Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block] | Organization and Basis of Presentation Organization Liberty Property Trust (the “Trust”) is a self-administered and self-managed Maryland real estate investment trust (a “REIT”). Substantially all of the Trust’s assets are owned directly or indirectly, and substantially all of the Trust’s operations are conducted directly or indirectly, by its subsidiary, Liberty Property Limited Partnership, a Pennsylvania limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership” and, together with the Trust and their consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company”). The Trust is the sole general partner and also a limited partner of the Operating Partnership, owning 97.7% of the common equity of the Operating Partnership at March 31, 2018 . The Company owns and operates industrial properties nationally and owns and operates office properties in a focused group of office markets. Additionally, the Company owns certain assets in the United Kingdom. Unless otherwise indicated, the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements apply to both the Trust and the Operating Partnership. The terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” mean the Trust and Operating Partnership collectively. The Operating Partnership is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) of the Trust as the limited partners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights. The Trust is the primary beneficiary of the Operating Partnership as it has the power to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership and the rights to absorb 97.7% of the net income of the Operating Partnership. The Trust has no significant assets or liabilities other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. As the Operating Partnership is already consolidated in the balance sheets of the Trust, the identification of this entity as a VIE has no impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Trust. In addition, the Company holds a 20% interest in Liberty/Comcast 1701 JFK Boulevard, LP which was determined to be a VIE. The Company determined that it is not the primary beneficiary as the Company and its third party partner share control of the joint venture. The Company's maximum exposure to loss is equal to its equity investment in the joint venture which was $77.1 million and $17.3 million as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. See Note 12 for further discussion of Liberty/Comcast 1701 JFK Boulevard, LP. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 . In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements for these interim periods have been included. The results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for a full fiscal year. Revenue Recognition In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance (except revenue in the scope of other accounting standards, including standards related to leasing). Subsequently, the FASB issued the following standards related to ASU 2014-09: ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations; ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing ; ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients ; ASU 2017-05 , Gains and losses from the derecognition of nonfinancial assets (Topic 610-20) , and ASU 2017-13, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to the Staff Announcement at the July 20, 2017 EITF Meeting and Rescission of Prior SEC Staff Announcements and Observer Comments (collectively, the “New Revenue Standards”). The New Revenue Standards provide a unified model to determine how revenue is recognized. In accordance with the New Revenue Standards, the Company performs the following steps: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations within the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied. The Company evaluated each of its revenue streams: lease agreement revenue, development service fee revenue, deferred land sale revenue and gain or loss on sale of nonfinancial assets and adopted the New Revenue Standards effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. The Company concluded that there are no revenue streams from its lease agreements that are covered by the New Revenue Standards with the possible exception of non-lease components as further discussed below. The New Revenue Standards did not have an impact on the amount and timing of recognizing the Company's development service fee income. The Company recognizes development service fee income on a variable basis as a percentage of costs incurred on third party development contracts. Property development services, which are a single performance obligation, continue to be satisfied and recognized over time. The Company measures its progress toward completing the performance obligation under each arrangement. The measurement of the transfer of value to the customer for these services utilizes the input method (actual costs incurred against anticipated project costs) since this method best depicts the actual transfer of value promised to the customer. The total amount of consideration to be received from these projects is assessed on a quarterly basis. Based on existing contracts, completion is anticipated by the end of 2018. The Company recognizes revenues from improving land sites and selling the underlying land on behalf of its development partner to home builders in the United Kingdom. These agreements contain a pre-emption clause and a seller's call option. The Company recognizes revenue as the pre-emption period or seller's call option lapses utilizing the output method. There was no revenue recognized for such contracts during the three months ended March 31, 2018 or March 31, 2017. The New Revenue Standards did not have an impact on the gain or loss of sale of nonfinancial assets. The New Revenue Standards require the Company to derecognize nonfinancial assets once it transfers control of a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in-substance nonfinancial asset. Additionally, when the Company transfers its controlling interest in a nonfinancial asset, but retains a noncontrolling ownership interest, the Company is required to measure any noncontrolling interest it receives or retains at fair value. The guidance requires companies to recognize a full gain or loss on the transaction. See Notes 5 and 7 for further discussion of sales of nonfinancial assets during the three months ended March 31, 2018. Estimated gross revenue related to the remaining performance obligations under existing contracts (before allocation of related costs and expenses) as of March 31, 2018 that will be recognized as revenue in future periods was approximately $85.9 million , which is expected to be recognized substantially in 2018 and the remainder through 2020 . The Company adopted the practical expedient to assess the recognition of revenue for open contracts during the transition period. There was no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings recorded at January 1, 2018. Development Fee Contracts From time to time, the Company enters into contracts to develop properties on a fee basis for joint ventures in which the Company holds an interest or for unrelated third parties. In these cases the Company typically agrees to be responsible for all aspects of the development of the project (and, in certain instances, related infrastructure) and to guarantee the timely lien-free completion of construction of the project and the payment, subject to certain exceptions, of cost overruns incurred in the development of the project. If the Company encounters construction delays or unexpected costs in the development of these projects or is otherwise unable to recover the costs it incurs, the resulting unrecovered costs and potential payments to customers could generate losses that would adversely affect the Company's cash flow and net income. On a quarterly basis, the Company applies reasonable estimates and judgments to assess whether or not it is necessary to accrue any estimated future losses with respect to such contracts. The Company recognized an aggregate net loss of $1.7 million on these contracts during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and an aggregate net profit of $481,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2017. Should external or internal circumstances change requiring the Company to adjust the estimated future cash flows from these development contracts or in a manner that indicates that such development contracts may result in a loss, the Company could be required to record additional losses in the future. See Note 12 where certain fee development matters relating specifically to the Comcast Technology Center are discussed in further detail. Systems Implementation Expense The Company is incurring costs associated with its efforts to implement new financial and operating systems in certain cloud computing arrangements. The Company evaluated the arrangements in accordance with ASU 2015-05, “ Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement” and concluded that such arrangements are service contracts under the standard. Accordingly, the Company expenses substantially all costs as incurred. Certain costs that relate to the software service agreements received over time are set up as prepaid and expensed over the applicable service period. These costs include license costs incurred during the implementation period as well as consulting, personnel and other direct costs related to the implementation. The Company incurred $706,000 of systems implementation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018. There were no such costs for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Expensed Pursuit Costs The Company capitalizes pre-development and pre-acquisition costs incurred in pursuit of new development, land or operating property opportunities for which the Company currently believes future development or asset acquisition is probable. Future development and the consummation of acquisitions is dependent upon various factors, including, as appropriate, due diligence, zoning and regulatory approval, rental market conditions and construction costs. Initial pre-development and pre-acquisition costs incurred on future development, land or operating property acquisitions that is not considered probable are expensed as incurred. In addition, if the status of a future development, land or operating property acquisitions by the Company is no longer probable, any capitalized pre-development or pre-acquisition costs are written off. The Company expensed costs related to pursuit costs of $324,000 and $32,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017, respectively. In the third quarter of 2017, the Company began to separately classify expensed pursuit costs in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. These costs, which were reclassified retrospectively for all periods, were formerly classified as general and administrative expense. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. Early adoption of ASU 2016-02 is permitted. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. Revenue related to the lease component of the contract will be recognized on a straight-line basis, while revenue related to the non-lease component will be recognized under the provisions of the New Revenue Standards. For lease agreements longer than one year in which the Company is the lessee, the Company will measure the present value of the future lease payments and recognize a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability on its balance sheet. In addition, the new standard states that only direct leasing costs may be capitalized. The Company has assembled a project team that is working to analyze and evaluate the impact of the guidance on its consolidated financial statements. The team is monitoring activity with respect to possible amendments to ASU 2016-02, particularly the amendment that provides a practical expedient to lessors by removing the requirement to separate lease and non-lease components. The Company expects to adopt the new lease standard on January 1, 2019. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 is designed to clarify how entities should classify cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 became effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. The standard requires retrospective application. The adoption of the ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”) , which requires that restricted cash and cash equivalents be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the consolidated statements of cash flows. The new standard is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods therein. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 as of December 31, 2017. The impact of the implementation of ASU 2016-18 was as follows: Three months ended March 31, 2017 Net cash provided by operating activities (prior to adoption of ASU 2016-18) $ 86,382 Impact of including restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents (1,902 ) Net cash provided by operating activities (after adoption of ASU 2016-18) $ 84,480 In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASU 2017-05”). ASU 2017-05 is designed to provide guidance on how to recognize gain and losses on sales, including partial sale, of nonfinancial assets to noncustomers. The Company adopted ASU 2017-05 effective January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective method and the adoption did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”). ASU 2017-09 clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. ASU 2017-09 became effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. The new guidance will be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date. The adoption of the ASU 2017-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (“ASU 2017-12”). ASU 2017-12 is designed to better align a company’s financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. ASU 2017-12 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted using a modified retrospective transition method. This adoption method will require the Company to recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2017-12 as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year that an entity adopts the update. The Company is evaluating the impact ASU 2017-12 will have on the Company's financial position and results of operations. |