Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income rose during the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2001, due to increases in gain on sale of loans, service charges on deposits and gain on sale of securities. Electronic Refund Check fees were a key component of non-interest income during the first quarter of 2001 as well, which also attributed to the increase in non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2001.
Net gain on sale of loans increased 327% during the second quarter of 2001 and 277% during the first six months of 2001 as declining market interest rates prompted an increase in consumer refinance activity of 1-4 family fixed-rate residential loans, which Republic generally sells into the secondary market. Revenue from mortgage banking activities, principally gains on sale of loans, increased during the three- and six-month periods June 30, 2001, as a result of increased secondary market sales volume. As a percentage of loans sold, gain on sale decreased due primarily to a promotional mortgage loan product that reduced the amount of fees charged to the client. Overall the Bank originated $148 million in mortgage loans available for sale during the second quarter of 2001 compared to $34 million during the same period in 2000. The Bank also originated $240 million in loans available for sale during the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to $55 million during the same period in 2000. The market’s interest-rate environment heavily influences secondary market residential loan originations and, correspondingly, consumer-refinance activity. Generally, long-term market interest rates during 2001 have been substantially below 2000 levels, which has led to higher secondary market originations and sales volumes this year. Management does not anticipate that this level of 1-4 family refinancing volume will continue at current levels in the near term unless there is a further reduction in long-term market interest rates.
A declining interest-rate environment during the first six months of 2001 also led to an increase in the market value of the available for sale securities portfolio. Republic sold $23 million and $87 million of securities available for sale during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2001 resulting in overall gains of $435,000 and $906,000, respectively. Management elected to sell these securities in order to extend the duration of the overall portfolio and realize an increase in yield due to favorable market conditions. Approximately, $44 million of these securities were subject to rapid prepayment due to the declining interest environment. Republic also had $12 million and $55 million in securities that were called during the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001 resulting in additional recognized gains of $135,000 and $248,000, respectively.
Service charges on deposit accounts was positively affected by the Bank’s new “Overdraft Honor” program. Overdraft related fees increased $447,000 for the second quarter of 2001 and $859,000 for the first six months of 2001 compared to the same periods in 2000. The “Overdraft Honor” program permits selected clients to automatically overdraft their accounts up to $500 for the Bank’s customary fee. At June 30, 2001 the Bank had 20,000 clients participating in the program.
The Bank receives substantially all Electronic Refunds Check fees during the first quarter of the fiscal year. Electronic Refund Check fees increased $998,000 during the first six months of 2001. This increase was due to a 65% increase in overall ERC volume compared to prior year resulting from successful marketing efforts during the last half of 2000. The Company plans to continue aggressive marketing strategies to increase its overall market share in this line of business.
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased during the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2001 compared to the same period in 2000. The most significant factors comprising the increase in non-interest expense for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001 were increases in salaries and benefits, marketing and legal expenses.
Salary and employee benefits increased for both the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2001. The increase was attributable to annual merit increases and associated incentive compensation accruals, additions to commercial lending and cash management professional sales staff, additions to staff and overtime at Refunds Now and additional staff to support the strong loan origination volume attained during the first six months of 2001. Total full-time equivalent employees (FTE’s) increased to 500 at June 30, 2001 from 467 at June 30, 2000.
Marketing and development increased during the three-month and six-month period ended June 30, 2001. The increase was attributable to the Company’s aggressive direct-mail marketing campaign for the “Absolutely Free Checking” product and enhanced radio marketing for the Bank’s fixed-rate secondary market loan products.
Legal expenses increased $321,000 for the second quarter of 2001 over the same period in 2000 and $383,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 over the first six months of 2000. The increase was attributable to the patent litigation at Refunds Now. (For further discussion, see Part II, Item 1, Legal proceedings on page 32 of this 10Q.)
COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT JUNE 30, 2001 AND DECEMBER 31, 2000
Securities available for sale. Securities available-for-sale consists primarily of mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations (CMO’s), U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government Agencies. Excluding CMO’s and other mortgage-backed securities, investments in the AFS category have an increased weighted-average maturity of 1.19 years compared to December 31, 2000. Securities available-for-sale increased from $172 million at December 31, 2000 to $235 million at June 30, 2001. On January 1, 2001, Republic reclassified substantially all of its securities to be held to maturity into the available for sale category as permitted by SFAS No. 133.
Securities to be held to maturity . Securities to-be-held-to-maturity decreased from $104 million at December 31, 2000 to $2 million at June 30, 2001. The decrease occurred due to the reclassification of substantially all of these securities into the available for sale category on January 1, 2001.
Mortgage loans held for sale. Mortgage loans held for sale is primarily comprised of fixed-rate, single family residential loans the Company intends to sell into the secondary market. Management has elected to sell the majority of its fixed-rate residential loans into the secondary market in order to reduce its exposure to market interest rate risk. Mortgage loans held for sale increased to $13 million at June 30, 2001 as lower long-term market interest rates has led to an increase in the number of customers electing to refinance into fixed-rate secondary market loan products.
Loans. Net loans, primarily consisting of secured real estate loans, increased slightly by $26 million to $1.2 billion at June 30, 2001. Republic’s commercial real estate lending portfolio increased $29.8 million from December 31, 2000 as a result of the Bank’s continued emphasis on commercial real estate lending. Republic maintained consistent volume in the real estate construction portfolio as a result of steady customer demand. Residential real estate loans declined $11.2 million as consumer refinance activity increased. Many adjustable rate portfolio loans were refinanced into fixed-rate, secondary market loans as consumers elected to take advantage of a generally declining long-term interest rate environment.
Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was a negative $152,000 in the second quarter of 2001, compared to $432,000 in the second quarter of 2000. For the six months ended June 30, 2001 the provision for loan losses was $1.6 million compared to $1.0 million during the same period in 2000. The negative provision for loan losses of $152,000 during the second quarter of 2001 was due to the stronger than anticipated recoveries of previously charged-off Refund Anticipation Loans from Refunds Now of $475,000.
The higher provision for loan losses in 2001 compared to 2000 was attributable to an increase in estimated losses associated with the higher volume of Refund Anticipation Loans at Refunds Now. Excluding the net charge-offs related to Refunds Now, net charge-offs for the Bank’s traditional loan portfolios decreased from $620,000 for the six months of 2000 to $528,000 during the same period in 2001.
While Refunds Now transaction volume increased, net charge-offs also increased from $347,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2000 to $1.0 million for the same period in 2001. This increase was attributable to higher overall volume, and to a lesser extent, losses attributable to limited errors in information received from third parties that Refunds Now utilizes, in part, in connection with its underwriting criteria. Management anticipates that it will recover a portion of these losses going forward, but the amount of recovery, if any, is not subject to reasonable estimation. Due to the generally fast transaction time associated with the tax refund loan business, traditional bank underwriting criteria cannot be applied; therefore, the Bank is largely dependent on tax refunds being validated and transmitted by the various taxing authorities. These products are thus subject to fluctuating loss percentages that are not readily predictable based on historical experience on a year-to-year basis.
The total allowance for loan losses remained consistent at $7.9 million from December 31, 2000 to June 30, 2001. Management believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for loan losses at June 30, 2001. Management continues to monitor the commercial real estate loan portfolio closely, recognizing that commercial real estate loans generally carry a greater risk of loss than residential real estate loans. Management believes that it had provided an adequate component within the allowance for loans associated with the growth in commercial real estate lending has been established.
Table 4 below depicts the allowance activity by loan type for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.
Table 4 - Summary of Loan Loss Experience
| Three months ended | | Six months ended | |
| June 30, | | June 30, | |
|
| |
| |
| 2001 | | 2000 | | 2001 | | 2000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | |
| Balance-beginning of period | $ | 7,862 | | $ | 7,862 | | $ | 7,862 | | $ | 7,862 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Charge-offs: | | | | | | | | |
| Real Estate | (93 | ) | (445 | ) | (216 | ) | (576 | ) |
| Commercial | (25 | ) | (25 | ) | (41 | ) | (33 | ) |
| Consumer | (306 | ) | (128 | ) | (564 | ) | (328 | ) |
| Tax Refund Loans | | | | | (1,550 | ) | (500 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Total | (424 | ) | (598 | ) | (2,371 | ) | (1,437 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
Recoveries: | | | | | | | | |
| Real Estate | 1 | | 36 | | 8 | | 37 | |
| Commercial | 5 | | 5 | | 13 | | 5 | |
| Consumer | 135 | | 125 | | 272 | | 275 | |
| Tax Refund Loans | 475 | | | | 481 | | 153 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Total | 616 | | 166 | | 774 | | 470 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net charge-offs | 192 | | (432 | ) | (1,597 | ) | (967 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Provision for loan losses | (152 | ) | 432 | | 1,637 | | 967 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | |
| Balance-end of period | $ | 7,902 | | $ | 7,862 | | $ | 7,902 | | $ | 7,862 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits. Total deposits were $859 million at June 30, 2001 compared to $864 million at December 31, 2000. Non-interest bearing deposits increased $14 million since December 31, 2000 to $122 million as management continues to focus on gathering lower cost funds through the Company’s free checking promotion and Cash Management area. Because these funds are primarily transaction based, they are likely to have fluctuating balances from period to period.
Money market certificates of deposit increased $31 million as declining market interest rates prompted certificate of deposit clients to switch their maturing deposits into more liquid investment vehicles. Certificates of deposits decreased $50 million as management pursued a strategy of lowering its rates on high-cost, retail certificates of deposit while utilizing lower-cost, longer-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings during the first six months of 2001.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings declined $56 million. Approximately $30 million of this decrease occurred as funds received from securities sold during the year were utilized to reduce short-term borrowings. In addition, securities sold under agreements to repurchase declined due to decreases in a small number of the Company’s larger cash management accounts. These accounts are subject to large periodic changes in balances; however, the Company continues to maintain positive banking relationships with each of these clients.
Other borrowed funds. Other borrowed funds consists primarily of borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank. Management elected to extend borrowings in this category in order to improve its overall interest rate risk position and lower its current cost of funds. The Company borrowed $110 million during 2001 with $40 million fixed for 5 years. The remaining $70 million in borrowings are callable by the Federal Home Loan Bank after their respective fixed-rate periods, ranging from one to five years. These advances have a maturity of five to ten years if not called earlier by the Federal Home Loan Bank.
Loans, including impaired loans under SFAS 114 and excluding consumer loans, are placed on non-accrual status when they become past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest, unless they are adequately secured and in the process of collection. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. These loans remain on non-accrual status until the borrower demonstrates the ability to remain current or the loan is deemed uncollectible and is charged off. Consumer loans are not placed on non-accrual status but are reviewed periodically and charged off when they reach 120 days past due or are deemed uncollectible. At June 30, 2001, Republic had $314,000 in consumer loans 90 days or more past due compared to $116,000 at December 31, 2000.
The Bank’s level of delinquent loans increased to 1.50% at June 30, 2001, up from 1.27% at December 31, 2000. Republic experienced an increase in total non-performing loans from $4.1 million at December 31, 2000 to $6.4 million at June 30, 2001. The majority of this increase is attributable to past due loans in the single family residential loan portfolio. These residential loans are typically well secured with minimal risk of significant future losses to the Bank. Additionally, a portion of loans past due have matured, but are pending renewal or are pending refinance. Other real estate owned decreased marginally from $478,000 at December 31, 2000 to $405,000 at June 30, 2001. Management does not consider the overall increase in non-performing assets during the period to be material or indicative of any adverse change in the overall asset quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio.
Table 5 provides information related to non-performing assets and loans 90 days or more past due.
Table 5 - Non-Performing Loans
| June 30, | | December 31, | |
(dollars in thousands) | 2001 | | 2000 | |
| | | | |
Loans on non-accrual status | $ | 5,327 | | $ | 3,100 | |
Loans past due 90 days or more | 1,055 | | 984 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | |
Total non-performing loans | 6,382 | | 4,084 | |
| | | | |
Other real estate owned | 405 | | 478 | |
|
| |
| |
Total non-performing assets | $ | 6,787 | | $ | 4,562 | |
|
| |
| |
| | | | |
Percentage of non-performing loans to total loans | 0.55 | % | 0.36 | % |
| | | | |
Percentage of non-performing assets to total loans | 0.58 | % | 0.40 | % |
Republic defines impaired loans to be those commercial real estate and commercial loans greater than $499,999 that management has classified as doubtful (collection of all amounts due is highly questionable or improbable) or loss (all or a portion of the loans have been written off or a specific allowance for loss has been provided). Republic's policy is to charge off all or that portion of its investment in an impaired loan upon a determination it is probable the full amount may not be collected. Impaired loans, which are a component of loans on non-accrual status, decreased from $767,000 at December 31, 2000 to approximately $735,000 at June 30, 2001.
Republic maintains sufficient liquidity to fund loan demand and routine deposit withdrawal activity. Liquidity is managed by retaining sufficient liquid assets in the form of investment securities and core deposits to meet demand. Funding and cash flows can also be realized from the available-for-sale portion of the securities portfolio and paydowns from the loan portfolio. Republic’s banking centers also provide access to retail deposit markets. Approximately $61 million of deposits, repurchase agreements and short-term borrowings collateralized by investment securities, private insurance bonds and Federal Home Loan Bank letters of credit are attributable to three customer relationships at June 30, 2001. These funds are short-term in nature and subject to immediate withdrawal by those entities. Should these funds be withdrawn, Republic has the ability to replenish them through alternative funding sources, including established lines of credit with other financial institutions, the FHLB and brokerage firms. While Republic utilizes numerous funding sources in order to meet liquidity requirements, FHLB borrowings remain a material component of management’s balance sheet strategy. (See Note 6 regarding other borrowed funds for additional information on available credit lines).
Total capital increased from $117 million at December 31, 2000 to $119 million at June 30, 2001. The increase in capital was primarily attributable to net income during the first six months of 2001, increases in accumulated other comprehensive income and stock options exercised by Republic’s associates. These increases were largely offset by a “Dutch Auction” tender offer completed in March 2001. Republic purchased 747,319 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock through a modified Dutch auction tender offer at a cost of $10 per share. The overall reduction to capital attributable to the tender offer was $7.6 million. The offer to purchase commenced February 12, 2001 and expired on March 13, 2001.
Republic’s board of directors approved a Class A share repurchase program of 500,000 shares during 1998 and 1999. Under the repurchase program, Republic repurchased approximately 441,000 shares through December 31, 2000 with a weighted average cost of $9.99, at a total cost of $4.4 million. Republic purchased no shares under this program during the first six months of 2001. Republic is authorized to buyback an additional 59,000 shares of Class A Common Stock under the current program as of June 30, 2001.
During the second quarter of 2001, the board of directors of Republic Bank & Trust Company approved a $5 million dividend to Republic Bancorp, Inc. The Parent Company then utilized the $5 million dividend as a capital contribution to its newly formed, wholly owned banking subsidiary, Republic Bank & Trust Company of Indiana.
Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy within a framework that makes capital requirements, in part, dependent on the individual risk profiles of financial institutions. Republic continues to exceed the regulatory requirements for Tier I, Tier I leverage and total risk–based capital. The Bank intends to maintain a capital position that meets or exceeds the "well capitalized" requirements as defined by the FDIC. Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy within a framework that makes capital requirements, in part, dependent on the individual risk profiles of financial institutions. Republic’s average capital to average assets ratio was 7.43% at June 30, 2001 compared to 7.58% at December 31, 2000.
Table 6 - Capital Ratios
| | | | | | | | | | Minimum | |
| | | | | | | | | | Requirement | |
| | | | | | Minimum | | To Be Well | |
| | | | | | Requirement | | Capitalized | |
| | | | | | For Capital | | Under Prompt | |
| | | | | | Adequacy | | Corrective | |
As of June 30, 2001 | | Actual | | Purposes | | Action Provisions | |
| |
| |
| | Amount | | Ratio | | Amount | | Ratio | Amount | | Ratio |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Total Risk Based Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Republic Bancorp, Inc. | | $ | 131,165 | | 11.06 | % | $ | 94,853 | | 8 | % | $ | 118,567 | | 10 | % |
| Republic Bank & Trust Company | | 121,820 | | 10.31 | | 94,561 | | 8 | % | 118,201 | | 10 | % |
| Republic Bank & Trust Company of Indiana | | 4,996 | | 138.70 | | 288 | | 8 | % | 360 | | 10 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Republic Bancorp, Inc. | | $ | 123,263 | | 10.40 | % | $ | 47,427 | | 4 | % | $ | 71,140 | | 6 | % |
| Republic Bank & Trust Company | | 113,958 | | 9.64 | | 47,280 | | 4 | % | 70,920 | | 6 | % |
| Republic Bank & Trust Company of Indiana | | 4,956 | | 137.59 | | 144 | | 4 | % | 216 | | 6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier I Leverage Capital (to Average Assets) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Republic Bancorp, Inc. | | $ | 123,263 | | 8.15 | % | $ | 60,508 | | 4 | % | $ | 75,635 | | 5 | % |
| Republic Bank & Trust Company | | 113,958 | | 7.55 | | 60,355 | | 4 | % | 75,444 | | 5 | % |
| Republic Bank & Trust Company of Indiana | | 4,956 | | 101.75 | | 195 | | 4 | % | 244 | | 5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kentucky banking laws limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to Parent Company by Republic Bank & Trust Company without prior approval of the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions. Under these laws, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to current year's net income, as defined in the laws, combined with the retained net income of the preceding two years, less any dividends declared during those periods. At June 30, 2001, Republic Bank & Trust Company had approximately $8.7 million of retained earnings that could be utilized for payment of dividends if authorized by its board of directors without prior regulatory approval.
Indiana banking laws prohibit the payment of dividends to the Parent Company by Republic Bank & Trust Company of Indiana for a period of three years without prior approval of the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions. These laws also require a minimum Tier I Capital ratio of 8% to be maintained for a period of three years.
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT AND MARKET RISK |
|
Asset/liability management control is designed to ensure safety and soundness, maintain liquidity and regulatory capital standards, and achieve acceptable net interest income. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in the net interest income as a result of market fluctuations in interest rates. Management, on an ongoing basis, monitors interest rate and liquidity risk in order to implement appropriate funding and balance sheet strategies. Management considers interest rate risk to be Republic’s most significant market risk.
Republic utilizes an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity. Potential changes in market interest rates and their subsequent effects on net interest income are then evaluated. The model projects the effect of instantaneous movements in interest rates of both 100 and 200 basis points. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of Republic’s deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies.
Republic’s interest sensitivity profile changed from December 31, 2000 to June 30, 2001 as management pursued a strategy of extending liabilities to reduce the sensitivity of the Company’s balance sheet to fluctuations in market interest rates. Given a sustained 100 basis point downward shock to the yield curve used in the simulation model, Republic’s base net interest income would decrease by an estimated 0.62% at June 30, 2001 compared to an increase of 2.22% at December 31, 2000. Given a 100 basis point increase in the yield curve Republic’s base net interest income would decrease by an estimated 1.94% at June 30, 2001 compared to a decrease of 3.85% at December 31, 2000. Management elected to shift a portion of Republic’s funding from short-term repricing liabilities to longer-term FHLB borrowings with fixed interest rates from one to five years. (See discussion regarding other borrowed funds on page 26 of this document.) In addition to moderating the Company’s interest rate risk position, this strategy minimized potential additional income from future rate decreases and reduced the negative impact on potential income resulting from future rate increases.
The interest sensitivity profile of Republic at any point in time will be affected by a number of factors. These factors include the mix of interest sensitive assets and liabilities as well as their relative pricing schedules. It is also influenced by market interest rates, deposit growth, loan growth, and other factors. The table below is representative only and is not a precise measurement of the effect of changing interest rates on Republic’s net interest income in the future.
Table 7 - Interest Rate Sensitivity
| June 30, 2001 | |
|
| |
| Decrease in Rates | | | | Increase in Rates | |
|
| | | |
| |
| 200 | | 100 | | | | 100 | | 200 | |
| Basis Points | | Basis Points | | Base | | Basis Points | | Basis Points | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| (dollars in thousands) | |
| | |
Projected interest income | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | $ | 86,899 | | $ | 90,612 | | $ | 94,517 | | $ | 97,804 | | $ | 101,114 | |
Investments | 11,079 | | 12,362 | | 13,739 | | 14,994 | | 16,300 | |
Short-term investments | 344 | | 511 | | 587 | | 535 | | 671 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total interest income | 98,322 | | 103,485 | | 108,843 | | 113,333 | | 118,085 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Projected interest expense | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | 26,255 | | 30,528 | | 34,857 | | 39,342 | | 43,958 | |
Repurchase agreements and other borrowings | 19,702 | | 20,178 | | 20,877 | | 21,911 | | 23,205 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total interest expense | 45,957 | | 50,706 | | 55,734 | | 61,253 | | 67,163 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | $ | 52,365 | | $ | 52,779 | | $ | 53,109 | | $ | 52,080 | | $ | 50,922 | |
Change from base | $ | (744 | ) | $ | (330 | ) | | | $ | (1,029 | ) | $ | (2,187 | ) |
% Change from base | -1.40 | % | -0.62 | % | | | -1.94 | % | -4.12 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2000 | |
|
| |
| Decrease in Rates | | | | Increase in Rates | |
|
| | | |
| |
| 200 | | 100 | | | | 100 | | 200 | |
| Basis Points | | Basis Points | | Base | | Basis Points | | Basis Points | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| (dollars in thousands) | |
| | |
Projected interest income | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | $ | 100,645 | | $ | 105,004 | | $ | 108,130 | | $ | 112,093 | | $ | 115,729 | |
Investments | 14,868 | | 16,447 | | 18,160 | | 19,738 | | 21,027 | |
Short-term investments | 246 | | 194 | | 162 | | 89 | | 106 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total interest income | 115,759 | | 121,645 | | 126,452 | | 131,920 | | 136,862 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Projected interest expense | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | 35,333 | | 40,182 | | 43,051 | | 47,458 | | 51,500 | |
Repurchase agreementsand other borrowings | 23,709 | | 26,784 | | 29,911 | | 33,031 | | 36,026 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total interest expense | 59,042 | | 66,966 | | 72,962 | | 80,489 | | 87,526 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | $ | 56,717 | | $ | 54,679 | | $ | 53,490 | | $ | 51,431 | | $ | 49,336 | |
Change from base | $ | 3,227 | | $ | 1,189 | | | | $ | (2,059 | ) | $ | (4,154 | ) |
% Change from base | 6.03 | % | 2.22 | % | | | -3.85 | % | -7.77 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
|
See discussion in Note 1 to financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The information for this item is incorporated by reference to the Asset /Liability Management and Market Risks section on page 26 and 27 of Part 1, Item 2., Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of this report.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal proceedings
Reference is made to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2000, in which information was reported regarding the litigation brought by Beneficial Franchise Company, Inc. against the Bank and others. There has been no material change in the status of this litigation during the quarter. The Company continues to believe that the allegations in this lawsuit are without merit, and continues to vigorously defend against this lawsuit.
Item 2. Changes in securities
During the second quarter of 2001, Republic issued approximately 15,000 shares of Class A Common Stock upon conversion of shares of Class B Common Stock by shareholders of Republic in accordance with the share-for-share conversion provision option of the Class B Common Stock. The exemption from registration of the newly issued Class A Common Stock relied upon was Section (3)(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are attached to and listed in the Exhibit Index on page 35.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(Registrant)
| | | Principal Executive Officer: |
| | | |
Date: | August 14, 2001 | | /s/ Steven E. Trager |
|
| |
|
| | | Steven E. Trager |
| | | Chief Executive Officer |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Principal Financial Officer: |
| | | |
Date: | August 14, 2001 | | /s/ Kevin Sipes |
|
| |
|
| | | Kevin Sipes |
| | | Chief Financial Officer & |
| | | Chief Accounting Officer |
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | Incorporated |
Exhibit | | Description | | By Reference To |
| |
| |
|
| | | | |
10.23 | | Officer Compensation Continuation Agreement with Kevin Sipes | | Filed as Exhibit 10.23 on page 35 of this Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
11 | | Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings | | Filed as Exhibit 11 on page 43 of this Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001 |
| | | | |
15 | | Awareness Letter | | Filed as Exhibit 15 on page 44 of this Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001 |