of valuation allowances.
| September 30, 2004
| | June 30, 2004
| |
|
| |
| |
| (Dollars in thousands) | |
Non-accruing loans: | | | | | | |
One- to four-family | $ | 1,632 | | $ | 2,158 | |
Commercial and multi-family | | — | | | — | |
Consumer | | 27 | | | 24 | |
|
| |
| |
Total non-accruing loans | | 1,659 | | | 2,182 | |
| | | | | | |
Real estate owned, net | | 473 | | | — | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | | | |
Total non-performing assets | | 2,132 | | | 2,182 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | | | |
Total risk elements | $ | 2,132 | | $ | 2,182 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | | | |
Non-accruing loans as a percentage of total loans | | 0.12 | % | | 0.17 | % |
|
| |
| |
| | | | | | |
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets | | 0.11 | % | | 0.11 | % |
|
| |
| |
| | | | | | |
Total risk elements as a percentage of total assets | | 0.11 | % | | 0.11 | % |
|
| |
| |
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap. The interest rate risk inherent in assets and liabilities may be determined by analyzing the extent to which such assets and liabilities are “interest rate sensitive” and by measuring an institution’s interest rate sensitivity “gap.” An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a defined time period if it matures or reprices within that period. The difference or mismatch between the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within a defined period and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within the same period is defined as the interest rate sensitivity gap. An institution is considered to have a negative gap if the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within a specified time period exceeds the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within the same period. If more interest-earning assets than interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice within a specified period, then the institution is considered to have a positive gap. Accordingly, in a rising interest rate environment, in an institution with a negative gap, the cost of its rate sensitive liabilities would theoretically rise at a faster pace than the yield on its rate sensitive assets, thereby diminishing future net interest income. In a falling interest rate environment, a negative gap would indicate that the cost of rate sensitive liabilities would decline at a faster pace than the yield on rate sensitive assets and improve net interest income. For an institution with a positive gap, the reverse would be expected.
At September 30, 2004, the Company’s total deposits and borrowings maturing or repricing within one year exceeded its total interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within one year by $88.8 million, representing a one year negative gap of 4.52% of total assets, compared to a one year negative gap of $148.6 million, or 7.81%, of total assets at June 30, 2004. The Company’s gap position changed from June 30, 2004 primarily due to a decline in market interest rates, which resulted in a moderate increase in prepayment activity assumptions on loans and mortgage-backed securities. The accelerated cash flows were also affected by the early redemption of a callable agency security. Additionally, due to the recent decrease in long-term interest rates, certain investment securities with callable features are now assumed to be redeemed within one year. Furthermore, the short-term estimated cash flows of the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities decreased due to the extension of medium-term borrowings and certificates of deposits maturing beyond one year.
In evaluating the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk, certain limitations inherent in the method of interest rate gap analysis must be considered. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgages, have features which restrict changes in interest rates in the short-term and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels may deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the gap position. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase. The Company considers all of these factors in monitoring its exposure to interest rate risk.
18
Net Portfolio Value. The Company’s interest rate sensitivity is regularly monitored by management through additional interest rate risk (“IRR”) measures, including an IRR “Exposure Measure” or “Post-Shock” NPV ratio and a “Sensitivity Measure.” A low Post-Shock NPV ratio indicates greater exposure to IRR. Greater exposure can result from a high sensitivity to changes in interest rates. The Sensitivity Measure is the change in the NPV ratio, in basis points, caused by a 2% increase or decrease in rates, whichever produces a larger decline. At least quarterly, and generally monthly, management models the change in net portfolio value (“NPV”) over a variety of interest rate scenarios. NPV is the present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. An NPV ratio, in any interest rate scenario, is defined as the NPV in that rate scenario divided by the market value of assets in the same scenario. Assumptions used in calculating interest rate sensitivity are periodically reviewed and modified as appropriate.
As of September 30, 2004, due to historically low interest rate levels, the effect of a 2% decrease in interest rates could not be simulated. As of September 30, 2004, the Bank’s internally generated initial NPV ratio was 9.90%. Following a 2% increase in interest rates, the Bank’s Post-Shock NPV ratio was 8.46%. The change in the NPV ratio, or the Bank’s Sensitivity Measure, was negative 1.44%. As of September 30, 2004, the Company’s internally generated initial NPV ratio was 9.53%, the Post-Shock ratio was 8.04%, and the Sensitivity Measure was negative 1.49%. As of June 30, 2004, the Bank’s Post-Shock NPV ratio and Sensitivity Measure were 7.87% and negative 1.72%, respectively, and the Company’s Post-Shock NPV ratio and Sensitivity Measure were 7.30% and negative 1.91%, respectively. Both the Post-Shock NPV ratio and the Sensitivity Measure improved since June 30, 2004. The improvement in the Sensitivity Measure is primarily attributable to a decline in the projected duration of assets and an extension in the duration of liabilities. Asset duration decreased principally due to a moderate increase in prepayment estimates due to a decline in longer term market rates. Liability duration increased with the extension of wholesale borrowing maturities, growth in core deposit balances and longer term certificates of deposit. Variances between the Bank’s and the Company’s NPV ratios are attributable to balance sheet items which are adjusted during consolidation, such as investments, intercompany borrowings and capital.
Internally generated NPV measurements are based on simulations which utilize institution specific assumptions, including discount and decay rates, and generally result in lower levels of presumed interest rate risk than Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) measurements indicate.
The OTS measures the Bank’s IRR on a quarterly basis using data from the quarterly Thrift Financial Reports filed by the Bank with the OTS, coupled with non-institution specific assumptions which are based on national averages. As of June 30, 2004 (the latest date for which information is available), the Bank’s initial NPV ratio, as measured by the OTS, was 8.82%, the Bank’s Post-Shock ratio was 4.77% and the Sensitivity Measure was negative 4.05%.
In addition to monitoring NPV and gap, management also monitors the duration of assets and liabilities and the effects on net interest income resulting from parallel and non-parallel increases or decreases in rates.
At September 30, 2004, based on its internally generated simulation models, the Company’s consolidated net interest income projected for one year forward would decrease 5.3% from the base case, or current market, as a result of an immediate and sustained 2% increase in interest rates. Although interest rates are not expected to rise 2% immediately, interest rate projections over the next year assume a rise in interest rates and a tightening of the rate spread between the 3-month U.S. treasury bill and the 10-year U.S. treasury bond. If short term rates rise more quickly than long term rates, interest rate risk measures would be expected to improve but earnings would likely be negatively affected.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, and borrowings from the FHLB of New York. While scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows and early loan repayments are more influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions and competition. The Company has competitively set rates on deposit products for selected terms and, when necessary, has supplemented deposits with longer-term or less expensive alternative sources of funds.
19
The Bank maintains appropriate levels of liquid assets. The Company’s most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, U.S. government agency securities and mortgage-backed securities. The levels of these assets are dependent on the Bank’s operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period.
In the event the Company should require funds beyond its ability to generate them internally, additional sources of funds are available through the use of FHLB of New York advances, reverse repurchase agreements and various overnight repricing lines of credit. The Company uses its liquid resources principally to fund maturing certificates of deposit and deposit withdrawals, to purchase loans and securities, to fund existing and future loan commitments, and to meet operating expenses. Management believes that loan repayments and other sources of funds will be adequate to meet the Company’s foreseeable liquidity needs. Future liquidity requirements are not expected to be significantly different from historical experience.
The Company’s cash needs for the three months ended September 30, 2004 were provided by operating activities, including the sale of loans, an increase in deposits, an increase in other borrowings, and principal repayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities. During the three months ended September 30, 2004, the cash provided was used to repay FHLB of New York advances and other borrowings and to fund investing activities, which included the origination of loans. During the three months ended September 30, 2003, the cash needs of the Company were provided by operating activities, including the sale of loans, proceeds from maturities of investment securities and principal repayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities. During this period, the cash provided was used for investing activities, which included the origination of loans and the purchase of investment and mortgage-backed securities, as well as to fund a decrease in deposits and the repayment of FHLB of New York advances and other borrowings. Additionally, during the three months ended September 30, 2003, the cash provided was used to fund an investment in BOLI.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company’s most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk, as the majority of its assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates. See the discussion in this Form 10-Q under “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Interest Rate Sensitivity.”
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: |
An evaluation of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) was carried out as of September 30, 2004 under the supervision and with the participation of the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Registrant’s senior management. The Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2004, the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
(b) | Changes in Internal Controls: |
During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, no change occurred in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
20
PART II — Other Information
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings None. |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table summarizes the Company’s stock repurchase activity for each month during the three months ended September 30, 2004. All shares repurchased during the three months ended September 30, 2004 were repurchased in the open market. |
| | Total Number of Shares Repurchased
| | Average Price Paid Per Share
| | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan
| | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Repurchases for the Month | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 1 - July 31, 2004 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 447,800 |
August 1 - August 31, 2004 | | | 128,200 | | $ | 15.21 | | | 128,200 | | | 319,600 |
Sept. 1 - Sept. 30, 2004 | | | 49,600 | | $ | 15.43 | | | 49,600 | | | 270,000 |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Total repurchases | | | 177,800 | | $ | 15.27 | | | 177,800 | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| At September 30, 2004, the Company had one repurchase plan under which it had not yet completed all approved repurchases. This repurchase plan was publicly announced February 27, 2004 and authorized the Company to repurchase up to 5%, or 670,000, of its outstanding shares over the following 18 months. |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities None. |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None. |
Item 5. | Other Information None. |
Item 6. | Exhibits See Exhibit Index. |
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
November 9, 2004 ———————– Date | | PENNFED FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Joseph L. LaMonica —————————————— Joseph L. LaMonica President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
November 9, 2004 ———————– Date | |
By: /s/ Claire M. Chadwick —————————————— Claire M. Chadwick Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
22
EXHIBIT INDEX
Regulation S-K Exhibit Number
| | Document | | Reference to Prior Filing or Exhibit Number |
|
2 | | Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession | | None |
3 (i) | | Articles of Incorporation | | (a) |
3 (ii) | | Bylaws | | (a) |
4 | | Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures | | (b) |
4 (i) | | Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement | | (c) |
10 | | Material contracts: | | |
| | (a) Employee Stock Ownership Plan | | (d) |
| | (b) 1994 Amended and Restated Stock Option and Incentive Plan | | (e) |
| | (c) Employment Agreement with Joseph L. LaMonica | | (f) |
| | (d) Employment Agreement with Patrick D. McTernan | | (f) |
| | (e) Employment Agreement with Jeffrey J. Carfora | | (f) |
| | (f) Employment Agreement with Barbara A. Flannery | | (f) |
| | (g) Employment Agreement with Claire M. Chadwick | | (f) |
| | (h) Employment Agreement with Maria F. Magurno | | (f) |
| | (i) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | (g) |
| | (a) First Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | (h) |
| | (j) Supplemental Executive Death Benefit Plan | | (h) |
| | (k) Outside Director’s Retirement Plan | | (g) |
| | (m) Form of Consulting Agreement | | (g) |
11 | | Statement re: computation of per share earnings | | 11 |
18 | | Letter re: change in accounting principles | | None |
19 | | Report furnished to security holders | | None |
22 | | Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders | | None |
23 | | Consents of experts and counsel | | None |
24 | | Power of Attorney | | None |
31.1 | | Certification Required by Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) | | |
| | (Chief Executive Officer) | | 31.1 |
31.2 | | Certification Required by Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) | | |
| | (Chief Financial Officer) | | 31.2 |
32 | | Certifications Required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code | | 32 |
99 | | Additional Exhibits | | Not applicable |
| (a) | Included as appendices to the Company’s definitive proxy statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 2003 (File No. 0-24040). Such previously filed document is hereby incorporated by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
| (b) | The Company hereby agrees to furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, the instruments defining the rights of the holders of each issue of the Company’s long-term debt. |
| (c) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 1996 as amended on Form 8-A/A (the “Form 8-A/A”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 1998, as further amended on Form 8-A/A-2 (the “Form 8-A/A-2”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 1998 and as further amended on Form 8-A/A-3 (the “Form 8-A/A-3”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2004. The First Amendment to the Stockholders Protection Rights Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-A/A, the Second Amendment to the Stockholders Protection Rights Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-A/A-2, the Third Amendment to the Stockholders Protection Rights Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2003 and the Fourth Amendment to the Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-A/A-3. These documents are hereby incorporated by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
| (d) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 1994 (Registration No. 33-76854). Such previously filed document is hereby incorporated by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
23
| (e) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24, 2001 (File No. 0-24040). Such previously filed document is hereby incorporated by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
| (f) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 15, 2004 (File No. 0-24040). All of such previously filed documents are hereby incorporated by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
| (g) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 2003 (File No. 0-24040). Such previously filed document is hereby incorporated by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
| (h) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004 (File No. 0-24040). Such previously filed document is hereby incorporated by reference in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
24