Contribution to consolidated net income decreased $1.1 million in the current twelve-month period compared to the same period a year ago. Growth in operating margin and improvement in other income (expense) was more than offset by higher operating and financing costs. Operating margin increased $29.6 million between periods. Customer growth, coupled with increased margin from electric generation and industrial customers during 2001, contributed $29 million in incremental margin, while rate relief added $20 million. Differences in heating demand caused by weather variations between periods resulted in a $19 million margin decrease. Modestly warmer-than-normal temperatures experienced during the current period reduced margin by $8 million. Prior-period margin was $11 million higher than expected due to temperatures that were ten percent colder than normal. Operations and maintenance expense increased $24.1 million, or ten percent, reflecting general increases in labor and maintenance costs, higher uncollectible expenses, and incremental operating expenses associated with providing service to a steadily growing customer base. Depreciation expense and general taxes increased $12 million, or nine percent, as a result of additional plant in service. Average gas plant in service for the current twelve-month period increased $186 million, or eight percent, compared to the corresponding period a year ago. This was attributable to the upgrade of existing operating facilities and the expansion of the system to accommodate new customers. Other income (expense) improved $15.5 million between periods. The current period includes a one-time pretax gain of $8.9 million for the sale of undeveloped property, a $3 million nonrecurring pretax gain on the sale of certain assets recognized in the fourth quarter of 2001, and an incremental $3.8 million of interest income primarily earned on deferred PGA account balances.
9
Net interest deductions increased $5.3 million, or seven percent, due primarily to incremental borrowings to finance construction expenditures. Income tax expense in the current period includes $2.5 million of income tax benefits recognized in 2001 associated with the resolution of state income tax issues. The prior period includes $5 million of income tax benefits recognized in 2000 associated with the favorable resolution of certain federal tax issues and the statutory closure of open federal tax years. Rates and Regulatory ProceedingsNevada General Rate Cases.In July 2001, Southwest filed general rate applications with the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada (PUCN) seeking approval to increase annualized revenues by $21.7 million in its southern Nevada rate jurisdiction and $7.7 million in its northern Nevada rate jurisdiction. In November 2001, Southwest received approval from the PUCN to increase rates by $13.5 million, or five percent, annually in southern Nevada and $5.9 million, or five percent, annually in northern Nevada effective December 2001. In January 2002, the PUCN settled several open issues in the case regarding rate design. Changes included increasing the residential basic service charge by $2.00 per month in both jurisdictions, which should improve revenue stability in Nevada. The changes were effective February 2002 and did not impact the amount of rate relief granted. California General Rate Cases.In February 2002, Southwest filed general rate applications with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for its northern and southern California jurisdictions. The application seeks annual increases over a five-year period beginning January 2003, which cumulatively amount to $6.3 million in northern California and $17.2 million in southern California. For 2003, an annualized $2.7 million, or 13 percent, revenue increase was requested for the northern jurisdiction and an annualized $6.7 million, or eight percent, revenue increase was requested for the southern jurisdiction. Additional smaller annual revenue increases are proposed in the subsequent years of the application through 2007. Hearings are expected to begin in the third quarter of 2002. The last general rate increases received in California were January 1998 in northern California and January 1995 in southern California. PGA FilingsArizona PGA Filings. In Arizona, Southwest adjusts rates monthly for changes in purchased gas costs, within pre-established limits. In January 2002, Southwest filed an advice letter with the Arizona Corporation Commission to eliminate a temporary rate adjustment surcharge, which was otherwise set to expire at the end of the second quarter of 2002. This action was taken in recognition of moderating gas costs and projections of PGA balancing account activity. The filing was approved effective February 2002, and reduces revenues by $31.9 million annually with no reduction to margin. Nevada PGA Filings.In December 2001, Southwest submitted an out-of-cycle PGA filing to the PUCN for a $29.2 million decrease for southern Nevada customers. In January 2002, an additional decrease of $13.9 million was requested. The total of the two filings, $43.1 million, was agreed to in a settlement among all parties and approved by the PUCN effective February 2002. The filings were made in advance of the scheduled annual date to allow customers to receive the benefit of decreases experienced in natural gas costs. PGA changes impact cash flows but have no direct impact on profit margin. California Order Instituting Investigation (OII). In July 2001, the CPUC ordered an investigation into the reasonableness of Southwest natural gas procurement practices and costs from June 1999 through May 2001, and related measures taken to minimize gas costs beyond May 2001. During the third quarter of 2001, Southwest filed a detailed report and testimony with the CPUC on these matters for both its northern and southern California service territories. The OII resulted from complaints by southern California customers about the size of monthly PGA rate increases that were necessary due to the unusually high cost of natural gas during the winter of 2000-2001. In regards to the southern California jurisdiction, the Office of Ratepayer Advocate and the County of San Bernardino recommended disallowances of $7.3 million and $11.7 million, respectively. No issues were raised related to the northern California rate jurisdiction. The proposed disallowances were based solely on decisions by Southwest not to purchase gas for storage during the winter of 2000-2001. Hearings were held in January 2002 with a final decision anticipated in the second quarter of 2002. Southwest defended its decisions related to storage, based on testimony which demonstrated that injecting additional volumes of natural gas into storage during the 2000 injection season (April through
10
September) could not be economically justified based on market conditions and price forecasts that existed at the time decisions were made. Management believes it has adequately defended the prudency of its gas procurement practices and, as a result, believes there is no legal basis for a disallowance. Recently Issued Accounting PronouncementsIn June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. The asset retirement obligations included within the scope of SFAS No. 143 are those that are unavoidable as a result of the acquisition, construction, development, or normal operation of long-lived assets. The standard requires that a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets be recognized as a liability when incurred. When a liability for an asset retirement obligation is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes a cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Entities are also required to recognize period-to-period changes for the liability related to asset retirement obligations resulting from the passage of time and/or revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss. Upon initial application of SFAS No. 143, entities are required to recognize the following items in the statement of financial position: a liability for any existing asset retirement obligations adjusted for cumulative accretion to the date of adoption of SFAS No. 143, an asset retirement cost capitalized as an increase to the carrying amount of the associated long-lived asset, and accumulated depreciation for the capitalized cost. SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002, with early adoption encouraged. Management has not yet quantified the effects of the new standard on the financial position or results of operations of the Company. Forward-Looking StatementsThis report contains statements which constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (Reform Act). All such forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by the Reform Act. A number of important factors affecting the business and financial results of the Company could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, the impact of weather variations on customer usage, customer growth rates, natural gas prices, the effects of regulation/deregulation, the timing and amount of rate relief, changes in gas procurement practices, changes in capital requirements and funding, the impact of conditions in the capital markets on financing costs, resolution of pending litigation, acquisitions and competition. PART II - OTHER INFORMATIONITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGSLitigation is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona consisting of two cases that were originally filed in the District of Arizona (Civ ‘99 1294 PHX ROS and Civ ‘00 0119 PHX ROS), two cases that were transferred to the District of Arizona from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Civ ‘00 1775 PHX ROS and Civ ‘00 1812 PHX ROS) and one case that was transferred to the District of Arizona from the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada (Civ ‘00 0452 PHX ROS). All of the litigation relates to the now terminated acquisition of the Company by ONEOK, Inc. and the rejection of competing offers from Southern Union Company. This litigation is described in Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” in the Company’s 2001 Form 10-K filed with the SEC. There have been no new material developments related to these proceedings. The Company has been named as a defendant in various other legal proceedings. The ultimate dispositions of these proceedings are not presently determinable; however, it is the opinion of management that none of this litigation will have a material adverse impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
11
ITEMS 2-5. None ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
|