Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | ' |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | The Company and Nature of Operations | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
FalconStor Software, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), develops, manufactures and sells data migration, business continuity, disaster recovery, optimized backup and de-duplication solutions and provides the related maintenance, implementation and engineering services. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(b) | Principles of Consolidation | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(c) | Reclassifications | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Certain prior year’s amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Certain costs previously recorded within “selling and marketing” are now presented within “research and development costs” to better align these costs with functions performed. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(d) | Use of Estimates | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s significant estimates include those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable allowances, share-based payment compensation, cost-based investments, marketable securities, valuation of embedded derivatives, software development costs, goodwill and other intangible assets and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
The financial market volatility, both in the U.S. and in many other countries where the Company operates, has impacted and may continue to impact the Company’s business. Such conditions could have a material impact to the Company’s significant accounting estimates discussed above. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(e) | Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Marketable Securities | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company records its cash equivalents and marketable securities at fair value in accordance with the authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) on fair value measurements and disclosures. As of December 31, 2013 the Company’s cash equivalents consisted of money market funds and commercial paper. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s cash equivalents consisted of money market funds. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents amounted to approximately $8.5 million and $4.3 million, respectively. |
|
As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had $0.8 million of restricted cash. The restricted cash serves as collateral related to deposit service indebtedness with the Company’s commercial bank. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have any deposit service indebtedness with the Company’s bank. |
|
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s marketable securities consisted of corporate bonds and government securities. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of the Company’s marketable securities was approximately $8.1 million and $10.5 million, respectively. All of the Company’s marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale, and accordingly, unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities, net of tax, are reflected as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity. Any other-than-temporary impairments are recorded within interest and other income (loss), net in the consolidated statement of operations. See Note (3) Marketable Securities for additional information. |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(f) | Fair Value of Financial Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measurements, a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies, is as follows: |
|
Level 1—Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets. |
|
Level 2—Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
Level 3—Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment. |
|
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated carrying value due to the short maturity of these instruments. See Note (4) Fair Value Measurements for additional information. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(g) | Derivative Financial Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risk. Terms of convertible preferred stock are reviewed to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under FASB ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”) to be accounted for separately from the host contract, and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivatives are required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in current period operating results. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(h) | Revenue Recognition | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company derives its revenue from sales of its products, support and services. Product revenue consists of the Company’s software integrated with industry standard hardware and sold as complete turn-key integrated solutions. Product revenue also consists of stand-alone software applications. Support and services revenue consists of both maintenance revenues and professional services revenues. Revenue is recorded net of applicable sales taxes. |
|
In accordance with the authoritative guidance issued by the FASB on revenue recognition, the Company recognizes revenue from product sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable, the product is delivered, and collection of the resulting receivable is deemed probable. Products delivered to a customer on a trial basis are not recognized as revenue until a permanent key code is delivered to the customer. Reseller customers typically send the Company a purchase order when they have an end user identified. Distributor customers typically send the Company a purchase order when they have a reseller and end user identified. For bundled arrangements that include either maintenance or both maintenance and professional services, the Company uses the residual method to determine the amount of product revenue to be recognized. Under the residual method, consideration is allocated to the undelivered elements based upon vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the fair value of those elements, with the residual of the arrangement fee allocated to and recognized as product revenue. If VSOE does not exist for all undelivered elements of an arrangement, the Company recognizes total revenue from the arrangement ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement. The Company's long-term portion of deferred revenue consists of (i) payments received for maintenance contracts with terms in excess of one year as of the balance sheet date, (ii) payments received for product sales bundled with multiple years of maintenance but for which VSOE did not exist for all undelivered elements of the arrangement, and (iii) payments received in connection with the Company's joint development agreement in 2013 which the Company does not anticipate recognizing into revenue within the next twelve months. The Company provides an allowance for product returns as a reduction of revenue, based upon historical experience and known or expected trends. |
|
Revenues associated with maintenance services are deferred and recognized as revenue ratably over the term of the contract. Revenues associated with software implementation and software engineering services are recognized when the services are performed. Costs of providing these services are included in cost of support and services. |
|
The Company has entered into various distribution, licensing and joint promotion agreements with OEMs, whereby the Company has provided to the OEM a non-exclusive software license to install the Company’s software on certain hardware or to resell the Company’s software in exchange for payments based on the products distributed by these OEMs. Such payments from the OEM or distributor are recognized as revenue in the period reported by the OEM. |
|
From time to time the Company will enter into funded software development arrangements. Under such arrangements, revenue recognition will not commence until final delivery and/or acceptance of the product. For arrangements where the Company has VSOE for the undelivered elements, the Company will follow the residual method and recognize product revenue upon final delivery and/or acceptance of the product. For arrangements where the Company does not have VSOE for the undelivered elements, the Company will recognize the entire arrangement fee ratably commencing at the time of final delivery and/or acceptance through the end of the service period in the arrangement. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(i) | Property and Equipment | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is recognized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (3 to 7 years). Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases or over their estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(j) | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in business combinations. The Company has not amortized goodwill related to its acquisitions, but instead tests the balance for impairment. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company tests goodwill for impairment by first comparing the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting unit. If the fair value is determined to be less than the book value or qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired, a second step is performed to compute the amount of impairment as the difference between the estimated fair value of goodwill and the carrying value. |
|
The Company’s annual impairment assessment is performed during the fourth quarter of each year, and the Company has determined there to be no impairment for any of the periods presented. Based on the Company’s analysis, the fair value of its reporting unit substantially exceeds the carrying value of its goodwill balances as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. Identifiable intangible assets include (i) assets acquired through business combinations, which include customer contracts and intellectual property, and (ii) patents amortized over three years using the straight-line method. |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, amortization expense was $122,951, $118,789 and $323,540, respectively. The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows: |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 31-Dec-13 | | 31-Dec-12 | | | | |
Goodwill | | $ | 4,150,339 | | | $ | 4,150,339 | | | | | |
| | | |
Other intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Gross carrying amount | | $ | 3,256,709 | | | $ | 3,128,588 | | | | | |
| | | |
Accumulated amortization | | (3,077,113 | ) | | (2,954,162 | ) | | | | |
Net carrying amount | | $ | 179,596 | | | $ | 174,426 | | | | | |
| | | |
|
As of December 31, 2013, amortization expense for existing identifiable intangible assets is expected to be $97,933, $58,797 and $22,866 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Such assets will be fully amortized at December 31, 2016. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(k) | Software Development Costs and Purchased Software Technology | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
In accordance with the authoritative guidance issued by the FASB on costs of software to be sold, leased, or marketed, costs associated with the development of new software products and enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility of the product has been established. Based on the Company’s product development process, technological feasibility is established upon completion of a working model. Amortization of software development costs is recorded at the greater of the straight-line basis over the product’s estimated life, or the ratio of current period revenue of the related products to total current and anticipated future revenue of these products. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded $339,589, $301,263 and $140,326, respectively, of amortization expense related to capitalized software costs. The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of software development costs as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows: |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | | | | | |
Software development costs: | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross carrying amount | | 2,718,900 | | | 1,745,058 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Accumulated amortization | | (922,825 | ) | | (583,236 | ) | | | | | | |
Software development costs, net | | 1,796,075 | | | 1,161,822 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
|
As of December 31, 2013, amortization expense for software development costs is expected to be $487,284, $487,284, $409,595, $228,481 and $183,431 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively. Such assets will be fully amortized at December 31, 2018. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(l) | Income Taxes | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company records income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In determining the period in which related tax benefits are realized for financial reporting purposes, excess share-based compensation deductions included in net operating losses are realized after regular net operating losses are exhausted. |
|
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the authoritative guidance issued by the FASB on income taxes, which addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return, should be recorded in the financial statements. Pursuant to the authoritative guidance, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it meets the “more likely than not” threshold that the position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authority, based on the technical merits of the position or expiration of statutes. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. In addition, the authoritative guidance addresses de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods, and also requires increased disclosures. The Company includes interest and penalties related to its uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense within its consolidated statement of operations. See Note (6) Income Taxes for additional information. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(m) | Long-Lived Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows, undiscounted and without interest, is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(n) | Share-Based Payments | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company accounts for share-based payments in accordance with the authoritative guidance issued by the FASB on share-based compensation, which establishes the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. Under the provisions of the authoritative guidance, share-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite employee service period (generally the vesting period), net of estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payments using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The estimation of share-based awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from the Company’s current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. The Company considers many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including types of awards, employee class and historical experience. Additionally, share-based awards to non-employees are expensed over the period in which the related services are rendered at their fair value. All share-based awards are expected to be fulfilled with new shares of common stock. See Note (10) Share-Based Payment Arrangements for additional information. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(o) | Foreign Currency | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated at rates of exchange at the end of the period, while results of operations are translated at average exchange rates in effect for the period. Gains and losses from the translation of foreign assets and liabilities from the functional currency of the Company’s subsidiaries into the U.S. dollar are classified as accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations within interest and other income (loss), net. |
|
During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, foreign currency transactional losses totaled approximately $1,073,000, $653,000 and $78,000, respectively. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(p) | Earnings Per Share (EPS) | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Basic EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding increased by dilutive common stock equivalents, attributable to stock option awards, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding. Due to the net loss for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, all common stock equivalents, totaling 16,931,548, 11,532,032 and 14,982,611, respectively, were excluded from diluted net loss per share because they were anti-dilutive. The common stock equivalents consist of 8,150,032 of outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards and 8,781,516 related to outstanding Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 11,532,032 and 14,982,611 of outstanding stock option and restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. |
|
The following represents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computation: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Numerator: | | | | | | |
|
Net Loss | | $ | (10,932,590 | ) | | $ | (14,984,321 | ) | | $ | (23,368,283 | ) |
|
Effects of redeemable convertible preferred stock: | | | | | | |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends | | 216,379 | | | — | | | — | |
|
Less: accretion to redemption value of series A preferred stock | | 127,504 | | | — | | | — | |
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (11,276,473 | ) | | $ | (14,984,321 | ) | | $ | (23,368,283 | ) |
|
| | | | | | |
|
Denominator: | | | | | | |
|
Basic Shares outstanding | | 47,979,467 | | | 47,408,995 | | | 46,648,928 | |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | |
|
Stock options and restricted stock | | — | | | — | | | — | |
|
Preferred stock | | — | | | — | | | — | |
|
Diluted shares outstanding | | 47,979,467 | | | 47,408,995 | | | 46,648,928 | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
EPS: | | | | | | |
|
Basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.32 | ) | | $ | (0.50 | ) |
|
| | | | | | |
|
Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.32 | ) | | $ | (0.50 | ) |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(q) | Investments | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
During December 2013, the Company sold its interest in Tianjin Zhongke Blue Whale Information Technologies Co., Ltd. (“Blue Whale”), a Chinese joint venture, for $3.0 million. The Company recorded a gain of $2,096,364 within "interest and other income (loss), net" in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2013 the Company did not have any other cost-method investments. |
|
As of December 31, 2012, the Company maintained certain cost-method investments totaling approximately $0.9 million, which are included within “other assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. During 2012 and 2011 the Company recognized impairment charges of approximately $11,000 and $42,000, respectively, related to certain of its cost-method investments as a result of other-than-temporary declines in market value related to certain of these investments. These charges are included within “interest and other income (loss), net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(r) | Treasury Stock | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company accounts for treasury stock under the cost method and includes treasury stock as a component of stockholders’ equity. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(s) | New Accounting Pronouncements | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued new guidance which requires the netting of an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, against a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carry forward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carry forward if such settlement is required or expected in the event the uncertain tax position is disallowed. The new guidance is effective prospectively to all existing unrecognized tax benefits, but entities can choose to apply it retrospectively. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, which for the Company will be the first quarter of 2014. We do not expect the adoption of the new guidance by the Company to have a material impact on our financial results. |
|
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance which requires companies to present information about reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income in their financial statements or footnotes. The adoption of this new accounting guidance in the first quarter of 2013 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See Note (7) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss for the related disclosure. |
|