The following table illustrates the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities affected Republic's interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), (ii) changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume) and (iii) the net change. The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.
Non-interest Income
Non interest income increased $1.1 million or 10% during the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005, due primarily to the net gain on sale of RALs and an increase in service charges on deposit accounts.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased $851,000, or 26%, during the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005, due primarily to growth in the Company’s checking account base supported by the Bank’s “Overdraft Honor” program, which permits selected clients to overdraft their accounts up to a predetermined dollar amount (up to a maximum of $750) for the Bank’s customary overdraft fee. The Company also increased its overdraft fee by 7% in August 2005 while the total number of accounts eligible for the “Overdraft Honor” program increased to 57,000 at March 31, 2006 from 51,000 at March 31, 2005.
ERC/ERD fees decreased $1.6 million, or 31%, to $3.4 million during the first quarter of 2006. This decrease was due to a 27% decrease in ERC/ERD volume from prior year resulting primarily from the discontinuation of business with one large integrated software partner.
Net gain on sale of RALs was $2 million for the first quarter of 2006 as the Company completed its first securitization ever of a portion of the RAL portfolio. See additional discussion above under “Tax Refund Solutions” and under Footnote 11 “Segment Information” of Item 1. “Financial Statements.”
Non-interest Expenses
Non-interest expenses increased $2.6 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Salaries and employee benefits increased $1.8 million during the quarter, attributable to annual merit increases and increased incentive compensation accruals and stock option compensation expense. The Company recorded stock option expense of $216,000 in 2006 related to the adoption of SFAS 123R, while full time equivalent employees (“FTE’s”) increased from 641 at March 31, 2005 to 662 at March 31, 2006.
Occupancy and equipment expense increased $367,000, or 11%, during the first quarter of 2006. The increase in occupancy and equipment was primarily attributable to general maintenance and repairs, increased rent for the Company’s operation’s areas, and relocation expenses of several departments within the Company.
COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT MARCH 31, 2006 AND DECEMBER 31, 2005
Loans
Net loans, primarily consisting of secured real estate loans, increased by $50 million to $2.1 billion at March 31, 2006. This growth is partly attributable to the residential real estate portfolio, which increased $26 million during the first quarter of 2006 as a result of the Company’s promotional “$299 Closing Cost” products.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Provision for Loan Losses
The Company posted a provision for loan losses of $1.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, compared to a provision of $1.6 million for the same period in 2005. Also included in the provision for loan losses were $883,000 and $1.6 million for losses associated with RALs during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The banking segment provision for loan losses increased $418,000 during the first quarter of 2006 primarily due to loan growth.
The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans declined slightly to 0.52% at March 31, 2006 as compared to 0.53% as of December 31, 2005. Management believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for loan losses at March 31, 2006.
31
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses and selected ratios follows:
Table 3 - Summary of Loan Loss Experience
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31 | |
(dollars in thousands) | 2006 | | 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period | $ | 11,009 | | $ | 13,554 | |
Charge offs: | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | |
Residential | | (300 | ) | | (77 | ) |
Commercial | | (30 | ) | | (102 | ) |
Construction | | - | | | - | |
Commercial | | - | | | - | |
Consumer | | (91 | ) | | (126 | ) |
Home equity | | (54 | ) | | (41 | ) |
Tax Refund Solutions | | (876 | ) | | (1,928 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | (409 | ) | | - | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | | (1,760 | ) | | (2,274 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: | | | | | | |
Real estate: | | | | | | |
Residential | | 28 | | | 7 | |
Commercial | | 5 | | | 4 | |
Construction | | 79 | | | - | |
Commercial | | 4 | | | 10 | |
Consumer | | 79 | | | 7 | |
Home equity | | 3 | | | 93 | |
Tax Refund Solutions | | 475 | | | 600 | |
Discontinued operations | | 64 | | | - | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | | 737 | | | 721 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan charge offs / recoveries | | (1,023 | ) | | (1,553 | ) |
Provision for loan losses from continuing operations | | 1,330 | | | 1,590 | |
Provision for loan losses from discontinued operations | | (293 | ) | | 230 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at end of period | $ | 11,023 | | $ | 13,821 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans | | 0.52 | % | | 0.74 | % |
Net loan charge offs to average loans outstanding (annualized) | | 0.13 | | | 0.34 | |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans | | 184 | | | 203 | |
Deposits
Total deposits increased $34 million from December 31, 2005 to $1.6 billion at March 31, 2006. Interest-bearing deposits increased $20 million while non interest-bearing deposits increased $14 million from December 31, 2005 to March 31, 2006.
The increase in non interest-bearing accounts relates primarily to short-term funds received from TRS. Due to the seasonality of the business, the non interest-bearing funds from TRS are expected to decline to near $0 by the end of the second quarter of 2006.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Short-term Borrowings
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings increased $22 million during the first quarter of 2006 to $315 million. The majority of this increase was attributable to one large cash management account which increased $23 million. Based on the transactional nature of the Company’s cash management accounts, repurchase agreement balances are subject to large fluctuations on a daily basis.
32
FHLB Borrowings
FHLB Borrowings decreased $67 million, or 12%, to $495 million at March 31, 2006. Maturing advances were paid off during the quarter as the Company utilized excess cash from maturing available for sale securities.
Approximately $115 million of the Company’s advances have overnight maturities with a weighted average coupon rate of 4.99% . Approximately $304 million of the Company’s advances are fixed, with maturities ranging from less than one to five years. The current weighted average maturity of the fixed FHLB advances at March 31, 2006 is 2 years with a weighted average coupon rate of 4.03% .
The remaining FHLB borrowings consist of convertible advances with original fixed rate periods ranging from one to five years and original maturities ranging from three to ten years. At the end of their respective fixed rate periods, the FHLB has the right to convert the borrowings to floating rate advances tied to LIBOR. If the FHLB elects to convert the debt to a floating rate instrument, Republic has the right to pay off the advances without penalty. During the first quarter of 2006, the FHLB converted $15 million in advances to floating rate, overnight borrowings. At March 31, 2006, the Company still had $75 million of these borrowings with a weighted average coupon of 4.86% that were eligible to be converted by the FHLB. Based on market conditions at this time, management believes it is likely these advances could be converted to floating rate borrowings by the FHLB during 2006.
LIQUIDITY
Republic maintains sufficient liquidity to fund loan demand and routine deposit withdrawal activity. Liquidity is managed by maintaining sufficient liquid assets in the form of investment securities. Funding and cash flows can also be realized by the sale of securities available for sale, principal paydowns on loans and MBSs and proceeds realized from loans held for sale. The Company’s liquidity is impacted by its ability to sell securities, which is limited, due to the level of securities that are needed to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes, as required by law. At March 31, 2006, these securities had a fair market value of $394 million. Republic’s banking centers and its Internet site, www.republicbank.com, provide access to retail deposit markets. These retail deposits, if offered at attractive rates, have historically been a source of additional funding when needed. In addition, brokered certificates of deposit have provided a source of liquidity to the Company when needed to fund loan growth.
Traditionally, the Company has also utilized secured and unsecured borrowing lines to supplement its funding requirements. At March 31, 2006, the Company had capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank to borrow an additional $223 million. The Company also had $175 million in approved unsecured line of credit facilities available at March 31, 2006 through various third party sources.
The Company’s principal source of funds for dividend payments is dividends received from the Bank. Kentucky and Indiana banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to the Parent Company by the Bank without prior approval of the respective states’ banking regulators. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year’s net profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years. At March 31, 2006, Republic Bank & Trust Company and Republic Bank & Trust Company of Indiana could, without prior approval, declare dividends of approximately $38 million and $241,000, respectively. The Company does not plan to pay dividends from Republic Bank & Trust Company of Indiana in the foreseeable future.
Also, see section titled “Tax Refund Solutions” for discussion of the securitization of the RAL portfolio and its impact on liquidity.
CAPITAL
Total stockholders’ equity increased from $214 million at December 31, 2005 to $222 million at March 31, 2006. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily attributable to net income earned during 2006 reduced by dividends declared, the repurchase of Company stock and the decline in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) as a result of a decrease in the value of the available for sale securities portfolio.
33
During the first quarter of 2006 the Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock except for shares acquired through stock option exercises. During the third quarter of 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of an additional 262,500 shares, from time to time, if market conditions are deemed favorable to the Company. The repurchase program will remain effective until the number of shares authorized is repurchased or until Republic’s Board of Directors terminates the program. As of March 31, 2006, the Company had 48,697 shares which could be purchased under the current program.
Regulatory Capital Requirements – The Parent Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Republic’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Parent Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities and certain off balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
The FDIC has categorized the Bank as well capitalized. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum Total Risk Based, Tier I Risk Based and Tier I Leverage ratios. Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy within a framework that makes capital requirements, in part, dependent on the individual risk profiles of financial institutions. Republic continues to exceed the regulatory requirements for Tier I leverage, Tier I risk based and total risk based capital. Republic and the Bank intend to maintain a capital position that meets or exceeds the “well capitalized” requirements as defined by the Federal Reserve and FDIC. Republic’s average capital to average assets ratio was 7.99% at March 31, 2006 compared to 8.00% at December 31, 2005. Formal measurements of the capital ratios for the Company and Republic Bank & Trust Company are performed at each quarter end.
In August 2005, Republic Bancorp Capital Trust (“RBCT”), an unconsolidated trust subsidiary of Republic Bancorp, Inc., issued $40 million in Trust Preferred Securities (“TPS”). The TPS pay a fixed interest rate for 10 years and adjust with LIBOR thereafter. Treated as Tier I capital for regulatory purposes, the TPS mature on September 30, 2035 and are redeemable at the Company’s option after ten years. The sole asset of RBCT represents the proceeds of the offering loaned to Republic Bancorp, Inc. in exchange for subordinated debentures which have terms that are similar to the TPS. The subordinated debentures and the related interest expense, which are payable quarterly at the annual rate of 6.015%, are included in the consolidated financial statements. The proceeds obtained from the TPS offering have been and will continue to be utilized to fund loan growth, support an existing stock repurchase program and for other general business purposes.
The following table sets forth the Company’s risk based capital amounts and ratios as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
34
Table 4 – Capital Ratios
| | As of March 31, 2006 | | | | As of December 31, 2005 | |
| | Actual | | | | Actual | |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | Ratio | | | | Amount | | Ratio | |
|
|
Total Risk Based Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Republic Bancorp, Inc. | $ | 277,543 | | 15.40 | % | | $ | 267,054 | | 15.03 | % |
Republic Bank & Trust Co. | | 230,993 | | 13.25 | | | | 220,730 | | 12.78 | |
Republic Bank & Trust Co. of Indiana | | 11,384 | | 19.35 | | | | 11,488 | | 22.76 | |
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Republic Bancorp, Inc. | | 266,520 | | 14.79 | | | | 256,046 | | 14.41 | |
Republic Bank & Trust Co. | | 197,108 | | 11.31 | | | | 186,905 | | 10.82 | |
Republic Bank & Trust Co. of Indiana | | 10,796 | | 18.35 | | | | 10,855 | | 21.51 | |
|
Tier I Leverage Capital (to Average Assets) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Republic Bancorp, Inc. | | 266,520 | | 9.69 | | | | 256,046 | | 9.47 | |
Republic Bank & Trust Co. | | 197,108 | | 7.22 | | | | 186,905 | | 7.12 | |
Republic Bank & Trust Co. of Indiana | | 10,796 | | 14.72 | | | | 10,855 | | 13.62 | |
REGULATORY MATTERS
On July 22, 2005 Republic Bank & Trust Company received its most recent Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) performance evaluation prepared as of October 4, 2004. The FDIC concluded that Republic Bank & Trust Company violated Regulation B related to its RAL line of business and assigned a “Needs to Improve” rating. Republic Bank & Trust Company voluntarily changed certain procedures and processes to address the Regulation B issues raised by the FDIC during the CRA Evaluation. As required by statute, the FDIC referred their conclusions regarding the Regulation B violations to the Department of Justice (“DOJ”). Also by statute, a financial holding company, such as the Company, that controls a Bank with a “less than satisfactory” CRA rating, has limitations on certain future business activities until the CRA rating improves. Management does not believe these limitations will have any material effect on the Company’s current business plans. At this time, there has been no corrective action recommended or imposed by the FDIC or the DOJ.
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT AND MARKET RISK
Asset/liability management control is designed to ensure safety and soundness, maintain liquidity and regulatory capital standards and achieve acceptable net interest income. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income as a result of market fluctuations in interest rates. Management, on an ongoing basis, monitors interest rate and liquidity risk in order to implement appropriate funding and balance sheet strategies. Management considers interest rate risk to be Republic’s most significant market risk in a fluctuating rate environment.
The interest sensitivity profile of Republic at any point in time will be affected by a number of factors. These factors include the mix of interest sensitive assets and liabilities, as well as their relative pricing schedules. It is also influenced by market interest rates, deposit growth, loan growth and other factors.
Republic utilizes an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity. Potential changes in market interest rates and their subsequent effects on net interest income are evaluated with the model. The model projects the effect of instantaneous movements in interest rates of both 100 and 200 basis point increments equally across all points on the yield curve. These projections are computed based on various assumptions, which are used to determine the 100 and 200 basis point increments, as well as the base case (which is a twelve month projected amount) scenario. Assumptions based on growth expectations and on the historical behavior of Republic’s deposit and loan rates and their related balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies. Additionally, actual results could differ materially from the model if interest rates do not move equally across all points on the
35
yield curve. The March 31, 2006 simulation analysis indicates that an increase in interest rates would have a negative effect on net interest income, and a decrease in interest rates would have a positive effect on net interest income.
The following table illustrates Republic's estimated annualized earnings sensitivity profile based on the asset/liability model as of March 31, 2006:
Table 5 – Interest Rate Sensitivity
| Net Interest |
| Income Change |
|
Increase 200 basis points | -9.20 | % |
Increase 100 basis points | -4.95 | |
Decrease 100 basis points | 3.93 | |
Decrease 200 basis points | 7.57 | |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Information required by this item is included under Part I, Item 2., “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by Republic Bancorp, Inc.’s management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. In addition, no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the first quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of operations, Republic and the Bank are defendants in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, there is no proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of management, threatened litigation in which an adverse decision could result in a material adverse change in the business or consolidated financial position of Republic or the Bank.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
Information regarding risk factors appears in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, under the heading titled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and in the Form 10-K Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors. There has been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form 10-K.
36
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Details of Republic’s Class A Common Stock purchases during the first quarter of 2006 are included in the following table:
| | | | | | | | Total Number of | | Maximum |
| | | | | | | | Shares | | Number of Shares |
| | | | | | | | Purchased | | that May Yet Be |
| | Total Number of | | | | | as Part of Publicly | | Purchased |
| | Shares | | Average Price | | Announced Plans or | | Under the Plan or |
Period | | Purchased | | Paid per Share | | Programs | | Programs |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
January 1– January 31 | | 12,200 | * | | $ | 20.77 | | - | | 48,697 |
Feb. 1– Feb. 28 | | 840 | * | | | 20.27 | | - | | 48,697 |
March 1 – March 31 | | - | | | | - | | - | | 48,697 |
| |
|
| | | | |
| | |
Total | | 13,040 | | | $ | 20.74 | | | | |
* - Represents shares repurchased by the Company in connection with stock option exercises. | | |
During the first quarter of 2006 the Company did not repurchase any shares in addition to the stock option exercises detailed above. During the third quarter of 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of an additional 262,500 shares, from time to time, if market conditions are deemed favorable to the Company. The repurchase program will remain effective until the number of shares authorized is repurchased or until Republic’s Board of Directors terminates the program. As of March 31, 2006, the Company had 48,697 shares which could be repurchased under the current stock repurchase program.
During the first quarter of 2006, Republic issued approximately 2,000 shares of Class A Common Stock upon conversion of shares of Class B Common Stock by shareholders of Republic in accordance with the share-for-share conversion provision option of the Class B Common Stock. The exemption from registration of the newly issued Class A Common Stock relied upon was Section (3)(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.
There were no equity securities of the registrant sold without registration during the quarter covered by this report.
37
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The annual meeting of the shareholders of Republic Bancorp, Inc. was held on April 25, 2006. The following item was considered:
Election of the following nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors for the ensuing year:
Nominee | | For | | Withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard M. Trager | | 33,404,398 | | 40,632 |
Steven E. Trager | | 33,405,007 | | 40,024 |
A. Scott Trager | | 33,405,800 | | 39,230 |
Bill Petter | | 33,406,298 | | 38,733 |
R. Wayne Stratton | | 33,357,449 | | 87,582 |
Henry M. Altman, Jr. | | 33,140,789 | | 304,241 |
Sandra Metts Snowden | | 33,403,677 | | 41,354 |
Susan Stout Tamme | | 33,013,474 | | 431,556 |
Charles E. Anderson | | 33,420,419 | | 24,612 |
As previously disclosed in the Form 8-K dated April 7, 2006, Mr. Petter announced his retirement as Vice Chairman of Republic Bancorp, Inc. and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Republic Bank & Trust Company effective May 1, 2006. At its next scheduled board meeting in May, it is expected that the Board of Directors will reduce the number of Holding Company directors to eight.
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as a part of this report:
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
|
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) of |
| | the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) of |
| | the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1* | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section |
| | 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2* | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section |
| | 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC. (Registrant)
Principal Executive Officer:
|
| |
| |
May 9, 2006 | By: | Steven E. Trager President & Chief Executive Officer |
| Principal Financial Officer: |
| |
| |
May 9, 2006 | By: | Kevin Sipes Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
| | |
39